Compare · ELP vs ETR
ELP vs ETR
Side-by-side comparison of Companhia Paranaense de Energia (COPEL) (ELP) and Entergy Corporation (ETR): market cap, price performance, sector, and recent activity on the wire.
Summary
- Both ELP and ETR operate in Electric Utilities: Central (Utilities), so they compete in similar markets.
- ETR is the larger of the two at $49.50B, about 3.0x ELP ($16.50B).
- ETR has hit the wire 14 times in the past 4 weeks while ELP has been quiet.
- ETR has more recent analyst coverage (25 ratings vs 0 for ELP).
Companhia Paranaense de Energia (COPEL)
Companhia Paranaense de Energia - COPEL engages in the generation, transmission, distribution, and sale of electricity to industrial, residential, commercial, rural, and other customers primarily in the State of Paraná, Brazil. As of December 31, 2019, the company operated 19 hydroelectric plants, 25 wind plants, and one thermoelectric plant with a total installed capacity of 5,742.0 megawatts; and owned and operated 3,389 kilometers of transmission lines and 199,952.6 kilometers of distribution lines. It holds concessions to distribute electricity in 399 municipalities in the State of Paraná and in the municipality of Porto União in the State of Santa Catarina. The company also provides telecommunication services to corporate clients, including supermarkets, universities, banks, internet service providers, and television networks, as well as to retail clients; and broadband internet access to public elementary and middle schools. In addition, it supplies piped gas to 47,238 customers, including thermoelectric plants, cogeneration plants, gas stations, other businesses, and residences through a gas distribution network covering 833 kilometers in the State of Paraná. Companhia Paranaense de Energia  COPEL was founded in 1954 and is headquartered in Curitiba, Brazil.
Entergy Corporation
Entergy Corporation, together with its subsidiaries, engages in the production and distribution of electricity in the United States. The company generates electricity through gas/oil, nuclear, coal, hydro, and solar power sources. It operates in two segments, Utility and Entergy Wholesale Commodities. The company's Utility segment generates, transmits, distributes, and sells electric power in portions of Arkansas, Mississippi, Texas, and Louisiana, including the City of New Orleans; and distributes natural gas. Its Entergy Wholesale Commodities segment engages in the ownership, operation, and decommissioning of nuclear power plants located in the northern United States; sale of electric power to wholesale customers; provision of services to other nuclear power plant owners; and owning interests in non-nuclear power plants that sell electric power to wholesale customers. It sells energy to retail power providers, utilities, electric power co-operatives, power trading organizations, and other power generation companies. The company's power plants have approximately 30,000 megawatts (MW) of electric generating capacity, which include 8,000 MW of nuclear power. The company delivers electricity to 3.0 million utility customers in Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas. Entergy Corporation was incorporated in 1949 and is based in New Orleans, Louisiana.
Latest ELP
- COPEL - Copel's Recurring Ebitda Amounted to R$ 1,754.6 Million in 1Q26, a 16.7% Increase Compared to the R$ 1,503.2 Million Recorded in 1Q25
- COPEL - Copel Recorded Recurring Ebitda of R$ 1,358.1 Million in 4Q25, an Increase of 16.1% Compared to R$ 1,169.6 Million Recorded in 4Q24
- SEC Form 6-K filed by Companhia Paranaense de Energia (COPEL)
- SEC Form 6-K filed by Companhia Paranaense de Energia (COPEL)
- SEC Form 6-K filed by Companhia Paranaense de Energia (COPEL)
- SEC Form 6-K filed by Companhia Paranaense de Energia (COPEL)
- SEC Form 6-K filed by Companhia Paranaense de Energia (COPEL)
- SEC Form 6-K filed by Companhia Paranaense de Energia (COPEL)
- SEC Form 6-K filed by Companhia Paranaense de Energia (COPEL)
- SEC Form 6-K filed by Companhia Paranaense de Energia (COPEL)
Latest ETR
- "Officer" Under Sec. 16 Rules Fisackerly Haley exercised 10,638 shares at a strike of $52.69 and sold $1,170,180 worth of shares (10,638 units at $110.00) as part of a pre-agreed trading plan (SEC Form 4)
- New insider Stack Patrick J Jr claimed ownership of 15,280 shares (SEC Form 3)
- Director Ropp Ralph Lewis was granted 905 shares, increasing direct ownership by 60% to 2,423 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Puckett Karen A was granted 1,079 shares, increasing direct ownership by 3% to 34,223 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Levenick Stuart L was granted 1,079 shares, increasing direct ownership by 2% to 47,209 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Hyland M Elise was granted 1,079 shares, increasing direct ownership by 6% to 19,426 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Frederickson Philip L was granted 1,079 shares, increasing direct ownership by 3% to 33,639 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Ellis Brian W was granted 1,079 shares, increasing direct ownership by 8% to 14,453 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Donald Kirkland H was granted 858 shares, increasing direct ownership by 4% to 24,505 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Caldwell James Frank Jr was granted 722 shares, increasing direct ownership by 239% to 1,024 units (SEC Form 4)