|
|
PAGE
|
|
1
|
ITEM 1.
|
|
1
|
ITEM 2.
|
|
1
|
ITEM 3.
|
|
1
|
ITEM 4.
|
|
35
|
ITEM 4A.
|
|
49
|
ITEM 5.
|
|
50
|
ITEM 6.
|
|
66
|
ITEM 7.
|
|
68
|
ITEM 8.
|
|
73
|
ITEM 9.
|
|
74
|
ITEM 10.
|
|
75
|
ITEM 11.
|
|
88
|
ITEM 12.
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
|
89
|
ITEM 13.
|
|
89
|
ITEM 14.
|
|
89
|
ITEM 15.
|
|
89
|
ITEM 16.
|
|
90
|
ITEM 16A.
|
|
90 |
ITEM 16B.
|
|
90
|
ITEM 16C.
|
|
90 |
ITEM 16D.
|
|
91 |
ITEM 16E.
|
|
91 |
ITEM 16F.
|
|
92
|
ITEM 16G.
|
|
92 |
ITEM 16H.
|
|
93 |
ITEM 16I.
|
|
93 |
ITEM 16J.
|
|
93 |
ITEM 16K.
|
CYBERSECURITY |
93 |
|
|
|
|
94
|
ITEM 17.
|
|
94
|
ITEM 18.
|
|
94
|
ITEM 19.
|
|
94
|
CERTAIN DEFINED TERMS
Unless the context otherwise requires, as of the date of and as used in this Annual Report the term: (i) “we”, “us”, “our” or the
“Company” include the Toro Corp. and all of its subsidiaries; (ii) “Toro” refers only to Toro Corp. (formerly named “Tankco Shipping Inc.”) and not to its subsidiaries; (iii) “Castor” refers to Castor Maritime Inc.; (iv) “Toro Subsidiaries”
refers to the eight tanker-owning subsidiaries and an additional subsidiary formerly owning the M/T Wonder Arcturus contributed to Toro prior to the Distribution (as defined herein); (v) “common shares”
refers to the common shares, par value $0.001 per share, of Toro, (vi) “Distribution” refers to the distribution of 9,461,009 common shares on a pro rata basis to the holders of common stock of Castor, (vii) “Spin-Off” refers to, collectively,
the separation of the assets, liabilities and obligations of Castor and the Toro Subsidiaries and the contribution of the Toro Subsidiaries to Toro, the issuance of 140,000 shares of 1.00% Series A Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Convertible
Preferred Shares (the “Series A Preferred Shares”) to Castor, the issuance of the 40,000 Series B Preferred Shares (the “Series B Preferred Shares”) of Toro to Pelagos Holdings Corp (“Pelagos”) and the Distribution, all of which occurred on March
7, 2023 (such date, the “Distribution Date”); (viii) “Toro Spin-Off Resolutions” refers to, collectively, resolutions by our board of directors (the “Board”) on November 15, 2022 and December 30, 2022, (a) to focus our efforts on our then current
business of tanker shipping services, (b) that we have no interest or expectancy to participate or pursue any opportunity in areas of business outside of the tanker shipping business and (c) that Petros Panagiotidis, our director, Chairman, Chief
Executive Officer and controlling shareholder and his affiliates, such as Castor Ships S.A. (“Castor Ships”), are not required to offer or inform us of any such opportunity; (ix) “Master Management Agreement” refers to the master management
agreement entered into between Toro, Toro’s shipowning subsidiaries and Castor Ships with effect as of the date of the Distribution for the commercial and technical management of the Company’s vessels and (x) “Amended and Restated Master
Management Agreement” refers to the amended and restated master management agreement between Castor and Castor Ships, effective July 1, 2022 under which the vessels owned by the Toro Subsidiaries were commercially and technically managed by
Castor Ships prior to the Spin-Off.
We use the term “deadweight ton”, or “dwt”, in describing the size of vessels. Dwt, expressed in metric tons, each of which is equivalent to 1,000 kilograms, refers to the maximum
weight of cargo and supplies that a vessel can carry. A “ton mile” is a standardized shipping metric and refers to the volume of cargo being carried (a “ton”) and the distance sailed for the shipment in nautical miles.
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Matters discussed in this Annual Report on Form 20-F (the “Annual Report”) may constitute forward-looking statements. We intend such
forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for forward-looking statements contained in Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Forward-looking statements include all matters that are not historical facts or matters of fact at the date of this document. We are including this cautionary statement in connection with this safe harbor
legislation. This Annual Report and any other written or oral statements made by us or on our behalf may include forward-looking statements, which reflect our current views with respect to future events and financial performance. These
forward-looking statements may generally, but not always, be identified by the use of words such as “anticipate”, “believe”, “target”, “likely”, “will”, “would”, “could”, “should”, “seeks”, “continue”, “contemplate”, “possible”, “might”,
“expect”, “intend”, “estimate”, “forecast”, “project”, “plan”, “objective”, “potential”, “may”, “anticipates” or similar expressions or phrases.
The forward-looking statements in this Annual Report are based upon various assumptions, many of which are based, in turn, upon further assumptions, including without limitation,
our management’s examination of current or historical operating trends, data contained in our records and other data available from third parties. Although we believe that these assumptions were reasonable when made, because these assumptions are
inherently subject to significant uncertainties and contingencies which are difficult or impossible to predict and are beyond our control, we cannot assure you that we will achieve or accomplish any forward-looking statements, including these
expectations, beliefs or projections.
In addition to these assumptions, other important factors that, in our view, could cause actual results to differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements
include generally:
|
• |
the effects of the Spin-Off;
|
|
• |
our business strategy, expected capital spending and other plans and objectives for future operations, including our ability to expand our business as a new entrant to the tanker and liquefied petroleum gas
(“LPG”) shipping industry;
|
|
• |
market conditions and trends, including volatility and cyclicality in charter rates (particularly for vessels employed in the spot voyage market or pools), factors affecting supply and demand for vessels, such
as fluctuations in demand for and the price of the products we transport, fluctuating vessel values, changes in worldwide fleet capacity, opportunities for the profitable operations of vessels in the segments of the shipping industry in
which we operate and global economic and financial conditions, including interest rates, inflation and the growth rates of world economies;
|
|
• |
our ability to realize the expected benefits of vessel acquisitions or sales, and the effects of any change in our fleet’s size or composition, increased transactions costs and other adverse effects (such as
lost profit) due to any failure to consummate any sale of our vessels, on our future financial condition, operating results, future revenues and expenses, future liquidity and the adequacy of cash flows from our operations;
|
|
• |
our relationships with our current and future service providers and customers, including the ongoing performance of their obligations, dependence on their expertise, compliance with applicable laws, and any
impacts on our reputation due to our association with them;
|
|
• |
the availability of debt or equity financing on acceptable terms and our ability to comply with the covenants contained in agreements relating thereto, in particular due to economic, financial or operational
reasons;
|
|
• |
our continued ability to enter into time charters, voyage charters or pool arrangements with existing and new customers and pool operators and to re-charter our vessels upon the expiry of the existing charters
or pool agreements;
|
|
• |
any failure by our contractual counterparties to meet their obligations;
|
|
• |
changes in our operating and capitalized expenses, including bunker prices, dry-docking, insurance costs, costs associated with regulatory compliance and costs associated with climate change;
|
|
• |
our ability to fund future capital expenditures and investments in the acquisition and refurbishment of our vessels (including the amount and nature thereof and the timing of completion thereof, the delivery and
commencement of operations dates, expected downtime and lost revenue);
|
|
• |
fluctuations in interest rates and currencies, including the value of the U.S. dollar relative to other currencies;
|
|
• |
any malfunction or disruption of information technology systems and networks that our operations rely on or any impact of a possible cybersecurity breach;
|
|
• |
existing or future disputes, proceedings or litigation;
|
|
• |
future sales of our securities in the public market, our ability to maintain compliance with applicable listing standards or the delisting of our common shares;
|
|
• |
volatility in our share price;
|
|
• |
potential conflicts of interest involving members of our Board, senior management and certain of our service providers that are related parties;
|
|
• |
general domestic and international geopolitical conditions, such as political instability, events or conflicts (including armed conflicts, such as the war in Ukraine and the conflict in the Middle East), acts of
piracy or maritime aggression, such as recent maritime incidents involving vessels in and around the Red Sea, sanctions, “trade wars” and potential governmental requisitioning of our vessels during a period of war or emergency;
|
|
• |
global public health threats and major outbreaks of disease;
|
|
• |
any material cybersecurity incident;
|
|
• |
changes in seaborne and other transportation, including due to the maritime incidents in and around the Red Sea, fluctuating demand for tanker and LPG carriers and/or disruption of shipping routes due to
accidents, political events, international sanctions, international hostilities and instability, piracy, smuggling or acts of terrorism;
|
|
• |
changes in governmental rules and regulations or actions taken by regulatory authorities, including changes to environmental regulations applicable to the shipping industry and to vessel rules and regulations,
as well as changes in inspection procedures and import and export controls;
|
|
• |
inadequacies in our insurance coverage;
|
|
• |
developments in tax laws, treaties or regulations or their interpretation in any country in which we operate and changes in our tax treatment or classification;
|
|
• |
the impact of climate change, adverse weather and natural disasters;
|
|
• |
accidents or the occurrence of other unexpected events, including in relation to the operational risks associated with transporting crude oil and/or refined petroleum products; and
|
|
• |
any other factor described in this Annual Report.
|
Any forward-looking statements contained herein are made only as of the date of this Annual Report, and we disclaim any intention or obligation to update any forward-looking
statements as a result of developments occurring after the date of this Annual Report, except to the extent required by applicable law. New factors emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for us to predict all or any of these factors.
Further, we cannot assess the impact of each such factor on our business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to be materially different from those contained in any forward-looking statement. See
“Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors” for a more detailed discussion of these risks and uncertainties and for other risks and uncertainties. Please see our filings with the Securities and Exchange
Commission for a more complete discussion of these foregoing and other risks and uncertainties. These factors and the other risk factors described in this Annual Report are not necessarily all of the important factors that could cause actual
results or developments to differ materially from those expressed in any of our forward-looking statements. Given these uncertainties, investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements.
ITEM 1. |
IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISERS
|
A.
|
Directors and Senior Management
|
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
ITEM 2. |
OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE
|
Not applicable.
The descriptions of agreements contained herein are summaries that set forth certain material provisions of those agreements. Such descriptions do not purport to be
complete and are subject to, and are qualified in their entirety by reference to, the applicable provisions of each agreement, each of which is an exhibit to this Annual Report or included as an exhibit to certain of our other of our reports and other information filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). We encourage you to refer to each agreement for additional information.
Market and Industry Data
This Annual Report includes estimates regarding market and industry data. Unless otherwise indicated, information concerning our industry
and the markets in which we operate, including our general expectations, market position, market opportunity, market trends and market size, are based on our management’s knowledge and experience in the markets in which we operate, together with
currently available information obtained from various sources, including publicly available information, industry reports and publications, surveys, our clients, trade and business organizations and other contacts in the markets in which we
operate. Certain information is based on management estimates, which have been derived from third-party sources, as well as data from our internal research, and are based on certain assumptions that we believe to be reasonable based on such data
and other similar sources and on our knowledge of, and our experience to date in, the markets in which we operate.
While we believe the estimated market and industry data included in this Annual Report are generally reliable, such information, which is
derived in part from management’s estimates and beliefs, is inherently uncertain and imprecise. Market and industry data are subject to change and may be limited by the availability of raw data, the voluntary nature of the data gathering process
and other limitations inherent in any statistical survey of such data. In addition, projections, assumptions and estimates of the future performance of the markets in which we operate and our future performance are necessarily subject to
uncertainty and risk due to a variety of factors, including those described in “Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” and “Item 3. Key Information—D.
Risk Factors.” These and other factors could cause results to differ materially from those expressed in the estimates made by third parties and by us. Accordingly, you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such market and industry
data or any other such estimates. We cannot guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this information.
Not applicable.
B.
|
Capitalization and Indebtedness
|
Not applicable
C.
|
Reasons for the Offer and Use of Proceeds
|
Not applicable.
Some of the following risks relate principally to the industry in which we operate. Other risks relate principally to the ownership of our common shares. The occurrence of any of
the events described in this section could significantly and negatively affect our business, financial condition, operating results, cash available for dividends, as and if declared, or the trading price of our common shares or any other
securities of ours.
Summary of Risk Factors
|
• |
Charter rates for our vessels are volatile and cyclical in nature. A decrease in charter rates may adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.
|
|
• |
An oversupply of tanker vessel and LPG carrier capacity may prolong or further depress charter rates when they occur, which may limit our ability to operate our vessels profitably.
|
|
• |
Future growth in the demand for our services will depend among others on changes in supply and demand, economic growth in the world economy and demand for LPG and LPG transportation relative to changes in
worldwide fleet capacity.
|
|
• |
Global economic and financial conditions may negatively impact the sectors of the shipping industry in which we operate, including the extension of credit.
|
|
• |
Risks involved in operating ocean-going vessels could affect our business and reputation.
|
|
• |
The operation of tankers has unique operational risks associated with the transportation of oil.
|
|
• |
The age of our tanker vessel may impact our ability to obtain financing and a decline in the market values of our vessels could limit the amount of funds that we can borrow, cause us to breach certain financial
covenants in our future credit facilities and/or result in impairment charges or losses on sale.
|
|
• |
Geopolitical conditions, such as political instability or conflict, terrorist attacks and international hostilities, can affect the seaborne transportation industry, which could adversely affect our business.
|
|
• |
Compliance with rules and other vessel requirements imposed by classification societies may be costly and could reduce our net cash flows and negatively impact our results of operations.
|
|
• |
We are subject to international laws and regulations and standards (including, but not limited to, environmental standards such as IMO 2020 for the low sulfur fuels and the International Ballast Water Convention
for discharging of ballast water), as well as to regional requirements, such as European Union and U.S. laws and regulations for the prevention of water pollution, each of which may adversely affect our business, results of operations,
and financial condition. In particular, new short-, medium- and long-term measures developed by the IMO, the European Union and other entities to promote decarbonization and the reduction of greenhouse gas (“GHG”) emissions may adversely
impact our operations and markets.
|
|
• |
Increased inspection procedures and tighter import and export controls could increase costs and disrupt our business.
|
|
• |
We may not be able to execute our strategy and we may not realize the benefits we expect from acquisitions or other strategic transactions.
|
|
• |
We operate secondhand vessels, some of which have an age above the industry average, which may lead to increased technical problems for our vessels and/or higher operating expenses or affect our ability to
profitably charter our vessels and to comply with environmental standards and future maritime regulations and result in a more rapid depreciation in our vessels’ market and book values.
|
|
• |
We are dependent upon Castor Ships, a related party, and other third-party sub-managers for the management of our fleet and business, and failure of such counterparties to meet their obligations could cause us
to suffer losses or could negatively impact our results of operations and cash flows.
|
|
• |
Our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, who may be deemed to beneficially own, directly or indirectly, a majority of our outstanding common shares and 100% of our Series B Preferred Shares, has control over
us.
|
|
• |
We expect that any new or amended credit facility we enter into will contain restrictive financial covenants that we may not be able to comply with due to economic, financial or operational reasons and may limit
our business and financing activities.
|
|
• |
We do not have a declared dividend policy and our Board may never declare dividends on our common shares.
|
|
• |
Our share price may be highly volatile, and as a result, investors in our common shares could incur substantial losses.
|
|
• |
Future issuances of common shares or other equity securities, including as a result of an optional conversion of Series A Preferred Shares, or the potential for such issuances, may impact the price of our common
shares and could impair our ability to raise capital through equity offerings. Shareholders may experience significant dilution as a result of any such issuances.
|
|
• |
We are incorporated in the Marshall Islands, which does not have a well-developed body of corporate and case law.
|
|
• |
We have limited the fields in which we focus our operations and this may have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results.
|
Risks Relating to Our Industry
Charter rates for our vessels are volatile and cyclical in nature. A decrease in charter rates may adversely affect our business, financial condition and
operating results.
The tanker and LPG carrier industries are both cyclical and volatile in terms of charter rates, profitability and vessel
values. Fluctuations in charter rates result from changes in the supply and demand for vessel capacity and changes in the supply and demand for the products transported by tankers and LPG carriers. Further, because many factors influencing the
supply of, and demand for, vessel capacity (including the supply and demand for the products transported by tankers and LPG carriers) are unpredictable, the timing, direction and degree of changes in these markets are also unpredictable.
Deterioration of charter rates resulting from various factors relating to the cyclicality and volatility of our business may adversely affect our ability to profitably charter or re-charter our vessels or to sell our vessels on a profitable
basis. This could negatively impact our operating results, liquidity and financial condition.
For a discussion of factors impacting charter rates in the tanker and LPG carrier industries, refer to “—Charter rates for tanker vessels are
volatile and cyclical in nature. A decrease in tanker charter rates may adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results” and “—Charter rates for LPG carriers are volatile and
cyclical in nature. A decrease in LPG carrier charter rates may adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results”, respectively.
We are exposed to fluctuating demand, supply and prices for crude oil, refined petroleum and/or LPG products, and may be affected by a decrease in the demand for such products
and the volatility in their prices due to their effects on supply and demand of maritime transportation services.
Our growth significantly depends on continued growth in worldwide and regional demand for the products we transport and their carriage by sea, which could be negatively affected by several
factors, including declines in prices for such products or general political, regulatory and economic conditions.
In past years, China and India have had two of the world’s fastest growing economies in terms of gross domestic product and have been the main driving forces behind increases in shipping trade
and the demand for marine transportation. While China in particular has enjoyed rates of economic growth significantly above the world average, slowing economic growth rates may reduce the country’s contribution to world trade growth. If economic
growth continues to slow down in China, India and other countries in the Asia Pacific region, particularly in sectors of the economy related to the products we transport, we may face decreases in shipping trade and demand. The level of imports to
and exports from China may also be adversely affected by changes in political, economic and social conditions (including a slowing of economic growth) or other relevant policies of the Chinese government, such as changes in laws, regulations or
export and import restrictions, internal political instability, changes in currency policies, changes in trade policies and territorial or trade disputes. Furthermore, a slowdown in the economies of the United States or the European Union, or
certain other Asian countries may also have adverse impacts on economic growth in the Asia Pacific region. Therefore, a negative change in the economic conditions of any of these countries or elsewhere may reduce demand for tanker vessels and LPG
carriers and their associated charter rates, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results, as well as our prospects.
Supply and demand for the products our vessels transport are sensitive to the price of oil, which was volatile during 2023. The price of Very Low Sulphur Fuel Oil (“VLSFO”) in
Singapore ranged from a low of $554 per metric ton in June 2023 to a peak of around $705 per metric ton in November 2023. As of February 29, 2024, the price of VLSFO in Singapore is $639 per metric ton. While the supply of oil products
periodically tightened in 2023 as a result of the imposition of sanctions against Russia and Belarus in connection with its invasion of Ukraine, global supply has rebounded due to record production by the United States and other Atlantic basin
countries. For further details on these Russian sanctions, see “—Our charterers calling on ports located in countries or territories that are the subject of sanctions or embargoes imposed by the U.S. government
(including OFAC) or other authorities or failure to comply with the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (the “FCPA”) or similar laws could lead to monetary fines or penalties and adversely affect our reputation. Such failures and other events
could adversely affect the market for our common shares.” However, growth in the supply of oil products, including crude oil, refined petroleum products and LPG, may outpace demand for such products in 2024, as there is growing evidence
of softening global demand due to, among other factors, persistent inflationary pressures, the impact of higher interest rates and deteriorating macroeconomic outlooks in certain of the regions we operate in, such as Europe, which has experienced
a decline in manufacturing and industrial activity. In light of these economic pressures, the price of oil is generally expected to decline and may remain volatile as the market continues to adjust in changing patterns in supply and demand.
Certain additional factors may influence the price of oil and therefore supply and demand for the products we transport. For
example, sustained periods of low oil prices typically result in reduced exploration and extraction because oil companies’ capital expenditure budgets are subject to cash flow from such activities and are therefore sensitive to changes in
energy prices, a fact which could limit oil supply and lead to increases in crude oil and refined petroleum product prices. Consumer demand for crude oil and refined petroleum products, and as a result crude oil and refined petroleum product
prices, could also be affected by a shift towards other (renewable) energy resources such as wind energy, solar energy, nuclear energy, electricity or water energy. Changes in oil supply balance and oil prices, or the supply balance and prices
of products derived from oil, can have a material effect on demand for crude oil, refined petroleum product and LPG shipping services. In particular, changes to the trade patterns or trade routes of the products we transport may have a
significant negative or positive impact on the ton mile, and therefore the demand for our tankers and LPG carriers. As of February 29, 2024, trade routes for tankers and LPG carriers have been disrupted by escalating attacks on vessels in and
around the Red Sea. For further details, see “—Geopolitical conditions, such as political instability or conflict, terrorist attacks and
international hostilities, can affect the seaborne transportation industry, which could adversely affect our business.” Periods of low demand can cause excess vessel supply and intensify the competition in
the industry, which often results in vessels being idle for long periods of time, which could reduce our revenues and materially harm the profitability of our business and/or segments, operating results and/or available cash. As noted above,
the global economy and demand for crude oil, refined petroleum products and LPG continues to adapt to disruptions in oil supply due to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and related sanctions and the market may enter a period of oversupply of oil
products as demand shows signs of weakening, which may have a material effect on demand for tanker and LPG carriers shipping services, and, consequently, on our business, financial condition, cash flows and operating results. See also “—Geopolitical conditions, such as political instability or conflict, terrorist attacks and international hostilities, can affect the seaborne transportation industry, which could adversely affect our business.”
Worldwide inflationary pressures could negatively impact our results of operations and cash flows.
Over the course of 2023, inflationary pressures across many sectors globally continued to weigh on economic activity, though to a lesser extent than in 2022. While the U.S. consumer price index,
an inflation gauge that measures costs across dozens of items fell to 3.1% before seasonal adjustment in December 2023, down from 6.5% in December 2022, inflation has proven stickier in Europe, where inflation rates have generally been slower to
fall and remained relatively high throughout 2023. The ongoing effects of inflation on the supply and demand of the products we transport could alter demand for our services and reduced economic activity due to governmental responses to
persistent inflation in any of the regions in which we operate could cause a reduction in trade by altering consumer purchasing habits and reducing demand for the crude oil and/or refined petroleum products we carry. As a result, the volumes of
goods we deliver and/or charter rates for our vessels may be affected. Alternatively, if inflation fails to abate in 2024, we could experience persistently high operating, voyage and administrative costs. Any of these factors could have an
adverse effect on our business, financial condition, cash flows and operating results. For additional information, see “—We are exposed to fluctuating demand, supply and prices for crude oil, refined petroleum
and/or LPG products, and may be affected by a decrease in the demand for such products and the volatility in their prices due to their effects on supply and demand of maritime transportation services.”
Global economic and financial conditions may negatively impact the sectors of the shipping industry in which we operate, including the extension of credit.
As the shipping industry is highly dependent on economic growth and the availability of credit to finance and expand operations, it may be negatively affected by a decline in economic activity or
a deterioration of economic growth and financial conditions. Various factors may impact economic growth and the availability of credit, including those discussed in “—We are exposed to fluctuating demand, supply
and prices for crude oil, refined petroleum and/or LPG products, and may be affected by a decrease in the demand for such products and the volatility in their prices due to their effects on supply and demand of maritime transportation services”
and “—Worldwide inflationary pressures could negatively impact our results of operations and cash flows.”
A decline in economic activity or a deterioration of economic growth and financial conditions may have a number of adverse consequences for the sectors of the shipping industry in which we
operate, including, among other things:
|
• |
low charter rates, particularly for vessels employed on short-term time charters and in the spot voyage market or pools;
|
|
• |
decreases in the market value of vessels and the limited second-hand market for the sale of vessels;
|
|
• |
limited financing for vessels;
|
|
• |
widespread loan covenant defaults; and
|
|
• |
declaration of bankruptcy by certain vessel operators, vessel managers, vessel owners, shipyards and charterers.
|
The occurrence of one or more of these events could have a material adverse effect on our business, cash flows, compliance with debt covenants, financial condition and operating results.
Increases in bunker prices could affect our operating results and cash flows.
Fuel is a significant, if not the largest, expense in our shipping operations when vessels are under voyage charters and is an important factor in negotiating charter rates. Bunker prices have
increased significantly since 2021, starting at $415 per metric ton in January 2021 and reaching a high of $1,100 per metric ton in July 2022, before declining to a still elevated price of $617 per metric ton by the end of December 2022. This
volatility was in part attributable to the eruption of armed conflict in Ukraine. In 2023, bunker rates demonstrated decreasing volatility as the market adapted to the conflict in Ukraine, with the price for VLSFO
in Singapore reaching a high of $705 per metric ton in November 2023 which decreased to around $617 per metric ton by the end of December 2023. As of February 29, 2024, the price of VLSFO in Singapore was approximately $639 per metric ton but
uncertainty regarding its future direction remains. In addition, the conflict in the Middle East, including recent maritime incidents in and around the Red Sea, could
cause disruptions to the production and supply of oil, and therefore fuel, with adverse impacts on the price of VLSFO in 2024. As a result, our bunker costs for our vessels when off-hire, idling, or
operating in the spot voyage charter market have increased substantially in recent years and may continue to increase, which could have an adverse impact on our operating results and cash flows.
Geopolitical conditions, such as political instability or conflict, terrorist attacks and international hostilities, can affect the seaborne transportation
industry, which could adversely affect our business.
We conduct most of our operations outside of the United States and our business, results of operations, cash flows, financial condition and ability to pay dividends, if any, in the future may be
adversely affected by changing economic, political and government conditions in the countries and regions where our vessels are employed or registered. Moreover, we operate in a sector of the economy that has been and is likely to continue to be
adversely impacted by the effects of geopolitical developments, including political instability or conflict, terrorist attacks or international hostilities.
Currently, the world economy faces a number of challenges, including tensions between the United States and China, new and continuing turmoil and hostilities in Russia, Ukraine, the Middle East
(such as recent maritime incidents in and around the Red Sea) and other geographic areas and countries, continuing economic weakness in the European Union and slowing growth in China and the continuing threat of terrorist attacks around the
world.
In particular, the armed conflict between Russia and Ukraine and a severe worsening of Russia’s relations with Western economies has disrupted global markets, contributing to shifts in trading
patterns and trade routes for products, including crude oil, refined petroleum products and LPG, that may continue into the future. These changes are due in part to the imposition of sanctions against Russia and Belarus by various governments,
which have contributed to increased volatility in the price of crude oil and refined petroleum products. See “—Our charterers calling on ports located in countries or territories that are the subject of
sanctions or embargoes imposed by the U.S. government (including OFAC) or other authorities or failure to comply with the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (the “FCPA”) or similar laws could lead to monetary fines or penalties and adversely
affect our reputation. Such failures and other events could adversely affect the market for our common shares”, “—Worldwide inflationary pressures could negatively impact our results of operations and
cash flows” and “—The Company is exposed to fluctuating demand and supply for maritime transportation services, as well as fluctuating prices of crude oil, refined petroleum and/or LPG products and may
be affected by a decrease in the demand for such products and the volatility in their prices.”
Geopolitical conflicts have also resulted in attacks on vessels, mining of waterways and other efforts to disrupt international shipping. An attack on one of our
vessels or merely the perception that our vessels are a potential piracy or terrorist target could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results. Notably, since November 2023, vessels in and around
the Red Sea have faced an increasing number of attempted hijackings and attacks by drones and projectiles launched from Yemen, which armed Houthi groups have claimed responsibility for. These groups have stated that these attacks are a response
to the Israel-Hamas conflict. While initially Israeli and US-linked vessels were thought to be the primary targets of these attacks, vessels from a variety of countries have been the subject of these incidents, including vessels flying the
Marshall Islands flag. As a result of these attacks, certain vessels have sunk, been set alight and suffered other physical damage and crew injuries and fatalities have occurred, leading to heightened concerns for crew safety and security, as
well as trade disruption. An increasing number of companies have rerouted their vessels to avoid passage through affected areas and are now completing their trades via alternative routes, such as through the Cape of Good Hope, incurring greater
shipping costs and delays, as well as the costs of security measures. Though governments including the United States and United Kingdom have responded with air strikes against the hostile groups believed to be responsible for these
attacks, the continuation or escalation of the conflict may drive the foregoing costs and risks higher. Any physical damage to our vessels or injury or loss of life of any of the individuals onboard our vessels could result in significant
reputational damage or operational disruption, the exact magnitude of which cannot be estimated with certainty at this time. There can be no assurance regarding the precise nature, expected duration or likely severity of these maritime incidents.
Future hostilities or other political instability in regions where our vessels trade could also negatively affect the shipping industry by resulting rising costs and changing patterns of supply and demand, as well as our trade patterns, trade
routes, operations and performance.
Further, if attacks on vessels occur in regions that insurers characterize as “war risk” zones or by the Joint War Committee as “war and strikes” listed areas, premiums payable for such coverage
could increase significantly and such insurance coverage may be more difficult to obtain, if available at all. As of February 29, 2024, such listed areas included parts of the Southern Red Sea, Gulf of Aden and Black Sea, as well as the coastal
waters of Yemen, Israel and Iran, among others. Insurance costs for vessels with links to the United States, United Kingdom or Israel have already increased as a result of attacks in and around the Red Sea, with such vessels reportedly seeing
increases of 25% to 50% in their war risk premium relative to other vessels transiting through the Red Sea, and should these attacks continue or become indiscriminate, we could similarly experience a significant increase in our insurance costs
and/or we may not be adequately insured to cover losses from these incidents. See also “—Our business has inherent operational risks, which may not be adequately covered by insurance.” Crew costs,
including costs that may be incurred to the extent we employ onboard security guards, could also increase due to acts of piracy or other maritime incidents, including attacks on vessels. Our customers could also suffer significant losses,
impairing their ability to make payments to us under our charters. Any of the foregoing factors could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
The threat of future terrorist attacks around the world also continues to cause uncertainty in the world’s financial markets and international commerce and may affect our business, operating
results and financial condition. Continuing conflicts and recent developments in the Middle East, including continuing unrest in Syria and Iran and relating to the Israel-Hamas conflict and recent attacks on vessels in and around the Red Sea
which armed Houthi groups have claimed responsibility for, as well as the overthrow of Afghanistan’s democratic government by the Taliban, may lead to additional acts of terrorism and armed conflict around the world. This may contribute to
further economic instability in the global financial markets and international commerce. Additionally, any escalations between Western Nations, Israel and/or Iran could result in retaliation that could potentially affect the shipping industry.
For example, there have been an increased number of attacks on or seizures of vessels in the Strait of Hormuz (which already experienced an increased number of attacks on and seizures of vessels in recent years, including the seizure of two
Greek-flagged vessels in 2022 and one Marshall Islands-flagged vessel in 2023), and ship owners have reported a heightened level of harassment when transiting through the region. Any of these occurrences could have a material adverse impact on
our operating results, revenues and costs. See also “—Acts of piracy or other attacks on ocean-going vessels, including due to geopolitical conflicts, could adversely affect our business.”
Separately, protectionism is on the rise globally. For example, in Europe, large sovereign debts and fiscal deficits, low growth prospects and high unemployment rates in a number of countries
have contributed to the rise of various Eurosceptic parties, which advocate for their countries to leave the European Union and/or adopt protectionist policies. These parties are increasingly popular in various European countries, including major
European economic powers such as Germany and France. The withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union has increased the risk of additional trade protectionism and has created supply chain disruptions. The United States, which has
emerged as a key market for LPG and major producer of crude oil, has similarly seen a rise in protectionist policies. For example, in 2018, China and the United States each began implementing increasingly protective trade measures, including
significant tariff increases, in a trade war between these countries. Although there have been signs of thawing China-United states relations, many of these protectionist measures remain in place a deterioration in relations may occur. U.S.
presidential candidate Donald Trump has also threatened to impose tariffs exceeding 60% on Chinese goods if elected president, which could reignite the China-United States trade war.
Trade barriers to protect domestic industries against foreign imports depress shipping demand. Protectionist developments, such as the imposition of
trade tariffs or the perception they may occur, may have a material adverse effect on global economic conditions, and may significantly reduce global trade. Moreover, increasing trade protectionism may cause an increase in (a) the cost of goods
exported from regions globally, (b) the length of time required to transport goods and (c) the risks associated with exporting goods. Such increases may significantly affect the quantity of goods to be shipped, shipping time schedules, voyage
costs and other associated costs, which could have an adverse impact on our charterers’ business, operating results and financial condition and could thereby affect their ability to make timely charter hire payments to us and to renew and
increase the number of their time charters with us. This could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results. Further, protectionist policies in any country could impact global markets, including
foreign exchange and securities markets. Any resulting changes in currency exchange rates, tariffs, treaties and other regulatory matters could in turn adversely impact our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
We are new entrants to the competitive tanker and LPG shipping sectors and may face difficulties in establishing our business.
Our tanker-owning subsidiaries entered into the tanker shipping business in 2021 and our LPG carrier-owning subsidiaries entered into the LPG shipping business in 2023. As new
entrants to the tanker and LPG shipping businesses, we may struggle to establish market share and broaden our customer base for our operations in these highly competitive markets due to our lesser-known reputation, while incurring operating costs
associated with the operation and upkeep of our tankers and LPG carriers. In addition, we compete with various companies that operate larger fleets and may be able to offer more competitive prices and greater availability and diversity of
vessels, all while achieving economies of scale in their fleet operating costs. Due in part to the fragmented tanker and LPG carrier markets, existing or additional competitors with greater resources may enter or grow their positions in the
tanker and LPG carrier sectors through consolidations or acquisitions and could operate more competitive fleets, causing us to lose or be unable to gain market share. Any of these competitors may be able to devote greater financial and other
resources to their activities than we can, resulting in a significant competitive threat to us.
Further, we likely possess less operational expertise relative to more experienced competitors and, in general, are more heavily reliant
on the knowledge and services of third-party managers for our commercial success. As of the date of this Annual Report, our manager, Castor Ships, has subcontracted, with our consent, the technical management for all of our vessels to a
third-party ship-management company, except one tanker vessel for which Castor Ships has provided technical management since June 7, 2023. Any failure by us or Castor Ships to partner with third-party providers with the appropriate expertise to
effectively deliver our services could tarnish our reputation as a vessel operator and impact the growth of our business, our financial condition and operating profits.
Risks involved in operating ocean-going vessels could affect our business and reputation.
The operation of an ocean-going vessel carries inherent risks. These risks include the possibility of:
|
• |
environmental and other accidents;
|
|
• |
cargo and property losses and damage;
|
|
• |
business interruptions caused by mechanical failure, human error, armed conflict, terrorism, piracy, political action in various countries, labor strikes or adverse weather conditions; and
|
|
• |
work stoppages or other labor problems with crew members serving on our vessels, some of whom are unionized and covered by collective bargaining agreements.
|
Environmental laws often impose strict liability for remediation of spills and releases of oil, oil products and hazardous substances, which could subject us to liability without regard to
whether we were negligent or at fault. A spill, such as of bunker oil on our vessels or oil products cargo carried by our tankers, or an accidental release of other hazardous substances from our vessels, could result in significant liability,
including fines, penalties and criminal liability and remediation costs for natural resource damages, as well as third-party damages.
Any of these circumstances or events could increase our costs or lower our revenues. The involvement of our vessels in an oil spill or other environmental incident may harm our reputation as a
safe and reliable operator, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, cash flows, financial condition, and operating results.
In addition to the foregoing risks, the operation of tankers and transportation of oil presents unique operational risks. See “—The operation of tankers has
unique operational risks associated with the transportation of oil.”
Acts of piracy or other attacks on ocean-going vessels, including due to geopolitical conflicts, could adversely affect our business.
Acts of piracy have historically affected ocean-going vessels trading in regions of the world such as the South China Sea, the Indian Ocean and, in particular, the
Gulf of Aden off the coast of Somalia and the Gulf of Guinea region off Nigeria, which experienced increased incidents of piracy in recent years. Pirate activity is also intermittent off the coast of Eastern Malaysia and a number of oil cargo
seizures have occurred there. Sea piracy incidents continue to occur with tanker and LPG carrier vessels particularly vulnerable to such attacks. Acts of piracy may result in death or injury to persons or damage to property. In addition, crew
costs, including costs of employing on-board security guards, could increase in such circumstances. We may not be adequately insured to cover losses from these incidents, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition, cash flows and results of operations. See also “—Geopolitical conditions, such as political instability or conflict, terrorist attacks
and international hostilities, can affect the seaborne transportation industry, which could adversely affect our business” and “—Our business has inherent operational risks, which may not be adequately covered by insurance.”
Our charterers calling on ports located in countries or territories that are the subject of sanctions or embargoes imposed by the U.S. government (including
OFAC) or other authorities or failure to comply with the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (the “FCPA”) or similar laws could lead to monetary fines or penalties and adversely affect our reputation. Such failures and other events could adversely
affect the market for our common shares.
Certain countries (including certain regions of Ukraine, Russia, Belarus, Cuba, Iran, North Korea and Syria), entities and persons are targeted by economic sanctions and embargoes
imposed by the United States, the European Union and other jurisdictions, and a number of those countries have been identified as state sponsors of terrorism by the U.S. Department of State. In particular, sanctions imposed in relation to the
Russian invasion of Ukraine have created significant disruptions in the global economy and in the shipping industry. Since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022, economic sanctions have been imposed by the United States, the European Union, the
United Kingdom and a number of other countries on Russian financial institutions, businesses and individuals, as well as certain regions within the Donbas region of Ukraine. Certain of these sanctions have targeted the Russian oil and petroleum
industry and, in particular, the transport of Russian crude oil and refined petroleum products by maritime vessels. Several jurisdictions, including the United States, the United Kingdom, European Union and Canada, have adopted import bans of
Russian energy products, such as crude oil and refined petroleum products. The United Kingdom and European Union have also introduced export restrictions, which capture the provision of maritime vessels and supplies to or for use in Russia. They
have also imposed additional restrictions on providing financing, financial assistance, technical assistance and brokering or other services that would further the provision of vessels to or for use in Russia. For example, the United Kingdom has
barred the provision of ships or services, including shipping services, facilitating the maritime transport of Russian crude oil, with effect from December 5, 2022, and refined oil products, with effect from February 5, 2023. The Group of Seven
nations and the European Union have also imposed a price cap of $60 per barrel on Russian crude oil with effect from December 5, 2022 and introduced a separate price cap on refined petroleum products with effect from February 5, 2023. In October
2023, the United States also introduced sanctions against 50 tanker vessels with ties to the Russian oil trade, significantly impeding such vessels’ abilities to load cargoes, and has imposed sanctions against at least two companies and their
tankers for breaching the $60 per barrel price cap on Russian crude oil. Recent sanctions efforts by the European Union and United Kingdom have focused on preventing the circumvention of sanctions against Russia and the European Union has adopted
sanctions against a number of foreign companies accused of assisting Russia in circumventing sanctions. These restrictions may affect our current or future charters.
In addition, certain jurisdictions, such as Greece and the United States, have temporarily detained vessels suspected of violating sanctions. Countries, such as Canada, the United
Kingdom and the EU, have also broadly prohibited Russian-affiliated vessels from entering their waters and/or ports. Furthermore, certain of the oil majors, such as ExxonMobil and BP, have divested from Russia or announced their intention to exit
the region.
As a result of these bans and related trade sanctions, many consumers of crude oil and refined petroleum products have sought out alternative sources of these
products and trade patterns and trade routes for crude oil and refined petroleum products have changed. For example, the United States has emerged as a major producer of crude oil, refined petroleum
products and natural gas liquids, producing record amounts of oil in 2023 that have helped to offset supply constraints due to Russia’s exclusion from the market and strong demand for exported crude oil. The prices of crude oil, refined
petroleum and LPG-related products have increased and remained elevated as a result of these bans and related trade sanctions, though record production by the United States has exerted downward price pressure. Increases in the price of oil,
refined petroleum and LPG products have and are likely to affect adversely global oil demand and reduce worldwide oil transport should they continue. While global shipping rates of oil have generally increased since the commencement of Russia’s
invasion of Ukraine, especially because of increased ton mile demand due to changing trading patterns and the banning of Russian oil tankers by several countries, it is uncertain what the ultimate result will be on the Company’s business and
financial position. However, due to their effect on the global market for crude oil and petroleum products, current or additional sanctions could have a material adverse impact on the Company’s business, cash flows, financial condition and
operating results.
Economic sanctions and embargo laws and regulations vary in their application with regard to countries, entities or persons and the scope of activities they subject to sanctions.
These sanctions and embargo laws and regulations may be strengthened, relaxed or otherwise modified over time. Any violation of sanctions or embargoes could result in the Company incurring monetary fines, penalties or other sanctions. In
addition, certain institutional investors may have investment policies or restrictions that prevent them from holding securities of companies that have contacts with countries or entities or persons within these countries that are identified by
the U.S. government as state sponsors of terrorism. We are required to comply with such policies in order to maintain access to charterers and capital.
Current or future counterparties of ours may be affiliated with persons or entities that are or may be in the future the subject of sanctions imposed by the governments of the
United States, the European Union, and/or other international bodies. Further, it is possible that, in the future, our vessels may call on ports located in sanctioned jurisdictions on charterers’ instructions, without our consent and in violation
of their charter party. Moreover, our charterers may violate applicable sanctions and embargo laws and regulations as a result of actions that do not involve us or our vessels. As a result, we may be required to terminate existing or future
contracts to which we, or our subsidiaries, are party.
We operate in a number of countries throughout the world, including countries known to have a reputation for corruption. We are committed to doing business in accordance with
applicable anti-corruption laws, and have adopted a code of business conduct and ethics. However, we are subject to the risk that we, or our affiliated entities, or our or our affiliated entities’ respective officers, directors, employees or
agents’ actions may be deemed to be in violation of such anti-corruption laws, including the FCPA. Any such violation could result in substantial fines, sanctions, civil and/or criminal penalties and curtailment of operations in certain
jurisdictions.
If the Company, our affiliated entities, or our or their respective officers, directors, employees and agents, or any of our charterers are deemed to have violated economic
sanctions and embargo laws, or any applicable anti-corruption laws, our results of operations may be adversely affected due to the resultant monetary fines, penalties or other sanctions. In addition, we may suffer reputational harm as a result of
any actual or alleged violations. This may affect our ability to access U.S. capital markets and conduct our business, and could result in some investors deciding, or being required, to divest their interest, or not to invest, in us. The
determination by these investors not to invest in, or to divest from, our common shares may adversely affect the price at which our common shares trade. Investor perception of the value of our common shares may also be adversely affected by the
consequences of war, the effects of terrorism, civil unrest and governmental actions in the countries or territories in which we operate. Any of these factors could adversely affect our business, financial condition, and operating results.
Furthermore, detecting, investigating and resolving actual or alleged violations is expensive and can consume significant time and attention of our senior management and
adversely affect our business, results of operations or financial condition as a result.
Global public health threats can affect the seaborne transportation industry, which could adversely affect our business.
Public health threats or widespread health emergencies, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, influenza and other highly communicable diseases or viruses (or concerns over the possibility of such
threats or emergencies) could lead to a significant decrease in demand for the transportation of the products carried by our vessels. In recent years, our business and the tanker and LPG carrier sectors have from time to time been impacted by
various public health emergencies in various parts of the world in which we operate, most notably the COVID-19 pandemic. While most countries around the world have removed restrictions implemented in response to the
COVID-19 pandemic, the emergence of new public health threats or widespread health emergencies, whether globally or in the regions in which we operate, may result in new restrictions, lead to further economic uncertainty and heighten certain of
the other risks described in this Annual Report. In particular, such events have and may also in the future adversely impact our operations, including timely rotation of our crews, the timing of completion of any outstanding or future
newbuilding projects or repair works in dry-dock as well as the operations of our customers. Delayed rotation of crew may adversely affect the mental and physical health of our crew and the safe operation of our vessels as a consequence. Any
public health threat or widespread health emergency, whether widespread or localized, could create significant disruptions in our business and adversely impact our business, financial condition, cash flows and operating results.
A cyber-attack could materially disrupt our business and may result in a significant financial cost to us.
We rely on information technology systems and networks in our operations, our vessels and administration of our business. Information systems are vulnerable to security breaches
by computer hackers and cyber terrorists. We rely on industry-accepted security measures and technology to securely maintain confidential and proprietary information maintained on our information systems. However, these measures and technology
may not adequately prevent security breaches. Our business operations could be targeted by individuals or groups seeking to sabotage or disrupt our information technology systems and networks, to steal data, or to ask for ransom. A successful
cyber-attack could materially disrupt our operations, including the safety of our operations, or lead to unauthorized release, alteration or unavailability of information in our systems. Any such attack or other breach of our information
technology systems could have a material adverse effect on our business and operating results. In addition, the unavailability of our information systems or the failure of these systems to perform as anticipated for any reason could disrupt our
business and could result in decreased performance and increased operating costs, causing our business and operating results to suffer.
In 2017, the IMO adopted Resolution MSC.428(98) on Maritime Cyber Risk Management, which encourages administrations to ensure that cyber risks are appropriately addressed in SMS
no later than the first annual verification of the Company’s Document of Compliance (DOC) after January 1, 2021, and the U.S. Coast Guard published non-binding guidance in February 2021 on addressing cyber risks in a vessel’s safety management
system. While we are currently in compliance with the requirements of Resolution MSC.428(98), the cybersecurity measures we maintain may not be sufficient to prevent the occurrence of a cybersecurity attack and/or incident. Any inability to
prevent security breaches (including the inability of our third-party vendors, suppliers or counterparties to prevent security breaches) or any failure to adopt or maintain appropriate cybersecurity risk management and governance procedures could
cause existing or prospective clients to lose confidence in our IT systems and could adversely affect our reputation, cause losses to us or our customers and/or damage our brand. This might require us to create additional procedures for managing
the risk of cybersecurity, which could require additional expenses and/or capital expenditures. The impact of such regulations is difficult to predict at this time.
The risks associated with informational and operational technology incidents have increased in recent years given the increased prevalence of remote work arrangements, and may be
further heightened by geopolitical tensions and conflicts, such as the ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine. State-sponsored Russian actors have taken and may continue to take retaliatory actions
and enact countermeasures against countries and companies that have divested from or curtailed business with Russia as a result of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and related sanctions imposed on Russia. See “—Our
charterers calling on ports located in countries or territories that are the subject of sanctions or embargoes imposed by the U.S. government (including OFAC) or other authorities or failure to comply with the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act
(the “FCPA”) or similar laws could lead to monetary fines or penalties and adversely affect our reputation. Such failures and other events could adversely affect the market for our common shares” for further information on these
sanctions. This includes cyber-attacks and espionage against other countries and companies in the world, which may negatively impact such countries in which we operate and/or companies to whom we provide services or receive services from. Any
such attacks, whether widespread or targeted, could create significant disruptions in our business and adversely impact our financial condition, cash flows and operating results.
Compliance with rules and other vessel requirements imposed by classification societies may be costly and could reduce our net cash flows and negatively impact
our results of operations.
The hull and machinery of every commercial vessel must be certified as being “in class” by a classification society recognized by the flag administration in the jurisdiction in
which the vessel is registered (or “flagged”). The classification society certifies that a vessel is safe and seaworthy in accordance with the applicable rules of the class and the regulations of the country of registry of the vessel and the
Safety of Life at Sea Convention.
A vessel must undergo annual surveys, intermediate surveys and special surveys. A vessel’s machinery may be placed on a continuous survey cycle, under which the machinery would be
surveyed periodically over a five-year period. We expect our vessels to be on special survey cycles for hull inspection and continuous survey cycles for machinery inspection. Vessels are also required to be dry-docked, or inspected by divers,
every two to three years for inspection of underwater parts.
While the Company believes that it has adequately budgeted for compliance with all currently applicable safety and other vessel operating requirements, newly enacted regulations
applicable to the Company and its vessels may result in significant and unanticipated future expense. If any vessel does not maintain its class or fails any annual, intermediate or special survey, the vessel will be unable to trade between ports
and will be unemployable, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, cash flows, financial condition and operating results.
We are subject to international laws and regulations and standards (including, but not limited to, environmental standards such as IMO 2020 for the low sulfur
fuels and the International Ballast Water Convention for discharging of ballast water), as well as to regional requirements, such as European Union and U.S. laws and regulations for the prevention of water pollution, each of which may adversely
affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition. In particular, new short-, medium- and long-term measures developed by the IMO, the European Union and other entities to promote decarbonization and the reduction of GHG
emissions may adversely impact our operations and markets.
Our operations are subject to numerous international, regional, national, state and local laws, regulations, treaties
and conventions in force in international waters and the jurisdictions in which our vessels operate or are registered, which can significantly affect the ownership and operation of our vessels. See “Item 4.
Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—Environmental and Other Regulations in the Shipping Industry” for a discussion of certain of these laws, regulations and standards. Compliance with such laws, regulations and standards,
where applicable, may require installation of costly equipment or implementation of operational changes and may affect the profitability, resale value and useful lives of our vessels. These costs could have a material adverse effect on our
business, cash flows, financial condition, and operating results. A failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations may result in administrative and civil penalties, criminal sanctions or the suspension or termination of our operations.
Environmental laws often impose strict liability for emergency response and remediation of spills and releases of oil and hazardous substances, which could subject us to liability
without regard to whether we are negligent or at fault. See “—Risks involved in operating ocean-going vessels could affect our business and reputation” and “—The operation
of tankers has unique operational risks associated with the transportation of oil.”
In connection with IMO 2020 regulations and requirements relating to fuel sulfur levels, as of the date of this Annual Report, we have transitioned to burning IMO compliant fuels
as none of our vessels is equipped with scrubbers (also known as Exhaust Gas Cleaning Systems). As a result, these vessels currently utilize VLSFO containing up to 0.5% sulfur content. Notably, low sulfur fuel is more expensive than standard high
fuel oil and may become more expensive. The price of VLSFO in Singapore ranged from a low of $554 per metric ton in June 2023 to a peak of around $705 per metric ton in November 2023. As of February 29, 2024, the price of VLSFO in Singapore was
around $639 per metric ton, but uncertainty regarding its future direction and the availability of VLSFO remains. For further information, see “—Increases in bunker prices could affect our operating results and
cash flows.”
The IMO has also imposed updated guidelines for ballast water management systems specifying the maximum amount of viable organisms allowed to be discharged from a vessel’s ballast
water. Depending on the date of the International Oil Pollution Prevention (IOPP) renewal survey, existing vessels constructed before September 8, 2017 must comply with the updated D-2 standard on or after September 8, 2019. For most vessels,
compliance with the D-2 standard involves installing onboard systems to treat ballast water and eliminate unwanted organisms. All of our vessels are equipped with a ballast water treatment system and therefore are currently in compliance with
this regulation.
Due to concern over climate change, a number of countries, the European Union and the IMO have adopted regulatory frameworks to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
These regulatory measures may include, among others, adoption of cap-and-trade regimes, carbon taxes, increased efficiency standards, and incentives or mandates for renewable energy. Further, although the emissions of GHG from international
shipping currently are not subject to the Paris Agreement or the Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, which required adopting countries to implement national programs to reduce emissions of certain gases.
In addition, the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships (MARPOL) Annex VI has been adopted that restricts air emissions from vessels.
In June 2021, IMO’s Marine Environment Protection Committee (“MEPC”) adopted amendments to the MARPOL Annex VI that will require ships to reduce their carbon dioxide and GHG
emissions. These new requirements combine technical and operational approaches to improve the energy efficiency of ships for future GHG reduction measures. Beginning January 1, 2023, each vessel is required to comply with the new Energy
Efficiency Existing Ship Index (“EEXI”). Furthermore, from 2023 to 2026, each vessel must initiate the collection of data for the reporting of its annual operational Carbon Intensity Indicator (“CII”) and CII rating. The IMO is required to review
the effectiveness of the implementation of the CII and EEXI requirements by January 1, 2026 at the latest. Prior to the implementation of the new regulations under revised Annex VI of MARPOL, official calculations and estimations suggested that
merchant vessels built before 2013, including some of our older vessels, may not fully comply with the EEXI requirements. Therefore, to ensure compliance with EEXI requirements many owners/operators may choose to limit engine power rather than
apply energy-saving devices and/or effect certain alterations on existing propeller designs, as the reduction of engine power is a less costly solution than these measures. As of the date of this Annual Report, official calculations had
determined that one tanker vessel and three of the four LPG carrier vessels were in compliance with the EEXI requirements as of January 1, 2023. Our remaining one LPG carrier vessel is expected to be in compliance with the EEXI requirements by
obtaining until April 2024 its first annual International Air Pollution Prevention (“IAPP”) certificate, effective from January 1, 2023.
The engine power limitation is predicted to lead to reduced ballast and laden speeds (at scantling draft) in the non-compliant vessels, which will affect non-compliant vessels’
commercial utilization and also decrease the global availability of vessel capacity. Furthermore, required software and hardware alterations as well as documentation and recordkeeping requirements will increase a vessel’s capital and operating
expenditures.
Further, on January 27, 2021 the Biden administration issued an executive order temporarily blocking new leases for oil and gas drilling in U.S. federal waters. While leasing has
since resumed, a record low of just three offshore lease sales over the next five years were unveiled in September 2023. However, leasing for oil and gas drilling in federal waters remains a contentious political issue, with certain states and
Republicans in U.S. Congress pushing for increased leasing.
On November 13, 2021, the Glasgow Climate Pact was announced following discussions at the 2021 United Nations Climate Change Conference (“COP26”). The Glasgow Climate Pact calls
for signatory states to voluntarily phase out fossil fuels subsidies. A shift away from these products could potentially affect the demand for our vessels and negatively impact our future business, operating results, cash flows and financial
position. COP26 also produced the Clydebank Declaration, in which 22 signatory states (including the United States and United Kingdom) announced their intention to voluntarily support the establishment of zero-emission shipping routes.
Governmental and investor pressure to voluntarily participate in these green shipping routes could cause us to incur significant additional expenses to “green” our vessels. The 2023 United Nations Climate Change Conference (“COP28”) in Dubai
called for, among other measures, a swift transition from fossil fuels and deep GHG emission cuts.
The foregoing regulations represent a growing trend towards “green” or sustainable sources of energy and increasing intervention by certain governments to impose more stringent
emissions regimes. These regulations have and may continue to impact demand for crude oil, refined petroleum products and LPG, as well as increase our costs of operation, any of which could have an adverse effect on our business and operating
results.
Developments in safety and environmental requirements relating to the recycling and demolition of vessels may result in escalated and unexpected costs.
The 2009 Hong Kong International Convention for the Safe and Environmentally Sound Recycling of Ships, or the Hong Kong Convention, aims to ensure ships being recycled once they
reach the end of their operational lives do not pose any unnecessary risks to the environment, human health and safety. On November 28, 2019, the Hong Kong Convention was ratified by the required number of countries and it will be in force on
June 26, 2025, as the ratifying states represent 40% of world merchant shipping by gross tonnage after the ratification by Bangladesh and Liberia in June 2023. The Republic of the Marshall Islands recently ratified this Hong Kong Convention in
January 2024. Upon the Hong Kong Convention’s entry into force, each ship sent for recycling will have to carry an inventory of its hazardous materials. The hazardous materials, the use or installation of which are prohibited in certain
circumstances, are listed in an appendix to the Hong Kong Convention. Ships will be required to have surveys to verify their inventory of hazardous materials initially, throughout their lives and prior to the ship being recycled. When
implemented, the foregoing requirement may lead to cost escalation by shipyards, repair yards and recycling yards. This may then result in a decrease in the residual scrap value of a vessel, and a vessel could potentially not cover the cost to
comply with the latest requirements, which may have an adverse effect on our future performance, cash flows, financial position and operating results.
Further, on November 20, 2013, the European Parliament and the Council of the EU adopted the Ship Recycling Regulation, which, among other things, requires any non-EU flagged
vessels calling at a port or anchorage of an EU member state, including ours, to set up and maintain an Inventory of Hazardous Materials from December 31, 2020. Such a system includes information on the hazardous materials with a quantity above
the threshold values specified in relevant EU Resolution that are identified in the ship’s structure and equipment. This inventory must be properly maintained and updated, especially after repairs, conversions or unscheduled maintenance on board
the ship.
The smuggling of drugs or other contraband onto our vessels may lead to governmental claims against us.
We expect that our vessels will call in ports in areas where smugglers attempt to hide drugs and other contraband on vessels, with or without the knowledge of crew members. To the
extent our vessels are found with contraband, whether inside or attached to the hull of our vessel, with or without the knowledge of any of our crew, we may face governmental or other regulatory claims which could have an adverse effect on our
business, results of operations, cash flows and financial condition.
We are subject to international safety standards and the failure to comply with these regulations may subject us to
increased liability, may adversely affect our insurance coverage and may result in a denial of access to, or detention in, certain ports.
The operation of our vessels is affected by the requirements set forth in the International Safety Management Code, or the
ISM Code, promulgated by the IMO under the SOLAS Convention (each as defined in “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business
Overview—Environmental and Other Regulations in the Shipping Industry—International Maritime Organization”). The ISM Code requires ship owners, ship managers and bareboat charterers to develop and maintain an extensive “Safety Management System” that includes the adoption of a safety and environmental protection policy
setting forth instructions and procedures for the safe operation of vessels and describing procedures for dealing with emergencies. In addition, vessel classification societies impose significant safety and other requirements on our vessels.
Failure to comply with these regulations may subject us to increased liability, may adversely affect our insurance coverage and may result in a denial of access to, or detention in, certain ports, and have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial condition and operating results.
Maritime claimants could arrest our vessels, which could interrupt our cash flow and business.
Crew members, suppliers of goods and services to a vessel, shippers and receivers of cargo and other parties may be entitled to a maritime
lien against a vessel for unsatisfied debts, claims or damages. In many jurisdictions, a maritime lien holder may enforce its lien by “arresting” or “attaching” a vessel through judicial proceedings. The arrest or attachment of our vessels, if
not timely discharged, could have significant ramifications for the Company, including off-hire periods and/or potential cancellations of charters, high costs incurred in discharging the maritime lien, other expenses to the extent such arrest or
attachment is not covered under our insurance coverage, breach the covenants in our future credit facilities and reputational damage. This in turn could negatively affect the market for our shares and adversely affect our business, financial
condition, results of operations, cash flows and ability to service or refinance our debt. In addition, in jurisdictions where the “sister ship” theory of liability applies, such as South Africa, a claimant may arrest the vessel that is subject
to the claimant’s maritime lien and any “associated” vessel, which is any vessel owned or controlled by the same owner. In countries with “sister ship” liability laws, claims might be asserted against us or any of our vessels for liabilities of
other vessels that we then own, compounding the negative effects of an arrest or attachment on the Company. Any of those occurrences could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results.
Governments could requisition our vessels during a period of war or emergency resulting in a loss of earnings.
The government of a vessel’s registry could requisition for title or seize a vessel. Requisition for title occurs when a government takes
control of a vessel and becomes the owner. A government could also requisition a vessel for hire. Requisition for hire occurs when a government takes control of a vessel and effectively becomes the charterer at dictated charter rates. Generally,
requisitions occur during a period of war or emergency although governments may elect to requisition vessels in other circumstances. Although we would expect to be entitled to compensation in the event of a requisition of one or more of our
vessels, the amount and timing of payment, if any, would be uncertain. Government requisition of one or more of our vessels could have a material adverse effect on our business, cash flows, financial condition and operating results.
Increased inspection procedures and tighter import and export controls could increase costs and disrupt our business.
International shipping is subject to various security and customs inspection and related procedures in countries of origin and destination and trans-shipment points. Inspection
procedures may result in the seizure of the contents of our vessels, delays in the loading, offloading, trans-shipment or delivery and the levying of customs duties, fines or other penalties against us.
It is possible that changes to inspection procedures could impose additional financial and legal obligations on us. Changes to inspection procedures could also impose additional
costs and obligations on our customers and may, in certain cases, render the shipment of certain types of cargo uneconomical or impractical. Any such changes or developments may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition
and operating results.
Our business has inherent operational risks, which may not be adequately covered by insurance.
Our vessels and their cargoes are at risk of being damaged or lost because of events such as marine disasters, adverse weather conditions, mechanical failures, human error,
environmental accidents, war, terrorism, piracy and other circumstances or events. In addition, transporting cargoes across a wide variety of international jurisdictions creates a risk of business interruptions due to political circumstances in
foreign countries, hostilities, labor strikes and boycotts, the potential changes in tax rates or policies, and the potential for government expropriation of our vessels. See “—Geopolitical conditions, such as
political instability or conflict, terrorist attacks and international hostilities, can affect the seaborne transportation industry, which could adversely affect our business” for further information regarding geopolitical circumstances
which have or may impact insurance. Any of these events may result in loss of revenues, increased costs and decreased cash flows to our customers, which could impair their ability to make payments to us under our charters.
We procure insurance for our vessels against those risks that we believe the shipping industry commonly insures against. This insurance includes marine hull and machinery
insurance, protection and indemnity insurance, which include environmental damage, pollution insurance coverage, crew insurance, and, in certain circumstances, war risk insurance. Currently, the amount of coverage for liability for pollution,
spillage and leakage available to us on commercially reasonable terms through protection and indemnity associations and providers of excess coverage is $1 billion per occurrence. In certain instances, we may be required by our pooling agreements
to arrange for additional loss of hire cover.
We do not carry loss of hire insurance. Loss of hire insurance covers the loss of revenue during extended vessel off-hire periods, such as those that occur
during an unscheduled dry-docking due to damage to the vessel from accidents. Accordingly, any loss of a vessel or any extended period of vessel off-hire, due to an accident or otherwise, could have a material adverse effect on our business,
results of operations and financial condition.
Despite the above policies, we may not be insured in amounts sufficient to address all risks and we or our pool managers may not be able to obtain adequate insurance coverage for
our vessels in the future or may not be able to obtain certain coverage at reasonable rates. For example, in the past more stringent environmental regulations have led to increased costs for, and in the future may result in the lack of
availability of, insurance against risks of environmental damage or pollution. We may enter into credit facilities that impose restrictions on the use of any proceeds we may receive from claims under our insurance policies.
Further, insurers may not pay particular claims. Our insurance policies contain deductibles for which we will be responsible and limitations and exclusions which may increase our
costs or lower our revenues. Moreover, insurers may default on claims they are required to pay. Any of these factors could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition.
Risks Relating to the Tanker Industry
Charter rates for tanker vessels are volatile and cyclical in nature. A decrease in tanker charter rates may adversely affect our business, financial condition
and operating results.
The tanker industry is both cyclical and volatile in terms of charter rates and profitability. Fluctuations in charter rates result from changes in the supply and demand for
tanker capacity and changes in the supply and demand for vessel capacity and changes in the supply and demand for the crude oil and refined petroleum products transported by our tanker vessels. Further, because many factors (including the supply
and demand for the products transported by tankers) influencing the supply of, and demand for, vessel capacity are unpredictable, the timing, direction and degree of changes in the tanker market are also unpredictable. Deterioration of charter
rates resulting from various factors relating to the cyclicality and volatility of our business may adversely affect our ability to profitably charter or re-charter our vessels or to sell our vessels on a profitable basis. This could negatively
impact our operating results, liquidity and financial condition.
Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has disrupted energy production, trade patterns and trade routes, including shipping in the Black
Sea and elsewhere, and has impacted energy prices and tanker rates. For further details, see “—The Company is exposed to fluctuating demand and supply for maritime transportation
services, as well as fluctuating prices of crude oil and refined petroleum products, and may be affected by a decrease in the demand for such products and the volatility in their prices.” and “—Our charterers calling on ports located in countries or territories that are the subject of sanctions or embargoes imposed by the U.S. government (including OFAC) or other authorities or failure to
comply with the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (the “FCPA”) or similar laws could lead to monetary fines or penalties and adversely affect our reputation. Such failures and other events could adversely affect the market for our common
shares.”
Demand for tanker capacity is affected by the supply of and demand for oil products transported by such vessels, including refined petroleum products, which are transported by the
vessels attributable to our Handysize tanker segment. A variety of factors may impact the supply of and demand for crude oil and/or refined petroleum products, including regional availability of refining capacity and inventories and competition
from alternative sources of energy. Factors that influence demand for tanker vessel capacity include, but are not limited to:
|
• |
global and regional economic and political conditions and developments, including economic growth in global and local economies and the timeframe over which such growth occurs, demand for tanker transport that
exceeds capacity for such fleets worldwide, armed conflicts (such as Russia’s invasion of Ukraine or the armed conflict(s) in the Middle East, including maritime incidents in and around the Red Sea, and the spread or worsening of any such
conflicts) and terrorist activities, international trade sanctions, embargoes and strikes, particularly those that impact the regions or trade routes traveled by our vessels, the regions where the cargoes we carry are produced or
consumed, or any similar events which would interrupt the production or consumption of liquefied gases and associated products;
|
|
• |
regional availability of refining capacity and inventories compared to geographies of oil production regions;
|
|
• |
developments in international trade, including national policies regarding strategic oil inventories (including the reduction or replenishment of strategic reserves and if strategic reserves are set at a lower
level in the future as oil decreases in the energy mix), actions taken by OPEC and major oil producers and refiners and fluctuations in the profit margins of crude oil and refined petroleum products;
|
|
• |
the distance over which crude oil and/or refined petroleum products are to be moved by sea;
|
|
• |
changes in seaborne and other transportation and distribution patterns, typically influenced by the relative advantage of the various sources of production, locations of consumption, pricing differentials and
seasonality;
|
|
• |
alternative sources of energy, such as natural gas, coal, hydroelectric power and other alternative sources of energy;
|
|
• |
environmental and other regulatory developments;
|
|
• |
epidemics and pandemics;
|
|
• |
currency exchange and interest rates; and
|
For a discussion of factors affecting the supply of tanker vessel capacity, see “—An oversupply of
tanker vessel capacity may prolong or further depress low charter rates when they occur, which may limit our ability to operate our vessels profitably.” These factors are outside of our control and are unpredictable, and accordingly we
may not be able to correctly assess the nature, timing and degree of changes in charter rates. Any of these factors could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results. In particular, a significant
decrease in charter rates would cause asset values to decline. See “—The age of our tanker vessel may impact our ability to obtain financing and a decline in the market values of our vessels could limit the
amount of funds that we can borrow, cause us to breach certain financial covenants in our future credit facilities and/or result in impairment charges or losses on sale.”
An oversupply of tanker vessel capacity may prolong or further depress charter rates when they occur, which may limit our ability to operate our vessels
profitably.
Factors that influence the supply of tanker vessel capacity include:
|
• |
supply and demand for energy resources and crude oil and/or refined petroleum products
|
|
• |
the number of newbuilding orders and deliveries;
|
|
• |
the number of shipyards and ability of shipyards to deliver vessels;
|
|
• |
port and canal congestion;
|
|
• |
the number of conversions of tankers to other uses or conversions of other vessels to tankers;
|
|
• |
scrapping of older vessels;
|
|
• |
vessel freight rates, which are affected by factors that may affect the rate of newbuilding, scrapping and laying-up vessels (as set out below);
|
|
• |
the availability of modern tanker capacity;
|
|
• |
the speed of vessels being operated;
|
|
• |
the number of vessels that are out of service or laid up.
|
In addition to the prevailing and anticipated charter rates, factors that affect the rate of newbuilding, scrapping and laying-up include newbuilding prices, secondhand vessel
values in relation to scrap prices, the availability of financing for new vessels and shipping activity, dry-dock and special survey expenditures, costs of bunkers and other operating costs, costs associated with classification society surveys,
normal maintenance costs, insurance coverage costs, the efficiency and age profile of the existing fleet in the market, and government and industry regulations of maritime transportation practices, in particular environmental protection laws and
regulations and laws and regulations regarding safety which impact our industry.
The limited activity in the tanker newbuilding market during 2022 has continued during 2023, and, as result, the new contracting to active fleet ratio continues to remain at
relatively low levels. The worldwide tanker fleet grew by 3.5% during 2022 and by 1.9% during 2023. The total orderbook of tanker vessels at the end of 2023 stood at 4.45% of the current fleet, with deliveries expected mainly during the next two
to three years.
Tanker vessel supply will continue to be affected by the delivery of new vessels and potential orders of more vessels than vessels removed from the global fleet, either through
scrapping or accidental losses. An oversupply of tanker vessel capacity could contribute to or exacerbate decreases in charter rates or prolong the period during which low charter rates prevail which may have a material adverse effect on the
profitability of our business and/or segments, cash flows, financial condition and operating results.
The operation of tankers has unique operational risks associated with the transportation of oil.
The operation of tankers transporting crude oil and/or refined petroleum products is inherently risky and presents unique operational risks. For example, an oil spill may cause
significant environmental damage. Additionally, compared to other types of vessels, tankers are exposed to a higher risk of damage and loss by fire, whether ignited by a terrorist attack, collision, or other cause, due to the high flammability
and hazardous characteristics of the crude oil and refined petroleum products transported in tankers. Our crews could also be inadvertently exposed to the crude oil and refined petroleum products that we transport or their byproducts, such as
escaped gases, which may pose a risk to their health and safety. As a result, the unique operational risks associated with the transportation of oil could result in significantly more expensive insurance coverage and the associated costs of an
oil spill or other health and safety incidents could exceed the insurance coverage available to us. Any of the foregoing factors may adversely affect our tanker segments, our cash flows and segment and overall operating results.
The operation of tankers is subject to strict regulations and vetting requirements, that our manager and sub-managers need to comply with. Should either we or
our manager and third-party sub-managers not continue to successfully clear the oil majors’ risk assessment processes, our tanker vessels’ employment, as well as our relationship with charterers, could be adversely affected.
Shipping, and especially crude oil, refined petroleum products and chemical tankers have been, and will remain, heavily regulated. For an overview of government regulations that
may impact our tanker operations, see “Item 4.B. Business Overview—Environmental and Other Regulations in the Shipping Industry.” The so called “oil major” companies, together with a number of
commodities traders, represent a significant percentage of the production, trading and shipping logistics (i.e., terminals) of crude oil and refined petroleum products worldwide. Concerns for the environment have led the oil majors to develop and
implement a strict ongoing due diligence process when selecting their commercial partners. This vetting process has evolved into a sophisticated and comprehensive risk assessment of both the vessel operator and the vessel, including physical ship
inspections, completion of vessel inspection questionnaires performed by accredited inspectors and the production of comprehensive risk assessment reports. In the case of term charter relationships, additional factors are considered when awarding
such contracts, including:
|
• |
office assessments and audits of the vessel operator;
|
|
• |
the operator’s environmental, health and safety record;
|
|
• |
compliance with the standards of the International Maritime Organization (the “IMO”), a United Nations agency that issues international trade standards for shipping;
|
|
• |
compliance with heightened industry standards that have been set by several oil companies;
|
|
• |
shipping industry relationships, reputation for customer service, technical and operating expertise;
|
|
• |
compliance with oil majors’ codes of conduct, policies and guidelines, including transparency, anti-bribery and ethical conduct requirements and relationships with third parties;
|
|
• |
shipping experience and quality of ship operations, including cost-effectiveness;
|
|
• |
quality, experience and technical capability of crews;
|
|
• |
the ability to finance vessels at competitive rates and overall financial stability;
|
|
• |
relationships with shipyards and the ability to obtain suitable berths;
|
|
• |
construction management experience, including the ability to procure on-time delivery of new vessels according to customer specifications;
|
|
• |
willingness to accept operational risks pursuant to the charter, such as allowing termination of the charter for force majeure events; and
|
|
• |
competitiveness of the bid in terms of overall price.
|
Should either we or our manager and sub-managers not continue to successfully clear the oil majors’ risk assessment processes on an ongoing basis, our tanker vessels’ present and
future employment, as well as our relationship with our existing charterers and our ability to obtain new charterers, whether medium- or long-term, could be adversely affected. Such a situation may lead to the oil majors’ terminating existing
charters and refusing to use our tanker vessels which would adversely affect the growth of our business, cash flows and operating results.
The age of our tanker vessel may impact our ability to obtain financing and a decline in the market values of our vessels could limit the amount of funds that
we can borrow, cause us to breach certain financial covenants in our future credit facilities and/or result in impairment charges or losses on sale.
The fair market values of tanker vessels have generally experienced high volatility. The fair market values of our vessels depend on a number of factors, including:
|
• |
prevailing level of charter rates;
|
|
• |
general economic and market conditions affecting the shipping industry;
|
|
• |
the types, sizes and ages of the vessels, including as compared to other vessels in the market;
|
|
• |
supply of and demand for vessels;
|
|
• |
the availability and cost of other modes of transportation;
|
|
• |
distressed asset sales, including newbuilding contract sales below acquisition costs due to lack of financing;
|
|
• |
governmental or other regulations, including those that may limit the useful life of vessels; and
|
|
• |
the need to upgrade vessels as a result of environmental, safety, regulatory or charterer requirements, technological advances in vessel design or equipment or otherwise.
|
The average age of our tanker fleet, which comprised one vessel with an age of 18.0 years as of February 29, 2024, was older than the industry average of 12.9 years
as of the same date. Our tanker vessel may therefore be viewed as providing insufficient or only short-term collateral. This could restrict our access to or terms of any financing against this tanker
vessel. If the fair market value of our tanker vessel declines, we may also need to record an impairment charge in our financial statements or incur a loss on the sale of this tanker vessel, which could adversely affect our financial
results. In addition, a decline in the fair market value of our tanker vessel could cause us not to be in compliance with covenants contained in any future facilities secured against such vessel that require the maintenance of a certain
percentage of the fair market values of the tanker vessel securing any future facility to the principal outstanding amount of the respective facility. We have entered into facilities on these terms in the past.
Further, if vessel values are elevated at a time when we wish to acquire additional vessels, the cost of such acquisitions may increase and this could adversely affect our business, cash flows,
financial condition and operating results. We may also incur losses and be unable to recoup part of our investment in our tanker vessels if we sell any tanker vessel at less than its book value due to unfavorable market or operating conditions.
Risks Relating to the LPG Carrier Industry
Charter rates for LPG carriers are volatile and cyclical in nature. A decrease in LPG carrier charter
rates may adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.
The LPG carrier industry is both cyclical and volatile in terms of charter rates, profitability and vessel values. Fluctuations in charter
rates result from changes in the supply and demand for vessel capacity and changes in the supply and demand for the products transported by LPG carriers. The degree of charter rate volatility among different types of LPG carriers has also varied
widely. Further, because many factors (including the supply and demand for the products transported by LPG carriers) influencing the supply of, and demand for, vessel capacity are unpredictable, the timing, direction and degree of changes in the
LPG carrier market are also unpredictable.
The global economy and the LPG carrier industry have experienced significant disruptions as a result of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and sanctions
imposed in relation to such conflict. LPG carrier rates have been impacted by changing energy prices as a result of disruptions to energy production, trade patterns and trade routes, including shipping in the Black Sea and elsewhere. The
continuation or further extension of economic sanctions, boycotts or otherwise may eventually result in a reduction in the supply of LPG available for transportation and could negatively impact charter rates over the longer term. For further
details regarding Russian sanctions, see “—Our charterers calling on ports located in countries or territories that are the subject of sanctions or embargoes imposed by the U.S. government (including OFAC) or
other authorities or failure to comply with the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (the “FCPA”) or similar laws could lead to monetary fines or penalties and adversely affect our reputation. Such failures and other events could adversely affect
the market for our common shares.”
Any deterioration of charter rates resulting from various factors relating to the cyclicality and volatility of our business, including those above,
may adversely affect our ability to profitably charter or re-charter our LPG carriers or to sell our vessels LPG carriers on a profitable basis. In particular, a significant decrease in charter rates would cause asset values to decline. Any of
the foregoing factors could negatively impact our operating results, liquidity and/or financial condition.
Future growth in the demand for our services will depend among others on changes in supply and demand, economic growth in the world
economy and demand for LPG and LPG transportation relative to changes in worldwide fleet capacity.
The capacity of the world LPG carrier fleet appears likely to increase in the near term. However, future growth in the demand for LPG carriers, as well
as the charter rates for such LPG carriers, depends on a variety of factors that may impact the supply of and demand for the products we transport. Factors that influence demand for LPG carrier capacity include, but are not limited to:
|
• |
changes in the supply of vessel capacity for the seaborne transportation of LPG products, which is influenced by the following factors:
|
|
• |
the available supply of LPG products;
|
|
• |
changes in the supply of vessel capacity for the seaborne transportation of LPG products, which is influenced by the following factors:
|
|
• |
the availability of financing for new and secondhand LPG carriers and shipping activity;
|
|
• |
the number of newbuilding deliveries and the ability of shipyards to deliver newbuildings by contracted delivery dates and capacity levels of shipyards;
|
|
• |
the scrapping rate of older vessels and secondhand LPG carrier values in relation to scrap prices;
|
|
• |
the number of vessels that are out of service, as a result of vessel casualties, repairs and dry-dockings;
|
|
• |
the number of conversions LPG carriers to other uses or conversions of other vessels to LPG carriers, as applicable;
|
|
• |
port and canal congestion;
|
|
• |
the speed of LPG carriers being operated;
|
|
• |
changes in environmental and other regulations that may limit the useful lives of vessels;
|
|
• |
changes in LPG carrier prices; and
|
|
• |
any factors that affect the foregoing;
|
|
• |
changes in the level of demand for seaborne transportation of LPG products, which is influenced by the following factors:
|
|
• |
the level of production of LPG products in net export regions;
|
|
• |
the level of demand for LPG products globally, and in particular, in net import regions such as Asia, Europe, Latin America and India;
|
|
• |
regional availability of refining, liquefaction and deliquefaction capacity and inventories compared to geographies of oil and natural gas production and liquefaction and deliquefaction regions;
|
|
• |
a reduction in global or general industrial activity specifically in the plastics and chemical industry;
|
|
• |
changes in the cost of petroleum and natural gas from which liquefied gases are derived; and
|
|
• |
prevailing global and regional economic conditions;
|
|
• |
global and regional economic and political conditions and developments, including economic growth in global and local economies and the timeframe over which such growth occurs, demand for LPG carrier transport that exceeds capacity for
such fleets worldwide, armed conflicts (such as Russia’s invasion of Ukraine or the armed conflict(s) in the Middle East, including maritime incidents in and around the Red Sea, and the spread or worsening of any such conflicts) and
terrorist activities, international trade sanctions, embargoes and strikes, particularly those that impact the regions or trade routes traveled by our vessels, the regions where the cargoes we carry are produced or consumed, or any
similar events which would interrupt the production or consumption of liquefied gases and associated products;
|
|
• |
developments in international trade, including national policies regarding strategic oil inventories (including the reduction or replenishment of strategic reserves and if strategic reserves are set at a lower level in the future as
oil decreases in the energy mix), actions taken by OPEC and major oil and gas producers and refiners, as well a major LPG companies, and fluctuations in the profit margins of crude oil, refined petroleum products and/or LPG;
|
|
• |
the distances between exporting and importing regions over which LPG products are to be transported by sea;
|
|
• |
infrastructure to support seaborne LPG products trade, including pipelines, railways and terminals;
|
|
• |
changes in seaborne and other transportation and distribution patterns, typically influenced by the relative advantage of the various sources of production, locations of consumption, opportunities for arbitrage, pricing differentials
and seasonality;
|
|
• |
changes to the arbitrage of certain LPG products in different countries, regions or continents;
|
|
• |
currency exchange and interest rates;
|
|
• |
changes in environmental and other regulations that may limit the production or consumption of LPG products;
|
|
• |
competition from alternative sources of energy alternative sources of energy, such as natural gas, coal, hydroelectric power and other alternative sources of energy, and consumer demand for “green” or sustainable products;
|
|
• |
inclement weather and/or natural catastrophes; and
|
|
• |
epidemics and pandemics.
|
These factors are outside of our control and are unpredictable, and accordingly we may not be able to correctly assess the nature, timing and degree of changes or their precise impact on our
business. Any of these factors could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results.
The active fleet on the small LPG carrier vessels, which have similar characteristics to the ones we own, has remained largely stable with a slight 1% decrease between 2022 and
2023 (from 600 to 596 vessels, respectively). Moreover, the orderbook of small LPG carrier vessels has remained at low levels and has slightly decreased in 2023, from 14 vessels in 2022 to 8 vessels in 2023.
A decline in the market values of our LPG carriers could limit the amount of funds that we can borrow, cause us to breach certain
financial covenants in our future credit facilities and/or result in impairment charges or losses on sale.
The fair market values of LPG carriers have generally experienced high volatility based on a variety of factors. Factors which may affect the fair market
values of our LPG carriers include, without limitation:
|
• |
prevailing level of charter rates;
|
|
• |
general economic and market conditions affecting the shipping industry;
|
|
• |
the types, sizes and ages of the LPG carriers, including as compared to other LPG carriers in the market and as relates to environmental and energy efficiency;
|
|
• |
supply of and demand for LPG carriers, including as a result of the competitive environment we operate in;
|
|
• |
the availability and cost of other modes of transportation;
|
|
• |
distressed asset sales, including newbuilding contract sales below acquisition costs due to lack of financing;
|
|
• |
speculative LPG carrier orders from peers during periods of low LPG carrier prices, thereby increasing the supply of LPG carrier capacity, satisfying demand sooner and potentially suppressing charter rates;
|
|
• |
governmental or other regulations, including those that may limit the useful life of LPG carriers;
|
|
• |
the need to upgrade LPG carriers as a result of environmental, safety, regulatory or charterer requirements, technological advances in LPG carrier design or equipment or otherwise; and
|
|
• |
The size of the LPG carrier market is small and illiquid resulting to only a limited number of vessel sales taking place on an annual basis.
|
In addition, when vessel prices are considered to be low, companies not usually involved in shipping may make speculative vessel orders, thereby
increasing the supply of vessel capacity, satisfying demand sooner and potentially suppressing charter rates. To the extent we enter into any future facilities that require the maintenance of a certain percentage of
the fair market values of the LPG carriers securing any future facility to the principal outstanding amount of the respective facility, a decline in the fair value of our LPG carriers could cause us not to be in compliance with such covenants.
We have entered into facilities on these terms in the past.
Further, if vessel values are elevated at a time when we wish to acquire additional vessels, the cost of such acquisitions may increase and this could
adversely affect our business, cash flows, financial condition and operating results. We may also incur losses and be unable to recoup part of our investment in our LPG carriers if we sell any LPG carrier at less than its book value due to
unfavorable market or operating conditions.
Risks Relating to Our Company
We may be dependent on a small number of charterers for the majority of our business.
A small number of charterers have accounted for a significant part of our revenues and we expect this trend to continue in our operations. Indicatively, for the period ended
December 31, 2022, we derived 42% of our operating revenues from three pool managers and in the year ended December 31, 2023, we derived 92% of our operating revenues from two pool managers and one charterer. While the majority of our vessels no
longer participate in pools, including the V8 Plus Pool (the “V8 Plus Pool”) in which all of our Aframax/LR2 vessels formerly participated prior to their sale by us to third-parties, we expect our credit concentration to remain significant
because our LPG carrier vessels are chartered by a small number of charterers. For further information regarding the V8 Plus Pool, see “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—B. Related Party
Transactions—The V8 Plus Pool.” All the charters for our fleet have fixed terms, but may be terminated earlier due to certain events, such as a charterers’ failure to make payments to us because of financial inability, disagreements with
us or otherwise. The ability of each of our counterparties to perform their obligations under a charter with us depends on a number of factors that are beyond our control and may include, among other things, general economic conditions, the
condition of the shipping industry, prevailing prices for crude oil, refined petroleum and LPG-related products and the overall financial condition of the counterparty. Should a counterparty fail to honor its obligations under an agreement with
us, we may be unable to realize revenue under that charter arrangement and could sustain losses. In addition, if we lose an existing charterer, it may be difficult for us to promptly replace the revenue we derived from that counterparty. Any of
these factors could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, cash flows and operating results. For further information, see Note 1 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report for
an overview of our charterer concentration.
We may not be able to execute our business strategy and we may not realize the benefits we expect from acquisitions or other strategic transactions.
As our business grows, we intend to acquire additional tanker and/or LPG carrier vessels, including to replace existing vessels, diversify our fleet and expand our activities,
subject to the conditions set out in the Toro Spin-Off Resolutions. See“—We have limited the fields in which we focus our operations and this may have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and
operating results.” These objectives have implications for various operating costs, the perceived desirability of our vessels to charterers and the ability to attract financing for our business on favorable terms or at all. Our future
growth will primarily depend upon a number of factors, some of which may not be within our control. These factors include our ability to:
|
• |
identify suitable vessels, including newbuilding slots at reputable shipyards and/or shipping companies for acquisitions at attractive prices;
|
|
• |
realize anticipated benefits, such as new customer relationships, cost savings or cash flow enhancements from acquisitions;
|
|
• |
obtain required financing for our existing and new operations;
|
|
• |
integrate any acquired vessels, assets or businesses successfully with our existing operations, including obtaining any approvals and qualifications necessary to operate vessels that we acquire;
|
|
• |
enlarge our customer base and continue to meet technical and safety performance standards; |
|
• |
ensure, either directly or through our manager and sub-managers, that an adequate supply of qualified personnel and crew are available to manage and operate our growing business and fleet;
|
|
• |
improve our operating, financial and accounting systems and controls; and
|
|
• |
cope with competition from other companies, many of which have significantly greater financial resources than we do, and may reduce our acquisition opportunities or cause us to pay higher prices.
|
Our failure to effectively identify, acquire, develop and integrate any vessels could adversely affect our business, financial condition, investor sentiment and operating results.
Finally, acquisitions may require additional equity issuances, which may dilute our common shareholders if issued at lower prices than the price they acquired their shares, or debt issuances (with amortization payments), both of which could lower
our available cash. See “—Future issuances of common shares or other equity securities, including as a result of an optional conversion of Series A Preferred Shares, or
the potential for such issuances, may impact the price of our common shares and could impair our ability to raise capital through equity offerings. Shareholders may experience significant dilution as a result of any such issuances.” If any such events occur, our financial condition may be adversely affected.
We operate secondhand vessels, some of which have an age above the industry average, which may lead to increased technical problems for our vessels and/or
higher operating expenses or affect our ability to profitably charter our vessels, to comply with environmental standards and future maritime regulations and to obtain financing on favorable terms or at all and result in a more rapid
deterioration in our vessels’ market and book values.
Our current fleet consists only of secondhand vessels. While we have inspected our vessels and we intend to inspect any potential future vessel acquisition, this does not provide
us with the same knowledge about its condition that we would have had if the vessel had been built for and operated exclusively by us. Generally, purchasers of secondhand vessels do not receive the benefit of warranties that purchasers of
newbuild vessels receive from the builders and the makers of the vessels that they acquire.
The cost of maintaining a vessel in good operating condition and operating it generally increases with the age of a vessel because, amongst other things:
|
• |
as our vessels age, typically, they become less fuel-efficient and more costly to maintain than more recently constructed vessels due to improvements in design, engineering and technology and due to increased
maintenance requirements;
|
|
• |
cargo insurance rates increase with the age of a vessel, making our vessels more expensive to operate; and
|
|
• |
governmental regulations, environmental and safety or other equipment standards related to the age of vessels may also require expenditures for alterations or the addition of new equipment to our vessels and may
restrict the type of activities in which our vessels may engage.
|
The average age of our LPG carrier fleet was 7.5 years as of February 29, 2024,
compared to the industry average of the world fleet of small LPGs up to 5,000 cbm, which was 22.0 years as of the same date. Further, the average age of our tanker fleet, which comprised one vessel as of such date, was 18.0 years of February
29, 2024, compared to a tanker shipping industry average of 12.9 years. We therefore face increased costs due to the age of our tanker vessel relative to many of our peers.
Charterers also have age restrictions on the vessels they charter and in the past have actively discriminated against chartering older vessels, which may result in lower
utilization of our vessels and, in turn, in lower revenues. Our charterers have a high and increasing focus on quality and compliance standards with their suppliers across the entire supply chain, including the shipping and transportation
segment. Our continued compliance with these standards and quality requirements is vital for our operations. The charter hire rates and the value and operational life of a vessel are determined by a number of factors, including the vessel’s
efficiency, operational flexibility and physical life. Efficiency includes speed, fuel economy and the ability to load and discharge cargo quickly. Flexibility includes the ability to enter harbors, operate in extreme climates, utilize related
docking facilities and pass-through canals and straits. The length of a vessel’s physical life is related to its original design and construction, its maintenance and the impact of the stress of operations.
The age of our tanker vessel may impede our ability to obtain external financing against that vessel at all or at reasonable terms as our tanker vessel may be seen as less
valuable collateral. For further information on the factors which could affect our ability to obtain financing, including the age of our fleet, see “—The age of our tanker vessel may impact our ability to obtain
financing and a decline in the market values of our vessels could limit the amount of funds that we can borrow, cause us to breach certain financial covenants in our future credit facilities and/or result in impairment charges or losses on
sale.”
We face competition from companies with more modern vessels with more fuel-efficient designs than our vessels (“eco–vessels”). If new tankers are built that are more efficient or
more flexible or have longer physical lives than even the current eco-vessels, competition from the current eco-vessels and any more technologically advanced vessels could adversely affect the amount of
charter hire payments we receive for our vessels once their charters expire and the resale value of our vessels could significantly decrease.
We cannot assure you that, as our vessels age, market conditions will justify expenditures to maintain or update our vessels or enable us to operate our vessels profitably during
the remainder of their useful lives or that we will be able to finance the acquisition of new vessels at the time that we retire or sell our aging vessels. This could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and
operating results.
We are reliant on the spot market for a portion of our revenue, thereby exposing us to risk of losses based on short-term volatility in shipping rates.
We may opportunistically employ some or all of our vessels in the spot market, either in the voyage charter market or in spot-market oriented pools, if spot market conditions are
favorable. The spot charter market is highly competitive and freight rates in this market have been volatile, fluctuating significantly based upon supply of and demand for vessels and crude oil, refined petroleum and/or LPG products. Conversely,
longer-term charter contracts have pre-determined rates over more extended periods of time, providing a fixed source of revenue to us. The successful operation of our vessels in the competitive spot charter market depends upon, among other
things, our commercial manager and/or our pool operators obtaining profitable spot charters and minimizing, to the extent possible, time spent waiting for charters and time spent traveling unladen to pick up cargo. We cannot assure you that we
will be successful in keeping our vessels fully employed in these short-term markets, or that future spot revenues will be sufficient to enable such vessels to operate profitably.
In the past, there have been periods when revenues derived in the spot market have declined below the operating cost of vessels. If spot charter rates decline, then we may be
unable to operate our vessels trading in the spot market profitably and/or meet our obligations, including payments on indebtedness. Furthermore, as charter rates for spot charters are fixed for a single voyage which may last up to several weeks,
during periods in which spot charter rates are rising, we will generally experience delays in realizing the benefits from such increases. A significant decrease in spot revenues or our inability to fully employ our vessels by taking advantage of
the spot market would therefore adversely affect operating results, including our profitability and cash flows, with the result that our ability to serve our working capital and debt service needs could be impaired.
We are subject to certain risks with respect to our counterparties on contracts, and failure of such counterparties to meet their obligations could cause us to
suffer losses or negatively impact our results of operations and cash flows.
We have entered into, and may enter into in the future, various contracts, including charter agreements, pool agreements, management agreements, shipbuilding contracts and credit
facilities. Such agreements subject us to counterparty risks. The ability of each of our counterparties to perform its obligations under a contract with us will depend on a number of factors that are beyond our control and may include, among
other things, general economic conditions, the condition of the maritime and offshore industries, the overall financial condition of the counterparty, charter rates received for specific types of vessels, and various expenses. For example, the
combination of a reduction of cash flow resulting from a decline in world trade and the lack of availability of debt or equity financing may result in a significant reduction in the ability of our charterers and/or pool operators to make payments
to us. In addition, in depressed market conditions, our charterers and customers may no longer need a vessel that is then under charter or contract or may be able to obtain a comparable vessel at lower rates and pool operators may not be able to
profitably employ our participating vessels, if any. As a result, charterers and customers may seek to renegotiate the terms of their existing charter agreements or avoid their obligations under those contracts and pool operators may terminate
the pool agreements or admit inability to comply with their obligations under those agreements. This may have a significant impact on our revenues due to our concentrated customer base. For further details, see “—We
may be dependent on a small number of charterers for the majority of our business.” We may also face these counterparty risks due to assignments. Should a counterparty fail to honor its obligations under agreements with us, we could
sustain significant losses which could have a material adverse effect on our business, cash flows, financial condition, and operating results.
We are dependent upon Castor Ships, a related party, and other third-party sub-managers for the management of our fleet and business and failure of such
counterparties to meet their obligations could cause us to suffer losses or could negatively impact our results of operations and cash flows.
The management of our business, including, but not limited to, the commercial and technical management of our fleet as well as administrative, financial and other business
functions, is carried out by Castor Ships, which is a company controlled by our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Petros Panagiotidis. We are reliant on Castor Ships’ continued and satisfactory provision of its services.
As of the date of this Annual Report, Castor Ships has subcontracted, with our consent, the technical management for all our vessels to a third-party ship-management company at
its own expense, except for the M/T Wonder Mimosa, which Castor Ships has provided the technical management since June 7, 2023. Our subcontracting arrangements with third-parties may expose us to risks
such as low customer satisfaction with the service provided by these subcontractors, increased operating costs compared to those we would achieve for our vessels, and an inability to maintain our vessels according to our standards or our current
or potential customers’ standards.
Our ability to enter into new charters and expand our customer relationships depends largely on our ability to leverage our relationship with our manager and its subcontractors
and their reputations and relationships in the shipping industry. If any of these counterparties suffer material damage to their reputations or relationships, it may also harm our ability to renew existing charters upon their expiration, obtain
new charters or maintain satisfactory relationships with suppliers and other third parties. In addition, the inability of our manager to fix our vessels at competitive charter rates either due to prevailing market conditions at the time or due to
its inability to provide the requisite quality of service, could adversely affect our revenues and profitability and we may have difficulty meeting our working capital and debt obligations.
Our operational success and ability to execute our business strategy will depend significantly upon the satisfactory and continued performance of these services by our manager
and/or sub-managers, as well as their reputations. Any of the foregoing factors could have an adverse effect on our and their reputations and on our business, financial condition and operating results. Although we may have rights against our
manager and/or sub-managers if they default on their obligations to us, our shareholders will share that recourse only indirectly to the extent that we recover funds.
We have limited the fields in which we focus our operations and this may have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results.
Our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer also serves as Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of our former parent company, Castor. Therefore, in
connection with the Spin-Off, we resolved to limit the fields in which we focus our operations. We currently focus our efforts on tanker and LPG carrier shipping services, and we have no interest or expectancy to participate or pursue any
opportunity in areas of business outside of these shipping businesses nor that Petros Panagiotidis, our director, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and controlling shareholder and his affiliates, such as Castor Ships, offer or inform us of any
such opportunity. This does not, however, preclude us from pursuing opportunities outside of these shipping business if in the future our Board determines to do so. For example, since completion of the Spin-Off, we have expanded into the LPG
carrier market. Focusing our operations on the tanker and LPG carrier shipping business may reduce the scope of opportunities we may exploit and have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results.
Similarly, in connection with the Spin-Off, Castor’s board resolved to, among other things, limit the fields in which it focuses its operations, and that Castor has no interest or
expectancy to participate or pursue any opportunity in areas of business outside of the dry bulk shipping business nor that Petros Panagiotidis, its director, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and controlling shareholder
and his affiliates will offer or inform it of any such opportunity. This does not preclude Castor, however, from pursuing opportunities outside of the dry bulk shipping business if in the future Castor’s board determines to do so, including in
the shipping sectors we operate in.
Our failure to obtain an opportunity that our Board deems in the interest of our shareholders may have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating
results. See also “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—B. Related Party Transactions—The Spin-Off Resolutions.”
We expect that any new or amended credit facility we enter into will contain restrictive covenants that we may not be able to comply with due to economic,
financial or operational reasons and may limit our business and financing activities.
In the past, we have entered into facilities that have imposed operating and financial restrictions and covenants on us and we expect that any new or amended facilities that we enter into in the
future may require us to abide by similar terms. In particular, under the terms of any new or amended facilities, we may be required to obtain the consent of our lenders to undertake various actions, such as:
|
• |
incurring or guaranteeing additional indebtedness outside of our ordinary course of business;
|
|
• |
charging, pledging or encumbering our vessels;
|
|
• |
changing the flag, class, management or ownership of our vessels;
|
|
• |
changing the commercial and technical management of our vessels;
|
|
• |
declaring or paying any dividends or other distributions at a time when the Company has an event of default or the payment of such distribution would cause an event of default;
|
|
• |
forming or acquiring any subsidiaries;
|
|
• |
making any investments in any person, asset, firm, corporation, joint venture or other entity;
|
|
• |
merging or consolidating with any other person;
|
|
• |
changing the ownership, beneficial ownership, control or management of the Company entities party to the facility, or of any of secured vessels, if the effect of such change would be to materially change the
ultimate legal and beneficial ownership in effect at the time the facility was executed; and
|
|
• |
entering into any demise charter contract or let our vessels under any pooling agreement whereby all of the vessel’s earnings are pooled or shared with any other person.
|
We may also be subject to various financial covenants under any new or amended facilities, including those that require us to maintain a (i) certain minimum level of cash and cash
equivalents, (ii) specified leverage ratio and/or (iii) minimum net worth amount.
Our ability to comply with the covenants and restrictions contained in our future credit facilities may be affected by events beyond our
control and which could impair our ability to comply with the terms of such facilities, including prevailing economic, financial and industry conditions, interest rate developments, changes in the funding costs of our banks and changes in vessel
earnings and asset valuations. In particular, inflationary pressures have and may continue to impact interest rates, including SOFR, as discussed in “—Worldwide inflationary pressures could negatively impact our
results of operations and cash flows.” In the event of non-compliance, we may be required to make prepayments or trigger cross-default provisions that we may not have sufficient funds to satisfy. Any such payments may impede our business
strategy due to the diversion of funds away from our core operating activities. To the extent facilities are secured by our vessels, lenders could also seek to foreclose on those assets. Financial and operating covenants in our facilities could
also constrain our ability to acquire vessels, as we would have to make contemplated expenditures for vessel acquisitions at levels which do not breach any applicable covenants in our future credit facilities. Any of these factors could have a
material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results.
We may not be able to obtain debt or equity financing on acceptable terms, which may negatively impact our planned growth.
As a result of concerns about the stability of financial markets generally and the solvency of counterparties, among other factors, the ability to obtain money from the credit
markets has become more difficult as many lenders have increased interest rates, enacted tighter lending standards, refused to refinance existing debt at all or on terms similar to current debt and reduced, and, in some cases, ceased to provide
funding to borrowers. Due to these factors, we cannot be certain that financing or refinancing will be available if needed and, to the extent required, on acceptable terms. The age of our tanker vessel may also impact our ability to obtain new
financing against such on favorable terms or at all and may hinder our plans to reduce the average age of our fleet through vessel acquisitions and/or replacements. See “—The age of our tanker vessel may impact
our ability to obtain financing and a decline in the market values of our vessels could limit the amount of funds that we can borrow, cause us to breach certain financial covenants in our future credit facilities and/or result in impairment
charges or losses on sale.” If financing is not available when needed, or is available only on unfavorable terms, we may be unable to enhance our existing business, complete additional vessel acquisitions or otherwise take advantage of
business opportunities as they arise.
We are a holding company, and we depend on the ability of our subsidiaries to distribute funds to us to satisfy our financial and other obligations.
We are a holding company and have no significant assets other than the equity interests in our subsidiaries. Our subsidiaries own all of
our existing vessels, and subsidiaries we form or acquire will own any other vessels we may acquire in the future. All payments under our charters and/or pool arrangements are made to our subsidiaries. As a result, our ability to meet our
financial and other obligations, and to pay dividends in the future, as and if declared, will depend on the performance of our subsidiaries and their ability to distribute funds to us. The ability of a subsidiary to make these distributions could
be affected by a claim or other action by a third party, including a creditor, by the terms of our financing arrangements, or by the applicable law regulating the payment of dividends in the jurisdictions in which our subsidiaries are organized.
If we are unable to obtain funds from our subsidiaries, we will not be able to meet our liquidity needs unless we obtain funds from other sources, which we may not be able to do.
We do not have a declared dividend policy and our Board may never declare dividends on our common shares.
The declaration and payment of dividends, if any, will always be subject to the discretion of our Board, restrictions contained in our current or future agreements and the
requirements of Marshall Islands law. We do not have a declared dividend policy and if the Board determines to declare dividends, the timing and amount of any dividends declared will depend on, among other things, our earnings, financial
condition and cash requirements and availability, our ability to obtain debt and equity financing on acceptable terms as contemplated by our business strategy, our compliance with the terms of our outstanding indebtedness and the ability of our
subsidiaries to distribute funds to us. The tanker and LPG shipping industry is highly volatile, and we cannot predict with certainty the amount of cash, if any, that will be available for distribution as dividends in any period. Also, there may
be a high degree of variability from period to period in the amount of cash that is available for the payment of dividends.
In addition, we pay dividends on our Series A Preferred Shares. The dividend rate for the Series A Preferred Shares is 1.00% per annum of the stated amount of $1,000 per share;
for each quarterly dividend period commencing on or after the seventh anniversary of the issue date (the “reset date”), the dividend rate will be the dividend rate in effect for the prior quarterly dividend period multiplied by a factor of 1.3;
provided, however, that the dividend rate will not exceed 20% per annum in respect of any quarterly dividend period. Further, in the event that we declare a dividend of the stock of a subsidiary which we control, the holder(s) of the Series B
Preferred Shares are entitled to receive preferred shares of such subsidiary. The rights of the holders of our Series A Preferred Shares rank senior to the obligations to holders of our common shares. This means that, unless accumulated dividends
have been paid or set aside for payment on all of our outstanding Series A Preferred Shares for all past completed dividend periods, no distributions may be declared or paid on our common shares subject to limited exceptions. See “Item 8. Financial Information—A. Consolidated Statements and other Financial Information—Dividend Policy.”
We may incur expenses or liabilities or be subject to other circumstances in the future that reduce or eliminate the amount of cash that we have available for distribution as
dividends, including as a result of the risks described herein. Our business strategy contemplates that we will finance our acquisitions of additional vessels using cash from operations, through debt financings and/or from the net proceeds of
future equity issuances on terms acceptable to us. If financing is not available to us on acceptable terms or at all, our Board may determine to finance or refinance acquisitions with cash from operations, which would reduce the amount of any
cash available for the payment of dividends, if any.
The Republic of Marshall Islands laws generally prohibit the payment of dividends other than from surplus (retained earnings and the
excess of consideration received for the sale of shares above the par value of the shares) or while a company is insolvent or would be rendered insolvent by the payment of such a dividend. We may not have sufficient surplus in the future to pay
dividends and our subsidiaries may not have sufficient funds or surplus to make distributions to us. We currently pay no cash dividends and we may never pay dividends.
Increasing scrutiny and changing expectations from investors, lenders and other market participants with respect to our Environmental, Social and Governance
(“ESG”) policies may impose additional costs on us or expose us to additional risks.
Companies across all industries are facing increasing scrutiny relating to their ESG practices and policies. Investor advocacy groups, certain institutional investors, investment
funds, lenders and other market participants are increasingly focused on ESG practices and in recent years have placed increasing importance on the implications and social cost of their investments. The increased focus and activism related to ESG
and similar matters may hinder access to capital, as investors and lenders may decide to reallocate capital or to not commit capital as a result of their assessment of a company’s ESG practices. Companies which do not adapt to or comply with
investor, lender or other industry shareholder expectations and standards, which are evolving, or which are perceived to have not responded appropriately to the growing concern for ESG issues, regardless of whether there is a legal requirement to
do so, may suffer from reputational damage and the business, financial condition, and/or stock price of such a company could be materially and adversely affected.
We may face increasing pressures from investors, lenders and other market participants, who are increasingly focused on climate change, to prioritize sustainable energy practices,
reduce our carbon footprint and promote sustainability. As a result, we may be required to implement more stringent ESG procedures or standards so that our existing and future investors and lenders remain invested in us and make further
investments in us, especially given the highly focused and specific trade and transport of crude oil and refined petroleum products in which we are engaged. If we do not meet these standards, our business and/or our ability to access capital
could be harmed.
These limitations in both the debt and equity capital markets may affect our ability to grow as our plans for growth may include accessing the equity and debt capital markets. If
those markets are unavailable, or if we are unable to access alternative means of financing on acceptable terms, or at all, we may be unable to implement our business strategy, which could impair our ability to service our indebtedness. Further,
it is likely that we will incur additional costs and require additional resources to monitor, report, comply with and implement wide-ranging ESG requirements. Any of the foregoing factors could have a material adverse effect on our business,
financial condition and operating results.
We are a new company, and our anti-fraud and corporate governance procedures might not be as advanced as those implemented by our listed peer competitors
having a longer presence in the shipping industry.
As a publicly traded company, the SEC, Nasdaq Capital Market, and other regulatory bodies subject us to increased scrutiny on the way we manage and operate our business by urging
us or mandating us to take a series of actions that have nowadays become an area of focus among policymakers and investors. Listed companies are occasionally encouraged to follow best practices and often must comply with these rules and/or
practices addressing a variety of corporate governance and anti-fraud matters, such as director independence, board committees, corporate transparency, ethical behavior, sustainability and prevention of and controls relating to corruption and
fraud. While we believe we follow all requirements that regulatory bodies may from time to time impose on us, our internal processes and procedures might not be as advanced or mature as those implemented by other listed shipping companies with a
longer experience and presence in the U.S. capital markets, which could be an area of concern to our investors and expose us to greater operational risks.
We may be subject to litigation that, if not resolved in our favor and not sufficiently insured against, could have a material adverse effect on us.
We may, from time to time, be involved in various litigation or arbitration matters. These matters may include, among other things, contract disputes, personal injury claims,
environmental claims or proceedings, asbestos and other toxic tort claims, employment matters, governmental claims for taxes or duties, and other litigation or arbitration that arises in the ordinary course of our business. We cannot predict with
certainty the outcome or effect of any claim or other litigation matter, and the ultimate outcome of any litigation or arbitration, or the potential costs to resolve it, may have a material adverse effect on our business. Insurance may not be
applicable or sufficient in all cases and/or insurers may not remain solvent, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition.
We may have to pay tax on United States source income, which would reduce our
earnings, cash from operations and cash available for distribution to our shareholders.
Under the United States Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the “Code”), 50% of the gross shipping income of a vessel owning or chartering corporation, such as ourselves and our
subsidiaries, that is attributable to transportation that begins or ends, but that does not both begin and end, in the United States may be subject to a 4% U.S. federal income tax without allowance for deduction, unless that corporation qualifies
for exemption from tax under Section 883 of the Code and the applicable Treasury Regulations promulgated thereunder.
We intend to take the position that we and each of our subsidiaries qualify for this statutory tax exemption for our 2021 and future taxable years. However, as discussed below
under “Taxation—U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations—U.S. Federal Income Taxation of Our Company”, whether we qualify for this exemption in view of our share structure is unclear and there can be no
assurance that the exemption from tax under Section 883 of the Code will be available to us. If we or our subsidiaries are not entitled to this exemption, we would be subject to an effective 2% U.S. federal income tax on the gross shipping income
we derive during the year that is attributable to the transport of cargoes to or from the United States. If this tax had been imposed for our 2021, 2022 and 2023 taxable year, we anticipate that U.S source income taxes of approximately $206,174,
$960,181 and $350,667 would be charged for these periods, respectively, and we have included a provision for these amounts in our Consolidated Financial Statements. However, there can be no assurance that such taxes will not be materially higher
or lower in future taxable years.
A change in tax laws, treaties or regulations, or their interpretation, of any country in which we operate could result in a higher tax rate on our worldwide
earnings, which could result in a significant negative impact on our earnings and cash flows from operations.
We conduct our operations through subsidiaries which can trade worldwide. Tax laws and regulations are highly complex and subject to interpretation. Consequently, we are subject
to changing tax laws, treaties and regulations in and between countries in which we operate. Our income tax expense, if any, is based upon our interpretation of tax laws in effect in various countries at the time that the expense was incurred. A
change in these tax laws, treaties or regulations, or in the interpretation thereof, could result in a materially higher tax expense or a higher effective tax rate on our worldwide earnings, and such change could be significant to our financial
results. If any tax authority successfully challenges our operational structure, or the taxable presence of our operating subsidiaries in certain countries, or if the terms of certain income tax treaties are interpreted in a manner that is
adverse to our structure, or if we lose a material tax dispute in any country, our effective tax rate on our worldwide earnings could increase substantially. An increase in our taxes could have a material adverse effect on our earnings and cash
flows from these operations. Moreover, in February 2023, the Marshall Islands was added to a list of non-cooperative jurisdictions for tax purposes, commonly referred to as the “EU blacklist.” Although the Marshall Islands was removed from the EU
Blacklist in October 2023, the effect of these developments, including whether the European Union will again add the Marshall Islands to the EU blacklist, any legislation that the Marshall Islands may enact with a view toward not again being
added to (or being removed from) the EU blacklist, how the European Union may react to such legislation, and how counterparties will react to these developments, is unclear and could potentially have a material adverse effect on our business,
financial condition and operating results.
Our subsidiaries may be subject to taxation in the jurisdictions in which its activities are conducted. The amount of any such taxation may be material and would reduce the
amounts available for distribution to us.
Our historical financial results may not be representative of our results as a separate, standalone company.
Some of the historical financial information we have included in this Annual Report has been derived from the consolidated financial statements and accounting records of Castor
and does not necessarily reflect what our financial position, results of operations or cash flows would have been had we been a separate, standalone company during the periods presented. Although Castor did account for our business as two
separate business segments, we were not operated as a separate, standalone company for the historical periods presented. The historical information included for the period prior to March 7, 2023 does not necessarily indicate what our results of
operations, financial position, cash flows or costs and expenses will be in the future.
We are dependent on our management and their ability to hire and retain key personnel and their ability to devote sufficient time and attention to their
respective roles. In particular, we are dependent on the retention and performance of our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Petros Panagiotidis.
Our success depends upon our and our management’s ability to hire and retain key members of our management team and the ability of our management team to devote sufficient time
and attention to their respective roles in light of outside business interests. In particular, we are dependent upon the performance of our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Petros Panagiotidis, who has outside business interests in Castor,
Castor Ships and other ventures. Mr. Panagiotidis will continue to devote such portion of his business time and attention to our business as is appropriate and will also continue to devote substantial time to Castor’s business and other business
and/or investment activities that Mr. Panagiotidis maintains now or in the future. Mr. Panagiotidis’ intention to provide adequate time and attention to other ventures will preclude him from devoting substantially all his time to our business.
Further, the loss of Mr. Panagiotidis, either to outside business interests or for unrelated reasons, or resignation of Mr. Panagiotidis from any of his current managerial roles could adversely affect our business prospects and financial
condition. Any difficulty in hiring and retaining key personnel generally could also adversely affect our results of operations. We do not maintain “key man” life insurance on any of our officers.
Risks Relating to Our Preferred Shares
Our Series A Preferred Shares rank senior to our common shares with respect to dividends, distributions and payments upon liquidation and are convertible into
our common shares, which could have an adverse effect on the value of our common shares.
Dividends on the Series A Preferred Shares accrue and are cumulative from their issue date and are payable quarterly on each distribution payment date declared by the Board, out
of funds legally available for such purpose. The dividend rate for the period from, and including, the issue date to, but excluding, the reset date will be 1.00% per annum of the stated amount of $1,000 per share; however, for each quarterly
dividend period commencing on or after the reset date, the dividend rate will be the dividend rate in effect for the prior quarterly dividend period multiplied by a factor of 1.3, provided that the dividend rate will not exceed 20% per annum in
respect of any quarterly dividend period.
The rights of the holders of our Series A Preferred Shares rank senior to the obligations to holders of our common shares. This means that, unless accumulated dividends have been
paid or set aside for payment on all of our outstanding Series A Preferred Shares for all past completed dividend periods, no distributions may be declared or paid on our common shares subject to limited exceptions. Likewise, in the event of our
voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution or winding-up, no distribution of our assets may be made to holders of our common shares until we have paid to holders of our Series A Preferred Shares a liquidation preference equal to $1,000 per
share plus accumulated and unpaid dividends.
In addition, our Series A Preferred Shares are convertible, in whole or in part, at their holder’s option, to common shares at any time and from time to time from and after the
third anniversary of their issue date and prior to the seventh anniversary of such date. The conversion of our Series A Preferred Shares could result in significant dilution to our shareholders at the time of conversion. See also “—Risks Relating to our Common Shares—Future issuances of common shares or other equity securities, including as a result of an conversion of Series A Preferred Shares, or the potential for such issuances, may impact
the price of our common shares and could impair our ability to raise capital through equity offerings. Shareholders may experience significant dilution as a result of any such issuances.”
Accordingly, the existence of the Series A Preferred Shares and the ability of a holder to convert the Series A Preferred Shares into common shares on or after the third and prior
to the seventh anniversary of their issue date could have a material adverse effect on the value of our common shares. See “Item 10. Additional Information—B. Memorandum and Articles of Incorporation—Description
of the Series A Preferred Shares” for a more detailed description of the Series A Preferred Shares.
Risks Relating to our Common Shares
Our share price may be highly volatile and, as a result, investors in our common shares could incur substantial losses.
The stock market in general, and the market for shipping companies in particular, have experienced extreme volatility that has often been unrelated or disproportionate to the
operating performance of particular companies. As a result of this volatility, investors may experience rapid and substantial losses on their investment in our common shares that are unrelated to our operating performance. Our stock price has
been volatile and may continue to be volatile, which may cause our common shares to trade above or below what we believe to be their fundamental value. Furthermore, significant historical fluctuations in the market price of our former parent
company’s common shares have been accompanied by reports of strong and atypical retail investor interest, including on social media and online forums, and, as our common shares were distributed to our former parent company’s common shareholders
in connection with the Spin-Off, we may have a similar shareholder base and experience similar patterns of investment. Since completion of the Spin-Off, the price of our common shares has been volatile, ranging from a low of $1.42 per share on
March 24, 2023 to a high of $6.50 per share on August 14, 2023. As of February 29, 2024, the closing bid price of our common shares was $6.15 per common share. Our shares may continue to experience volatility as the market evaluates our prospects
as an independent publicly traded company.
Market volatility and trading patterns may create several risks for investors, including but not limited to the following:
|
• |
the market price of our common shares may experience rapid and substantial increases or decreases unrelated to our operating performance or prospects, or macro or industry fundamentals;
|
|
• |
to the extent volatility in our common shares is caused by a “short squeeze” in which coordinated trading activity causes a spike in the market price of our common shares as traders with a short position make
market purchases to avoid or to mitigate potential losses, investors may purchase common shares at inflated prices unrelated to our financial performance or prospects, and may thereafter suffer substantial losses as prices decline once
the level of short-covering purchases has abated; and
|
|
• |
if the market price of our common shares declines, you may be unable to resell your shares at or above the price at which you acquired them. We cannot assure you that the equity issuance of our common shares
will not fluctuate, increase or decline significantly in the future, in which case you could incur substantial losses.
|
We may incur rapid and substantial increases or decreases in our stock price in the foreseeable future that may not coincide in
timing with the disclosure of news or developments by or affecting us. Accordingly, the market price of our common shares may decline or fluctuate rapidly, regardless of any developments in our business. Overall, there are various factors, many
of which are beyond our control, that could negatively affect the market price of our common shares or result in fluctuations in the price or trading volume of our common shares, which include but are not limited to:
|
• |
investor reaction to our business strategy;
|
|
• |
the sentiment of the significant number of retail investors whom we believe hold our common shares, in part due to direct access by retail investors to broadly available trading platforms, and whose investment
thesis may be influenced by views expressed on financial trading and other social media sites and online forums;
|
|
• |
the amount and status of short interest in our common shares, access to margin debt, trading in options and other derivatives on our common shares and any related hedging and other trading factors;
|
|
• |
our continued compliance with the listing standards of the Nasdaq Capital Market and any action we may take to maintain such compliance, such as a reverse stock split;
|
|
• |
regulatory or legal developments in the United States and other countries, especially changes in laws or regulations applicable to our industry;
|
|
• |
variations in our financial results or those of companies that are perceived to be similar to us;
|
|
• |
our ability or inability to raise additional capital and the terms on which we raise it;
|
|
• |
our continued compliance with our debt covenants;
|
|
• |
variations in the value of our fleet;
|
|
• |
declines in the market prices of stocks generally;
|
|
• |
trading volume of our common shares;
|
|
• |
sales of our common shares by us or our shareholders;
|
|
• |
speculation in the press or investment community about our Company, our industry or our securities;
|
|
• |
general economic, industry and market conditions; and
|
|
• |
other events or factors, including those resulting from such events, or the prospect of such events, including war, terrorism and other international conflicts, public health issues including health epidemics or
pandemics, and natural disasters such as fire, hurricanes, earthquakes, tornados or other adverse weather and climate conditions, whether occurring in the United States or elsewhere, could disrupt our operations or result in political or
economic instability.
|
The sale of significant volumes of our common shares, or the perception in the market that this will occur, may decrease their market price and have an adverse impact on our
business, including due to Nasdaq minimum bid price requirements.
Some companies that have experienced volatility in the market price of their common shares have been subject to securities class-action litigation. If instituted against us, such
litigation could result in substantial costs and diversion of management’s attention and resources, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, operating results and growth prospects. There can be no guarantee that the price of our common shares will remain at or rise above its current level or that future sales of our common shares will not be at prices lower than those initially distributed or sold to
investors.
Future issuances of common shares or other equity securities, including as a result of an optional conversion of Series A Preferred Shares, or the potential
for such issuances, may impact the price of our common shares and could impair our ability to raise capital through equity offerings. Shareholders may experience significant dilution as a result of any such issuances.
Toro has an authorized share capital of 3,900,000,000 common shares that it may issue without further shareholder approval. Our business strategy may require the issuance of a
substantial amount of additional shares and in the year ended December 31, 2023, we issued 8,500,000 common shares to Pani Corp. (“Pani”), a company controlled by Toro’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, for gross proceeds of $19,465,000,
less issuance costs of $817,764. Based on market conditions, we may also opportunistically seek to issue equity securities, including additional common shares. We cannot assure you at what price the offering of our shares in the future, if any,
will be made but they may be offered and sold at a price significantly below the current trading price of our common shares or the acquisition price of common shares by shareholders and may be at a discount to the trading price of our common
shares at the time of such sale. Purchasers of the common shares we sell, as well as our existing shareholders, will experience significant dilution if we sell shares at prices significantly below the price at which they invested.
Further, our Series A Preferred Shares are convertible, in whole or in part, at their holder’s option, to common shares at any time and from time to time from and after the third
anniversary of their issue date and prior to the seventh anniversary of such date. All 140,000 Series A Preferred Shares outstanding as of the date of this Annual Report are beneficially owned by Castor. Subject to certain adjustments, the
“Conversion Price” for any conversion of the Series A Preferred Shares shall be the lower of (i) 150% of the volume weighted average price (“VWAP”) of our common shares over the five consecutive trading day period commencing on and including the
Distribution Date, and (ii) the VWAP of our common shares over the 10 consecutive trading day period expiring on the trading day immediately prior to the date of delivery of written notice of the conversion; provided, that, in no event shall the
Conversion Price be less than $2.50. The number of common shares to be issued to a converting holder shall be equal to the quotient of (i) the aggregate stated amount of the Series A Preferred Shares converted plus Accrued Dividends (but
excluding any dividends declared but not yet paid) thereon on the date on which the conversion notice is delivered divided by (ii) the Conversion Price. If converted by Castor, Castor will have registration rights in relation to the common shares
issued upon conversion. See “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—B. Related Party Transactions—Contribution and Spin-Off Distribution Agreement.” The issuance of additional common
shares upon conversion of the Series A Preferred Shares could result in significant dilution to our shareholders at the time of conversion.
In addition, we may issue additional common shares or other equity securities of equal or senior rank in the future in connection with, among other things, our Equity Incentive
Plan (under which a total of 1,240,000 restricted common have already been granted subject but remain unvested as of February 29, 2024), debt prepayments or future vessel acquisitions, without shareholder approval, in a number of circumstances.
To the extent that we issue restricted stock units, stock appreciation rights, options or warrants to purchase our common shares in the future and those stock appreciation rights, options or warrants are exercised or as the restricted stock units
vest, our shareholders may experience further dilution. Holders of shares of our common shares have no preemptive rights that entitle such holders to purchase their pro rata share of any offering of shares of any class or series and, therefore,
such sales or offerings could result in increased dilution to our shareholders.
Our issuance of additional common shares or other equity securities of equal or senior rank, or the perception that such issuances may occur, could have the following effects:
|
• |
our existing shareholders’ proportionate ownership interest in us will decrease;
|
|
• |
the earnings per share and the per share amount of cash available for dividends on our common shares (as and if declared) could decrease;
|
|
• |
the relative voting strength of each previously outstanding common share could be diminished;
|
|
• |
the market price of our common shares could decline; and
|
|
• |
our ability to raise capital through the sale of additional securities at a time and price that we deem appropriate could be impaired.
|
The market price of our common shares could also decline due to sales, or the announcements of proposed sales, of a large number of common shares by our large shareholders
(including sales of common shares issued upon conversion, if any, of the Series A Preferred Shares), or the perception that these sales could occur.
We are incorporated in the Marshall Islands, which does not have a well-developed body of corporate and case law.
We are organized in the Republic of the Marshall Islands, which does not have a well-developed body of corporate or case law, and as a
result, shareholders may have fewer rights and protections under Marshall Islands law than under a typical jurisdiction in the United States. Our corporate affairs are governed by our Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws and by the Marshall
Islands Business Corporations Act (the “BCA”). The provisions of the BCA resemble provisions of the corporation laws of a number of states in the United States. However, there have been few judicial cases in the Marshall Islands interpreting the
BCA. The rights and fiduciary responsibilities of directors under the laws of the Marshall Islands are not as clearly established as the rights and fiduciary responsibilities of directors under statutes or judicial precedent in existence in the
United States. The rights of shareholders of companies incorporated in the Marshall Islands may differ from the rights of shareholders of companies incorporated in the United States. While the BCA provides that its provisions shall be applied and
construed in a manner to make them uniform with the laws of the State of Delaware and other states with substantially similar legislative provisions, there have been few, if any, court cases interpreting the BCA in the Marshall Islands and we
cannot predict whether Marshall Islands courts would reach the same conclusions as U.S. courts. Thus, you may have more difficulty in protecting your interests in the face of actions by our management, directors or controlling shareholders than
shareholders of a corporation incorporated in a United States jurisdiction which has developed a relatively more substantial body of case law would.
The Marshall Islands has no established bankruptcy act, and as a result, any bankruptcy action involving us would have to be initiated
outside the Marshall Islands, and our shareholders may find it difficult or impossible to pursue their claims in such other jurisdictions.
We are incorporated in the Marshall Islands, and the majority of our officers and directors are non-U.S. residents. It may be difficult to serve legal process
or enforce judgments against us, our directors or our management.
We are incorporated under the laws of the Republic of the Marshall Islands, and substantially all of our assets are located outside of the United States. Our principal executive
office is located in Cyprus. In addition, the majority of our directors and officers are non-residents of the United States, and substantially all of their assets are located outside the United States. As a result, it may be difficult or
impossible for you to bring an action against us or against these individuals in the United States if you believe that your rights have been infringed under securities laws or otherwise. Even if you are successful in bringing an action of this
kind, the laws of the Republic of the Marshall Islands and of other jurisdictions may prevent or restrict you from enforcing a judgment against our assets or our directors and officers. Although you may bring an original action against us or our
affiliates in the courts of the Marshall Islands, and the courts of the Marshall Islands may impose civil liability, including monetary damages, against us or our affiliates for a cause of action arising under Marshall Islands law, it may be
impracticable for you to do so.
Our Bylaws contain exclusive forum provisions that may limit a shareholder’s ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum that it finds favorable.
Our Bylaws provide that, unless we consent in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, the High Court of the Republic of the Marshall Islands shall be the sole and
exclusive forum for asserting any internal corporate claim, intra-corporate claim or claim governed by the internal affairs doctrine and that the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York shall be the sole and exclusive
forum for any action asserting a claim arising under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act. If the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York does not have jurisdiction over the claims assigned to it by our exclusive
forum provisions, any other federal district court of the United States may hear such claims.
While the validity of exclusive forum provisions has been upheld under the law of certain jurisdictions, uncertainty remains as to whether our exclusive forum provisions will be
fully or partially recognized by all jurisdictions. If a court were to find either exclusive forum provision contained in our articles of association to be inapplicable or unenforceable (in whole or in part) in an action, we may incur additional
costs associated with resolving such action in other jurisdictions, which could adversely affect our operating results and financial condition.
The exclusive forum provision in our Bylaws will not relieve us of our duties to comply with federal securities laws and the rules and regulations thereunder, and our shareholders
will not be deemed to have waived our compliance with these laws, rules and regulations. In particular, Section 27 of the Exchange Act creates exclusive federal jurisdiction over all claims brought to enforce any duty or liability created by the
Exchange Act or the rules and regulations thereunder, and Section 22 of the Securities Act creates concurrent jurisdiction for federal and state courts over all suits brought to enforce any duty or liability created by the Securities Act or the
rules and regulations thereunder.
Our exclusive forum provision may limit a shareholder’s ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum of its choosing for disputes with us or our directors or other employees or
increase the costs associated with bringing litigation against us or our directors, employees or officers, which may discourage lawsuits against such parties.
We are subject to certain anti-takeover provisions that could have the effect of discouraging, delaying or preventing a merger or acquisition, or could make it
difficult for our shareholders to replace or remove our current Board, and could adversely affect the market price of our common shares.
Several provisions of our Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws could make it difficult for our shareholders to change the composition of our Board in any one year, preventing them
from changing the composition of management. In addition, the same provisions may discourage, delay or prevent a merger or acquisition that shareholders may consider favorable. These provisions include:
|
• |
authorizing our Board to issue “blank check” preferred shares without shareholder approval;
|
|
• |
providing for a classified Board with staggered, three-year terms;
|
|
• |
establishing certain advance notice requirements for nominations for election to our Board or for proposing matters that can be acted on by shareholders at shareholder meetings;
|
|
• |
prohibiting cumulative voting in the election of directors;
|
|
• |
prohibiting any owner of 15% or more of our voting stock from engaging in a business combination with us within three years after the owner acquired such ownership, except under certain conditions;
|
|
• |
limiting the persons who may call special meetings of shareholders; and
|
|
• |
establishing supermajority voting provisions with respect to amendments to certain provisions of our Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws.
|
On the Distribution Date, our Board declared a dividend of one preferred share purchase right (a “Right”), for each outstanding common share and adopt a shareholder rights plan,
as set forth in the Shareholder Protection Rights Agreement (the “Rights Agreement”) entered into between Toro and Broadridge Corporate Issuer Solutions, Inc., as rights agent, on such same date. Each Right allows its holder to purchase from Toro
one common share (or one one-thousandth of a share of Series C Participating Preferred Shares), for the Exercise Price of $22 once the Rights become exercisable. This portion of a Series C Participating Preferred Share will give the shareholder
approximately the same dividend, voting and liquidation rights as would one common share. The Rights Agreement is intended to protect shareholders from coercive or otherwise unfair takeover tactics. In general terms, it imposes a significant
penalty upon any person or group that acquires 15% or more of our outstanding common shares without the approval of our Board. If a shareholder’s beneficial ownership of our common shares as of the time of the public announcement of the rights
plan and associated dividend declaration is at or above the applicable threshold, that shareholder’s then-existing ownership percentage would be grandfathered, but the rights would become exercisable if at any time after such announcement, the
shareholder increases its ownership percentage by 1% or more. Our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Petros Panagiotidis, and Mr. Panagiotidis’ controlled affiliates are exempt from these provisions. For a full description of the rights plan,
see “Item 10. Additional Information—B. Shareholder Protection Rights Agreement.”
The Rights may have anti-takeover effects. The Rights will cause substantial dilution to any person or group that attempts to acquire us without the approval of our Board. As a
result, the overall effect of the Rights may be to render more difficult or discourage any attempt to acquire us. Because our Board can approve a redemption of the Rights for a permitted offer, the Rights should not interfere with a merger or
other business combination approved by our Board.
In addition to the Rights above, we have issued 40,000 Series B Preferred Shares, representing 99.5% of the aggregate voting power of our total issued and outstanding share
capital, net of treasury shares, as of February 29, 2024 to an entity controlled by Mr. Panagiotidis. See “—Our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, who may be deemed to beneficially own, directly or indirectly,
a majority of our outstanding common shares and 100% of our Series B Preferred Shares, has control over us” and “Item 10. Additional Information—B. Memorandum and Articles of Association.”
In addition, our future credit facilities may contain covenants prohibiting or limiting a change of control. See “—We expect that any new or
amended credit facility we enter into will contain restrictive covenants that we may not be able to comply with due to economic, financial or operational reasons and may limit our business and financing activities” for associated risks.
The foregoing anti-takeover provisions could substantially impede the ability of public shareholders to benefit from a change in control and, as a result, may adversely affect the
market price of our common shares and your ability to realize any potential change of control premium.
Our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, who may be deemed to beneficially own, directly or indirectly, a majority of our outstanding common shares and 100%
of our Series B Preferred Shares, has control over us.
Our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Petros Panagiotidis, may be deemed to be the ultimate beneficial owner of
9,611,240 common shares representing 51.9% of the 18,501,439 common shares outstanding, net of 476,970 treasury shares, as of February 29, 2024 and 40,000 shares of our Series B Preferred Shares outstanding
as of the same date. The shares of Series B Preferred Shares each carry 100,000 votes. Together, such shares represent 51.7% of our total outstanding share capital, net of treasury shares and 99.8% of the aggregate voting power of our total
outstanding share capital, net of treasury shares, as of February 29, 2024 and Mr. Panagiotidis therefore has control over our actions. Mr. Panagiotidis also controls Castor as he was the ultimate beneficial owner of 12,000 Series B Preferred
Shares, each carrying 100,000 votes, of Castor as of February 29, 2024. The interests of Mr. Panagiotidis may be different from your interests.
We cannot assure you that our internal controls and procedures over financial reporting will be sufficient. Further,
we are an “emerging growth company”, and we cannot be certain if the reduced requirements applicable to emerging growth companies make our securities less attractive to investors
We are subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act and the other rules and regulations of the SEC which create additional
costs for us and will require the time and attention of management, including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as amended (the “Sarbanes-Oxley Act”). Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires any company subject to the reporting requirements
of the U.S. securities laws to do a comprehensive evaluation of its and its consolidated subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting. To comply with this statute, we are required to document and test our internal control procedures
and our management is required to assess and issue a report concerning our internal control over financial reporting. Such evaluations, as well as any proposed remedial measures, require time and resources. We may not be able to predict or
estimate the amount of the additional costs we may incur, the timing of such costs or the degree of impact that our management’s attention to these matters will have on our business. If our management cannot favorably assess the effectiveness of
our internal control over financial reporting, investor confidence in our financial results may weaken, and our stock price may suffer. Further, controls previously evaluated as effective may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or
that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may also not prevent or detect misstatements.
As of February 29, 2024, we are an “emerging growth company” as defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012 (the “JOBS Act”). As an emerging growth company, we are
not required to comply with, among other things, the auditor attestation requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Investors may find our securities less attractive because we rely on this provision. If investors find our securities less attractive
as a result, there may be a less active trading market for our securities and prices of such securities may be more volatile.
We are a foreign private issuer and, as a result, are not subject to U.S. proxy rules and will be subject to Exchange Act reporting obligations that, to some
extent, are more lenient and less frequent than those of a U.S. domestic public company.
We report under the Exchange Act as a non-U.S. company with foreign private issuer status. Because we qualify as a foreign private issuer under the Exchange Act, we are exempt
from certain provisions of the Exchange Act that are applicable to U.S. domestic public companies, including (i) the sections of the Exchange Act regulating the solicitation of proxies, consents or authorizations in respect of a security
registered under the Exchange Act, (ii) the sections of the Exchange Act requiring insiders to file public reports of their stock ownership and trading activities and liability for insiders who profit from trades made in a short period of time,
and (iii) the rules under the Exchange Act requiring the filing with the SEC of quarterly reports on Form 10-Q containing unaudited financial and other specified information, or current reports on Form 8-K, upon the occurrence of specified
significant events. In addition, foreign private issuers are not required to file their annual report on Form 20-F until four months after the end of each financial year, while U.S. domestic issuers that are large accelerated filers are required
to file their annual report on Form 10-K within 60 days after the end of each fiscal year. Foreign private issuers are also exempt from Regulation FD, aimed at preventing issuers from making selective disclosures of material information. As a
result of the above, you may not have the same protections afforded to shareholders of companies that are not foreign private issuers or controlled companies.
In addition, as a foreign private issuer, we are also entitled to and do rely on exceptions from certain corporate governance requirements of the Nasdaq Capital Market.
As a result, you may not have the same protections afforded to shareholders of companies that are not foreign private issuers.
U.S. tax authorities could treat us as a “passive foreign investment company”, which could have adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences to U.S.
shareholders, particularly if we continue to hold significant cash relative to the operating assets we own.
A foreign corporation will be treated as a “passive foreign investment company” (a “PFIC”) for U.S. federal income tax purposes if either (1) at least 75% of its gross income for
any taxable year consists of certain types of “passive income” or (2) at least 50% of the average value of the corporation’s assets produce or are held for the production of those types of “passive income.” For purposes of these tests, “passive
income” includes dividends, interest, and gains from the sale or exchange of investment property and rents and royalties other than rents and royalties which are received from unrelated parties in connection with the active conduct of a trade or
business. For purposes of these tests, income derived from the performance of services does not constitute “passive income,” whereas rental income would generally constitute “passive income” to the extent not attributable to the active conduct of
a trade or business. U.S. shareholders of a PFIC are subject to a disadvantageous U.S. federal income tax regime with respect to the income derived by the PFIC, the distributions they receive from the PFIC and the gain, if any, they derive from
the sale or other disposition of their shares in the PFIC.
We do not believe that we will be treated as a PFIC for any taxable year. However, our status as a PFIC is determined on an annual basis and will depend upon the operations of our
vessels and our other activities during each taxable year. In this regard, we intend to treat the gross income we derive or are deemed to derive from our time chartering, pool arrangements and/or voyage chartering activities as services income,
rather than rental income. Accordingly, we believe that our income from our chartering and/or pool activities does not constitute “passive income,” and the assets that we own and operate in connection with the production of that income do not
constitute passive assets.
There is, however, no direct legal authority under the PFIC rules addressing our method of operation, in particular, in the event that all our vessels are employed in pools.
Accordingly, no assurance can be given that the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”), or a court of law will accept our position, and there is a risk that the IRS or a court of law could determine that we are a PFIC. Moreover, no assurance
can be given that we would not constitute a PFIC for any taxable year in which if we become unable to acquire vessels in a timely fashion or if there were to be changes in the nature and extent of our operations.
In addition, for purposes of the PFIC “asset” test described above, cash and other current assets readily convertible into cash (“Cash Assets”) are considered to be assets that
produce passive income. As indicated in our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report, we hold significant Cash Assets relative to the operating assets we hold. Although we do not expect to be treated as a PFIC
for our 2023 taxable year, we cannot predict whether our position in cash and other “passive” assets will cause us to be treated as a PFIC in a future taxable year.
If the IRS were to find that we are or have been a PFIC for any taxable year, our U.S. shareholders would face adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences and information
reporting obligations. Under the PFIC rules, unless those shareholders made an election available under the Internal Revenue Code (which election could itself have adverse consequences for such shareholders, as discussed below under “Item 10. Additional Information—E. Taxation—U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations—Passive Foreign Investment Company Status and Significant Tax Consequences”), such shareholders would be liable to pay U.S.
federal income tax upon excess distributions and upon any gain from the disposition of our common shares at the then prevailing income tax rates applicable to ordinary income plus interest as if the excess distribution or gain had been recognized
ratably over the shareholder’s holding period of our common shares. Please see the section of this Annual Report entitled “Item 10. Additional Information—E. Taxation—U.S. Federal Income Tax
Considerations—Passive Foreign Investment Company Status and Significant Tax Consequences” for a more comprehensive discussion of the U.S. federal income tax consequences to U.S. shareholders if we are treated as a PFIC.
ITEM 4. |
INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY
|
A.
|
History and Development of the Company
|
Spin-Off from Castor
Toro was incorporated by Castor under the laws of the Republic of the Marshall Islands on July 29, 2022 as Tankco Shipping Inc., to serve
as the holding company of the Toro Subsidiaries in connection with the Spin-Off. On September 29, 2022, we were renamed Toro Corp. On November 15, 2022 and December 30, 2022, based on the recommendation of a special committee of independent
disinterested directors of Castor (the “Special Committee”), the independent disinterested members of the board of directors of Castor approved the Spin-Off in the Castor Spin-Off Resolutions (as defined in “Item
7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—B. Related Party Transactions”) in order for each of Toro, holding Castor’s tanker segments, and Castor, holding its dry bulk segment, to operate and pursue opportunities as a separate
“pure play” company in the relevant shipping sector, to be evaluated as such by the market and to enhance our and Castor’s financing and growth opportunities. The terms of the Spin-Off were negotiated and approved by the Special Committee.
In connection with the Spin-Off, on March 7, 2023, Castor contributed to us the Toro Subsidiaries, in exchange for (i) all of our
9,461,009 common shares at the time, (ii) the issue of 140,000 Series A Preferred Shares to Castor, with a cumulative preferred distribution accruing initially at a rate of 1.00% per annum on the stated amount of $1,000 per share and a par value
of $0.001 per share, all of which were retained by Castor after the Spin-Off, and (iii) the issue of 40,000 Series B Preferred Shares, each carrying 100,000 votes on all matters on which our shareholders are entitled to vote but no economic
rights, to Pelagos, a company controlled by our and Castor’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, against payment of their nominal value of $0.001 per Series B Preferred Share. On March 7, 2023, Castor distributed all of our 9,461,009 common
shares at the time on a pro rata basis to its holders of common stock. Our common shares commenced trading on March 7, 2023 on the Nasdaq Capital Market under the symbol “TORO”.
Subscription Agreement with Pani
On April 17, 2023, Toro entered into a subscription agreement with Pani, a company controlled by Toro’s Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer. For a description of this and other recent equity transactions, please see “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—B. Liquidity and Capital Resources—Equity Transactions.”
Purchase of Series D Cumulative Perpetual Convertible Preferred Shares of Castor
On August 7, 2023, we agreed to purchase 50,000 Castor Series D Preferred Shares for aggregate cash consideration of $50.0
million. For a description of this transaction, please see “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—B. Related Party Transactions— Purchase by the Company of 5.00% Series D Cumulative Perpetual Convertible Preferred Shares of Castor.”
Business
We are an independent, growth-oriented shipping company that acquires, owns, charters and operates oceangoing tanker and LPG carrier vessels and provides worldwide energy seaborne
transportation services for crude oil, refined petroleum products and LPG. As of the date of this Annual Report, we primarily operate in the LPG sector and maintain a fleet of one Handysize tanker vessel and four LPG carrier vessels with an
aggregate cargo carrying capacity of 0.1 million dwt and an average fleet age of 9.6 years. As of December 31, 2023, our fleet comprised six vessels, made up of one Handysize tanker vessel, one Aframax/LR2 vessel and four LPG carrier vessels.
Our commercial strategy primarily focuses on deploying our fleet under a mix of pools, voyage charters and time charters according to our assessment of market conditions. We
adjust the mix of these charters to take advantage of the relatively stable cash flows and high utilization rates for our vessels associated with period time charters, to profit from attractive trip charter rates during periods of strong charter
market conditions associated with voyage charters or to take advantage of high utilization rates for our vessels along with exposure to attractive charter rates during periods of strong charter market conditions when employing our vessels in
pools. As of the date of this Annual Report, the tanker vessel in our fleet was employed in a pool and our four LPG carrier vessels were employed in period time charters. Such arrangements will be reevaluated by management on a periodic basis.
We intend to expand our fleet in the future and may acquire additional tankers and/or LPG carriers, including to replace existing vessels or vessels we have disposed of, diversify
our fleet, expand our activities and reduce the average age of our fleet, and potentially, if our Board so determines, acquire vessels in other sectors, based on, in each case, our assessment of market conditions and subject to the conditions set
out in the Toro Spin-Off Resolutions. We intend to acquire additional vessels principally in the secondhand market, including acquisitions from third-parties, and we may also acquire additional vessels from related parties, provided that such
related party acquisitions are negotiated and conducted on an arms-length basis. We may also enter into newbuilding contracts to the extent that we believe they present attractive opportunities. For an overview of our fleet, please see “—B. Business Overview—Our fleet.”
Our principal executive office is at 223 Christodoulou Chatzipavlou Street, Hawaii Royal Gardens, 3036 Limassol, Cyprus. Our telephone
number at that address is +357 25 357 768. Our website is www.torocorp.com. The SEC maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC.
The address of the SEC’s Internet site is www.sec.gov. None of the information contained on, or that can be accessed through, these websites is incorporated into or forms a part of this Annual Report.
Fleet Development and Vessel Capital Expenditures
In 2021, our fleet grew from zero vessels to nine vessels through the acquisition by Castor of nine tanker vessels, one of which was sold
to a third-party on May 9, 2022 and delivered to that party on July 15, 2022 prior to completion of the Spin-Off. In the second and third quarters of 2023, we acquired four LPG carriers comprising our newly established LPG carrier segment.
Between the second and fourth quarters of 2023, we completed the sales of six of our tanker vessels to third-parties due to attractive purchase terms offered by these buyers. This included one of the two Handysize vessels then comprising our
Handysize segment and all six of the seven Aframax/LR2 vessels then comprising our Aframax/LR2 segment. On January 24, 2024, we have completed the sale of the M/T Wonder Sirius, the sole remaining
Aframax/LR2 tanker comprising our Aframax/LR2 segment. For further information on these vessel acquisitions and the financing transaction associated with certain of these vessel acquisitions, see “—B. Business
Overview—Our fleet” and Notes 5, 6 and 18 to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report.
As of the date of this Annual Report, all of our vessels are equipped with a ballast water treatment system (“BWTS”). During the period ended December 31, 2021 and the years ended
December 31, 2022 and 2023, we made capital expenditures of $1.2 million, $0.3 million and $0.8 million, respectively, for the installation of BWTS on our vessels.
During the period ended December 31, 2021 and the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2023, we operated tanker vessels that engaged in the worldwide transportation of crude oil and
refined petroleum products using our Aframax/LR2 tankers, which transport crude oil, and Handysize tankers, which transport refined petroleum products and, from their first acquisition in the second quarter of 2023, we operated 5,000 cbm LPG
carriers, which transport liquefied petroleum gas. As a result of the different characteristics of such LPG carriers in relation to our other two operating segments, we determined that, with effect from the second quarter of 2023, we operated in
three reportable segments: (i) Aframax/LR2 tanker segment, (ii) Handysize tanker segment and (iii) LPG carrier segment. The reportable segments reflect our internal organization and the way our chief operating decision maker reviews the operating
results and allocates capital within the Company. Further, the transport of crude oil (carried by Aframax/LR2 tankers), refined petroleum products (carried by Handysize tanker vessels) and LPG (carried by LPG carriers) has different
characteristics. In addition, the nature of trade, trading routes, charterers and cargo handling of LPG, refined petroleum products and crude oil differs.
We do not disclose geographic information relating to our segments. When we charter a vessel to a charterer, the charterer is free, subject to certain exemptions, to trade the
vessel worldwide and, as a result, the disclosure of geographic information is impracticable. For further information, see Note 12 to our Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report.
Our Fleet
The following table summarizes key information about our fleet as of February 29, 2024:
Vessel
Name
|
|
Capacity
(dwt)
|
|
Year
Built
|
|
Country of
Construction
|
|
Type of
Charter
|
|
Gross Charter
Rate ($/day)
|
|
Estimated
Earliest Charter
Expiration
|
|
Estimated
Latest Charter
Expiration
|
|
Handysize Segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,718
|
|
2006
|
|
S. Korea
|
|
Tanker Pool(1)
|
|
N/A
|
|
N/A
|
|
N/A
|
|
LPG Carrier
Segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,743
|
|
2020
|
|
Japan
|
|
Time Charter Period
|
|
310,000 per month
|
|
August 2024
|
|
August 2025
|
|
|
|
4,753
|
|
2015
|
|
Japan
|
|
Voyage(2)
|
|
$1,080,000 lump sum
|
|
April 2024(3)
|
|
N/A
|
|
LPG Dream
Syrax
|
|
5,158
|
|
2015
|
|
Japan
|
|
Time Charter Period
|
|
308,500 per month
|
|
April 2024
|
|
May 2024
|
|
LPG Dream
Vermax
|
|
5,155
|
|
2015
|
|
Japan
|
|
Time Charter Period (4)
|
|
314,950 per month
|
|
March 2025
|
|
March 2026
|
|
(1) |
The vessel is currently participating in an unaffiliated tanker pool specializing in the employment of Handysize tanker vessels.
|
(2) |
After redelivery from the current charter, estimated to take place on April 26, 2024, in accordance with the prevailing charter party terms, the vessel has been fixed at a gross charter rate equal to $323,000
per month for a period of minimum 12 to maximum 24 months.
|
(3) |
Estimated completion date of voyage.
|
(4) |
In accordance with the prevailing charter party, on January 31, 2024, the vessel has been fixed for a period of minimum 12 to maximum 24 months, at a gross charter rate equal to $318,000 per month, starting from
March 22, 2024.
|
Chartering of our Fleet
We intend to actively market our tanker fleet, which comprised one vessel as of February 29, 2024, predominantly in pool arrangements but may also enter into spot voyage market
and/or time charter contracts in order to secure optimal employment in the tanker shipping market. With regard to our LPG carrier fleet, which comprised four vessels as of February 29, 2024, we intend mainly to employ our LPG carrier vessels in
period time charter contracts, while evaluating the conditions and taking advantage of some spot voyages upon redelivery from period time charters if spot market conditions are favorable.
Charter rates in the spot market are volatile and sometimes fluctuate on a seasonal and year-to-year basis. Fluctuations derive from imbalances in the availability of cargoes for
shipment and the number of vessels available at any given time to transport these cargoes, as well as supply and demand for crude oil and oil products carried by ocean-going vessels internationally. Vessels operating in the spot market generate
revenue that is less predictable than those under period time charters but may enable us to capture increased profit margins during periods of improvements in the tanker shipping market. Industry downturns relating to the products that our
vessels transport could result in a reduction in profit margins and lead to losses. Based on market conditions, we may opportunistically look to employ more of our vessels in the spot market under time charter trip contracts, voyage charter
contracts and/or pooling arrangements.
Voyage charters involve a charterer engaging a vessel for a particular journey. A voyage contract is made for the use of a vessel, for which we are paid freight (a fixed amount
per ton of cargo carried or a lump sum amount) on the basis of transporting cargo from a loading port to a discharge port. Depending on charterparty terms, freight can be fully prepaid, or be paid upon reaching the discharging destination upon
delivery of the cargo, at the discharging destination but before discharging, or during a ship’s voyage. Revenues from voyage charters are typically tied to prevailing market rates and may therefore be more volatile than rates from other
charters, such as time charters.
Time charters involve a charterer engaging a vessel for a set period of time. Time charter agreements may have extension options ranging from months to, sometimes, years and are
therefore viewed as providing more predictable cash flows over the period of the engagement than may otherwise be attainable from other charter arrangements. The time charter party generally provides, among others, typical warranties regarding
the speed and the performance of the vessel as well as owner protective restrictions such that the vessel is sent only to safe ports by the charterer, subject always to compliance with applicable sanction laws and war risks, and carry only lawful
and non-hazardous cargo. We typically enter into time charters ranging from one month to 12 months and, in isolated cases, on longer terms depending on market conditions. Time charter agreements may have extension options that range over certain
time periods, which are usually periods of months. The charterer has the full discretion over the ports visited, shipping routes and vessel speed, subject to the owner’s protective restrictions set forth in the agreed charterparty’s terms. Under
our time charter agreements, whereby our vessels are utilized by a charterer for a set duration of time, the charterer pays a fixed or floating daily hire rate and other compensation costs related to the contracts.
A pool consists of a group of vessels of similar types and sizes provided by various owners for the purpose of enabling a centralized pool operator to engage those vessels
commercially. Pools employ experienced commercial charterers and operators who have close working relationships with customers and brokers, while technical management is separate from pool operations. Their main objective is to enter into
arrangements for the employment and operation of the pool vessels, so as to secure for the pool participants the highest commercially available earnings per vessel on the basis of pooling the net revenues of the pool vessels and dividing it
between the pool participants based on the terms of the pool agreement. Pool vessels are marketed as a single group of vessels, primarily in the spot market but also from time to time for time charters, and all revenues earned from the operation
of the pool vessels are aggregated together and, after deduction of all costs involved in the operation of the pool, shared between the pool participants based on an agreed key. The size and scope of pools enable them to achieve larger economies
of scale and to have better negotiating power with all procurement vendors (e.g., bunker suppliers, port agents, towing companies, etc.) and as a result they are able to reduce their costs for such items. They also achieve geographic
diversification by deploying their pool vessels in both Atlantic and Pacific markets while arbitraging from spread opportunities. The diversification in revenue streams due to typically broader shipping capabilities of pool fleet vessels and/or
more accessible customer base, alongside payments to pool participants on a set schedule, can stabilize revenues for pool participants, though this may be offset by volatility in spot rates. Furthermore, due to their large fleets, pools can make
vessels available for prompt cargoes (which are usually priced at higher than market rates) on short notice and thus they are able to capture the premium of such prompt cargoes. Pools also have higher market visibility, which provides them with
opportunities not available to smaller tanker market participants. By being able to reduce costs and optimize revenues, pools aim to outperform the industry benchmark indices by utilizing their size and sophistication and improving utilization
rates for participating vessels through various methods, including securing backhaul voyages and contracts of affreightment.
For further information on our charters and charter terms, please refer to “Item 5. Operation and Financial Results Review—A. Operating
Results—Hire Rates and the Cyclical Nature of the Industry.”
Management of our Business
Our vessels are commercially and technically managed by Castor Ships, a company controlled by our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Petros Panagiotidis. Castor Ships manages
our business overall and provides us with crew management, technical management, operational employment management, insurance management, provisioning, bunkering, commercial, chartering and administrative services, including, but not limited to,
securing employment for our fleet, arranging and supervising the vessels’ commercial operations, handling all of the Company’s vessel sale and purchase transactions, undertaking related shipping projects, management advisory and support services,
accounting and audit support services, as well as other associated services requested from time to time by us and our ship-owning subsidiaries. Castor Ships may choose to subcontract these services to other parties at its discretion. As of the
date of this Annual Report, Castor Ships has subcontracted the technical management of all of our vessels to a third-party ship-management company, except for the M/T Wonder Mimosa, which Castor Ships has
directly provided technical management services to since June 7, 2023. Castor Ships pays, at its own expense, these technical management companies a fee for the services it has subcontracted to them, without burdening the Company with any
additional cost.
In exchange for the above management services, we and our subsidiaries pay Castor Ships (i) following an inflation-based adjustment effective July 1, 2023, a (A) flat quarterly
management fee in the amount of $0.8 million for the management and administration of our business and (B) daily fee of $1,039 per vessel for the provision of ship management services under separate ship management agreements entered into by our
shipowning subsidiaries, (ii) a commission of 1.25% on all gross income received from the operation of our vessels and (iii) a commission of 1% on each consummated sale and purchase transaction.
For further information, see “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—B. Related Party Transactions.”
Environmental and Other Regulations in the Shipping Industry
Government regulations and laws significantly affect the ownership and operation of our fleet. We are subject to international conventions and treaties, regional, national, state
and local laws and regulations in force in the countries in which our vessels may operate or are registered relating to safety, health and environmental protection including the storage, handling, emission, transportation and discharge of
hazardous and non-hazardous materials, and the remediation of contamination and liability for damage to natural resources. Compliance with such international conventions, laws, regulations, insurance and other requirements entails significant
expense, including for vessel modifications and the implementation of certain operating procedures.
A variety of government and private entities subject our vessels to both scheduled and unscheduled inspections. These entities include the local port authorities (applicable
national authorities such as the United States Coast Guard (“USCG”), harbor master or equivalent), classification societies, flag state administrations (countries of registry) and charterers, particularly terminal operators. Certain of these
entities require us to obtain permits, licenses, certificates and other authorizations for the operation of our vessels. Failure to maintain necessary permits, certificates and approvals could require us to incur substantial costs or result in
the temporary suspension of the operation of our vessels.
Increasing environmental concerns have created a demand for vessels that conform to stricter environmental standards. We are required to maintain operating standards for our
vessels that emphasize operational safety, quality maintenance, continuous training of our officers and crews and compliance with United States, European Union and international regulations. We believe that the operation of our vessels is in
substantial compliance with applicable environmental laws and regulations and that our vessels have all material permits, licenses, certificates or other authorizations necessary for the conduct of our operations. However, because such laws and
regulations frequently change and may impose increasingly stricter requirements, we cannot predict the ultimate cost of complying with these requirements, or the impact of these requirements on the resale value or useful lives of our vessels. In
addition, a serious marine incident that causes significant adverse environmental impact could result in additional legislation or regulation that could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results.
International Maritime Organization
The International Maritime Organization, the United Nations agency for maritime safety and the prevention of pollution by vessels (the “IMO”), has adopted the
International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships, 1973, as modified by the Protocol of 1978 relating thereto, collectively referred to as MARPOL 73/78 and herein as “MARPOL”, the International Convention for the Safety of
Life at Sea of 1974 (“SOLAS Convention”), and the International Convention on Load Lines of 1966. MARPOL establishes environmental standards relating to oil leakage or spilling, garbage management, sewage, air emissions, handling and disposal
of noxious liquids and handling of harmful substances in packaged forms. MARPOL is applicable to dry bulk, tanker, containers, LPG and LNG carriers, among other vessels, and includes six Annexes, each of which regulates a different source of
pollution. Annex I relates to operational or accidental oil leakage or spilling; Annexes II and III relate to harmful substances carried in bulk in liquid or in packaged form, respectively; Annexes IV and
V relate to sewage and garbage management, respectively. Annex VI, which relates to air emissions, was separately adopted by the IMO in September of 1997. New emissions standards, titled IMO-2020, took effect on January 1, 2020.
Air Emissions
In September 1997, the IMO adopted Annex VI to MARPOL to address air emissions from vessels. Effective May 2005, Annex VI sets limits on sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxide and other
emissions from all commercial vessel exhausts and prohibits “deliberate emissions” of ozone-depleting substances (such as halons and chlorofluorocarbons), emissions of volatile compounds from cargo tanks, and the shipboard incineration of
specific substances. Annex VI also includes a global cap on the sulfur content of fuel oil and allows for special emission control areas to be established with more stringent limits on sulfur emissions, as explained below. Emissions of “volatile
organic compounds” from certain tankers and shipboard incineration (from incinerators installed after January 1, 2000) of certain substances (such as polychlorinated biphenyls, or PCBs) are also prohibited. We believe that our vessels are
currently compliant in all material respects with these requirements.
The Marine Environment Protection Committee, or “MEPC,” adopted amendments to Annex VI regarding emissions of sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxide, particulate matter and ozone
depleting substances, which entered into force on July 1, 2010. The amended Annex VI seeks to further reduce air pollution by, among other things, implementing a progressive reduction of the amount of sulfur contained in any fuel oil used on
board ships. On October 27, 2016, at its seventieth session, the MEPC agreed to implement a global 0.5% m/m sulfur oxide emissions limit (reduced from 3.50%) starting from January 1, 2020. This limitation can be met by using low-sulfur compliant
fuel oil, alternative fuels, or certain exhaust gas cleaning systems. Ships are now required to obtain bunker delivery notes and International Air Pollution Prevention Certificates from their flag states that specify sulfur content. Additionally,
at MEPC 73, amendments to Annex VI to prohibit the carriage of bunkers above 0.5% sulfur on ships not equipped with exhaust gas cleaning systems were adopted and took effect on March 1, 2020. These regulations subject ocean-going vessels to
stringent emissions controls and may cause us to incur substantial costs. As of the date of this Annual Report, our vessels are not equipped with scrubbers and we have transitioned to burning IMO compliant fuels.
Sulfur content standards are even stricter within certain “Emission Control Areas”, or (“ECAs”). As of January 1, 2015, ships operating within an ECA were not permitted to use
fuel with sulfur content in excess of 0.1% m/m. Amended Annex VI establishes procedures for designating new ECAs. Currently, the IMO has designated four ECAs, including specified portions of the Baltic Sea area, North Sea area, North American
area and United States Caribbean area. Ocean-going vessels in these areas are subject to more stringent emission controls and may cause us to incur additional costs. Other areas in China are subject to local regulations that impose stricter
emission controls. If other ECAs are approved by the IMO, or other new or more stringent requirements relating to emissions from marine diesel engines or port operations by vessels are adopted by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”)
or the other jurisdictions where we operate, compliance with these regulations could entail significant capital expenditures or otherwise increase the costs of our operations.
Amended Annex VI also establishes new tiers of stringent nitrogen oxide emissions standards for marine diesel engines, depending on their date of installation. At
the MEPC meeting held from March to April 2014, amendments to Annex VI were adopted which address the date on which Tier III Nitrogen Oxide (“NOx”) standards in ECAs will go into effect. Under the amendments, Tier III NOx standards apply to
ships that operate in the North American and U.S. Caribbean Sea ECAs designed for the control of NOx produced by vessels with a marine diesel engine installed and constructed on or after January 1, 2016. Tier III requirements could apply to
areas that will be designated for Tier III NOx in the future. Currently, as four of the five vessels in our current fleet were built prior to 2016, they are not affected by Tier III requirements from an operational perspective. The LPG Dream Terrax was built after January 1, 2016 but has not complied with Tier III
requirements since the date of its construction and therefore is not trading and cannot be trading in USA. Our LPG carrier vessels are also subject to and currently in compliance with Tier II NOx, which regulates nitrogen dioxide emissions from
vessels built on or after January 1, 2011, while our Handysize vessel is subject to and currently in compliance with Tier I NOx requirements. However, we may acquire additional vessels that are subject to Tier II or Tier III NOx in the future
and/or additional trading restrictions could be imposed upon vessels that are currently in compliance with Tier I or II NOx standards, each of which may cause us to incur additional capital expenses and/or other compliance costs.
At MEPC 70 and MEPC 71, the MEPC approved the North Sea and Baltic Sea as ECAs for nitrogen oxide for ships built on or after January 1, 2021. The EPA promulgated equivalent (and
in some respects stricter) emissions standards in 2010. As determined at the MEPC 70, the new Regulation 22A of MARPOL Annex VI became effective as of March 1, 2018, and requires ships above 5,000 gross tonnage to collect and report annual data
on fuel oil consumption to an IMO database, with the first year of data collection having commenced on January 1, 2019. The IMO intends to use such data as the first step in its roadmap for developing its strategy to reduce greenhouse gas
emissions from ships, as discussed further below. The 2023 IMO GHG Strategy seeks a reduction in carbon intensity of international shipping as an average across international shipping, by at least 40% by 2030. Related measures are discussed
further below.
As of January 1, 2013, MARPOL made mandatory certain measures relating to energy efficiency for ships. All ships are now required to develop and implement Ship Energy Efficiency
Management Plans (“SEEMPS”), and new ships must be designed in compliance with minimum energy efficiency levels per capacity mile as defined by the Energy Efficiency Design Index (“EEDI”). Under these measures, by 2025, all new ships built will
be 30% more energy efficient than those built in 2014. Additionally, MEPC 75 adopted amendments to MARPOL Annex VI which brings forward the effective date of the EEDI’s “phase 3” requirements from January 1, 2025 to April 1, 2022 for several ship
types, including gas carriers, general cargo ships, and LNG carriers. This may require us to incur additional operating or other costs for those vessels built after January 1, 2013. Further, MEPC 75 approved draft amendments requiring that, on or
before January 1, 2023, all ships above 400 gross tonnage must have an approved SEEMP on board. For ships above 5,000 gross tonnage, the SEEMP needs to include certain mandatory content.
In addition to the recently implemented emission control regulations, the IMO has been devising strategies to reduce greenhouse gases and carbon emissions from
ships. According to its latest announcement, IMO plans to initiate measures to reduce carbon intensity by at least 40% by 2030 and 70% by 2050 from the levels in 2008. It also plans to introduce measures to reduce GHG emissions by 50% by 2050
from the 2008 levels. These are likely to be achieved by setting energy efficiency requirements and encouraging ship owners to use alternative fuels such as biofuels, methanol, LNG, LPG and electro-/synthetic fuels such as hydrogen or ammonia
and may also include limiting the speed of the ships. However, there is still uncertainty regarding the exact measures that the IMO will undertake to achieve these targets. IMO-related uncertainty is also a factor discouraging ship owners from
ordering newbuild vessels, as these vessels may have high future environmental compliance costs with untested technology.
In June 2021, IMO’s Marine Environment Protection Committee (“MEPC”) adopted amendments to MARPOL Annex VI that will require ships to reduce their greenhouse gas
emissions. These amendments combine technical and operational approaches to improve the energy efficiency of ships, also providing important building blocks for future GHG reduction measures. The new measures require the IMO to review the
effectiveness of the implementation of the Carbon Intensity Indicator (“CII”) and Energy Efficiency Existing Ship Index (“EEXI”) requirements, by January 1, 2026 at the latest. EEXI is a technical measure and will apply to ships above 400 GT.
It indicates the energy efficiency of the ship compared to a baseline and is based on a required reduction factor (expressed as a percentage relative to the EEDI baseline). On the other hand, CII is an operational measure which specifies carbon
intensity reduction requirements for vessels with 5,000 GT and above. The CII determines the annual reduction factor needed to ensure continuous improvement of the ship’s operational carbon intensity within a specific rating level. The
operational carbon intensity rating would be given on a scale of A, B, C, D or E indicating a major superior, minor superior, moderate, minor inferior, or inferior performance level, respectively. The performance level would be recorded in the
ship’s SEEMP. A ship rated E for three consecutive years would have to submit a corrective action plan to show how the required index (D or above) would be achieved. Further, the European Union has endorsed a binding target of at least 55%
domestic reduction in economy wide GHG reduction by 2030 compared to 1990. The amendments to MARPOL Annex VI (adopted in a consolidated revised Annex VI) entered into force on November 1, 2022, with the requirements for EEXI and CII
certification coming into effect from January 1, 2023. This means that the first annual reporting on carbon intensity will be completed for 2023, with the first rating given in 2024. We are also required to comply with requirements relating to
new European Union Emissions Trading Scheme (“EU ETS”) regulations for carbon emissions for voyages of vessels above 5000 GT departing from or arriving to ports in the European Union phased in from the beginning of 2024, with an implementation
scheme of 40% of emissions, followed by 70% of emissions in 2025 and ending in 2026 with 100% of the emissions produced by these voyages.
We may incur costs to comply with these revised standards including the introduction of new emissions software platform applications which will enable continuous monitoring of
CIIs as well as automatic generation of CII reports, amendment of SEEMP part II plans and adoption and implementation of ISO 500001 procedures. Additional or new conventions, laws and regulations may be adopted that could require the installation
of expensive emission control systems and could adversely affect our business, cash flows, financial condition and operating results.
Safety Management System Requirements
The SOLAS Convention was amended to address the safe manning of vessels and emergency training drills. The Convention of Limitation of Liability for Maritime Claims (the “LLMC”)
sets limitations of liability for a loss of life or personal injury claim, or a property claim against ship owners. We believe that our vessels are in substantial compliance with SOLAS and LLMC standards.
Under Chapter IX of the SOLAS Convention, or the International Safety Management Code for the Safe Operation of Ships and for Pollution Prevention (the “ISM Code”), our operations
are also subject to environmental standards and requirements. The ISM Code requires the party with operational control of a vessel to develop an extensive safety management system that includes, among other things, the adoption of a safety and
environmental protection policy, as well as a cybersecurity risk policy, setting forth instructions and procedures for operating its vessels safely and describing procedures for responding to emergencies. We rely upon the safety management system
that we and our technical management team have developed for compliance with the ISM Code. The failure of a vessel owner or bareboat charterer to comply with the ISM Code may subject such party to increased liability, decrease available insurance
coverage for the affected vessels and result in a denial of access to, or detention in, certain ports.
The ISM Code requires that vessel operators obtain a safety management certificate for each vessel they operate. This certificate evidences compliance by a vessel’s management
with the ISM Code requirements for a safety management system. No vessel can obtain a safety management certificate unless its manager has been awarded a document of compliance, issued by each flag state, under the ISM Code. We have obtained
applicable documents of compliance for our offices and safety management certificates for our vessels for which the certificates are required by the IMO. The document of compliance and safety management certificate are renewed as required.
Regulation II-1/3-10 of the SOLAS Convention on goal-based ship construction standards for oil tankers stipulates that ships over 150 meters in length must have adequate strength,
integrity and stability to minimize risk of loss or pollution.
The IMO has also adopted the International Convention on Standards of Training, Certification and Watchkeeping for Seafarers (“STCW”). As of February 2017, all seafarers are
required to meet the STCW standards and be in possession of a valid STCW certificate. Flag states that have ratified SOLAS and STCW generally authorize the classification societies to undertake surveys to confirm compliance on their behalf.
The IMO’s Maritime Safety Committee and MEPC, respectively, each adopted relevant parts of the International Code for Ships Operating in Polar Water (the “Polar Code”). The Polar
Code, which entered into force on January 1, 2017, covers design, construction, equipment, operational, training, search and rescue as well as environmental protection matters relevant to ships operating in the waters surrounding the two poles.
It also includes mandatory measures regarding safety and pollution prevention as well as recommended provisions. The Polar Code applies to new ships constructed after January 1, 2017, and from January 1, 2018, ships constructed before January 1,
2017 are required to meet the relevant requirements by the earlier of their first intermediate or renewal survey.
Furthermore, recent action by the IMO’s Maritime Safety Committee and United States agencies indicates that cybersecurity regulations for the maritime industry are likely to be
further developed in the near future in an attempt to combat cybersecurity threats. Companies are required from January 2021 to develop additional procedures for monitoring cybersecurity in addition to those required by the IMO, which could
require additional expenses and/or capital expenditures.
Fuel Regulations in Arctic Waters
MEPC 76 adopted amendments to MARPOL Annex I (addition of a new regulation 43A) to introduce a prohibition on the use and carriage for use as fuel of heavy fuel oil (HFO) by ships
in Arctic waters on and after July 1, 2024. The prohibition will cover the use and carriage for use as fuel of oils having a density at 15°C higher than 900 kg/m3 or a kinematic viscosity at 50°C higher than 180 mm2/s. Ships engaged in securing
the safety of ships, or in search and rescue operations, and ships dedicated to oil spill preparedness and response are exempt. Ships which meet certain construction standards with regard to oil fuel tank protection would need to comply on and
after July 1, 2029.
Pollution Control and Liability Requirements
The IMO has negotiated international conventions that impose liability for pollution in international waters and the territorial waters of the signatories to such conventions. For
example, the IMO adopted an International Convention for the Control and Management of Ships’ Ballast Water and Sediments (the “BWM Convention”) in 2004. The BWM Convention entered into force on September 8, 2017. The BWM Convention requires
ships to manage their ballast water to remove, render harmless, or avoid the uptake or discharge of new or invasive aquatic organisms and pathogens within ballast water and sediments. The BWM Convention’s implementing regulations call for a
phased introduction of mandatory ballast water exchange requirements, to be replaced in time with mandatory concentration limits, and require all ships to carry a ballast water record book and an international ballast water management
certificate.
On December 4, 2013, the IMO Assembly passed a resolution revising the application dates of the BWM Convention so that the dates are triggered by the entry into force date and not
the dates originally in the BWM Convention. This, in effect, makes all vessels delivered before the entry into force date “existing vessels” and allows for the installation of ballast water management systems on such vessels at the first
International Oil Pollution Prevention (“IOPP”) renewal survey following entry into force of the convention. The MEPC adopted updated guidelines for approval of ballast water management systems (G8) at MEPC 70. At MEPC 71, amendments were
introduced to extend the date existing vessels are subject to certain ballast water standards. Those changes were adopted at MEPC 72. Ships over 400 gross tons generally must comply with a “D-1 standard,” requiring the exchange of ballast water
only in open seas and away from coastal waters. The “D-2 standard” specifies the maximum amount of viable organisms allowed to be discharged, and compliance dates vary depending on the IOPP renewal dates. Depending on the date of the IOPP renewal
survey, existing vessels must comply with the D-2 standard on or after September 8, 2019. For most ships, compliance with the D-2 standard will involve installing onboard systems to treat ballast water and eliminate unwanted organisms. Ballast
water management systems, which include systems that make use of chemical, biocides, organisms or biological mechanisms, or which alter the chemical or physical characteristics of the ballast water, must be approved in accordance with IMO
Guidelines (Regulation D-3). As of October 13, 2019, MEPC 72’s amendments to the BWM Convention took effect, making the Code for Approval of Ballast Water Management Systems, which governs assessment of ballast water management systems, mandatory
rather than permissive, and formalized an implementation schedule for the D-2 standard. Under these amendments, all ships must meet the D-2 standard by September 8, 2024. Significant costs may be incurred to comply with these regulations.
Additionally, in November 2020, MEPC 75 adopted amendments to the BWM Convention which would require a commissioning test of the ballast water management system for the initial survey or when performing an additional survey for retrofits. This
analysis will not apply to ships that already have an installed BWM system certified under the BWM Convention. These amendments entered into force on June 1, 2022. To date we have made $2.3 million in capital expenditures relating to the
installation of BWTS on our vessels. For further information on these installations, see “—A. History and Development of the Company—Fleet Development and Vessel Capital Expenditures.”
Many countries already regulate the discharge of ballast water carried by vessels from country to country to prevent the introduction of invasive and harmful species via such
discharges. The U.S., for example, requires vessels entering its waters from another country to conduct mid-ocean ballast exchange, or undertake some alternate measure, and to comply with certain reporting requirements. Ballast water compliance
requirements could adversely affect our business, results of operations, cash flows and financial condition.
The IMO also adopted the International Convention on Civil Liability for Bunker Oil Pollution Damage (the “Bunker Convention”) to impose strict liability on ship owners (including
the registered owner, bareboat charterer, manager or operator) for pollution damage in jurisdictional waters of ratifying states caused by discharges of bunker fuel. The Bunker Convention requires registered owners of ships over 1,000 gross tons
to maintain insurance for pollution damage in an amount equal to the limits of liability under the applicable national or international limitation regime (but not exceeding the amount calculated in accordance with the LLMC). With respect to
non-ratifying states, liability for spills or releases of oil carried as fuel in ships’ bunkers typically is determined by the national or other domestic laws in the jurisdiction where the events or damages occur.
Ships are required to maintain a certificate attesting that they maintain adequate insurance to cover an incident. In jurisdictions such as the United States where the Bunker
Convention has not been adopted, the Oil Pollution Act of 1990, along with various legislative schemes and common law standards of conduct govern, and liability is imposed either on the basis of fault or on a strict-liability basis.
Anti-Fouling Requirements
In 2001, the IMO adopted the International Convention on the Control of Harmful Anti-fouling Systems on Ships (the “Anti-fouling Convention”). The Anti-fouling Convention, which
entered into force on September 17, 2008, prohibits the use of organotin compound coatings to prevent the attachment of mollusks and other sea life to the hulls of vessels. Vessels of over 400 gross tons engaged in international voyages are also
required to undergo an initial survey before the vessel is put into service or before an International Anti-fouling System Certificate is issued for the first time; and subsequent surveys when the anti-fouling systems are altered or replaced.
In June 2021, MEPC 76 adopted amendments to the Anti-fouling Convention to prohibit the use of biocide cybutryne contained in anti-fouling systems, which would apply to ships from
January 1, 2023, or, for ships already bearing such an anti-fouling system, at the next scheduled renewal of the system after that date, but no later than 60 months following the last application to the ship of such a system, as studies have
proven that the substance is harmful to a variety of marine organisms.
We have obtained Anti-fouling System Certificates for all of our vessels that are subject to the Anti-fouling Convention.
Compliance Enforcement
Noncompliance with the ISM Code or other IMO regulations may subject the ship owner or bareboat charterer to increased liability, may lead to decreases in available insurance
coverage for affected vessels and may result in the denial of access to, or detention in, some ports. The USCG and European Union authorities have indicated that vessels not in compliance with the ISM Code by applicable deadlines will be
prohibited from trading in U.S. and European Union ports, respectively. As of the date of this Annual Report, our vessels are ISM Code certified through their respective third-party managers. Castor Ships has obtained the interim documents of
compliance in order to operate the vessels in accordance with the ISM Code and all other international and regional requirements that are applicable to our vessels. However, there can be no assurance that such certificates will be maintained in
the future. The IMO continues to review and introduce new regulations. It is impossible to predict what additional regulations, if any, may be passed by the IMO and what effect, if any, such regulations might have on our operations.
United States Regulations
The U.S. Oil Pollution Act of 1990 and the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act
The U.S. Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (“OPA”) established an extensive regulatory and liability regime for the protection and cleanup of the environment from oil spills. OPA affects
all “owners and operators” whose vessels trade or operate within the U.S., its territories and possessions or whose vessels operate in U.S. waters, which includes the U.S.’s territorial sea and its 200 nautical mile exclusive economic zone around
the U.S. The U.S. has also enacted the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (“CERCLA”), which applies to the discharge of hazardous substances other than oil, except in limited circumstances, whether on land or at
sea. OPA and CERCLA both define “owner and operator” in the case of a vessel as any person owning, operating or chartering by demise, the vessel. Both OPA and CERCLA impact our operations.
Under OPA, vessel owners and operators are “responsible parties” and are jointly, severally and strictly liable (unless the spill results solely from the act or omission of a
third party, an act of God or an act of war) for all containment and clean-up costs and other damages arising from discharges or threatened discharges of oil from their vessels, including bunkers (fuel). OPA defines these other damages broadly to
include:
|
(i)
|
injury to, destruction or loss of, or loss of use of, natural resources and related assessment costs;
|
|
(ii)
|
injury to, or economic losses resulting from, the destruction of real and personal property;
|
|
(iii)
|
loss of subsistence use of natural resources that are injured, destroyed or lost;
|
|
(iv)
|
net loss of taxes, royalties, rents, fees or net profit revenues resulting from injury, destruction or loss of real or personal property, or natural resources;
|
|
(v)
|
lost profits or impairment of earning capacity due to injury, destruction or loss of real or personal property or natural resources; and
|
|
(vi)
|
net cost of increased or additional public services necessitated by removal activities following a discharge of oil, such as protection from fire, safety or health hazards, and loss
of subsistence use of natural resources.
|
OPA contains statutory caps on liability and damages but such caps do not apply to direct clean-up costs. Effective December 12, 2019, the USCG adjusted the limits of OPA
liability for non-tank vessels, edible oil tank vessels, and any oil spill response vessels, to the greater of $1,200 per gross ton or $997,100 (subject to periodic adjustment for inflation). However, these limits of liability do not apply if an
incident was proximately caused by the violation of an applicable U.S. federal safety, construction or operating regulation by a responsible party (or its agent, employee or a person acting pursuant to a contractual relationship), or a
responsible party’s gross negligence or willful misconduct. The limitation on liability similarly does not apply if the responsible party fails or refuses to (i) report the incident as required by law where the responsible party knows or has
reason to know of the incident; (ii) reasonably cooperate and assist as requested in connection with oil removal activities; or (iii) without sufficient cause, comply with an order issued under the Federal Water Pollution Act (Section 311 (c),
(e)) or the Intervention on the High Seas Act.
CERCLA contains a similar liability regime whereby owners and operators of vessels are liable for cleanup, removal and remedial costs, as well as damages for injury to, or
destruction or loss of, natural resources, including the reasonable costs associated with assessing the same, and health assessments or health effects studies. There is no liability if the discharge of a hazardous substance results solely from
the act or omission of a third party, an act of God or an act of war. Liability under CERCLA is limited to the greater of $300 per gross ton or $5.0 million for vessels carrying a hazardous substance as cargo and the greater of $300 per gross ton
or $500,000 for any other vessel. However, these limits do not apply (rendering the responsible person liable for the total cost of response and damages) if the release or threat of release of a hazardous substance resulted from willful
misconduct or negligence, or the primary cause of the release was a violation of applicable safety, construction or operating standards or regulations. The limitation on liability also does not apply if the responsible person fails or refused to
provide all reasonable cooperation and assistance as requested in connection with response activities where the vessel is subject to OPA.
OPA and CERCLA each preserve the right to recover damages under existing law, including maritime tort law. OPA and CERCLA both require owners and operators of vessels to establish
and maintain with the USCG evidence of financial responsibility sufficient to meet the maximum amount of liability to which the particular responsible person may be subject. Vessel owners and operators may satisfy their financial responsibility
obligations by providing a proof of insurance, a surety bond, qualification as a self-insurer or a guarantee. We comply and plan to be in compliance going forward with the USCG’s financial responsibility regulations by providing applicable
certificates of financial responsibility.
The 2010 Deepwater Horizon oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico resulted in additional regulatory initiatives or statutes, including higher
liability caps under OPA, new regulations regarding offshore oil and gas drilling, and a pilot inspection program for offshore facilities. Several of these initiatives and regulations have been or may be revised. For example, the U.S. Bureau of
Safety and Environmental Enforcement’s (“BSEE”) revised Production Safety Systems Rule (“PSSR”), effective December 27, 2018, modified and relaxed certain environmental and safety protections under the 2016 PSSR. Additionally, the BSEE amended
the Well Control Rule, effective July 15, 2019, which rolled back certain reforms regarding the safety of drilling operations. In 2023, the BSSE issued a final Well Control Rule which revises or rescinds certain modifications that were made in
the 2019 rule. The effects of these proposals and changes are currently unknown. On January 27, 2021 the Biden administration issued an executive order temporarily blocking new leases for oil and gas drilling in federal waters. On April 18, 2022
the Bureau of Land Management resumed oil and gas leasing on a much reduced basis and, in September 2023, a record low of just three offshore lease sales over the next five years were unveiled. However, leasing for oil and gas drilling in federal
waters remains a contentious political issue, with certain states and Republicans in U.S. Congress pushing for increased leasing. Compliance with any new requirements of OPA and future legislation or regulations applicable to the operation of our
vessels could impact the cost of our operations or demand for our vessels and adversely affect our business.
OPA specifically permits individual states to impose their own liability regimes with regard to oil pollution incidents occurring within their boundaries, provided they accept, at
a minimum, the levels of liability established under OPA and some states have enacted legislation providing for unlimited liability for oil spills, including bunker fuel spills. Many U.S. states that border a navigable waterway have enacted
environmental pollution laws that impose strict liability on a person for removal costs and damages resulting from a discharge of oil or a release of a hazardous substance. Some of these laws are more stringent than U.S. federal law in some
respects. Moreover, some states have enacted legislation providing for unlimited liability for discharge of pollutants within their waters, although in some cases, states which have enacted this type of legislation have not yet issued
implementing regulations defining shipowners’ responsibilities under these laws. The Company intends to be in compliance with all applicable state regulations in the relevant ports where the Company’s vessels call.
We currently maintain pollution liability coverage insurance in the amount of $1.0 billion per incident for our vessels. If the damages from a catastrophic spill were to exceed
our insurance coverage, it could have an adverse effect on our business and operating results.
Other United States Environmental Initiatives
The U.S. Clean Air Act of 1970 (including its amendments of 1977 and 1990) (“CAA”) requires the EPA to promulgate standards applicable to emissions of greenhouse gasses, volatile
organic compounds and other air contaminants. The CAA requires states to adopt State Implementation Plans, some of which regulate emissions resulting from vessel loading and unloading operations which may affect our vessels.
The U.S. Clean Water Act (“CWA”) prohibits the discharge of oil, hazardous substances and ballast water in U.S. navigable waters unless authorized by a duly issued permit or
exemption and imposes strict liability in the form of penalties for any unauthorized discharges. The CWA also imposes substantial liability for the costs of removal, remediation and damages and complements the remedies available under OPA and
CERCLA.
The EPA and the USCG have also enacted rules relating to ballast water discharge, compliance with which requires the installation of equipment on our vessels to treat ballast
water before it is discharged or the implementation of other port facility disposal arrangements or procedures at potentially substantial costs and/or otherwise restrict our vessels from entering U.S. waters. The EPA will regulate these ballast
water discharges and other discharges incidental to the normal operation of certain vessels within United States waters pursuant to the Vessel Incidental Discharge Act (“VIDA”), which was signed into law on December 4, 2018 and replaces the 2013
Vessel General Permit (“VGP”) program (which authorizes discharges incidental to operations of commercial vessels and contains numeric ballast water discharge limits for most vessels to reduce the risk of invasive species in U.S. waters,
stringent requirements for exhaust gas scrubbers, and requirements for the use of environmentally acceptable lubricants) and current Coast Guard ballast water management regulations adopted under the U.S. National Invasive Species Act, such as
mid-ocean ballast exchange programs and installation of approved USCG technology for all vessels equipped with ballast water tanks bound for U.S. ports or entering U.S. waters. VIDA establishes a new framework for the regulation of vessel
incidental discharges under the CWA, requires the EPA to develop performance standards for those discharges within two years of enactment, and requires the U.S. Coast Guard to develop implementation, compliance and enforcement regulations within
two years of the EPA’s promulgation of standards. Though the EPA issued a notice of proposed rulemaking in October 2020 and a supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking in October 2023 (whose comment period closed on December 18, 2023), as of
December 31, 2023, the EPA has not promulgated a final rule on new discharge standards and the USCG has not developed implementation, compliance and enforcement regulations. Under VIDA, all provisions of the 2013 VGP and USCG regulations
regarding ballast water treatment remain in force and effect until the EPA and U.S. Coast Guard regulations are finalized. Non-military, non-recreational vessels greater than 79 feet in length must continue to comply with the requirements of the
VGP, including submission of a Notice of Intent (“NOI”) or retention of a Permit Authorization and Record of Inspection (PARI) form and submission of annual reports. We have submitted NOIs for our vessels where required. Compliance with the EPA,
U.S. Coast Guard and state regulations could require the installation of additional ballast water treatment equipment on our vessels which have not already installed this equipment or the implementation of other port facility disposal procedures
as a result of which we may incur additional capital expenditures or may otherwise have to restrict certain of our vessels from entering U.S. waters.
The California Air Resources Board regulation for reducing emissions from diesel auxiliary engines on ships while at-berth is applicable for container vessels
from January 1, 2023. Effective January 1, 2025, every dry bulk carrier and oil tanker vessel approaching California ports must be also equipped with shore power supply.
European Union Regulations
In October 2009, the European Union amended a directive to impose criminal sanctions for illicit ship-source discharges of polluting substances, including minor discharges, if
committed with intent, recklessly or with serious negligence and the discharges individually or in the aggregate result in deterioration of the quality of water. Aiding and abetting the discharge of a polluting substance may also lead to criminal
penalties. The directive applies to all types of vessels, irrespective of their flag, with certain exceptions for warships or where human safety or that of the ship is in danger. Criminal liability for pollution may result in substantial
penalties or fines and increased civil liability claims. Regulation (EU) 2015/757 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2015 (amending EU Directive 2009/16/EC) governs the monitoring, reporting and verification of carbon
dioxide emissions from maritime transport, and, subject to some exclusions, requires companies with ships over 5,000 gross tonnage to monitor and report carbon dioxide emissions annually, which may cause us to incur additional expenses.
The European Union has adopted several regulations and directives requiring, among other things, more frequent inspections of high-risk ships, as determined by type, age and flag
as well as the number of times the ship has been detained. The European Union also adopted and extended a ban on substandard ships and enacted a minimum ban period and a definitive ban for repeated offenses. The regulation also provided the
European Union with greater authority and control over classification societies, by imposing more requirements on classification societies and providing for fines or penalty payments for organizations that failed to comply. Furthermore, the EU
has implemented regulations requiring vessels to use reduced sulfur content fuel for their main and auxiliary engines. The EU Directive 2005/33/EC (amending Directive 1999/32/EC) introduced requirements parallel to those in MARPOL Annex VI
relating to the sulfur content of marine fuels. In addition, the EU imposed a 0.1% maximum sulfur requirement for fuel used by ships at berth in the Baltic, the North Sea and the English Channel (the so called “SOx-Emission Control Area”). As of
January 2020, EU member states must also ensure that ships in all EU waters, except in the SOx-Emission Control Area, use fuels with a 0.5% maximum sulfur content.
On September 15, 2020, the European Parliament voted to include greenhouse gas emissions from the maritime sector in the European Union’s carbon market. This will require
shipowners to buy permits to cover these emissions. On July 14, 2021, the EU Commission proposed legislation to amend the EU ETS to include shipping emissions which was phased in beginning in 2023. In January 2024, EU ETS was extended to cover
carbon dioxide emissions from all large ships (of 5,000 gross tonnage and above) entering EU ports, regardless of the flag they fly.
Greenhouse Gas Regulation
Currently, the emissions of greenhouse gases from international shipping are not subject to the Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, which
entered into force in 2005 and pursuant to which adopting countries have been required to implement national programs to reduce greenhouse gas emissions with targets extended through 2020. International negotiations are continuing with respect to
greenhouse gas emissions and restrictions on shipping emissions may be included in any new treaty. In December 2009, more than 27 nations, including the U.S. and China, signed the Copenhagen Accord, which includes a non-binding commitment to
reduce greenhouse gas emissions. The 2015 United Nations Climate Change Conference in Paris resulted in the Paris Agreement, which entered into force on November 4, 2016 and does not directly limit greenhouse gas emissions from ships. The U.S.
initially entered into the agreement, but the Trump administration withdrew from the Paris Agreement effective November 4, 2020. On January 20, 2021, U.S. President Biden signed an executive order to rejoin the Paris Agreement, which took effect
on February 19, 2021.
At MEPC 70 and MEPC 71, a draft outline of the structure of the initial strategy for developing a comprehensive IMO strategy on reduction of greenhouse gas emissions from ships
was approved. In accordance with this roadmap, in April 2018, nations at the MEPC 72 adopted an initial strategy to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from ships. The initial strategy identifies “levels of ambition” to reducing greenhouse gas
emissions, including (1) decreasing the carbon intensity from ships through implementation of further phases of the EEDI for new ships; (2) reducing carbon dioxide emissions per transport work, as an average across international shipping, by at
least 40% by 2030, pursuing efforts towards 70% by 2050, compared to 2008 emission levels; and (3) reducing the total annual greenhouse emissions by at least 50% by 2050 compared to 2008 while pursuing efforts towards phasing them out entirely.
The initial strategy notes that technological innovation, alternative fuels and/or energy sources for international shipping will be integral to achieve the overall ambition. The MEPC 76 adopted amendments to MARPOL Annex VI that will require
ships to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions. These amendments combine technical and operational approaches to improve the energy efficiency of ships, in line with the targets established in the 2018 Initial IMO Strategy for Reducing GHG
Emissions from Ships and provide important building blocks for future GHG reduction measures. The new measures will require all ships to calculate their EEXI following technical means to improve their energy efficiency and to establish their
annual operational carbon intensity indicator (CII) and CII rating. Carbon intensity links the GHG emissions to the transport work of ships. These regulations could cause us to incur additional substantial expenses.
The EU made a unilateral commitment to reduce overall greenhouse gas emissions from its member states by 20% of 1990 levels by 2020. The EU also committed to reduce its emissions
by 20% under the Kyoto Protocol’s second period from 2013 to 2020. Starting in January 2018, large ships over 5,000 gross tonnage calling at EU ports are required to collect and publish data on carbon dioxide emissions and other information. As
previously discussed, implementation of regulations relating to the inclusion of greenhouse gas emissions from the maritime sector in the European Union’s carbon market is also forthcoming.
In the United States, the EPA issued a finding that greenhouse gases endanger the public health and safety, adopted regulations to limit greenhouse gas emissions from certain
mobile sources, and proposed regulations to limit greenhouse gas emissions from large stationary sources. However, in March 2017, U.S. President Trump sought to eliminate elements of the EPA’s plan to cut greenhouse gas emissions and rolled back
standards to control methane and volatile organic compound emissions from new oil and gas facilities. However, the Biden administration directed the EPA to publish rules suspending, revising or rescinding certain of these regulations. The EPA
and/or individual U.S. states could enact additional environmental regulations that would affect our operations.
Any passage of climate control legislation or other regulatory initiatives by the IMO, the EU, the U.S. or other countries where we operate, or any treaty adopted at the
international level to succeed or further implement the Kyoto Protocol or Paris Agreement which further restricts emissions of greenhouse gases could require us to make significant financial expenditures which we cannot predict with certainty at
this time. Even in the absence of climate control legislation, our business may be indirectly affected to the extent that climate change results in sea level changes or increases in extreme weather events.
International Labor Organization
The International Labor Organization is a specialized agency of the UN that has adopted the Maritime Labor Convention 2006 (“MLC 2006”). A Maritime Labor Certificate and a
Declaration of Maritime Labor Compliance is required to ensure compliance with the MLC 2006 for all ships that are 500 gross tonnage or over and are either engaged in international voyages or flying the flag of a Member and operating from a port,
or between ports, in another country. Our vessels are certified as per MLC 2006 and, we believe, in substantial compliance with the MLC 2006.
Vessel Security Regulations
Since the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 in the United States, there have been a variety of initiatives intended to enhance vessel security such as the U.S. Maritime
Transportation Security Act of 2002 (“MTSA”). To implement certain portions of the MTSA, the USCG issued regulations requiring the implementation of certain security requirements aboard vessels operating in waters subject to the jurisdiction of
the United States and at certain ports and facilities, some of which are regulated by the EPA.
Similarly, Chapter XI-2 of the SOLAS Convention imposes detailed security obligations on vessels and port authorities and mandates compliance with the International Ship and Port
Facility Security Code (“the ISPS Code”). The ISPS Code is designed to enhance the security of ports and ships against terrorism. To trade internationally, a vessel must attain an International Ship Security Certificate (“ISSC”) from a recognized
security organization approved by the vessel’s flag state. Ships operating without a valid certificate may be detained, expelled from, or refused entry at port until they obtain an ISSC. The various requirements, some of which are found in the
SOLAS Convention, include, for example, onboard installation of automatic identification systems to provide a means for the automatic transmission of safety-related information from among similarly equipped ships and shore stations, including
information on a ship’s identity, position, course, speed and navigational status; onboard installation of ship security alert systems, which do not sound on the vessel but only alert the authorities on shore; the development of vessel security
plans; ship identification number to be permanently marked on a vessel’s hull; a continuous synopsis record kept onboard showing a vessel’s history including the name of the ship, the state whose flag the ship is entitled to fly, the date on
which the ship was registered with that state, the ship’s identification number, the port at which the ship is registered and the name of the registered owner(s) and their registered address; and compliance with flag state security certification
requirements.
The USCG regulations, intended to align with international maritime security standards, exempt non-U.S. vessels from MTSA vessel security measures, provided such vessels have on
board a valid ISSC that attests to the vessel’s compliance with the SOLAS Convention security requirements and the ISPS Code. Future security measures could have a significant financial impact on us. We intend to comply with the various security
measures addressed by MTSA, the SOLAS Convention and the ISPS Code.
The cost of vessel security measures has also been affected by the escalation in the frequency of acts of piracy against ships, notably off the coast of Somalia in the Gulf of
Aden and off the coast of Nigeria in the Gulf of Guinea. Furthermore, costs of vessel security measures have been affected by the geopolitical conflicts in the Middle East and maritime incidents in and around the Red Sea, including off the coast
of Yemen in the Gulf of Aden where vessels have faced an increased number of armed attacks targeting Israeli and US-linked ships, as well as Marshall Islands’ flagged vessels. Substantial loss of revenue and other costs may be incurred as a
result of detention of a vessel or additional security measures, and the risk of uninsured losses could have a material adverse effect on our business, liquidity and operating results. Costs are incurred in taking additional security measures in
accordance with Best Management Practices to Deter Piracy, notably those contained in the BMP5 industry standard.
Inspection by Classification Societies
The hull and machinery of every commercial vessel must be classed by a classification society authorized by its country of registry. The classification society certifies that a
vessel is safe and seaworthy in accordance with the applicable rules and regulations of the country of registry of the vessel and SOLAS. Most insurance underwriters make it a condition for insurance coverage and lending that a vessel be certified
“in class” by a classification society which is a member of the International Association of Classification Societies, the IACS. The IACS has adopted harmonized Common Structural Rules, or the Rules, which apply to oil tankers contracted for
construction on or after July 1, 2015. The Rules attempt to create a level of consistency between IACS Societies. Our vessels are certified as being “in class” by the applicable IACS Classification Societies (e.g., American Bureau of Shipping,
Lloyd’s Register of Shipping, Det Norske Veritas, Nippon Kaiji Kyokai, etc.).
A vessel must undergo annual surveys, intermediate surveys, dry-dockings and special surveys. A vessel’s machinery may be on a continuous survey cycle, under which the machinery
would be surveyed periodically over a five-year period. Every vessel is also required to be dry-docked every 30 to 36 months for inspection of the underwater parts of the vessel. If any vessel does not maintain its class and/or fails any annual
survey, intermediate survey, dry-docking or special survey, the vessel will be unable to carry cargo between ports and will be unemployable and uninsurable which could cause us to be in violation of certain covenants in our loan agreements. Any
such inability to carry cargo or to be employed, or any such violation of covenants, could have a material adverse impact on our financial condition and operating results.
Risk of Loss and Liability Insurance
General
The operation of any cargo vessel includes risks such as mechanical failure, physical damage, collision, property loss, cargo loss or damage and business interruption due to
political circumstances in foreign countries, piracy incidents, hostilities and labor strikes. In addition, there is always an inherent possibility of marine disaster, including oil spills and other environmental events, and the liabilities
arising from owning and operating vessels in international trade. We and our pool operators carry insurance coverage as customary in the shipping industry. However, not all risks can be insured, specific claims may be rejected, and we might not
be always able to obtain adequate insurance coverage at reasonable rates. Any of these occurrences could have a material adverse effect on our business.
Hull and Machinery Insurance
We procure hull and machinery insurance, protection and indemnity insurance, which includes environmental damage and pollution insurance, war risk insurance, freight and
demurrage and defense insurance for all vessels in our fleet. Each of our vessels is insured up to what we believe to be at least its fair market value, after meeting certain deductibles. We do not have and do not expect to obtain loss of hire
insurance (or any other kind of business interruption insurance) covering the loss of revenue during off-hire periods, other than due to war risks, for any of our vessels. In certain instances where our vessels are participating in a pool
transit through high-risk areas, the pool operator arranges for kidnap and ransom loss of hire insurance for a specified duration on our behalf.
Protection and Indemnity Insurance
Protection and indemnity insurance is provided by mutual protection and indemnity associations, or “P&I Associations” or clubs, and covers our third-party liabilities in
connection with our shipping activities. This includes third-party liability and other related expenses of injury or death of crew, passengers and other third parties, loss or damage to cargo, claims arising from collisions with other vessels,
damage to other third-party property, pollution arising from oil or other substances, and salvage, towing and other related costs, including wreck removal.
Our current protection and indemnity insurance coverage for pollution is $1 billion per vessel per incident. There are 13 P&I Associations that comprise the “International
Group”, a group of P&I Associations that insure approximately 90% of the world’s commercial tonnage and have entered into a pooling agreement to reinsure each association’s liabilities. The International Group’s website states that the pool
provides a mechanism for sharing all claims in excess of $10 million up to, currently, approximately $3.1 billion. As a member of a P&I Association, which is a member of the International Group, we are subject to calls payable to the
associations based on our claim records as well as the claim records of all other members of the individual associations and members of the shipping pool of P&I Associations comprising the International Group.
Competition
We operate in markets that are highly competitive, particularly in the tanker industry where ownership of tanker vessels is highly fragmented. The LPG carrier market is also
moderately fragmented in terms of ownership. Although we believe that at the present time no single company has a dominant position in the markets in which we operate, that could change and we may face substantial competition for charters from a
number of established companies who may have greater resources or experience.
The process of obtaining new employment for our fleet generally involves intensive screening, and competitive bidding, and often extends for several months. We compete for
charters on the basis of price, vessel location, size, age and condition of the vessel, as well as based on customer relationships and our reputation as an owner and operator. In the LPG carrier sector, we may compete with LPG distributors and
traders who use their fleets not only to transport their own LPG, but also to transport LPG for third-party charterers in direct competition with independent owners and operators. Demand for tanker and LPG carrier vessels fluctuates in line with
the main patterns of trade for the cargoes transported by our vessels and varies according to supply and demand for such products.
Permits and Authorizations
We are required by various governmental and quasi-governmental agencies to obtain certain permits, licenses and certificates with respect to our vessels. The kinds of permits,
licenses and certificates required depend upon several factors, including the commodity transported, the waters in which the vessel operates, the nationality of the vessel’s crew and the age of a vessel. We have been able to obtain all permits,
licenses and certificates currently required to permit our vessels to operate. Additional laws and regulations, environmental or otherwise, may be adopted which could limit our ability to do business or increase our cost of doing business.
Seasonality
Based on the Company’s historical data and industry trends, we expect demand for our tanker and LPG carrier vessels to exhibit seasonal variations and, as a result, charter and
freight rates to fluctuate. In particular, the LPG carrier market is typically stronger in the fall and winter months in anticipation of increased consumption of propane and butane for heating during the winter months. In addition, unpredictable
weather patterns in these months tend to disrupt vessel scheduling and supplies of certain commodities. Similarly, tanker freight rates tend to perform stronger in the first and fourth quarters of the year, driven by higher demand for oil
products in the winter months in the Northern hemisphere, though this seasonal pattern has somewhat weakened in recent years due to an increasing proportion of oil product demand originating from Asia, which is less affected by seasonal
consumption patterns. These variations may result in quarter-to-quarter volatility in our operating results for our vessels when trading in the spot trip or voyage charter market or if on period time charter when a new time charter is being
entered into. Seasonality in the tanker and LPG shipping sector in which we operate could materially affect our operating results and cash flows.
C.
|
Organizational Structure
|
We were incorporated by Castor in the Republic of the Marshall Islands on July 29, 2022, with our principal executive offices located at 223 Christodoulou Chatzipavlou Street,
Hawaii Royal Gardens, 3036 Limassol, Cyprus. A list of our subsidiaries is filed as Exhibit 8.1 to this Annual Report.
D.
|
Property, Plants and Equipment
|
We own no properties other than our vessels. For a description of our fleet, please see “B. Business Overview—Our Fleet.”
ITEM 4A. |
UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
|
None.
ITEM 5. |
OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS
|
The following is a discussion of the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2022, and December 31, 2023. You should read the
following discussion and analysis together with our consolidated financial statements and related notes to those statements included in “Item 18. Financial Statements.” Amounts relating to percentage
variations in period-on-period comparisons shown in this section are derived from those consolidated financial statements. The following discussion contains forward-looking statements that reflect our future plans, estimates, beliefs and expected
performance. These forward-looking statements are dependent upon events, risks and uncertainties that may be outside our control which could cause actual results, cash flows, financial positions, events or conditions to differ materially from
those currently anticipated and expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements as a result of many factors, including those set forth in “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors.” Refer to the
section captioned “Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” for further discussion of such events, risks and uncertainties. All dollar amounts referred to in this discussion and analysis
are expressed in U.S. dollars except where indicated otherwise.
For a discussion of our results for the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to the period ended December 31, 2021, please see “—Item 5.
Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—A. Operating Results—Year ended December 31, 2022 as compared to period ended December 31, 2021” contained in our annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2022, filed with
the SEC on March 8, 2023.
In the second quarter of 2023, we established our LPG carrier operations through the acquisition of two LPG carrier vessels. As a result, as of December 31, 2023, we operated in
three reportable segments: (i) the Aframax/LR2 tanker segment, (ii) the Handysize tanker segment and (iii) the LPG carrier segment. The reportable segments reflect the internal organization of the Company and the way the chief operating decision
maker reviews the operating results and allocates capital within the Company. Further, the transport of crude oil (carried by Aframax/LR2 tankers), refined petroleum products (carried by Handysize tanker vessels) and liquefied petroleum gas
(carried by LPG carriers) has different characteristics. In addition, the nature of trade, trading routes, charterers and cargo handling of liquefied petroleum gas, refined petroleum products and crude oil differs.
Following completion of the sale of the M/T Wonder Sirius in January 2024, the Company no longer has any Aframax/LR2 vessels and
management has determined that, with effect from the second quarter of 2024, the Company operates in two reportable segments: (i) the Handysize tanker segment and (ii) the LPG carrier segment.
Principal factors impacting our business, results of operations and financial condition
Our results of operations are affected by numerous factors. The principal factors that have impacted the business during the fiscal periods presented in the following discussion
and analysis and that are likely to continue to impact our business are the following:
|
• |
The levels of demand and supply of seaborne cargoes and vessel tonnage in the shipping industries in which we operate;
|
|
• |
The cyclical nature of the shipping industry in general and its impact on charter and freight rates and vessel values;
|
|
• |
The successful implementation of our business strategy, including the ability to obtain equity and debt financing at acceptable and attractive terms to fund future capital expenditures and/or to implement this
business strategy;
|
|
• |
The global economic growth outlook and trends;
|
|
• |
Economic, regulatory, political and governmental conditions that affect shipping and the tanker shipping industry, including international conflict or war (or threatened war), such as between Russia and Ukraine
and in the Middle East, and acts of piracy or maritime aggression, such as recent maritime incidents involving vessels in and around the Red Sea;
|
|
• |
The employment and operation of our fleet including the utilization rates of our vessels;
|
|
• |
The ability to successfully employ our vessels at economically attractive rates and the strategic decisions regarding the employment mix of our fleet in the voyage, time charter and pool markets, as our charters
expire or are otherwise terminated;
|
|
• |
Management of the operational, financial, general and administrative elements involved in the conduct of our business and ownership of our fleet, including the effective and efficient management of our fleet by
our manager and its sub-managers, and each of their suppliers;
|
|
• |
The number of charterers and pool operators who use our services and the performance of their obligations under their agreements, including their ability to make timely payments to us;
|
|
• |
The ability to maintain solid working relationships with our existing charterers and pool operators and our ability to increase the number of our charterers through the development of new working relationships;
|
|
• |
The vetting approvals requested by oil majors and the Chemical Distribution Institute (CDI) for the vessels managed by our
manager and/or sub-managers;
|
|
• |
Dry-docking and special survey costs and duration, both expected and unexpected;
|
|
• |
Our borrowing levels and the finance costs related to our outstanding debt as well as our compliance with our debt covenants;
|
|
• |
Management of our financial resources, including banking relationships and of the relationships with our various stakeholders;
|
|
• |
Major outbreaks of diseases and governmental responses thereto; and
|
|
• |
The level of any distribution on all classes of our shares.
|
These factors are volatile and in certain cases may not be within our control. Accordingly, past performance is not necessarily indicative of future
performance, and it is difficult to predict future performance with any degree of certainty. See also “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors” in this Annual Report and “Risk Factors” herein.
Hire Rates and the Cyclical Nature of the Industry
One of the factors that impacts our profitability is the hire and freight rates at which we are able to fix our vessels and the pool rates we earn from the pool arrangements. The
shipping industry is cyclical with attendant volatility in rates and, as a result, profitability. The tanker shipping sector has been characterized by long and short periods of imbalances between supply and demand, causing charter rates to be
volatile.
The degree of charter rate volatility among different types of tanker and LPG carrier vessels has varied widely, and charter rates for these vessels have also varied significantly
in recent years. Fluctuations in charter rates result from changes in the supply and demand for vessel capacity and changes in the supply and demand for the crude oil, refined petroleum products and liquefied petroleum gas carried by oceangoing
vessels internationally. The factors and the nature, timing, direction and degree of changes in industry conditions affecting the supply and demand for vessels are unpredictable to a great extent and outside our control.
Our vessel deployment strategy seeks to maximize revenues throughout industry cycles while maintaining cash flow stability and foreseeability. Our gross revenues on a standalone
basis for the year ended December 31, 2023 consisted predominantly of hire earned by our vessels participating in pools, as well as revenue earned under time charter contracts and voyage charter contracts. For a description of these chartering
arrangements, refer to “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—Chartering of Our Fleet.”
The year ended December 31, 2023 was one of the best years for spot crude tanker trades since 2000. Deadweight carrying capacity of the tanker fleet increased by approximately
1.9% in 2023, as compared to 4.1% in 2022, while demand in terms of tonne miles for crude oil and oil products in 2023 is estimated to have grown by 6.8% and 10.3%, respectively, and is expected to continue growing at a robust pace in 2024. The
tanker spot charter market has seen significant volatility throughout 2023, with rates rising from $47,913 per day in January 2023 to $68,437 per day in March 2023 before declining to a low of $23,606 per day in September 2023 and ending the year
at $43,637 per day in December 2023. Volatility in charter rates in the tanker market may affect the value of tanker vessels, which occasionally follow the trends of tanker charter rates, and similarly affects our earnings, cash flows and
liquidity.
In comparison to the spot market average, LPG 5,000 cbm rates have shown little volatility in 2023, as charter rates ranged from a low of $10,028 per day in January 2023 to a high
of $10,356 per day in June 2023, after which rates remained roughly the same until year end. There has been a slight increase in time charter rates of around 1.7% in 2023 in the regions from the Red Sea to the Indian, North and South Pacific
Oceans and 6.3% in 2023 in the regions from the Mediterranean and Adriatic Seas to the Baltic Sea, North and South Atlantic Oceans compared to last year. In 2022 and 2023, the deadweight carrying capacity of the small LPG carrier vessels is
estimated to have increased by 4% annually in each of the two periods.
Our future gross revenues may be affected by our commercial strategy, including decisions regarding the employment mix of our fleet among time and voyage
charters and pool arrangements. See Note 13 to our Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report for a breakdown of revenues per category.
Employment and operation of our fleet
Another factor that impacts our profitability is the employment and operation of our fleet. The profitable employment of our fleet is highly dependent on the levels of demand and
supply in the shipping segments in which we operate, our commercial strategy including the decisions regarding the employment mix of our fleet among time and voyage charters and pool arrangements, as well as our manager’s and sub-managers’
ability to leverage our relationships with existing or potential customers. As a new entrant to the tankers and LPG carriers’ business, our customer base is currently concentrated to a small number of charterers and pool managers. The breadth of
our customer base has historically had an impact on the profitability of our business and in the year ended December 31, 2023, 81% of our revenues were earned on pool arrangements entered into with two pool managers. Further, the effective
operation of our fleet mainly requires regular maintenance and repair, effective crew selection and training, ongoing supply of our fleet with the spares and the stores that it requires, contingency response planning, auditing of our vessels’
onboard safety procedures, arrangements for our vessels’ insurance, chartering of the vessels, training of onboard and on shore personnel with respect to the vessels’ security and security response plans (ISPS), obtaining of ISM certifications,
compliance with environmental regulations and standards and performing the necessary audit for the vessels within the year of taking over a vessel and the ongoing performance monitoring of the vessels.
Financial, general and administrative management
The management of financial, general and administrative elements involved in the conduct of our business and ownership of our vessels requires us to manage our financial
resources, which includes managing banking relationships, administrating our bank accounts, managing our accounting system, records and financial reporting, monitoring and ensuring compliance with the legal and regulatory requirements affecting
our business and assets and managing our relationships with our service providers and customers.
Important Measures and Definitions for Analyzing Results of Operations
Our management uses the following metrics to evaluate our operating results, including our operating results at the segment level, and to allocate capital accordingly:
Total vessel revenues. Total vessel revenues are generated from voyage
charters, time charters and pool arrangements. Total vessel revenues are affected by the number of vessels in our fleet, hire and freight rates and the number of days a vessel operates which, in turn, are affected by several factors, including
the amount of time that we spend positioning our vessels, the amount of time that our vessels spend in dry-dock undergoing repairs, maintenance and upgrade work, the age, condition and specifications of our vessels, and levels of supply and
demand in the seaborne transportation market. Total vessel revenues are also affected by our commercial strategy related to the employment mix of our fleet between vessels on time charters, vessels operating on voyage charters and vessels in
pools.
We measure revenues in each segment for three separate activities: (i) time charter revenues, (ii) voyage charter revenues, and (iii) pool revenues. For a
description of these types of chartering arrangements, refer to “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—Chartering of Our Fleet.”
Voyage expenses. Our voyage expenses primarily consist of bunker expenses, port and canal expenses and brokerage
commissions paid in connection with the chartering of our vessels. Voyage expenses are incurred primarily during voyage charters or when the vessel is repositioning or unemployed. Bunker expenses, port and canal dues increase in periods during
which vessels are employed on voyage charters because these expenses are in this case borne by us. Under a time charter, the charterer pays substantially all the vessel voyage related expenses. Under pooling arrangements, voyage expenses are
borne by the pool operator. Gain/loss on bunkers may also arise where the cost of the bunker fuel sold to the new charterer is greater or less than the cost of the bunker fuel acquired.
Operating expenses. We are responsible for vessel operating costs, which include crewing, expenses for repairs and
maintenance, the cost of insurance, tonnage taxes, the cost of spares and consumable stores, lubricating oils costs, communication expenses and other expenses. Expenses for repairs and maintenance tend to fluctuate from period to period because
most repairs and maintenance typically occur during periodic dry-docking. Our ability to control our vessels’ operating expenses also affects our financial results. Daily vessel operating expenses are calculated by dividing fleet operating
expenses by the Ownership Days for the relevant period.
Management fees. Management fees include fees paid to related parties providing certain ship management services to our
fleet pursuant to the Ship Management Agreements.
Off-hire. Off-hire is the period our fleet is unable to perform the services for which it is required under a charter
for reasons such as scheduled repairs, vessel upgrades, dry-dockings or special or intermediate surveys or other unforeseen events.
Dry-docking/Special Surveys. We periodically dry-dock and/or perform special surveys on our fleet for inspection,
repairs and maintenance and any modifications to comply with industry certification or governmental requirements. Our ability to control our dry-docking and special survey expenses and our ability to complete our scheduled dry-dockings and/or
special surveys on time also affects our financial results. Dry-docking and special survey costs are accounted for under the deferral method whereby the actual costs incurred are deferred and are amortized on a straight-line basis over the period
through the date the next survey is scheduled to become due.
Ownership Days. Ownership Days are the total number of calendar days in a period during which we owned a vessel.
Ownership Days are an indicator of the size of our fleet over a period and determine both the level of revenues and expenses recorded during that specific period.
Available Days. Available Days are the Ownership Days in a period less the aggregate number of days our vessels are
off-hire due to scheduled repairs, dry-dockings or special or intermediate surveys. The shipping industry uses Available Days to measure the aggregate number of days in a period during which vessels are available to generate revenues. Our
calculation of Available Days may not be comparable to that reported by other companies.
Operating Days. Operating Days are the Available Days in a period after subtracting unscheduled off-hire and idle days.
Fleet Utilization. Fleet Utilization is calculated by dividing the Operating
Days during a period by the number of Available Days during that period. Fleet Utilization is used to measure a company’s ability to efficiently find suitable employment for its vessels and minimize the number of days that its vessels are
off-hire for reasons such as major repairs, vessel upgrades, dry-dockings or special or intermediate surveys and other unforeseen events.
Daily Time Charter Equivalent (“TCE”) Rate. The Daily Time Charter Equivalent
Rate (“Daily TCE Rate”), is a measure of the average daily revenue performance of a vessel. The Daily TCE Rate is not a measure of financial performance under U.S. GAAP (i.e., it is a non-GAAP measure) and should not be considered as an
alternative to any measure of financial performance presented in accordance with U.S. GAAP. We calculate Daily TCE Rate by dividing total revenues (time charter and/or voyage charter revenues, and/or pool revenues, net of charterers’
commissions), less voyage expenses, by the number of Available Days during that period. Under a time charter, the charterer pays substantially all the vessel voyage related expenses. However, we may incur voyage related expenses when positioning
or repositioning vessels before or after the period of a time or other charter, during periods of commercial waiting time or while off-hire during dry-docking or due to other unforeseen circumstances. Under voyage charters, the majority of voyage
expenses are generally borne by us whereas for vessels in a pool, such expenses are borne by the pool operator. The Daily TCE Rate is a standard shipping industry performance measure used primarily to compare period-to-period changes in a
company’s performance and, management believes that the Daily TCE Rate provides meaningful information to our investors because it compares daily net earnings generated by our vessels irrespective of the mix of charter types (e.g., time charter,
voyage charter, pools) under which our vessels are employed between the periods while it further assists our management in making decisions regarding the deployment and use of our vessels and in evaluating our financial performance. Our
calculation of the Daily TCE Rates may be different from and may not be comparable to that reported by other companies.
EBITDA. EBITDA is not a measure of financial performance under U.S. GAAP, does not represent and should not be
considered as an alternative to net income, operating income, cash flow from operating activities or any other measure of financial performance presented in accordance with U.S. GAAP. We define EBITDA as earnings before interest and finance costs
(if any), net of interest income, taxes (when incurred), depreciation and amortization of deferred dry-docking costs. EBITDA is used as a supplemental financial measure by management and external users of financial statements to assess our
operating performance. We believe that EBITDA assists our management by providing useful information that increases the comparability of our operating performance from period to period and against the operating performance of other companies in
our industry that provide EBITDA information. This increased comparability is achieved by excluding the potentially disparate effects between periods or companies of interest, other financial items, depreciation and amortization and taxes, which
items are affected by various and possibly changing financing methods, capital structure and historical cost basis and which items may significantly affect net income between periods. We believe that including EBITDA as a measure of operating
performance benefits investors in (a) selecting between investing in us and other investment alternatives and (b) monitoring our ongoing financial and operational strength. EBITDA as presented below may be different from and may not be comparable
to similarly titled measures of other companies.
The following tables reconcile our consolidated and per segment Daily TCE Rate and our consolidated EBITDA to the most directly comparable GAAP measures and present operational
metrics of the Company on a consolidated basis and per operating segment for the periods presented (amounts in U.S. dollars, except for utilization and days). We entered the LPG carrier business in the second quarter of 2023 and, accordingly, no
comparative financial information exists for the year ended December 31, 2022.
Reconciliation of Daily TCE Rate to Total vessel revenues — Consolidated
|
|
Year ended
December 31,
|
|
|
Year ended
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2022
|
|
|
2023
|
|
Total vessel revenues
|
|
$
|
111,885,865
|
|
|
$
|
78,468,574
|
|
Voyage expenses – including commissions to related party
|
|
|
(29,319,414
|
)
|
|
|
(4,444,716
|
)
|
TCE revenues
|
|
$
|
82,566,451
|
|
|
$
|
74,023,858
|
|
Available Days
|
|
|
3,037
|
|
|
|
2,734
|
|
Daily TCE Rate
|
|
$
|
27,187
|
|
|
$
|
27,075
|
|
Reconciliation of Daily TCE Rate to Total vessel revenues — Aframax/LR2 Tanker Segment
|
|
Year ended
December 31,
|
|
|
Year ended
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2022
|
|
|
2023
|
|
Total vessel revenues
|
|
$
|
96,248,212
|
|
|
$
|
56,163,961
|
|
Voyage expenses – including commissions to related party
|
|
|
(29,100,348
|
)
|
|
|
(1,939,564
|
)
|
TCE revenues
|
|
$
|
67,147,864 |
|
|
$
|
54,224,397
|
|
Available Days
|
|
|
2,307
|
|
|
|
1,355
|
|
Daily TCE Rate
|
|
$
|
29,106
|
|
|
$
|
40,018
|
|
Reconciliation of Daily TCE Rate to Total vessel revenues — Handysize Tanker Segment
| |
Year ended
December 31,
|
|
|
Year ended
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2022
|
|
|
2023
|
|
Total vessel revenues
|
|
$
|
15,637,653
|
|
|
$
|
15,611,872
|
|
Voyage expenses – including commissions to related party
|
|
|
(219,066
|
)
|
|
|
(198,730
|
)
|
TCE revenues
|
|
$
|
15,418,587
|
|
|
$
|
15,413,142
|
|
Available Days
|
|
|
730
|
|
|
|
642
|
|
Daily TCE Rate
|
|
$
|
21,121 |
|
|
$
|
24,008
|
|
Reconciliation of Daily TCE Rate to Total vessel revenues — LPG Carrier Segment
|
|
Year ended
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2023
|
|
Total vessel revenues
|
|
$
|
6,692,741
|
|
Voyage expenses – including commissions to related party
|
|
|
(2,306,422
|
)
|
TCE revenues
|
|
$
|
4,386,319
|
|
Available Days
|
|
|
737
|
|
Daily TCE Rate
|
|
$
|
5,952
|
|
Operational Metrics — Consolidated
|
|
Year ended
December 31,
|
|
|
Year ended
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2022
|
|
|
2023
|
|
Daily vessel operating expenses
|
|
$
|
6,969
|
|
|
$
|
7,331
|
|
Ownership Days
|
|
|
3,115
|
|
|
|
2,876
|
|
Available Days
|
|
|
3,037
|
|
|
|
2,734
|
|
Operating Days
|
|
|
3,028
|
|
|
|
2,650
|
|
Fleet Utilization
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
97
|
%
|
Daily TCE Rate
|
|
$
|
27,187
|
|
|
$
|
27,075
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
$
|
58,881,032
|
|
|
$
|
144,719,062
|
|
Operational Metrics — Aframax/LR2 Tanker Segment
|
|
Year ended
December 31,
|
|
|
Year ended
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2022
|
|
|
2023
|
|
Daily vessel operating expenses
|
|
$
|
7,290
|
|
|
$
|
8,041
|
|
Ownership Days
|
|
|
2,385
|
|
|
|
1,454
|
|
Available Days
|
|
|
2,307
|
|
|
|
1,355
|
|
Operating Days
|
|
|
2,298
|
|
|
|
1,325
|
|
Fleet Utilization
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
98
|
%
|
Daily TCE Rate
|
|
$
|
29,106
|
|
|
$
|
40,018
|
|
Operational Metrics — Handysize Tanker Segment
|
|
Year ended
December 31,
|
|
|
Year ended
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2022
|
|
|
2023
|
|
Daily vessel operating expenses
|
|
$
|
5,921
|
|
|
$
|
7,539
|
|
Ownership Days
|
|
|
730
|
|
|
|
685
|
|
Available Days
|
|
|
730
|
|
|
|
642
|
|
Operating Days
|
|
|
730
|
|
|
|
635
|
|
Fleet Utilization
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
99
|
%
|
Daily TCE Rate
|
|
$
|
21,121
|
|
|
$
|
24,008
|
|
Operational Metrics — LPG Carrier Segment
|
|
Year ended
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2023
|
|
Daily vessel operating expenses
|
|
$
|
5,738
|
|
Ownership Days
|
|
|
737
|
|
Available Days
|
|
|
737
|
|
Operating Days
|
|
|
690
|
|
Fleet Utilization
|
|
|
94
|
%
|
Daily TCE Rate
|
|
$
|
5,952
|
|
Reconciliation of EBITDA to Net (loss)/income – Consolidated
|
|
Year ended
December 31,
|
|
|
Year ended
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2022
|
|
|
2023
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
49,926,383
|
|
|
|
140,636,993
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
7,294,476
|
|
|
|
6,839,702
|
|
Interest and finance costs, net(1)
|
|
|
699,992
|
|
|
|
(3,108,300
|
)
|
U.S. source income taxes
|
|
|
960,181
|
|
|
|
350,667
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
$
|
58,881,032
|
|
|
$
|
144,719,062
|
|
(1) |
Includes interest and finance costs and interest income, if any.
|
Consolidated Results of Operations
Year ended December 31, 2023, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2022
|
|
Year ended
December 31, 2022
|
|
|
Year ended
December 31, 2023
|
|
|
Change –amount
|
|
Total vessel revenues
|
|
$
|
111,885,865
|
|
|
$
|
78,468,574
|
|
|
$
|
(33,417,291
|
)
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voyage expenses (including commissions to related party)
|
|
|
(29,319,414
|
)
|
|
|
(4,444,716
|
)
|
|
|
24,874,698
|
|
Vessel operating expenses
|
|
|
(21,708,290
|
)
|
|
|
(21,084,635
|
)
|
|
|
623,655
|
|
Management fees to related parties
|
|
|
(2,833,500
|
)
|
|
|
(3,153,660
|
)
|
|
|
(320,160
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(7,294,476
|
)
|
|
|
(6,839,702
|
)
|
|
|
454,774
|
|
General and administrative expenses (including costs from related parties)
|
|
|
(2,093,347
|
)
|
|
|
(5,357,265
|
)
|
|
|
(3,263,918
|
)
|
(Provision)/ recovery of provision for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
(266,732
|
)
|
|
|
266,732
|
|
|
|
533,464
|
|
Gain on sale of vessels
|
|
|
3,222,631
|
|
|
|
99,026,692
|
|
|
|
95,804,061
|
|
Operating income
|
|
$
|
51,592,737
|
|
|
$
|
136,882,020
|
|
|
|
85,289,283
|
|
Interest and finance costs, net(1)
|
|
|
(699,992
|
)
|
|
|
3,108,300
|
|
|
|
3,808,292
|
|
Foreign exchange losses
|
|
|
(6,181
|
)
|
|
|
(23,493
|
)
|
|
|
(17,312
|
)
|
Dividend income from related party
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,020,833
|
|
|
|
1,020,833
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
(960,181
|
)
|
|
|
(350,667
|
)
|
|
|
609,514
|
|
Net income and comprehensive income
|
|
$
|
49,926,383
|
|
|
$
|
140,636,993
|
|
|
$
|
90,710,610
|
|
(1) |
Includes interest and finance costs, net of interest income, if any.
|
Total vessel revenues
Total vessel revenues, net of charterers’ commissions, decreased to $78.5 million in the year ended December 31, 2023, from $111.9 million in the same period in 2022. This
decrease of $33.4 million was largely driven by the decrease in the Available Days of our fleet to 2,734 days in the year ended December 31, 2023, from 3,037 days in the corresponding period in 2022, as the result of the sale of the (i) M/T Wonder Arcturus on July 15, 2022, (ii) M/T Wonder Bellatrix on June 22, 2023, (iii) M/T Wonder Polaris on June 26, 2023,
(iv) M/T Wonder Musica on July 6, 2023, (v) M/T Wonder Avior on July 17, 2023, (vi) M/T Wonder Formosa on November 16,
2023 and (vii) M/T Wonder Vega on December 21, 2023, partly offset by the acquisition of (i) LPG Dream Terrax on May 26,
2023, (ii) LPG Dream Arrax on June 14, 2023, (iii) LPG Dream Syrax on July 18, 2023 and (iv) LPG Dream Vermax on August 4, 2023. During the year ended
December 31, 2023, our fleet earned on average a Daily TCE Rate of $27,075, compared to an average Daily TCE Rate of $27,187 earned during the same period in 2022. Daily TCE Rate is not a recognized measure under U.S. GAAP. Please refer to “—Daily TCE Rate” and “—Reconciliation of Daily TCE Rate to Total vessel revenues —
Consolidated” above for the definition and reconciliation of this measure to the most directly comparable financial measure calculated and presented in accordance with U.S. GAAP.
Voyage expenses
Voyage expenses for our fleet decreased by $24.9 million, to $4.4 million in the year ended December 31, 2023, from $29.3 million in the same period of 2022. This decrease in
voyage expenses is mainly associated with the decrease in expenses associated with our vessels’ commercial employment arrangements, as during the year ended December 31, 2023, seven of our eight tanker vessels operated under pool agreements
pursuant to which our pool operators bear bunker consumption costs and port expenses, resulting in a substantial decrease in such expenses as compared to the year ended December 31, 2022, during which our Aframax/LR2 tanker segment operated
predominantly under voyage charters under which we bore bunker consumption costs and port expenses. It was also due to the reduction of Ownership Days of our fleet, to 2,876 days in the year ended December 31, 2023 from 3,115 days in the same
period in 2022 due to the decrease of the average number of operating vessels to 7.9 vessels in the year ended December 31, 2023 from 8.5 vessels in the same period of 2022.
Vessel Operating Expenses
The decrease in vessel operating expenses by $0.6 million, to $21.1 million in the year ended December 31, 2023, from $21.7 million in the same period of 2022,
mainly reflects the decrease in the Ownership Days of our fleet, partly offset by the increase in the daily vessel operating expenses to $7,331 in the year ended December 31, 2023, from $6,969 in the same period in 2022, due to
additional expenses related to the engagement of new third party manager subcontracted to technically manage a number of our vessels.
Management Fees
The increase in management fees by $0.3 million, to $3.1 million in the year ended December 31, 2023, from $2.8 million in the same period of 2022, mainly reflects the (i)
increase in management fees from $850 per vessel per day to $975 per vessel per day following entry by the Toro Subsidiaries into the Amended and Restated Master Management Agreement with effect from July 1, 2022, (ii) increased management fees
with effect from July 1, 2023, from $975 per vessel per day to $1,039 per vessel per day which were adjusted for inflation in accordance with the terms of the Master Management Agreement and (iii) entry into new management agreements on April 26,
2023 with Castor Ships S.A. for our four LPG carriers, which are effective from the date of the purchase agreements, partially offset by the decrease in the Ownership Days of our fleet.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation expenses for our fleet decreased to $5.6 million in the year ended December 31, 2023, from $6.6 million in the same period in 2022 as a result of the decrease in the
Ownership Days of our fleet. Dry-dock and special survey amortization charges amounted to $1.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, compared to a charge of $0.7 million in the year ended December 31, 2022. This increase in dry-dock
amortization charges primarily resulted from the increase in dry-dock amortization days from 563 days in the year ended December 31, 2022, to 870 dry-dock amortization days in the year ended December 31, 2023.
General and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses in the year ended December 31, 2023, amounted to $5.4 million, whereas, in the same period in 2022, general and administrative
expenses totaled $2.1 million. This increase of $3.3 million is mainly associated with (i) the stock based compensation cost for non-vested shares granted under our Equity Incentive Plan amounting to $1.2 million and (ii) a $2.6 million flat
vessel management fee for the period from March 7, 2023 through December 31, 2023. The flat vessel management fee was increased from $0.75 million to $0.8 million, in accordance with the terms of Master Management Agreement with effect from
July 1, 2023. For the year ended December 31, 2022, and for the period from January 1, 2023 through March 7, 2023 (completion of Spin-Off), General and administrative
expenses reflect the expense allocations made to the Company by Castor based on the proportion of the number of Ownership Days of our fleet vessels to the total Ownership Days of Castor’s full fleet.
Gain on sale of vessels
On June 22, 2023, we concluded the sale of the M/T Wonder Bellatrix which we sold, pursuant to
an agreement dated May 12, 2023, for cash consideration of $37.0 million. The sale resulted in net proceeds to the Company of $35.8 million and the Company recorded a net gain on the sale of $19.3 million in the second quarter of 2023. On June
26, 2023, we concluded the sale of the M/T Wonder Polaris which we sold, pursuant to an agreement dated May 18, 2023, for cash consideration of $34.5 million. The sale resulted in net proceeds to the
Company of $33.3 million and the Company recording a net gain on the sale of $21.3 million in the second quarter of 2023. On July 6, 2023, we concluded the sale of the M/T Wonder Musica which we sold,
pursuant to an agreement dated June 15, 2023, for cash consideration of $28.0 million. The sale resulted in net proceeds to the Company of $27.2 million and the Company recording a net gain on the sale of $16.1 million in the third quarter of
2023. On July 17, 2023, we concluded the sale of the M/T Wonder Avior which we sold, pursuant to an agreement dated April 28, 2023, for cash consideration of $30.1 million. The sale resulted in net
proceeds to the Company of $29.1 million and the Company recording a net gain on the sale of $17.6 million in the third quarter of 2023. On November 16, 2023, we concluded the sale of the M/T Wonder Formosa
which we sold, pursuant to an agreement dated September 1, 2023, for cash consideration of $18.0 million. The sale resulted in net proceeds to the Company of $17.2 million and the Company recording a net gain on the sale of $8.2 million in the
fourth quarter of 2023. On December 21, 2023, we concluded the sale of the M/T Wonder Vega which we sold, pursuant to an agreement dated September 5, 2023, for cash consideration of $31.5 million. The
sale resulted in net proceeds to the Company of $30.3 million and the Company recording a net gain on the sale of $16.5 million in the fourth quarter of 2023.
Interest and finance costs, net
Interest and finance costs, net amounted to $(3.1) million in the year ended December 31, 2023, whereas in the same period of 2022, interest and finance costs, net amounted to
$0.7 million. This variation is mainly due to higher cash balances compared to the same period of 2022 and the increase in interest income for the year ended December 31, 2023 on our available cash, which more than offset an increase in the
weighted average interest rate on our long-term debt from 4.9% in the year ended December 31, 2022 to 8.1% in the same period of 2023.
Year ended December 31, 2023, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2022 — Aframax/LR2 Tanker Segment
|
|
Year ended
December 31, 2022
|
|
|
Year ended
December 31, 2023
|
|
|
Change –amount
|
|
Total vessel revenues
|
|
$
|
|
96,248,212
|
|
|
$
|
56,163,961
|
|
|
$
|
(40,084,251
|
)
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voyage expenses (including commissions to related party)
|
|
|
|
(29,100,348
|
)
|
|
|
(1,939,564
|
)
|
|
|
27,160,784
|
|
Vessel operating expenses
|
|
|
|
(17,386,009
|
)
|
|
|
(11,691,675
|
)
|
|
|
5,694,334
|
|
Management fees to related parties
|
|
|
|
(2,167,000
|
)
|
|
|
(1,443,009
|
)
|
|
|
723,991
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
|
(5,889,352
|
)
|
|
|
(3,475,084
|
)
|
|
|
2,414,268
|
|
(Provision )/ recovery of provision for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
|
(266,732
|
)
|
|
|
266,732
|
|
|
|
533,464
|
|
Gain on sale of vessels
|
|
|
|
3,222,631
|
|
|
|
90,800,434
|
|
|
|
87,577,803
|
|
Segment operating income
|
|
$
|
|
44,661,402
|
|
|
$
|
128,681,795
|
|
|
$
|
84,020,393
|
|
Total vessel revenues
Total vessel revenues, net of charterers’ commissions, for our Aframax/LR2 tanker segment amounted to $56.2 million in the year ended December 31, 2023, as compared to $96.2
million in the same period of 2022. This decrease of $40.0 million is mainly due to the decrease in the Available Days of our Aframax/LR2 vessels in our fleet to 1,355 days in the year ended December 31, 2023, from 2,307 days in the corresponding
period in 2022, as the result of the sale of the (i) M/T Wonder Arcturus on July 15, 2022, (ii) M/T Wonder Bellatrix on June 22, 2023, (iii) M/T Wonder Polaris on June 26, 2023, (iv) M/T Wonder Musica on July 6, 2023 , (v) M/T Wonder Avior on July 17, 2023 and (vi)
M/T Wonder Vega on December 21, 2023, partially offset by the improved Aframax/LR2 tanker market charter rates, as compared to the corresponding period in 2022. During the year ended December 31, 2023,
our Aframax/LR2 tanker fleet earned an average Daily TCE Rate of $40,018, compared to an average Daily TCE Rate of $29,106 earned in the same period of 2022. Daily TCE Rate is not a recognized measure under U.S. GAAP. Please refer to “—Daily TCE Rate” and “—Reconciliation of Daily TCE Rate to Total vessel revenues — Aframax/LR2 Tanker Segment” above for the
definition and reconciliation of this measure to Total vessel revenues, the most directly comparable financial measure calculated and presented in accordance with U.S. GAAP.
Voyage Expenses
Voyage expenses for our Aframax/LR2 tanker segment amounted to $1.9 million and $29.1 million in the year ended December 31, 2023, and the same period of 2022, respectively. This
decrease of $27.2 million is mainly associated with our Aframax/LR2 vessels, including the vessels sold during the period, operating mostly under pool agreements during the year ended December 31, 2023, under which our pool operators bear bunker
consumption and port expenses, whereas, in the corresponding period in 2022, our Aframax/LR2 tanker fleet operated mostly under voyage charters, under which we bear all voyage expenses, including bunkers and port expenses.
Vessel Operating Expenses
The decrease in Operating expenses by $5.7 million, to $11.7 million in the year ended December 31, 2023, from $17.4 million in the same period in 2022,
mainly reflects the decrease in the Ownership Days of our Aframax/LR2 vessels to 1,454 days in the year ended December 31, 2023 from 2,385 days in the same period in 2022.
Management Fees
The decrease in Management fees by $0.7 million, to $1.4 million in the year ended December 31, 2023, from $2.1 million in the same period in 2022, mainly reflects the decrease in
the Ownership Days of our Aframax/LR2 tanker fleet, partially offset by (i) an increase in management fees from $850 per vessel per day to $975 per vessel per day following entry by the Toro Subsidiaries into the Amended and Restated Master
Management Agreement with effect from July 1, 2022 and (ii) the further inflation-based adjustment in management fees that was effected on July 1, 2023 under the Master Management Agreement, which is discussed in more detail under “—Consolidated Results of Operations—Management Fees.”
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation expenses for our Aframax/LR2 tanker segment decreased to $2.8 million in the year ended December 31, 2023, from $5.5 million in the same period in 2022, as a result
of the decrease in the Ownership Days of our Aframax/LR2 tanker fleet. Dry-dock and special survey amortization charges in the year ended December 31, 2023 of $0.7 million relate to the amortization of the M/T
Wonder Musica, M/T Wonder Avior, M/T Wonder Vega and M/T Wonder Sirius in this period, as the vessels underwent
their scheduled dry-docking repairs during the second quarter of 2022, the fourth quarter of 2022, the third quarter of 2023 and the fourth quarter of 2023, respectively. Dry-dock and special survey amortization charges amounted to $0.4 million
in the same period of 2022, related only to the amortization of the M/T Wonder Musica.
Gain on sale of vessels
Refer to discussion under ‘‘—Consolidated Results of Operations—Gain on sale of vessels” above
for details on the sale of the M/T Wonder Bellatrix, M/T Wonder Polaris, M/T Wonder Musica, M/T Wonder Avior and M/T Wonder Vega.
Year ended December 31, 2023, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2022— Handysize Tanker Segment
|
|
Year ended
December 31, 2022
|
|
|
Year ended
December 31, 2023
|
|
|
Change –amount
|
|
Total vessel revenues
|
|
$ |
15,637,653
|
|
|
$ |
15,611,872
|
|
|
$
|
(25,781
|
)
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voyage expenses (including commissions to related party)
|
|
|
(219,066
|
)
|
|
|
(198,730
|
)
|
|
|
20,336
|
|
Vessel operating expenses
|
|
|
(4,322,281
|
)
|
|
|
(5,164,248
|
)
|
|
|
(841,967
|
)
|
Management fees to related parties
|
|
|
(666,500
|
)
|
|
|
(688,547
|
)
|
|
|
(22,047
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(1,405,124
|
)
|
|
|
(1,490,577
|
)
|
|
|
(85,453
|
)
|
Gain on sale of vessels
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
8,226,258
|
|
|
|
8,226,258
|
|
Segment operating income
|
|
$
|
9,024,682
|
|
|
$
|
16,296,028
|
|
|
$ |
7,271,346
|
|
Total Vessel revenues
Total vessel revenues, net of charterers’ commissions for our Handysize tanker segment amounted to $15.6 million in the year ended
December 31, 2023, unchanged versus the same period in 2022. That was the result of the improvement in the Handysize tanker market relative to the same period in 2022, reflected in the increase in the Handysize fleet average Daily TCE Rate to
$24,008 in the year ended December 31, 2023 from $21,121 in the same period in 2022, offset by the decrease in the Available Days of our Handysize vessels in our fleet to 642 days in the year ended December 31, 2023, from 730 days in the
corresponding period in 2022, as a result of the sale of M/T Wonder Formosa on November 16, 2023. Daily TCE Rate is not a recognized measure under U.S. GAAP. Please refer to “-Daily TCE Rate” and “-Reconciliation of Daily TCE Rate to Total vessel revenues — Handysize Tanker Segment” above for the definition and reconciliation of this measure to Total vessel
revenues, the most directly comparable financial measure calculated and presented in accordance with U.S. GAAP.
Voyage Expenses
Voyage Expenses amounted to $0.2 million for our Handysize tanker segment in the year ended December 31, 2023 and in the same period in 2022, reflecting increased brokerage
commissions paid to a related party due to the improvement in the Handysize tanker market in 2023 compared to 2022 as discussed above, offset by the decrease of the Ownership Days of our Handysize tanker fleet in 2023 compared to 2022.
Vessel Operating Expenses
The increase in operating expenses for our Handysize tanker segment by $0.9 million, to $5.2 million in the year ended December 31, 2023, from $4.3 million in the corresponding
period of 2022, mainly reflects increased crewing expenses and the additional expenses related to the change of the third party managers which are subcontracted to technically manage a number of our vessels, partially offset by the decrease of
the Ownership Days of our Handysize tanker fleet to 685 days in the year ended December 31, 2023, from 730 days in the corresponding period in 2022.
Management Fees
Management fees amounted to $0.7 million for our Handysize tanker segment in the year ended December 31, 2023 and in the same period in 2022, as a result of the
increased management fees following entry by the Toro Subsidiaries into the Amended and Restated Master Management Agreement with effect from July 1, 2022 and the
inflation-based adjustment in management fees that was effected on July 1, 2023, under the Master Management Agreement, which is discussed in more detail under “—Consolidated Results of Operations—Management Fees”, offset by the decrease of the
Ownership Days of our Handysize tanker fleet.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation expenses for our Handysize tanker segment decreased to $1.0 million in the year ended December 31, 2023 from $1.1 million
in the same period in 2022, as a result of the decrease in the Ownership Days of our Handysize tanker fleet. Dry-dock amortization charges in the year ended December 31, 2023 and the same period of 2022 amounted to $0.5 million and $0.3 million,
respectively, and this increase of $0.2 million relates to the M/T Wonder Formosa which underwent its scheduled dry-dock and special survey in the first quarter of 2023.
Gain on sale of vessels
Refer to discussion under “—Consolidated Results of Operations—Gain on sale of vessels” above for details on the sale of the M/T Wonder Formosa.
Year ended December 31, 2023— LPG Carrier Segment
We entered the LPG business in the second quarter of 2023 and, accordingly, no comparative financial information exists for the year ended December 31, 2022.
|
|
Year ended
December 31, 2023
|
|
Total vessel revenues
|
|
$
|
6,692,741
|
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
Voyage expenses (including commissions to related party)
|
|
|
(2,306,422
|
)
|
Vessel operating expenses
|
|
|
(4,228,712
|
)
|
Management fees to related parties
|
|
|
(1,022,104
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(1,874,041
|
)
|
Segment Operating loss
|
|
$
|
(2,738,538
|
)
|
Total Vessel revenues
Total vessel revenues for our LPG carrier segment amounted to $6.7 million in the year ended December 31, 2023. During the year ended December 31, 2023, we owned on average 2.0
LPG carriers that earned a Daily TCE Rate of $5,952 . Daily TCE Rate is not a recognized measure under U.S. GAAP. Please refer to “—Daily TCE Rate” and “—Reconciliation of Daily TCE Rate to Total vessel revenues — LPG Carrier Segment” above for the definition and reconciliation of this measure to Total vessel revenues, the most directly comparable financial
measure calculated and presented in accordance with U.S. GAAP. During the period in which we owned them, both our LPG carriers were engaged in voyage charters.
Voyage Expenses
Voyage expenses for our LPG carrier segment amounted to $2.3 million relating to the voyage charters in the year ended December 31, 2023, mainly comprised bunkers’ consumption
costs and port expenses.
Vessel Operating Expenses
Operating expenses for our LPG carrier segment amounted to $4.2 million in the year ended December 31, 2023, mainly comprised crew wages costs, stores, spares and insurance costs.
Management Fees
Management fees for our LPG carrier segment amounted to $1.0 million in the year ended December 31, 2023.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization expenses amounted to $1.9 million in the year ended December 31, 2023 and exclusively relate to vessels’
depreciation for the period during which we owned them.
Implications of Being an Emerging Growth Company
We are an “emerging growth company” as defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act, or JOBS Act. An emerging growth company may take advantage of specified reduced public
company reporting requirements that are otherwise applicable generally to public companies. These provisions include:
|
• |
an exemption from the auditor attestation requirement of management’s assessment of the effectiveness of the emerging growth company’s internal controls over financial reporting pursuant to Section 404(b) of
Sarbanes-Oxley; and
|
|
• |
an exemption from compliance with any new requirements adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, or the PCAOB, requiring mandatory audit firm rotation or a supplement to the auditor’s report in
which the auditor would be required to provide additional information about the audit and financial statements.
|
We may choose to take advantage of some or all of these reduced reporting requirements. We may take advantage of these provisions until the last day of the fiscal year following
the fifth anniversary of the date we first sell our common equity securities pursuant to an effective registration statement under the Securities Act or such earlier time that we are no longer an emerging growth company. We will cease to be an
emerging growth company if we have more than $1.235 billion in “total annual gross revenues” during our most recently completed fiscal year, if we become a “large accelerated filer” with a public float of more than $700 million, as of the last
business day of our most recently completed second fiscal quarter or as of any date on which we have issued more than $1 billion in non-convertible debt over the three-year period prior to such date. For as long as we take advantage of the
reduced reporting obligations, the information that we provide shareholders may be different from information provided by other public companies.
B.
|
Liquidity and Capital Resources
|
We operate in a capital-intensive industry, and we expect to finance the purchase of additional vessels and other capital expenditures through a combination of cash from
operations, proceeds from equity offerings, and borrowings from debt transactions. Our liquidity requirements relate to servicing the principal and interest on our debt, funding capital expenditures and working capital (which includes maintaining
the quality of our vessels and complying with international shipping standards and environmental laws and regulations) and maintaining cash reserves for the purpose of satisfying certain minimum liquidity restrictions contained in our credit
facility. In accordance with our business strategy, other liquidity needs may relate to funding potential investments in new vessels and maintaining cash reserves against fluctuations in operating cash flows. Our funding and treasury activities
are intended to maximize investment returns while maintaining appropriate liquidity.
For the year ended December 31, 2023, our principal sources of funds were cash from operations and the net proceeds from (i) the sale of six vessels of our fleet and (ii) the
issuance of common shares pursuant to the subscription agreement with Pani, as discussed below under “—Equity Transactions.”
As of December 31, 2023, and December 31, 2022, we had cash and cash equivalents of $155.2 million and $41.8 million, respectively, which excludes $0.4 million and $0.7 million of
restricted cash in each period under our debt agreements, respectively. Cash and cash equivalents are primarily held in U.S. dollars.
Two of our subsidiaries, Rocket Shipping Co. and Gamora Shipping Co., entered into an $18.0 million term loan facility on April 27, 2021. In connection with
the Spin-Off, we amended this facility and Toro replaced Castor as guarantor for it. See “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—B. Related Party Transactions—Contribution and Spin-Off
Distribution Agreement” below. As of December 31, 2023, we had $5.3 million of gross indebtedness outstanding under this facility, of which $1.3 million was due to mature in the year ending December 31, 2024. As of December 31, 2023, we
were also in compliance with all the financial and liquidity covenants contained in our debt agreement. The outstanding principal balance of $5.3 million on this facility was prepaid on January 25, 2024 following the completion of the sale of M/T Wonder Sirius and we no longer have any outstanding indebtedness under any facility as of the date of this Annual Report.
Working capital is equal to current assets minus current liabilities. As of December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, we had a working capital surplus of $157.3 million and $48.2
million, respectively.
We believe that our current sources of funds and those that we anticipate to internally generate for a period of at least the next twelve months from December 31, 2023, will be
sufficient to fund the operations of our fleet and meet our normal working capital requirements for that period and for the foreseeable future.
Our medium- and long-term liquidity requirements relate to the funding of cash dividends on our Series A Preferred Shares, when declared, and expenditures relating to the
operation and maintenance of our vessels. Sources of funding for our medium- and long-term liquidity requirements include cash flows from operations or new debt financing, if required.
As noted above, routine or strategic acquisitions may require the incurrence of additional indebtedness, including debt issuances, and/or additional equity issuances, which may
dilute our common shareholders if issued at lower prices than the price they acquired their shares, both of which could lower our available cash. See “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks Relating to Our
Company—We may not be able to execute our growth strategy and we may not realize the benefits we expect from acquisitions or other strategic transactions.”
For a discussion of our management agreements with our related-party manager and relevant fees charged, see “Item 7. Major Shareholders and
Related Party Transactions—B. Related Party Transactions.”
Capital Expenditures
From time to time, we make capital expenditures in connection with vessel acquisitions and vessels upgrades and improvements (either for the purpose of meeting regulatory or legal
requirements or for the purpose of complying with requirements imposed by classification societies). We currently finance our capital expenditures using cash from operations and debt financing and expect to continue to do so in the future, though
in the future, we may also utilize, subject to market conditions, further debt financing and equity issuances as a source of funding. As of December 31, 2023 and as of the date of this Annual Report, we did not have any commitments for capital
expenditures related to vessel acquisitions.
A failure to fulfill our capital expenditure commitments generally results in a forfeiture of advances paid with respect to the contracted acquisitions and a write-off of capitalized expenses. In
addition, we may also be liable for other damages for breach of contract. Such events could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and operating results.
Equity Transactions
Under Toro’s initial Articles of Incorporation dated July 29, 2022, Toro’s authorized capital stock consisted of 1,000 shares par value $0.001 per share. On March 2, 2023, the
Company’s articles of incorporation were amended and restated and Toro’s authorized capital stock was increased to 3,900,000,000 common shares, par value $0.001 per share and 100,000,000 preferred shares, par value $0.001 per share. In connection
with the Spin-Off, on March 7, 2023 Toro issued to Castor (i) 9,461,009 common shares with one vote per share, and (ii) 140,000 Series A Preferred Shares, with a stated value of $1,000 and par value of $0.001 per share, and no voting power, and
issued to Pelagos, a company controlled by Toro’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, 40,000 Series B Preferred Shares. Such common shares were distributed on March 7, 2023 pro rata to the shareholders of record of Castor as of February 22,
2023 at a ratio of one Toro common share for every ten Castor common shares.
On April 17, 2023, Toro entered into a subscription agreement with Pani, a company controlled by Toro’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to which Toro issued and
sold, and Pani purchased, 8,500,000 common shares, par value $0.001 per share, at a purchase price of $2.29 per share, for gross proceeds of $19,465,000, less issuance costs of $817,764 and was approved by a special committee of our
disinterested and independent directors. The 8,500,000 common shares were issued on April 19, 2023 in a private placement pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act and Regulation D promulgated thereunder. The terms of the subscription
agreement were negotiated and approved by a special committee of our disinterested and independent directors. See also “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—B. Related Party Transactions.”
On September 6, 2023, our Board adopted an Equity Incentive Plan (the “Equity Incentive Plan”) under which directors, officers and employees (including any prospective director,
officer or employee) of the Company and/or its subsidiaries and affiliates and consultants and service providers to (including persons who are employed by or provide services to any entity that is itself a consultant or service provider to) the
Company and its subsidiaries and affiliates, are eligible to receive awards including (a) non-qualified stock options, (b) stock appreciation rights, (c) restricted stock, (d) restricted stock unit, (e) dividend equivalents, (f) cash awards, (g)
unrestricted stock and (h) other equity-based or equity-related Awards. The Equity Incentive Plan is administered by the Company’s board of directors and the aggregate number of common shares that may be issued with respect to awards granted
under the Equity Incentive Plan cannot exceed the 2,000,000 common shares. The Company’s board of directors may terminate the Equity Incentive Plan at any time. On September 28, 2023, a total of 1,240,000 restricted common shares had been granted
under the Equity Incentive Plan to directors, officers and non-employees. The fair value of each restricted share was $5.83, based on the latest closing price of our common shares on the grant date.
Non-vested restricted common shares granted under the Equity Incentive Plan are entitled to receive dividends, which are not refundable even if such shares are forfeited. See also “Item 6. Directors, Senior
Management and Employees—B. Compensation.”
On November 6, 2023, our Board approved a share repurchase program
(the “Repurchase Program”), authorizing the repurchase of up to $5.0 million of the Company’s common shares commencing November 10, 2023, through to March 31, 2024. Shares may be repurchased pursuant to the Repurchase Program in open market
and/or privately negotiated transactions. The timing, manner and total amount of any share repurchases is determined by management at its discretion and depends upon business, economic and market conditions, corporate and regulatory
requirements, prevailing share prices, and other considerations. The authorization does not obligate the Company to acquire any specific number of common shares. During the year ended December 31, 2023, the Company repurchased under the Repurchase Program 222,600 common shares in open market transactions for
aggregate consideration of approximately $1.0 million. On December 27, 2023, 179,251 repurchased common shares were cancelled and were removed from the Company’s share capital. The remaining 43,349
repurchased common shares have been classified as treasury shares as they were not cancelled as of December 31, 2023. See also “Item 16E. Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and
Affiliated Persons” for further information regarding the number of common shares repurchased under the Repurchase Program in the year ended December 31, 2023.
Our Borrowing Activities
As of December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, $5.3 million and $13.3 million, respectively, of gross indebtedness was outstanding under our $18.0 million term loan facility
attributable to our Aframax/LR2 segment. On January 25, 2024, the outstanding principal amount of $5.3 million under this facility was prepaid using part of the proceeds of the sale of the M/T Wonder Sirius,
which served as security under the facility.
As of December 31, 2023, and December 31, 2022, we were in compliance with all the financial and liquidity covenants contained in this debt agreement.
Cash Flows
The following table summarizes our net cash flows provided by/(used in) operating, investing and financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2023 and the year ended
December 31, 2022:
|
|
For the year
ended
|
|
|
For the year
ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
2022
|
|
|
December 31,
2023
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
41,538,177
|
|
|
|
56,126,319
|
|
Net cash provided by investing activities
|
|
|
11,788,681
|
|
|
|
50,706,251
|
|
Net cash (used in)/ provided by financing activities
|
|
|
(16,510,675
|
)
|
|
|
6,273,237
|
|
Operating Activities: Net cash provided by operating activities amounted to $56.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2023,
consisting of net income of $140.6 million, with non-cash adjustment for the aggregate gain on sale of the M/T Wonder Bellatrix, M/T Wonder Polaris, M/T Wonder Musica, M/T Wonder Avior, M/T Wonder Formosa and M/T Wonder Vega of $99.0
million, non-cash adjustments related to depreciation and amortization of $6.9 million, amortization of deferred finance charges of $0.1 million, a payment of dry-dock costs of $3.5 million, stock compensation cost of $1.3 million and a net
decrease of $9.7 million in working capital which mainly derived from a decrease in accounts receivable by $6.5 million, an increase in ‘Due from/to related parties’ by $3.8 million and a decrease in prepaid expenses by $4.2 million. For the year
ended December 31, 2022, net cash provided by operating activities amounted to $41.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, consisting of net income of $49.9 million, non-cash adjustments related to depreciation and amortization of $7.3
million, amortization of deferred finance charges of $0.1 million, gain on sale of the M/T Wonder Arcturus of $3.2 million, provision for doubtful accounts of $0.3 million, payment of dry-dock costs of
$1.9 million, partly offset by a net increase of $11.0 million in working capital, which mainly derived from an increase in prepaid expenses by $4.8 million and an increase in accounts receivable trade by $6.8 million. The $14.6 million increase
in net cash provided by operating activities in the year ended December 31, 2023, as compared with the same period of 2022, reflects mainly the increase in net income which was largely driven by the gain on sale of the aforementioned vessels.
Investing Activities: Net cash provided by investing activities in the year ended December
31, 2023 amounted to $50.7 million and mainly reflects the (i) net proceeds from the sale of the M/T Wonder
Bellatrix, M/T Wonder Polaris, M/T Wonder Musica, M/T Wonder Avior, M/T Wonder Formosa and M/T Wonder Vega amounting to $172.9 million, partly offset by (A) vessel acquisitions of the LPG Dream Terrax, LPG Dream Arrax, LPG Dream Syrax and LPG Dream Vermax amounting to $70.7 million and (B) payments of initial vessel and BWTS installation expenses amounting to $1.5 million and (ii) purchase of 50,000 5.00% Series D Cumulative
Perpetual Convertible Preferred Shares of Castor with a stated amount of $1,000 each for the purchase price of $50.0 million. Net cash provided by investing activities in the year ended December 31, 2022 amounting to $11.8 million mainly
reflect the net proceeds from the sale of the M/T Wonder Arcturus amounting to $12.6 million, partly offset by the payments in the current period of
prior year initial vessel and BWTS installation expenses amounting to $0.8 million.
Financing Activities: Net cash provided by financing activities during the year ended
December 31, 2023 amounted to $6.3 million and relates to (i) Spin-Off expenses amounting to $2.7 million incurred by Castor on our behalf, which were reimbursed by us pursuant to the Contribution and Spin-Off Distribution Agreement entered
into between us and Castor on February 24, 2023, (ii) $2.0 million of period scheduled principal repayments in connection with our $18.0 million term loan facility and $6.0 million for the early repayment of the outstanding portion of that loan
secured by M/T Wonder Polaris, (iii) payment for repurchase of common shares under the Company’s share
repurchase program amounting to $1.0 million and (iv) payment to Castor of a dividend on the Series A Preferred Shares for the period from March 7, 2023 to October 14, 2023 amounting to $0.9 million, as more than offset by net proceeds from the
issuance of 8,500,000 common shares pursuant to a subscription agreement with Pani, a company controlled by our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, amounting to $18.7
million and a net increase in former parent company investment amounting to $0.2 million. Net cash used in financing activities during the year ended December 31, 2022 amounting to $16.5 million, relates to: (i) a net decrease in former parent
company investment amounting to $13.4 million, and (ii) $3.1 million of period scheduled principal repayments in connection with our $18.0 million term loan facility.
C.
|
Research and Development, Patents and Licenses, Etc.
|
Not applicable.
Our results of operations depend primarily on the charter rates that we are able to realize. Charter hire rates paid for tanker vessels and LPG carriers are primarily a function
of the underlying balance between vessel supply and demand. For a discussion regarding the market performance, please see “—A. Operating Results—Hire Rates and Cyclical Nature of the Industry.” There can
be no assurance as to how long charter rates will remain at their current levels or whether they will improve or deteriorate and, if so, when and to what degree. That may have a material adverse effect on our future growth potential and our
profitability.
Due to the sale of M/T Wonder Sirius on January 24, 2024, the Company no longer has any Aframax/LR2 vessels. Consequently, management has
decided that, starting from the second quarter of 2024, the Company operates in two reportable segments: (i) the Handysize tanker segment, comprising one vessel, and (ii) the LPG carrier segment, comprising four vessels. This change may adversely
impact our future growth potential and profitability, given that, as of February 29, 2024, a number of our LPG carriers were fixed for a minimum period of 12 months at gross charter rates materially lower than the rates observed for our
Aframax/LR2 and Handysize tanker vessels in the year ended December 31, 2023. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—Our Fleet” for further information regarding the terms of such
charters and charter rates.
Furthermore, the Company’s business could be adversely affected by the risks related to the conflict in Ukraine and the severe worsening of Russia’s relations with
Western economies that has created significant uncertainty in global markets, including increased volatility in the prices of certain of products which our vessels transport and shifts in the trading patterns for such products which may
continue into the future. In addition, since November 2023, vessels in and around the Red Sea have faced an increasing number of attempted hijackings and attacks by drones and projectiles launched from Yemen which armed Houthi groups have
claimed responsibility for and which have resulted in casualties and sunken or damaged vessels. Refer to “Item 3. Key
Information—D. Risk Factors—Geopolitical conditions, such as political instability or conflict, terrorist attacks and international hostilities can affect the seaborne transportation
industry, which could adversely affect our business” for further details.
We are currently unable to predict with reasonable certainty the potential effects of the ongoing conflict in Ukraine or the Middle East, including due to the attacks on vessels
described above, on our future business, financial condition, cash flows or operating results and these events could have a material adverse effect on any of the foregoing.
Furthermore, during 2023 many economies worldwide experienced inflationary pressures. For further information, see “Item 3. Key Information—D.
Risk Factors—The Company is exposed to fluctuating demand and supply for maritime transportation services, as well as fluctuating prices of oil and refined petroleum products, and may be affected by a decrease in the demand for such products
and the volatility in their prices.” Such inflationary pressures and disruptions could adversely impact our operating costs and demand and supply for products we transport. It remains to be seen whether inflationary pressures will
continue, and to what degree. Interventions in the economy by central banks in response to inflationary pressures may slow down economic activity, reducing demand for products we carry, and cause a reduction in trade. As a result, the volumes of
products we deliver and/or charter rates for our vessels may be affected. These factors could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, cash flows and operating results.
E.
|
Critical Accounting Estimates
|
Critical accounting estimates are those estimates made in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles that involve a significant level of estimation uncertainty and
have had or are reasonably likely to have a material impact on our financial condition or results of operations. We prepare our financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP. On a regular basis, management reviews the accounting policies,
assumptions, estimates and judgments to ensure that our financial statements are presented fairly and in accordance with U.S. GAAP. However, because future events and their effects cannot be determined with certainty, actual results could differ
from our assumptions and estimates, and such differences could be material. For a description of our significant accounting policies, please read Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report and “Item 18.
Financial Statements” in this Annual Report.
Mezzanine equity
As discussed in Note 8 of our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report, the Company has issued as part of the Spin-Off to Castor 140,000 Series A
Preferred Shares.
The Series A Preferred Shares are convertible, in whole or in part, at their holder’s option, to common shares at any time and from time to time from and after the
third anniversary of their issue date and prior to the seventh anniversary of the issue date of March 7, 2023. For each quarterly dividend period commencing on or after
the seventh anniversary of the issue date, the dividend rate on the Series A Preferred Shares will be the dividend rate in effect for the prior quarterly dividend period multiplied by a factor of 1.3; provided, however, that the dividend rate
will not exceed 20% per annum in respect of any quarterly dividend period. Dividends are subject to declaration by the Board or any authorized committee thereof and may be paid only out of legally available funds for such purpose.
Castor, a related party, is the holder of all of our issued and outstanding Series A Preferred Shares. The Series A Preferred Shares have been classified in Mezzanine equity as
per ASC 480-10-S99 “Distinguishing liabilities from Equity – SEC Materials” as they are in essence redeemable at the option of the holder as Mr. Panagiotidis, the Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and controlling shareholder of us and Castor, who
can effectively determine the timing of the redemption of the Series A Preferred Shares.
The fair value of Series A Preferred Shares on initial recognition was determined through Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy as defined in FASB guidance for Fair Value
Measurements (ASC 820). Determining the fair value of the mezzanine equity requires management to make judgments about the valuation methodologies, including the unobservable inputs and other assumptions and estimates, which are significant in
the fair value measurement of mezzanine equity. For the estimation of the fair value of the mezzanine equity, we used the Black & Scholes and the discounted cash flow model and we also used significant unobservable inputs which are sensitive
in nature and subject to uncertainty, such as expected volatility.
Vessel Impairment
The Company reviews for impairment on its vessels held and used whenever events or changes in circumstances (such as market conditions, obsolescence or damage to the asset,
potential sales and other business plans) may result in the fair value of a vessel being less than its carrying amount indicating that the carrying amount of the assets may not be recoverable. When the estimate of undiscounted cash flows,
excluding interest charges, expected to be generated by the use of the asset is less than its carrying amount, including the value of unamortized dry-docking costs, we are required to evaluate the asset for an impairment loss. Measurement of the
impairment loss is based on the fair value of the asset.
The carrying values of our vessels may not represent their fair market value at any point in time since the market prices of second-hand vessels tend to fluctuate with changes in
charter rates and the cost of newbuilds. Historically, both charter rates and vessel values tend to be cyclical, including for the reasons discussed under the headings “—Charter rates for our vessels are volatile
and cyclical in nature. A decrease in charter rates may adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results”, “—Charter rates for tanker vessels are volatile and cyclical in nature.
A decrease in tanker charter rates may adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results” and “—Charter rates for LPG carriers are volatile and cyclical in nature. A decrease in
LPG carrier charter rates may adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results” in “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors”.
Our estimates of basic market value assume that the vessels are all in good and seaworthy condition without need for repair and, if inspected, would be certified in class without
notations of any kind. Our estimates are based on the estimated market values for the vessels received from a third-party independent shipbroker approved by our financing providers. Vessel values are highly volatile. Accordingly, our estimates
may not be indicative of the current or future basic market value of the vessels or prices that could be achieved if the vessels were to be sold.
We perform undiscounted cash flow tests when necessary, as an impairment analysis, in which we made estimates and assumptions relating to determining the projected undiscounted
net operating cash flows by considering the following:
|
• |
the charter revenues from existing time charters for the fixed fleet days;
|
|
• |
the estimated vessel operating expenses and voyage expenses;
|
|
• |
the estimated dry-docking expenditures;
|
|
• |
an estimated gross daily charter rate for the unfixed days (based on the ten-year average of the historical one-year time charter rates available for each type of vessel) over the remaining economic life of each
vessel, excluding estimated days of scheduled off-hires and net of estimated commissions;
|
|
• |
the residual value of vessels;
|
|
• |
commercial and technical management fees;
|
|
• |
an estimated utilization rate; and
|
|
• |
the remaining estimated lives of our vessels, consistent with those used in our depreciation calculations.
|
As of December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2023, the charter-free market value of all our vessels exceeded their carrying value. Thus, no undiscounted cash flow tests were deemed
necessary to be performed for any of our vessels. Therefore, for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2023, this is not considered a critical accounting estimate.
ITEM 6. |
DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES
|
A.
|
Directors and Senior Management
|
Set forth below are the names, ages and positions of our directors and executive officer. Our Board currently consists of three directors. Our Board is divided into
three classes of directors (Class A, Class B and Class C). Our Class A, Class B and Class C directors’ initial terms expire at the first, second and third annual meeting of shareholders held after March 7, 2023, respectively. Following the
expiration of our directors initial terms, directors shall be elected annually on a staggered basis thereafter and each director will hold office until the third succeeding annual general meeting from their
election and until his or her successor is elected and has qualified, except in the event of such director’s death, resignation, removal or the earlier termination of his or her term of office. Concurrent
with the Distribution, we appointed Petros Zavakopoulos as Class A director, Angelos Rounick Platanias as Class B director and Petros Panagiotidis as Class C director. If the number of directors on our Board is changed, any increase or decrease
shall be apportioned among the classes so as to maintain or attain a number of directors in each class as nearly equal as reasonably possible. The business address of each of our directors and executive officer listed below is 223 Christodoulou
Chatzipavlou Street, Hawaii Royal Gardens, 3036 Limassol, Cyprus.
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position
|
Petros Panagiotidis
|
|
33
|
|
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Class C Director
|
Angelos Rounick Platanias
|
|
33
|
|
Secretary and Class B Director
|
Petros Zavakopoulos
|
|
32
|
|
Class A Director
|
Ioannis E. Lazaridis
|
|
56
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
Certain biographical information with respect to each director and senior management of the Company listed above is set forth below.
Petros Panagiotidis, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Class C Director
Petros Panagiotidis is the founder of Toro Corp. He has been serving as the Company’s Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer since we became an independent, publicly
listed company on March 7, 2023. With his expertise in shipping and extensive experience in capital markets he navigates the Company’s strategic path and overall management, driving operational excellence and ensuring sustainable growth.
Additionally, Mr. Panagiotidis is the founder of Castor Maritime Inc. and since its inception in 2017, he has been serving as its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Panagiotidis holds a Bachelor’s degree in International
Studies and Mathematics from Fordham University and a Master’s degree in Management and Systems from New York University. In 2023, Mr. Panagiotidis received the Lloyd’s List Next Generation Shipping Award in recognition for his achievements
within the maritime sector.
Angelos Rounick Platanias, Secretary and Class B Director
Angelos Rounick Platanias has been a non-executive member and Secretary of our Board since the Distribution and serves as a member of the Company’s Audit Committee. Mr. Rounick
Platanias is currently employed as Senior Director of Strategy for Retail Markets at NextEra Energy Resources, a diversified clean energy company with an emphasis on power generation and a major producer of wind and solar energy globally and has
gained experience across various energy sectors, including oil and gas and power. Prior to his current role, Mr. Rounick Platanias was employed by McKinsey & Co. as a strategy and operations consultant with a focus on clients in global energy
markets. He holds a Master’s degree in Energy Trade and Finance, from the Costas Grammenos Center for Shipping Trade and Finance at London’s Bayes Business School, as well as a Bachelor’s degree in Robotics Engineering from Worcester Polytechnic
Institute.
Petros Zavakopoulos, Class A Director
Petros Zavakopoulos has been a non-executive member of our Board since the Distribution and serves as Chairman of the Company’s Audit Committee. Mr. Zavakopoulos also currently
serves as Chairman and Managing Director of Cosmomed S.A., a leading manufacturer and distributor of medical and personal protective products in Southeast Europe, and sits on the board of directors of Leoussis S.A. and F. Bosch International
Limited, two companies operating in the healthcare space. Previously, he was based in Florida, USA and worked as a member of the sales team at Sempermed USA, Inc., a globally integrated manufacturer of medical and industrial gloves. Mr.
Zavakopoulos holds a Bachelor’s degree in Economics from the University of Amsterdam.
Ioannis E. Lazaridis, Chief Financial Officer
Mr. Lazaridis has served as our Chief Financial Officer since the Distribution. Mr. Lazaridis is currently Chief Financial Officer of Castor Ships S.A. and previously, has served
in various managerial and directorial capacities for shipping companies, including as non-executive Chairman of the board of directors of Capital Product Partners L.P., as Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Capital Product
Partners L.P.’s general partner, Capital GP L.L.C., as President of NYSE-listed Crude Carriers Corp. prior to its merger with Capital Product Partners L.P. and as Chief Financial Officer of Capital Maritime & Trading Corp. Between 1990 and
2004 Mr. Lazaridis was employed by Crédit Agricole Indosuez Cheuvreux, Kleinwort Benson Securities and Norwich Union Investment Management in various positions related to equity sales and portfolio management. Mr. Lazaridis holds a Bachelor’s
degree in Economics from the University of Thessaloniki in Greece, a Master’s of Arts in Finance from the University of Reading in the United Kingdom and is a Chartered Financial Analyst of each of the CFA Institutes of the United Kingdom and the
CFA Institute of the United States.
The services rendered by our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Petros Panagiotidis, are included in the Master Management Agreement
with Castor Ships and we provide no separate compensation to him. For a full description, please refer to “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—B. Related Party Transactions” below.
We pay our non-executive directors fees in the aggregate amount of $40,000 per annum, or $20,000 per director per annum, plus reimbursement for their out-of-pocket expenses. Our Chief Executive Officer, who also serves as our director, does not
receive additional compensation for his service as director.
Equity Incentive Plan
On September 6, 2023, our Board adopted the Equity Incentive Plan under which directors, officers and employees (including any prospective director, officer or employee) of the
Company and/or its subsidiaries and affiliates and consultants and service providers to (including persons who are employed by or provide services to any entity that is itself a consultant or service provider to) the Company and its subsidiaries
and affiliates, are eligible to receive awards including (a) non-qualified stock options, (b) stock appreciation rights, (c) restricted stock, (d) restricted stock unit, (e) dividend equivalents, (f) cash awards, (g) unrestricted stock and (h)
other equity-based or equity-related Awards. The purpose of the Equity Incentive Plan is to provide the foregoing persons, whose initiative and efforts are deemed to be important to the successful conduct of our business, with incentives to enter
into and remain in service to us and our affiliates and to align such person’s interests with our own and enhance long-term performance. The Equity Incentive Plan is administered by the Board and the aggregate number of common shares that may be
issued with respect to awards granted under the Equity Incentive Plan cannot exceed the 2,000,000 common shares. The Board may terminate the Equity Incentive Plan at any time.
On September 28, 2023, a total of 1,240,000 restricted common shares had been granted under the Equity Incentive Plan to directors, officers and non–employees,
1,100,000 restricted common shares of which were awarded to our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Petros Panagiotidis, pursuant to the Equity Incentive Plan and the Restricted Stock Award Agreement, dated as of September 28, 2023, between
us and Mr. Panagiotidis (the “Restricted Stock Award Agreement”). The remaining 140,000 restricted common shares were awarded to directors, officers and non–employees. The restricted common shares
granted to Mr. Panagiotidis under the Restricted Stock Award Agreement are not subject to any performance conditions and will vest in full and their applicable restrictions shall lapse immediately upon (i) Mr. Panagiotidis’ death or Disability or
(ii) a Change of Control, in each case as defined in the Equity Incentive Plan. The fair value of each restricted share was $5.83, based on the closing price of our common
shares on the grant date. Non-vested restricted common shares granted under the Equity Incentive Plan are entitled to receive dividends, which are not refundable even if such shares are forfeited.
As of the date of this Annual Report, no shares have vested from the Equity Incentive Plan. Under the Restricted Stock Award Agreement, 500,000 restricted common shares awarded to
Mr. Panagiotidis will vest on September 28, 2024, 300,000 restricted common shares will vest on September 28, 2025 and the remaining 300,000 restricted common shares will vest on September 28, 2026, unless the conditions for vesting set forth in
the Restricted Stock Award Agreement are not met prior to each respective vesting date. See “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—B. Related Party
Transactions” and Note 11 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report for further information.
Our Board currently consists of three directors who are elected annually on a staggered basis. Each director holds office for a three-year term or until his successor is duly
elected and qualified, except in the event of his death, resignation, removal or the earlier termination of his term of office. Our directors do not have service contracts and do not receive any benefits upon termination of their directorships.
Our audit committee comprises our independent directors, Angelos Rounick Platanias and Petros Zavakopoulos. Our Board has determined that the members of the audit committee meet
the applicable independence requirements of the SEC and the Nasdaq Stock Market Rules. Our Board has determined that Mr. Zavakopoulos is an “Audit Committee Financial Expert” under the SEC’s rules and the corporate governance rules of the Nasdaq
Capital Market. The audit committee is responsible for our external financial reporting function as well as for selecting and meeting with our independent registered public accountants regarding, among other matters, audits and the adequacy of
our accounting and control systems.
Officers are appointed from time to time by our Board and hold office until a successor is appointed.
We have no employees. Our vessels are commercially and technically managed by Castor Ships. For further details, see “Item 7. Major Shareholders
and Related Party Transactions—B. Related Party Transactions—Management, Commercial and Administrative Services.”
With respect to the total amount of common shares owned by all of our officers and directors individually and as a group, please see “Item 7.
Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—A. Major Shareholders.” Please also see “Item 10. Additional Information—B. Memorandum and Articles of Association” for a description of the
rights of the holder of our Series A Preferred Shares and Series B Preferred Shares relative to the rights of holders of our common shares.
F.
|
Disclosure of a Registrant’s Action to Recover Erroneously Awarded Compensation
|
Not applicable.
ITEM 7. |
MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
|
Certain information regarding beneficial ownership of 5% or more of our common shares and equity ownership by our directors and officers is reported below. Information regarding
beneficial ownership of our common shares is based on information available to us, including information contained in public filings.
The percentage of beneficial ownership and the following discussion is based on 18,501,439 common shares outstanding, net of
476,970 treasury shares, as of February 29, 2024.
Name of Beneficial Owner
|
|
No. of Common Shares
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
Pani Corp. (1)
|
|
|
9,611,240
|
|
|
|
51.9
|
%
|
All executive officers and directors (other than Petros Panagiotidis) as a group(2)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
%
|
(1) |
Pani Corp. is a corporation organized under the laws of the Republic of Liberia. Pani is controlled by the Company’s Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer, Petros Panagiotidis. As of February 29, 2024, Mr. Panagiotidis beneficially owns 9,611,240 common shares, which includes 11,240 common shares acquired by Pani from Thalassa Investment Co. S.A., an entity controlled by Mr.
Panagiotidis, on April 25, 2023. The 9,611,240 common shares represent 51.9% of common shares outstanding, net of treasury shares, as of February 29, 2024. Mr. Panagiotidis also beneficially owns through Pelagos 40,000 of the Company’s
Series B Preferred Shares, representing all such Series B Preferred Shares outstanding, each Series B Preferred Share having the voting power of 100,000 common shares. For further information regarding the Series B Preferred Shares,
refer to “Item 10. Additional Information—B. Memorandum and Articles of Association.” Mr. Panagiotidis therefore beneficially owns 51.7% of the
Company’s total outstanding share capital, net of treasury shares and controls 99.8% of the aggregate voting power of the Company’s total issued and outstanding share capital, net of treasury shares.
|
(2) |
Excluding Petros Panagiotidis, none of the directors and executive officers individually, nor taken as a group, hold more than 1% of the outstanding common shares.
|
All of our common shareholders are entitled to one vote for each common share held. As of February 29, 2024 there were 11 holders of record of Toro’s common shares, seven of which
have a U.S. mailing address. One of these holders is Cede & Co., a nominee company for The Depository Trust Company, which held approximately 47.3% of Toro’s outstanding common shares, net of treasury shares, as of the same date. The
beneficial owners of the common shares held by Cede & Co. may include persons who reside outside the United States.
B.
|
Related Party Transactions
|
From time to time, we have entered into agreements and have consummated transactions with certain related parties. We may enter into related party transactions from time to time
in the future. Related party transactions are subject to review and approval of a special committee composed solely of independent members of our Board.
Management, Commercial and Administrative Services
Our vessels are commercially and technically managed by Castor Ships, a company controlled by our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer under the Master Management Agreement
entered into between Toro, Toro’s shipowning subsidiaries and Castor Ships with effect as of the date of the Distribution. Prior to our separation from Castor, the vessels owned by the Toro Subsidiaries were commercially and technically managed
by Castor Ships pursuant to the Amended and Restated Master Management Agreement between Castor and Castor Ships, effective July 1, 2022, which is in substantially the same form as the Master Management Agreement described herein. The following
is a summary of the Master Management Agreement and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the relevant agreement, which is attached as an exhibit hereto and incorporated by reference into this Annual Report. Refer to Note
3 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report for further information.
Castor Ships manages our business overall and provides us with a wide range of shipping services such as crew management, technical management, operational employment management,
insurance management, provisioning, bunkering, accounting and audit support services, commercial, chartering and administrative services, including, but not limited to, securing employment for our fleet, arranging and supervising the vessels’
commercial operations, providing technical assistance where requested in connection with the sale of a vessel, negotiating loan and credit terms for new financing upon request and providing cybersecurity and general corporate and administrative
services, among other matters. Castor Ships is generally not liable to us for any loss, damage, delay or expense incurred during the provision of the foregoing services, except insofar as such events arise from Castor Ships or its employees’
fraud, gross negligence or willful misconduct (for which our recovery will be limited to two times the Flat Management Fee, as defined below). Notwithstanding the foregoing, Castor Ships is in no circumstances responsible for the actions of the
crews of our vessels. We have also agreed to indemnify Castor Ships in certain circumstances. Under the terms of the Master Management Agreement, our shipowning subsidiaries have also entered into separate management agreements appointing Castor
Ships as commercial and technical manager of their vessels (collectively, the “Ship Management Agreements”).
Castor Ships may choose to subcontract some of these services to other parties at its discretion. As of the date of this Annual Report, Castor Ships has subcontracted the
technical management of all of our vessels to a third-party ship-management company, except for the M/T Wonder Mimosa, which Castor Ships has directly provided technical management services to since June
7, 2023. Castor Ships pays, at its own expense, these third-party management companies a fee for the services it has subcontracted to them, without burdening the Company with any additional cost.
In exchange for these services, we pay Castor Ships (i) a flat quarterly management fee in the amount of $0.8 million for the management
and administration of our business (the “Flat Management Fee”) , (ii) a commission of 1.25% on all gross income received from the operation of our vessels, and (iii) a commission of 1% on each consummated sale and purchase transaction. In
addition, each of our vessel-owning subsidiaries pays Castor Ships a daily fee of $1,039 per vessel for the provision of commercial and technical ship management services provided under the Ship Management Agreements (the “Ship Management Fee”).
The Ship Management Fee and Flat Management Fee are adjusted annually for inflation on each anniversary of the Master Management Agreement’s effective date and, in accordance with the terms of the Master Management Agreement, the Ship Management
Fee increased from $975 per vessel per day to $1,039 per vessel per day and the Flat Management Fee increased from $0.75 million to $0.8 million effective July 1, 2023. We may also reimburse Castor Ships for extraordinary fees and costs, such as
the costs of repairs, maintenance or structural changes to our vessels.
The Master Management Agreement has a term of eight years from its effective date and this term automatically renews for a successive
eight-year term on each anniversary of the effective date, starting from the first anniversary of the effective date, unless the agreements are terminated earlier in accordance with the provisions contained therein. In the event that the Master
Management Agreement is terminated by the Company or is terminated by Castor Ships due to a material breach of the Master Management Agreement by the Company or a change of control in the Company (including certain business combinations, such as
a merger or the disposal of all or substantially all of our assets or changes in key personnel such as our current directors or Chief Executive Officer), Castor Ships is entitled to a termination fee equal to seven times the total amount of the
Flat Management Fee calculated on an annual basis. This termination fee is in addition to any termination fees provided for under each Ship Management Agreement.
The V8 Plus Pool
In the period between September 30, 2022, and December 12, 2022, the M/T Wonder Polaris, M/T Wonder Sirius, M/T Wonder Bellatrix, M/T Wonder Musica, M/T Wonder Avior and M/T Wonder
Vega, entered into a series of separate agreements with V8 Pool Inc. (“V8”), a member of the Navig8 Group of companies, for the participation of the vessels in the V8 Plus Pool. Under the terms of the respective agreements, the vessels
participated in the V8 Plus Pool for a minimum period of six months. During the period of the vessels’ participation, each was provided with certain commercial management services and entered into charters by the pool manager. In return for such
services, the pool manager was entitled to a $250 daily fee and customary 2% commission on all income received under charters and contracts of affreightment. The relevant Toro Subsidiary received its proportional share of pool revenues, subject
to adjustments for expenses, among other factors. Each Toro Subsidiary was entitled to elect one voting representative to the pool’s committee, which approved (i) the basis for calculating pool costs and (ii) requirements under which pool
participants could have been required to make additional contributions to the pool’s working capital. Certain of the agreements contained trading restrictions for vessels not yet fully equipped with BWTS. The agreement was negotiated and approved
by a special committee of independent disinterested directors.
In February 2023, the agreement relating to the M/T Wonder Sirius’s participation in the V8 Plus Pool was terminated and the vessel
commenced a period time charter. In December 2023, after the termination of the period time charter, the M/T Wonder Sirius was entered back into V8 Plus Pool. The V8 Plus Pool is managed by V8 Plus
Management Pte Ltd., a company in which Petros Panagiotidis has a minority equity interest. Following the sales of the M/T Wonder Bellatrix and M/T Wonder Polaris
in the second quarter of 2023, the M/T Wonder Avior and M/T Wonder Musica in the third quarter of 2023, the M/T Wonder Vega
in the fourth quarter of 2023 and the M/T Wonder Sirius in January 2024, the foregoing vessels’ respective pool agreements with the V8 Plus Pool were terminated.
The Spin-Off Resolutions
On November 15, 2022 and December 30, 2022, our Board resolved among other things, (i) to focus our efforts on our current business of tanker shipping services, (ii) that we have
no interest or expectancy to participate or pursue any opportunity in areas of business outside of the tanker shipping business and (iii) that Petros Panagiotidis, our director, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and controlling shareholder and
his affiliates, such as Castor Ships, are not required to offer or inform us of any such opportunity. The foregoing Toro Spin-Off Resolutions do not preclude us, however, from pursuing opportunities outside of the tanker shipping business if in
the future our Board determines to do so. Nevertheless, focusing our operations on tanker and LPG carrier shipping may reduce the scope of opportunities we may exploit.
Similarly on November 15, 2022 and December 30, 2022, Castor’s board resolved, among other things, (i) to focus its efforts on its current business of dry bulk shipping services,
(ii) that Castor has no interest or expectancy to participate or pursue any opportunity in areas of business outside of the dry bulk shipping business and (iii) that Petros Panagiotidis, its director, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, Chief
Financial Officer and controlling shareholder and his affiliates are not required to offer or inform it of any such opportunity (such resolutions, the “Castor Spin-Off Resolutions”). This does not preclude Castor from pursuing opportunities
outside of its declared business focus area, including in the tanker shipping business, if in the future Castor’s board determines to do so and it has since entered into the container shipping sector.
Mr. Panagiotidis will continue to devote such portion of his business time and attention to our business as is appropriate and will also continue to devote substantial time to
Castor’s business and other business and/or investment activities that Mr. Panagiotidis maintains now or in the future. Mr. Panagiotidis’ intention to provide adequate time and attention to other ventures will preclude him from devoting
substantially all his time to our business. Our Board and Castor’s board have each resolved to accept this arrangement.
Contribution and Spin-Off Distribution Agreement
The following description of the Contribution and Spin-Off Distribution Agreement does not purport to be complete and is subject to, and qualified in its entirety by reference to,
the Contribution and Spin-Off Distribution Agreement, which is included as an exhibit to this Annual Report and incorporated by reference herein. The terms of the transactions which are the subject of the Contribution and Spin-Off Distribution
Agreement were negotiated and approved by the Special Committee.
We entered into the Contribution and Spin-Off Distribution Agreement with Castor, pursuant to which (i) Castor contributed the Toro Subsidiaries to us in exchange for all our
9,461,009 common shares at the time and 140,000 Series A Preferred Shares and the issue of 40,000 Series B Preferred Shares to Pelagos against payment of their nominal value, (ii) Castor agreed to indemnify us and our vessel-owning subsidiaries
for any and all obligations and other liabilities arising from or relating to the operation, management or employment of vessels or subsidiaries it retains after to the Distribution Date and we agreed to indemnify Castor for any and all
obligations and other liabilities arising from or relating to the operation, management or employment of the vessels contributed to us or our vessel-owning subsidiaries, and (iii) we agreed to replace and replaced Castor as guarantor under the
$18.0 million term loan facility. The Contribution and Spin-Off Distribution Agreement also provided for the settlement or extinguishment of certain liabilities and other obligations between us and Castor.
Under the Contribution and Spin-Off Distribution Agreement, Castor distributed all of our 9,461,009 common shares at the time to holders of its common shares, with one of our
common shares being distributed for every ten shares of Castor’s common shares held by Castor stockholders as of the close of business on February 22, 2023 (the “Record Date”).
Further, the Contribution and Spin-Off Distribution Agreement provides for certain registration rights to Castor relating to the common shares, if any, issued upon conversion of
the Series A Preferred Shares (the “Registerable Securities”). Such securities will cease to be registerable by us upon the earliest of (i) their sale pursuant to an effective registration statement, (ii) their eligibility for sale or sale
pursuant to Rule 144 of the Securities Act, and (iii) the time at which they cease to be outstanding. Subject to Castor timely providing us with all information and documents reasonably requested by us in connection with such filings and to
certain blackout periods, we have agreed to file, as promptly as practicable and in any event no later than 30 calendar days after a request by Castor, one or more registration statements to register Registrable Securities then held by Castor and
to use our reasonable best efforts to have each such registration statement declared effective as soon as practicable after such filing and keep such registration statement continuously effective until such registration rights terminate. All fees
and expenses incident to our performance of our obligations in connection with such registration rights shall be borne solely by us and Castor shall pay any transfer taxes and fees and expenses of its counsel relating to a sale of Registrable
Securities. These registration rights shall terminate on (i) the date occurring after the seventh anniversary of the original issue date of the Series A Preferred Shares on which Castor owns no Registrable Securities or (ii) if earlier, the date
on which Castor owns no Series A Preferred Shares and no Registerable Securities.
Any and all agreements and commitments, currently existing between us and our subsidiaries, on the one hand, and Castor and its subsidiaries, on the other hand, terminated as of
March 7, 2023. None of these arrangements and commitments is deemed material to the Company. In particular, our vessel-owning subsidiaries ceased to be parties to the Amended and Restated Master Management Agreement and entered into the Master
Management Agreement with Toro and Castor Ships described above. Our vessel-owning subsidiaries ceased to be party to certain custodial and Cash Pooling Deeds entered into individually by each of such subsidiaries and Castor Maritime SCR Corp.
and entered into substantively similar cash management and custodial arrangements with our wholly owned treasury subsidiary, Toro RBX Corp. Under the Contribution and Spin-Off Distribution Agreement, we also agreed to reimburse Castor for
transaction expenses incurred in connection with our separation from Castor, such as adviser and filing fees. Following the Spin-Off, the Company reimbursed Castor $2,694,646 for expenses related to the Spin-Off that were incurred by Castor. As
of December 31, 2023, there were no outstanding expenses to be reimbursed by the Company under the Contribution and Spin-Off Distribution Agreement.
Purchase of Common Shares by Pani
The following description of the Subscription Agreement (as defined herein) does not purport to be complete and is subject to, and qualified in its entirety by reference to the
Subscription Agreement, which is included as an exhibit to this Annual Report and incorporated by reference herein.
On April 17, 2023, Toro entered into a subscription agreement (the “Subscription Agreement”) with Pani, a company controlled by our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, pursuant
to which Toro issued and sold, and Pani purchased, 8,500,000 common shares at a purchase price of $2.29 per share for gross proceeds of $19,465,000, less issuance costs of $817,764. The 8,500,000 common shares were issued on April 19, 2023 in a
private placement pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act and Regulation D promulgated thereunder. As of February 29, 2024, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer beneficially owns through Pani 51.9% of our outstanding common shares,
net of treasury shares, and controls 99.8% of the aggregate voting power of the Company’s total issued and outstanding share capital, net of treasury shares. See “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party
Transactions—A. Major Shareholders” for further details.
The Subscription Agreement contains customary representations, warranties, and covenants of each party. We granted Pani certain customary registration rights with respect to the
common shares purchased thereunder and, following the exercise of such rights by Pani, we filed on November 13, 2023 a registration statement on Form F-3 relating to the possible offer and sale from time to time of up to 8,500,000 common shares
by Pani.
Dividends to Castor on the Series A Preferred Shares
As discussed under “Item 4. Information on the Company—A. History and Development of the Company—Spin-Off from Castor”, which discussion
is incorporated by reference herein, in connection with the Spin-Off Toro issued 140,000 Series A Preferred Shares to Castor on March 7, 2023. As of December 31, 2023, we had paid to Castor a dividend amounting to $851,667 on the Series A
Preferred Shares for the period from March 7, 2023 to October 14, 2023 and the accrued amount for the period from October 15, 2023 to December 31, 2023 (included in the dividend period ended January 14, 2024) amounted to $315,000. Refer to “Item 10. Additional Information—B. Memorandum and Articles of Incorporation—Description of the Series A Preferred Shares” for further information regarding the terms of the Series A Preferred Shares.
Purchase by the Company of 5.00% Series D Cumulative Perpetual Convertible Preferred Shares of Castor
On August 7, 2023, we agreed to purchase 50,000 Castor Series D Preferred Shares for aggregate cash consideration of $50.0 million. The distribution rate on the Castor Series D
Preferred Shares is 5.00% per annum, which rate will be multiplied by a factor of 1.3 on the seventh anniversary of the issue date of the Series D Preferred Shares and annually thereafter, subject to a maximum distribution rate of 20% per annum
in respect of any quarterly dividend period. Dividends on the Castor Series D Preferred Shares are payable quarterly in arrears on the 15th day of January, April,
July and October in each year, subject to approval by the board of directors of Castor. The first payment date occurred on October 16, 2023 and we received a dividend on the Castor Series D Preferred Shares amounting to $0.5 million.
The Castor Series D Preferred Shares are convertible, in whole or in part, at our option into common shares of Castor from the first anniversary of the issue date of
the Castor Series D Preferred Shares at the lower of (i) $0.70 per common shares and (ii) the 5 day value weighted average price immediately preceding the conversion. The conversion price of the Castor Series D Preferred Shares is subject to
adjustment upon the occurrence of certain events, including the occurrence of splits and combinations (including a reverse stock split) of the common shares. The minimum conversion price is $0.30 per common share of Castor.
This transaction and its terms were approved by the independent members of the board of directors of each of Castor and Toro at the recommendation of their respective special
committees composed of independent and disinterested directors, which negotiated the transaction and its terms.
Grant of Restricted Common Shares to our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
On September 6, 2023, our Board adopted the Equity Incentive Plan, permitting the grant of up to 2,000,000 common shares to eligible participants. See “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—B. Liquidity and Capital Resources—Equity Transactions” and “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—B. Compensation” for a
description of the Equity Incentive Plan. See also Note 11 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report for further information.
C.
|
Interests of Experts and Counsel
|
Not applicable.
ITEM 8. |
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
A.
|
Consolidated Statements and other Financial Information
|
Please see “Item 18. Financial Statements.”
Legal Proceedings
To our knowledge, we are not currently a party to any legal proceedings that, if adversely determined, would have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of
operations or liquidity. As such, we do not believe that pending legal proceedings, taken as a whole, should have any significant impact on our financial statements. We are, and from time to time in the future may be, subject to legal proceedings
and claims in the ordinary course of business, principally personal injury and property casualty claims. While we expect that these claims would be covered by our existing insurance policies, those claims, even if lacking merit, could result in
the expenditure of significant financial and managerial resources.
Dividend Policy
We are a recently formed company and have a limited performance record and operating history. Accordingly, we cannot assure you that we will be able to pay
dividends on our common shares at all, and our ability to pay dividends will be subject to the limitations set forth below and under “Item 3. Risk Factors—Risks Relating to our Common Shares—We do not have a
declared dividend policy and our Board may never declare dividends on our common shares.”
We do not have a declared dividend policy. Under our Bylaws, our Board may declare and pay dividends in cash, stock or other property of the Company. Any dividends
declared will be in the sole discretion of the Board and will depend upon factors such as earnings, increased cash needs and expenses, restrictions in any of our agreements (including our current and future credit facilities), overall market
conditions, current capital expenditure programs and investment opportunities, and the provisions of Marshall Islands law affecting the payment of distributions to shareholders (as described below), and will be subject to the priority of our
Series A Preferred Shares. The foregoing is not an exhaustive list of factors which may impact the payment of dividends.
Dividends on our Series A Preferred Shares accrue and are cumulative from their issue date and are payable quarterly, assuming dividends have been declared by our Board or any
authorized committee thereof out of legally available funds for such purpose. From, and including, their issue date to, but excluding, the seventh anniversary of the issue date (the “reset date”), the dividend rate for the Series A Preferred
Shares is 1.00% per annum of the stated amount of $1,000 per share; for each quarterly dividend period commencing on or after the reset date, the dividend rate will be the dividend rate in effect for the prior quarterly dividend period multiplied
by a factor of 1.3; provided, however, that the dividend rate will not exceed 20% per annum in respect of any quarterly dividend period. We may redeem the Series A Preferred Shares at any time on or after the reset date, in whole or in part, at a
redemption price of $1,000 per share plus an amount equal to all accumulated and unpaid dividends thereon to the date of redemption, whether or not declared. The rights of the holders of our Series A Preferred Shares rank senior to the
obligations to holders of our common shares. This means that, unless accumulated dividends have been paid or set aside for payment on all of our outstanding Series A Preferred Shares for all past completed dividend periods, no distributions may
be declared or paid on our common shares subject to limited exceptions.
The Series A Preferred Shares are convertible, in whole or in part, at their holder’s option, to common shares at any time and from time to time from and after the third
anniversary of their issue date and prior to the reset date. Subject to certain adjustments, the “Conversion Price” for any conversion of the Series A Preferred Shares shall be the lower of (i) 150% of the VWAP of our common shares over the five
consecutive trading day period commencing on and including March 7, 2023, and (ii) the VWAP of our Common Shares over the 10 consecutive trading day period expiring on the trading day immediately prior to the date of delivery of written notice of
the conversion; provided, that, in no event shall the Conversion Price be less than $2.50. The number of Common Shares to be issued to a converting holder shall be equal to the quotient of (i) the aggregate stated amount of the Series A Preferred
Shares converted plus Accrued Dividends (but excluding any dividends declared but not yet paid) thereon on the date on which the conversion notice is delivered divided by (ii) the Conversion Price.
In the event that we declare a dividend of the stock of a subsidiary which we control, the holder(s) of the Series B Preferred Shares are entitled to receive preferred shares of
such subsidiary. Such preferred shares will have at least substantially identical rights and preferences to our Series B Preferred Shares and will be issued pro rata to holder(s) of the Series B Preferred
Shares. The Series B Preferred Shares have no other dividend or distribution rights.
See “Item 10. Additional Information—B. Memorandum and Articles of Association” for more detailed descriptions of the Series A Preferred
Shares and Series B Preferred Shares.
Further, non-vested restricted common shares granted under the Equity Incentive Plan are entitled to receive dividends, which are not refundable even if such shares are forfeited.
Marshall Islands law provides that we may pay dividends on and redeem any shares of capital stock only to the extent that assets are legally available for such purposes. Legally
available assets generally are limited to our surplus, which essentially represents our retained earnings and the excess of consideration received by us for the sale of shares above the par value of the shares. In addition, under Marshall Islands
law, we may not pay dividends on or redeem any shares of capital stock if we are insolvent or would be rendered insolvent by the payment of such a dividend or the making of such redemption.
Any dividends paid by us may be treated as ordinary income to a U.S. shareholder. Please see the section entitled “Item 10. Additional
Information—E. Taxation—U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations—U.S. Federal Income Taxation of U.S. Holders—Distributions” for additional information relating to the U.S. federal income tax treatment of our dividend payments, if any are
declared in the future.
We have not paid any dividends to our shareholders as of the date of this Annual Report.
In January 2024, we used part of the proceeds of the sale of the M/T
Wonder Sirius to fully prepay the remaining outstanding balance of $5.3 million under the $18.0 million term loan facility, our only outstanding loan facility under which the M/T Wonder Sirius served as security. As a result, we have no outstanding indebtedness under any facility as of the date of this Annual Report. Further, as a result of the sale, we no longer have any
Aframax/LR2 vessels and management has determined that, with effect from the second quarter of 2024, we operate in two reportable segments: (i) the Handysize tanker segment and (ii) the LPG carrier segment.
From January 1, 2024 and as of February 29, 2024, the Company repurchased 476,970 shares of common stock for aggregate consideration of $2.8 million under its share repurchase program.
There have been no significant changes since the date of our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report, other than those described above and in Note 18 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report.
ITEM 9. |
THE OFFER AND LISTING
|
A.
|
Offer and Listing Details
|
Our common shares, including their associated Preferred Share Purchase Rights under the Rights Agreement, currently trade on the Nasdaq Capital Market under the symbol “TORO”.
Not applicable.
Please see “Item 9. The Offer and Listing—A. Offer and Listing Details.”
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
ITEM 10. |
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
|
Not applicable.
B.
|
Memorandum and Articles of Association
|
Articles of Association and Bylaws
The following is a description of material terms of our Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws. Because this description is a summary, it does not contain all information that you
may find useful. For more complete information, you should read our Articles of Incorporation and our Bylaws, as amended, copies of which are filed as exhibits to this Annual Report and are incorporated herein by reference.
Any amendment to our Articles of Incorporation to alter our capital structure requires approval by an affirmative majority of the voting power of the total number of shares issued
and outstanding and entitled to vote thereon. Shareholders of any series or class of shares are entitled to vote upon any proposed amendment, whether or not entitled to vote thereon by the Articles of Incorporation, if such amendment would (i)
increase or decrease the par value of the shares of such series or class, or (ii) alter or change the powers, preferences or special rights of the shares of such series or class so as to adversely affect them. Such class vote would be conducted
in addition to the vote of all shares entitled to vote upon the amendment and requires approval by an affirmative majority of the voting power of the affected series or class.
Purpose
Our purpose is to engage in any lawful act or activity for which corporations may now or hereafter be organized under the BCA. However, in connection with the Spin-Off, our Board
has resolved to focus our efforts on our then-current business of tanker shipping services, though we have since expanded into LPG carrier services in accordance with such resolutions. See “Item 7. Major
Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—B. Related Party Transactions—The Spin-Off Resolutions” for further details. Our Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws, as amended, do not impose any limitations on the ownership rights of our
shareholders.
Shareholders’ Meetings
The time and place of our annual meeting of shareholders is determined by our Board. Our first annual meeting of shareholders was held on November 15, 2022. Special meetings of
the shareholders, unless otherwise prescribed by law, may be called for any purpose or purposes permitted under applicable law (i) at any time by the Chairman, Chief Executive Officer or President of the Company or a majority of the Board and
(ii) by shareholders holding more than 50% of the voting rights in the Company. No other person or persons are permitted to call a special meeting, unless otherwise prescribed by law. The Board may fix a record date of not more than sixty (60)
nor less than fifteen (15) days prior to the date of any meeting of shareholders.
Authorized Capitalization
Under our Articles of Incorporation, our authorized capital stock consists of 3,900,000,000 common shares, par value $0.001 per share and
100,000,000 preferred shares, par value $0.001 per share. As of December 31, 2023 and as of February 29, 2024, 19,021,758 and 18,978,409 common shares were issued and 18,978,409 and 18,501,439 common shares were outstanding, net of 43,349 and
476,970 common shares repurchased under the Repurchase Program and held by us as treasury shares and inclusive of 1,240,000 restricted common shares issued pursuant to Equity Incentive Plan, 140,000 Series A Preferred Shares were issued and
outstanding, 40,000 Series B Preferred Shares were issued and outstanding and no Series C Participating Preferred Shares were authorized, respectively. Authorization for the issuance of Series C Participating Preferred Shares in connection with
our Rights Agreement is valid until the expiry of such agreement. See “Item 10. Additional Information—B. Memorandum and Articles of Association—Shareholder Protection Rights Agreement” for additional
details.
On November 14, 2022, Castor, in its capacity as our sole shareholder, authorized our Board to effect one or more reverse stock splits of our common shares issued and outstanding
at the time of the reverse stock split at a cumulative exchange ratio of between one-for-two and one-for-five hundred shares. Our Board may determine, in its sole discretion, whether to implement any reverse stock split by filing an amendment to
our Articles of Incorporation, as well as the specific timing and ratio, within such approved range of ratios; provided that any such reverse stock split or splits are implemented prior to the Company’s annual meeting of shareholders in 2026.
This authorization was intended to provide us the means to maintain compliance with the continued listing requirements of the Nasdaq Capital Market, and in particular the minimum bid price requirement, if required, as well as to realize certain
beneficial effects of a higher trading price for our common shares, including the ability to appeal to certain investors and potentially increased trading liquidity under appropriate circumstances.
Description of the Common Shares
For a description of our common shares, see “Description of Common Shares” in Exhibit 2.2 (Description of Securities), which description is incorporated by reference herein. As of February 29, 2024, Pani, a corporation controlled by our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, owned 51.9% of our
outstanding common shares, net of treasury shares, which makes it more difficult to effect a change of control of us.
Preferred Shares
Our Articles of Incorporation authorize our Board to establish one or more series of preferred shares and to determine, with respect to any series of preferred shares, the terms
and rights of that series, including:
|
• |
the designation of the series;
|
|
• |
the number of shares of the series;
|
|
• |
the preferences and relative, participating, option or other special rights, if any, and any qualifications, limitations or restrictions of such series; and
|
|
• |
the voting rights, if any, of the holders of the series.
|
Description of the Series A Preferred Shares
The number of designated Series A Preferred Shares initially is 140,000 and the “stated amount” per Series A Preferred Share is $1,000. We have issued all Series A Preferred
Shares to Castor. The Series A Preferred Shares have the following characteristics:
|
• |
Ranking. With respect to the payment of dividends and distributions of assets upon any liquidation, dissolution or winding up, the Series A Preferred
shares rank (i) senior to our common shares, the Series B Preferred Shares and any class or series of our stock that ranks junior to the Series A Preferred Shares in the payment of dividends or in the distribution of assets upon our
liquidation, dissolution or winding up (together with our common stock, “Junior Stock”); (ii) senior to or on a parity with the Series C Preferred Shares and each other series of our preferred shares we may issue with respect to the
payment of dividends and distributions of assets upon any liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company; and (iii) junior to all existing and future indebtedness and other non-equity claims on us.
|
|
• |
Dividends. Holders of Series A Preferred Shares shall be entitled to receive, when, as and if declared by our Board, but only out of funds legally
available therefor, cumulative cash dividends at the Annual Rate and no more, payable quarterly in arrears on the 15th day of each January, April, July and October, respectively, in each year, beginning on April 15, 2023 (each, a
“Dividend Payment Date”), with respect to the Dividend Period ending on the day preceding such respective Dividend Payment Date, to holders of record on the 15th
calendar day before such Dividend Payment Date or such other record date not more than 30 days preceding such Dividend Payment Date fixed for that purpose by our Board (or a duly authorized committee of the Board) in advance of payment of
each particular dividend. The amount of the dividend per Series A Preferred Share for each Dividend Period will be calculated on the basis of a 360-day year consisting of twelve 30-day months.
|
“Annual Rate” means from, and including, the Issue Date to, but excluding, the seventh anniversary of the Issue Date (the “Reset Date”), 1.00% per annum of the stated amount.
For each Dividend Period commencing on or after the Reset Date, the Annual Rate shall be the Annual Rate in effect for the prior Dividend Period multiplied by a factor of 1.3; provided, however, that in no event will the Annual Rate on the Series
A Preferred Shares exceed 20% per annum in respect of any Dividend Period.
“Dividend Period” means each period commencing on (and including) a Dividend Payment Date and continuing to (but not including) the next succeeding Dividend Payment Date,
except that the first Dividend Period for the initial issuance of the Series A Preferred Shares shall commence on (and include) the Issue Date.
“Issue Date” means the Distribution Date.
|
• |
Restrictions on Dividends, Redemption and Repurchases. So long as any Series A Preferred Share remains outstanding, unless full Accrued Dividends on
all outstanding Series A Preferred Shares through and including the most recently completed Dividend Period have been paid or declared and a sum sufficient for the payment thereof has been set aside for payment, no dividend may be
declared or paid or set aside for payment, and no distribution may be made, on any Junior Stock, other than a dividend payable solely in stock that ranks junior to the Series A Preferred Shares in the payment of dividends and in the
distribution of assets on any liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company. “Accrued Dividends” means, with respect to Series A Preferred Shares, an amount computed at the Annual Rate from, as to each share, the date of issuance
of such share to and including the date to which such dividends are to be accrued (whether or not such dividends have been declared), less the aggregate amount of all dividends previously paid on such share.
|
So long as any Series A Preferred Share remains outstanding, unless full Accrued Dividends on all outstanding Series A Preferred Shares through and including the most
recently completed Dividend Period have been paid or declared and a sum sufficient for the payment thereof has been set aside for payment, no monies may be paid or made available for a sinking fund for the redemption or retirement of Junior
Stock, nor shall any shares of Junior Stock be purchased, redeemed or otherwise acquired for consideration by us, directly or indirectly, other than (i) as a result of (x) a reclassification of Junior Stock, or (y) the exchange or conversion of
one share of Junior Stock for or into another share of stock that ranks junior to the Series A Preferred Shares in the payment of dividends and in the distribution of assets on any liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company; or (ii)
through the use of the proceeds of a substantially contemporaneous sale of other shares of stock that rank junior to the Series A Preferred Shares in the payment of dividends and in the distribution of assets on any liquidation, dissolution or
winding up of the Company.
|
• |
Redemption. The Series A Preferred Shares are perpetual and have no maturity date. We may, at our option, redeem the Series A Preferred Shares in whole
or in part, at any time and from time to time after the Reset Date, at a cash redemption price equal to the stated amount, together with an amount equal to all Accrued Dividends to, but excluding, the redemption date.
|
|
• |
Conversion Rights. The Series A Preferred Shares are convertible, at their holder’s option, to common shares, in whole or in part, at any time and from
time to time from and after the third anniversary of the Issue Date until but excluding the Reset Date. Subject to certain adjustments, the “Conversion Price” for any conversion of the Series A Preferred Shares shall be the lower of (i)
150% of the VWAP of our common shares over the five consecutive trading day period commencing on and including the Distribution Date, and (ii) the VWAP of our common shares over the 10 consecutive trading day period expiring on the
trading day immediately prior to the date of delivery of written notice of the conversion; provided, that, in no event shall the Conversion Price be less than $2.50. The number of common shares to be issued to a converting holder shall be
equal to the quotient of (i) the aggregate stated amount of the Series A Preferred Shares converted plus Accrued Dividends (but excluding any dividends declared but not yet paid) thereon on the date on which the conversion notice is
delivered divided by (ii) the Conversion Price. Castor will have registration rights in relation to the common shares issued upon conversion. See “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party
Transactions—B. Related Party Transactions—Contribution and Spin-Off Distribution Agreement.” The Series A Preferred Shares otherwise are not convertible into or exchangeable for property or shares of any other series or class of
our capital stock.
|
|
• |
Liquidation Rights. In the event of any liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the affairs of the Company, whether voluntary or involuntary, before
any distribution or payment out of our assets may be made to or set aside for the holders of any Junior Stock, holders of Series A Preferred Shares will be entitled to receive out of our assets legally available for distribution to our
shareholders an amount equal to the stated amount per share ($1,000), together with an amount equal to all Accrued Dividends to the date of payment whether or not earned or declared (the “Liquidation Preference”). If the Liquidation
Preference has been paid in full to all holders of Series A Preferred Shares and all holders of any class or series of our stock that ranks on a parity with Series A Preferred Shares in the distribution of assets on liquidation,
dissolution or winding up of the Company, the holders of Junior Stock will be entitled to receive all of our remaining assets according to their respective rights and preferences.
|
|
• |
Voting Rights. Except as indicated below or otherwise required by law, the holders of the Series A Preferred Shares do not have any voting rights.
|
|
○ |
Right to Elect Directors on Nonpayment of Dividends. If and whenever dividends payable on Series A Preferred Shares or any class or series of our stock that ranks on a
parity with the Series A Preferred Shares in the payment of dividends (“Dividend Parity Stock”) having voting rights equivalent to those described in this paragraph (“Voting Parity Stock”) have not been declared and paid (or, in the case
of Series A Preferred Shares and Voting Parity Stock bearing dividends on a cumulative basis, shall be in arrears) in an aggregate amount equal to full dividends for at least six quarterly Dividend Periods or their equivalent (whether or
not consecutive) (a “Nonpayment Event”), the number of directors then constituting our Board shall be automatically increased by (i) one, if at such time the Board consists of eight or fewer directors or (ii) two, if at such time the
Board consists of nine or more directors, and the holders of Series A Preferred Shares, together with the holders of any outstanding Voting Parity Stock then entitled to vote for additional directors, voting together as a single class in
proportion to their respective stated amounts, shall be entitled to elect the additional director or two directors, as the case may be (the “Preferred Share Directors”); provided that our Board shall at no time include more than two
Preferred Share Directors (including, for purposes of this limitation, all directors that the holders of any series of voting preferred shares are entitled to elect pursuant to like voting rights). When (i) Accrued Dividends have been
paid (or declared and a sum sufficient for payment thereof set aside) in full on the Series A Preferred Shares after a Nonpayment Event, and (ii) the rights of holders of any Voting Parity Stock to participate in electing the Preferred
Share Directors shall have ceased, the right of holders of the Series A Preferred Shares to participate in the election of Preferred Share Directors shall cease (but subject always to the revesting of such voting rights in the case of any
future Nonpayment Event), the terms of office of all the Preferred Share Directors shall forthwith terminate, and the number of directors constituting our Board shall automatically be reduced accordingly. Any Preferred Share Director may
be removed at any time without cause by the holders of record of a majority of the outstanding Series A Preferred Shares and Voting Parity Stock, when they have the voting rights described above (voting together as a single class in
proportion to their respective stated amounts). The Preferred Share Directors shall each be entitled to one vote per director on any matter that shall come before our Board for a vote.
|
|
○ |
Other Voting Rights. So long as any Series A Preferred Shares are outstanding, in addition to any other
vote or consent of shareholders required by law or by our Articles of Incorporation, the vote or consent of the holders of at least two thirds of the Series A Preferred Shares at the time outstanding, voting together with any other
series of preferred shares that would be adversely affected in substantially the same manner and entitled to vote as a single class in proportion to their respective stated amounts (to the exclusion of all other series of preferred
shares), given in person or by proxy, either in writing without a meeting or by vote at any meeting called for the purpose, will be necessary for effecting or validating: (i) any amendment, alteration or repeal of any provision of our
Articles of Incorporation or Bylaws that would alter or change the voting powers, preferences or special rights of the Series A Preferred Shares so as to affect them adversely; (ii) the issuance of Dividend Parity Stock if the Accrued
Dividends on all outstanding Series A Preferred Shares through and including the most recently completed Dividend Period have not been paid or declared and a sum sufficient for the payment thereof has been set aside for payment; (iii)
any amendment or alteration of the Articles of Incorporation to authorize or create, or increase the authorized amount of, any shares of any class or series or any securities convertible into shares of any class or series of our capital
stock ranking prior to Series A in the payment of dividends or in the distribution of assets on any liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company; or (iv) any consummation of (x) a binding share exchange or reclassification
involving the Series A Preferred Shares, (y) a merger or consolidation of the Company with another entity (whether or not a corporation), or (z) a conversion, transfer, domestication or continuance of the Company into another entity or
an entity organized under the laws of another jurisdiction, unless in each case (A) the Series A Preferred Shares remain outstanding or, in the case of any such merger or consolidation with respect to which we are not the surviving or
resulting entity, or any such conversion, transfer, domestication or continuance, the Series A Preferred Shares are converted into or exchanged for preference securities of the surviving or resulting entity or its ultimate parent, and
(B) such shares remaining outstanding or such preference securities, as the case may be, have such rights, preferences, privileges and voting powers, and limitations and restrictions, and
limitations and restrictions thereof, taken as a whole, as are not materially less favorable to the holders thereof than the rights, preferences, privileges and voting powers, and restrictions and limitations thereof, of the Series A
Preferred Shares immediately prior to such consummation, taken as a whole. The foregoing voting rights do not apply in connection with the creation or issuance of Series C Participating Preferred Shares of the Company substantially in
the form approved by the Board in connection with the Shareholder Protection Rights Agreement.
|
|
• |
No Preemptive Rights; No Sinking Fund. Holders of the Series A Preferred Shares do not have any preemptive rights. The Series A Preferred Shares will
not be subject to any sinking fund or any other obligation of us for their repurchase or retirement.
|
The Series A Preferred Shares have been classified in Mezzanine equity as per ASC 480-10-S99 “Distinguishing liabilities from Equity – SEC Materials” as they are in essence
redeemable at the option of the holder as our Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and controlling shareholder, Mr. Panagiotidis, can effectively determine the timing of the redemption of the Series A Preferred Shares. For further information, see
Note 8 to our Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report.
Description of the Series B Preferred Shares
On March 7, 2023, we issued all of our 40,000 authorized Series B Preferred Shares to Pelagos. Pelagos is a company controlled by Petros Panagiotidis, our Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer and Castor’s Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. As a result, we are controlled by Mr. Panagiotidis, making it more difficult to effect a change of control of us.
The Series B Preferred Shares have the following characteristics:
|
• |
Conversion. The Series B Preferred Shares are not convertible into common shares.
|
|
• |
Distributions. In the event that we declare a dividend of the stock of a subsidiary which we control, the holder(s) of the Series B Preferred Shares
are entitled to receive preferred shares of such subsidiary. Such preferred shares will have at least substantially identical rights and preferences to our Series B Preferred Shares and be issued in an equivalent number to our Series B
Preferred Shares. The Series B Preferred Shares have no other dividend or distribution rights.
|
|
• |
Voting. Each Series B Preferred Share has the voting power of 100,000 common shares and counts for 100,000 votes for purposes of determining quorum at
a meeting of shareholders, subject to adjustment to maintain a substantially identical voting interest in Toro following the (i) creation or issuance of a new series of shares of the Company carrying more than one vote per share to be
issued to any person other than holders of the Series B Preferred Shares, except for the creation (but not the issuance) of Series C Participating Preferred Shares substantially in the form approved by the Board and included as an exhibit
to this Annual Report, without the prior affirmative vote of a majority of votes cast by the holders of the Series B Preferred Shares or (ii) issuance or approval of common shares pursuant to and in accordance with the Shareholder
Protection Rights Agreement. The Series B Preferred Shares vote together with the common shares as a single class, except that the Series B Preferred Shares vote separately as a class on amendments to the Articles of Incorporation that
would materially alter or change the powers, preference or special rights of the Series B Preferred Shares.
|
|
• |
Liquidation, Dissolution or Winding Up. Upon any liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company, the Series B Preferred Shares shall have the
same liquidation rights as and pari passu with the common shares up to their par value of $0.001 per share and, thereafter, the Series B Preferred Shares have no right to participate further in
the liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company.
|
Description of the Series C Participating Preferred Shares
As of the date of this Annual Report, no Series C Participating Preferred Shares were authorized in connection with our Rights Agreement (as defined below). See “Item 10. Additional Information—B. Memorandum and Articles—Shareholder Protection Rights Agreement.” If issued, the Series C Participating Preferred Shares will, among other things:
|
• |
entitle holders to dividend payments in an amount per share equal to the aggregate per share amount of all cash dividends, and the aggregate per share amount (payable in kind) of all non-cash dividends or other
distributions other than a dividend payable in our common shares or a subdivision of our outstanding common shares (by reclassification or otherwise) declared on our common shares; and
|
|
• |
entitle holders to 1,000 votes per Series C Participating Preferred Share on all matters submitted to a vote of the shareholders of the Company.
|
Each one one-thousandth of a Series C Participating Preferred Share issued in connection with the Rights Agreement should approximate the value of one common share.
Shareholder Protection Rights Agreement
On the Distribution Date, our Board declared a dividend of one preferred share purchase right (a “Right” or the “Rights”) for each outstanding common share and adopted a
shareholder rights plan, as set forth in the Shareholder Protection Rights Agreement (the “Rights Agreement”) entered into between the Company and Broadridge Corporate Issuer Solutions, Inc., as rights agent (the “Rights Agent”) on the same date.
Each Right trades with, and are inseparable from, our common shares, entitles the holder to purchase from the Company, for $22, one common share (or one one-thousandth of a share of Series C Participating Preferred Shares) and will become
exercisable following the earlier of (i) the tenth business day (or other date designated by resolution of the Board) after any person other than our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Petros Panagiotidis, or Mr. Panagiotidis’ controlled
affiliates commences a tender offer that would result in such person becoming the beneficial owner of a total of 15% or more of the common shares or (ii) the date of the “Flip-in” Trigger, as defined below. For additional details, see the Rights
Agreement included as an exhibit to this Annual Report.
The rights plan adopted under the Rights Agreement and the Rights have the following characteristics:
|
• |
Distribution and Transfer of the Rights. Our Board will declare a dividend of one Right for each share of our common shares outstanding. Prior to the
Separation Time referred to below, the Rights would be evidenced by and trade with our common shares and would not be exercisable. After the Separation Time, we would cause the Rights Agent to mail Rights certificates to shareholders and
the Rights would trade independent of the common shares. New Rights will accompany any new common shares of the Company issued after the Distribution until the Separation Time.
|
|
• |
Separation Time. Rights would separate from our common shares and become exercisable following the earlier of (i) the tenth (10) business day (or other
date designated by resolution of the Board) after any person (other than Mr. Panagiotidis or his controlled affiliates) commences a tender offer that would result in such person becoming the beneficial owner of a total of 15% or more of
the common shares or (ii) the date of the “Flip-in” Trigger.
|
|
• |
Exercise of the Rights. On or after the Separation Time, each Right would initially entitle the holder to purchase, for $22 (the “Exercise Price”), one
common share (or one one-thousandth of a share of Series C Participating Preferred Shares, such portion of a Series C Participating Preferred Share being designed to give the shareholder approximately the same dividend, voting and
liquidation rights as would one common share). Prior to exercise, the Right does not give its holder any dividend, voting, or liquidation rights.
|
|
• |
“Flip-in” Trigger. Upon public announcement by the Company that any person other than Mr. Panagiotidis or his controlled affiliates (an “Acquiring
Person”) has acquired 15% or more of our outstanding common shares:
|
|
(i) |
Rights owned by the Acquiring Person or transferees thereof would automatically be void; and
|
|
(ii) |
each other Right will automatically become a right to buy, for the Exercise Price, that number of common shares of the Company (or equivalent fractional shares of Series C Participating Preferred Shares) having
a market value of twice the Exercise Price.
|
|
• |
“Flip-over” Trigger. After an Acquiring Person has become such, (i) the Company may not consolidate or merge with any person, if the Company’s Board is
controlled by the Acquiring Person or the Acquiring Person is the beneficial owner of 50% or more of the outstanding shares of our common shares, and the transaction is with the Acquiring Person or its affiliate or associate or the shares
owned by the Acquiring Person are treated differently from those of other shareholders, and (ii) the Company may not sell 50% or more of its assets if the Company’s Board is controlled by the Acquiring Person unless in either case proper
provision is made so that each Right would thereafter become a right to buy, for the Exercise Price, that number of common shares of such other person having a market value of twice the Exercise Price.
|
|
• |
Redemption. The Rights may be redeemed by the Board, at any time until a “Flip-in” Trigger has occurred, at a redemption price of $0.001 per Right.
|
|
• |
Power to Amend. Our Board may amend the Rights Agreement in any respect until a “Flip-in” Trigger has occurred. Thereafter, our Board may amend the
Rights Agreement in any respect not materially adverse to Rights holders generally.
|
|
• |
Expiration. The Rights will expire on the tenth anniversary of the Distribution Date.
|
Furthermore, if any person (other than Mr. Panagiotidis or his controlled affiliates) acquires between 15% and 50% of our outstanding
common shares, the Board may, in lieu of allowing Rights to be exercised, require each outstanding Right to be exchanged for one common share of the Company (or one one-thousandth of a share of Series C Participating Preferred Shares). The Board
may enter into a trust agreement pursuant to which the Company would deposit into a trust its common shares that would be distributable to shareholders (excluding the Acquiring Person) in the event this exchange option is implemented.
Certain synthetic interests in securities created by derivative positions, whether or not such interests are considered to be ownership of the underlying common shares or are
reportable for purposes of Regulation 13D of the Exchange Act, as amended, are treated as beneficial ownership of the number of our common shares equivalent to the economic exposure created by the derivative position, to the extent our actual
common shares are directly or indirectly held by counterparties to the derivatives contracts. Swaps dealers unassociated with any control intent or intent to evade the purposes of the Rights Agreement are excepted from such imputed beneficial
ownership.
The Rights Agreement “grandfathers” the current level of ownership of persons who, prior to the date of the Rights Agreement, beneficially owned 15% or more of our outstanding
common shares, so long as they do not purchase additional shares in excess of certain limitations. Such provisions also “grandfather” our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Petros Panagiotidis, and Mr. Panagiotidis’ controlled affiliates.
The Rights may have anti-takeover effects. The Rights will cause substantial dilution to any person or group that attempts to acquire us without the approval of our Board. As a
result, the overall effect of the Rights may be to render more difficult or discourage any attempt to acquire us. Because our Board can approve a redemption of the Rights for a permitted offer, the Rights should not interfere with a merger or
other business combination approved by our Board.
The foregoing description of the Rights Agreement does not purport to be complete and is subject to, and qualified in its entirety by
reference to the Rights Agreement, which is included as an exhibit to this Annual Report.
Transfer Agent
The registrar and transfer agent for our common shares is Broadridge Corporate Issuer Solutions, Inc.
Exclusive Forum
Our Bylaws provide that unless we consent in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, the High Court of the Republic of Marshall Islands shall be the sole and exclusive
forum for any internal corporate claim, intra-corporate claim, or claim governed by the internal affairs doctrine and that the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York shall be the sole and exclusive forum for any claim
arising under the Securities Act or Exchange Act. If the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York does not have jurisdiction over the claims assigned to it by our exclusive forum provisions, any other federal district
court of the United States may hear such claims. Any person or entity purchasing or otherwise acquiring or holding any interest in shares of capital stock of the Company shall be deemed to have notice of and consented to this exclusive forum
provision.
The exclusive forum provision in our Bylaws will not relieve us of our duties to comply with federal securities laws and the rules and regulations thereunder, and our shareholders
will not be deemed to have waived our compliance with these laws, rules and regulations. In particular, Section 27 of the Exchange Act creates exclusive federal jurisdiction over all claims brought to enforce any duty or liability created by the
Exchange Act or the rules and regulations thereunder, and Section 22 of the Securities Act creates concurrent jurisdiction for federal and state courts over all suits brought to enforce any duty or liability created by the Securities Act or the
rules and regulations thereunder.
Marshall Islands Company Law Considerations
For a description of significant differences between the statutory provisions of the BCA and the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware relating to shareholders’ rights, refer to Exhibit 2.2
(Description of Securities).
We refer you to “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—B. Liquidity and Capital Resources” and “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—B. Related Party Transactions” for a discussion of certain material contracts to which we are a party.
The Marshall Islands impose no exchange controls on non-resident corporations.
The following is a discussion of the material Marshall Islands and U.S. federal income tax considerations relevant to a U.S. Holder and a Non-U.S. Holder, each as defined below,
with respect to the common shares. This discussion does not purport to deal with the tax consequences of owning common shares to all categories of investors, such as dealers in securities or commodities, traders in securities that elect to use a
mark-to-market method of accounting for securities holdings, financial institutions, insurance companies, tax-exempt organizations, U.S. expatriates, persons liable for the Medicare contribution tax on net investment income, persons liable for
the alternative minimum tax, persons who hold common shares as part of a straddle, hedge, conversion transaction or integrated investment, persons that purchase or sell common shares as part of a wash sale for tax purposes, U.S. Holders whose
functional currency is not the United States dollar, and investors that own, actually or under applicable constructive ownership rules, 10% or more of our common shares. This discussion deals only with holders who hold our common shares as a
capital asset. You are encouraged to consult your own tax advisers concerning the overall tax consequences arising in your own particular situation under U.S. federal, state, local or foreign law of the ownership of common shares. The discussion
below is based, in part, on the description of our business in this Annual Report above and assumes that we conduct our business as described in that section. Except as otherwise noted, this discussion is based on the assumption that we will not
maintain an office or other fixed place of business within the United States.
Marshall Islands Tax Consequences
We are incorporated in the Republic of the Marshall Islands. Under current Marshall Islands law, we are not subject to tax on income or capital gains, and no Marshall Islands
withholding tax will be imposed upon payments of dividends by us to our shareholders, and holders of our common shares that are not residents of or domiciled or carrying on any commercial activity in the Republic of the Marshall Islands will not
be subject to Marshall Islands tax on the sale or other disposition of our common shares.
U.S. Federal Income Taxation of Our Company
Taxation of Operating Income: In General
Unless exempt from U.S. federal income taxation under the rules discussed below, a foreign corporation is subject to U.S. federal income taxation in respect of any income that is
derived from the use of vessels, from the hiring or leasing of vessels for use on a time, voyage or bareboat charter basis, from the participation in a pool, partnership, strategic alliance, joint operating agreement, cost sharing arrangements or
other joint venture it directly or indirectly owns or participates in that generates such income, or from the performance of services directly related to those uses, which we refer to collectively as “shipping income,” to the extent that the
shipping income is derived from sources within the United States. For these purposes, 50% of shipping income that is attributable to transportation that begins or ends, but that does not begin and end, in the United States constitutes income from
sources within the United States, which we refer to as “U.S. source gross shipping income” or USSGTI.
Shipping income attributable to transportation that begins and ends in the United States is U.S. source income. We are not permitted by law to engage in such transportation and
thus will not earn income that is considered to be 100% derived from sources within the United States.
Shipping income attributable to transportation between non-U.S. ports is considered to be derived from sources outside the United States. Such income is not subject to U.S. tax.
If not exempt from tax under Section 883 of the Code, our USSGTI would be subject to a tax of 4% without allowance for any deductions (“the 4% tax”) as described below.
Exemption of Operating Income from U.S. Federal Income Taxation
Under Section 883 of the Code and the regulations thereunder, we will be exempt from the 4% tax on our USSGTI if:
|
(1) |
we are organized in a foreign country that grants an “equivalent exemption” to corporations organized in the United States; and
|
|
(a) |
more than 50% of the value of our stock is owned, directly or indirectly, by individuals who are “residents” of a foreign country that grants an “equivalent exemption” to corporations organized in the United
States (each such individual is a “qualified shareholder” and collectively, “qualified shareholders”), which we refer to as the “50% Ownership Test,” or
|
|
(b) |
our stock is “primarily and regularly traded on an established securities market” in our country of organization, in another country that grants an “equivalent exemption” to U.S. corporations, or in the United
States, which we refer to as the “Publicly-Traded Test.”
|
The Marshall Islands, the jurisdiction in which we and our ship-owning subsidiaries are incorporated, grants an “equivalent exemption” to U.S. corporations. Therefore, we will be
exempt from the 4% on our USSGTI if we meet either the 50% Ownership Test or the Publicly Traded Test.
Due to the widely dispersed nature of the ownership of our common shares, it is highly unlikely that we will satisfy the requirements of the 50% Ownership Test. Therefore, we
expect to be exempt from the 4% tax on our USSGTI only if we can satisfy the Publicly-Traded Test.
Treasury Regulations provide, in pertinent part, that stock of a foreign corporation must be “primarily and regularly traded on an established securities market in the U.S. or in
a qualified foreign country.” To be “primarily traded” on an established securities market, the number of shares of each class of our stock that are traded during any taxable year on all established securities markets in the country where they
are listed must exceed the number of shares in each such class that are traded during that year on established securities markets in any other country. Our common shares, which are traded on the Nasdaq Capital Market, meet the test of being
“primarily traded.”
To be “regularly traded” one or more classes of our stock representing more than 50% of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock entitled to vote and of the total
value of the stock that is listed must be listed on an established securities market (“the vote and value” test) and meet certain other requirements. Our common shares are listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market but do not represent more than 50% of
the voting power of all classes of stock entitled to vote. Our Series B Preferred Shares, which have super voting rights and have voting control but are not entitled to dividends, are not listed. Thus, based on a strict reading of the vote and
value test described above, our stock is not “regularly traded.”
Treasury Regulations provide, in pertinent part, that a class of stock will not be considered to be “regularly traded” on an established securities market for any taxable year in
which 50% or more of such class of the outstanding shares of the stock is owned, actually or constructively under specified stock attribution rules, on more than half the days during the taxable year by persons who each own 5% or more of the
value of such class of the outstanding stock, which we refer to as the “5% Override Rule.” When more than 50% of the shares are owned by 5% shareholders, then we will be subject to the 5% Override Rule unless we can establish that among the
shares included in the closely-held block of stock are a sufficient number of shares in that block to “prevent nonqualified shareholders in the closely held block from owning 50 percent or more of the stock.”
We believe our ownership structure meets the intent and purpose of the Publicly Traded Test and the tax policy behind it even if it does not literally meet the vote and value
requirements. In our case, there is no closely held block because less than 5% shareholders in aggregate own more than 50% of the value of our stock. However, we expect that we would have satisfied the Publicly Traded Test if, instead of our
current share structure, our common shares represented more than 50% of the voting power of our stock. In addition, we can establish that nonqualified shareholders cannot exercise voting control over the corporation because a qualified
shareholder controls the non-traded voting stock. Moreover, we believe that the 5% Override Rule suggests that the Publicly Traded Test should be interpreted by reference to its overall purpose, which we consider to be that Section 883 should
generally be available to a publicly traded company unless it is more than 50% owned, by vote or value, by nonqualified 5% shareholders. We therefore believe our stock structure, when considered by the U.S. Treasury in light of the Publicly
Traded Test enunciated in the regulations, should be accepted as satisfying the exemption. Accordingly, we intend to take the position that we qualify for the benefits of Section 883. However, there can be no assurance that our particular stock
structure will be treated as satisfying the Publicly Traded Test. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that we or our subsidiaries will qualify for the benefits of Section 883 for any taxable year.
Taxation in the Absence of Exemption under Section 883 of the Code
If contrary to our position described above the IRS determines that we do not qualify for the benefits of Section 883 of the Code, USSGTI, to the extent not considered to be
“effectively connected” with the conduct of a U.S. trade or business, as described below, would be subject to a 4% tax imposed by Section 887 of the Code on a gross basis, without the benefit of deductions, which we refer to as the “4% gross
basis tax regime.”
To the extent the benefits of the exemption under Section 883 of the Code are unavailable and USSGTI is considered to be “effectively connected” with the conduct of a U.S. trade
or business, as described below, any such “effectively connected” U.S.-source shipping income, net of applicable deductions, would be subject to the U.S. federal corporate income tax imposed at a rate of 21%. In addition, we may be subject to the
30% “branch profits” tax on earnings effectively connected with the conduct of such U.S. trade or business, as determined after allowance for certain adjustments, and on certain interest paid or deemed paid attributable to the conduct of such
U.S. trade or business.
USSGTI would be considered “effectively connected” with the conduct of a U.S. trade or business only if:
|
• |
We have, or are considered to have, a fixed place of business in the United States involved in the earning of shipping income; and
|
|
• |
substantially all our USSGTI is attributable to regularly scheduled transportation, such as the operation of a vessel that follows a published schedule with repeated sailings at regular intervals between the
same points for voyages that begin or end in the United States.
|
We do not currently have, nor do we intend to have or permit circumstances that would result in us having, any vessel operating to the United States on a regularly scheduled
basis. Based on the foregoing and on the expected mode of our shipping operations and other activities, we believe that none of our USSGTI will be “effectively connected” with the conduct of a U.S. trade or business.
U.S. Taxation of Gain on Sale of Vessels
Regardless of whether we qualify for exemption under Section 883 of the Code, we do not expect to be subject to U.S. federal income taxation with respect to gain realized on a
sale of a vessel, provided the sale is considered to occur outside of the United States under U.S. federal income tax principles. In general, a sale of a vessel will be considered to occur outside of the United States for this purpose if title to
the vessel, and risk of loss with respect to the vessel, pass to the buyer outside of the United States. It is expected that any sale of a vessel by us will be considered to occur outside of the United States.
U.S. Federal Income Taxation of U.S. Holders
As used herein, the term “U.S. Holder” means a beneficial owner of our common shares that is a U.S. citizen or resident, U.S. corporation or other U.S. entity taxable as a
corporation, an estate the income of which is subject to U.S. federal income taxation regardless of its source, or a trust if (i) a court within the United States is able to exercise primary jurisdiction over the administration of the trust and
one or more U.S. persons have the authority to control all substantial decisions of the trust or (ii) it has in place an election to be treated as a United States person for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
If a partnership holds our common shares, the tax treatment of a partner of such partnership will generally depend upon the status of the partner and upon the activities of the
partnership. If you are a partner in a partnership holding our common shares, you are encouraged to consult your tax adviser.
No ruling has been or will be requested from the IRS regarding any matter affecting the Company or its shareholders. The statements made
here may not be sustained by a court if contested by the IRS.
Distributions
Subject to the discussion of passive foreign investment companies, or PFIC, below, any distributions made by us with respect to our common shares to a U.S. Holder will generally
constitute dividends to the extent of our current or accumulated earnings and profits, as determined under U.S. federal income tax principles. Distributions in excess of such earnings and profits will be treated first as a nontaxable return of
capital to the extent of the U.S. Holder’s tax basis in his common shares on a dollar-for-dollar basis and thereafter as capital gain. However, we do not expect to calculate earnings and profits in accordance with U.S. federal income tax
principles. Accordingly, you should expect to generally treat the distributions we make as dividends. Because we are not a U.S. corporation, U.S. Holders that are corporations will generally not be entitled to claim a dividends-received deduction
with respect to any distributions they receive from us. Dividends paid with respect to our common shares will generally be treated as “passive category income” for purposes of computing allowable foreign tax credits for U.S. foreign tax credit
purposes.
Dividends paid on our common shares to a U.S. Individual Holder will generally be treated as ordinary income. However, if you are a U.S. Individual Holder, dividends that
constitute qualified dividend income will be taxable to you at the preferential rates applicable to long-term capital gains provided that you hold the shares for more than 60 days during the 121-day period beginning 60 days before the ex-dividend
date and meet other holding period requirements. Dividends paid with respect to the shares generally will be qualified dividend income provided that, in the year that you receive the dividend, the shares are readily tradable on an established
securities market in the United States. Our common shares are listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market, and we therefore expect that dividends will be qualified dividend income.
Special rules may apply to any “extraordinary dividend,” generally, a dividend paid by us in an amount which is equal to or in excess of 10% of a shareholder’s adjusted tax basis
(or fair market value in certain circumstances) or dividends received within a one-year period that, in the aggregate, equal or exceed 20% of a shareholder’s adjusted tax basis (or fair market value upon the shareholder’s election) in a common
share. If we pay an “extraordinary dividend” on our common shares that is treated as “qualified dividend income,” then any loss derived by a U.S. Individual Holder from the sale or exchange of such common shares will be treated as long-term
capital loss to the extent of such dividend.
Sale, Exchange or other Disposition of Common Shares
Subject to the discussion of our status as a PFIC below, a U.S. Holder generally will recognize taxable gain or loss upon a sale, exchange or other disposition of our common
shares in an amount equal to the difference between the amount realized by the U.S. Holder from such sale, exchange or other disposition and the U.S. Holder’s tax basis in such stock. Such gain or loss will be treated as long-term capital gain or
loss if the U.S. Holder’s holding period is greater than one year at the time of the sale, exchange or other disposition. Such capital gain or loss will generally be treated as U.S.-source income or loss, as applicable, for U.S. foreign tax
credit purposes. A U.S. Holder’s ability to deduct capital losses is subject to certain limitations.
Passive Foreign Investment Company Status and Significant Tax Consequences
Special U.S. federal income tax rules apply to a U.S. Holder that holds stock in a foreign corporation classified as a PFIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes. In general, we
will be treated as a PFIC with respect to a U.S. Holder if, for any taxable year in which such holder held our common shares, either
|
• |
at least 75% of our gross income for such taxable year consists of passive income (e.g., dividends, interest, capital gains and rents derived other than in the active conduct of a rental business); or
|
|
• |
at least 50% of the average value of the assets held by the corporation during such taxable year produce, or are held for the production of, passive income.
|
For purposes of determining whether we are a PFIC, we will be treated as earning and owning our proportionate share of the income and assets, respectively, of any of our
subsidiaries’ corporations in which we own at least 25% of the value of the subsidiary’s stock. Income earned, or deemed earned, by us in connection with the performance of services would not constitute “passive income” for these purposes. By
contrast, rental income would generally constitute “passive income” unless we were treated under specific rules as deriving our rental income in the active conduct of a trade or business.
In general, income derived from the bareboat charter of a vessel will be treated as “passive income” for purposes of determining whether we are a PFIC, and such vessel will be
treated as an asset which produces or is held to produce “passive income.” On the other hand, income derived from the time charter of a vessel should not be treated as “passive income” for such purpose, but rather should be treated as services
income; likewise, a time chartered vessel should generally not be treated as an asset which produces or is held for the production of “passive income.”
Subject to the discussion in the follow paragraph, based on our current assets and activities, we do not believe that we will be a PFIC for the current or subsequent taxable
years. Although there is no legal authority directly on point, and we are not relying upon an opinion of counsel on this issue, our belief is based principally on the position that, for purposes of determining whether we are a passive foreign
investment company, the gross income we derive or are deemed to derive from the time and voyage chartering activities and pool arrangements of our wholly owned subsidiaries should constitute services income, rather than rental income.
Correspondingly, such income should not constitute passive income, and the assets that we or our wholly-owned subsidiaries own and operate in connection with the production of such income, particularly the vessels, should not constitute passive
assets for purposes of determining whether we were a passive foreign investment company. We believe there is substantial legal authority supporting our position consisting of case law and IRS pronouncements concerning the characterization of
income derived from time charters and voyage charters as services income for other tax purposes. However, in the absence of any legal authority specifically relating to the statutory provisions governing passive foreign investment companies, the
IRS or a court could disagree with our position. In addition, although we intend to conduct our affairs in a manner to avoid being classified as a passive foreign investment company with respect to any taxable year, we cannot assure you that the
nature of our operations will not change in the future.
For purposes of the PFIC “asset” test described above, Cash Assets are considered to be assets that produce passive income. As indicated in our consolidated financial statements
included elsewhere in this Annual Report, we have significant Cash Assets relative to the operating assets we hold. Although we do not expect to be treated as a PFIC for our 2023 taxable year, we cannot predict whether our position in cash and
other “passive” assets will cause us to be treated as a PFIC in a future taxable year.
As discussed more fully below, if we were to be treated as a PFIC for any taxable year, a U.S. Holder would be subject to different U.S. federal income taxation rules depending on
whether the U.S. Holder makes an election to treat us as a “Qualified Electing Fund,” which election is referred to as a “QEF Election.” As discussed below, as an alternative to making a QEF Election, a U.S. Holder should be able to make a
“mark-to-market” election with respect to our common shares, which election is referred to as a “Mark-to-Market Election.” A U.S. Holder holding PFIC shares that does not make either a “QEF Election” or “Mark-to-Market Election” will be subject
to the Default PFIC Regime, as defined and discussed below in “Item 10. Additional Information—E. Taxation—U.S. Federal Income Taxation of U.S. Holders—Taxation of U.S. Holders Not Making a Timely QEF or
“Mark-to-Market” Election.”
If the Company were to be treated as a PFIC, a U.S. Holder would be required to file IRS Form 8621 to report certain information regarding the Company. If you are a U.S. Holder
who held our common shares during any period in which we are a PFIC, you are strongly encouraged to consult your tax adviser.
The QEF Election
If a U.S. Holder makes a timely QEF Election, which U.S. Holder we refer to as an “Electing Holder,” the Electing Holder must report each year for United States federal income tax
purposes his pro rata share of our ordinary earnings and our net capital gain, if any, for our taxable year that ends with or within the taxable year of the Electing Holder, regardless of whether or not distributions were made by us to the
Electing Holder. The Electing Holder’s adjusted tax basis in the common shares will be increased to reflect taxed but undistributed earnings and profits. Distributions of earnings and profits that had been previously taxed will result in a
corresponding reduction in the adjusted tax basis in the common shares and will not be taxed again once distributed. An Electing Holder would generally recognize capital gain or loss on the sale, exchange or other disposition of our common
shares. It should be noted that if any of our subsidiaries is treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes, a U.S. Holder must make a separate QEF Election with respect to each such subsidiary.
Taxation of U.S. Holders Making a “Mark-to-Market” Election
If we are a PFIC in a taxable year and our shares are treated as “marketable stock” in such year, you may make a mark-to-market election with respect to your shares. As long as
our common shares are traded on the Nasdaq Capital Market, as they currently are and as they may continue to be, our common shares should be considered “marketable stock” for purposes of making the Mark-to-Market Election. However, a
mark-to-market election generally cannot be made for equity interests in any lower-tier PFICs that we own, unless shares of such lower-tier PFIC are themselves “marketable.” As a result, even if a U.S. Holder validly makes a mark-to-market
election with respect to our common shares, the U.S. Holder may continue to be subject to the Default PFIC Regime (described below) with respect to the U.S. Holder’s indirect interest in any of our subsidiaries that are treated as an equity
interest in a PFIC. U.S. Holders are urged to consult their own tax advisers in this regard.
Taxation of U.S. Holders Not Making a Timely QEF or “Mark-to-Market” Election
Finally, a U.S. Holder who does not make either a QEF Election or a Mark-to-Market Election with respect to any taxable year in which we are treated as a PFIC, or a U.S. Holder
whose QEF Election is invalidated or terminated (or a “Non-Electing Holder”), would be subject to special rules, or the Default PFIC Regime, with respect to (1) any excess distribution (i.e., the portion of any distributions received by the
Non-Electing Holder on the common shares in a taxable year (other than the taxable year in which such Non-Electing Holder’s holding period in the common shares begins) in excess of 125% of the average annual distributions received by the
Non-Electing Holder in the three preceding taxable years, or, if shorter, the Non-Electing Holder’s holding period for the common shares), and (2) any gain realized on the sale, exchange, redemption or other disposition of the common shares.
Under the Default PFIC Regime:
|
• |
the excess distribution or gain would be allocated ratably over the Non-Electing Holder’s aggregate holding period for the common shares;
|
|
• |
the amount allocated to the current taxable year and any taxable year before we became a PFIC would be taxed as ordinary income; and
|
|
• |
the amount allocated to each of the other taxable years would be subject to tax at the highest rate of tax in effect for the applicable class of taxpayer for that year, and an interest charge for the deemed tax
deferral benefit would be imposed with respect to the resulting tax attributable to each such other taxable year.
|
Any distributions other than “excess distributions” by us to a Non-Electing Holder will be treated as discussed above under “Taxation—U.S.
Federal Income Taxation of U.S. Holders—Distributions.”
If a Non-Electing Holder who is an individual dies while owning the common shares, such Non-Electing Holder’s successor generally would not receive a step-up in tax basis with
respect to the common shares.
Shareholder Reporting
A U.S. Holder that owns “specified foreign financial assets” with an aggregate value in excess of $50,000 (and in some circumstances, a higher threshold) may be required to file
an information report with respect to such assets with its tax return. “Specified foreign financial assets” may include financial accounts maintained by foreign financial institutions, as well as the following, but only if they are held for
investment and not held in accounts maintained by financial institutions: (i) stocks and securities issued by non-United States persons, (ii) financial instruments and contracts that have non-United States issuers or counterparties, and (iii)
interests in foreign entities. Significant penalties may apply for failing to satisfy this filing requirement. U.S. Holders are urged to contact their tax advisers regarding this filing requirement.
U.S. Federal Income Taxation of “Non-U.S. Holders”
A beneficial owner of our common shares (other than a partnership) that is not a U.S. Holder is referred to herein as a “Non-U.S. Holder.”
Dividends on Common Shares
Non-U.S. Holders generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax or withholding tax on dividends received from us with respect to our common shares, unless that income is
effectively connected with a trade or business conducted by the Non-U.S. Holder in the United States. If the Non-U.S. Holder is entitled to the benefits of a U.S. income tax treaty with respect to those dividends, that income is taxable only if
it is attributable to a permanent establishment maintained by the Non-U.S. Holder in the United States.
Sale, Exchange or Other Disposition of Common Shares
Non-U.S. Holders generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax or withholding tax on any gain realized upon the sale, exchange or other disposition of our common
shares, unless:
|
• |
the gain is effectively connected with a trade or business conducted by the Non-U.S. Holder in the United States. If the Non-U.S. Holder is entitled to the benefits of a U.S. income tax treaty with respect to
that gain, that gain is taxable only if it is attributable to a permanent establishment maintained by the Non-U.S. Holder in the United States; or
|
|
• |
the Non-U.S. Holder is an individual who is present in the United States for 183 days or more during the taxable year of disposition and other conditions are met.
|
If the Non-U.S. Holder is engaged in a U.S. trade or business for U.S. federal income tax purposes, the income from the common shares, including dividends and the gain from the
sale, exchange or other disposition of the stock that is effectively connected with the conduct of that trade or business will generally be subject to U.S. federal income tax in the same manner as discussed in the previous section relating to the
taxation of U.S. Holders. In addition, in the case of a corporate Non-U.S. Holder, the earnings and profits of such Non-U.S. Holder that are attributable to effectively connected income, subject to certain adjustments, may be subject to an
additional branch profits tax at a rate of 30%, or at a lower rate as may be specified by an applicable U.S. income tax treaty.
Backup Withholding and Information Reporting
If you are a U.S. Individual Holder, information reporting requirements on IRS Form 1099 generally will apply to dividend payments or other taxable distributions made to you
within the United States, and the payment of proceeds to you from the sale of common shares effected at a United States office of a broker.
Additionally, backup withholding may apply to such payments if you fail to comply with applicable certification requirements or (in the case of dividend payments) are notified by
the IRS that you have failed to report all interest and dividends required to be shown on your federal income tax returns.
If you are a Non-U.S. Holder, you are generally exempt from backup withholding and information reporting requirements with respect to dividend payments made to you outside the
United States by us or another non-United States payor. You are also generally exempt from backup withholding and information reporting requirements in respect of dividend payments made within the United States and the payment of the proceeds
from the sale of common shares effected at a United States office of a broker, as long as either (i) you have furnished a valid IRS Form W-8 or other documentation upon which the payor or broker may rely to treat the payments as made to a
non-United States person, or (ii) you otherwise establish an exemption.
Payment of the proceeds from the sale of common shares effected at a foreign office of a broker generally will not be subject to information reporting or backup withholding.
However, a sale effected at a foreign office of a broker could be subject to information reporting in the same manner as a sale within the United States (and in certain cases may be subject to backup withholding as well) if (i) the broker has
certain connections to the United States, (ii) the proceeds or confirmation are sent to the United States or (iii) the sale has certain other specified connections with the United States.
You generally may obtain a refund of any amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules that exceed your income tax liability by filing a refund claim with the IRS.
Other Tax Considerations
In addition to the income tax consequences discussed above, the Company may be subject to tax, including tonnage taxes, in one or more other jurisdictions where the Company
conducts activities. All our vessel-owning subsidiaries are subject to tonnage taxes. Generally, under a tonnage tax, a company is taxed based on the net tonnage of qualifying vessels such company operates, independent of actual earnings. The
amount of any tonnage tax imposed upon our operations may be material.
F.
|
Dividends and Paying Agents
|
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
We are subject to the informational requirements of the Exchange Act. In accordance with these requirements we file reports and other information with the SEC, including annual
reports on Form 20-F and periodic reports on Form 6-K. The SEC maintains an Internet website that contains reports and other information about issuers, like us, that file electronically with the SEC. The address of that website is www.sec.gov.
Our filings will also be available on our website at www.torocorp.com. This web address is provided as an inactive textual reference only. Information contained on, or that can be accessed through, these websites, does not constitute part of, and
is not incorporated into, this Annual Report.
As a foreign private issuer, we are exempt under the Exchange Act from, among other things, the rules prescribing the furnishing and content of proxy statements, and our executive
officers, directors and principal shareholders are exempt from the reporting and short-swing profit recovery provisions contained in Section 16 of the Exchange Act. In addition, we are not required under the Exchange Act to file periodic reports
and financial statements with the SEC as frequently or as promptly as U.S. companies whose securities are registered under the Exchange Act. However, we intend to furnish or make available to our shareholders annual reports containing our
financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP.
Shareholders may also request a copy of our filings at no cost, by writing or telephoning us at the following address:
Toro Corp.
223 Christodoulou Chatzipavlou Street
Hawaii Royal Gardens
3036 Limassol, Cyprus
Tel: + 357 25 357 768
I.
|
Subsidiary Information
|
Not applicable.
J.
|
Annual Report to Security Holders
|
Not applicable.
ITEM 11. |
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
|
We are exposed to various market risks, including foreign currency fluctuations, changes in interest rates and credit risk. Our activities expose us primarily to the financial
risks of changes in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates as described below.
Interest Rate Risk
The international shipping industry is capital intensive, requiring significant amounts of investment provided in the form of long-term debt. As of December 31, 2023 our term loan
facility had a floating interest rate that fluctuated with changes in the financial markets and in particular changes in SOFR. From and after March 7, 2023, the reference rate for this term loan facility was changed from LIBOR to SOFR. As of
December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, our net effective exposure to floating interest rate fluctuations on our outstanding debt was $5.3 million and $13.2 million, respectively. Our interest expense has been affected by changes in the general
level of interest rates, particularly LIBOR and SOFR. As an indication of the extent of our sensitivity to interest rate changes, an increase in LIBOR or SOFR of 1% would have decreased our net income both in the year ended December 31, 2022 and
2023 by approximately $0.1 million based upon our floating interest-bearing average debt level during these periods. We expect our sensitivity to interest rate changes to increase in the future if we enter into additional debt agreements in
connection with future vessel acquisitions and/or the unencumbered part of our existing fleet. We do not consider the risk from interest rate fluctuations to be material for our results of operations as on January 25, 2024, we fully prepaid the
outstanding principal amount under our only outstanding loan facility using part of the proceeds of the sale of the M/T Wonder Sirius.
Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk
We generate all of our revenues in U.S. dollars. A minority of our vessels’ operating expenses (approximately 1.2% for the year ended December 31, 2022 and 3.0% for the year ended
December 31, 2023) and of our general and administrative expenses (approximately 9.9% for the year ended December 31, 2022 and 8.8% for the year ended December 31, 2023) are in currencies other than the U.S. dollar, primarily Euro. For accounting
purposes, expenses incurred in other currencies are converted into U.S. dollars at the exchange rate prevailing on the date of each transaction. We do not consider the risk from exchange rate fluctuations to be material for our results of
operations because as of December 31, 2022 and as of December 31, 2023, these non-U.S. dollar expenses represented 0.4% and 1.4% our revenues, respectively. However, the portion of our business conducted in other currencies could increase in the
future, which could increase our exposure to losses arising from exchange rate fluctuations.
Inflation Risk
Inflation has not had a material effect on our expenses in the preceding fiscal year. In the event that significant global inflationary pressures appear, these pressures would
increase our operating costs.
ITEM 12. |
DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES OTHER THAN EQUITY SECURITIES
|
Not applicable.
ITEM 13. |
DEFAULTS, DIVIDEND ARREARAGES AND DELINQUENCIES
|
Not applicable.
ITEM 14. |
MATERIAL MODIFICATIONS TO THE RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS AND USE OF PROCEEDS
|
We have adopted the Stockholders Protection Rights Agreement, pursuant to which each of our common shares includes one right that entitles the holder to purchase from us a unit
consisting of one-thousandth of a share of our Series C Participating Preferred Shares if any third party seeks to acquire control of a substantial block of our common shares without the approval of our Board. See “Item 10. Additional Information—B. Memorandum and Articles of Association—Stockholders Rights Agreement” included in this Annual Report and Exhibit 2.2 (Description of Securities) to
this Annual Report for a description of our Stockholders Rights Agreement.
Please also see “Item 10. Additional Information—B. Memorandum and Articles of Association” for a description of the rights of holders of
our Series A Preferred Shares and Series B Preferred Shares relative to the rights of holders of our common shares.
ITEM 15. |
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
|
A.
|
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
|
As of December 31, 2023, our management conducted an evaluation pursuant to Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) promulgated under the Exchange Act, as amended, of the effectiveness of
the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act.
The term disclosure controls and procedures is defined under SEC rules as controls and other procedures of an issuer that are designed to ensure that information required to be
disclosed by the issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include,
without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by an issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Act is accumulated and communicated to the issuer’s management or persons
performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. There are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any system of disclosure controls and procedures, including the possibility of human
error and the circumvention or overriding of the controls and procedures. Accordingly, even effective disclosure controls and procedures can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving their control objectives.
Our management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of
the disclosure controls and procedures are met. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the partnership
have been detected. Further, in the design and evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures, our management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.
Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.
Based upon that evaluation, our management concluded that, as of December 31, 2023, our disclosure controls and procedures which include, without limitation, controls and
procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure, were effective in providing reasonable assurance that information that was required to be disclosed by us in reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act was recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods
specified in the rules and forms of the SEC.
B.
|
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
|
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) promulgated under the Exchange
Act. Our internal controls were designed to provide reasonable assurance as to the reliability of our financial reporting and the preparation and presentation of our financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States.
Our internal controls over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:
|
• |
Pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company;
|
|
• |
Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that our receipts and
expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of the Company’s management and directors; and
|
|
• |
Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
|
Our management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based upon the 2013 framework in Internal Control – Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this evaluation, our management believes that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2023.
However, because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of
effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree or compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
C.
|
Attestation Report of the Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
This Annual Report does not include an attestation report of the Company’s registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s
report was not subject to attestation by the Company’s registered public accounting firm, since, as an “emerging growth company”, we are exempt from having our independent auditor assess our internal control over financial reporting under Section
404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
D.
|
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
|
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this Annual Report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to affect,
our internal control over financial reporting.
ITEM 16A. |
AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT
|
The Board has determined that Mr. Petros Zavakopoulos, who serves as Chairman of the Audit Committee, qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” under SEC rules, and that
Mr. Zavakopoulos is “independent” under applicable Nasdaq rules and SEC standards.
On March 7, 2023, we adopted a code of ethics that applies to any of our employees, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. The code of ethics may be
downloaded from our website (www.torocorp.com). None of the information contained on, or that can be accessed through, the Company’s website is incorporated into or forms a part of this Annual Report. Additionally, any person, upon request, may
receive a hard copy or an electronic file of the code of ethics at no cost. If we make any substantive amendment to the code of ethics or grant any waivers, including any implicit waiver, from a provision of our code of ethics, we will disclose
the nature of that amendment or waiver on our website. No such amendment was made, or waiver granted, since the adoption of our code of ethics.
ITEM 16C. |
PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
|
Audit Fees
Aggregate audit fees billed during the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2023 represent fees billed by our principal accounting firm, Deloitte Certified Public Accountants S.A.,
an independent registered public accounting firm and member of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited. For the year ended December 31, 2023, audit fees represent compensation for professional services rendered for the audit of the consolidated
financial statements of the Company and for the review of the quarterly financial information, as well as the audit of the Predecessor Toro Corp. financial statements for the period ended December 31, 2022. For the year ended December 31, 2022,
audit fees represent compensation for professional services rendered for the audit of the Predecessor Toro Corp. financial statements for the period ended December 31, 2021 and for the review of the financial information for the six and nine
months ended June 30 and September 30, 2022.
Audit fees also include fees billed in connection with the review of registration statements and issuance of related consents and comfort letters and other audit services required
for SEC or other regulatory filings.
|
|
For the year ended
|
|
In U.S. dollars
|
|
December 31,
2022
|
|
|
December 31,
2023
|
|
Audit Fees
|
|
$
|
216,939
|
|
|
$
|
419,711
|
|
Audit-Related Fees
Not applicable.
Tax Fees
Not applicable.
All Other Fees
Not applicable.
Audit Committee’s Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures
Our audit committee pre-approves all audit, audit-related and non-audit services not prohibited by law to be performed by our independent auditors and associated fees prior to the engagement of the
independent auditor with respect to such services. Prior to the Spin-Off and establishment of our audit committee, the audit committee of Castor pre-approved all such services.
ITEM 16D. |
EXEMPTIONS FROM THE LISTING STANDARDS FOR AUDIT COMMITTEES
|
Not applicable.
ITEM 16E. |
PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY THE ISSUER AND AFFILIATED PERSONS
|
On November 6, 2023, our Board approved a share repurchase program, authorizing the repurchase of up to $5.0 million of our common shares commencing November 10, 2023 through
to March 31, 2024. Shares may be repurchased in open market and/or privately negotiated transactions. The timing, manner and total amount of any share repurchases will be determined by management at its discretion and will depend upon business,
economic and market conditions, corporate and regulatory requirements, prevailing share prices, and other considerations. The authorization does not obligate us to acquire any specific amount of common shares.
As of December 31, 2023, we have repurchased the following common shares:
Period
|
|
Total Number of
Shares Purchased(1),(2)
|
|
|
Average Price
Paid per Share(3)
|
|
|
Total Number
of Shares Purchased
as part of Publicly
Announced Plans
or Programs
|
|
|
Maximum Number
(or Approximate Dollar
Value) of Shares that
May Yet Be Purchased
Under the Plans
or Programs
|
|
November 10-30, 2023
|
|
|
60,176
|
|
|
$
|
4.1901
|
|
|
|
60,176
|
|
|
$
|
4,747,856
|
|
December 1-31, 2023
|
|
|
162,424
|
|
|
$
|
4.8794
|
|
|
|
162,424
|
|
|
$
|
3,955,318
|
|
Total
|
|
|
222,600
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
222,600
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
(1) |
On November 11, 2023, we announced the launch of the Repurchase Program authorizing the repurchase of up to $5.0 million of our common shares commencing November 10, 2023 through to March 31,
2024. The Repurchase Program was approved by the Board on November 6, 2023. The Repurchase Program may be suspended or terminated at any time by the Board.
|
(2) |
Common shares were repurchased by Toro in open market transactions.
|
(3) |
The average price paid per share does not include commissions paid for each transaction.
|
On December 27, 2023, 179,251 repurchased common shares were cancelled and were removed from the Company’s share capital.
The remaining 43,349 repurchased common shares were classified as treasury shares as they were not cancelled as of December 31, 2023. These 43,349 repurchased common shares were subsequently cancelled and removed from our share capital on
January 3, 2024. Between January 1, 2024 and February 29, 2024, the Company also repurchased 476,970 shares of common stock for aggregate consideration of $2.8
million under its share repurchase program.
ITEM 16F. |
CHANGE IN REGISTRANT’S CERTIFYING ACCOUNTANT
|
Not applicable.
ITEM 16G. |
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
|
Pursuant to an exception under the Nasdaq listing standards available to foreign private issuers, we are not required to comply with all of the corporate governance practices
followed by U.S. companies under the Nasdaq listing standards, which are available at www.nasdaq.com, because in certain cases we follow our home country (Marshall Islands) practice. Pursuant to Section 5600 of the Nasdaq Listed Company Manual,
we are required to list the significant differences between our corporate governance practices that comply with and follow our home country practices and the Nasdaq standards applicable to listed U.S. companies. Set forth below is a list of those
differences:
|
• |
Independence of Directors. The Nasdaq requires that a U.S. listed company maintain a majority of independent directors. Although our Board is currently composed of three
directors a majority of whom are independent, we cannot assure you that in the future we will have a majority of independent directors.
|
|
• |
Executive Sessions. The Nasdaq requires that non-management directors meet regularly in executive sessions without management. The Nasdaq also requires that all
independent directors meet in an executive session at least once a year. As permitted under Marshall Islands law and our bylaws, our non-management directors do not regularly hold executive sessions without management.
|
|
• |
Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee. The Nasdaq requires that a listed U.S. company have a nominating/corporate governance committee of independent directors and a
committee charter specifying the purpose, duties and evaluation procedures of the committee. As permitted under Marshall Islands law and our bylaws, we do not currently have a nominating or corporate governance committee, nor do we expect
to establish such committees.
|
|
• |
Compensation Committee. The Nasdaq requires U.S. listed companies to have a compensation committee composed entirely of independent directors and a committee charter
addressing the purpose, responsibility, rights and performance evaluation of the committee. As permitted under Marshall Islands law, we do not currently have a compensation committee. To the extent we establish such committee in the
future, it may not consist of independent directors, entirely or at all.
|
|
• |
Audit Committee. The Nasdaq requires, among other things, that a listed U.S. company have an audit committee with a minimum of three members, all of whom are independent.
As permitted by Nasdaq Rule 5615(a)(3), we follow home country practice regarding audit committee composition. Therefore, our audit committee is composed of two independent directors, Mr. Angelos Rounick Platanias and Mr. Petros
Zavakopoulos. Although the members of our audit committee are independent, we are not required to ensure their independence under Nasdaq Rule 5605(c)(2)(A) subject to compliance with Rules 10A-3(b)(1) and 10A-3(c) under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934.
|
|
• |
Shareholder Approval Requirements. The Nasdaq requires that a listed U.S. company obtain prior shareholder approval for certain issuances of authorized stock or the
approval of, and material revisions to, equity compensation plans. As permitted under Marshall Islands law and our bylaws, we do not intend seek shareholder approval prior to issuances of authorized stock or the approval of and material
revisions to equity compensation plans.
|
|
• |
Corporate Governance Guidelines. The Nasdaq requires U.S. companies to adopt and disclose corporate governance guidelines. The guidelines must address, among other
things: director qualification standards, director responsibilities, director access to management and independent advisers, director compensation, director orientation and continuing education, management succession and an annual
performance evaluation of the Board. We are not required to adopt such guidelines under Marshall Islands law and we have not and do not intend to adopt such guidelines.
|
ITEM 16H. |
MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURE
|
Not applicable.
ITEM 16I. |
DISCLOSURE REGARDING FOREIGN JURISDICTIONS THAT PREVENT INSPECTIONS
|
Not applicable.
ITEM 16J.
|
INSIDER TRADING POLICIES
|
Not applicable.
We maintain various cybersecurity measures and protocols to safeguard our systems and data and continuously monitor and assess potential threats to pre-emptively address any
emerging cyber risks. We have implemented various processes for assessing, identifying, and managing material risks from cybersecurity threats, which are integrated into our overall risk management framework. These processes include access
controls to organizational systems, data encryption, cybersecurity training and security awareness campaigns through direct mail, and are designed to systematically evaluate potential vulnerabilities and cybersecurity threats and minimize their
potential impact on our organization’s operations, assets, and stakeholders. Our cybersecurity risk management processes share common methodologies, reporting channels and governance processes with our broader risk management processes. By
embedding cybersecurity risk management into and aligning it with our broader risk management processes, we aim to ensure a comprehensive and proactive approach to safeguarding our assets and operations.
We engage assessors, consultants, auditors, and other third-party specialists to enhance the effectiveness of our cybersecurity processes, augment our internal capabilities,
validate our controls, and stay abreast of evolving cybersecurity risks and best practices.
In 2023, we did not detect any cybersecurity incidents that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect us, including our business strategy, results of
operations, or financial condition.
Responsibility for overseeing cybersecurity risks is integrated into the purview of the Information Technology and Cybersecurity Department of Castor Ships (the “ITC Department”),
our commercial and technical co-manager. The ITC Department is responsible for monitoring, detecting and assessing cybersecurity risks and incidents at the parent company, subsidiary and vessel level. The ITC Department provides these services to
us pursuant to the Amended and Restated Master Management.
We also utilize third-party service providers for certain IT-related and other services, where appropriate, to assess, test or otherwise assist with aspects of our security
controls. Accordingly, we also implement processes to oversee and identify material cybersecurity risks associated with our utilization of third-party service providers on whom we have a material dependency, such as conducting due diligence
assessments to evaluate their cybersecurity measures, data protection practices, and compliance with relevant regulatory requirements.
The ITC Department currently comprises a senior IT professional with expertise in risk management, cybersecurity, and information technology. This individual has, and any future
members of the ITC Department are expected to have, credentials relevant to their role, which includes prior experience working in similar roles and formal education (e.g., a Bachelor of Science in information technology fields). The ITC
Department is also expected to keep abreast of cybersecurity best practices and procedures. The ITC Department is responsible for assessing, identifying and mitigating material cybersecurity risks, including at a strategic level, monitoring for,
defending against and remediating cybersecurity incidents and implementing and making improvements to our overall cybersecurity strategy. The ITC Department utilizes key performance indicators and metrics to monitor their performance and track
progress towards goals established by the ITC Department.
As we do not have a dedicated board committee solely focused on cybersecurity, our full Board oversees the implementation of our cybersecurity strategy, as well as cybersecurity
risks, with the aim of protecting our interests and assets. Our cybersecurity strategy was developed by the ITC Department and approved by senior management. The Board receives periodic reports and presentations on cybersecurity risks from the
ITC Department, including regarding recent incidents or breaches (if any), vulnerabilities, mitigation strategies and the overall effectiveness of our cybersecurity program. These reports highlight significant or emerging cybersecurity threats,
their potential impact on the organization, ongoing initiatives to mitigate risks and any proposed actions or investments required to enhance our cybersecurity posture.