UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
For the fiscal year ended December 31 , 2022
OR
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 001-819881
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
| (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | |||||||
(Address, including zip code, of principal executive offices)
(800 ) 261-0240
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
| Title of each class | Trading Symbol(s) | Name of each exchange on which is registered | ||||||
The | ||||||||
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☐ No ☒
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐ No ☒
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
☒ | Accelerated filer | ☐ | |||||||||
Non-accelerated filer | ☐ | Smaller reporting company | |||||||||
Emerging growth company | |||||||||||
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management's assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☒
If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that require a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant's executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b). ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒.
The aggregate market value of common shares held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second quarter, June 30, 2022, was approximately $571 million.
There were 132,424,929 shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share, issued and outstanding as of February 17, 2023.
Paya Holdings Inc.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Annual Report on FORM 10-K
December 31, 2022
Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This Annual Report on Form 10-K includes “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). These forward-looking statements relate to expectations regarding the Merger and our future financial performance or business strategies. These forward-looking statements are based on information available as of the date of this Form 10-K and our management's current expectations, forecasts and assumptions, and involve a number of judgments, risks and uncertainties, including:
•uncertainties associated with the proposed Merger, including the failure to complete the Merger in a timely manner or at all, restrictions on business conduct and lawsuits related to the proposed Merger;
•the occurrence of any event, change or other circumstances that could give rise to the termination of the Merger Agreement;
•the inability to complete the proposed Merger due to the failure to satisfy conditions precedent, including satisfaction of the minimum tender condition;
•risks related to disruption of management’s attention from our ongoing business operations due to the proposed Merger;
•the effect of the announcement of the proposed Merger on our relationships with our customers, operating results and business generally;
•the costs of the proposed Merger if the proposed Merger is not consummated;
•continued economic uncertainty, an economic slowdown or a recession;
•our ability to effectively manage our credit risk and collect on our accounts receivable;
•the ongoing effects of the COVID-19 pandemic as well as natural disasters and other business disruptions including other outbreaks of epidemic or pandemic disease;
•our ability to compete against competitors in an increasingly competitive industry;
•changes in demand within a number of key industry end-markets and geographic regions;
•failure to retain key personnel, especially in light of the proposed Merger;
•our future operating results fluctuating, failing to match performance or to meet expectations;
•our obligations under various laws and regulations;
•the effect of litigation, judgments, orders or regulatory proceedings on our business, especially instituted against us or our directors challenging the proposed Merger;
•our ability to successfully acquire and integrate new operations;
•our ability to meet Environmental, Social, and Governance policies;
•global or local political movements;
•our ability to fulfill our public company obligations;
•our ability to maintain the quality of the products and services we offer;
•any failure of our management information systems;
•our ability to meet our debt service requirements and obligations;
3
•changes in the payment processing market in which Paya competes;
•changes in consumer preferences away from traditional electronic payment mechanisms;
•changes in the vertical markets that Paya targets;
•risks relating to Paya’s relationships within the payment ecosystem;
•risk that Paya may not be able to execute its growth strategies;
•risks relating to data security; and
•changes in accounting policies applicable to Paya.
Forward-looking statements should not be relied upon as representing our views as of any subsequent date. We undertake no obligation to update forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date they were made, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as may be required under applicable securities laws.
4
Part I
Item 1. Business
Unless the context otherwise requires, references to “we”, “us”, “our”, "Paya", "Paya Holdings", or “the Company” refer to Paya Holdings Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries.
Overview
We are a leading independent integrated payments and commerce platform providing card, Automated Clearing House ("ACH"), and check payment processing solutions via software to middle-market businesses in the United States. Our solutions integrate with our customers’ core business software to enable payments acceptance, reconcile invoice detail, and post payment information to their core accounting systems. In this manner, we enable our customers to collect revenue from their consumer ("B2C") and business ("B2B") customers with a seamless experience and high-level of security across payment types. Given the focus on B2B and consumer bill payments integrated into software, as of December 31, 2022, approximately 85% of our payment card volume is card-not-present and on average, our customers accept approximately $500,000 of credit and debit card volume per year.
We concentrate on strategic vertical markets defined by strong secular growth and low penetration of electronic payments that are non-cyclical in nature such as B2B goods & services, healthcare, faith-based & non-profit, government & utilities, and education. Our technology, distribution, and support are tailored to the specific and complex payment needs of customers in these verticals. We have deep expertise of industry-specific considerations and believe this makes us a leading provider of integrated payment solutions in these markets with a sustainable competitive advantage.
In these strategic verticals, we deliver our payment solutions through front-end Customer Relationship Management ("CRM") and back-end accounting independent software vendors (“ISVs”) who sell or refer our integrated payments bundled with their proprietary software solutions to their customers. We enter into contracts with these ISVs where they deliver new customers to us in exchange for a portion of transaction revenue those customers generate. We refer to these ISVs as "partners" and the customers they bring to us as "customers." Our partners choose Paya because of our easy to use and feature rich technology platform, vertical expertise, and commitment to customer service. To our partners, embedding payments in their software increases customer life-time value and generates a new revenue stream through a share of Paya’s payments revenue.
Our payment technology is centered around Paya Connect, a proprietary, API-driven and service-oriented payments platform which integrates with our customers’ front-end CRM and back-end accounting software and acts as a universal gateway which connects to multiple card processors as well as Paya’s proprietary ACH processing platform. Paya Connect also serves as the foundation for modular value-added solutions including digital boarding, flexible funding, e-invoicing, auto-billing and recurring payments, tokenized and secure transactions, and robust customer and partner reporting, which are differentiators in our key end markets. Further, Paya Connect’s architecture allows us to easily add incremental value-added services into our ecosystem through API integration.
We have built industry-leading scale with a highly diverse customer portfolio. As of December 31, 2022, we served approximately 100,000 businesses, representing over $49 billion in card and ACH payment volume for the year ended December 31, 2022. Our customer portfolio is highly diversified with no single customer representing more than 1% of payment revenue for the year ended December 31, 2022. Average transaction size was approximately $300 inclusive of all card and ACH payment transactions in 2022.
We derive most of our revenue from fees paid by our customers which principally include a processing fee that is charged as a percentage of total payment volume, as well as fixed interchange fees and convenience-based fees. In some cases, including card processing in our government and utilities end-market and in ACH and check processing, fees are charged in the form of a fixed fee per transaction. Our revenue is re-occurring in nature because of the consistency of B2B and consumer bill payments, the mission-critical and embedded nature of the solutions we provide, and the high switching costs associated with these solutions due to complex levels of integration. We also
5
benefit from a high degree of operating leverage given the combination of our highly scalable payments platform and low customer acquisition costs resulting from our partner-centric model.
Segments
We have two reportable segments, Integrated Solutions and Payment Services.
Integrated Solutions
Our Integrated Solutions segment represents the delivery of our credit and debit card payment solutions, and to a lesser extent, ACH processing solutions to customers via integrations with software partners across our strategic vertical markets. Our Integrated Solutions partners include vertical focused front-end CRM software providers as well as back-end Enterprise Resource Planning ("ERP") and accounting solutions. Integrated Solutions represented 64.2% of revenue for the year ending December 31, 2022.
Payment Services
The Payment Services segment represents the delivery of card payment processing solutions to our customers through resellers, as well as ACH, check, and gift card processing. Card payment processing solutions in this segment utilize Paya’s core technology infrastructure and do not typically originate through a software integration. ACH, check, and gift card processing may or may not be integrated with third-party software, however, Paya focuses on strategically cross selling these products with new software partners. Payment Services represented 35.8% of revenue for the year ending December 31, 2022.
Business Developments; Merger of Paya with Nuvei Corporation
On January 9, 2023, Paya announced the execution of an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) with Nuvei Corporation, a corporation incorporated pursuant to the laws of Canada (“Parent”), and Pinnacle Merger Sub, Inc., a Delaware corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of Parent (“Purchaser”).
Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, and upon the terms and subject to the conditions thereof, Purchaser agreed to commence a tender offer (the “Offer”), to purchase all of the shares of common stock of the Company issued and outstanding at a price of $9.75 per share (the “Offer Price”), in cash, without interest thereon (but subject to applicable withholding). Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, and upon the terms and subject to the conditions thereof, Paya will merge with and into the Purchaser, with Paya continuing as the surviving corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of Parent (the “Merger”). If the Merger is consummated, the Company’s common stock will be delisted from the Nasdaq Capital Market ("Nasdaq") and the duty to file reports will be suspended under Section 13 and 15(d) of the Exchange Act.
On January 24, 2023, Purchaser commenced the Offer by filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") and mailing to the Company’s stockholders a Tender Offer Statement on Schedule TO. The Company concurrently filed with the SEC and mailed to stockholders a Solicitation/Recommendation Statement on Schedule 14D-9, which recommended that the Company’s stockholders tender their shares to Purchaser pursuant to the Offer. The Offer will initially remain open for a minimum of 20 business days from the date of commencement of the Offer. The Merger Agreement includes customary termination provisions for both the Company and Parent, and provides that, in connection with the termination of the Merger Agreement under specified circumstances, including termination by the Company to accept and enter into an agreement with respect to a Superior Proposal (as defined in the Merger Agreement), the Company will pay Parent a termination fee of approximately $38 million. The parties to the Merger Agreement are also entitled to specifically enforce the terms and provisions of the Merger Agreement.
The Merger Agreement provides, among other things, that upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement, at the effective time of the Merger, each share of the Company’s common stock that is not (a) validly tendered and irrevocably accepted for purchase pursuant to the Offer, (b) held by a stockholder who is entitled to demand appraisal and who has properly and validly exercised appraisal rights in accordance with, and
6
who has complied with, applicable law, or (c) held by Parent, Purchaser, or any other direct or indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Parent, will be thereupon converted into the right to receive cash in an amount equal to the Offer Price, on the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement. The proposed Merger is expected to close during the first quarter of 2023.
Strategic Vertical Markets
We are a leading provider of integrated payment solutions in attractive vertical markets where we have a sustainable competitive advantage. Our technology solutions are tailored to the specific, complex needs of customers in these verticals, and we have deep expertise of industry-specific considerations. Strategic vertical markets include:
B2B Goods & Services
We have a leading presence in the B2B goods and services end market given our beginnings as part of Sage and deep expertise in accounting software integrations. We offer integrations into back-end ERP and accounting solutions, including Sage Intacct, X3, 50, 100, 300, and 500, as well as Acumatica and Intuit Quickbooks. In this vertical, we leverage value-added resellers as distribution, in addition to receiving referrals directly from our software partners. We also integrate with ISVs that focus on sub-verticals such as manufacturing and construction. This end market is characterized by under-penetration of electronic payments and high retention due to the required levels of integration.
Healthcare
Our healthcare portfolio is primarily comprised of ambulatory providers and healthcare practices that we serve through ISV partners. Our differentiated solutions in this end market include flexible funding, pre-authorization, and reporting capabilities, acceptance of health savings account ("HSA") & flexible spending account ("FSA") cards, and multi-layer location management. While our existing customers focus on these sub-verticals, our core capabilities are broadly applicable to software providers focused on specialty medicine. The healthcare end market is characterized by underlying secular growth and complex payment functionality needs that serve as a barrier to entry for competitors.
Faith-based, Education & Non-profit
Our faith-based and non-profit customers, which utilize our payments technology for donation collection and fundraising, have unique feature requirements including recurring billing, event management, and integrated e-Commerce. In this end market, we utilize both ISV partner and direct distribution models. Our direct distribution model was acquired as part of our acquisition of Stewardship, which delivers payment processing solutions via a proprietary donation management software platform. The non-profit market is characterized by late adoption of electronic payments, with adoption accelerating in recent years due to advances in payment technology.
The education vertical represents a growth area for us, with increasingly strong relationships with education-specific ISVs that deliver tuition collection tools, cafeteria and school store management software, and other administrative solutions. Education is generally non-cyclical and benefits from attractive levels of electronic payment adoption and the need for flexible settlement solutions.
Government & Utilities
Like the faith-based and non-profit vertical, our government and utilities portfolio consists of both ISV partner and direct distribution models. Our direct distribution model was developed through our acquisition of First Billing Services and further enhanced through our acquisition of The Payment Group, LLC ("TPG" or "The Payment Group"), which provides e-billing and payment portal software. Since acquisition, we have also found success selling First Billing’s software through partnerships in this vertical. Electronic payment methods in this end market are significantly underpenetrated, providing attractive underlying customer growth and high retention, while also benefiting from low cyclicality given the nature of these services. TPG provides municipalities and
7
courts with a completely automated payment system for receiving payments online and processing them instantly. New competitor entry into this vertical is challenging given the importance of track-record and reference clients servicing government and municipal entities effectively.
Paya End Market Revenue Composition by Vertical as of December 31, 2022:
(1) Includes both card and ACH.
Partner-centric Distribution
Paya’s overall strategy is built with our partner-centric distribution model in mind, including our technology roadmap, customer service capabilities, and sales focus. This results in an attractive integrated experience of software and payments for the customers of our partners. Our approach allows us to flexibly and scalably address multiple attractive verticals at once and invest in technology rather than a “feet on the street” direct salesforce.
To understand our strategy requires a better understanding of our partners. We serve independent software vendors ranging from front-end CRM applications to back-end accounting solutions. These partners are typically differentiated in their vertical markets and serve a sophisticated, middle-market business customer, who in turn uses the software to sell their goods and services B2B or B2C. Paya’s core function is allowing these businesses to accept payments from their customers in a way that improves customer experience and automates the invoice to payment reconciliation.
The first pillar of our sales strategy is to sign new partnerships in our core markets. Our go-to-market organization utilizes a solutions-oriented approach that focuses on understanding our software partners’ payments needs and helping them craft solutions that differentiate themselves in a specific marketplace. We believe that successfully embedding payments in our partners' software greatly enhances their customer retention and provides them a substantial new revenue stream in excess of the typical monthly subscription.
In addition to signing new partnerships, we also focus on increasing the penetration of our offerings among the installed base of our existing partners. We do this effectively by selling our Paya Connect functionality to an installed base that may not be fully utilizing integrated payment capabilities.
We go to market via two primary partner channels: ISVs and value-added resellers. While we have existing independent sales organizations ("ISO") partners that focus primarily on reselling payments, technological advances have driven growth of the ISV and value-added reseller ("VAR") channels, which are in turn displacing the ISO channel and growing far more rapidly.
•Integrated Software Vendors. Our ISV partners strive for business growth, relying on our comprehensive, secure payments solutions to support their vertical-specific needs. We work with these software companies to provide a future-proof payments platform to their client base, constantly innovating to provide new payment functionality and maintaining compliance with evolving industry standards and regulations. Integrating their business management software seamlessly into our platform creates higher lifetime customer value and provides a more complete end-to-end experience.
8
Our integrations ensure seamless delivery of our full suite of payment processing capabilities to our customers. These integrations are also a critical part of our marketing strategy, as we work with partners to actively promote our preferred relationship and the advantages of an integrated payment solution to their existing base of customers.
Finally, these ISVs typically focus on a specific vertical or sub-vertical market and chose Paya because the payment functionality and support we offer is tailored to the specific needs of their given vertical.
•Value-Added Resellers. We work with VARs that bundle our suite of features and services with an existing software product and resell the package as an integrated or complete turn-key solution. This is a key channel for our B2B vertical given the prevalence of the value-added reseller distribution model among ERP and accounting software providers.
•Direct Sales. Although our sales force is primarily focused on winning channel partners, we have a direct sales force that brings our proprietary software solutions with embedded payments directly to customers in the government & utilities and faith-based & non-profit end markets.
•Independent Sales Organizations. We partner with ISOs in our Payment Services segment that have their own distribution capabilities and technologies. We provide them with the products and tools we believe are necessary to acquire new customers and grow their adoption of electronic payments. In addition to payment functionality, we deliver valuable back-office support, training, and the tools necessary for independent sales organizations to manage their business.
•ACH Sales. For our ACH product, we deploy a go-to-market model leveraging ISOs and third-party resellers combined with cross-selling to our integrated partnerships to expand distribution of our capabilities. These efforts are represented in our Payment Services segment.
Products, Solutions and Technology
We provide a robust suite of proprietary technology solutions tailored to address the evolving needs of our sophisticated partners and customers. Our offerings are developed with vertical specific needs in-mind and are designed to support the end-to-end payments requirements of tech-savvy, middle market businesses. Our solutions are highly scalable, built for exceptional up-time, sustain high transaction volume, and offer a multi-channel, payment method agnostic experience.
Organization
We have significantly invested in our information technology ("IT") and product teams and capabilities. Our product management team employs a customer-centric approach. This team maintains a close connection with the sales force, a strong understanding of customer feature requirement needs in the pipeline, and a continuous assessment of market trends. The team of product management professionals is supported by an agile IT development organization and robust on-shore and off-shore development support focused on building payments applications and additional value-added services into integrated solutions. Our technology infrastructure team is focused on maintaining the integrity and security of client data and ensuring best-in-class cyber security technology is deployed.
Operations
Paya’s operations division is focused on delivering commercially differentiated customer and partner support to the integrated payments ecosystem. We achieve this goal by deploying a comprehensive set of user engagement tools to facilitate continued service excellence. These include a cloud-based telephony infrastructure and CRM system with a robust ticketing module, case management, chat bots, a customer accessible knowledgebase, and targeted call routing for premium service. The operations team represents a significant competitive advantage in core markets due to (1) large acquirers lacking service and implementation efforts tailored for the middle market
9
and (2) software providers lacking payments expertise and scale to deliver the dedicated customer support that we offer.
Business Operations
•Advanced Client Solutions: Technical personnel with advanced payment knowledge and deep-rooted expertise in our integrations and solutions help partners and customers identify the right solutions during the sales process and throughout the lifetime of the relationship as they add new products and functionality.
•Implementation: White-glove onboarding for integration partners and large ERP end customers when needed; ensuring rapid activation for all new partners and customers to maximize the revenue opportunity for all parties.
•Partner Support and Premier Accounts: Dedicated team provides personalized service to top 40 partners and 400+ premier customers.
•Card and ACH Customer Care: Experienced front-line end-customer support teams that provide phone, ticket, chat and email support to customers for all payments related questions, including integrated solutions, ACH services and card processing.
•Government & Utilities Operations: Vertical specific implementation, relationship management, and customer support resources focused on serving municipal clients and government focused software partners.
Technology Operations
•Product Development: Our product development function manages the deployment and expansion of our payments product suite, primarily consisting of Paya Connect. Our developers work closely with our product managers to ensure they are actively addressing client demands and understanding trends in specific customer needs.
•Technology Infrastructure: Our technology infrastructure function ensures that systems are reliable, secure and fully operational while meeting industry and PCI-DSS security standards.
Security, Disaster Recovery and Back-up Systems
Paya has a robust technology security framework to manage and protect the large amount of information we store relating to customer transaction history and payment card information. We encrypt card information and customer data that is stored in our databases. Paya continues to deploy strong commercially acquired encryption methods. We have relationships with several third-party security technology vendors to disrupt threats including email threat protection (anti-phishing), endpoint security (anti-virus), network next-gen security, and firewalls. In addition to these measures, Paya has an external Security Operations Center which monitors for malicious activity 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. This team is responsible for detecting intrusions, malware, and other events that could jeopardize data integrity, availability, and confidentiality. Upon detection, they work with Paya to protect against and contain the risk. We also leverage vendors for internal and external penetration testing, and for forensic incident response. Our security processes and procedures have been evaluated and validated by several third-party compliance tests:
•Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard (“PCI-DSS”)
•Payment Application Data Security Standard (“PA-DSS”)
•National Automated Clearing House Association (“NACHA”)
10
•NIST Cybersecurity Framework
•Third party cyber assessments
In the summer of 2019, we completed a total platform modernization and infrastructure refresh. This included the relocation and upgrade of our physical infrastructure to a Tier 1 hardened location. In doing so, we significantly improved the performance of our platforms, raised our availability numbers, more efficiently satisfied current compliance mandates, and reduced our licensing profile. Within this new operating construct, we now have multiple levels of redundancy covering network, servers, storage, and applications via virtualization. We also modernized the network infrastructure of all our office locations and installed multiple redundant network paths, including last mile ISP and Telco. Our infrastructure roadmap includes further expansion into off premise Cloud infrastructure, leveraging Amazon Web Services ("AWS") and continuous dual location processing, removing the occurrence of service interruptions during scheduled maintenance periods. This will also dramatically reduce physical site risk.
Third Party Processors and Sponsor Banks
In the course of facilitating credit and debit card processing services, we rely on third parties to provide authorization, settlement and funding services in connection with our customers’ transactions. These institutions include third-party processors (such as Global Payments, FIS and Fiserv) and sponsor banks, who facilitate our access to the payment networks, such as Visa, Mastercard, and Discover. The processors and sponsor banks in turn have agreements with the payment networks, which permit them to route transaction information through their networks in exchange for fees.
For much of our credit and debit card payment volume, we engage Global Payments. Global Payments handles approximately two-thirds of our payment volume, providing authorization and settlement services to Paya, which include communicating with the credit card networks and providing funding instructions to the sponsor bank to facilitate the cash clearing process. Once a business accepts a payment transaction, Global Payments records the sale amount, type of transaction, location at which the transaction was processed, and other relevant information. We have built an entire value-added ecosystem around the transaction and control these aspects internally.
BMO Harris and Chesapeake Bank are our sponsor banks for debit and credit card transactions. Sponsor banks provide cash collection, and funding services for our card processing customers. Additionally, we adhere to the underwriting guidelines provided by our sponsor banks. Because we are not a “member bank” as defined by Visa and Mastercard, in order to process and settle these card transactions for our customers, we have entered into sponsorship agreements with member banks. Visa and Mastercard rules restrict us from performing funds settlement or accessing customer settlement funds.
Our sponsorship agreement enables us to route Visa and Mastercard transactions under the member bank’s control and under the member bank’s identification numbers to clear credit and signature debit card transactions through Visa and Mastercard.
Our sponsorship agreements with the member banks require, among other things, that we abide by the bylaws and regulations of the Visa and Mastercard networks. As of December 31, 2022, we have not been notified of any such issues by our sponsor banks, Visa or Mastercard.
In addition to bankcard processing, we process EFT transactions through the ACH network. We process ACH transactions, which require requesting customer-processed funds from the bank each day, receiving the funds, and then repaying those funds to the customer. We primary perform this service using the Enterprise ACH system (“eACH”) and the eMagnus system, our proprietary database and transaction processing system. eMagnus automatically calculates splits with our customers and determines the pay-out schedule. Owning the ACH processing engine represents a key differentiator for us as we control the end-to-end user experience and provide a payment-method agnostic experience to our partners. We have longstanding relationships with multiple originating depository financial institutions ("ODFIs"), including Wells Fargo, Fifth Third Bank, and America's
11
Christian Credit Union ("ACCU"). ODFIs interface between the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the "Federal Reserve”) and ACH processors to facilitate payment flows.
Customers
Customer and Transaction Risk Management
We maintain a complete underwriting and risk monitoring management infrastructure with a dedicated team of underwriters, credit analysts, and risk and compliance management leads. Given that our core end markets are primarily focused on B2B and less focused on B2C and retail e-Commerce, we experience low levels of fraud and chargeback risk. Card brand networks generally allow chargebacks up to four months after the later of the date the transaction is processed or the delivery of the product or service to the cardholder. If the business incurring the chargeback is unable to fund the refund to the card issuing bank, we are required to do so. For the year ended December 31, 2022, Bad Debt Expense was $1.7 million.
Despite the low risk profile, we believe our security and risk offerings are differentiators in the marketplace. We utilize a comprehensive risk framework profile, which is essential in delivering low loss rates while maximizing approval rates and customer satisfaction. As such, our underwriting criteria is tailored towards our end markets and related business models. For example, we deploy vertical-specific monitoring relating to large ticket sizes and monthly patterns of utility and non-profit businesses.
Customer Underwriting
Our credit underwriting criteria consists of evaluating the nature of the business, end market, volume history, length of time between payment and delivery of goods or services, pricing, proposed transaction levels, and overall financial condition of the applicant. We may require cash or non-cash collateral as a condition for processing approval. These processes are documented and used for ongoing monitoring as the customer begins processing. Based on experience level, our underwriting staff is given various levels of autonomy to adjust transaction or volume thresholds, establish funding delays, establish daily discount funding and call-or-return collateral. These levels are originally set, reviewed, and signed off on by management. Our sponsor banks evaluate our customer underwriting policies and procedures to ensure compliance with card brand rules and regulations.
Risk Management/Transaction Monitoring
We take a sophisticated approach to risk management that involves intra-day reporting and monitoring of customer-level transaction activity to evaluate potential for credit and fraud risk. The risk management team reviews all unusual activity, which may include ticket size, rolling volume levels, refund and chargeback levels as well as authorization history. Risk management tools and reporting are reviewed daily to suspend unusual processing activity if sufficient abnormalities are observed. Accounts with suspended funds are investigated daily and the risk management team decides if any transactions should be held for further review. We believe this allows us to minimize credit and fraud risk by providing time to formally review the processing with our customer, the cardholders and the issuing banks.
Investigation and Loss Prevention
If a customer exceeds the thresholds established by our underwriting process, or if ongoing risk management processes identify suspicious activity or a potential breach of card brand rules and regulations or the terms of our customer agreement, we utilize a robust documentation and review process. The review will include the actions taken to reduce our exposure to loss and the exposure of our customer, which can start with requesting additional information and can be escalated to withholding or diverting funds, verifying delivery of merchandise or even deactivating the customer account. The financial condition of the business may also be considered during these investigations.
12
Collateral
As a condition for processing approval, we may require some customers to post collateral including certificates of deposits, letters of credit, cash, upfront or rolling reserves. This collateral is held in order to offset potential credit losses or risk liability that we may incur during the life of the relationship.
Competition
We compete with a variety of merchant acquirers that have different business models, go-to-market strategies and technical capabilities. Many merchant acquirers provide integrated payments solutions and/or related hardware to customers within our existing verticals. Our competition comes from a combination of niche players and horizontal acquirers which differ by individual vertical, including REPAY, i3 Verticals, Stripe, and the acquiring arms of FIS, FISERV and Global Payments. Our competitors also include banks, credit card providers, technology and ecommerce companies.
We believe the most significant competitive factors in the markets in which we compete are the following: (1) product offering, including depth of integration capabilities and ability to deliver differentiated value-added solutions; (2) customer service, including integration, transaction, and technology support for payors, customers, and software integration partners; (3) processing and technology reliability, and (4) transaction economics, including fees charged to customers and commission payouts to software integration partners.
Regulatory Compliance
Government Regulation and Payment Network Rules
We operate in an increasingly complex legal and regulatory environment. Our business and the products and services that we offer may be subject to a variety of federal, state and local laws and regulations, and the rules and standards of the card brand networks that we utilize to provide our electronic payment services, as more fully described below.
Dodd-Frank Act
The Dodd-Frank Act of 2010, and the related rules and regulations have resulted in significant changes to the regulation of the financial services industry. Merchants are permitted to set minimum dollar amounts for the acceptance of credit cards and to offer discounts or incentives to entice consumers to pay with cash, checks, debit cards or credit cards, as the merchant prefers. There are certain prohibitions on card brand network exclusivity and merchant routing restrictions of debit card transactions. Additionally, the Durbin Amendment to the Dodd-Frank Act provides that the interchange fees that certain issuers charge merchants for debit transactions will be regulated by the Federal Reserve and must be “reasonable and proportional” to the cost incurred by the issuer in authorizing, clearing and settling the transactions. Rules released by the Federal Reserve in July 2011 to implement the Durbin Amendment mandate a cap on debit transaction interchange fees for issuers with assets of $10 billion or greater.
The Dodd-Frank Act also created the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (the “CFPB”), which has assumed responsibility for most federal consumer protection laws, and the Financial Stability Oversight Council, which has the authority to determine whether any non-bank financial company, such as us, should be supervised by the Federal Reserve because it is systemically important to the U.S. financial system. Any new rules or regulations implemented by the CFPB or the Financial Stability Oversight Council or in connection with the Dodd-Frank Act that are applicable to us, or any changes that are adverse to us resulting from litigation brought by third parties challenging such rules and regulations, could increase our cost of doing business or limit permissible activities.
Privacy and Information Security Regulations
We provide services that may be subject to privacy laws and regulations of a number of jurisdictions. Relevant federal privacy laws may include the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999, which applies directly to a broad range of
13
financial institutions and indirectly, or in some instances directly, to companies that provide services to financial institutions, as a number of recent and novel state laws, including the California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018 (the "CCPA"), the California Privacy Rights Act (the "CPRA"), which went into effect in January 2023, and similar laws enacted in Connecticut, Colorado, Utah and Virginia, which go into effect at various times in 2023. These laws and regulations restrict the collection, processing, storage, use and disclosure of personal information, require notice to individuals of privacy practices and provide individuals with certain rights to prevent the use and disclosure of certain nonpublic or otherwise legally protected information. These laws also impose requirements for safeguarding and proper destruction of personal information through the issuance of data security standards or guidelines. Our business may also be subject to the Fair Credit Reporting Act ("FCRA") and the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act of 2003 ("FACTA"), which regulate the use and reporting of consumer credit information and also impose disclosure requirements on entities who take adverse action based on information obtained from credit reporting agencies. In addition, there are state laws restricting the ability to collect and utilize certain types of personal information such as Social Security and driver’s license numbers and imposing secure disposal requirements for personal data. Certain state laws mandate businesses to implement reasonable data security measures. States are increasingly legislating data protection requirements for a broader list of personal data, such as biometric data, and are strengthening protections for students’ personal information. All fifty states, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands have now enacted data breach notification laws requiring businesses that experience a security breach of their computer databases that contain personal information to notify affected individuals, consumer reporting agencies and governmental agencies that possess data.
Each privacy law and regulation that applies to us could increase our cost of doing business or limit permissible activities.
Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Regulation
Our business is subject to U.S. federal anti-money laundering laws and regulations, including the Bank Secrecy Act of 1970, as amended by the USA PATRIOT Act of 2001, which we refer to collectively as the “BSA.” The BSA, among other things, requires money services businesses to develop and implement risk-based anti-money laundering programs, report large cash transactions and suspicious activity and maintain transaction records. We are also subject to certain economic and trade sanctions programs that are administered by the Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”) that prohibit or restrict transactions to or from (or transactions dealing with) specified countries, their governments and, in certain circumstances, their nationals, such as those who might be narcotics traffickers and terrorists or terrorist organizations. Similar anti-money laundering, counter terrorist financing and proceeds of crime laws apply to movements of currency and payments through electronic transactions and to dealings with persons specified on lists maintained by organizations similar to OFAC in several other countries and which may impose specific data retention obligations or prohibitions on intermediaries in the payment process. We have developed and continue to enhance compliance programs and policies to monitor and address related legal and regulatory requirements and developments.
Unfair or Deceptive Acts or Practices
We and many of our customers are subject to Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act prohibiting unfair or deceptive acts or practices. In addition, laws prohibiting these activities and other laws, rules and or regulations, including the Telemarketing Sales Act, may directly impact the activities of certain of our clients, and in some cases may subject us, as the customer's payment processor or provider of certain services, to investigations, fees, fines and disgorgement of funds if we are deemed to have aided and abetted or otherwise provided the means and instrumentalities to facilitate the illegal or improper activities of the customer through our services. Various federal and state regulatory enforcement agencies, including the Federal Trade Commission and the states attorneys general, have authority to take action against non-banks that engage in unfair or deceptive acts or practices or violate other laws, rules and regulations and to the extent we are processing payments or providing services for a customer that may be in violation of laws, rules and regulations, we may be subject to enforcement actions and as a result may incur losses and liabilities that may impact our business.
In addition, the CFPB has recently attempted to extend certain provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act that prevent the employment of unfair, deceptive or abusive acts or practices (“UDAAP”) to payment processors. Though there is
14
still litigation involving whether payment processing companies are subject to these requirements (and the extent of their application), these requirements may apply or be applicable in the future. UDAAPs could involve omissions or misrepresentations of important information to consumers or practices that take advantage of vulnerable consumers, such as elderly or low-income consumers.
Payment Network Rules and Standards
Payment networks establish their own rules and standards that allocate liabilities and responsibilities among the payment networks and their participants. These rules and standards, including the PCI-DSS, govern a variety of areas including the use of cards, the security features of cards, security standards for processing, data security and allocation of liability for certain acts or omissions including liability in the event of a data breach. The payment networks may change these rules and standards from time to time as they may determine in their sole discretion and with or without advance notice to their participants. These changes may be made for any number of reasons, including as a result of changes in the regulatory environment, to maintain or attract new participants, or to serve the strategic initiatives of the networks and may impose additional costs and expenses on or be disadvantageous to certain participants. Participants are subject to audit by the payment networks to ensure compliance with applicable rules and standards. The networks may fine, penalize or suspend the registration of participants for certain acts or omissions or the failure of the participants to comply with applicable rules and standards.
To provide our electronic payment services, we must be registered as a service provider with each of the payment networks. Because we are not a bank, we are not eligible for primary membership in certain payment networks, including Visa and Mastercard, and are therefore unable to directly access these networks. The operating regulations of certain payment networks, including Visa and Mastercard, require us to be sponsored by a member bank as a service provider. We are registered with certain payment networks, including Visa and Mastercard, through various sponsor banks. The agreements with our bank sponsors give them substantial discretion in approving certain aspects of our business practices including our solicitation, application and qualification procedures for clients and the terms of our agreements with clients. We are also subject to network operating rules and guidelines promulgated by NACHA relating to payment transactions we process using the ACH Network. Like the card networks, NACHA may update its operating rules and guidelines at any time, and we will be subject to these changes. These operating rules and guidelines allocate responsibility and liabilities to the various participants in the payment network. Recently, NACHA has focused upon data security and privacy responsibilities. We are subject to audit by our partner financial institutions for compliance with the rules and guidelines. Our sponsor financial institutions have substantial discretion in approving certain aspects of our business practices, including the terms of our agreements with our ACH processing clients.
Money Transmitter Regulation
We may be subject to various U.S. federal, state, and foreign laws and regulations governing money transmission and the issuance and sale of payment instruments, including some of the prepaid products we may sell. In the future, we may be subject to money transmitter regulation and may be required to obtain additional licenses and registrations which we may not be able to obtain.
In the United States, most states license money transmitters and issuers of payment instruments. These states not only regulate and control money transmitters, but they also license entities engaged in the transmission of funds. Many states exercise authority over the operations of our services related to money transmission and payment instruments and, as part of this authority, subject us to periodic examinations. Many states require, among other things, that proceeds from money transmission activity and payment instrument sales be invested in high-quality marketable securities before the settlement of the transactions or otherwise restrict the use and safekeeping of such funds. Such licensing laws also may cover matters such as regulatory approval of consumer forms, consumer disclosures and the filing of periodic reports by the licensee and require the licensee to demonstrate and maintain specified levels of net worth. Many states also require money transmitters, issuers of payment instruments, and their agents to comply with federal and/or state anti-money laundering laws and regulations.
15
Stored Value Services
Stored value cards, store gift cards and electronic gift certificates are subject to various federal and state laws and regulations, which may include laws and regulations related to consumer and data protection, licensing, consumer disclosures, escheat, anti-money laundering, banking, trade practices and competition and wage and employment. The customers who utilize the gift card processing products and services that we may sell may be subject to these laws and regulations. In the future, if we seek to expand these stored value card products and services, or as a result of regulatory changes, we may be subject to additional regulation and may be required to obtain additional licenses and registrations which we may not be able to obtain.
The Credit Card Accountability Responsibility and Disclosure Act of 2009 (the “Card Act”) together with the Federal Reserve’s amended Regulation E, set forth the requirements with respect to general use prepaid gift cards, store gift cards and electronic certificates. These include certain prohibited features and revised disclosure obligations. Prepaid services may also be subject to the rules and regulations of Visa, Mastercard, Discover and American Express and other payment networks with which our clients and the card issuers do business. The customers who utilize the gift card processing products and services that we may sell are responsible for compliance with all applicable rules and requirements relating to their gift product program.
Additionally, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network of the U.S. Department of the Treasury, or “FinCEN”, issued a final rule in July 2011 regarding the applicability of the BSA’s regulations to “prepaid access” products and services. This rulemaking clarified the anti-money laundering obligations for entities engaged in the provision and sale of prepaid services, such as prepaid gift cards. We are not registered with FinCEN based on our determination that our current products and services do not constitute a “prepaid program” as defined in the BSA and we are not a “provider” of prepaid access. We may in the future need to register with FinCEN as a “money services business-provider of prepaid access” in accordance with the rule based on changes to our products or services.
Other Regulation
We are subject to U.S. federal and state unclaimed or abandoned property (escheat) laws which require us to turn over to certain government authorities the property of others we hold that has been unclaimed for a specified period of time such as account balances that are due to a distribution partner or client following discontinuation of its relationship with us. The Housing Assistance Tax Act of 2008 requires certain merchant acquiring entities and third-party settlement organizations to provide information returns for each calendar year with respect to payments made in settlement of electronic payment transactions and third-party payment network transactions occurring in that calendar year. Reportable transactions are also subject to backup withholding requirements.
The foregoing is not an exhaustive list of the laws and regulations to which we are subject, and the regulatory framework governing our business is changing continuously.
Intellectual Property
Certain of our products and services are based on proprietary software and related payment systems solutions. We rely on a combination of copyright, trademark, and trade secret laws, as well as employee and third-party non-disclosure, confidentiality, and other contractual arrangements to establish, maintain, and enforce our intellectual property rights in our technology, including with respect to our proprietary rights related to our products and services. In addition, we license technology from third parties that is integrated into some of our solutions.
We own several registered trademarks, including Paya, First Billing, FirstCloud, FirstUtility, and Stewardship and we have other pending applications. We also own multiple domain names, including www.paya.com.
Human Capital Management
As of December 31, 2022, we employed approximately 300 employees across five U.S. office locations, with some employees working remotely. We are an Equal Employment Opportunity and Affirmative Action employer. All
16
aspects of employment including the decision to hire, promote, discipline, or discharge, are based on merit, competence, performance, and business needs. We do not discriminate on the basis of race, color, religion, marital status, age, national origin, ancestry, physical or mental disability, medical condition, pregnancy, genetic information, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, veteran status, or any other status protected under federal, state, or local law.
Many of our employees are highly skilled in technical areas specific to payment technology and software solutions as well as delivery support, and many have deep knowledge of our core verticals and integrated payments. From time to time, we supplement our workforce with consultants or independent contractors, primarily in the information technology area, through contracted service arrangements.
Our employees are key to our success as a company, and we are committed to attracting, developing and retaining the best talent. We leverage formal and informal programs to identify and attract top talent including social media, career fairs, and professional associations and industry groups. We develop and retain the best talent through various means including performance evaluation and goal setting as well as a robust training and development curriculum. Our online training platform provides a variety of tools and application resources for all team members to build learning experiences and skills.
We provide employees with competitive compensation and benefits consistent with positions, skill levels, experience, knowledge, and geographic location. All employees are eligible for health insurance, paid and unpaid leave, a retirement plan, and life/disability/accident coverage. We also offer a variety of voluntary benefits that allow employees to select the options that meet their needs, including, critical illness coverage, medical and dependent care flexible spending accounts, health saving accounts, paid parental leave, and an employee assistance program.
Our executive management team and People Operations regularly review and update our talent strategy, monitoring a variety of data, including turnover, diversity, and tenure, to design and implement effective reward/recognition, training, development, succession, and benefit programs to meet the needs of our businesses and our employees. The Compensation Committee assists our Board in its oversight of human capital management including, corporate culture, diversity and inclusion, recruiting, retention, attrition, talent management, career development and progression, succession and employee relations.
The success of our business is connected to the well-being of our team members. Accordingly, we are committed to the health, safety and wellness of our team members worldwide.
Other Available Information
Our website address is www.paya.com. We make available on the Investor Relations section of our website, which can be found at investors.paya.com, free of charge, our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, Proxy Statements, and Forms 3, 4 and 5, and amendments to those reports, as soon as reasonably practicable after filing such documents with, or furnishing such documents to, the SEC.
Additionally, the SEC maintains an internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC at http://www.sec.gov. We use these mediums, including our website, to communicate with our stockholders and the public about our Company.
The information contained on, or that can be accessed through, the websites referred to above are not incorporated into this Annual Report. Further, our references to the website addresses are intended to be inactive textual references only.
17
Item 1A. Risk Factors
RISK FACTOR SUMMARY
Our business involves significant risks and uncertainties that make an investment in us speculative and risky. The following is a summary list of the principal risk factors that could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations. These are not the only risks and uncertainties we face, and you should carefully review and consider the full discussion of our risk factors, which is presented below.
•Uncertainties associated with the Merger with a wholly-owned affiliate of Nuvei Corporation could adversely affect our business, results of operations, stock price and financial condition.
•Failure to complete the Merger could adversely affect our business and the market price of our shares of common stock.
•The Merger Agreement contains provisions that limit our ability to pursue alternatives to the Merger.
•We are subject to certain restrictions on the conduct of our business under the terms of the Merger Agreement.
•Legal proceedings have been commenced against us, our Board of Directors and Nuvei Corporation relating to the Offer and the Merger, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.
•Our results could be adversely affected by continued economic uncertainty, an economic slowdown or a recession.
•A substantial portion of our merchants are middle market businesses, which may increase the impact of economic fluctuations and merchant attrition on us.
•The COVID-19 pandemic has had, and may continue to have, a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
•The payment processing industry is highly competitive and such competition is likely to increase, which may adversely influence the prices we can charge to merchants for our services and the compensation we must pay to our distribution partners, and as a result, our profit margins.
•Degradation of the quality of the products and services we offer, including support services, could adversely impact our ability to attract and retain merchants and partners. Increases in card network fees and other changes to fee arrangements may result in the loss of merchants or a reduction in our earnings.
•Reliance on third parties, including our strategic relationship with Sage, and distribution partners that may not serve us exclusively and are subject to attrition and merchants who may be reluctant to switch to a new merchant acquirer, which may adversely affect our growth.
•Unauthorized disclosure of merchant or cardholder data, whether through breach of our computer systems, computer viruses, or otherwise, could expose us to liability, protracted and costly litigation and damage our reputation.
•If the banks that currently provide ACH and wire transfers fail to properly transmit ACH or terminate their relationship with us or limit our ability to process funds or we are not able to increase our ACH capacity with our existing and new banks, our ability to process funds on behalf of our clients and our financial results and liquidity could be adversely affected.
•If we fail to comply with the applicable requirements of card networks and industry self-regulatory organizations, those card networks or organizations could seek to fine us, suspend us, or terminate our
18
registrations through our bank sponsors or our merchants or sales partners may incur fines or penalties that we cannot collect from them, causing us to bear the cost.
•In order to remain competitive and to continue to increase our revenues and earnings, we must continually update our products and services, a process which could result in increased costs and the loss of revenues, earnings, merchants and distribution partners if the new products and services do not perform as intended or are not accepted in the marketplace.
•We may not be able to continue to expand our share of our existing vertical markets or expand into new vertical markets, which would inhibit our ability to grow and increase our profitability.
•Our ability to grow our business will depend in part on the addition of new partners, and our inability to effectively onboard these new partners could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
•We may not be able to successfully execute our strategy of growth through acquisitions.
•We may not be able to successfully manage our intellectual property and may be subject to infringement claims.
•A substantial portion of our merchants are middle market businesses, which may increase the impact of economic fluctuations and merchant attrition on us.
•Our systems and our third-party providers’ systems may fail due to factors beyond our control, which could interrupt our service, resulting in our inability to process payments, cause us to lose business, increase our costs and expose us to liability.
•Our reliance on other service and technology providers may result in service interruptions for our merchants.
•Fraud by merchants or others could subject us to liability and materially affect our results.
•Our reliance on bank sponsors, which have substantial discretion with respect to certain elements of our business practices to process electronic payment transactions may materially adversely affect our business.
•We incur liability when our merchants refuse or cannot reimburse us for chargebacks resolved in favor of their customers.
•Our risk management policies and procedures may not be fully effective in mitigating our risk exposure in all market environments or against all types of risks.
•Our ability to successfully operate the business depends upon the efforts of certain key personnel and our ability to attract, recruit, retain and develop qualified employees.
•We are subject to extensive government regulation, including the Bank Secrecy Act and limitations on consumer information among others, and any new laws and regulations, industry standards or revisions made to existing laws, regulations or industry standards affecting the electronic payments industry may have an unfavorable impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
19
RISK FACTORS
You should carefully consider these risk factors, together with all of the other information included in this annual report on Form 10-K, including our consolidated financial statements and the related notes thereto, before you decide whether to make an investment in our securities. The risks set out below are not the only risks we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and/or operating results. If any of the following events occur, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected. In such case, the value of our common stock and the trading price of our securities could decline, and you may lose all or part of your investment.
Risks Related to the Proposed Merger
Uncertainties associated with the Merger with a wholly-owned affiliate of Nuvei Corporation could adversely affect our business, results of operations, stock price and financial condition.
On January 8, 2023, we entered into the Merger Agreement with Nuvei Corporation and the Purchaser, a wholly owned subsidiary of Parent. Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, we will merge with and into the Purchaser, with the Company continuing as the surviving corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Parent. If the Merger is consummated, the Company’s common stock will be delisted from Nasdaq and the duty to file reports will be suspended under Section 13 and 15(d) of the Exchange Act. In connection with the Merger, on January 24, 2023, the Purchaser commenced the Offer to purchase any and all issued and outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock at a price of $9.75 per share without interest, to the seller in cash, less any applicable withholding taxes, upon the terms and subject to the conditions described in the Offer to Purchase, dated January 24, 2023.
Completion of the Merger is subject to various closing conditions, including, but not limited to, the Purchaser acquiring, pursuant to the Offer, 50% of the total number of shares of our common stock outstanding plus at least one additional share of our common stock (the “Minimum Condition”). There is no guarantee that all closing conditions will be satisfied (or waived, if permitted by the Merger Agreement and applicable law). Many of the conditions to completion of the Merger are not within our control, and we cannot predict when or if these conditions will be satisfied (or waived, if permitted by the Merger Agreement and applicable law). In addition, the Merger may fail to close for other reasons.
The announcement and pendency of the Merger, as well as any delays in the expected timeframe, could cause disruption in and create uncertainties, which could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations, stock price and financial condition, regardless of whether the Merger is completed, and could cause us not to realize some or all of the benefits that we expect to achieve if the Merger is successfully completed within its expected timeframe. These risks include, but are not limited to:
•an adverse effect on our relationship with vendors, customers, and employees, including if our vendors, customers or others attempt to negotiate changes in existing business relationships, consider entering into business relationships with parties other than us, delay or defer decisions concerning their business with us, or terminate their existing business relationships with us during the pendency of the Merger;
•a diversion of a significant amount of management time and resources towards the completion of the Merger;
•being subject to certain restrictions on the conduct of our business;
•impacts on the price of our common stock;
•the requirement that we pay a termination fee of approximately $38 million if the Merger Agreement is terminated under certain circumstances;
20
•developments beyond our control, including, but not limited to, changes in domestic or global economic conditions that may affect the timing or success of the Merger;
•stockholder litigation that could prevent or delay the Merger or otherwise negatively impact our business and operations;
•possibly foregoing certain business opportunities that we might otherwise pursue absent the pending Merger; and
•difficulties attracting and retaining key employees.
Failure to complete the Merger could adversely affect our business and the market price of our shares of common stock.
The closing of the Merger may not occur on the expected timeline or at all. The Merger Agreement contains customary termination provisions for both the Company and Parent, and provides that, in connection with the termination of the Merger Agreement under specified circumstances, including termination by the Company to accept and enter into an agreement with respect to a Superior Proposal (as defined in the Merger Agreement), the Company will pay Parent a termination fee of approximately $38 million. If Paya is required to pay this termination fee, such fee, together with costs incurred to execute the Merger Agreement and pursue the Merger, could have a material adverse effect on Paya’s financial condition and results of operations.
If the Merger Agreement is terminated and the Merger is not consummated, the price of our common stock may decline and you may not recover your investment or receive a price for your shares similar to what has been offered pursuant to the Merger. In addition, the price of our common stock has in the past and may continue to fluctuate substantially in the event that the Merger is not consummated. Factors affecting the trading price of our common stock may include:
•actual or anticipated fluctuations in our quarterly financial results or the quarterly financial results of companies perceived to be similar to it;
•changes in the market’s expectations about our operating results;
•success of competitors;
•our operating results failing to meet market expectations in a particular period;
•changes in financial estimates and recommendations by securities analysts concerning us or the payments industry and market in general;
•operating and stock price performance of other companies that investors deem comparable to us;
•our ability to market new and enhanced products on a timely basis;
•changes in laws and regulations affecting our business;
•commencement of, or involvement in, litigation involving us;
•changes in its capital structure, such as future issuances of securities or the incurrence of additional debt;
•the volume of shares of common stock available for public sale;
•any significant change in our board or management;
21
•sales of substantial amounts of common stock by our directors, executive officers or significant stockholders or the perception that such sales could occur; and
•general economic and political conditions such as recessions, interest rates, fuel prices, international currency fluctuations and acts of war or terrorism.
Broad market and industry factors may depress the market price of our common stock irrespective of our operating performance. The stock market in general and Nasdaq have experienced price and volume fluctuations that have often been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of the particular companies affected. The trading prices and valuations of these stocks, and of our common stock, may not be predictable. A loss of investor confidence in the market for financial technology stocks or the stocks of other companies which investors perceive to be similar to us could depress its stock price regardless of its business, prospects, financial conditions or results of operations. A decline in the market price of our common stock also could adversely affect our ability to issue additional securities and our ability to obtain additional financing in the future.
The Merger Agreement contains provisions that limit our ability to pursue alternatives to the Merger.
Under the Merger Agreement, we are restricted from soliciting, initiating, proposing or inducing the making, submission or announcement of, or knowingly encouraging, facilitating or assisting alternative acquisition proposals from third parties and/or providing non-public information to third parties in response to any inquiries regarding, or the submission of any proposal or offer that constitutes, or could reasonably be expected to lead to, any Acquisition Proposal (as defined in the Merger Agreement). These provisions could discourage a third party that may have an interest in acquiring all or a significant part of our business from considering or proposing that acquisition, even if such third party were prepared to pay consideration with a higher value than the value of the consideration in the Merger.
We are subject to certain restrictions on the conduct of our business under the terms of the Merger Agreement.
Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, we have agreed to certain restrictions on the operations of our business. We have agreed to limit the conduct of our business to those actions undertaken in the ordinary course of business and to refrain from, among other things, subject to certain specified exceptions (as set forth in the Merger Agreement): incurring debt; entering into, adopting, amending, modifying or terminating any employee plans; increasing the compensation of any director, officer, employee or independent contractor, or hiring or terminating certain employees (other than for “cause”); settling certain pending or threatened legal proceedings; changing our methods, procedures, principles or practices of financial accounting; and incurring certain capital expenditures. Because of these restrictions, we may be prevented from undertaking certain actions with respect to the conduct of our business that we might otherwise have taken if not for the Merger Agreement. Such restrictions could prevent us from pursuing certain business opportunities that arise prior to the effective time of the Merger and are outside the ordinary course of business, and could otherwise adversely affect our business and operations prior to completion of the Merger.
Legal proceedings have been commenced against us, our Board of Directors and Nuvei Corporation relating to the Offer and the Merger, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.
Legal proceedings relating to the Offer and the Merger have been commenced against the Company, the Company's Board of Directors and Nuvei Corporation. Such litigation is common in connection with acquisitions of public companies, regardless of any merits related to the underlying acquisition. The outcome of any proceedings filed against the Company is uncertain, and we may not be successful in defending against any such claims. While we are defending against the proceedings commenced against the Company, the Company's Board of Directors and Nuvei Corporation in connection with the Offer and the Merger, the costs of the defense of such actions and other effects of such litigation could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results. See Part I, Item 3, Legal Proceedings in this Annual Report for a description of these proceedings.
22
Risks Relating to Our Business and Operations
Our results could be adversely affected by continued economic uncertainty, an economic slowdown or a recession.
The electronic payments industry depends heavily on the overall level of consumer, commercial and government spending. We are exposed to general economic conditions that affect consumer confidence, consumer spending, consumer discretionary income and changes in consumer purchasing habits. Periods of a slowing economy or recession, or periods of economic uncertainty, have historically been accompanied by a decrease in consumer spending and have negatively impacted our business. In 2022, in response to record levels of inflation, the Federal Reserve raised the federal funds rate and signaled it will continue to increase rates during 2023, with no reductions expected until 2024. Further increases in rates could adversely affect our financial performance by reducing the aggregate dollar volume of transactions made using electronic payments. If our merchants make fewer sales of their products and services using electronic payments, or consumers spend less money through electronic payments, we will have fewer transactions to process at lower dollar amounts, resulting in lower revenue. In addition, as a result of increased interest rates, our interest expense on the $250 million senior secured term loan facility (the "Term Loan") increased in 2022. We utilize derivative instruments to manage risk from fluctuations in interest rates on our Term Loan. As a result, to date, the effects of rising interest rates on our results of operations and financial condition have not been significant. However, there can be no assurance that our interest rates will not continue to increase and that we will be able to mitigate such increases in the future.
In addition, sustained deterioration in general economic conditions or a weakening in the economy could force merchants to close at higher than historical rates, resulting in exposure to potential losses and a decline in the number of transactions that we process. We also have material fixed and semi-fixed costs, including rent, debt service, contractual minimums, and salaries, which could limit our ability to quickly adjust costs and respond to changes in our business and the economy. Furthermore, our ability to generate revenues in specific markets is directly affected by local and regional conditions, and unfavorable regional economic or political conditions, such as those resulting from Russia's invasion of Ukraine. The war in Ukraine has given rise to potential global security issues that may adversely affect international business and economic conditions as well as economic sanctions imposed by the international community that have impacted the global economy. Certain of our customers may be negatively impacted by these events.
A severe or prolonged economic downturn, including a recession or depression, could impact our business, including our revenues and our ability to raise additional capital when needed on favorable terms or at all. We cannot anticipate the impact of the current economic environment on our business and any of the foregoing could materially harm our business. Nevertheless, if economic conditions worsen or a recession occurs, our business, operations and financial results could be materially adversely affected.
A substantial portion of our merchants are middle market businesses, which may increase the impact of economic fluctuations and merchant attrition on us.
We market and sell our solutions to middle market merchants. Middle market merchants are typically more susceptible to the adverse effects of economic fluctuations than larger businesses. We experience attrition in merchants and merchant charge volume in the ordinary course of business resulting from several factors, including business closures, transfers of merchants’ accounts to our competitors and account closures that we initiate due to heightened credit risks relating to, or contract breaches by, a merchant. Adverse changes in the economic environment or business failures of our middle market merchants may have a greater impact on us than on our competitors who do not focus on middle market merchants to the extent that we do. We cannot accurately predict the level of middle market merchant attrition if economic conditions worsen or a recession occurs. If we are unable to establish accounts with new merchants or otherwise increase our payment processing volume to counter the effect of this attrition, our revenues will decline.
23
The COVID-19 global pandemic has had, and may continue to have, a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
Our business could be adversely affected by the effects of health pandemics or epidemics, including the ongoing COVID-19 global pandemic, the evolution of which continues to be uncertain. In 2020 and 2021, many of our customers experienced a decline in transaction volumes as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic compared to pre-pandemic levels. However, given many of our customers leverage our payment technology to accept transactions in a card-not-present environment, their business operations were not impacted dramatically. Further, most of our recurring or contractual transactions are B2B and not tied to consumer discretionary spend and, as such, were not significantly impacted. However, recurring COVID-19 outbreaks around the world such as those most recently occurring in China following the suspension of China's zero-COVID policy, have heightened concerns relating to new and potentially more dangerous virus variants, which, if transmitted around the globe could lead to the re-introduction of precautionary measures similar to, or more strict than, those imposed at the height of the pandemic. A resurgence of COVID-19 or another pandemic or epidemic may reinstate shelter-in place and social distancing policies, as well as broader economic decline, that can have a material impact on our results of operations. As the COVID-19 pandemic continues to evolve, its ultimate impact on our business is subject to change. A severe outbreak of COVID-19 or another pandemic or epidemic can disrupt our business and adversely materially impact our financial results
The payment processing industry is highly competitive and such competition is likely to increase, which may adversely influence the prices we can charge to merchants for our services and the compensation we must pay to our distribution partners, and as a result, our profit margins.
The payment processing industry is highly competitive. We primarily compete in the middle market merchant industry. Competition has continued to increase recently as other providers of payment processing services have established a sizable market share in the middle market. Our primary competitors for middle market merchants include financial institutions and their affiliates and well-established payment processing companies that target middle market merchants directly and through third parties, including REPAY, i3 Verticals, Stripe, and the acquiring arms of FIS, FISERV, and Global Payments. We also compete with many of these same entities for distribution partners. Many of our distribution partners are not exclusive to us but also have relationships with our competitors, such that we must continually expend resources to maintain those distribution partner relationships. Our growth depends on our ability to increase our market share through successful competitive efforts to gain new merchants and distribution partners.
In addition, many financial institutions, subsidiaries of financial institutions or well-established payment processing companies with which we compete, have substantially greater capital, technological, and marketing resources than we have. These factors may allow our competitors to offer better pricing terms to merchants and more attractive compensation to distribution partners, which could result in a loss of our potential or current merchants and distribution partners. This competition may effectively limit the prices we can charge our merchants, cause us to increase the compensation we pay to our distribution partners and require us to control costs aggressively to maintain acceptable profit margins. Our future competitors may also develop or offer services that have price or other advantages over the services we provide.
We are also facing new competition from emerging and non-traditional payment processing companies as well as traditional companies offering alternative electronic payments services and products. Certain of these competitors integrate proprietary software and service solutions with electronic payments services and have significant financial resources and robust networks that could allow them to have access to merchants needing electronic payments services. If these new entrants gain a greater share of total electronic payments transactions, they could impact our ability to retain and grow our relationships with merchants and distribution partners. These new entrants also may compete in ways that minimize or remove the role of traditional payment gateways in the electronic payments process upon which our services are based, which could also limit our ability to retain or grow those relationships. The wide acceptance of internet-based commerce has resulted in a number of alternative payment processing systems in which traditional intermediaries play only minor roles. Use of emerging alternative payment platforms, such as Apple Pay, PayPal, Stripe, Square, Bitcoin or other cryptocurrencies can alter consumer card, ACH and
24
check payment processing behavior and consequently result in our products and services becoming unnecessary for merchants and partners. Wide acceptance of alternative payments methods could have a material adverse impact on our business.
Consolidation among financial institutions, including the merger of our customers with other entities that are not our customers could materially affect our financial position, results of operation and cash flows.
Consolidation among financial institutions, particularly in the area of credit card operations, and consolidation in the retail industry, is a risk that could negatively affect our existing agreements and future revenues with our merchants and partners. Continued consolidation among financial institutions could increase the bargaining power of our current and future customers and further increase our customer concentration. Consolidation among financial institutions and retail customers and the resulting loss of any significant number of customers by us could have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
Degradation of the quality of the products and services we offer, including support services, could adversely impact our ability to attract and retain merchants and partners.
Our merchants and partners expect a consistent level of quality in the provision of our products and services, which are a significant element of the value proposition we offer to them. If the reliability or functionality of our products and services is compromised or the quality or support of such products and services is otherwise degraded, we could lose existing merchants and partners and find it harder to attract new merchants and partners. If we are unable to scale our support functions to address the growth of our merchant portfolio and partner network, the quality of our support may decrease, which could also adversely affect our ability to attract and retain merchants and partners.
Failing to successfully implement initiatives to grow or improve our products and services could also adversely impact our business. While we offer redundant back-up capabilities inside of our data center environments, we still have site specific risk related to physical or communication network-based outages. Additionally, we rely on AWS and Azure to operate certain aspects of our service, including providing a distributed computing infrastructure platform for business operations, or what is commonly referred to as a “cloud” computing service. We continue building out full redundancy to prevent downtime in the case of an outage, we currently may encounter disruptions or interference in connection with our use of AWS and Azure. This could have an impact on our operations and consequently, our business would be adversely impacted if our partners and merchants leave due to a downtime or disruption.
Potential distribution partners and merchants may be reluctant to switch to a new merchant acquirer, which may adversely affect our growth.
Many potential distribution partners and merchants worry about potential disadvantages associated with switching payment providers, such as a loss of accustomed functionality, increased costs, and business disruption. For distribution partners, switching to us from another payment provider or integrating with us may constitute a significant undertaking. As a result, many distribution partners and merchants often resist change. There can be no assurance that our strategies for overcoming potential reluctance to change vendors or initiate a relationship with us will be successful, and this resistance may adversely affect our growth and performance results.
25
Increases in card network fees and other changes to fee arrangements may result in the loss of merchants or a reduction in our earnings.
From time to time, card networks, including Visa and Mastercard, increase the fees that they charge merchant service providers. At their sole discretion, our sponsoring banks have the right to pass any increases in interchange fees on to us. Our sponsoring banks may seek to increase the sponsorship fees they charge us, all of which are based upon the dollar amount of the payment transactions we process. In addition, our back-end payment processors may seek to increase the fees they charge us, which are also based upon the floor amount of the payment transactions we process as well as the number of merchants we support. We could attempt to pass these increases along to our merchants, but this strategy might result in the loss of merchants to our competitors who do not pass along the increases. If competitive practices prevent us from passing along the higher fees to our merchants in the future, we may have to absorb all or a portion of such increases, which may increase our operating costs and reduce our earnings. In addition, in certain of our markets, card issuers pay merchant acquirers fees based on debit card usage in an effort to encourage debit card use. If this practice were discontinued, our revenue and margins in jurisdictions where we receive these fees would be adversely affected.
If we fail to comply with the applicable requirements of card networks and industry self-regulatory organizations, those card networks or organizations could seek to fine us, suspend us, or terminate our registrations through our bank sponsors. If our merchants or sales partners incur fines or penalties that we cannot collect from them, we may have to bear the cost of such fines or penalties.
We do not directly access the payment card networks, such as Visa, MasterCard and Discover, which enable our acceptance of credit cards and debit cards. Instead, we rely on sponsor banks and third-party processors to access such networks and settle transactions, and we must pay fees for such services.
Visa, Mastercard and other card networks set complex and evolving rules and standards with which our sponsor banks, third-party processors and we must comply. The payment networks and their member financial institutions routinely update, generally expand and modify requirements applicable to merchant acquirers, including rules regulating data integrity, third-party relationships (such as those with respect to sponsor banks and ISOs), merchant chargeback standards and PCI-DSS. Under certain circumstances, we are required to report incidents to the card networks within a specified time frame.
The rules of card networks are set by their boards, which include members that are card issuers that directly or indirectly sell processing services to merchants in competition with us. There is a risk that these members could use their influence to enact changes to the card network rules or policies that are detrimental to us. Any changes in network rules or standards that increase the cost of doing business or limit our ability to provide processing services to our merchants will adversely affect the operation of our business.
If we, our bank sponsors or our third-party processors fail to comply with the applicable rules and requirements of the Visa or Mastercard payment networks, Visa or Mastercard could suspend or terminate our registration. Further, our transaction processing capabilities, including settlement processes, could be delayed or otherwise disrupted, and recurring non-compliance could result in the payment networks seeking to fine us, or suspend or terminate our registrations which allow us to process transactions on their networks, making it impossible for us to conduct our business on its current scale. Under certain circumstances specified in the payment network rules, we may be required to submit to periodic audits, self-assessments, or other assessments of our compliance with the PCI-DSS. Such activities may reveal that we have failed to comply with the PCI-DSS. In addition, even if we comply with the PCI-DSS, there is no assurance that we will be protected from a security breach.
The termination of our registration with the payment networks, or any changes in payment network or issuer rules that limit our ability to provide merchant acquiring services, could have an adverse effect on our payment processing volumes, revenues and operating costs. If we are unable to comply with the requirements applicable to our settlement activities, the payment networks may no longer allow us to provide these services, which would require us to spend additional resources to obtain settlement services from a third-party provider. In addition, if we were
26
precluded from processing Visa and Mastercard electronic payments, we would lose a substantial portion of our revenues.
In addition, if a merchant or sales partner fails to comply with the applicable requirements of the card networks, it could be subject to a variety of fines or penalties that may be levied by those card networks. We may have to bear the cost of such fines or penalties if we are unable to collect them from the applicable merchant or sales partner. The termination of our member registration, any change in our status as a service provider or merchant processor, or any changes in network rules or standards could prevent us from providing processing services relating to the affected card network and could adversely affect our business, financial condition, or results of operations.
We are also subject to the operating rules of NACHA. NACHA is a self-regulatory organization which administers and facilitates private-sector operating rules for ACH payments and defines the roles and responsibilities of financial institutions and other ACH network participants. The NACHA Rules and Operating Guidelines impose obligations on us and our partner financial institutions. These obligations include audit and oversight by the financial institutions and the imposition of mandatory corrective action, including termination, for serious violations. If an audit or self-assessment under PCI-DSS or NACHA identifies any deficiencies that we need to remediate, the remediation efforts may distract our management team and be expensive and time consuming.
Similarly, our ACH sponsor banks have the right to audit our compliance with NACHA’s rules and guidelines and are given wide discretion to approve certain aspects of our business practices and terms of our agreements with ACH customers. Like the payment networks, NACHA may update its operating rules and guidelines at any time, which could require us to take more costly compliance measures or to develop more complex monitoring systems.
There may be a decline in the use of electronic payments as a payment mechanism for consumers or adverse developments with respect to the electronic payments industry in general, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition, and operating results.
Maintaining or increasing our profitability is dependent on consumers and businesses continuing to use credit cards, debit cards and make ACH payments at the same or increasing rate. If consumers do not continue to use these cards or methods of payment for their transactions or if there is a change in the mix of payments between cash and electronic payments which is adverse to us, our profits could decline and we could incur material losses. Regulatory changes may also result in merchants seeking to charge customers additional fees for use of electronic payments which may discourage their use. Additionally, in recent years, increased incidents of security breaches have caused some consumers to lose confidence in the ability of businesses to protect or store their information, causing consumers to discontinue use of electronic payment methods. Security breaches could also result in financial institutions cancelling large numbers of credit and debit cards, or consumers electing to cancel their cards following such an incident. These events could result in reduced use of electronic payments, and therefore, could adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.
In order to remain competitive and to continue to increase our revenues and earnings, we must continually update our products and services, a process which could result in increased costs and the loss of revenues, earnings, merchants and distribution partners if the new products and services do not perform as intended or are not accepted in the marketplace.
The electronic payments industry in which we compete is subject to rapid technological changes and is characterized by new technology, product and service introductions, evolving industry standards, regulatory compliance, changing merchant needs and the entrance of non-traditional competitors. We are subject to the risk that our existing products and services become obsolete, and that we are unable to develop new products and services in response to industry demands. Our future success will depend in part on our ability to develop or adapt to technological changes and evolving industry trends. We are continually involved in a number of projects, many of which require investment in non-revenue generating products or services that our distribution partners and merchants expect to be included in our product and service offerings. These projects carry the risks associated with any development effort, including
27
difficulty in determining market demand and timing for delivery of new products and services, cost overruns, delays in delivery and performance problems.
In addition, new products and offerings may not perform as intended or generate the business or revenue growth expected. Defects in our software and errors or delays in our processing of electronic transactions could result in additional development costs, diversion of technical and other resources from our other development efforts, loss of credibility with current or potential distribution partners and merchants, harm to our reputation, fines imposed by card networks, or exposure to liability claims. Any delay in the delivery of new products or services or the failure to differentiate our products and services could render them less desirable, or possibly even obsolete, to our merchants. Additionally, the market for alternative payment processing products and services is evolving, and it may develop too rapidly or not rapidly enough for us to recover the costs we have incurred in developing new products and services.
We may not be able to continue to expand our share of our existing vertical markets or expand into new vertical markets, which would inhibit our ability to grow and increase our profitability.
Our future growth and profitability depend, in part, upon our continued expansion within the vertical markets in which we currently operate, the emergence of other vertical markets for electronic payments and our integrated solutions, and our ability to penetrate new vertical markets and our current distribution partners’ customer base. As part of our strategy to expand into new vertical markets, we look for acquisition opportunities and partnerships with other businesses that will allow us to increase our market penetration, technological capabilities, product offerings and distribution capabilities. We may not be able to successfully identify suitable acquisition or partnership candidates in the future, and if we do, they may not provide us with the benefits we anticipated.
Our expansion into new vertical markets also depends upon our ability to adapt our existing technology or to develop new technologies to meet the particular needs of each new vertical market. We may not have adequate financial or technological resources to develop effective and secure services or distribution channels that will satisfy the demands of these new vertical markets. Penetrating these new vertical markets may also prove to be more challenging or costly or take longer than we may anticipate. If we fail to expand into new vertical markets and increase our penetration into existing vertical markets, we may not be able to continue to grow our revenues and earnings.
Our ability to grow our business will depend in part on the addition of new partners. Inability to effectively onboard these new partners could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our ability to grow our business will depend in part on the addition of new partners, and an inability to effectively onboard these new partners could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. We may encounter delays onboarding partners due to economic uncertainty, an economic slowdown or a recession, risks related to the Merger, the continuing effects of COVID-19, issues integrating the partner into Paya Connect, or other unforeseen circumstances. If we do not effectively onboard our new partners, including assisting such partners to quickly resolve any post-onboarding issues and provide effective ongoing support, our reputation could be damaged and our ability to add new partners and our relationships with our existing partners could be adversely affected. Additionally, if we fail to onboard these partners in a timely manner, it could lead to delays in collecting revenues that we may otherwise receive, causing our financial condition and results of operations to be adversely affected.
We may not be able to successfully execute our strategy of growth through acquisitions.
A significant part of our growth strategy is to enter new vertical markets through platform acquisitions of vertically focused integrated payment and software solutions providers and to expand within our existing vertical markets through selective tuck-in acquisitions. Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, from its execution until the Merger is consummated or the Merger Agreement is terminated, without the consent of Parent, we may not acquire any other business, any material equity interest or enter into any joint venture, partnership, strategic alliance, limited liability company or similar arrangement with any third person, other than acquisitions of immaterial assets from
28
vendors or suppliers under contracts in existence as of the date of the Merger Agreement in the ordinary course of business.
If the Merger is not consummated, we expect to continue to execute our acquisition strategy, however:
•we may not be able to identify suitable acquisition candidates or acquire additional assets on favorable terms;
•we may compete with others to acquire assets, and as competition increases, could result in decreased availability or increased prices for acquisition candidates;
•we may compete with others for select acquisitions and our competition may consist of larger, better-funded organizations with more resources and easier access to capital;
•we may experience difficulty in anticipating the timing and availability of acquisition candidates;
•we may not be able to obtain the necessary financing, on favorable terms or at all, to finance any of our potential acquisitions;
•we may not be able to generate the cash necessary to execute our acquisition strategy; and
•we may be unable to maintain uniform standards, controls, procedures, and policies as we attempt to integrate the acquired businesses, and this may lead to operational inefficiencies.
The occurrence of any of these factors could adversely affect our growth strategy.
Fraud by merchants or others could cause us to incur losses.
We face potential liability for fraudulent electronic payment transactions initiated by merchants or others. Merchant fraud occurs when a merchant opens a fraudulent merchant account and conducts fraudulent transactions or when a merchant, rather than a customer (though sometimes working in collusion with a customer engaged in fraudulent activities), knowingly uses a stolen or counterfeit card or card number to record a false sales transaction, or intentionally fails to deliver the merchandise or services sold in an otherwise valid transaction. Any time a merchant is unable to fund a chargeback, we are responsible for that chargeback.
Additionally, merchant fraud occurs when employees of merchants change the merchant demand deposit accounts to their personal bank account numbers, so that payments are improperly credited to the employee’s personal account. We have established systems and procedures to detect and reduce the impact of merchant fraud, but we cannot be sure that these measures are or will be effective. Failure to effectively manage risk and prevent fraud could increase our chargeback or other liability. In addition, beginning in October 2015, U.S. merchants that cannot process the Eurocard, Mastercard, and Visa standard ("EMV"), chip-based cards are held financially responsible for certain fraudulent transactions conducted using such cards. This has increased the risk to merchants who are not yet EMV-compliant and shifted a substantial amount of fraud to card-not-present transactions, which is the primary environment in which we operate. This increased risk and the shift to card-not-present fraud has resulted in us having to seek increased chargebacks from such merchants. Increases in chargebacks, failure to recover fraud-related losses from our merchants that have not yet complied with EMV standards or other liability could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
We also have potential liability for losses caused by fraudulent card-based payment transactions. Card fraud occurs when a merchant’s customer uses a stolen card (or a stolen card number in a card-not-present transaction) to purchase merchandise or services. In a card-present transaction, if the merchant swipes or dips the card, receives authorization for the transaction from the issuer and verifies the signature on the back of the card against the paper receipt signed by the customer, the issuer remains liable for any loss. In a card-not-present transaction, even if the merchant receives authorization for the transaction, the merchant is liable for any loss arising from the transaction. Many of the merchants that we serve transact a substantial percentage of their sales in card-not-present transactions
29
over the Internet or in response to telephone or mail orders, which makes these merchants more vulnerable to fraud than merchants whose transactions are conducted largely in card-present transactions.
Criminals are using increasingly sophisticated methods to engage in illegal activities such as counterfeiting and fraud. For example, bust-out fraud is a first-party fraud scheme where legitimate business credentials are combined with legitimate personal identity credentials and used to open a merchant account. After a period of either no processing or normal processing activity, typically ranging from four to 12 months, and processing minimal volume, the criminal quickly processes a substantial volume from fraudulent cards, receives the corresponding deposits and exits before chargebacks or returns are assessed. Incidents and types of fraud and counterfeiting may increase in the future. Failure to effectively identify and manage risk and prevent fraud could increase our chargeback liability or cause us to incur other liabilities.
We incur liability when our merchants refuse or cannot reimburse us for chargebacks resolved in favor of their customers.
We have potential liability for chargebacks associated with the transactions we process. If a billing dispute between a merchant and a cardholder is not ultimately resolved in favor of the merchant, the disputed transaction is “charged back” to the merchant’s bank and credited or otherwise refunded to the cardholder. The risk of chargebacks is typically greater with those merchants that promise future delivery of goods and services rather than delivering goods or rendering services at the time of payment. If we or our bank sponsors are unable to collect the chargeback from the merchant’s account or reserve account (if applicable), or if the merchant refuses or is financially unable (due to bankruptcy or other reasons) to reimburse the merchant’s bank for the chargeback, we may bear the loss for the amount of the refund paid to the cardholder. Any increase in chargebacks not paid by our merchants could increase our costs and decrease our revenues. Additionally, an ACH transaction could be rejected in certain situations, including instances where we attempt to pull fees out of a bank account with insufficient funds, where an account has been closed, or where the account number is invalid. If an ACH reject occurs, we may bear the loss for the amount not pulled from the applicable account, which could increase our costs and decrease our revenues.
Our risk management policies and procedures may not be fully effective in mitigating our risk exposure in all market environments or against all types of risks.
We operate in a rapidly changing industry. Accordingly, our risk management policies and procedures may not be fully effective to identify, monitor, manage and remediate our risks. Some of our risk evaluation methods depend upon information provided by others and public information regarding markets, merchants or other matters that are otherwise inaccessible by us. In some cases, that information may not be accurate, complete, or current. Additionally, our risk detection system is subject to a high degree of “false positive” risks being detected, which makes it difficult for us to identify real risks in a timely manner. If our policies and procedures are not fully effective or we are not always successful in capturing all risks to which we are or may be exposed, we may suffer harm to our reputation or be subject to litigation or regulatory actions that materially increase our costs and subject us to reputational damage that could limit our ability to grow and cause us to lose existing merchant clients.
The loss of key personnel or of our ability to attract, recruit, retain and develop qualified employees could adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Our success depends upon the continued services of our senior management and other key personnel who have substantial experience in the electronic payments industry and the markets in which we offer our services. Our ability to recruit and retain our senior management, key personnel, and other skilled employees may be affected as a result of the announcement of the Merger. In addition, our success depends in large part upon the reputation within the industry of our senior managers who have, developed relationships with our distribution partners, payment networks and other payment processing and service providers. Further, for us to continue to successfully compete and grow, we must attract, recruit, develop and retain personnel who will provide us with expertise across the entire spectrum of our intellectual capital needs. Our success is also dependent on the skill and experience of our sales force, which we must continuously work to maintain. While we have key personnel who have substantial experience with our operations, we must also develop our personnel to provide succession plans capable of maintaining the
30
continuity of our operations. The market for qualified personnel is competitive, and we may not succeed in recruiting additional personnel or may fail to effectively replace current personnel who depart with qualified or effective successors, including as a result of the announcement of the Merger. In addition, a sustained labor shortage or increased turnover rates within our employee base could lead to increased costs and could otherwise degrade our ability to efficiently operate our business.
Failure to retain or attract key personnel, including as a result of the announcement of the Merger, could impede our ability to grow and could result in our inability to operate our business profitably. In addition, contractual obligations related to confidentiality, assignment of intellectual property rights, and non-solicitation may be ineffective or unenforceable and departing employees may share our proprietary information with competitors in ways that could adversely impact us, or seek to solicit our distribution partners or merchants or recruit our key personnel to competing businesses.
Risks Relating to Intellectual Property and Information Technology
Unauthorized disclosure of merchant or cardholder data, whether through breach of our computer systems, computer viruses, or otherwise, could expose us to liability, protracted and costly litigation and damage our reputation.
We are responsible for data security for ourselves and for third parties with whom we partner and under the rules and regulations established by the payment networks, such as Visa, MasterCard, Discover and American Express, and debit card networks and by industry regulations and standards that may be promulgated by organizations such as NACHA, which manages the governance of the ACH network. These third parties include merchants, our distribution partners and other third-party service providers and agents. We and other third parties collect, process, store and/or transmit sensitive data, such as names, addresses, social security numbers, credit or debit card numbers and expiration dates, driver’s license numbers and bank account numbers. We have ultimate liability to the payment networks and our bank that sponsors our registration with Visa or MasterCard for our failure or the failure of third parties with whom we contract to protect this data in accordance with PCI-DSS and network requirements. The loss, destruction or unauthorized modification of merchant or cardholder data by us or our contracted third parties could result in significant fines, sanctions and proceedings or actions against us by the payment networks, card issuing banks, governmental entities, consumers, or others.
Threats may derive from human error, fraud, or malice on the part of employees or third parties, or from accidental technological failure. For example, certain of our employees have access to sensitive data that could be used to commit identity theft or fraud. Concerns about security increase when we transmit information electronically because such transmissions can be subject to attack, interception, or loss. Also, computer viruses can be distributed and spread rapidly over the Internet and could infiltrate our systems or those of our contracted third parties. Denial of service or other attacks could be launched against us for a variety of purposes, including interfering with our services or to create a diversion for other malicious activities. These types of actions and attacks and others could disrupt our delivery of services or make them unavailable. Any such actions or attacks against us or our contracted third parties could impugn our reputation, force us to incur significant expenses in remediating the resulting impacts, expose us to uninsured liability, result in the loss of our bank sponsors or our ability to participate in the payment networks, subject us to lawsuits, fines or sanctions, distract our management or increase our costs of doing business.
We and our contracted third parties could be subject to security breaches, cyber-attacks or cyber intrusions or disruptions by hackers, nation-state affiliated actions, and cyber-terrorists. Security breaches, cyber-attacks and cyber intrusions have generally increased as the number, intensity and sophistication of attempted attacks and intrusions from around the world have increased. Our encryption of data and other protective measures may not prevent unauthorized access to or use of sensitive data. A breach of a system may subject us to material losses or liability, including payment network fines, assessments and claims for unauthorized purchases with misappropriated credit, debit or card information, impersonation, or other similar fraud claims. A misuse of such data or a cybersecurity breach could harm our reputation and deter merchants from using electronic payments generally and our services specifically, thus reducing our revenue. In addition, any such misuse or breach could cause us to incur costs to correct the breaches or failures, expose us to uninsured liability, increase our risk of regulatory scrutiny,
31
subject us to lawsuits, and result in the imposition of material penalties and fines under state and federal laws or by the payment networks. While we maintain insurance coverage that may, subject to policy terms and conditions, cover certain aspects of cyber risks, our insurance coverage may be insufficient to cover all losses. In addition, a significant cybersecurity breach of our systems or communications could result in payment networks prohibiting us from processing transactions on their networks or the loss of our bank sponsors that facilitate our participation in the payment networks, either of which could materially impede our ability to conduct business.
Although we generally require that our agreements with distribution partners or our service providers which may have access to merchant or cardholder data include confidentiality obligations that restrict these parties from using or disclosing any merchant or cardholder data except as necessary to perform their services under the applicable agreements, we cannot guarantee that these contractual measures will prevent the unauthorized use, modification, destruction or disclosure of data or allow us to seek reimbursement from the contracted party. In addition, many of our merchants are middle market businesses that may have limited competency regarding data security and handling requirements and thus may experience data breaches. Any unauthorized use, modification, destruction, or disclosure of data could result in protracted and costly litigation, and our incurring significant losses.
In addition, our agreements with our bank sponsors and our third-party payment processors (as well as payment network requirements) require us to take certain protective measures to ensure the confidentiality of merchant and consumer data. Any failure to adequately comply with these protective measures could result in fees, penalties, litigation, or termination of our bank sponsor agreements.
Cybersecurity has become a top priority for regulators around the world, and some jurisdictions have enacted laws requiring companies to notify individuals of data security breaches involving certain types of personal data. In February 2018, the SEC issued guidance stating that public companies are expected to have controls and procedures that relate to cybersecurity disclosure, and are required under the federal securities laws to disclose information relating to certain cyber-attacks or other information security breaches. In March 2022, the SEC proposed new cybersecurity disclosure requirements intended to increase the transparency of publicly traded organizations' cybersecurity practices, and has placed cybersecurity risk disclosure and compliance requirements on its rule-making agenda for 2023. Therefore, we are anticipating more detailed requirements about the information we may be required to regularly disclose if the Merger is not consummated and we continue to be a public company after rules become effective. If we fail to comply with the relevant laws and regulations relating to cybersecurity, we could suffer financial loss, a disruption of our business, liability to investors, regulatory intervention or reputational damage.
Any significant unauthorized disclosure of sensitive data entrusted to us would cause significant damage to our reputation, and impair our ability to attract new distribution partners, and may cause parties with whom we already have such agreements to terminate them.
We may not be able to successfully manage our intellectual property and may be subject to infringement claims.
We rely on a combination of contractual rights and copyright, trademark and trade secret laws to establish and protect our proprietary technology. Third parties may challenge, circumvent, infringe or misappropriate our intellectual property, or such intellectual property may not be sufficient to permit us to take advantage of current market trends or otherwise to provide competitive advantages, which could result in costly redesign efforts, discontinuance of service offerings or other competitive harm. Others, including our competitors, may independently develop similar technology, duplicate our services or design around our intellectual property and, in such cases, we could not assert our intellectual property rights against such parties. Further, our contractual arrangements may not effectively prevent disclosure of our confidential information or provide an adequate remedy in the event of unauthorized disclosure of our confidential information. We may have to litigate to enforce or determine the scope and enforceability of our intellectual property rights and knowhow, which is expensive, could cause a diversion of resources and may not prove successful. Also, because of the rapid pace of technological change in our industry, aspects of our business and our services rely on technologies developed or licensed by third parties, and we may not be able to obtain or continue to obtain licenses and technologies from these third parties on reasonable terms or at
32
all. The loss of intellectual property protection or the inability to license or otherwise use third-party intellectual property could harm our business and ability to compete.
We may also be subject to costly litigation if our services and technology are alleged to infringe upon or otherwise violate a third party’s proprietary rights. Third parties may have, or may eventually be issued, patents that could be infringed by our products, services, or technology. Any of these third parties could make a claim of infringement against us with respect to our products, services, or technology. We may also be subject to claims by third parties for patent, copyright or trademark infringement, breach of license or violation of other third-party intellectual property rights. Any claim from third parties may result in a limitation on our ability to use the intellectual property subject to these claims. Additionally, in recent years, individuals and groups have been purchasing intellectual property assets for the sole purpose of making claims of infringement or other violations and attempting to extract settlements from companies like ours. Even if we believe that intellectual property related claims are without merit, defending against such claims is time consuming and expensive and could result in the diversion of the time and attention of our management and employees. Claims of intellectual property infringement or violation also might require us to redesign affected products or services, enter into costly settlement or license agreements, pay costly damage awards, or face a temporary or permanent injunction prohibiting us from marketing or selling certain of our products or services. Even if we have an agreement for indemnification against such costs, the indemnifying party, if any in such circumstances, may be unable to uphold its contractual obligations. If we cannot or do not license the infringed technology on reasonable terms or substitute similar technology from another source, our revenue and earnings could be adversely impacted.
Our systems and our third-party providers’ systems may fail due to factors beyond our control, which could interrupt our service, resulting in our inability to process payments, cause us to lose business, increase our costs and expose us to liability.
We depend on the efficient and uninterrupted operation of numerous systems, including our computer network systems, software, data centers and telecommunication networks, as well as the systems and services of our bank sponsors, the payment networks, third-party providers of processing services and other third parties. Our systems and operations or those of our third-party providers, such as our provider of authorization services, or the payment networks themselves, could be exposed to damage or interruption from, among other things, fire, natural disaster, power loss, telecommunications failure, unauthorized entry, computer viruses, denial-of-service attacks, acts of terrorism, human error or sabotage, financial insolvency and similar events. Our property and business interruption insurance may not be adequate to compensate us for all losses or failures that may occur. At present, our systems are not fully redundant. Therefore, certain aspects of our operations may be subject to interruption. While we have disaster recovery policies and arrangements in place, they have not been tested under actual disasters or similar events.
Defects in our systems or those of third parties, errors or delays in the processing of payment transactions, delays or discrepancies in merchant funding and settlement processes, telecommunications failures or other difficulties could result in failure to process transactions, additional operating costs, diversion of technical and other resources, loss of revenue, merchants and distribution partners, loss of merchant and cardholder data, harm to our business or reputation, exposure to fraud losses or other liabilities and fines and other sanctions imposed by payment networks.
We rely on other service and technology providers. If they fail or discontinue providing their services or technology generally or to us specifically, our ability to provide services to merchants may be interrupted, and, as a result, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely impacted.
We rely on third parties to provide or supplement card processing services and for infrastructure hosting services. We also rely on third parties for specific software and hardware used in providing our products and services. The termination by our service or technology providers of their arrangements with us or their failure to perform their services efficiently and effectively may adversely affect our relationships with our merchants and, if we cannot find alternate providers quickly, may cause those merchants to terminate their relationship with us.
33
We also rely in part on third parties for the development of and access to new technologies, or updates to existing products and services for which third parties provide ongoing support, which increases the cost associated with new and existing product and service offerings. Failure by these third-party providers to devote an appropriate level of attention to our products and services could result in delays in introducing new products or services, or delays in resolving any issues with existing products or services for which third-party providers provide ongoing support.
Risks Relating to Reliance on Third Parties
To acquire and retain a segment of our merchants, we depend in part on distribution partners that may not serve us exclusively and are subject to attrition.
We rely in significant part on the efforts of integrated software vendors and referral partners to market our services to merchants seeking to establish an integrated payment processing relationship. These distribution partners seek to introduce us, as well as our competitors, to newly established and existing middle market merchants. Generally, our agreements with distribution partners (except for a portion of our Integrated Solutions and Payment Services segments) are not exclusive and distribution partners retain the right to refer merchants to other merchant acquirers. Gaining and maintaining loyalty or exclusivity can require financial concessions to maintain current distribution partners and merchants or to attract potential distribution partners and merchants from our competitors. We have been required, and expect to be required in the future, to make concessions when renewing contracts with our distribution partners and such concessions can have a material impact on our financial condition or operating performance. If these distribution partners switch to another merchant acquirer, cease operations, or become insolvent, we will no longer receive new merchant referrals from them and we risk losing existing merchants that were originally enrolled by them. We cannot accurately predict the level of attrition of our distribution partners or merchants in the future, particularly those merchants we acquired as customers in the portfolio acquisitions we have completed in the past three years, which makes it difficult for us to forecast growth. If we are unable to establish relationships with new distribution partners or merchants, or otherwise increase our transaction processing volume to counter the effect of this attrition, our revenues will decline.
If the banks that currently provide ACH and wire transfers fail to properly transmit ACH or terminate their relationship with us or limit our ability to process funds or we are not able to increase our ACH capacity with our existing and new banks, our ability to process funds on behalf of our clients and our financial results and liquidity could be adversely affected.
We currently have agreements with three sponsor banks (Wells Fargo, Fifth Third Bank, and ACCU), to execute ACH and wire transfers to support our processing services. If one or more of the banks fails to process ACH transfers on a timely basis, or at all, then our relationship with our clients could be harmed and we could be subject to claims by a client with respect to the failed transfers. In addition, these banks have no obligation to renew their agreements with us on commercially reasonable terms, if at all. Currently, some agreements with our bank sponsors give them substantial discretion in approving certain aspects of our business practices, including our solicitation, application and qualification procedures for clients and the terms of our agreements with clients. If these banks terminate their relationships with us or restrict the dollar amounts of funds that they will process on behalf of our clients, their doing so may impede our ability to process funds and could have an adverse impact on our financial results and liquidity.
Inability to maintain our strategic relationship with Sage could adversely affect our business.
We have a strategic relationship with Sage Group plc, a global provider of integrated accounting, payroll, and payment solutions, which previously acquired Paya in 2006 and remained a strategic partner after GTCR, LLC acquired us in 2017. As part of this strategic relationship, we offer integration into Sage Intacct, X3, and other Sage products. During 2022, 2021 and 2020, we derived approximately 7.7%, 8.1%, and 8.6%, respectively, of our revenue from this relationship. We depend on Sage to refer new merchants to us and deliver an acceptable level of software functionality and service to our joint customers. There can be no assurance we will realize the expected benefits from this strategic relationship or that it will continue in the future. If successful, this relationship may be mutually beneficial and result in the continued growth in joint customers. However, such a relationship carries an
34
element of risk given the ongoing competition for this customer base. Also, if Sage fails to perform or if the relationship fails to continue as expected, we could suffer reduced sales or other operational difficulties and our business, results of operations and financial condition could be materially adversely affected.
We rely on bank sponsors, which have substantial discretion with respect to certain elements of our business practices, to process electronic payment transactions. If these sponsorships are terminated and we are not able to secure new bank sponsors, we will not be able to conduct our business.
Because we are not a bank, we are not eligible for membership in the Visa, Mastercard, and other payment networks, and are, therefore, unable to directly access these payment networks, which are required to process transactions. These networks’ operating regulations require us to be sponsored by a member bank to process electronic payment transactions. We are currently registered with Visa and Mastercard through BMO Harris and Chesapeake Bank. We are also subject to network operating rules promulgated by the NACHA relating to payment transactions processed by us using the ACH Network. For ACH payments, our ACH network is sponsored by Wells Fargo and Fifth Third Bank. The term of the agreements with Wells Fargo and Fifth Third Bank, which automatically renew annually, do not have a fixed termination date but are terminable with written notice. From time to time, we may enter into other sponsorship relationships as well.
The current term of our agreement with BMO Harris lasted through November 1, 2022 and automatically renews for one year periods unless either party provides the other at least six months’ notice of its intent to terminate. Although we believe our relationships with BMO Harris Bank and Chesapeake Bank are good, there cannot be any guarantee that BMO Harris Bank or Chesapeake Bank will not provide a notice of termination at any time.
Our bank sponsors may terminate their agreements with us if we materially breach the agreements and do not cure the breach within an established cure period, if our membership with Visa and/or Mastercard terminates, if we enter bankruptcy or file for bankruptcy, or if applicable laws or regulations, including Visa and/or Mastercard regulations, change to prevent either the applicable bank or us from performing services under the agreement. If these sponsorships are terminated and we are unable to secure a replacement bank sponsor within the applicable wind down period, we will not be able to process electronic payment transactions.
Although we do not believe that we are substantially dependent on any of these agreements, bank sponsors do have discretion in these agreements and there is a possibility that the termination of a sponsorship could have an adverse impact on our business due to the need to transition services to an alternative provider. If any of these contracts were terminated, we believe we would be able to enter into alternative arrangements, although we may not be able to procure terms of an equal or more advantageous nature. Additionally, each of these agreements have wind down and de-conversion periods, which we believe would allow sufficient time for us to replace any of the aforementioned sponsors during such de-conversion periods. We are unable to predict with any certainty which terms might change in such alternative arrangements.
Furthermore, our agreements with our bank sponsors provide the bank with substantial discretion in approving certain elements of our business practices, including our solicitation, application, and underwriting procedures for merchants. We cannot guarantee that our bank sponsors’ actions under these agreements will not be detrimental to us, nor can we provide assurance that any of our bank sponsors will not terminate their sponsorship of us in the future. Our bank sponsors have broad discretion to impose new business or operational requirements on us, which may materially adversely affect our business. If our sponsorship agreements are terminated and we are unable to secure another bank sponsor, we will not be able to offer Visa or Mastercard transactions or settle transactions which would likely cause us to terminate our operations.
Our bank sponsors also provide or supplement authorization, funding, and settlement services in connection with our bankcard processing services. If our sponsorships agreements are terminated and we are unable to secure another bank sponsor, we will not be able to process Visa and MasterCard transactions, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
35
In July 2018, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (“OCC”) announced that it will begin accepting special purpose national bank charter applications from financial technology companies (“FinTech Charter”). Even though the application for FinTech Charters remains controversial, we cannot predict whether or which, if any, of our current or future competitors would take advantage of the charter, if available. However, such a development could increase the competitive risks discussed above or create new competitive risks, such as our nonbank competitors being able to more easily access the payment networks without the requirement of a bank sponsor, which could provide them with a competitive advantage.
Legal and Regulatory Risks
We are subject to extensive government regulation, and any new laws and regulations, industry standards or revisions made to existing laws, regulations or industry standards affecting the electronic payments industry may have an unfavorable impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
In addition to those regulations discussed below that are imposed by the cards networks, NACHA and PCI-DSS, we are subject to numerous regulations that affect electronic payments including, U.S. financial services regulations, consumer protection laws, escheat regulations, the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (“FERPA”), the Protection of Pupil Rights Amendment (“PPRA”), and other privacy and information security regulations. Regulation and proposed regulation of our industry has increased significantly in recent years, with states enacting regulations in areas that have historically only been federally regulated. Changes to statutes, regulations, or industry standards, including interpretation and implementation of statutes, regulations, or standards, could increase our cost of doing business, affect our competitive balance, and significantly increase the difficulty of compliance. Failure to comply with regulations may have an adverse effect on our business, including the limitation, suspension or termination of services provided to, or by, third parties, and the imposition of penalties or fines.
Interchange fees, which are typically paid by the payment processor to the issuer in connection with electronic payments, are subject to increasingly intense legal, regulatory, and legislative scrutiny. In particular, the 2010 Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, (the "Dodd-Frank Act”), significantly changed the U.S. financial regulatory system by regulating and limiting debit card fees charged by certain issuers, allowing merchants to set minimum dollar amounts for the acceptance of credit cards and allowing merchants to offer discounts or other incentives for different payment methods.
Rules implementing the Dodd-Frank Act also contain certain prohibitions on payment network exclusivity and merchant routing restrictions. These restrictions could limit the number of debit transactions, and prices charged per transaction, which would negatively affect our business. The Dodd-Frank Act also created the CFPB, which has assumed responsibility for most federal consumer protection laws, and the Financial Stability Oversight Council, which has the authority to determine whether any non-bank financial company, such as us, should be supervised by the Federal Reserve, because it is systemically important to the U.S. financial system. Because we provide data processing and other services to U.S. banks, we are subject to regular oversight and examination by the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (the “FFIEC”), which is an inter-agency body of federal banking regulators. Any such designation would result in increased regulatory burdens on our business, which increases our risk profile and may have an adverse impact on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
We and many of our merchants are subject to Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act prohibiting unfair or deceptive acts or practices. That statement and other laws, rules and or regulations, including the Telemarketing Sales Act, may directly impact the activities of certain of our merchants and, in some cases, may subject us, as the merchant’s electronic processor or provider of certain services, to investigations, fees, fines and disgorgement of funds if we were deemed to have improperly aided and abetted or otherwise provided the means and instrumentalities to facilitate the illegal or improper activities of the merchant through our services. Various federal and state regulatory enforcement agencies, including the Federal Trade Commission and state attorneys general, have authority to take action against non-banks that engage in unfair or deceptive practices or violate other laws, rules and regulations and to the extent we are processing payments or providing services for a merchant that may be
36
in violation of laws, rules and regulations, we may be subject to enforcement actions and as a result may incur losses and liabilities that may impact our business.
Our business may also be subject to the FCRA, which regulates the use and reporting of consumer credit information and imposes disclosure requirements on entities that take adverse action based on information obtained from credit reporting agencies. We could be liable if our practices under the FCRA are not in compliance with the FCRA or regulations under it.
Separately, the Housing Assistance Tax Act of 2008 included an amendment to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), that requires the filing of yearly information returns by payment processing entities and third-party settlement organizations with respect to payments made in settlement of electronic payment transactions and third-party payment network transactions occurring in that calendar year. Reportable transactions are also subject to backup withholding requirements. We could be liable for penalties if our information returns do not comply with these regulations.
These and other laws and regulations, even if not directed at us, may require us to make significant efforts to change our products and services and may require that we incur additional compliance costs and change how we price our services to merchants. Implementing new compliance efforts may be difficult because of the complexity of new regulatory requirements and may cause us to devote significant resources to ensure compliance. Furthermore, regulatory actions may cause changes in business practices by us and other industry participants which could affect how we market, price and distribute our products and services, which could limit our ability to grow, reduce our revenues, or increase our costs. In addition, even an inadvertent failure to comply with laws and regulations, as well as rapidly evolving social expectations of corporate fairness, could damage our business or our reputation.
We may be required to register under the Bank Secrecy Act as a money services business or to become licensed under state money transmission statutes.
We provide payment processing services through our Paya, Inc. subsidiary, including card processing and ACH processing services. We have taken the position that Paya, Inc. is: (i) exempt from the BSA, as Paya is a payment processor and therefore able to avail itself of the payment processor exemption in accordance with guidance from the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, or FinCEN, including FinCEN Administrative Letter Ruling FIN-2014-R009; and (ii) exempt from licensure under various state money transmission laws, either expressly as a payment processor or agent of the payee, or pursuant to common law as an agent of the payee.
While we believe we have defensible arguments in support of our positions under the BSA and the state money transmission statutes, we have not expressly obtained confirmation of such positions from either FinCEN or the state banking departments who administer the state money transmission statutes. It is possible that FinCEN or certain state banking departments may determine that our activities are not exempt. Any determination that Paya, Inc. is in fact required to be registered either under the BSA or licensed under the state money transmission statutes may require substantial expenditures of time and money and could lead to liability in the nature of penalties or fines, as well as cause us to be required to cease operations in some or all of the US jurisdictions we service, which would have a materially adverse effect on our business and our financial results.
While we believe we are exempt from the BSA we are contractually required to comply with certain obligations in the BSA pursuant to our agreements with those federally-insured depository institutions that sponsor our card processing activities and our ACH activities.
In addition, we, and those federally-insured depository institutions that sponsor our card processing activities and our ACH activities, are subject to the sanctions programs enforced by OFAC. If we fail to comply with these sanctions programs or our sanctions compliance program is found to be deficient then the fines or penalties we face may be severe and our efforts to remediate our sanctions compliance program may be costly and result in diversion of management time and effort and may still not guarantee compliance.
37
Governmental regulations designed to protect or limit access to or use of consumer information could adversely affect our ability to effectively provide our services to merchants.
Governmental bodies in the United States have adopted, or are considering the adoption of, laws and regulations restricting the use, collection, storage, and transfer of, and requiring safeguarding of, non-public personal information. Our operations are subject to certain provisions of these laws. Relevant federal privacy laws include the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999, which applies directly to a broad range of financial institutions and indirectly, or in some instances directly, to companies that provide services to financial institutions. These laws and regulations restrict the collection, processing, storage, use and disclosure of personal information, require notice to individuals of privacy practices and provide individuals with certain rights to prevent the use and disclosure of protected information. These laws also impose requirements for safeguarding and proper destruction of personal information through the issuance of data security standards or guidelines. The Federal Trade Commission’s information safeguarding rules under the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act require us to develop, implement and maintain a written, comprehensive information security program containing safeguards that are appropriate for our size and complexity, the nature and scope of our activities and the sensitivity of any customer information at issue. Our financial institution clients are subject to similar requirements under the guidelines issued by the federal banking regulators. As part of their compliance with these requirements, each of our financial institution clients is expected to have a program in place for responding to unauthorized access to, or use of, customer information that could result in substantial harm or inconvenience to customers and they are also responsible for our compliance efforts as a major service provider. Changes in our relationships with service providers, such as our plan to use AWS and Azure to provide additional redundancy, could further complicate the applicability of these regulations to our business. In addition, regulators are proposing new laws or regulations which could require us to adopt certain cybersecurity and data handling practices. In many jurisdictions, consumers must be notified in the event of a data breach, and such notification requirements continue to increase in scope and cost. The changing privacy laws in the United States create new individual privacy rights and impose increased obligations on companies handling personal data. In addition, there are state laws restricting the ability to collect and utilize certain types of information such as Social Security and driver’s license numbers. Certain state laws impose similar privacy obligations as well as obligations to provide notification of security breaches of computer databases that contain personal information to affected individuals, state officers and consumer reporting agencies and businesses and governmental agencies that own data.
In connection with providing services to our merchants, we are required by regulations and contracts with our merchants and with our financial institution referral partners to provide assurances regarding the confidentiality and security of non-public consumer information. These contracts require periodic audits by independent companies regarding our compliance with industry standards and allow for similar audits regarding best practices established by regulatory guidelines. The compliance standards relate to our infrastructure, components and operational procedures designed to safeguard the confidentiality and security of non-public consumer personal information shared by our merchants with us. Our ability to maintain compliance with these standards and satisfy these audits will affect our ability to attract, grow and maintain business in the future.
Additionally, privacy and data security have become significant issues in the United States. With the recent increase in publicity regarding data breaches resulting in improper dissemination of consumer information, all 50 states have passed laws regulating the actions that a business must take if it experiences a data breach, such as prompt disclosure to affected customers. As we receive, collect, process, use, and store personal and confidential data, we are subject to diverse laws and regulations relating to data privacy and security, including, local state laws such as the New York Stop Hacks and Improve Data Security Act (the “SHIELD Act”), and the CCPA.
The SHIELD Act requires companies to implement a written information security program that contains appropriate administrative, technical, and physical safeguards. The CCPA, which became effective on January 1, 2020 and operative on January 1, 2023, gives California residents expanded rights to access and delete their personal information, opt out of certain personal information sharing and receive detailed information about how their personal information is used. The CCPA provides for civil penalties for violations, as well as a private right of action for data breaches that is expected to increase data breach litigation. The CCPA may increase our potential liability and may require us to modify our data collection or processing practices and policies and to incur substantial costs and expenses in effort to comply. Moreover, the CPRA, which became effective on January 1,
38
2023, significantly modifies and expands the CCPA, potentially resulting in further uncertainty and requiring us to incur additional costs and expenses in an effort to comply. Colorado, Connecticut, Virginia and Utah have each enacted comprehensive consumer data protection legislation, which is already effective or becomes effective throughout 2023. This, along with a growing number of other U.S. states that are proposing new privacy laws, has created the need for multi-state compliance. We continue to monitor and adapt to this evolving privacy landscape.
If we fail to comply with the laws and regulations relating to the protection of data privacy, we could be exposed to suits for breach of contract or to governmental proceedings. In addition, our relationships and reputation could be harmed, which could inhibit our ability to retain existing merchants and distribution partners and obtain new merchants and distribution partners.
If more restrictive privacy laws or rules are adopted by authorities in the future, our compliance costs may increase and our ability to perform due diligence on, and monitor the risk of, our current and potential merchants may decrease, which could create liability for us. Additionally, our opportunities for growth may be curtailed by our compliance capabilities or reputational harm, and our potential liability for security breaches may increase.
Changes in tax laws or their interpretations, or becoming subject to additional U.S., state or local taxes that cannot be passed through to our clients, could negatively affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We are subject to extensive tax liabilities, including federal and state and transactional taxes such as excise, sales/use, payroll, franchise, withholding, and ad valorem taxes. The rules dealing with taxation are constantly under review by legislators and regulators. We cannot predict how future tax proposals or regulations or other guidance issued by regulators might affect us. Changes in tax laws or their interpretations could decrease the amount of revenues we receive, the value of any tax loss carryforwards and tax credits recorded on our balance sheet and the amount of our cash flow, and have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Some of our tax liabilities are subject to periodic audits by the respective taxing authority which could increase our tax liabilities. Furthermore, companies in the payment processing industry, including us, may become subject to incremental taxation in various tax jurisdictions. Taxing jurisdictions have not yet adopted uniform positions on this topic. If we are required to pay additional taxes and are unable to pass the tax expense through to our clients, our costs would increase and our net income would be reduced, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The elimination of the London Interbank Offered Rate ("LIBOR") could adversely affect the cost of our debt.
The United Kingdom’s Financial Conduct Authority (the "FCA"), which regulates LIBOR, stopped persuading or compelling banks to submit LIBOR rates after 2021, and on December 31, 2021, ICE Benchmark Administration, the administrator of LIBOR, with the support of the Federal Reserve Board and the FCA, ceased publication of USD LIBOR for the one week and two month U.S. dollar LIBOR tenors. Publications related to all other LIBOR tenors will cease immediately on June 30, 2023. In the U.S, the Alternative Reference Rates Committee formally recommended the Secured Overnight Financing Rate or "SOFR," plus a recommended spread adjustment, as the replacement for USD LIBOR. The application of or transition to SOFR or any other alternative reference rate could increase our interest expense or may introduce operational risks in our accounting or financial reporting and other aspects of our business.
Any of these occurrences could materially and adversely affect our borrowing costs, financial condition, and results of operations.
39
Legal proceedings could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
In the ordinary course of business, we may become involved in various litigation matters, including but not limited to commercial disputes and employee claims, and from time to time may be involved in governmental or regulatory investigations or similar matters arising out of our current or future business. Any claims asserted against us, regardless of merit or eventual outcome, could harm our reputation and have an adverse impact on our relationship with our merchants, distribution partners and other third parties and could lead to additional related claims. Certain claims may seek injunctive relief, which could disrupt the ordinary conduct of our business and operations or increase our cost of doing business. Our insurance or indemnities may not cover all claims that may be asserted against us, and any claims asserted against us, regardless of merit or eventual outcome, may harm our reputation and cause us to expend resources in our defense. Furthermore, there is no guarantee that we will be successful in defending ourselves in future litigation. Should the ultimate judgments or settlements in any pending litigation or future litigation or investigation significantly exceed our insurance coverage, they could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Increasing scrutiny and changing expectations from investors, lenders, customers, government regulators and other market participants with respect to our Environmental, Social and Governance (“ESG”) policies and activities may impose additional costs on us or expose us to additional risks.
Companies across all industries and around the globe are facing increasing scrutiny relating to their ESG policies and activities. Investors, lenders and other market participants are increasingly focused on ESG practices and in recent years have placed increasing importance on the implications and social cost of their investments. Investment in funds that specialize in companies that perform well in assessments performed by ESG raters are increasingly popular, and major institutional investors have emphasized the importance of such ESG measures to their investment decisions. Responding to ESG considerations, including diversity and inclusion, environmental stewardship, support for local communities, labor conditions and human rights, ethics and compliance with law and corporate governance and transparency, and implementing goals and initiatives involve risks and uncertainties and depend in part on third-party performance or data that is outside our control.
In February 2021, the Acting Chair of the SEC issued a statement directing the Division of Corporation Finance to enhance its focus on climate-related disclosure in public company filings and in March 2021 the SEC announced the creation of a Climate and ESG Task Force in the Division of Enforcement. We risk damage to our brand and reputation or limited access to capital markets and loans, if we fail to adapt to or comply with investor, lender or other stakeholder expectations and standards and potential government regulation in a number of areas, such as diversity and inclusion, environmental stewardship, support for local communities, and corporate governance and transparency. In addition, compliance with standards and regulation may result in additional costs.
Risks Relating to Indebtedness
We have and will continue to have high levels of indebtedness.
Paya Holdings III, LLC (“Paya III”), Holdings and other indirect subsidiaries of Paya are party to a Credit Agreement, dated as of June 25, 2021 (the “Credit Agreement”). As of December 31, 2022, there were no outstanding borrowings under the revolving credit facility thereunder (the “2021 Revolving Credit Facility”) and $246.9 million outstanding under the Term Loan facility thereunder (the “2021 Term Credit Facility” and together with the 2021 Revolving Credit Facility, the “2021 Credit Facility”). Because borrowings under the 2021 Credit Facility bear interest at variable rates, increases in interest rates on debt that has not been fixed using interest rate hedges will increase interest expense, reduce cash flow or increase the cost of future borrowings or refinancings.
Our indebtedness could have important consequences to our investors, including, but not limited to:
•increasing vulnerability to, and reducing its flexibility to respond to, general adverse economic and industry conditions;
40
•requiring the dedication of a substantial portion of cash flow from operations to the payment of principal of, and interest on, its indebtedness, thereby reducing the availability of such cash flow to fund working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions, joint ventures or other general corporate purposes;
•limiting flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in its business and the competitive environment; and
•limiting our ability to borrow additional funds and increasing the cost of any such borrowing.
If the proposed Merger is consummated, then the Company will terminate the Credit Agreement and concurrently repay all advances and other obligations outstanding thereunder and the surviving corporation will assume all remaining debts, liabilities and duties of the Company (if any), in each case as provided under the applicable provisions of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, as amended.
Risks Relating to Ownership of our Common Stock and Our Status as a Public Company
If the Merger is not consummated and we remain a public company, we may issue additional common stock or other equity securities without your approval, which would dilute your ownership interests and may depress the market price of the common stock.
Pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement, until the Merger is consummated or the Merger Agreement is terminated, we generally may not issue, sell, deliver, pledge or agree or commit to issue, deliver, encumber or subject to a lien, or pledge any securities. However, if the Merger is not consummated and we remain a public company, we may issue additional shares of common stock or other equity securities in the future in connection with, among other things, future acquisitions, repayment of outstanding indebtedness or grants under the Omnibus Plan without stockholder approval in a number of circumstances. In 2021 and 2022, we issued a total of 15,362,438 and 170,958 shares of common stock, respectively, including shares issued in a primary offering, shares issued to partially finance the acquisition of Paragon Payment Solutions, shares issued in exchange for our then outstanding warrants, and shares issued under the Omnibus Plan. In addition, we are required to issue an aggregate of 14,018,188 shares of common stock to existing equity holders of Paya upon achievement of milestone targets. Our issuance of additional common stock or other equity securities of equal or senior rank would have the following effects:
•our existing shareholders’ proportionate ownership interest will decrease;
•the amount of cash available per share, including for payment of dividends in the future, may decrease;
•the relative voting strength of each previously outstanding share of common stock may be diminished; and
•the market price of our common stock may decline.
Provisions in our charter and Delaware law may inhibit a takeover, which could limit the price investors might be willing to pay in the future for our common stock and could entrench management.
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws contain provisions to limit the ability of others to acquire control of us or cause us to engage in change-of-control transactions, including, among other things:
•provisions that authorize our board of directors, without action by our stockholders, to authorize by resolution the issuance of shares of preferred stock and to establish the number of shares to be included in such series, along with the preferential rights determined by our board of directors;
•provisions that permit only a majority of our board of directors or the Chair of the board of directors at the direction of a majority of the board of directors or, for so long as GTCR-Ultra Holdings, LLC ("Ultra") and its affiliates beneficially own at least 35% of our common stock, the Chair of the board of directors at the written request of the holders of a majority of the voting power of the then outstanding shares of voting stock, to call shareholder meetings, and therefore do not permit stockholders to call special stockholder meetings;
41
•provisions that impose advance notice requirements, minimum shareholding periods and ownership thresholds, and other requirements and limitations on the ability of stockholders to propose matters for consideration at stockholder meetings; and
•a staggered board whereby our directors are divided into three classes, with each class subject to reelection once every three years on a rotating basis.
These provisions could have the effect of depriving our stockholders of an opportunity to sell their shares at a premium over prevailing market prices by discouraging third parties from seeking to obtain control of us in a tender offer or similar transaction. With our staggered board of directors, at least two annual meetings of shareholders will generally be required in order to effect a change in a majority of our directors. Our staggered board of directors can discourage proxy contests for the election of our directors and purchases of substantial blocks of our shares by making it more difficult for a potential acquirer to gain control of our board of directors in a relatively short period of time.
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides, subject to limited exceptions, that the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware will be the sole and exclusive forum for certain stockholder litigation matters, which could limit our stockholders’ ability to obtain a favorable judicial forum for disputes with us or our directors, officers, employees or stockholders.
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation requires, to the fullest extent permitted by law, that derivative actions brought in our name, actions against directors, officers and employees for breach of fiduciary duty and other similar actions may be brought only in the Court of Chancery in the State of Delaware and, if brought outside of Delaware, the stockholder bringing the suit will be deemed to have consented to service of process on such stockholder’s counsel. Any person or entity purchasing or otherwise acquiring any interest in shares of our capital stock shall be deemed to have notice of and consented to the forum provisions in its amended and restated certificate of incorporation.
This choice of forum provision may limit a stockholder’s ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum that it finds favorable for disputes with us or any of our directors, officers, other employees or stockholders, which may discourage lawsuits with respect to such claims. Alternatively, if a court were to find the choice of forum provision contained in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation to be inapplicable or unenforceable in an action, we may incur additional costs associated with resolving such action in other jurisdictions, which could harm its business, operating results and financial condition.
A market for our common stock may not be sustained, which would adversely affect the liquidity and price of our common stock.
The price of our common stock may fluctuate significantly due to general market and economic conditions. An active trading market for our common stock may not be sustained.
We may be unable to satisfy Nasdaq listing requirements in the future, which could limit investors’ ability to effect transactions in our common stock and subject us to additional trading restrictions.
If we fail to continue to satisfy ongoing Nasdaq listing requirements, or if we are delisted, there could be significant material adverse consequences, including:
•a limited availability of market quotations for our common stock;
•a limited amount of news and analyst coverage for us; and
•a decreased ability to obtain capital or pursue acquisitions by issuing additional equity or convertible securities
42
If we fail to maintain effective internal control over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures, we may not be able to accurately report our financial results, or report them in a timely manner.
We are a public reporting company subject to the rules and regulations established from time to time by the SEC and Nasdaq. As a public company we are required to document and test our internal control over financial reporting pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act so that our management can certify as to the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. In addition, our independent registered public accounting firm is required to provide an attestation report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting in our Annual Reports on Form 10-K on an ongoing basis.
As of December 31, 2021, we identified a material weakness in our controls related to the operating effectiveness of the review of the annual income tax provision prepared by a third-party firm. We did not maintain effective controls to sufficiently review the completeness and accuracy of the annual tax provision.
This material weakness resulted in adjustments that have been recorded in our consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2021. Our management and our independent registered public accounting firm determined that as of December 31, 2022, this material weakness had been remediated and our internal control over financial reporting are effective.
Remediation of the 2021 required, and any other material weakness or any significant deficiency would require management to devote significant time and incur significant expense, and management may not be able to remediate other future material weakness or significant deficiencies in a timely manner. The existence of any material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting could result in errors in our financial statements that could require us to restate our financial statements and cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations. If we are unable to remediate the existing material weakness or assert that our internal control over financial reporting is effective, or if our independent registered public accounting firm is unable to express an opinion as to the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, or expresses an adverse opinion, investors may lose confidence in the accuracy and completeness of our financial reports, we may face restricted access to the capital markets and our stock price may be adversely affected.
In addition, if the Merger is not consummated and we remain a public company, we expect to continue to incur costs related to our internal control over financial reporting in the upcoming years to improve our internal control environment. If we are unable to comply with the requirements applicable to us as a public company, including the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, in a timely manner, we may be unable to accurately report our financial results, or report them within the timeframes required by the SEC. If this occurs, we also could become subject to sanctions or investigations by the SEC or other regulatory authorities.
We do not anticipate paying dividends for the foreseeable future.
Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, until the Merger is consummated or the Merger Agreement is terminated, without prior consent from Parent, we may not declare, set aside or pay any dividend or other distribution in respect of any shares of capital stock or other equity or voting interest, or make any other distribution in respect of the shares of capital stock or other equity or voting interest. In addition, we do not anticipate that our board of directors will declare dividends in the foreseeable future. In addition, the ability of our board of directors to pay dividends in the future may be restricted by our debt documents, our holding company structure and capital requirements at our subsidiaries. Because we do not pay dividends, and do not anticipate paying dividends for the foreseeable future, the price of our common stock must appreciate in order for you to realize a gain on your investment. This appreciation may not occur.
43
Our ability to meet expectations and projections in any research or reports published by securities or industry analysts, or a lack of coverage by securities or industry analysts, could result in a depressed market price and limited liquidity for our common stock.
The trading market for our common stock is influenced by the research and reports that industry or securities analysts may publish about us, our business, our market, or our competitors. If no securities or industry analysts commence coverage of us, our stock price would likely be less than that which would be obtained if it had such coverage, and the liquidity, or trading volume of our common stock may be limited, making it more difficult for a stockholder to sell shares at an acceptable price or amount. If any analysts do cover us, their projections may vary widely and may not accurately predict the results we actually achieve. Our share price may decline if our actual results do not match the projections of research analysts covering us. Similarly, if one or more of the analysts who write reports on us downgrades our stock or publishes inaccurate or unfavorable research about our business, our share price could decline. If one or more of these analysts ceases coverage of us or fails to publish reports on us regularly, our share price or trading volume could decline.
If the Merger is not consummated and we remain a public company, future sales of our common stock by Ultra may reduce the market price of common stock that you might otherwise obtain.
As of December 31, 2022, Ultra beneficially owned 45,234,022 shares of common stock and is entitled to receive an additional 14,018,188 shares in the event that the price of our common stock exceeds $17.50 per share for 20 out of any 30 consecutive trading days through October 16, 2025 (see Note 3 for details on the Fintech Transaction). If the Merger is not consummated and we remain a public company, Ultra or its affiliates may sell large amounts of the Company's common stock in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions. The Company also entered into a registration rights agreement with Ultra and certain other stockholders, pursuant to which it granted certain registration rights to Ultra and the other stockholders party thereto. The registration and availability of such a significant number of shares of common stock for trading in the public market may increase the volatility in the Company’s stock price or put significant downward pressure on the price of its stock.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
None.
Item 2. Properties
We maintain several offices across the United States, all of which we lease.
Our office locations, as of December 31, 2022, include:
•Corporate headquarters in Atlanta, Georgia with approximately 23,000 leased square feet;
•Finance and Operations in Reston, Virginia with approximately 10,000 leased square feet;
•Sales and Operations in Fort Walton Beach, Florida with approximately 11,000 leased square feet;
•Sales and Operations in Mount Vernon, Ohio with approximately 2,000 leased square feet; and
•Sales and Operations in Dallas, Texas with approximately 6,000 leased square feet.
44
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
Other than as described below, we are currently not a party to any legal proceedings that would be expected to have a material adverse effect on our business or financial condition. From time to time, we are subject to litigation incidental to our business, as well as other litigation of a non-material nature in the ordinary course of business.
In connection with the Offer and Merger Agreement, five complaints have been filed as individual actions in United States District Courts and one complaint has been filed in New York Supreme Court. Certain demand letters have also been sent to the Company by purported stockholders making similar allegations.
On January 25, 2023, Ryan O’Dell, a purported stockholder of the Company, filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, captioned O’Dell v. Paya Holdings Inc., et al., Case No. 1:23-cv-659 (the “O’Dell Complaint”). On January 31, 2023, Jordan Wilson, a purported stockholder of the Company, filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, captioned Jordan Wilson v. Paya Holdings Inc., et al., Case No. 1:23-cv-790 (the “Wilson Complaint”). On January 31, 2023, Robert Wilhelm, a purported stockholder of the Company, filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, captioned Wilhelm v. Paya Holdings Inc., et. al., Case No. 1:23-cv-119 (the “Wilhelm Complaint”). On February 1, 2023, Dustin Asbury, a purported stockholder of the Company, filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, captioned Asbury v. Paya Holdings Inc., et. al., Case No. 1-23-cv-861 (the “Asbury Complaint”). On February 2, 2023, Jacob Wheeler, a purported stockholder of the Company, filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, captioned Wheeler v. Paya Holdings Inc., et. al., Case No. 1:23-cv-892 (the “Wheeler Complaint” and together with the O’Dell Complaint, the Wilson Complaint, the Wilhelm Complaint and the Asbury Complaint, the “Complaints”).
The Complaints allege, among other things, that the defendants (the Company and the Company’s Board of Directors) violated Sections 14(d), 14(e) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act and Rule 14d-9 promulgated thereunder by omitting and/or misrepresenting certain material facts relating to the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement from the Schedule 14D-9 filed by the Company on January 24, 2023. The Complaints seek, among other relief, (i) injunctive relief preventing the consummation of the Merger, (ii) recission of the Merger Agreement or rescissory damages, (iii) other damages purportedly incurred on account of the alleged omissions or misstatements, and (iv) an award of plaintiff’s costs and disbursements of the action, including attorneys’ and expert fees and expenses.
On January 31, 2023, Brian Levy, a purported stockholder of the Company, filed a complaint in the Supreme Court of the State of New York for Nassau County, captioned Brian Levy v. Debora Boyda, et al., Index No. 601850/2023 (the “Levy Complaint”). The Levy Complaint alleges, among other things, that the defendants (the Company, the Company’s Board of Directors, and Nuvei Corporation) violated Section 10-5-50 of the Georgia Uniform Securities Act of 2008 and/or negligently and fraudulently misrepresented and concealed certain material facts related to the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement under New York common law. The Levy Complaint seeks, among other relief, (i) a declaration that the Company and the Company’s Board of Directors violated Section 10-5-50 of the Georgia Uniform Securities Act of 2008, (ii) a declaration that defendants negligently and fraudulently misrepresented, concealed and omitted material facts related to the Merger, (iii) injunctive relief preventing the consummation of the Merger, and (iv) an award of interest, attorney’s fees, expert fees and other costs.
The outcome of the matters described above cannot be predicted with certainty. However, the Company believes that the allegations in the Complaints, the Levy Complaint and the demand letters are without merit. Additional complaints or demand letters may be filed against or received by the Company, the Company’s Board of Directors, Nuvei Corporation and/or Purchaser in connection with the Merger Agreement and the proposed Merger, the Schedule TO and the Schedule 14D-9.
45
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable
46
Part II
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Shareholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Holders
As of December 31, 2022, there were 78 holders of record of our common stock.
Dividend Information
We do not currently pay any cash dividends on our common stock. The declaration and amount of all dividends will be at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend upon many factors, including our financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, prospects, industry conditions, capital requirements of our business, covenants associated with certain debt obligations, legal requirements, regulatory constraints, industry practice and other factors the board of directors deems relevant. We can give no assurances that we will pay a dividend in the future.
Stock Performance Graph
The following stock price performance graph should not be deemed incorporated by reference by any general statement incorporating by reference this Annual Report on Form 10-K into any filing under the Exchange Act or the Securities Act, except to the extent that we specifically incorporate this information by reference, and shall not otherwise be deemed filed under such acts.
The graph below compares the cumulative total return of our common stock from October 19, 2020, the date on which our common shares commenced trading on the Nasdaq, through December 31, 2022, with the comparable cumulative return of two indices, the S&P Information Technology Net Total Return, and the Russell 2000 Total Return. The performance graph and table assume an initial investment of $100 on October 19, 2020. We have not paid any cash dividends and, therefore, the cumulative total return calculation for us is based solely upon the change in share price. The share price performance shown on the graph is not necessarily indicative of future price performance.
47
| Paya Holdings Inc. | Russell 2000 | S&P Information Technology | ||||||||||||||||||
| October 19, 2020 | $ | 100.00 | $ | 100.00 | $ | 100.00 | ||||||||||||||
| December 31, 2020 | 111.77 | 122.39 | 109.77 | |||||||||||||||||
| March 31, 2021 | 90.21 | 137.61 | 111.86 | |||||||||||||||||
| June 30, 2021 | 90.70 | 143.19 | 124.70 | |||||||||||||||||
| September 30, 2021 | 89.47 | 136.61 | 126.29 | |||||||||||||||||
| December 31, 2021 | 52.18 | 139.15 | 147.28 | |||||||||||||||||
| March 31, 2022 | 48.40 | 128.29 | 134.88 | |||||||||||||||||
| June 30, 2022 | 54.24 | 105.85 | 107.50 | |||||||||||||||||
| September 30, 2022 | 50.29 | 103.17 | 100.75 | |||||||||||||||||
| December 31, 2022 | 64.77 | 109.15 | 105.44 | |||||||||||||||||
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
None.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
None.
48
Item 6. [Reserved]
49
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following Management Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”) summarizes the significant factors affecting the consolidated operating results, financial condition, liquidity and capital resources of Paya Holdings Inc. and is intended to help the reader understand Paya Holdings Inc., our operations and our present business environment. This discussion should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements and notes to those statements included in Part II, Item 8 within this Annual Report on Form 10-K. References to “we,” “us,” “our”, “Paya”, “Paya Holdings”, or “the Company” refer to Paya Holdings Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries.
Overview
We are a leading independent integrated payments and commerce platform providing card, ACH, and check payment processing solutions via software to middle-market businesses in the United States. Our solutions integrate with customers’ core business software to enable payments acceptance, reconcile invoice detail, and post payment information to their core accounting system. In this manner, we enable our customers to collect revenue from their B2C and B2B customers with a seamless experience and high-level of security across payment types.
Recent Developments
Merger of Paya with Nuvei Corporation
On January 9, 2023, we. announced the execution of the Merger Agreement with Nuvei Corporation, the Parent, and Pinnacle Merger Sub, Inc., the Purchaser.
Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, and upon the terms and subject to the conditions thereof, Purchaser agreed to commence the Offer, to purchase all of the shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share, of the Company issued and outstanding at the Offer Price, in cash, without interest thereon (but subject to applicable withholding). Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, and upon the terms and subject to the conditions thereof, we will consummate the Merger. If the Merger is consummated, the Company’s common stock will be delisted from the Nasdaq and the duty to file reports will be suspended under Section 13 and 15(d) of the Exchange Act.
On January 24, 2023, Purchaser commenced the Offer by filing with the SEC and mailing to the Company’s stockholders a Tender Offer Statement on Schedule TO. The Company concurrently filed with the SEC and mailed to stockholders a Solicitation/Recommendation Statement on Schedule 14D-9, which recommended that the Company’s stockholders tender their shares to Purchaser pursuant to the Offer. The Offer will initially remain open for a minimum of 20 business days from the date of commencement of the Offer. The Merger Agreement includes customary termination provisions for both the Company and Parent, and provides that, in connection with the termination of the Merger Agreement under specified circumstances, including termination by the Company to accept and enter into an agreement with respect to a Superior Proposal (as defined in the Merger Agreement), the Company will pay Parent a termination fee of approximately $38 million. The parties to the Merger Agreement are also entitled to specifically enforce the terms and provisions of the Merger Agreement.
The Merger Agreement provides, among other things, that upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement, at the effective time of the Merger, each share of the Company’s common stock that is not (a) validly tendered and irrevocably accepted for purchase pursuant to the Offer, (b) held by a stockholder who is entitled to demand appraisal and who has properly and validly exercised appraisal rights in accordance with, and who has complied with, applicable law, or (c) held by Parent, Purchaser, or any other direct or indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Parent, will be thereupon converted into the right to receive cash in an amount equal to the Offer Price, on the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement. The proposed Merger is expected to close during the first quarter of 2023.
50
Termination Agreement with Respect to Tax Receivable Agreement ("TRA")
On January 8, 2023, in connection with the execution and delivery of the Merger Agreement, the Company and Ultra entered into an agreement (the “Termination Agreement”) with respect to the termination of the TRA. The Termination Agreement implements certain provisions of the TRA in connection with the occurrence of the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, including the acceleration of all obligations under the TRA pursuant to its terms resulting in the payment of an early termination fee of approximately $19.5 million to Ultra.
Factors Affecting Results of Operations
Factors impacting our business, results of operations, and forecasts
A number of factors impact our business, results of operations, financial condition, and forecasts, including, but not limited to, the following:
•Increased adoption of integrated payments solutions. We generate revenue through volume-based rates and per item fees attributable to payment transactions between our customers and their customers. We expect to grow our customer base by bringing on new software partners, continuing to sell payment capabilities to customers of our existing software partners not yet leveraging our payment integrations, and by adding integrations within existing multi-platform software partners to access additional customer bases. Further, we expect to benefit from the natural growth of our partners who are typically growing franchises within their respective verticals.
•Acquisition, retention, and growth of software partnerships. Paya leverages a partner-first distribution network to grow our client base and payment volume. Continuing to innovate and deliver new commerce products and wraparound services is critical to our ability to attract, retain, and grow relationships with software partners in our Paya verticals and adjacent markets.
•Growth in customer life-time value. We benefit from, and aid-in, the growth of online electronic payment transactions to our customers. This is dependent on the sales growth of the customers’ businesses, the overall adoption of online payment methods by their customer bases, and the adoption of our additional integrated payment modules such as our proprietary ACH capabilities. Leveraging these solutions helps drive increased customer retention, as well as higher volume and revenue per customer.
•Economic conditions. Changes in macro-level consumer spending trends, including due to economic slowdown and or a recession, could affect the amount of volumes processed on our platform, thus resulting in fluctuations to our revenue streams.
Key Components of Revenue and Expenses
The period to period comparisons of our results of operations have been prepared using the historical periods included in our consolidated financial statements. The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this document.
Revenue
The Company’s business model provides payment services, credit and debit card processing, and ACH processing to customers through enterprise or vertically focused software partners, direct sales, reseller partners, other referral partners, and a limited number of financial institutions. The Company recognizes processing revenues at the time customer transactions are processed and periodic fees over the period the service is performed. Transaction based revenue represents revenue generated from transaction fees based on volume and is recognized on a net basis. Service based fee revenue is generated from charging a service fee, a fee charged to the client for facilitating bankcard processing, and is recognized on a gross basis. The Company also generates service based fees related to ACH inclusive of monthly support and statement fees.
51
Cost of services
Cost of services includes card processing costs, ACH costs, other fees paid to card networks, and equipment expenses directly attributable to payment processing and related services to customers. These costs are recognized as incurred. Cost of services also includes revenue share amounts paid to reseller and referral partners based on customer activity. These expenses are recognized as transactions are processed. Accrued revenue share represents amounts earned during the month but not yet paid at the end of the period.
Selling general & administrative
Selling, general and administrative expenses consist primarily of salaries, wages, commissions, marketing costs, professional services costs, technology costs, occupancy costs of leased space, and bad debt expense. Stock based compensation expense is also included in this category.
Depreciation & Amortization
Depreciation and amortization consist primarily of amortization of intangible assets, including customer relationships, internal use software, acquired customer lists, trade names, and to a lesser extent, depreciation on our investments in property, equipment, and software. We depreciate and amortize our assets on a straight-line basis. These lives are 3 years for computers and equipment and acquired internal-use software, 5 years for furniture, fixtures, and office equipment, and the lesser of the asset useful life or remaining lease term for leasehold improvements. Repair and maintenance costs are expensed as incurred and included in selling, general and administrative expenses on the consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income. The purchase of customer lists are treated as asset acquisitions, resulting in recording an intangible asset at cost on the date of acquisition. The acquired customer lists intangible assets have a useful life of 5 years, other customer relationships are amortized over a period of 5-15 years, developed technology 5-10 years, and trade names over 5-25 years.
Results of Operations
The period to period comparisons of our results of operations have been prepared using the historical periods included in our audited consolidated financial statements. The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this document.
52
Year Ended December 31, 2022 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2021
| (in millions) | Amount of | % Change | |||||||||||||||||||||
| For the Year Ended | Increase | Favorable | |||||||||||||||||||||
| December 31, | (Decrease) | (Unfavorable) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 2022 | 2021 | 2022 vs. 2021 | 2022 vs. 2021 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Revenue | $ | 282.7 | $ | 249.4 | $ | 33.3 | 13.4 | % | |||||||||||||||
| Cost of services exclusive of depreciation and amortization | (138.7) | (119.3) | (19.4) | (16.3 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Selling, general & administrative expenses | (87.0) | (77.5) | (9.5) | (12.3 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization | (31.8) | (30.0) | (1.8) | (6.0 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Income from operations | 25.2 | 22.6 | 2.6 | 11.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| Other income (expense) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest expense | (14.3) | (14.1) | (0.2) | (1.4 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Other income (expense) | 2.7 | (8.0) | 10.7 | 133.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| Total other income (expense) | (11.6) | (22.1) | 10.5 | 47.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| Income (loss) before income taxes | 13.6 | 0.5 | 13.1 | NM | |||||||||||||||||||
| Income tax (expense) benefit | (5.3) | (1.3) | (4.0) | NM | |||||||||||||||||||
| Net income (loss) | 8.3 | (0.8) | 9.1 | 1137.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
NM - not meaningful
Comparison of the Years Ended December 31, 2022 and 2021 (in millions, except percentages)
Revenue
Revenue increased by $33.3, or 13.4%, to $282.7 for the year ended December 31, 2022 from $249.4 for the year ended December 31, 2021. The increase was primarily driven by the Integrated Solutions segment, increasing $26.3 or 16.9%. The increase in Integrated Solutions revenue was driven primarily by increased volume from both new and existing customers.
Cost of services exclusive of depreciation and amortization
Cost of services increased by $19.4 or 16.3%, to $138.7 for year ended December 31, 2022 from $119.3 for the year ended December 31, 2021. The increase was driven by growth from higher revenue share partners in Integrated Solutions, growth in ACH in Payment Services and the inorganic contribution from Paragon.
Selling, general & administrative
Selling, general & administrative expenses increased by $9.5, or 12.3%, to $87.0 for the year ended December 31, 2022 from $77.5 for the year ended December 31, 2021. The increase is primarily due to $3.6 in stock compensation expense, $2.6 in compensation and benefits, $1.3 in technology related costs, specifically hosting, maintenance and support, and $1.3 in M&A related expense.
Depreciation and amortization
Depreciation and amortization increased by $1.8, or 6.0%, to $31.8 for the year ended December 31, 2022 as from $30.0 for the year ended December 31, 2021. The increase is primarily due to $1.8 in increased amortization related
53
to the residual buyout of customer lists acquired during 2021 and 2022 and $0.9 in internally developed software amortization offset by a $0.8 decrease in technology intangible amortization.
Interest Expense
Interest expense increased by $0.2, or 1.4%, to $14.3 for the year ended December 31, 2022 from $14.1 for the year ended December 31, 2021, primarily due to slightly higher interest rates on the Term Loan credit facility.
Other Income (Expense)
Other income (expense) was $2.7 for the year ended December 31, 2022 and other income (expense) was $(8.0) for the year ended December 31, 2021. The change period over period is primarily due to a prepayment penalty of $2.3 and write off of debt issuance costs of $6.2 related to our Prior Credit Agreement in 2021, a $2.9 increase in gains on the interest rate cap agreement in 2022 compared to 2021, and a $0.7 decrease in value of the Tax Receivable Agreement liability. These were offset by a $0.6 gain on contingent consideration in 2021, and a $0.5 lease loss in 2022.
Year Ended December 31, 2021 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2020
| (in millions) | Amount of | % Change | |||||||||||||||||||||
| For the Year Ended | Increase | Favorable | |||||||||||||||||||||
| December 31, | (Decrease) | (Unfavorable) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 2020 | 2021 vs. 2020 | 2021 vs. 2020 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Revenue | $ | 249.4 | $ | 206.0 | $ | 43.4 | 21.1 | % | |||||||||||||||
| Cost of services exclusive of depreciation and amortization | (119.3) | (102.1) | (17.2) | (16.8) | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| Selling, general & administrative expenses | (77.5) | (63.0) | (14.5) | (23.0) | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization | (30.0) | (24.6) | (5.4) | (22.0) | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| Income from operations | 22.6 | 16.3 | 6.3 | 38.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| Other income (expense) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest expense | (14.1) | (17.6) | 3.5 | 19.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| Other income (expense) | (8.0) | 1.2 | (9.2) | NM | |||||||||||||||||||
| Total other income (expense) | (22.1) | (16.4) | (5.7) | (34.8) | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| Loss before income taxes | 0.5 | (0.1) | 0.6 | NM | |||||||||||||||||||
| Income tax (expense) benefit | (1.3) | (0.4) | (0.9) | NM | |||||||||||||||||||
| Net loss | (0.8) | (0.5) | (0.3) | (60.0) | % | ||||||||||||||||||
NM - not meaningful
Comparison of the Years Ended December 31, 2021 and 2020
For discussion of the comparison of our operating results for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, please read section entitled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 15, 2022.
54
Key performance indicators and non-GAAP Financial Measures
Our management uses a variety of financial and operating metrics to evaluate our business, analyze our performance, and make strategic decisions. We believe these metrics and non-GAAP financial measures provide useful information to investors and others in understanding and evaluating our operating results in the same manner as management. However, these measures are not financial measures calculated in accordance with GAAP and should not be considered as substitutes for financial measures that have been calculated in accordance with GAAP. We primarily review the following key performance indicators and non-GAAP measures when assessing our performance:
Revenue
We analyze our revenues by comparing actual revenues to our internal projections for a given period and to prior periods to assess our performance. We believe that revenues are a meaningful indicator of the demand and pricing for our services. Key drivers to change in revenues are primarily by the dollar volume, basis point spread earned, and number of transactions processed in a given period.
Payment Volume
Payment volume is defined as the total dollar amount of all payments processed by our customers through our services. Volumes for 2022, 2021 and 2020 are shown in the table below:
| For the year ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||
| (in millions) | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | ||||||||||||||
| Payment volumes | $ | 49,533.6 | $ | 42,924.5 | $ | 33,272.4 | |||||||||||
The increase in volume for the year ended December 31, 2022 was primarily driven by continued growth in Payment Services, specifically ACH, as well as from strong growth in Integrated Solutions from both new and existing customers and inorganic Paragon contributions.
Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted Net Income
Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure that represents earnings before interest and other expense, income taxes, depreciation, and amortization ("EBITDA"), and further adjustments to EBITDA to exclude certain non-cash items and other non-recurring items that we believe are not indicative of ongoing operations to come to Adjusted EBITDA.
Adjusted Net Income is a non-GAAP financial measure that represents net income prior to amortization and further adjustments to exclude certain non-cash items and other non-recurring items that management believes are not indicative of ongoing operations to come to Adjusted Net Income.
We disclose EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA, and Adjusted Net Income in this Annual Report because these non-GAAP measures are key measures used by us to evaluate our business, measure our operating performance and make strategic decisions. We believe EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA, and Adjusted Net Income are useful for investors and others in understanding and evaluating our operations results in the same manner as we do. However, EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA, and Adjusted Net Income are not financial measures calculated in accordance with GAAP and should not be considered as a substitute for net income, income before income taxes, or any other operating performance measure calculated in accordance with GAAP. Using these non-GAAP financial measures to analyze our business would have material limitations because the calculations are based on the subjective determination of management regarding the nature and classification of events and circumstances that investors may find significant. In addition, although other companies in our industry may report measures titled EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted Net Income or similar measures, such non-GAAP financial measures may be calculated differently from how we calculate non-GAAP financial measures, which reduces their overall usefulness as
55
comparative measures. Because of these limitations, you should consider EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA, and Adjusted Net Income alongside other financial performance measures, including net income and our other financial results presented in accordance with GAAP.
Adjusted EBITDA for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020:
The following table presents a reconciliation of net income (loss) to EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA for each of the periods indicated:
| For the year ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||
| (in millions) | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | ||||||||||||||
| Net income (loss) | 8.3 | $ | (0.8) | $ | (0.5) | ||||||||||||
| Depreciation & amortization | 31.8 | 30.0 | 24.6 | ||||||||||||||
| Income tax expense (benefit) | 5.3 | 1.3 | 0.4 | ||||||||||||||
| Interest and other expense | 11.6 | 22.1 | 16.4 | ||||||||||||||
| EBITDA | 57.0 | 52.6 | 40.9 | ||||||||||||||
Transaction-related expenses(a) | 4.2 | 3.0 | 4.6 | ||||||||||||||
Stock based compensation(b) | 7.2 | 3.7 | 1.9 | ||||||||||||||
Restructuring costs(c) | 2.5 | 2.2 | 2.0 | ||||||||||||||
Discontinued service costs(d) | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.3 | ||||||||||||||
Management fees and expenses(e) | — | — | 0.9 | ||||||||||||||
Non-recurring public company start-up costs | 0.4 | 1.1 | 0.9 | ||||||||||||||
Non-recurring contingent non-income tax liability | 0.5 | 0.8 | — | ||||||||||||||
Other costs(f) | 1.9 | 1.6 | 1.5 | ||||||||||||||
| Total adjustments | 17.1 | 12.6 | 12.1 | ||||||||||||||
| Adjusted EBITDA | $ | 74.1 | $ | 65.2 | $ | 53.0 | |||||||||||
(a)Represents professional service fees related to mergers and acquisitions such as legal fees, consulting fees, accounting advisory fees, and other costs.
(b)Represents non-cash charges associated with stock-based compensation expense, which has been, and will continue to be for the foreseeable future, a significant recurring expense in our business and an important part of our compensation strategy.
(c)Represents costs associated with restructuring plans designed to streamline operations and reduce costs including costs associated with the relocation of facilities, certain staff restructuring charges including severance, certain executive hires, and acquisition related restructuring charges.
(d)Represents costs incurred to retire certain tools, applications and services that are no longer in use.
(e)Represents advisory fees that we will not be required to pay going forward.
(f)Represents non-operational gains or losses, non-standard project expense, non-operational legal expense and legal debt refinancing expense.
56
Adjusted Net Income for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020:
The following table presents a reconciliation of net income (loss) to Adjusted Net Income for each of the periods indicated:
| For the year ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||
| (in millions) | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | ||||||||||||||
| Net income (loss) | 8.3 | (0.8) | (0.5) | ||||||||||||||
| Amortization add back | 26.6 | 25.4 | 20.7 | ||||||||||||||
Debt refinancing interest expense(a) | — | 9.5 | — | ||||||||||||||
Transaction-related expenses(b) | 4.2 | 3.0 | 4.6 | ||||||||||||||
Stock based compensation(c) | 7.2 | 3.7 | 1.9 | ||||||||||||||
Restructuring costs(d) | 2.5 | 2.2 | 2.0 | ||||||||||||||
Discontinued IT service costs(e) | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.3 | ||||||||||||||
Management fees and expenses(f) | — | — | 0.9 | ||||||||||||||
Non-recurring public company start-up costs | 0.4 | 1.1 | 0.9 | ||||||||||||||
| Non-recurring contingent non-income tax liability | 0.5 | 0.8 | — | ||||||||||||||
Other costs(g) | 1.9 | 1.6 | 1.5 | ||||||||||||||
| Total adjustments | 43.7 | 47.5 | 32.8 | ||||||||||||||
Tax effect of adjustments(h) | (3.5) | (4.1) | — | ||||||||||||||
| Adjusted Net Income | $ | 48.5 | $ | 42.6 | $ | 32.3 | |||||||||||
(a)Represents one-time debt refinancing expenses for the prepayment penalty and write-off of debt issuance costs in connection with our Prior Credit Agreement.
(b)Represents professional service fees related to mergers and acquisitions such as legal fees, consulting fees, accounting advisory fees, and other costs.
(c)Represents non-cash charges associated with stock-based compensation expense, which has been, and will continue to be for the foreseeable future, a significant recurring expense in our business and an important part of our compensation strategy.
(d)Represents costs associated with restructuring plans designed to streamline operations and reduce costs including costs associated with the relocation of facilities, certain staff restructuring charges including severance, certain executive hires, and acquisition related restructuring charges.
(e)Represents costs incurred to retire certain tools, applications and services that are no longer in use.
(f)Represents advisory fees that we will not be required to pay going forward.
(g)Represents non-operational gains or losses, non-standard project expense, non-operational legal expense and legal debt refinancing expense.
(h)Represents pro forma income tax adjustment effect, at the anticipated blended rate, for all items expected to have a cash tax impact (i.e. items that were not originally recorded through goodwill). Any impact to the valuation allowance assessment for these adjustments has not been considered. The Company has not applied a pro forma tax adjustment in 2020 due to the different ownership structure.
Segments
We provide our services through two reportable segments 1) Integrated Solutions and 2) Payment Services. The Company’s reportable segments are the same as the operating segments.
More information about our two reportable segments:
57
•Integrated Solutions — Our Integrated Solutions segment represents the delivery of our credit and debit card payment solutions, and to a lesser extent, ACH processing solutions to customers via integrations with software partners across our strategic vertical markets. Our Integrated Solutions partners include vertical focused front-end Customer Relationship Management software providers as well as back-end Enterprise Resource Planning and accounting solutions.
•Payment Services — Our Payment Services segment represents the delivery of card payment processing solutions to our customers through resellers, as well as ACH, check, and gift card processing. Card payment processing solutions in this segment do not originate via a software integration but still utilize Paya’s core technology infrastructure. ACH, check, and gift card processing may or may not be integrated with third-party software.
All segment revenue is from external customers.
The following table shows our segment income statement data and selected performance measures for the periods indicated:
Year Ended December 31, 2022 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2021
| For the year ended December 31, | Change | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (in millions, except for percentages) | 2022 | 2021 | Amount | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Integrated Solutions | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Segment revenue | $ | 181.5 | $ | 155.2 | $ | 26.3 | 16.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Segment gross profit(1) | $ | 90.0 | $ | 81.7 | $ | 8.3 | 10.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| Segment gross profit margin | 49.6 | % | 52.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Payment Services | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Segment revenue | $ | 101.3 | $ | 94.2 | $ | 7.1 | 7.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Segment gross profit(1) | $ | 53.9 | $ | 48.4 | $ | 5.5 | 11.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| Segment gross profit margin | 53.3 | % | 51.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
(1)Segment gross profit is revenue less cost of services excluding depreciation and amortization
Comparison of the Years Ended December 31, 2022 and 2021
Integrated Solutions
Revenue for the Integrated Solutions segment was $181.5 for the year ended December 31, 2022 as compared to $155.2 for the year ended December 31, 2021. The increase of $26.3 was primarily due to an increase in payment volume from both new and existing customers.
Gross profit for the Integrated Solutions segment was $90.0 resulting in a gross profit margin of 49.6% for the year ended December 31, 2022 as compared to $81.7 with a gross profit margin of 52.6% for the year ended December 31, 2021. The increase of $8.3, or 10.2% improvement in segment gross profit was primarily due to revenue growth partially offset by growth from higher revenue share partners resulting in a 3.0% decrease in gross profit margin from 2021 to 2022.
Payment Services
Revenue for the Payment Services segment was $101.3 for the year ended December 31, 2022 as compared to $94.2 for the year ended December 31, 2021. The increase of $7.1 was due to an increase in payment volume.
58
Gross profit for the Payment Services segment was $53.9 for the year ended December 31, 2022 as compared to $48.4 for the year ended December 31, 2021. The increase of $5.5, or 11.4% increase in segment gross profit was primarily due to a ACH growth resulting in a 1.9% increase in gross profit margin from 2021 to 2022.
Year Ended December 31, 2021 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2020
| For the year ended December 31, | Change | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (in millions, except for percentages) | 2021 | 2020 | Amount | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Integrated Solutions | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Segment revenue | $ | 155.2 | $ | 122.3 | $ | 32.9 | 26.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Segment gross profit(1) | $ | 81.7 | $ | 65.3 | $ | 16.4 | 25.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| Segment gross profit margin | 52.6 | % | 53.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Payment Services | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Segment revenue | $ | 94.2 | $ | 83.7 | $ | 10.5 | 12.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Segment gross profit(1) | $ | 48.4 | $ | 38.7 | $ | 9.7 | 25.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| Segment gross profit margin | 51.4 | % | 46.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
(1)Segment gross profit is revenue less cost of services excluding depreciation and amortization
Comparison of the Years Ended December 31, 2021 and 2020
For discussion of the comparison of our operating results for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, please read section entitled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 15, 2022.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Sources
We have historically sourced our liquidity requirements primarily with cash flow from operations and, when needed, with borrowings under our Credit Facilities and in 2021 with an equity issuance. We have historically sourced our acquisitions mostly with cash flow from operations and borrowings under our Credit Facilities, and prior to becoming a publicly traded company, with capital infusions from Ultra. As of December 31, 2022, we had $168.8 of unrestricted cash and cash equivalents on hand and borrowing capacity of $45.0 from our 2021 Revolving Credit Facility.
We believe our existing cash and cash provided by our ongoing operations together with funds available under our Credit Facilities will be sufficient to meet our working capital, capital expenditures and cash needs for the next 12 months and beyond.
Uses
Our material cash requirements from known contractual and other obligations primarily relate to the commitment fees related to our Credit Facilities, interest on long-term debt and operating lease obligations. Expected timing of these payments are as follows:
59
| Payments due by period | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (in millions) | Total | 1 year | 2 – 3 years | 4 – 5 years | More than 5 years | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Long-term debt(1) | $ | 246.9 | $ | 2.5 | $ | 5.0 | $ | 5.0 | $ | 234.4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest on long-term debt(2) | 56.1 | 10.5 | 20.6 | 20.2 | 4.8 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating leases(3) | 4.0 | 1.3 | 2.0 | 0.7 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 307.0 | $ | 14.3 | $ | 27.6 | $ | 25.9 | $ | 239.2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
(1)Reflects contractual principal payments. See Note 8. Long-term debt in the notes to the consolidated financial statements for discussion of the new Term Loan.
(2)Reflects minimum interest payable under the Term Loan. We have assumed a Eurodollar rate of 0.75% plus a spread of 3.25% for purposes of calculating interest payable on the Term Loan. Payments herein are subject to change as payments for variable rate debt have been estimated.
(3)We lease certain property and equipment for various periods under non-cancelable operating leases.
Indebtedness
On June 25, 2021, Paya entered into the 2021 Credit Facility, consisting of a $250 million senior secured term loan facility, and a $45 million senior secured revolving credit facility. Beginning on December 31, 2021, the Company will make quarterly amortization payments on the Term Loan. As of December 31, 2022, $246.9 million remains outstanding under the Term Loan and there were no borrowings outstanding under the Revolver.
Cash Flows
The following tables present a summary of cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities for the following comparative periods.
| For the year ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||
| (in millions) | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | ||||||||||||||
| Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities | $ | 45.5 | $ | 36.6 | $ | 21.4 | |||||||||||
| Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities | (19.3) | (37.3) | (33.1) | ||||||||||||||
| Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | 10.1 | 135.7 | 3.8 | ||||||||||||||
| Change in cash | $ | 36.3 | $ | 135.0 | $ | (7.9) | |||||||||||
Comparison of the Years Ended December 31, 2022 and 2021
Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $8.9 to $45.5 for the year ended December 31, 2022 compared to $36.6 for the year ended December 31, 2021. The increase in operating cash in 2022 was primarily due to increased revenues.
Investing Activities
Net cash used in investing activities decreased $18.0 to $19.3 for the year ended December 31, 2022 compared to $37.3 for the year ended December 31, 2021. The decrease was primarily due to cash paid for customer lists of $6.3 during 2022 compared to $17.1 during 2021. In addition, during 2021 we acquired Paragon Payment Solutions for $14.5 net of cash received, compared to the 2022 acquisition of JS Innovations LLC for $6.0 net of cash received.
60
Financing Activities
Net cash provided by financing activities decreased $125.6 to $10.1 for the year ended December 31, 2022 compared to $135.7 in the year ended December 31, 2021. The decrease was primarily due to proceeds from the Equity Offering in 2021 of $116.8. In addition, the Company repaid its long-term debt of $228.1 under its Prior Credit Agreement and borrowed $250.0 under a new Credit Agreement along with payment of debt issuance costs of $6.2 during 2021 compared to $2.5 in debt payments under the new Credit Agreement during 2022.
Comparison of the Years Ended December 31, 2021 and 2020
For discussion of the comparison of our cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, please read section entitled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 15, 2022.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our discussion and analysis of our historical financial condition and results of operations for the periods described is based on our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. For a discussion of the significant accounting policies and estimates that we use in the preparation of our audited consolidated financial statements, refer to Note 1 of the notes to our audited consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 within this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The preparation of these historical financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates, assumptions and judgments in certain circumstances that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities and contingencies as of the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting periods. We evaluate our assumptions and estimates on an ongoing basis. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. These estimates may change as new events occur or additional information is obtained, and we may periodically be faced with uncertainties, the outcomes of which are not within our control and may not be known for a prolonged period of time. Because the use of estimates is inherent in the financial reporting process, actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
The following critical accounting discussion pertains to accounting policies we believe are most critical to the portrayal of our historical financial condition and results of operations and that require significant, difficult, subjective or complex judgments.
Revenue Recognition
Application of the accounting principles in U.S. GAAP related to the measurement and recognition of revenue requires us to make judgments and estimates. Complex arrangements with nonstandard terms and conditions may require significant contract interpretation to determine the appropriate accounting. Specifically, the determination of whether we are a principal to a transaction, or an agent, can require considerable judgment. We have concluded that we are the agent in providing merchants access to credit card networks as we are performing this service on behalf of the principal, the card companies. In addition, we are not primarily responsible for fulfilling this promise to the customer, do not bear risk or take possession of funds to be paid to issuing banks for interchange fees, and do not have discretion in setting the price for interchange fees charged by the card companies. For all other aspects of our services provided to merchants, we determined we are the principal as we control the service being provided before transfer to the customer. Additionally, our payment processing services consist of variable consideration under a stand-ready service of distinct days of service that are substantially the same with the same pattern of transfer to the customer. The variable consideration is as a result of the number or volume of transactions to be processed.
We determined to use each day as a time-based measure of progress toward satisfaction of the single performance obligation of each contract. We determined this method most accurately depicts the pattern by which services are transferred to the merchant, as performance depends on the extent of transactions processed for that merchant on a
61
given day. Likewise, consideration to which we expect to be entitled is determined according to our efforts to provide service each day. Changes in judgments with respect to these assumptions and estimates could impact the amount of revenue recognized.
Business Combinations
Upon acquisition of a company, we determine if the transaction is a business combination, which is accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting. Under the acquisition method, once control is obtained of a business, the assets acquired, and liabilities assumed, including amounts attributed to noncontrolling interests, are recorded at fair value. We use our best estimates and assumptions to assign fair value to the tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date. One of the most significant estimates relates to the determination of the fair value of these assets and liabilities, specifically intangible assets such as internal-use software, trade names and trademarks, and customer relationships. The determination of the fair values is based on estimates and judgments made by management with the assistance of a third-party valuation firm. Significant assumptions for intangible assets include the discount rate, projected revenue growth rates and margin, customer retention factors, obsolescence rates and royalty rate used to calculate the expected future cash flows. Our estimates of fair value are based upon assumptions we believe to be reasonable, but which are inherently uncertain and unpredictable. Measurement period adjustments are reflected at the time identified, up through the conclusion of the measurement period, which is the time at which all information for determination of the values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed is received and is not to exceed one year from the acquisition date. We may record adjustments to the fair value of these tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed, with the corresponding offset to goodwill.
Additionally, uncertain tax positions and tax-related valuation allowances are initially recorded in connection with a business combination as of the acquisition date. We continue to collect information and reevaluate these estimates and assumptions periodically and record any adjustments to preliminary estimates to goodwill, provided we are within the measurement period. If outside of the measurement period, any subsequent adjustments are recorded to the consolidated statement of income and comprehensive income.
Income Taxes
Under ASC 740, “Income Taxes,” deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the expected future tax consequences attributable to net operating losses, tax credits, and temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases, which will result in taxable or deductible amounts in the future. Our income tax expense/benefit, deferred tax assets, valuation allowance and tax receivable agreement liability reflect management’s best assessment of estimated current and future taxes. Significant judgments and estimates are required in determining the consolidated income tax expense/benefits, deferred tax assets, valuation allowance and tax receivable agreement liability. In evaluating our ability to recover our deferred tax assets, we consider all available positive and negative evidence, including projected future taxable income and results of recent operations. Estimating future taxable income is inherently uncertain, requires judgment and is consistent with estimates we are using to manage our business. Any increases or decreases to our valuation allowance will be recorded through earnings in the period the determination was made.
Principles of Consolidation
Refer to Note 1 of the notes to our audited consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 within this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a discussion of principles of consolidation.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
Refer to Note 1 of the notes to our audited consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 within this Annual Report on Form 10-K for our assessment of recently issued and adopted accounting standards.
62
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Our principal market risks are our exposure to effects of inflation and interest rates.
Effects of Inflation
While inflation may impact our revenues and cost of services, we believe the effects of inflation, if any, on our results of operations and financial condition have not been significant. However, there can be no assurance that our results of operations and financial condition will not be materially impacted by inflation in the future.
Interest Rates
Our future income, cash flows and fair values relevant to financial instruments are subject to risks relating to interest rates. We are subject to interest rate risk in connection with our Credit Facilities, which have variable interest rates. The interest rates on these facilities are based on a fixed margin plus a market interest rate, which can fluctuate accordingly but is subject to a minimum rate. Interest rate changes do not affect the market value of such debt, but could impact the amount of our interest payments, and accordingly, our future earnings and cash flows, assuming other factors are held constant. The Federal Reserve Board has raised interest rates and signaled that it will continue to raise rates. Our interest expense increased primarily due to rising interest rates on the Term Loan credit facilities from the higher interest rate environment.
The Company utilizes derivative instruments to manage risk from fluctuations in interest rates on its Term Loan. In February 2021, the Company entered into a interest rate cap agreement with a notional amount of $171.5 million, with an effective date of March 31, 2021, expiring on March 31, 2023. There were no changes to the interest rate cap in connection with the entry into the new Credit Agreement. Refer to Note 9 of the notes to our audited consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 within this Annual Report on Form 10-K for more information. As a result of the interest rate cap agreement, to date, the effects of rising interest rates on our results of operations and financial condition have not been significant. However, there can be no assurance that our interest rates will not continue to increase and that we will be able to mitigate such increases in the future.
We may incur additional borrowings from time to time for general corporate purposes, including working capital and capital expenditures.
63
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements
64
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Shareholders and the Board of Directors of Paya Holdings Inc.:
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Paya Holdings Inc. (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the related consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income, changes in stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2022, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company at December 31, 2022 and 2021, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2022, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2022, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) and our report dated February 21, 2023 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matters
The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective or complex judgments. The communication of the critical audit matter does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.
| Realizability of deferred tax assets | ||||||||
| Description of the Matter | As of December 31, 2022, the Company recorded deferred tax assets of $22.5 million and a corresponding valuation allowance of $10.6 million. As explained in Note 11 of the consolidated financial statements, deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance if, based on the weight of available positive and negative evidence, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. In determining the amount of any required valuation allowance, the Company considers the history of profitability, projections of future profitability, the reversal of future taxable temporary differences, the overall amount of deferred tax assets, and the timeframe necessary to utilize the deferred tax assets prior to their expiration. | |||||||
65
| Description of the Matter | Auditing the realizability of the Company’s deferred tax assets was complex and involved significant audit effort due to the highly judgmental nature of the estimates required to measure the taxable temporary differences and the timing of their reversals. Further, the material weakness in internal control over financial reporting related to the operating effectiveness of management’s review of the annual income tax provision prepared by a third-party firm, specifically the valuation allowance related to deferred tax assets, that existed during the year ended December 31, 2022 affected our audit procedures in this area. | |||||||
| How We Addressed the Matter in Our Audit | We obtained an understanding, evaluated the design, and tested the operating effectiveness of internal controls over the Company’s assessment of the realizability of deferred tax assets. For example, we tested the controls implemented by management over its quarterly review of the third-party firm, the measurement of the taxable temporary differences and the timing of their reversals, and the overall income tax provision calculations. To test the Company’s assessment of the realizability of deferred tax assets and the related valuation allowance, our audit procedures included, among others, evaluating the positive and negative evidence related to the likelihood of realization of the deferred tax assets, including evaluating trends in the Company’s historical financial results and projected sources of taxable income. Because of the material weakness that existed during 2022, we performed additional testing procedures over the completeness and accuracy of the data used by the Company in measuring its deferred tax assets and taxable temporary differences. We involved our tax professionals in our assessment of the Company’s projected sources of taxable income, including our assessment of the Company’s estimates of the timing and amount of reversals of taxable temporary differences and application of tax law. | |||||||
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2014.
Tysons, Virginia
February 21, 2023
66
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Shareholders and the Board of Directors of Paya Holdings Inc.:
Opinion on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
We have audited Paya Holdings Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2022, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) (the COSO criteria). In our opinion, Paya Holdings Inc. (the Company) maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2022, based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the related consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income, changes in stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2022, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”) and our report dated February 21, 2023 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Basis for Opinion
The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.
Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Tysons, Virginia
February 21, 2023
67
| Paya Holdings Inc. | |||||||||||||||||
| Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income | |||||||||||||||||
| (In thousands) | |||||||||||||||||
| Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||
| 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |||||||||||||||
| Revenue | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||
| Cost of services exclusive of depreciation & amortization | ( | ( | ( | ||||||||||||||
| Selling, general & administrative expenses | ( | ( | ( | ||||||||||||||
| Depreciation & amortization | ( | ( | ( | ||||||||||||||
| Income from operations | |||||||||||||||||
| Other income (expense) | |||||||||||||||||
| Interest expense | ( | ( | ( | ||||||||||||||
| Other income (expense) | ( | ||||||||||||||||
| Total other income (expense) | ( | ( | ( | ||||||||||||||
| Income (loss) before income taxes | ( | ||||||||||||||||
| Income tax (expense) benefit | ( | ( | ( | ||||||||||||||
| Net income (loss) | ( | ( | |||||||||||||||
| Other comprehensive income | |||||||||||||||||
| Comprehensive income (loss) | $ | $ | ( | $ | ( | ||||||||||||
| Weighted average shares outstanding of common stock | |||||||||||||||||
| Basic net income (loss) per share | $ | $ | ( | $ | ( | ||||||||||||
| Weighted average diluted shares outstanding of common stock | |||||||||||||||||
| Diluted net income (loss) per share | $ | $ | ( | $ | ( | ||||||||||||
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
68
| Paya Holdings Inc. | |||||||||||
| Consolidated Balance Sheets | |||||||||||
| (In thousands) | |||||||||||
| December 31, | |||||||||||
| 2022 | 2021 | ||||||||||
| Assets | |||||||||||
| Current assets: | |||||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | $ | |||||||||
| Trade receivables, net | |||||||||||
| Prepaid expenses | |||||||||||
| Income taxes receivable | |||||||||||
| Other current assets | |||||||||||
| Total current assets before funds held for clients | |||||||||||
| Funds held for clients | |||||||||||
| Total current assets | $ | $ | |||||||||
| Non-current assets: | |||||||||||
| Property and equipment, net | |||||||||||
| Goodwill | |||||||||||
| Intangible assets, net | |||||||||||
| Operating lease ROU assets, net of amortization | |||||||||||
| Other non-current assets | |||||||||||
| Total assets | $ | $ | |||||||||
| Liabilities and stockholders' equity | |||||||||||
| Current liabilities: | |||||||||||
| Trade payables | |||||||||||
| Accrued liabilities | |||||||||||
| Accrued revenue share | |||||||||||
| Current tax receivable agreement liability | |||||||||||
| Income taxes payable | |||||||||||
| Current operating lease liabilities | |||||||||||
| Other current liabilities | |||||||||||
| Total current liabilities before client funds obligations | |||||||||||
| Client funds obligations | |||||||||||
| Total current liabilities | $ | $ | |||||||||
| Non-current liabilities: | |||||||||||
| Deferred tax liability, net | |||||||||||
| Non-current debt | |||||||||||
| Tax receivable agreement liability | |||||||||||
| Non-current lease liabilities | |||||||||||
| Other non-current liabilities | |||||||||||
| Total liabilities | $ | $ | |||||||||
| Stockholders' equity: | |||||||||||
Common stock, $ | |||||||||||
| Additional paid-in capital | |||||||||||
| Accumulated deficit | ( | ( | |||||||||
| Total stockholders' equity | |||||||||||
| Total liabilities and stockholders' equity | $ | $ | |||||||||
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
69
| Paya Holdings Inc. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (In thousands except share data) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Common stock | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Shares | Amount | Additional paid-in capital | Retained earnings | Total stockholders' equity | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Balance at December 31, 2019 | $ | $ | $ | ( | $ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net loss | — | — | — | ( | ( | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Recapitalization transaction, net | ( | — | ( | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Stock based compensation - Class C incentive units | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Stock based compensation - Common stock | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Balance at December 31, 2020 | $ | $ | $ | ( | $ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net loss | — | — | — | ( | ( | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Stock compensation - Class C incentive units | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Stock compensation - Common stock | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Equity Offering | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Par value of common stock adjustment - see note 1 | — | ( | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Shares issued for acquisition | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Warrant exchange | ( | — | ( | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| RSU Vesting | — | ( | — | ( | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Warrant exercise | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Recapitalization transaction - see note 1 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cumulative effect of adoption of new accounting standard | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Balance at December 31, 2021 | $ | $ | $ | ( | $ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net income | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Stock compensation - Class C incentive units | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Stock compensation - Common stock | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| RSU vesting | — | ( | — | ( | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Balance at December 31, 2022 | $ | $ | $ | ( | $ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
70
| Paya Holdings Inc. | |||||||||||||||||
| Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows | |||||||||||||||||
| (in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||
| Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||
| 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |||||||||||||||
| Cash flows from operating activities: | |||||||||||||||||
| Net income (loss) | $ | $ | ( | $ | ( | ||||||||||||
| Depreciation & amortization expense | |||||||||||||||||
| Loss on disposal of property and equipment | |||||||||||||||||
| Deferred tax benefit | ( | ( | ( | ||||||||||||||
| Bad debt expense | |||||||||||||||||
| Stock-based compensation | |||||||||||||||||
| Non-cash change in tax receivable agreement liability | ( | ( | |||||||||||||||
| Change in fair value of derivative | ( | ( | |||||||||||||||
| Non-cash lease expense | |||||||||||||||||
| Gain on contingent consideration | ( | ||||||||||||||||
| Amortization of debt issuance costs | |||||||||||||||||
| Loss on debt extinguishment | |||||||||||||||||
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of impact of business acquisitions: | |||||||||||||||||
| Trade receivables | ( | ( | ( | ||||||||||||||
| Prepaid expenses | ( | ( | ( | ||||||||||||||
| Other current assets | ( | ||||||||||||||||
| Other non-current assets | ( | ||||||||||||||||
| Trade payables | ( | ||||||||||||||||
| Accrued liabilities | ( | ||||||||||||||||
| Accrued revenue share | ( | ||||||||||||||||
| Income tax payable/receivable, net | |||||||||||||||||
| Other current liabilities | ( | ||||||||||||||||
| Lease liabilities | ( | ( | |||||||||||||||
| Other non-current liabilities | ( | ( | |||||||||||||||
| Net cash provided by operating activities | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||
| Cash flows from investing activities: | |||||||||||||||||
| Purchases of property and equipment, net of impact of business acquisitions | ( | ( | ( | ||||||||||||||
| Purchases of customer lists | ( | ( | ( | ||||||||||||||
| Acquisition of business, net of cash received | ( | ( | ( | ||||||||||||||
| Net cash (used in) investing activities | $ | ( | $ | ( | $ | ( | |||||||||||
| Cash flows from financing activities: | |||||||||||||||||
| Payments on non-current debt | ( | ( | ( | ||||||||||||||
| Payment of debt issuance costs | ( | ( | |||||||||||||||
| Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt | |||||||||||||||||
| Distribution to Ultra | ( | ||||||||||||||||
| Capital contributions from Ultra | |||||||||||||||||
| Recapitalization | |||||||||||||||||
71
| Proceeds from equity offering | |||||||||||||||||
| Movements in client fund obligations, net | ( | ||||||||||||||||
| Repurchase of restricted stock to satisfy tax withholding obligations | ( | ( | |||||||||||||||
| Warrant exchange | ( | ||||||||||||||||
| Payment on tax receivable agreement liability | ( | ||||||||||||||||
| Net cash provided by financing activities: | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||
| Net change in cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash | ( | ||||||||||||||||
| Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash, beginning of period | |||||||||||||||||
| Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash, end of period | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||
| Reconciliation of cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash | |||||||||||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||
| Restricted cash included in funds held for clients | |||||||||||||||||
| Total cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||
| Supplemental disclosures: | |||||||||||||||||
| Cash interest paid | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||
| Cash taxes paid, including estimated payments | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||
| Non-cash investing activity | |||||||||||||||||
| Non-cash stock issuance related to Paragon acquisition | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
72
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(in Thousands, unless otherwise noted)
1.Organization, basis of presentation and summary of accounting policies
Organization
Paya Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation, conducts operations through its wholly-owned subsidiaries. These operating subsidiaries are comprised of Paya, Inc., Paya EFT, Inc., Stewardship Technology, Inc., First Mobile Trust, LLC, The Payment Group, LLC ("TPG" or "The Payment Group"), Blue Parasol Group, LLC ("Paragon Payment Solutions" or "Paragon"), and JS Innovations LLC ("VelocIT").
On October 16, 2020, Paya Holdings Inc. (f/k/a FinTech Acquisition Corp. III Parent Corp.) (“we,” “us,” “Paya” or the “Company”), consummated the merger with FinTech Acquisition Corp. III (“FinTech”), FinTech III Merger Sub Corp. (“Merger Sub”), GTCR-Ultra Holdings, LLC (“Ultra”), Paya Holdings II, LLC (“Holdings”), GTCR/Ultra Blocker, Inc. and GTCR Fund XI/C LP ("Seller") (the “Fintech Transaction”) contemplated by the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of August 3, 2020 (“Fintech Merger Agreement”). See Note 3 Fintech Transaction for more information.
The Company is an independent integrated payments platform providing card, Automated Clearing House ("ACH"), and check payment processing solutions via software to middle-market businesses in the United States. Paya’s solutions integrate with customers’ core business software to enable payments acceptance, reconcile invoice detail, and post payment information to their core accounting system.
The Company is headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia and, as of December 31, 2022, also had operations in Reston, VA, Fort Walton Beach, FL, Mt. Vernon, OH and Dallas, TX.
Basis of presentation
These financial statements reflect the consolidated results of operations, financial position and cash flows of the Company, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”). Certain amounts in prior years have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.
Principles of Consolidation
These consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiary companies. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and/or cash equivalents are short-term, highly liquid investments with a maturity of ninety days or less at the time of purchase. The fair value of our cash and cash equivalents approximates carrying value. At times, cash and cash equivalents exceed the amount insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
73
Concentration of credit risk
Our cash, cash equivalents, trade receivables, funds receivable and customer accounts are potentially subject to concentration of credit risk. Deposits held with banks may exceed the amount of governmental insurance provided on such deposits. Generally, these deposits may be redeemed upon demand, and therefore, these bear minimal default risk. The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers’ financial condition and generally requires no collateral from its customers. No individual customers represented more than 10% of the Company’s revenue.
Prepaid expenses
Prepaid expenses primarily consist of insurance, software licenses, rent, and supplier invoices.
Other current assets
Other current assets primarily consist of current deferred debt issuance costs related to the line of credit, the interest rate cap agreement, other receivables and equipment inventory.
Funds held for clients and client funds obligation
Funds held for clients and client funds obligations result from the Company’s processing services and associated settlement activities, including settlement of payment transactions. Funds held for clients represent assets that are restricted for use solely for the purposes of satisfying the obligations to remit funds relating to the Company’s processing services, which are classified as client funds obligations on our consolidated balance sheets. Funds held for clients are generated principally from merchant services transactions and are comprised of both settlements’ receivable and cash as of period end. Certain merchant settlement assets that relate to settlement obligations accrued by the Company are held by partner banks. The Company classified funds held for clients as a current asset since these funds are held solely for the purpose of satisfying the client funds obligations.
The Company records corresponding settlement obligations for amounts payable to merchants and for payment instruments not yet presented for settlement as client funds obligations. Client funds obligations represent the Company's contractual obligations to remit funds to satisfy clients' settlement obligations. The client funds obligations represent liabilities that will be repaid within one year of the balance sheet date. Differences in the funds held for clients and client funds obligation are due to timing differences between when transactions are settled and when payment instruments are presented for settlement and are considered to be immaterial. The changes in settlement assets and obligations are presented on a net basis within financing activities in the consolidated statements of cash flows.
74
The composition of our funds held for clients balance consisted of the following:
| December 31, | |||||||||||
| 2022 | 2021 | ||||||||||
| Funds held for clients | |||||||||||
| Cash held to satisfy client funds obligations | $ | $ | |||||||||
| Receivables held to satisfy client funds obligations | |||||||||||
| Total | $ | $ | |||||||||
Property and equipment, net
Property and equipment, is stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation of property and equipment is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. These lives are 3 years for computers and equipment, 5 years for furniture, fixtures, and office equipment, and the lesser of the asset useful life or remaining lease term for leasehold improvements. Also, the Company capitalizes software development costs and website development costs incurred in accordance with ASC 350-40, Internal Use Software. The useful lives are 3 to 5 years for internal-use software. Repair and maintenance costs are expensed as incurred and included in selling, general and administrative expenses on the consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income.
Leases
On January 1, 2021, the Company adopted Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2016-02, Leases ("Topic 842") using the modified retrospective transition approach. We applied the new standard to all leases existing at the date of initial application. Refer to the discussion under Note 13 Commitments and Contingencies.
We determine if a contract is a leasing arrangement at inception. Leases with an initial term of 12 months or less are not recorded on the balance sheet. Right-of-use ("ROU") assets and lease liabilities are recognized at the commencement date based on the present value of remaining lease payments over the lease term. For this purpose, the Company considers only payments that are fixed and determinable at the time of commencement. The Company calculates the present value of future payments by using an estimated incremental borrowing rate, which approximates the rate at which the Company would borrow, on a secured basis and over a similar term. ROU assets represent our right to control the use of an identified asset for the lease term and lease liabilities represent our obligation to make lease payments arising from the lease. We use the incremental borrowing rate on the commencement date in determining the present value of our lease payments. We recognize operating lease expense for our operating leases on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
The Company’s lease agreements may contain variable costs such as common area maintenance, insurance, real estate taxes, or other costs. Variable lease costs are expensed as incurred on the consolidated statements of income.
Impairment of long-lived assets
The Company evaluates the recoverability of its long-lived assets in accordance with the provisions of ASC 360, Property, Plant and Equipment (“ASC 360”). ASC 360 requires that long-lived assets and certain identifiable intangibles be reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets is measured by comparing the carrying amount of an asset to future undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. There was no impairment of long-lived assets recognized in any period presented in the consolidated financial statements.
75
Goodwill and other intangible assets, net
Goodwill represents the premium paid over the fair value of the net tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired in the Company’s business combinations. The Company evaluates goodwill and intangible assets in accordance with ASC 350, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (“ASC 350”). ASC 350 requires goodwill to be either qualitatively or quantitatively assessed for impairment annually (or more frequently if impairment indicators arise) for each reporting unit. The Company tests goodwill and intangible assets annually for impairment as of September 30 of each year, and at interim periods, using a qualitative approach. Our annual evaluation assesses qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not the fair value is less than the carrying value of the asset. If the Company is unable to conclude that goodwill and intangible assets, net are not impaired during its qualitative assessment, the Company will perform a quantitative assessment by estimating the fair value of the assets and comparing the fair value to the carrying value. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, it was more likely than not that the fair value of goodwill and intangible assets, net exceeded their carrying value and as such, there was no
Intangible assets with finite lives consist of internal use software, trade names, customer lists and customer relationships and are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives. From time to time, the Company acquires customer lists from sales agents in exchange for an upfront cash payment. The purchase of customer lists are treated as asset acquisition, resulting in recording an intangible asset at cost on the date of acquisition. The acquired customer lists intangible assets have a useful life of 5 years. Factors that could trigger an impairment review include significant under-performance relative to expected historical or projected future operating results, significant changes in the manner of our use of the acquired assets or the strategy for our overall business or significant negative industry or economic trends. If this evaluation indicates that the value of the intangible asset may be impaired, the Company makes an assessment of the recoverability of the net book value of the asset over its remaining useful life. If this assessment indicates that the intangible asset is not recoverable, based on the estimated undiscounted future cash flows of the asset over the remaining amortization period, the Company reduces the net book value of the related intangible asset to fair value and may adjust the remaining amortization period.
The Company evaluates its intangible assets with finite lives for indications of impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the net book value may not be recoverable. There were no indicators of impairment identified no
Long-term debt and issuance costs
Eligible debt issuance costs associated with the Company's credit facilities are deferred and amortized to interest expense over the term of the related debt using the effective interest method. Debt issuance costs associated with Company's term debt are presented on the Company's consolidated balance sheets as a direct reduction in the carrying value of the associated debt liability.
Cost of services exclusive of depreciation and amortization
Cost of services includes card processing costs, ACH costs, and other fees paid to card networks, and equipment expenses directly attributable to payment processing and related services to merchants. These costs are recognized as
76
Selling, general and administrative expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses consist primarily of salaries, wages, commissions, marketing costs, professional services costs, technology costs, occupancy costs of leased space, and bad debt expense. Stock based compensation expense is also included in this category.
Depreciation & Amortization
Depreciation and amortization consist primarily of amortization of intangible assets, mainly including customer relationships, internal use software, customer lists, trade names and to a lesser extent depreciation on our investments in property, equipment, and software. We depreciate and amortize our assets on a straight-line basis in accordance with our accounting policies. These lives are 3 years for computers and equipment and acquired internal-use software, 5 years for furniture, fixtures, and office equipment, and the lesser of the asset useful life or remaining lease term for leasehold improvements. Repair and maintenance costs are expensed as incurred and included in selling, general and administrative expenses on the consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income. The acquired customer lists are amortized over Customer lists are amortized over a period of 5 -15 years depending on the intangible, developed technology 5 -10 years, and trade names over 25 years.
Derivative Financial Instruments
The Company accounts for its derivative instruments in accordance with ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging ("ASC 815"). ASC 815 establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments requiring the recognition of all derivative instruments as assets or liabilities in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets at fair value. The Company records its derivative instruments as assets or liabilities, depending on its rights or obligations under the applicable derivative contract. Changes in fair value are recognized in earnings in the affected period.
The Company uses an interest rate cap contract to manage risk from fluctuations in interest rates on its Term Loan credit agreement. Interest rate caps involve the receipt of variable-rate amounts beyond a specified strike price over the life of the agreement without exchange of the underlying principal amount. The interest rate cap is not designated as a hedging instrument. Changes in the fair value of the interest rate cap are recorded through other income (expense) in the consolidated statement of income and comprehensive income, other current assets on the consolidated balance sheets, and in changes in other current assets in the consolidated statement of cash flows.
Income Taxes
The Company utilizes the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized principally for the expected tax consequences of temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their reported amounts, using currently enacted tax rates. The measurement of a deferred tax asset is reduced, if necessary, by a valuation allowance if it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax asset will not be realized.
The Company recognizes a tax benefit for uncertain tax positions if the Company believes it is more likely than not that the position will be upheld on audit based solely on the technical merits of the tax position. The Company evaluates uncertain tax positions after the consideration of all available information. Such tax positions must initially and subsequently be estimated as the largest amount of tax benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement with the tax authorities, assuming full knowledge of the position and relevant facts. The Company's policy is to recognize any interest and penalties related to income taxes as income tax expense in the relevant period.
77
Business Combinations
Upon acquisition of a company, we determine if the transaction is a business combination defined by ASC 805, Business Combinations ("ASC 805"), which is accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting. Under the acquisition method, once control is obtained of a business, the assets acquired, and liabilities assumed, including amounts attributed to noncontrolling interests, are recorded at fair value. We use our best estimates and assumptions to assign fair value to the tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date. One of the most significant estimates relates to the determination of the fair value of these assets and liabilities, specifically intangible assets such as internal use software, trade names and trademarks, and customer relationships. The determination of the fair values is based on estimates and judgments made by management with the assistance of a third-party valuation firm. Significant assumptions for intangible assets include the discount rate, projected revenue growth rates and margin, customer retention factors, obsolescence rates and royalty rate used to calculate the expected future cash flows. Our estimates of fair value are based upon assumptions we believe to be reasonable, but which are inherently uncertain and unpredictable. Measurement period adjustments are reflected at the time identified, up through the conclusion of the measurement period, which is the time at which all information for determination of the values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed is received and is not to exceed one year from the acquisition date. We may record adjustments to the fair value of these tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed, with the corresponding offset to goodwill. Qualitative factors that contribute to the recognition of goodwill include certain intangible assets that are not recognized as separate identifiable intangible assets.
Fair-Value Measurements
The Company follows ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements ("ASC 820"), which defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The determination of fair value is based on the principal or most advantageous market in which the Company could participate and considers assumptions that market participants would use when pricing the asset or liability, such as inherent risk, transfer restrictions, and risk of nonperformance. Also, determination of fair value assumes that market participants will consider the highest and best use of the asset.
The Company uses the hierarchy prescribed in ASC 820 for fair value measurements, based on the available inputs to the valuation and the degree to which they are observable or not observable in the market.
The three levels of the hierarchy are as follows:
Level 1 Inputs—Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities accessible to the reporting entity at the measurement date;
78
Level 2 Inputs—Inputs are quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active; inputs other than quoted prices, but that are observable for the asset or liability (e.g., interest rates; yield curves); and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or by other means (i.e., market corroborated inputs); and
Level 3 Inputs—Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability used to measure fair value. These inputs reflect the Company’s own assumptions about what other market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. These are based on the best information available and can include the Company's own data.
Emerging Growth Company
Prior to December 31, 2021, the Company was an “emerging growth company” (“EGC”) as defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act, (JOBS Act), and elected to take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies, including using the extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards. As of December 31, 2021, the Company became a large accelerated filer under the rules of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") and is no longer classified as an EGC.
Recently Issued Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted
In March 2020, the FASB issued ASU 2020-04, Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848): Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting which provides optional expedients and exceptions for applying U.S. GAAP to contracts, hedging relationships, and other transactions affected by reference rate reform if certain criteria are met. The amendments in this ASU were effective for all entities as of March 12, 2020 through December 31, 2022, however, in December 2022 the FASB issued ASU 2022-06, Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848): Deferral of the Sunset Date of Topic 848 which extended the sunset date from December 31, 2022 to December 31, 2024. An entity may elect to apply the amendments for contract modifications by Topic or Industry Subtopic as of any date from the beginning an interim period that includes or is subsequent to March 12, 2020, or prospectively from the date that the financial statements are available to be issued. Once elected for a Topic or an Industry Subtopic, the amendments must be applied prospectively for all eligible contract modifications for that Topic or Industry Subtopic. The Company may apply ASU 2020-04 as its contracts referenced in London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) are impacted by reference rate reform. The Company is currently evaluating the effect of ASU 2020-04 on its consolidated financial statements.
Par Value of Common Stock
During 2021, the Company identified an immaterial error in the par value of its Common stock impacting the balance of Common stock and Additional Paid-in-Capital in the Company’s interim and annual financial statements beginning as of and for the year ended December 31, 2020. The Company corrected the error, which resulted in an increase of $113
Recapitalization Transaction
During 2021, the Company identified an immaterial error related to the capitalization of a deferred tax asset impacting the balances of the Tax Receivable Agreement liability, Deferred Tax Liability, Net, and Additional Paid-in-Capital in the Company’s interim and annual financial statements beginning as of and for the year ended December 31, 2020. The Company corrected the error which resulted in an increase of $841 to Additional Paid-in-Capital and a corresponding decrease to the Tax Receivable Agreement liability of $410 and Deferred Tax Liability, net of $431 as of December 31, 2021.
79
Cash Flow Classification
During 2021, the Company identified an immaterial error in its interim and annual financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2020, whereby the restricted cash within Funds Held for Clients was not appropriately included in the statement of cash flows. These amounts are now shown in the accompanying reconciliation of cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash to amounts shown on the Company's consolidated balance sheets. The original and as adjusted amounts are shown below along with the errors.
| As Filed | As Adjusted | Change | |||||||||||||||
| December 31, | December 31, | December 31, | |||||||||||||||
| 2020 | 2020 | 2020 | |||||||||||||||
| CASH FLOW FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES | |||||||||||||||||
| Movements in cash held on behalf of customers, net | $ | ( | $ | $ | |||||||||||||
NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) OPERATING ACTIVITIES | |||||||||||||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES | |||||||||||||||||
| Movements in client fund obligations, net | ( | ( | |||||||||||||||
NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) FINANCING ACTIVITIES | ( | ||||||||||||||||
| Net change in cash and cash equivalents | $ | ( | $ | ( | $ | ( | |||||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period | |||||||||||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents, end of period | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||
| Reconciliation of cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash | |||||||||||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||
| Restricted cash included in funds held for clients | |||||||||||||||||
| Total cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||
2.Revenue recognition
The Company follows ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) (“ASC 606”) and performs a five-step analysis of transactions to determine when and how revenue is recognized, based upon the core principle that revenue is recognized to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services
At contract inception, the Company assesses the goods and services promised in its contracts with customers and identifies performance obligations for each promise to transfer to the customer a good or service that is distinct. The Company’s performance obligation relating to its payment processing services revenue is to provide continuous access to the Company’s system to process as much as its customers require. Since the number or volume of transactions to be processed is not determinable at contract inception, the Company’s payment processing services consist of variable consideration under a stand-ready service of distinct days of service that are substantially the same with the same pattern of transfer to the customer. As such, the stand-ready obligation is accounted for as a single-series performance obligation whereby the variability of the transaction value is satisfied daily as the performance obligation is performed. In addition, the Company applies the right to invoice practical expedient to payment processing services as each performance obligation is recognized over time and the amounts invoiced are reflective of the value transferred to the customer.
The Company uses each day as a time-based measure of progress toward satisfaction of the single performance obligation of each contract. This method most accurately depicts the pattern by which services are transferred to
80
the merchant, as performance depends on the extent of transactions processed for that merchant on a given day. Likewise, consideration to which the Company expects to be entitled is determined according to our efforts to provide service each day.
ASC 606 requires disclosure of the aggregate amount of the transaction price allocated to unsatisfied performance obligations; however, as permitted by the standard, the Company has elected to exclude from this disclosure any contracts with an original duration of one year or less and any variable consideration that meets specified criteria. As discussed above, the Company’s core performance obligation is a stand-ready obligation comprised of a series of distinct days of service, and revenue related to this performance obligation is generally billed and recognized as the services are performed. The variable consideration allocated to this performance obligation meets the specified criteria for disclosure exclusion. The aggregate fixed consideration portion of customer contracts with an initial contract duration greater than one year is not material.
The Company’s customers are all small to medium size businesses and municipalities who are underwritten to the credit standards of the Company and who each have merchant processing agreements. The Company, through its risk informed bad debt and allowance accounting, appropriately reserves for any potential risk to its revenue and cash flows. Since the cash is collected for the majority of transactions within a month, there is not a significant time lag or risk of uncollectibility in the recognition of revenue.
We do not have any material contract assets or liabilities for any period presented and we did not recognize any impairments of any contract assets or liabilities for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 or 2020.
The Company generates its revenue from three revenue sources which include Transaction based revenue, Service based fee revenue and Equipment revenue and are defined below:
Transaction based revenue
Transaction based revenue represents revenue generated from transaction fees based on volume, including interchange fees and convenience based fees. The Company generates transaction based revenue from fees charged to merchants for card-based processing volume and ACH transactions. Transaction based revenues are recognized on a net basis equal to the full amount billed to the bankcard merchant, net of interchange fees and assessments. Interchange fees are fees paid to card-issuing banks and assessments paid to payment card networks. Interchange fees are set by credit card networks based on various factors, including the type of bank card, card brand, merchant transaction processing volume, the merchant’s industry and the merchant’s risk profile and are recognized at the time merchant transactions are processed. Transaction based revenue was recorded net of interchange fees and assessments of $519,519 , $477,273 and $416,043 in the years ending December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
Service based fee revenue
Service based fee revenue represents revenue generated from recurring and periodic service fees. The Company generates service based fee revenue from charging a service fee, a fee charged to the client for facilitating bankcard processing, which is recognized on a gross basis. The Company also generates service based fees related to ACH inclusive of monthly support fees and monthly statement fees.
Equipment revenue
Equipment revenue comprises sales of equipment which primarily consists of payment terminals.
The Company generates its revenue from two
81
Integrated Solutions
Our Integrated Solutions segment represents the delivery of our credit and debit card payment solutions, and to a lesser extent, ACH processing solutions to customers via integrations with software partners across our strategic vertical markets. Our Integrated Solutions partners include vertical focused front-end Customer Relationship Management software providers as well as back-end Enterprise Resource Planning and accounting solutions.
Payment Services
Our Payment Services segment represents the delivery of card payment processing solutions to our customers through resellers, as well as ACH, check, and gift card processing. Card payment processing solutions in this segment do not originate via a software integration but still utilize Paya’s core technology infrastructure. ACH, check, and gift card processing may or may not be integrated with third-party software.
The following table presents the Company's revenue disaggregated by segment and by source as follows:
| Integrated Solutions | |||||||||||||||||
| Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||
| 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |||||||||||||||
| Revenue from contracts with customers | |||||||||||||||||
| Transaction based revenue | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||
| Service based fee revenue | |||||||||||||||||
| Equipment revenue | |||||||||||||||||
| Total revenue | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||
| Payment Services | |||||||||||||||||
| Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||
| 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |||||||||||||||
| Revenue from contracts with customers | |||||||||||||||||
| Transaction based revenue | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||
| Service based fee revenue | |||||||||||||||||
| Equipment revenue | |||||||||||||||||
| Total revenue | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||
3.Fintech transaction
On October 16, 2020, FinTech consummated the Fintech Transaction pursuant to the terms of the Fintech Merger Agreements and acquired all of the issued and outstanding equity interests in Paya from the Seller.
Pursuant to the Fintech Merger Agreements, Fintech purchased from the Seller all of the issued and outstanding equity interests of Paya for $1.045 billion, of which $500 million was paid in cash and the remaining $545 million was paid to the Seller in the form of 54,534,022 shares of Common Stock and up to an additional 14,018,188 shares of Paya’s common stock, which we refer to as the Earnout Shares, in the event that the closing sale price of Paya’s common stock exceeds certain price thresholds for 20 out of any 30 consecutive trading days during the first five years following the closing of the Fintech Transaction. None of these thresholds have been achieved as of December 31, 2022. The number of shares of the equity consideration was based on a $10.00 per share value for Paya’s common stock.
The Fintech Transaction was accounted for as a reverse recapitalization, with no goodwill or other intangible assets recorded, in accordance with U.S. GAAP. This determination was primarily based on post Fintech Transaction
82
relative voting rights, composition of the governing board, management and intent of the Fintech Transaction. Under this method of accounting, Fintech was treated as the acquired company for financial reporting purposes. Accordingly, for accounting purposes, the Fintech Transaction was accounted for as the equivalent of Paya issuing stock for the net assets of FinTech, accompanied by a recapitalization. The net assets of the Company were stated at historical cost, with no goodwill or other intangible assets recorded. Reported amounts from operations included herein prior to the Fintech Transaction are those of Paya.
The following tables reconcile the elements of the Fintech Transaction to the consolidated statement of cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2020.
| Recapitalization | |||||
| Cash proceeds from FinTech | $ | ||||
| Cash proceeds from sale of equity securities | |||||
| Gross cash received by Paya from Fintech Transaction | |||||
| Less: company transaction expenses | ( | ||||
| Net cash received from Recapitalization | |||||
| Less: cash paid to Seller | ( | ||||
| Net contributions from Recapitalization Transaction | $ | ||||
The cash paid to Seller was funded from the proceeds from net cash received from Recapitalization (described above), offset by certain other transaction costs incurred in connection with the Fintech Transaction.
Prior to the Fintech Transaction, FinTech had 2,258,765 shares of Class A common stock, par value $0.001 per share (the “Class A Shares”) outstanding and 8,857,500 shares of Class B common stock, par value $0.001 per share (the “Class B Shares”) outstanding, which comprised of Founder Shares held by the Founders and Former FinTech Director Shares held by individuals who are not founders but were directors of FinTech.
On October 22, 2020, FinTech was renamed Paya Holdings, Inc. and each currently issued and outstanding share of FinTech Class B Shares automatically converted on a one -for-one basis, into shares of Class A common stock. Immediately thereafter, each currently issued and outstanding share of FinTech Class A Shares automatically converted on a one -for-one basis, into shares of the common stock of Paya Holdings. In connection with the Fintech Transaction, 5,681,812 Class A Shares were redeemed.
The number of shares of Common Stock of Paya Holdings issued immediately following the consummation of the Fintech Transaction is summarized as follows:
| Shares by Type | Number of shares by type | |||||||
| as of December 31, 2020 | ||||||||
| FinTech total shares outstanding prior to the Fintech Transaction | ||||||||
| Less: Redemption of FinTech shares | ( | |||||||
| Class A Shares of FinTech | ||||||||
| Shares issued to PIPE investors | ||||||||
| Shares issued to FinTech and PIPE investors | ||||||||
| Shares issued to the Sellers | ||||||||
| Total Shares of Common Stock outstanding for earnings per share computation | ||||||||
| Plus: Contingent shares subject to forfeiture | ||||||||
| Total Shares of Common Stock outstanding | ||||||||
83
4.Business combinations
JS Innovations LLC transaction overview
On January 19, 2022, the Company closed on the acquisition of VelocIT which provides fully integrated, omnichannel payment solutions to accounting and ERP partners. The acquisition was accounted for as a business combination as defined by ASC 805, and the aggregate purchase price was $7,079 consisting of $6,079 cash paid at closing and $1,000 cash paid in January 2023, which is recorded in accrued liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Transaction costs related to the acquisition of VelocIT totaled $397 and are recorded in selling, general and administrative expenses on the consolidated statement of income and comprehensive income for 2022.
Goodwill of $2,064 resulted from the acquisition and is deductible for tax purposes. As of December 31, 2022, the measurement period for goodwill has closed.
The following table summarizes the fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed by the Company and resulting goodwill as of December 31, 2022:
Assets | |||||
Current Assets: | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | ||||
| Trade receivables, net | |||||
Prepaid expenses | |||||
Total current assets | $ | ||||
Other assets: | |||||
Goodwill | |||||
| Intangible assets | |||||
Total assets | $ | ||||
Liabilities | |||||
Current liabilities: | |||||
| Accrued liabilities | $ | ||||
| Accrued revenue share | |||||
Total current liabilities | $ | ||||
Total liabilities | $ | ||||
Net assets | $ | ||||
Paragon Payment Solutions transaction overview
On April 23, 2021, the Company closed the acquisition of Paragon, which was accounted for as a business combination as defined by ASC 805. The aggregate purchase price paid at closing was $26,624 , consisting of $19,124 in cash and $7,500 of the Company's common stock.
84
Goodwill of $14,780 resulted from the acquisition and is partially deductible for tax purposes. Intangible assets not recognized apart from goodwill consist primarily of the expected revenue synergies. As of December 31, 2022, the measurement period for goodwill has closed.
Transaction costs related to the acquisition of Paragon totaled $983 and are recorded in selling, general and administrative expenses on the consolidated statement of income and comprehensive income for the year ended December 31, 2021.
The following table summarizes the acquisition date fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed by the Company and resulting goodwill as of December 31, 2021:
Assets | |||||
Current Assets: | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | ||||
| Trade receivables, net | |||||
Prepaid expenses | |||||
Other current assets | |||||
| Funds held for clients | |||||
Total current assets | $ | ||||
Other assets: | |||||
Property and equipment, net | |||||
Goodwill | |||||
Intangible assets | |||||
Other non-current assets | |||||
Total assets | $ | ||||
Liabilities | |||||
Current liabilities: | |||||
Trade payables | $ | ||||
| Accrued liabilities | |||||
| Accrued revenue share | |||||
| Other current liabilities | |||||
Client funds obligations | |||||
Total current liabilities | $ | ||||
Non-current liabilities: | |||||
| Deferred tax liability, net | |||||
| Other non-current liabilities | |||||
Total liabilities | $ | ||||
Net assets | $ | ||||
The Payment Group transaction overview
Paya purchased TPG. on October 1, 2020 for total cash consideration of $22,270 , which was accounted for as a business combination as defined by ASC 805.
85
The following table summarizes the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed by the Company and resulting goodwill at October 1, 2020:
| Assets | |||||
| Current Assets: | |||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | ||||
| Funds held for clients | |||||
| Prepaid expenses | |||||
| Total current assets | $ | ||||
| Other assets: | |||||
| Goodwill | |||||
| Intangible assets | |||||
| Other assets | |||||
| Total assets | $ | ||||
| Liabilities | |||||
| Current liabilities: | |||||
| Other accrued expenses | $ | ||||
| Client fund obligation | |||||
| Total current liabilities | $ | ||||
| Deferred tax liability – non-current | |||||
| Total liabilities | $ | ||||
| Net assets | $ | ||||
Intangible assets acquired consist of customer relationships of $4,100 and developed technology of $6,000 . All intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line basis in line with Company policy. Goodwill of $12,452 resulted from the acquisition and is partially deductible for tax purposes. Intangible assets not recognized apart from goodwill consist primarily of the expected revenue synergies. As of December 31, 2022, the measurement period for goodwill has closed.
Transaction costs related to the transaction totaled $561 and are recorded in selling, general & administrative expenses on the consolidated statement of income and comprehensive income for the year ended December 31, 2020.
86
5.Property and equipment, net
Property and equipment, net consists of the following:
| December 31, 2022 | December 31, 2021 | ||||||||||
| Computers and equipment | $ | $ | |||||||||
| Internal-use software | |||||||||||
| Office equipment | |||||||||||
| Furniture and fixtures | |||||||||||
| Leasehold improvements | |||||||||||
| Other equipment | |||||||||||
| Total property and equipment | |||||||||||
| Less: accumulated depreciation | ( | ( | |||||||||
| Total property and equipment, net | $ | $ | |||||||||
6.Leases
The Company adopted Topic 842, Leases, using a modified retrospective transition approach as of January 1, 2021. The Company has elected to adopt the package of transition practical expedients and, therefore, has not reassessed (1) whether existing or expired contracts contain a lease, (2) lease classification for existing or expired leases or (3) the accounting for initial direct costs that were previously capitalized. The Company also elected the practical expedient to use hindsight for leases existing as of January 1, 2021.
The Company evaluates each of its lease and service arrangements at inception to determine if the arrangement is, or contains, a lease and the appropriate classification of each identified lease. A lease exists if the Company obtains substantially all of the economic benefits of, and has the right to control the use of, an asset for a period of time. The Company has operating leases for real estate and IT equipment. ROU assets represent the right to use an underlying asset for the lease term and lease liabilities represent the obligation to make lease payments arising from the lease. Operating lease assets and liabilities are recognized at the commencement date based on the present value of lease payments over the lease term. The Company uses its incremental borrowing rate to calculate the present value of lease payments. Lease terms consider options to extend or terminate based on the determination of whether such renewal or termination options are deemed reasonably certain. Lease agreements that contain non-lease components are generally accounted for as a single lease component.
Operating lease costs are recorded in Selling, general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of operations based on the underlying asset. Variable costs, such as maintenance expenses, property and sales taxes, association dues and index-based rate increases, are expensed as they are incurred. Variable lease payments associated with the Company’s leases are recognized when the event, activity, or circumstance in the lease agreement on which those payments are assessed occurs. Variable lease payments are presented as operating expenses in Selling, general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of operations.
The Company has elected not to recognize ROU assets and lease liabilities for short-term leases of all applicable class of underlying assets that have a lease term of twelve months or less. The Company recognizes the lease payments associated with its short-term leases as an expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Variable lease payments associated with these leases are recognized and presented in the same manner as for all other Company leases.
87
The Company monitors for events or changes in circumstances that require a reassessment of a lease. When a reassessment results in the remeasurement of a lease liability, a corresponding adjustment is made to the carrying amount of the corresponding ROU asset unless doing so would reduce the carrying amount of the ROU asset to an amount less than zero. In that case, the amount of the adjustment that would result in a negative ROU asset balance is recorded in gain or loss in the consolidated statements of operations. During the year ended December 31, 2022, the Company terminated one of its lease agreements and recorded an immaterial impairment charge, of approximately $149 , in selling, general, and administrative expenses, to derecognize the corresponding ROU asset.
As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the Company's total lease cost was $1,626 and $1,672 , respectively, which consisted of $1,216 and $1,287 , respectively, in operating lease cost and $410 and $386 , respectively, in variable lease cost. Rental expense was $1,699 for the year ended December 31, 2020.
As of December 31, 2022, amounts reported in the consolidated balance sheets were as follows:
| Operating Leases: | December 31, 2022 | December 31, 2021 | |||||||||
| Right-of-use assets | $ | $ | |||||||||
| Lease liability, current | |||||||||||
| Lease liability, noncurrent | |||||||||||
| Total lease liabilities | $ | $ | |||||||||
| Weighted-average remaining lease term (in years) | |||||||||||
| Weighted-average discount rate (annual) | % | % | |||||||||
Other information related to leases are as follows:
| Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||
| 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |||||||||||||||
| Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities | |||||||||||||||||
| Operating cash flows from operating leases | ( | ( | |||||||||||||||
| Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for lease liabilities | |||||||||||||||||
| Operating leases | |||||||||||||||||
88
The following table presents a maturity analysis of the Company's operating lease liabilities as of December 31, 2022:
| Future Minimum Lease Payments | |||||
| 2023 | $ | ||||
| 2024 | |||||
| 2025 | |||||
| 2026 | |||||
| 2027 | |||||
| Thereafter | |||||
| Total Lease payments | $ | ||||
| Less Imputed Interest | |||||
| Total lease obligations | $ | ||||
7.Goodwill and other intangible assets, net
Goodwill recorded in the consolidated financial statements was $223,181 and $221,117 at December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. There were no indicators of impairment noted in the periods presented.
The following table presents changes to goodwill for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021 for each reporting unit:
| Integrated Solutions | Payment Services | Total | |||||||||||||||
| Balance as of December 31, 2020 | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||
| Measurement period adjustment | |||||||||||||||||
| Acquisition - Paragon purchase accounting | |||||||||||||||||
| Balance as of December 31, 2021 | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||
| Acquisition - VelocIT purchase accounting | |||||||||||||||||
| Balance as of December 31, 2022 | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||
Intangible assets other than goodwill at December 31, 2022 included the following:
| Weighted Average Useful Life (Years) | Useful Lives | Gross Carrying Amount at | Accumulated Amortization | Net Carrying Value as of | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| December 31, | December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2022 | 2022 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Customer Relationships | $ | $ | ( | $ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Developed Technology | ( | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Trade name | ( | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| $ | $ | ( | $ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
89
Intangible assets other than goodwill at December 31, 2021 included the following:
| Weighted Average Useful Life (Years) | Useful Lives | Gross Carrying Amount at | Accumulated Amortization | Net Carrying Value as of | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| December 31, | December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 2021 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Customer Relationships | $ | $ | ( | $ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Developed Technology | ( | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Trade name | 5- | ( | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| $ | $ | ( | $ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization expense totaled $26,602 , $25,464 and $20,709 for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
The following table shows the expected future amortization expense for intangible assets at December 31, 2022:
| Expected Future Amortization Expense | |||||
| 2023 | $ | ||||
| 2024 | |||||
| 2025 | |||||
| 2026 | |||||
| 2027 | |||||
| Thereafter | |||||
| Total expected future amortization expense | $ | ||||
8.Long-term debt
On June 25, 2021, Paya Holdings III, LLC, as Parent borrower, Paya, Inc., as borrower (together, the “Borrowers”), and Holdings, each a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, entered into a new senior secured credit agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) with Credit Suisse AG, Cayman Islands Branch, as administrative agent, collateral agent and letter of credit ("L/C") issuer (the “Agent”), and the other lenders and L/C issuers party thereto. The Credit Agreement governs new senior secured credit facilities (the “Senior Secured Credit Facilities”), consisting of a $250 million senior secured term loan facility (the “Term Loan”) and a $45 million senior secured revolving credit facility (the “Revolver”). The Revolver includes borrowing capacity available for letters of credit. Any issuance of letters of credit will reduce the amount available under the Revolver.
The proceeds from the Term Loan were used (1) to repay, in full, the outstanding loans under the prior credit agreement, dated as of August 1, 2017, among Holdings, the Borrowers, the financial institutions from time to time party thereto as lenders, and Antares Capital LP, as administrative agent (as amended from time to time, the “Prior Credit Agreement”), permanently terminate all commitments thereunder, release and terminate all liens securing such Prior Credit Agreement, and discharge all guarantees thereunder, (2) to pay certain fees and expenses incurred in connection with the Credit Agreement and the repayment of the Prior Credit Agreement, and (3) for working capital and general corporate purposes (including capital expenditures and acquisitions permitted thereunder). At closing of the Credit Agreement, the Revolver was undrawn.
The Term Loan has a seven-year maturity and the Revolver has a five-year maturity. The Credit Agreement provides that the Company may make one or more offers to the lenders, and consummate transactions with individual lenders
90
that accept the terms contained in such offers, to extend the maturity date of the lender’s term loans and/or revolving commitments, subject to certain conditions, and any extended term loans or revolving commitments will constitute a separate class of term loans or revolving commitments.
All of the Borrowers’ obligations under the Senior Secured Credit Facilities are guaranteed by the subsidiary guarantors named therein. In addition, the obligations under the Senior Secured Credit Facilities are secured by a pledge of 100 % of the capital stock of certain domestic subsidiaries owned by Holdings and a security interest in substantially all of the Borrowers’ and the guarantors’ tangible and intangible assets.
At the Borrowers’ option, the Borrowers may request an increase of the commitments under the Revolver or the Term Loan or may add one or more new term loan facilities or revolving credit facilities in an aggregate amount not to exceed the sum of (x) the greater of $61 million and 100 % of consolidated EBITDA (as defined in the Credit Agreement) plus (y) unused amounts under the Credit Agreement’s general indebtedness basket, so long as certain conditions, including a consolidated first lien net leverage ratio (as defined in the Credit Agreement) of not more than 4.25 to 1.00 (on a pari passu basis) or 5.00 to 1.00 (on a junior basis), in each case on a pro forma basis, is satisfied.
Borrowings under the Senior Secured Credit Facilities bear interest, equal to (i) an alternative base rate equal to the greater of (a) the prime rate announced by the Agent or the highest interest rate published by the Federal Reserve Board as the “bank prime loan” rate, (b) the Federal Reserve Bank of New York rate plus 0.5 % per annum, and (c) the Eurodollar rate for an interest period of one-month beginning on such day plus 100 basis points, plus 2.25 % (provided that the Eurodollar rate applicable to the Term Loan shall not be less than 0.75 % per annum); or (ii) the Eurodollar rate (provided that the Eurodollar rate applicable to the Term Loan shall not be less than 0.75 % per annum), plus 3.25 %. The Borrowers are also required to pay an unused commitment fee to the lenders under the Revolver equal to 0.50 % with step-downs to 0.375 % and 0.25 % when the Borrowers’ consolidated first lien net leverage ratio is less than or equal to 3.75 to 1.00 and 3.25 to 1.00, respectively. The Borrowers must also pay customary letter of credit fees, including a fronting fee as well as administration fees.
Commencing December 31, 2021, the Borrowers are required to repay the Term Loan portion of the Senior Secured Credit Facilities in quarterly principal installments equal to 0.25 % of the aggregate principal amount outstanding thereunder, with the balance payable at maturity.
The Credit Agreement contains a financial covenant that requires Holdings to maintain at the end of each fiscal quarter, commencing with the quarter ending December 31, 2021, a consolidated first lien net leverage ratio of not more than 6.50 to 1.00 but solely to the extent that the aggregate amount under letters of credit and loans outstanding under the Revolver exceeds 35 % of the aggregate amount of all revolving commitments.
The Credit Agreement also contains a number of covenants that, among other things, restrict, subject to certain exceptions, the ability of Holdings and its subsidiaries to: (i) incur additional indebtedness; (ii) create liens on assets; (iii) engage in mergers or consolidations; (iv) sell assets; (v) pay dividends and distributions or repurchase the Company’s capital stock; and (vi) change their fiscal year. The Credit Agreement contains customary affirmative covenants and events of default. As of December 31, 2022 the Company was in compliance with all financial covenants and ratios.
Net proceeds from the issuance of the Term Loan in 2021 totaled $243.6 million, which includes a debt discount of $1.3 million and related debt issuance costs of $5.1 million. The debt discount and related debt issuance costs are capitalized and amortized over the life of the agreement. Proceeds used to repay the Prior Credit Agreement totaled $233.8 million, which includes principal payment of $228.1 million, interest payment of $3.4 million and a prepayment penalty of $2.3 million. The prepayment penalty and a write-off of debt issuance costs of $6.2 million are included in other income (expense) in the consolidated statement of income and comprehensive income.
91
The Company’s long-term debt consisted of the following as of December 31, 2022 and 2021:
| December 31, 2022 | December 31, 2021 | ||||||||||
| Term loan credit agreement | $ | $ | |||||||||
| Debt issuance costs, net | ( | ( | |||||||||
| Total debt | |||||||||||
| Less: current portion of debt | ( | ( | |||||||||
| Total long-term debt | $ | $ | |||||||||
There were no
The current portion of debt was included within other current liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet.
The Company had $4,245 and $5,018 of unamortized Term Loan debt issuance costs that were netted against the outstanding loan balance and $680 and $875 of unamortized costs associated with the Revolver as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. The Revolver debt issuance costs are recorded in other current and other long term assets and are amortized over the life of the Revolver. Amortization of the debt issuance costs are included in interest expense in the consolidated statement of income and comprehensive income.
Total interest expense was $14,311 , $14,142 , and $17,637 for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively. This included the long-term debt interest expense of $12,936 , $12,229 and $15,671 for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively, and amortization of debt issuance costs of $969 , $930 and $1,072 for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
Annual principal payments on the Term Loan for the following years is as follows:
Future Principal Payments | |||||
| 2023 | $ | ||||
| 2024 | |||||
| 2025 | |||||
| 2026 | |||||
| 2027 | |||||
| Thereafter | |||||
| Total future principal payments | $ | ||||
9.Derivatives
92
On November 16, 2017 the Company entered into an interest rate cap agreement (the "prior agreement") with a notional amount of $125,000 for the initial period, reducing consistent with the required quarterly debt payments, and an effective date of December 29, 2017. The prior agreement terminated on December 31, 2020. The Company paid a premium of $169 for the right to receive payments if the LIBOR rises above the cap percentage, thus effectively ensuring interest expense is capped at a maximum rate of the cap plus 6 % for the duration of the prior agreement. The premium is recorded in other long-term assets on the consolidated balance sheet. The prior agreement was a derivative not designated as a hedging instrument for accounting purposes.
The interest rate cap rate was as follows:
| Period rate is applicable | ||||||||||||||
| Date From | Date To | Notional Amount | Cap Rate (%) | |||||||||||
| December 29, 2017 | March 29, 2018 | |||||||||||||
| March 30, 2018 | June 28, 2018 | |||||||||||||
| June 29, 2018 | September 28, 2018 | |||||||||||||
| September 29, 2018 | December 31, 2018 | |||||||||||||
| December 31, 2018 | March 29, 2019 | |||||||||||||
| March 30, 2019 | June 28, 2019 | |||||||||||||
| June 29, 2019 | September 29, 2019 | |||||||||||||
| September 30, 2019 | December 31, 2019 | |||||||||||||
| December 31, 2019 | March 30, 2020 | |||||||||||||
| March 31, 2020 | June 29, 2020 | |||||||||||||
| June 30, 2020 | September 29, 2020 | |||||||||||||
| September 30, 2020 | December 31, 2020 | |||||||||||||
| March 31, 2021 | March 31, 2023 | |||||||||||||
The fair value of the prior agreement was $0 at December 31, 2020.
The fair values of the prior agreement and the interest rate cap agreement are included in other current assets on the consolidated balance sheet. Changes in fair value are recorded in earnings in other income (expense). The Company recognized non-cash gains (losses) of $1,404 , $127 and $(1 ) in other income (expense) for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively, related to the interest rate cap agreements. The Company received cash payments of $1,710 , $0 and $0 for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively, from the interest rate cap agreement.
10.Equity
Common Stock
The holders of the Company's common stock are entitled to one vote for each share of common stock held. Of the 132,230,837 shares of common stock outstanding, a total of 5,681,812 are considered contingently issuable as they require the trading price of our stock to exceed $15.00 per share for 20 out of any 30 consecutive trading days through October 16, 2025. In addition, should our share price exceed $17.50 per share for 20 out of any 30 consecutive trading days through October 16, 2025, the Company is required to issue up to an additional 14,018,188 shares of common stock, for total contingently issuable shares of 19,700,000 . See Note 3, Fintech Transaction, for more information regarding the earnout shares.
On March 17, 2021, the Company priced an offering of 20,000,000 shares of its common stock. The Company and the selling stockholder each agreed to sell 10,000,000 shares of common stock to the underwriters at a price
93
of $12.25 per share. The offering closed and the shares were delivered on March 22, 2021. As a result of the offering, the Company received cash proceeds of $122,500 , net of transaction costs of $5,736 .
Paya Holdings Inc. Omnibus Incentive Plan
On December 22, 2020, the Company adopted the Paya Holdings Inc. Omnibus Incentive Plan, which originally allowed for issuance of up to 8,800,000 shares of its common stock. During 2022, an additional 10,000,000 shares were approved for issuance under the Omnibus Incentive Plan by the stockholders. The purpose of the plan is to enhance the profitability and value of the Company for the benefit of its stockholders by enabling the Company to offer eligible individual stock and cash-based incentives in order to attract, retain, and reward such individuals and strengthen the mutuality of interest between such individuals and the stockholders. Under the Omnibus Incentive Plan, the Company may grant stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted shares, performance awards, and other stock-based and cash-based awards to eligible employees, consultants or non-employee directors of the Company. The Company recognized $6,466 , $2,842 and $28 of share-based compensation for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively, in selling, general & administrative expenses on the consolidated statement of income and comprehensive income on a straight-line basis over the vesting periods. As of December 31, 2022, the Company had two stock-based compensation award types granted and outstanding: restricted stock units ("RSUs") and stock options.
RSUs represent the right to receive shares of the Company's common stock at a specified date in the future. RSUs issued under the Omnibus Incentive Plan vest over 3 or 5 year periods. RSUs granted under the Omnibus Incentive Plan were as follows:
| Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||
| 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |||||||||||||||
| RSUs granted | |||||||||||||||||
| Fair value of common stock | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||
The fair value of each option award is estimated on the date of the grant, using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and the assumptions in the following table:
| Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||
| 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |||||||||||||||
| Stock options granted | |||||||||||||||||
| Fair value of stock options | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||
| Expected volatility | |||||||||||||||||
| Dividend yield | |||||||||||||||||
| Expected term | |||||||||||||||||
| Risk-free interest rate | |||||||||||||||||
The risk-free interest rate is based on the yield of a zero coupon United States Treasury Security with a maturity equal to the expected life of the stock option from the date of the grant. The assumption for expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of a peer group of market participants as the Company has limited historical volatility. It is the Company's intent to retain all profits for the operations of the business for the foreseeable future, as such the dividend yield assumption is zero . The Company applied the simplified method (as described in Staff Accounting Bulletin 110), which is the mid-point between the vesting date and the end of the contract term in determining the expected term of the stock options as the Company has limited historical
94
basis upon which to determine historical exercise periods. Forfeitures are accounted for as incurred, and all stock options exercised will be settled in common stock.
The following table summarizes stock option activities:
| Number of Options | Weighted-Average Exercise Price | Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Term (in years) | Weighted-Average Fair Value | |||||||||||
| Outstanding, December 31, 2020 | $ | $ | ||||||||||||
| Granted | $ | |||||||||||||
| Exercised | ||||||||||||||
| Forfeited | ( | |||||||||||||
| Outstanding, December 31, 2021 | $ | $ | ||||||||||||
| Granted | $ | |||||||||||||
| Exercised | ||||||||||||||
| Forfeited | ( | |||||||||||||
| Outstanding, December 31, 2022 | $ | $ | ||||||||||||
| As of December 31, 2021 | ||||||||||||||
| Vested and Expected to vest | $ | $ | ||||||||||||
| Exercisable | $ | $ | ||||||||||||
| As of December 31, 2022 | ||||||||||||||
| Vested and Expected to vest | $ | $ | ||||||||||||
| Exercisable | $ | $ | ||||||||||||
The following table summarizes RSU activities
| Number of Shares | Weighted-Average Fair Value | |||||||
| Outstanding, December 31, 2020 | $ | |||||||
| Granted | ||||||||
| Vested | ( | |||||||
| Forfeited | ( | |||||||
| Outstanding, December 31, 2021 | $ | |||||||
| Granted | ||||||||
| Vested | ( | |||||||
| Forfeited | ( | |||||||
| Outstanding, December 31, 2022 | $ | |||||||
95
Class C Incentive Units
Ultra provides Class C Incentive Units as part of their incentive plan. As certain employees of the Company were recipients of the Class C Incentive Units, the related share-based compensation was recorded by the Company.
The total number of units associated with share-based compensation granted and forfeited during the period from inception to December 31, 2022 is as follows:
| Time Vesting | |||||
| December 31, 2020 balance | |||||
| Granted | |||||
| Forfeited | ( | ||||
| December 31, 2021 balance | |||||
| Granted | |||||
| Forfeited | ( | ||||
| Exercised | ( | ||||
| December 31, 2022 balance | |||||
As of December 31, 2022, 32,349,025 of the units had vested. The units vest on a straight-line basis over the terms of the agreement as described below.
| Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||
| 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |||||||||||||||
| Time vesting units | |||||||||||||||||
| 5 year vesting period | |||||||||||||||||
| 1 year vesting period | |||||||||||||||||
| Outstanding Incentive Units | |||||||||||||||||
There were no 40,982 , 3,806,844 and 1,592,674 , respectively, of Class C units were forfeited due to departures of employees from the Company.
The Company recognized $778 , $821 and $1,850 of share-based compensation related to the Class C incentive units, for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively, in selling, general & administrative expenses on the consolidated statement of income and comprehensive income. The Company used the fair value of the awards on the grant date to determine the share-based compensation expense. The Company did not issue any Class C incentive units in 2022 or 2021. For units issued in 2020, Ultra evaluated the value of units based on the distribution waterfall specified in the respective agreements. Ultra engaged a third-party valuation firm to estimate its enterprise value (“EV”) as determined by discounted cash flow, guideline public company, and merger and acquisition valuation methodologies.
Warrants
On September 15, 2021, the Company completed a registered exchange offer of the Company's 17,714,945 outstanding warrants. In connection therewith, the Company exchanged an aggregate 17,428,489 warrants tendered for shares of the Company’s common stock at an exchange ratio of 0.26 shares for each warrant. As a result, at closing, the Company issued an aggregate of 4,531,407 shares of common stock and separate from the exchange, 2,450 warrants were exercised.
96
Additionally, on the same date, the Company and Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company, entered into Amendment No. 1 (the “Warrant Amendment”) to the Warrant Agreement, dated as of November 15, 2018, by and between FinTech Acquisition Corp. III and the warrant agent, governing the warrants. The Warrant Amendment provided the Company with the right to mandatorily exchange the Company’s remaining outstanding warrants for shares of the Company’s common stock, at an exchange ratio of 0.234 shares for each warrant. Simultaneously with the closing of the warrant exchange offer, the Company notified holders of the remaining warrants that it would exercise its right to exchange the warrants for shares of common stock and, consequently, the 284,006 outstanding warrants that were not tendered in the exchange were converted into an aggregate 66,457 shares of common stock. As a result of these transactions, there were no warrants outstanding as of December 31, 2022.
Earnings per Share
Earnings per share has been computed by dividing net income (loss) available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the respective period. Potentially dilutive securities consist of shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options, issuance of earnout shares, exercise of warrants, and vesting of restricted stock awards.
The following table provides the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share:
| Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||
| 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |||||||||||||||
| Numerator: | |||||||||||||||||
| Net income (loss) | $ | $ | ( | $ | ( | ||||||||||||
| Denominator: | |||||||||||||||||
| Weighted average common shares - basic | |||||||||||||||||
| Add effect of dilutive securities: | |||||||||||||||||
| Stock-based awards | |||||||||||||||||
| Weighted average common shares assuming dilution | |||||||||||||||||
| Earnings per share: | |||||||||||||||||
| Basic | $ | $ | ( | $ | ( | ||||||||||||
| Diluted | $ | $ | ( | $ | ( | ||||||||||||
| Anti-dilutive shares excluded from calculation of diluted EPS: | |||||||||||||||||
| Restricted stock units - granted | |||||||||||||||||
| Stock options - granted | |||||||||||||||||
| Warrants - outstanding | |||||||||||||||||
| Earnout shares | |||||||||||||||||
| Total anti-dilutive shares | |||||||||||||||||
97
11.Income taxes
The income tax benefits (expenses) from continuing operations were as follows:
| Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||
| 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |||||||||||||||
| Current: | |||||||||||||||||
| Federal | $ | ( | $ | ( | $ | ( | |||||||||||
| State | ( | ( | ( | ||||||||||||||
| Total current provision | ( | ( | ( | ||||||||||||||
| Deferred: | |||||||||||||||||
| Federal | $ | $ | $ | ( | |||||||||||||
| State | |||||||||||||||||
| Total deferred (expense) benefit | |||||||||||||||||
| Total (expense) benefit for income taxes | $ | ( | $ | ( | $ | ( | |||||||||||
The provision for income taxes differs from the amount computed by applying the statutory federal income tax rate to income before provision for income taxes. The rate reconciliation for continuing operations presented below is based on the U.S. federal statutory tax rate of 21% for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021, and 2020.
| Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||
| 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |||||||||||||||
| Tax computed at federal statutory rate | % | % | % | ||||||||||||||
| State Taxes (net of federal benefit) | |||||||||||||||||
| State rate change | |||||||||||||||||
| Nondeductible Expenses | ( | ( | ( | ||||||||||||||
| Meals and Entertainment | ( | ||||||||||||||||
| TRA | ( | ||||||||||||||||
| Pass-through Income | ( | ||||||||||||||||
| Stock compensation | ( | ||||||||||||||||
| Transaction cost | |||||||||||||||||
| Deferred Financing Cost | |||||||||||||||||
| Deferred write-off and Other | |||||||||||||||||
| Uncertain Tax Positions - Liability | |||||||||||||||||
| Uncertain Tax Positions - Interest | |||||||||||||||||
| Change in entity type | ( | ||||||||||||||||
| Valuation allowance | ( | ( | |||||||||||||||
| Return to Provision Adjustments | ( | ||||||||||||||||
| Contingent consideration | ( | ||||||||||||||||
| Income tax (expense) benefit | % | % | ( | % | |||||||||||||
The Company’s income tax provision was computed based on the federal statutory rate and the average state statutory rates, net of the related federal benefit. Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. Significant components of the Company’s deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows:
98
| December 31, 2022 | December 31, 2021 | ||||||||||
| Deferred tax assets | |||||||||||
| Accrued expenses | $ | $ | |||||||||
| Bad debt reserve | |||||||||||
| Deferred rent | |||||||||||
| Fixed Assets | |||||||||||
| Net operating loss carryforward - federal and state | |||||||||||
| Interest expense limitation | |||||||||||
| Goodwill amortization | |||||||||||
| Lease liability | |||||||||||
| Stock compensation | |||||||||||
| Other | |||||||||||
| Total net deferred tax assets | |||||||||||
| Deferred tax liabilities | |||||||||||
| Deferred rent | ( | ||||||||||
| Fixed assets | ( | ||||||||||
| Intangible amortization | ( | ( | |||||||||
| California 338(g) amortization | ( | ( | |||||||||
| Right of use asset | ( | ( | |||||||||
| Other | ( | ( | |||||||||
| Total deferred tax liabilities | ( | ( | |||||||||
| Valuation allowance | ( | ( | |||||||||
| Net deferred tax liability | $ | ( | $ | ( | |||||||
The Company had a $8,399 and $8,975 federal operating loss carryforward as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, which can be carried forward indefinitely. The Company had a $6,243 and $29,897 net operating loss carryforward for various state jurisdictions as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.
ASC 740, Income Tax ("ASC 740") requires deferred tax assets to be reduced by a valuation allowance, if, based on the weight of available positive and negative evidence, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. In accordance with this requirement, the Company regularly reviews the recoverability of its deferred tax assets and establishes a valuation allowance if appropriate. In determining the amount of any required valuation allowance, the Company considers the history of profitability, projections of future profitability, the reversal of future taxable temporary differences, the overall amount of deferred tax assets, and the timeframe necessary to utilize the deferred tax assets prior to their expiration. Based on the weight of all positive and negative quantitative and qualitative evidence available as outlined above, management has concluded that it is more likely than not that the Company will be able to realize a portion of its federal and state deferred tax assets in the foreseeable future and has recorded a valuation allowance of $10,646 and $9,740 against these assets as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.
As of December 31, 2022, the earliest tax year open to federal and state examinations is 2019 and no years are currently under examination in any jurisdiction. The Company believes based on the recognition and measurement principles of ASC 740 that the unrecognized tax benefits recorded for all remaining open years in all jurisdictions, including those currently under audit, is appropriate. The Company does not expect its unrecognized tax benefits to significantly change in the next 12 months.
99
The ending amount of all unrecognized tax benefits was $229 229 . The Company accrued interest and penalties associated with uncertain tax positions as part of the tax provision and resulted in an ending amount of interest and penalties as of December 31, 2022 of $23 and $48 , respectively.
The aggregate change in the balance of gross unrecognized tax benefits, which excludes interest and penalties, for 2022, 2021 and 2020 is as follows:
| Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||
| 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |||||||||||||||
| Beginning balance | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||
| Additions based on tax positions related to prior years | |||||||||||||||||
| Additions based on tax positions related to current years | |||||||||||||||||
| Reductions for tax positions due to lapse of statute | |||||||||||||||||
| Other changes | |||||||||||||||||
| Ending balance | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||
CARES Act
On March 27, 2020, the CARES Act was signed into law. Intended to provide economic relief to those impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic, the CARES Act includes provisions, among others, addressing the carryback of net operating losses ("NOLs") for specific periods, refunds of alternative minimum tax credits, temporary modifications to the limitations placed on the tax deductibility of net interest expenses, and technical amendments for qualified improvement property (“QIP”). Additionally, the CARES Act, in efforts to enhance business’ liquidity, provides for refundable employee retention tax credits and the deferral of the employer-paid portion of social security taxes.
12.Fair value
The Company made recurring fair value measurements of contingent liabilities arising from the Paragon acquisition using Level 3 unobservable inputs. These liabilities were related to potential earnout payments in connection with certain growth metrics related to the financial performance of Paragon in the 12 months from April 23, 2021 through April 22, 2022 as laid out in the acquisition agreement. The contingent liability no longer exists as of December 31, 2022.
There were no transfers into or out of Level 3 during the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021.
The Company makes recurring fair value measurements for derivative instruments. Refer to Note 9. Derivatives for additional information. The Company has determined that the significant inputs used to value the interest rate cap fall within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. As a result, the Company has determined that its interest rate cap valuation is classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy as shown in the table below.
100
| Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | |||||||||||||||
| December 31, 2021 | |||||||||||||||||
Interest rate cap agreement(a) | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||
| December 31, 2022 | |||||||||||||||||
Interest rate cap agreement(a) | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||
(a) Interest rate cap asset value is included in on the consolidated balance sheets. | |||||||||||||||||
Other financial instruments not measured at fair value on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets at December 31, 2022 and 2021 include cash, trade receivable, prepaid expenses and other current assets, accounts payable, and accrued expenses and other current liabilities as their estimated fair values reasonably approximate their carrying value as reported on the consolidated balance sheets. The Company’s debt obligations are carried at amortized cost less debt issuance costs. Amortized cost approximates fair value. Fair value has been estimated based on actual trading information, and quoted prices, provided by bond traders and would be classified as Level 2.
13.Commitments and contingencies
Liabilities under Tax Receivable Agreement
Pursuant to the Tax Receivable Agreement ("TRA"), the Company is obligated to make payments to Ultra equal to 85 % of the realized tax benefits that Holdings realizes or is deemed to realize as a result of the Designated Tax Attributes. Designated Tax Attributes include (i) the tax basis increases resulting from the exchange of Holdings and GTCR/Ultra Blocker, Inc. equity interests in exchange for shares of the Company’s common stock and cash pursuant to the Fintech Merger Agreement, (ii) imputed interest deemed to be paid by the Company as a result of, and additional tax basis arising from, any payments the Company makes under the TRA, (iii) tax basis of assets immediately prior to the Fintech Transaction that are held by Holdings and its subsidiaries or GTCR/Ultra Blocker, Inc., and (iv) net operating losses and other section 163(j) carryforwards of Holdings’ subsidiaries or GTCR/Ultra Blocker, Inc. The Company is not obligated to make any payments under the TRA until the tax benefits associated the transaction that gave rise to the payment are realized. Amounts payable under the TRA are contingent upon, among other things, generation of future taxable income over the term of the TRA. If the Company does not generate sufficient taxable income in the aggregate over the term of the TRA to utilize the tax benefits, then the Company would not be required to make the related TRA payments. As of December 31, 2022, the TRA liability is $18,504 based on the amount deemed probable under ASC 450. As of December 31, 2021, the amount of the TRA liability was $19,502 . The total TRA payment obligation assuming sufficient taxable income to recognize 100 % of the Designated Tax Attributes was $32,147 and $32,245 as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. Payments were made of $592 pursuant to the TRA during the year ended December 31, 2022 and recorded in payment on tax receivable liability in the consolidated statement of cash flows. Both the TRA-related deferred tax assets and the Company’s obligation are estimates that are subject to change. Any changes in the fair value of the TRA liability are recorded in other income (expense) on the consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income. The Company recorded a gain of $406 for the year ended December 31, 2022 associated with the change in the TRA liability.
101
Legal matters
From time to time the Company is a party to legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. In accordance with U.S. GAAP, the Company records a liability when it is both probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. These provisions are reviewed regularly and adjusted to reflect the impacts of negotiations, settlements, rulings, advice of legal counsel, and other information and events pertaining to a particular case.
14.Related party transactions
Contributions from Ultra
In connection with the acquisition of First Billing Services ("FBS") in 2019, Ultra contributed all of its shares in Stewardship valued at $4,000 as of the acquisition date of FBS to the Company as a capital contribution. Subsequent to the acquisition of FBS, Ultra also contributed all of its acquired membership interest in FBS valued at $4,500 as of the acquisition date of FBS to the Company as a capital contribution. The Company also received cash contributions from Ultra in the amounts of $0 , $0 and $12,211 for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
Receivable from affiliate
The Company, previously as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Ultra, funded certain transactions on behalf of its parent company that result in a receivable from affiliate between the two entities. In the year ended December 31, 2020, Holdings settled its receivable from affiliate balance in connection with the Fintech Transaction, which resulted in a distribution of $24,943 to Ultra. The Company had a related party receivable from affiliate balance of $0
Advisory Agreement
The Company entered into an Advisory Agreement with GTCR Management XI LP, an affiliate of GTCR, on August 1, 2017 for business consulting services. In exchange for those services the Company paid GTCR Management XI LP an annual advisory fee of $1,000 payable in advance in quarterly installments. The Company recorded total charges of $0 , $0 , and $750 related to the Advisory Agreement in selling, general & administrative expenses on the consolidated statement of income and comprehensive income for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021, and 2020, respectively. The Company recorded no
The Company reimburses GTCR for expenses incurred as a result of the Acquisition and for services related to the Advisory Agreement. The Company recorded no charges for expenses incurred for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021, and 2020. The Company recorded no
Related party transactions – Antares
Antares Capital LP is an investor in GTCR, LLC and was the administrative agent and a lender under the Prior Credit Agreement. As such, Antares is considered a related party. The Company recorded interest expense of $0 , $6,841 , and $15,671 in expense on the consolidated statement of income and comprehensive income for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021, and 2020 respectively, related to the Prior Credit Agreement. On June 25, 2021, the Company repaid the remaining principal and interest on the Prior Credit agreement and as such, Antares is no longer the administrative agent or a lender under the Company's current Credit Agreement. See Note 8 for further details.
102
15.Defined contribution plan
16.Segments
The Company determines its operating segments based on ASC 280, Segment Reporting. The Company reorganized its segments in 2020. Based on the manner in which the chief operating decision making group (“CODM”) manages and monitors the performance of the business in 2022, the Company currently has two
More information about our two reportable segments:
•Integrated Solutions - Our Integrated Solutions segment represents the delivery of our credit and debit card payment solutions, and to a lesser extent, ACH processing solutions to customers via integrations with software partners across our strategic vertical markets. Our Integrated Solutions partners include vertical focused front-end Customer Relationship Management software providers as well as back-end Enterprise Resource Planning and accounting solutions.
•Payment Services - Our Payment Services segment represents the delivery of card payment processing solutions to our customers through resellers, as well as ACH, check, and gift card processing. Card payment processing solutions in this segment do not originate via a software integration but still utilize Paya’s core technology infrastructure. ACH, check, and gift card processing may or may not be integrated with third-party software.
All segment revenue is from external customers.
The following tables present total revenues and segment gross profit, excluding depreciation and amortization, for each reportable segment and includes a reconciliation of segment gross profit to total U.S. GAAP operating profit, excluding depreciation and amortization, by including certain corporate-level expenses.
| Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||
| 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |||||||||||||||
| Integrated Solutions | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||
| Payment Services | |||||||||||||||||
| Total Revenue | |||||||||||||||||
| Integrated Solutions gross profit | |||||||||||||||||
| Payment Services gross profit | |||||||||||||||||
| Total segment gross profit | |||||||||||||||||
| Selling, general & administrative expenses | ( | ( | ( | ||||||||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization | ( | ( | ( | ||||||||||||||
| Interest expense | ( | ( | ( | ||||||||||||||
| Other income (expense) | ( | ||||||||||||||||
| Income (loss) before income taxes | $ | $ | $ | ( | |||||||||||||
103
17.Subsequent events
Merger with Nuvei Corporation
On January 9, 2023, the Company announced the execution of an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) with Nuvei Corporation, a corporation incorporated pursuant to the laws of Canada (“Parent”), and Pinnacle Merger Sub, Inc., a Delaware corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of Parent (“Purchaser”).
Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, and upon the terms and subject to the conditions thereof, Purchaser agreed to commence a tender offer (the “Offer”), to purchase all of the shares of common stock of the Company issued and outstanding at a price of $9.75 per share (the “Offer Price”), in cash, without interest thereon (but subject to applicable withholding). Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, and upon the terms and subject to the conditions thereof, we will merge with and into the Purchaser, with the Company continuing as the surviving corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of Parent (the “Merger”). If the Merger is consummated, the Company’s common stock will be delisted from the Nasdaq Capital Market and the duty to file reports will be suspended under Section 13 and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act").
On January 24, 2023, Purchaser commenced the Offer by filing with the SEC and mailing to the Company’s stockholders a Tender Offer Statement on Schedule TO. The Company concurrently filed with the SEC and mailed to stockholders a Solicitation/Recommendation Statement on Schedule 14D-9, which recommended that the Company’s stockholders tender their shares to Purchaser pursuant to the Offer. The Offer will initially remain open for a minimum of 20 business days from the date of commencement of the Offer. The Merger Agreement includes customary termination provisions for both the Company and Parent, and provides that, in connection with the termination of the Merger Agreement under specified circumstances, including termination by the Company to accept and enter into an agreement with respect to a Superior Proposal (as defined in the Merger Agreement), the Company will pay Parent a termination fee of approximately $38 million. The parties to the Merger Agreement are also entitled to specifically enforce the terms and provisions of the Merger Agreement.
The Merger Agreement provides, among other things, that upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement, at the effective time of the Merger, each share of the Company’s common stock that is not (a) validly tendered and irrevocably accepted for purchase pursuant to the Offer, (b) held by a stockholder who is entitled to demand appraisal and who has properly and validly exercised appraisal rights in accordance with, and who has complied with, applicable law, or (c) held by Parent, Purchaser, or any other direct or indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Parent, will be thereupon converted into the right to receive cash in an amount equal to the Offer Price, on the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement. The proposed Merger is expected to close during the first quarter of 2023.
Termination Agreement with Respect to TRA
On January 8, 2023, in connection with the execution and delivery of the Merger Agreement, the Company and Ultra entered into an agreement (the “Termination Agreement”) with respect to the termination of the TRA. The Termination Agreement implements certain provisions of the TRA in connection with the occurrence of the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, including the acceleration of all obligations under the TRA pursuant to its terms resulting in the payment of an early termination fee of approximately $19.5 million to Ultra.
Legal Proceedings Relating to the Offer and the Merger Agreement
In connection with the Offer and Merger Agreement, five complaints have been filed as individual actions in United States District Courts and one complaint has been filed in New York Supreme Court. Certain demand letters have also been sent to the Company by purported stockholders making similar allegations.
104
On January 25, 2023, Ryan O’Dell, a purported stockholder of the Company, filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, captioned O’Dell v. Paya Holdings Inc., et al., Case No. 1:23-cv-659 (the “O’Dell Complaint”). On January 31, 2023, Jordan Wilson, a purported stockholder of the Company, filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, captioned Jordan Wilson v. Paya Holdings Inc., et al., Case No. 1:23-cv-790 (the “Wilson Complaint”). On January 31, 2023, Robert Wilhelm, a purported stockholder of the Company, filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, captioned Wilhelm v. Paya Holdings Inc., et. al., Case No. 1:23-cv-119 (the “Wilhelm Complaint”). On February 1, 2023, Dustin Asbury, a purported stockholder of the Company, filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, captioned Asbury v. Paya Holdings Inc., et. al., Case No. 1-23-cv-861 (the “Asbury Complaint”). On February 2, 2023, Jacob Wheeler, a purported stockholder of the Company, filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, captioned Wheeler v. Paya Holdings Inc., et. al., Case No. 1:23-cv-892 (the “Wheeler Complaint” and together with the O’Dell Complaint, the Wilson Complaint, the Wilhelm Complaint and the Asbury Complaint, the “Complaints”).
The Complaints allege, among other things, that the defendants (the Company and the Company’s Board of Directors) violated Sections 14(d), 14(e) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act and Rule 14d-9 promulgated thereunder by omitting and/or misrepresenting certain material facts relating to the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement from the Schedule 14D-9 filed by the Company on January 24, 2023. The Complaints seek, among other relief, (i) injunctive relief preventing the consummation of the Merger, (ii) recission of the Merger Agreement or rescissory damages, (iii) other damages purportedly incurred on account of the alleged omissions or misstatements, and (iv) an award of plaintiff’s costs and disbursements of the action, including attorneys’ and expert fees and expenses.
On January 31, 2023, Brian Levy, a purported stockholder of the Company, filed a complaint in the Supreme Court of the State of New York for Nassau County, captioned Brian Levy v. Debora Boyda, et al., Index No. 601850/2023 (the “Levy Complaint”). The Levy Complaint alleges, among other things, that the defendants (the Company, the Company’s Board of Directors, and Nuvei Corporation) violated Section 10-5-50 of the Georgia Uniform Securities Act of 2008 and/or negligently and fraudulently misrepresented and concealed certain material facts related to the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement under New York common law. The Levy Complaint seeks, among other relief, (i) a declaration that the Company and the Company’s Board of Directors violated Section 10-5-50 of the Georgia Uniform Securities Act of 2008, (ii) a declaration that defendants negligently and fraudulently misrepresented, concealed and omitted material facts related to the Merger, (iii) injunctive relief preventing the consummation of the Merger, and (iv) an award of interest, attorney’s fees, expert fees and other costs.
105
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
None.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in Company reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
As required by Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15 under the Exchange Act, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2022. Based upon their evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a- 15 (e) and 15d-15 (e) under the Exchange Act) were effective as of December 31, 2022.
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Management is responsible for designing, implementing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2022. In making this assessment, our management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”) in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013 framework).
Based on its evaluation, management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2022. Our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2022 has been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in its report which is included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Remediation of Material Weakness in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
In 2022, based on our assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2021, as previously disclosed under "Item 9A. Controls and Procedures" in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, management, in connection with our independent auditors, identified a material weakness in our controls related to the operating effectiveness of the review of the annual income tax provision prepared by a third-party firm, specifically the valuation allowance related to deferred tax assets. This impacted the timing of realization of a deferred tax asset, while the total projected deferred tax benefit remained unchanged.
To remediate this material weakness, management refined the scope of the Company's external tax advisors to provide advice related to complex or unusual items and enhanced the design and precision of the Company's controls related to the income tax provision calculations and documentation, including controls related to the valuation allowance assessment.
Management is satisfied that these remediation activities are sufficient to conclude there is effective operation of controls over the completeness and accuracy over the annual income tax provision and the valuation allowance as of December 31, 2022.
106
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Other than as described above, there have been no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the three months ended December 31, 2022 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Inherent Limitation over Internal Controls
Internal control over financial reporting, no matter how well designed, has inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. Further, because of changes in conditions, the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting may vary over time.
Item 9B. Other Information
Not applicable
Item 9C. Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections
Not applicable
107
Part III
Item 10. Directors, Executives, Officers and Corporate Governance
Directors
Our business and affairs are managed under the direction of our Board, which is composed of ten directors. Our certificate of incorporation (our “Certificate”) provides that the authorized number of directors may be changed only by resolution of our Board. Our Certificate also provides that our Board will be divided into three classes of directors, with the classes as nearly equal in number as possible. At each annual meeting of shareholders, a class of directors will be elected for a three-year term to succeed the class whose term is then expiring.
The following table sets forth the director class, name, age as of February 17, 2023, and other information for each member of our Board:
| Name | Class | Age | Position | Director Since | Current Term Expires | ||||||||||||
| Debora Boyda | II | 59 | Director | 2022 | 2025 | ||||||||||||
Oni Chukwu | I | 65 | Director | 2021 | 2024 | ||||||||||||
Aaron D. Cohen | III | 46 | Chair of the Board | 2020 | 2023 | ||||||||||||
Michael J. Gordon | III | 53 | Director | 2020 | 2023 | ||||||||||||
Jeffrey Hack | II | 57 | Chief Executive Officer and Director | 2020 | 2025 | ||||||||||||
Kalen James (KJ) McConnell | II | 37 | Director | 2020 | 2025 | ||||||||||||
| Collin E. Roche | III | 51 | Director | 2020 | 2023 | ||||||||||||
| Sid Singh | I | 45 | Director | 2021 | 2024 | ||||||||||||
| Anna May Trala | I | 56 | Director | 2020 | 2024 | ||||||||||||
| Stuart Yarbrough | I | 72 | Director | 2020 | 2024 | ||||||||||||
| Debora Boyda | ||
| Ms. Boyda has been our director since May 2022. Since 2016, Ms. Boyda has served as a board director for Wells Enterprises where she serves on the Nominating and Audit Committees, and is the Chair of the Compensation and Talent Management Committee. Since 2016, Ms. Boyda has also served as a board director for The Chicago Network, a non-profit organization dedicated to the mission of empowering women in leadership. Since 2021, Ms. Boyda has served as a board director for Trustmark Benefits, where she also serves on both the Audit and Compensation Committees. From May 2018 to April 2021, Ms. Boyda was the Chief Executive Officer of Isobar, a member of the Dentsu International network. During her time at Isobar, Mr. Boyda served on Dentsu’s North American Executive Leadership team. Prior to joining Isobar, Ms. Boyda was the President of Sapient/Razorfish from September 2014 to May 2018. Ms. Boyda received an MSA in Integrated Marketing from Northwestern University, and a Bachelor of Arts in English from Harvard University. | ||
| Oni Chukwu | ||
| Mr. Chukwu has been our director since April 2021. Mr. Chukwu served as Chair of the board of directors of Exago Inc. from 2016 until its sale to Insight Software in October 2021, and has served as a director on the board of Invatron Systems Corp. since July 2020. Most recently, Mr. Chukwu became a director of Pole Star Space Applications Limited in April 2021, and of Opus Agency in January 2021. From 2013 to 2020, Mr. Chukwu was the Chief Executive Officer of Aventri, a cloud-based enterprise Event Management Software. Mr. Chukwu also served for six months as the Executive Chairman of Aventri’s board of directors following its acquisition by HGGC, LLC. Prior to his time with Aventri, Mr. Chukwu was an Executive Vice President and the Chief Financial Officer of Triple Point Technology, an enterprise software company, from 2006 to 2013. In addition, Mr. Chukwu served as the Chief Financial Officer of Healthcare Software Synergies before it was acquired by United Healthcare, and at LexBridge Corporation, before it was acquired by PKS. Mr. Chukwu attended the University of New Haven, where he earned an MBA and received an honorary Ph.D. in Business Administration. | ||
108
Aaron D. Cohen, Chair. | ||
Mr. Cohen has been our director since October 2020. Mr. Cohen joined GTCR in 2003 and currently serves as a Managing Director of the firm and head of the Financial Services & Technology group. He previously worked at Hicks, Muse, Tate & Furst and in the Mergers & Acquisitions group of Salomon Smith Barney. He holds a bachelor’s degree in accountancy with high honors from the University of Illinois at Urbana — Champaign. Mr. Cohen is a Certified Public Accountant. Mr. Cohen previously played an instrumental role in GTCR’s investments in Prestige Brands, a publicly-listed company. | ||
| Michael J. Gordon | ||
Mr. Gordon has been our director since October 2020. Mr. Gordon has served as the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Aris Global since April 2022. Mr. Gordon previously served as the Chief Executive Officer of Altus Group from September 2020 to April 2022, at which time he assumed the role as Chief Executive Officer at Aris Global. Prior to that, Mr. Gordon was the Chief Executive Officer of Callcredit Information Group from 2014 to 2019. Mr. Gordon has also actively worked as a non-executive director on several companies in the United States and United Kingdom, including Constructionline, Zoopla/Hometrack and FinTech. Prior to joining Callcredit Mr. Gordon spent nine years in a range of senior leadership roles at FICO (NYSE: FICO) joining in 2005 as Vice President — Global Insurance Industry Lead and was promoted to additional positions including FICO’s Vice President and Managing Director for EMEA and Executive Vice President of Sales, Services and Marketing. Prior to joining FICO in 2005, Mr. Gordon spent more than 13 years in the financial services industry. As a vice president at Capgemini (formerly Ernst & Young Consulting LLP), Mr. Gordon provided strategic and operational solutions to banking and insurance providers, and he led the Insurance Centre of Excellence and Solutions. Mr. Gordon has a BS in Industrial Engineering/Operations Research from Northwestern University and an MBA in Finance and Business Economics from The University of Chicago Graduate School of Business. | ||
| Jeffrey Hack | ||
| Mr. Hack has served as our Chief Executive Officer and a director since November 2018. Mr. Hack is an experienced executive who has spent his career building successful technology-centric financial services businesses. He brought his passion for leveraging innovative technology to deliver a world-class partner and customer experience to us when he joined as Chief Executive Officer. Under his leadership the rebranded company, which brings more than 20 years of tenured customers, quickly accelerated its technology and product roadmaps, enhanced its client implementation scale, integrated the acquisitions of First Billing, Stewardship, The Payment Group, Paragon and VelocIT, and expanded its sales and go to market strategy with a focus on serving software providers with flexible and custom integrated payment solutions. Under Mr. Hack’s leadership, the Company has experienced solid top and bottom-line growth. Mr. Hack led our business combination (the "Business Combination") with Fintech and Nasdaq listing in October 2020 as well as an equity raise and debt refinancing in 2021. From February 2017 to October 2018, Mr. Hack was an advisor and investor in financial technology and data/analytics companies. From June 2017 to October 2018, Mr. Hack was a Board Member of Boost Payment Solutions, a global provider of B2B payment technologies. From September 2013 to January 2017, Mr. Hack was an Executive Vice President and Management Committee Member at First Data Corporation, a global provider of payments technology and the largest US merchant processor. Mr. Hack was an integral part of the leadership team that transformed First Data, leading to a successful IPO. During his tenure, he held various leadership roles at the firm, including serving as Chief Operating Officer of Global Business Solutions, First Data’s largest division. At First Data, Mr. Hack led the commercialization of integrated payments and software solutions to SMB clients, resulting in increased sales and retention. | ||
| Prior to First Data, Mr. Hack was Chief Operating Officer at Morgan Stanley Smith Barney from 2011 to 2013, where he was part of the new management team that led the successful integration of Smith Barney into Morgan Stanley following its acquisition from Citigroup. Prior to joining Morgan Stanley, Mr. Hack spent seven years at J.P. Morgan Chase in a variety of leadership roles as Executive Vice President and Managing Director. Among his responsibilities were leading Corporate Strategy and serving as Chief Operating Officer of J.P. Morgan’s Treasury and Securities Services businesses. Earlier in his career, Mr. Hack spent 10 years at Smith Barney in leadership positions in product management, strategy, and finance. He served as Smith Barney’s Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer from 2000 to 2004. He previously worked at McKinsey & Company as Engagement Manager advising major financial services companies from 1991 to 1994. Mr. Hack received his MBA from Harvard Business School and a Bachelor of Science degree in Economics from The Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania. | ||
109
| KJ McConnell | ||
| Mr. McConnell has been our director since October 2020. Mr. McConnell joined GTCR in 2014 and is currently a Managing Director at the firm. Prior to joining GTCR, Mr. McConnell worked as an Associate at TPG Capital and as an Analyst in the Financial Institutions group at Goldman Sachs. He holds an MBA from Harvard Business School, where he was a Baker Scholar, and a bachelor’s degree in finance with highest honors from the Indiana University Kelley School of Business. | ||
| Collin E. Roche | ||
Mr. Roche has been our director since October 2020. Mr. Roche has been with GTCR since 1996 and currently serves as a Co-CEO and Managing Director of the firm. Prior to joining GTCR, Mr. Roche was an Associate at EVEREN Securities in Chicago and an Analyst with Goldman, Sachs & Company in New York. He holds an MBA from Harvard Business School, where he was a Baker Scholar and Henry Ford II Scholar, and a bachelor’s degree in political economy with honors from Williams College. Mr. Roche was previously head of the Financial Services & Technology group at GTCR. Mr. Roche was previously a director of GTCR public company investments including PrivateBancorp, Syniverse, Transaction Network Services and VeriFone. | ||
| Sid Singh | ||
| Mr. Singh has been our director since September 2021. Mr. Singh has served as President, United States Information Solutions at Equifax (NYSE: EFX) since February 2019 and intends to step down from such position on March 1, 2023. Mr. Singh’s prior roles included Group President, Integrated Solutions and Vertical Markets at Global Payments (NYSE: GPN), where he led the multi-year strategy and growth of the integrated and software-led payments business. Mr. Singh currently serves on the board of Vantage Score LLC, a joint venture between Equifax, Experian and Transunion and previously served on the board of a joint venture between La Caixa and Global Payments in Spain. Mr. Singh also co-founded RKM Educational & Charitable Trust, a non-profit organization which provides scholarships to economically challenged students in India, runs a physiotherapy center for the elderly and provides vocational training for women. Mr. Singh holds an MBA from the Institute of Management Technology and a bachelor’s degree in mechanical engineering from Punjab Technical University. | ||
| Anna May Trala | ||
| Ms. Trala has been our director since October 2020. Ms. Trala has served as GTCR’s Chief Financial Officer since 2003 and currently serves as a Managing Director of the firm, leading its finance, treasury, tax, portfolio valuation, investor reporting and technology functions. Prior to joining GTCR, Ms. Trala was a partner in the Transaction Advisory Services group at Ernst & Young LLP advising the private equity industry in merger, acquisition and divestiture processes primarily in the healthcare, TMT, financial services and growth business services sectors. While at Ernst & Young LLP, Ms. Trala was involved in more than 100 transactions. Ms. Trala also led the TAS human capital initiatives for the Midwest region. She holds a Bachelor of Science in accounting from Goldey Beacom College and is a CPA. | ||
| Stuart Yarbrough | ||
| Mr. Yarbrough has been our director since October 2020. Mr. Yarbrough’s professional experience includes over 20 years in public accounting, primarily with Ernst & Young and BDO Seidman, LLP. Since June 2008, Mr. Yarbrough has been a private investor. Mr. Yarbrough was a principal at CrossHill Financial Group Inc., a company he co-founded, which provided investment banking services and venture debt financing to growth companies. Mr. Yarbrough previously served on the board of directors of Solera Holdings, Inc., Cision Ltd. and DigitalNet Holdings, Inc., as well as several other public companies. Mr. Yarbrough has a bachelor’s degree in management sciences from Duke University. | ||
110
Executive Officers
Below is a list of the names, ages, positions and a brief account of the business experience of the individuals who serve as executive officers of the Company as of February 17, 2023.
| Name | Age | Position | ||||||
| Jeffrey Hack | 57 | Chief Executive Officer | ||||||
| Glenn Renzulli | 44 | Chief Financial Officer | ||||||
| Benjamin Weiner | 33 | Executive Vice President, Head of B2B and Government | ||||||
| Balaji Devarasetty | 48 | Chief Information Officer | ||||||
| Melinda Doster | 55 | General Counsel and Secretary | ||||||
Jeffrey Hack is our Chief Executive Officer. His biography can be found above under “—Directors.”
Glenn Renzulli. Mr. Renzulli has served as our Chief Financial Officer since January 2019. Mr. Renzulli has experience in scaling and expediting growth in software and service businesses. As Paya’s Chief Financial Officer, he leads financial reporting, accounting, investor relations, corporate development and risk functions. Mr. Renzulli has decades of experience managing all aspects of finance teams, including financial planning and analysis, cash management, corporate development, and investor and lender relations. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Renzulli served as CFO of Opus Global, a compliance and risk management SaaS company and GTCR portfolio company, from June 2017 to January 2019. From May 2016 to June 2017, he was Chief Financial Officer for PeopleAdmin, a talent management SaaS provider serving the Education and Government sectors. From October 2015 to May 2016, he was the Chief Financial Officer of TeacherMatch, a human capital SaaS provider which was purchased by PeopleAdmin. Prior to those roles, he was the Chief Financial Officer of TCS Education System. He holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Finance from Fairfield University and is a graduate of GE’s Financial Management Program (FMP).
Benjamin Weiner. Mr. Weiner has served as our Executive Vice President, Head of B2B and Government since September 2022. Prior thereto, he served as our Chief Strategy Officer since November 2020 and had held various other management positions at the Company since August 2017. Mr. Weiner is responsible for sales and customer success, marketing, product and overall business strategy and execution. Mr. Weiner previously worked at GTCR evaluating investment opportunities across the payments space. He holds a Bachelor of Business Administration degree from the Ross School of Business at the University of Michigan.
Balaji Devarasetty. Balaji Devarasetty has served as our Chief Information Officer since April 2022 and served as our Chief Technology Officer since October 2021. Mr. Devarasetty has more than 20 years of experience leading high-growth financial technology and integrated payments teams. Prior to joining the Company, from September 2018 to October 2021 he served as Head of Technology for Bakkt and was a founding executive. From April 2016 to August 2018, Mr. Devarasetty was the Chief Technology Officer for Integrated Payments at Vantiv. He holds a Bachelor of Chemical Engineering from Sri Venkateshwara University, a MS in Nonlinear Dynamics and Controls from The University of Akron, and an MBA from the Weatherhead School of Management at Case Western Reserve University.
Melinda Doster. Ms. Doster has served as our General Counsel and Secretary since December 2020. Ms. Doster has broad expertise in payments and financial services, a commercial mindset and a track-record of building high-performing teams through talent management and professional development. Before joining Paya, Ms. Doster was Chief Counsel of Elavon and Deputy General Counsel of Payment Services at U.S. Bank during her over 20 years with the company. Ms. Doster started her career as a litigator with Long Aldridge & Norman (now Dentons) following a clerkship with the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. Ms. Doster holds a Juris Doctor from Vanderbilt University School of Law and a Bachelor of Arts degree from Duke University.
111
Board Meetings and Committees
Our Board has an Audit and Risk Committee, a Compensation Committee and a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. For the year ended December 31, 2022, our Board held four regular meetings. During 2022, the Audit and Risk Committee held four regular meetings, the Compensation Committee held four regular meetings and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee held three regular meetings. Directors are expected to attend the annual meeting of shareholders and all or substantially all of the Board meetings and meetings of committees on which they serve. In 2022, each director attended at least 75% of the meetings of the Board during such director’s tenure and the total number of meetings held by any of the committees of the Board on which the director served. In 2022, all directors attended the 2022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
The composition, duties and responsibilities of the standing committees of the Board are as set forth below. Each of the committees is subject to a written charter, which is available at our corporate website at https://investors.paya.com. Our website is not part of this Annual Report. In the future, our Board may establish other committees, as it deems appropriate, to assist it with its responsibilities.
| Board Member | Audit and Risk Committee | Compensation Committee | Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee | ||||||||
| Debora Boyda | X | ||||||||||
| Oni Chukwu | X | X | X (Chair) | ||||||||
| Aaron Cohen (Chair) | X | ||||||||||
| Michael J. Gordon | X (Chair) | X | |||||||||
| Jeffrey Hack | |||||||||||
| KJ McConnell | X | X | |||||||||
| Collin Roche | |||||||||||
| Sid Singh | X | ||||||||||
| Ana May Trala | X | ||||||||||
| Stuart Yarbrough * | X (Chair) | ||||||||||
*Our Board has determined that Mr. Yarbrough qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” as such term is defined in Item 407(d)(5) of Regulation S-K.
Audit and Risk Committee
The Audit and Risk Committee is responsible for, among other matters:
1.appointing, approving the compensation of, and assessing the qualifications, performance and independence of our independent registered public accounting firm;
2.pre-approving audit and permissible non-audit services, and the terms of such services, to be provided by our independent registered public accounting firm;
3.reviewing our policies on risk assessment and risk management;
4.reviewing and discussing with management and the independent registered public accounting firm our annual and quarterly financial statements and related disclosures as well as critical accounting policies and practices used by us;
5.reviewing the adequacy of our internal control over financial reporting;
6.establishing policies and procedures for the receipt and retention of accounting-related complaints and concerns;
7.recommending, based upon the Audit and Risk Committee’s review and discussions with management and the independent registered public accounting firm, whether our audited financial statements shall be included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K;
112
8.monitoring our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements as they relate to our financial statements and accounting matters;
9.preparing the Audit and Risk Committee report required by the rules of the SEC to be included in our annual proxy statement;
10.reviewing all related party transactions for potential conflict of interest situations and approving all such transactions; and
11.reviewing and discussing with management and our independent registered public accounting firm our earnings releases and scripts.
Compensation Committee
The Compensation Committee is responsible for, among other matters:
1.annually reviewing and approving corporate goals and objectives relevant to the compensation of our chief executive officer;
2.evaluating the performance of our chief executive officer in light of such corporate goals and objectives and recommending to the Board the compensation of our chief executive officer;
3.reviewing and approving the compensation of our other executive officers;
4.appointing, compensating and overseeing the work of any compensation consultant, legal counsel or other advisor retained by the compensation committee;
5.conducting the independence assessment outlined in Nasdaq rules with respect to any compensation consultant, legal counsel or other advisor retained by the compensation committee;
6.annually reviewing and reassessing the adequacy of the committee charter in its compliance with the listing requirements of the Nasdaq;
7.reviewing and establishing our overall management compensation, philosophy and policy;
8.overseeing and administering our compensation and similar plans;
9.reviewing and making recommendations to our Board with respect to director compensation; and
10.reviewing and discussing with management the compensation discussion and analysis to be included in our annual proxy statement or Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for, among other matters:
1.developing and recommending to our Board criteria for board and committee membership;
2.subject to the rights of GTCR under the Director Nomination Agreement, identifying and recommending to our Board the persons to be nominated for election as directors and to each of our Board’s committees;
3.developing and recommending to our Board best practices and corporate governance principles;
4.developing and recommending to our Board a set of corporate governance guidelines;
5.reviewing and monitoring the development and implementation of the goals the Company may establish from time to time with respect to its environmental, social and governance (“ESG”) and sustainability matters, and provide guidance to the Board on such matters;
6.reviewing the Company’s policies, programs and initiatives for employee diversity and inclusion and provide guidance to the Board on diversity matters; and
113
7.reviewing and recommending to our Board the functions, duties and compositions of the committees of our Board.
Code of Ethics
We maintain a Code of Ethics that applies to all of our employees, officers and directors, including those officers responsible for financial reporting. Our Code of Ethics is available on our website at https://investors.paya.com. We intend to disclose any amendments to the Code, or any waivers of its requirements, on our website.
Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires directors, executive officers and persons who beneficially own more than 10% of our common stock to file certain reports with the SEC concerning their beneficial ownership of our common stock. Based solely on our review of the Section 16(a) reports filed electronically with the SEC and our knowledge of certain transactions with directors and executive officers, we believe that all reporting persons were in compliance with all Section 16(a) filing requirements with respect to the year ended December 31, 2022, except that one Form 4 report relating to the withholding of shares of common stock by the Company upon the vesting of an award of restricted stock units and another Form 4 report relating to an award of restricted stock units granted to Mr. Devarasetty, were inadvertently filed after the due date.
Item 11. Executive Compensation
The purpose of this compensation discussion and analysis section is to provide information about the material elements of compensation that are paid, awarded to, or earned by, our named executive officers (“Named Executive Officers”). For fiscal year 2022, our Named Executive Officers, were:
•Jeffrey Hack, Chief Executive Officer; •Glenn Renzulli, Chief Financial Officer; •Balaji Devarasetty, Chief Information Officer; •Benjamin Weiner, Executive Vice President, Head of B2B & Government; •Melinda Doster, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary; and •Michele Shepard, Former Chief Commercial Officer. | ||
Compensation Philosophy and Objectives
Our executive compensation program is guided by our overarching philosophy of paying for demonstrable performance. We strive to provide an executive compensation program that is competitive, rewards achievement of our business objectives, and aligns the interests of our executive officers, including our Named Executive Officers, with those of our shareholders. Consistent with this philosophy, we have structured our executive compensation program to achieve the following primary objectives:
•provide market total competitive compensation opportunities and benefit levels that will attract, motivate, reward, and retain a highly talented team of executive officers within the context of responsible cost management that is internally consistent and fair;
•establish a direct link between our financial and operational results and strategic objectives and the compensation of our executive officers; and
•align the interests and objectives of our executive officers with those of our shareholders by linking their long-term incentive compensation opportunities to shareholder value creation and their cash incentives to our annual performance.
114
Our executive compensation program is designed to recruit and retain as executive officers individuals with the highest capacity to develop, grow, and manage our business, and to align their compensation with our short-term and long-term goals. To do this, our executive compensation program is made up of the following primary elements: base salary, an annual cash bonus opportunity, a long-term incentive compensation opportunity, and health and welfare benefits.
Our executive compensation program rewards team accomplishments while promoting individual accountability and depends on Company results and individual accomplishments. A portion of total compensation is placed at risk through annual performance bonuses and long-term incentives. As shown in the Summary Compensation Table, in 2022, the annual performance bonuses represented between 14% to 20% of the total compensation for our Named Executive Officers. The combination of incentives is designed to balance annual operating objectives and Company earnings performance with longer-term shareholder value creation.
We seek to provide competitive compensation that is commensurate with performance. While we do not target a specific percentile of the market, we calibrate both annual and long-term incentive opportunities to generate awards with a decreased value when goals are not fully achieved and awards with an increased value when goals are exceeded. Compensation amounts historically have been highly individualized, resulted from arm’s length negotiations and have been based on a variety of informal factors including, in addition to the factors listed above, our financial condition and available resources, our need for that particular position to be filled and the compensation levels of our other executive officers, each as of the time of the applicable compensation decision. To help ensure we provide our Named Executive Officers with fair and market-competitive compensation and to support retention of our key leaders, we annually review the compensation we offer our executives against the executives within our peer group of companies. Our peer group is regularly reviewed by the Compensation Committee with consideration given to the advice of our independent compensation consultant. The peer group for 2022 is set forth below:
•Agilysys
•Alkami Technology
•BTRS Holdings
•Cantaloupe
•Cass Information Systems
•EverCommerce
•EVERTEC
•EVO Payments
•i3 Verticals
•Intapp
•International Money Express
•Mitek Systems
•Paymentus Holdings
•Payoneer Global
•Phreesia
•PROS Holdings
•Pushpay Holdings
•Repay Holdings
•Rimini Street
•SecureWorks
•Shift4 Payments
•SPS Commerce
•Verra Mobility
•Zuora.
115
Compensation-Setting Process
Role of the Compensation Committee
Our Board has appointed the Compensation Committee, which consists of Messrs. Chukwu, Cohen, Gordon, and McConnell and Ms. Boyda to discharge its responsibilities relating to compensation matters, including the design and administration of our executive compensation program. Our Board believes that each member of the Compensation Committee is an “independent” director as defined by the Nasdaq listing standards. The Compensation Committee has overall responsibility for evaluating and recommending compensation programs, policies, and practices, and determining the compensation and benefits of our executive officers, including our Named Executive Officers.
Each year, the Compensation Committee conducts an annual review of the compensation arrangements of our executive officers, including our Named Executive Officers, typically during the first quarter of the fiscal year. The Compensation Committee does not establish a specific target for formulating the target total direct compensation opportunities of our executive officers. The members of the Compensation Committee consider various information, including a competitive market analysis based on our peer group performed by its compensation consultant, each executive officer’s performance against the financial, operational, and strategic objectives established by the Compensation Committee and our Board, and the recommendations of our CEO (except with respect to his own compensation) in light of their individual experience, knowledge of the Company, knowledge of the competitive market, knowledge of each executive officer and business judgment in making their compensation decisions.
Role of the Chief Executive Officer
In discharging its responsibilities, the Compensation Committee works with members of our management, including our CEO. Our management assists the Compensation Committee by providing information on corporate and individual performance, market compensation data, and management’s perspective on compensation matters. The Compensation Committee solicits and reviews the recommendations of our CEO with respect to each individual compensation element and target total direct compensation for each of our executive officers based on his evaluation of their performance for the prior year. The Compensation Committee reviews and discusses these recommendations with our CEO and considers them as one factor in determining and approving the compensation of our executive officers. Our CEO attends meetings of the Compensation Committee at which executive compensation matters are addressed, except with respect to discussions involving his own compensation. The Compensation Committee also will annually analyze our Chief Executive Officer’s performance and determine his base salary, cash performance awards and grants of long-term equity incentive awards based on its assessment of his performance with input from its compensation consultant.
Role of Compensation Consultant
The Compensation Committee has the sole authority to retain an external compensation consultant to assist it by providing information, analysis, and other advice relating to our executive compensation program and the decisions resulting from its annual executive compensation review, including the authority to approve the compensation consultant’s reasonable fees and other retention terms. The compensation consultant reports directly to the Compensation Committee and its chair, and serves at the discretion of the Compensation Committee, which reviews the engagement annually.
In 2022, the Compensation Committee engaged Compensia, Inc. (“Compensia”), a national compensation consulting firm, to serve as its compensation consultant to advise on executive compensation matters. The Compensation Committee has evaluated its relationship with Compensia to ensure that it believes that such firm is independent from management. Based on this evaluation, as well as consideration of the factors affecting independence set forth in Rule 10C-1(b)(4) of the Exchange Act, Rule 5605(d)(3)(D) of the Nasdaq listing standards and such other factors as it deemed relevant, the Compensation Committee has determined that no conflict of interest was raised as a result of the work performed by Compensia.
116
Compensation Elements
As previously noted, the primary elements of our executive compensation program consist of base salary, an annual cash bonus opportunity, long-term incentive compensation opportunity, and health and welfare benefits. The Compensation Committee attempts to structure the target total direct compensation of our executive officers, including our Named Executive Officers, to provide a guaranteed amount of cash compensation in the form of competitive base salaries, while also providing a meaningful amount of annual cash compensation that is at risk and dependent on our performance and individual performances of the executive officers, in the form of our annual bonus plan. The Compensation Committee also seeks to provide a portion of the target total direct compensation of our executive officers in the form of equity awards in order to align their long-term interests with those of our shareholders.
Pay Mix
We utilize the particular elements of compensation described above and below because we believe that it provides a well-proportioned mix of fixed compensation, retention value and at-risk compensation which produces short-term and long-term performance incentives and rewards. By following this approach, we provide the executive a measure of security in the minimum expected level of compensation, while motivating the executive to focus on business metrics that will produce a high level of short-term and long-term performance for the Company and long-term wealth creation for the executive, as well as reducing the risk of recruitment of top executive talent by competitors. The mix of metrics used for our annual performance bonus and long-term incentive program likewise provides an appropriate balance between short-term financial performance and long-term financial and stock performance.
For key executives, the mix of compensation is weighted toward at-risk pay (annual incentives and long-term incentives). Maintaining this pay mix results fundamentally in a pay-for-performance orientation for our executives, which is aligned with our stated compensation philosophy of providing compensation commensurate with performance.
Base Salary
Base salary represents the fixed portion of the compensation of our Named Executive Officers. Generally, we use base salary to provide each Named Executive Officer with a specified level of cash compensation during the year with the expectation that he or she will perform his or her responsibilities to the best of his or her ability and in our best interests. The Compensation Committee reviews the base salaries of our Named Executive Officers each year as part of its annual review of our executive compensation program, considering a competitive market analysis performed by its compensation consultant, each Named Executive Officer’s level of responsibilities, past performance, and expected future contributions, and the recommendations of our CEO (except with respect to his own base salary) and makes adjustments as it determines to be reasonable and necessary. In 2022, annualized base salary amounts for our Named Executive Officers were as follows: $500,000 for Mr. Hack, $400,000 for Mr. Renzulli, $350,000 for Mr. Devarasetty, $300,000 for Mr. Weiner, and $280,000 for Ms. Doster.
Annual Cash Bonus
In order to incentivize and reward our executive officers, including our Named Executive Officers, for their contributions to our business success, they are eligible to receive an annual cash bonus based on our actual achievement of one or more financial, operational, and/or strategic performance objectives established by our Board at the beginning of the year and an evaluation of their individual performance. Each Named Executive Officer’s target annual cash bonus opportunity (expressed as a percentage of base salary) is set forth in his or her employment agreement. For 2022, the target annual cash bonus opportunity of our Named Executive Officers, expressed as a percentage of the Named Executive Officer’s annual base salary, were as follows: 100% for Mr. Hack, 75% for Mr. Renzulli, 60% for Mr. Devarasetty, 67% for Mr. Weiner, and 50% for Ms. Doster.
117
Although we have not adopted a formal bonus plan, our Board generally selects the performance measures and related target levels for the target annual cash bonus opportunities at the beginning of the year. Our Board selected revenue and adjusted EBITDA as the corporate performance measures for 2022. For purposes of the annual bonuses, “adjusted EBITDA” is calculated as earnings before interest and other expense, income taxes, depreciation, and amortization, or EBITDA, adjusted to exclude certain non-cash items and other non-recurring items that the Company believes are not indicative of ongoing operations.
After evaluating the Company’s financial performance, specifically the selected performance measures, as well as the individual performance of our executive officers and their respective contributions to these results, the Compensation Committee determined to pay our Named Executive Officers 98% of their target annual cash bonus opportunities for 2022, which resulted in the following payments: $492,088 for Mr. Hack, $295,262 for Mr. Renzulli, $206,682 for Mr. Devarasetty, $197,822 for Mr. Weiner, and $137,792 for Ms. Doster.
Long-term Equity Incentives
We use equity awards granted under the Paya Holdings Inc. 2020 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “Omnibus Incentive Plan”) to incentivize and reward our executive officers, including our Named Executive Officers, for long-term corporate performance based on the value of our common stock and, thereby, to align their interests with the interests of our shareholders. Equity awards also help us retain our executive officers in a highly competitive market. Each of our Named Executive Officers is eligible to participate in the Omnibus Incentive Plan. The Omnibus Incentive Plan allows for the grant of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted shares, performance awards, other share-based awards (such as RSUs) and cash-based awards. The Compensation Committee determines the size and vesting terms of all awards made under the Omnibus Incentive Plan, and recommends the terms to the Board for approval. The Compensation Committee administers all other aspects of the Omnibus Incentive Plan.
The Compensation Committee reviews the outstanding equity holdings of our executive officers each year as part of its annual review of our executive compensation program, considering a competitive market analysis performed by Compensia, each executive officer’s level of responsibilities, past performance, and expected future contributions, and the recommendations of our CEO (except with respect to his own base salary) and makes decisions as to whether to grant equity awards to our executive officers.
In fiscal year 2022, we granted restricted stock units and stock options under the Omnibus Incentive Plan to our Named Executive Officers that vest on the first three anniversaries of the grant date and on the first five anniversaries of the grant date, respectively, in each case subject to continued employment.
Messrs. Hack, Renzulli and Weiner also hold Incentive Units, which are further described in “Equity Incentive Awards—Incentive Units” below.
Health and Welfare Benefits
Our executive officers, including our Named Executive Officers, are eligible to participate in the same employee benefit plans, and on the same terms and conditions, as all other full-time employees. These benefits include medical, dental, and vision insurance, an employee assistance program, health and dependent care flexible spending accounts, basic life insurance, accidental death and dismemberment insurance, short-term and long-term disability insurance, commuter benefits, and reimbursement for mobile phone coverage.
We also maintain a tax-qualified retirement plan that provides all full-time employees with an opportunity to save for retirement on a tax-advantaged basis. Under our 401(k) plan (the “401(k) Plan”), participants may elect to defer a portion of their compensation on a pre-tax basis and have it contributed to the 401(k) Plan subject to applicable annual limits under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Internal Revenue Code”). Employee elective deferrals are 100% vested at all times. The 401(k) Plan requires the Company to make matching contributions equal to 50% of a participant’s elective deferrals each year, up to 7% of compensation contributed by the participant to the 401(k) Plan, subject to applicable limits under the Internal Revenue Code and 401(k) Plan. These matching contributions are immediately 100% vested. We may also make discretionary contributions to the
118
401(k) Plan. We did not make any discretionary contributions to the 401(k) Plan with respect to our Named Executive Officers in 2022.
We believe these benefits are generally consistent with those offered by other companies and specifically with those companies with which we compete for employees.
Employment Agreements and Severance Benefits
We believe that a strong, experienced management team is essential to the best interests of the Company and our shareholders. We have entered into employment agreements with the Named Executive Officers in order to minimize employment security concerns and distractions. These benefits, which are payable only if the executive is terminated by the Company without cause or the executive resigns for good reason, are described and quantified in the section captioned “Item 11. Executive Compensation—Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control.”
Risk Mitigation
The Company has determined that any risks arising from its compensation programs and policies are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company. The Company’s compensation programs and policies mitigate risk by combining performance-based, long-term compensation elements with payouts that are highly correlated to the value delivered to shareholders. The combination of performance measures for annual bonuses and the equity compensation programs, share ownership and retention guidelines for executive officers, as well as the multiyear vesting schedules for equity awards encourage employees to maintain both a short and a long-term view with respect to Company performance.
Tax and Accounting Considerations
The Compensation Committee takes the applicable tax and accounting requirements into consideration in designing and overseeing our executive compensation program.
Deductibility of Executive Compensation
Under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, compensation paid to our “covered employees” (which include our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and certain other current and former Named Executive Officers) will not be deductible to the extent it exceeds $1 million. In 2022, the Compensation Committee considered the potential future effects of Section 162(m) when determining the compensation of our Named Executive Officers and is expected to consider the potential future effects of Section 162(m) when determining future Named Executive Officer compensation. However, the Compensation Committee has not adopted a policy that all compensation paid to covered employee must be deductible and reserves the right to pay compensation that is not deductible if it determines such payments to be in the best interests of the Company and our shareholders.
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation
The Compensation Committee takes accounting considerations into account in designing compensation plans and arrangements for our executive officers and other employees. Chief among these is ASC Topic 718, the standard which governs the accounting treatment of certain stock-based compensation. Among other things, ASC Topic 718 requires us to record a compensation expense in our income statement for all equity awards granted to our executive officers and other employees. This compensation expense is based on the grant date “fair value” of the equity award and, in most cases, will be recognized ratably over the award’s requisite service period (which, generally, will correspond to the award’s vesting schedule).
119
Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code
Section 280G of the Code disallows a tax deduction with respect to “excess parachute payments” to certain executive officers of companies that undergo a change in control. In addition, Section 4999 of the Code imposes a 20% excise tax penalty on the individual receiving the “excess parachute payment.” Parachute payments are compensation that is linked to or triggered by a change in control and may include, but are not limited to, bonus payments, severance payments, certain fringe benefits, and payments and acceleration of vesting from long-term incentive plans or programs and other equity-based compensation. “Excess parachute payments” are parachute payments that excess a threshold determined under Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code based on an executive officer’s prior compensation. In approving compensation arrangements for our Named Executive Officers in the future, we expect that the Compensation Committee will consider all elements of the cost to us of providing such compensation, including the potential impact of Section 280G of the Code. However, the Compensation Committee may, in its judgment, authorize compensation arrangements that could give rise to loss of deductibility of Section 280G of the Code and the imposition of excise taxes under Section 4999 of the Code when it believes that such arrangements are appropriate to attract and retain executive talent. We do not provide for excise tax gross-ups to our executive officers and do not expect to do so in the future.
Shareholder Say-on-Pay and Say-on Frequency Vote
We also consider the advisory “say-on-pay” vote in evaluating the design of our executive compensation and the compensation decisions for each of the Named Executive Officers. In May 2022, we held a shareholder advisory vote on the compensation of our Named Executive Officers. Approximately 99% of the votes cast approved the compensation of our Named Executive Officers. At our annual meeting of stockholders held on May 31, 2022, our shareholders recommended, and the Board determined, that the shareholder vote on the compensation of our Named Executive Officers would occur every year.
2022 Summary Compensation Table
The following table summarizes the compensation paid to, awarded to, or earned by the Named Executive Officers for our last three most recently completed fiscal years.
| Name and Principal Position | Year | Salary ($) | Bonus ($) | Stock Awards ($)(1) | Option Awards ($)(2) | Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)(3) | All Other Compensation ($)(4) | Total ($) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Jeffrey Hack | 2022 | 500,000 | — | 765,030 | 1,234,956 | 492,088 | 10,250 | 3,002,324 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Chief Executive Officer | 2021 | 500,000 | — | — | — | 500,000 | 9,750 | 1,009,750 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 2020 | 500,000 | — | — | — | 275,000 | 9,750 | 784,750 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Glenn Renzulli | 2022 | 400,000 | — | 420,767 | 679,226 | 295,262 | 9,139 | 1,804,394 | ||||||||||||||||||
Chief Financial Officer (5) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Balaji Devarasetty | 2022 | 350,000 | — | 780,600 | 49,392 | 206,682 | 10,250 | 1,396,924 | ||||||||||||||||||
Chief Information Officer (5) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Benjamin Weiner | 2022 | 300,000 | — | 391,263 | 509,102 | 197,822 | 10,250 | 1,408,437 | ||||||||||||||||||
Executive Vice President, Head of B2B and Government (5) | 2021 | 280,000 | — | 1,289,036 | — | 168,000 | 9,750 | 1,746,786 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 2020 | 275,401 | 1,500,000 | — | — | 93,000 | 9,751 | 1,878,152 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Melinda Doster | 2022 | 280,000 | — | 95,626 | 154,365 | 137,792 | 10,250 | 678,033 | ||||||||||||||||||
General Counsel and Secretary (5) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Michele Shepard | 2022 | 330,187 | — | 47,811 | 77,179 | — | 117,992 | 573,169 | ||||||||||||||||||
Former Chief Revenue Officer (6) | 2021 | 83,077 | 250,000 | 2,393,700 | 1,229,124 | — | 2,000 | 3,957,901 | ||||||||||||||||||
(1)Amounts reported for 2022 reflect the aggregate grant date fair value, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, of the RSUs granted pursuant to the Omnibus Incentive Plan. For more information on the RSUs, see “—Equity Incentive Awards” and the “Outstanding Equity Awards at 2022 Fiscal Year-End” table below. The assumptions used in calculating the grant date fair value of the RSUs reported in this column are set forth in Note 10 to our consolidated financial statements included herein.
120
(2)Amounts reported for 2022 reflect the aggregate grant date fair value, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, of the stock options granted pursuant to the Omnibus Incentive Plan. For more information on the stock options, see “—Equity Incentive Awards” and the “Outstanding Equity Awards at 2022 Fiscal Year-End” table below.
(3)Amounts represent the annual bonus earned by each of our Named Executive Officers pursuant to their respective employment agreements based on the achievement of the applicable performance conditions.
(4)Amounts represent (i) the amount of matching contributions under our 401(k) plan, and (ii) with respect to Ms. Shepard for 2022, $116,667 in severance payments and $1,325 in matching contributions under our 401(k) plan.
(5)Messrs. Renzulli and Devarasetty and Ms. Doster were not Named Executive Officers for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2020 or December 31, 2021.
(6)Ms. Shepard departed her role as Chief Commercial Officer of the Company, effective September 25, 2022, and remained employed by the Company in a non-executive role to facilitate a transition of her duties through October 7, 2022
2022 Grants of Plan-Based Awards
The following table sets forth certain information with respect to grants of plan-based awards for the year ended December 31, 2022 with respect to our Named Executive Officers.
| Name | Grant Date | Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards ($) | Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards ($) | All Other Stock Awards Number of Shares of Stock or Units(1) | All Other Option Awards Number of Securities Underlying Options(2) | Exercise or Base Price of Option Awards ($)(3) | Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards ($) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Threshold | Target | Maximum | Threshold | Target | Maximum | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Jeffrey Hack | — | — | 500,000 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3/16/22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 149,420 | — | — | 765,030 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3/16/22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 448,260 | 5.12 | 1,234,956 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Glenn Renzulli | — | — | 300,000 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3/16/22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 82,181 | — | — | 420,767 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3/16/22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 246,543 | 5.12 | 679,226 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Balaji Devarasetty | — | — | 210,000 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3/16/22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 5,976 | — | — | 30,597 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3/16/22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 17,928 | 5.12 | 49,393 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 11/10/22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 90,580 | — | — | 750,002 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Benjamin Weiner | — | — | 201,000 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3/16/22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 37,355 | — | — | 191,258 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3/16/22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 112,065 | 5.12 | 308,739 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 8/9/22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 51,640 | 7.25 | 200,363 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 8/9/22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 27,587 | — | — | 200,006 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Melinda Doster | — | — | 140,000 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3/16/22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 18,677 | — | — | 95,626 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3/16/22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 56,031 | 5.12 | 154,365 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Michele Shepard | — | — | 400,000 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3/16/22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 9,338 | — | — | 47,811 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3/16/22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 28,014 | 5.12 | 77,179 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
(1)Represents RSUs granted to our Named Executive Officers that vest in equal installments on the first three anniversaries of the grant date.
(2)Represents stock options granted to our Named Executive Officers that vest in equal installments on the first five anniversaries of the grant date.
(3)Represents the closing stock price as of the date of grant.
Employment Agreements
We have entered into employment agreements with each of Messrs. Hack, Renzulli, Devarasetty and Weiner and Mses. Doster and Shepard that provide for annual base salary, target bonus opportunity, and eligibility to participate in our benefit plans generally.
121
Base Salaries: Messrs. Hack, Renzulli, Devarasetty and Weiner and Mses. Doster and Shepard’s annualized base salaries for the 2022 fiscal year were $500,000, $400,000, $350,000, $300,000, $280,000 and $400,000, respectively.
Target Annual Bonus: For each of Messrs. Hack, Renzulli, Devarasetty and Weiner and Mses. Doster and Shepard, the target annual bonuses for the 2022 fiscal year were 100%, 75%, 60%, 67%, 50% and 100% of their base salaries, respectively. For the 2022 fiscal year, Messrs. Hack, Renzulli, Devarasetty and Weiner and Mses. Doster and Shepard received bonus payments of $492,088, $295,262, $206,682, $197,822, $137,792 and $0, respectively, based in part on individual performance and based in part on pre-established Company and Paya, Inc. performance metrics established by our Board.
Severance Benefits and Restrictive Covenants: The employment agreements also provide for certain severance benefits upon a resignation by the applicable Named Executive Officer for “good reason” or upon a termination by the Company without “cause,” as well as standard restrictive covenants. Please see the section entitled “Item 11. Executive Compensation—Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control” below for more details regarding the severance benefits and restrictive covenants.
Equity Incentive Awards
Omnibus Incentive Plan Awards
We maintain the Omnibus Incentive Plan for employees and other service providers who perform services for us. The purpose of awards under the Omnibus Incentive Plan is to align the interests of eligible service providers with the interests of our shareholders by providing long term incentive compensation opportunities tied to Company and/or share performance.
Each of our Named Executive Officers is eligible to participate in the Omnibus Incentive Plan. The Omnibus Incentive Plan allows for the grant of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted shares, performance awards, other share-based awards (such as RSUs) and cash-based awards. The Compensation Committee determines the size and vesting terms of all awards made under the Omnibus Incentive Plan, and recommends the terms to the Board for approval. The Compensation Committee administers all other aspects of the Omnibus Incentive Plan.
Incentive Units
Pursuant to the Limited Liability Company Agreement of Ultra (the “Ultra LLC Agreement”), Ultra may, subject to approval of its board of managers (the “Board of Managers”), issue Class C units in Ultra (the “Incentive Units”) to any employee, officer, director, consultant or other service provider of Ultra or any of its subsidiaries. The Incentive Units are intended to constitute “profits interests” within the meaning of Revenue Procedures 93-27 and 2001-43. As profits interests, the Incentive Units have no value for tax purposes on the date of grant, but instead are designed to gain value only after holders of certain other classes of equity in Ultra have received a certain level of returns. Subject to adjustment pursuant to the terms of the Ultra LLC Agreement, 50,000,000 Incentive Units are authorized for issuance under the Ultra LLC Agreement, and as December 31, 2022, there were 37,723,954 Incentive Units outstanding. See the “Outstanding Equity Awards at 2022 Fiscal Year-End” table below for additional details on the Incentive Units granted to our Named Executive Officers.
Messrs, Hack, Renzulli and Weiner were granted Incentive Units pursuant to the terms and conditions set forth in the Ultra LLC Agreement and a senior management agreement and/or award agreement with each of Messrs. Hack, Renzulli and Weiner (as applicable, referred to herein as “award agreements”). The number of Incentive Units granted to each of Messrs. Hack, Renzulli and Weiner was not determined pursuant to any formulaic equation or benchmarking to any peer groups; rather, the number of Incentive Units is determined by the Board of Managers in its sole discretion, after taking into account discussions among management team and overall retention goals. The Incentive Units held by Messrs. Hack, Renzulli and Weiner generally vest 20% on each of the first five anniversaries of the grant date (subject to their continued employment); however, the Incentive Units held by Messrs. Hack and
122
Renzulli that were scheduled to vest on or prior to January 31, 2021 automatically vested on the closing of the Fintech Transaction, to the extent that they had not vested as of such time. For information about treatment of the Incentive Units upon termination of employment, and “Investor Complete Selldown” or a “Sale of the Company,” please see “—Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control” below.
Subject to the terms of the Ultra LLC Agreement and the award agreements, holders of vested Incentive Units are entitled to participate in distributions made by Ultra following a return of capital contributions to the holders of Class A-1 Preferred Units and Class A-2 Units and certain other preferred distribution rights, and subject to the achievement of certain “participation thresholds” (as set forth in the award agreements).
Outstanding Equity Awards at 2022 Fiscal Year End
The following table sets forth certain information with respect to outstanding equity awards of our Named Executive Officers as of December 31, 2022 with respect to the named executive officer. The market value of the shares in the following table is the fair value of such shares at December 31, 2022.
| Name | Option Awards | Stock Awards | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Exercisable | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Unexercisable | Options Exercise Price | Option Expiration Date | Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested | Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (5) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Jeffrey Hack | 12,999,257 | 3,249,814 | (1)(2) | N/A(3) | N/A(3) | 149,420 | (7) | $ | 1,175,935 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| — | 448,260 | (6) | $ | 5.12 | 3/16/2032 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Glenn Renzulli | 2,822,875 | 1,881,917 | (1)(4) | N/A(3) | N/A(3) | 82,181 | (7) | $ | 646,764 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| — | 246,543 | (6) | $ | 5.12 | 3/16/2032 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Balaji Devarasetty | 30,000 | 120,000 | (8) | $ | 9.48 | 10/1/2031 | 196,556 | (11) | $ | 1,546,896 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| — | 17,928 | (6) | $ | 5.12 | 3/16/2032 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Benjamin Weiner | 1,214,516 | (1) | — | N/A(3) | N/A(3) | 64,942 | (12) | $ | 511,094 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| — | 112,065 | (6) | $ | 5.12 | 3/16/2032 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| — | 51,640 | (9) | $ | 7.25 | 8/9/2032 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Melinda Doster | 16,000 | 24,000 | (8) | $ | 13.73 | 12/7/2030 | 32,010 | (7) | $ | 251,919 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| — | 56,031 | (10) | $ | 5.12 | 3/16/2032 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Michele Shepard | 50,500 | — | $ | 9.48 | 10/5/2031 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
(1)These equity awards held by Messrs. Hack, Renzulli and Weiner are Incentive Units, which are intended to be profits interests for federal income tax purposes. For more information on the Incentive Units, see “—Incentive Units”. Despite the fact that the Incentive Units do not require the payment of an exercise price or have an option expiration date, we believe they are economically similar to stock options and, as such, they are reported in this table as “Option” awards. Awards reflected as “Unexercisable” are Incentive Units that have not yet vested. Awards reflected as “Exercisable” are Incentive Units that have vested, but remain outstanding.
(2)These Incentive Units will vest on November 12, 2023, so long as Mr. Hack remains continuously employed by the Company through the applicable vesting date.
(3)These awards are not traditional options, and therefore, there is no exercise price or expiration date associated with them.
(4)Fifty percent of these Incentive Units vested on January 14, 2023, and 50% will vest on January 14, 2024 so long as Mr. Renzulli remains continuously employed by the Company through the applicable vesting date.
(5)Market value based on the closing market price of our common stock on December 31, 2022 of $7.87 per share.
(6)Twenty percent of these options will vest on each of March 16, 2023, March 16, 2024, March 16, 2025, March 16, 2026 and March 16, 2027 in each case so long as the Named Executive Officer remains continuously employed by the Company through the applicable vesting date.
(7)One-third of these RSUs will vest on each of March 16, 2023, March 16, 2024 and March 16, 2025 in each case so long as the Named Executive Officer remains continuously employed by the Company through the applicable vesting date.
(8)Twenty-five percent of these options will vest on each of October 1, 2023. October 1, 2024, October 1, 2025 and October 1, 2026, in each case, so long as the Named Executive Officer remains continuously employed by the Company through the applicable vesting date.
(9)Twenty percent of these options will vest on each of August 9, 2023, August 9, 2024, August 9, 2025, August 9, 2026 and August 9, 2027, in each case, so long as Mr. Weiner remains continuously employed by the Company through the applicable vesting date.
(10)One-third of these options will vest on each of December 7, 2023, December 7, 2024 and December 7, 2025, in each case, so long as Ms. Doster remains continuously employed by the Company through the applicable vesting date.
(11)50,000 RSUs will vest on each of October 1, 2023 and October 1, 2024, in each case, so long as Mr. Devarasetty remains continuously employed by the Company through the applicable vesting dates. One-third of 90,580 RSUs will vest on each of November 10, 2023, November 10, 2024 and November 10, 2025, in each case, so long as Mr. Devarasetty remains continuously employed by the Company
123
through the applicable vesting dates. One-third of the remaining 5,976 RSUs will vest on each of March 16, 2023, March 16, 2024 and March 16, 2025, in each case, so long as Mr. Devarasetty remains continuously employed by the Company through the applicable vesting dates.
(12)One-third of 27,587 RSUs will vest on each of August 9, 2023, August 9, 2024 and August 9, 2025, in each case, so long as Mr. Weiner remains continuously employed by the Company through the applicable vesting date. One-third of 37,355 RSUs will vest on each of March 16, 2023, March 16, 2024 and March 16, 2025, in each case so long as Mr. Weiner remains continuously employed by the Company through the applicable vesting date.
Options Exercised and Stock Vested in the 2022 Fiscal Year
The following table sets forth certain information with respect to the vesting or exercise of stock options during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022 with respect to our Named Executive Officers.
| Name | Option Awards | Stock Awards | |||||||||||||||
| Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise | Value Realized on Exercise | Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting | Value Realized on Vesting | ||||||||||||||
| Jeffrey Hack | — | $ | — | — | $ | — | |||||||||||
| Glenn Renzulli | — | $ | — | — | $ | — | |||||||||||
| Balaji Devarasetty | — | $ | — | 50,000 | $ | 305,500 | |||||||||||
| Melinda Doster | — | $ | — | 13,333 | $ | 113,997 | |||||||||||
| Michele Shepard | — | $ | — | 84,166 | $ | 520,146 | |||||||||||
| Benjamin Weiner | — | $ | — | 46,469 | $ | 320,636 | |||||||||||
Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control
Severance Benefits
Each employment agreement provides for severance benefits (as described below) in the event the Named Executive Officer’s employment is terminated by the Board without “cause” or by the Named Executive Officer for “good reason” (each as defined in the employment agreements). Such severance benefits are subject to each Named Executive Officer’s execution and non-revocation of a general release of claims and continued compliance with the restrictive covenants set forth in the Named Executive Officer’s employment agreement (as further described below).
Mr. Hack’s severance benefits consist of (a) continued payment of base salary for a period of 12 months (the “severance period”); provided that we may elect to extend the severance period for an additional 12 months, and if so elected, the amount payable during the second year of the severance period will be $1,250,000 and paid within 60 days of our election to extend the severance period, (b) reimbursement of Mr. Hack’s premiums incurred for participation in Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (COBRA) coverage for the applicable severance period, and (c) a pro-rated annual bonus for the fiscal year during which Mr. Hack’s termination occurs (the “termination year”), payable at the time annual bonuses are otherwise paid to senior management and calculated based on the portion of target bonuses received by the remaining senior management team members with respect to the applicable termination year.
Mr. Renzulli’s severance benefits consist of an amount equal to one year of his base salary, payable over six months.
Mr. Weiner's severance benefits consist of an amount equal to one year of his base salary, payable over 12 months.
Mr. Devarasetty's and Ms. Doster's severance benefits consist of an amount equal to six months of base salary, payable over six months.
In connection with her termination, Ms. Shepard, the Company and Paya, Inc. entered into a separation, severance and general release agreement. Subject to Ms. Shepard’s execution and non-revocation of a general release of claims and compliance with the restrictive covenants set forth in her employment agreement and equity award agreements,
124
Ms. Shepard will receive (i) an amount equal to $700,000, payable in substantially equal installments on the Company’s regular payroll dates during the 12-month period following the Release Effective Date (as defined therein) (the “Severance Period”), and (ii) provided Ms. Shepard elects and remains eligible to continue coverage for herself and her spouse and eligible dependents, if any, under the Company’s group health plans pursuant to the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985 (“COBRA”), the Company will pay or reimburse Ms. Shepard, at the Company’s option, on a monthly basis for the difference between the amount Ms. Shepard pays to effect and continue such coverage and the employee contribution amount that similarly situated employees of the Company pay for the same or similar coverage under such group health plans through the earliest of (1) the end of the Severance Period, (2) the date when Ms. Shepard becomes eligible for group medical plan participation under any subsequent employer’s group medical plan, or (3) the date Ms. Shepard is no longer eligible for COBRA.
For purposes of Mr. Hack’s employment agreement, “good reason” generally means, subject to certain notice and cure provisions, (i) a reduction in base salary, a material reduction in employee benefits, or failure to pay an annual bonus consistent with the bonus plan adopted by the Board, (ii) any change to his title, or the assignment of duties materially inconsistent with his position, or (iii) a material breach of his employment agreement or breach of any representation set forth in his employment agreement.
For purposes of Messrs. Renzulli and Weiner’s employment agreements, “good reason” generally means, subject to certain notice and cure provisions, (i) a reduction in base salary, target bonus, and employee benefits, (ii) a material diminution in title or (iii) the assignment of duties materially inconsistent with the executive’s position.
For purposes of Ms. Doster’s and Mr. Devarasetty's employment agreements, “good reason” generally means, subject to certain notice and cure provisions, (i) a material reduction in base salary, (ii) the assignment of duties materially inconsistent with the Named Executive Officer’s position, (iii) with respect to Mr. Devarasetty, a material reduction target bonus, and/or (iv) with respect to Mr. Devarasetty, in the event he was not appointed to the role of Chief Information Officer on or before September 5, 2022, provided that this prong would not constitute “good reason” at any time on or after a “change in control,” as defined in the Omnibus Incentive Plan.
For purposes of Ms. Shepard’s employment agreement, “good reason” generally means, subject to certain notice and cure provisions, (i) a material reduction in base salary and target bonus, (ii) a material diminution in title, responsibilities, or authority, (iii) the assignment of duties materially inconsistent with her position, (iv) a material breach of the employment agreement, or (v) a change in Ms. Shepard’s primary work office or arrangements to a location outside of the New York metropolitan area, in each case, without prior written consent.
For purposes of Messrs. Hack and Renzulli's employment agreements, “cause” generally means (i) the conviction (with respect to Mr. Hack) or commission (with respect to Mr. Renzulli) of a felony or crime involving moral turpitude, or the commission of any other act or omission involving fraud, (ii) substantial and repeated failure to perform duties of the office held by the executive (as reasonably directed by the CEO or the Board (other than as a result of disability) with respect to Mr. Renzulli), (iii) gross negligence or willful misconduct, (iv) conduct by the executive which would reasonably be expected to bring the Company or its subsidiaries into substantial public disgrace or disrepute, and for Mr. Renzulli adversely damage the Company (v) breach of the restrictive covenants set forth in the executive’s employment agreement, (vi) for Mr. Hack, failure to observe or a violation of any written policies of the Company or Paya, Inc., (vii) for Mr. Renzulli, material violation of any written policies of the Company or Paya, Inc. that would be reasonably expected to adversely damage the Company or Paya, Inc., and/or (viii) for Mr. Hack, being named as a defendant in any criminal proceedings, and as a result of being named as a defendant, the operations, financial condition, or reputation of the Company is materially injured (provided that, in the event Mr. Hack is so named, any severance payments that would be owed to him in the event of a termination without “cause” shall be placed in an escrow account and, if Mr. Hack is ultimately not convicted of such charge, then the severance payments will be released to him).
For purposes of Messrs. Weiner and Devarasetty, Ms. Doster and Ms. Shepard’s employment agreements, “cause” generally means (i) being named as a defendant in any criminal proceedings, and as a result of being named as a defendant, the operations, financial condition, or reputation of the Company, Paya, Inc. or their respective subsidiaries are materially injured, or being convicted of a crime, (ii) the commission of any other act or omission
125
involving dishonesty or fraud with respect to the Company, Paya, Inc. or any of their respective subsidiaries or any of their customers, vendors or employees, (iii) substantial and repeated failure to perform duties of the office held by the executive as reasonably directed by the CEO (or the Board, with respect to Mr. Weiner) (other than as a result of disability), (iv) gross negligence or willful misconduct with respect to the Company, Paya, Inc. or any of their respective subsidiaries or any of their customers, vendors or employees, (v) conduct which could reasonably be expected to bring the Company, Paya, Inc. or any of their respective subsidiaries into substantial public disgrace or disrepute, (vi) any breach (material breach, with respect to Ms. Doster) of the restrictive covenants set forth in the executive’s employment agreement, and/or (vii) a failure to observe Paya, Inc. policies or standards regarding employment practices (including nondiscrimination and sexual harassment policies).
The employment agreements also subject Messrs. Hack, Renzulli, Weiner, Devarasetty, and Mess. Doster and Shepard to certain restrictive covenants, including assignment of inventions, non-competition and non-solicitation (and no hire) covenants and perpetual mutual non-disparagement (non-mutual for Ms. Doster) and confidentiality covenants. The non-competition and non-solicitation covenants apply during each respective Named Executive Officer’s employment and for 12 months thereafter (the “post-termination restricted period”); provided that (i) if Mr. Hack’s severance period is extended to 24 months, his post-termination restricted period will be increased to 24 months and (ii) if Messrs. Renzulli or Weiner’s employment is terminated for “good reason” or without “cause”, the executive’s post-termination restricted period will be reduced to 6 months.
Options and RSUs
Pursuant to the terms of the option award agreements and RSU award agreements, in the event the Company terminates the Named Executive Officer’s employment without “cause” or the Named Executive Officer resigns for “good reason” (each as defined in the applicable award agreement), in each case within one year following a “change in control” (as defined in the applicable award agreement), any unvested portion of the award will automatically vest upon such termination.
Incentive Units
Pursuant to the terms of the applicable award agreements, the Incentive Units fully vest upon a “Sale of the Company” or an “Investor Complete Selldown” (as such terms are defined in the Ultra LLC Agreement), subject to the holder’s continued employment through such sale. A “Sale of the Company” is generally defined as an event, whereby any “person” or group of related “persons” (other than the investors parties to the Ultra LLC Agreement and their controlled affiliates), in the aggregate, acquire(s) (a) a majority of the Class B Units of Ultra (or successor securities thereto) then outstanding or (b) all or substantially all of Ultra’s assets determined on a consolidated basis, provided that a “public offering” (as defined in the Ultra LLC Agreement) does not constitute a “Sale of the Company.” An “Investor Complete Selldown” will occur in the event Ultra has sold all of its assets.
In the event a Named Executive Officer who holds Incentive Units experiences a termination of employment, his unvested Incentive Units will be immediately forfeited without consideration; provided that if such termination is by the Named Executive Officer with “good reason,” due to death or disability, or by Ultra or an affiliate without “cause,” then an additional 20% of the Incentive Units will become vested as of the date of such termination, and in the case of Mr. Hack, any remaining unvested Incentive Units that would have been immediately forfeited are instead treated as follows (i) on the day following the date that a new chief executive officer commences employment as such (the “Change Date”), 50% of such unvested Incentive Units, if any, will vest, and (ii) on the date that is six months following the Change Date, all of Mr. Hack’s remaining unvested Incentive Units, if any, will vest; in each case, subject to Mr. Hack’s cooperation and support with the succession process in good faith. In addition, if a Named Executive Officer’s termination of employment is for “cause” (as defined in the Named Executive Officer’s employment agreement), all Incentive Units (whether vested or unvested) will be immediately forfeited without consideration. If a Named Executive Officer resigns without “good reason” (as defined in the Named Executive Officer’s employment agreement), his Incentive Units (whether vested or unvested) will be immediately forfeited without consideration; provided that in the event a Named Executive Officer resigns without “good reason,” the following portion of the Named Executive Officer’s vested Incentive Units will not be
126
automatically forfeited: 50% if such resignation occurs prior to November 1, 2024, 75% if such resignation occurs on or following November 1, 2024, and 100% if such resignation occurs following November 1, 2025.
The following table sets forth quantitative estimates of the benefits that would have accrued to each of our Named Executive Officers if his or her employment had been terminated without cause on December 31, 2022. Amounts below reflect potential payments pursuant to the employment agreements and our Omnibus Incentive Plan.
| Qualifying Termination (Non-Change in Control) | Qualifying Termination (Change in Control)(3) | Change in Control | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Name | Cash Severance Benefits ($)(1) | Continued Health Benefits ($) | Value of Accelerated Equity Awards ($)(2) | Cash Severance Benefits ($)(4) | Continued Health Benefits ($) | Value of Accelerated Equity Awards ($)(5) | Value of Accelerated Equity Awards ($)(6) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Jeffrey Hack | 1,000,000 | 53,577 | (2) | 1,000,000 | 53,577 | 2,408,650 | (6) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Glenn Renzulli | 400,000 | — | (2) | 400,000 | — | 1,324,758 | (6) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Balaji Devarasetty | 175,000 | — | — | 175,000 | — | 1,596,198 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Melinda Doster | 140,000 | (1) | — | — | 140,000 | — | 406,004 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Michele Shepard | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Benjamin Weiner | 300,000 | — | (2) | 300,000 | — | 851,289 | (6) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
(1)Represents the potential payments upon a termination without cause or resignation for good reason on December 31, 2022. With respect to Mr. Hack, the value reflected (i) assumes the Company did not extend the severance period for an additional 12 months, and (ii) consists of 12 months base salary continuation and his target bonus calculated pursuant to the terms of the employment agreement.
(2)Represents (i) with respect to Messrs. Hack, Renzulli and Weiner, accelerated vesting of 20% of such executive’s Incentive Units upon a termination without cause, resignation for good reason, or termination due to death or disability, and (ii) with respect to Mr. Hack, vesting of any remaining unvested Incentive Units as follows: (x) on the day following the date that a new chief executive officer commences employment as such (the “Change Date”), 50% of such unvested Incentive Units, if any, will vest, and (y) on the date that is six months following the Change Date, all of Mr. Hack’s remaining unvested Incentive Units, if any, will vest; in each case, subject to Mr. Hack’s cooperation and support with the succession process in good faith. The value that would have been conferred to holders of such Incentive Units that would have accelerated in connection such termination is not determinable as of December 31, 2022, and therefore was excluded from the table above.
(3)Assumes a termination without cause or resignation for good reason occurs within 12 months following a change in control as of December 31, 2022.
(4)Represents the potential payments upon a termination without cause or resignation for good reason within 12 months following a change in control on December 31, 2022. With respect to Mr. Hack, the value reflected (i) assumes the Company did not extend the severance period for an additional 12 months, and (ii) consists of 12 months base salary continuation and his target bonus calculated pursuant to the terms of the employment agreement.
(5)Represents (i) with respect to Mr. Devarasetty and Ms. Doster, accelerated vesting of all outstanding equity awards under the Omnibus Incentive Plan, and (ii) with respect to Messrs. Hack, Renzulli and Weiner, accelerated vesting of all outstanding equity awards under the Omnibus Incentive Plan, and regardless whether such Named Executive Officer is terminated in connection with such change in control, full acceleration of any unvested Incentive Units upon a Sale of the Company or Investor Complete Selldown, subject to employment through such event. The value that would have been conferred to holders of such Incentive Units that would have accelerated in connection with a Sale of the Company or Investor Complete Selldown is not determinable as of December 31, 2022, and therefore was excluded from the table above.
(6)Any unvested Incentive Units will fully vest upon a Sale of the Company or Investor Complete Selldown, subject to employment through such event. The value that would have been conferred to Messrs. Hack, Renzulli and Weiner as holders of such Incentive Units that would have accelerated in connection with a Sale of the Company or Investor Complete Selldown is not determinable as of December 31, 2022, and therefore was excluded from the table above.
(7)Ms. Shepard departed her role as Chief Commercial Officer on September 25, 2022 and received the severance benefits described above under “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control—Severance Benefits.”
Director Compensation
Structure
Beginning in the 2022 fiscal year, the annual compensation of our non-employee directors and non-GTCR directors provides for (i) an annual cash retainer of $30,000 for service as the non-executive chair, (ii) an annual cash retainer of $35,000 for service as a non-employee director (including the non-executive chair), (iii) an additional annual cash retainer of $50,000 for service as the chairperson of the Audit and Risk Committee, and an additional $10,000
127
annual cash retainer for each other member of the Audit and Risk Committee, (iv) an additional annual cash retainer of $12,500 for service as the chairperson of the Compensation Committee, and an additional $6,250 annual cash retainer for each other member of the Compensation Committee, (v) an additional cash retainer of $10,000 for service as the chairperson of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, and an additional cash retainer of $5,000 for each other member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, and (vi) an annual RSU award with a fair market value of $130,000. In addition, in the event a new non-employee director is elected or appointed to the Board, the Compensation Committee will determine such non-employee director’s eligibility to receive an RSU award in such amount and with such vesting schedule as determined by the Compensation Committee. All non-employee directors are also reimbursed for their reasonable expenses to attend meetings of our Board and related committees and otherwise attend to our business.
In addition, all non-employee directors were also reimbursed for their reasonable expenses to attend meetings of our Board and related committees and otherwise attend to our business.
Compensation for Fiscal Year 2022
The following table provides information concerning the compensation of each director of the Board who served as member of the Board, but did not serve as an employee of the Company or was affiliated with GTCR in the 2022 fiscal year. Mr. Hack, our Chief Executive Officer and directors affiliated with GTCR do not receive compensation for service as directors. The compensation received by Mr. Hack as an employee of the Company is presented in the “2022 Summary Compensation Table.”
| Name | Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($)(1) | Stock Awards ($)(2) | Total ($) | |||||||||||
| Jeffrey Hack | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||
| KJ McConnell | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||
| Deborah Boyda | $ | 21,979 | $ | 250,000 | (3) | $ | 271,979 | |||||||
| Oni Chukwu | $ | 61,250 | $ | 130,000 | (4) | $ | 191,250 | |||||||
| Sid Singh | $ | 45,000 | $ | 130,000 | (5) | $ | 175,000 | |||||||
| Anna May Trala | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||
| Stuart Yarbrough | $ | 85,000 | $ | 130,000 | (6) | $ | 215,000 | |||||||
| Aaron D. Cohen | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||
| Collin E. Roche | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||
| Michael J. Gordon | $ | 52,500 | $ | 80,000 | (7) | $ | 132,500 | |||||||
(1)Represents total director fees paid to the directors set forth above in connection with their services on the Board.
(2)Amounts reported in the “Stock Awards” column reflect the aggregate grant date fair value, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, of RSUs granted under the Omnibus Incentive Plan. The assumptions used in calculating the grant date fair value of the RSUs reported in this column are set forth in Note 10 to our consolidated financial statements included herein.
(3)Represents RSUs granted on June 1, 2022 and will vest annually in equal installments over the next five years.
(4)Represents RSUs that will vest June 30, 2023. Mr. Chukwu also holds 17,123 RSUs that vest in equal installments over the next four years starting on June 30, 2023.
(5)Represents RSUs that will vest on June 30, 2023. Mr. Singh also holds 18,400 RSUs that vest in equal installments over the next four years starting on September 30, 2023.
(6)Represents RSUs that will vest on June 1, 2023.
(7)Represents RSUs that will vest on June 30, 2023. Mr. Gordon also holds 15,000 RSUs that vest in equal installments over the next three years starting on October 16, 2023.
CEO Pay Ratio
For Fiscal year 2022:
•The annual total compensation of the median employee was $68,458;
•The annual total compensation of our Chief Executive Officer was $3,002,324; and
128
•The estimated ratio of the annual total compensation of our Chief Executive Officer to the median annual total compensation of all other employees was 44 to 1.
To determine our median employee, we used December 31, 2022 as the date upon which we identified the median employee. We identified our median employee after review of gross wages on IRS Form W‐2 for 2022 for all individuals employed by us on December 31, 2022 (other than our Chief Executive Officer). This pay ratio is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with SEC rules based on the methodology described below. The SEC rules for identifying the median compensated employee and calculating the pay ratio allow companies to adopt a variety of methodologies, apply certain exclusions, and make reasonable estimates and assumptions that reflect their compensation practices. As such, the pay ratio reported by other companies may not be comparable to the pay ratio reported above, as other companies may utilize different methodologies, exclusions, estimates, and assumptions in calculating their own pay ratios.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management Related Shareholder Matters
The following table sets forth information about the beneficial ownership of our common stock as of February 17, 2023 for:
•each person or group known to us who beneficially owns more than 5% of our common stock;
•each of our directors;
•each of our Named Executive Officers; and
•all of our directors and executive officers as a group.
The numbers of shares of common stock beneficially owned and percentages of beneficial ownership are based on 132,424,929 shares of common stock outstanding as of February 17, 2023.
Beneficial ownership for the purposes of the following table is determined in accordance with the rules and regulations of the SEC. These rules generally provide that a person is the beneficial owner of securities if such person has or shares the power to vote or direct the voting thereof, or to dispose or direct the disposition thereof or has the right to acquire such powers within 60 days. Common stock subject to options or RSUs that are currently exercisable or exercisable or will vest within 60 days of February 17, 2023 are deemed to be outstanding and beneficially owned by the person holding the options or RSUs. These shares, however, are not deemed outstanding for the purposes of computing the percentage ownership of any other person. Except as disclosed in the footnotes to this table and subject to applicable community property laws, we believe that each shareholder identified in the table possesses sole voting and investment power over all common stock shown as beneficially owned by the shareholder.
129
Unless otherwise noted below, the address of each beneficial owner listed on the table is c/o Paya Holdings Inc., 303 Perimeter Center North Suite 600 Atlanta, Georgia 30346.
| Number of Shares Beneficially Owned | Percentage of Shares Outstanding | |||||||
| Name of Beneficial Owner | ||||||||
| 5% Stockholders: | ||||||||
GTCR-Ultra Holdings, LLC(1) | 45,234,022 | 34.2% | ||||||
Massachusetts Financial Services Company(2) | 11,595,135 | 8.8% | ||||||
Named Executive Officers and Directors: | ||||||||
Debora Boyda | — | — | % | |||||
Jeffrey Hack(3) | 139,458 | * | ||||||
Glenn Renzulli(4) | 76,702 | * | ||||||
Balaji Devarasetty(5) | 70,528 | * | ||||||
Benjamin Weiner | 60,962 | * | ||||||
Melinda Doster(6) | 51,458 | * | ||||||
Michele Shepard(7) | 53,824 | * | ||||||
Oni Chukwu | 4,281 | * | ||||||
Aaron D. Cohen | — | — | % | |||||
Michael J. Gordon | 17,886 | * | ||||||
| KJ McConnell | — | — | % | |||||
| Collin E. Roche | — | — | % | |||||
| Sid Singh | 4,600 | * | ||||||
| Anna May Trala | — | — | % | |||||
| Stuart Yarbrough | — | — | % | |||||
All executive officers and directors as a group (14 individuals)(8) | 479,699 | * | ||||||
(*)Indicates beneficial ownership of less than 1% of class.
(1)As reported on Schedule 13D/A filed on January 9, 2023 consists of shares held directly by GTCR-Ultra Holdings, LLC (“Ultra”). In addition, the Company is obligated to issue to Ultra 14,000,000 additional shares of common stock to be issued in 7,000,000 share increments, when the Company’s stock price reaches $15.00 and $17.50 per share, respectively, as calculated in accordance with the merger agreement entered into for the acquisition of the Company by FinTech Acquisition Corp. III (“Fintech”). If all 14,000,000 additional shares are issued, Ultra would beneficially own 59,234,022 shares, or 44.7% of the Company’s outstanding shares of common stock. Voting and dispositive power with respect to the shares of common stock held by Ultra is exercised by GTCR Investment XI LLC. Decisions of GTCR Investment XI LLC are made by a vote of a majority of its directors, and, as a result, no single person has voting or dispositive authority over such securities. Messrs. David A. Donnini, Collin E. Roche, Constantine S. Mihas, Mark M. Anderson, Aaron D. Cohen, Sean L. Cunningham, and Benjamin J. Daverman are each managing directors of GTCR LLC, which provides management services to GTCR Investment XI LLC and each disclaims beneficial ownership of the securities controlled by such entity, except to the extent of his pecuniary interest in such securities. The business address of each of the foregoing entities and persons is c/o GTCR Management XI LLC, 300 North LaSalle Street, Suite 5600, Chicago, Illinois 60654.
(2)As reported on Schedule 13G/A filed on February 8, 2023. Massachusetts Financial Services Company reported that it has sole voting power and sole dispositive power as to all of these shares. The business address of the foregoing entity is 111 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02199.
(3)Includes 49,806 shares of common stock that may be acquired pursuant to the conversion of RSUs and 89,652 shares issuable upon the exercise of options exercisable, each within 60 days of February 17, 2023.
(4)Includes 27,393 shares of common stock that may be acquired pursuant to the conversion of RSUs and 49,309 shares issuable upon the exercise of options exercisable, each within 60 days of February 17, 2023.
(5)Includes 1,992 shares of common stock that may be acquired pursuant to the conversion of RSUs and 33,586 shares issuable upon the exercise of options exercisable, each within 60 days of February 17, 2023
(6)Includes 6,225 shares of common stock that may be acquired pursuant to the conversion of RSUs and 27,206 shares issuable upon the exercise of options exercisable, each within 60 days of February 17, 2023.
(7)Ms. Shepard departed from her role as Chief Commercial Officer effective September 25, 2022.
(8)Includes all current directors and executive officers. Includes 97,867 shares issuable upon the exercise of outstanding exercisable options and 222,166 shares of common stock that may be acquired pursuant to the conversion of vested RSUs within 60 days of February 17, 2023.
Changes in Control Pending Merger with Nuvei Corporation
On January 9, 2023, the Company announced the execution of the Merger Agreement with Parent and the Purchaser. Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, and upon the terms and subject to the conditions thereof, the Purchaser has commenced the Offer to purchase all of the shares of common stock of the Company issued and outstanding at a price of $9.75 per share, in cash, without interest thereon (but subject to applicable withholding).
130
Subject to the terms and conditions of the Merger Agreement and in accordance with Section 251(h) of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (“DGCL”), the Purchaser will be merged with and into the Company, with the Company surviving the Merger as a wholly owned subsidiary of Parent in accordance with the DGCL. At the effective time of the Merger (the “Effective Time”), each share that is not (a) validly tendered and irrevocably accepted for purchase pursuant to the Offer, (b) held by a stockholder who is entitled to demand appraisal and who has properly and validly exercised appraisal rights in accordance with, and who has complied with, applicable law, or (c) held by Parent, the Purchaser, or any other direct or indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Parent, will be thereupon converted into the right to receive cash in an amount equal to the Offer Price, on the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement.
The portion of each of the Company’s stock options (the “Options”) that is outstanding and vested as of immediately prior to the Effective Time and that has an exercise price less than the Offer Price will be cancelled and converted into the right to receive a lump sum cash payment, without interest, in an amount equal to the product of (i) the total number of Shares subject to such vested Option, multiplied by (ii) the excess of (a) the Offer Price over (b) the exercise price per Share under such Option. The portion of each Option that is outstanding and unvested as of immediately prior to the Effective Time and that has an exercise price less than the Offer Price will be converted into an option (a “Parent Option”) to purchase a number of subordinate voting shares of Parent (“Parent Shares”) equal to the product (rounded down to the nearest share) of (x) the number of Shares subject to such unvested Option multiplied by (y) the exchange ratio (which is based on the ratio of the Offer Price to the trading price of Parent Shares), with an exercise price per Parent Share (rounded up to the nearest cent) equal to the per Share exercise price under the unvested Option prior to the Effective Time divided by the exchange ratio. Each Parent Option will be subject to terms and conditions (including the same vesting and exercisability terms) that are no less favorable than those that applied to the unvested Option immediately prior to the Effective Time. Each Option, whether vested or unvested, that has an exercise price per Share that is equal to or greater than the Offer Price will be canceled for no consideration.
The portion of each of the Company’s RSUs that is outstanding and vested as of immediately prior to the Effective Time (including any RSUs held by a non-employee director of the Company that vest pursuant to their terms), will be cancelled and converted into the right to receive a lump sum cash payment, without interest, in an amount equal to (i) the total number of Shares issuable in settlement of such vested RSUs as of immediately prior to the Effective Time multiplied by (ii) the Offer Price (plus the value of any accrued but unpaid dividend equivalent rights relating to such vested RSUs). Any RSUs that are outstanding and unvested as of immediately prior to the Effective Time will be converted into a restricted stock unit award (the “Parent RSUs”) with respect to a number of Parent Shares equal to the product of (x) the number of Shares underlying such unvested RSUs as of immediately prior to the Effective Time multiplied by (y) the exchange ratio. The Parent RSUs will be subject to terms and conditions (including the same vesting terms) that are no less favorable than those that applied to the unvested RSUs immediately prior to the Effective Time.
Subject to the terms and conditions of the Merger Agreement, as a result of the Merger, a change in control of the Company is expected to occur.
Additionally, in connection with the execution and delivery of the Merger Agreement, (i) Ultra, in its capacity as a stockholder of the Company, entered into a Tender and Support Agreement with the Company and Parent, and (ii) Ultra and the Company entered into a Termination Agreement with respect to the TRA. See “Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence—Related Party Transactions—Tender and Support Agreement” and "—Tax Receivable Agreement."
131
Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans
The following table sets forth information regarding the Company’s equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2022.
| Plan Category | Number of Securities to be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights(2) | Weighted-Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights(2) | Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuances Under Equity Compensation Plans (Excluding Securities Reflected in First Column) | ||||||||
Equity Compensation Plans Approved by Security Holders(1) | 3,897,251 | $ | 6.30 | 14,472,560 | |||||||
| Equity Compensation Plans Not Approved by Security Holders | — | $ | — | — | |||||||
| Total | 3,897,251 | $ | 6.30 | 14,472,560 | |||||||
(1)Represents the Paya Holdings Inc. 2020 Omnibus Incentive Plan.
(2)Does not reflect RSUs, which have no exercise price.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
Policies and Procedures for Approval of Related Party Transactions
We have adopted a written policy with respect to the review, approval and ratification of related party transactions. Under the policy, our Audit and Risk Committee is responsible for reviewing and pre-approving related party transactions. In the course of its review and approval of related party transactions, our Audit and Risk Committee considers the relevant facts and circumstances to decide whether to pre-approve such transactions. In particular, our policy requires our Audit and Risk Committee to consider, among other factors it deems appropriate:
•the related person’s relationship to us and interest in the transaction;
•the material facts of the proposed transaction, including the proposed aggregate value of the transaction;
•the impact on a director’s independence in the event the related person is a director or an immediate family member of the director;
•the benefits to us of the proposed transaction;
•if applicable, the availability of other sources of comparable products or services; and
•an assessment of whether the proposed transaction is on terms that are comparable to the terms available to an unrelated third party or to employees generally.
The Audit and Risk Committee may only approve those transactions that are in, or are not inconsistent with, our best interests and those of our shareholders, as the Audit and Risk Committee determines in good faith.
In addition, under our Code of Ethics our employees, directors and executive officers must seek determinations and prior authorizations or approvals of potential conflicts of interest.
Related Party Transactions
Other than compensation arrangements for our directors and named executive officers, which are described in the section entitled “Item 11. Executive Compensation”, below we describe transactions during the year ended December 31, 2022 to which we were a participant or will be a participant, in which:
132
•the amounts involved exceeded or will exceed $120,000; and
•any of our directors, executive officers, or holders of more than 5% of our capital stock, or any member of the immediate family of, or person sharing the household with, the foregoing persons, had or will have a direct or indirect material interest.
Tender and Support Agreement
On January 8, 2023, in connection with the execution and delivery of the Merger Agreement, Ultra, solely in its capacity as a stockholder of the Company, entered into a tender and support agreement (the “Tender and Support Agreement”) with Parent and the Company, pursuant to which Ultra agreed, among other things, (i) to tender all of the shares held by Ultra in the Offer, subject to certain exceptions (including the valid termination of the Merger Agreement), (ii) to vote against other proposals to acquire the Company and in favor of the adoption of the Merger Agreement and (iii) to certain other restrictions on its ability to take actions with respect to the Company and its shares.
Director Nomination Agreement
In connection with the closing of our Fintech Transaction with Fintech, we entered into a Director Nomination Agreement (the “Director Nomination Agreement”) with GTCR (as defined in the Director Nomination Agreement). The Director Nomination Agreement provides GTCR the right to designate nominees for election to the Company’s Board for so long as GTCR beneficially own 5% or more of the total number of the Company’s shares of common stock then outstanding. The number of nominees that GTCR is entitled to nominate under the Director Nomination Agreement is dependent on its beneficial ownership of shares of common stock. For so long as GTCR beneficially owns more than 5% of the outstanding shares of common stock, GTCR will have the right to nominate a specific number of directors equal to the product of (x) the total number of directors of the Company multiplied by (y) GTCR’s beneficial ownership percentage of outstanding Company common stock (rounded up to the nearest whole number). In addition, GTCR will have the right to designate the replacement for any of its designees whose board service has terminated prior to the end of the director’s term, regardless of GTCR’s beneficial ownership at such time. GTCR will also have the right to have its designees participate on committees of the Board, subject to compliance with applicable law and the listing rules of the Nasdaq.
Tax Receivable Agreement
In connection with the closing of the Fintech Transaction, the Company entered into the TRA with Ultra, Seller, Holdings and GTCR/Ultra Blocker, Inc. Holdings is a subsidiary of the Company. The TRA generally provides for the payment by the Company to Ultra of 85% of the net cash savings, if any, in U.S. federal, state and local income taxes that the Company actually realizes (or is deemed to realize in certain circumstances) in periods after the closing of the Fintech Transaction as a result of: (i) certain tax attributes of Seller, Holdings and subsidiaries of Holdings that existed prior to the closing of the Fintech Transaction; (ii) certain increases in the tax basis of Holdings assets resulting from the transactions effected at the closing of the Fintech Transaction; (iii) imputed interest deemed to be paid by the Company as a result of payments the Company makes under the TRA; and (iv) certain increases in tax basis resulting from payments the Company makes under the TRA. Payments were made of $592 pursuant to the TRA during the year ended December 31, 2022.
On January 8, 2023, in connection with the execution and delivery of the Merger Agreement, the Company and Ultra entered into the Termination Agreement with respect to the termination of the TRA. The Termination Agreement implements certain provisions of the TRA in connection with the occurrence of the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, including the acceleration of all obligations under the TRA pursuant to its terms resulting in the payment of an early termination fee of approximately $19.5 million to Ultra.
Indemnification of Officers and Directors
133
We are party to indemnification agreements with each of our officers and directors. The indemnification agreements provide the officers and directors with contractual rights to indemnification, expense advancement and reimbursement, to the fullest extent permitted under Delaware law. Additionally, we may enter into indemnification agreements with any new directors or officers that may be broader in scope than the specific indemnification provisions contained in Delaware law. Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act may be permitted to our officers and directors pursuant to the foregoing agreements, we have been advised that, in the opinion of the SEC, such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act, and is therefore unenforceable.
Director Independence
Our Board has affirmatively determined that all our directors, except for Mr. Hack, meet the requirements to be independent directors under Nasdaq listing standards. In making these determinations, our Board considered the current and prior relationships that each director has with the Company and all other facts and circumstances that our Board deemed relevant in determining independence, including beneficial ownership of our common stock, and the transactions involving such director described in the section entitled “Related Party Transactions.”
In addition, our Board has affirmatively determined that (i) Messrs, Chukwu, Singh and Yarbrough, the members of the Audit and Risk Committee, meet the definition of "independent director" for purposes of serving on an audit committee under Rule 10A-3 of the Exchange Act and the applicable Nasdaq listing standards, and (ii) Ms. Boyda and Messrs, Cohen, Chukwu, Gordon and McConnell, the members of the Compensation Committee, meet the definition of "independent director" for purposes of serving on a compensation committee under Rule 10C-1 of the Exchange Act and the applicable Nasdaq listing standards.
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services
Our independent registered public accounting firm is Ernst & Young LLP , Tysons, VA , Auditor Firm ID: 42 . Services provided to the Company and its subsidiaries by Ernst & Young LLP for the year ended December 31, 2022 are described below.
Fees and Services
The following table summarizes the aggregate fees for professional audit services and other services rendered by Ernst & Young LLP for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021:
| 2022 | 2021 | |||||||||||||||||||
Audit Fees (1) | $ | 1,827,500 | $ | 2,001,000 | ||||||||||||||||
Audit-Related Fees (2) | 42,500 | 426,400 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Tax Fees | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
| All Other Fees | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 1,870,000 | $ | 2,427,400 | ||||||||||||||||
(1)Consist of fees for the audit and other procedures in connection with the Company's consolidated financial statements included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, the quarterly reviews of the Company's consolidated financial statements included in its Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, and other services normally provided in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements during those fiscal years.
(2)Consist of fees for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the consolidated financial statements but are not reported in the prior line.
In considering the nature of the services provided by the independent auditor, the Audit and Risk Committee determined that such services are compatible with the provision of independent audit services. The Audit and Risk Committee discussed these services with the independent auditor and the Company’s management to determine that they are permitted under the rules and regulations concerning auditor independence promulgated by the SEC to implement the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as well as the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.
134
Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures
The Audit and Risk Committee has adopted a policy that requires advance approval of all audit services as well as non-audit services to the extent required by the Exchange Act and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Unless the specific service has been previously pre-approved with respect to that year, the Audit and Risk Committee must approve the permitted service before the independent auditor is engaged to perform it. Each year, the Audit and Risk Committee will pre-approve audit services, audit-related services and tax services to be used by the Company.
135
Part IV
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
(a)(1) Index to consolidated Financial Statements
The Financial Statements listed in the Index to consolidated Financial Statements are filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. See Part II, Item 8—Financial Statement and Supplementary Data.
(a)(2) Financial Statement Schedules
Other financial statement schedules for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021 have been omitted since they are either not required, not applicable, or the information is otherwise included in the consolidated financial statements or the notes to consolidated financial statements.
(a)(3) Exhibits
The Exhibits listed in the accompanying Exhibit Index are attached and incorporated herein by reference and filed as part of this report.
| Exhibit No. | Description | ||||
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of August 3, 2020, by and among GTCR-Ultra Holdings, LLC, GTCR-Ultra Holdings II, LLC, FinTech III Merger Sub Corp., FinTech Acquisition Corp. III, FinTech Acquisition Corp. III Parent Corp., GTCR/Ultra Blocker, Inc., and GTCR Fund XI/C LP (included as Annex A the definitive Proxy Statement/Prospectus filed on September 23, 2020). | |||||
| Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of January 8, 2023, by and among Nuvei Corporation, Pinnacle Merger Sub, Inc. and Paya Holdings Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Paya Holdings Inc.'s Form 8-K filed on January 9, 2023). | |||||
| Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Paya Holdings Inc., filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware on October 16, 2020 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Paya Holdings Inc.’s Form 8-K filed on October 22, 2020). | |||||
| Amended and Restated Bylaws of Paya Holdings Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Paya Holdings Inc.’s Form 8-K filed on October 22, 2020). | |||||
| Description of Paya Holdings Inc.'s Securities (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Paya Holdings Inc.'s Form 10-K filed on March 15, 2022). | |||||
| Warrant Agreement, dated November 15, 2018, between Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company and FinTech Acquisition Corp. III. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of FinTech Acquisition Corp. III’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 21, 2018). | |||||
Amendment No. 1 to Warrant Agreement, dated September 15, 2021, by and between Paya Holdings Inc. and Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Paya Holdings Inc.’s Form 8-K filed on September 15, 2021). | |||||
| Registration Rights Agreement, dated October 16, 2020, by and among FinTech Acquisition Corp. III Parent Corp. and certain stockholders of Parent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Paya Holdings Inc.’s Form 8-K filed on October 22, 2020). | |||||
| Director Nomination Agreement, dated as of October 16, 2020, by and among Paya Holdings Inc., GTCR-Ultra Holdings, LLC, GTCR Fund XI/B LP and GTCR Fund XI/C LP (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Paya Holdings Inc.’s Form 8-K filed on October 22, 2020). | |||||
| Tax Receivable Agreement, dated as of October 16, 2020, by and among FinTech Acquisition Corp. III Parent Corp., GTCR-Ultra Holdings, LLC, GTCR Ultra-Holdings II, LLC, GTCR/Ultra Blocker, Inc., a Delaware corporation and GTCR Fund XI/C LP (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Paya Holdings Inc.’s Form 8-K filed on October 22, 2020). | |||||
136
| Exhibit No. | Description | ||||
| Form of PIPE Subscription Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of FinTech Acquisition Corp. III’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 3, 2020). | |||||
| Paya Holdings Inc. 2020 Omnibus Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Paya Holdings Inc.'s Form S-8 filed on December 22, 2020). | |||||
| Amendment to Paya Holdings Inc. 2020 Omnibus Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Paya Holdings Inc.'s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 1, 2022). | |||||
| Form of Director/Officer Indemnification Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to Paya Holdings Inc.’s Form 8-K filed on October 22, 2020). | |||||
| Employment Agreement, dated as of October 16, 2020, by and between Paya Holdings Inc., Paya Inc. and Jeffrey Hack (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to Paya Holdings Inc.’s Form 8-K filed on October 22, 2020). | |||||
| Employment Agreement, dated as of October 16, 2020, by and between Paya Holdings Inc., Paya Inc. and Glenn Renzulli (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to Paya Holdings Inc.’s Form 8-K filed on October 22, 2020). | |||||
| Employment Agreement, dated as of October 16, 2020, by and between Paya Holdings Inc., Paya Inc. and Benjamin Weiner (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Company's Form 10-K filed on March 15, 2022). | |||||
Employment Agreement, dated as of November 25, 2020, by and between Paya Holdings Inc., Paya Inc. and Melinda Doster (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to the Company's Form 10-K filed on March 15, 2022). | |||||
Employment Agreement, dated as of October 5, 2021, by and between Paya Holdings Inc., Paya Inc. and Michele Shepard (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to the Company's Form 10-K filed on March 15, 2022). | |||||
Employment Agreement, dated as of August 31, 2021, by and between Paya Holdings Inc., Paya Inc. and Balaji Devarasetty (incorporated by reference to Exhibit (e)(10) to Paya Holdings Inc.'s Recommendations/Solicitation Statement on Schedule 14D-9 filed on January 24, 2023). | |||||
Form of Stock Option Grant Notice and Stock Option Agreement | |||||
| Form of Director Restricted Stock Unit Grant Notice and Restricted Stock Unit Agreement | |||||
Form of Employee Restricted Stock Unit Grant Notice and Restricted Stock Unit Agreement | |||||
Credit Agreement, dated as of June 25, 2021, by and among Paya Holdings III, LLC, Paya, Inc., Paya Holdings II, LLC, Credit Suisse AG, Cayman Islands Branch, as administrative agent, collateral agent and L/C issuer (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Paya Holdings Inc.’s Form 8-K filed on June 28, 2021). | |||||
| Tender and Support Agreement, dated as of January 8, 2023, by and among Nuvei Corporation, Paya Holdings Inc. and GTCR Ultra-Holdings, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Paya Holding’s Form 8-K filed on January 9, 2023). | |||||
| Termination Agreement, dated as of January 8, 2023, by and between Paya Holdings Inc. and GTCR Ultra-Holdings, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Paya Holding’s Form 8-K filed on January 9, 2023). | |||||
| Separation, Severance and General Release Agreement, dated as of October 7, 2022, by and among Paya Holdings Inc., Paya Inc. and Michele Shepard. | |||||
| List of subsidiaries of Paya Holdings Inc. | |||||
| Consent of Ernst & Young. | |||||
| Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rules Rule 13a-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith. | |||||
| Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rules Rule 13a-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith. | |||||
| Certification of the Chief Accounting Officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rules Rule 13a-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith. | |||||
137
| Exhibit No. | Description | ||||
| Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. | |||||
| Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. | |||||
| Certification of the Chief Accounting Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. | |||||
| 101.INS | XBRL Instance Document. | ||||
| 101.SCH | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document. | ||||
| 101.CAL | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document. | ||||
| 101.DEF | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document. | ||||
| 101.LAB | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document. | ||||
| 101.PRE | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document. | ||||
| 104 | Cover Page Interactive Data File (Formatted as inline XBRL). | ||||
-----------------
† Schedules omitted pursuant to Item 601(b)(2) of Regulation S-K. The Company agrees to furnish supplementally a copy of any omitted schedule to the SEC upon request.
* The certifications furnished in Exhibit 32.1 and 32.2 hereto are deemed to accompany this Annual Report on Form 10-K and will not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.
+ Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement
Item 16. Form 10-K Summary
None.
138
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Date: February 21, 2023 PAYA HOLDINGS INC
.
| /s/ Glenn Renzulli | |||||
| Glenn Renzulli | |||||
| Chief Financial Officer | |||||
139
| Name | Position | Date | ||||||||||||
| /s/ Jeffrey Hack | Chief Executive Officer and Director | February 21, 2023 | ||||||||||||
| Jeffrey Hack | (Principal Executive Officer) | |||||||||||||
| /s/ Glenn Renzulli | Chief Financial Officer | February 21, 2023 | ||||||||||||
| Glenn Renzulli | (Principal Financial Officer) | |||||||||||||
| /s/ Eric Bell | Chief Accounting Officer | February 21, 2023 | ||||||||||||
| Eric Bell | (Principal Accounting Officer) | |||||||||||||
| /s/ Aaron Cohen | Chair of the Board | February 21, 2023 | ||||||||||||
| Aaron Cohen | ||||||||||||||
| /s/ Oni Chukwu | Director | February 21, 2023 | ||||||||||||
| Oni Chukwu | ||||||||||||||
| /s/ Mike Gordon | Director | February 21, 2023 | ||||||||||||
| Michael Gordon | ||||||||||||||
| /s/Deborah Boyda | Director | February 21, 2023 | ||||||||||||
| Deborah Boyda | ||||||||||||||
| /s/ KJ McConnell | Director | February 21, 2023 | ||||||||||||
| Kalen James McConnell | ||||||||||||||
| /s/ Collin Roche | Director | February 21, 2023 | ||||||||||||
| Collin Roche | ||||||||||||||
| /s/ Sid Singh | Director | February 21, 2023 | ||||||||||||
| Sid Singh | ||||||||||||||
| /s/ Anna May Trala | Director | February 21, 2023 | ||||||||||||
| Anna May Trala | ||||||||||||||
| /s/ Stuart Yarbrough | Director | February 21, 2023 | ||||||||||||
| Stuart Yarbrough | ||||||||||||||
140