Compare · EOG vs TBN
EOG vs TBN
Side-by-side comparison of EOG Resources Inc. (EOG) and Tamboran Resources Corporation (TBN): market cap, price performance, sector, and recent activity on the wire.
Summary
- Both EOG and TBN operate in Oil & Gas Production (Energy), so they compete in similar markets.
- EOG is the larger of the two at $73.39B, about 72.9x TBN ($1.01B).
- Over the past year, EOG is up 20.8% and TBN is up 65.1% - TBN leads by 44.3 points.
- TBN has been more active in the news (25 items in the past 4 weeks vs 15 for EOG).
- EOG has more recent analyst coverage (25 ratings vs 9 for TBN).
EOG Resources Inc.
EOG Resources, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, explores for, develops, produces, and markets crude oil, and natural gas and natural gas liquids. Its principal producing areas are in New Mexico and Texas in the United States; the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago; the People's Republic of China; and the Sultanate of Oman. As of December 31, 2020, it had total estimated net proved reserves of 3,220 million barrels of oil equivalent, including 1,514 million barrels (MMBbl) of crude oil and condensate reserves; 813 MMBbl of natural gas liquid reserves; and 5,360 billion cubic feet of natural gas reserves. The company was formerly known as Enron Oil & Gas Company. EOG Resources, Inc. was incorporated in 1985 and is headquartered in Houston, Texas.
Latest EOG
- EOG Resources to Present at Upcoming Conference
- Director Daniels Robert P was granted 57 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.16% to 34,752 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Kerr Michael T. was granted 57 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.25% to 22,931 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Dugle Lynn A was granted 57 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.75% to 7,654 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Crisp Charles R sold $256,953 worth of shares (1,887 units at $136.17), decreasing direct ownership by 3% to 63,160 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Chandler John D was granted 1,541 shares, increasing direct ownership by 187% to 2,367 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Daniels Robert P was granted 1,541 shares, increasing direct ownership by 5% to 34,695 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Clark Janet F was granted 1,541 shares, increasing direct ownership by 3% to 49,241 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Crisp Charles R was granted 1,541 shares, increasing direct ownership by 2% to 65,047 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Robertson Julie J was granted 1,541 shares, increasing direct ownership by 10% to 17,150 units (SEC Form 4)
Latest TBN
- Director Siegel David N was granted 2,975 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.84% to 358,221 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Barrett Fredrick J was granted 2,975 shares, increasing direct ownership by 8% to 40,498 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Stoneburner Richard K was granted 2,975 shares, increasing direct ownership by 3% to 107,704 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Elliott Patrick James Dymock was granted 2,975 shares, increasing direct ownership by 12% to 28,482 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Bellman Jeffrey Lance was granted 2,975 shares, increasing direct ownership by 15% to 23,234 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Sheffield Scott D was granted 2,975 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.92% to 326,961 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Pace Phillip Z was granted 2,975 shares, increasing direct ownership by 7% to 44,683 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Robb Andrew John was granted 2,975 shares, increasing direct ownership by 26% to 14,295 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Dalton Ryan was granted 2,975 shares, increasing direct ownership by 5% to 62,078 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Stoneburner Richard K was granted 5,407 shares, increasing direct ownership by 5% to 104,729 units (SEC Form 4)