SEC Form 10-K filed by Solarmax Technology Inc.

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

___________________________

FORM 10-K

___________________________

(Mark One)

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023

OR

For the transition period from January 1, 2023 to December 31, 2023

Commission file number 001-41959

___________________________

___________________________

(951) 300-0788

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Securities registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☐      No ☒

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐      No ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒      No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ☒      No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,”  “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☐

If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b).  ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ☐      No ☒

APPLICABLE ONLY TO REGISTRANTS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY

PROCEEDINGS DURING THE PRECEDING FIVE YEARS:

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Section 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court. Yes ☐      No ☐

(APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE REGISTRANTS)

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date. 45,247,447 shares of common stock as of April 15, 2024.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

List hereunder the following documents if incorporated by reference and the Part of the Form 10-K (e.g., Part I, Part II, etc.) into which the document is incorporated: (1) Any annual report to security holders; (2) Any proxy or information statement; and (3) Any annual report filed pursuant to Rule 424(b) or (c) under the Securities Act of 1933. The listed documents should be clearly described for identification purposes (e.g., annual report to security holders for fiscal year ended December 24, 1980). None.

Table of Contents

CAUTIONARY NOTE CONCERNING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This annual report contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements for many reasons, including the reasons described in “Item 1A. Risk Factors,” “Item 7. Management Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Result of Operations,” and “Item 1. Business” sections of this annual report. In some cases, you can identify these forward-looking statements by terms such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “continue,” “could,” “depends,” “estimate,” “expects,” “intend,” “may,” “ongoing,” “plan,” “potential,” “predict,” “project,” “should,” “will,” “would” or the negative of those terms or other similar expressions, although not all forward-looking statements contain those words.

Our operations and business prospects are always subject to risks and uncertainties including, among others:

The forward-looking statements in this annual report represent our views as of the date of this annual report. We anticipate that subsequent events and developments will cause our views to change. However, while we may elect to update these forward-looking statements at some point in the future, we have no current intention to do so except to the extent required by applicable law. You should, therefore, not rely on these forward-looking statements as representing our views as of any date subsequent to the date of this annual report.

Part I

Item 1. Business

Introduction

We are an integrated solar and renewable energy company. A solar energy system retains the direct current (DC) electricity from the sun and converts it to alternating current (AC) electricity that can be used to power residential homes and commercial businesses. The solar business is based on the ability of the users of solar energy systems to save on energy costs and reduce their carbon imprint as compared with power purchased from the local electricity utility company. We were founded in 2008 to engage in the solar business in the United States.

We operate in two segments – the United States segment and the China segment. Our United States operations primarily consist of the sale and installation of photovoltaic and battery backup systems for residential and commercial customers, and sales of LED systems and services to government and commercial users. Prior to 2020, we also financed the purchase of solar equipment from us. Since early 2020, because we did not have the capital to support such operations, we suspended making loans to our solar customers, and we are not currently financing the purchase of solar systems and we do not anticipate engaging in such activities in the near future, if at all. Our finance revenue reflects revenue earned on our current portfolio, with no new loans having been added since early 2020.

Our United States operations generated revenue of $54.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, consisting of solar and battery revenue of $50.5 million, LED revenue of $3.1 million and finance revenue of $0.6 million. Our United States operations generated revenue of $45.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, consisting of solar and battery revenue of $40.6 million, LED revenue of $3.3 million and finance revenue of $0.8 million.

Our business in China is conducted through our subsidiaries, primarily ZHTH and ZHPV, and their subsidiaries. Our China operations consist primarily of identifying and procuring solar farm projects for resale to third parties and performing engineering, procurement and construction services,, which are referred to as EPC services, primarily for solar farm projects. Our China operations did not generate any revenue for the years ended December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022. Our China segment last generated revenue for the year ended December 31, 2021, substantially all of which was generated in the second quarter of the year.

Initial Public Offering

On February 27, 2024, we sold 4,500,000 shares of common stock, at a price of $4.00 per share in our initial public offering. The gross proceeds of the offering were $18 million, prior to deducting the underwriting discounts, commissions and offering expenses payable by the Company. In addition, we granted the underwriters a 45-day option to purchase an additional 675,000 shares of common stock at the initial public offering price, less underwriting discounts and commissions, to cover over-allotments. On March 5, 2024, the underwriters purchased 539,950 shares of common stock upon the partial exercise of the over-allotment option. Net proceeds received by us from our initial public offering, including the partial exercise of the over-allotment option, were approximately $18.6 million. We also issued to Kingswood, a division of Kingswood Capital Partners, LLC, the representative of the underwriters, and its designees warrants to purchase 403,196 shares. On March 13, 2024, these warrants were fully exercised on a cashless basis. Based on the formula for cashless exercise, we issued a total of 207,311 shares of common stock, and, as result of the exercise, no warrants remained outstanding.

Effects of COVID-19 Pandemic

The United States Center for Disease Control announced that the COVID-19 public health emergency ended in May 2023, with the result that the COVID restrictions in the United States are no longer in effect and restrictions have been terminated worldwide. We believe our United States operations are not, and have not since mid-2022 been, materially affected by COVID. However, the effects of China’s zero tolerance policy with respect to COVID-19, which is no longer in effect, has impaired our ability to negotiate both new contracts with and payment schedules with State Power Investment Corporation Guizhou Jinyuan Weining Energy Co., Ltd. (“SPIC”), a state-owned entity which has been the only customer for our China segment since 2020, with the result that we have no pending agreement with SPIC and we are continuing to negotiate payment of outstanding receivables from SPIC.

Our Corporate Structure

We are a Nevada corporation formed in January 2008. We have four wholly-owned subsidiaries in the United States: SolarMax Renewable Energy Provider, Inc., SolarMax Financial, Inc. (“SolarMax Financial”), SolarMax LED, Inc. (“LED”) and SMX Capital, Inc. (“SMX Capital”).

Our wholly-owned subsidiaries outside the United States are Accumulate Investment Co. Ltd. (BVI), a British Virgin Islands corporation (“Accumulate’), SolarMax Technology Holdings (Hong Kong) Limited, a Hong Kong corporation (“SolarMax Hong Kong”), Golden SolarMax Finance Co., Ltd, a Chinese corporation (“Golden SolarMax”) and SolarMax Technology Holdings (Cayman) Limited, a Cayman Islands corporation (“SolarMax Cayman”).

Accumulate has one wholly-owned subsidiary, Accumulate Investment Hong Kong, a Hong Kong corporation, which has one wholly-owned subsidiary, ZHPV.

SolarMax Hong Kong has one wholly-owned subsidiary, SolarMax Shanghai. SolarMax Shanghai is a wholly foreign-owned entity, which is referred to as a WFOE. SolarMax Shanghai currently has subsidiaries that are not significant, but forms subsidiaries which acquire permits for solar farms with a view to selling the project subsidiaries pursuant to the terms of agreements with the ultimate buyer, which during 2020 and 2021 was SPIC. We refer to SolarMax Shanghai and its subsidiaries collectively as ZHTH.

The following charts show our corporate structure for our United States and China segments. The chart for the China segment does not include the subsidiaries of ZHPV, which are either project subsidiaries or subsidiaries which are formed to perform services for a specific contract; or subsidiaries of SolarMax Shanghai.

United States Segment

Our principal executive offices are located at 3080 12^th Street, Riverside, California 92507. Our telephone number is (951) 300-0788. Our website is http://www.solarmaxtech.com. Any information contained on, or that can be accessed through, our website or any other website or any social media is not a part of this annual report. 

United States Operations

Solar Energy Systems

The photovoltaic market in the United States was the second largest in the world in 2021, with an installed capacity of more than 97 GW that accounted for approximately 11% of the world’s total installed capacity,  The United States photovoltaic market has been projected to grow at a compound annual growth rate of 17% between 2021 and 2025.  Renewable energy accounted for 13% of the United States electricity generation, with solar being the fastest-growing source of renewable energy.  The United States market is projected to reach $125 million by 2030.  California is the leading state in the United States for installed solar capacity, with 32% of total U.S. installations.  California state law set California’s renewable electricity procurement goal at 50% by 2050. ¹

We design, install and sell high performance photovoltaic solar energy systems and battery systems, and we have installations at more than 12,000 homes and businesses. A photovoltaic system generates electricity directly from sunlight via an electric process that occurs naturally in certain types of materials. A system consists of one or more photovoltaic modules and an inverter. Photovoltaic modules, which are manufactured in different sizes and shapes, generate direct current (DC) electricity. The electricity current is then fed through an inverter to produce the alternating current (AC) electricity that can be used to power residences and commercial businesses. The major components of our solar energy systems include solar panels that convert sunlight into electrical current, inverters that convert the DC electrical output from the panels to AC current compatible with the electric grid, racking that attaches the solar panels to the roof or ground and electrical hardware that connects the solar energy system to the electric grid. The battery systems we sell are rechargeable and can be used not only to store solar energy for backup protection when the power grid goes down, but also to reduce the reliance on the electrical grid by storing solar energy to be used when the sun in not shining or when power costs are the highest during the day. We currently install solar systems only in California.

We provide and install both grid-tied and off-grid systems. Grid-tied systems remain connected to the electric grid, so that the energy generated by the system is sent back to the grid during the day and power is drawn back at night. The electric grid thus serves as a “storage device” for photovoltaic-generated power. If consumers use more power than is generated by their solar energy system, they can purchase power from the regional utility company. If consumers use less power than the system generates, they can sell the electricity back to their local utility companies and receive a credit on their electric bills. In order to sell power back to the utility company, the owners need to make an application to the utility company and the utility company then gives the owners a standard agreement covering the purchase of the excess power. Grid-tied systems generally represent the most common, affordable and feasible option for urban and suburban residences.

Off-grid systems are not connected to the utility grid and therefore require battery backup. Off-grid solutions are less common and are mostly employed for residences that do not have the option of connecting to the utility grid. Almost all of our installations are grid-tied systems.

Sale and Installation Process

Our system sale and installation process consists of five stages – feasibility, design, permitting, procurement and installation. In addition, when a customer requests additional services, we will enter into post-installation maintenance agreements with customers who own the systems.  We have a dedicated team to handle every detail of the customer’s solar panel, battery or LED installation.

We market to our customers using print ad, internet, radio and television advertising along with customer referrals. We are in the process of shifting our focus from traditional radio advertisements to sponsorships and other public relation initiatives. After the initial contact with a prospective customer, our construction and solar engineers visit the customer to conduct an on-site evaluation and assess the customer’s electricity needs. The site assessment includes a shading analysis, roof inspection and review of any existing mechanical systems. Additionally, we review the customer’s recent utility bills so that we can present a proposal designed to meet the customer’s energy requirements and answer the customer’s questions. At this stage, the customer has not made any commitment to purchase a system from us.

___________________________

¹ IHS Markit; International Energy Agency; GlobalData; mordorintelligence.com; Wikipedia, Solar power by country, April 2023; National Renewable Energy Laboratory; PV Magazine; BNEF (https://about.bnef,com); Bloomberg (https://www.bloomberg.com);  https://www.energy.ca.gov/rules-and-regulations/energy-suppliers-reporting/clean-energy-and-pollution-reduction-act-sb-350.

At the design stage, we analyze the information obtained during the feasibility stage to design a proposed solar energy solution, based on the customer’s stated energy needs, financial means and the specifics of the building location. Upon completion of the design stage, we present the customer with a detailed written proposal outlining the components of the system, the proposed timeline of the system implementation, the estimated price and estimated energy savings as well as the expected return on the investment based on existing rate information. Approved customers who purchase our systems sign a purchase agreement and tender to us a down payment equal to the lesser of 10% of the overall cost or $1,000, which can be refunded within three days.

The period of time between the initial customer contact at the feasibility stage and the signing of the contract upon the completion of the design stage (the negotiation period) may range from less than a month to more than a year, with six to twelve months being the average negotiation period for larger commercial projects.

Before installing any solar or backup battery system, we must obtain required permits and approvals from the local fire department and the department of building and safety and other applicable state and local agencies, as well as from utility companies. We prepare a full permitting package and apply for these permits on behalf of the customer. We may also assist the customer with necessary paperwork to apply for and obtain the tax rebates and incentives. The permitting process typically takes four to eight weeks. Upon completion of this stage, we require customers to pay 40% of the total purchase price.

Once the customer orders the system, we order products, parts and materials necessary to implement the project. Upon delivery of the materials to the customer’s site, we require an additional 40% of the purchase price.

Finally, we assemble and install the system at the customer’s site. Once installation is complete, we meet with the customer to conduct a final walk-through of the system and review its components. Upon the final walk-through and sign-off by the city inspector, the system becomes fully operational, and we require the remaining 20% of the purchase price. The payment schedules do not apply to customers for whom we are providing financing.  We provide end-to-end customer service during the lifetime of the product.

Source of Supply

We do not have a supply agreement with any supplier.  We purchase solar panels from a number of suppliers.  Battery systems are available from a number of suppliers, including Tesla, Enphase and LG.

One supplier, Consolidated Electrical Distributors, accounted for 10% or more of the purchases for our United States operations. This supplier accounted for purchases of approximately $4.9 million, or 12% of our purchases, for the year ended December 31, 2023, and $5.2 million, or 18% of our purchases, for the year ended December 31, 2022.

Warranty Obligations; Production Guarantee

All parts of the system provided by us are under manufacturers’ warranties, typically for 25 years for the panels and inverters. The manufacturer’s warranty on the solar energy systems’ components, which is typically passed through to the customers, ranges from one to ten years. We provide a limited installation services warranty that warrants the installation services related to the system owner’s photovoltaic modules and inverters to be free from defects in the installation services under normal application, use and service conditions for a period of ten years from the date of the original installation services. Our agreement with our customers provides that we are not responsible for damage resulting from natural disasters, such as hurricanes, floods or other weather conditions. For leased systems we require the customer to maintain insurance covering these risks.

Prior to 2015, we entered into power purchase agreements that have a term of up to 20 years. We own and maintain the systems and sell the power generated by the systems to commercial customers pursuant to the power purchase agreement. Revenue from power purchase agreements is not material.

Commencing in 2015, our standard contract for residential systems provides for a production guarantee, which means that we guarantee that the system will generate a specified minimum solar energy during a given year. The agreements generally have a ten-year term. In the standard form of contract, we specify a minimum annual production and provide that if the power generated by the system is less than 95% of the estimate, we will reimburse the owner for the cost of the shortfall. Because our obligations are not contingent upon external factors, such as sunlight, changes in weather patterns, forest fires, or increases in air pollution, these factors could affect the amount of solar power that is generated and could increase our exposure under the production guarantee. The contract also provides that the purchasers of these systems shall not be entitled to reimbursement for shortfalls caused by overshadowing, shading or other interference not attributable to the design of the system and the accompanying equipment. Our only production guarantees are pursuant to agreements with our customers.

In 2017, we incurred unanticipated liability based on the failure to of our systems to meet the production guarantee or otherwise perform in accordance with our warranty.  Our only production guarantees are pursuant to agreements with our customers.  Although we believe we have taken steps designed to prevent a misalignment of system designs and production guarantees which affected us in 2017, we cannot assure you that we will not be subject to unanticipated liability based on the failure of our systems to meet production guarantees or otherwise perform in accordance with our warranty.

With respect to leases with a leasing company, the leasing company establishes its own production guarantees, conducts its own review of those guarantees in conjunction with system design, and is responsible for any necessary modification in its contracts.

Our warranty for the LED products sold and services rendered ranges from one year for labor and up to seven years for certain products sold to governmental municipalities,

Leasing Agreements with us as the Lessor

Prior to 2014, we leased systems primarily to commercial and not-for-profit customers through our subsidiaries and three entities in which we have a 30% interest. These leases are operating leases and we own the systems, which we lease to the customers. Although we no longer lease new systems, we continue to own the equipment subject to the existing leases. The leases do not include a production guarantee. At the end of the lease, the customer has an option to purchase the equipment at its then fair market value for commercial customers. For not-for-profit customers, we generally have agreed up front to donate the system to the customers at the end of the lease.  We have not leased systems for our account after 2014. Instead, leases are made with a third-party leasing company.

Our customers may lease systems pursuant to third-party leasing companies selected by the customer.  During the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, revenues from leasing companies with which we had an agreement did not account for any significant percentage of our revenues.

Power Purchase Agreements

Prior to 2015, we entered into solar power purchase agreements with some commercial customers, and many of these agreements remain in effect. Pursuant to these agreements, we were responsible for the design, permitting, financing and installation of a solar energy system on a customer’s property after which we sell the power generated by the system to the customer at an agreed upon rate. To the extent that the system does not generate sufficient power to meet its obligations, we may have to purchase power from a local utility company, which will be a cost of revenues. We receive the income from the sales of electricity pursuant to these agreements as well as any tax credits and other incentives generated from the system, and we are responsible for the operation and maintenance of the system for the duration of the agreement. At the end of the term, a customer may extend the agreement, have us remove the system or buy the solar energy system from us. We have generated nominal revenue from power purchase agreements. From 2015 until March 2019, we did not offer power purchase agreements.

Seasonality

Since the inception of our business in 2008, we have experienced different levels of seasonality for our residential sales, small commercial and large commercial projects.

Our residential sales are prone to seasonal fluctuations. It has been our experience that we generate a larger percentage of sales in March and April, when residential customers focus on possible tax advantages of solar energy, and in the summer months of July and August, when utility rates and bills typically increase. We believe that the increase in residential sales during March and April results from consumers’ increased awareness of the tax benefits of solar energy system systems. We believe that the higher volume of sales in the summer months results from typically higher electrical bills in the summer, when electricity use is highest, which we think heightens consumers’ awareness of the opportunity to reduce their energy costs in the future through the use of solar energy.

We have historically experienced a slight increase for small commercial projects during the summer season. As with residential sales, we attribute higher volume in small commercial sales to small business owners’ reaction to the generally higher electricity bills during the summer months.

We have generally not experienced any significant seasonal fluctuations for our large commercial projects in the United States. We suspect that customers committing to large commercial purchases or leases of solar energy systems have generally made more studied decisions and are therefore less sensitive to seasonal variations or immediate market conditions. The negotiation period for larger projects may range from a couple of months to a year or more. We therefore believe that the timing of the execution of large commercial deals depends largely on the progress of contract negotiations.

Financing Activities

Because we believe the high cost of buying and installing solar energy systems remains a major barrier for a typical residential customer, we had developed financing programs to enable customers who meet our credit standards to finance the purchase of our solar energy systems through SolarMax Financial.  Since early 2020, because we did not have the capital to support such operations, we suspended making loans to our solar customers but may resume lending if we have sufficient funds, including from the proceeds of our initial public offering.  Our finance revenue currently reflects revenue earned on our current portfolio, with no new loans having been added since early 2020.  We have no present plans to re-commence financing operations.

The following table sets forth customer loan receivables at December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022: 

Financing Program

We have financing programs with third-party financing companies, the most significant of which is a home improvement financing program agreement executed on October 12, 2021, with GoodLeap, LLC (“GoodLeap” formerly known as LoanPal, LLC), pursuant to which GoodLeap provides financing to our customers who meet GoodLeap’s credit criteria. We sell the systems to our customers, and GoodLeap pays us the purchase price, less a program fee. The financing agreement is between the customer and GoodLeap, and we are not a party to the agreement.

LED Projects

We provide LED products that help commercial customers save money by lowering electricity costs through the advanced technology of LED light bulbs. The energy-saving incandescent bulbs use approximately 25% less energy than traditional varieties, while the LED light bulbs use approximately 75% less energy, last 40 times longer, and are considered safer to use.

We have relationships with a number of LED system manufacturers that provide us with access to a variety of high-performance products and ultimately enables us to meet customers’ energy needs and budgets. Our LED streetlight system has an exclusive ETL Mark under our company name, which is evidence that our product complies with North American safety standards and is a requirement for contracts with municipal customers.

There are several steps to completing an LED installation with a customer. The first step is to review the customer’s previous year’s power bill and to look at its financial statements for the last three years. The next step is to conduct a lighting survey to effectively present an energy saving proposal to the potential customer. We typically offer financing services similar to our solar system financing. Some commercial projects require us to engage a third-party vendor to help install the LED lighting systems for our clients while other projects customers choose to be responsible for the installation of the system.

Marketing

We have an in-house sales and marketing staff of 30, of which 25 market solar and battery backup projects and five market LED products and systems. While we use a variety of marketing and advertising tools, we believe that word of mouth is one of our most effective marketing strategies. We estimate that approximately 40% of our sales are generated through referrals by our customers.

We also participate in industry trade shows, use telemarketing, radio, television, Internet advertising and social media as well as participating in local community events such as local festivals and door-to-door sales.

Personal meetings with prospective customers and site visits at the feasibility stage are also part of our advertising budget. In our experience, on average, we make three to four visits at the feasibility stage before we can generate a contract from the customer. As we expand the breadth of our operations, we plan to hire additional professionals and general sales personnel to market our systems to a larger number of prospective customers.

Our marketing effort includes our ability to offer financing in connection with purchases of our systems. We do not have a separate marketing staff for our financing activities.

Competition

Solar energy systems in general compete with both the local or regional providers of electricity as well as a number of independent companies that offer to provide electricity at prices that are lower than the regional utility company. Our primary competition is with the local utility companies that supply power to our potential customers.

Within the solar energy industry, we face intense and increasing competition from other solar energy system providers. The solar energy industry is highly fragmented, consisting of many small, privately-held companies with limited resources and operating histories, and we believe that no solar energy provider has a significant percentage of the California market. We also compete with major companies, as well as a large number of smaller companies. We have experienced price erosion as a result of increased competition which has affected our gross margin. Because California has much sun and little rain, solar power companies seek to market in California rather than in states with less sun and more rain. We cannot estimate the effects of the recent increased rain and flooding in Southern California on our business and the solar market in general.  We believe that the number of new solar energy installation companies that have entered the industry in California has increased significantly since 2008 when we commenced business, and the increased competition is reflected in lower margins as we may have to reduce our prices to generate business. We expect additional companies to enter the business in the future, considering that the entry barrier in this industry is relatively low and the government incentives currently remain high.

We believe that competition is primarily based on price and, if financing is required, the availability and terms of financing, and, to a lesser extent, the ability to schedule installation to meet the customer’s schedule. Some of our competitors may offer financing terms with payments over a longer period and with either a lower down payment or no down payments than are available with third party lessors with whom we work, which may make them more attractive to potential customers.

Government Regulation

Although we are not a regulated utility company, our operations are subject to regulation, supervision and licensing under various federal, state and local statutes, regulations and ordinances. Additionally, our business is materially affected by federal and state programs and policies related to financial incentives for solar energy users and providers. Local utility companies work with all solar companies to connect their systems to the grid. Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations governs energy savings and efficiency standards for new and remodeled construction for indoor and outdoor lighting requirements.

Construction Licenses and Permits

As a company performing general contractor and design work, we must take steps such that we obtain and timely renew appropriate general contractor and other required licenses. In connection with each installation, we are required to obtain building permits and comply with local ordinances and building codes for each project. Our operations are also subject to generally applicable laws and regulations relating to discharge of materials into the environment and protection of the environment. We are also subject to federal and state occupational health and safety regulations. We may also be subject to federal or state wage requirements, at least in connection with any solar projects on government land or buildings or other public works projects.

Consumer Protection Laws

In negotiating and entering into contracts with our residential customers, we must comply with state and federal consumer protection laws. In conducting our marketing campaigns, we must comply with the federal Telemarketing and Consumer Fraud and Abuse Prevention Act, and Telemarketing Sales Rule promulgated by the Federal Trade Commission, as well as state regulations governing telemarketing and door-to-door sales practices. In negotiating and entering into contracts with our residential customers, we must comply with a number of state regulations governing home solicitation sales, home improvement contracts and installment sales contracts.

Consumer Financing Regulations

In the event that we recommence financing operations in California, our finance subsidiary, SolarMax Financial will have to be registered as a California finance lender pursuant to a license issued by the California Department of Corporations, which regulates and enforces laws relating to consumer finance companies, and SolarMax Financial would be required to comply with regulations pertaining to consumer financing. Such rules and regulations generally provide for licensing of consumer finance companies, limitations on the amount of financing provided, duration and charges, including finance charge rates, for various categories of contracts, requirements as to the form and content of the loans and other documentation, and restrictions on collection practices and creditors’ rights. As a licensed finance lender, SolarMax Financial will be subject to periodic examination by state regulatory authorities.

SolarMax Financial would also be subject to extensive federal regulation, including the Truth in Lending Act, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and the Fair Credit Reporting Act and other laws. These laws would require SolarMax Financial to provide certain disclosures to prospective customers and protect against discriminatory lending practices and unfair credit practices. The principal disclosures required under the Truth in Lending Act include the terms of repayment, the total finance charge and the annual percentage rate charged on each contract. The Equal Credit Opportunity Act prohibits creditors from discriminating against loan applicants on the basis of race, color, sex, age, or marital status, among other things. Pursuant to Regulation B promulgated under the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, lenders are required to make certain disclosures regarding consumer rights and advise consumers whose credit applications are not approved of the reasons for the rejection. The Fair Credit Reporting Act requires SolarMax Financial to provide certain information to consumers whose applications were not approved or were conditionally approved on terms materially less favorable than the most favorable terms normally offered on the basis of a report obtained from a consumer-reporting agency.

In addition, SolarMax Financial would be subject to the provisions of the federal Gramm-Leach-Bliley financial reform legislation, which imposes additional privacy obligations on SolarMax Financial with respect to our applicants and our customers. SolarMax Financial has appropriate policies in place to comply with these additional obligations.  SolarMax Financial does not presently engage, and has not since early 2020, engaged, in lending activities, and has no present plans to do so since we do not have the capital to enable us to engage in these activities.

Government Subsidies and Incentives

The solar energy industry depends on the continued effectiveness of various government subsidies and tax incentive programs existing at the federal and state level to encourage the adoption of solar power. Government policies, in the form of both regulation and incentives, have accelerated the adoption of solar technologies by businesses and consumers. We and our customers benefit from these regulations in the form of federal tax incentives, state utility rebates and depreciation. Because of the high cost of installing solar energy systems, the existence of tax incentives as well as regulations requiring utility companies to purchase excess power from solar energy systems connected to the grid are important incentives to the installation of a solar energy system.

Federal Tax Incentive. Solar PV systems installed in 2020 and 2021 are eligible for a 26% tax credit. The Inflation Reduction Act has made changes to the existing tax credit and extends the provisions of the Solar Investment Tax Credit so owners who install designated solar energy systems between January 1, 2022 through the end of 2032 will receive a tax credit of 30% of the cost of the solar energy system from their federal income taxes. Owners who owe less federal income tax than the 30% tax credit can carry over any unused credit until January 1, 2032. After 2032, the residential investment tax credit will be reduced to 26% for installations completed in 2033 and to 22% for -installations completed in 2034, and tax credit will no longer be available for installations completed after December 31, 2034.

State Incentives and Utility Company Rebates. In addition to federal income tax credit, utility companies in California and other states offer various incentives and rebate programs. Capital cost rebates provide funds to customers based on the cost and size of a customer’s solar energy system. The value of the rebate is subtracted from the total purchase price, resulting in a net adjusted cost for the purpose of determining the value of the federal tax credit. Performance-based rebates provide funding to customers based on the energy produced by their systems. Under a feed-in tariff subsidy, the government sets prices that regulated utility companies are required to pay for renewable electricity generated by end-users. Under that subsidy program, prices are set above market rates and may be differentiated based on system size or application.

The building standard approved by the California Energy Commission in May 2018 mandates the installation of solar arrays on new single-family residences and on multi-family buildings of up to three stories starting in 2020. The Building Standards Commission has adopted these recommendations without change, and we cannot assure you that the Building Standards Commission will not change this standard or that the standard will survive any legal challenges which may be brought in opposition to the standard.

The California Public Utilities Commission may consider a proposal to significantly reduce the incentives homeowners receive for installing rooftop solar systems. If such a change or any significant change in the benefits provided to homeowners for installing rooftop solar systems, our U.S. business will be materially impaired. We cannot assure you that the present benefits provided to homeowners for installing solar systems will not be adopted.

Depreciation. Certain qualified clean energy facilities, property and technology placed in service after 2024 may be classified as 5-year property under the modified accelerated cost recovery system (MACRS) under Inflation Reduction Act of 2022. Under Internal Revenue Code Section 168(e)(3)(B), qualified facilities, qualified property and energy storage technology are considered 5-year property. These types of property are recoverable under the MACRS. A business with a solar PV system placed in service between January 1, 2018 and December 31, 2022 can elect to claim a 100% bonus depreciation. Starting in 2023, the percentage of capital equipment that can be expensed immediately drops 20% per year (e.g., 80% in 2023 and 60% in 2024) until the provision drops to 0% in 2027.

Tariffs and Trade Policies. The solar energy industry has recently experienced decreasing prices in solar panels, a principal component in any solar energy system. Most solar panels are imported and the price of the solar panels is impacted by trade policies, such as tariffs and quotas. The U.S. government has imposed tariffs on solar cells, solar panels and aluminum that is used in solar panels manufactured overseas. Based on determinations by the U.S. government under the 2012 solar trade case, the anti-dumping and countervailing tariff rates range from approximately 33%-255%. Such anti-dumping and countervailing tariffs are subject to annual review and may be increased or decreased. These tariffs have increased the price of solar panels containing China-manufactured solar cells. We do not purchase panels from China or Taiwan for our United States operations. The purchase price of solar panels containing solar cells manufactured in China reflects these tariff penalties. While solar panels containing solar cells manufactured outside of China are not subject to these tariffs, the prices of these solar panels are, and may continue to be, more expensive than panels produced using Chinese solar cells, before giving effect to the tariff penalties.

On January 23, 2018, the United States placed tariffs on imported solar cells and modules for a period of four years with an effective date of February 7, 2018. The tariff level was set at 30%, with a 5% declining rate per year for the four- year term of the tariff. The tariff includes a 2.5 GW exemption for cells per year, which does not include any sub quotas for individual countries. Additionally, the only countries excluded from the tariff are those that the U.S. government deems as developing nations, with the exception of the Philippines and Thailand that are eligible for the U.S. Generalized System of Preferences program.

While the state and federal incentives benefit the industry by making solar energy systems more affordable and attractive to consumers, they also expose the industry to the risk of negative consequences should these incentives be discontinued or reduced. The market for solar energy products is, and will continue to be, heavily dependent on public policies that support growth of solar energy. There can be no assurances that such policies will continue. Decreases in the level of rebates, incentives or other governmental support for solar energy would materially and adversely affect the demand for solar energy products, including our business.

Net Metering.  Net metering is a billing mechanism that credits solar energy system owners for the electricity that they add to the electricity grid. If the owner of a solar system generates more electricity than it consumes, the excess electricity is sold back to the grid.

The California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) introduced “Net Metering 3.0” (NEM 3.0) as the latest iteration of net metering policies. Under NEM 3.0, customers continue to receive credit for the electricity they produce; however, the calculation of this credit is based on avoided cost rates. These rates align more closely with wholesale rates for electricity, reflecting what utilities themselves pay for electricity rather than the conventional rates paid by customers.

Under NEM 3.0 the economic viability of combining solar panel systems with battery storage is enhanced. As a result, the payback period for the combined installations has accelerated, surpassing that of solar-only installations. We may need to revise our pricing metrics to reflect this change in order for the purchase of a solar system to be economically attractive to the customer, which may result in lower prices and reduced margins.

To the extent that utility companies are not required to purchase excess electricity from owners of solar systems or are permitted to lower the amounts paid, the market for solar systems may be impaired. Because net metering can enable the solar system owner to further reduce the cost of electricity by selling excess electricity to the utility company, any elimination or reduction of this benefit would reduce the cost savings from solar energy. The recent changes in California’s net metering payments may have reduce the market for residential solar installations to the extent that the installation of the homeowner’s decision to install a solar system is based on the benefits of the net metering structure, which has been modified to reduce the benefits to the homeowner.  We cannot assure you that net metering will not be eliminated or the benefits significantly reduced for future solar systems, which may dampen the market for solar energy.

California Consumer Privacy Act

In June 2018, California passed the CCPA, which became effective in 2020. As a practical matter, companies needed to have their data tracking systems in place by the start of 2019, since the law gives consumers the right to request all the data a company has collected on them over the previous 12 months. This law covers all companies that serve California residents and have at least $25 million in annual revenue. Under the law, any California consumer has a right to demand to see all the information a company has saved on the consumer, as well as a full list of all the third parties that data is shared with. The consumer also has the right to request that the company delete the information it has on the resident. The CCPA broadly defined broadly defines “protected data.” The CCPA also has specific requirements for companies subject to the law. For example, the law specifies that companies must have a clear and conspicuous link on their websites to a page from which consumers may exercise their right to opt out of data sharing. The CCPA provides for a private right of action for unauthorized access, theft or disclosure of personal information in certain situations, with possible damage awards of $100 to $750 per consumer per incident, or actual damages, whichever is greater. The CCPA also permits class action lawsuits. Because the law was recently adopted, we have not been able to determine the extent to which the law applies to us, our website and our privacy policies.

Employment Regulations

California labor law is more pro-employee than the laws of other states, and the damages and penalties an employee can recover are higher under California labor law than under federal labor law. California has numerous laws and regulations relating to the relationship between an employer and our employees, including wage and hour laws, laws relating to anti-discrimination, and laws mandating expanded training to employees to prevent sexual harassment. In 2004, California passed a law requiring employers with 50 or more employees to provide two hours of sexual-harassment-prevention training to supervisors every two years. A recently passed law requires that by January 1, 2020, employers with five or more employees provide at least two hours of sexual-harassment-prevention training to supervisory employees and one hour of training to nonsupervisory employees. The law also requires that, beginning January 1, 2020, seasonal, temporary and other employees hired to work for less than six months need to be trained within the earlier of 30 calendar days of hire or within 100 hours worked. Our professional employer organization has implemented our sexual harassment prevention program.

Intellectual Property

We do not have any intellectual property that is material to our business.

Operations in China

General

The photovoltaic market in China was the largest in the world in 2021, reaching a cumulative total installed capacity of 253 GW in 2020, which accounted for more than one-third of the world’s cumulative total installed capacity. China’s photovoltaic market has been projected to grow at a compound annual growth rate of 14.1% between 2021 and 2025. The ground-market segment (i.e., solar farm installations) is expected to dominate the market during this forecast period. The China market is projected to reach $137 billion by 2030. The growth is driven by increasing government support and the continued decline in the cost of solar energy generation. ²

We commenced operations in China following the acquisition on April 28, 2015, of the ownership of Chengdu ZHTH, which is currently a subsidiary of ZHTH, and ZHPV, through share exchange agreements with the equity owners of these companies.

Our business in China is conducted through ZHTH and ZHPV and their subsidiaries. Unlike systems that we sell in the United States, which are installations for residential and small business users, the projects in China are generally solar farms, which are constructed on large land areas where multiple ground-mount solar tracking towers are installed. While a typical residential or small business installation in the United States generally generates between 6.5KW and 0.2MW of power, the solar farms can generate in the range of 30MW to more than 100MW of power. To comply with the local requirements to own and operate the EPC business in China, ZHTH and ZHPV establish subsidiaries for different purposes. These special purpose subsidiaries include project subsidiaries which were formed by ZHTH or ZHPV to own the solar farms and the permits to construct and operate solar farms and the equity in the subsidiaries, or, in the case of the agreements with SPIC, are sold to the buyer of the projects upon completion. ZHTH was primarily engaged in the business of identifying and procuring solar system projects for resale to third party developers and related services in China. ZHPV’s core business is to provide EPC services.

 _________________________________ 

² IHS Markit; International Energy Agency; GlobalData; mordorintelligence.com; Wikipedia, Solar power by country, April 2023; National Renewable Energy Laboratory; PV Magazine;

BNEF (https://about.bnef,com); Bloomberg (https://www.bloomberg.com)

Our business in China initially consisted primarily of identifying and procuring solar farm system projects for resale to third party developers and related services in China, identifying potential buyers of solar farms, and providing engineering, procuring and construction services, which are referred to in the industry as EPC services, for solar farms and, to a significantly lesser extent, rooftop solar systems in China. Approximately 95% of our China revenue in 2019 was generated from Changzhou Almaden Co., Ltd., which is a related party that we refer to in this annual report as AMD. We have not generated any revenue from AMD since 2019. Since the second half of 2019, our business in China consisted of EPC services pursuant to agreements with SPIC.  Substantially all of our China revenues for the years ended December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020 were generated from projects for SPIC. During 2022, 2023 and 2024 through the date of this annual report, we did not generate revenues in the China segment.

Based on the effective light resource and available land use, we are focusing on provinces with large tracts of available land and solar resources sufficient for the development of solar farms. We look to work with local entities on the project development. As part of this process, we need to discuss the potential development with local government agencies, which may involve discussions with several departments. The local government agencies publish the availability of permits for solar farms, and we need to obtain the permit for the solar farm from the applicable government agency. We may also find the buyer who will own the solar farm. If we find a buyer to operate the solar farm, we transfer the equity of the project subsidiary related to the solar farm to the buyer. If we identify the buyer, we seek to both obtain the contract to perform the EPC work as well as to operate and maintain the project after completion. For our contracts with SPIC, SolarMax and SPIC jointly selected the location of the project and the project subsidiary is formed pursuant to a co-development agreement.

We do not operate any solar farms as an owner, and we have no present plans to operate solar farms for our own account. To the extent that, in the future, we propose to construct and operate a solar farm for our own account, any decision would be subject to obtaining sufficient financing to enable us to construct and operate the project and complying with government regulations relating to the ownership of a solar farm.

For the EPC services in the PRC, we generally provide a one-year quality warranty on our EPC services from the date of completion of the EPC work.

ZHPV holds a construction enterprise qualification certificate for Level III of general contractor for power engineering constructor issued on December 18, 2022, which permits ZHPV to conduct business as a contractor in power engineering construction. The qualification certificate expires on June 30, 2024. The certificate is granted by the local government and enables ZHPV to perform its services throughout China. We engage local licensed engineering firms to perform the initial design work through a bidding process. When the engineering firm completes its design proposal, we obtain owner approval prior to procurement and construction. Following the acquisition of Chengdu ZHTH, the business of Chengdu ZHTH was assumed and developed by its parent company SolarMax Shanghai. Chengdu ZHTH has since ceased to be active and we are in the process of deregistering Chengdu ZHTH with local authorities in China. We refer to SolarMax Shanghai and its subsidiaries collectively as ZHTH.

Seasonal weather patterns affect our PRC subsidiaries’ construction of large-scale solar projects. Northern provinces often experience below zero temperatures along with snowstorms which could cause a closure of transportation options along with frozen ground which needs to be cleared for solar equipment, all of which can cause slowdowns in construction and increase our cost. Our EPC contracts to date have been in the southern provinces where cold weather does not have the same effect although the southern provinces may be subject to other adverse weather conditions.

Effective on May 12, 2016, in connection with the execution of the amendment to the share exchange agreement for the acquisition of ZHPV, ZHPV entered into a debt settlement agreement with Uonone Group Co., Ltd., one of the former owners of ZHPV. Pursuant to the debt settlement agreement, ZHPV and Uonone agreed to settle a list of pending business transactions entered by them during the period from December 31, 2012 to December 31, 2015. As of December 31, 2023, the Uonone Group has repaid all amounts agreed to under the debt settlement agreement except for a RMB 3.0 million contingent receivable, which does not arise until and unless we become obligated under a contingent liability. We have not become obligated under the contingent liability. The contingent liability is a potential obligation of ZHPV which existed at the time of our acquisition of ZHPV and related to the estimated costs of a project ZHPV had completed, and we cannot estimate whether or when ZHPV may have any obligation under the contract. However, in the event ZHPV becomes liable, it has an offsetting receivable from Uonone. As of the date of this annual report, no claim and no indication of any claim have been made against ZHPV. Additionally, under the debt settlement agreement, to the extent ZHPV receives settlement proceeds on matters that relate to events prior to the acquisition, ZHPV shall repay to Uonone the amount received less taxes, fees and expenses in connection with such settlement. As of December 31, 2022, the payable balance due to Uonone Group related to the legal settlement received by ZHPV was $2.1 million. During the year ended December 31, 2023, we received additional legal settlement proceeds of $6.6 million and paid Uonone and expenses on behalf of Uonone $6.9 million.

Agreements with SPIC

We have not generated any revenue from our China operations during 2022, 2023 and 2024 through the date of this annual report.  Substantially all of our China revenue for the year ended December 31, 2021 of $7.8 million and for the year ended December 31, 2020, of $96.1 million, was generated from four contracts with SPIC, and included revenue from SPIC and revenue from the sale of power by the project subsidiaries for the projects prior to the transfer of control to SPIC.  As of December 31, 2023, we had a receivable from SPIC in the amount of $7.7 million, which we expect to collect during 2024. Although we are negotiating with SPIC for additional projects, we cannot give any assurance that we will be successful in our negotiations or that any agreements we enter into with SPIC will be profitable to us.  The COVID-19 restrictions and the residual effects of the COVID-19 restrictions impaired our ability to obtain payment of the receivable from SPIC and to negotiate contracts with SPIC.

Source of Supply

Our PRC subsidiaries purchase the equipment for the project from local suppliers pursuant to a bidding process. The construction team will remain on site to perform the EPC services, using local licensed subcontractor as needed. The EPC services include continuing negotiations with local government and utility companies to resolve any issues that may occur on-site until the project is fully connected to the grid.

Solar panels and other components are available from a number of suppliers. We did not make any purchases during the year ended December 31, 2022 or the year ended December 31, 2023.

Competition

Within the solar farm industry in China, our China segment faces increasing competition from other project developers and EPC companies. The solar energy industry is very competitive, consisting of state-owned enterprises and a large number of private companies. Because China’s central government has announced a policy in favor of renewable energy sources, solar companies worldwide seek to develop and expand their business in China. We believe the number of new solar farm installation companies entering the industry in China has increased significantly since 2015 when we commenced business through our PRC subsidiaries in China. This increased competition has caused some price erosion, which has affected our margins and could result in further reductions in our margins as our PRC subsidiaries may reduce prices to generate new business and could impair their ability to enter into EPC agreements with non-related parties. As the interest in solar farms in China increases, there is increased competition for permits, and the government entities that issue the permits may prefer Chinese companies over companies that are owned by a United State company. Since our only customer in China since 2019 was SPIC, our PRC subsidiaries are dependent upon SPIC’s policies in engaging contractors for the development of solar farm projects. Since SPIC is state-owned enterprise, our procurement policies may be subject to government policies which may favor a Chinese company rather than a subsidiary of a United States company.

Government Subsidies

The solar investment and the development of the solar industry in China depend on continued government subsidies. Government policies have, and will continue to have, a significant impact on the solar industry in general. Government agencies set the rates that the utility company pays the solar farm owner. In general, the rate set at the beginning of the contract period remains the same during the period, although there is a risk that the rate will be changed. The rate varies from province to province. The government has announced that there will be a yearly decrease in the payment. After 2016, all the solar projects in China are required to be involved with the local government to help alleviate poverty in the region. In addition, solar farm construction needs to be integrated with local agriculture, tourism or animal husbandry, which leads to increases in the cost of our EPC services.

PRC Government Regulations

Renewable Energy Law and Other Government Directive

The Renewable Energy Law of PRC, which originally became effective on January 1, 2006 and was amended on December 26, 2009, sets forth policies to encourage the development and on-grid application of renewable energy, including solar energy. Renewable energy under this law refers to non-fossil fuel energy, including wind energy, solar energy, water energy, biomass energy, geothermal energy, ocean energy and other forms of renewable energy. The law also sets forth a national policy to encourage the installation and use of solar energy water heating systems, solar energy heating and cooling systems, photovoltaic systems and other systems that use solar energy. It also provides economic incentives, such as the establishment of national funding, preferential loans provided by financial institutions with financial interest subsidies to certain renewable energy development and utilization projects, and tax preferential treatment for the development of certain renewable energy projects. 

The PRC Energy Conservation Law, which was amended on October 28, 2007, July 2, 2016 and October 26, 2018, encourages utilization of energy-saving building materials like new wall materials and energy-saving equipment, and encourage the installation and application of renewable energy use systems such as solar energy. The law also encourages and supports the vigorous development of methane in rural areas, promotes the utilization of renewable energy resources such as biomass energy, solar energy and wind power, develops small-scale hydropower generation based on the principles of scientific planning and orderly development, promotes energy-saving-type rural houses and furnaces, encourages the utilization of non-cultivated lands for energy plants, and energetically develops energy forests such as firewood forests.

On September 4, 2006, the Ministry of Finance, or MOF, and Ministry of Construction jointly promulgated the Interim Measures for Administration of Special Funds for Application of Renewable Energy in Building Construction, pursuant to which the MOF will arrange special funds to support the application of Building Integrated Photovoltaics systems, or BIPV applications, to enhance building energy efficiency, protect the environment and reduce consumption of fossil fuel energy. Under these measures, applications to provide hot water supply, refrigeration, heating and lighting are eligible for such special funds.

On October 10, 2010, the State Council of the PRC promulgated a decision to accelerate the development of seven strategic new industries. Pursuant to this decision, the PRC government will promote the popularization and application of solar thermal technologies by increasing tax and financial policy support, encouraging investment and providing other forms of beneficial support.

In March 2011, the National People’s Congress approved the Outline of the Twelfth Five-Year Plan for National Economic and Social Development of the PRC, which includes a national commitment to promoting the development of renewable energy and enhancing the competitiveness of the renewable energy industry. Accordingly, in January 2012, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology and the Ministry of Science and Technology respectively promulgated the Twelfth Five-Year Special Plans Regarding the New Materials Industry and the High-tech Industrialization to support the development of the PRC solar power industry.

On March 8, 2011, the MOF and the Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development jointly promulgated the Circular on Further Application of Renewable Energy in Building Construction to increase the utilization of renewable energy in buildings.

On March 27, 2011, the NDRC promulgated the revised Guideline Catalogue for Industrial Restructuring which categorizes the solar power industry as an encouraged item. This Guideline Catalogue was revised on February 16, 2013 (effective on May 1, 2013) and on October 30, 2019 (effective on January 1, 2020). The solar power industry is still categorized as an encouraged item.

In March 2016, the National People’s Congress approved the Outline of the Thirteenth Five-Year Plan for National Economic and Social Development of the PRC, which mentions a national commitment to continuing to support the development of PV generation industry.

On February 14, 2019, the NDRC issued the Green Industry Guidance Catalogue (2019 Edition) to include solar power equipment manufacturing into the green industry guidance catalogue, to further encourage the development of solar industry.

On January 20, 2020, the NEA, the NDRC, and the Ministry of Finance jointly issued Opinions on Promoting the Healthy Development of Non-hydroelectric Renewable Energy Power Generation, aiming at (i) improving the current subsidy method, (ii) improving market allocation of resources and subsidy decline mechanism, and (iii) optimizing subsidy redemption process.

On March 5, 2020, the NEA issued Notice on Matters Related to the Construction of Wind Power and Photovoltaic Power Generation Projects in 2020, in order to adjust and improve the specific plans for the construction and management of wind power and photovoltaic power generation projects.

On September 29, 2020, the NDRC, the NEA and the MOF jointly issued Supplementary Notice on Matters Relating to Several Opinions on Promoting the Sound Development of Non-Hydro-Renewable Energy Power Generation, in order to further clarify relevant policies of additional subsidy funds for renewable energy electricity prices and stabilize industry expectations.

On February 2, 2021, the State Council issued Guiding Opinions on Accelerating the Establishment and Improvement of the Green and Low-Carbon Circular Development Economic System, in order to accelerate the establishment of a robust economic system of green and low-carbon circular development.

On February 24, 2021, the NDRC, the MOF, the People’s Bank of China, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission and the NEA issued Notice on Guiding to Increase Financial Support to Promote the Healthy and Orderly Development of Wind Power and Photovoltaic Power Generation Industries, in order to help solving the problems of renewable energy companies such as tight cash flow and difficulties in production and operation.

On January 30, 2022, the NDRC and NEA jointly released the Opinions on Improving Institutional Mechanisms and Measures for Green and Low-carbon Energy Transition. The Opinions systematically propose institutional mechanisms and measures to support the green and low-carbon transformation of the energy supply side, request to promote the construction of clean, low-carbon energy as the main energy supply system and to promote the construction of energy infrastructure to adapt to the green and low-carbon transition.

On March 17, 2022, the NEA released the Guidance on Energy Work in 2022, one of the primary targets of this Guidance was to increase the share of non-fossil fuels in primary energy consumption to around 17.3% in 2022 and increase the share of wind and solar power in total power consumption to around 12.2%.

Laws and Regulations Concerning the Electric Power Industry

The regulatory framework of the PRC power industry consists primarily of the Electric Power Law of the PRC, which became effective on April 1, 1996, and was most recently amended on December 29, 2018, and the Electric Power Regulatory Ordinance, which became effective on May 1, 2005. One of the stated purposes of the Electric Power Law is to protect the legitimate interests of investors, operators and users and to ensure the safety of power operations. According to the Electric Power Law, the PRC government encourages PRC and foreign investment in the power industry. The Electric Power Regulatory Ordinance sets forth regulatory requirements for many aspects of the power industry, including, among others, the issuance of electric power business permits, the regulatory inspections of power generators and grid companies and the legal liabilities for violations of the regulatory requirements.

Electric Power Business Permit

On January 5, 2006, the NDRC promulgated the Administrative Provisions on Renewable Energy Power Generation which set forth specific measures for setting the price of electricity generated from renewable energy sources, including solar, and for allocating the costs associated with renewable power generation. The Administrative Provisions on Renewable Energy Power Generation also delegate administrative and supervisory authority among government agencies at the national and provincial levels and assign partial responsibility to electricity grid companies and power generation companies for implementing the Renewable Energy Law.

Pursuant to the Provisions on the Administration of the Electric Power Business Permit, which were issued by the State Electricity Regulatory Commission, known as SERC, and became effective on December 1, 2005 (subsequently revised on May 30, 2015), unless otherwise provided by the SERC, no company or individual in the PRC may engage in any aspect of electric power business (including power generation, transmission, dispatch and sales) without first obtaining an electric power business permit from the SERC. These provisions also require that if an applicant seeks an electric power business permit to engage in power generation, it must also obtain in advance all relevant government approvals for the project including construction, generation capacity and environmental compliance.

However, there are exceptions pursuant to which certain of our photovoltaic power generation projects may not need to obtain an electric power business permit from the SERC. On July 18, 2013, the NDRC issued the Interim Measures for the Administration of Distributed PV Power Generation, which waived the previous requirement to obtain an Electric Power Business Permit for distributed generation projects. On April 9, 2014, the NEA issued the Circular on Clarifying Issues concerning the Administration of Electric Power Business Permit, which was replaced by Circular on Improving the Administration of Electric Power Business Permit by Implementing the Inspiration of the Reforms on Administration, Delegate Powers, and Services issued by NEA on March 23, 2020, which waived requirement to obtain an Electric Power Business Permit for those solar power generation projects with installed capacity less than 6MW and any distributed generation projects approved by or filed with the NDRC or its local branches, and required the local NEA to simplify the Electric Power Business Permit application procedure for the solar power generation companies.

Grid Connection and Dispatchment

All electric power generated in China is distributed through power grids, except for electric power generated by facilities not connected to a grid. The distribution of power to each grid is administered by dispatch centers, which administer and dispatch planned output by power plants connected to the grid. The Regulations on the Administration of Electric Power Dispatch to Networks and Grids, promulgated by the State Council and the former Ministry of Electric Power Industry, effective on November 1, 1993, as amended on January 8, 2011, and its implementation measures, regulate the operation of dispatch centers.

Feed-in Tariff (FIT) Payments

The Renewable Energy Law of the PRC, as amended on December 26, 2009 and effective on April 1, 2010, sets forth policies to encourage the development and utilization of solar power and other renewable energy. The Renewable Energy Law authorizes the relevant pricing authorities to set favorable prices for electricity generated from solar and other renewable energy sources.

The NDRC further issued the Circular on Promoting the Healthy Development of PV Industry by Price Leverage on August 26, 2013, or the 2013 Circular. Under this circular, the feed-in tariff (“FIT”) (including VAT) for solar power projects approved or filed after September 1, 2013 or beginning operation after January 1, 2014 would be RMB0.90 per kilowatt hour (“kWh”), RMB0.95 per kWh or RMB1.00 per kWh, depending on the locations of the projects (excluding on-grid solar power projects located in Tibet).

In addition, the 2013 Circular sets forth special rules that entitle distributed generation projects (excluding the projects that have received an investment subsidy from the central budget) to a national subsidy of RMB0.42 per kWh. According to the Circular on Further Implementing Polices Relating to Distributed Generation issued by the NEA on September 2, 2014 and the Circular on Implementation Plans of PV Generation Construction for 2015 issued by the NEA on March 16, 2015, rooftop distributed generation projects that sell electricity directly to consumers or to both consumers and grid enterprises receive a national subsidy of RMB0.42 per kWh plus the local desulphurized coal benchmark electricity price for the electricity sold to the State Grid or a negotiated electricity purchase price for electricity sold directly to consumers. Ground-mounted projects and rooftop distributed generation projects which sell all electricity to grid enterprises are entitled to the FIT of RMB0.90 per kWh, RMB0.95 per kWh or RMB1.00 per kWh, depending on where the project is located (excluding on-grid solar power projects located in Tibet).

On December 22, 2015, the NDRC issued the Circular on Improving the Policies on the On-grid Tariffs of Onshore Wind Power Generation and PV Generation, effective on January 1, 2016, which provides that ground mounted projects, as well as rooftop distributed generation projects that sell all electricity generated to the local grid companies, are entitled to FIT of RMB0.80 per kWh, RMB0.88 per kWh or RMB0.98 per kWh, depending on where the project is located (excluding on grid solar power projects located in Tibet), provided that these projects are filed after January 1, 2016 and fall within the regional scale index of the year, or these projects are filed prior to January 1, 2016 and fall within regional scale index of the year, but do not commence operations prior to June 30, 2016.

The difference between the FIT for solar power projects and the desulphurized coal benchmark electricity price, or the subsidies paid to distributed generation projects, are funded by the renewable energy development funds. The above FIT and subsidy policies are valid for 20 years for each power generation project since its formal operation, in principle.

On December 30, 2016, the MIIT, NDRC, the Ministry of Science and Technology and MOF jointly promulgated the Development Guide Regarding the New Materials Industry to support and provide details for the development of the PRC solar power industry.

On February 10, 2017, the NEA promulgated the Circular on Printing and Distributing the Guidance on Energy Work in 2017, which promotes the construction of PV and thermal power projects. According to this circular, the PRC government planned to add the new construction scale of 20 million kilowatts and the new installed capacity of 18 million kilowatts in 2017. Although it is the PRC government’s policy to encourage such construction, it is not clear what specific targets have been fulfilled.

On May 31, 2018, the NEA, Ministry of Finance and NDRC of the PRC jointly promulgated a Notice regarding the Matters of Photovoltaic Power Generation in 2018 (“2018 PV Power Generation Notice”). The 2018 PV Power Generation Notice set forth new policies on general and distributed PV power stations. For example, based on the industry practice, no scale for the construction of general photovoltaic power station will be arranged in 2018. Before the issuance of any new rules in respect of the construction of general photovoltaic power stations, no national government subsidies were provided to general photovoltaic power station. There will be a scale of 10 gigawatts for the construction of distributed photovoltaic power station. In general, the feed-in tariff for general photovoltaic power stations will be reduced by RMB 0.05 per kWh.

On April 28, 2019, the NDRC issued a Notice Regarding Issues of Improvement on Mechanism for Grid Price of Photovoltaic Power Generation, effective on July 1, 2019. The benchmark solar PV tariff has been changed into guiding solar PV tariff. For utility-scale solar PV projects that fully feed electricity into grids after July 1, 2019, the FIT will be RMB 0.4 per kWh, RMB 0.45 per kWh, or RMB 0.55 per kWh depending on where the project is located. Commercial and industrial distributed PV that deliver 100% of output to the grid will apply utility-scale PV FITs, others can receive a subsidy of RMB 0.1/kWh.

On January 7, 2019, NDRC and the NEA jointly promulgated the Circular on Actively Promoting Subsidy-free Grid Price Parity for Wind Power and PV Power, which set forth several measures regarding project organization, construction, operation and supervision to promote PV power generation power projects with grid price equivalent to or below the benchmark grid price of coal-fired power units.

On March 31, 2020, NDRC issued Notice Regarding Issues of Grid Price of Photovoltaic Power Generation in 2020, effective on June 1, 2020, pursuant to which the guidance price of the new centralized photovoltaic power station in the I~III resource area, which will be included in the scope of state financial subsidy, is 0.35 per kWh (including tax, the same below), RMB 0.4 per kWh and RMB 0.49 per kWh, respectively. In principle, the feed-in electricity price of the new centralized photovoltaic power station shall be determined by means of market competition and shall not exceed the guidance price in the resource area where it is located. The Circular also makes it clear that commercial and industrial distributed PV that deliver 100% of output to the grid will apply utility-scale PV FITs, others can receive a subsidy of RMB 0.05/kWh.

On June 7, 2021, NDRC issued Notice Regarding Issues of Grid Price of New Energy Generation in 2021, effective on August 1, 2021, pursuant to which no subsidy will be provided to the new centralized photovoltaic power station and distributed PV project and onshore wind power project from central government budget in 2021 and achieve grid parity.

We have been advised by AllBright Law Offices, our PRC counsel, that, based on their review of our operations material provided by us and their review of PRC laws and regulations, our operations in the PRC, as presently conducted, based on our approved qualifications, comply in all material respects with applicable PRC laws and regulations.

Subsidy Catalog

On November 29, 2011, the MOF, NDRC and NEA jointly issued the Interim Measures for the Administration of Levy and Use of Renewable Energy Development Fund, which provides that development funds for renewable energy include designated funds arranged by the public budget of national finance, and renewable energy tariff surcharge collected from electricity consumers. Solar power projects can only receive government subsidies after completing certain administrative and perfunctory procedures with the relevant authorities of finance, price and energy to be listed in the Subsidy Catalog issued by the MOF, NDRC and NEA. These subsidies represent the difference between the FIT for solar power projects and the desulphurized coal benchmark electricity price. In January 2016, the NEA announced that there would be a nation-wide inspection on all solar power projects in operation and under construction, and that fall within the regional scale index of the year would be included in and managed via the Platform for Renewable Energy Power Generation Projects for the purpose of government subsidies application and payment.

In order to be listed in the Subsidy Catalog, ground-mounted projects submit applications to the relevant provincial authorities; and in accordance with the Circular on Issues Concerning Implementing Electric Quantity-based Subsidy Policy for Distributed Generation Projects issued by the MOF on July 24, 2013, rooftop distributed generation projects submit applications to the grid enterprises in the area where the projects are located. After preliminary review of the applications, the provincial authorities will jointly report to the MOF, NDRC and NEA, and the MOF, NDRC and NEA has final review of such applications to decide whether to list in the Subsidy Catalog.

Development Funds of Renewable Energy

The Renewable Energy Law provides financial incentives, including national funding for the development of renewable energy projects.

Pursuant to the Interim Measures for the Administration of Designated Funds for the Development of Clean Energy issued by the MOF and effective on June 12, 2020, the MOF sets up designated funds to support the development and utilization of clean energy in accordance with the national fiscal budget.

According to the Implementing Measures for the Administration of Price of Renewable Energy and Cost Sharing Program and the Interim Measures for Adjustment to Additional On-grid Tariff for Renewable Energy issued by the NDRC, the gap between the FIT for solar power projects and the desulphurized coal benchmark electricity price is subsidized by collecting tariff surcharge from the electricity consumers within the service coverage of grid enterprises at or above provincial level.

Mandatory Purchase of Renewable Energy

The Renewable Energy Law, which was most recently revised by the Standing Committee of the NPC on December 26, 2009, imposes mandatory obligations on grid enterprises to purchase the full amount of on-grid electricity generated by approved renewable energy plants whose power generation projects meet the grid connection technical standards in the areas covered by the grid enterprises’ power grids. Grid enterprises must improve the power grid construction in order to better absorb electricity generated from renewable energy.

Pursuant to the Measures for the Supervision and the Administration of Purchase of Full Amount of Renewable Energy by Grid Companies issued by the SERC in July 2007, the SERC and its local branches supervise the purchase of the full amount of renewable energy by the grid enterprises. If the grid enterprises do not purchase the full volume of the electricity generated from the renewable energy due to the circumstances such as force majeure or any other circumstance endangering the safety and stability of the power grids, the grid enterprises must promptly notify the renewable energy power generation companies of the details in writing and also submit detailed facts to the competent local branches of the SERC.

The Several Opinions on Promoting the Healthy Development of PV Industry also requires the grid enterprises to ensure PV power generation projects’ timely connection to the power grid and purchase the full amount of electricity generated by the PV power generation projects.

On March 20, 2015, the NDRC and NEA issued the Guidance Opinion on Improvement of Electric Power Operation and Adjustment and Promotion of Full Utilization of Clean Energy that emphasizes that the competent provincial authorities must strengthen the implementation of the provisions with regard to the purchase of the full amount of electricity generated by renewable energy and avoid any curtailment of solar power projects. In addition, it also stated that electricity generated by clean energy is encouraged to be sold directly to the consumers in the regions where there is an ample supply of clean energy, and the relevant parities must coordinate the trans-provincial supply of electricity and power transmission capability, in order to maximize the utilization of clean energy. Local governments also announced their intentions to efficiently implement the system regarding the purchase of the full amount of renewable energy, such as the Inner Mongolian Autonomous Government.

On March 24, 2016, the NDRC issued the Measures for the Administration of Guaranteed Purchase of Full Amount of Renewable Energy, to strengthen the administration of, and provide details for, the implementation of the purchase of the full amount of renewable energy by the grid enterprises.

On May 10, 2019, NDRC and NEA jointly released Notice on Establishing a Mandatory Renewable Electricity Consumption Mechanism, pursuant to which, the government will set renewable electricity consumption quotas in electricity power consumption. The renewable consumption quotas will be determined at the provincial level and the provincial energy administrations will lead the implementation process.

Environmental Protection

The construction processes of the solar power projects may generate noise, waste water, gaseous emissions and other industrial wastes. Therefore, we are subject to a variety of government regulations related to the storage, use and disposal of hazardous materials and to the protection of the environment of the community. The major environmental regulations applicable to our business activities in the PRC include the Environmental Protection Law of the PRC, the Law on the Prevention and Control of Noise Pollution, the Law on the Prevention and Control of Air Pollution, the Law on the Prevention and Control of Water Pollution, the Law on the Prevention and Control of Solid Waste Pollution, the Environmental Impact Evaluation of Law, and the Regulations on the Administration of Environmental Protection in Construction Projects.

Foreign Investment in Solar Power Business

The principal regulation governing foreign ownership of solar power businesses in the PRC was the Foreign Investment Industrial Guidance Catalog. Under the most recent catalog, which was amended in 2017 and effective on July 28, 2017, the construction and operation of new energy power stations (including solar power, wind power, etc.) is classified as an “encouraged foreign investment.” Foreign-invested enterprises in the encouraged foreign investment industry might be entitled to certain preferential treatment, such as exemption from tariffs on equipment imported for their operations, after obtaining approval from the PRC government authorities.

On

March 15, 2019, the National People’s Congress adopted the Foreign Investment Law, or new FIL which became effective on January 1, 2020, and replaced the previous fragmented foreign investment regime: three separate foreign investment laws previously enacted, which are the Wholly Foreign-Owned Enterprises Law, the Chinese-Foreign Equity Joint Ventures Law, and the Chinese-Foreign Contractual Joint Ventures Law. On December 26, 2019, State Counsel of PRC issued Regulation on the Implementation of the Foreign Investment Law of PRC, or Implementation of new FIL, effective on January 1, 2020. The new FIL sets forth a few definitions and guiding principles vis-à-vis foreign investment. It defines “foreign investors” as any “natural person, enterprise, or other organization of a foreign country” and “foreign-invested enterprises” as any enterprise established under Chinese law that is wholly or partially invested by foreign investors. The new FIL further defines “foreign investment” as any foreign investor’s direct or indirect investment in mainland China, including (a) establishing FIEs either individually or jointly with other investors; (b) acquiring shares, equity, property shares, other similar rights and interests in Chinese domestic enterprises; (c) investing in new projects either individually or jointly with other investors; and (d) making investments through other means provided by laws, administrative regulations, or the State Council. In addition, pursuant to Foreign Investment Law, the existing foreign invested enterprises established prior to the effective date of the Foreign Investment Law may keep their corporate organization forms within five years after the effective date of the Foreign Investment Law before such existing foreign invested enterprise change their organization forms, organization structures, and their activities of foreign-invested enterprises in accordance with the PRC Company Law, the Partnership Enterprise Law and other laws. PRC Company Law was adopted by Standing Committee of the People’s Congress on December 29, 1993 and recently amended on December 29, 2023, to be effective on July 1, 2024. The new amendment of PRC Company law requires registered capital subscribed for by all the shareholders shall, according to the articles of association, be fully paid up by the shareholders within 5 years as of the date of establishment. The government authorities are working on rules for transition period regarding the existing companies. According to State Administration for Market Regulation Announcement on Seeking Public Comments for the Provisions of the State Council on Implementation of the Registration Administration System for Registered Capital under the PRC Company Law (Draft for Comment),  there will be a three-year transitional period from July 1, 2024 to June 30, 2027, and for limited liability company established before the effectiveness of the PRC Company Law, if the remaining term of capital contribution is less than five years as of July 1, 2027, the term of capital contribution is not required to be adjusted; if the remaining term of capital contribution exceeds five years, the remaining term of capital contribution shall be adjusted to be within five years during the transitional period. The new FIL also reaffirms that the State supports the policy of opening up and encourages foreign investment made by foreign investors in mainland China and implements policies in high level freedom and convenience in investment to build a market environment of stability, transparency, predictability, and fair competition. In addition, the State established pre-establishment national treatment plus negative list. National treatment means foreign investment will be treated no less favorably than domestic investment during the investment access stage unless otherwise stipulated under negative list which impose special administrative measures in foreign investment access. The negative list will be approved or published by the State Council. The new FIL also sets out a list of policy measures for promoting foreign investment, such as equal treatment of foreign and domestic with respect to the application of business development policies, formulation of standards and application of compulsory standards, and government procurement. Furthermore, the new FIL lists protective measures and regulating provisions foreign investment. For example, in general foreign investors’ investments are not subject to governmental expropriation; forced technology transfer by administrative measures will be prohibited; the laws including the Company Law and the Partnership Enterprise will govern FIEs’ organizational forms, institutional frameworks and standard of conduct. The new FIL sets forth certain legal responsibilities. For example, if a foreign investor invests in a prohibited industry, it will be ordered to cease investment activities, restore the conditions that existed prior to the activities by, for instance, disposing of its shares or assets, and forfeiting any illegal proceeds. If a foreign investor investing in a restricted industry violates the conditions specified by the negative list, it will be ordered to make corrections to satisfy the conditions within a certain period. As a matching regulation to new FIL, the regulation highlights the promotion and protection of foreign investment and details measures to ensure the effective implementation of new FIL.

On June 23, 2020, the NDRC and the MOFCOM jointly issued the Special Administrative Measures for the Access of Foreign Investment (2020 Edition) (the “Negative List”), which came into force on July 23, 2019. In December 2021, the MOFCOM and the NDRC promulgated the Special Administrative Measures for Foreign Investment Access (2021 Version), which became effective on January 1, 2022. The 2021 version of the Negative list replaced the 2020 version of the Negative list. “Negative list” means a special administrative measure for access of foreign investment in specific fields as imposed by the PRC. Foreign investors are not allowed to invest in the forbidden investment as specified in the negative list. Foreign investors must comply with the special equity management requirements, senior management requirements and other restrictive access special management measures when making investments in the restricted investments as specified in the negative list. The Negative List provides that sectors that are not specified in the Negative List shall be subject to administration under the principle of treating domestic investments and foreign investments equally. The NDRC and the MOFCOM jointly also issued the Industrial Catalogue to Encourage Foreign Investment, or the Encourage Catalogue, which sets forth the industries and economic activities that foreign investment in China is encouraged to be engaged in. According to the Encouraged Catalogue amended on June 30, 2019 and subsequently amended on October 26, 2022, which became effective on January 1, 2023, the construction and operation of new energy power stations (including solar power, wind power, etc.) is within the scope of industries that encourage foreign investment.

Work Safety

The Work Safety Law of the PRC, which became effective on November 1, 2002 and was amended on August 31, 2014, is the principal law governing the supervision and administration of work safety for solar power projects. In accordance with the Measures for the Supervision and the Administration of Work Safety of Electricity Industry promulgated by the NDRC, which became effective on March 1, 2015, power plants are responsible for maintaining their safety operations in accordance with the relevant laws, regulations, rules and standards regarding the work safety. The NEA and its local branches supervise and administer the work safety of electricity industry at the national and local level. On April 20, 2015, the NEA and the State Administration of Work Safety jointly promulgated the Circular on Standardizing Safe Production Process for PV Generation Enterprises, which detailed the standards of production process for PV generation enterprises for work safety purpose.

Labor Laws and Social Insurance

Pursuant to the PRC Labor Law, which first took effect on January 1, 1995 and was most recently amended on December 29, 2019 (also the effective date), a written labor contract is required when an employment relationship is established between an employer and an employee. On June 29, 2007, the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress, or the SCNPC, promulgated the Labor Contract Law, as amended on December 28, 2012 (effective as of July 1, 2013), which formalizes employees’ rights concerning employment contracts, overtime hours, layoffs and the role of trade unions and provides for specific standards and procedures for the termination of an employment contract. In addition, the Labor Contract Law requires the payment of a statutory severance payment upon the termination of an employment contract in most cases, including in cases of the expiration of a fixed-term employment contract. In addition, under the Regulations on Paid Annual Leave for Employees and its implementation rules, which became effective on January 1, 2008 and on September 18, 2008 respectively, employees are entitled to a paid vacation ranging from 5 to 15 days, depending on their length of service and to enjoy compensation of three times their regular salaries for each such vacation day in case such vacation days are deprived by employers, unless the employees waive such vacation days in writing. Although we are currently in compliance with the relevant legal requirements for terminating employment contracts with employees in our business operation, in the event that we decide to lay off a large number of employees or otherwise change its employment or labor practices, provisions of the Labor Contract Law may limit its ability to effect these changes in a manner that we believe to be cost-effective or desirable, which could adversely affect our business and results of operations.

Enterprises in China are required by PRC laws and regulations to participate in certain employee benefit plans, including social insurance funds, namely a pension plan, a medical insurance plan, an unemployment insurance plan, a work-related injury insurance plan, a maternity insurance plan and a housing provident fund, and contribute to the plans or funds in amounts equal to certain percentages of salaries, including bonuses and allowances, of the employees as specified by the local government from time to time at locations where they operate their businesses or where they are located. According to the Social Insurance Law, without force majeure reasons, employers must not suspend or reduce their payment of social insurance for employees, otherwise the employer may be ordered to pay the required contributions within a stipulated deadline and be subject to a late fee of 0.05% of the amount overdue per day from the original due date by the relevant authority. If the employer still fails to rectify the failure to make social insurance contributions within such stipulated deadline, it may be subject to a fine ranging from one to three times the amount overdue. According to Regulations on Management of Housing Fund, employers must not suspend or reduce the payment of house provident funds for their employees. Under the circumstances where financial difficulties do exist due to which an employer is unable to pay or pay up house provident funds, permission of labor union of the employer and approval of the local house provident funds commission must first be obtained before the employer can suspend or reduce their payment of house provident funds. An enterprise that fails to make housing fund contributions may be ordered to rectify the noncompliance and pay the required contributions within a stipulated deadline; otherwise, a fine of over RMB 10,000 and up to RMB 50,000 may be imposed on the employer, and an application may be made to a local court for compulsory enforcement.

Taxation

PRC Enterprise Income Tax

The PRC enterprise income tax is calculated based on the taxable income determined under PRC laws and accounting standards. On March 16, 2007, the National People’s Congress of China enacted a new PRC Enterprise Income Tax Law, which became effective on January 1, 2008 and was later amended on February 24, 2017 and December 29, 2018. On December 6, 2007, the State Council promulgated the Implementation Rules to the PRC Enterprise Income Tax Law, or the Implementation Rules, which also became effective on January 1, 2008. On December 26, 2007, the State Council issued the Notice on Implementation of Enterprise Income Tax Transition Preferential Policy under the PRC Enterprise Income Tax Law, or the Transition Preferential Policy Circular, which became effective simultaneously with the PRC Enterprise Income Tax Law. The PRC Enterprise Income Tax Law imposes a uniform enterprise income tax rate of 25% on all domestic enterprises, including foreign-invested enterprises unless they qualify for certain exceptions, and terminates most of the tax exemptions, reductions and preferential treatments available under previous tax laws and regulations.

Moreover, under the PRC Enterprise Income Tax Law, enterprises organized under the laws of jurisdictions outside China with their “de facto management bodies” located within China may be considered PRC resident enterprises and therefore subject to PRC enterprise income tax at the rate of 25% on their worldwide income. The Implementation Rules define the term “de facto management body” as the management body that exercises full and substantial control and overall management over the business, productions, personnel, accounts and properties of an enterprise. In addition, the Circular Related to Relevant Issues on the Identification of a Chinese holding Company Incorporated Overseas as a Residential Enterprise under the Criterion of De Facto Management Bodies Recognizing issued by the State Administration of Taxation (Circular 82) promulgated by the State Administration of Taxation on April 22, 2009 provides that a foreign enterprise controlled by a PRC company or a PRC company group will be classified as a “resident enterprise” with its “de facto management bodies” located within China if the following requirements are satisfied: (i) the senior management and core management departments in charge of its daily operations function mainly in China; (ii) its financial and human resources decisions are subject to determination or approval by persons or bodies in China; (iii) its major assets, accounting books, company seals and minutes and files of its board and shareholders’ meetings are located or kept in China; and (iv) at least half of the enterprise’s directors or senior management with voting rights reside in China. Although the circular only applies to offshore enterprises controlled by PRC enterprises and not those controlled by PRC individuals or foreigners, the determining criteria set forth in the circular may reflect the State Administration of Taxation’s general position on how the “de facto management body” test should be applied in determining the tax resident status of offshore enterprises, regardless of whether they are controlled by PRC enterprises, individuals or foreigners.

PRC VAT and Business Tax

Pursuant to the Interim Regulation of the People’s Republic of China on Value-Added Tax (the “VAT Regulation”), which was amended on November 10, 2008, February 6, 2016 and November 19, 2017 and its implementation rules, any entity or individual engaged in the sales of goods, provision of specified services and importation of goods into China is generally required to pay a VAT, at the rate of 17% of the gross sales proceeds received, less any deductible VAT already paid or borne by such entity.

Pursuant to the PRC Provisional Regulations on Business Tax, which was eliminated on November 9, 2017, taxpayers falling under the category of service industry in China are required to pay a business tax at a normal tax rate of 5% of their revenues. In November 2011, the MOF and the State Administration of Taxation promulgated the Pilot Plan for Imposition of Value-Added Tax to Replace Business Tax. Pursuant to this plan and relevant notices, from January 1, 2012, the value-added tax has been imposed to replace the business tax in the transport and shipping industry and some of the modern service industries in certain pilot regions, of which Shanghai is the first one. A VAT rate of 6% applies to revenue derived from the provision of some modern services.

On December 12, 2013, the MOF and SAT issued Notice of the Ministry of Finance and the State Administration of Taxation on Including the Railway Transportation and Postal Industries in the Pilot Program of Replacing Business Tax with Value-Added Tax (2013 Amendment), which was most recently amended in May 2016, along with Pilot Implemental Rules of Replacing Business Tax with VAT, which was effective on January 1, 2014 and was most recently revised on March 23, 2016 (“Pilot Rules”). Pursuant to the Pilot Rules, the entity and individual who provide service in transportation, postal and other modern service industrial shall be obligated to pay VAT. Taxpayers who provide taxable service shall pay VAT instead of the Business Tax. The tax rate for provision of modern service industry (exclusive of leasing of tangible chattel) is 6%.

In March 2016, the MOF and the SAT jointly issued the Circular on the Pilot Program for Overall Implementation of the Collection of Value Added Tax Instead of Business Tax, or Circular 36, which took effect in May 2016. Pursuant to the Circular 36, all of the companies operating in construction, real estate, finance, modern service or other sectors which were required to pay business tax are required to pay VAT, in lieu of business tax. In November 2017, PRC State Counsel issued the amendment to Interim Regulations of PRC Value Added Taxes, or the VAT Regulation, pursuant to which entities and individuals that sell goods or labor services of processing, repair or replacement, sell services, intangible assets, or immovables, or import goods within the territory of the PRC are taxpayers of VAT, and shall pay VAT. The tax rate for VAT shall be, among others, (1) 17% for taxpayers engaged in sale of goods, services, lease of tangible movables or importation of goods, unless otherwise stipulated in VAT Regulation; (2) 11% for taxpayers engaged in sale of transportation, postal, basic telecommunications, construction, lease of immovables, sale of immovable, transfer of land use rights, sale or importation of certain types of goods; (3) 6% for taxpayers engaged in sale of services and intangible assets, unless otherwise stipulated in VAT Regulation. Pursuant to the Circular of the Ministry of Finance and the State Administration of Taxation on Adjusting Value-added Tax Rates promulgated on April 4, 2018 and effective on May 1, 2018, by the Ministry of Finance and State Administration of Taxation, where a taxpayer engages in a taxable sales activity for the value-added tax purpose or imports goods, the previous applicable 17% and 11% tax rates are adjusted to 16% and 10%, respectively. Pursuant to Announcement on Policies for Deepening the VAT Reform issued by the PRC Ministry of Finance, PRC State Taxation Administration and the General Administration of Customs on May 20, 2019 and effective on April 1, 2019, the previous rate of 16% or 10% are adjusted to be 13% or 9%, respectively, for taxpayer’s general sale activities or imports.

Dividend Withholding Tax

Pursuant to the PRC Enterprise Income Tax Law and the Implementation Rules, dividends generated after January 1, 2008 and payable by a foreign-invested enterprise in China to its foreign investors are subject to a 10% withholding tax, unless any such foreign investor’s jurisdiction of incorporation has a tax treaty with China that provides for a different withholding arrangement.  

Foreign Currency Exchange

Foreign currency exchange regulation in the PRC is primarily governed by the Regulations on the Administration of Foreign Exchange, most recently revised by the State Council on August 5, 2008, Notice on Further Simplifying and Improving Policies of Foreign Exchange Administration Regarding Direct Investment issued by SAFE on February 13, 2015, and the Provisions on the Administration of Settlement, Sale and Payment of Foreign Exchange promulgated by People’s Bank of China on June 20, 1996. Currently, RMB is convertible for current account items, including the distribution of dividends, interest payments, trade and service related foreign exchange transactions. Conversion of RMB for most capital account items, such as direct investment, security investment and repatriation of investment, however, is still subject to registration with the SAFE. Foreign-invested enterprises may buy, sell and remit foreign currencies at financial institutions engaged in foreign currency settlement and sale after providing valid commercial documents and, in the case of most capital account item transactions, obtaining approval from the SAFE. Capital investments by foreign enterprises are also subject to limitations, which include approvals by the NDRC, the Ministry of Construction, and registration with the SAFE.

In August 2008, the SAFE issued the Circular on the Relevant Operating Issues Concerning the Improvement of the Administration of Payment and Settlement of Foreign Currency Capital of Foreign-Invested Enterprises, or the SAFE Circular No. 142, regulating the conversion by a foreign invested enterprise of foreign currency-registered capital into RMB by restricting how the converted RMB may be used. Pursuant to the SAFE Circular No. 142, the RMB capital converted from foreign currency registered capital of a foreign-invested enterprise may only be used for purposes within the business scope approved by the applicable government authority and may not be used for equity investments within the PRC. In addition, the SAFE strengthened its oversight of the flow and use of the RMB capital converted from foreign currency registered capital of foreign-invested enterprises. The use of such RMB capital may not be changed without the SAFE’s approval, and such RMB capital may not in any case be used to repay RMB-denominated loans if the proceeds of such loans have not been used. Violations may result in severe monetary or other penalties. Furthermore, on March 30, 2015, the SAFE issued the Circular on Reforming the Administration Approach Regarding the Foreign Exchange Capital Settlement of Foreign-invested Enterprises, or SAFE Circular No. 19, which became effective on June 1, 2015 and replaced Circular 142. SAFE Circular No. 19 provides that, the conversion from foreign currency registered capital of foreign-invested enterprises into the Renminbi capital may be at foreign-invested enterprises’ discretion, which means that the foreign currency registered capital of foreign-invested enterprises for which the rights and interests of monetary contribution has been confirmed by the local foreign exchange bureau (or the book-entry of monetary contribution has been registered) can be settled at the banks based on the actual operational needs of the enterprises. However, SAFE Circular No. 19 does not materially change the restrictions on the use of foreign currency registered capital of foreign-invested enterprises. For instance, it still prohibits foreign-invested enterprises from, among other things, spending RMB capital converted from its foreign currency registered capital on expenditures beyond its business scope.

In February 2012, the SAFE promulgated the Notice on the Administration of Foreign Exchange Matters for Domestic Individuals Participating in the Stock Incentive Plans of Overseas Listed Companies, or the Stock Option Notice. Under the Stock Option Notice, domestic individuals who participate in equity incentive plans of an overseas listed company are required, through a PRC agent or PRC subsidiary of such listed company, to register with SAFE and complete certain other bank and reporting procedures. The Stock Option Notice simplifies the requirements and procedures for the registration of stock incentive plan participants, especially in respect of the required application documents and the absence of strict requirements on offshore and onshore custodian banks.

The Circular of Further Improving and Adjusting Foreign Exchange Administration Policies on Foreign Direct Investment issued by the SAFE on November 19, 2012 and amended on May 4, 2015 substantially amends and simplifies the foreign exchange procedure. Pursuant to this circular, the opening of various special purpose foreign exchange accounts (e.g. pre-establishment expense accounts, foreign exchange capital accounts, guarantee accounts), the reinvestment of lawful incomes derived by foreign investors in the PRC (e.g. profit, proceeds of equity transfer, capital reduction, liquidation and early repatriation of investment), and purchase and remittance of foreign exchange as a result of capital reduction, liquidation, early repatriation or share transfer in a foreign-invested enterprise no longer require the SAFE’s approval, and multiple capital accounts for the same entity may be opened in different provinces, which was not possible before. In addition, the SAFE promulgated the Circular on Printing and Distributing the Provisions on Foreign Exchange Administration over Domestic Direct Investment by Foreign Investors and the Supporting Documents in May 2013, which specifies that the administration by the SAFE or its local branches over direct investment by foreign investors in the PRC must be conducted by way of registration and banks shall process foreign exchange business relating to the direct investment in the PRC based on the registration information provided by the SAFE and its branches.

On February 13, 2015, the SAFE promulgated the Circular on Further Simplification and Improvement of Foreign Currency Administration Policies on Direct Investment, which became effective on June 1, 2015. This circular aims to further remove or simplify the approval requirements of SAFE upon the direct investment by foreign investors.

Dividend Distribution

The principal regulations governing dividend distributions of wholly foreign-owned enterprises include:

Under these regulations, wholly foreign-owned enterprises in the PRC may pay dividends only out of their accumulated profits as determined in accordance with PRC accounting standards and regulations.  In addition, each of our wholly foreign-owned enterprises is required to set aside at least 10% of its accumulated after-tax profits each year, if any, to fund certain statutory reserve funds, until the aggregate amount of such fund reaches 50% of its registered capital.

Regulations Relating to Internet Information Security and Privacy Protection

Internet information in China is regulated from a national security standpoint. The National People’s Congress, or the NPC, enacted the Decisions on Preserving Internet Security in December 2000, as amended in August 2009, which subject violators to potential criminal punishment in China for any attempt to: (i) gain improper entry into a computer or system of strategic importance; (ii) disseminate politically disruptive information; (iii) leak state secrets; (iv) spread false commercial information; or (v) infringe intellectual property rights. The Ministry of Public Security of the PRC, or the MPS, has promulgated measures that prohibit use of the internet in ways which, among other things, result in a leak of state secrets or a spread of socially destabilizing content. If an internet information service provider violates these measures, the MPS and its local branches may revoke its operating license and shut down its websites.

The Standing Committee of China’s National People’s Congress passed the Cybersecurity Law (the “CSL”), China’s first cybersecurity law, in November 2016, which took effect in June 2017. The CSL is the first Chinese law that systematically lays out the regulatory requirements for cybersecurity and data protection, and any individual or organization using the network must comply with the PRC constitution and applicable laws, follow the public order and respect social moralities, and must not endanger cyber security, or engage in activities by making use of the network that endanger the national security, honor and interests, or infringe on the fame, privacy, intellectual property and other legitimate rights and interests of others. Usually, a network is broadly defined and includes, but is not limited to, the Internet. The legal consequences of violation of the CSL include penalties of warning, confiscation of illegal income, suspension of related business, winding up for rectification, shutting down the websites, and revocation of business license or relevant permits. The costs of compliance with, and other burdens imposed by, CSL may limit the use and adoption of our products and services and could have an adverse impact on our business.

On July 10, 2021, CAC published the Cybersecurity Review Measures (Revised Draft for Public Comments), or the “Review Measures (Draft)”, and on December 28, 2021, the CAC and other ministries and commissions jointly promulgated the Cybersecurity Review Measures, which came into effect on February 15, 2022, targeting to further restate and expand the applicable scope of the cybersecurity review. Pursuant to the Cybersecurity Review Measures, Critical Information Infrastructure Operators (“CIIO”) that intend to purchase Internet products and services and online platform operators engaging in data processing activities that affect or may affect national security must be subject to cybersecurity review. Cybersecurity Review Measures further stipulate that if a network platform operator possesses the personal information of more than one million users and intends to list in a foreign country, it shall apply to CAC for cybersecurity review. Because our PRC subsidiaries do not deal with the public and do not possess personal data of at least 1,000,000 users, we do not believe that we are required to apply for review by the Cybersecurity Review Office. In the event that, in the future, we possess such data or if the requirements for review are changed, we may be required to obtain such approval, the failure of which could affect our ability to have our common stock traded on Nasdaq.

PRC Civil Code passed by China’s National People’s Congress on May 22, 2020, effective on January 1, 2021, also stipulates that the personal information of a natural person shall be protected by the law. Furthermore, the Data Security Law of the PRC was published on June 10, 2021 by the National People’s Congress and came into effect on September 1, 2021. Such law consists of seven chapters, namely General Provisions, Data Security and Development, Data Security System, Data Security Protection Obligation, Security and Openness of Government Data, Legal Liability and Supplementary Provisions. However, the relationship between the Data Security Law of the PRC and the implemented National Security Law of the PRC, the Cyber Security Law of the PRC, PRC Civil Code, the Confidentiality Law of the PRC and the ongoing Personal Information Protection Law of the PRC needs to be carefully clarified.

Qualification of Construction Enterprise

According to the Construction Law of the PRC issued by the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress on November 1, 1997, effective on March 1, 1998, and as amended on April 22, 2011 and most recently on April 23, 2019 (effective on the same day), building construction enterprises, survey enterprises, design enterprises and construction supervision enterprises that engage in construction activities shall meet the following conditions: (1) having registered capital conforming to state provisions; (2) having specialized technical personnel with legally required qualifications who are commensurate with the construction activities being engaged in; (3) having technical equipment for engaging in related construction activities; and (4) other conditions as may be prescribed by laws and administrative regulations. In addition, building construction enterprises, survey enterprises, design enterprises and project supervision enterprises that engage in construction activities shall be classified into different grades of qualifications in accordance with their registered capital, specialized technical personnel, technical equipment in their possession and previous performance in construction projects completed, and may engage in construction activities within the scope permitted under their respective qualifications only after acquirement of the corresponding grade of qualification certificates upon passing qualification examination. Under circumstances where a construction enterprise undertakes projects out of the scope permitted under its level of qualification, the relevant governing authorities will have the power to demand such enterprise to cease its illegal conduct and impose on such enterprise administrative penalties which include fines, suspension of operation for rectification, lowering its grade of qualification, revocation of qualification certificates and confiscation of illegal income.

Pursuant to the Administration Rules Regarding Qualification of Construction Enterprise issued by the Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the PRC on September 13, 2016, which was most recently modified by the Decisions of the Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development on the Modification of the Administration Rules Regarding Qualification of Construction Enterprise and Other Regulations on December 22, 2018 (effective on the same day), a construction enterprise may conduct its construction business after the receipt of a qualification which is classified into three categories, named as General Construction Contractor Qualification, Professional Contractor Qualification, and Construction Labor Service Qualification, with each category having several grades. In addition, construction enterprises must maintain their assets, major personnel, technical equipment, etc., at the level required by their respective grades of construction qualifications, otherwise, the relevant local authorities will have the power to demand the enterprises to rectify within a prescribed time limit, the longest of which shall not exceed three months. During the period in which the enterprises are rectifying in regard to its qualifications, the enterprises cannot apply to upgrade their construction qualifications or add items into their current construction qualifications and cannot undertake new construction projects. Provided that the enterprises have failed to rectify to reach the standards of their construction qualifications within the prescribed time limit, the authorities which grant such enterprises the qualifications will have the power to revoke the qualification certificates.

Regulations on Overseas Listing

On December 24, 2021, the CSRC issued Provisions of the State Council on the Administration of Overseas Securities Offering and Listing by Domestic Companies (Draft for Comments) (the “Administration Provisions”), and the Provisions of the State Council on the Administration of Overseas Securities Offering and Listing by Domestic Companies (Draft for Comments) (the “Measures”).

The Administration Provisions and Measures for overseas listings lay out requirements for filing documents and include unified regulation management, strengthening regulatory coordination, and cross-border regulatory cooperation. Domestic companies seeking to list abroad must carry out relevant security screening procedures if their businesses involve such supervision. Companies endangering national security are among those off-limits for overseas listings.

In August 2006, six PRC regulatory agencies jointly adopted the Provisions on the Merger and Acquisition of Domestic Enterprises by Foreign Investors, or the M&A Rule. As amended in 2009, this rule requires that, if an overseas company established or controlled by PRC domestic companies or citizens intends to acquire equity interests or assets of any other PRC domestic company affiliated with the PRC domestic companies or citizens, such acquisition must be submitted to the Ministry of Commerce, rather than local regulators, for approval. In addition, this regulation requires that an overseas company controlled directly or indirectly by PRC companies or citizens and holding equity interests of PRC domestic companies needs to obtain the approval of the CSRC prior to listing its securities on an overseas stock exchange.

While the application of the M&A Rule remains unclear, based on our understanding of current PRC laws, regulations, and the Provisions on Indirect Issuance of Securities Overseas by a Domestic Enterprise or Overseas Listing of Its Securities for Trading announced by the CSRC on September 21, 2006 (effective the same day), we believe it is not applicable to us since we are not an overseas company controlled by PRC domestic companies or natural persons.

On December 24, 2021, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, or the CSRC, issued Provisions of the State Council on the Administration of Overseas Securities Offering and Listing by Domestic Companies (Draft for Comments) (the “Administration Provisions”), and the Provisions of the State Council on the Administration of Overseas Securities Offering and Listing by Domestic Companies.   On February 17, 2023, the CSRC released the “Trial Administrative Measures of Overseas Securities Offering and Listing by Domestic Companies” (the “Trial Measures”) and five supporting guidelines. The new regulations require PRC companies that are listed or in the process of being listed on foreign exchanges (“PRC Companies”) to make certain filings with the CSRC. The new regulations authorize the CSRC to review such fillings, penalize relevant PRC Companies or people in charge, or report to overseas securities regulatory institutions in case of violation of the Trial Measures, in order to ensure PRC Companies are in compliance with PRC regulations and policies. The new regulations became effective on March 31, 2023.  Failure to file as required could subject us or our controlling stockholders to fines and penalties, which may be significant.  As of the date of this annual report, the CSRC has not published any additional supplemental regulations or guidelines as to PRC Companies.  Based on our audited financial statements for 2023, which show that a majority of our income is derived from our United States operations and a majority of our assets are located in the United States and the fact that our management is located in the United States, we believe that we are not an issuer that is required to make a filing with the CSRC, and, accordingly, we did not make such a filing in connection with our initial public offering in February 2024.  In the event that the CSRC disagrees with this opinion, we and our controlling stockholders may be subject to fines and penalties, which may be significant.

If, conversely, it is determined that CSRC approval was required for our initial public offering, we may face sanctions by the CSRC or other PRC regulatory agencies for failure to seek CSRC approval for our initial public offering. These sanctions may include fines and penalties on our operations in the PRC, delays or restrictions on the repatriation into the PRC of the proceeds from our initial public offering, restrictions on or prohibition of the payments or remittance of dividends by our PRC subsidiaries, or other actions that could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, reputation and prospects, as well as the trading price of our common stock.  If we determine to raise funds in a subsequent public offering, we will need to determine whether a filing with the CSRC is required in order for us to complete the offering.

Regulations on Stock Incentive Plans

On December 25, 2006, the People’s Bank of China promulgated the Administrative Measures of Foreign Exchange Matters for Individuals, setting forth the respective requirements for foreign exchange transactions by individuals (both PRC or non-PRC citizens) under either the current account or the capital account. Additionally, individuals shall not evade foreign exchange supervisions by partitioning the intended amount of foreign exchange into separate transactions.

On February 15, 2012, SAFE issued the Notices on Issues concerning the Foreign Exchange Administration for Domestic Individuals Participating in Stock Incentive Plan of Overseas Publicly-Listed Company, or the Stock Incentive Plan Rules. The purpose of the Stock Incentive Plan Rules is to regulate foreign exchange administration of PRC domestic individuals who participate in employee stock holding plans and stock option plans of overseas listed companies. According to the Stock Incentive Plan Rules, if PRC “domestic individuals” (both PRC residents and non-PRC residents who reside in China for a continuous period of not less than one year, excluding the foreign diplomatic personnel and representatives of international organizations) that participate in any stock incentive plan of an overseas listed company, a PRC domestic qualified agent, which could be the PRC subsidiary of such overseas listed company, shall, among others things, file, on behalf of such individual, an application with SAFE to conduct the SAFE registration with respect to such stock incentive plan, and obtain approval for an annual allowance with respect to the purchase of foreign exchange in connection with stock holding or stock option exercises. In addition, the Circular on Relevant Issues Concerning Foreign Exchange Control on Domestic Residents’ Offshore Investment and Financing and Roundtrip Investment Through Special Purpose Vehicles promulgated by SAFE in July 2014 (SAFE Circular No. 37) also provides certain requirements and procedures for foreign exchange registration in relation to an equity incentive plan of a special purpose vehicle before listing. In this regard, if a non-listed special purpose vehicle grants equity incentives to its directors, supervisors, senior officers and employees in its domestic subsidiaries, the relevant domestic individual residents may register with SAFE before exercising their rights.

The Stock Incentive Plan Rules and SAFE Circular 37 were promulgated only recently and many issues require further interpretation. Although, based on advice of AllBright Law offices, our PRC counsel, we do not believe that we are subject to these rules, we cannot assure you that SAFE will not come to a different conclusion. If we are subject to these rules and we or our PRC employees fail to comply with the Stock Incentive Plan Rules, we and our PRC employees may be subject to fines and other legal sanctions. In addition, the General Administration of Taxation has issued several circulars concerning employee stock options, and, under these circulars, our employees working in China who exercise stock options would be subject to PRC individual income tax. Our PRC subsidiary would have obligations to file documents related to employee stock options with relevant tax authorities and withhold individual income taxes of those employees who exercise their stock options. If our employees fail to pay and we fail to withhold their income taxes, we may face sanctions imposed by tax authorities or other PRC government authorities.

Employees

On March 31, 2024, we had 79 employees in the United States, of which five were executives, 30 were in sales and marketing, 32 were in operations and installation and 12 were in accounting and administrative, and we had eight employees in China, of which two were executives, and six were in accounting and administrative. None of our employees are represented by a labor union. We consider our employee relations to be good. We have agreements with a professional employer organization, Insperity PEO Services, L.P., under which the professional employer organization administers our human resources, payroll and employee benefits functions for our United States employees, who are co-employed by us or one of our subsidiaries and Insperity. On July 1, 2021, we began a 401(k) plan through Insperity PEO Services, L.P.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

An investment in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below, together with all of the other information in this annual report, including “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and our consolidated financial statements and related notes before making a decision to invest in our common stock. Our business, operating results, financial condition, or prospects could be materially and adversely affected by any of these risks and uncertainties. If any of these risks actually occurs, the trading price of our common stock could decline and you might lose all or part of your investment. Our business, operating results, financial performance, or prospects could also be harmed by risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently do not believe are material.

Risks Related to Our Business

We have sustained losses since our organization, our financial statements have a going concern footnote and we cannot assure you that we can or will operate profitably.

Although we reported net income of approximately $0.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, we had a net loss of approximately $6.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2022 and our financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2023 have a going concern footnote. The losses in the year ended December 31, 2022 resulted primarily from losses in the United States segment, and the loss for the year ended December 31, 2022 reflects the write-off of approximately $3.4 million of capitalized merger costs and loans made by us in connection with our proposed merger with Alberton Acquisition Corporation. We also incurred losses in prior years, and we cannot assure you that our net income for 2023 is not an aberration and that we will not incur future losses.  We cannot assure you that we will operate profitably. We did not generate any revenue from our China segment for 2023 and 2022, and we have not generated any revenue from our China segment during 2024 through the date of this annual report, and we cannot assure you that we will generate any revenue from our China segment in the future.  Substantially all the revenues from the China segment for the years ended December 31, 2021 were generated from projects with SPIC.   Although we are engaged in negotiations with SPIC for agreements, we cannot assure you that we will be successful in these efforts or that any contract we may enter into will be profitable.  Revenues from the United States operations increased to approximately $54.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2023 from $44.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2022. We will need to increase our revenue and reduce our costs of our operations in both the United States and China in order for us to operate profitably on an ongoing basis. We cannot assure you that we will be able to operate profitably or achieve positive cash flows from operations in the future, and the failure to do so may impair our ability to continue in business.

Although we generated positive cash flow from operations for the year ended December 31, 2023, we had negative cash flow from operations in prior years, and, if we don’t generate positive cash flow from operations for the year ended December 31, 2024, we may need to use a portion of the proceeds of our initial public offering to meet our liquidity needs.

Although we had positive cash flow from operations of approximately $3.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, we incurred negative cash flow from operations of approximately $2.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2022 and negative cash flow from operations in prior years.  We expect negative cash flow from operations in the future, and we cannot assure you that we can or will generate a positive cash flow from operations.  If we cannot generate positive cash  flow from operations, we may need to use a portion of the proceeds of our initial public offering to meet our liquidity needs.

Because almost all of our revenue in China since we commenced operations in China was derived from two customers, one of which is a related party which has not been a customer since the first half of 2019 and the other is SPIC, a state-owned enterprise, our inability to develop new business in China could impair our ability to continue our China operations. 

Since the second half of 2019, our business in China consisted of EPC services pursuant to agreements with SPIC, which is a large state-owned enterprise under the administration of the Chinese government that holds a range of energy assets. Substantially all of our China revenues for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 were generated from four projects for SPIC. The revenue from our contracts with SPIC includes, for 2021, revenue from the EPC services performed on one of the four projects begun in 2020 and completed in 2021 for approximately $7.8 million, or 21% of total revenues, and, for 2020, revenue from the EPC services performed on the four projects of approximately $96.1 million, or 73% of total revenue.  Prior to the second half of 2019, most of our revenue from our China segment was generated from subsidiaries or affiliates of Changzhou Almaden Co., Ltd., which is a related party that we refer to in this annual report as AMD. Revenue from AMD accounted for 96% of the revenue of our China and 11% of our consolidated revenue for the year ended December 31, 2019. We did not generate any revenue from AMD and its subsidiaries and affiliates subsequent to 2019. We did not generate any revenue from our China segment during the 2022, 2023 or 2024 through the date of this annual report.  Although we are engaged in negotiations with SPIC with respect to potential contracts, as of the date of this annual report, we do not have any agreements or projects with SPIC or any other party for our China segment, and we can give no assurance that we will enter into additional agreements with SPIC or other parties or that any contract we enter into will be profitable. Our inability to increase our customer base may impair our ability to grow and operate profitably following completion of the offering. Further, our current dependence on a state-owned enterprise for our business could materially impair our ability to operate profitably in China, and the willingness of non-related parties to enter into agreement with us and the terms of such agreements may be impacted by the trade relationship between the United States and China. In dealing with SPIC, we may be subject to government policies relating to such factors as the terms on which we sell the project and SPIC’s procurement policies. As a state-owned enterprise, SPIC may favor Chinese companies over subsidiaries of a United States company. We cannot assure you that we will be able to continue to sell solar farm projects to SPIC or that it will be able to generate an acceptable gross margin on this work. If we are unable to generate revenue from SPIC on reasonable terms and if we fail to generate business in China from non-affiliated parties it may be necessary for us to discontinue our Chinese operations.

Pandemics and epidemics, natural disasters, war, terrorist activities, political unrest, and other outbreaks could disrupt our delivery and operations, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Global pandemics, epidemics in China or elsewhere in the world, or fear of spread of contagious diseases, such as Ebola virus disease (EVD), coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS), severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), H1N1 flu, H7N9 flu, avian flu and monkeypox, as well as hurricanes, earthquakes, tsunamis, or other natural disasters could disrupt our business operations, reduce or restrict our operations and services, incur significant costs to protect our employees and facilities, or result in regional or global economic distress, which may materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations. Actual or threatened war, terrorist activities, political unrest, civil strife, including the Russian invasion of Ukraine and the war between Israel and Hamas or any other hostilities in the Middle East and other geopolitical uncertainty could have a similar adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations. Any one or more of these events may impede our operation and delivery efforts and adversely affect our sales results, or even for a prolonged period of time, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Our business may be affected by the COVID-19 pandemic and the steps taken by the government in China to address the pandemic.

The United States Center for Disease Control announced that the COVID-19 public health emergency ended in May 2023, with the result that the COVID restrictions in the United States are no longer in effect and restrictions have been terminated worldwide. We believe our United States operations are not, and have not since mid-2022 been, materially affected by COVID.  However, the effects of China’s zero tolerance policy with respect to COVID-19, which is no longer in effect, has impaired our ability to negotiate both new contracts with and payment schedules with SPIC, a state-owned entity which has been the only customer for our China segment since 2020, with the result that we have no pending agreement with SPIC and we are continuing to negotiate payment of outstanding receivables from SPIC.

We have relied on loans through the United States government’s EB-5 program, which loans need to be refinanced when they become due, and we cannot assure you that the limited partners will accept our proposed terms of the refinancing or that we may need to use a substantial portion of the proceeds of our initial public offering to pay the loans. 

Two of our subsidiaries borrowed a total of $55.5 million from Clean Energy Funding (“CEF”) and Clean Energy Funding II (“CEF II”), who are related parties. CEF and CEF II are limited partnerships of which the general partner is a limited liability company owned and managed by two of our directors, one of whom is the chief executive officer, and a former executive officer/director. The funding was made pursuant to the United States government’s EB-5 program, and the lenders made loans from the proceeds of capital contributions of the limited partners who made their investment as part of the EB-5 program. Under this program, which is administered by the United States Customs and Immigration Service, entrepreneurs (and their spouses and unmarried children under 21) are eligible to apply for a green card (permanent residence) if they make the necessary investment in a commercial enterprise in the United States and plan to create or preserve ten permanent full-time jobs for qualified United States workers. We are a commercial enterprise that creates permanent full-time jobs in the United States. The loans are secured and are payable 48 months from the date of the advance and may be extended by the lender as may be necessary to meet applicable USCIS immigrant investor visa requirements, which is the date when the final step of the EB-5 visa process is completed and the immigrant investors, who are the limited partners of the lender, can become lawful permanent residents of the United States. The initial four-year term of all of the loans has expired and the loans are on extension until the limited partners have met the USCIS requirements. As the loans matured, we offered the limited partners, in lieu of the payment by the limited partnership of their capital contributions, a convertible note in the principal amount equal to their capital contributions to the partnerships, with a term of five years, with 20% of the principal amount being due on each of the first, second, third fourth and fifth anniversaries of the date of issuance. The notes are secured by the same assets that secured the notes issued to the lenders. As of March 31, 2024, notes to CEF and CEF II in the aggregate principal amount of $15.0 million were outstanding, and convertible notes in the principal amount of $36.5 million had been issued to former limited partners of CEF, of which principal payments of $19.75 million had been made on the anniversary of the respective dates of issuance, convertible notes in the principal amount of $2.5 million had been early redeemed for $1.77 million, and the outstanding principal amount of $14.25 million was outstanding. With respect to the outstanding notes to CEF and CEF II, limited partners who made investments of $2.5 million can currently demand repayment from the lender of their investment in the partnership which made the loans to us, which can trigger a payment obligation on our subsidiary’s part. Because the date on which the remaining limited partners can demand repayment of their capital account is dependent upon the approval of their petition for permanent residency, we cannot predict when or whether such petition will be approved. We cannot assure you that we will have or be able to obtain the funds to pay the EB-5 loans when they mature, and our inability to pay or refinance these loans could have a material adverse effect upon our business. To the extent that we are unable to refinance these obligations, we will use our available funds, including the net proceeds from our initial public offering for such purpose or it may be necessary to modify the terms of the convertible notes. If the limited partners who have the right to demand repayment of their capital accounts exercise their right, which can trigger the maturing of loans in the total principal amount of $2.5 million, the funds available from our initial public offering may not be sufficient to provide us with funds to pay such loans, and we can give have no assurance that we will be able to obtain funding from other sources or reasonable terms, if at all. We intend to offer the limited partners who funded the loans from CEF and CEF II convertible notes similar to the convertible notes we previously issued. We cannot assure you that the remaining limited partners or any significant number of the remaining limited partners will accept the note in lieu of cash repayment of their capital account or that we would not have to revise the terms of the notes in order to obtain the agreement of such limited partners to a refinancing. To the extent that we use the proceeds of our initial public offering to pay the loans, we will have less proceeds for the development and expansion of our business. Because we cannot predict when additional loans will become due or whether the limited partners will accept our proposed refinancing, it is possible that we may have to raise additional funds to pay these loans. Further, to the extent that other limited partners perceive that the terms on which we settle litigation are more favorable than the terms of the convertible note we propose to offer, they may not be willing to accept the convertible notes. The loans that can become due based on the approvals of petitions for permanent resident status which have been obtained, together with other loans which may become due may substantially exceed our available funds. As a result, if the limited partners do not accept a convertible note, we would need to obtain funding from other sources. We cannot assure you that other sources of financing will be available to us on reasonable, if any, terms. Further, to the extent that the limited partners accept our proposed refinancing, the subsequent sale of their common stock issued upon conversion of their convertible notes could have a material negative effect upon the market price of our common stock. Further, the market for and the market price of our common stock at the time we seek to obtain the agreement of the remaining limited partners to accept our convertible notes in lieu of cash payments of their capital accounts may affect the willingness of the limited partners to accept our convertible debt and the terms that they would accept. Further, if the limited partners accept convertible notes, the sale of the underlying shares or the market’s perception of the effect of the sale of such shares may have a material adverse effect upon the price of our common stock.

We will require significant funds in addition to the proceeds from our recent initial public offering if we are to restart our financing of solar energy systems in the United States and for any contracts which our China segment may enter into.

The solar energy systems market is cash intensive, particularly with respect to the financing of purchases by our United States customers and the construction of solar farm projects in China. Since early 2020, because we did not have the capital to support such operations, we suspended making loans to our solar customers.  We will require substantial additional funding to restart our financing activities, and we will not be able to restart our financing activities for solar installations in the United States until and unless we receive additional financing.

Although our contracts with our customers generally provide for progress payments, because of the amount and timing of the receipt of progress payments, we require project financing for our solar projects in China. Because our revenue and cash flow from our China segment can vary significantly from quarter to quarter, we may need significant funds in addition to our initial public offering to finance our China operations during periods when those operations do not have significant or any revenue or cash flow from operations. Although we have obtained project funding for our four past projects with SPIC, the funding is related to the specific project and is not available to us for working capital. The funds available to us from the proceeds of our initial public offering may not be sufficient to enable us to meet our requirements to develop and expand our business in China and pay our current liabilities. Furthermore, if we need to raise additional funds, we cannot assure you as to the availability or terms of any financing. Any equity financing could result in dilution, which may be significant, to our stockholders. Further, to the extent that we have to rely on debt rather than equity, our profit from financing operations will be impacted and changes in interest rates may further reduce our margins on the loans. If we are not able to finance the sale of our systems, whether through loans to customers or leases with customers, our failure to sell our solar energy systems will adversely affect our revenues and the results of our operations. We require funds for our operations regardless of the proceeds from our initial public offering. To the extent that we require financing for our operations, including to finance our EB-5 loans, the failure to obtain necessary financing may impair our ability to continue in operations.

Our failure to control our costs could impair our financial results.

 Our cost of revenues and our operating expenses increased significantly both in U.S. dollars and as a percentage of revenues. Unless we are able to reduce both our cost of revenues and our operating costs, we will not be able to operate profitably. There are many factors beyond our control that may affect our costs, such as the price of components, cost of labor and the availability of warehouse and office space at reasonable rents as well as the effect of competition, and recently, inflation. Unless we are able to control our costs, we will not be able to operate profitably. We cannot assure you that we can or will ever operate profitably.

We require significant funds to pay our debt obligations, including obligations to management.

Our debt obligations at December 31, 2023 include $17.0 million in loans from related party limited partnerships which were funded by EB-5 investments, and $16.25 million on 4% convertible notes issued to former partners of the limited partnerships.  Further, to the extent that we use funds from the proceeds of our initial public offering to pay our debt obligations, we will not have funds available for other uses, including the development of our China segment or the re-introduction of our financing activities in the United States. In addition to our current debt, we owed our chief executive officers and our former executive vice president and one other former employee a total of  $1,275,000 in connection with our repurchase of their stock, and we owed our former executive vice president approximately $0.3 million pursuant to her severance agreement, all of which were due following completion of the initial public offering. Subsequent to the initial public offering, we paid $600,000 of the $1,275,000 owed in connection with our repurchase of stock to our former executive vice president and one other former employee. We also paid the balance owed to our former executive vice president pursuant to her severance agreement.  We agreed to pay our chief executive officer a total of $675,000 owed to him in connection with our repurchase of his stock in twelve equal monthly installments, commencing on February 27, 2025. Our inability to obtain any financing we require could materially impair our ability to develop our business and to operate profitably.

Changes in utility regulations and pricing could impair the market for our products.

The market for alternative energy products is affected by utility regulation and pricing policies. Changes in regulations or pricing could result in a significant reduction in the demand for solar products. Depending on the region, electricity generated by solar energy systems competes most effectively with expensive peak-hour electricity from the electric grid, rather than the less expensive average price of electricity. Modifications to the utility companies’ peak hour pricing policies affect the competitive nature of our systems. To the extent that we have to lower prices, the profitability of our systems could be impaired. In addition, any changes to government or internal utility regulations and policies that favor electric utilities could reduce our competitiveness and cause a significant reduction in demand for our products and services.

Changes in net metering regulations in California is likely to result in a reduced level of benefits, which is impairing the market for residential solar products.

Net metering is a billing mechanism that credits solar energy system owners for the electricity that they add to the electricity grid. If the owner of a solar system generates more electricity than it consumes, the excess electricity is sold back to the grid. California’s first net metering policy set a “cap” for the three investor-owned utility companies in the state: Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E), San Diego Gas & Electric (SDG&E), and Southern California Edison (SCE). All three have reached their cap where total solar installations in each utility’s territory were capped at five percent of total peak electricity demand. The California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) created the current program known as “Net Metering 2.0” (NEM 2.0) that extends California net metering. NEM 2.0 is slightly different from the first net metering policy. Under NEM 2.0, customers will still receive the retail credit for electricity produced but will be required to pay more in Non-Bypassable Charges. NEM 2.0 also requires new solar customers to pay a one-time Interconnection Application Fee, the amount of which is dependent upon the utility company. For systems under 1MW this fee is $132 for San Diego Gas & Electric, $145 for Pacific Gas& Electric, and $75 for Southern California Edison. NEM 2.0 customers are also required to use Time of Use (ToU) rates. The California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) has adopted NEM 3.0 which establishes the successor to NEM 2.0 in California. NEM 3.0 features a 75% reduction in export rates (the value of excess electricity pushed onto the grid by solar systems), thereby reducing the overall savings and increasing the payback period of home solar installations. The changes under NEM 3.0 are likely to result in reduced benefits for most residential solar users and could alter the return on investment for solar customers.

To the extent that utility companies are not required to purchase excess electricity from owners of solar systems or are permitted to lower the amounts paid, the market for solar systems may be impaired. Because net metering can enable the solar system owner to further reduce the cost of electricity by selling excess electricity to the utility company, any elimination or reduction of this benefit would reduce the cost savings from solar energy. The recent changes in California’s net metering payments are reducing the market for residential solar installations to the extent that the installation of the homeowner’s decision to install a solar system is based on the benefits of the net metering structure, which has been modified to reduce the benefits to the home owner. We cannot assure you that net metering will not be eliminated or the benefits significantly reduced for future solar systems, which may dampen the market for solar energy or that our sales, particularly for residential units, will not be impaired.

Our business may be affected by increases in the price of solar energy products, including price increases resulting from the United States’ trade and tariff policies.

The declining cost of solar panels has been a key factor in the pricing of our solar energy systems, which, in turn affects the potential customer’s decision to use solar energy. With any stabilization or increase of solar panel and other component prices, our ability to market our solar energy systems could be impaired, which would affect our revenues and gross profit. The cost of solar panels and raw materials could increase in the future due to tariff penalties or other factors. The U.S. government has imposed tariffs on solar cells, solar panels and aluminum used in solar panels manufactured overseas. These tariffs have increased the price of solar panels containing foreign manufactured solar cells. At present, we purchase solar panels containing solar cells and panels manufactured overseas for our United States installations. While solar panels containing solar cells manufactured inside the United States are not subject to these tariffs, the prices of these solar panels are, and may continue to be, more expensive than panels produced using overseas solar cells, before giving effect to the tariff penalties and the tariff policies may result in an increase in prices of domestic products. If additional tariffs are imposed or other negotiated outcomes occur, our ability to purchase these products on competitive terms from those countries could be limited. Any of those events could impair our financial results if we incur the cost of trade penalties or purchase solar panels or other system components from alternative, higher-priced sources.

We may be subject to cybersecurity risks.

We face significant and persistent cybersecurity risks due to the need to protect both our business generally and any transaction which we are considering or with respect to which we are in negotiation, as well as the need to protect the confidentiality of information concerning our personnel and others with whom we conduct business. We face threats from bad actors who seek to disrupt our business as well as others who are engaging in malicious activities for profit, to make a political point or for no particular reason other than creating disruption. Disclosure of certain information as a result of a cybersecurity breach may result is a breach of privacy laws. The substantial level of harm that could occur to us and those with whom we conduct business were we to suffer impacts of a material cybersecurity incident requires us to maintain robust governance and oversight of these risks and to implement mechanisms, controls, technologies, and processes designed to help us assess, identify, and manage these risks.

While we have not, as of the date of this annual report, experienced a cybersecurity threat or incident, we cannot assure you that we will not experience such an incident in the future. Any cybersecurity incidents, whether or not successful, could result in our incurring additional costs related to, for example, rebuilding our internal systems, implementing additional threat protection measures, responding to regulatory inquiries or actions, paying damages or making payments to obtain access to our computer systems, or taking other remedial steps with respect to third parties. We cannot assure you that the steps we are taking will not be successful in preventing a cybersecurity breach, that we will not suffer cybersecurity breaches or that we will not incur significant expenses in seeking to deal with the consequences of any attempted or successful cybersecurity breaches or that, if we suffer a material cybersecurity breach that we will be able to continue in business following such breach.

We may be subject to liability if private information that we receive is not secure or if we violate privacy laws and regulations.

We are or may become subject to a variety of laws and regulations in the United States and abroad regarding privacy, data security, cybersecurity and data protection. These laws and regulations are continuously evolving and developing. The scope and interpretation of the laws that are or may be applicable to us are often uncertain and may be conflicting, particularly with respect to foreign laws. In particular, there are numerous United States federal, state, and local laws and regulations and foreign laws and regulations regarding privacy and the collection, sharing, use, processing, disclosure, and protection of personal information and other user data. Such laws and regulations often vary in scope, may be subject to differing interpretations, and may be inconsistent among different jurisdictions.

In June 2018, California adopted the California Consumer Privacy Act (“CCPA”), which became effective in 2020. Under the law, any California consumer has a right to demand to see all the information a company has saved on the consumer, as well as a full list of all the third parties that data is shared with. The consumer also has the right to request that a company delete the information it has on the consumer. The CCPA broadly defines “protected data.” The CCPA also has specific requirements for companies subject to the law. The CCPA provides for a private right of action for unauthorized access, theft or disclosure of personal information in certain situations, with possible damage awards of $100 to $750 per consumer per incident, or actual damages, whichever is greater. The CCPA also permits class action lawsuits.

In November 2016, the Standing Committee of China’s National People’s Congress passed China’s first Cybersecurity Law (“CSL”), which became effective in June 2017. The CSL is the first Chinese law that systematically lays out the regulatory requirements on cybersecurity and data protection, subjecting many previously under-regulated or unregulated activities in cyberspace to government scrutiny. The legal consequences of violation of the CSL include penalties of warning, confiscation of illegal income, suspension of related business, winding up for rectification, shutting down the websites, and revocation of business license or relevant permits. The costs of compliance with, and other burdens imposed by, CSL may limit the use and adoption of our products and services and could have an adverse impact on our business. 

The European Union Parliament approved a new data protection regulation, known as the General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”), which came into effect in May 2018. The GDPR includes operational requirements for companies that receive or process personal data of residents of the European Economic Area. The GDPR imposes significant penalties for non-compliance. Although we do not conduct any business in the European Economic Area, in the event that residents of the European Economic Area access our website and input protected information, we may become subject to provisions of the GDPR.

We are also subject to laws restricting disclosure of information relating to our employees. We strive to comply with all applicable laws, policies, legal obligations, and industry codes of conduct relating to privacy, data security, cybersecurity and data protection. However, given that the scope, interpretation, and application of these laws and regulations are often uncertain and may be conflicting, it is possible that these obligations may be interpreted and applied in a manner that is inconsistent from one jurisdiction to another and may conflict with other rules or our practices. Any failure or perceived failure by us or our third-party service-providers to comply with our privacy or security policies or privacy-related legal obligations, or any compromise of security that results in the unauthorized release or transfer of personally identifiable information or other user data, may result in governmental enforcement actions, litigation, or negative publicity, and could have an adverse effect on our business and operating results. Although we maintain cybersecurity insurance, we cannot assure you that this insurance will cover or satisfy any claim made against us or adequately cover any defense costs we may incur.

In addition, we are required to report security breaches and describe steps we are taking to address potential cybersecurity threats.

Our business would be impaired if we lose our licenses, if more stringent government regulations are enacted or if we fail to comply with the growing number of regulations pertaining to solar energy and consumer financing industries.

Our business is subject to numerous federal and state laws and regulations. The installation of solar energy systems performed by us is subject to oversight and regulation under local ordinances, building, zoning and fire codes, environmental protection regulation, utility interconnection requirements, and other rules and regulations. If we engage in financing transactions through SolarMax Financial, we will be subject to numerous consumer credit and financing regulations. The consumer protection laws, among other things:

Our Chinese subsidiary ZHPV holds a construction enterprise qualification certificate for Level III of general contractor for power engineering constructor issued on December 18, 2022, which permits ZHPV to conduct business as a contractor in power engineering construction. The qualification expires on June 30, 2024. The failure of ZHPV to hold this certificate would impair our ability both to negotiate contracts and to perform our obligations under any contracts we may have with customers. The number of laws affecting both aspects of our business continues to grow. We can give no assurances that we will properly and timely comply with all laws and regulations that may affect us. If we fail to comply with these laws and regulations, we may be subject to civil and criminal penalties. In addition, non-compliance with certain consumer disclosure requirements related to home solicitation sales and home improvement contract sales affords residential customers with a right to rescind such contracts in some jurisdictions, including California.

A material decrease in the retail price of electricity from the local utility company or from other sources would affect our ability to generate revenues.

We believe that a customer’s decision to buy a solar energy system from it is primarily driven by a desire to pay less for electricity. Decreases in the retail prices of electricity from utility companies or other renewable energy sources, which is not likely in the foreseeable future as a result of climbing energy prices, would impair our ability to offer competitive pricing which would, in turn, affect our ability both to generate revenue and to maintain gross margins. The price of electricity from utility companies could decrease as a result of such factors as a reduction in the price of oil or natural gas as a result of new drilling techniques or a relaxation of associated regulatory standards; the development of energy conservation technologies and public initiatives to reduce electricity consumption; the construction of a significant number of new power generation plants, including nuclear, natural gas or renewable energy technologies.

Changes in regulations relating to fossil fuel can impact the market for renewable energy, including solar.

The market for renewable energy in general and solar energy in particular is affected by regulations relating to the use of fossil fuel and the encouragement of renewable energy. To the extent that changes in regulations have the effect of reducing the cost of gas, oil and coal or encouraging the use of such fuels, the market for solar systems may be impaired.

A material decline in the price of electricity charged by the local utility company to commercial users may impair our ability to attract commercial customers.

Often large commercial customers pay less for energy from utility companies than residential customers. To the extent that utility companies offer commercial customers a lower rate for electricity, they may be less willing to switch to solar energy. Under such conditions, we may be unable to offer solar energy systems in commercial markets that produce electricity at rates that are competitive with the price of retail electricity they are able to obtain from the local utility company. In such event, we would be at a competitive disadvantage compared to the local utility company and may be unable to attract new commercial customers, which would impact our revenues.

Solar energy and other forms of renewable energy compete with other forms of energy and the attractiveness of solar energy reflects the cost of electricity from the local grid.

Solar energy competes with other all other forms of energy, including, particularly local utility companies, whose pricing structure effectively determines the market for solar energy. If consumers, whether residential or commercial, believe that they are paying and will continue to pay too much for electricity from a local utility company, they may consider other alternatives, including alternative providers of electricity from local utility companies as well as forms of renewable energy. If they are in a location where, because of the climate and geography, solar energy is a possibility, they may consider solar energy as an alternative, provided they are satisfied that they will receive a net savings in their cost of electricity and their system will provide them with a constant source of energy. Further, although some customers may purchase a solar energy system because of environmental considerations, we believe that the cost of electricity is the crucial factor that influences the decision of a user, particularly a commercial user, to elect to use solar energy.

Within the solar energy market, we face intense and increasing competition in the market of solar energy system providers, which exposes us to the risk of reduction of our market penetration and/or of our profit margins.

The solar energy system installation market is highly and increasingly competitive. The number of new solar energy installation businesses that have entered the industry in California has almost doubled since 2008 when we commenced business. We compete with major companies in the solar business, particularly in California, as well as a large number of small companies. The solar energy industry may continue to expand and possibly consolidate. We may continue to encounter increasing competition from larger companies that have greater resources than we and which would enjoy more economies of scale and greater name recognition than we have. Further, increasing competition may also lead to an excessive supply of solar energy installation services on the market which could continue to affect both our ability to generate revenue as well as our gross margin. To the extent that our ability to provide financing to our customers is an important element in selling our systems, we will compete with both other solar companies that provide financing and with banks, leasing companies and other businesses that seek to offer financing alternatives to purchasers of solar systems.  Since early 2020, because we did not have the capital to support such operations, we suspended making loans to our solar customers.

The results of our operations may vary significantly from quarter to quarter.

In our experience in the United States, consumers generally, and residential customers in particular, express interest in a solar energy system during March and April, when they are preparing their tax returns, and in July and August, when they experience high electricity charges from the local utility company. Since the selling cycle is typically three to four months, we generally install systems two to three months after the contract date, and we recognize revenue using a cost-based input method that recognizes revenue as work is performed. If we cannot complete a sale to a customer when the customer expresses interest in a solar system, that potential customer may seek alternative sources. Factors which may cause our quarterly results to fluctuate include:

The results of our China operations may also vary significantly from quarter to quarter since revenue from our China operations is dependent upon both the timing of contracts and the timing of our work and the completion of our obligations on projects for which we have contracts. Changes in revenue and the results of operations from our China segment from quarter to quarter may have a negative effect on our net income and the market for and price of our common stock. The last year in which we generated revenue from our China segment was 2021, and all of our revenue in that year was generated in the second quarter.  We had no revenue from the China segment for 2022, 2023 and 2024 through the date of this annual report, and we have no contracts in place for us to perform any services in China.

Because we are dependent on our chief executive officer and the head of our China operations, the loss of their services and our failure to hire additional qualified key personnel could harm our business.

Our business is largely dependent upon the continued efforts of one of our founders and our chief executive officer, David Hsu. Our operations in China are dependent upon Mr. Hsu and Bin Lu, who is the head of our China operations. Although we have an employment agreement with Mr. Hsu, and SolarMax Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. has an employment agreement with Mr. Lu, these agreements do not guarantee that Mr. Hsu or Mr. Lu will continue to work for us. The loss of Mr. Hsu could affect our ability to operate profitably in both the United States and China and, depending upon the nature of the termination of their relationship, could result in substantial severance payments which we may have difficulty in funding. The loss of Mr. Lu could have a material adverse effect upon our ability to develop and operate our business in China; however, if we are unable to develop significant business in China, we may be unable to retain Mr. Lu. Because our senior management is based in the United States, our failure to develop senior management personnel in China may strain our management resources and make it difficult for our corporate management to monitor both the China operations and United States operations efficiently. Our failure to have qualified executive personnel in China who can operate in accordance with and implement our business plan and who understand and can comply with applicable United States and Chinese laws and regulations may impair our ability to generate revenue and operating income from the China segment, which could impair our overall operations and financial condition.

In order to develop our business, we need to identify, hire and retain qualified sales, installation and other personnel in both the United States and China.

To develop our business, we need to hire, train, deploy, manage and retain a substantial number of skilled employees, including sales, installation and other employees and marketing and, if we engage in financing activities, lending personnel for these activities. Identifying, recruiting and training qualified personnel requires significant time, expense and attention. If we are unable to hire, develop and retain qualified personnel or if our personnel are unable to achieve the desired level of productivity for a reasonable period of time, we may have difficulty in developing our business. Competition for qualified personnel in the solar industry is increasing, particularly for skilled installers and other personnel involved in the installation of solar energy systems. We also compete with the homebuilding and construction industries for skilled labor. As these industries recover and seek to hire additional workers, our cost of labor may increase. The unionization of our United States labor force could also increase our labor costs. Shortages of skilled labor could significantly delay a project or otherwise increase costs. Because our profit on a particular installation is based in part on assumptions as to the cost of such project, cost overruns, delays or other execution issues may cause us to not achieve our expected margins or cover our costs for that project. In addition, we compete for a limited pool of technical and engineering resources in both the United States and China that requires us to pay wages that are competitive with relatively high regional standards for employees in these fields. We not only compete for highly qualified personnel, but we also face other companies seeking to hire our personnel, particularly our highly skilled personnel. If we cannot meet our hiring, retention and efficiency goals, we may be unable to complete the customers’ projects on time, in an acceptable manner, if at all. Any significant failures in this regard would materially impair our growth, reputation, business and financial results. If we are required to pay higher compensation than we anticipate, the increased cost may adversely impact our financial results and our ability to develop our business.

Although our employees in the United States are co-employed by a professional employer organization, we may be liable for the failure of the organization to comply with our obligations under applicable law.

We contract with a professional employer organization, or PEO, that administers our human resources, payroll and employee benefits functions for our United States employees. Although we recruit and select our personnel, our United States employees are co-employed by the PEO and us. Pursuant to the agreement with the PEO, our United States personnel are compensated through the PEO, receive their W-2s from the PEO and are governed by the personnel policies of the PEO. This relationship permits management to focus on our operations rather than human resource administration, but this relationship also exposes us to some risks. Among other risks, if the PEO fails to adequately withhold or pay employer taxes or to comply with other laws, such as the Fair Labor Standards Act, the Family and Medical Leave Act, the Employee Retirement Income Security Act or state and federal anti-discrimination laws, health and safety laws, sexual harassment laws and laws protecting the security of employee information, all of which are outside of our control, we would be liable for such violations, and the indemnification provisions of our agreement with the PEO, if applicable, may not be sufficient to insulate us from those liabilities. Court and administrative proceedings related to these matters could distract management from our business and cause us to incur significant expense. If we were held liable for violations by the PEO of applicable laws, such liability may adversely affect our business and the results of our operations and our cash flow.

Since we act as a general contractor in the United States, we face typical risks of a construction company.

We act as the licensed contractor for our United States customers and are subject to risks associated with construction, cost overruns, delays, regulatory compliance and other contingencies, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations. For our residential projects, it is the general contractor, construction manager and installer. For our commercial projects, we are the general contractor and construction manager, and we typically rely on licensed subcontractors to support some of our solar panel installations. In either case we are responsible for the completion of the project and must take steps to make sure that we and our subcontractors comply with all applicable laws and regulations. We may be liable to customers for any damage we cause to their home or facility, or belongings or property during the installation of our systems. In addition, shortages of skilled labor for our commercial projects could significantly delay a project or otherwise increase costs. Because our profit on a particular installation is based in part on assumptions we make as to the cost of such project, cost overruns, delays or other execution issues may impair our ability to generate the gross margins that we are seeking. In addition, the installation of solar energy systems and the evaluation and modification of buildings as part of our energy efficiency business is subject to oversight and regulation in accordance with national, state and local laws and ordinances relating to building codes, safety, environmental protection, utility interconnection and metering, and related matters. It is difficult and costly to track the requirements of every individual authority with jurisdiction over our installations and to design solar energy systems to comply with these varying standards. Any new government regulations or utility policies pertaining to our systems may result in significant additional expenses to us and our customers and, as a result, could cause a significant reduction in demand for our systems.

If we engage in financing activities, our failure to adequately assess credit risks for financing the sale of our systems in the United States could impair our ability to operate profitably.

We provided financing to our customers through SolarMax Financial until early 2020, when we ceased such operations because we did not have sufficient capital to fund these operations.  The principal amount of our loan portfolio was $6.8 million at December 31, 2023 and $10.6 million at December 31, 2022. All of our financing revenue relates to loans made prior to early 2020.  We do not have significant experience with loans to customers to evaluate the effectiveness of our credit criteria. If we try to meet financing terms of competitors, we may have to reduce our financing criteria, which could increase the possibility of default by the customers. Residential customers could be more adversely impacted during economic slowdowns or recessions, which could affect their ability or willingness to pay. Our failure to collect any significant portion of our customer loan receivables or the need to place a significant reserve against these receivables could materially impair our financial condition and the results of our operations. We cannot assure you that we will not incur significant losses on our customer loan portfolio.

Although we file UCC-1 financing statements in connection with our loans, we may have difficulty in generating any money in the event that we foreclose on a defaulting customer. The foreclosure process could be time-consuming and collection is uncertain, particularly if the customer seeks protection under applicable bankruptcy or insolvency laws. Additionally, any defects in the filing of the financing statements could impair the validity of our security interest. Unless the subsequent owner of the building on which the solar power system is located is willing to assume the obligations with respect to the system on terms acceptable to us, we would incur substantial costs in removing and reselling the system. Further, even if we are able to remove the system, the components may not be saleable at their book value, if at all. Our failure to collect the amount due under the customer loan agreements would materially impair our financial condition and the results of our operations.

Compliance with occupational safety and health requirements and best practices can be costly, and noncompliance with such requirements may result in potentially significant monetary penalties, operational delays and adverse publicity.

The installation of solar energy systems requires employees to work at heights with complicated and potentially dangerous electrical systems. The evaluation and modification of buildings as part of our energy efficiency business requires our employees to work in locations that may contain potentially dangerous levels of asbestos, lead or mold. There is substantial risk of serious injury or death if proper safety procedures are not followed. Our operations are subject to regulation under the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Act, or OSHA, and equivalent state laws. Changes to federal or state OSHA requirements, or stricter interpretation or enforcement of existing laws or regulations, could result in increased costs. If we fail to comply with applicable OSHA regulations, even if no work-related serious injury or death occurs, we may be subject to civil or criminal enforcement and be required to pay substantial penalties, incur significant capital expenditures, or suspend or limit operations. Any such accidents, citations, violations, injuries or failure to comply with industry best practices may subject us to adverse publicity, damage our reputation and competitive position and adversely affect our business.

The availability and price of silicon raw materials may affect our gross margins and profitability.

Polysilicon is an essential raw material in the production of solar power products. The costs of silicon wafers and other silicon-based raw materials have accounted for a large portion of the costs associated with solar panels. Although the price of silicon had declined in recent years, recent increases in the price of polysilicon in the past have resulted in increases in the price of wafers, leading to increases solar panel costs. Due to the volatile market prices, we cannot assure you that the price of polysilicon will remain at its current levels particularly in view of inflationary pressures, especially if the global solar power market gains its growth momentum. Moreover, in the event of an industry-wide shortage of polysilicon, we may experience late or non-delivery from suppliers and it may be necessary for us to purchase silicon raw materials of lower quality that may result in lower efficiencies and reduce our average selling prices and revenues.

Our business is subject to the effects of inflation and has been subject to supply chain issues.

Prior to mid-to-late 2021, our business was not impacted by inflation or supply chain issues. With the recent inflationary pressures, our business is subject to the inflationary pressures are affecting many domestic and foreign companies.

The effects of inflation and supply side issues with respect to polysilicon are described in the preceding risk factor.

The effects of inflation may also affect the marketability of our solar systems to residential users.  In our United States segment, our cost of revenue per watt of solar systems, which made up approximately 80% of our cost of revenues, increased approximately 12% during the first half of 2022 compared to the same period a year ago.  In the third quarter of 2022, we were able to obtain panels at a lower cost and our cost of revenue per watt of solar systems was equal to our cost per revenue per watt in the third quarter of 2021.  There is no assurance we can continue to source panels at more favorable prices. We have increased the price of solar system installations in our United States segment to offset this increase in cost beginning in the first half of 2022 and continuing through the date of this annual report.  The increase in prices due to inflation may also affect the marketability of our solar systems in the United States.  To the extent that homeowners are incurring high expenses generally, they may have less available cash to invest in a solar system.  Although we do not have any data as to the effect of higher utility costs on purchases of solar systems, it has been our experience during 2022 and 2023 that, as inflationary pressures are increasing the cost of electricity generally, our domestic business has grown as homeowners are seeking alternatives to what they see as high utility bills.  As a result, we have been able to increase our prices which has reduced the effect of increased prices of raw materials.  Although we did suffer a decline in gross margin in 2022  as a result of the increase in the cost of raw materials, which was mitigated in the third quarter of 2022 as a result of obtaining favorable pricing on solar panels, the reduction in margin was reduced because we were able to increase prices.  In 2023, our unit cost of revenue increased by 15%, which was partially offset by an increase in unit price of 8%. However, competitive factors limit the amount we can increase our prices, but our price increases have reduced what would otherwise have been a greater decline in gross margin.  We are seeking to reduce the effect of increased prices in raw materials by purchasing in greater quantities.  However, to the extent inflation continues or increases, we may not be able to raise prices sufficient to prevent a significant decline in our gross margins and the results of our operations, and if our prices are too high, the residential customer may not see the value of installing our solar system. 

Estimated compensation costs per employee for sales, marketing and administrative personnel in our United States segment increased approximately 16% for the year ended December 31, 2023 compared to the year ended December 31, 2022, and approximately 12% during the year ended December 31, 2022 compared to 2021 in response to the increased cost of retaining and attracting talent, and such costs may continue to increase as labor costs in California continue to increase as a result of the inflationary pressures. In addition, to the extent that inflationary pressure affects our cost of revenue and general overhead, we may face the choice of raising prices to try and maintain our margins or reduce or maintain our price structure to meet competition which would result in a lower gross margin and a drop in operating income.

Our China segment is already feeling the effects of both inflation and supply chain issues.  Our China segment had a 0% gross margin for the year ended December 31, 2021 because our cost of revenue for one of our projects with SPIC was significantly adjusted as a result of the unanticipated increase in costs, particularly the panel costs, which resulted in a significant adjustment in cost which essentially reversed the profit that was recognized in 2020 for the project.  We were not able to raise our price to cover the additional costs.  During the year ended December 31, 2022, our China operations did not generate any revenue as a result of the temporary halt of construction on certain projects, resulting both from the local holidays and our inability to acquire the solar panels for the project at the budgeted price due to the local supply chain issues and the absence of new projects. Since the second quarter of 2020, the prices of the solar panels in China have been increasing due to the tight supply in the local market. We did not generate revenue from our China segment in the year ended December 31, 2023; however, panel prices have moderated and we continue to pursue new solar construction projects in our China segment. We cannot assure you that, if we are able to negotiate contracts with SPIC, that we will be able to accurately price our costs, with the risk that inflationary and supply side issues will not result on our generating a loss on any projects for we contract.

Because we derive most of our United States revenue from sales of our solar energy systems in California, we depend on the economic and regulatory climate and weather and other conditions in California.

We currently derive most of our United States revenue from solar energy projects in the United States from California. This geographic concentration exposes us more to government regulations, economic conditions, weather conditions, earthquakes, mudslides, fire, including wildfires, power outages, and other natural disasters and effects of climate change, and changes affecting California than if we operated in more states.  We cannot predict the effect of the recent heavy rains and flooding in California will have on both the market for solar systems in California and on our business in particular and on our ability to solar systems in a timely manner.  Any inability to install solar systems in a timely manner, whether because of heavy rain or flooding or other causes will also affect the timing of our revenue flow.

Because we provide a production guarantee for some solar systems in California, we may incur additional costs if the output of our systems does not meet the required minimums.

Commencing in 2015, our standard contract for residential systems provides for a production guarantee, which means that we guarantee that the system would generate a specified minimum amount of solar energy during a year. The agreements generally have a term specified in the contract, which is generally ten years. In our standard contract, we specify a minimum annual production and provide that if the power generated by the system is less than 95% of the estimate, we will reimburse the owner for the cost of the shortfall. Because our obligations are not contingent upon external factors, such as sunlight, changes in weather patterns or increases in air pollution, unusual rain, flooding and wildfires and other factors could affect the amount of solar power that is generated and could increase our exposure under the production guarantee. Although our obligations under these agreements have not been significant through December 31, 2023, we cannot assure you that in the future any obligations we have under these agreements will not have a material adverse effect upon our revenue and the results of our operations. Although we believe that the conditions relating to those installations were unique and that we have taken corrective action, we cannot assure you that we will not have unanticipated liability in the future for the failure of systems to comply with applicable production guarantees regardless of the cause of such failure.

As of December 31, 2023, we did not maintain adequate internal controls over financial accounting and reporting as is required for a public company, and there are limitations on the effectiveness of such controls, and a failure of our control systems to prevent error or fraud may materially harm us and represent a material weakness in our internal controls over financial reporting.

At December 31, 2023, we were a privately owned company and not subject to the provisions of Sarbanes-Oxley Act, which require the establishment and maintenance of internal controls over financial accounting and reporting for a public company.  As a result, at December 31, 2023, we had not established effective internal controls over financial accounting and reporting.  Since prior to the completion of our initial public offering and a Nasdaq listing, on February 29, 2024, we have taken steps toward the establishment of internal controls and disclosure controls.  However, we may be unable to establish effective internal controls. The failure to establish internal controls would leave us without the ability to properly recognize revenues and account for important transactions accurately, and to reliably assimilate and compile our financial information and significantly impair our ability to prevent error and detect fraud. Moreover, we do not expect that disclosure controls or internal control over financial reporting, even if established, will prevent all error and fraud. A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the control system’s objectives will be met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, have been detected. Failure of our control systems to prevent error or fraud could materially adversely impact us. Implementing any appropriate changes to our internal controls may require specific compliance training of our directors and employees, including the employees of our China segment, entail substantial costs in order to modify our existing accounting systems, take a significant period of time to complete and divert management’s attention from other business concerns. These changes may not, however, be effective in developing or maintaining internal control. If we are unable to conclude that we have effective internal controls over financial reporting, investors may lose confidence in our operating results, the price of the common stock could decline and we may be subject to litigation or regulatory enforcement actions. In addition, if we are unable to meet the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, our common stock may not be able to remain listed on the Nasdaq Stock Market.

Our warranty costs may exceed our warranty reserve.

We provide warranties to the clients of our EPC services for one year in China and for ten years to the purchasers of our solar systems in the United States. Although we generally pass the warranties from our equipment suppliers to the purchasers of the systems, we provide the warranty with respect to our installation and related services. We maintain a warranty reserve on our financial statements, and our warranty claims may exceed the warranty reserve. Any significant warranty expenses could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. Our warranty expenses relating to systems with a production guarantee may be affected by significant changes in weather conditions which substantially reduce sun exposure. Significant warranty problems could impair our reputation which could result in lower revenue and a lower gross margin. Although we believe that the problems associated with the systems installed for the leasing company do not apply to our present solar systems, we cannot assure you that we will not incur unanticipated warranty costs in the future.

Because of the rapid development of solar panels and other components for solar systems, we may be subject to inventory obsolescence.

The solar industry has seen rapid technological development. We have an inventory of raw materials that include silicon wafers and other consumables and construction materials used in solar system installations. We evaluate our inventory on a quarterly basis for excess and obsolete inventory, based on assumptions as to market demand, market conditions and technological developments. We cannot assure you that we will not incur significant inventory write-offs resulting from obsolete inventory.

If we seek to expand our business through acquisition, we may not be successful in identifying acquisition targets or integrating their businesses with our existing business.

In 2013 and 2015, we acquired three companies, LED in the United States in 2013 and two companies in China. In 2015, we incurred impairment losses in connection with the LED acquisition, resulting in impairment write-offs relating to the goodwill associated with the acquisition. There are significant risks associated with any acquisition program, including, but not limited to, the following:

If any of these risks occur, our business, financial condition and prospects may be impaired.

Our China segment requires significant funding in connection with project construction.

To the extent that our China segment enters into project construction agreements with SPIC or other parties, we will have substantial funding requirements for project construction.  In 2020, we obtained construction financing of $23.0 million for one project for SPIC and in 2019, we obtained construction financings of $31.0 million for two projects for SPIC.  The financings in 2020 and 2019 were the obligations of the project subsidiaries which were owned by us and consolidated by us when the financings were issued but were subsequently deconsolidated when the controlling interest in the project companies were sold to SPIC, and the obligations relating to the funding remained the obligation of the project subsidiary.  As a result of transfer of control of the project subsidiary, we deconsolidated the subsidiary upon transfer of control.  If we enter into project construction agreements, we will need to obtain project financing.  Our failure to obtain such financing on reasonable terms will adversely affect both our operations and our ability to enter into project construction agreements.  As a result, if we are not able to obtain the necessary project financing, we may need to use a portion of our initial public offering for such purchase if we are to continue to engage in project construction in China.  We cannot assure you that we will be able to obtain the necessary financing or that we will be able to operate profitably, if at all, in China.

We may not be successful in developing our solar farm project business in China.

In order to conduct the solar farm project business in China, we will need to:

In the event that we are not able to satisfy any of these conditions, we may not be able to generate revenue from our China operations, and it may be necessary for us to suspend or terminate these operations. Further, the development of solar projects also may be adversely affected by many other factors outside of our control, such as inclement weather, acts of God, and delays in regulatory approvals or in third parties’ delivery of equipment or other materials, shortages of skilled labor and the effect of China’s zero tolerance COVID-19 policy. We cannot assure you that we will be able to engage in the solar farm business successfully. Our failure to operate this business successfully will materially impair our financial condition and the results of our operations.

Delays in construction of solar farms could increase our costs and impair our revenue stream from our China operations.

We generally seek to obtain permits and construct solar farms for our end user customers to whom we sell the projects. We incur significant costs prior to completion, and the contracts with the end user typically have a completion schedule. Any delay would delay our receipt of payment from the customer as well as our recognition of revenue from the project. If the delay is significant, it could result in penalties under the contract or a refusal of the customer to pay the stated purchase price or any interim payments that are due under the contract. Delays can result from a number of factors, many of which are beyond our control, and include, but are not limited to:

Our business in the United States is largely dependent upon government subsidies and incentives.

The solar energy industry depends on the continued effectiveness of various government subsidies and tax incentive programs existing at the federal and state level to encourage the adoption of solar power. Government policies, in the form of both regulation and incentives, have accelerated the adoption of solar technologies by businesses and consumers. We and our customers benefit from these regulations in the form of federal tax incentives, state utility rebates and depreciation. Because of the high cost of installing solar energy systems, the existence of tax incentives as well as regulations requiring utility companies to purchase excess power from solar energy systems connected to the grid are important incentives to the installation of a solar energy system. Should any of the incentives be discontinued or materially reduced, our business and the results of our operations may be impaired.

United States trade policy affects our ability to purchase domestic solar panel.

One of the effects of the United States tariffs on imported solar panels, including solar panel from China, is an increased demand for products manufactured in the United States which may affect both our ability to purchase solar panels and the price and other terms at which solar panels are available to us. Our inability to obtain domestically produced solar panels at a reasonable cost can impair our ability to generate revenue and maintain reasonable gross margins.

Risks Related to Doing Business in China

Changes in the PRC Government policies on solar power and industry conditions as well as changes in the trade relationship between the United States and China could affect our ability to generate business in China.

Our ability to develop business in China is dependent upon the continuation of government policies relating to solar power and the relationship between the solar farm owner and the local utility company. Any changes in the policies or practices that affect the solar power industry could make the construction and operation of a solar farm less desirable. Although our China subsidiary is a licensed EPC contractor in China, changes in the law or regulations could make it difficult or more expensive for us to maintain our license. Delays in payments from the utility companies or difficulties in connecting with the grid could also make solar farms less attractive. Any regulations or practices that give preference to a China business rather than a subsidiary of a United States business or which would require us to devote a portion of our profit for local uses would also make it more difficult or more expensive to operate our business. We cannot assure you that changes in law or practices will not impair our ability to conduct our business in China. Further, any deterioration in the relationship between the United States and China on trade and related matters may impair our ability to obtain permits for solar farms and to enter into EPC and other agreements for solar farms in China.

Neither we nor our PRC subsidiaries were required to obtain permissions from Chinese authorities for our initial public offering to foreign investors. However, if the CSRC or another PRC regulatory body subsequently determines that their approval was needed for the offering, we cannot predict whether we will be able to obtain such approval. As a result, we face uncertainty about future actions by the PRC government that could significantly affect our ability to offer, or continue to offer, securities to investors and cause the value of our securities to significantly decline or be worthless.

As of the date of this annual report, our PRC subsidiaries have not been involved in any investigations on cybersecurity review initiated by the Cyberspace Administration of China based on the Cybersecurity Review Measures, and our PRC subsidiaries have not received any inquiry, notice, warning, sanctions in such respect or any regulatory objections to our initial public offering. As of the date of this annual report, recent regulatory actions by China’s government related to data security or anti-monopoly have not materially impacted our ability to conduct our business, accept foreign investments or list on a U.S. or other foreign exchanges. Based on existing PRC laws and regulations, neither we nor our PRC subsidiaries are currently subject to any pre-approval requirement from the CAC to operate our business or conduct a public offering, subject to PRC government’s interpretation and implementation of the Cybersecurity Review Measures.

On July 6, 2021, the relevant PRC government authorities published the Opinions on Strictly Cracking Down Illegal Securities Activities in Accordance with the Law. These opinions call for strengthened regulation over illegal securities activities and supervision on overseas listings by China-based companies and propose to take effective measures, such as promoting the construction of relevant regulatory systems to deal with the risks and incidents faced by China-based overseas-listed companies. As of the date of this annual report, no official guidance or related implementation rules have been issued in relation to these recently issued opinions and the interpretation and implementation of these opinions remain unclear at this stage. On December 24, 2021, the CSRC, issued the Administration Provisions and the Measures. On February 17, 2023, the CSRC released the Trial Measures and five supporting guidelines. The new regulations require PRC Companies to make certain filings with the CSRC. The new regulations authorize the CSRC to review such fillings, penalize relevant PRC Companies or people in charge, or report to overseas securities regulatory institutions in case of violation of the Trial Measures, in order to ensure PRC Companies are in compliance with PRC regulations and policies. The new regulations became effective on March 31, 2023.  Failure to have filed as required could subject us or our controlling stockholders to fines and penalties, which may be significant.  As of the date of this annual report, the CSRC has not published any additional implementation regulations or guidelines as to PRC Companies. Based on our audited financial statements for 2023, which show that a majority of our loss is derived from our United States operations and a majority of our assets are located in the United States and the fact that our management is located in the United States, we believe that we are not a PRC Company that is required to make a filing with the CSRC, and, accordingly, we did not make such a filing in connection with our initial public offering.  In the event that the CSRC disagrees with this opinion, we and our controlling stockholders may be subject to fines and penalties, which may be significant. However, because of our China segment, the CSRC or other regulatory authorities could reach a different conclusion, in which event we could be subject to additional requirements or penalties for not having filed with the CSRC and a cybersecurity review may potentially be required under the Cybersecurity Review Measures.

As of the date of this annual report, there are no PRC laws and regulations in force explicitly requiring that we obtain any permission from PRC authorities including the CSRC to issue securities to foreign investors. Based on existing PRC laws and regulations, neither we nor our subsidiaries are required to obtain any pre-approval from the CSRC to conduct our initial public offering, subject to interpretation of the existing PRC laws and regulations by the PRC government authorities. As of the date of this annual report, we have not received any inquiry, notice, warning, sanctions or any regulatory objections to our initial public offering from the CSRC.

However, the CSRC or other Chinese government agencies may exert more oversight and control over offerings that are conducted overseas and foreign investment in China-based issuers. We do not believe we are a China-based issuer as our management and headquarter are located in the U.S. and our major operation is the US Segment. However, if our interpretation of these laws and regulations are incorrect and the CSRC or another PRC regulatory body determines that its approval was needed for our initial public offering and we are required to obtain any approval or permission in the future, due to the change of applicable laws, regulations, we may incur additional costs to procure such approval or permission, and there is no guarantee that we can successfully obtain such approval or permission. Any failure to obtain such approval or permission could materially and adversely affect our business, our ability to maintain our listing on Nasdaq and the market for and the value of our common stock and we or our PRC subsidiaries may face approval delays, adverse actions or sanctions by the CSRC or other PRC regulatory agencies. In any such event, these regulatory agencies may impose fines and penalties, limit our acquisitions and operations of our PRC subsidiaries in China, or take other actions that could materially adversely affect us or our PRC subsidiaries business, financial condition, results of operations, reputation and prospects, as well as the trading price of our common stock. As a result, we face uncertainty about future actions by the PRC government that could significantly affect our ability to offer, or continue to offer, securities to investors and cause the value of our securities to significantly decline or be worthless.

Our PRC subsidiaries are wholly-owned subsidiaries, and we do not have any variable interest entity structure in China. Our direct ownership in our PRC subsidiaries is governed by and in compliance with PRC regulations. However, if the PRC regulations change or are interpreted differently in the future, our securities may decline in value or become worthless if we are unable to assert our control rights over the assets of our PRC subsidiaries.

Our PRC subsidiaries are wholly-owned subsidiaries. We own equity interests in our PRC subsidiaries, and we do not have any variable interest entity structure in China. Our direct ownership in our PRC subsidiaries is governed by and in compliance with PRC regulations. However, if the PRC regulations change or are interpreted differently in the future, our common stock may decline in value or become worthless if we are unable to assert our control rights over the assets of our PRC subsidiaries that conduct substantially of our operations in China.

Although we do not believe we are a China-based issuer, because of our China segment, any change of regulations and rules by the Chinese government, such as those related to data security or anti-monopoly concerns, may intervene or influence our operations at any time and any additional control over offerings conducted overseas and/or foreign investment in issuers with significant Chinese operations could result in a material change in our operations and/or the value of our securities and could significantly limit or completely hinder our ability to offer, or continue to offer, our securities to investors and cause the value of such securities to significantly decline and possibly be worthless.

Although we are a Nevada corporation headquartered in the United States with management team and operations in the United States, through our subsidiaries, we conduct business in China, and our China business is subject to Chinese law. Our operations in China may be impacted or influenced by the new regulations and policies of the Chinese government. For example, between July 2 and July 6, 2021, Cyberspace Administration of China, or the CAC, announced cybersecurity investigations of the business operations of certain U.S.-listed Chinese companies. On July 6, 2021, the General Office of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China and the General Office of the State Council jointly issued “The Opinions on Severely Cracking Down on Illegal Securities Activities According to Law,” or “the Opinions.” The Opinions emphasized the needs to strengthen the administration over illegal securities activities and the supervision over overseas listings by Chinese companies. According to the Opinion, measures, including promoting the institution of relevant regulatory systems, will be taken to control the risks and manage the incidents from overseas-listed Chinese companies. On July 10, 2021, CAC published the Cybersecurity Review Measures (Revised Draft for Public Comments), or the “Review Measures (Draft),” and on December 28, 2021, the CAC and other ministries and commissions jointly promulgated the Cybersecurity Review Measures, which came into effect on February 15, 2022, targeting to further restate and expand the applicable scope of the cybersecurity review. Pursuant to the Cybersecurity Review Measures, CIIO that intend to purchase Internet products and services and online platform operators engaging in data processing activities that affect or may affect national security must be subject to cybersecurity review. Cybersecurity Review Measures further stipulate that if a network platform operator possesses the personal information of more than one million users and intends to list in a foreign country, it shall apply to the CAC for cybersecurity review. Although we are unlikely to be a CIIO or online platform operator as defined in the Cybersecurity Review Measures, it is not certain whether any future regulations will impose restrictions on the business that we are currently engaging in China. Because our PRC subsidiaries do not deal with the public and do not possess personal data of at least 1,000,000 users, we do not believe that we are required to apply for review by the Cybersecurity Review Office. In the event that, in the future, we possess such data or if the requirements for review are changed, we may be required to obtain such approval, the failure of which could affect our ability to have our common stock traded on Nasdaq. On July 23, 2021, General Office of the State Council promulgated “Opinions on Further Reducing Students’ Homework Burden and After-school Tutoring Burden at the Stage of Compulsory Education,” pursuant to which the institutions that offer tutoring of school curriculum shall be registered as non-profit organizations and are not allowed to make profits and raise capital. The new regulation also disallows foreign investment in these institutions through acquisitions, franchise or contractual agreements. Although we do not engage in CIIO, online platform services or any education or tutoring related business and we are a United States, and not a Chinese, company, our offering and listing on Nasdaq may be negatively affected by these new regulations as they have materially negatively affected stock prices of the U.S. listed Chinese companies which are the CIIO, online platform servers, or in the tutoring business. Any additional restriction, scrutiny or negative publicity of the U.S.-listed Chinese companies could cause the U.S. investors less interested in our securities, or hinder our ability to offer, or continue to offer, our securities to investors and cause the value of such securities to significantly decline or be worthless.

Although we do not believe we a China-based issuer, because of our China segment, the Chinese government may exert substantial interventions and influences to offerings that are conducted overseas and/or foreign investment in China-based issuers at any time. Any new policies, regulations, rules, actions or laws by the PRC government may subject us to material changes in operations, may cause the value of our common stock significantly decline or be worthless, and may completely hinder our ability to offer, or continue to offer, securities to investors. 

The Chinese government has exercised and continues to exercise substantial control over virtually every sector of the Chinese economy through regulation and state ownership. The central or local governments of these jurisdictions may impose new, stricter regulations or interpretations of existing regulations that would require additional expenditures and efforts on our part to ensure our compliance with such regulations or interpretations. Accordingly, The Chinese government may exert substantial interventions and influences on offerings that are conducted overseas and/or foreign investment in China-based issuers at any time. Although we do not believe we are a China-based issuer, because of our China segment, any new policies, regulations, rules, actions or laws by the PRC government may subject us to material changes in operations, may cause the value of our common stock significantly decline or be worthless, and may completely hinder our ability to offer, or continue to offer, securities to investors. Because our sole customer is a state-owned enterprise, it may have a significant effect as to whether or when we enter into new contracts with SPIC as well as the timing of payments by SPIC.

For example, the Chinese cybersecurity regulator announced in July 2021, that it had begun an investigation of certain U.S. listed Chinese companies and later ordered that companies’ app be removed from smartphone app stores. On July 24, 2021, the General Office of the Communist Party of China Central Committee and the General Office of the State Council jointly released the Guidelines for Further Easing the Burden of Excessive Homework and Off-campus Tutoring for Students at the Stage of Compulsory Education, pursuant to which foreign investment in such firms via mergers and acquisitions, franchise development, and variable interest entities are banned from this sector.

As such, offerings conducted overseas and/or foreign investment in China-based issuers may be subject to various government and regulatory interference in the provinces in which they operate at any time. Because of the China segment, we may incur increased costs necessary to comply with existing and newly adopted laws and regulations or penalties for any failure to comply. If the PRC government initiates an investigation into us at any time alleging us violation of cybersecurity laws, anti-monopoly laws, and securities offering rules in China in connection with our initial offering, we may have to spend additional resources and incur additional time delays to comply with the applicable rules, and any such action could cause the value of our securities to significantly decline or be worthless and may limit or completely hinder your ability to offer, or continue to offer, securities to investors.

In light of recent events indicating greater oversight by the Cyberspace Administration of China, or CAC, over data security, particularly for companies listing on a foreign exchange, based on the nature of our business in China, we believe that these regulations do not apply to our business in China and did not apply to our initial public offering. 

Pursuant to the PRC Cybersecurity Law, which was promulgated by the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress on November 7, 2016 and took effect on June 1, 2017, personal information and important data collected and generated by a critical information infrastructure operator in the course of its operations in China must be stored in China, and if a critical information infrastructure operator purchases internet products and services that affects or may affect national security, it should be subject to cybersecurity review by the CAC. Due to the lack of further interpretations, the exact scope of “critical information infrastructure operator” remains unclear. On July 10, 2021, the CAC publicly issued the Measures for Cybersecurity Review (Revised Draft for Comments) aiming to, upon its enactment, replace the existing Measures for Cybersecurity Review. On December 28, 2021, CAC and other ministries and commissions jointly promulgated the Cybersecurity Review Measures which became effective on February 15, 2022, which required that any critical information infrastructure operators that intend to purchase Internet products and services and online platform operators engaging in data processing activities that affect or may affect national security must be subject to cybersecurity review. Cybersecurity Review Measures further provides “network platform operator” possessing personal information of no less than one million users which seeks to list in a foreign stock exchange should also be subject to cybersecurity review.

Because our PRC subsidiaries do not deal with the public and do not possess personal data of at least 1,000,000 users, we do not believe that we are required to apply for review by the Cybersecurity Review Office. In the even that, in the future, our PRC subsidiaries possess such data or if the requirements for review are changed, we may be required to obtain such approval, the failure of which could affect our ability to have our common stock traded on Nasdaq.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, as of the date of this annual report, there are no PRC laws and regulations in force explicitly requiring that we obtain any permission from PRC authorities to issue securities to foreign investors, and we have not received any inquiry, notice, warning, sanction or any regulatory objection to our initial public offering from the CAC or any other PRC authorities that have jurisdiction over our operations. However, there remains significant uncertainty as to the enactment, interpretation and implementation of regulatory requirements related to overseas securities offering and other capital markets activities. If it is determined in the future that the CAC or other approval had been required for our initial public offering, we may face sanctions by the CAC or other PRC regulatory agencies. These regulatory agencies may impose fines and penalties on our operations in China, limit our PRC subsidiaries’ ability to pay dividends outside of China, limit our operations in China, delay or restrict the repatriation of the proceeds from our initial public offering into China or take other actions that could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects, as well as the trading price of the common stock. The CAC or other PRC regulatory agencies also may take actions requiring our PRC subsidiaries, or to halt any public financing before settlement and delivery of the common stock. In addition, if the CAC or other regulatory agencies later promulgate new rules requiring that we obtain its approvals for our initial public offering, we may be unable to obtain a waiver of such approval requirements, if and when procedures are established to obtain such a waiver. Any uncertainties and/or negative publicity regarding such an approval requirement could have a material adverse effect on the trading price of the common stock.

The transfer of funds between our United States and China segments is subject to restriction.

Our equity structure is a direct holding structure, that is, SolarMax Technology Inc., a Nevada corporation, directly controls its U.S. subsidiaries and its subsidiaries in its China segment including: (i) Golden SolarMax Finance. Co. Ltd, a PRC subsidiary, (ii) SolarMax Technology Holdings (Hong Kong) Limited, a Hong Kong subsidiary which directly holds SolarMax Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd, a PRC subsidiary (together with its subsidiaries thereunder, “ZHTH”); (iii) Accumulate Investment Co., Ltd, a British Virgin Islands subsidiary which then directly holds Accumulate Investment Co., Limited, a Hong Kong subsidiary that directly holds ZHPV; a PRC subsidiary and (iv) SolarMax Technology Holdings, a Cayman Islands subsidiary. Our business in China is conducted through ZHPV and ZHTH.

In the reporting periods presented in this annual report and throughout the date of this annual report, no dividends, distribution or other transfers of funds have occurred between and among us and our United States subsidiaries, on the one hand; and us and our PRC subsidiaries, on the other hand, and we have not made any dividends, distributions or other transfer of funds to investors. For the foreseeable future, we intend to use any earnings we generate for research and development, to develop new products and to expand our production capacity. As a result, we do not expect to pay any cash dividends. To the extent that we may in the future seek to fund the business through distributions, dividends or transfer of funds among and between holding company and subsidiaries, any such transfer of funds with PRC subsidiaries is subject to government regulations. The structure of cash flows within holding company and PRC subsidiaries and a summary of the applicable regulations, is as follows:

1. Within the direct holding structure, the cross-border transfer of funds within SolarMax and our PRC subsidiaries is legal and compliant with the laws and regulations of the PRC. Funds from our initial public offering can be directly transferred to our subsidiaries including ZHPV and ZHTH, and then transferred to subordinate operating entities through ZHPV and ZHTH according to the laws and regulation of the PRC.

2. If we intend to distribute dividends from our PRC subsidiaries, either for use in our US segment or for distribution to stockholders, we will transfer the dividends from the PRC entities to ZHPV and ZHTH in accordance with the laws and regulations of the PRC, and then ZHPV and ZHTH will transfer the dividends to its parent company and then to SolarMax and, if the funds are to be paid to our stockholders as a dividend, the dividends will be distributed to all stockholders in proportion to the shares they hold, regardless of whether the stockholders are U.S. investors or investors in other countries or regions. We do not have any plans to pay dividends to our stockholders.

3. Our PRC subsidiaries’ ability to distribute dividends is based upon their distributable earnings. Current PRC regulations permit our PRC subsidiaries to pay dividends to their respective shareholders only out of their accumulated profits, if any, determined in accordance with PRC accounting standards and regulations. In addition, each of the PRC subsidiaries is required to set aside at least 10% of its after-tax profits each year, if any, to fund a statutory reserve until such reserve reaches 50% of each of their registered capitals. These reserves are not distributable as cash dividends.

In addition, the Enterprise Income Tax Law and its implementation rules provide that a withholding tax at a rate of 10% will be applicable to dividends payable by Chinese companies to non-PRC-resident enterprises unless reduced under treaties or arrangements between the PRC central government and the governments of other countries or regions where the non-PRC resident enterprises are tax resident. Pursuant to the tax agreement between Mainland China and the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, the withholding tax rate in respect to the payment of dividends by a PRC enterprise to a Hong Kong enterprise may be reduced to 5% from a standard rate of 10%. However, if the relevant tax authorities determine that our transactions or arrangements are for the primary purpose of enjoying a favorable tax treatment, the relevant tax authorities may adjust the favorable withholding tax in the future. Accordingly, there is no assurance that the reduced 5% withholding rate will apply to dividends received by our Hong Kong subsidiary from its PRC subsidiaries. This withholding tax will reduce the amount of dividends we may receive from our PRC subsidiaries.

To address persistent capital outflows and the RMB’s depreciation against the U.S. dollar in the fourth quarter of 2016, the People’s Bank of China and the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, or SAFE, have implemented a series of capital control measures in the subsequent months, including stricter vetting procedures for China-based companies to remit foreign currency for overseas acquisitions, dividend payments and shareholder loan repayments. The PRC government may continue to strengthen its capital controls and our PRC subsidiaries’ dividends and other distributions may be subject to tightened scrutiny in the future.

Foreign currency exchange regulation in the PRC is primarily governed by the Regulations on the Administration of Foreign Exchange, most recently revised by the State Council on August 5, 2008, Notice on Further Simplifying and Improving Policies of Foreign Exchange Administration Regarding Direct Investment issued by SAFE on February 13, 2015, and the Provisions on the Administration of Settlement, Sale and Payment of Foreign Exchange promulgated by People’s Bank of China on June 20, 1996. Currently, RMB is convertible for current account items, including the distribution of dividends, interest payments, trade and service related foreign exchange transactions. Conversion of RMB for most capital account items, such as direct investment, security investment and repatriation of investment, however, is still subject to registration with the SAFE. Foreign-invested enterprises may buy, sell and remit foreign currencies at financial institutions engaged in foreign currency settlement and sale after providing valid commercial documents and, in the case of most capital account item transactions, obtaining approval from the SAFE. Capital investments by foreign enterprises are also subject to limitations, which include approvals by the NDRC, the Ministry of Construction, and registration with the SAFE.

Therefore, we may experience difficulties in completing the administrative procedures necessary to obtain and remit foreign currency for the payment of dividends from our profits, if any. Furthermore, if our subsidiaries in the PRC incur debt on their own in the future, the instruments governing the debt may restrict their ability to pay dividends or make other payments.

Because one customer in China has represented substantially all of our of our revenue from our China segment, we need to develop new clients if we are to generate revenue from our China segment.

The nature of our business in China is such that a small number of customers is responsible for a significant percentage of both our revenue from the China segment and of our total revenue. Our China segment has not generated any revenue during 2022, 2023 or 2024 through the date of this annual report and substantially all of our revenue for 2021 was generated during the first six months of the year. Because EPC contracts are of limited duration, once we complete the construction and installation of a solar farm, there is no ongoing revenue stream from the customer. Accordingly, it is necessary for us, on an ongoing basis, to continue to develop new EPC business, and our failure to develop the EPC business will impair our ability to operate profitably and the ability of our China segment to continue operations. Further, we are dependent upon a small number of customers, with our customer since 2020 being SPIC, a state-owned enterprise, which accounted for almost all of revenue from our China segment for 2021 and 2020, and we did not generate any revenue from our China segment in the years ended December 31, 2023 or 2022 and we did not generate any revenue during 2024 to the date of this annual report. Further, our quarterly revenues from China are affected by the timing of contracts we receive and the time during which the work is performed, which could result in significant changes in revenue and net income from the China segment from quarter to quarter.

Our business in both the United States and China is dependent on the continuation of government benefits, and no assurance can be given that such benefits will be continued.

Federal, state and local government laws, including tax laws, regulations and policies concerning the electric utility industry, utility rate structures, interconnection procedures, and internal policies and electric utility regulations heavily influence the market for electricity generation products and services. These regulations and policies, which, on the state and local level, differ from state to state, often relate to tax benefits, electricity pricing, net metering the interconnection of customer-owned electricity generation with the local electricity utility company. These laws, regulations and policies are constantly subject to change, and many benefit provisions have sunset clauses, which would result in a termination or reduction of the benefit unless the benefit is expressly extended. The solar power industry is heavily dependent on government incentives and subsidies that constitute an important economic factor in a user’s decision to purchase a solar energy system. We cannot assure you that these benefits will continue at their present levels, if at all. The reduction, elimination or expiration of government benefits and economic incentives for solar energy systems could substantially increase the cost of our systems to our potential customers, which would in turn reduce the demand for our solar energy systems.

California legislation has reduced the formula for paying the resident for selling us used power to the local utility, which affects the benefits to the residential homeowner and may affect their willingness to have solar systems installed which may affect our pricing, our sales and our gross margin.

In many areas in China, solar farms, particularly on-grid photovoltaic systems, would not be commercially viable without government subsidies or economic incentives. The cost of generating electricity from solar energy in these markets currently exceeds, and very likely will continue to exceed for the foreseeable future, the cost of generating electricity from conventional or other renewable energy sources. These subsidies and incentives have been primarily in the form of set electricity prices and performance incentive programs, to solar farm operators. To the extent that these incentives are not available, we may not be able to sell our systems to customers in these regions. Further, if we decide to operate the solar farms in these regions for our own account instead of selling the project, we may not be able to generate a profit from those operations, which would impair results of our operations and our ability to operate profitably.

In China, we compete with other companies for a limited number of available permits.

In China, we obtain permits, construct and sell solar farms to major customers who have the financial ability to purchase and operate these systems. The permits are granted by the local government agency and a list of available permits is published by the agency. There is a limited number of potential customers as well as a limited number of permits available and we compete with other firms in seeking to obtain permits and seeking to perform EPC services. In seeking both permits and customers, we compete with other companies, many of which are Chinese companies that have significantly greater financial resources and are better known in China than we are. Further, many of our competitors have or can develop relationships with both the government officials who issue the permits as well as the buyers of the projects, and our competition may not be subject to the restrictions imposed on us by the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. We cannot assure you that we will be able to obtain the necessary permits for our customers or enter into agreements with end users who would operate the solar farms. As the interest in solar farms in China increases, there is increased competition for permits, and the government entities that issue the permits may prefer Chinese companies over companies that are owned by a United States parent. Our failure to obtain the permits and enter into agreements would impair our ability to generate revenue from this business. In addition, to date, except for our agreements with SPIC, our China segment has generated minimal revenue in China from unrelated parties. If we are not able to develop our business with new customers or if our business with SPIC or with related party decreases, our ability to generate revenue in China will be significantly impaired. Unrelated parties may prefer to work with a Chinese company than a company owned by a United States company, particularly in view of the trade disputes between the United States and China.

Because of the cost of construction of the solar farms, we could require financing in order to complete projects in China, and the inability to obtain such financing may impair our ability to generate contracts for solar farm projects in China.

Although our EPC contracts with solar farm owners provide for progress payments, we cannot assure you that we will be paid in a timely manner or that our customers will not be significantly delinquent on their payments. Because we are dependent upon a small number of customers, our cash flow at any time may be dependent upon the payment policies and practices of one customer. During the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022 and continuing through the date of this annual report, we did not generate revenues in the China segment. Our China segment revenue for the year ended December 31, 2021 and the year ended December 31, 2020 was derived from four projects for SPIC. Our failure both to receive timely progress payments and to obtain any necessary project financing in China would impair our ability to develop our business in China. Because of the size of the solar farms that we build in China, it is likely to require financing for our projects. We cannot assure you that we will be able to obtain financing or that our business will not be impaired by delinquent customers. Further, we may not be able to generate business without a financing arrangement. At December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, we had $7.7 million and $8.4 million of accounts receivable from SPIC, respectively. These receivables represent the balance of the contractual billings pursuant to the construction contracts and the unpaid portion of the equity transfer agreements pursuant to which we sold to SPIC a controlling interest in four projects. SPIC is a large state-owned company in China, and we believe that it has the financial ability to meet its obligations on its contracts. Collections in China are paper-based, bureaucratic and often require in-person meetings. Travel restrictions in China due to the COVID restrictions in China have prevented the kind of in-person meetings necessary to collect on the receivables from SPIC. Beginning in August 2022, our China personnel began in-person collection meetings with SPIC, and SPIC has started the payment process.

Because our business in China involves the construction of large projects for a small number of customers; we do not have an ongoing revenue base and needs to obtain new customers.

Because of the nature of our China operations, we construct large projects for a small number of customers, who may not require additional services from us after we have completed the projects. As a result, we need to continually market our services to new customers who have the financial resources to purchase a solar farm or to obtain additional projects from existing customers. Thus, each year one customer and its affiliates have been responsible for a large percentage, if not substantially all, of the revenue from the China segment and a large percentage of our total revenue, and the major customers in one year may not generate any significant revenue in future years. Further, to the extent that any customer fails to make timely payments to us, our business and cash flow could be impaired. If we are unable to develop new sales contracts for solar farms, it may not be able to continue our China operations which would impair our operating results and our financial condition.

Because of the amount of land required for a solar farm, it may be difficult to obtain the necessary land use rights, which may increase the cost of the land.

There is no private ownership of land in China, and the owner or operator of a solar farm must obtain the necessary land use rights from the applicable government agency. Solar farms require a substantial amount of land. It is also crucial to have a land parcel close to the grid connection point in order to control the cost for the construction of transmission lines and to avoid the electricity transmission loss. One solar farm for which we performed EPC services had to reduce the size of the project because of zoning issues and the inability to obtain land use rights to sufficient contiguous parcels of land to support the initial size of the project. The shortage of available land may also result in an increase in the cost of the land use rights as well as increased competition for the land use rights. Further, since the land is owned by the government, the government has the ability to determine what is the best use of the limited available land and it might determine that the land could be used for purposes other than solar farms. If we or solar farm owners cannot obtain sufficient land use rights at a reasonable cost, the solar farm owner may be reluctant to make the investment in solar farms which would impair our ability to generate revenue and operate profitably in China. Further, changes in the size of a project may result in increased costs as well as construction difficulties which we may be unable to pass on to our customers, resulting in a decrease in our gross margin.

There is intense competition for a limited number of project sites that are appropriate for solar power projects. As the downstream solar power market in China continues to evolve, the number of attractive project sites available has decreased and will continue to decrease. Even if we sign agreements, we may not be able to find and secure the land use rights to suitable project sites for the relevant projects. We generally use the land for our ground-mounted projects through land use right grants or assignment by the government or leasing from the land use right owners. Our rights to the properties used for our solar power projects may be challenged by property owners or other third parties, in case of any disputes over the ownership or lease of the properties. It is critical to maintain the land use rights on the land parcels and access and use rights on the roof tops during the life cycle of solar power projects. In the event that the relevant lease agreement is determined to be null and void by competent authorities or our land use rights and access and use rights on roof tops are recouped by the government, the solar power projects may be forced to cease operation and our results of operation, financial condition will be materially adversely affected.

The economics of a solar farm are affected by the money that solar farm owners receive from utility companies.

In China, a solar farm sells the power it generates to the electricity utility company at prices which are set by the Electricity Bureau, a government agency, at the beginning of the term of the power sales agreement between the owner and the utility company. The prices have been declining, and we cannot assure you that the price reductions will not continue or that price reductions will not increase substantially and make the ownership of a solar farm uneconomical. The cash flow that the owner receives from the utility company is critical in determining whether the project will be profitable to the owner. If the potential revenue stream is not sufficient to meet the owner’s return, taking into account the cost of the project, the cost of the land use rights and the other operating costs, the owner may be unwilling to develop a solar farm or it may be necessary for us to reduce our charges in order to generate the revenue, which could significantly reduce our gross margin on the project and could result in a negative gross margin. Decreases in the potential revenue stream may also significantly affect the terms on which we could provide maintenance services for a solar farm following its completion. Further, it is possible that the Electricity Bureau could set prices at a level which makes it uneconomical to operate a solar farm, in which event we would not be able to continue in this business. Although the rate is presently set for the duration of the contract with the utility company, we cannot assure you that the Chinese government would not change its policy and reduce the rate during the term of the agreement. We cannot assure you that we will be able to operate our EPC business or manage solar farms in China profitably, and our failure to operate profitably in China could materially impair our overall ability to operate profitably and to continue to operate in China.

Changes in solar farm delivery schedules and order specifications may affect our revenue stream and gross margin.

Although we build solar farms pursuant to agreements with the customers, we may experience delays in scheduling and changes in the specification of the project. These changes may result from a number of factors, including a determination by the customer that the scope of the project needs to be changed and the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and steps taken by the government of China to address the pandemic, including its zero COVID policy which has resulted in closures in provinces and municipalities. In the event of such changes, we may suffer a delay in the recognition of revenue from the projects and may increase our costs. We cannot assure you that our revenue and gross margin will not be affected by delays, changes in specifications or increased costs or that we will be able to recoup revenue lost as a result of the delays or changes. Further, if we cannot allocate our personnel to a different project, we will continue to incur expenses relating to the project, including labor and overhead. We cannot assure you that our income will not decline as a result of changes in customers’ orders or their requirements for their projects.

If we operate solar farms in China for our own account, we will be subject to additional regulations.

Although we have no present plans to own and operate solar farms for our own account, we may consider the possibility of owning and operating solar farms for our own account in the future, either by direct ownership or by holding a majority equity interest in a company that owns solar farms. Unlike the solar systems that we sell in the United States, which are relatively small in scale and generally provide power for one home or building, the solar farms in China operate on a significantly larger scale. Thus, while a typical residential or small business installation in the United States generally generates between 6.5KW and 0.2MW of power, the solar farms in China can generate between 30MW and 100MW of power. In the event that we operate solar farms for our own account, which would involve constructing the solar farm for our own account and selling the electricity either to end users or to the local utility company, we will be subject to significant additional regulation by the applicable Chinese authorities and we will require significant additional funding for such purpose.

Our quarterly revenues may be affected by weather conditions, including climate changes, in certain provinces of China

The construction of solar farms in China is subject to adverse weather conditions, including wind, flood, rain, typhoons, snow and temperature extremes, as well as earthquakes, mudslides and similar conditions. These weather conditions are common but difficult to predict and can slow or stop construction. The effects of climate change may increase severe adverse weather conditions. To the extent that we have EPC contracts for solar farms in the provinces affected by adverse seasonal weather, revenue generated during these months may sharply decrease. If we are not able to work on a project on a sustained basis, our ability to operate efficiently may be impaired which may result in reduced revenue, increased expenses and reduced gross margin.

We are subject to numerous risks in engaging in business in China, including, but not limited to, changes in policies of the Chinese government, a deterioration in the relationships between the United States and China, the legal system in China which may not adequately protect our rights, change in the Chinese economy and steps taken by the government to address the changes, inflation, adverse weather conditions, fluctuations in the currency ratio between the U.S. dollar and the RMB, currency exchange restrictions, the interpretation of tax laws, tariffs and importation regulations.

Our China segment’s operations are mainly located in China. Accordingly, our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations may be is subject to numerous risks in China, including, but not limited to, changes in policies of the Chinese government, a deterioration in the relationships between the United States and China, the legal system in China which may not adequately protect our rights, change in the Chinese economy and steps taken by the government to address the changes, inflation, adverse weather conditions, fluctuations in the currency ratio between the U.S. dollar and the RMB, currency exchange restrictions, the interpretation of tax laws, tariffs and importation regulations.

The Chinese government has exercised and continues to exercise substantial control over virtually every sector of the Chinese economy through regulation and state ownership. The central Chinese government or local governments having jurisdiction within China may impose new, stricter regulations, or interpretations of existing regulations, that would require additional expenditures and efforts on our part to ensure our compliance with such regulations or interpretations. As such, our subsidiaries in the PRC may be subject to governmental and regulatory interference in the provinces in which they operate. We could also be subject to regulation by various political and regulatory entities, including local and municipal agencies and other governmental subdivisions. Our ability to operate in China may be impaired by any such laws or regulations, or any changes in laws and regulations in the PRC. We may incur increased costs necessary to comply with existing and future laws and regulations or penalties for any failure to comply. The legal and judicial systems in the PRC are still rudimentary, and enforcement of existing laws is inconsistent. As a result, it may be impossible to obtain swift and equitable enforcement of laws that do exist, or to obtain enforcement of the judgment of one court by a court of another jurisdiction.

At various times during recent years, the United States and China have had significant disagreements over political and economic issues. Controversies between the United States and China may affect the economic outlook both in the U.S. and in China. Our business and the price of our common stock could be adversely affected.

In addition, our China business is also subject to other risks. For example, the construction of solar farms in China is subject to adverse weather conditions, including wind, flood, rain, typhoons, snow and temperature extremes, as well as earthquakes, mudslides and similar conditions. These weather conditions are common but difficult to predict and can slow or stop construction. The change in value of the RMB against the U.S. dollar and other currencies is affected by various factors, including changes in China’s political and economic conditions.

Our China segment is subject to numerous regulations in China, including but not limited to, regulations relating to investments in our China subsidiaries, labor laws and other laws relating to employee relations, the issuance of permits for solar farms, licensing, the development, construction and operation of solar power projects, and the sale of power generated from the projects, cybersecurity and the failure to comply with any such regulations may impair our ability to operate in China.

Our China segment is subject to numerous regulations in China, including but not limited to, regulations relating to investments in our China subsidiaries, labor laws and other laws relating to employee relations, the issuance of permits for solar farms, licensing, the development, construction and operation of solar power projects, and the sale of power generated from the projects, cybersecurity and the failure to comply with any such regulations may impair our ability to operate in China.

As our China segment operates in China, we are subject to the laws and regulations of the PRC, which can be complex and evolve rapidly. The PRC government has the power to exercise significant oversight and discretion over the conduct of our business, and the regulations to which we are subject may change rapidly and with little notice to us or our shareholders. As a result, the application, interpretation, and enforcement of new and existing laws and regulations in the PRC are often uncertain. In addition, these laws and regulations may be interpreted and applied inconsistently by different agencies or authorities, and inconsistently with our current policies and practices. New laws, regulations, and other government directives in the PRC may also be costly to comply with, and such compliance or any associated inquiries or investigations or any other government actions may:

The promulgation of new laws or regulations, or the new interpretation of existing laws and regulations, in each case that restrict or otherwise unfavorably impact the ability or manner in which we conduct our business and could require us to change certain aspects of our business to ensure compliance, which could decrease demand for our products, reduce revenues, increase costs, require us to obtain more licenses, permits, approvals or certificates, or subject us to additional liabilities. To the extent any new or more stringent measures are required to be implemented, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected as well as materially decrease the value of our ordinary shares. 

For example, we have been subject to stricter regulatory requirements in terms of entering into labor contracts with our employees and paying various statutory employee benefits, including pensions, housing fund, medical insurance, work-related injury insurance, unemployment insurance and maternity insurance to designated government agencies for the benefit of our employees.

Our independent registered public accounting firm’s audit documentation related to its audit reports included in this annual report include audit documentation located in China. PCAOB may not be able to inspect audit documentation located in China and, as such, you may be deprived of the benefits of such inspection which could result in limitations or restrictions to our access to the U.S. capital markets. Furthermore, trading in our securities may be prohibited under the Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act or the Accelerating Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act if the PCAOB is unable to inspect or investigate completely, and, as a result, U.S. national securities exchanges, such as the Nasdaq, may determine to delist our securities. The Accelerating Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act amended the HFCA Act and requires the SEC to prohibit an issuer’s securities from trading on any U.S. stock exchanges or market if our auditor is not subject to PCAOB inspections for two consecutive years instead of three.

Our independent registered public accounting firm issued an audit opinion on our financial statements that are included in this annual report. As an auditor of companies that are traded publicly in the United States and a firm registered with the PCAOB, our auditor is required by the laws of the United States to undergo regular inspections by the PCAOB. Our auditor is headquartered in New York City, and has been inspected by the PCAOB on a regular basis with the last inspection in 2018 and an ongoing inspection that started in November 2020. However, recent developments with respect to audits of China-based companies, such as our China segment, create uncertainty about the ability of our auditor to fully cooperate with the PCAOB’s request for audit workpapers without the approval of the Chinese authorities. As a result, our investors may be deprived of the benefits of PCAOB’s oversight of our auditors through such inspections.

Inspections of certain other firms that the PCAOB has conducted outside of China have identified deficiencies in those firms’ audit procedures and quality control procedures, which may be addressed as part of the inspection process to improve future audit quality. The PCAOB is currently unable to conduct inspections of audit firms located in China and Hong Kong. They are currently able to conduct inspections of U.S. audit firms where audit workpapers are located in China; however, PCAOB requests for workpapers are subject to approval by Chinese authorities. The audit workpapers for our Chinese operations are located in China.

The PCAOB has not requested our auditor to provide the PCAOB with copies of our audit workpapers and consequently our auditors have not sought permission from PRC authorities to provide copies of these materials to the PCAOB. If our auditors are not permitted to provide requested audit workpapers located in China to the PCAOB, investors would be deprived of the benefits of PCAOB’s oversight of such auditors through such inspections.

In addition, as part of a continued regulatory focus in the United States on access to audit and other information currently protected by national law, in particular China’s, in June 2019, a bipartisan group of lawmakers introduced bills in both houses of Congress that would require the SEC to maintain a list of issuers for which the PCAOB is not able to inspect or investigate an auditor report issued by a foreign public accounting firm. The Ensuring Quality Information and Transparency for Abroad-Based Listings on our Exchanges (EQUITABLE) Act prescribes increased disclosure requirements for such issuers and, beginning in 2025, the delisting from national securities exchanges such as Nasdaq of issuers included for three consecutive years on the SEC’s list. On December 18, 2020, the HFCA Act was signed into law. In essence, the HFCA Act requires the SEC to prohibit foreign companies from listing securities on U.S. securities exchanges if a company retains a foreign accounting firm that cannot be inspected by the PCAOB for three consecutive years, beginning in 2021. The enactment of the HFCA Act and any additional rulemaking efforts to increase U.S. regulatory access to audit information could cause investor uncertainty for affected issuers, including the surviving corporation, and the market price of the surviving corporation’s securities could be adversely affected, and the surviving corporation could be delisted if it is unable to cure the situation to meet the PCAOB inspection requirement in time. On December 2, 2021, the SEC adopted amendments to finalize rules implementing the submission and disclosure requirements in the HFCA Act. We will be required to comply with these rules if the SEC identifies us as having a “non-inspection” year under a process to be subsequently established by the SEC. Furthermore, the Accelerating Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act amended the HFCA Act and requires the SEC to prohibit an issuer’s securities from trading on any U.S. stock exchanges or stock market, including the over-the-counter market if our auditor is not subject to PCAOB inspections for two consecutive years instead of three. On September 22, 2021, the PCAOB adopted a final rule implementing the HFCA Act, which provides a framework for the PCAOB to use when determining, as contemplated under the HFCA Act, whether the Board is unable to inspect or investigate completely registered public accounting firms located in a foreign jurisdiction because of a position taken by one or more authorities in that jurisdiction. On December 16, 2021, the PCAOB issued a determination report (the “Determination Report”) which found that the PCAOB is unable to inspect or investigate completely registered public accounting firms headquartered in: (i) mainland China of the People’s Republic of China because of a position taken by one or more authorities in mainland China; and (ii) Hong Kong, a Special Administrative Region and dependency of the PRC, because of a position taken by one or more authorities in Hong Kong. In addition, the Determination Report identified the specific registered public accounting firms which are subject to these determinations.

On June 4, 2020, then President Donald J. Trump issued a memorandum ordering the President’s Working Group on Financial Markets, or the PWG, to submit a report to the President within 60 days of the memorandum that includes recommendations for actions that can be taken by the executive branch and by the SEC or PCAOB on Chinese companies listed on U.S. stock exchanges and their audit firms, in an effort to protect investors in the U.S. On August 6, 2020, the PWG released a report recommending that the SEC take steps to implement the five recommendations outlined in the report. In particular, to address companies from non-cooperating jurisdictions that do not provide the PCAOB with sufficient access to fulfil its statutory mandate, including China, the PWG recommends enhanced listing standards on U.S. stock exchanges. This would require, as a condition to initial and continued exchange listing, PCAOB access to workpapers of the principal audit firm for the audit of the listed company. Companies unable to satisfy this standard as a result of governmental restrictions on access to audit workpapers and practices in non-cooperating jurisdictions may satisfy this standard by providing a co-audit from an audit firm with comparable resources and experience where the PCAOB determines it has sufficient access to audit workpapers and practices to conduct an appropriate inspection of the co-audit firm. The report permits the new listing standards to provide for a transition period until January 1, 2022 for listed companies, but would apply immediately to new listings once the necessary rulemakings and/or standard-setting are effective. If the surviving company fails to meet the new listing standards before the deadline specified thereunder, the surviving company could face possible de-listing from Nasdaq, deregistration from the SEC and/or other risks, which may materially and adversely affect, or effectively terminate, securities of the surviving company trading in the United States.

Our independent accountants, Marcum LLP, is a United States accounting firm headquartered in New York City and is subject to inspection and is annually inspected by the PCAOB. Marcum LLP is not headquartered in mainland China or Hong Kong and was not identified in the Determination Report as a firm subject to the PCAOB’s determinations. In the event that, in the future, either PRC regulators take steps to impair Marcum’s access to the workpapers relating to our China operations or the PCAOB expands the scope of the determinations so that we will be subject to the HFCA Act, as the same may be amended,  you may be deprived of the benefits of such inspection which could result in limitation or restriction to our access to the U.S. capital markets and trading of our securities, including “over-the-counter” trading, may be prohibited, under the HFCA Act. On August 26, 2022, the CSRC, the Ministry of Finance of the PRC, and the PCAOB signed the Protocol, governing inspections and investigations of audit firms based in China and Hong Kong. Pursuant to the Protocol, the PCAOB shall have independent discretion to select any issuer audits for inspection or investigation and has the unfettered ability to transfer information to the SEC. On December 15, 2022, the PCAOB announced that it “was able to secure complete access to inspect and investigate audit firms in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) for the first time in history, in 2022. Therefore, on December 15, 2022, the PCAOB Board voted to vacate previous determinations to the contrary.” Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the PCAOB is not able to inspect and investigate completely our auditor’s work papers in China, you may be deprived of the benefits of such inspection which could result in limitation or restriction to our access to the U.S. capital markets and trading of our securities may be prohibited under the HFCA Act or the Accelerating Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act, and Nasdaq may determine to delist our securities if the PCAOB determines that it cannot inspect or investigate completely our auditor under such Acts. 

Changes in the policies of the PRC government could have a significant impact on our operations in China and the profitability of our business.

The PRC’s economy is in a transition from a planned economy to a market-oriented economy subject to five-year or ten-year plans and annual plans adopted by the government that set national economic development goals. Policies of the PRC government can have significant effects on the economic conditions within the PRC. Although the PRC government has stated that that economic development will follow the model of a market economy, the concept of a market economy in the PRC is different from the way a market economy is understood in the United States. While we believe that this trend toward a market economy, as understood by the PRC government, will continue, there can be no assurance that this will be the case. A change in policies by the PRC government could adversely affect our interests by, among other factors: changes in laws, regulations or the interpretation thereof, confiscatory taxation, restrictions on currency conversion, imports or sources of supplies, or the expropriation or nationalization of private enterprises. Further, the availability of credit in the PRC can have a major impact on the ability of companies to purchase or otherwise acquire capital assets. While the Chinese economy has grown significantly in the past 30 years, the growth has been uneven, both geographically and among various sectors of the economy and it has been impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. The PRC government has implemented various measures to encourage economic growth and guide the allocation of resources. Some of these measures benefit the overall Chinese economy but may also have a negative effect on us. For example, our financial condition and results of operations may be adversely affected by government control over capital investments or changes in tax regulations that are applicable to us. Accordingly, we cannot assure you that the PRC government will continue to pursue such policies or that such policies may not be significantly altered, especially in the event of a change in leadership, social or political disruption, or other circumstances affecting the PRC’s political, economic and social environment. The interpretation of some of these measures, including tax measures, is both complex and evolving and it may be difficult to ascertain, with any degree of certainty, whether we are in compliance. our financial condition and results of operations may be adversely affected by the effects of government control over capital investments or changes in and interpretations of tax, currency and other regulations that are applicable to it.

A slowdown or other adverse developments in the PRC economy may harm our customers and the demand for our products.

Although the PRC economy has grown significantly in the past two decades, there is no assurance that this growth will continue and there have been recent periods of declining growth. A slowdown in overall economic growth, an economic downturn, a recession or other adverse economic developments in the PRC could significantly reduce the demand for projects such as ours. The Chinese economy in general, and the market for solar farms, in particular, may be adversely affected by the effects of reciprocal tariffs imposed by the United States on Chinese goods and by China on United States goods.

Future inflation in China may inhibit the profitability of our business in China.

In recent years, the Chinese economy has experienced periods of rapid expansion and high rates of inflation. Rapid economic growth can lead to inflation. Any adverse change in the terms on which we construct solar energy projects or sells electricity generated by our China operations may impair our ability to operate profitably in China. Factors such as rapid expansion and inflation have led to the adoption by the PRC government, from time to time, of various corrective measures designed to restrict the availability of credit or regulate growth and contain inflation. High inflation may in the future cause the PRC government to impose controls on credit and/or prices, or to take other action, which could inhibit economic activity in China, and thereby harm the market for our products and services.

The fluctuation of the RMB may have a material adverse effect on your investment.

The change in value of the RMB against the U.S. dollar and other currencies is affected by various factors, including changes in China’s political and economic conditions. On July 21, 2005, the PRC government changed its decade-old policy of pegging the value of the Renminbi to the U.S. dollar. Under such policy, the Renminbi was permitted to fluctuate within a narrow and managed band against a basket of certain foreign currencies. Later on, the People’s Bank of China decided to implement further reform of the RMB exchange regime to enhance the flexibility of RMB exchange rates. Such changes in policy have resulted in a significant appreciation of the Renminbi against the U.S. dollar since 2005. There remains significant international pressure on the PRC government to adopt a more flexible currency policy, which could result in a further and more significant adjustment of the Renminbi against the U.S. dollar.

Any significant appreciation or revaluation of the RMB may have a material adverse effect on the value of, and any dividends payable on, shares of our common stock in foreign currency terms. More specifically, if we decide to convert our RMB into U.S. dollars, appreciation of the U.S. dollar against the RMB would have a negative effect on the U.S. dollar amount available to us. To the extent that we need to convert the U.S. dollar we receive from any equity or debt financing into RMB for our operations, appreciation of the RMB against the U.S. dollar would have an adverse effect on the RMB amount we would receive from the conversion. In addition, appreciation or depreciation in the exchange rate of the RMB to the U.S. dollar could materially and adversely affect the price of our common stock in U.S. dollars without giving effect to any underlying change in our business or results of operations.  Foreign currency transaction gains and losses are a result of the effect of exchange rate changes on transactions denominated in currencies other than the functional currency. We incurred losses on those foreign currency transactions of approximately $266,000 and $938,000 for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively.  

Restrictions on currency exchange may limit our ability to receive and use our revenue effectively.

Revenue from our China operations is denominated in RMB. Restrictions on currency exchange may limit our ability to use any earnings generated in China to fund our business activities in the United States and, if and when we operate profitably, to make dividend payments to our shareholders in U.S. dollars. Under current PRC laws and regulations, RMB is freely convertible for current account items, such as trade and service-related foreign exchange transactions and dividend distributions. However, RMB is not freely convertible for direct investment or loans or investments in securities outside China, unless such use is approved by the PRC State Administration of Foreign Exchange (“SAFE”). For example, foreign exchange transactions under our subsidiaries’ capital accounts, including principal payments in respect of foreign currency-denominated obligations, remain subject to significant foreign exchange controls and the approval requirement of SAFE. SolarMax Shanghai and ZHPV have completed all necessary filing to qualify as a foreign investment enterprise according to the requirements of SAFE. These limitations could affect our ability to obtain foreign exchange for capital expenditures.

Our Chinese subsidiaries are subject to restrictions on making dividend and other payments to it.

Under the applicable requirements of PRC law, our PRC subsidiaries may only distribute dividends after making allowances to fund certain statutory reserves, consisting of the statutory surplus reserve and discretionary surplus reserve, based on after-tax net income determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles of the PRC (“PRC GAAP”). Appropriation to the statutory surplus reserve for each entity should be at least 10% of the after-tax net income determined in accordance with the PRC GAAP until the reserve is equal to 50% of such entity’s registered capital. Our subsidiaries’ statutory reserves were RMB 5,547,722 (approximately $808,000), RMB 4,934,464 (approximately $715,000) at December 31, 2022, RMB 4,589,510 (approximately $722,000) at December 31, 2021 and RMB 4,255,199 (approximately $652,000) at December 31, 2020. These reserves are not distributable as cash dividends.

In addition, if our PRC subsidiaries or our affiliated entity in China incurs debt on their own behalf in the future, the instruments governing the debt may restrict their ability to pay dividends or make other payments to us. Any such restrictions may materially affect such entities’ ability to make dividends or make payments, in service fees or otherwise, to us, which may materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Because we must comply with the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, we may face a competitive disadvantage in competing with Chinese companies that are not bound by those prohibitions.

We are required to comply with the United States Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, which prohibits U.S. companies and their foreign subsidiaries and controlled entities from engaging in bribery or other prohibited payments to foreign officials for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business. Foreign companies, including some of our competitors, are not subject to these prohibitions. Corruption, extortion, bribery, pay-offs, theft and other fraudulent practices occur from time to time in China. If our competitors engage in these practices, they may receive preferential treatment from personnel of other companies or government agencies, giving competitors an advantage in securing permits or business or from government officials. Although we inform our personnel that such practices are illegal, we cannot assure you that our employees or other agents will not engage in such conduct for which we might be held responsible. If our employees or other agents are found to have engaged in such practices, we could suffer severe penalties.

Our ability to generate business from SPIC, which has been the sole customer of our China segment since the middle of 2019, may be subject to government policies relating to such factors as the terms on which our PRC subsidiaries sell the project to SPIC and SPIC’s procurement policies. As a state-owned enterprise, SPIC may favor Chinese companies over subsidiaries of a United States company.

SPIC has been the sole customer of our China segment since the middle of 2019. We may be subject to government policies relating to such factors as the terms on which our PRC subsidiaries sell the project to SPIC and SPIC’s procurement policies. As a state-owned enterprise, SPIC may favor Chinese companies over subsidiaries of a United States company. If SPIC favor Chinese companies, the business of our China segment may be adversely affected.

Uncertainties with respect to the PRC legal system could have a material adverse effect on us.

The PRC legal system is a civil law system based on written statutes. Unlike the common law system, prior court decisions in a civil law system may be cited as reference but have limited precedential value. Since 1979, newly introduced PRC laws and regulations have significantly enhanced the protection of interest relating to foreign investments in China. However, since these laws and regulations are relatively new and the PRC legal system is continuing to evolve, the interpretations of such laws and regulations may not always be consistent, and enforcement of these laws and regulations involves significant uncertainties, any of which could limit available legal protections.

In addition, the PRC administrative and judicial authorities have significant discretion in interpreting, implementing or enforcing statutory rules and contractual terms, and it may be more difficult to predict the outcome of administrative and judicial proceedings and the level of legal protection we may enjoy in the PRC than under some more developed legal systems. These uncertainties may affect our decisions on the policies and actions to be taken to comply with PRC laws and regulations and may affect our ability to enforce our contractual or tort rights. In addition, the regulatory uncertainties may be exploited through unmerited legal actions or threats in an attempt to extract payments or benefits from us. Such uncertainties may therefore increase our operating expenses and costs, and materially and adversely affect our business and results of operations.

The PRC’s legal and judicial system may not adequately protect our business and operations and the rights of our investors.

The PRC legal and judicial system may negatively impact foreign investors. In 1982, the National People’s Congress amended the Constitution of China to authorize foreign investment and guarantee the “lawful rights and interests” of foreign investors in the PRC. However, the PRC’s system of laws is not yet comprehensive. The legal and judicial systems in the PRC are still rudimentary, and enforcement of existing laws is inconsistent. As a result, it may be impossible to obtain swift and equitable enforcement of laws that do exist, or to obtain enforcement of the judgment of one court by a court of another jurisdiction. The PRC’s legal system is based on the civil law regime, which means that it is based on written statutes. A decision by one judge does not set a legal precedent that is required to be followed by judges in other cases. In addition, the interpretation of Chinese laws may be varied to reflect domestic political changes. The promulgation of new laws, changes to existing laws and the pre-emption of local regulations by national laws may adversely affect foreign investors. There can be no assurance that a change in leadership, social or political disruption, or unforeseen circumstances affecting the PRC’s political, economic or social life, will not affect the PRC government’s ability to continue to support and pursue these reforms. Such a shift could have a material adverse effect on our business and prospects.

Three of our directors are located outside of the United States; therefore, investors may not be able to enforce federal securities laws or their other legal rights against those officers and directors (prior to and after the offering) located outside the United States.

All of our executive officers and directors will be located in the United States except that two directors are located in China and one director is located in Taiwan. As a result, it may be difficult, or in some cases not possible, for investors in the United States to enforce their legal rights, to effect service of process upon those officers and directors located outside the United States, to enforce judgments of United States courts predicated upon civil liabilities and criminal penalties on them under United States securities laws. In particular, the PRC does not have treaties providing for the reciprocal recognition and enforcement of judgments of courts with the United States and many other countries and regions. Therefore, recognition and enforcement in the PRC of judgments of United States courts in relation to any matter not subject to a binding arbitration provision may be difficult or impossible. There is uncertainty as to whether the courts of the PRC would enforce judgments of United States courts obtained against these persons predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the United States federal and state securities laws. In addition, according to the PRC Civil Procedures Law, courts in the PRC will not enforce a foreign judgment against us or our directors and officers if they decide that the judgment violates the basic principles of PRC law or national sovereignty, security or public interest. As a result, it is uncertain whether and on what basis a PRC court would enforce a judgment rendered by a court in the United States. Under the PRC Civil Procedures Law, foreign shareholders may originate actions based on PRC law against a company in China for disputes if they can establish sufficient nexus to the PRC for a PRC court to have jurisdiction, and meet other procedural requirements, including, among others, the plaintiff must have a direct interest in the case, and there must be a concrete claim, a factual basis and a cause for the suit. It will be, however, difficult for U.S. shareholders to originate actions in the PRC against us or our directors who are located in the PRC in accordance with PRC laws because we are incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada and it will be difficult for U.S. shareholders, by virtue only of holding our common stock, to establish a connection to the PRC for a PRC court to have jurisdiction as required under the PRC Civil Procedures Law. In addition, it also takes the costs and time for U.S. shareholders to take such court procedures in order to enforce liabilities and judgments in China. As a result of the foregoing, it would be very expensive and time-consuming for a stockholder to either seek to enforce a U.S. judgment in China or to commence an action in a Chinese court, with a strong likelihood that the stockholder will not be successful.

Substantial uncertainties exist with respect to the interpretation and implementation of the newly enacted PRC Foreign Investment Law and how it may impact the viability of our current corporate structure, corporate governance, business operations and financial results.

On March 15, 2019, the National People’s Congress approved the Foreign Investment Law, which came into effect on January 1, 2020 and replaced the trio of existing laws regulating foreign investment in China, namely, the Sino-foreign Equity Joint Venture Enterprise Law, the Sino-foreign Cooperative Joint Venture Enterprise Law and the Wholly Foreign-invested Enterprise Law, together with their implementation rules and ancillary regulations. The Foreign Investment Law embodies an expected PRC regulatory trend to rationalize its foreign investment regulatory regime in line with prevailing international practice and the legislative efforts to unify the corporate legal requirements for both foreign and domestic investments. However, since it is relatively new, uncertainties still exist in relation to its interpretation and implementation and how it may impact the viability of our current corporate governance and business operations in China and our financial results.

Although we do not believe we are a China-based issuer, our business includes our China segment which is subject to the rules and regulations in China as well as China governmental intervention and influence. The rules and regulations in China can change quickly with little advance notice, and Chinese government may intervene or influence our China operation at any time, or may exert more control over offerings conducted overseas and/or foreign investment in us, which could result in a material change in our operations in China and our operations in the U.S. and could cause the value of our securities to significantly decline or be worthless, and limit the legal protections available to us; and any actions by the Chinese government to exert more oversight and control over offerings that are conducted overseas and/or foreign investment in issuers with China operations could significantly limit or completely hinder our ability to offer or continue to offer securities to investors and cause the value of such securities to significantly decline or be worthless; and limit the legal protections available to us.

Although we do not believe that we are a China-based issuer, our business includes our China segment. The rules and regulations in China including the interpretations of many laws, regulations and rules are not always uniform and enforcement of these laws, regulations and rules involves uncertainties. The rules and regulations as well as the interpretation and enforcement of laws and that rules and regulations in China can change quickly with little advance notice and the risk that the Chinese government may intervene or influence our operations at any time, or may exert more control over offerings conducted overseas and/or foreign investment in China-based issuers, and Chinese government may intervene or influence our China operation at any time, or may exert more control over offerings conducted overseas and/or foreign investment in us, which could result in a material change in our operations in China and our operations in the U.S., and could cause the value of our securities to significantly decline or be worthless, and limit the legal protections available to us; and any actions by the Chinese government to exert more oversight and control over offerings that are conducted overseas and/or foreign investment in issuers with China operations could significantly limit or completely hinder our ability to offer or continue to offer securities to investors and cause the value of such securities to significantly decline or be worthless.

We cannot rule out the possibility that the PRC government will institute a licensing regime or pre-approval requirement covering our industry at some point in the future. If such a licensing regime or approval requirement were introduced, we cannot assure you that we would be able to obtain any newly required license in a timely manner, or at all, which could materially and adversely affect our business and impede our ability to continue our operations.

From time to time, we may have to resort to administrative and court proceedings to enforce our legal rights. However, since PRC administrative and court authorities have significant discretion in interpreting and implementing statutory and contractual terms, it may be more difficult to evaluate the outcome of administrative and court proceedings and the level of legal protection we enjoy than in more developed legal systems. Furthermore, the PRC legal system is based in part on government policies and internal rules (some of which are not published in a timely manner or at all) that may have retroactive effect. As a result, we may not be aware of our violation of these policies and rules until sometime after the violation. Such uncertainties, including uncertainty over the scope and effect of our contractual, property (including intellectual property) and procedural rights, could materially and adversely affect our business and impede our ability to continue our operations.

Non-compliance with labor-related laws and regulations of the PRC may have an adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operation.

We have been subject to stricter regulatory requirements in terms of entering into labor contracts with our employees and paying various statutory employee benefits, including pensions, housing fund, medical insurance, work-related injury insurance, unemployment insurance and maternity insurance to designated government agencies for the benefit of our employees. Pursuant to the PRC Labor Contract Law, or the Labor Contract Law, that became effective in January 2008 and was amended in December 2012 and became effective on July 1, 2013, and its implementing rules that became effective in September 2008, employers are subject to stricter requirements in terms of signing labor contracts, minimum wages, paying remuneration, determining the term of employees’ probation and unilaterally terminating labor contracts. In the event that we decide to terminate some of our employees or otherwise change our employment or labor practices, the Labor Contract Law and its implementation rules may limit our ability to effect those changes in a desirable or cost-effective manner, which could adversely affect our business and results of operations. We believe our current practice complies with the Labor Contract Law and its amendments. However, the relevant governmental authorities may take a different view and impose fines on us.

As the interpretation and implementation of labor-related laws and regulations are still evolving, our employment practices could violate labor-related laws and regulations in China, which may subject us to labor disputes or government investigations. If we are deemed to have violated relevant labor laws and regulations, we could be required to provide additional compensation to our employees and our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

PRC regulation of direct investment by offshore holding companies to PRC entities may delay or prevent us from making additional capital contributions to our PRC subsidiaries and affiliated entities, which could impair our liquidity and our ability to fund and expand our business.

Our equity structure is a direct holding structure, that is, SolarMax directly controls its U.S. segment and China segment. In the reporting periods presented in this annual report and throughout the date of this annual report, no dividends, distribution or other transfers of funds have occurred between and among us and our non-PRC subsidiaries, on the one hand; and us and our PRC subsidiaries, on the other hand, have not made any dividends, distributions or other transfer of funds to investors.

To the extent that we may in the future seek to fund the business through distribution, dividends or transfer of funds among and between holding company and subsidiaries, any such transfer of funds with PRC subsidiaries is subject to government regulations. The structure of cash flows within holding company and PRC subsidiaries and a summary of the applicable regulations, is as follows:

1. Within the direct holding structure, the cross-border transfer of funds within us and our PRC subsidiaries is legal and compliant with the laws and regulations of the PRC. Funds from our initial public offering can be directly transferred to our subsidiaries including ZHPV and ZHTH, and then transferred to subordinate operating entities through ZHPV and ZHTH according to the laws and regulation of the PRC.

2. If we intend to distribute dividends, from our PRC subsidiaries, either for use in our US segment or for distribution to stockholders, we will transfer the dividends from the PRC entities to ZHPV and ZHTH in accordance with the laws and regulations of the PRC, and then ZHPV and ZHTH will transfer the dividends to its parent company and then to SolarMax, and, if the funds are to be paid to our stockholders as a dividend, the dividend will be distributed to all stockholders in proportion to the shares they hold, regardless of whether the stockholders are U.S. investors or investors in other countries or regions. We do not have any present plans to pay dividends to our stockholders.

3. Our PRC subsidiaries’ ability to distribute dividends is based upon their distributable earnings. Current PRC regulations permit our PRC subsidiaries to pay dividends to their respective shareholders only out of their accumulated profits, if any, determined in accordance with PRC accounting standards and regulations. In addition, each of the PRC subsidiaries is required to set aside at least 10% of its after-tax profits each year, if any, to fund a statutory reserve until such reserve reaches 50% of each of their registered capitals. These reserves are not distributable as cash dividends.

In addition, the Enterprise Income Tax Law and its implementation rules provide that a withholding tax at a rate of 10% will be applicable to dividends payable by Chinese companies to non-PRC-resident enterprises unless reduced under treaties or arrangements between the PRC central government and the governments of other countries or regions where the non-PRC resident enterprises are tax resident. Pursuant to the tax agreement between Mainland China and the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, the withholding tax rate in respect to the payment of dividends by a PRC enterprise to a Hong Kong enterprise may be reduced to 5% from a standard rate of 10%. However, if the relevant tax authorities determine that our transactions or arrangements are for the primary purpose of enjoying a favorable tax treatment, the relevant tax authorities may adjust the favorable withholding tax in the future. Accordingly, there is no assurance that the reduced 5% withholding rate will apply to dividends received by our Hong Kong subsidiary from its PRC subsidiaries. This withholding tax will reduce the amount of dividends we may receive from our PRC subsidiaries.

To address persistent capital outflows and the RMB’s depreciation against the U.S. dollar in the fourth quarter of 2016, the People’s Bank of China and the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, or SAFE, have implemented a series of capital control measures in the subsequent months, including stricter vetting procedures for China-based companies to remit foreign currency for overseas acquisitions, dividend payments and shareholder loan repayments. The PRC government may continue to strengthen its capital controls and our PRC subsidiaries’ dividends and other distributions may be subject to tightened scrutiny in the future. The PRC government also imposes controls on the conversion of RMB into foreign currencies and the remittance of currencies out of the PRC. Therefore, SolarMax may experience difficulties in completing the administrative procedures necessary to obtain and remit foreign currency for the payment of dividends from our profits, if any. Furthermore, if our subsidiaries in the PRC incur debt on their own in the future, the instruments governing the debt may restrict their ability to pay dividends or make other payments.

We cannot assure you that we will be able to obtain these government registrations or approvals on a timely basis, if at all, with respect to future loans or capital contributions by us to our entities in China. If we fail to receive such registrations or approvals, our ability to use capital raised and to capitalize our PRC operations may be negatively affected, which could adversely affect our liquidity and our ability to fund and expand our business.

Under Chinese law, our Chinese subsidiaries are limited in their ability to pay dividends to us, which may impair our ability to pay dividends and to fund our United States segment in the future. 

Under PRC regulations, our PRC subsidiaries may pay dividends only out of their accumulated profits as determined in accordance with PRC accounting standards and regulations. In addition, each of our wholly foreign-owned enterprises is required to set aside at least 10% of its accumulated after-tax profits each year, if any, to fund certain statutory reserve funds, until the aggregate amount of such fund reaches 50% of its registered capital. Any limitation on the ability of our PRC subsidiary to pay dividends or make other distributions to us could materially and adversely limit our ability to grow, make investments or acquisitions that could be beneficial to our business, pay dividends, or otherwise fund and conduct our business.

A failure by the beneficial owners of our common stock who are PRC residents to comply with certain PRC foreign exchange regulations may restrict our ability to distribute profits, restrict our overseas and cross-border investment activities and subject us to liability under PRC law.

SAFE has promulgated regulations, including the Notice on Relevant Issues Relating to Domestic Residents’ Investment and Financing and Round-Trip Investment through Special Purpose Vehicles, or SAFE Circular No. 37, effective on July 4, 2014, and its appendices, that require PRC residents, including PRC institutions and individuals, to register with local branches of SAFE in connection with their direct establishment or indirect control of an offshore entity, for the purpose of overseas investment and financing, with such PRC residents’ legally owned assets or equity interests in domestic enterprises or offshore assets or interests, referred to in SAFE Circular No. 37 as a “special purpose vehicle.” SAFE Circular No. 37 further requires amendment to the registration in the event of any significant changes with respect to the special purpose vehicle, such as increase or decrease of capital contributed by PRC individuals, share transfer or exchange, merger, division or other material event. In the event that a PRC shareholder holding interests in a special purpose vehicle fails to fulfill the required SAFE registration, the PRC subsidiaries of that special purpose vehicle may be prohibited from making profit distributions to the offshore parent and from carrying out subsequent cross-border foreign exchange activities, and the special purpose vehicle may be restricted in its ability to contribute additional capital into its PRC subsidiary. Further, failure to comply with the various SAFE registration requirements described above could result in liability under PRC law for foreign exchange evasion.

Although we have been advised by AllBright Law Offices, our PRC counsel that these regulations are not applicable to us since we are not a special purpose vehicle under Circular 37, we cannot assure you that SAFE will not reach a different conclusion. If we are subject to these regulations, the regulations may apply to our direct and indirect stockholders who are PRC residents and may apply to any offshore acquisitions or share transfers that we make in the future if our shares are issued to PRC residents. However, in practice, different local SAFE branches may have different views and procedures on the application and implementation of SAFE regulations. If filings are required, we cannot assure you that these individuals or any other direct or indirect stockholders or beneficial owners of our company who are PRC residents will be able to successfully complete the registration or update the registration of their direct and indirect equity interest as required in the future. If they fail to make or update the registration, our PRC subsidiaries could be subject to fines and legal penalties, and SAFE could restrict our cross-border investment activities and our foreign exchange activities, including restricting our PRC subsidiaries’ ability to distribute dividends to, or obtain loans denominated in foreign currencies from SolarMax, or prevent SolarMax from paying dividends. As a result, our business operations and our ability to make distributions to you could be materially and adversely affected.

Certain PRC regulations, including the M&A Rules and national security regulations, may require a complicated review and approval process which could make it more difficult for us to pursue growth through acquisitions in China.

On August 8, 2006, six PRC regulatory authorities, including the Ministry of Commerce, the State Assets Supervision and Administration Commission, the State Administration for Taxation, the State Administration for Industry and Commerce, CSRC and SAFE, jointly issued the Regulation on Mergers and Acquisitions of Domestic Enterprises by Foreign Investors, or the M&A Rules, which became effective on September 8, 2006 and were amended on June 22, 2009. The M&A Rules established additional procedures and requirements that could make merger and acquisition activities in China by foreign investors more time-consuming and complex. For example, the MOFCOM must be notified in the event a foreign investor takes control of a PRC domestic enterprise. In addition, certain acquisitions of domestic companies by offshore companies that are related to or affiliated with the same entities or individuals of the domestic companies, are subject to approval by the MOFCOM. In addition, the Implementing Rules Concerning Security Review on Mergers and Acquisitions by Foreign Investors of Domestic Enterprises, issued by the MOFCOM in August 2011, require that mergers and acquisitions by foreign investors in “any industry with national security concerns” be subject to national security review by MOFCOM. In addition, any activities attempting to circumvent such review process, including structuring the transaction through a proxy or contractual control arrangement, are strictly prohibited.

There is significant uncertainty regarding the interpretation and implementation of these regulations relating to merger and acquisition activities in China. In addition, complying with these requirements could be time-consuming, and the required notification, review or approval process may materially delay or affect our ability to complete merger and acquisition transactions in China. As a result, our ability to seek growth through acquisitions may be materially and adversely affected.

Although we do not believe that our business in China is part of an industry with national security concerns, we cannot assure you that MOFCOM will not reach a different conclusion. If MOFCOM determines that we should have obtained its approval, we may be required to file for remedial approvals. There is no assurance that it would be able to obtain such approval from MOFCOM. We may also be subject to administrative fines or penalties by MOFCOM that may require us to limit its business operations in the PRC, delay or restrict the conversion and remittance of its funds in foreign currencies into the PRC or take other actions that could have material and adverse effect on its business, financial condition and results of operations.

Under the new Enterprise Income Tax Law, we may be classified as a “resident enterprise” of China. Such classification could result in unfavorable tax consequences to us and our non-PRC stockholders.

The new Enterprise Income Tax (EIT) Law, which was most recently amended on December 29, 2018, and its implementing rules provide that enterprises established outside of China whose “de facto management bodies” are located in China are considered “resident enterprises” under PRC tax laws. The implementing rules promulgated under the new EIT Law define the term “de facto management bodies” as a management body which substantially manages, or has control over the business, personnel, finance and assets of an enterprise. However, there are no further detailed rules or precedents governing the procedures and specific criteria for determining “de facto management body.” It is still unclear if the PRC tax authorities would determine that our China operations, which are owned by its subsidiary, SolarMax Hong Kong, should be classified as a PRC “resident enterprise.”

If we are deemed as a PRC “resident enterprise,” we will be subject to PRC enterprise income tax on our worldwide income at a uniform tax rate of 25%, although dividends distributed to us from our existing PRC subsidiaries and any other PRC subsidiaries which we may establish from time to time could be exempt from the PRC dividend withholding tax due to a PRC “resident recipient” status. This could have a material and adverse effect on our overall effective tax rate, our income tax expenses and our net income. Furthermore, dividends, if any, paid to our stockholders may be decreased as a result of the decrease in distributable profits. In addition, if we were to be considered a PRC “resident enterprise,” dividends we pay with respect to shares of our common stock and the gains realized from the transfer of shares of our common stock may be considered income derived from sources within the PRC and be subject to PRC withholding tax. This could have a material and adverse effect on the value of your investment in us and the price of shares of our common stock.

Because we require a license to engage in the EPC business in China, any changes in the certification or qualification requirements could impair our ability to operate in China.

A specific license is required to engage in the EPC business in China. our subsidiary ZHPV currently holds the necessary licenses, including Construction Enterprise Qualification Certificate (“Qualification”) for Level III of General Contractor for Power Engineering Constructor which permits ZHPV to conduct business as a contractor in the power engineering construction business throughout the PRC. However, any changes in the requirements for obtaining and maintaining such licensure could impair ZHPV’s ability to retain its license which could preclude us from performing EPC services in China. The qualification certificate expires on June 30, 2024.

If we import polysilicon into China from the United States or South Korea, our gross margin may be impaired.

On July 18, 2013, MOFCOM announced that it would enact preliminary tariffs on imports of solar-grade polysilicon at rates up to 57% for United States suppliers and 48.7% for South Korean suppliers. This decision was affirmed by MOFCOM in January 2014. Import tariffs and limitations imposed on foreign polysilicon suppliers may lead to price increases for products from Chinese domestic suppliers. Although our China segment does not source any significant amount of polysilicon from the United States or South Korea, if we import polysilicon from these countries our cost of revenue is likely to increase, and we may not be able to pass the increased cost to our customers, which would impair our gross margin.

We may fail to comply with laws and regulations regarding the development, construction and operation of solar power projects and photovoltaic production projects in China.

The development, construction and operation of solar power projects and photovoltaic production projects are highly regulated activities. Our operations in China are governed by various laws and regulations, including national and local regulations relating to urban and rural planning, building codes, safety, environmental protection, fire control, utility transmission, engineering and metering and related matters. For example, the establishment of a solar power project is subject to the approval of the National Development and Reform Commission (“NDRC”) or its local branches, pursuant to the Administrative Provisions on Generation of Electricity by Renewable Energy Resources promulgated by the NDRC on January 5, 2006. Pursuant to the Provisions on the Administration of Electric Power Business Permit, which became effective on December 1, 2005 and were amended on May 30, 2015, certain solar power projects may be required to obtain the electric power business permits specifically for power generation from the State Electricity Regulatory Commission, known as SERC. Pursuant to the Interim Measures for the Administration of Solar Power Projects, promulgated by the National Energy Administration, known as the NEA, on August 29, 2013, solar power projects are subject to filings with the provincial NDRC. Such filing is subject to the national development plan for solar power generation, the regional scale index and implementation plan of the year as promulgated by the competent national energy authority and is a pre-condition for connecting to the power grid. Pursuant to the Interim Measures for the Administration of Distributed Generation Projects, or the Distributed PV Interim Measures, promulgated by the NEA on November 18, 2013, distributed generation projects are subject to filings with the provincial or regional NDRC. Such filing is subject to State Council’s rules for administration of investment projects and the regional scale index and implementation plan of the year as promulgated by the competent national energy authority. Distributed generation projects in the regional scale index of the year that are not completed or put into operation within two years from their respective filing date are cancelled and disqualified from receiving national subsidies. The Distributed PV Interim Measures also provide that the filing procedures should be simplified and the electric power business permit and permits in relation to land planning, environmental impact review, energy saving evaluation and other supporting documents may be waived. Detailed requirements of the filing are also subject to local regulations, and the effects of the Distributed PV Interim Measures on our business are yet to be evaluated. Pursuant to the Standard Conditions of Photovoltaic Production Industry, or the Photovoltaic Production Rule, promulgated by the PRC’s Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (“MIIT”) and, effective on March 25, 2015, the minimum proportion of capital funds contributed by the producer for newly built, renovation and expansion photovoltaic (“PV”) production projects shall be 20%. The Photovoltaic Production Rule also provides, among other matters, requirements in relation to the production scale, cell efficiency, energy consumption and operational life span of various PV products. It also requires companies to obtain pollution discharge permits.

Our failure to obtain or maintain any required approvals, permits, licenses or filings or to comply with the conditions associated therewith could result in fines, sanctions, suspension, revocation or non-renewal of approvals, permits or licenses, or even criminal penalties, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Any new government regulations pertaining to solar power projects may result in significant additional expenses to the development, construction and operation of solar power projects and, as a result, could cause a significant reduction in demand for our solar power projects and services. Currently, some of our project companies in the PRC have not obtained electric power business permits due to the delays in the governmental review or approval processes, which has impacted us with respect to one project. Failure to secure such permits may lead to monetary damages, fines or even criminal penalties.

We cannot assure you that we will be able to promptly and adequately respond to changes of laws and regulations, or that our employees and contractors will act in accordance with our internal policies and procedures. Failure to comply with laws and regulations where we develop, construct and operate solar power projects may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. We have been advised by our PRC counsel, AllBright Law Offices, that, based on their review of our operations materials, including our approved qualifications and PRC laws and regulations, our operations in the PRC, as presently conducted, comply in all material respects with applicable PRC laws and regulations.

Failure to comply with PRC regulations regarding the registration of share options held by our employees who are “domestic individuals” may subject such employee or us to fines and legal or administrative sanctions.

Pursuant to Notices on Issues concerning the Foreign Exchange Administration for Domestic Individuals Participating in Stock Incentive Plan of Overseas Publicly-Listed Company issued by the SAFE in February 2012, or the Stock Incentive Plan Rules, “domestic individuals” (both PRC residents and non-PRC residents who reside in China for a continuous period of not less than one year, excluding foreign diplomatic personnel and representatives of international organizations) participating in any stock incentive plan of an overseas listed company are required, through qualified PRC agents, including the PRC subsidiary of such overseas-listed company, to register with the SAFE and complete certain other procedures related to the stock incentive plan.

We and our employees who qualify as “domestic individuals” and have been granted stock options, or the PRC optionees, will become subject to the Stock Incentive Plan Rules when we become an overseas listed company upon the completion of the offering. We plan to conduct and complete the registration as required under the Stock Incentive Plan Rules and other relevant SAFE registrations and to update the registration on an on-going basis. If we or our PRC optionees fail to comply with the Individual Foreign Exchange Rule and the Stock Incentive Plan Rules, we and our PRC optionees may be subject to fines and other legal sanctions. We may also face regulatory uncertainties that could restrict our ability to adopt additional option plans for our directors and employees under PRC law. In addition, the General Administration of Taxation has issued circulars concerning employee stock options. Under these circulars, our employees working in China who exercise stock options will be subject to PRC individual income tax. Its PRC subsidiaries have obligations to file documents related to employee stock options with relevant tax authorities and withhold individual income taxes of those employees who exercise their stock options. If its employees fail to pay and we fail to withhold their income taxes, we may face sanctions imposed by tax authorities or any other PRC government authorities. Furthermore, there are substantial uncertainties regarding the interpretation and implementation of the Individual Foreign Exchange Rule and the Stock Incentive Plan Rules.

We face uncertainty with respect to indirect transfers of equity interests in PRC resident enterprises or other assets attributed to a PRC establishment of a non-PRC company, or immovable properties located in China owned by a non-PRC company.

We face uncertainties on the reporting and consequences of private equity financing transactions, private share exchange transactions and private transfer of shares, including private transfer of public shares, in our company by non-resident investors.

On February 3, 2015, the PRC’s State Administration of Taxation (“SAT”) issued Announcement on Several Issues Concerning the Enterprise Income Tax on Indirect Property Transfers by Non-RPC Resident Enterprises, or SAT Notice No. 7, to supersede the existing tax rules in relation to the tax treatment of the Indirect Transfer. SAT Notice No. 7 introduces a new tax regime and extends the SAT’s tax jurisdiction to capture transactions involving indirect transfer of (i) real properties in China and (ii) assets of an “establishment or place” situated in China, by a non-PRC resident enterprise through a disposition of equity interests in an overseas holding company. SAT Notice No. 7 also extends the Interpretation with respect to the disposition of equity interests in an overseas holding company. In addition, SAT Notice No. 7 further clarifies how to assess reasonable commercial purposes and introduces safe harbors applicable to internal group restructurings. However, it also brings challenges to both the foreign transferors and transferees as they are required to make self-assessments of whether an Indirect Transfer or similar transaction should be subject to PRC tax and whether they should file or withhold any tax payment accordingly.

However, there is a lack of clear statutory interpretation, there are uncertainties on the reporting and consequences on future private equity financing transactions, share exchange or other transactions involving the transfer of shares in our company by investors that are non-PRC resident enterprises, or sale or purchase of shares in other non-PRC resident companies or other taxable assets by us. We and other non-resident enterprises in our group may be subject to filing obligations or taxes if we and other non-resident enterprises in our group are transferors in such transactions and may be subject to withholding obligations if we and other non-resident enterprises in our group are transferees in such transactions. For the transfer of shares in our company by investors that are non-PRC resident enterprises, our PRC subsidiaries may be requested to assist in filing under the rules and notices. We may be required to expend costly resources to comply with SAT Notice No. 7, or to establish a case to be tax exempt under SAT Notice No. 7, which may cause us to incur additional costs and may have a negative impact on the value of your investment in us.

The PRC tax authorities have discretion under SAT Notice No. 7 to make adjustments to the taxable capital gains based on the difference between the fair value of the transferred equity interests and the investment cost. We may pursue acquisitions in the future that may involve complex corporate structures. If we are considered as a non-PRC resident enterprise under the EIT Law and if the PRC tax authorities make adjustments to the taxable income of the transactions under and SAT Notice No. 7, our income tax expenses associated with such potential acquisitions will be increased, which may have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Regulatory bodies of the United States may be limited in their ability to conduct investigations or inspections of our operations in China.

From time to time, we may receive requests from certain US agencies to investigate or inspect our operations, or to otherwise provide information. While we will be compliant with these requests from these regulators, there is no guarantee that such requests will be honored by those entities who provide services to us or with whom we associate, especially as those entities are located in China. Furthermore, an on-site inspection of our facilities in China by any of these regulators may be limited or entirely prohibited. Such inspections, though permitted by us and our affiliates, are subject to the unpredictability of the Chinese enforcers, and may therefore be impossible to facilitate. According to Article 177 of the PRC Securities Law which became effective in March 2020, the securities regulatory authority of the State Council may establish a regulatory cooperation mechanism with the securities regulatory authorities of another country or region, to implement cross-border supervision and administration and no overseas securities regulator is allowed to directly conduct an investigation or evidence collection activities within the territory of the PRC. Accordingly, without the consent of the competent PRC securities regulators and relevant authorities, no organization or individual may provide the documents and materials relating to securities business activities to overseas parties.

Risks Related to our Common Stock

An active, liquid and orderly trading market for our common stock may not develop or be maintained, and our stock price may be volatile.

We cannot predict the nature of the market for our common stock, and we cannot assure you that an active, liquid or orderly trading market for our common stock will be maintained. To the extent that an active market does not develop, you may have difficulty in selling any shares of our common stock. If there is no active, liquid or orderly market for our common stock, the reported bid and asked price at the time you seek to purchase or sell shares may not reflect the price at which you could either buy or sell shares of our common stock.

The trading price of our common stock may be volatile, and you could lose all or part of your investment.

Prior to our initial public offering in February 2024, there was no public market for our common stock. The trading price of our common stock is likely to be volatile and could be subject to fluctuations in response to various factors, some of which are beyond our control and may not relate to the results of our operations. These fluctuations could cause you to lose all or part of your investment in our common stock as you might be unable to sell your shares at or above the price you paid in our initial public offering or in the market following the offering. Factors that could cause fluctuations in the trading price of our common stock include the following:

In recent years, the stock markets generally have experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have often been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of listed companies. Broad market and industry factors may significantly affect the market price of our common stock, regardless of our actual operating performance. These fluctuations may be even more pronounced in the trading market for our common stock shortly following our initial public offering. If the market price of shares of our common stock after our initial public offering does not ever exceed the initial public offering price, you may not realize any return on your investment in us and may lose some or all of your investment.

In addition, in the past, following periods of volatility in the overall market and in the market price of a particular company’s securities, securities class action litigation has often been instituted against these companies. This litigation, if instituted against us, could result in substantial costs and a diversion of our management’s attention and resources.

Our amended and restated articles of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws and our employment agreement with our chief executive officer, as well as Nevada law, contain provisions that could discourage acquisition bids or merger proposals, which may adversely affect the market price of our common stock.

Our amended and restated articles of incorporation authorize our board of directors to issue preferred stock without stockholder approval. If our board of directors issues preferred stock, such issuance could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire us. Our employment agreements with our two senior executive officers provide that, in the event of a termination of employment by David Hsu, our chief executive officer, following a change of control, we are to pay Mr. Hsu, upon termination, a lump sum payment equal to two times the highest annual compensation for the three years preceding the date of termination, multiplied by the number of years he has been employed by us. Mr. Hsu’s employment commenced in February 2008. In addition, some provisions of our amended and restated articles of incorporation and bylaws could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire control of us, even if the change of control would be beneficial to our stockholders, including:

Provisions of our bylaws and Nevada law could deter a change of our management, which could discourage or delay offers to acquire us.

Certain provisions of Nevada law and of our bylaws could discourage or make it more difficult to accomplish a proxy contest or other change in our management or the acquisition of control by a holder of a substantial amount of our voting stock. It is possible that these provisions could make it more difficult to accomplish or could deter transactions that stockholders may otherwise consider to be in their best interests or in our best interests. These provisions include:

A portion of the compensation to our senior executive officers may not be deductible, which may increase our taxes

Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code limits the deduction that public companies may take for annual compensation paid to its chief executive officer, chief financial officer and the three other most highly compensated officers, who are referred to as “covered employees.”  All compensation in excess of $1.0 million paid to a covered employee, including post termination compensation and death benefits, may be nondeductible for federal income tax purposes, with certain exceptions pursuant to certain contracts that were in effect on November 2, 2017.  In the event that the compensation we pay to any covered employee exceeds $1.0 million, such excess may not be deductible which, if our operations are profitable, could increase our income taxes and reduce our net income, which could negatively affect the price of our stock.

Because our bylaws limit the court in which you may bring an action against us, you may have difficulty enforcing any rights which you may claim.

Our bylaws provide that any person who acquires equity in us shall be deemed to have notice and consented to the forum selection provision of our bylaws, which require actions to be brought only in the state courts in Clark County, Nevada, which may inhibit or deter stockholders’ actions (i) on behalf of us, (ii) asserting claims of breach of fiduciary duty by officers or directors of us, or (iii) arising out of the Nevada Revised Statutes. Further, this exclusive forum provision may limit our stockholders’ ability to obtain what they believe to be a favorable judicial forum for disputes with us and our officers and directors. This provision does not apply to claims brought under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Because we do not intend to pay dividends on our common stock, your only opportunity to achieve a return on your investment is if the price of our common stock appreciates.

We do not plan to declare dividends on shares of our common stock in the foreseeable future. As a result, your only opportunity to achieve a return on your investment will be if you sell your common stock at a price greater than you paid for it. We cannot assure you that the price of our common stock that will prevail in the market will ever equal or exceed the price that you pay in our initial public offering or in the open market.

Future sales of our common stock in the public market could reduce our stock price, and any additional capital raised by us through the sale of equity or convertible securities may dilute your ownership in us.

All of the 40,000,186 shares of common stock that were outstanding prior to our initial public offering, which constitute approximately 87.5% of our outstanding common stock, are eligible for sale pursuant to Rule 144 at various times, subject to limitations provided by Rule 144 and lock-up agreements which our stockholders, including our directors and officers, who hold 38,901,642 shares have signed lock-ups for period of 180 days from the February 12, 2024 effective date of the registration statement relating to our initial public offering, which expires on August 10, 2024, release from the lock-up restriction at the discretion of the underwriters.  If the managing underwriter of our initial public offering, waives or releases parties to the lock-up, the market price for our common stock could be adversely impacted.

In addition, the holders of our convertible debentures in the principal amount of $14.25 million at March 31, 2024, have conversion rights at a conversion price of $3.20 per share, being 80% of the initial public offering price, subject to six month lock-up provision. To the extent that the remaining limited partners of the partnerships that made loans of $55.5 million to our subsidiaries, accept our proposed refinancing of the loan made by the partnerships to our subsidiaries, we may issue a significant number of shares of common stock  Both the sale and the market’s reaction to the possible sale of such shares and any additional shares which may be issued upon conversion of additional convertible notes which we may issue could have a material adverse impact on the market price of and the market for our common stock. Although the partnerships are related parties since the general partner is a related party, the limited partners to whom we issued and propose to issue the convertible notes are not related parties.

We intend to file a registration statement with the SEC on Form S-8 providing for the registration of shares of our common stock issued or reserved for issuance under our equity incentive plan or pursuant to stock options. Subject to the satisfaction of vesting conditions and the expiration of lock-up agreements, shares registered under the registration statement on Form S-8 will be available for resale immediately in the public market without restriction other than those restrictions imposed on sales by affiliates pursuant to Rule 144.

We cannot predict the size of future issuances of our common stock or securities convertible into common stock or the effect, if any, that future issuances and sales of shares of our common stock will have on the market price of our common stock. Sales of substantial amounts of our common stock (including shares issued in connection with any acquisition we may make), or the perception that such sales, including sales by our existing stockholders pursuant to Rule 144, could occur, may adversely affect prevailing market prices of our common stock.

We may issue preferred stock whose terms could adversely affect the voting power or value of our common stock.

Our amended and restated articles of incorporation authorize us to issue, without the approval of our stockholders, one or more classes or series of preferred stock having such designations, preferences, limitations and relative rights, including preferences over our common stock respecting dividends and distributions, as our board of directors may determine. The terms of one or more classes or series of preferred stock could adversely impact the voting power or value of our common stock. For example, we might grant holders of preferred stock the right to elect one or more directors in all events or on the happening of specified events or the right to veto specified transactions. Similarly, the repurchase or redemption rights or liquidation preferences we might assign to holders of preferred stock could affect the residual value of the common stock.

For as long as we are an emerging growth company, we will not be required to comply with certain reporting requirements, including those relating to accounting standards and disclosure about our executive compensation, that apply to other public companies.

We are classified as an “emerging growth company” under the JOBS Act. For as long as we are an emerging growth company, which may be up to five full fiscal years, we will not be required to, among other things, (i) provide an auditor’s attestation report on management’s assessment of the effectiveness of our system of internal control over financial reporting pursuant to Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, (ii) comply with any new requirements adopted by the PCAOB requiring mandatory audit firm rotation or a supplement to the auditor’s report in which the auditor would be required to provide additional information about the audit and the financial statements of the issuer, (iii) provide certain disclosure regarding executive compensation, or (iv) hold nonbinding advisory votes on executive compensation. We will remain an emerging growth company for up to five years, although we will lose that status sooner if we have more than $1.235 billion of revenues in a fiscal year, have more than $700 million in market value of our common stock held by non-affiliates, or issue more than $1.0 billion of non-convertible debt over a three-year period.

To the extent that we rely on any of the exemptions available to emerging growth companies, you will receive less information about our executive compensation and internal control over financial reporting than issuers that are not emerging growth companies. If some investors find our common stock to be less attractive as a result, there may be a less active trading market for our common stock and our stock price may be more volatile.

Because our directors and executive officers own or have the right to vote approximately 28.3% of our outstanding common stock, they may be able to elect all directors, approve all matters requiring stockholder approval and block any action which may be beneficial to stockholders. 

Our directors and executive officers beneficially own approximately 28.3% of our outstanding common stock.  Our bylaws provide that one-third of the outstanding common stock constitutes a quorum for a meeting of stockholders. As a result, they may have the ability to elect all of our directors and to approve actions requiring stockholder approval as well as to prevent any action from being taken which they oppose even if such action would benefit stockholders.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

Not applicable

Item 1C. Cybersecurity

Our company diligently monitors cybersecurity risks, conducting annual reviews at senior management levels and, if necessary, with the Audit Committee for updates to the Board of Directors. Currently, we believe there are no significant cybersecurity threats that pose a material risk to our business strategy, operations, or financial condition.

To safeguard data confidentiality, integrity, and accessibility, we have robust processes in place for assessing, identifying, and managing cybersecurity risks. Our information security (IT) function is outsourced to vendors with specialized security expertise and comprehensive risk management procedures, encompassing physical, procedural, and technical safeguards. These measures include response plans, regular system tests, third-party reviews, incident simulations, and ongoing policy and procedure refinement to mitigate risks.

Our primary strategy for mitigating cyber risks involves storing sensitive data with trusted third-party providers who meet stringent audit and security standards. Our enterprise resource planning (ERP) and system of record are hosted by a third party employing rigorous monitoring tools, controls, policies, and an experienced security team. Our vendors comply with various industry standards such as SOC 1, SOC 2, PCI-DSS, EU-US Privacy Shield framework, NIST, and ISO 27000 series.

Our IT network is managed by a third-party managed service provider (MSP) proficient in network setup and security. The MSP monitors our network around the clock, to provide prevention, detection, correlation, investigation, and response to any security incidents, promptly notifying management of any potential issues.

Our MSP conducts proactive threat hunting to identify potential cybersecurity risks within our network. Additionally, a dedicated team researches vulnerabilities, performs vulnerability scans, conducts security audits, and reviews policies to mitigate potential risks.

Network Protection

We use a security package with regularly updated antivirus software to block and prevent malicious processes and files. Firewalls are configured to block potentially harmful activity, and the network is segmented to protect confidential data with access permissions based on the principle of least privilege. We maintain backup data in key locations to facilitate recovery in the event of data loss or disaster.

Detect Issues

Our system employs active scanners to constantly monitor for potential threats, suspicious behavior, and harmful activity. It utilizes user behavioral analysis and learning to stop potential threats in real time. Both our vendors maintain teams to review alerts, confirming true or false positives in the network.

Threat Response

Our vendors provide SOC teams that automatically investigate and address potential attacks. They collaborate to ensure immediate responses, utilizing playbooks and auto-remediation methods such as password resets, IP blocking, software removal, and risk mitigation.

Item 2. Properties

We lease our offices and do not own any real estate. Our corporate headquarters is located in Riverside, California and currently consists of approximately 159,000 square feet pursuant to a lease which expires on December 31, 2026 at a current annual rent of approximately $1.6 million.

We also lease office space in Diamond Bar, California from a related party pursuant to a lease that expires on October 31, 2026 at a current annual rent of approximately $0.3 million.

We also lease office space in China.

We believe our current facilities are adequate for the foreseeable future. If we require additional or substitute space, we believe that we will be able to obtain such space on acceptable, commercially reasonable terms.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

In the ordinary course of our business, we and our subsidiaries are involved in various legal proceedings involving contractual relationships, product liability claims, and a variety of other matters. We do not believe there are any such pending legal proceedings that will have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

Part II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Market Information

Our common stock is traded on the Nasdaq Global Market under the symbol SMXT.

Stockholders

As of April 10, 2024, we had 74 stockholders of record.  Based on information provided to us we believe that we have more than 700 beneficial owners of our common stock.

Transfer Agent

Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company, One State Street, 30th floor, New York, New York 10004-1561 is the transfer agent for our common stock.

Dividends

We have never paid or declared any cash dividends on our common stock, and we do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our common stock in the near future. We intend to retain all available funds and any future earnings to fund the development and expansion of our business. Any future determination to pay dividends will be at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend upon a number of factors, including our results of operations, financial condition, future prospects, contractual restrictions, restrictions imposed by applicable law and other factors our board of directors deems relevant.

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

The following table gives information concerning common stock that may be issued by us with respect to compensation plans, including individual compensation arrangements) as of December 31, 2023:

Use of Proceeds from Our Initial Public Offering 

The net proceeds from our initial public offering were approximately $18.6 million.  As of March 31, 2024, we used approximately $0.8 million to make payments due to our former executive vice president and $0.1 million to a former employee pursuant to our agreements with them. We also used $2.9 million to pay the principal payments due on the convertible debentures issued to the former limited partners of CEF pursuant to the terms of the debentures.  The balance is being held in short-term interest-bearing deposits and securities. 

Item 6. [ Reserved ]

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

You should read the following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations together with “Selected Consolidated Financial Data” and our financial statements and the related notes appearing elsewhere in this annual report. In addition to historical information, this discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements that involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. See “Cautionary Note Concerning Forward-Looking Statements.” Our actual results may differ materially from those discussed below. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, those identified below, and those discussed in “Risk Factors” included elsewhere in this annual report.. All amounts in this annual report are in U.S. dollars, unless otherwise noted.

Agreement of Merger with Alberton

On October 27, 2020, we entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) among us; the Alberton Acquisition Corporation (“Alberton”), and Alberton Merger Subsidiary, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Alberton, as Merger Sub. Merger Sub was formed for the sole purpose of the proposed merger with us. Under the Merger Agreement, Merger Sub was to have been merged with and into us, and we would continue as the surviving corporation and as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Alberton and our shareholders would receive stock in Alberton. In April 2022, we terminated the Merger Agreement pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement. In connection with the Merger Agreement, we made loans to Alberton in the total amount of $1,664,446.66 and we made loans to the Alberton’s sponsor in the total amount of $651,369.01. Although the loans are payable by Alberton and Alberton’s sponsor as a result of the termination of the Merger Agreement, because we are not able to collect any of the outstanding principal amount such loans, we recognized an expense in the full amount of these loans, along with capitalized merger costs, which together totaled approximately $3.4 million, in the year ended December 31, 2022.

Initial Public Offering

On February 27, 2024, we sold 4,500,000 shares of common stock, at a price of $4.00 per share in our initial public offering. The gross proceeds of the offering were $18 million, prior to deducting the underwriting discounts, commissions and offering expenses payable by the Company. In addition, we granted the underwriters a 45-day option to purchase an additional 675,000 shares of common stock at the initial public offering price, less underwriting discounts and commissions, to cover over-allotments. On March 5, 2024, the underwriters purchased 539,950 shares of common stock upon the partial exercise of the over-allotment option. Net proceeds received by us from our initial public offering, including the partial exercise of the over-allotment option, were approximately $18.6 million.  We are using the proceeds of our initial public offering for working capital and other corporate purposes.

Reverse Stock Split

On July 15, 2022, we effected a 0.59445-for-one reverse stock split and, in connection with the reverse stock split, we reduced our authorized common stock from 500,000,000 shares to 297,225,000 shares. All share and per share information in this annual report retroactively reflects the reverse stock split. 

Overview

We are an integrated solar and renewable energy company. A solar energy system retains the direct current (DC) electricity from the sun and converts it to alternating current (AC) electricity that can be used to power residential homes and commercial businesses. We were founded in 2008 to engage in the solar business in the United States and, following our acquisition of Chengdu ZHTH and ZHPV, we commenced operations in China.

Our United States operations primarily consist of the sale and installation of photovoltaic and battery backup systems for residential and commercial customers, and sales of LED systems and services to government and commercial users. Prior to 2020, we also financed the purchase of solar equipment from us.  Since early 2020, because we did not have the capital to support such operations, we suspended making loans to our solar customers, and we are not currently financing the purchase of solar systems and we do not anticipate engaging in such activities in the near future, if at all.  Our finance revenue reflects revenue earned on our current portfolio, with no new loans having been added since early 2020.

Our business in China is conducted through our subsidiaries, primarily ZHTH and ZHPV, and their subsidiaries. Our China operations consist primarily of identifying and procuring solar farm projects for resale to third parties and performing EPC services primarily for solar farm projects. Our China operations did not generate any revenue for the years ended December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022.  Our China segment last generated revenue for the year ended December 31, 2021, substantially all of which was generated in the second quarter of the year.

Substantially all of our revenue for our China segment since 2020 has been generated from four projects for SPIC. At December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, we had $7.7 million and $8.4 million, respectively, of accounts receivable from SPIC. These receivables represent the balance of the contractual billings pursuant to the construction contracts and the unpaid portion of the equity transfer agreements pursuant to which we, in 2020 and 2021, sold to SPIC 70% controlling interests in three of the project entities and a 100% interest in the fourth project entity. SPIC is a large state-owned company in China, and we believe that it has the financial ability to meet its obligations on its contracts, including the transfer agreements relating to the four projects. Collections in China are paper-based, bureaucratic and often require in-person meetings. Travel restrictions in China due to the COVID restrictions in China prevented the kind of in-person meetings necessary to collect on the receivables from SPIC. Beginning in August 2022, our China personnel began in-person collection meetings with SPIC, and SPIC has started the payment process. We do not believe that any reserve against these accounts receivable is required at December 31, 2023. SPIC is a state-owned entity in China and is legally obligated to pay its receivables when a bill is issued. We will continue to evaluate the collectability of these receivables on an ongoing basic in connection with the preparation of our financial statements for each quarter.

Our business in China is conducted through our principal subsidiaries, ZHPV and ZHTH, and their subsidiaries. ZHTH is engaged in the business of identifying and procuring solar system projects for resale to third party developers and related services in China. After the project subsidiary acquires the permits for a solar project and obtains a contract for the sale of the project, ZHPV builds the project pursuant to an EPC contract. The subsidiary that owns the equity in the project subsidiary transfers the equity in the project subsidiary to the project owner. During 2020 and 2021, we has agreements with SPIC for the construction of four solar farm projects pursuant to which we preformed the EPC work and sold SPIC 70% of the equity in three of the project subsidiaries and 100% of the equity in the fourth, in each case, upon completion and acceptance of the project by SPIC, we transferred 70% of the equity in the project subsidiary to SPIC, retaining a 30% interest, and SPIC has a first right of refusal to purchase the 30% interest in the project subsidiary from us after the project has been in operation at full capacity for one year. As of March 31, 2024. SPIC has not exercised this right.

Unlike systems in the United States, which are installations for residential and small business users, the projects in China are generally solar farms, which are large land areas where multiple ground-mount solar tracking towers are installed.

Effects of NEM 3.0

Net metering is a billing mechanism that credits solar energy system owners for the electricity that they add to the electricity grid. If the owner of a solar system generates more electricity than it consumes, the excess electricity is sold back to the grid. The California Public Utilities Commission has adopted the current net metering regulations, known as NEM 3.0, which became effective in April 2023. NEM 3.0 features a 75% reduction in export rates (the value of excess electricity pushed onto the grid by solar systems) from the rate set forth in the previous net metering regulations, NEM 2.0,, thereby reducing the overall savings and increasing the payback period of home solar installations. The changes under NEM 3.0, which are likely to result in reduced benefits for most residential solar users, could alter the return on investment for solar customers.

In January 2024, we laid off a portion of our employees associated with the design and installation of residential solar systems in response to a slowdown in demand after NEM 3.0 took effect in April 2023. The layoff represented approximately 25% of our residential solar system design and installation team. Approximately half of the employees who were laid off had been hired in late 2022 to help install the growing backlog of residential solar systems under contract in anticipation of NEM 3.0, and the contracts representing that backlog were completed during 2023. We may need to revise our pricing metrics to reflect the change resulting from NEM 3.0 in order for the purchase of a solar system to be economically attractive to the customer, which may result in lower prices and reduced margins. Although we anticipate the near-term impact of NEM 3.0 on residential solar contracts will be offset by commercial solar contracts for which we use third-party subcontractors to complete the installations, we cannot assure you that our overall business will not be impacted by the effects of NEM 3.0.

Effects of COVID-19 Pandemic

The United States Center for Disease Control announced that the COVID-19 public health emergency ended in May 2023, with the result that the COVID restrictions in the United States are no longer in effect and restrictions have been terminated worldwide. We believe our United States operations are not, and have not since mid-2022 been, materially affected by COVID.  However, the effects of China’s zero tolerance policy with respect to COVID-19, which is no longer in effect, has impaired our ability to negotiate both new contracts with and payment schedules with State Power Investment Corporation Guizhou Jinyuan Weining Energy Co., Ltd. (“SPIC”), a state-owned entity which has been the only customer for our China segment since 2020, with the result that we have no pending agreement with SPIC and we are continuing to negotiate payment of outstanding receivables from SPIC.

Inflation and Supply Chain Issues

Prior to mid-to-late 2021, our business was not impacted by inflation or supply chain issues. With the recent inflationary pressures combined with the world-wide supply chain issues, our business is subject to the inflationary and we were subject to supply chain issues that were affecting many domestic and foreign companies, and we expect that the inflationary pressures will continue to affect our ability to sell our products, the price at which can sell products in both the United States and China and our gross margin in both the United States and China. To the extent that we are not able to raise our prices or to the extent that we cannot accurately project our costs when we set our prices, our gross margin and the results of our operations will be impacted.

Polysilicon is an essential raw material in the production of solar power products, principally solar panels. The costs of silicon wafers and other silicon-based raw materials have accounted for a large portion of the costs associated with solar panels. Although the price of silicon had declined in recent years, increases in the price of polysilicon have resulted in increases in the price of wafers, leading to increases in our costs. Due to the volatile market prices, we cannot assure you that the price of polysilicon will remain at its current levels particularly in view of inflationary pressures and supply chain issues, especially if the global solar power market gains its growth momentum. Moreover, in the event of an industry-wide shortage of polysilicon, we may experience late or non-delivery from suppliers and it may be necessary for us to purchase silicon raw materials of lower quality that may result in lower efficiencies and reduce its average selling prices and revenues. We currently are able to obtain the raw material we request, although the prices pay are increasing as a result of the inflationary pressures.

The inflationary pressures that are affecting us are not unique to our industry, and relate to the cost of raw materials, labor costs generally and the price at which we can sell our products. Because solar energy can be seen as a way to provide a homeowner with relief from the increasing utility prices for electricity, the market for solar systems generally, and our business specifically, has enabled us to sell more solar systems. Thus, the effects of inflation may also affect the marketability of our solar systems to residential users. In our United States segment, our revenue from solar systems increased from $40.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2022 to $50.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2023 and from $27.5 million in the year ended December 31, 2021 to $40.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2022. Our cost of revenue per watt of solar systems, which makes up approximately 80% of our costs, increased approximately 10% during the year ended December 31, 2023 compared to the same period in 2022, but decreased approximately 3% during 2022 compared to 2021 primarily due to our ability to acquire solar panels in bulk during the second half of 2022 at a cost more favorable than in 2021. In the third quarter of 2022, we were able to obtain panels at a lower cost and our cost per revenue per watt of solar systems for 2022 was equal to our cost per revenue per watt in the 2021. There is no assurance we can continue to source panels at favorable prices. We have increased the price of solar system installations in our United States segment to offset the increase in cost in 2023 and during the first half of 2022. Although we do not have any data as to the effect of higher utility costs on purchases of solar systems, it has been our experience during the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022 that, as inflationary pressures are increasing the cost of electricity generally, our domestic business has grown as homeowners are seeking alternatives to what they see as high utility bills. As a result, we have been able to increase our prices, which reduced the effect of increased cost of raw materials and the general increase in overhead costs. However, the changes in NEM 3.0 did not affect our business in 2023 as we believe homeowners purchased solar systems in anticipation of NEM 3.0, and our residential business is feeling the effects of the reduced value seen as a result of NEM 3.0.  Our gross margin from United States operations increased from 16.7% for the year ended December 31, 2022 to 21% for the year ended December, 2023 and decreased from 19.8% for the year ended December 31, 2021 to 16.7% for the year ended December 31, 2022 as a result of the increase in the cost of raw materials. The effect of increased costs on our margin was reduced because we were able to increase prices. However, competitive factors limit the amount we can increase our prices, but our price increases reduced what would otherwise have been a decline in gross margin for the year ended December 31, 2023, and, if our prices are too high, the residential customer may not see the value of installing a solar system. We are seeking to reduce the effect of increased prices in raw materials by purchasing in greater quantities. However, to the extent inflation continues or increases, we may not be able to raise prices sufficiently to prevent a significant decline in our gross margins and the results of our operations.

Compensation costs per employee for sales, marketing and administrative personnel in our United States segment increased approximately 16% for the year ended December 31, 2023 compared to the year ended December 31, 2022, and approximately 12% during the year ended December 31, 2022 compared to 2021 in response to the increased cost of retaining and attracting talent, and such costs may continue to increase as labor costs in California continue to increase as a result of the inflationary pressures. In addition, to the extent that inflationary pressure affects our cost of revenue and general overhead, we may face the choice of raising prices to try and maintain our margins or reduce or maintain our price structure to generate business. In addition, to the extent that inflationary pressure affects our cost of revenue and general overhead, we may face the choice of raising prices to try and maintain our margins or reduce or maintain our price structure to meet competition which would resulting in a lower gross margin and a drop in operating income. Supply chain issues have caused us to periodically stock up on components such as solar panels and battery systems to ensure an adequate supply to meet expected demand, putting pressure on our cash flow. We do not believe that the supply chain issues that affected our operations in prior periods are currently affecting us. We cannot assure you that such delays and increased costs will not affect our business in the future.

Our China segment has felt the effects of both inflation and supply chain issues. Our China segment had a 0% gross margin for the year ended December 31, 2021 because our cost of revenue for one of our projects with SPIC was significantly adjusted as a result of the unanticipated increase in costs particularly the solar panel costs which resulted in a significant adjustment in cost during the period which could not be passed on to SPIC, which essentially reversed the profit that was recognized in 2020 for the project. We did not generate any revenue for our China segment for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022 and 2024 through the date of this annual report. Since the second quarter of 2020, the prices of the solar panels in China have been increasing due to the tight supply in the local market We cannot assure you that, if we are able to negotiate contracts with SPIC or any other purchaser, that we will be able to accurately price our costs, with the risk that, if we incur unanticipated inflationary and supply side costs, we may recognize a loss on the projects.

We are seeking to address the inflationary pressures by seeking to cut overhead expenses where possible and raising prices to levels that we believe are both competitive and attractive to customers in view of the increases in utility prices in California and maintaining an inventory of raw materials to enable us to better price our products. We believe that the proceeds of our initial public offering will provide us with funding to assist us in dealing with the effects of inflation on our business.

Transfer of Funds between our United States and China segments.

Our equity structure is a direct holding structure, that is, we directly control our U.S. subsidiaries and our subsidiaries in our China segment including: (i) Golden SolarMax Finance. Co. Ltd, a PRC subsidiary, (ii) SolarMax Technology Holdings (Hong Kong) Limited, a Hong Kong subsidiary which directly holds SolarMax Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd, a PRC subsidiary (together with its subsidiaries thereunder, “ZHTH”); (iii) Accumulate Investment Co., Ltd, a British Virgin Islands subsidiary which then directly holds Accumulate Investment Co., Limited, a Hong Kong subsidiary that directly holds ZHPV; a PRC subsidiary, and (iv) SolarMax Technology Holdings, a Cayman Islands subsidiary. Our business in China is conducted through ZHPV and ZHTH.

Since prior to the reporting periods presented in this prospectus and through the date of this prospectus, no dividends, distribution or other transfers of funds have occurred between and among us and our subsidiaries, on the one hand; and our Chinese subsidiaries, on the other hand, and we have not made any dividends, distributions or other transfer of funds to our stockholders. For the foreseeable future, we intend to use any earnings for our operations. As a result, we do not expect to pay any cash dividends. To the extent that we may in the future seek to fund the business through distribution, dividends or transfer of funds among and between holding company and subsidiaries, any such transfer of funds with PRC subsidiaries is subject to PRC government regulations. The structure of cash flows within holding company and PRC subsidiaries and a summary of the applicable regulations, is as follows:

1. Within the direct holding structure, the cross-border transfer of funds between us and our PRC subsidiaries is legal and compliant with the laws and regulations of the PRC. Funds can be directly transferred to our subsidiaries including ZHPV and ZHTH, and then transferred to subordinate operating entities through ZHPV and ZHTH according to the laws and regulations of the PRC.

2. If we intend to distribute dividends from our PRC subsidiaries, either for use in our United States segment or for distribution to stockholders, we will transfer the dividends from the PRC entities to ZHPV and ZHTH in accordance with the laws and regulations of the PRC, and then ZHPV and ZHTH will transfer the dividends to their respective parent companies and then to us and, if the funds are to be paid to our stockholders as a dividend, the dividend will be distributed by us to all stockholders based on their share ownership, regardless of whether the shareholders are U.S. investors or investors in other countries or regions.

3. Our PRC subsidiaries’ ability to distribute dividends is based upon their distributable earnings. Current PRC regulations permit our PRC subsidiaries to pay dividends to their respective shareholders only out of their accumulated profits, if any, determined in accordance with PRC accounting standards and regulations. In addition, each of the PRC subsidiaries is required to set aside at least 10% of its after-tax profits each year, if any, to fund a statutory reserve until such reserve reaches 50% of each of their registered capitals. These reserves are not distributable as cash dividends.

In addition, the Enterprise Income Tax Law and its implementation rules provide that a withholding tax at a rate of 10% will be applicable to dividends payable by Chinese companies to non-PRC-resident enterprises unless reduced under treaties or arrangements between the PRC central government and the governments of other countries or regions where the non-PRC resident enterprises are tax resident. Pursuant to the tax agreement between Mainland China and the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, the withholding tax rate in respect to the payment of dividends by a PRC enterprise to a Hong Kong enterprise may be reduced to 5% from a standard rate of 10%. However, if the relevant tax authorities determine that our transactions or arrangements are for the primary purpose of enjoying a favorable tax treatment, the relevant tax authorities may adjust the favorable withholding tax in the future. Accordingly, there is no assurance that the reduced 5% withholding rate will apply to dividends received by ours Hong Kong subsidiary from its PRC subsidiaries. This withholding tax will reduce the amount of dividends we may receive from our PRC subsidiaries.

To address persistent capital outflows and the RMB’s depreciation against the U.S. dollar in the fourth quarter of 2016, the People’s Bank of China and the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, or SAFE, have implemented a series of capital control measures in the subsequent months, including stricter vetting procedures for China-based companies to remit foreign currency for overseas acquisitions, dividend payments and shareholder loan repayments. The PRC government may continue to strengthen its capital controls and our PRC subsidiaries’ dividends and other distributions may be subject to tightened scrutiny in the future.

Foreign currency exchange regulation in the PRC is primarily governed by the Regulations on the Administration of Foreign Exchange, most recently revised by the State Council on August 5, 2008, Notice on Further Simplifying and Improving Policies of Foreign Exchange Administration Regarding Direct Investment issued by SAFE on February 13, 2015, and the Provisions on the Administration of Settlement, Sale and Payment of Foreign Exchange promulgated by People’s Bank of China on June 20, 1996. Currently, RMB is convertible for current account items, including the distribution of dividends, interest payments, trade and service-related foreign exchange transactions. Conversion of RMB for most capital account items, such as direct investment, security investment and repatriation of investment, however, is still subject to registration with the SAFE. Foreign-invested enterprises may buy, sell and remit foreign currencies at financial institutions engaged in foreign currency settlement and sale after providing valid commercial documents and, in the case of most capital account item transactions, obtaining approval from the SAFE. Capital investments by foreign enterprises are also subject to limitations, which include approvals by the NDRC, the Ministry of Construction, and registration with the SAFE.

Therefore, we may experience difficulties in completing the administrative procedures necessary to obtain and remit foreign currency for the payment of dividends from our profits, if any. Furthermore, if our subsidiaries in the PRC incur debt on their own in the future, the instruments governing the debt may restrict their ability to pay dividends or make other payments.

Years Ended December 31, 2023 and 2022

Results of Operations

The following tables set forth information relating to our operating results for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022 (dollars in thousands) and as a percentage of revenue: