Compare · BRIA vs LEVI
BRIA vs LEVI
Side-by-side comparison of BrilliA Inc (BRIA) and Levi Strauss & Co (LEVI): market cap, price performance, sector, and recent activity on the wire.
Summary
- Both BRIA and LEVI operate in Apparel (Consumer Discretionary), so they compete in similar markets.
- LEVI carries a market cap of $8.83B.
- Over the past year, BRIA is down 22.7% and LEVI is up 40.7% - LEVI leads by 63.4 points.
- LEVI has been more active in the news (17 items in the past 4 weeks vs 1 for BRIA).
- LEVI has more recent analyst coverage (25 ratings vs 0 for BRIA).
- Company
- BrilliA Inc
- Levi Strauss & Co
- Price
- $1.82+0.00%
- $22.32-0.78%
- Market cap
- -
- $8.83B
- 1M return
- +0.00%
- +20.75%
- 1Y return
- -22.72%
- +40.70%
- Industry
- Apparel
- Apparel
- Exchange
- AMEX
- NYSE
- IPO
- 2024
- 2019
- News (4w)
- 1
- 17
- Recent ratings
- 0
- 25
Levi Strauss & Co
Levi Strauss & Co. operates as an apparel company. It designs, markets, and sells jeans, casual and dress pants, tops, shorts, skirts, jackets, footwear, and related accessories for men, women, and children in the Americas, Europe, and Asia. The company sells its products under the Levi's, Dockers, Signature by Levi Strauss & Co., and Denizen brands; and also licenses its Levi's and Dockers trademarks for various product categories, including footwear, belts, wallets and bags, outerwear, sweaters, dress shirts, kids wear, sleepwear, and hosiery. The company sells its products through third-party retailers, such as department stores, specialty retailers, third-party e-commerce sites, and franchisees who operate brand-dedicated stores; and directly to consumers through various formats, including company-operated mainline and outlet stores, company-operated e-commerce sites, and select shop-in-shops located in department stores and other third-party retail locations. It operates approximately 3,100 brand-dedicated stores and shop-in-shops. The company was founded in 1853 and is headquartered in San Francisco, California.
Latest BRIA
- SEC Form 3 filed by new insider Koh Wah Seng Philip
- SEC Form 3 filed by new insider Kok Poh Fui
- SEC Form 3 filed by new insider Bahari Iming
- SEC Form 3 filed by new insider Kronfeld Gary Harris
- SEC Form 6-K filed by BrilliA Inc
- BrilliA Reports Positive Operating Cash Flow and Cost Reduction for the Six Months Ended September 30, 2025
- SEC Form 3 filed by new insider Hartanto Kendrew
- SEC Form 3 filed by new insider Podiono Salim
- BrilliA Expands into Japan's Athleisure Sector
- BrilliA Reports on NYSE Bell Ringing on August 25th
Latest LEVI
- Director Rodgers Elliott was granted 8,381 shares, increasing direct ownership by 16% to 59,619 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Prime Joshua E was granted 8,381 shares, increasing direct ownership by 13% to 73,218 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Patrick Artemis was granted 8,381 shares, increasing direct ownership by 59% to 22,646 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Ming Jenny J was granted 8,381 shares, increasing direct ownership by 13% to 72,983 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Marberger David S was granted 8,381 shares, increasing direct ownership by 37% to 31,225 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Jones Jeffrey J Ii was granted 8,381 shares, increasing direct ownership by 403% to 10,461 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Geballe Daniel W was granted 8,381 shares, increasing direct ownership by 71% to 20,172 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Garten Yael was granted 8,381 shares, increasing direct ownership by 14% to 68,952 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Eckert Robert was granted 8,381 shares, increasing direct ownership by 9% to 102,870 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Beraud Jill was granted 8,381 shares, increasing direct ownership by 5% to 181,157 units (SEC Form 4)