Compare · DLR vs KRG
DLR vs KRG
Side-by-side comparison of Digital Realty Trust Inc. (DLR) and Kite Realty Group Trust (KRG): market cap, price performance, sector, and recent activity on the wire.
Summary
- Both DLR and KRG operate in Real Estate Investment Trusts (Real Estate), so they compete in similar markets.
- DLR is the larger of the two at $64.48B, about 11.8x KRG ($5.45B).
- Over the past year, DLR is up 5.6% and KRG is up 21.3% - KRG leads by 15.7 points.
- DLR has been more active in the news (14 items in the past 4 weeks vs 10 for KRG).
- DLR has more recent analyst coverage (25 ratings vs 24 for KRG).
- Company
- Digital Realty Trust Inc.
- Kite Realty Group Trust
- Price
- $183.56-1.98%
- $26.85-0.56%
- Market cap
- $64.48B
- $5.45B
- 1M return
- -7.54%
- +2.32%
- 1Y return
- +5.62%
- +21.27%
- Industry
- Real Estate Investment Trusts
- Real Estate Investment Trusts
- Exchange
- NYSE
- NYSE
- IPO
- 2004
- 2004
- News (4w)
- 14
- 10
- Recent ratings
- 25
- 24
Digital Realty Trust Inc.
Digital Realty supports the world's leading enterprises and service providers by delivering the full spectrum of data center, colocation and interconnection solutions. PlatformDIGITALR, the company's global data center platform, provides customers a trusted foundation and proven Pervasive Datacenter Architecture PDxTM solution methodology for scaling digital business and efficiently managing data gravity challenges. Digital Realty's global data center footprint gives customers access to the connected communities that matter to them with more than 284 facilities in 48 metros across 23 countries on six continents.
Kite Realty Group Trust
Kite Realty Group Trust is a full-service, vertically integrated real estate investment trust (REIT) that provides communities with convenient and beneficial shopping experiences. We connect consumers to retailers in desirable markets through our portfolio of neighborhood, community, and lifestyle centers. Using operational, development, and redevelopment expertise, we continuously optimize our portfolio to maximize value and return to our shareholders.
Latest DLR
- SEC Form 4 filed by Director Patterson Mark R
- SEC Form 4 filed by Director Kennedy Kevin
- SEC Form 4 filed by Director Preusse Mary Hogan
- SEC Form 4 filed by Director Laperch William G
- SEC Form 4 filed by Director Mohebbi Afshin
- SEC Form 4 filed by Director Jamieson Veralinn
- SEC Form 4 filed by Director Bolze Stephen R.
- SEC Form 4 filed by Director Swanezy Susan
- Director Mandeville Jean F H P was granted 1,289 shares, increasing direct ownership by 13% to 11,039 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Mandeville Jean F H P covered exercise/tax liability with 284 shares, decreasing direct ownership by 3% to 9,750 units (SEC Form 4)
Latest KRG
- Director Grimes Steven P sold $161,374 worth of shares (5,922 units at $27.25), decreasing direct ownership by 0.84% to 696,384 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Young Caroline L. was granted 4,958 shares, increasing direct ownership by 10% to 55,705 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Wurtzebach Charles H was granted 4,958 shares, increasing direct ownership by 7% to 71,102 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Peterson Barton R was granted 4,958 shares, increasing direct ownership by 5% to 114,189 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director O'Reilly David R. was granted 4,958 shares, increasing direct ownership by 7% to 73,734 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Lynch Peter L was granted 4,958 shares, increasing direct ownership by 6% to 84,126 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Kelly Christie B. was granted 4,958 shares, increasing direct ownership by 5% to 95,777 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Grimes Steven P was granted 4,958 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.71% to 702,306 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Coleman Victor J was granted 4,958 shares, increasing direct ownership by 5% to 107,985 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Burks Derrick was granted 4,958 shares, increasing direct ownership by 16% to 36,751 units (SEC Form 4)