ddog-20260429

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

_______________________

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

_______________________

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

(Amendment No. )

_______________________

Filed by the Registrant x Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o

Check the appropriate box:


o			Preliminary Proxy Statement

o			Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

x			Definitive Proxy Statement

o			Definitive Additional Materials

o			Soliciting Material Pursuant to § 240.14a-12

DATADOG, INC.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if Other Than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box)


x			No fee required.

o			Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

o			Fee computed on table in exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

Table of Contents

Datadog, Inc.

620 8th Avenue, 45th Floor

New York, New York 10018

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

To Be Held On June 15, 2026

To the Stockholders of Datadog, Inc.:

On behalf of our board of directors, it is our pleasure to cordially invite you to attend the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Datadog, Inc., a Nevada corporation. The Annual Meeting will be held virtually, via live webcast at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/DDOG2026, originating from New York, New York, on Monday, June 15, 2026 at 2:30 p.m., Eastern Time. We believe hosting a virtual meeting enables participation by more of our stockholders, while lowering the cost of conducting the meeting. Stockholders attending the virtual meeting will be afforded the same rights and opportunities to participate as they would at an in-person meeting. We encourage you to attend online and participate. We recommend that you log in a few minutes before 2:30 p.m., Eastern Time, on June 15, 2026 to ensure you are logged in when the Annual Meeting starts.

The Annual Meeting will be held for the following purposes:

1.To elect four Class I directors, Olivier Pomel, Dev Ittycheria, Shardul Shah and Ami Vora, each to serve for a term expiring at our Annual Meeting of Stockholders in 2029 and to hold office until their successors are duly elected or appointed and qualified, or until his or her earlier death, resignation, retirement, disqualification or removal;

2.To approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers, as disclosed in this proxy statement;

3.To ratify the selection by the audit committee of our board of directors of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2026;

4.To vote on a stockholder proposal, if properly presented at the Annual Meeting; and

5.To conduct any other business properly brought before the Annual Meeting by or at the direction of our board of directors

These items of business are more fully described in the Proxy Statement accompanying this Notice.

The record date for the Annual Meeting, and any adjournment or postponement thereof, is April 22, 2026. Only stockholders of record at the close of business on that date may vote at the Annual Meeting or any adjournment thereof.

By Order of the Board of Directors

Kerry Acocella

General Counsel and Secretary

New York, New York

April 29, 2026

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Stockholders’ Meeting to be Held on Monday, June 15, 2026 at 2:30 p.m. Eastern Time. The proxy statement and annual report to shareholders are available at www.proxyvote.com.

Table of Contents


You are cordially invited to attend the Annual Meeting. Whether or not you expect to attend the Annual Meeting, PLEASE VOTE YOUR SHARES. As an alternative to voting online at the Annual Meeting, you may vote your shares in advance of the Annual Meeting through the internet, by telephone or, if you receive a paper proxy card in the mail, by mailing the completed proxy card. Voting instructions are provided in the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or, if you receive a paper proxy card by mail, the instructions are printed on your proxy card. Even if you have voted by proxy, you may still vote online if you attend the Annual Meeting. Please note, however, that if your shares are held of record by a broker, bank or other agent and you wish to vote at the Annual Meeting, you must follow the instructions from such organization and will need to obtain a proxy issued in your name from that record holder.

Table of Contents


			Page
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THESE PROXY MATERIALS AND VOTING			2

PROPOSAL 1 ELECTION OF DIRECTORS			8

INFORMATION REGARDING DIRECTOR NOMINEES AND CURRENT DIRECTORS			9

INFORMATION REGARDING THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE			11

PROPOSAL 2 APPROVAL, ON A NON-BINDING, ADVISORY BASIS, OF THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS			19

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS			20

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION			21

PAY VERSUS PERFORMANCE			39

CEO PAY RATIO			43

NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION			44

PROPOSAL 3 RATIFICATION OF DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP AS OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM			46

PROPOSAL 4 STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL, IF PROPERLY PRESENTED			47

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT			49

TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PERSONS			51

HOUSEHOLDING OF PROXY MATERIALS			52

OTHER MATTERS			53

APPENDIX A - RECONCILIATION OF NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES			53

-i-

Table of Contents

Datadog, Inc.

620 8th Avenue, 45th Floor

New York, New York 10018

PROXY STATEMENT

FOR THE 2026 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

To Be Held on June 15, 2026 at 2:30 p.m., Eastern Time

Our board of directors is soliciting your proxy to vote at the 2026 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) of Datadog, Inc., a Nevada corporation, to be held virtually, via live webcast at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/DDOG2026, originating from New York, New York, on Monday, June 15, 2026 at 2:30 p.m., Eastern Time, and any adjournment or postponement thereof. We believe hosting a virtual meeting enables participation by more of our stockholders, while lowering the cost of conducting the meeting. Stockholders attending the virtual meeting will be afforded the same rights and opportunities to participate as they would at an in-person meeting.

For the Annual Meeting, we have elected to furnish our proxy materials, including this proxy statement and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025 (the “Annual Report”), to our stockholders primarily via the internet. On or about April 29, 2026, we expect to mail to our stockholders a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”) that contains notice of the Annual Meeting and instructions on how to access our proxy materials on the internet, how to vote at the Annual Meeting, and how to request printed copies of the proxy materials. Stockholders may request to receive all future materials in printed form by mail or by email by following the instructions contained in the Notice. A stockholder’s election to receive proxy materials by mail or email will remain in effect until revoked. We encourage stockholders to take advantage of the availability of the proxy materials on the internet to help reduce the environmental impact and cost of our Annual Meeting.

Only stockholders of record at the close of business on April 22, 2026 (the “Record Date”) will be entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. On the Record Date, there were 330,775,832 shares of Class A common stock and 25,166,391 shares of Class B common stock outstanding and entitled to vote (together, the “common stock”). Each holder of Class A common stock will have the right to one vote per share of Class A common stock and each holder of Class B common stock will have the right to ten votes per share of Class B common stock. The holders of shares of common stock will vote together as a single class on all matters submitted to a vote at the Annual Meeting. For instructions on how to attend the Annual Meeting, please see the instructions at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/DDOG2026 and on page 2 of this proxy statement.

In this proxy statement, we refer to Datadog, Inc. as “Datadog,” “we” or “us” and the board of directors of Datadog as “our board of directors.” The Annual Report, which contains consolidated financial statements as of and for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025, accompanies this proxy statement. You also may obtain a copy of the Annual Report without charge by emailing IR@datadoghq.com.

Table of Contents

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THESE PROXY MATERIALS AND VOTING

Why did I receive a notice regarding the availability of proxy materials on the internet?

Pursuant to rules adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), we have elected to provide access to our proxy materials over the internet. Accordingly, we have sent you the Notice because our board of directors is soliciting your proxy to vote at the 2026 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, including at any adjournments or postponements thereof. All stockholders will have the ability to access the proxy materials on the website referred to in the Notice or to request a printed set of the proxy materials. Instructions on how to access the proxy materials over the internet or to request a printed copy may be found in the Notice.

We intend to mail the Notice on or about April 29, 2026 to stockholders of record entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting.

Will I receive any other proxy materials by mail?

We may send you a proxy card, along with a second Notice, ten calendar days after our first mailing of the Notice or thereafter.

How do I attend, participate in, and ask questions during the Annual Meeting?

We will be hosting the Annual Meeting via live webcast only. Any stockholder as of the Record Date can attend the Annual Meeting live online at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/DDOG2026. The meeting will start at 2:30 p.m., Eastern Time, on Monday, June 15, 2026. Stockholders attending the Annual Meeting will be afforded the same rights and opportunities to participate as they would at an in-person meeting.

In order to enter the Annual Meeting, you will need the control number, which is included in the Notice or on your proxy card if you are a stockholder of record, or included with your voting instruction card and voting instructions received from your broker, bank or other agent if you hold your shares in “street name.” Instructions on how to attend and participate are available at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/DDOG2026. We recommend that you log in a few minutes before 2:30 p.m., Eastern Time to ensure you are logged in when the Annual Meeting starts. The webcast will open 15 minutes before the start of the Annual Meeting.

If you would like to submit a question during the Annual Meeting, you may log in at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/DDOG2026 using your control number, type your question into the “Ask a Question” field, and click “Submit.”

To help ensure that we have a productive and efficient meeting, and in fairness to all stockholders in attendance, you will also find posted our rules of conduct for the Annual Meeting when you log in prior to its start. These rules of conduct will include the following guidelines:

•You may submit questions and comments electronically through the meeting portal during the Annual Meeting.

•Only stockholders of record as of the Record Date for the Annual Meeting and their proxy holders may submit questions or comments.

•Please direct all questions to Olivier Pomel, our Chief Executive Officer.

•Please include your name and affiliation, if any, when submitting a question or comment.

•Limit your remarks to one brief question or comment that is relevant to the Annual Meeting.

•Questions may be grouped by topic by our management.

•Questions may also be ruled as out of order if they are, among other things, irrelevant to the business of the Annual Meeting, related to pending or threatened litigation, disorderly, repetitious of statements already made, or in furtherance of the speaker’s own personal, political or business interests.

•Be respectful of your fellow stockholders and Annual Meeting participants.

•No audio or video recordings of the Annual Meeting are permitted.

What if I have technical difficulties or trouble accessing the Annual Meeting?

We will have technicians ready to assist you with any technical difficulties you may have accessing the Annual Meeting. If you encounter any difficulties accessing the Annual Meeting during the check-in or meeting time, please call the technical

Table of Contents

support number that will be posted at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/DDOG2026. Technical support will be available starting at 1:30 p.m., Eastern Time on June 15, 2026.

Who can vote at the Annual Meeting?

Only stockholders of record at the close of business on the Record Date, April 22, 2026, and their valid proxyholders will be entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. On the Record Date, there were 330,775,832 shares of Class A common stock and 25,166,391 shares of Class B common stock outstanding and entitled to vote.

•Stockholder of Record: Shares Registered in Your Name. If, on the Record Date, your shares were registered directly in your name with our transfer agent, Equiniti Trust Company, LLC, then you are a stockholder of record. As a stockholder of record, you may vote online during the Annual Meeting or by proxy in advance. Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, we urge you to vote your shares by proxy in advance of the Annual Meeting through the internet, by telephone or by completing and returning a printed proxy card that you may request or that we may elect to deliver at a later time to ensure your vote is counted.

•Beneficial Owner: Shares Registered in the Name of a Broker or Bank. If, on the Record Date, your shares were held not in your name, but rather in an account at a brokerage firm, bank or other similar organization, then you are the beneficial owner of shares held in “street name” and the Notice is being forwarded to you by that organization. The organization holding your account is considered to be the stockholder of record for purposes of voting at the Annual Meeting. As a beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your broker, bank or other agent regarding how to vote the shares in your account. You are also invited to attend the Annual Meeting. However, since you are not the stockholder of record, you may vote your shares online during the Annual Meeting only by following the instructions from such organization and after obtaining a valid proxy from your broker, bank or other agent.

How many votes do I have?

Each holder of shares of our Class A common stock will have one vote per share of Class A common stock held as of the Record Date, and each holder of shares of our Class B common stock will have ten votes per share of Class B common stock held as of the Record Date. The holders of the shares of our Class A common stock and Class B common stock will vote as a single class on all matters described in this proxy statement for which your vote is being solicited.

What am I voting on?

There are four matters scheduled for a vote:

•Proposal 1: Election of four Class I directors, each to hold office until our annual meeting of stockholders in 2029;

•Proposal 2: Advisory approval of the compensation of our named executive officers, as disclosed in this proxy statement in accordance with SEC rules;

•Proposal 3: Ratification of the selection by the audit committee of our board of directors of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2026; and

•Proposal 4: Stockholder proposal, if properly presented, requesting the adoption of a simple majority voting provision.

What if another matter is properly brought before the Annual Meeting?

Our board of directors knows of no other matters that will be presented for consideration at the Annual Meeting. If any other matters are properly brought before the Annual Meeting, it is the intention of the persons named in the accompanying proxy to vote on those matters in accordance with their best judgment.

How do I vote?

•Stockholder of Record: Shares Registered in Your Name. If you are a stockholder of record, you may vote (1) online during the Annual Meeting or (2) in advance of the Annual Meeting by proxy through the internet, by telephone or by using a proxy card that you may request or that we may elect to deliver at a later time. Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, we urge you to vote by proxy to ensure your vote is counted. You may still attend the Annual Meeting and vote online even if you have already voted by proxy.

Table of Contents

•To vote online during the Annual Meeting, follow the provided instructions to join the Annual Meeting at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/DDOG2026, starting at 2:30 p.m., Eastern Time on Monday, June 15, 2026. The webcast will open 15 minutes before the start of the Annual Meeting.

•To vote in advance of the Annual Meeting through the internet, go to www.proxyvote.com to complete an electronic proxy card. You will be asked to provide the control number from the Notice or the printed proxy card. Your internet vote must be received by 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time on Sunday, June 14, 2026 to be counted.

•To vote in advance of the Annual Meeting by telephone, dial 1-800-690-6903 using a touch-tone phone and follow the recorded instructions. You will be asked to provide the control number from the Notice or the printed proxy card. Your telephone vote must be received by 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time on Sunday, June 14, 2026 to be counted.

•To vote in advance of the Annual Meeting using a printed proxy card that may be delivered to you, simply complete, sign and date the proxy card and return it promptly in the envelope provided. If you return your signed proxy card to us before the Annual Meeting, we will vote your shares as you direct.

•Beneficial Owner: Shares Registered in the Name of Broker or Bank. If you are a beneficial owner of shares registered in the name of your broker, bank or other agent, you should have received a Notice containing voting instructions from that organization rather than from us. To vote prior to the Annual Meeting, simply follow the voting instructions in the Notice to ensure that your vote is counted. To vote online during the Annual Meeting, you must follow the instructions from your broker, bank or other agent and will need to obtain a proxy issued in your name from that record holder.


Internet voting during the Annual Meeting and/or internet proxy voting in advance of the Annual Meeting allows you to vote your shares online, with procedures designed to ensure the authenticity and correctness of your vote instructions. Please be aware that you must bear any costs associated with your internet access.

Can I vote my shares by filling out and returning the Notice?

No. The Notice identifies the items to be voted on at the Annual Meeting, but you cannot vote by marking the Notice and returning it. The Notice provides instructions on how to vote by proxy in advance of the Annual Meeting through the internet, by telephone, using a printed proxy card or online during the Annual Meeting.

What does it mean if I receive more than one Notice?

If you receive more than one Notice, your shares may be registered in more than one name or in different accounts. Please follow the voting instructions on the Notices to ensure that all of your shares are voted.

Can I change my vote after submitting my proxy?

•Stockholder of Record: Shares Registered in Your Name. If you are a stockholder of record, then yes, you can revoke your proxy at any time before the final vote at the Annual Meeting. You may revoke your proxy in any one of the following ways:

•Submit another properly completed proxy card with a later date.

•Grant a subsequent proxy by telephone or through the internet.

•Send a timely written notice that you are revoking your proxy via email at IR@datadoghq.com.

•Attend the Annual Meeting and vote online during the meeting. Simply attending the Annual Meeting will not, by itself, revoke your proxy. Even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, we recommend that you also submit your proxy or voting instructions or vote in advance of the Annual Meeting by telephone or through the internet so that your vote will be counted if you later decide not to attend the Annual Meeting.

Your most current proxy card or telephone or internet proxy is the one that is counted.

•Beneficial Owner: Shares Registered in the Name of Broker or Bank. If you are a beneficial owner and your shares are held in “street name” by your broker, bank or other agent, you should follow the instructions provided by your broker, bank or other agent.

Table of Contents

If I am a stockholder of record and I do not vote, or if I return a proxy card or otherwise vote without giving specific voting instructions, what happens?

If you are a stockholder of record and do not vote through the internet, by telephone, by completing the proxy card that may be delivered to you or online during the Annual Meeting, your shares will not be voted.

If you return a signed and dated proxy card or otherwise vote without marking voting selections, your shares will be voted in accordance with the recommendations of our board of directors: “FOR” the election of each of the four nominees for director; “FOR” the advisory approval of executive compensation; “FOR” the ratification of the selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2026; and “AGAINST” the stockholder proposal requesting the adoption of a simple majority voting provision, if properly presented. If any other matter is properly presented at the Annual Meeting, your proxyholder (one of the individuals named on your proxy card) will vote your shares using his best judgment.

If I am a beneficial owner of shares held in “street name” and I do not provide my broker, bank or other agent with voting instructions, what happens?

If you are a beneficial owner and do not instruct your broker, bank or other agent how to vote your shares, the question of whether your broker or nominee will still be able to vote your shares depends on whether, pursuant to stock exchange rules, the particular proposal is deemed to be a “routine” matter. Brokers and nominees can use their discretion to vote “uninstructed” shares with respect to matters that are considered to be “routine,” but not with respect to “non-routine” matters. Under applicable rules and interpretations, “non-routine” matters are matters that may substantially affect the rights or privileges of stockholders, such as mergers, stockholder proposals, elections of directors (even if not contested), executive compensation, and certain corporate governance proposals, even if management-supported. Accordingly, your broker or nominee may vote your shares on Proposal 3. Your broker or nominee, however, may not vote your shares on Proposals 1, 2 and 4 without your instructions. Please instruct your bank, broker or other agent to ensure that your vote will be counted.

What are “broker non-votes”?

A “broker non-vote” occurs when your broker submits a proxy for the meeting with respect to “routine” matters but does not vote on “non-routine” matters because you did not provide voting instructions on these matters. These unvoted shares with respect to “non-routine” matters are counted as “broker non-votes.”

As a reminder, if you are a beneficial owner of shares held in “street name,” in order to ensure your shares are voted in the way you would prefer, you must provide voting instructions to your broker, bank or other agent by the deadline provided in the materials you receive from such organization.

How are votes counted?

Votes will be counted by the inspector of election appointed for the Annual Meeting, who will separately count: (1) with respect to Proposal 1, votes “FOR,” “WITHHOLD” and broker non-votes, (2) with respect to Proposal 2, votes “FOR,” “AGAINST,” abstentions and broker non-votes, (3) with respect to Proposal 3, votes “FOR,” “AGAINST,” and abstentions and (4) with respect to Proposal 4, votes “FOR,” “AGAINST,” abstentions and broker non-votes.

Table of Contents

How many votes are needed to approve each proposal?

The following table summarizes the minimum vote needed to approve each proposal and the effect of abstentions, withhold votes and broker non-votes:

Proposal

Vote Required for Approval

“Withhold”

Vote

Abstentions

Broker

Non-Votes

1. Election of directors

The four nominees receiving the most “FOR” votes will be elected.

No effect

Not
applicable

No effect

2. Advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers

This proposal, commonly referred to as the “say-on-pay” vote, must receive more “FOR” votes than “AGAINST” votes to be approved. Since this proposal is an advisory vote, the result will not be binding on our board of directors. However, our board of directors values our stockholders’ opinions, and our board of directors and the compensation committee will take into account the outcome of the advisory vote when considering future executive compensation decisions.

Not
applicable

No effect

3. Ratification of the selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2026

Must receive more “FOR” votes than “AGAINST” votes to be approved.

Not
applicable

No effect

Not
applicable

4. Stockholder proposal requesting the adoption of a simple majority voting provision, if properly presented.

Must receive more “FOR” votes than “AGAINST” votes to be approved.

Not
applicable

No effect

What is the quorum requirement?

A quorum of stockholders is necessary to hold a valid meeting. A quorum will be present if stockholders holding at least a majority of the voting power of the outstanding shares entitled to vote at the meeting are present at the Annual Meeting by virtual attendance or represented by proxy (regardless of whether the proxy has authority to vote on any matter). On the Record Date, there were 330,775,832 shares of Class A common stock and 25,166,391 shares of Class B common stock outstanding and entitled to vote.

Abstentions, withhold votes and broker non-votes will be counted towards the quorum requirement. If there is no quorum, the person who called the meeting, the Chairperson of the meeting, or the holders of a majority of the voting power of the shares present at the Annual Meeting by virtual attendance or represented by proxy may adjourn the Annual Meeting to another date.

How can I find out the results of the voting at the Annual Meeting?

Preliminary voting results will be announced at the Annual Meeting. In addition, final voting results will be published in a current report on Form 8-K that we expect to file within four business days after the Annual Meeting. If final voting results are not available to us in time to file a Form 8-K within four business days after the Annual Meeting, we intend to file a Form 8-K to publish preliminary results and, within four business days after the final results are known to us, file an additional Form 8-K to publish the final results.

When are stockholder proposals and director nominations due for next year’s annual meeting?

To be considered for inclusion in next year’s proxy materials, your proposal must be submitted in writing by December 30, 2026, to our Secretary at 620 8th Avenue, 45th Floor, New York, New York 10018, Attention: Secretary.

Table of Contents

Pursuant to our bylaws, if you wish to submit a proposal (including a director nomination) at the annual meeting of stockholders to be held in 2027 that is not to be included in the proxy materials, you must do so not later than the close of business on March 17, 2027 nor earlier than the close of business on February 15, 2027. However, if the date of such annual meeting is not held between May 16, 2027 and July 15, 2027, to be timely, notice by the stockholder must be received (A) not earlier than the close of business on the 120th day prior to such annual meeting and (B) not later than the close of business on the later of the 90th day prior to such annual meeting or, if later than the 90th day prior to such annual meeting, the 10th day following the day on which public announcement of the date of such annual meeting is first made. You are also advised to review our bylaws, which contain additional requirements about advance notice of stockholder proposals and director nominations.

Who is paying for this proxy solicitation?

We will pay for the cost of soliciting proxies. In addition to these proxy materials, our directors and employees may also solicit proxies in person, by telephone or by other means of communication. Directors and employees will not be paid additional compensation for soliciting proxies. We may reimburse brokers, banks and other agents for the cost of forwarding proxy materials to beneficial owners.

Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 1

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Our board of directors currently consists of nine members and is divided into three classes. Each class consists, as nearly as possible, of one-third of the total number of directors, and each class has a three-year term. At each annual meeting of stockholders, the successors to directors whose terms then expire will be elected to serve from the time of election until the third annual meeting following the election.

Our directors are divided into the three classes as follows:

•Class I directors: Olivier Pomel, Dev Ittycheria, Shardul Shah and Ami Vora, whose terms will expire at the upcoming Annual Meeting,

•Class II directors: Amit Agarwal, Alexis Lê-Quôc, Michael Callahan and Dominic Phillips, whose terms will expire at the annual meeting of stockholders to be held in 2027; and

•Class III directors: Titi Cole, Matthew Jacobson and Julie Richardson, whose terms will expire at the annual meeting of stockholders to be held in 2028.

Any additional directorships resulting from an increase in the number of directors will be distributed among the three classes so that, as nearly as possible, each class will consist of one-third of the directors. Vacancies on the board of directors may be filled only by persons elected by a majority of the remaining directors. A director elected by the board of directors to fill a vacancy in a class, including vacancies created by an increase in the number of directors, shall serve for the remainder of the full term of that class and until the director’s successor is duly elected or appointed and qualified. The division of our board of directors into three classes with staggered three-year terms may delay or prevent a change of our management or a change in control of Datadog.

Each of Mr. Pomel, Mr. Ittycheria, Mr. Shah and Ms. Vora is currently a member of our board of directors and has been nominated for reelection to serve as a Class I director. Ms. Vora, who was identified by Spencer Stuart, joined our board of directors in September 2025 after having been considered and recommended by our nominating and corporate governance committee, whereas Mr. Pomel, Mr. Ittycheria and Mr. Shah were previously elected by the stockholders. Each of these nominees has agreed to stand for reelection at the Annual Meeting. Our management has no reason to believe that any nominee will be unable to serve. If elected at the Annual Meeting, each of these nominees would serve until the annual meeting of stockholders to be held in 2029 and until her or his successor has been duly elected or appointed and qualified, or if sooner, until the director’s death, resignation, retirement, disqualification or removal.

If any nominee becomes unavailable for election as a result of an unexpected occurrence, shares that would have been voted for that nominee will instead be voted for the election of a substitute nominee proposed by us or alternatively, our board of directors may leave a vacancy on the board of directors or reduce the size of the board of directors.

Our nominating and corporate governance committee seeks to assemble a board that, as a whole, possesses the appropriate balance of professional and industry knowledge, financial expertise, diversity and high-level management experience necessary to oversee and direct our business. To that end, the committee has identified and evaluated nominees in the broader context of the board’s overall composition, with the goal of recruiting members who complement and strengthen the skills of other members and who also exhibit integrity, collegiality, sound business judgment and other qualities that the committee views as critical to effective functioning of the board. To provide a mix of experience and perspective on the board, the committee also takes into account diversity. The biographies below include information, as of the date of this proxy statement, regarding the specific and particular experience, qualifications, attributes or skills of each director or director nominee that led the committee to believe that that nominee should continue to serve on the board. However, each of the members of the committee may have a variety of reasons why a particular person would be an appropriate nominee for the board, and these views may differ from the views of other members.

OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR EACH CLASS I DIRECTOR NOMINEE NAMED ABOVE.

Table of Contents

INFORMATION REGARDING DIRECTOR NOMINEES AND CURRENT DIRECTORS

The following table sets forth, for the Class I nominees and our other directors who will continue in office after the Annual Meeting, their ages and positions or offices held with us as of the date of this proxy statement:

Name

Age

Principal Occupation/Position

Class I director nominees for election at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders

Olivier Pomel

Chief Executive Officer, Co-Founder and Director

Dev Ittycheria

Director

Shardul Shah

Director

Ami Vora

Director

Class II directors continuing in office until the annual meeting of stockholders to be held in 2027

Amit Agarwal

Director

Alexis Lê-Quôc

Chief Technology Officer, Co-Founder and Director

Michael Callahan

Director

Dominic Phillips

Director

Class III directors continuing in office until the annual meeting of stockholders to be held in 2028

Titi Cole

Director

Matthew Jacobson

Director

Julie Richardson

Director

Candidates for director nominees are reviewed in the context of the current composition of the board of directors, the operating requirements of Datadog and the long-term interests of our stockholders. In conducting this assessment, the nominating and corporate governance committee typically considers diversity, skills and such other factors as it deems appropriate, given the current needs of the board of directors and our business, to maintain a balance of knowledge, experience and capability.

Set forth below is biographical information for the director nominees and each person whose term of office as a director will continue after the Annual Meeting. This includes information regarding each director’s experience, qualifications, attributes or skills that led our board of directors to recommend them for board service.

Nominees for Election at the Annual Meeting

Olivier Pomel is one of the co-founders of our company and has served as our Chief Executive Officer and a member of our board of directors since June 2010. Prior to co-founding Datadog, Mr. Pomel was Vice President of Technology at Wireless Generation, Inc., a SaaS technology company, from 2002 until its acquisition by News Corp. in 2010. Previously, Mr. Pomel held engineering positions at a number of technology and software companies, including IBM Research. Mr. Pomel received his M.S. in Computer Science from Ecole Centrale Paris. We believe Mr. Pomel is qualified to serve as a member of our board of directors because of his experience building and leading our business and his insight into corporate matters as our Chief Executive Officer.

Dev Ittycheria has served as a member of our board of directors since February 2014. Mr. Ittycheria served as President and Chief Executive Officer of MongoDB, Inc. from 2014 to 2025 and has served as a member of its board since 2014. Prior to joining MongoDB, Mr. Ittycheria served as a Managing Director at OpenView Venture Partners, a venture capital firm, from October 2013 to September 2014. From February 2012 to June 2013, Mr. Ittycheria served as a Venture Partner at Greylock Partners, a venture capital firm. From April 2008 to February 2010, Mr. Ittycheria served as President-Enterprise Management at BMC Software, Inc., a computer software company, which he joined in connection with its acquisition of BladeLogic, Inc., a computer software company that Mr. Ittycheria co-founded and for which he served as Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Ittycheria previously served on the board of directors of athenahealth, Inc., a public cloud-based services company, from June 2010 to February 2019; Bazaarvoice, Inc., a public software company, from January 2010 to August 2014; AppDynamics, Inc., a private software company, from March 2011 until its acquisition by Cisco Systems, Inc. in March 2017; and Altimeter Growth Corporation, a public special purpose investment vehicle, from

Table of Contents

September 2020 to December 2021. Mr. Ittycheria received his B.S. in Electrical Engineering from Rutgers University. We believe that Mr. Ittycheria is qualified to serve as a member of our board of directors because of his experience in building and leading high-growth businesses and his service on the boards of multiple public companies.

Shardul Shah has served as a member of our board of directors since November 2012. He is a partner at Index Ventures, an international venture capital firm, where he has worked since 2008. Mr. Shah’s investment focus is primarily centered around cloud infrastructure, security and enterprise software. Mr. Shah has served and currently serves on the board of directors of multiple private technology companies. Prior to Index Ventures, Mr. Shah was an associate at Summit Partners. Mr. Shah received his B.A. in Economics and Biology from the University of Chicago. We believe that Mr. Shah is qualified to serve as a member of our board of directors because of his experience in the venture capital industry and his knowledge of infrastructure, security and software.

Ami Vora has served as a member of our board of directors since September 2025. Since December 2025, she has served as Head of Product Anthropic after serving as the Chief Product Officer at Faire, the online marketplace for wholesale goods, from November 2022 to December 2024. From 2007 until November 2022, Ms. Vora held various roles at Meta, including VP Product and Design at WhatsApp, VP Product for Facebook Ads, and Director at Instagram. Ms. Vora began her career building developer tools at Microsoft. She holds a Bachelor’s Degree in Computer Science from Harvard University. We believe Ms. Vora is qualified to serve as a member of our board of directors because of her extensive experiencing building products at a global scale at high growth technology companies.

Directors Continuing in Office Until the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be Held in 2027

Amit Agarwal has served as a member of our board of directors since January 2025. Mr. Agarwal founded Standard Template Labs in September 2025 and serves as its Chief Executive Officer. In 2025 he was a Partner at ICONIQ Capital, an investment and venture capital firm. From 2012 to 2024, Mr. Agarwal held senior leadership positions at Datadog, including serving as President from August 2022 to December 2024 and Chief Product Officer from April 2012 to August 2022. Prior to joining the company, Mr. Agarwal held senior product management and engineering positions at a number of software companies, including Quest Software and IBM. Mr. Agarwal received his M.B.A. in General Management from York University and his M.S. in Computer Science from Dalhousie University. We believe Mr. Agarwal is qualified to serve as a member of our board of directors because of his experience building and leading the development of our product and sales teams and his insights into our business as our former Chief Product Officer.

Alexis Lê-Quôc is one of the co-founders of our company and has served as our Chief Technology Officer and a member of our board of directors since June 2010. Prior to co-founding Datadog, Mr. Lê-Quôc worked at Wireless Generation from March 2004 to December 2010, where he most recently served as Director of Live Operations. Previously, Mr. Lê-Quôc held engineering positions at a number of technology and software companies, including IBM Research and France Télécom S.A. Mr. Lê-Quôc received his M.S. in Computer Science from CentraleSupélec. We believe Mr. Lê-Quôc is qualified to serve as a member of our board of directors because of his experience building and leading the development of our technology and his insight into our business as our Chief Technology Officer.

Michael Callahan has served as a member of our board of directors since June 2011. Mr. Callahan served as Chief Executive Officer of Awake Security, Inc., a private cyber security company that he co-founded, from August 2014 to July 2018. From September 2011 to August 2014, Mr. Callahan was an Entrepreneur in Residence at Greylock Partners. Earlier in his career, Mr. Callahan was Chief Technologist for Enterprise NAS at Hewlett Packard from April 2007 to October 2009; Chief Technology Officer and co-founder of PolyServe, a software company, from May 2000 to April 2007; and Director of Advanced Development at Ask Jeeves, a search engine, from January 1999 to May 2000. Mr. Callahan received his A.B. in Social Studies from Harvard University and was a Rhodes Scholar and Junior Research Fellow in mathematics at the University of Oxford. We believe that Mr. Callahan is qualified to serve as a member of our board of directors because of his extensive experience in the technology industry.

Table of Contents

Dominic Phillips has served as a member of our board of directors since February 2026. Mr. Phillips has served as the Chief Financial Officer of Samsara Inc. since December 2019. From April 2014 to November 2019, he held various finance roles at ServiceNow, Inc., most recently Vice President, Finance and Head of Corporate Development, and from August 2010 to April 2014, he held various roles on Morgan Stanley’s technology investment banking team, most recently Vice President. Mr. Phillips holds a B.S. in Business from California Polytechnic State University—San Luis Obispo and an M.B.A. from University of California, Berkeley, Haas School of Business. We believe that Mr. Phillips is qualified to serve as a member of our board of directors because of his extensive senior management experience in the software industry as well as his depth of knowledge of financial and accounting issues, developed in senior financial roles at public companies in the software industry.

Directors Continuing in Office Until the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be Held in 2028

Titi Cole has served as a member of our board of directors since June 2022. From 2022 to January 2025, she served as the CEO of Legacy Franchises of Citigroup Inc. where she was responsible for overseeing Citi’s consumer businesses in the markets the company was exiting. Beginning in 2020, she held various senior leadership positions as Citi’s Head of Global Operations and Fraud Prevention and the Chief Client Officer for Personal Banking and Wealth Management. From 2015 to 2020, Ms. Cole was the Head of Consumer and Small Business Banking Operations and Contact Centers at Wells Fargo after previously leading Shared Services for Consumer Credit Solutions, and also served as a member of Wells Fargo’s Management Committee. She has also held leadership roles at Bank of America and BMO Harris Bank in Chicago. Ms. Cole has served on the board of directors of Citigroup Inc., a publicly held financial services company, since 2025. Ms. Cole received a B.A. in Economics from the University of Ibadan in Nigeria and a M.B.A. from Northwestern University's Kellogg School of Management. We believe that Ms. Cole is qualified to serve as a member of our board of directors because of her extensive experience with global institutions at scale.

Matthew Jacobson has served as a member of our board of directors since July 2019, and previously served as a board observer from December 2015 through July 2019. He is a Partner at ICONIQ Capital, an investment and venture capital firm, where he has worked since September 2013 and sits on the firm’s executive, management and investment committees. Mr. Jacobson currently serves on the board of directors of GitLab Inc., a publicly traded software company, as well as the boards of a number of private technology companies. Additionally, Mr. Jacobson previously served on the board of directors of Braze, Inc. from July 2017 to April 2023 and Sprinklr, Inc. from April 2014 until December 2022. Prior to ICONIQ Capital, Mr. Jacobson held operating roles at Groupon and investing roles at Battery Ventures and Technology Crossover Ventures. He began his career as an investment banker at Lehman Brothers. Mr. Jacobson received his B.S. in Economics with concentrations in Finance and Management from The Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania. We believe that Mr. Jacobson is qualified to serve as a member of our board of directors because of his extensive experience in the venture capital and technology industries.

Julie G. Richardson has served as a member of our board of directors since May 2019. From November 2012 to October 2014, Ms. Richardson was a Senior Adviser to Providence Equity Partners LLC, a global asset management firm. From April 2003 to November 2012, Ms. Richardson was a Partner and Managing Director at Providence Equity, a private equity investment fund, and oversaw its New York office. Prior to Providence Equity, Ms. Richardson served as Global Head of JP Morgan’s Telecom, Media and Technology Group, and was previously a Managing Director in Merrill Lynch & Co.’s investment banking group. Ms. Richardson has served on the boards of directors of BXP, Inc., a publicly traded developer in the United States, since May 2025 and UBS Group AG, a publicly held financial services company, since May 2017. Ms. Richardson previously served on the boards of directors of Arconic, Inc. from 2016 to 2018, The Hartford Financial Group from 2014 to 2020, VEREIT, Inc. from 2015 to 2021 and Yext Inc. from 2015 to January 2025. Ms. Richardson holds a B.B.A from the University of Wisconsin-Madison. We believe that Ms. Richardson is qualified to serve as a member of our board of directors because of her investment management and financial services experience, and her extensive experience serving on public company boards.

INFORMATION REGARDING THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Independence of the Board of Directors

Our Class A common stock is listed on the Nasdaq Global Select Market (“Nasdaq”). Under the Nasdaq listing standards, a majority of the members of our board of directors must qualify as “independent,” as affirmatively determined by our board of directors. Our board of directors consults with our counsel to ensure that its determinations are consistent with relevant securities and other laws and regulations regarding the definition of “independent,” including those set forth in pertinent listing standards of Nasdaq, as in effect from time to time.

Table of Contents

Our board of directors has affirmatively determined that the following eight directors are independent within the meaning of the applicable Nasdaq listing standards: Mses. Cole, Richardson and Vora and Messrs. Callahan, Ittycheria, Jacobson, Phillips and Shah. In making this determination, our board of directors found that none of these directors or nominees for director had a material or other disqualifying relationship with Datadog. Messrs. Agarwal, Pomel and Lê-Quôc are not independent due to their current or former positions as executive officers of Datadog.

Accordingly, a majority of our directors are independent, as required under applicable Nasdaq rules. In making this determination, our board of directors considered the applicable Nasdaq rules and all other facts and circumstances our board of directors deemed relevant in determining their independence, including their beneficial ownership of our capital stock.

Board Leadership Structure

Dev Ittycheria currently serves as lead independent director of our board of directors. The primary responsibilities of the lead independent director are to: work with the Chief Executive Officer to develop board meeting schedules and agendas; provide the Chief Executive Officer feedback on the quality, quantity and timeliness of the information provided to the board; develop the agenda for and moderate executive sessions of the independent members of the board; preside over board meetings when the chairperson is not present; act as principal liaison between the independent members of the board and the Chief Executive Officer; and convene meetings of the independent directors as appropriate. Accordingly, the lead independent director has substantial ability to shape the work of the board. We believe that having a lead independent director supports the board in its oversight of the business and affairs of Datadog. In addition, we believe that having a lead independent director creates an environment that is conducive to objective evaluation and oversight of management’s performance, increasing management accountability and improving the ability of the board to monitor whether management’s actions are in the best interests of Datadog and its stockholders. As a result, Datadog believes that having a lead independent director can enhance the effectiveness of the board as a whole.

Role of the Board in Risk Oversight

Our board of directors oversees an enterprise-wide approach to risk management, designed to support the achievement of organizational objectives, to improve long-term organizational performance, and to enhance stockholder value. A fundamental part of risk management is not only understanding the most significant risks a company faces and what steps management is taking to manage those risks but also understanding what level of risk is appropriate for a given company. The involvement of our full board of directors in reviewing our business is an integral aspect of its assessment of management’s tolerance for risk and also its determination of what constitutes an appropriate level of risk.

While our full board of directors has overall responsibility for risk oversight, it has delegated oversight of certain risks to its committees. Our audit committee monitors our major financial risk exposures and the steps our management has taken to monitor and control these exposures, including guidelines and policies to govern the process by which risk assessment and management is undertaken. Furthermore, our audit committee oversees risks associated with cybersecurity, information security and data privacy, and generally, each quarter, the audit committee reviews and discusses with our Chief Information Security Officer material cybersecurity risks and our processes for assessing, identifying, and managing such risks, and the audit committee will receive updates as necessary between each quarterly meeting. Further, our audit committee also monitors compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, in addition to oversight of the performance of our internal audit function. Our compensation committee monitors whether any of our compensation policies and programs has the potential to encourage excessive risk-taking. Our nominating and corporate governance committee oversees our major corporate governance risks, including through monitoring the effectiveness of our Corporate Governance Guidelines.

In connection with its reviews of the operations of our business, our full board of directors addresses the primary risks associated with our business including, for example, strategic planning. Our board of directors appreciates the evolving nature of our business and industry and is actively involved with monitoring new threats and risks as they emerge.

At periodic meetings of our board of directors and its committees, management reports to and seeks guidance from our board and its committees with respect to the most significant risks that could affect our business, such as legal risks, information security and privacy risks, and financial, tax and audit-related risks. In addition, among other matters, management provides our audit committee periodic reports on our compliance programs and investment policy and practices.

Table of Contents

Meetings of the Board of Directors

Our board of directors is responsible for the oversight of management and the strategy of our company and for establishing corporate policies. Our board of directors meets periodically during the year to review significant developments affecting us and to act on matters requiring the approval of our board of directors. Our board of directors met five times during our last fiscal year, of which each director attended 75% or more of the aggregate of the meetings of our board of directors and of the committees on which he or she served. We encourage our directors and nominees for director to attend our Annual Meeting. Seven of the nine directors, serving at the time of our 2025 annual meeting of stockholders attended that meeting.

Information Regarding Committees of the Board of Directors

Our board of directors has established an audit committee, a compensation committee and a nominating and corporate governance committee. Our board of directors may establish other committees to facilitate the management of our business. Our board of directors has adopted a written charter for each of our committees, which are available to stockholders on our investor relations website at investors.datadoghq.com.

The following table provides membership and meeting information for fiscal 2025 for each of the committees of our board of directors:

Name(1)

Audit

Compensation

Nominating

and Corporate

Governance

Olivier Pomel

Alexis Lê-Quôc

Amit Agarwal

Titi Cole

Michael Callahan

Matthew Jacobson

Dev Ittycheria

Julie Richardson

Shardul Shah

Ami Vora

Total Meetings in 2025

*Committee Chairperson

(1) Mr. Phillips is omitted from the table as he joined the board of directors in February 2026. Ms. Vora was appointed to the board of directors in September 2025.

Our board of directors has determined that each committee member and nominee meets the applicable Nasdaq rules and regulations regarding “independence” and each committee member and nominee is free of any relationship that would impair his or her individual exercise of independent judgment with regard to us.

Below is a description of each committee of our board of directors.

Audit Committee

The audit committee of our board of directors consists of Ms. Richardson and Messrs. Callahan, Jacobson and Shah. Ms. Richardson is the chair of the audit committee.

Our board of directors reviews the Nasdaq listing standards definition of independence for audit committee members on an annual basis and has determined that each member of the audit committee satisfies the independence requirements under Nasdaq listing standards and Rule 10A-3(b)(1) of the Exchange Act. Our board of directors has also determined that Ms. Richardson, the chair of the audit committee, is an “audit committee financial expert” within the meaning of SEC regulations. Each member of our audit committee can read and understand fundamental financial statements in accordance with applicable requirements. In arriving at these determinations, our board of directors has examined each audit committee member’s scope of experience and the nature of their employment in the corporate finance sector.

Table of Contents

The principal duties and responsibilities of our audit committee include, among other things:

•selecting a qualified firm to serve as the independent registered public accounting firm to audit our financial statements;

•helping to ensure the independence and performance of the independent registered public accounting firm;

•helping to maintain and foster an open avenue of communication between management and the independent registered public accounting firm;

•discussing the scope and results of the audit with the independent registered public accounting firm, and reviewing, with management and the independent accountants, our interim and year-end operating results and significant issues regarding accounting principles and financial-statement presentation;

•reviewing and discussing with management and the independent registered public accounting firm any proposed earnings press releases and other financial information and guidance provided publicly or to ratings agencies;

•reviewing our policies on risk assessment and risk management;

•reviewing and discussing with the company’s Chief Information Security Officer material risks relating to data privacy, technology and information security;

•reviewing the audit plan of the company’s internal audit function and conferring with management and the independent accountants concerning the scope, design and effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures;

•reviewing related party transactions;

•obtaining and reviewing a report by the independent registered public accounting firm at least annually, that describes its internal quality-control procedures, any material issues with such procedures, and any steps taken to deal with such issues when required by applicable law;

•overseeing procedures for receiving, retaining and investigating complaints regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters and confidential and anonymous submissions by employees concerning questionable accounting and auditing matters;

•reviewing results of management’s efforts to monitor compliance with our policies and programs; and

•approving (or, as permitted, pre-approving) all audit and all permissible non-audit services to be performed by the independent registered public accounting firm.

Report of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors

The audit committee has reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025 with management. The audit committee has also reviewed and discussed with Deloitte & Touche LLP, Datadog’s independent registered public accounting firm, the matters required to be discussed by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”) and the SEC. The audit committee has also received the written disclosures and the letter from Deloitte & Touche LLP required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding the independent accountants’ communications with the audit committee concerning independence, and has discussed with Deloitte & Touche LLP the accounting firm’s independence. Based on the foregoing, the audit committee has recommended to the board of directors that the audited financial statements be included in Datadog’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025 and filed with the SEC.

Members of the Audit Committee

Julie Richardson, Chairperson

Michael Callahan

Matthew Jacobson

Shardul Shah

The material in this report is not “soliciting material,” is not deemed “filed” with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference in any filing of Datadog under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), or the Exchange Act, whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language in any such filing.

Table of Contents

Compensation Committee

The compensation committee of our board of directors consists of Messrs. Callahan and Ittycheria and Mses. Cole and Richardson. Mr. Callahan is the chair of the compensation committee.

Our board of directors reviews the Nasdaq listing standards definition of independence for compensation committee members on an annual basis and has determined that each member of and nominee to the compensation committee satisfies the independence requirements under Nasdaq listing standards and is a “non-employee director” as defined in Rule 16b-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act.

The compensation committee acts on behalf of our board of directors to review, oversee and approve (or make recommendations to our board of directors for approval of) our compensation strategy, policies, plans and programs, including:

•approving the retention of compensation consultants and outside service providers and advisors;

•reviewing and approving, or recommending that our board of directors approve, the compensation, individual and corporate performance goals and objectives and other terms of employment of our executive officers, including evaluating the performance of our chief executive officer and, with his assistance, that of our other executive officers;

•reviewing and recommending to our board of directors the compensation of our directors;

•reviewing and approving, or recommending that our board of directors approve, incentive compensation and equity plans;

•administering any equity and non-equity incentive plans including pension, profit sharing, bonus, benefit and other similar plans;

•reviewing our practices and policies of employee compensation as they relate to risk management and risk-taking incentives;

•establishing and overseeing our compensation clawback or similar policies;

•reviewing and evaluating succession plans for the executive officers;

•reviewing matters relating to human capital management, and as the compensation committee determines to be appropriate, making recommendations to the board of directors regarding human capital management policies and strategies; and

•reviewing and establishing general policies relating to compensation and benefits of our employees and reviewing our overall compensation philosophy.

Compensation Committee Processes and Procedures

The compensation committee generally meets quarterly and with greater frequency if necessary. The compensation committee also acts periodically by unanimous written consent in lieu of a formal meeting. The agenda for each meeting is usually developed by the chairperson of the compensation committee, in consultation with management. The compensation committee meets regularly in executive session. However, from time to time, various members of management and other employees as well as outside advisors or consultants may be invited by the compensation committee to make presentations, to provide financial or other background information or advice or to otherwise participate in compensation committee meetings. Our Chief Executive Officer may not participate in, or be present during, any deliberations or determinations of the compensation committee regarding his compensation.

The charter of the compensation committee grants the compensation committee full access to all books, records, facilities and personnel of Datadog. In addition, under the charter, the compensation committee has the authority to obtain, at our expense, advice and assistance from compensation consultants and internal and external legal, accounting or other advisors and other external resources that the compensation committee considers necessary or appropriate in the performance of its duties. The compensation committee has direct responsibility for the oversight of the work of any consultants or advisers engaged for the purpose of advising the compensation committee. In particular, the compensation committee has the authority to retain compensation consultants to assist in its evaluation of executive and director compensation, including the authority to approve the consultant’s reasonable fees and other retention terms.

Table of Contents

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

No member of our compensation committee is currently one of our officers or employees. None of our executive officers currently serves, or has served during the last year, as a member of the board of directors or compensation committee of any entity that has one or more executive officers serving as a member of our board of directors or compensation committee.

Report of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors

The compensation committee has reviewed and discussed the section of this proxy statement titled “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” with management. Based on such review and discussion, the compensation committee has recommended to the board of directors that the section titled “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” be included in this proxy statement and incorporated into Datadog’s annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025.

Respectfully submitted by the members of the compensation committee of the board of directors:

Members of the Compensation Committee

Michael Callahan, Chairperson

Titi Cole

Dev Ittycheria

Julie Richardson

The material in this report is not “soliciting material,” is furnished to, but not deemed “filed” with, the SEC and is not deemed to be incorporated by reference in any filing of Datadog under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, other than Datadog’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, where it shall be deemed to be “furnished,” whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language in any such filing.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

The nominating and corporate governance committee of our board of directors consists of Messrs. Jacobson, Ittycheria and Shah and Ms. Cole. Mr. Jacobson is the chair of the nominating and corporate governance committee.

Our board of directors reviews the Nasdaq listing standards definition of independence on an annual basis and has determined that each member of and nominee to the nominating and corporate governance committee satisfies the independence requirements under Nasdaq listing standards.

The principal duties and responsibilities of our nominating and corporate governance committee include, among other things:

•identifying, evaluating, and selecting, or recommending that our board of directors approve, nominees for election to our board of directors and its committees;

•approving the retention of director search firms;

•evaluating the performance of our board of directors, committees of the board and of individual directors;

•considering and making recommendations to our board of directors regarding the composition of our board of directors and its committees;

•evaluating the adequacy of our articles of incorporation and bylaws, corporate governance practices, reporting, information dissemination and continuing education;

•reviewing (together with other committees of the board of directors) annually any stockholder proposals submitted for inclusion in our proxy statement and stockholder nominees for election to the board of directors; and

•periodically reviewing our ESG policies, programs and public disclosure, and considering current and emerging ESG trends.

Table of Contents

Board Composition

The nominating and corporate governance committee believes that candidates for director should have certain minimum qualifications, including the ability to read and understand basic financial statements and having the highest personal integrity and ethics. The nominating and corporate governance committee also intends to consider such factors as possessing relevant expertise upon which to be able to offer advice and guidance to management, having sufficient time to devote to our affairs, demonstrated excellence in his or her field, having the ability to exercise sound business judgment and having the commitment to rigorously represent the long-term interests of our stockholders. These qualifications may be modified from time to time. Candidates for director nominees are reviewed in the context of the current composition of the board of directors, the operating requirements of Datadog and the long-term interests of our stockholders. In conducting this assessment, the nominating and corporate governance committee typically considers diversity, skills and such other factors as it deems appropriate, given the current needs of the board of directors and our business, to maintain a balance of knowledge, experience and capability.

Our nominating and corporate governance committee is primarily responsible for maintaining a balanced board of directors, which includes recommending directors for re-election and identifying new director candidates who will bring complementary skills and varied perspectives to our board of directors. In their approach to composition and refreshment, our nominating and corporate governance committee strives to achieve an appropriate balance of continuity and institutional knowledge, together with fresh perspectives and skills, through a mix of newer-tenured and more seasoned directors. Our nominating and corporate governance committee believes this balance best serves our shareholders’ interests and that the overlap of new and longer-tenured directors provides new directors with the opportunity to learn from the knowledge and experience of longer-tenured directors.

In the case of incumbent directors whose terms of office are set to expire, the nominating and corporate governance committee reviews these directors’ overall service to Datadog during their terms, including the number of meetings attended, level of participation, quality of performance and any other relationships and transactions that might impair the directors’ independence. To identify new director candidates, the nominating and corporate governance committee may engage, if it deems appropriate, a professional search firm. In 2025, the nominating and corporate governance committee engaged Spencer Stuart and Heidrick & Struggles, each a third-party search firm, to help identify potential director nominees. In the case of new director candidates, our nominating and corporate governance committee also evaluates whether the nominee is independent for Nasdaq purposes, based upon applicable Nasdaq listing standards, applicable SEC rules and regulations and the advice of counsel, if necessary. Our nominating and corporate governance committee conducts any appropriate and necessary inquiries into the backgrounds and qualifications of possible candidates after considering the function and needs of our board of directors. Our nominating and corporate governance committee meets to discuss and consider the candidates’ qualifications and then selects a nominee for recommendation to our board of directors.

Our nominating and corporate governance committee’s efforts have resulted in significant changes to our board of directors recently. Two new independent directors were appointed to our board in 2025 and 2026 bringing fresh perspectives, diverse experiences and new insights to enhance the effective oversight of our business.

•Ami Vora joined the board in September 2025 bringing her extensive experience building products at a global scale at high growth technology companies.

•Dominic Phillips joined the board in February 2026 bringing his depth of knowledge of financial and accounting matters, as well as significant experience serving at public companies within the software industry.

Our nominating and corporate governance committee will consider stockholder recommendations of director candidates, so long as they comply with applicable law and our bylaws, and will review the qualifications of any such candidate in accordance with the criteria described in the two preceding paragraphs. Stockholders who wish to recommend individuals for consideration by our nominating and corporate governance committee to become nominees for election to our board of directors should do so by delivering a written recommendation to our nominating and corporate governance committee at 620 8th Avenue, 45th Floor, New York, New York 10018, Attention: Secretary.

If, rather than submitting a candidate to the nominating and corporate governance committee for consideration, you wish to formally nominate a director pursuant to proxy materials that you will prepare and file with the SEC, please see the deadline described in “When are stockholder proposals and director nominations due for next year’s annual meeting?”

Table of Contents

above and refer to our bylaws for a complete description of the required procedures for nominating a candidate to our board of directors.

Stockholder Communications with the Board of Directors

Our board of directors has adopted a formal process by which stockholders may communicate with the board or any of its directors. Stockholders and other interested parties wishing to communicate with the board or an individual director may send a written communication c/o Datadog, Inc., 620 8th Avenue, 45th Floor, New York, New York, 10018, Attn: Secretary. Written communications may be submitted anonymously or confidentially and may, at the discretion of the person submitting the communication, indicate whether the person is a stockholder or other interested party. Each communication will be reviewed by the Secretary to determine whether it is appropriate for presentation to the board or such director. Examples of inappropriate communications include product complaints, product inquiries, new product suggestions, resumes or job inquiries, surveys, solicitations or advertisements, or hostile communications.

Communications determined by the Secretary to be appropriate for presentation to the board or such director will be submitted to the board or such director on a periodic basis. Communications determined by the Secretary to be inappropriate for presentation will still be made available to any non-management director upon such director’s request.

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

Our board of directors has adopted the Datadog, Inc. Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to all officers, directors and employees. The Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is available on our website at investors.datadoghq.com. If we were to amend or waive any provision of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or any person performing similar functions, we intend to satisfy our disclosure obligations, if any, with respect to any such waiver or amendment by posting such information on our website.

Corporate Governance Guidelines

Our board of directors has adopted the Datadog, Inc. Corporate Governance Guidelines for the conduct and operation of the board in order to give directors a flexible framework for effectively pursuing our objectives for the benefit of our stockholders. The Corporate Governance Guidelines set forth the practices the board of directors intends to follow with respect to board composition and selection, board meetings and involvement of senior management, Chief Executive Officer performance evaluation and management succession planning and board committees and compensation. The Corporate Governance Guidelines may be viewed on our website at investors.datadoghq.com.

Insider Trading Policy; Prohibition on Hedging, Short Sales and Pledging

Our board of directors has adopted an insider trading policy and procedures governing the purchase, sale, and other dispositions of the company’s securities by directors, officers and employees. In addition, the insider trading policy provides that if the company itself transacts in the company’s securities, it must also comply with applicable law and regulations relating to insider trading. The company believes its insider trading policy is reasonably designed to promote compliance with insider trading laws, rules and regulations. A copy of the insider trading policy was filed as Exhibit 19.1 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025.

The insider trading policy prohibits hedging or monetization transactions with respect to our Class A common stock, including through the use of financial instruments such as prepaid variable forwards, equity swaps, collars, and exchange funds. In addition, our insider trading policy prohibits trading in derivative securities related to our Class A common stock, which include publicly traded call and put options, engaging in short selling of our Class A common stock, purchasing our Class A common stock on margin or holding it in a margin account and pledging our shares as collateral for a loan.

Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 2

APPROVAL, ON A NON-BINDING, ADVISORY BASIS, OF THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

In accordance with the requirements of Section 14A of the Exchange Act, we are providing our stockholders the opportunity to vote to approve, on a non-binding, advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers (as disclosed under “Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” the tables included under the heading “Executive Compensation—Executive Compensation Tables” and the accompanying narrative).

You are encouraged to review the section titled “Executive Compensation” and, in particular, the section titled “Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis” in this proxy statement, which provide a comprehensive review of our executive compensation program and its elements, objectives and rationale.

The vote on this resolution is not intended to address any specific element of compensation, rather the vote relates to the compensation of our named executive officers in its totality, as described in this proxy statement in accordance with the compensation disclosure rules of the SEC.

In accordance with Section 14A of the Exchange Act rules, stockholders are asked to approve the following non-binding resolution:

“RESOLVED, that the Company’s stockholders hereby approve, on a non-binding, advisory basis, the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers, as disclosed in the Company’s proxy statement for the 2026 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables and the accompanying narrative.”

Since this proposal is an advisory vote, the result will not be binding on our board of directors or our compensation committee. However, our board of directors values our stockholders’ opinions, and our board of directors and the compensation committee will take into account the outcome of the advisory vote when considering future executive compensation decisions.

OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE APPROVAL OF THE NON-BINDING RESOLUTION ON NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION.

Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

The following table sets forth, for our executive officers, their ages and positions held with us as of the date of this proxy statement:

Name

Age

Principal Position

Olivier Pomel

Chief Executive Officer, Co-Founder and Director

Alexis Lê-Quôc

Chief Technology Officer, Co-Founder and Director

David Obstler

Chief Financial Officer

Kerry Acocella

General Counsel and Secretary

Adam Blitzer

Chief Operating Officer

David Galloreese

Chief People Officer

Yanbing Li

Chief Product Officer

Sean Walters

Chief Revenue Officer

Biographical information for Olivier Pomel and Alexis Lê-Quôc is included above with the director biographies under the caption “Information Regarding Director Nominees and Current Directors.”

David Obstler has served as our Chief Financial Officer since November 2018. Prior to joining us, Mr. Obstler held Chief Financial Officer positions at a number of other companies including TravelClick, Inc., a hospitality technology company, where he served from September 2014 to October 2018, OpenLink Financial LLC, a financial services software provider, where he served from November 2012 to July 2014, MSCI Inc., a financial index and investment management software company, where he served from June 2010 to September 2012, and Risk Metrics Group, Inc., a risk management and corporate governance service provider, where he served from January 2005 to June 2010. Mr. Obstler has served on the board of directors of Braze, Inc., a publicly held software company, since May 2021. Earlier in his career, Mr. Obstler held various investment banking positions at J.P. Morgan, Lehman Brothers and Goldman Sachs. Mr. Obstler received his M.B.A. from Harvard Business School and his B.A. from Yale University.

Kerry Acocella has served as our General Counsel since January 2022 after serving as Chief Corporate Counsel since January 2019. Prior to joining us, Ms. Acocella served as Corporate Counsel at Lindblad Expeditions, a Nasdaq-listed expedition travel company from October 2017 to December 2018. From February 2013 to October 2017, she served as Executive Director, Legal & Chief Compliance Officer of Fifth Street Asset Management, a Nasdaq-listed asset manager. Earlier in her career, Ms. Acocella held legal positions at WW International, Inc., formerly Weight Watchers International, Inc., and Morrison & Foerster LLP. Ms. Acocella received her J.D. from Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law and her B.S. in Psychology from The University of Georgia.

Adam Blitzer has served as our Chief Operating Officer since May 2021. Prior to joining us, Mr. Blitzer held senior management positions at Salesforce, a customer relationship management service platform, from December 2016 to May 2021, most recently as Executive Vice President and General Manager of Digital. Mr. Blitzer founded Pardot in February 2007 and ran the company until October 2012. Pardot, a B2B marketing automation platform, was acquired by ExactTarget in 2012 and ultimately Salesforce in 2013. Mr. Blitzer holds a B.A. in Public Policy Studies from Duke University.

David Galloreese has served as our Chief People Officer since July 2024. Prior to joining us, Mr. Galloreese served as Chief Human Resources Officer for other companies including Figma, a cloud-based design platform, where he served from May 2021 to November 2022, and Wells Fargo & Company, a financial services company, where he served from July 2018 to April 2021. From October 2016 to June 2018, he served in various senior human resource management positions at Walmart Inc., a leading retailer, most recently as Chief People Officer of Sam’s Club. Earlier in his career, Mr. Galloreese held various senior human resource management positions at Medallia and Caesars Entertainment. Mr. Galloreese received his M.B.A from New York University and his B.A. from the University of California, Los Angeles.

Yanbing Li has served as our Chief Product Officer since August 2024. Prior to joining us, Dr. Li held various senior engineering, product management and general management positions at a number of technology companies. Most recently she served as Senior Vice President of Engineering of Aurora, a self-driving technology company, from July 2021 to August 2024, and Vice President of Engineering and Product, Google Cloud, from June 2019 to July 2021. Previously she served in various senior engineering and general management positions at VMWare, a provider of multi-cloud services, from 2008 to 2019, most recently as Senior Vice President and General Manager of Storage and Availability BU. Dr. Li

Table of Contents

has served on the board of directors of Equinix, Inc., a publicly held digital infrastructure company, since August 2025 and served on the board of directors of NeoPhotonics, a developer and manufacturer of lasers and optoelectronic solutions, from 2019 to 2022. Dr. Li holds a Ph.D from Princeton University, a M.S. from Cornell University and a B.S. from Tsinghua University.

Sean Walters has served as our Chief Revenue Officer since January 2022 after serving as Senior Vice President of Worldwide Sales since 2018. Prior to joining us, Mr. Walters held various roles at Medallia, Inc., a SaaS-based customer feedback company, from April 2013 to February 2018, including as Area Vice President and General Manager from February 2017 to February 2018 and Regional Vice President from August 2015 to February 2017. From June 2011 to April 2013, Mr. Walters held various sales positions at BMC Software, Inc., an information technology and services company. Earlier in his career, Mr. Walters held various sales positions at IBM, BEA Systems and ADP. Mr. Walters received his B.S. in Marketing from Rowan University.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Overview

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis section discusses our executive compensation policies and how and why our compensation committee arrived at specific compensation decisions for the year ended December 31, 2025 for the individuals who served as our principal executive officer and principal financial officer and our three other most highly-compensated executive officers as of December 31, 2025, collectively referred to as our “named executive officers”:


Name						Position(s)
Olivier Pomel						Chief Executive Officer and Co-Founder
David Obstler						Chief Financial Officer
Alexis Lê-Quôc						President, Chief Technology Officer and Co-Founder
Adam Blitzer						Chief Operating Officer
Sean Walters						Chief Revenue Officer

Business Highlights

Our Business

Datadog is the AI-powered observability and security platform for cloud applications.

Our SaaS platform integrates and automates infrastructure monitoring, application performance monitoring, log management, user experience monitoring, cloud security, service management and many other capabilities to provide unified, real-time observability and security for our customers’ entire technology stack. Datadog is used by organizations of all sizes and across a wide range of industries to enable digital transformation and cloud migration, drive collaboration among development, operations, security and business teams, accelerate time to market for applications, reduce time to problem resolution, secure applications and infrastructure, understand user behavior and track key business metrics.

Many of our products are fully capable stand-alone so clients can choose to use different capabilities incrementally or deploy many at once. When deployed together, our products automatically enable cross-correlation, which in turn allows customers to gain greater levels of visibility across their infrastructure and applications to more rapidly troubleshoot problems.

Our platform is supported by more than 1,000 integrations to seamlessly aggregate metrics and events across all of the systems and services that power digital businesses. Our easy-to-use platform is deployed through a self-service installation process. Users can derive value from our platform within minutes without any specialized training or heavy implementation or customization. Customers can easily expand their usage of our platform on a self-serve basis, adding hosts or volumes of data monitored. Our platform is massively scalable, currently monitoring trillions of events per hour and millions of servers and containers.

Table of Contents

Fiscal Year 2025 Financial and Business Highlights

•Revenue was $3.43 billion, an increase of 28% year-over-year.

•GAAP operating loss was $(44) million; GAAP operating margin was (1)%.

•Non-GAAP operating income was $768 million; non-GAAP operating margin was 22%.

•GAAP net income per diluted share was $0.31; non-GAAP net income per diluted share was $2.05.

•As of December 31, 2025, we had 603 customers with annual recurring revenue (“ARR”) of $1 million or more, an increase of 31% year-over-year, and about 4,310 customers with ARR of $100,000 or more, an increase of 19% year-over-year.

•We broadened our platform offerings in 2025, including On Call to create on-call schedules and integrate real-time observability data into customers' incident response plans, Product Analytics to improve business outcomes and product development decisions with quantitative insights into user experiences and behavior, and Bits AI SRE Agent to autonomously investigate alerts, surface root causes, and draft summaries about incidents.

•Total shareholder return for the three-year period ended December 31, 2025 was 85%

To supplement our consolidated financial statements, which are prepared in accordance with GAAP, we provide investors with certain non-GAAP financial measures, including non-GAAP operating income, non-GAAP operating margin, and non-GAAP net income per diluted share. For a full reconciliation of each non-GAAP financial measure to the most directly comparable financial measure stated in accordance with GAAP please see Appendix A to this proxy statement, and for information on how we calculate ARR, please see our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 18, 2026.

2025 Advisory Vote on Named Executive Officer Compensation

At last year’s annual meeting of stockholders, approximately 96% of the votes cast approved the “say-on-pay” proposal regarding the compensation awarded to our named executive officers. We take stockholders’ views seriously and view this result as an indication that the principles of our executive compensation program are supported by them. We have adopted a policy pursuant to which we plan to hold a say-on-pay vote on an annual basis. A “say-on-frequency” vote is required every six years, and as such, our next say-on-frequency vote will be in 2027.

Table of Contents

Executive Summary

We endeavor to maintain sound governance standards consistent with our executive compensation practices. The compensation committee reviews our executive compensation program on an annual basis for consistency with our short-term and long-term goals given the dynamic nature of our business and the market in which we compete for executive talent. The following summarizes our executive compensation-related practices that were in effect during 2025:


What we do						What we don’t do
•Our compensation committee consists solely of independent members of our board of directors. •Our compensation committee has retained an independent third-party compensation consultant for guidance in making compensation decisions. •Each year, we assess our executive compensation against a reasonable set of industry competitors generally of a similar size and market capitalization. •We conduct an annual compensation risk assessment to determine if our executive compensation program presents any risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the company. •A significant portion of our named executive officers’ compensation is variable, “at-risk” and tied directly to our measurable performance. •Our annual performance-based bonus opportunities and a significant portion of our long-term equity incentive opportunities are dependent upon our achievement of annual corporate objectives established each year. •Our annual performance-based bonus opportunities and performance-based long-term equity incentive opportunities are subject to payout caps in the event of significant over achievement of applicable annual performance targets. •Equity awards with multi-year vesting requirements are an integral part of our executive compensation program, and comprise the primary at-risk portion of our named executive officer compensation package. •If we are required to prepare an accounting restatement due to the material noncompliance with any financial reporting requirement under the securities laws, we must recoup incentive compensation received by our named executive officers under our clawback policy, which complies with the rules and standards adopted by the SEC and Nasdaq.						•We do not provide guaranteed annual bonuses or equity award rights for our executive officers. •We prohibit hedging and pledging of Datadog stock. •We do not provide excessive severance payments. •We do not provide single-trigger vesting acceleration of outstanding equity awards upon a change in control of the company. •We do not provide our executive officers with any excise tax gross-ups.

Objectives, Philosophy and Elements of Executive Compensation

Our executive compensation program aims to achieve the following main objectives:

•attract, retain and reward highly-qualified executives who have the skills and leadership necessary to grow our business;

•provide incentives that motivate and reward our executives for achievement of our key performance goals; and

Table of Contents

•align our executives’ interests with those of our stockholders by linking their long-term incentive compensation opportunities to our annual performance and stockholder value creation and their cash incentives to our annual performance.

Our executive compensation program generally consists of the following three principal elements: base salary, a performance-based cash bonus opportunity and long-term equity incentive compensation opportunities. We also provide our executive officers with benefits available to all our employees, including retirement benefits under Datadog’s 401(k) plan and participation in employee health and welfare benefit plans. The following chart summarizes the three main elements of our executive compensation program, their objectives and key features.

Element

Objectives

Key Features

Base Salary

(fixed cash)

•Provides stable income for performing job responsibilities.

•Attracts highly-qualified executives.

•Reviewed annually and determined by the compensation committee based on a number of factors (including company and individual performance) and by reference, in part, to competitive market analysis performed by our compensation committee’s independent compensation consultant.

Performance-Based Cash Bonus

(at-risk cash)

•Motivates and rewards for contributing to our key business objectives.

•Balances achievement of top-line and bottom-line performance metrics, specifically, net new ARR and non-GAAP operating income, to provide incentives that drive efficient, long-term growth.

•Aligns management and stockholder interests by linking pay to performance.

•Target bonus opportunities are reviewed annually.

•Individual awards are determined by the compensation committee based upon a number of factors (including company and individual performance and positions that have a similar impact on the organization) and by reference, in part, to a competitive market analysis performed by our compensation committee’s independent compensation consultant.

•Bonus payouts are dependent upon achievement of specific corporate performance objectives consistent with our long-term strategic plan, generally determined by the compensation committee and communicated at the beginning of the year.

•Bonus payouts for our named executive officers apart from our Chief Revenue Officer are subject to a cap of 200% of the annual target bonus opportunity that may only be achieved in the event of significant out-performance relative to our target performance goals each year. We believe this cap manages potential incentive compensation costs and avoids incentivizing undue risk in our executive compensation program, while still maintaining appropriate incentives for our named executive officers.

Table of Contents

Element

Objectives

Key Features

Long-Term Equity Incentive

(at-risk equity)

•Motivates and rewards for long-term company performance as well as key business and retention objectives.

•Aligns management and stockholder interests by linking pay to performance.

•Attracts highly-qualified executives and encourages their continued employment over the long-term.

•Long-term equity incentive opportunities are reviewed annually and are generally granted during the first half of the year.

•Individual awards are determined by the compensation committee based on a number of factors (including company and individual performance) and by reference, in part, to a competitive market analysis prepared by our compensation committee’s independent compensation consultant.

•A significant portion of long-term equity incentive compensation for our named executive officers is granted in the form of performance-based restricted stock units (“PSUs”). These awards may be earned contingent upon achievement of specific pre-established corporate performance objectives. We believe this further aligns the interests of our named executive officers with our stockholders in driving long-term company performance and growth in value.

•The number of PSUs that may be earned is subject to a cap of 200% of the target number of PSUs. We believe this cap manages potential incentive compensation costs and avoids incentivizing undue risk in our executive compensation program, while still maintaining appropriate incentives for our named executive officers

We focus on providing a competitive compensation package to our named executive officers that provides significant short and long-term incentives for the achievement of pre-established measurable corporate objectives. We believe that this approach provides an appropriate blend of short-term and long-term incentives to maximize stockholder value.

We do not have any formal policies for allocating compensation among salary, performance bonus awards and equity grants, short-term and long-term compensation or among cash and non-cash compensation. Instead, the compensation committee uses its judgment to establish a total compensation program for each named executive officer that is a mix of current, short-term and long-term incentive compensation, and cash and non-cash compensation, that it believes appropriate to achieve the goals of our executive compensation program and our corporate objectives. However, historically we have structured a significant portion of the named executive officers’ total target compensation opportunities to be variable, “at-risk” and tied directly to our measurable performance. We believe such compensation, comprised of short-term performance-based cash bonus opportunities and long-term equity awards, aligns the incentives of the named executive officers with the interests of our stockholders and the achievement of our corporate goals.

How We Determine Executive Compensation

Role of our Compensation Committee, Management and the Board

The compensation committee is appointed by our board of directors and helps our board oversee our compensation policies, plans and programs with the goal of attracting, incentivizing, retaining and rewarding top-quality executive management and employees. The compensation committee is responsible for reviewing and determining all compensation paid to our executive officers, including our named executive officers, and also reviews our compensation practices and policies as they relate to risk management and risk-taking incentives. Our compensation committee consists solely of independent members of the board.

The compensation committee meets periodically throughout the year to manage and evaluate our executive compensation program, and generally determines the principal elements of compensation (base salary, a performance-based cash bonus

Table of Contents

opportunity and equity awards) for our executive officers on an annual basis; however, decisions may occur at other times for new hires, promotions or other special circumstances as our compensation committee determines appropriate. The compensation committee does not delegate authority to approve executive officer compensation. The Company does not currently grant stock options, stock appreciation rights or similar instruments with option-like features, and the compensation committee does not maintain a formal policy regarding the timing of the grant of equity awards to our executive officers.

In fulfilling its responsibilities, the compensation committee considers input from an independent compensation consultant and, as appropriate, management. The Chief Executive Officer evaluates and provides to the compensation committee performance assessments and compensation recommendations. While the Chief Executive Officer discusses his recommendations with the compensation committee, he does not participate in the deliberations concerning, or the determination of, his own performance and compensation. The compensation committee discusses and makes final determinations with respect to executive compensation matters without the Chief Executive Officer present during discussions of his own compensation. From time to time, various other members of management and other employees as well as outside advisors or consultants may be invited by the Compensation Committee to make presentations, provide financial or other background information or advice or otherwise participate in the compensation committee meetings.

Role of Compensation Consultant

The compensation committee has the sole authority to retain compensation consultants to assist in its evaluation of executive compensation, including the authority to approve the consultant’s reasonable fees and other retention terms. The compensation committee retained Compensia as its independent compensation consultant for 2025. Compensia’s engagement included:

•compiling a group of peer companies to use as a reference in evaluating current executive pay practices and considering different compensation programs to aid in making executive compensation decisions for 2025;

•conducting market research and analysis to assist the compensation committee in developing executive compensation levels, including appropriate salaries and the size and structures of target cash bonus opportunities and equity awards for our executive officers, including the named executive officers;

•periodically reviewing and advising on compensation trends and regulatory developments;

•reviewing market and peer group equity usage metrics to assist with understanding of Datadog’s equity budget relative to the competitive market;

•conducting an annual compensation risk assessment; and

•periodically conducting a review of our non-employee director compensation policies and practices.

The compensation committee has evaluated whether the work of Compensia as compensation consultant raises any conflict of interest, taking into account relevant factors in accordance with applicable SEC rules and Nasdaq listing standards. Based on its analysis, the compensation committee determined that the work of Compensia and the individual compensation advisors employed by Compensia did not create any conflict of interest pursuant to the SEC rules and Nasdaq listing standards.

Use of Competitive Market Compensation Data

The compensation committee believes that it is important when making its compensation decisions to be informed as to the current practices of the competitive market using an analysis of the compensation practices of comparable public companies with which we compete for top talent. To this end, the compensation committee directed its independent compensation consultant to review and update the list of the publicly-traded companies to be used as a peer group in connection with assessing our compensation practices relative to the competitive market.

The independent compensation consultant proposed, and the compensation committee approved, an updated group of public companies that were reasonably comparable to Datadog in terms of industry and financial characteristics to provide management and the compensation committee with an analysis of relevant compensation information to support compensation decision-making. The compensation peer group was intended to reflect companies with executive positions of similar scope and complexity to Datadog. In determining the peer group, the independent compensation consultant considered whether a company was (i) U.S.-headquartered; (ii) a software / services company focused on SaaS and

Table of Contents

enterprise; (iii) generally within a range of 0.5x to 2.5x Datadog’s trailing four fiscal quarters’ revenue; and (iv) generally within a range of 0.3x to 3.0x Datadog’s market capitalization.

The independent compensation consultant also considered several secondary factors, including the companies that include Datadog in their peer groups and the Datadog peer groups used by key institutional investor advisors and whether a potential peer company had strong revenue growth, completed an initial public offering around the time of our initial public offering, competes with us for executive talent, and had a comparable headcount. The compensation peer group with respect to 2025 was as follows:


Atlassian	HubSpot	The Trade Desk
Cloudflare	MongoDB	Veeva Systems
CrowdStrike Holdings	Okta	Workday
DocuSign	Palantir Technologies	Zoom Video Communications
Dynatrace	Palo Alto Networks	Zscaler
Fortinet	Snowflake

The compensation committee reviews our compensation peer group at least annually and makes adjustments to its composition, if warranted, taking into account changes in both our business and the businesses of the companies in the peer group. For purposes of selecting the 2025 compensation peer group, Splunk was removed because it was acquired and Twilio and Unity Software were removed because they were significantly below the market capitalization range in the selection criteria above and less aligned than other peers on a combination of secondary factors. Palo Alto Networks and Workday were added to the peer group based on a review of comparability across the range of selection criteria referenced above.

Using data compiled from the peer companies, the independent compensation consultant completed an assessment and analysis of our executive compensation to inform the compensation committee’s determinations regarding executive compensation for 2025. The independent compensation consultant prepared, and the compensation committee reviewed, a range of competitive market data reference points with respect to base salary, performance bonuses, total target cash compensation (base salary and the annual target performance bonus), equity compensation grant value, and target total direct compensation (total target cash compensation and equity compensation grant value) with respect to each of our executive officers, including each of the named executive officers. The compensation committee did not target pay to fall at any particular percentile of the competitive market data, but rather reviewed these market data reference points as a helpful reference point in making 2025 compensation decisions. Competitive market data is only one of the factors that the compensation committee considers in making compensation decisions. The compensation committee considers other factors as described below under “Factors Used in Determining Executive Compensation” below.

Factors Used in Determining Executive Compensation

The compensation committee sets the compensation of our executive officers, including our named executive officers at levels determined to be competitive and appropriate for each named executive officer, using their professional experience and judgment. Pay decisions are not made by use of a formulaic approach or using compensation benchmarks; the compensation committee believes that executive pay decisions require consideration of a multitude of relevant factors which may vary from year to year. In making executive compensation decisions, the compensation committee generally takes into consideration the factors listed below.

•Company and individual performance

•Existing business needs and criticality for future business needs and performance

•Scope of job function and skill set

•Relative pay among our executive officers

•Need to attract new talent and retain existing talent in a highly competitive industry

•Value of existing equity holdings, including the potential value of unvested equity awards

•Range of competitive market data reference points, as described above under “Use of Competitive Market Compensation Data”

•Recommendations from our Chief Executive Officer (other than for his own compensation)

Table of Contents

2025 Executive Compensation Elements

Base Salary

Base salary represents the fixed portion of the compensation of our executive officers, including our named executive officers, and is an important element of compensation intended to attract and retain highly-talented individuals. In February 2025, the compensation committee reviewed the base salaries of our executive officers, taking into consideration the competitive market analysis prepared by its compensation consultant and the recommendations of our Chief Executive Officer, as well as the other factors described in “Factors Used in Determining Executive Compensation” above. Following this review, the compensation committee approved base salary increases for our executive officers, effective March 1, 2025, to bring their base salaries to a level more aligned to the range of those of similarly-situated executives at the companies in our compensation peer group. The annual base salaries approved for our named executive officers were as follows:


Named Executive Officer						Base Salary
Olivier Pomel						$450,000, increased from $425,000
David Obstler						$450,000, increased from $425,000
Alexis Lê-Quôc						$450,000, increased from $425,000
Adam Blitzer						$450,000, increased from $425,000
Sean Walters						$475,000, increased from $450,000

Annual Performance-Based Cash Bonus

Our annual performance-based cash bonus awards provide incentive compensation that is specifically designed to motivate our executive officers, including our named executive officers, to achieve pre-established, company-wide priorities set by the compensation committee and to reward them for results and achievements in a given year. The annual target bonus opportunities for our executive officers are determined by the compensation committee and expressed as a percentage of each individual’s annual base salary, as adjusted by the compensation committee pursuant to its review described above. Following a review of the competitive market analysis prepared by its compensation consultant and the recommendations of our Chief Executive Officer (except with respect to his own annual target bonus opportunity), as well as the factors described in “Factors Used in Determining Executive Compensation” above, the compensation committee maintained the target bonus opportunity as a percentage of annual base salary consistent with the prior year for each of our named executive officers . Bonus payouts were capped at 200% of the 2025 annual target bonus opportunities for all named executive officers, apart from our Chief Revenue Officer. We believe the cap manages potential incentive compensation costs and avoids incentivizing undue risk in our executive compensation program, while still maintaining appropriate and rigorous incentives for our named executive officers. The annual target bonus opportunities approved for our named executive officers for 2025 were as follows:


Named Executive Officer	As a % of Base Salary		Target Bonus Opportunity
Olivier Pomel	94	%	$	425,000
David Obstler	94	%	$	425,000
Alexis Lê-Quôc	94	%	$	425,000
Adam Blitzer	94	%	$	425,000
Sean Walters	100	%	$	475,000

Executive Cash Bonus Award Goal Setting

The compensation committee approved the performance metrics for 2025 performance-based cash bonus awards in February 2025. The targets against which performance was measured were generated through our annual budget and strategic planning process, which was reviewed with our board of directors and finalized in the first quarter of 2025. The compensation committee determined that the performance metric for our named executive officers for 2025, apart from our Chief Revenue Officer, would be based on the attainment of pre-established levels of net new ARR, with certain decelerators applied if our non-GAAP operating income fell below a target level. Net new ARR was calculated as the difference between the annual run-rate revenue, or ARR, as of December 31, 2025 and ARR as of December 31, 2024.

The performance target for net new ARR for these named executive officers was 100% of our 2025 operating plan. These named executive officers would only earn a bonus payout if our net new ARR attainment was at least 50% of the net new

Table of Contents

ARR performance target. When the net new ARR attainment exceeded the performance target (which would, in the compensation committee’s view, require extraordinary efforts), accelerators were triggered in order to reward higher than targeted performance. Such bonus payout amount was subject to a cap of 200% of the 2025 annual target bonus opportunities for these named executive officers.

As our Chief Revenue Officer’s responsibilities are focused on sales, the compensation committee determined that it would be more appropriate for him to participate in a cash bonus plan aligned with the cash bonus plans applicable to the global sales team. The performance metric and related target level for our Chief Revenue Officer was based on attainment of net new ARR generated by the sales channels over which he has oversight responsibility. The performance goal for our Chief Revenue Officer was generated through our internal sales target process for the fiscal year, and was established at 100% of such target for 2025.

The compensation committee intended the performance goals for our named executive officers to be challenging to attain based on its analysis of external market factors and internal forecasts. Actual bonuses earned for 2025 are included in the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column of the “2025 Summary Compensation Table” and are further discussed below.

Fiscal 2025 Bonus Payouts

In February 2026, the compensation committee determined the achievement level of the net new ARR target for 2025 was approximately 139% and the non-GAAP operating income target level had been achieved, resulting in a bonus payout of approximately 183% of the named executive officers’ annual target bonus opportunities.

For our Chief Revenue Officer, the compensation committee approved the attainment of his performance goal semi-annually. In July 2025, the compensation committee approved payments for the first half of fiscal 2025 based on the percentage attainment at mid-year against the annual performance target, resulting in a bonus payment equal to approximately 24% of Mr. Walter’s annual target bonus opportunity, which was paid in August 2025. In February 2026, the percentage attainment of the corporate performance goals for fiscal year 2025 was determined to be 81% of Mr. Walter’s annual target bonus opportunity. Only the portion that was earned in excess of the amount determined and paid in August 2025 was paid in February 2026.

The annual bonus payouts for our named executive officers for 2025 were as follows:


Named Executive Officer	Annual Target Bonus Opportunity		Actual Bonus Earned		Actual Bonus Earned (as a % of Target)
Olivier Pomel	$	425,000	$	777,251	183	%
David Obstler	$	425,000	$	777,251	183	%
Alexis Lê-Quôc	$	425,000	$	777,251	183	%
Adam Blitzer	$	425,000	$	777,251	183	%
Sean Walters	$	475,000	$	383,468	81	%

The 2025 bonus payout earned and received by each named executive officer was determined in strict accordance with the terms of the applicable annual bonus program based on actual performance, with no exercise of upward discretion by the compensation committee and no supplemental bonus paid to any named executive officer.

Equity Awards

We view long-term incentive compensation in the form of equity awards as a critical element of our executive compensation program. The realized value of these equity awards is directly related to our stock price, and, therefore, these awards are an incentive for our executive officers to create long-term value for our stockholders. Equity awards also help us retain qualified executive officers in an increasingly competitive market.

Long-term incentive compensation opportunities in the form of equity awards are granted to our Chief Executive Officer and our other executive officers by the compensation committee. As with other elements of compensation, the compensation committee determines the amount of the long-term incentive compensation opportunities for our executive officers as part of its annual compensation review and after taking into consideration the individual officer’s responsibilities and performance, existing equity retention profiles, our total annual projected equity budget, the

Table of Contents

competitive market analysis prepared by its compensation consultant as well as the other factors described in “Factors Used in Determining Executive Compensation” above. For awards to executive officers other than the Chief Executive Officer, the compensation committee also took into account the Chief Executive Officer recommendations regarding appropriate grants as well as performance and impact, scope of role, retention goals and other circumstances. The amounts of the equity awards are intended to provide competitively-sized awards and resulting target total direct compensation opportunities that the compensation committee believes are reasonable and appropriate taking into consideration the factors described herein.

The target grant value of long-term equity incentive compensation was weighted 50% in the form of performance stock unit (“PSU”) awards and 50% in the form of restricted stock unit (“RSU”) awards. Such awards are settled for shares of our Class A common stock upon satisfaction of service-based vesting conditions and in the case of PSUs, the applicable performance-based and service-based vesting conditions. The service-based vesting condition for both our PSU awards and RSU awards is four years. Because these equity awards are subject to a multi-year vesting requirement, they serve our retention objectives since our executive officers generally must remain continuously employed by us through the applicable vesting dates to fully earn these awards.

In addition, since the value of these awards fluctuates with any changes in the value of the underlying shares, they serve as an incentive that aligns the interests of our executive officers with the long-term interests of our stockholders. In particular, the PSUs are specifically designed to motivate our executive officers to achieve pre-established, company-wide performance goals set by the compensation committee and to reward them for the results and achievements in a given year. We believe this further aligns interests with our stockholders in driving long-term company performance and growth in value. Together, RSUs and PSUs are important tools to motivate and retain our named executive officers, since the value of the awards is delivered to our executive officers over four-year periods, subject to their continued service.

2025 Equity Awards

Our named executive officers received RSU and PSU allocations as determined by the compensation committee based on the factors described above.

The following table sets forth the equity awards granted to our named executive officers on April 1, 2025:


Named Executive Officer	Time-Based RSUs (#)(1)	Target PSUs (#)(1)	Total Fair Value at Grant Date(2)
Olivier Pomel	127,805	127,805	$	25,831,947
David Obstler	66,269	66,269	$	13,394,290
Alexis Lê-Quôc	94,670	94,670	$	19,134,700
Adam Blitzer	65,322	65,322	$	13,202,883
Sean Walters	60,589	60,589	$	12,246,249

(1)The RSUs are subject to service based vesting conditions and the PSUs are subject to both performance-based and service-based vesting conditions. The shares underlying the granted RSUs and earned PSUs for the named executive officers vest as to one-quarter of the shares on March 1, 2026 and the remainder of the shares vest in 12 equal installments on each June 1, September 1, December 1 and March 1 thereafter, subject to the named executive officer remaining in continuous service with us through each such vesting date.

(2)Amounts reported represent the aggregate grant date fair value of RSUs and PSUs (with respect to the PSU awards, assuming target performance is achieved) granted to our named executive officers under our 2019 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2019 Plan”), computed in accordance with Financial Accounting Standard Board Accounting Standards Codification, Topic 718 (“ASC Topic 718”), excluding the effect of estimated forfeitures. The assumptions used in calculating the grant date fair value reported in this column are set forth in the notes to our audited consolidated financial statements included in the Annual Report. This amount does not reflect the actual economic value that may be realized by the named executive officer.

PSU Award Design

The compensation committee approved the terms of the PSUs including the performance metrics in February 2025. The PSUs are earned based on a one-year performance period, with any earned shares subject to the satisfaction of a four-year service based vesting condition from the date of grant. The targets against which performance was measured were generated through our annual budget and strategic planning process, which was reviewed with our board of directors and finalized in the first quarter of 2025. For 2025, the compensation committee determined that the performance goals for our named executive officers would be based on the growth of annual revenue subject to the achievement of a target amount of non-GAAP operating income.

Table of Contents

Our executive officers would only earn the PSUs subject to their PSU awards if our 2025 revenue was at least 90% of the pre-established performance target and the pre-established target level of non-GAAP operating income was achieved. If our annual revenue exceeded the performance target (which would, in the compensation committee’s view, require extraordinary efforts), accelerators would be triggered in order to reward the higher than targeted performance.

The compensation committee intended the performance goals for our executive officers to be challenging to attain based on analysis of external market factors and internal forecasts. For example, our fiscal 2025 revenue target reflected a revenue growth rate of 23% year-over-year. In addition, the number of PSUs that could be earned was subject to a cap of 200% of the target number of PSUs. We believe the cap manages potential incentive compensation costs and avoids incentivizing undue risk in our executive compensation program, while still maintaining appropriate incentives for our executive officers.

For the year ended December 31, 2025, our annual revenue was $3.43 billion, an increase of 28% year-over-year. Based on our actual performance, the compensation committee determined that the non-GAAP operating income target was met and the revenue performance target was achieved at 104% of target, which exceeded the maximum level of achievement and as a result the PSUs award earned by each executive officer was capped at 200% of the target performance level.


	Target		Actual		Achievement		Achievement		PSUs Earned
	(in thousands)				(as a % of Target)		(as a % of fiscal 2024 Revenue)		(as a % of Target)
Revenue	$	3,294,000	$	3,427,158	104.0	%	128	%	200	%

The following table sets forth the PSU awards earned by our named executive officers upon certification of the performance level achievement by the compensation committee on February 5, 2026. The number of PSUs earned was determined in strict accordance with the terms and conditions of the PSU awards based on performance, with no exercise of discretion by the compensation committee.


Named Executive Officer						PSUs Earned (#)(1)
Olivier Pomel						255,610
David Obstler						132,538
Alexis Lê-Quôc						189,340
Adam Blitzer						130,644
Sean Walters						121,178

(1)Such earned PSUs for the named executive officers will vest as to 25% of the shares on March 1, 2026 and the remaining shares vest in 12 equal installments on each June 1, September 1, December 1 and March 1 thereafter, subject in each case to the named executive officer remaining in continuous service (as defined in the 2019 Plan) of the company as of each such date.

Other Features of Our Executive Compensation Program

Severance and Change in Control Benefits

We have entered into an executive severance agreement with each of our named executive officers. The agreements provide that upon a termination of employment by us without “cause” or by the executive for “good reason” (each as defined in the agreement), the executive will receive a lump sum payment equal to the sum of six months of base salary and 50% of the executive’s annual target bonus opportunity, as well as continued payment of premiums pursuant to the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985 (“COBRA”) for six months (or, if earlier, until the date that the executive is eligible for substantially equivalent coverage under a subsequent employer’s plan). If such termination of employment occurs within three months prior to, or 12 months following, a “change in control” (as defined in the agreement) of the company, the executive will instead receive a lump sum payment equal to the sum of 12 months of base salary and 100% of the executive’s annual target bonus opportunity, as well as continued payment of COBRA premiums for 12 months (or, if earlier, when the executive is eligible for substantially equivalent coverage under a subsequent employer’s plan), and will also receive 100% vesting of outstanding and unvested equity awards, excluding awards that vest based upon the satisfaction of performance criteria. The terms of the applicable award agreement govern the treatment of performance-based equity awards upon a change in control of the company. Such agreements provide that upon a change in control PSUs that have been earned based upon the achievement of performance criteria and certification by the compensation committee but remain subject to time-based vesting will be subject to the change in control provisions of the

Table of Contents

executive severance agreement. As a condition to receiving the severance benefits above, the named executive officer must sign a release of claims in favor of the company in a form prescribed by us within a specified time period and such release has become effective.

Mr. Obstler’s executive severance agreement will apply only to the extent more favorable than the terms of his offer letter. Under Mr. Obstler’s offer letter, if he resigns for good reason or we terminate his employment other than for death, “cause” or “permanent disability” (each as defined in his offer letter), then Mr. Obstler will be eligible to receive the following severance benefits (less applicable tax withholdings): (1) six months of base salary paid in accordance with our regular payroll practices; (2) a prorated target bonus for the greater of the portion of the applicable calendar year during which he was employed or six months, payable pro rata over the six-month severance period; and (3) payment on his behalf of the premiums for him and his eligible dependents to continue coverage under our group health plan pursuant to COBRA for a period of up to six months following the date his employment terminates. As a condition to receiving the severance benefits above, Mr. Obstler must sign and not revoke a release of claims in favor of the company in a form reasonably acceptable to us within the time period set forth in his offer letter.

Other Benefits

We do not generally provide perquisites or other personal benefits to our named executive officers. Our named executive officers are eligible to participate in our employee benefit plans, including our medical, dental, vision, group life, disability and accidental death and dismemberment insurance plans, in each case on the same basis as all of our other employees. As with all other employees, we pay the premiums for basic life, accidental death and dismemberment and disability insurance for our named executive officers.

We maintain a defined contribution retirement plan that provides eligible employees, including each of our named executive officers, with an opportunity to save for retirement on a tax-advantaged basis. Eligible employees may defer eligible compensation on a pre-tax basis, up to the statutorily prescribed annual limits on contributions under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). We match contributions to the plan by our employees, including our executive officers, up to a maximum of $2,000. Employee contributions are allocated to each participant’s individual account and are then invested in selected investment alternatives according to the participant’s directions. Employees are immediately and fully-vested in their contributions and fully-vested in the company’s matching contribution after one year of service. The 401(k) plan is intended to be qualified under Section 401(a) of the Code with the 401(k) plan’s related trust intended to be tax exempt under Section 501(a) of the Code. As a tax-qualified retirement plan, contributions to the 401(k) plan and earnings on those contributions are not taxable to the employees until distributed from the 401(k) plan.

Compensation Recovery (“Clawback”) Policy

Our Incentive Compensation Recoupment Policy, or clawback policy, is consistent with the applicable SEC rules and Nasdaq listing standards. Under our clawback policy, if we are required to prepare an accounting restatement, we must reasonably promptly recoup from any current or former covered executive officer, including our named executive officers, the amount of incentive-based compensation received by such covered executive officer in excess of the amount of incentive based compensation that would have been received had such amount been determined based on the accounting restatement. Incentive-based compensation that was erroneously received during the three fiscal years preceding the date on which an accounting restatement was deemed required is subject to potential clawback.

Policy Prohibiting Hedging and Pledging

Our insider trading policy prohibits all directors, officers, other employees and designated consultants from purchasing our stock on margin or holding our stock in a margin account, pledging our stock as collateral or engaging in hedging, derivative or similar transactions with respect to our stock, such as prepaid variable forwards, equity swaps, collars, exchange funds, puts, calls and short sales.

Table of Contents

Executive Compensation Tables

2025 Summary Compensation Table

The following table shows, for the fiscal years ended 2025, 2024 and 2023, as applicable, compensation awarded to or paid to, or earned by, our named executive officers.


Name and Principal Position	Year	Salary ($)		Stock Awards ($)(1)		Non-Equity Incentive Compensation ($)(2)		All Other Compensation ($)(3)		Total ($)
Olivier Pomel	2025	$	445,833	$	25,831,947	$	777,251	$	450	$	27,055,481
Chief Executive Officer and Co-Founder	2024	420,833		19,049,976		371,295		450		19,842,554
	2023	400,000		10,908,938		335,546		450		11,644,934

David Obstler	2025	445,833		13,394,290		777,251		4,210		14,621,584
Chief Financial Officer	2024	420,833		14,743,236		371,295		5,743		15,541,107
	2023	400,000		8,181,672		335,546		1,980		8,919,198

Alexis Lê-Quôc	2025	445,833		19,134,700		777,251		2,690		20,360,475
President, Chief Technology Officer and Co-Founder	2024	420,833		16,192,539		371,295		2,690		16,987,357
	2023	400,000		10,908,938		335,546		2,450		11,646,934

Adam Blitzer(4)	2025	445,833		13,202,883		777,251		2,450		14,428,418
Chief Operating Officer	2024	420,834		12,777,373		371,295		2,300		13,571,802

Sean Walters	2025	470,833		12,246,249		383,468		2,690		13,103,240
Chief Revenue Officer	2024	441,667		11,794,442		333,280		2,690		12,572,079
	2023	393,333		7,727,169		308,729		2,690		8,431,922

(1)Amounts reported represent the aggregate grant date fair value of PSUs, assuming target performance, and RSUs granted to our named executive officers under the 2019 Plan computed in accordance with ASC Topic 718, excluding the effect of estimated forfeitures. For accounting purposes, the grant date fair value of PSUs was calculated based on the probable outcome of the performance metrics for fiscal 2025 as of the grant date. The assumptions used in calculating the grant date fair value of the RSUs and PSUs reported in this column are set forth in the notes to our audited consolidated financial statements included in the Annual Report. This amount does not reflect the actual economic value that may be realized by the named executive officer. The value of the PSUs granted in 2025, assuming that the highest tier of achievement of the company’s performance goals under the terms of the PSU awards is achieved or exceeded, is as follows for each of the named executive officers: Mr. Pomel, $25,831,947; Mr. Obstler, $13,394,290; Mr. Lê-Quôc, $19,134,700; Mr. Blitzer, $13,202,883; and Mr. Walters, $12,246,249.

(2)Amounts reported represent the executive officers’ total cash bonuses earned for each of the years presented, as applicable, based on the achievement of company performance goals as determined by the compensation committee.

(3)Amounts reported include life insurance premiums paid by us on behalf of the named executive officer and for certain named executive officers, matching contributions under our 401(k) Plan in the amount of $2,000.

(4)Mr. Blitzer was not among the Company’s named executive officers in 2023.

SEC Form DEF 14A filed by Datadog Inc.