10-K/A

Large accelerated filer

Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer

Smaller reporting company

Emerging growth company

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM

10-K/A

(Amendment No. 1)

FOR ANNUAL AND TRANSITION REPORTS

PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

(Mark One)

☒	ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023

☐	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES E XCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from

Commission File Numbers:

001-38329

NEWMARK GROUP, INC.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)


Delaware	6531	81-4467492
(State or other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)	(Primary Standard Industrial Classification Code Number)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

125 Park Avenue

New York, New York 10017

(212)

372-2000

(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of Registrant’s principal executive offices)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:


Title of Each Class	Trading Symbol(s)	Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
Class A Common Stock, $0.01 par value	NMRK	The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None

(Title of Class)

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐ No ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation

S-T

(§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a

non-accelerated

filer, a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See definition of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule

12b-2

of the Exchange Act.

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C.7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. Yes

☒

No ☐

If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to

§240.10D-1(b). ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule

12b-2

of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No

☒

The aggregate market value of voting common equity held by

non-affiliates

of the registrant, based upon the closing price of the Class A common stock on June 30, 2023 as reported on Nasdaq, was approximately $814.4 million.

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the re

istrant’s

classes

of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.


Class				Outstanding at April 24, 2024
Class A Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share				154,181,554 shares
Class B Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share				21,285,533 shares


Auditor Name: Ernst & Young, LLP		Auditor Location: New York, New York		PCAOB ID Number: 42

Newmark Group, Inc.

2023 FORM 10-K/A ANNUAL REPORT

TABLE OF CONTENTS


		Page

EXPLANATORY NOTE			1

PART III			2

ITEM 10.	DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE		2

ITEM 11.	EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION		23

ITEM 12.	SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS		64

ITEM 13.	CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE		70

ITEM 14.	PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES		97

PART IV			98

ITEM 15.	EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES		98

EXPLANATORY NOTE

Throughout this document Newmark Group, Inc. is referred to as “Newmark,”

and

, together with its subsidiaries, as the “Company,” “we,” “us,” or “our.”

On February 29, 2024, Newmark filed its Annual Report on Form

10-K

for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023 (the “Original Form

10-K”).

Certain Part III information was omitted from the Original Form

10-K

in reliance on General Instruction G(3) to Form

10-K.

General Instruction G(3) to Form

10-K

provides that registrants may incorporate by reference certain information from a definitive proxy statement which involves the election of directors if such definitive proxy statement is filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year. The Company does not anticipate that its definitive proxy statement involving the election of directors in connection with its 2024 annual meeting of stockholders will be filed by April 29, 2024

(i.e., within 120 days after the end of the Company’s 2023 fiscal year). Accordingly, this Amendment No. 1 (this “Amendment”) hereby amends and restates Part III, Items 10 through 14 of the Original Form

10-K

as set forth below. The information included herein as required by Part III, Items 10 through 14 of the Original Form

10-K

is more limited than what is required to be included in the definitive proxy statement to be filed in connection with our 2024 annual meeting of stockholders. Accordingly, the definitive proxy statement to be filed at a later date will include additional information related to the topics herein and additional information not required by Part III, Items 10 through 14 of Form

10-K.

This Amendment also restates Item 15 of Part IV of the Original Form

10-K.

In addition, as required by Rule

12b-15

under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), new certifications by our principal executive officer and principal financial officer are filed as exhibits to this Amendment under Item 15 of Part IV hereof.

No other amendments are being made hereby to the Original Form

10-K.

Except as stated herein, this Amendment does not reflect events occurring after the filing of the Original Form

10-K

with the SEC on February 29, 2024, and no attempt has been made in this Amendment to modify or update other disclosures as presented in the Original Form

10-K.

Terms used but not defined herein have the meanings given to them in the Original Form

10-K.

PART III

ITEM 10.

DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Our Board of Directors is currently composed of four members. Information with respect to our directors is set forth below.

INFORMATION ABOUT OUR DIRECTORS


Name	Age	Director Since	Biographies
Howard W. Lutnick	62	2017	Mr. Lutnick is our Executive Chairman and has served as our principal executive officer since 2016. Mr. Lutnick also serves as the Chairman of our Board of Directors. Mr. Lutnick is the Chairman of the board of directors and Chief Executive Officer of BGC Group, Inc., a leading global brokerage and financial technology company, positions in which he has served BGC Group, Inc. or its predecessor BGC Partners, Inc. since 1999. Mr. Lutnick joined Cantor Fitzgerald, L.P. (“Cantor”) in 1983 and has served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Cantor since 1992 and Chairman since 1996. Mr. Lutnick also served as President of Cantor from 1991 until 2017. In addition, Mr. Lutnick also holds offices at and provides services to various other affiliates of Cantor and provides services to our and BGC Group, Inc.’s operating partnerships and subsidiaries, including BGC Partners, L.P. (“BGC U.S. OpCo”), BGC Global Holdings, L.P. (“BGC Global OpCo”), and Newmark Partners, L.P. (“Newmark OpCo”). In addition, Mr. Lutnick is the Chief Executive Officer, President, sole shareholder and a director of CF Group Management, Inc. (“CFGM”), the managing general partner of Cantor. Mr. Lutnick has also been a director of Satellogic, Inc. (“Satellogic”), the only non-affiliate of ours for which Mr. Lutnick serves as director, since January 2022. Mr. Lutnick is a member of the board of directors of the Horace Mann School, the board of directors of the National September 11 Memorial & Museum, and the board of directors of the Partnership for New York City. In addition, Mr. Lutnick also served as the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of CF Finance Acquisition Corp., a special purpose acquisition company (“SPAC”), from October 2015 until consummation of its business combination with GCM Grosvenor, Inc. (“GCM Grosvenor”), in November 2020; as the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of CF Finance Acquisition Corp. II, a SPAC, from September 2019 until consummation of its business combination with View, Inc. in March 2021; as the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of CF Finance Acquisition Corp. III from March 2016 until consummation of its business combination with AEye, Inc., in August 2021; as the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of CF Acquisition Corp. V from April 2020 until consummation of its business combination with Satellogic, the only non-affiliate of ours for which Mr. Lutnick serves as a director, in January 2022; as the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of CF Acquisition Corp. VI from April 2020 until consummation of its business combination with Rumble Inc. in September 2022; and as the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of CF Acquisition Corp. VIII from July 2020 until consummation of its business combination with XBP Europe, Inc. in November 2023. Currently, Mr. Lutnick has served as the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of CF Acquisition Corp. VII, a SPAC, since July 2020. Additionally, Mr. Lutnick has served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Cantor Fitzgerald Income Trust, Inc. (formerly known as Rodin Global Property Trust, Inc.), a non-traded real estate investment trust, or REIT, since February 2017. Mr. Lutnick received an undergraduate degree from Haverford College.


Name	Age	Director Since	Biographies
Virginia S. Bauer	67	2018	Ms. Bauer has been a director of our Company since June 2018. From 2010 to 2022, Ms. Bauer served as Chief Executive Officer of GTBM, Inc., a security technology company that develops and markets proprietary software solutions, where she currently serves as an advisor. Prior thereto, Ms. Bauer served as Senior Vice President of Covenant House International from 2009 to 2010, as the Secretary of Commerce for the State of New Jersey from 2004 to 2008, and as Director of the New Jersey Lottery Commission from 2003 to 2004. In addition, Ms. Bauer has served on the board of directors of the New Jersey Economic Development Authority since January 2020, on the Foundation Board of Monmouth Medical Center since 2009 and on the board of directors of the National September 11 Memorial & Museum since 2008. She previously served on the Board of Commissioners of The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey from 2008 to 2012 and on the Advisory Board of the Lower Manhattan Development Corporation from 2001 to 2004.


Name	Age	Director Since	Biographies
Jay Itzkowitz	64	2022	Mr. Itzkowitz has been a director of our Company since August 2022. Mr. Itzkowitz is an experienced real estate and mergers and acquisitions attorney. Since 2016, Mr. Itzkowitz has been the Executive Vice President and General Counsel of S.D. Malkin Properties, a Connecticut-based real estate investment firm. Mr. Itzkowitz holds senior positions in affiliates of S.D. Malkin Properties, including Value Retail PLC, the London-based owner and operator of large-scale premium shopping villages in Europe and China, and NY Hockey Holdings, the holding company of the New York Islanders and UBS Arena. From 2013 to 2016, Mr. Itzkowitz served as Senior Vice President and General Counsel for Los Angeles-based Anuvu Operations LLC (formerly Global Eagle Entertainment Inc.). From 2004 to 2014, Mr. Itzkowitz served as a Senior Managing Director of Cantor and affiliated entities. Prior to joining Cantor, Mr. Itzkowitz practiced law at Hogan Lovells (formerly Hogan & Hartson L.L.P.) and was Head of Mergers & Acquisitions for Vivendi Universal S.A. in New York and Paris. From 1992 to 2002, Mr. Itzkowitz held senior legal positions at The News Corporation Limited and its affiliate Fox Entertainment Group in Los Angeles, London, and New York. Prior to joining News Corporation, Mr. Itzkowitz practiced law at the firm of Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, LLP. In addition, Mr. Itzkowitz currently serves on the Board of Pininfarina S.p.A., a Milan Stock Exchange-listed automotive design firm. Mr. Itzkowitz graduated from Rutgers University School of Law and Harvard College.


Name	Age	Director Since	Biographies
Kenneth A. McIntyre	63	2020	Mr. McIntyre has been a director of our Company since January 2020. Mr. McIntyre has over 25 years of experience in the commercial real estate industry. Since February 2020, Mr. McIntyre has been the Chief Executive Officer of the Real Estate Executive Council (“REEC”), having served as a founding member of the board of directors of the organization since 2003. REEC is a preeminent trade association in the U.S. for minority commercial real estate professionals. Since 2012, Mr. McIntyre has been the Founder and Managing Principal of PassPort Real Estate, LLC, a New York-based consulting firm focused on advising developers and institutions on commercial real estate deals and platform structuring. His clients have included the Real Estate Associate Program (Project REAP), a non-profit that is focused on increasing the diversity of talent in the commercial real estate industry, where he served as the Executive Director, and The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, where he served as Executive Advisor to the Office of Diversity & Inclusion. Mr. McIntyre was a Senior Vice President and Head of Commercial Real Estate at Hudson City Savings Bank from May 2014 to May 2016. Prior to joining Hudson City Saving Bank, Mr. McIntyre was a Managing Director in MetLife’s Real Estate Investments Group with various responsibilities across both the debt and equity portfolios, including Head of Equity Acquisitions; Head of Strategic Initiatives; Head of Real Estate Capital Markets; and Head of Commercial Mortgage Production and Pricing. Prior to joining MetLife, Mr. McIntyre held senior origination and relationship management roles at KeyBank, GE Capital Real Estate, UBS and Chase. Since March 2021, Mr. McIntyre has served on the Board of Trustees of Acadia Realty Trust. In addition, he is a member of The Real Estate Roundtable, where he serves on the Equity, Diversity and Inclusion Committee. Mr. McIntyre is also a Member of the Board of Governors for the Real Estate Board of New York and serves on the boards of directors of the National Jazz Museum of Harlem and the Yorkville Youth Athletic Association.

INFORMATION ABOUT OUR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

Our executive officers are appointed annually by and serve at the discretion of our Board. In addition to Mr. Lutnick, who serves as Chairman of our Board and our principal executive officer, our executive officers, their respective ages and positions, and certain other information with respect to each of them are as follows:

Barry M. Gosin, 73, has served as our Chief Executive Officer since 1979 and a principal since 1978. Mr. Gosin guides our national and global expansion initiatives and oversees all facets of our day-to-day operations. Mr. Gosin spearheaded our merger with BGC and has since led our acquisition and hiring efforts and increased our annual revenues by over 10 times. An active industry and community leader, Mr. Gosin serves as a member of the board of directors of the Partnership for New York City, Trustee of the Citizens Budget Commission, and Trustee of Pace University.

Michael J. Rispoli, 52, has served as our Chief Financial Officer since 2012. As head of the finance and accounting departments, Mr. Rispoli steers our financial activities, with a focus on managing risk and monitoring cash flow. His responsibilities include financial planning and forecasting, accounting, financial reporting, financial due diligence, investor relations, and analysis and integration of acquisitions. Mr. Rispoli also provides services to our operating partnership and subsidiaries. Prior to joining Newmark, Mr. Rispoli was the Chief Financial Officer of Grubb & Ellis from August 2010 to April 2012 and had served in various capacities with such firm since May 2007. Mr. Rispoli served as executive director and corporate controller at Conexant Systems, Inc. from 2000 to 2007. Mr. Rispoli began his career at PricewaterhouseCoopers as manager of business assurance. Mr. Rispoli is a licensed CPA in the State of New Jersey (inactive).

Stephen M. Merkel, 65, has been our Executive Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Assistant Corporate Secretary since January 2019 and was our Corporate Secretary from December 2017 to January 2019. Mr. Merkel has been Executive Managing Director, General Counsel and Secretary of Cantor since December 2000 and was Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of Cantor from May 1993 to December 2000. He joined Cantor in 1993 and oversees all legal and compliance functions. Mr. Merkel has been Executive Vice President and General Counsel of BGC since September 2001 and was its Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary from June 1999 to September 2001. Mr. Merkel was BGC’s Secretary from June 1999 to January 2019. Mr. Merkel also holds offices at and provides services to various operating partnerships and subsidiaries of Newmark and affiliates of Cantor and provides services to our operating partnerships and subsidiaries, including BGC U.S. OpCo, BGC Global OpCo and Newmark OpCo. Mr. Merkel also served as the Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of CF Finance Acquisition Corp., from October 2015 until consummation of its business combination with GCM Grosvenor in November 2020. Prior to joining Cantor, Mr. Merkel was Vice President and Assistant General Counsel at Goldman Sachs & Co. from February 1990 to May 1993. From September 1985 to January 1990, Mr. Merkel was an associate with the law firm of Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison. Mr. Merkel is a founding member of the board of directors of the Wholesale Markets Brokers’ Association, Americas. Mr. Merkel graduated with a B.A. magna cum laude from the University of Pennsylvania and received his law degree from the University of Michigan School of Law.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Independence of Directors

Our Board has determined that each of Ms. Bauer and Messrs. McIntyre and Itzkowitz qualifies as an “independent director” in accordance with the published listing requirements of the Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (“Nasdaq”). The Nasdaq independence definition consists of a series of objective tests, including that the director is not an officer or employee of ours and has not engaged in various types of business dealings with us. In addition, as further required by Nasdaq rules, our Board has made a subjective determination with respect to each independent director that no relationships exist which, in the opinion of our Board, would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment by each such director in carrying out the responsibilities of a director. In making these determinations, our Board has reviewed and discussed information provided by the individual directors and us with regard to each director’s business and personal activities as they may relate to us and our management, including participation on any boards of other organizations in which other members of our Board are members. In evaluating Ms. Bauer’s independence, the Board took into consideration her service on the board of directors of the National September 11 Memorial & Museum since 2008, an organization where Mr. Lutnick also is a member of the board of directors, as well as the fact that Ms. Bauer’s husband was employed by an affiliate of Cantor and subsequent to his death on September 11, 2001, her family received the payments and health care coverage distributed to all affected victims from The Cantor Fitzgerald Relief Fund. In evaluating Mr. McIntyre’s independence, the Board took into consideration his service as an independent director at a public company for which the Company provides an immaterial amount of ordinary course real estate services. In evaluating Mr. Itzkowitz’s independence, the Board took into consideration his prior employment by a Cantor affiliate and his prior partnership interest in Cantor, which ended in 2014.

Meetings and Committees of Our Board of Directors

Our Board held 14 meetings during the year ended December 31, 2023. In addition to meetings, our Board and its committees reviewed and acted upon matters by unanimous written consent from time to time. During 2023, each independent director attended 100% of the total number of meetings of the Board and the committees of which he or she was a member.

Audit Committee

Our Audit Committee consists of Ms. Bauer and Messrs. McIntyre and Itzkowitz with Mr. McIntyre serving as Chair of the Audit Committee. Each member of the Committee qualifies as “independent” in accordance with the published listing requirements of Nasdaq and under special standards established by the SEC for members of audit committees, and each member of the Committee has been determined by our Board to meet the qualifications of an “audit committee financial expert” in accordance with SEC rules. The Committee operates pursuant to an Audit Committee Charter, which is available at www.nmrk.com/esg/governance under the heading “Audit Committee Charter” or upon written request from us free of charge.

Our Audit Committee selects our independent registered public accounting firm, consults with our auditors and with management with regard to the adequacy of our financial reporting, internal control over financial reporting and the audit process and considers any permitted non-audit services to be performed by our auditors. The Committee also approves all related party transactions, oversees the management of our enterprise risk management program, oversees compliance with our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (the “Code of Ethics”) and administers our whistleblower policy, including the establishment of procedures with respect to the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints received by us regarding accounting, internal controls and auditing matters, and the anonymous submission by employees of complaints involving questionable accounting or auditing matters (collectively, the “Whistleblower Policy”). The Committee pre-approves all audit services, audit-related services and permitted non-audit services to be performed for us by our auditors, subject to certain minimum exceptions set forth in our Audit Committee Charter. The Committee held 17 meetings during the year ended December 31, 2023.

During 2023, our Audit Committee approved the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP (“Ernst & Young”) as our auditors for the year ending December 31, 2023. Ernst & Young was also approved to perform reviews of each of our quarterly financial reports for the year ending December 31, 2023, and certain other audit-related services such as accounting consultations. Pursuant to our Audit Committee Charter, the Audit Committee will pre-approve audit services, internal control-related services and permitted non-audit services to be performed for us by Ernst & Young, as set forth in the Audit Committee Charter.

Compensation Committee

Our Board of Directors has a Compensation Committee. The Committee consists of Ms. Bauer and Messrs. Itzkowitz and McIntyre, with Ms. Bauer serving as Chair of the Committee. Each member of the Committee qualifies as “independent” in accordance with the published listing requirements of Nasdaq. The Committee is responsible for reviewing and approving all compensation arrangements for our executive officers and for administering the Newmark Holdings, L.P. Participation Plan, which we refer to as the “Participation Plan,” our Long-Term Incentive Plan, which we refer to as the “Equity Plan” and our Incentive Bonus Compensation Plan, which we refer to as our “Incentive Plan” (together with the Equity Plan and the Participation Plan, the “Newmark Compensation Plans”). The Committee operates pursuant to a Compensation Committee Charter, which is available at www.nmrk.com/esg/governance under the heading “Compensation Committee Charter,” or upon written request from us free of charge. The Committee held 14 meetings during the year ended December 31, 2023.

ESG Committee

Our Board of Directors also has an Environmental, Social and Governance (“ESG”) Committee, which was formed in November 2020. The members of the ESG Committee are currently Ms. Bauer and Mr. McIntyre, both of whom are independent directors. Mr. McIntyre is the Chair of the ESG Committee. Each member of the ESG Committee qualifies as “independent” in accordance with the published listing requirements of Nasdaq. The ESG Committee is responsible for working with management to review ESG initiatives and procedures appropriate to the Company, to provide periodic review of ESG practices and policies, to review management’s current ESG strategy to ensure the Company engages in appropriate practices and technologies and to otherwise make recommendations on these matters to the full Board. The ESG Committee operates pursuant to an ESG Committee Charter, which is available at www.nmrk.com/esg/governance under the heading “Environmental, Social and Governance Committee Charter,” or upon written request from us free of charge. The Committee held six meetings during the year ended December 31, 2023.

Nominating Process

All directors participate in the consideration of director nominees recommended for selection by a majority of the independent directors as defined by the published listing requirements of Nasdaq. Accordingly, our Board does not have a separate nominating committee or committee performing similar functions and does not have a nominating committee charter. The Board believes that such participation of all directors is appropriate given the size of our Board and the level of participation of all of our independent directors in the nomination process. The Board will also consider qualified director candidates identified by a member of senior management or by a stockholder. However, it is our general policy to re-nominate qualified incumbent directors and, absent special circumstances, the Board will not consider other candidates when a qualified incumbent consents to stand for re-election. A stockholder wishing to submit a recommendation for a director candidate should follow the instructions set forth herein under the section below entitled “Communications with Our Board of Directors.”

Qualification Criteria and Diversity

Our Board considers the following minimum criteria when reviewing a director nominee: director candidates must (1) have the highest character and integrity, (2) be free of any conflict of interest which would violate applicable laws or regulations or interfere with the proper performance of the responsibilities of a director, (3) possess substantial and significant experience which would be of particular importance in the performance of the duties of a director, (4) have sufficient time available to devote to our affairs in order to carry out the responsibilities of a director and (5) have the capacity and desire to represent the best interests of our stockholders. In addition, the Board considers as one factor among many the diversity of Board candidates, which may include diversity of gender, age and ethnicity. See “—Environmental, Social and Governance Policies and Practices (ESG / Sustainability)—Board Diversity Matrix.” The Board also considers diversity of skills and experience as well as geographic background. Our Board screens candidates, does reference checks and conducts interviews, as appropriate. Our Board does not evaluate nominees for director any differently because the nominee is or is not recommended by a stockholder.

With respect to qualifications of the members of the Board, the Board generally values the broad business experience and independent business judgment in the financial, real estate or other fields of each member. Specifically, Ms. Bauer is qualified based on her depth of experience in both the technology and government sectors, Mr. Itzkowitz is qualified based on his experience as a mergers and acquisitions attorney in the real estate and media industries and his general business experience, and Mr. McIntyre is qualified based on his extensive experience in the commercial real estate industry and general business experience. Each of Ms. Bauer and Messrs. McIntyre and Itzkowitz is additionally qualified as a result of his or her status as an “audit committee financial expert.”

The following matrix provides information regarding the members of our Board, including certain types of knowledge, skills, experiences and attributes possessed by one or more of our directors which our Board believes are relevant to our business and industry. The matrix does not encompass all of the knowledge, skills, experiences or attributes of our directors, and the fact that a particular knowledge, skill, experience or attribute is not listed does not mean that a director does not possess it. In addition, the absence of a particular type of knowledge, skill, experience or attribute with respect to any of our directors does not mean the director in question is unable to contribute to the decision-making process in that area. The type and degree of knowledge, skill and experience listed below may vary among the members of the Board.

Skills and Experience

Bauer

Itzkowitz

Lutnick

McIntyre

Business Operations

Finance/Accounting

Risk Management

Global Business

Human Capital Management

M&A

Other Public Company Board Service and Governance

Environmental

Real Estate Industry Experience

Global Financial Markets

Brokerage

Regulatory

Innovation and Strategy

Ethics and Integrity

Senior Leadership/CEO

Technology/Information Security

Chairman of the Board

The Board has determined that, in light of Mr. Lutnick’s control of the stockholder vote of the Company through his control of Cantor, having a separate Chairman of the Board and principal executive officer is not efficient or appropriate for us. Additionally, our Board does not have a lead independent director for the same reason.

We believe that we and our stockholders are best served by having Mr. Lutnick serve as Chairman of the Board and as our Executive Chairman and principal executive officer. Mr. Lutnick’s role as Executive Chairman, which combines his roles of Chairman of the Board and principal executive officer, promotes unified leadership and direction for our Board of Directors and executive management, and it allows for a single, clear focus for the chain of command to execute our strategic initiatives and business plans. Mr. Lutnick may be referred to as “Chairman” or “Executive Chairman” interchangeably. Mr. Gosin, who serves as our Chief Executive Officer, and who is not a director, has industry-leading experience in our markets and provides strong leadership in strategic initiatives, acquisitions, and the recruitment of industry-leading professionals and key business leaders, as well as oversees the day-to-day management of the business. Our strong and independent Board members effectively oversee our management and provide vigorous oversight of our business and affairs and any proposed related party transactions. Our Board is composed of active and effective directors, a majority of whom are independent. Three of our four directors meet the independence qualifications in accordance with the published listing requirements of Nasdaq and the SEC and our Board’s standards for determining director independence. Mr. Lutnick is the only member of executive management who is also a director. We believe that requiring that the Chairman of the Board be an independent director is not necessary to ensure that our Board provides independent and effective oversight of our business and affairs. Such oversight is maintained through the composition of our Board, the strong leadership of our independent directors and Board committees and our highly effective corporate governance structures and processes.

Corporate Governance Guidelines

The Board has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines that provide the framework for the governance of the Company. The Corporate Governance Guidelines address, among other things, the composition and structure of the Board, including membership criteria, independence standards and limits on other directorships, duties and responsibilities of directors, meeting procedures, committees of the Board, executive officer leadership development and stockholder engagement, including with respect to ESG matters. The Board reviews these principles and other aspects of governance annually. The Corporate Governance Guidelines are available at www.nmrk.com/esg/governance under the heading “Corporate Governance Policies and Practices” or upon written request from the Company free of charge.

Executive Sessions

In order to comply with Nasdaq rules, the Board has resolved that it will continue to schedule and/or provide opportunities during at least two meetings per year in which the independent directors will meet without the presence of Mr. Lutnick.

Annual Meetings

The Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that each member of the Board is expected to attend Annual Meetings of Stockholders of the Company. At the 2023 Annual Meeting, held on October 5, 2023, all of the Company’s directors were in attendance.

Communications with Our Board of Directors

Stockholders may contact any member of our Board, including to recommend a candidate for director, by addressing their correspondence to the director, c/o Newmark Group, Inc., 125 Park Avenue, New York, New York 10017, Attention: Corporate Secretary. Our Corporate Secretary will forward all such correspondence to the named director.

The Board’s Role in Risk Oversight

Risk oversight is an integral part of Board and Committee deliberations throughout the year. The Audit Committee oversees the management of our enterprise risk management program, and it annually reviews an assessment prepared by management of the critical risks facing us, their relative magnitude and management’s actions to monitor and mitigate these risks.

Our management implemented an enterprise risk management program to enhance our existing processes through an integrated effort to identify, evaluate and manage risks that may affect our ability to execute our corporate strategy and fulfill our business objectives. The activities of the enterprise risk management program entail the identification, prioritization and assessment of a broad range of risks (e.g., strategic, operational, cybersecurity and information security, financial, legal/regulatory, reputational and market) and the formulation of plans to mitigate their effects.

Our Board and the Audit Committee receive periodic reports regarding the Company’s cybersecurity and information security risks from the Chief Information Security Officer (“CISO”) and the Chief Information Officer (“CIO”). Material events and updates related to such risks are reported to the full Board and Audit Committee annually and on an ad hoc basis where warranted, including based on the level of materiality of any cybersecurity incidents as determined by the incident reporting and escalation process led by our CISO and CIO. Our processes are regularly evaluated by internal and external experts, and the results of those reviews are reported to senior management and, where appropriate, the Board and Audit Committee.

Similarly, in designing and implementing our executive compensation program, the Compensation Committee takes into consideration our operating and financial objectives, including our risk profile, and considers executive compensation decisions based in part on incentivizing our executive officers to take appropriate business risk consistent with our overall goals and risk tolerance.

Non-executive brokers, managers and other professionals are generally compensated based upon production or commissions, which may involve committing to certain transactions in certain of our businesses. These transactions may expose the Company to risks by individual employees, who are motivated to increase production. While we have in place management oversight and risk management policies, there is an inevitable conflict of interest between our compensation structure and certain brokerage, transactional, or similar risks on various portions of our businesses.

Succession Planning

From time to time, the Board discusses succession planning, including our consideration of succession strategy, the impact of any potential absence due to illness or leave of certain key executive officers or employees, as well as competing demands on the time of certain of our executive officers who also provide services to Cantor, BGC (which term refers to BGC Partners, Inc. (“BGC Partners”) and its consolidated subsidiaries prior to July 1, 2023, and to BGC Group, Inc. (“BGC Group”) and its consolidated subsidiaries from July 1, 2023), and various other ventures and investments sponsored by Cantor. Our Board also discusses from time to time, as part of its succession planning, engagement and encouragement of future business leaders and the process of introducing directors to leaders in our business lines. The Board may also discuss short-term succession in the event that certain of the senior executive officers should, on an interim or unexpected basis, become temporarily unable to fulfill their duties. The Board also considers hiring, promotion and retention of leaders required for the changing business landscape and to lead future business lines and may also encourage current leaders to develop expertise in additional areas or business lines. At the business and departmental levels, managers discuss and identify potential talent, opportunities for employee growth, successors, and future leaders.

ENVIRONMENTAL, SOCIAL AND GOVERNANCE POLICIES AND PRACTICES (ESG / SUSTAINABILITY)

We believe that our ESG policies and practices will create sustainable long-term value for Newmark, our stockholders and other stakeholders, our clients and our employees while also helping us mitigate risks, reduce costs, protect brand value, and identify market opportunities. As Newmark continues to expand globally, we expect that our ESG initiatives will add value to our clients and positively impact the communities in which our clients and we operate.

Our Board-level ESG Committee provides oversight with respect to our ESG policies and practices. The ESG Committee charter may be found on our website at www.nmrk.com/esg/governance under the heading “Environmental, Social and Governance Committee Charter.” With the Board’s and the ESG Committee’s oversight, we are embedding social and human capital, employment, environmental, sustainability, charitable and corporate governance policies and practices into our corporate strategy, compensation, disclosure, and goals to maintain and advance long-term value for our investors.

Newmark supports sustainable business practices and is focused on taking the steps necessary to continue developing our sustainability program internally and further develop the sustainability-related services we offer our clients. In 2023, we retained a nationally certified women-owned firm to assist our leadership in this endeavor. We also established an ESG Executive Committee, comprised of key Company executives and other senior leaders, to provide direction for Newmark’s ESG and sustainability progress and initiatives. Their results include:

•

The publication of our first Corporate Responsibility Report in 2023;

•

Prioritization of industry-relevant ESG topics to guide our actions, informed by management, market, employee and investor interests and ESG standards;

•

Engagement on ESG topics to meet business and client objectives; and

•

Recognition as a Green Lease Leader from the Department of Energy and Institute for Market Transformation for sustainability and green lease guidance used internally and shared with clients

For more information about these topics, new and evolving initiatives and specific examples of policies and practices, see our website at www.nmrk.com/esg and “—Additional ESG / Sustainability Information” below. Unless the context indicates otherwise, references in this ESG and sustainability section to our “employees” include our professionals who are independent contractors.

Our Fundamental Values

Newmark is an organization built on strong values, employee engagement and ownership. At our core we are committed to our employees by providing them with an opportunity to participate in our success. We believe that by cultivating a dynamic mix of people and ideas, we enrich the performance of our businesses, the experiences of our increasingly diverse employee base, and the level of engagement in the communities in which we operate. We value hard work, innovation, superior client service, strong ethics and governance and equal opportunities. Further, philanthropy is woven into our corporate culture. We believe these values foster sustainable, profitable growth. We strive to be exemplary corporate citizens and honor high ethical principles in our interactions with other businesses, our employees and the communities in which we live and work. We take corporate social responsibility and sustainability seriously: we want to contribute to the common good.

Set forth below is a discussion of many of our ESG and sustainability policies and practices. These are our values in action.

Human Capital and Social Policies and Practices

We are committed to our people, our stockholders and the community as a whole. We have a variety of programs to incentivize and support our employees, from employee ownership to comprehensive benefits and training. We are also committed to equal opportunity, diversity and other policies and practices designed to fulfill our commitment to social and human capital development.

Attracting and Retaining the Best Talent

Our success depends on our ability to attract and retain talented, productive and skilled employees to transact with our clients in a challenging and regulated environment that is experiencing ever-increasing competition for talent. We are investing in creating a diverse, inclusive and incentivized work environment where our people can deliver their best work every day. In 2021 and in 2024, we were named by GlobeSt.com as one of commercial real estate’s “Best Places to Work.” Newmark was ranked #1 on LinkedIn’s 2022 “Top Companies in Real Estate” list, which ranks the top 25 companies at which to grow a career in the industry.

Flexible, Safe and Empowering Work Environment

We recognize that the health and well-being of our employees is fundamentally linked to the success of our organization. Our employees receive safety awareness training via Newmark’s online safety training platform, providing access to over 1,000 courses across three safety catalogs. We are committed to a culture built around the evolving needs of our talented workforce promoting flexibility, empowerment, and most importantly safety. As part of this commitment, we proudly offer a comprehensive benefits package crafted to enhance our culture and support the success of our employees, both at work and home. To facilitate the retention of our employees, we provide additional benefits, including a 401(k) match.

Performance-Based and Highly Retentive Compensation Structure

Virtually all our key executives and producers have equity or partnership stakes in the Company and/or its subsidiaries. Generally, they receive deferred equity, limited partnership units or restricted stock units (“RSUs”) as part of their compensation. As of March 31, 2024, our employees and independent contractors, partners, executive officers and directors owned approximately 28% of our equity. See the organizational chart under the heading “Item 1, Business — Our Organizational Structure” in the Original Form 10-K for more information. We issue limited partnership units and other forms of equity-based compensation, such as RSUs, which:

•

Provide liquidity to our partners and employees over time;

•

Align the interests of our partners and employees and management with those of common stockholders;

•

Help motivate and retain key partners and employees; and

•

Encourage a collaborative culture that drives cross-selling and growth.

The non-exchangeable partnership units held by our partners are subject to forfeiture (such as if the non-compete, confidentiality or non-solicit provisions of the Newmark Holdings limited partnership agreement are violated), and unvested RSUs are subject to service conditions that must be met in order for them to vest into shares of Newmark common stock. In addition, any partnership amounts paid following termination of service generally are paid over a number of years to ensure compliance with post-termination partner obligations. This compensation structure has proven to be highly retentive and since 2015, we have retained 94% of our top-performing producers.

We also enter into various agreements with certain of our employees and partners. Many of these individuals receive loans that may be either wholly or in part repaid from the distribution earnings that the individual receives on some or all of their limited partnership units or from the proceeds of the sales of their Newmark Class A common stock, or that may be forgiven over a period of time. These loans provide incentives and promote entrepreneurship, retention and long-term engagement.

Compensation Recovery/ Clawback Policy

The Company has adopted a compensation recovery policy (“Clawback Policy”) for its executive officers effective as of December 1, 2023, with retroactive applicability to October 2, 2023. The Clawback Policy applies to compensation received by the Company’s executive officers that results from the attainment of a financial reporting measure based on or derived from financial information (“Incentive-Based Compensation”). The Clawback Policy provides for recovery of Incentive-Based Compensation received by a covered person in the event of an accounting restatement due to material noncompliance with financial reporting requirements that is in excess of the Incentive-Based Compensation that such person would have received based upon the restated financial reporting measure. The Clawback Policy applies to Incentive-Based Compensation and not to compensation that is purely discretionary or based on subjective goals or goals unrelated to financial reporting measures.

Employee Diversity, Inclusion and Equal Opportunity

We are committed to equal opportunity, diversity and other policies and practices that seek to further our development of a diverse and inclusive workplace. We consider all qualified applicants for job openings and promotions without regard to race, color, religion, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, national origin or ancestry, age, disability, service in the armed forces, or any other characteristic that has no bearing on the ability of employees to do their jobs well. We continue to develop initiatives to support these values and include qualified, diverse candidates in the interview process for leadership roles.

We are dedicated to our efforts to achieve pay equity. Our promotion and compensation processes are designed to enable us to treat employees fairly, and our compensation decisions are differentiated based on performance.

Newmark participates in the Corporate Equality Index, a national benchmarking tool measuring policies, practices and benefits pertinent to lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer (LGBTQ+) employees and was named to GlobeSt.’s 2021 Women of Influence ‘Diversity Champion’ list.

Talent remains at the core of who we are as a company, and we remain committed to having a culture built around inclusion, equality and developing a diverse workforce. We are helping to shape future leaders from a wide variety of backgrounds. We actively participate in various initiatives, including the following:

•

The Network of Women (NOW), which supports the recruitment, development, and retention of women across our organization and offers tools to help our members make new professional contacts, find mentors and develop their careers, with the goal of advancing our businesses and reputation;

•

Sponsorship of the Summer Enrichment and Analyst Development Programs run by Artemis Real Estate Partners, a female-owned financial firm with a strong track record in fostering diversity;

•

The Pace Bridge Program, which provides training in commercial real estate fundamentals and related skills through a Newmark leadership speaker series and is administered by Project Destined, an education platform with deep experience in training underserved youth;

•

The National Minority Supplier Diversity Council to incorporate the organization’s 15,000 certified minority suppliers into our supplier bid process;

•

Girl Scouts’ Gender Parity Initiative: Fair Play, Equal Pay^®; and

•

Other programs that aim to create educational and career opportunities for under-served groups, including, but not limited to:

•

National Association for Industrial and Office Parks Young Professionals Group (SoCal chapter)

•

TEAK Fellowship

•

Professional Women in Construction

•

Apex for Youth

•

USC McMorrow Neighborhood Academic Initiative

•

HFS Chicago Scholars

We further participate in job fairs and job boards that are focused on reaching a diverse applicant pool.

Employee Engagement, Communication, Management and Leadership Training and Development

We invest in our employees’ long-term development and engagement by delivering training and development programs and a culture where our people can thrive and maximize their potential. This includes “Newmark Next Generation,” a program designed to recruit and develop junior sales professionals in our brokerage business. We require mandatory annual training in workplace respect and inclusion, anti-money laundering, and anti-crime, global sanctions, ethics, cyber-security and harassment among other topics. We also provide or support periodic job-specific and other developmental training and support for our employees so they can maximize their potential, as well as tuition reimbursement programs to eligible employees.

We provide virtual and in-person leadership training to managers on topics, including management effectiveness, communication skills, interview skills, writing and delivering effective performance evaluations, managing diverse teams and other topics. This training is supplemented by a comprehensive library of on-line training courses that managers and employees may access. Finally, our individual business lines offer ongoing learning and development opportunities tied to deepening the subject matter expertise of their professionals.

Our success depends on employees understanding how their work and engagement contribute to our strategy, culture, values and regulatory environment. We use various channels to facilitate open and direct communication, including internal calls and meetings with employees, training and policy updates, and our social outings and events.

Our Environmental Focus, Workplace Strategies and Sustainable Business Practices

We are focused on the environment and recognize the importance of treating our natural resources with the greatest respect, so that they are available to future generations. Building operations have a significant impact on the environment, and as technology continues to place greater demands on building systems for power and cooling, energy consumption is expected to continue to rise at an unsustainable rate. As one of the largest global commercial real estate service providers, we believe it is our responsibility to improve energy efficiency and reduce energy consumption to protect the environment through continuous improvement of building practices. We understand that sustainable buildings provide a better work environment, increase building efficiency, and reduce the environmental impact of building operations, and recognize that this requires continuous improvement in our own spaces and increasingly sophisticated support for our clients.

As a responsible business, we are acutely aware of climate change and other major issues affecting the environment. We also understand the impact commercial real estate can have on the health of the environment. That is why we encourage sustainable building practices and, in our global corporate services business and property management assignments, recommend strategies to clients to maximize energy efficiency, recycle materials and limit waste. These goals apply to Newmark’s offices as well as to the work we do for our clients, whether in selecting a location, building out space or managing an asset. Newmark’s property, facilities and energy/sustainability management teams work internally and with clients to reduce energy demand and carbon emissions. Newmark is increasingly collecting and measuring environmental data and this data is used to build client strategies around energy efficiency and renewable energy supply initiatives.

We are taking steps to minimize the environmental impact and carbon footprint of our corporate offices. We have updated our site selection guidelines to prioritize more energy efficient and sustainably managed spaces. We also updated our energy efficiency policy, our interior fit-out standards and our waste reduction policy. We continue to explore strategies for reducing our greenhouse gas emissions, increasing use of renewable energy, conserving water, and reducing waste. Newmark is working with the owners and property management teams that oversee the buildings we occupy to collect accurate and actionable energy data. As this data becomes more available, Newmark plans to implement energy efficiency initiatives where possible that will help lower our overall carbon footprint. We are also investigating the purchase of renewable energy supply where possible in deregulated energy markets. For all newly leased space for Newmark, we generally consider green lease options and strive to build and operate a sustainable workplace. Newmark occupies over a dozen buildings that are Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) Certified and over 30 that are Energy Star Certified. For example, our New York City Headquarters at 125 Park Ave. is in a building that has received U.S. Green Building Council LEED Gold Certification and is also Energy Star Certified.

Environmental Policy and Energy and Sustainable Service Reference Guide

We have a policy with respect to the responsible environmental management of our operations. We are creating a baseline to understand and minimize the impact that our business has on the environment and are actively searching for ways to reduce our footprint. We are pursuing traditional, as well as new and innovative, methods to achieve our goals.

Further information on our policy can be found on our website at www.nmrk.com/esg/environmental under the heading “Environmental Policy.”

Energy and sustainability are growing areas of focus for our clients and client services. Since 2017, Newmark’s Energy and Sustainability Services team has led energy management initiatives for Newmark clients. The team partners with clients to help identify, develop and manage green building investments, pursue Energy Star certifications, manage their greenhouse gas emissions inventory, and establish long-term energy conservation measures to help meet their corporate decarbonization and net zero emissions goals. The team utilizes a cloud-based Energy Intelligence Platform that empowers clients with access to their utility data, offers facility utility bill payment services and manages third-party procurement contracts, which it integrates with Energy Star reporting. To support our services, we have also developed an Energy and Sustainability Services Reference Guide, available at www.nmrk.com/storage-nmrk/uploads/documents/Newmark-Energy-and-Sustainability-Services-Guide_2023.pdf, which assists clients and property teams in reducing the environmental impact of property operations, maintenance and construction associated with real estate assets.

For more information about our policies and these initiatives and services provided to clients and within our own facilities as they evolve, please refer to our website at www.nmrk.com/esg and www.nmrk.com/industry/energy.

Business Continuity and Resiliency

We have begun implementing sustainability policies and practices to protect the continuity of our business and operations to maintain and advance value for stockholders and other stakeholders. These policies and practices include disaster recovery and crisis management protocols to minimize the impact of health emergencies and natural or other disasters on our operations. We maintain concurrent data centers in the United States and internationally, providing backup of our computer systems and capacity for our employees to work remotely during crises. These policies and practices enabled our employees to maintain a high level of performance while working in offices or remotely during the COVID-19 pandemic and other global events in compliance with relevant rules and regulations in applicable jurisdictions, and in preservation of the health, safety and welfare of our workforce.

Charitable Policies and Practices

Never has our commitment to our people and others been so evident as in our corporate giving and charitable work. Honoring the events of September 11, 2001, the Company currently matches 100% of individual employee donations to The Cantor Fitzgerald Relief Fund made in September of each year up to $5,000 per individual employee. Employees have the option of designating a bona-fide charity as the beneficiary of the donation and the match. In 2023, Newmark announced that it would match 100% of employee, broker and client donations up to $1 million to The Cantor Fitzgerald Relief Fund to support direct relief efforts in Israel. Additional charitable initiatives are in effect from time to time.

We are a leading sponsor of the Homeless Assistance Fund, a collective public-private initiative launched in 2022, led by the Partnership for New York City, to provide services and mental health resources to unsheltered New Yorkers. The Homeless Assistance Fund partners with Breaking Ground, a homeless outreach and housing nonprofit, to accelerate the connect-to-care process, getting individuals with mental illness into the treatment programs and housing they need. Taking our commitment a step further, Newmark provided office space, 24 hours a day, at its New York City headquarters for the Breaking Ground outreach teams working in the Grand Central/Midtown East area.

Newmark actively encourages our producers, managers and other employees to support the communities in which we live and operate through volunteerism and philanthropy. In 2023, we supported hospitals, universities, food banks and community-based organizations focused on childhood development and education and programs for the disabled, families and the financially disadvantaged. Some of the charities include: American Heart Association, Big Brothers, Big Sisters, Catholic Schools Foundation, Child Mind Institute, Children’s Hospital Boston, Diabetes Research Foundation, Fountain House, Habitat for Humanity, Jewish Community Relations Council, Lincoln Center, Met Museum, Municipal Arts Society, New York Foundation for the Arts, No Kid Hungry, Pace University, Urban Land Institute, WaterAid America, World Central Kitchen, YMCA, and the Youth Renewal Fund.

We actively encourage volunteerism from our people, and we proudly support our clients in their charitable efforts. To encourage our professionals to engage in civic and charitable efforts, we have a matching program for charities that fit within Newmark’s overall charitable mission.

As part of these values in action, we offer a Volunteer Time Off program to support individual employee volunteerism in the communities in which they work and live. All full and part-time regular employees are eligible to utilize one paid workday (whole day or two half-days) each calendar year to volunteer with bona fide charitable organizations of their choice. Participation is growing and as office life normalizes and pandemic measures continue to recede, we will encourage broader use of this benefit and participation by employees in charitable and community service activities within all our office communities.

We also support victims of disasters and sometimes, our volunteers travel to those in need. In January 2019, a group of more than 200 volunteers drawn from The Cantor Fitzgerald Relief Fund, employee volunteers from Newmark and its affiliates and many friends from the New York community and clients from Banco Santander and Scotiabank, traveled to Puerto Rico to aid in its recovery from Hurricanes Irma and Maria. This operation distributed $4 million in $1,000 prepaid cards to thousands of families still suffering from the devastation.

Additional information about our charitable efforts is available at www.nmrk.com/esg/social.

Corporate Governance Policies and Practices

Our commitment to good corporate governance policies and practices is demonstrated by our Corporate Governance Guidelines, our rigorous Code of Ethics, the charters of the Audit, Compensation and ESG Committees of our Board, our Hedging and Pre-Clearance Policy, our Clawback Policy and our other corporate governance policies and practices. Some highlights of our corporate governance policies and practices include the following:

•

Independence of a substantial majority of the members of the Board;

•

Only independent directors serve on each committee;

•

Board-level ESG Committee;

•

Annual independence review of independent outside directors;

•

Diverse array of personal characteristics and professional experience of the Board, consisting of 25% women and 25% persons of color;

•

Audit Committee is chaired by an independent director who is a person of color, and Compensation Committee is chaired by a woman independent director;

•

Annual election of each member of the Board – we do not have a classified (“staggered”) Board;

•

The ability of our Board to require the resignation of a director who fails to obtain a majority vote for election;

•

No stockholder rights plan or other “poison pill” or similar anti-takeover device;

•

A prohibition on personal loans to directors and executive officers;

•

Requirement for directors to inform the Board of changes in their principal job responsibilities;

•

Limits on the service of directors and executive officers on other public company boards;

•

Director orientation and continuing education;

•

Annual self-assessments of the performance of our Board and its committees and individual directors;

•

Prohibitions against trading while in possession of material, non-public information;

•

Prohibitions against hedging;

•

Clawback Policy for Incentive-Based Compensation;

•

Strict procedures and enforcement of our ethical standards and our conflict of interest policies, including our robust Whistleblower Policy – completely confidential and with a whistleblower hotline available 24/7;

•

Annual evaluation of the performance of both our Executive Chairman and Chief Executive Officer;

•

Procedures for establishing and disseminating agendas and materials for meetings of the Board and its committees in advance;

•

Periodic executive sessions of independent directors;

•

Consideration of factors including diversity of gender, age, ethnicity, skills, experience and geographic background in considering director candidates;

•

Strict ethical and other criteria for membership on the Board;

•

Detailed processes and review of all related party transactions and required approval by independent directors;

•

Access of the Board and its committees to management and to retain outside independent advisors;

•

Diversified mix of cash and short and long-term equity awards designed to be highly retentive and risk-appropriate, and to align the interests of our executive officers with those of our stockholders;

•

Executive officers holding much of their personal net worth in our and our affiliates’ equity;

•

Robust annual review and oversight of Code of Ethics responses;

•

Succession planning and management development of executive officers and potential senior managers having significant responsibility for business areas;

•

Annual stockholder say-on-pay votes;

•

Annual ratification of the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm; and

•

Annual review of our corporate governance policies and practices

Board Diversity Matrix

The table below provides certain highlights of the composition of our Board members as of April 26, 2024. Each of the categories listed in the below table has the meaning as it is used in Nasdaq Listing Rule 5605(f).


Board Size:
Total Number of Directors			4


Gender:	Male		Female		Non-Binary		Gender Undisclosed
Number of directors based on gender identity		3		1		—		—
Number of directors who identify in any of the categories below
African American or Black		1		—		—		—
Alaskan Native or American Indian		—		—		—		—
Asian		—		—		—		—
Hispanic or Latinx		—		—		—		—
Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander		—		—		—		—
White		2		1		—		—
Two or More Races or Ethnicities		—		—		—		—
LGBTQ+		—
Undisclosed		—

Whistleblower Complaint and Investigation Procedures for Accounting, Internal Controls, Auditing Matters and Employment and Labor Practices

We have a policy regarding reporting of complaints about accounting, internal controls, employment and labor practices, auditing matters, or questionable financial practices. The policy is designed to provide a channel of communication for employees and others who have concerns about our conduct or any of our directors or employees. Complaints are treated seriously and handled expeditiously. Any person may submit a complaint to our independent outside law firm to a dedicated hotline and email account available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Complaints that are accounting or financial in nature (“Accounting Complaints”) will be handled by the Chair of our Audit Committee and by our Chief Legal Officer, Corporate Secretary or designee.

Employees submitting an Accounting Complaint need not provide their names or other personal information and reasonable efforts will be used to conduct the investigation that follows from an Accounting Complaint from an employee in a manner that protects the confidentiality and anonymity of the employee submitting the Accounting Complaint.

Employees are reminded of the Whistleblower Policy at least annually and information is provided in local languages. We honor a culture of investigation, confidentiality and non-retaliation. Persons submitting complaints in good faith will not be subject to retaliation and the policy does not prohibit other actions protected under applicable law. Our Whistleblower Policy is publicly available on our website at www.nmrk.com/esg/governance under the heading “Whistleblower Complaint and Investigation Procedures for Accounting, Internal Controls, Auditing Matters and Employment and Labor Practices.”

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and Professional Integrity

Our corporate values and strong policies and procedures regarding ethics, conflicts of interests, related party transactions and similar matters are contained in our Code of Ethics. This commitment applies to members of our Board, executive officers, other officers and our other covered employees globally. The Code of Ethics and its training modules are circulated in local languages and training and certifications are conducted annually for all employees. Annual written certifications are required. Potential violations and disclosures globally are reviewed annually by executive management and escalated to the Audit Committee. Director and executive officer disclosures are reviewed by the Audit Committee on an annual basis. The Code of Ethics is available on our website at www.nmrk.com/esg/governance under the heading “Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and Professional Integrity.”

Compliance and Anti-Financial Crime Policy

We are committed globally to our policy regarding anti-money laundering and anti-financial crime, including anti-bribery and corruption, counter-terrorism financing and anti-fraud. We are committed to compliance and training regarding all relevant laws, rules, and regulations designed to combat bribery and corruption, including, but not limited to, the UK Bribery Act of 2010 and the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977, as amended. Further information on this policy can be found on our website at www.nmrk.com/esg/governance under the heading “Compliance and Anti-Financial Crime Policy and Corruption.”

In addition, our Code of Ethics provides that we will not enter into a business relationship or engage in an activity if we know or have reasonable grounds to suspect that a business relationship or activity is connected with or facilitates bribery or corruption. It is the responsibility of each person covered under the Code of Ethics to comply with applicable anti-bribery and corruption laws. Persons covered under the Code of Ethics are required to report any suspicions of bribery or corruption to the Compliance Officer or, as appropriate, to the Audit Committee or the Board, or in accordance with our Whistleblower Policy. For more information on our Code of Ethics and Whistleblower Policy, see the section entitled “Code of Ethics and Whistleblower Procedures.”

Global Anti-Bribery and Corruption Policy

In 2021, we implemented a specific global policy to combat bribery and corruption through a clear set of policies and procedures outlining anti-bribery and corruption standards, procedures and annual employee training. The policy specifically defines Bribery and Corruption and provides for management and Board oversight. Further information on this policy can be found on our website at www.nmrk.com/esg/governance under the heading “Global Anti-Bribery and Corruption Policy.”

Annual Risk Evaluation and Board-Level Risk Oversight

Our Board of Directors meets at least annually with our senior risk officer to review and evaluate our enterprise risk framework, risk management policies and practices, credit and risk mitigation policies and practices, and other related issues.

Focus on Our Internal Control Environment

As described more fully in its charter, the primary function of the Audit Committee is to assist our Board of Directors in its general oversight of the Company’s financial reporting, internal control over financial reporting and audit process. Management is responsible for the preparation, presentation and integrity of the Company’s financial statements; accounting and financial reporting principles; internal control over financial reporting; disclosure controls; and procedures designed to ensure compliance with accounting standards, applicable laws and regulations.

Our overall control environment is a focal point for our management, the Audit Committee and the Board. With this focus and with the oversight of the Audit Committee and the Board, management regularly enhances our overall control environment.

Cybersecurity and Information Security Program

We are committed to combating the global threat of cyberattacks and to securing our business through our information security programs to operate with confidence, through a deep understanding of cybersecurity risks, vulnerabilities, mitigations, and threats. These processes are managed by our cybersecurity team headed by our CISO and supported by our business continuity teams. We conduct periodic internal and external vulnerability audits and assessments and penetration testing and provide periodic cybersecurity training to employees. Further information on these processes can be found on our website at www.nmrk.com/esg/governance under the heading “Cyber-Security and Information Security Program.” Further information on our cybersecurity risk management strategy and the role of our Board and management in cybersecurity matters can be found in “Corporate Governance—The Board’s Role in Risk Oversight” in this Amendment and Part I, Item 1C, Cybersecurity of the Original Form 10-K.

Data Privacy Policy

We have a global data privacy policy applicable to all subsidiaries and business lines. We are committed to conducting our business in line with the right to privacy set forth in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (Article 12). As such, we are committed to handling personal data responsibly and recognize the privacy rights of persons involved in our business dealings. Our policy provides a mechanism for data subjects to raise concerns about personal data and privacy as well as a right of access to personal information, rights to correct or amend such information and the right to request deletion of such personal information. Further information on this program can be found on our website at www.nmrk.com/esg/governance under the heading “Data Privacy Program.”

Hedging and Pre-Clearance Policy

We have a policy with respect to hedging of equity securities issued by Newmark (collectively, “Company Equity Securities”). In this regard, we prohibit our directors, officers, and employees, including leased employees, brokers and independent contractors, from purchasing financial instruments (including prepaid variable forward contracts, equity swaps, collars, and exchange funds), or otherwise engaging in transactions that are designed to or have the effect of hedging or offsetting any decrease in the market value of Company Equity Securities held by such persons, except with the explicit approval of our Audit Committee or its designees. Additionally, we have a pre-clearance policy and process for trades in Company Equity Securities that all our directors, executive officers, and other designated insiders and employees, including leased employees, brokers and independent contractors must follow. Under this policy, such persons’ trades are subject to pre-clearance through our legal and compliance department. Directors and executive officers are also required to advise management in advance of entering into any SEC Rule 10b5-1 trading plans or similar plans in accordance with applicable law. For avoidance of doubt, Cantor and its affiliated entities or any securities issued by such entities other than the Company are not covered under the hedging restrictions. Further information on this program can be found on our website at www.nmrk.com/esg/governance under the heading “Hedging and Pre-Clearance Policy.”

Additional ESG / Sustainability Information

To learn more about our policies and practices and our continuing efforts related to human capital management, ESG and sustainability matters, please refer to the ESG / sustainability section of our website at www.nmrk.com/esg, our 2022 Corporate Responsibility Report and to our periodic reports filed under the Exchange Act for further information. You may also find our Corporate Governance Guidelines, Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, the charters of the committees of our Board of Directors, Hedging and Pre-Clearance Policy, Environmental Policy, information about our charitable initiatives and other sustainability and ESG policies and practices on our website. The information contained on, or that may be accessed through, our website, is not part of, and not incorporated into, this document.

STOCKHOLDER ENGAGEMENT

Our Board of Directors and management value the opportunity to engage with our stockholders and gain insight year-round on their views on a broad range of topics, including our strategy, financial performance, executive compensation, corporate governance, human capital management, including diversity and inclusion, and environmental and social goals. Our Board of Directors receives reporting on feedback from investors and stockholder voting results. In addition, our management routinely engages with investors at conferences and other forums. We also speak with proxy advisors to discuss, and receive feedback on, our governance practices and executive compensation programs. Feedback from investors informs the Board’s ongoing review of governance and compensation matters.

In recent years, we have also enhanced our engagement strategy through:

•

Information available on our website including SEC alerts, more detailed financial and operational disclosures in our investor presentations and supplemental Excel tables;

•

Commercial real estate-focused market reports, white papers, and thought leadership; and

•

Investor meeting, analyst and investor days, and conferences, including nearly 140 investment community interactions in 2022 with equity and fixed income investors, over 170 of such interactions in 2023, and nearly 130 of such interactions in the first three months of 2024. This was in addition to the several hundred people who listened to one or more of our quarterly financial results conference calls.

In each of the above periods, we reached out to institutions who collectively represented the majority of Newmark shares held by active professional investors. Of those who engaged with us, our interactions with them covered topics including industry trends, business trends and strategy, capital allocation, geographic and business line expansion, our recruitment and retention policies, key drivers of our growth, ESG, corporate governance matters, board composition and diversity, our executive compensation program, and ways to enhance our disclosures. We also periodically engage a third-party research firm to conduct anonymous surveys of our top institutional owners and the broader investment community to solicit candid feedback on these and other issues.

We look forward to further expanding our communication with stockholders and will continue to consider their views and perspectives, as appropriate, in making governance decisions and establishing strategic direction for the Company going forward.

DELINQUENT SECTION 16(a) REPORTS

Under the securities laws of the United States, our directors, executive officers and any person holding more than 10% of our Class A common stock, are required to file initial forms of ownership of our Class A common stock and reports of changes in that ownership with the SEC. Based solely on our review of the copies of such forms received by us with respect to 2023 and 2024 through the date hereof, the Company believes that all reports were filed on a timely basis with respect to transactions in 2023 and 2024 through the date hereof, except that Mr. Lutnick filed a Form 4 two days late to report a charitable gift made on July 17, 2023.

CODE OF ETHICS AND

WHISTLEBLOWER PROCEDURES

Our Board of Directors has adopted a Code of Ethics that applies to members of our Board of Directors, our executive officers, other officers and our covered employees globally. The Code of Ethics is publicly available on our website at www.nmrk.com/esg/governance under the heading “Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and Professional Integrity.” If we amend or grant any waiver from a provision of our Code of Ethics that applies to our executive officers, we intend to publicly disclose such amendment or waiver by posting information about such amendment or waiver on our website.

In accordance with the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the Audit Committee has established our Whistleblower Policy, which sets forth procedures for the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints regarding accounting, internal controls, or auditing matters, and for the confidential, anonymous reporting of employee concerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters. The Chief Legal Officer and the Corporate Secretary, and his, her or their designees and the Chair of the Audit Committee will direct the investigation of any such complaints in accordance with the procedures. Our Whistleblower Policy is publicly available on our website at www.nmrk.com/esg/governance under the heading “Whistleblower Complaint and Investigation Procedures for Accounting, Internal Controls, Auditing Matters and Employment and Labor Practices.” Information available on our website is not incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 11.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

HISTORICAL EVENTS AND THEIR IMPACT ON OUR COMPENSATION

Historical Information Regarding Newmark IPO, Separation Transaction and Spin-Off and its Effect on our Compensation

Separation and Spin-Off of the Company

On December 19, 2017, the Company, which had previously been a wholly owned subsidiary of BGC Partners, completed its initial public offering (the “IPO”). Through the following series of transactions prior to and following the completion of the Separation (as defined below) and the IPO, Newmark became a separate publicly traded company. Prior to the closing of the IPO, on December 13, 2017, BGC Partners, BGC Holdings, L.P. (“BGC Holdings”), BGC U.S. OpCo, the Company, Newmark Holdings, Newmark OpCo and, solely for the provisions listed therein, Cantor and BGC Global OpCo entered into the separation and distribution agreement (as amended on November 8, 2018 and amended and restated on November 23, 2018, the “Separation and Distribution Agreement”). Pursuant to the Separation and Distribution Agreement, BGC Partners, BGC Holdings and BGC U.S. OpCo and their respective subsidiaries (other than the Newmark group (defined below), the “BGC group”) transferred to the Company, Newmark Holdings and Newmark OpCo and their respective subsidiaries (the “Newmark group”) the assets and liabilities of the BGC group relating to BGC Partners’ Real Estate Services business (such series of transactions that resulted in the transfer are herein referred to as the “Separation”). For more information on our IPO and transactions and agreements related to the Separation and the IPO, see “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence—Separation, Initial Public Offering, and Spin-Off.”

On November 30, 2018, BGC Partners completed its previously announced pro-rata distribution (the “Spin-Off”) to its stockholders of all of the shares of our common stock owned by BGC Partners as of immediately prior to the effective time of the Spin-Off. In addition, BGC Partners also caused its subsidiary, BGC Holdings, to distribute pro rata (the “BGC Holdings distribution”) all of the exchangeable limited partnership units of Newmark Holdings held by BGC Holdings immediately prior to the effective time of the BGC Holdings distribution to its limited partners entitled to receive distributions on their BGC Holdings units. Following the Spin-Off and the BGC Holdings distribution, BGC Partners ceased to be our controlling stockholder, and BGC Partners and its subsidiaries no longer held any shares of our common stock or other equity interests in us or our subsidiaries. For more information on the Spin-Off, see “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence—Separation, Initial Public Offering, and Spin-Off—The Spin-Off.”

In connection with our IPO in December 2017, we established the Equity Plan and the Incentive Plan, under which the Compensation Committee may pay compensation in the form of cash, shares of our common stock or other equity awards, to our directors, executive officers or other officers or employees. We also maintain the Participation Plan, under which the Committee may award Newmark Holdings units to our directors, executive officers or other officers or employees.

Effect of the Separation and Spin-Off on Executive Compensation

In connection with the Separation, interests in Newmark Holdings were distributed to holders of interests in BGC Holdings in proportion to such interests of BGC Holdings held by such holders immediately prior to the Separation. Due to such distribution, any BGC Holdings-related interest that existed as of December 13, 2017 also included 0.454545 of a Newmark Holdings-related interest, and any redemption or exchange of a BGC Holdings-related interest prior to the Spin-Off must also have included the redemption or exchange of the associated ratable portion of a Newmark Holdings-related interest. This 0.454545 figure was based on what the distribution ratio would have been had the Spin-Off occurred immediately following the IPO.

As a result of the Separation, and due to the fact that certain BGC Partners awards granted pursuant to the BGC Partners compensation plans prior to the Separation became, upon the Separation, awards of interests in both BGC Holdings and Newmark Holdings, when we refer generally to partnership units that may be or have been awarded as part of compensation (i.e., NPSUs, PSUs, PPSUs, LPUs and PLPUs), we are referring to such units as may be awarded under the Newmark Compensation Plans, and, prior to BGC’s completion of its Corporate Conversion (as defined below) on July 1, 2023, BGC Partners’ compensation plans. When we refer to specific awards, we are referring to awards under the Newmark Compensation Plans, unless otherwise indicated.

In connection with the Spin-Off, holders of BGC Partners restricted stock awards participated in the distribution as if such holders held unrestricted shares of BGC Partners common stock, and following the Spin-Off, any shares of Newmark common stock issued in respect of restricted BGC Partners common stock remained subject to any vesting, lapse or forfeiture restrictions applicable to the restricted BGC Partners shares prior to the Spin-Off. RSU awards outstanding at the time under the Seventh Amended and Restated BGC Partners, Inc. Long Term Incentive Plan (the “BGC Equity Plan”), which was in effect at the time of the Spin-Off, were

adjusted so that each holder of a BGC Partners RSU award continued to hold a BGC RSU award covering BGC Partners Class A common shares, but also received a Newmark RSU award covering Newmark Class A common shares on an “as distributed basis” in order to reflect the impact of the Spin-Off on the pre-Spin-Off BGC Partners RSU awards. Such RSUs generally have the same terms, including vesting terms, as the pre-Spin-Off BGC Partners RSU awards, subject to any adjustments made by the compensation committee of the board of directors of BGC.

Effect of BGC’s July 1, 2023 Corporate Conversion on Executive Compensation

On July 1, 2023, BGC Group, BGC Partners, and BGC Holdings, along with certain other entities completed a series of mergers and related transactions in which BGC Partners converted from an “Up-C” to a “Full C-Corporation” in order to reorganize and simplify the organizational structure of the BGC entities (the “Corporate Conversion”). Upon the closing of the Corporate Conversion, BGC Group became the public holding company for BGC Partners, and BGC Holdings’ successor became a wholly owned subsidiary of BGC Group; accordingly, there are no longer any BGC Holdings units outstanding held by Newmark employees.

As a result of a series of transactions prior to and in anticipation of the Corporate Conversion, all BGC Holdings units held by the Newmark employees were redeemed or exchanged, in each case, for shares of BGC Partners Class A common stock or cash.

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Background

The following Compensation Discussion and Analysis describes the material elements of our executive compensation program for 2023, including aspects of our executive compensation program which were designed and implemented by the Compensation Committee in March 2024, at which time 2023 year-end compensation decisions with respect to each of our executive officers were reviewed and approved.

Our principal executive officer for 2023 was our Executive Chairman, Howard W. Lutnick, and our principal financial officer for 2023 was our Chief Financial Officer, Michael J. Rispoli. Our other two executive officers for 2023 were Barry M. Gosin and Stephen M. Merkel.

For 2021, 2022 and 2023, the compensation determined and approved by our Compensation Committee for Newmark matters for Messrs. Lutnick, Gosin, Merkel and Rispoli is reflected in full below. In each case compensation includes salary, other cash compensation and non-cash compensation.

Compensation Philosophy

Our executive compensation program, which is under the direction and control of our Compensation Committee, is designed to integrate compensation with the achievement of our short- and long-term business objectives and to assist it in attracting, motivating and retaining the highest quality executive officers and rewarding them for superior performance. Different components of our executive compensation program are geared to short- and longer-term performance, with the goal of increasing stockholder value over the long-term.

In determining the compensation of our executive officers, our Compensation Committee considers a variety of factors, both qualitative and quantitative, consistent with our overall goals. Our objectives include a program that reflects the retentive effect of the payment of appropriate compensation for each executive officer, the pay practices of the Company’s peer group and other companies, the Company’s financial performance as a whole and the performance of various business lines, including as compared to peer data, and the Company’s and the executives’ success in meeting corporate objectives including attracting and retaining qualified brokers and other professionals, market position, revenue and profitability and other financial criteria, strategic growth and business positioning and objectives for long-term competitive advantage. While many of our brokers and other professionals are paid commissions, the compensation received by our executive officers is not typically specifically tied to mathematical formula-based performance targets except for certain legacy commission-based arrangements relating to Mr. Gosin. Unless compensation is specifically set forth in an applicable employment agreement, the compensation of our most senior control officers under our program is determined based on a holistic review of all relevant compensation factors by the Compensation Committee with no particular weighting toward any specific metric or other factor. Such compensation factors may also include the ability to respond to extraordinary events and manage the business under changing financial, global, health, environmental and other circumstances. Further, although the vote is advisory and non-binding on the Board, the Compensation Committee considers the results of the “say-on-pay” vote.

We also believe that executive compensation should also reflect achievement of individual managerial objectives established for specific executive officers at the beginning of the fiscal year as well as reflect specific achievements by such individuals over the course of the year, such as development of specific products or customer relationships or executing or integrating specific acquisitions, dispositions and other strategic arrangements. We further believe that specific significant events led by executives, including acquisitions, dispositions and other strategic arrangements, as well as management activities that create significant value and other significant transactions, should also be given significant weight. We believe that the performance of our executives in managing our Company, and in the provision of services to our operating partnerships and subsidiaries, considered in light of general economic and specific company, industry and competitive conditions, should be the basis for determining their overall compensation.

In designing and implementing our executive compensation program, our Compensation Committee considers our operating and financial objectives, including our risk profile, and the effect that our executive compensation decisions will have on encouraging our executive officers to take an appropriate level of business, operational and market risk consistent with our overall goal of enhancing long-term stockholder value. In particular, the Committee considers those risks identified in our risk factors and the known trends and uncertainties identified in our management discussion and analysis in the Original Form 10-K, and considers how our executive compensation program serves to achieve its operating, financial and other strategic objectives while at the same time mitigating any

incentives for executive officers to engage in excessive risk-taking to achieve short-term results that may not be sustainable in the long-term. Although reviewed by the Compensation Committee, our policy is generally that the compensation of our executive officers should not be based on the short-term performance of our Class A common stock, whether favorable or unfavorable, since we believe that the price of our Class A common stock will, in the long-term, reflect our overall performance and, ultimately, our management by our executives. Long-term stock performance is reflected in executive compensation through the grant of various equity and partnership awards as described below.

Our Compensation Committee is aware that certain of our executive officers, including Messrs. Lutnick and Merkel, also receive compensation from our affiliates, including Cantor and BGC, for services rendered to each of them, but the Committee generally does not specifically review the nature or amount of such compensation. Messrs. Lutnick’s and Merkel’s overall compensation from BGC is reviewed and approved by the compensation committee of the board of directors of BGC and not by our Compensation Committee.

None of our executive officers has received any compensation for serving on our Board of Directors or on the board of directors of BGC.

Overview of Compensation and Processes

For 2023, executive compensation was composed of the following principal components: (i) a base salary, which is designed to retain talented executive officers and contribute to motivating, retaining and rewarding individual performance; (ii) an incentive bonus award that is intended to tie financial rewards to the achievement of the Company’s short- or longer-term performance objectives; and (iii) an incentive program that is designed to promote the achievement of short- and long-term performance goals and to align the long-term interests of executive officers with those of stockholders through the grant of awards. In all cases, performance objectives and goals relate to the performance of our executives at the Company and in the provision of services to our operating partnerships and subsidiaries.

From time to time, we may also restructure the existing partnership, equity and compensation arrangements of our executive officers as described below. We may also adopt various policies related to or in addition to such restructurings, including with respect to the grant of exchange rights, other monetization of awards, and the acceleration of the lapse of restrictions on restricted stock. We may also issue potential extraordinary grants to executive officers which may or may not be based on prior results or other performance measures, including stock price increase or other measures to be specified.

From time to time, we have also used employment agreements, change of control agreements, retention agreements, and other arrangements, including some with specified target or guaranteed bonus components, and extraordinary bonuses to attract, motivate and retain talented executives. Any such arrangements with the executive officers are summarized below.

Our Compensation Committee, with the assistance where appropriate of special project committees and advisors, approves, and recommends to our Board of Directors that it approve the salaries, bonuses and other compensation of our executive officers. In addition, the Committee approves grants to executive officers under and otherwise administers our Incentive Plan, our Equity Plan and our Participation Plan.

From time to time, the Compensation Committee has engaged a compensation consultant in connection with its compensation decisions. With respect to 2023, Korn Ferry (the “Compensation Advisor”) advised the Committee. The Committee retained the Compensation Advisor to provide surveys, information, and other assistance with respect to pay practices and compensation levels at the Company’s peer group and other companies, and the Committee discussed with the Compensation Advisor all compensation arrangements for 2023. For 2023, the Committee and the Compensation Advisor also reviewed additional pay for performance considerations and metrics and other measures including financial measures calculated in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) and non-GAAP financial results, development of strategic customer relationships, changes in margins, investment sales, origination and mortgage broker market share, fees from management services, servicing, and other, catalyst transactions, acquisitions, and strategy and management responsibility, challenges and risk management, international expansion and other specific line items and measures in order to review financial performance and consider compensation awards. The Committee reviewed the Company’s total revenues as a key performance measure for 2023. The Committee and the Compensation Advisor reviewed additional performance metrics for 2024, including strategic hires or retention of key employees in competitive market conditions, the market penetration of the Company’s products and businesses in new geographies or markets, strategic acquisitions, joint ventures, and dispositions, and considered various discretionary factors. The Committee reviewed this data with no particular weighting toward any specific metric or other factor. While the Committee does take into consideration such peer data and percentiles, the Committee does not attempt to benchmark executive compensation against any level, range, or percentile of compensation paid at any other companies, does not apply any specific measures of internal or external pay equity in reaching its conclusions, and does not employ tally sheets, wealth accumulation, or similar tools in its analysis.

The Compensation Committee considered whether the Compensation Advisor had any conflicts of interest in advising the Committee. The Committee considered whether the Compensation Advisor had been providing services of any other nature to the Company; the amount of fees received from the Company by the Compensation Advisor; the policies and procedures adopted by the Compensation Advisor that have been designed to prevent conflicts of interest; whether any business or personal relationships existed between the consultants employed by the Compensation Advisor who worked on Company matters and any member of the Committee; whether any business or personal relationship existed between such consultants and any of our executive officers; and whether the Compensation Advisor or such consultants hold any of our Class A common stock. The Compensation Advisor also provides services to the compensation committee of the board of directors of BGC. Upon evaluating such considerations, the Committee found no conflicts of interest in the Compensation Advisor advising the Committee.

In attempting to strike an appropriate balance, our Compensation Committee seeks to provide executive officers with an appropriately diversified mix of fixed and variable cash and non-cash compensation opportunities, time-based and performance-based awards, and short- and long-term incentives. In particular, our performance-based bonuses under our Incentive Plan focus on a mix of Company-wide and product-specific operating and financial metrics, in some cases based upon our absolute performance and in other cases based upon our performance relative to our peer group or other companies. In addition, the Incentive Plan award opportunities provide for the exercise of considerable negative discretion by the Committee to reduce, but not increase, amounts granted to executive officers under the Incentive Plan, and to take individual as well as corporate performance into account in exercising that discretion. Further, the Committee retains the discretion to pay out any amounts finally awarded under the Incentive Plan in equity or partnership awards, rather than cash, and to include restrictions on vesting, resale and forfeiture in any such equity or partnership awards.

Our policy for allocating between currently paid short- and long-term compensation is designed to ensure adequate base compensation to attract and retain talented executive officers, while providing incentives to maximize long-term value for our Company and our stockholders. Cash compensation is provided in the form of base salary to meet competitive salary norms and reward superior performance on an annual basis, and in the form of bonuses and awards for achievement of specific short-term goals or in the discretion of the Compensation Committee. Equity and partnership awards reward superior performance against specific objectives and long-term strategic goals and assist in retaining executive officers and aligning their interests with those of our Company and our stockholders. From time to time, we may provide additional equity or partnership awards on a periodic basis to reward superior performance, which awards may provide further long-term retention incentives.

Base salaries for the following year are generally set for our executive officers at year-end meetings of the Compensation Committee or in the early part of the applicable year. At these meetings, the Committee also approves incentive bonuses under the Incentive Plan for the prior year and any discretionary bonuses and grants of equity and partnership awards under our Equity Plan and the Participation Plan to our executive officers.

We provide long-term incentives to our executive officers through the grants of limited partnership units under the Participation Plan and exchange rights or cash settlement awards in connection with such partnership units and restricted stock and other equity grants under the Equity Plan. In addition, executive officers may receive a portion of their Incentive Plan bonuses in equity or partnership awards, rather than cash, with the number of awards determined by reference to the market price of a share of our Class A common stock on the date that the award is granted or such other date that awards to executive officers are made. Grants under our Equity Plan and our Participation Plan generally have vesting provisions that are time-based, rather than performance-based, although both plans are flexible enough to provide for performance-based awards.

At or around the year-end Compensation Committee meetings, our Executive Chairman, Mr. Lutnick, makes compensation recommendations to the Committee with respect to the other executive officers. Such executive officers are not present at the time of these deliberations. With respect to its determination of the Executive Chairman’s compensation, the Committee considers such information received from the Executive Chairman as it deems necessary or appropriate. The Committee deliberates separately in executive sessions with the Compensation Advisor as to all executive officers other than Mr. Lutnick in the presence of Mr. Lutnick, and separately in executive sessions with the Compensation Advisor as to all executive officers, including Mr. Lutnick, outside of the presence of Mr. Lutnick. The Committee may accept or adjust Mr. Lutnick’s recommendations and makes the sole determination of the compensation of all of our executive officers. In accordance with our Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Committee shall review and evaluate, at least annually, the performance and leadership of Mr. Lutnick as Executive Chairman and Mr. Gosin as Chief Executive Officer. Based upon the results of this evaluation, and input from the Compensation Advisor, the Committee reviews and approves Mr. Lutnick’s and Mr. Gosin’s compensation.

During the first quarter of each fiscal year, the practice of our Compensation Committee is to establish annual incentive performance goals and guidelines for all executive officers under the Incentive Plan, with the Committee retaining negative discretion to reduce or withhold any bonuses earned at the end of the year. All executive officers in office at that time are eligible to participate in the Incentive Plan. In all cases, such performance goals relate to the performance of our executive officers at the Company and in the provision of services to our operating partnership and subsidiaries.

Timing of Awards

Equity and partnership awards to executive officers that are in payment of the Incentive Plan or discretionary bonuses are typically granted annually in conjunction with the Compensation Committee’s review of Company performance and individual performance of executive officers, although interim grants may be considered and approved from time to time. The Committee’s annual review generally takes place at year-end meetings, which are generally held in the first quarter of each year, although the reviews may be held at any time and from time to time throughout the year. Grants to executive officers may be made on a mid-year or other basis in the event of business developments, changing compensation requirements or other factors, in the discretion of the Committee.

Our policy in recent years has generally been to award year-end grants to executive officer recipients by the end of the calendar year or in the quarter thereafter, with grants to non-executive employees occurring closer to the end of the first quarter of the following year. Grants, if any, to newly hired employees are effective on the first day of the quarter following the employee’s first day of employment. In addition, from time to time the Company may offer compensation enhancements or modifications to employees that it does not offer to its executive officers.

The exercise price of all exercisable equity-based compensation is set at the closing price of our Class A common stock on the Nasdaq Global Select Market on the date of grant. As discussed above, with respect to limited partnership units and other equity or partnership awards, grants may be made based on a dollar value, with the number of units or shares determined by reference to the market price of our Class A common stock on the date of grant or based on a specified number of awards.

Equity Plan and Participation Plan Awards

It is the Compensation Committee’s general policy to award restricted stock, exchange rights, awards that are repurchased for cash, which we refer to as “cash settlement awards,” and other equity or partnership awards to executive officers in order to align their interests with those of our long-term investors and to help attract and retain qualified individuals. Our Equity Plan permits the Committee to grant restricted stock, stock options, stock appreciation rights, deferred stock such as RSUs, bonus stock, performance awards, dividend equivalents and other stock-based awards, including to provide exchange rights for shares of our Class A common stock and cash settlement awards relating to Newmark Holdings limited partnership units.

Our Participation Plan provides for the grant or sale of Newmark Holdings limited partnership units. The total number of Newmark Holdings limited partnership units issuable under the Participation Plan will be determined from time to time by our Board of Directors, provided that exchange rights or cash settlement awards relating to units may only be granted pursuant to other stock-based awards granted under our Equity Plan. Partnership units in Newmark Holdings (other than NPSUs) are entitled to participate in preferred or quarterly partnership distributions from Newmark Holdings and (other than Preferred Units (as defined below) and NPSUs) are eligible to be made exchangeable for shares of our Class A common stock. We view these incentives as an effective tool in motivating, rewarding and retaining our executive officers.

Our Compensation Committee retains the right to grant a combination of forms of such awards under our Equity Plan and our Participation Plan to executive officers as it considers appropriate or to differentiate among executive officers with respect to different types of awards. The Committee has also granted authority to Mr. Lutnick, our Executive Chairman, and certain other members of our management to grant awards to non-executive officer employees of the Company under the Equity Plan and Participation Plan and to establish sub-plans for such persons.

In addition, our executive officers and other employees may also be offered the opportunity to purchase limited partnership units. The Compensation Committee and Mr. Lutnick will have the discretion to determine the price of any purchase right for partnership units, which may be set at preferential or historical prices that are less than the prevailing market price of our Class A common stock.

Discretionary and Retentive Partnership Opportunities

To incentivize executive officers and hold them accountable to stockholders, our Compensation Committee uses a variety of highly retentive partnership units issued under the Participation Plan. These partnership awards are granted as a tax-efficient, strongly retentive, and risk-appropriate means to align the interests of the executive officers with those of our long-term stockholders. For executive officers, these grants may include NPSUs, PSUs, and PPSUs, each as described below. The Committee believes that the features of the units, coupled with the discretion of the Committee to grant the right to partnership distributions, exchangeability into shares of Class A common stock of Newmark, and various liquidity opportunities, create a best-in-class form of incentive award for our executives. Until such units are made exchangeable into shares of Class A common stock or exchanged for cash or, in some cases, made exchangeable into another partnership unit with a capital account such as an HDU, at the discretion of the Committee, these units are generally forfeitable for any reason, subject to certain exceptions.

We believe this incentivizes performance. These partnership units may be redeemed for zero by the Committee at its discretion while in non-exchangeable form. Traditionally, the Committee generally has not granted options and equity-based awards such as RSUs to executives and emphasized instead these flexible and retentive limited partnership units. The Committee has granted NPSUs, along with PSUs, and HDUs, provided as long-term incentives to executive officers, which awards may receive discretionary grants of exchange rights and be coupled with cash settlement awards. The Committee may consider RSUs and options, as well as partnership units and other forms of compensation, in future grants.

NPSUs have no value for accounting or other purposes at the time of grant, do not participate in quarterly partnership distributions, are not allocated any items of profit or loss and may not be made exchangeable into shares of Class A common stock. Grants of NPSU awards are highly discretionary and provide additional flexibility for the Compensation Committee to determine the timing and circumstances of replacing such units with units that earn partnership distributions and any rights to exchange such units for shares of Class A common stock or cash. NPSUs have generally been granted to our executives in the event of business developments, changing compensation requirements or other factors, or in connection with execution of long-term employment arrangements.

From time to time, our Compensation Committee may choose to replace a NPSU with a non-exchangeable PSU or HDU. NPSUs are subject to adjustment at the time of conversion into PSUs based on the then-applicable exchange ratio (as described herein). A non-exchangeable PSU may also be replaced with a non-exchangeable HDU. A non-exchangeable PSU that has been granted the right to convert into a non-exchangeable HDU is referred to as a “PSU-H,” and a non-exchangeable PPSU that has been granted the right to be converted into cash upon conversion of the underlying PSU-H into an HDU is referred to as a “PPSU-H.” PSUs participate in quarterly partnership distributions, but otherwise generally have no value for accounting purposes and are not exchangeable into shares of Class A common stock until such exchange rights are granted by the Committee. HDUs have a stated capital account and are valued based upon such capital account which is initially based on the closing trading price of Class A common stock at the time the HDU right is granted. HDUs participate in quarterly partnership distributions and are not exchangeable into shares of Class A common stock unless such exchange rights are granted by the Committee.

Executive officers may also receive PPSUs. These units are preferred limited partnership units that may be awarded to holders of, or contemporaneously with the grant of, PSUs. PPSUs are entitled to a preferred distribution of net profits of Newmark Holdings, but otherwise are not entitled to participate in quarterly distributions. PPSUs cannot be made exchangeable into shares of Class A common stock, and can only be exchanged for cash, at the determination price on the date of grant, in connection with an exchange of the related PSUs or HDUs, and therefore are not included in our fully diluted share count. The ratio of the grant of PPSUs to traditional units (e.g., PSUs) is expected to approximate the compensatory tax rate applicable in the relevant country jurisdiction of the partner recipient. The determination price used to exchange PPSUs for cash is determined by the Compensation Committee on the date of the grant of such unit and is based on a closing trading price of Class A common stock identified by the Committee on such date.

Over time, as compensation goals are met and our executives are awarded other incentives, the Compensation Committee may choose, in its sole discretion, to grant an exchange right with respect to a PSU, thereby creating a potential liquidity event for the executive and creating a value for accounting purposes. The life cycle of these units, as they may evolve from NPSUs to shares of Class A common stock, provides the Committee and the Board of Directors with superior opportunities to retain and incentivize executives and employees in a tax-efficient and discretionary manner.

Until non-exchangeable units are made exchangeable into a share of Class A common stock or exchanged for cash at the discretion of the Committee, they are generally forfeitable for any reason, subject to certain exceptions. We believe this incentivizes performance and helps align the interests of our executives with those of our investors.

Our executive officers have much of their personal net worth in a combination of deferred compensation, including non-exchangeable and exchangeable limited partnership units and RSUs. Messrs. Lutnick, Gosin, Merkel and Rispoli hold limited partnership units in Newmark Holdings. Mr. Rispoli also holds RSUs in Newmark. Mr. Lutnick holds additional partnership interests in Cantor, which, through its and CFGM’s ownership of shares of our Class B common stock, controls approximately 58.2% of the total voting power of the outstanding Newmark common stock as of April 1, 2024. Mr. Merkel also holds additional partnership interests in Cantor.

Tax and Accounting Treatment

Section 162(m) of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the “Code”) eliminates a corporation’s tax deduction in a given year for payments to certain executive officers in excess of $1,000,000. We do not currently expect that decisions relating to compensation will be significantly impacted by Section 162(m) matters on a going forward basis. The Committee retains negative discretion to reduce or withhold performance-based compensation to our executive officers, including after taking into consideration changing business conditions or the executive officer’s individual performance.

Our management and our Compensation Committee recognize that we are subject to certain Financial Accounting Standards Board and SEC guidance on share-based awards and other accounting charges with respect to the compensation of the executive officers and other employees. However, management and the Committee do not believe that these accounting charges should necessarily determine the appropriate types and levels of compensation to be made available. Where material to the Committee’s decisions, these accounting charges will be described in our compensation discussion and analysis, compensation tables and related narratives.

Our Compensation Committee may grant equity and partnership awards to executive officers in a variety of ways under the Equity Plan and the Participation Plan, including restricted stock, RSUs, exchange rights, cash settlement awards and other equity grants under the Equity Plan and non-exchangeable limited partnership unit awards under the Participation Plan. Grants of such awards may have different accounting treatment and may be reported differently in the compensation tables and related narratives depending upon the type of award granted and how and when it is granted.

For GAAP purposes, a compensation charge is recorded on PSUs and similar limited partnership units if and when an exchange right is granted to such units to acquire shares of Class A common stock, and the charge is based on the market price of Class A common stock on the date on which the exchange right is granted, regardless of when such exchange occurs. Additionally, when the exchange actually occurs, a U.S. federal income tax deduction is generally allowed equal to the fair market value of a share of Class A common stock on the date of exchange.

For GAAP purposes, if shares of restricted stock granted are not subject to continued employment or service with us or any of our affiliates or subsidiaries, even if they are subject to compliance with our customary non-compete obligations, the grant-date fair value of the restricted stock is expensed on the date of grant.

Compensation Recovery / Clawback Policy and Forfeiture and Recoupment

Clawback Policy

The Company has adopted a Clawback Policy for its executive officers effective as of December 1, 2023, with retroactive applicability to October 2, 2023. The Clawback Policy applies to Incentive-Based Compensation. The Clawback Policy provides for recovery of Incentive-Based Compensation received by a covered person in the event of an accounting restatement due to material noncompliance with financial reporting requirements that is in excess of the Incentive-Based Compensation that such person would have received based upon the restated financial reporting measure. The Clawback Policy applies to Incentive-Based Compensation and not to compensation that is purely discretionary or based on subjective goals or goals unrelated to financial reporting measures.

Forfeiture and Recoupment

The partnership units issued to our executive officers, certain of which, such as PSUs or NPSUs, may be redeemed for zero at any time by the Compensation Committee, as well as partnership obligations under the Newmark Holdings limited partnership agreement, are retentive and provide broad discretion and significant clawback power to the Compensation Committee.

Further, our policy is to provide much of our compensation through highly retentive partnership units or other equity with strong vesting mechanisms. Accordingly, we do not require additional share ownership or hold-through-retirement thresholds.

2023 Compensation Actions Taken by the Compensation Committee

The compensation approved by our Compensation Committee and paid to our executive officers for 2023 is described in full in our Summary Compensation Table herein and the footnotes thereto. Below are descriptions of the various considerations and actions taken by our Compensation Committee for the determination of year-end compensation for our executive officers.

Consideration of Peer Data for 2023 and Other Factors

As part of its compensation process, in addition to qualitative and strategic factors, the Compensation Committee considered various peer, financial and market metrics by reviewing the latest public financial information available at the time compared with the disclosed growth rates for these same metrics at our full-service U.S. and U.K. listed peers. These peers were CBRE Group, Inc., Colliers International Group Inc., Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated, Savills plc and Cushman & Wakefield plc. The metrics included total consolidated revenue, share price change, and other financial measures including financial results, changes in margins, and fees from management services, servicing and other. The Committee also reviewed our relative performance versus these peers in individual business lines including leasing, investment sales, and commercial mortgage origination, management services and servicing, as well as our market share in investment sales and mortgage origination. The Committee noted that leasing volumes, growth in leasing fees, growth in fees from management services, servicing and other, and U.S. investment sales outpaced industry peers and relevant industry volumes over the time periods presented.

Performance data, including both financial and market data, is often reviewed by the Committee as presented by management and by the Compensation Advisor. As part of its compensation process, the Committee reviewed this data broadly and as part of its mix of factors, with no particular weighting toward any specific metric or other factor. Further, as discussed under “Overview of Compensation and Processes,” while we use market data from peer companies as a reference point for evaluating our executive compensation program among other qualitative and quantitative factors, we do not benchmark against any specific compensation level or metric.

Base Salary

Our executive officers receive base salaries or similar cash payments intended to reflect their skills, expertise and responsibilities. Subject to any applicable employment or other agreements, such payments and subsequent adjustments, if any, are reviewed and approved by the Compensation Committee annually, based on a variety of factors, which may include, from time to time, a review of relevant salaries of executives at our peer group of companies and others, and each executive officer’s individual performance for the prior year, including such executive officer’s experience and responsibilities.

We generally establish base pay at levels comparable to our peer group and other companies which employ similarly skilled personnel, including CBRE Group, Inc., Colliers International Group, Inc., Compass, Inc., Cushman & Wakefield plc, FirstService Corporation, Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated, Marcus & Millichap Inc., Opendoor Technologies Inc., RE/MAX Holdings, Inc., Savills plc, WeWork Inc., and Zillow Group, Inc. While we determine these levels by reviewing publicly available information with respect to our peer group of companies and others, we generally do not expect to engage in benchmarking.

For 2023, Mr. Lutnick spent approximately 33% of his time on our matters and Mr. Merkel spent approximately 25% of his time on our matters and they expect to spend approximately the same percentage of time on Newmark matters in 2024. These percentages may vary in 2024 depending on business developments at Newmark or Cantor, BGC or any of our or their respective affiliates. Messrs. Gosin and Rispoli spend all of their time on our matters, including on investments or ventures.

Base Salaries for 2023

Annual base salary rates for 2023 were established in March 2023 by our Compensation Committee with respect to each of our executive officers, based on their continuing qualifications, experience and responsibilities. The base salary rate for 2023 was continued at $1,000,000 for Messrs. Lutnick and Gosin. The base salary rate for Mr. Rispoli for 2023 was continued at $850,000, and the base salary rate for Mr. Merkel for 2023 was continued at $500,000.

Base Salaries for 2024

Annual base salary rates for 2024 were established in March 2024 by our Compensation Committee with respect to each of our executive officers, based on their continuing qualifications, experience and responsibilities. The base salary rate for 2024 was continued at $1,000,000 for Messrs. Lutnick and Gosin. The base salary rate for Mr. Rispoli for 2024 was continued at $850,000, and the base salary rate for Mr. Merkel for 2024 was continued at $500,000.

Incentive Plan Awards

We generally intend to award performance-based compensation in the form of bonuses to our executive officers, including pursuant to the Incentive Plan. The Compensation Committee believes that such performance-based compensation appropriately aligns the interests of our executive officers with the interests of our stockholders.

With respect to each performance period, our Compensation Committee specifies the applicable performance criteria and targets to be used under the Incentive Plan for that performance period. These performance criteria, which may vary from participant to participant, will be determined by the Committee and may be based upon one or more of the following financial performance measures and may be expressed on an absolute and/or relative basis and on a GAAP or non-GAAP basis:

•

pre-tax or after-tax net income;

•

pre-tax or after-tax operating income;

•

total or gross revenues or similar items;

•

profit, earnings or other margins;

•

stock price, dividends and/or total stockholder return;

•

EBITDA measures

•

cash flow(s);

•

market share;

•

pre-tax or after-tax earnings per share;

•

pre-tax or after-tax operating earnings per share;

•

expenses;

•

return on investment or equity;

•

environmental, social, governance or similar criteria; or

•

strategic business criteria, consisting of one or more objectives based on meeting specified revenue, market penetration, or geographic business expansion goals, cost targets, goals relating to acquisitions, strategic hires, dispositions or divestitures, or any combination thereof.

The actual Incentive Plan bonus paid to any given participant at the end of a performance period is based upon the extent to which the applicable performance goals for such performance period are achieved, subject to the exercise of negative discretion by the Compensation Committee, and may be paid in cash or in equity or partnership awards. These awards also serve as incentives for future performance and retention.

In addition, from time to time, our Compensation Committee may provide for target or guaranteed bonuses in employment or other agreements in order to attract and retain talented executives, or may grant ad hoc discretionary bonuses when an executive officer is not eligible to participate in the Incentive Plan award opportunities for that performance period or when it otherwise considers such bonuses to be appropriate. Such bonuses may also be paid in cash or in equity or partnership awards.

Incentive Plan Bonus Goals for 2023

In the first quarter of 2023, our Compensation Committee determined that Messrs. Lutnick, Gosin, Rispoli and Merkel, our executive officers for 2023, would be participating executives for 2023 in our Incentive Plan.

For 2023, the Compensation Committee used the same performance criteria for all executive officers and set a bonus for 2023 equal to the maximum value allowed for each individual pursuant to the terms of the Incentive Plan (i.e., $25 million), provided that (i) the Company achieved operating profits or Adjusted Earnings annually for 2023, as calculated on substantially the same basis in the Company’s 2022 year-end earnings release, or (ii) the Company achieved improvement or percentage growth in gross revenue or total transaction volumes for any product for 2023 as compared to 2022 over any of its peer group members or other industry measures, as reported in the Company’s 2023 earnings release, in each case calculated on substantially the same basis as in the Company’s financial results press release for 2022 and compared to the most recently available peer group information or industry measures, in each case subject to any appropriate corporate adjustment to reflect stock splits, reverse stock splits, mergers, spin offs or any other extraordinary corporate transactions in accordance with the Incentive Plan, the Equity Plan and the Participation Plan, as applicable, each of which we refer to as a “Performance Goal.”

The Compensation Committee determined that the payment of any such amount may be in the form of cash, shares of Class A common stock, limited partnership units, or other equity or partnership awards permitted under the Equity Plan, the Participation Plan or otherwise. The Compensation Committee, in its sole and absolute discretion, retained the right to reduce the amount of any Incentive Plan bonus payment based upon any factors it determines, including whether and the extent to which the Performance Goals or any other corporate, as well as individual, performance objectives have been achieved.

Incentive Plan Bonuses Awarded for 2023

On March 7, 2024, having determined that the Performance Goals established in the first quarter of 2023 had been met for 2023, our Compensation Committee made awards to the participating executive officers for 2023 under our Incentive Plan, with some adjustments by the Compensation Committee on March 26, 2024. The awards were granted using a stock price of $10.83 on March 7, 2024, as adjusted by the 0.9231 exchange ratio in effect as of such date, resulting in $10.00, and provided a combination of short- and long-term incentives that align the Company’s financial performance with its executive compensation. In addition to short-term cash compensation awarded to the participating executives, the Committee awarded significant portions of the 2023 Incentive Plan compensation to the Messrs. Lutnick and Merkel’s in the form of long-term partnership units. These units are eligible for partnership distributions, if any, in the current period, which are tied to the Company’s current and future earnings and may rise and fall with the Company’s results and market conditions in a given period. The partnership unit awards, however, are issued as non-exchangeable and the non-Preferred Unit awards may be made exchangeable into the Company’s Class A common stock at a future time at the Committee’s discretion, thus incentivizing future performance by aligning it with the Company’s stock price. All of such 2023 partnership awards are forfeitable in the event that any such executive was to leave the Company and compete or otherwise violate applicable partnership obligations.

In making its bonus determinations for 2023, our Compensation Committee considered various qualitative and quantitative compensation factors including the Performance Goals, the retentive effect of the payment of appropriate compensation for each executive officer, and the Company’s financial performance as a whole and the performance of various business lines, including as compared to peer data. The impact of any of these measures during 2023 or beyond may materially impact the value of current and previous partnership and equity awards, thus aligning the interests of the executive officers with those of our stockholders. The Compensation Committee also considered the pay practices of the Company’s peer group and other companies, including a compensation survey prepared by, and advice from, the Compensation Advisor. By choosing to pay a portion of Messrs. Lutnick’s and Merkel’s Incentive Plan awards in partnership units the Compensation Committee expects to incentivize those executive officers with respect to future performance and encourage ongoing contributions to management, our results and our existing and future businesses in a similar manner to how Messrs. Gosin and Rispoli are incentivized by the partnership unit and RSU awards, respectively, that they have received under their respective employment agreements. The specific Incentive Plan awards to our executive officers were as follows:

•

Mr. Lutnick’s aggregate bonus of $9,000,000 for 2023 was paid $4,000,000 in current cash compensation and $5,000,000 in a long-term partnership award represented by 500,000 non-exchangeable Newmark Holdings PSUs at $10.00 per unit. The aggregate value of the bonus for Mr. Lutnick remained the same as his bonus with respect to calendar year 2022. In exercising its discretion regarding the amount and form of this award, the Compensation Committee noted Mr. Lutnick’s leadership efforts and strategic guidance and emphasis on positioning the Company for expected future results and the results of various business metrics.

•

Mr. Rispoli’s bonus of $500,000 for 2023 was paid in current cash compensation. The bonus for Mr. Rispoli remained the same as his bonus with respect to calendar year 2022. In exercising its discretion regarding the amount and form of this award, the Compensation Committee noted Mr. Rispoli’s leadership and efforts in 2023 as well as his contribution to the Company’s acquisitions, treasury and other financial matters. In addition to his Incentive Plan award, Mr. Rispoli received a portion of his previously awarded RSU award which vested as provided for in his employment agreement. See “—Employment Agreement Awards” for more information.

•

Mr. Merkel’s aggregate bonus of $1,000,000 for 2023 was paid $500,000 in current cash compensation and $500,000 in a long-term partnership award represented by 25,000 non-exchangeable Newmark Holdings PSUs and 25,000 non-exchangeable Newmark Holdings PPSUs with a determination price of $10.00 per unit. The aggregate value of the bonus for Mr. Merkel remained the same as his bonus with respect to calendar year 2022. In exercising its discretion regarding the amount and form of this award, the Compensation Committee noted Mr. Merkel’s guidance on regulatory and other matters and overall leadership of business, legal and regulatory matters during the year.

•

Mr. Gosin received a $1,500,000 cash bonus award for 2023 pursuant to the terms of his employment agreement, as well as a discretionary $5,000,000 annual cash bonus, as provided for in his employment agreement, in lieu of an Incentive Plan Award for 2023. See “—Employment Agreement Awards” and “—2023 Gosin Discretionary Bonus Award” for more information.

Incentive Plan Bonus Goals for 2024

In March 2024, the Compensation Committee determined that Messrs. Lutnick, Gosin, Merkel and Rispoli, our current executive officers, would be participating executives for 2024 in the Incentive Plan. For 2024, the Committee established performance criteria for all executive officers and set a bonus for 2024 equal to the maximum value allowed for each individual pursuant to the terms of the Incentive Plan (i.e., $25 million), provided that (i) the Company achieves operating profits or Adjusted Earnings annually for 2024, as calculated on substantially the same basis as in the Company’s earnings release for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023, (ii) the Company achieves improvement or percentage growth in gross revenue or total or net transaction volumes for any product for 2024 as compared to 2023 over any of its peer group members or other industry measures, as reported in the Company’s earnings release for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, in each case calculated on substantially the same basis as in the Company’s 2023 earnings release and compared to the most recently available peer group information or industry measures, (iii) the Company increases its market penetration for any product or business into any new market or geography in 2024 as compared to 2023, (iv) the Company achieves the successful execution in 2024 of any material, significant, accretive, or strategic acquisition, entry into any joint venture, or disposition of any business or asset, (v) the Company achieves in 2024 the strategic hire or retention of key personnel in competitive market conditions, or (vi) the Company achieves in 2024 other strategic or significant performance as recognized by the Compensation Committee in its sole discretion (collectively, the “2024 Performance Goals”).

The 2024 Performance Goals, in each case, are expected to be reviewed by the Compensation Committee with no particular weighting toward any specific Performance Goal or other factor and are subject to any appropriate corporate adjustment to reflect stock splits, reverse stock splits, mergers, spin offs or any other extraordinary corporate transactions. As each of the Company’s executive officers also provides services to certain of our operating partnerships and subsidiaries, potential bonuses for 2024 are also on behalf of all such operating partnerships and subsidiaries, as may be applicable.

The Compensation Committee determined that the payment of any such amount may be in the form of cash, shares of Class A common stock, limited partnership units or other equity or partnership awards permitted under the Equity Plan, the Participation Plan or otherwise. To the extent determined to reflect the portion of an executive officer’s compensation related to services performed for a particular subsidiary, entity or affiliate as noted above, the cost of compensation awarded under any of the Newmark Compensation Plans shall be borne by such operating partnership or entity. The Committee, in its sole and absolute discretion, retains the right to reduce the amount of any Incentive Plan bonus payment based upon any factors it determines, including whether and the extent to which the 2024 Performance Goals or any other corporate, as well as individual, performance objectives have been achieved. The Committee further retains discretion to authorize bonuses and other awards to the participating executives regardless of whether or not such bonuses and awards are tax deductible under tax law in effect at the time of such bonuses and awards.

Employment Agreement Awards

2023 Employment Agreement Awards

Mr. Gosin received a $1,500,000 cash bonus award for 2023 pursuant to the terms of, as well as a discretionary $5,000,000 annual cash bonus, as provided by, his employment agreement. Messrs. Gosin and Rispoli’s respective employment agreements provided for awards issued at the signing of the employment agreements but attributed by the Compensation Committee to compensation for fiscal years through 2025 and 2026 respectively, but also allow the Compensation Committee to grant additional discretionary annual bonuses, including under the Incentive Plan.

Pursuant to the employment agreement that Mr. Gosin executed on February 10, 2023 (the “Gosin Employment Agreement”), Mr. Gosin’s 2023 bonus of $1,500,000 was paid in current cash compensation. Also pursuant to the Gosin Employment Agreement, Mr. Gosin received 4,581,902 non-exchangeable Newmark Holdings NPSUs on February 10, 2023, issued at $8.73 per unit (which was the closing price of Newmark’s Class A common stock on February 10, 2023), of which 1,145,475 non-exchangeable NPSUs, or $10,000,000 at $8.73 per unit, was attributed by the Compensation Committee to compensation for each of fiscal years 2022, 2023, 2024 and 2025. See “Employment Agreements—Gosin Employment Agreement” below for more information on the schedule and criteria for these non-exchangeable NPSUs to convert into non-exchangeable PSUs and receive exchangeability.

2022 Employment Agreement Awards

Pursuant to Mr. Rispoli’s employment agreement, dated September 29, 2022 (the “Rispoli Employment Agreement”), on October 1, 2022, Mr. Rispoli received an aggregate of 750,000 RSUs, which will vest over a seven-year schedule. Of these RSUs, the Compensation Committee attributed 100,000 RSUs to the signing of the Rispoli Employment Agreement, and 150,000 RSUs to compensation for each of fiscal years 2022, 2023, 2024, and 2025, and 50,000 RSUs to compensation for fiscal year 2026. See “Employment Agreements—Rispoli Employment Agreement” for more information on the vesting schedule of these RSUs.

2023 Gosin Discretionary Bonus Award

In addition to the annual cash bonus of $1,500,000 that Mr. Gosin received pursuant to the terms of the Gosin Employment Agreement for 2023, Mr. Gosin received a $5,000,000 discretionary cash bonus with respect to calendar year 2023 as approved by the Compensation Committee on December 12, 2023. In making this discretionary award, the Compensation Committee noted Mr. Gosin’s importance to the Company and extraordinary performance during the year. See “Employment Agreements—Gosin Employment Agreement” for more information.

Transactions with Executive Officers and Directors

From time to time, the Compensation Committee generally approves monetization of previously issued and outstanding units or the acceleration of the vesting of RSUs or other awards or other repurchase or monetization transactions in order to provide liquidity to the executives, taking into consideration the retentive impact of the remaining awards held by the executives.

Vesting, Replacement and Exchange Right Grants in 2023

Messrs. Lutnick and Merkel received no new standalone monetization with respect to 2023. See below under “Standing Policy for Mr. Lutnick” for a description of the exchange rights and/or other monetization rights granted to him with respect to 2023.

On March 30, 2023, (a) 203,186 of Mr. Gosin’s non-exchangeable Newmark Holdings PSUs were redeemed and an aggregate of 189,024 shares of Class A common stock of Newmark were issued, as adjusted by the then applicable exchange ratio of 0.9303, and (b) $3,125,001 associated with Mr. Gosin’s non-exchangeable Newmark Holdings PPSUs was redeemed and used for tax purposes.

On April 1, 2023, 1,145,494 of Mr. Gosin’s Newmark Holdings NPSUs were converted into 1,237,644 Newmark Holdings PSUs as adjusted by the then applicable exchange ratio of 0.9252 pursuant to the Gosin Employment Agreement. On December 31, 2023, Mr. Gosin received exchange rights on 1/7^th of the 1,237,644 Newmark Holdings PSUs converted on April 1, 2023, resulting in 176,804 exchangeable Newmark Holdings PSUs.

On December 31, 2023, 1,145,494 of Mr. Gosin’s Newmark Holdings NPSUs were converted into 1,240,901 Newmark Holdings PSUs as adjusted by the then applicable exchange ratio of 0.9231 pursuant to the Gosin Employment Agreement.

On October 1, 2023, Mr. Rispoli received exchangeability on 6,563 PSUs and 2,194 PPSUs, in accordance with the previously approved monetization schedule in connection with the signing of the Rispoli Employment Agreement, and 14,290 of Mr. Rispoli’s RSUs vested pursuant to the vesting schedule of the RSUs granted under the Rispoli Employment Agreement. For more detail regarding the monetization schedule for Mr. Rispoli’s PSUs and PPSUs entered into in connection with the signing of the Rispoli Employment Agreement, see “—Replacement and Exchange Right Grants in 2022.”

Replacement and Exchange Right Grants in 2022

Messrs. Lutnick, Gosin and Merkel received no standalone monetization with respect to 2022. See below under “Standing Policy for Mr. Lutnick” for a description of the exchange rights and/or other monetization rights granted to him with respect to 2022. In connection with signing the Rispoli Employment Agreement on September 29, 2022, Mr. Rispoli received immediate exchangeability on 25% of his then currently held 88,079 non-exchangeable PSUs and 87,049 non-exchangeable PPSUs (such 25% totaled 23,560 PPSUs with a value of $283,527 and 20,221 PSUs), and will receive monetization rights on another 25% of such units held as of September 29, 2022, split pro-rata into one-fifth (1/5) increments, on or as soon as practicable after October 1 of each of 2023-2027, to the extent such units had not previously been given monetization rights, with each monetization contingent upon Mr. Rispoli performing substantial services exclusively for us or any affiliate, remaining a partner in Newmark Holdings, and complying with the terms of the Rispoli Employment Agreement and any of his obligations to Newmark Holdings, us or any affiliate through such dates.

Replacement and Exchange Right Grants in 2021

Mr. Lutnick

Mr. Lutnick received no standalone monetization with respect to 2021. See below under “Standing Policy for Mr. Lutnick” for a description of the exchange rights and/or other monetization rights granted to him with respect to 2021, and under “Replacement and Exchange Right Grants Related to the 2021 Equity Event” for a description of the exchange rights and/or other monetization rights granted to him with respect to this event.

Mr. Gosin

On March 16, 2021, the Compensation Committee granted Mr. Gosin exchange rights into shares of Class A common stock with respect to 526,828 previously awarded non-exchangeable Newmark Holdings PSUs and 30,871 non-exchangeable Newmark Holdings acquisition-related PSUs (“APSUs”) held by Mr. Gosin (which, based on the closing price of the Class A common stock of $11.09 per share on such date and using the then applicable exchange ratio of 0.9365, had a value of $5,792,139 in the aggregate). In addition, on March 16, 2021, the Compensation Committee approved removing the sale restrictions on Mr. Gosin’s remaining 178,232 restricted shares of Class A common stock in BGC (which were originally issued in 2013) and associated 82,680 remaining restricted shares of Newmark Class A common stock (issued as a result of the Spin-Off in November 2018).

On September 21, 2021, 2,114,546 non-exchangeable BGC Holdings PSUs held by Mr. Gosin were redeemed, and an aggregate of 1,176,745 net shares of Class A common stock of BGC Partners were issued at $4.86 (which was the closing price of BGC Partners Class A common stock on September 21, 2021). Effective as of April 14, 2022, Mr. Gosin’s 905,371 BGC Holdings HDUs were redeemed for a cash payment of $3,521,893 based upon a price of $3.89 per unit, which was the closing price of BGC Partners’ Class A common stock on April 14, 2022.

On December 21, 2021, the Compensation Committee approved: (i) the redemption of all of Mr. Gosin’s remaining 838,996 non-exchangeable Newmark PPSUs for $8,339,980 in cash and (ii) compensation of approximately $7,357,329 by way of the Company causing 478,328 of Mr. Gosin’s non-exchangeable Newmark PSUs to be redeemed for zero and issuing 446,711 shares of our Class A common stock, based upon the closing price on our Class A common stock the date the Committee approved the transaction (which was $16.47) and the then applicable exchange ratio of 0.9339.

See below under “Replacement and Exchange Right Grants Related to the 2021 Equity Event” for a description of the exchange rights and/or other monetization rights granted to him with respect to this event.

Mr. Merkel

On March 16, 2021, the Company redeemed 30,926 non-exchangeable Newmark Holdings PSUs held by Mr. Merkel for zero and in connection therewith issued 28,962 shares of our Class A common stock. On the same day, the Company repurchased these shares from Mr. Merkel at the closing price of our Class A common stock of $11.09 per share under our stock buyback program. The total payment delivered to Mr. Merkel was $321,189, less applicable taxes and withholdings.

On April 27, 2021, (a) 73,387 non-exchangeable Newmark Holdings PSUs held by Mr. Merkel were redeemed for zero and 68,727 shares of Class A common stock of Newmark, as adjusted by the then applicable exchange ratio of 0.9365, were issued to Mr. Merkel and repurchased by the Company for $10.67 per unit (the April 27, 2021 closing price of our Class A common stock), and (b) $82,560.50 associated with Mr. Merkel’s non-exchangeable Newmark Holdings PPSUs was redeemed and used for tax purposes. The total payment delivered to Mr. Merkel was $815,878, less applicable taxes and withholdings.

On June 28, 2021, (a) 51,124.28 non-exchangeable Newmark Holdings PSUs held by Mr. Merkel were redeemed and an aggregate of 48,072 shares of Class A common stock of Newmark were issued, as adjusted by the then applicable exchange ratio of 0.9403, and (b) $329,155 associated with Mr. Merkel’s non-exchangeable Newmark Holdings PPSUs was redeemed and used for tax purposes.

Mr. Rispoli

On March 16, 2021, the Compensation Committee granted Mr. Rispoli (i) exchange rights into shares of Class A common stock with respect to 6,043 previously awarded non-exchangeable Newmark Holdings PSUs held by Mr. Rispoli (which, based on the closing price of the Class A common stock of $11.09 per share on such date and using the then-applicable exchange ratio of 0.9365, had a value of $62,758); and (ii) exchange rights into cash with respect to 4,907 previously awarded non-exchangeable Newmark Holdings PPSUs held by Mr. Rispoli (which had an average determination price of $15.57 per unit, for a total of $76,407 in the aggregate to be paid for taxes when (i) is exchanged).

2019 Newmark NPSU Awards

In connection with the 2018 year-end compensation cycle, the Compensation Committee previously approved the issuance of 500,000 Newmark Holdings NPSUs and 500,000 Newmark Holdings NPPSUs with a determination price of $10.05 per unit to Mr. Lutnick, effective April 1, 2019. The terms of those awards provided that on or about each April 1 of 2020, 2021, 2022, and 2023, Newmark Holdings shall grant an aggregate award of 125,000 non-exchangeable Newmark Holdings PSUs and 125,000 non-exchangeable PPSUs in replacement of 125,000 Newmark Holdings NPSUs and 125,000 Newmark Holdings NPPSUs (which, upon replacement, shall be cancelled and no longer exist), provided that (i) Newmark, inclusive of its affiliates thereof, earns, in aggregate, at least $5 million in gross revenues in the calendar quarter in which the applicable award of Newmark Holdings PSUs or PPSUs is to be granted and (ii) except in the event of death prior to the applicable grant date, Mr. Lutnick remains an employee of Newmark or an affiliate thereof and has at all times remained in compliance with the Newmark Holdings partnership agreement. Mr. Lutnick exercised his rights on December 21, 2021, pursuant to the standing policy for Mr. Lutnick to redeem his remaining 250,000 Newmark Holdings NPPSUs issued effective April 1, 2019. Pursuant to this grant, on April 1, 2023, the Company granted Mr. Lutnick an aggregate award of 125,000 non-exchangeable PSUs in replacement of the remaining 125,000 NPSUs.

Replacement and Exchange Right Grants Related to the 2021 Equity Event

On June 28, 2021, in connection with our accelerated receipt of common shares of Nasdaq, Inc. (“Nasdaq Shares”) (see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Nasdaq Monetization Transaction” in the Original Form 10-K), the Compensation Committee approved a plan to expedite the tax deductible exchange and redemption of a substantial number of limited partnership units held by partners of the Company (the “2021 Equity Event”). The 2021 Equity Event also accelerated certain compensation expenses, resulting in $428.6 million of compensation charges. These partnership units were settled using a $12.50 share price. In July 2021, the Compensation Committee approved increasing the price to $13.01 to settle certain units.

Some of the key components of the approved plan were as follows:

•

8.3 million and 8.0 million compensatory limited partnership units, respectively, of Newmark Holdings and BGC Holdings held by Newmark partners who are employees were redeemed or exchanged.

•

23.2 million and 17.4 million compensatory limited partnership units, respectively, of Newmark Holdings and BGC Holdings held by the Newmark Holdings’ partners who are independent contractors were redeemed or exchanged. Newmark also accelerated the payment of related withholding taxes to them with respect to their Newmark Holdings units. Independent contractors received one BGC Partners Class A common share for each redeemed non-preferred BGC Holdings unit or cash and are responsible for paying any related withholding taxes.

•

Partners with non-exchangeable non-preferred compensatory units exchanged or redeemed in connection with the 2021 Equity Event generally received restricted Class A common shares of Newmark and/or BGC to the extent tax deductible. A portion of the BGC Partners Class A common shares received by independent contractors were unrestricted to facilitate their payment of withholding taxes.

•

The issuance of Newmark Class A common stock related to the 2021 Equity Event reflected the June 28, 2021 exchange ratio of 0.9403.

•

Newmark Holdings and BGC Holdings limited partnership interests with rights to convert into HDUs for cash were also redeemed in connection with the 2021 Equity Event.

The specific transactions approved by the Compensation Committee, in connection with the 2021 Equity Event, with respect to Newmark’s executive officers are set forth below. All of the transactions included in the 2021 Equity Event with respect to Messrs. Lutnick, Gosin and Rispoli, were based on (i) the price for Newmark Class A common stock of $12.50 per share, as approved by the Compensation Committee; (ii) the price of BGC Partners Class A common stock of $5.86; and (iii) the price of Nasdaq common stock of $177.11.

Mr. Lutnick

On June 28, 2021, in connection with the 2021 Equity Event, the Compensation Committee approved the following for Mr. Lutnick:

(i)

the exchange of 279,725 exchangeable Newmark Holdings PSUs into 263,025 shares of Class A common stock of Newmark based on the then applicable exchange ratio of 0.9403; and $1,465,874 associated with Mr. Lutnick’s non-exchangeable 193,530 Newmark Holdings PPSUs was redeemed and used for tax purposes;

(ii)

the conversion of 552,482.62 non-exchangeable Newmark Holdings PSUs with the right to exchange PSUs into HDUs (“H-Rights”) into 552,482.62 non-exchangeable Newmark Holdings HDUs and redemption of such HDUs for their capital account of $7,017,000, paid in the form of Nasdaq Shares issued at $177.11 per share (which was the Nasdaq, Inc. closing price as of June 28, 2021); and $7,983,000 associated with Mr. Lutnick’s non-exchangeable Newmark Holdings PPSUs with H-Rights were redeemed and used for tax purposes;

(iii)

the exchange of 520,380 exchangeable BGC Holdings PSUs into 520,380 shares of Class A common stock of BGC Partners, and $1,525,705 associated with Mr. Lutnick’s exchangeable BGC Holdings PPSUs was redeemed and used for tax purposes;

(iv)

the redemption of 88,636 non-exchangeable BGC Holdings PSUs pursuant to Mr. Lutnick’s rights under his existing standing policy, and the issuance of 88,636 shares of Class A common stock of BGC Partners;

(v)

the conversion of 1,131,774 non-exchangeable BGC Holdings PSUs with H-Rights into 1,131,774 non-exchangeable BGC Holdings HDUs and $7,983,000 associated with Mr. Lutnick’s BGC Holdings PPSUs with H-Rights was redeemed and used for tax purposes in connection with the exercise of the exercise of the BGC Holdings HDUs; and

(vi)

the issuance of 29,059 shares of Class A common stock of Newmark.

In accordance with Mr. Lutnick’s right under his existing standing policy, and in connection with the 2021 Equity Event, upon the approval of the Compensation Committee: (i) 2,909,819 non-exchangeable Newmark Holdings PSUs, pursuant to Mr. Lutnick’s rights under his existing standing policy, were redeemed and 2,736,103 shares of Class A common stock of Newmark, based upon the then applicable exchange ratio of 0.9403, were granted to Mr. Lutnick; and (ii) $8,798,546 associated with Mr. Lutnick’s rights under his existing standing policy was redeemed and used for tax purposes.

Mr. Gosin

The Compensation Committee approved the following for Mr. Gosin:

(i)

the exchange of 1,531,061.84 exchangeable Newmark Holdings units (comprised of 1,438,597.37 exchangeable Newmark Holdings PSUs and 92,464.47 exchangeable Newmark Holdings APSUs) into 1,439,658 shares of Class A common stock of Newmark based upon the then applicable exchange ratio of 0.9403; and $834,508 associated with Mr. Gosin’s exchangeable Newmark Holdings PPSUs was redeemed and used for tax purposes;

(ii)

the conversion of 443,871.60 non-exchangeable Newmark Holdings PSUs with H-Rights into 443,871.60 non-exchangeable Newmark Holdings HDUs, and redemption of such HDUs, less any taxes and withholdings in excess of $5,362,452, paid in the form of Nasdaq Shares issued at $177.11 per share (which was the Nasdaq, Inc. closing price as of June 28, 2021); and $5,362,452 in connection with Mr. Gosin’s Newmark Holdings PPSUs with H-Rights was redeemed and used for tax purposes;

(iii)

the exchange of 3,348,706 exchangeable BGC Holdings units (comprised of 3,147,085 exchangeable BGC Holdings PSUs and 201,621 exchangeable BGC Holdings APSUs) into 3,348,706 shares of Class A common stock of BGC Partners; and $298,273 associated with Mr. Gosin’s exchangeable BGC Holdings PPSUs was redeemed and used for tax purposes;

(iv)

the conversion of 1,592,016 non-exchangeable BGC Holdings PSUs with H-Rights into 1,592,016 non-exchangeable BGC Holdings HDUs, and $1,129,499 associated with Mr. Gosin non-exchangeable BGC Holdings PPSUs was redeemed and used for tax purposes; and

(v)

the issuance of 12,500 shares of Class A common stock of Newmark.

Mr. Rispoli

On June 28, 2021, the Compensation Committee approved the following for Mr. Rispoli:

(i)

the exchange of 23,124 exchangeable Newmark Holdings PSUs into 21,744 shares of Class A common stock of Newmark based on the then applicable exchange ratio of 0.9403 and $208,407 associated with Mr. Rispoli’s exchangeable Newmark Holdings PPSUs was redeemed and used for tax purposes;

(ii)

6,000 non-exchangeable Newmark Holdings PSUs were redeemed and an aggregate of 5,642 restricted shares of Newmark were issued to Mr. Rispoli based upon the then applicable exchange ratio of 0.9403, and $52,309 associated with Mr. Rispoli’s non-exchangeable Newmark Holdings PPSUs was redeemed and used for tax purposes;

(iii)

the conversion of 5,846.07 non-exchangeable Newmark Holdings PSUs with H-Rights into 5,846 non-exchangeable Newmark Holdings HDUs and the redemption of such HDUs, less any taxes and withholdings in excess of $60,750, paid in the form of Nasdaq Shares issued at $177.11 per share (which was the Nasdaq, Inc. closing price as of June 28, 2021); and $60,750 associated with Mr. Rispoli’s PPSUs with H-Rights was redeemed and used for tax purposes;

(iv)

the exchange of 36,985 exchangeable BGC Holdings PSUs into 36,985 shares of Class A common stock of BGC Partners, and $134,573 associated with Mr. Rispoli’s exchangeable BGC Holdings PPSUs was redeemed and used for tax purposes; and

(v)

the issuance of 383 shares of Class A common stock of Newmark.

Gosin Commissions

Mr. Gosin did not receive any commissions in 2021. Mr. Gosin received commissions in 2022 in the amount of $646 payable in connection with brokerage transactions paid in the form of $65 in cash and $581 in non-exchangeable 73 Newmark Holdings NPSUs. Mr. Gosin did not receive commissions in 2023.

2021 Lutnick Award

Introduction

On December 27, 2021, the Compensation Committee approved a one-time bonus award to Mr. Lutnick (the “Award”), which was evidenced by the execution and delivery of a Retention Bonus Agreement dated December 28, 2021 (the “Effective Date”) and described below (the “Award Agreement”), in consideration of his success in managing certain aspects of the Company’s performance as its principal executive officer and Chairman. The Award rewarded Mr. Lutnick for his efforts in delivering superior financial results for the Company and its stockholders, including in particular his success in creating substantial value for the Company and its stockholders in connection with creating, structuring, hedging and monetizing the forward share contract to receive over time Nasdaq Shares (the “Nasdaq Derivative”) held by the Company and the strong balance sheet and significant amount of income created from the Nasdaq Derivative. A principal reason for structuring the Award with a substantial portion to be paid out over three years was also to further incentivize Mr. Lutnick to continue to serve as both the Company’s principal executive officer and its Chairman for the benefit of the Company’s stockholders.

The Award Agreement provides for an aggregate cash payment of $50 million, payable as follows: $20 million within three days of the Effective Date (which payment was made on December 31, 2021), and $10 million within 30 days following vesting on each of the first, second and third anniversaries of the Effective Date. Any entitlement to future amounts not vested will be forfeited immediately if, prior to the applicable anniversary date, Mr. Lutnick ceases to serve as both the Company’s Chairman and its principal executive officer, unless Mr. Lutnick ceasing to serve in either such capacity occurs pursuant to a “Vesting Termination,” as that term is defined in the Award Agreement. Mr. Lutnick has purchased Newmark Class A common stock with the after-tax proceeds of the initial tranche of the Award. The Award Agreement describes a “Vesting Termination” as (i) a termination of Mr. Lutnick’s employment by the Company without “Cause” (as that term is defined in the Award Agreement) or (ii) an involuntary removal of the Executive from the position of Chairman of the Board on or after the occurrence of a Change in Control (as that term is defined in the Change of Control Agreement dated as of December 13, 2017 by and between Mr. Lutnick and the Company (the “Change of Control Agreement”)). In the event that Mr. Lutnick ceases to serve as both the Company’s Chairman and its principal executive officer pursuant to a Vesting Termination, any amounts not vested will immediately become fully vested. The Award Agreement provides that Mr. Lutnick ceasing to serve as the Company’s Chairman and principal executive officer pursuant to his death or disability does not constitute a Vesting Termination. The provisions of the Change of Control Agreement do not apply to the Award. A copy of the Award Agreement was attached as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 29, 2021. See “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence—Derivative Suits” for a discussion of certain challenges to the Award.

The Compensation Committee’s Consideration of the Award and Award Agreement

The Award and the Award Agreement were approved by the Compensation Committee on December 27, 2021 after careful consideration of Mr. Lutnick’s contributions to the Company’s financial growth and success, and Mr. Lutnick’s specific contributions to that success as the Company’s principal executive officer. The terms were determined and agreed by the Committee following an extensive process that included numerous meetings of the Committee dedicated to discussing the Award through the last four months of 2021, during which the Committee evaluated reports and analyses prepared by Aon Human Capital Solutions (“Aon”). In order to assist it with its deliberations, the Committee retained Aon to be its independent compensation consultant and Mayer Brown LLP to be its independent counsel, in each case for the sole purpose of assisting the Committee in its consideration of the Award. The Committee evaluated and discussed reports and analyses prepared by Aon throughout its deliberations. Mr. Lutnick did not participate in any meetings of the Committee where the Award was discussed.

The Nasdaq Share Transactions

Among the principal factors considered by the Compensation Committee in deciding to grant Mr. Lutnick the Award was Mr. Lutnick’s critical role in the value created for Newmark and its stockholders in connection with the Nasdaq Derivative transactions described in the Company’s periodic reports, including in Item 7 of the Original Form 10-K under the heading “Nasdaq Monetization Transactions.” As detailed in that description of the Nasdaq Derivative, on September 28, 2017, the Company received the remaining rights to receive Nasdaq Shares that were first received by BGC Partners in June 2013, which at that time consisted of a total of 14,883,705 shares of Nasdaq, Inc., to be paid ratably over 15 years (subject to an earn-out, acceleration and present value discount as described in detail in the above-referenced description) (the “Nasdaq Earn-out”), meaning that in 2017, the Company received the rights to receive approximately 10,900,000 shares of Nasdaq, Inc. over the remaining 11 years of the contract provided the Nasdaq Earn-out terms were achieved. At that time, the Company considered the sale of the Nasdaq Derivative as recommended by certain of the Company’s advisors with proceeds in the range of $375-$425 million. Mr. Lutnick chose an alternative route for the Company. In choosing to purchase the long-dated Nasdaq Derivative from a highly rated bank and borrow the potential proceeds of the puts at the bank’s comparatively low cost of funds, Newmark was able to use a portion of the Nasdaq Derivative to repay debt, including debt related to the Berkeley Point Financial (“Berkeley Point”) acquisition without relinquishing the upside of the Nasdaq Earn-out, and while protecting the downside of a portion of the Nasdaq Derivative.

In 2021, the then-remaining tranches of Nasdaq Shares receivable by the Company pursuant to the Nasdaq Derivative were accelerated on a discounted basis under the terms of the Nasdaq Earn-out, resulting in the Company receiving approximately 6.2 million Nasdaq Shares worth approximately $1.093 billion as the final installment of the Nasdaq Earn-out. The total proceeds received by the Company were significantly in excess of the initial recommendation of value for the Nasdaq Derivative and totaled approximately $1.5 billion, after the cost of hedging and other transaction-related expenses.

In its consideration of the Award, the Compensation Committee carefully reviewed the history of the Company’s transactions in the Nasdaq Shares for the purpose of quantifying the benefit to the Company and its stockholders of the transactions in the Nasdaq Shares described above that were undertaken by Mr. Lutnick for the benefit of the Company and its stockholders, as distinguished from the fact of the Company having received rights to receive the Nasdaq Shares annually over time and the value attributed to the Nasdaq Derivative by the Company’s advisors at the time of the Company’s initial public offering. The Committee determined that Mr. Lutnick’s acumen in personally directing the Company’s transactions in the Nasdaq Shares, including those described above and in Item 7 of the Original Form 10-K under the heading “Nasdaq Monetization Transactions,” played a significant role in maximizing the value of the Nasdaq Shares for the period from 2018 through 2021.

The Compensation Committee determined that the Company’s holdings of the Nasdaq Shares, including the transactions involving such shares as directed by Mr. Lutnick, have played a very significant role in the Company’s financial success, creating a strong balance sheet, producing considerable income and positioning the Company for strategic success. The Committee determined that as a direct result, the Company has:

•

been able to reduce its reliance on indebtedness to execute its strategic growth plan;

•

been able to continue to grow through the hiring of important new employees, and been able to better retain its existing employees, even as the COVID-19 pandemic has caused significant disruption in the commercial real estate industry;

•

maintained a strong credit rating during a period of significant disruption in the commercial real estate industry;

•

acquired and integrated the Berkeley Point Financial business in a manner that would have been much more difficult without its strong financial base, as well as acquired numerous other real estate services companies; and

•

generally continued to thrive throughout the course of the COVID-19 pandemic despite the extremely challenged market conditions created by the pandemic.

The Compensation Committee further believes that the Nasdaq Shares transactions directed by Mr. Lutnick have been a substantial part of positioning the Company for continued future success and will enable it to continue to execute its business plan at a level that would not be achievable in the absence of Mr. Lutnick’s strategic direction concerning its holdings of, and transactions in, the Nasdaq Shares.

The Retention of Mr. Lutnick as the Company’s Principal Executive Officer

The Compensation Committee believes that the Company and its stockholders benefit from having had, and continuing to have, a strong executive management team. The Committee’s deliberations regarding the Award included extensive discussions regarding the near-term and medium-term future of the executive management team, and determined that it was in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders that the Award be structured in order to incentivize Mr. Lutnick to remain a part of the executive management team and as the Company’s principal executive officer in addition to serving as the Company’s Chairman. As a result, the Committee determined that any one-time bonus for Mr. Lutnick would be structured with a considerable retentive element that was dependent on Mr. Lutnick continuing to serve as both the Company’s principal executive officer and its Chairman in order for future installments of the

SEC Form 10-K/A filed by Newmark Group Inc. (Amendment)