Compare · TRP vs WMB
TRP vs WMB
Side-by-side comparison of TC Energy Corporation (TRP) and Williams Companies Inc. (WMB): market cap, price performance, sector, and recent activity on the wire.
Summary
- Both TRP and WMB operate in Natural Gas Distribution (Utilities), so they compete in similar markets.
- WMB is the larger of the two at $93.31B, about 1.3x TRP ($69.72B).
- Over the past year, TRP is up 32.9% and WMB is up 30.4% - TRP leads by 2.5 points.
- WMB has been more active in the news (13 items in the past 4 weeks vs 3 for TRP).
- Both have 25 recent analyst ratings on file.
TC Energy Corporation
TC Energy Corporation operates as an energy infrastructure company in North America. It operates through Canadian Natural Gas Pipelines, U.S. Natural Gas Pipelines, Mexico Natural Gas Pipelines, Liquids Pipelines, and Power and Storage segments. The company builds and operates 93,400 km network of natural gas pipelines, which transports natural gas from supply basins to local distribution companies, power generation plants, industrial facilities, interconnecting pipelines, LNG export terminals, and other businesses. It also has regulated natural gas storage facilities with a total working gas capacity of 535 billion cubic feet. In addition, it has approximately 4,900 km liquids pipeline system that connects Alberta crude oil supplies to refining markets in Illinois, Oklahoma, Texas, and the U.S. Gulf Coast. Further, the company owns or has interests in seven power generation facilities with a combined capacity of approximately 4,200 megawatts that are powered by natural gas and nuclear fuel sources located in Alberta, Ontario, Québec, and New Brunswick; and owns and operates approximately 118 billion cubic feet of non-regulated natural gas storage capacity in Alberta. The company was formerly known as TransCanada Corporation and changed its name to TC Energy Corporation in May 2019. TC Energy Corporation was incorporated in 1951 and is headquartered in Calgary, Canada.
Williams Companies Inc.
The Williams Companies, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, operates as an energy infrastructure company primarily in the United States. It operates through Transmission & Gulf of Mexico, Northeast G&P, and West segments. The Transmission & Gulf of Mexico segment comprises Transco and Northwest natural gas pipelines; and natural gas gathering and processing, and crude oil production handling and transportation assets in the Gulf Coast region. The Northeast G&P segment engages in the midstream gathering, processing, and fractionation activities in the Marcellus Shale region primarily in Pennsylvania and New York, and the Utica Shale region of eastern Ohio. The West segment comprises gas gathering, processing, and treating operations in the Rocky Mountain region of Colorado and Wyoming, the Barnett Shale region of north-central Texas, the Eagle Ford Shale region of South Texas, the Haynesville Shale region of northwest Louisiana, and the Mid-Continent region, which includes the Anadarko, Arkoma, and Permian basins; and natural gas liquid (NGL) and natural gas marketing operations, as well as storage facilities. The company owns and operates 30,000 miles of pipelines, 34 processing facilities, 9 fractionation facilities, and approximately 23 million barrels of NGL storage capacity. The Williams Companies, Inc. was founded in 1908 and is headquartered in Tulsa, Oklahoma.
Latest TRP
- TC Energy upgraded by CIBC
- TC Energy upgraded by Goldman with a new price target
- TC Energy to host first quarter 2026 conference call on May 1 and hold annual meeting of common shareholders on May 7
- SEC Form 6-K filed by TC Energy Corporation
- SEC Form 6-K filed by TC Energy Corporation
- NYSE Content Update: Premium Drink Giant Diageo to Mark St. Patrick's Day by Ringing the Bell
- SEC Form 6-K filed by TC Energy Corporation
- TC Energy downgraded by TD Securities
- SEC Form 6-K filed by TC Energy Corporation
- TC Energy files 2025 annual disclosure documents
Latest WMB
- Director Bergstrom Stephen W was granted 10,355 shares, increasing direct ownership by 5% to 215,005 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Muncrief Richard E was granted 3,415 shares, increasing direct ownership by 16% to 24,783 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Robeson Rose M was granted 3,818 shares, increasing direct ownership by 11% to 37,852 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Sheffield Scott D was granted 4,873 shares, increasing direct ownership by 7% to 76,302 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Creel Michael A was granted 4,873 shares, increasing direct ownership by 6% to 84,658 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Lockhart Carri A. was granted 3,250 shares, increasing direct ownership by 20% to 19,388 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Tyson Jesse J was granted 3,415 shares, increasing direct ownership by 16% to 25,343 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Spence William H was granted 5,086 shares, increasing direct ownership by 7% to 79,051 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Ragauss Peter A was granted 4,873 shares, increasing direct ownership by 7% to 75,586 units (SEC Form 4)
- Williams Announces Quarterly Cash Dividend