| Past Contacts, Transactions, Negotiations and Agreements |
Item 3 of the Schedule 14D-9 is hereby amended and supplement as follows:
The following paragraph under the header “Change in Control and Severance Benefits Under Existing Agreements” is hereby replaced with the following:
“For a description of the employment agreements for Messrs. Casalena, Gooden and Gubbay and Ms. O’Connor, reference is made to pages 76-79 of Squarespace’s Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A, filed with the SEC on August 22, 2024 (which we refer to as the “Proxy Statement”) (under the heading “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control”).”
| The Solicitation or Recommendation |
Item 4 of the Schedule 14D-9 is hereby amended and supplement as follows:
(1)
| The following paragraph under the header “Background of the Offer and the Merger” is hereby replaced with the following: |
“On February 16, 2024, the Board held a meeting, also attended by members of management of Squarespace, representatives of JPM and Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP (“Skadden”), Squarespace’s outside legal counsel. Representatives of JPM presented an overview of the February Proposal and various considerations related to potential next steps. Representatives of Skadden reviewed the Board’s fiduciary duties in considering a potential strategic transaction and discussed considerations and process related to the potential formation of a special committee of the Board in light of the fact that the February Proposal contemplated that existing Squarespace investors may participate in the potential transaction. During the meeting, the Skadden representatives disclosed that Skadden has historically represented and currently represents certain Permira Filing Parties (as defined in the Offer to Purchaser) on matters unrelated to Squarespace, noting that over the last two years, Skadden has advised certain Permira Filing Parties or their majority owned portfolio companies and affiliates on various public and non-public matters, including multiple publicly disclosed M&A transactions. In the last two years, Skadden has not provided advice to either General Atlantic or Accel. In addition, the Skadden representatives noted that, over the last two years, Skadden has advised Squarespace on various non-public matters. The Board discussed the February Proposal and potential options with respect to responding thereto. During the meeting, Mr. Casalena noted again that he had discussions with Permira representatives regarding Squarespace. The Board agreed to further consider the February Proposal and potential responses thereto at the upcoming regularly scheduled Board meeting on February 22, 2024.”
(2)
| The following paragraph under the header “Recommendation of the Squarespace Board” is hereby replaced with the following: |
“In the course of evaluating the A&R Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, including the Transactions, and making the decisions, determinations and recommendations described above (as applicable), the Squarespace Board and the Special Committee did not consider the liquidation value of Squarespace because (1) they considered Squarespace to be a viable, going concern; (2) they believed that liquidation sales generally result in proceeds substantially less than sales of a going concern; and (3) they considered determining a liquidation value to be impracticable given the significant execution risk involved in any breakup of Squarespace. For the foregoing reasons, the Squarespace Board and the Special Committee did not consider liquidation value to be a relevant factor. Further, the Squarespace Board and the Special Committee did not consider Squarespace’s net book value, which is an accounting concept, as a factor because they believed (1) that net book value is not a material indicator of the value of Squarespace as a going concern but rather is indicative of historical costs and (2) net book value does not take into account the prospects of Squarespace, market conditions, trends in the industry in which Squarespace operates or the business risks inherent in the industry. In addition, the Squarespace Board and the Special Committee did not view the purchase prices paid in the transactions described in the Offer to Purchase (all of which were below the Per Share Price) to be relevant except to the extent that those prices indicated the trading price of the Squarespace Common Stock during the applicable periods. The Squarespace Board and the Special Committee believed at the time of entering into the A&R Merger Agreement that the trading price of the Shares at any given time represents the best available indicator of Squarespace’s going concern value at that time so long as the trading price at that time is not impacted by speculation regarding the likelihood of a potential transaction. In addition, the Squarespace Board and the Special Committee considered the value of Squarespace as a going concern by taking into account the value of Squarespace’s current and anticipated business, financial condition, results of operations, prospects, and other forward-looking matters.”