Compare · LAMR vs SPG
LAMR vs SPG
Side-by-side comparison of Lamar Advertising Company (LAMR) and Simon Property Group Inc. (SPG): market cap, price performance, sector, and recent activity on the wire.
Summary
- Both LAMR and SPG operate in Real Estate Investment Trusts (Real Estate), so they compete in similar markets.
- SPG is the larger of the two at $68.20B, about 4.4x LAMR ($15.37B).
- Over the past year, LAMR is up 25.5% and SPG is up 31.1% - SPG leads by 5.7 points.
- LAMR has been more active in the news (9 items in the past 4 weeks vs 1 for SPG).
- SPG has more recent analyst coverage (25 ratings vs 8 for LAMR).
- Company
- Lamar Advertising Company
- Simon Property Group Inc.
- Price
- -
- -
- Market cap
- $15.37B
- $68.20B
- 1M return
- +7.26%
- +2.36%
- 1Y return
- +25.47%
- +31.13%
- Industry
- Real Estate Investment Trusts
- Real Estate Investment Trusts
- Exchange
- NASDAQ
- NYSE
- IPO
- 1996
- News (4w)
- 9
- 1
- Recent ratings
- 8
- 25
Lamar Advertising Company
Founded in 1902, Lamar Advertising (Nasdaq: LAMR) is one of the largest outdoor advertising companies in North America, with over 357,500 displays across the United States and Canada. Lamar offers advertisers a variety of billboard, interstate logo, transit and airport advertising formats, helping both local businesses and national brands reach broad audiences every day. In addition to its more traditional out-of-home inventory, Lamar is proud to offer its customers the largest network of digital billboards in the United States with over 3,600 displays.
Simon Property Group Inc.
Simon is a real estate investment trust engaged in the ownership of premier shopping, dining, entertainment and mixed-use destinations and an S&P 100 company (Simon Property Group, NYSE: SPG). Our properties across North America, Europe and Asia provide community gathering places for millions of people every day and generate billions in annual sales.
Latest LAMR
- Lamar Advertising Company filed SEC Form 8-K: Leadership Update
- Director Landrieu Mitchell was granted 542 shares, increasing direct ownership by 83% to 1,192 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Reifenheiser Thomas V was granted 542 shares, increasing direct ownership by 1% to 44,814 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Fletcher Nancy was granted 644 shares, increasing direct ownership by 10% to 7,053 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Koerner John E Iii was granted 644 shares, increasing direct ownership by 2% to 34,424 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Reilly Wendell was granted 508 shares, increasing direct ownership by 7% to 7,672 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Thompson Elizabeth Mary was granted 542 shares, increasing direct ownership by 11% to 5,608 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Loeb Marshall A was granted 542 shares, increasing direct ownership by 9% to 6,418 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Mumblow Stephen P was granted 678 shares, increasing direct ownership by 8% to 9,377 units (SEC Form 4)
- SEC Form 8-K filed by Lamar Advertising Company
Latest SPG
- Simon® is Teaming up with adidas® to Offer Fan Experiences for a Summer of Global Soccer
- SEC Form 4 filed by CEO/PRESIDENT/COO Simon Eli
- Director Roe Peggy was granted 1,073 shares, increasing direct ownership by 16% to 7,958 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Stewart Marta R was granted 1,122 shares, increasing direct ownership by 7% to 17,818 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Leibowitz Reuben S was granted 1,159 shares, increasing direct ownership by 2% to 55,289 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Cicco Martin J was granted 1,073 shares, increasing direct ownership by 359% to 1,372 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Smith Daniel C. was granted 1,073 shares, increasing direct ownership by 3% to 34,108 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Selig Stefan M was granted 1,109 shares, increasing direct ownership by 3% to 33,592 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Rodkin Gary M was granted 1,073 shares, increasing direct ownership by 5% to 20,760 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Lewis Randall J was granted 1,073 shares, increasing direct ownership by 18% to 6,956 units (SEC Form 4)