Compare · DEN vs EOG
DEN vs EOG
Side-by-side comparison of Denbury Inc. (DEN) and EOG Resources Inc. (EOG): market cap, price performance, sector, and recent activity on the wire.
Summary
- Both DEN and EOG operate in Oil & Gas Production (Energy), so they compete in similar markets.
- EOG is the larger of the two at $73.39B, about 20.5x DEN ($3.58B).
- EOG has hit the wire 14 times in the past 4 weeks while DEN has been quiet.
- Both have 25 recent analyst ratings on file.
Denbury Inc.
Denbury Inc., an independent energy company, focuses on producing oil from mature oil fields in the Gulf Coast and Rocky Mountain regions. The company holds interests in various oil and natural gas properties located in Mississippi, Texas, and Louisiana in the Gulf Coast region; and in Montana, North Dakota, and Wyoming in the Rocky Mountain region. As of December 31, 2020, it had 143 million barrels of oil equivalent of estimated proved oil and natural gas reserves. The company was formerly known as Denbury Resources Inc. and changed its name to Denbury Inc. in September 2020. Denbury Inc. was incorporated in 2003 and is headquartered in Plano, Texas.
EOG Resources Inc.
EOG Resources, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, explores for, develops, produces, and markets crude oil, and natural gas and natural gas liquids. Its principal producing areas are in New Mexico and Texas in the United States; the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago; the People's Republic of China; and the Sultanate of Oman. As of December 31, 2020, it had total estimated net proved reserves of 3,220 million barrels of oil equivalent, including 1,514 million barrels (MMBbl) of crude oil and condensate reserves; 813 MMBbl of natural gas liquid reserves; and 5,360 billion cubic feet of natural gas reserves. The company was formerly known as Enron Oil & Gas Company. EOG Resources, Inc. was incorporated in 1985 and is headquartered in Houston, Texas.
Latest DEN
- SEC Form SC 13G/A filed by Denbury Inc. (Amendment)
- SEC Form 15-12G filed by Denbury Inc.
- SEC Form 10-Q filed by Denbury Inc.
- SEC Form NT 10-Q filed by Denbury Inc.
- SEC Form SC 13G/A filed by Denbury Inc. (Amendment)
- SEC Form EFFECT filed by Denbury Inc.
- SEC Form EFFECT filed by Denbury Inc.
- SEC Form EFFECT filed by Denbury Inc.
- SEC Form EFFECT filed by Denbury Inc.
- SEC Form EFFECT filed by Denbury Inc.
Latest EOG
- EOG Resources to Present at Upcoming Conference
- Director Daniels Robert P was granted 57 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.16% to 34,752 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Kerr Michael T. was granted 57 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.25% to 22,931 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Dugle Lynn A was granted 57 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.75% to 7,654 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Crisp Charles R sold $256,953 worth of shares (1,887 units at $136.17), decreasing direct ownership by 3% to 63,160 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Chandler John D was granted 1,541 shares, increasing direct ownership by 187% to 2,367 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Daniels Robert P was granted 1,541 shares, increasing direct ownership by 5% to 34,695 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Clark Janet F was granted 1,541 shares, increasing direct ownership by 3% to 49,241 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Crisp Charles R was granted 1,541 shares, increasing direct ownership by 2% to 65,047 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Robertson Julie J was granted 1,541 shares, increasing direct ownership by 10% to 17,150 units (SEC Form 4)