SEC Form DEF 14A filed by Granite Construction Incorporated
$GVA
Military/Government/Technical
Industrials
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )
Filed by the Registrant ☒
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ☐
Check the appropriate box:
| ☐ | Preliminary Proxy Statement | ||||
| ☐ | Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) | ||||
| ☒ | Definitive Proxy Statement | ||||
| ☐ | Definitive Additional Materials | ||||
| ☐ | Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12 | ||||
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check all boxes that apply):
| ☒ | No fee required | ||||
| ☐ | Fee paid previously with preliminary materials | ||||
| ☐ | Fee computed on table in exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11 | ||||
GRANITE CONSTRUCTION INCORPORATED
585 West Beach Street
Watsonville, California 95076
Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders
April 23, 2026
| Date: | Thursday, June 4, 2026 | ||||
| Time: | 10:30 a.m., Pacific Time | ||||
| Place: | Virtual Meeting http://www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/GVA2026 | ||||
Purposes of the Meeting:
•To elect three directors of Granite Construction Incorporated (the “Company”) for a term set to expire at the 2029 annual meeting;
•To hold an advisory vote on executive compensation for the Named Executive Officers;
•To ratify the appointment by the Audit/Compliance Committee of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as Granite's independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2026; and
•To consider any other matters properly brought before the meeting.
Who May Attend the Meeting:
Only shareholders and/or their representatives, persons holding proxies from shareholders, and invited representatives of the media and financial community may attend the meeting.
How to Participate:
To participate in the Annual Meeting, you must visit http://www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/GVA2026 and enter the 16-digit control number included in the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, on your proxy card, or in the instructions that accompanied your proxy materials. During the Annual Meeting, shareholders may vote their shares virtually (other than persons who hold shares in the Granite Construction Profit Sharing and 401(k) Plan (such persons, the “401(k) Participants” and such plan, the “401(k) Plan”) and submit questions by following the instructions available on the meeting website. If you are a beneficial shareholder, you may contact the bank, broker or other institution where you hold your shares if you have questions about obtaining your control number.
Record Date:
The record date for the 2026 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the “Annual Meeting”) is April 10, 2026. This means that if you own Granite stock at the close of business on that date, you are entitled to receive notice of the meeting and vote at the meeting and any adjournments or postponements of the meeting.
Annual Report:
Our Annual Report to Shareholders for 2025 will be made available to shareholders at the same time as the proxy materials.
Shareholder List:
For 10 days prior to the meeting, a complete list of shareholders entitled to vote at the meeting will be available for examination by any shareholder for any purpose related to the meeting during regular business hours at Granite's headquarters located at 585 West Beach Street, Watsonville, CA 95076.
Information about the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials:
Instead of mailing a printed copy of our proxy materials, including our Annual Report, to each shareholder of record, we will provide access to these materials online. This reduces the amount of paper necessary to produce these materials, as well as the costs associated with mailing these materials to all shareholders. Accordingly, on or about April 23, 2026, we will begin mailing a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials to all shareholders of record as of April 10, 2026, other than to 401(k) Participants. We will also post our proxy materials on the website referenced in the Notice
(https://www.proxyvote.com). All 401(k) Participants will receive a package in the mail that includes all proxy materials. The proxy materials will be mailed to all 401(k) Participants on or about April 23, 2026.
All shareholders may choose to access our proxy materials online or may request to receive a printed set of our proxy materials. In addition, the Notice and website provide information regarding how you may request to receive proxy materials in printed form by mail on an ongoing basis.
Proxy Voting:
Your vote is important. Please vote your proxy promptly so your shares can be represented at the Annual Meeting even if you plan to attend the meeting. Shareholders, including 401(k) Participants, can vote or provide voting directions, as applicable, by Internet, telephone or mail. Shareholders, other than 401(k) Participants, may revoke a proxy and vote virtually if attending the Annual Meeting.
The Annual Meeting will be held exclusively online via live audio webcast on the above date and time. You or your proxyholder will be able to attend the Annual Meeting online, vote your shares virtually (other than 401(k) Participants) and submit questions during the meeting by visiting http://www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/GVA2026 and using your 16-digit control number included in the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, on your proxy card, or in the instructions that accompanied your proxy materials.
In the event of a technical malfunction or other situation that the meeting chair determines may affect the ability of the Annual Meeting to satisfy the requirements for a meeting of shareholders to be held by means of remote communication under the Delaware General Corporation Law, or that otherwise makes it advisable to adjourn the Annual Meeting, the chair or secretary of the meeting will convene the meeting at 10:30 a.m. Pacific Time on the date specified above and at our address specified above solely for the purpose of adjourning the meeting to reconvene at a date, time and physical or virtual location announced by the meeting chair. We will also post information regarding the adjournment on the investors page of our website at www.graniteconstruction.com. Additionally, the Company will display during the time scheduled for the Annual Meeting at http://www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/GVA2026 the date, time and physical or virtual location of the adjourned meeting.
| By Order of the Board of Directors, | |||||
 | |||||
M. Craig Hall Executive Vice President, Chief Legal Officer, Corporate Compliance Officer and Secretary | |||||
TABLE OF CONTENTS | |||||
| PAGE | |||||
i
| TABLE OF CONTENTS | |||||
| PAGE | |||||
ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS | |||||
| PAGE | |||||
iii
GRANITE CONSTRUCTION INCORPORATED
585 West Beach Street
Watsonville, California 95076
PROXY STATEMENT
As more fully described in the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, Granite Construction Incorporated, a Delaware corporation (referred to herein as “we,” “us,” “our,” “Granite” or the “Company”), on behalf of its Board of Directors (referred to herein as “Board of Directors” or “Board”), has made its proxy materials available to you on the Internet in connection with Granite's 2026 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the "Annual Meeting"), which will take place virtually at http://www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/GVA2026 on June 4, 2026. The Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials was mailed to all Granite shareholders of record, except 401(k) Participants, on or about April 23, 2026, and our proxy materials were posted on the website referenced in the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials and made available to shareholders on April 23, 2026. If you received a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials by mail and would like to receive a printed copy of our proxy materials, please follow the instructions included in the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials. The proxy materials were mailed to all 401(k) Participants on or about April 23, 2026.
After carefully considering the format of our Annual Meeting, our Board elected to hold the Annual Meeting exclusively online. Our aim is to offer shareholders rights and participation opportunities during our virtual Annual Meeting that are comparable to those that have been provided at our past in-person Annual Meetings. To participate in the Annual Meeting, you must go to http://www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/GVA2026 and enter the 16-digit control number included in the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, on your proxy card, or in the instructions that accompanied your proxy materials. During the Annual Meeting, shareholders may vote their shares virtually (other than 401(k) Participants) and submit questions by following the instructions available on the meeting website. Please refer to the “Participating in the Annual Meeting” section of this Proxy Statement for more details about attending the Annual Meeting online.
Granite, on behalf of its Board of Directors, is soliciting your proxy to vote your shares at the Annual Meeting or any subsequent adjournment or postponement. We solicit proxies to give all shareholders of record an opportunity to vote on the matters listed in the accompanying notice and/or any other matters that may be presented at the Annual Meeting. In this proxy statement you will find information on these matters, which is provided to assist you in voting your shares.
Granite was incorporated in Delaware in January 1990 as the holding company for Granite Construction Company, which was incorporated in California in 1922.
1
PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
The Board of Directors is divided into three classes. We keep the classes as equal in number as reasonably possible; however, the number of directors in a class depends on the total number of directors at any given time. Each director serves for a term of three years. The classes are arranged so that the terms of the directors in each class expire at successive annual meetings. Typically, this means that shareholders annually elect approximately one-third of the members of the Board. The Board currently consists of nine directors.
The terms of Carlos M. Hernandez, Celeste B. Mastin, and Kyle T. Larkin will expire at the Annual Meeting. The Board, upon recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, has nominated Carlos M. Hernandez, Celeste B. Mastin, and Kyle T. Larkin for new terms. Mr. Hernandez was appointed to the Board of Directors in June 2024. He was recommended as a potential director by a non-management director. All nominees serve as directors. If elected, each of the nominees will serve as a director until the 2029 annual meeting and until his or her successor is elected and qualified or he or she resigns or until his or her death, retirement or removal.
Management knows of no reason why any of these nominees would be unable or unwilling to serve. All nominees have accepted the nomination and agreed to serve as a director if elected by the shareholders.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS’ RECOMMENDATION
The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote “FOR” each of the above-named nominees.
2
Director Qualifications
The tables below highlight the qualifications, competency, experience and other information of each director, including each nominee for election to our Board, that contributed to the Board’s determination that each individual is qualified to serve on the Board. This high-level summary is not intended to be an exhaustive list of each director’s skills or contributions.
| Competency / Experience | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Name of Director | Financial Expertise & Literacy | Capital Structuring/ Project Finance/M&A | Strategic Planning Experience | Human Capital/Executive Compensation | Enterprise Risk Management | Project Execution Risk Management | Legal/Claims Management | Public Sector Contracting | Industry Experience | Operating Experience | Environmental and Social Factors | Cyber-Security | Politics/Public Policy | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Krusi | ⬤ | ⬤ | ⬤ | ⬤ | ⬤ | ⬤ | ⬤ | ⬤ | ⬤ | ⬤ | ⬤ | ⬤ | ¡ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| McNally | ⬤ | ⬤ | ⬤ | ⬤ | ⬤ | ⬤ | ⬤ | ⬤ | ⬤ | ⬤ | ⬤ | ⬤ | ⬤ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hernandez | ⬤ | ⬤ | ⬤ | ⬤ | ⬤ | ⬤ | ⬤ | ⬤ | ⬤ | ⬤ | ⬤ | ⬤ | ⬤ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Caldera | ⬤ | ⬤ | ⬤ | ⬤ | ⬤ | ⬤ | ⬤ | ⬤ | ¡ | ¡ | ⬤ | ⬤ | ⬤ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mullen | ⬤ | ⬤ | ⬤ | ⬤ | ⬤ | ⬤ | ¡ | ¡ | ¡ | ¡ | ⬤ | ⬤ | ¡ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Campbell | ⬤ | ⬤ | ⬤ | ⬤ | ⬤ | ⬤ | ⬤ | ⬤ | ⬤ | ⬤ | ⬤ | ⬤ | ⬤ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mastin | ⬤ | ⬤ | ⬤ | ⬤ | ⬤ | ¡ | ¡ | ¡ | ¡ | ⬤ | ⬤ | ⬤ | ¡ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Romer | ⬤ | ⬤ | ⬤ | ¡ | ⬤ | ⬤ | ¡ | ⬤ | ⬤ | ⬤ | ⬤ | ¡ | ⬤ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Larkin | ⬤ | ⬤ | ⬤ | ⬤ | ⬤ | ⬤ | ⬤ | ⬤ | ⬤ | ⬤ | ⬤ | ¡ | ¡ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ⬤ | Highly Experienced | ⬤ | General Experience | ¡ | Limited Experience or Expertise | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Location | Gender | Age Range | Tenure on Board | Race & Ethnicity | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Name of Director | Location | Gender | 59 and under | 60-64 | 65-69 | 70 + | 0-5 | 6-10 | 11 + | Race & Ethnicity | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Krusi | WA | M | ✓ | ✓ | W | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| McNally | FL | M | ✓ | ✓ | W | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hernandez | FL | M | ✓ | ✓ | H | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Caldera | MD | M | ✓ | ✓ | H | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mullen | CA | F | ✓ | ✓ | W | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Campbell | CA | F | ✓ | ✓ | B | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mastin | TX | F | ✓ | ✓ | W | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Romer | CA | M | ✓ | ✓ | W | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Larkin | CA | M | ✓ | ✓ | W | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
B Black or African American | H Hispanic or Latino | W White | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3
In addition to the tables above, the following paragraphs provide further information as of the date of this proxy statement about each director and director nominee. The information presented includes information each director or director nominee has given us about his or her age, all positions he or she holds with Granite, his or her principal occupation and business experience for the past five years, and the names of other publicly held companies of which he or she currently serves as a director or has served as a director during the past five years. In addition to the information in the tables above and included below regarding each director's and director nominee's specific experience, qualifications, attributes, and skills that led our Board to the conclusion that he or she should serve as a director, the Board believes that all of our directors and director nominees have a reputation for integrity, honesty and adherence to high ethical standards. The Board also believes that all of our directors have demonstrated business acumen and an ability to exercise sound judgment, as well as a commitment of service to Granite and our Board.
4
NOMINEES FOR DIRECTOR TO BE ELECTED FOR TERMS EXPIRING AT THE 2029 ANNUAL MEETING
 | Carlos M. Hernandez | Director since 2024 | ||||||
Mr. Hernandez served as Chief Executive Officer of Fluor Corporation from 2019 to 2020 and Executive Vice President and Chief Legal Officer from 2007 to 2019. Fluor Corporation is an engineering and construction firm based in Irving, Texas. Prior to joining Fluor, Mr. Hernandez served as General Counsel of ArcelorMittal Americas from 2004 to 2007, Executive Vice President and General Counsel of Fleming Companies, Inc. from 2000 to 2004, and he held the roles of Assistant General Counsel, Corporate Counsel and Assistant Counsel at Armco Inc. from 1981 to 1999. Mr. Hernandez serves on the board of PG&E, the nation’s largest utility. We believe Mr. Hernandez’s past experience as an executive with a major multi-national engineering and construction firm and his knowledge and understanding of the construction industry and Granite’s customers qualify him to serve on our Board. His career honors include the Dallas Hispanic Bar Association Corporate Counsel Diversity Award, the Robert H. Dedman Award in Ethics and Law, and the Hispanic National Bar Foundation Corporate Leadership Award. He received his BS in civil engineering from Purdue University and his JD from the University of Miami School of Law. Age 71. | ||||||||
 | Celeste B. Mastin | Director since 2017 | ||||||
Ms. Mastin has served as the President and Chief Executive Officer of H.B. Fuller Company since December 2022, and served as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of H.B. Fuller Company from March 2022 to December 2022. H.B. Fuller Company manufactures, develops, and sells adhesives around the world and is headquartered in St Paul, Minnesota. From March 2018 to March 2022, Ms. Mastin served as Chief Executive Officer of PetroChoice Lubrication Solutions. PetroChoice is one of the largest petroleum-based lubricant distributors in the United States for passenger and commercial vehicles and industrial applications. Prior to joining PetroChoice, Ms. Mastin was the Chief Executive Officer of Distribution International, Inc., a supplier of commercial and industrial insulation from 2013 to 2017. From 2007 to 2011, she served as Chief Executive Officer and as Chief Operating Officer of MMI Products, Inc., a manufacturer and distributor of building materials. From 2004 to 2007, Ms. Mastin held the role of Vice President of color and glass performance materials and Vice President of growth and development at Ferro Corporation. Ms. Mastin started her career in sales at Shell Chemical. She also held European and later global sales management positions as well as management positions at Bostik, Inc. We believe that Ms. Mastin’s global chemicals and building materials sectors experience, as well as her operating experience and proven leadership ability qualify her to serve on our Board. Ms. Mastin holds a B.S. in Chemical Engineering from Washington State University and a M.B.A. from the University of Houston. Age 57. | ||||||||
 | Kyle T. Larkin | Director since 2021 | ||||||
Mr. Larkin joined Granite in 1996 and has served as President since September 2020 and as Chief Executive Officer since June 2021. He also served as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer from February 2020 to September 2020, Senior Vice President and Manager of Construction and Materials Operations from 2019 to 2020, Senior Vice President and Group Manager from 2017 to 2019, Vice President and Regional Manager in Nevada from 2014 to 2017 and President of Granite’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Intermountain Slurry Seal, Inc. from 2011 to 2014. He served as Manager of Construction at the Reno area office from 2008 to 2011, Chief Estimator from 2004 to 2008 and Project Manager, Project Engineer and Estimator at Granite’s Nevada Branch between 1996 and 2003. We believe that Mr. Larkin’s knowledge of the construction industry, as well as his intimate knowledge of our business, employees, culture, and competitors, his understanding of the challenges and issues facing the Company and his insider’s perspective of the Company’s day-to-day operations and the strategic direction of the Company, qualify him to serve on our Board. Mr. Larkin holds a B.S. in Construction Management from California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo and an M.B.A. from the University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Age 54. | ||||||||
5
CONTINUING DIRECTORS WITH TERMS EXPIRING AT THE 2027 ANNUAL MEETING
 | Molly C. Campbell | Director since 2019 | ||||||
Ms. Campbell has over 30 years of experience in government and international logistics development. She served as a non-executive advisor for Boston Consulting Group from 2022 to 2026. Ms. Campbell was also a 2019 Fellow at Harvard University’s Advanced Leadership Initiative Program. Prior to that, she served as the Director of the Port of New York and New Jersey from 2015 to 2018, the Director of Financial Management Systems for Los Angeles World Airport in 2015, Deputy Executive Director from 2007 to 2015 and Chief Financial Officer from 2000 to 2007 of the Port of Los Angeles and is currently a member of the board of directors of East West Bank. Additionally, Ms. Campbell was a fellow of Stanford University's Distinguished Career Institute, DCI, for 2023. We believe Ms. Campbell’s executive leadership experience, expertise in finance, multi-modal logistics, the maritime industry and transportation and infrastructure project experience qualify her to serve on our Board. Ms. Campbell holds a B.A. degree in Political Science from the University of California, Los Angeles and an M.A. degree in Public Policy from Georgetown University. Age 65. | ||||||||
 | Michael F. McNally | Director since 2016 | ||||||
Mr. McNally retired in 2014 as President and Chief Executive Officer of Skanska USA Inc., a subsidiary of Skanska AB, one of the world’s largest construction companies, a position he had held since 2008. During that time, he also served as one of nine members of Skanska AB’s senior executive team. Prior to his tenure at Skanska, Mr. McNally held various management positions over a 38 year career with Fluor, Marshall Contractors, Mobil Oil and J. Ray McDermott. Mr. McNally is also currently a member of the board of directors of Limbach Holdings Inc. From 2020 to 2023, he was Vice Chair of the Board of Trustees for the University of Rhode Island. Mr. McNally also served on the board of directors of Terracon from 2016 to 2022 and from 2016 to 2019, he served as the Chairman of the U.S. Green Building Council (“USGBC”) Board. In 2013 he was presented with the USGBC Leadership in the Private Sector Award. In 2014, he organized and chaired the construction industry's first Safety Week bringing together more than 30 major construction companies to advance safety in the industry. We believe that Mr. McNally’s past experience as an executive with a major multi-national construction firm and his knowledge and understanding of the construction industry and Granite’s customers qualify him to serve on our Board. Mr. McNally is also a National Association of Corporate Directors (“NACD”) Board Leadership Fellow, is NACD Directorship Certified and holds the CERT Certificate in Cyber-Risk Oversight. Mr. McNally holds a B.S. degree in Civil Engineering from the University of Notre Dame and an M.B.A. from the University of Rhode Island. Age 71. | ||||||||
 | Laura M. Mullen | Director since 2021 | ||||||
Ms. Mullen served as an audit partner with KPMG LLP from 1996 to 2020. In her 37-year tenure with KPMG, Ms. Mullen served in various roles, including Global Lead Audit Engagement Partner, SEC Reviewing Partner, West Regional Professional Practice Partner and National Office Partner. We believe that Ms. Mullen’s experience as a senior audit partner of a Big Four accounting firm, as well as her in-depth knowledge and understanding of generally accepted accounting principles, experience in auditing and analyzing financial statements, understanding of internal control over financial reporting, and her understanding of audit committee functions qualify her to serve on our Board. Ms. Mullen currently serves on the board of directors of SSR Mining Inc. Ms. Mullen holds a B.S. degree in Business Administration from the California State University, Long Beach. She is a certified public accountant in California and a member of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. Age 65. | ||||||||
6
CONTINUING DIRECTORS WITH TERMS EXPIRING AT THE 2028 ANNUAL MEETING
 | Alan P. Krusi | Director since 2018 | ||||||
Mr. Krusi served as President, Strategic Development of AECOM Technology Corporation, a New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) listed company, from 2008 through 2015, where he led the firm’s M&A activities among other responsibilities. From 2003 until 2008, Mr. Krusi served as CEO and President of Earth Tech, Inc., a global engineering and construction firm, which primarily specialized in the design, construction, financing and operations of water treatment facilities, but also provided engineering and management services to the transportation and environmental markets. Prior to that, and over a period of twenty-six years, Mr. Krusi held a number of technical and management positions within the engineering and construction industries. From 1994 to 2003, Mr. Krusi was president of Obrien Kreitzberg, a company which specialized in providing construction management services to the transportation markets. We believe that Mr. Krusi’s extensive managerial experience attained from serving as the president and CEO of various companies in the engineering and construction services industry qualify him to serve on our Board. Mr. Krusi currently serves on the board of directors of SSR Mining Inc. Additionally, in 2022, Mr. Krusi completed the NACD Cyber-Risk Oversight Program. Mr. Krusi holds a B.A. in Geological Sciences from the University of California, Santa Barbara. Age 71. | ||||||||
 | Louis E. Caldera | Director since 2021 | ||||||
Mr. Caldera has been a Senior Lecturer at Harvard Business School teaching in the MBA program since July 2023. He has also served as a Senior Advisor to Belay Associates, LLC, a private equity firm, and its Everest Consolidator Acquisition Corp. since March 2021. Prior to that he served as Distinguished Adjunct Professor of Law and as a Senior Fellow in the Program on Law and Government at American University Washington College of Law from 2018 to 2021. He also served as a Professor of Leadership and a Senior Fellow of the George Washington University Cisneros Hispanic Leadership Institute from 2016 to 2018. From January 2009 to May 2009, he served in the Obama Administration as an Assistant to the President and Director of the White House Military Office. From August 2003 to February 2006, he served as President of The University of New Mexico, where he was also was a tenured member of the law school faculty from August 2003 to December 2010. Previously Mr. Caldera served as a California state legislator and as Secretary of the Army in the Clinton Administration. Mr. Caldera is the co-founder and co-chair of the Presidents’ Alliance on Higher Education and Immigration. He is also a member of the board of directors of Meritage Homes Corporation. He also served on the board of directors of DallasNews Corp. from March 2011 to September 2025. We believe that Mr. Caldera's knowledge and experience in the leadership of large public organizations, regulatory and governmental affairs, together with his legal training and business and public company board experience, qualify him to serve on our Board. Mr. Caldera holds a B.S. degree from the U.S. Military Academy, a M.B.A. from Harvard Business School and a J.D. from Harvard Law School. Age 70. | ||||||||
7
CONTINUING DIRECTORS WITH TERMS EXPIRING AT THE 2028 ANNUAL MEETING
 | J. Timothy Romer | Director since 2025 | ||||||
Mr. Romer has over 30 years of infrastructure, advisory, and capital markets experience serving in various senior roles at Goldman Sachs and Merrill Lynch, leading the Western Region Public Sector and Infrastructure Investment Banking groups, respectively. After leaving Goldman in 2019, he launched Foundation Infrastructure Opportunities, the infrastructure debt fund of Foundation Credit which focuses on investments in essential public infrastructure, serving as CEO from 2019 to 2022. He then transitioned to a partner role and continues to serve on the Investment Committee. Mr. Romer served as co-chief executive officer, and chief financial officer and head of strategy at Project Canary from 2022 to 2024, a climate data technology company that provides operational and environmental intelligence from emissions monitoring for the energy industry. He also served as chief financial officer for Adexa Inc. from 2000 to 2003, a supply chain optimization software company. Mr. Romer currently serves on the board and has been treasurer of the Chargers Impact Fund since 2020, which supports community-based initiatives throughout Southern California. We believe Mr. Romer’s distinguished career in leadership roles at top-tier financial institutions, expertise in finance and operations, and experience in infrastructure qualify him to serve on our board. Mr. Romer holds a B.S. degree in Industrial Engineering from Stanford University, and an M.B.A. from the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania. Age 64. | ||||||||
8
INFORMATION ABOUT THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Committees of the Board
The following chart shows the standing committees of the Board of Directors, the current membership of the committees and the number of meetings held by each committee in 2025.
Audit / Compliance | Compensation | Nominating and Corporate Governance | Risk | |||||||||||
Louis E. Caldera(1) | Chair | ✔ | ||||||||||||
Molly C. Campbell(1) | ✔ | Chair | ||||||||||||
Carlos M. Hernandez(1) | ✔ | ✔ | ||||||||||||
Alan P. Krusi(1) | ✔ | Chair | ||||||||||||
| Kyle T. Larkin | ||||||||||||||
Celeste B. Mastin(1) | ✔ | ✔ | ||||||||||||
Michael F. McNally(1)(2) | ||||||||||||||
Laura M. Mullen(1) | Chair | ✔ | ||||||||||||
J. Timothy Romer(1) | ✔ | ✔ | ||||||||||||
Number of Meetings in 2025 | 8 | 5 | 4 | 11 | ||||||||||
(1) Independent directors pursuant to the listing standards of the NYSE.
(2) Board Chair.
Audit/Compliance Committee
All members of the Audit/Compliance Committee are non-employee directors who are determined by the Board to be independent under the listing standards of the NYSE. Each member also satisfies the independence requirements for audit committee members of public companies established by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The Board has determined that Ms. Mullen meets the criteria as an audit committee financial expert as defined by SEC rules. The Board of Directors has also determined that all members of the Audit/Compliance Committee are financially literate as required by the listing standards of the NYSE. The Audit/Compliance Committee has direct responsibility for risk oversight related to accounting matters, financial reporting, enterprise, legal and compliance and cybersecurity risks. A more complete description of the risk responsibility, functions and activities of the Audit/Compliance Committee can be found under “Board Leadership Structure and its Role in Risk Oversight” and in “Report of the Audit/Compliance Committee” as well as in the Audit/Compliance Committee charter. The Audit/Compliance Committee charter is available on Granite's website. See “Granite Website” below.
Compensation Committee
All members of the Compensation Committee are non-employee directors who are determined by the Board to be independent under the listing standards of the NYSE. The Compensation Committee reviews and approves all aspects of compensation for our Chief Executive Officer and our other executive officers and recommends any changes to director compensation to the Board. In addition, the Compensation Committee is responsible for monitoring risk related to employment policies and our compensation and benefit systems, including consideration of whether any risks associated with such policies and systems are likely to have a material adverse effect on Granite. The Compensation Committee also reviews our overall compensation plans and strategies and, with respect to certain compensation plans, makes recommendations to the Board for their consideration and approval. The Compensation Committee also oversees and implements our clawback policy. The Compensation Committee has determined that the Company’s annual incentive compensation should partially be tied to safety. Granite uses two safety metrics, the OSHA Recordable Incident Rate (“ORIR”) and the Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred (“DART”) Rate, which are nationally recognized metrics, to monitor and manage safety performance and to benchmark its safety performance against the construction industry for incentive compensation purposes. For additional information regarding how safety metrics are used in Granite’s annual incentive plan, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—2025 AIP Performance Measures.” Our Chief Executive Officer attends Compensation Committee meetings and recommends annual salary levels, incentive compensation and payouts for other executive officers for the Compensation Committee's approval. The Compensation Committee also administers the Company’s equity incentive plan. The Compensation Committee may delegate any of its responsibilities to
9
a subcommittee composed of one or more members of the Committee. The Compensation Committee charter is available on Granite's website. See “Granite Website” below.
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
All members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are non-employee directors who are determined by the Board to be independent under the listing standards of the NYSE. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee develops and recommends corporate governance principles and practices to the Board and oversees the management of risks which are mitigated by these principles and practices. Upon the recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, the Board amended its corporate governance guidelines and policies to incorporate an over boarding policy that limits the number of public company boards that the Company’s directors can serve on to no more than four and the number of public company boards that the Company’s directors who serve as executive officers of public companies can serve on to no more than two.
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee recommends and nominates persons to serve on the Board and has undertaken a thoughtful approach to board refreshment through the Board nomination and evaluation process and retirement policy. In addition, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for overseeing management succession planning and discusses management succession with the Board Chair and Chief Executive Officer and periodically reports to the Board on management succession planning. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also oversees the annual evaluations of the Board and certain senior executive officers of the Company. These annual evaluations of the Board are conducted through questionnaires, which include a self-assessment, an assessment of the effectiveness of the Board and committees and a peer evaluation.
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for overseeing the Company’s environmental, social and governance (“ESG”) strategy, initiatives and policies, and related risks which are integrated into Granite's enterprise risk management system. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee oversees management’s preparation of the Company’s annual Sustainability Reports, and management recommends the Sustainability Report to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and Board of Directors for approval. Beginning with the Company’s 2020 Sustainability Report, Granite has aligned its sustainability reporting with the framework established by the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures and uses industry specific metrics, including those identified by the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board, to support performance, tracking and reporting. Granite is continuing to leverage its commitment to sustainability as a competitive advantage to create value for stakeholders.
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee's policy for considering director candidates, including shareholder recommendations, is discussed in more detail below under the heading “Board of Directors' Nomination Policy.” This policy and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee charter and Granite’s Sustainability Reports are available on Granite's website. See “Granite Website” below.
Risk Committee
All members of the Risk Committee are non-employee directors who are determined by the Board of Directors to be independent under the listing standards of the NYSE. The Risk Committee is responsible for overseeing the Company’s strategic, operational and health, safety and environmental compliance risks. The Risk Committee is also responsible for, among others things, overseeing Granite’s strategic planning process, management’s adoption and implementation of enterprise risk management policies and procedures, and the Company’s bid and proposal strategy for high risk contracts. The Risk Committee charter is available on Granite's website. See “Granite Website” below.
10
Role of the Compensation Consultant
The Compensation Committee directly retained the services of Frederic W. Cook & Co., Inc. (“FW Cook”) to provide advice and recommendations to the Compensation Committee on executive officer and Board of Director compensation programs.
FW Cook provided services to the Compensation Committee during 2025 which included, but were not limited to, the following:
•Attended meetings of the Compensation Committee as the Compensation Committee’s advisor;
•Reviewed the Company’s executive compensation benchmarking peer group and recommended changes for the Compensation Committee's consideration;
•Evaluated the competitive positioning of Granite’s executive officers' base salaries, annual incentive and long-term incentive compensation;
•Advised on target award levels within the annual and long-term incentive program and, as needed, on actual compensation actions for the Named Executive Officers;
•Provided advice on the design of Granite's annual and long-term incentive plans, including the performance measures and performance targets for the annual and long-term incentive programs;
•Advised on other executive compensation policies and practices such as the clawback policy, executive perquisites, and aggregate equity grant practices;
•Assisted with the preparation of the Company's “Compensation Discussion and Analysis”;
•Provided the Compensation Committee with an update on executive compensation trends and regulatory developments to inform the compensation planning process for 2025; and
•Assessed the potential for material risk within Granite's compensation policies and practices for all employees, including executive officers.
Based in part on the policies and procedures FW Cook and the Compensation Committee have in place, the Compensation Committee believes that the advice it receives from the executive compensation consultant, a FW Cook representative, is objective and independent. These policies and procedures include:
•FW Cook’s professional standards prohibit the executive compensation consultant from considering any other relationships FW Cook or any of its affiliates may have with Granite in rendering his or her advice and recommendations;
•FW Cook does not provide any services to Granite other than executive and non-employee director compensation advisory work conducted on behalf of the Committee;
•The Compensation Committee has the sole authority to retain and terminate the executive compensation consultant;
•The executive compensation consultant has direct access to the Compensation Committee without management intervention;
•The Compensation Committee evaluates the quality and objectivity of the services provided by the executive compensation consultant each year and determines whether to continue to retain the consultant; and
•The protocols for the engagement limit how the executive compensation consultant may interact with management.
In retaining FW Cook, the Compensation Committee considered the six factors set forth in Rule 10C-1(b)(4)(i) through (vi) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and its charter and concluded that no conflict of interest existed that would prevent FW Cook from serving as an independent compensation consultant to the Compensation Committee.
While it is necessary for the executive compensation consultant to interact with management to gather information, the Compensation Committee has adopted protocols governing if and when the executive compensation consultant's advice and recommendations can be shared with management. These protocols are included in the Compensation Committee’s engagement letters with FW Cook. The Compensation Committee also determines the appropriate forum for receiving the executive compensation consultant's recommendations. Where appropriate, management invitees are present to provide context for the recommendations.
11
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
During 2025, Mr. Caldera, Ms. Campbell, Mr. Darnell, and Ms. Mastin served as members of the Compensation Committee. No member of the Compensation Committee (1) was, during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025, or had previously been, an officer or employee of the Company or (2) had any material interest in a transaction of the Company or a business relationship with, or any indebtedness to, the Company. None of our executive officers have served as members of a board of directors or compensation committee of any other entity that has an executive officer serving as a member of our Board of Directors or Compensation Committee.
The Lead Director and Executive Sessions
Our bylaws and Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that in the event the Board Chair does not meet the independence requirements of the listing standards of the NYSE, the independent directors shall elect an independent director to serve as Lead Director for a one-year term or until his or her successor is elected or qualified or until such time, if earlier, at which an independent Board Chair is elected. Because Michael F. McNally, the current Board Chair, is an independent director, we currently do not have a Lead Director. In his capacity as Board Chair, Mr. McNally chairs all Board meetings, sets the agenda for the Board meetings, and presides over all executive sessions of the non-employee members of the Board.
Board Leadership Structure and Its Role in Risk Oversight
The Board of Directors has determined that having an independent director serve as the Board Chair is in the best interest of Granite and its shareholders at this time. The Board believes that having a strong independent director serve as Board Chair promotes greater oversight of Granite by the independent directors and provides for greater management accountability. The structure ensures more active participation by the independent directors in setting the Board's agenda and establishing the Board's priorities. However, the Board, in accordance with its Corporate Governance Guidelines and Policies, retains the flexibility to decide, as new circumstances arise, whether or not to combine or separate the position of Board Chair and principal executive officer.
As with all companies, we face a variety of risks in our business. Our Board of Directors is responsible for oversight of our Company's risks, and effective risk management is a top priority of the Board and management. The Board believes that having a system in place for risk management and implementing strategies responsive to our risk profile and exposures will adequately identify our material risks in a timely manner. In order to more efficiently manage these risks, the Board has delegated certain risk management oversight responsibilities to the Board committees as follows:
The Audit/Compliance Committee has direct responsibility for risk oversight relating to accounting matters, financial reporting, enterprise, legal and compliance and cybersecurity risks. Our Vice President of Internal Audit and independent registered public accounting firm, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, report directly to, and meet with, the Audit/Compliance Committee on a regular basis. The Audit/Compliance Committee and the Board also receive regular reports from our Chief Financial Officer, Corporate Controller, Treasurer, Chief Legal Officer (who is responsible for managing our risk management function and who serves as our Corporate Compliance Officer), and Chief Technology Officer (who is responsible for managing cybersecurity risk and risks associated with the adoption of artificial intelligence). The Audit/Compliance Committee and the Board also meet periodically with management to review the Company's major financial risk exposures and the steps that management has taken to monitor and control such exposures, which include the Company's risk assessment and risk management policies.
The Compensation Committee is responsible for overseeing the management of risks which are mitigated by our employment policies and our compensation and benefits systems, and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee oversees the management of risks which are mitigated by our Corporate Governance Guidelines and Policies, including compliance with listing standards for independent directors and committee assignments. Additionally, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee oversees risks related to ESG matters. The Risk Committee is responsible for overseeing the Company’s strategic, operational and health, safety and environmental compliance risks.
The committee chairs report on risk-related matters to the full Board from time to time as appropriate.
12
BOARD OF DIRECTORS' NOMINATION POLICY
Evaluation Criteria and Procedures
Members of the Board of Directors of Granite are divided into three classes and are nominated for election for staggered three-year terms. The Board, its members, its committee structure and its performance are reviewed on an annual basis. Evaluations for director nominees are conducted annually by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and are generally made on the basis of observations responses to surveys, questionnaires and evaluation forms circulated to directors annually.
Also included in this review is a careful evaluation of the diversity of skills and experience of Board members weighed against Granite's current and emerging operating and strategic challenges and opportunities. The Board of Directors makes every effort to nominate individuals who bring a variety of complementary skills and, as a group, possess the appropriate skills and experience to oversee our business. The Company intends to recruit and select director candidates whose capabilities, including their educational background, their work and life experiences, their diversity of experiences and perspectives, and their demonstrated records of performance will have the balance of expertise and judgment required for the Company’s long-term performance and growth. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers diversity in its broadest sense, including diversity in professional and life experiences, education, skills, perspectives and leadership, as well as other individual qualities and attributes that contribute to Board heterogeneity.
Current Board members whose performance, capabilities, and experience meet Granite's expectations and needs are nominated for re-election in the year of their respective term's completion. In accordance with Granite's Corporate Governance Guidelines and Policies, Board members who became a director during or after 2021 will not be re-nominated and no proposed candidate will be nominated if the nominee’s 75th birthday occurs prior to the annual meeting of shareholders in the year of re- nomination or nomination. Moreover, Directors who became a director during or after 2021 will retire no later than the first annual meeting of shareholders immediately following their 75th birthday. Board members who became a director before 2021 will not be re-nominated if the nominee’s 72nd birthday occurs prior to the annual meeting of shareholders in the year of re-nomination. Moreover, for any individual who became a director before 2021, such individual will retire no later than the first annual meeting of shareholders immediately following their 72nd birthday. Additionally, the Board believes having a term limit of 15 years for independent directors who join the Board after January 1, 2024 is a prudent way to ensure that fresh ideas, skills and perspectives are represented on the Board. As a result, no individual who joined the Board after January 1, 2024 will be re-nominated if the nominee has served on the Board for more than 15 years in the year of re-nomination. Moreover, a director who joined the Board after January 1, 2024 will retire no later than the first annual meeting of shareholders immediately following their 15th anniversary of being on the Board. The mandatory retirement age and term limit will not apply to an employee director who continues to serve as an employee of Granite.
Each member of the Board of Directors must meet a set of core criteria, referred to as the “three C's”: Character, Capability and Commitment. Granite was founded by persons of outstanding character, and it is Granite's intention to ensure that it continues to be governed by persons of high integrity and worthy of the trust of its shareholders. Further, Granite intends to recruit and select persons whose capabilities, including their educational background, their work and life experiences, their diversity of experiences and perspectives, and their demonstrated records of performance will have the balance of expertise and judgment required for its long-term performance and growth. Finally, Granite will recruit and select only those persons who demonstrate they have the commitment to devote the time necessary to appropriately discharge their responsibilities and to prepare for and, to the extent possible, attend and participate in all meetings of the Board and Committees on which they serve.
In addition to the three C's, the Board recruitment and selection process assures that the Board composition meets all of the relevant standards for independence and specific expertise. For each new recruitment process, a set of specific criteria is determined by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee with the assistance of the Board Chair and in certain circumstances a search firm. These criteria may specify, for example, the type of industry or geographic experience that would be useful to maintain and improve the balance of skills and knowledge on the Board. After the search criteria are established, appropriate candidates are sought out, including through the contacts of the current directors and officers, and in certain circumstances those of a search firm. The credentials of a set of qualified candidates provided by the search process are submitted for screening by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, the Board Chair and the Chief Executive Officer. Based on this review, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee invites the top candidates for personal interviews with the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and others as appropriate.
Normally, the search, review and interview process results in a single nominee to fill a specific vacancy. However, a given search may be aimed at producing more than one nominee, or the search for a single nominee may result in multiple
13
candidates of such capability and character that multiple candidates might be nominated and the Board may be expanded accordingly.
It is Granite's intention that this search and nomination process consider qualified candidates referred by a wide variety of sources, including all of Granite's constituents - its customers, employees, shareholders, and members of the communities in which it operates. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for assuring that relevant sources of potential candidates have been appropriately canvassed.
Shareholder Recommendation and Direct Nomination of Board Candidates
Granite will review and consider for nomination any candidate for membership to the Board recommended by a shareholder, utilizing the same evaluation criteria and selection process described in “Evaluation Criteria and Procedures” above. Shareholders wishing to recommend a candidate for consideration in connection with an election at a specific annual meeting of shareholders should notify Granite well in advance of the meeting date to allow adequate time for the review process and preparation of the proxy statement.
In addition, Granite’s bylaws provide that any shareholder entitled to vote in the election of directors may directly nominate a candidate or candidates for election at a meeting provided that timely notice of his or her intention to make such nomination is given. To be timely, a shareholder nomination for a director to be elected at an annual meeting of shareholders must be received at Granite’s principal office, addressed to the Corporate Secretary, no less than 120 days prior to the first anniversary of the date the proxy statement for the preceding year’s annual meeting of shareholders was released to shareholders, and must contain the information and comply with the requirements specified in our bylaws. If no meeting was held in the previous year, the date of the annual meeting of shareholders is changed by more than 30 calendar days from the previous year, or in the event of a special meeting, to be on time, the notice must be delivered by the close of business on the tenth day following the day on which notice of the date of the meeting was mailed or public announcement of the date of the meeting was made.
To be timely, a shareholder nomination for a director to be elected at the 2027 annual meeting of shareholders must be received at Granite’s principal office, addressed to the Corporate Secretary, on or before December 24, 2026. For further information, see “Shareholder Proposals to be Presented at the 2027 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.”
Director Independence
Under the listing standards of the NYSE, a director is considered independent if the Board determines that the director has no material relationship with Granite. In determining independence, the Board considers pertinent facts and circumstances including commercial, industrial, banking, consulting, legal, accounting, charitable and familial relationships, among others. The Board follows these guidelines, established by the NYSE, when assessing the independence of a director:
•A director who, within the last three years is, or has been, an employee of Granite or whose immediate family member is, or has been within the last three years, an executive officer of Granite, may not be deemed independent until three years after the end of such employment relationship. Employment as an interim Chair or Chief Executive Officer or other executive officer shall not disqualify a director from being considered independent following that employment.
•A director who has received, or has an immediate family member who has received, during any twelve-month period within the last three years more than $120,000 in direct compensation from Granite, other than director and committee fees, and pension or other forms of deferred compensation for prior service (provided such compensation is not contingent in any way on continued service), may not be deemed independent. Compensation received by a director for former service as an interim Chair or Chief Executive Officer or other executive officer, and compensation received by an immediate family member for service as an employee of Granite (other than an executive officer), will not be considered in determining independence under this test.
•The following directors may not be deemed independent: (a) a director who is a current partner or employee of a firm that is Granite's internal or external auditor; (b) a director who has an immediate family member who is a current partner of such a firm; (c) a director who has an immediate family member who is a current employee of such a firm and who personally works on Granite's audit; or (d) a director or immediate family member who was within the last three years a partner or employee of such a firm and personally worked on Granite's audit within that time.
14
•A director who, or whose immediate family member, is or has been within the last three years, employed as an executive officer of another company where any of Granite's present executive officers at the same time serves or served on that company's compensation committee may not be deemed independent.
•A director who is a current employee, or whose immediate family member is a current executive officer, of a company that has made payments to, or received payments from, Granite for property or services in an amount which, in any of the last three fiscal years, exceeds the greater of $1 million, or 2% of such other company's consolidated gross revenues for that fiscal year may not be deemed independent.
The Board reviews the independence of all non-employee directors every year. For the review, the Board relies on information from responses to questionnaires completed by directors and other sources. Directors are required to immediately inform the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of any material changes in their or their immediate family members' relationships or circumstances that could impact or change their independence status.
The following non-employee directors are independent under the listing standards of the NYSE: Louis E. Caldera, Molly C. Campbell, Carlos M. Hernandez, Alan P. Krusi, Celeste B. Mastin, Michael F. McNally, Laura M. Mullen, and J. Timothy Romer.
Board and Annual Shareholder Meeting Attendance
During 2025, the Board of Directors held 7 meetings. Each of the directors attended at least 75% of the aggregate of the total number of meetings of the Board and the total number of meetings of any committee(s) on which he or she served. Except for irreconcilable conflicts, directors are expected to attend the annual meeting of shareholders.
The annual meeting attendance policy is a part of Granite's Board of Directors Corporate Governance Guidelines and Policies, and is posted on Granite's website. See “Granite Website” below. All nine directors then in office attended Granite's 2025 annual meeting of shareholders.
Communications with the Board
Any shareholder wishing to communicate with the Board of Directors, or any particular director, including the Board Chair or, if applicable, the Lead Director, should do so by mailing any such correspondence to the Board of Directors or the particular director at c/o General Counsel, Granite Construction Incorporated, P.O. Box 50085, Watsonville, CA 95077-5085. All first class correspondence will be collected and forwarded unopened to the addressee. The Company’s Communications with the Board of Directors Policy is posted on Granite's website. See “Granite Website” below.
Corporate Governance Guidelines and Policies
Granite's Board of Directors is subject to the Board of Directors Corporate Governance Guidelines and Policies. The Board of Directors Corporate Governance Guidelines and Policies is available on our website. See “Granite Website” below.
Our Corporate Governance Guidelines and Policies include a director resignation policy in the event a Director nominee does not receive a majority of the votes cast in an election of Directors where the number of nominees is equal to the number of Directors to be elected (an “Uncontested Election”). The policy states that promptly after receiving notice that the Director nominee has not received the requisite majority vote in an Uncontested Election, the Director nominee shall tender his or her resignation to the Board of Directors. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee (excluding the Director who tendered the resignation) shall then make a recommendation to the Board of Directors on whether to accept or reject the resignation, or whether other action should be taken. The Board of Directors (excluding the Director who tendered the resignation) shall evaluate such recommendation in light of the best interests of the Company and its shareholders, and shall decide whether to accept or reject the resignation, or whether other action should be taken. In reaching its decision, the Board of Directors may consider any factors it deems relevant, including but not limited to the resigning Director’s qualifications, past and anticipated future contributions to the Company as well as the overall composition of the Board of Directors and whether accepting the tendered resignation would cause the Company to fail to meet any rule or regulation (inclusive of listing standards and federal securities laws). The Board of Directors shall act on the tendered resignation and publicly disclose its decision and the rationale behind it within 90 days after the inspector’s certification of the election results. If the Board of Directors elects to reject the resignation, the then incumbent Director will continue to serve until the next annual meeting of shareholders at which his or her term expires. Any vacancies in the Board of Directors resulting from a Director not receiving a majority vote and the Board accepting his or her resignation shall be filled in accordance with the bylaws.
15
Insider Trading Policy and Employee, Officer and Director Hedging
The Company's Insider Trading Policy , which is reasonably designed to promote compliance with insider trading laws, rules, regulations, and applicable listing standards: (1) governs the purchase, sale and/or other disposition of our securities by our directors, officers, employees, and the Company, and (2) prohibits our directors, officers and employees from engaging in hedging transactions with respect to Company securities. The policy prohibits transactions, other than a current sale transaction, that are designed to protect a holder of securities from a possible decline in the value of such securities, including puts, options, swaps, zero-cost collars, forward sale contracts or similar instruments or arrangements.
Code of Conduct
Granite's Code of Conduct applies to all Granite employees, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, and to the Board of Directors. The Code of Conduct is available on Granite's website. We will also post any amendments to the Code of Conduct, or waivers of the application of provisions of the Code of Conduct to any of our directors or executive officers, on our website. See “Granite Website” below.
Granite Website
The following charters and policies are available on Granite's website at www.graniteconstruction.com at the “Investors” site, then under “Corporate Governance”: the Audit/Compliance Committee Charter, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Charter, the Compensation Committee Charter, the Risk Committee Charter, the Board of Directors Corporate Governance Guidelines and Policies, the Board of Directors' Nomination Policy, and the Communication with the Board of Directors Policy. The Company’s Sustainability Reports are available on Granite’s website at www.graniteconstruction.com at the “Company” site, then under “Sustainability.” The information included in Granite’s Sustainability Reports is not incorporated into, and is not part of, this proxy statement. You can also obtain copies of these charters and policies and Granite’s Sustainability Reports, without charge, by contacting Granite's Investor Relations Department at 831.724.1011. The Code of Conduct is available on Granite's website at www.graniteconstruction.com at the “Company” site under “Code of Conduct.” You can obtain a copy of the Code of Conduct and any amendments to the Code of Conduct, without charge, by contacting Granite's Human Resources Department at 831.724.1011.
16
PROPOSAL 2: ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The Board of Directors is asking shareholders to approve an annual advisory resolution on executive compensation. The Board of Directors is providing such vote pursuant to Section 14A of the Exchange Act. The advisory vote is a non-binding vote on the compensation of our Named Executive Officers. The vote is not intended to address any specific item of compensation, but rather the overall compensation of our Named Executive Officers and the philosophy, policies and practices described in this proxy statement. The text of the resolution to be voted on at the Annual Meeting is as follows:
Resolved, that the shareholders of Granite Construction Incorporated approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Company's Named Executive Officers as disclosed in the proxy statement for the Company's 2026 Annual Meeting of Shareholders pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the Exchange Act (which disclosure includes the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section, the Summary Compensation Table for 2025, and the related compensation tables and narrative disclosure within the Executive and Director Compensation and Other Matters section of the proxy statement).
The Company urges you to read the disclosure under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” which discusses how our compensation policies and procedures implement our pay-for-performance compensation philosophy. You should also read the Summary Compensation Table and other related compensation tables and narrative disclosure which provide additional details about the compensation of our Named Executive Officers. We have designed our executive compensation structure to attract, motivate, and retain executives with the skills required to formulate and implement the Company's strategic objectives and grow sustainable shareholder value. We believe that our executive compensation program is reasonable, competitive, and strongly focused on pay for performance principles, and provides an appropriate balance between risk and incentives. In particular, key elements of our executive compensation program are:
•Total direct compensation generally is targeted within the range of the 50th percentile of comparable positions in the market;
•Individual executive pay levels are based on market data, experience, tenure, and impact on business and financial results;
•Short-term and long-term goals are aligned with interests of shareholders, with cash and stock-based incentives earned upon the attainment of pre-established financial and non-financial goals;
•A comprehensive benefits program which is also available to all salaried employees and includes: medical, dental, vision, life, accidental death and dismemberment insurance, short-term and long-term disability insurance, 401(k) Plan, Employee Stock Purchase Plan, health and wellness benefits, paid vacation and holiday pay; and
•Eligibility, along with other management employees, to participate in our Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation (“NQDC”) Program.
The vote regarding the compensation of the Named Executive Officers described above, referred to as a “Say on Pay advisory vote,” is advisory, and is therefore not binding on the Company, the Compensation Committee or the Board of Directors. Although non-binding, the Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors value the opinions that shareholders express in their votes and will review the voting results and take them into consideration when making future decisions regarding our executive compensation programs as they deem appropriate. We currently hold an advisory vote on the compensation of our Named Executive Officers every year. We expect to hold our next advisory vote on the compensation of our Named Executive Officers at our 2027 Annual Meeting.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS’ RECOMMENDATION
The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote “FOR” the approval of the compensation of the Named Executive Officers as disclosed in this proxy statement and as described pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the Exchange Act.
17
EXECUTIVE AND DIRECTOR COMPENSATION AND OTHER MATTERS
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Objective of the Compensation Program
The market for executive talent is highly competitive and the objective of our executive compensation program is to attract, motivate and retain talented, creative and experienced executives with the skills and leadership qualities necessary to compete in the marketplace, formulate and implement the Company’s strategic objectives, deliver consistent financial and operational performance and grow sustainable shareholder value. The Compensation Committee believes that an effective way to enhance Granite's performance is through variable compensation structured to align our executives’ interests with the Company’s short and long-term performance objectives. Key elements of the executive officer program are as follows:
•Total direct compensation generally is targeted within the range of the 50th percentile of comparable positions in the market;
•Individual executive pay levels are based on market data, experience, tenure and impact on business and financial results;
•Short-term and long-term goals are aligned with interests of shareholders, with cash and stock-based incentives earned upon the attainment of pre-established financial and non-financial goals;
•A comprehensive benefits program which includes: medical, dental, vision, life, accidental death and dismemberment insurance, short-term and long-term disability insurance, 401(k) Plan, Employee Stock Purchase Plan, health and wellness benefits, paid vacation and holiday pay; and
•Eligibility, along with other management employees, to participate in our NQDC Program.
Executive Officer Compensation Program
We conduct “Say on Pay” shareholder advisory votes, as required by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 and SEC rules. Our Board has determined to hold a Say on Pay vote on an annual basis, consistent with the results of the most recently held advisory vote regarding the frequency of Say on Pay votes. This resulted in the approval of the compensation of our Named Executive Officers for 2024 by approximately 95% of the votes cast. The Compensation Committee considers these voting results when planning compensation for subsequent years and believes the results affirm the Company’s executive compensation pay levels, programs and policies. Accordingly, the Compensation Committee did not adopt any changes to this program as a result of this vote, although the Compensation Committee is continually evaluating our executive compensation to further align the program with shareholders’ interests.
We use a balanced approach to compensation with a variety of pay elements to support the attraction and retention of key executive talent and to reward the achievement of both short and long-term goals, as described below:
18
| Compensation Element | Purpose | How this Links to Performance | ||||||
| Base Salary | Provides competitive market fixed income reflective of an executive’s role, responsibility, qualifications and experience. | Annually, the Compensation Committee reviews individual performance and market data and adjusts base salary accordingly. Fixed income reduces risk by providing regular salary compensation paid to executives. | ||||||
Short-Term Incentive | ||||||||
Annual Incentive Award | Rewards achievement of the Company's rigorous annual performance goals. | Variable income links compensation to the Company's financial and operational performance. Short-term incentive is paid only upon the achievement of pre-established performance goals that support execution of the Company's long-term strategic plan. | ||||||
•80% Adjusted Earnings before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (“EBITDA”) | ||||||||
•20% Adjusted Operating Cash Flow as a % of Revenue ("OCF") | ||||||||
•Safety Multiplier | ||||||||
•Individual Performance Modifier | ||||||||
Long-Term Incentive | ||||||||
75% Performance Based Award | Rewards growth of shareholder value and successful execution of the Company's long-term strategic plan. Promotes stock price value creation. | Variable income links compensation to the Company's financial performance. Performance-based long-term incentive is paid only upon the achievement of pre-established performance goals measured over a three-year period. Payment is made following the end of the three-year performance period in the form of Restricted Stock Units (“RSUs”) that cliff vest 10 days after grant. | ||||||
•67% Relative TSR (50% of total LTI opportunity) | ||||||||
•33% Capital Efficiency Return on Net Operating Assets ("RONA") (25% of total LTI opportunity) | ||||||||
25% Time Based Award | Provides retention tool that aligns long- term interests of executive with shareholders and rewards sustained long- term performance. | 25% of long-term award is time-based with ratable vesting over three years. | ||||||
The following table identifies our 2025 Named Executive Officers:
Named Executive Officer | Title as of December 31, 2025 | ||||
| Kyle T. Larkin | President and Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) | ||||
Staci M. Woolsey | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) | ||||
| Michael G. Tatusko | Senior Vice President, Construction | ||||
| Brian R. Dowd | Senior Vice President, Construction | ||||
| Bradley J. Williams | Senior Vice President, Construction | ||||
James A. Radich(1) | Former Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer (“COO”) | ||||
(1) Mr. Radich ceased to serve as an executive officer effective July 4, 2025.
19
Annual Review of Executive Compensation and Practices
The Compensation Committee and its compensation consultant annually conduct a comprehensive review of the Company’s executive compensation programs, policies and practices. The compensation consultant may recommend changes to the Compensation Committee based on market and corporate governance best practices.
Role of the Compensation Committee and CEO in Determining Executive Compensation
The Compensation Committee is actively engaged in the design and approval of all elements of the compensation program for our executive officers. Target total direct compensation, incentive program design and potential payouts are determined with assistance and recommendations from the compensation consultant as discussed below. The annual salary levels, incentive compensation targets and potential payouts of the executive officers other than the CEO are reviewed and approved by the Compensation Committee based on recommendations of the CEO and the compensation consultant. The Compensation Committee determines the compensation of the CEO and the CEO does not participate in any deliberations regarding his own compensation. For a detailed explanation, please refer to “Information About the Board of Directors and Corporate Governance — Committees of the Board of Directors — Compensation Committee.”
Role of the Compensation Consultant
The Compensation Committee retained the services of FW Cook as its compensation consultant to provide advice and recommendations on executive officer and Board of Director compensation programs. The compensation consultant attended Compensation Committee meetings and provided guidance and expertise on competitive pay practices and plan designs that are consistent with the key objectives of the compensation program. For a detailed explanation, please refer to “Information About the Board of Directors and Corporate Governance — Role of the Compensation Consultant.”
Annual Risk Assessment
The Compensation Committee in consultation with its independent compensation consultant, annually reviews the balance between risk and reward in the design of the executive officer and broader employee incentive compensation programs. The AIP and LTIP utilize a portfolio of performance metrics across the Company designed to balance short- and long-term financial objectives and generate sustainable shareholder value. Performance goals are set as a range for each objective with a maximum payout opportunity assigned to each performance goal. The Compensation Committee carefully reviews incentive plan goals to ensure the appropriate levels of difficulty and reviews the financial performance of Granite and its peers to ensure performance goals and payout opportunities are appropriately calibrated. The performance measures, threshold and maximum payout opportunities and the calibration of achievability of incentive plan goals are all designed to help ensure that the incentive plans appropriately balance risk and reward, limiting excessive risk-taking and the potential for windfall payouts. Finally, the Company maintains several risk mitigating governance policies such as executive stock ownership guidelines, anti-hedging/pledging policies and a clawback policy. As a result of the above, the Compensation Committee believes that the compensation program is not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.
Market Data Considered in Determining Executive Compensation for 2025
Each year the Compensation Committee reviews available industry compensation data to establish competitive compensation levels which will reward our executive officers if performance targets are achieved. Benchmark data was obtained in 2024 from a peer group consisting of eighteen public companies representing the construction, engineering, and/or construction materials industries. The Compensation Committee believes that industry-specific companies are the most appropriate source of benchmark data as they are most representative of Granite’s market for talent. The data from the peer group of eighteen public companies is used by the Compensation Committee to establish base salary, target total cash and long-term incentive compensation levels. As an additional market reference point, the Compensation Committee reviews national, general industry survey data based on each executive’s functional role and revenue responsibility.
20
Peer Group of Public Companies
The eighteen public companies selected for the peer group to inform 2025 target total direct compensation levels are in the construction, engineering, and/or construction materials industries and compete for executive talent in the same market as Granite. For 2025, the Compensation Committee approved the removal of Cornerstone Building Brands because it was acquired, and the addition of Knife River. At the time the peer group was approved, Granite’s trailing 4-quarter revenues were at the 47th percentile of the peer group and the Company’s 12-month average market capitalization was at the 24th percentile of the peer group. The trailing 4-quarter median revenue of the approved peer group was $3.9 billion (versus $3.6 billion for Granite) and the median 12-month average market capitalization was $3.5 billion (versus $2.0 billion for Granite).
The table below names each of the companies in the peer group that informed 2025 target compensation levels.
| Arcosa | EMCOR Group Inc. | MasTec, Inc. | Tetra Tech | ||||||||
| Comfort Systems USA, Inc. | Great Lakes Dredge and Docks | MYR Group, Inc. | Tutor Perini Corporation | ||||||||
| Construction Partners, Inc. | IES Holdings | Primoris Services Corporation | Valmont Industries, Inc. | ||||||||
| Dycom Industries, Inc. | KBR, Inc. | Sterling Infrastructure* | |||||||||
| Eagle Materials | Knife River | Summit Materials | |||||||||
*Formerly known as Sterling Construction.
21
COMPENSATION ELEMENTS
Base Salary
Base salaries are essential to attract and retain our leadership and provide our Named Executive Officers a stable level of wages as the other components of their compensation are not guaranteed and are based on Company performance. Annually, the CEO reviews compensation for the executive officers (other than for himself) and makes recommendations to the Compensation Committee based on responsibility, tenure, and individual performance. The Compensation Committee considers these recommendations, as well as benchmarking comparisons prepared by the compensation consultant and sets the base salaries with reference to the peer group market median for the executive officers, including the CEO. Following this review for 2025, the Compensation Committee increased base salaries based on performance and to bring them into closer alignment with market median rates. The Named Executive Officer base salaries for 2025 were slightly below the peer median data in aggregate for our Named Executive Officers and varied by each Named Executive Officer and their role. Outside of its normal course review, the Compensation Committee reviews executive officer compensation in connection with promotions, or other significant events.
Base Salaries
| Named Executive Officer | 2024 Base Salaries | 2025 Base Salaries | % Increase | ||||||||
| Kyle T. Larkin | $975,000 | $1,000,000 | 2.6% | ||||||||
Staci M. Woolsey(1) | $500,000 | $500,000 | —% | ||||||||
| Michael G. Tatusko | $468,000 | $486,720 | 4.0% | ||||||||
| Brian R. Dowd | $426,400 | $443,456 | 4.0% | ||||||||
| Bradley J. Williams | $468,000 | $486,720 | 4.0% | ||||||||
James A. Radich(2) | $546,000 | $546,000 | —% | ||||||||
(1) Ms. Woolsey’s base salary was increased to $500,000 in September 2024 at the time of her promotion to Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, with no further changes made during 2025.
(2) Mr. Radich ceased to serve as an executive officer effective July 4, 2025.
2025 Annual Incentive Plan
Annual incentive awards are an integral component of our executive compensation program. The Named Executive Officers participate in the AIP where their annual incentive compensation is determined by overall company financial and safety performance. The Compensation Committee considers the annual operating plan and strategic objectives set at the beginning of the year when determining performance measures and goals. As in prior years, performance against Company safety objectives served as a modifier to the calculated bonus based on Company financial performance. As part of the 2025 incentive compensation performance metric review, the Compensation Committee approved an individual performance modifier to the Annual Incentive Plan to differentiate performance among executives when desired. The Compensation Committee may adjust each NEO’s compensation under the Annual Incentive Plan based on individual performance that can modify the calculated award by plus or minus 10%. These adjustments are based on an assessment of the NEO’s performance, including contributions to the successful achievement of annual key performance goals, leadership within their area of responsibility, and strategic planning.
Annual Incentive Opportunity
As presented in detail below, each Named Executive Officer's targeted annual incentive opportunity is based on external benchmark data for similar positions, their level and responsibility within the organization, and is expressed as a percentage of base salary. The target is set by the Compensation Committee after a review of market median annual incentive target awards of Granite’s peer group and survey data. Pursuant to the terms of the AIP, maximum cash payouts cannot exceed two times the target opportunity. The aggregate AIP target opportunities were slightly below peer group median data for our Named Executive Officers for 2025. All NEO target bonus percentages remained the same from 2024 to 2025. Outside of its normal course review, the Compensation Committee reviews executive officer compensation in connection with promotions or other significant events.
22
The 2025 AIP opportunities for the Named Executive Officers are presented below.
2025 Annual Incentive Opportunity
| Named Executive Officer | Target as % of Base Salary | Threshold | Target | Maximum | ||||||||||
| Kyle T. Larkin | 120% | $600,000 | $1,200,000 | $2,400,000 | ||||||||||
| Staci M. Woolsey | 70% | $175,000 | $350,000 | $700,000 | ||||||||||
| Michael G. Tatusko | 65% | $158,184 | $316,368 | $632,736 | ||||||||||
| Brian R. Dowd | 65% | $144,123 | $288,246 | $576,493 | ||||||||||
| Bradley J. Williams | 65% | $158,184 | $316,368 | $632,736 | ||||||||||
James A. Radich(1) | 80% | $218,400 | $436,800 | $873,600 | ||||||||||
(1) Mr. Radich ceased to serve as an executive officer effective July 4, 2025. Pursuant to the terms of his 2025 Annual Incentive Plan award agreement, he was eligible to receive a prorated payout based on actual results through the end of the applicable performance period. See “Separation Agreement with Mr. Radich” for additional information.
2025 AIP Performance Measures and Results
At the beginning of the annual performance period (January 1st – December 31st), the Compensation Committee approved the 2025 AIP weighting and financial performance goals. The following table describes the 2025 AIP metrics used for our Named Executive Officers.
2025 AIP Performance Measure | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
EBITDA + OCF 80% + 20% | x | Safety Multiplier (90% - 115%) | = | AIP Payout | x | Individual Performance Modifier +/- 10% | = | Total AIP Payout(1) | ||||||||||||||||||
(1) Total payout not to exceed two times target. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Performance Measures for 2025
Our annual incentive metrics include EBITDA, OCF, Safety, and individual performance, each of which are important to our overall success in achieving our strategic goals. The rigorous performance goal setting process included reviewing peer data and historical performance with assistance from the Compensation Committee’s executive compensation consultant, FW Cook. For 2025, EBITDA, OCF, and Safety metrics exclude the impacts of the acquisitions of Papich Construction Company, Inc. (“Papich”), Slats Lucas, LLC and Warren Paving, Inc. (collectively, “Warren Paving”), and Cinderlite Trucking Corporation (“Cinderlite”).
EBITDA is defined as GAAP net income attributable to Granite, adjusted for net interest expense, taxes, depreciation, depletion and amortization, which is further adjusted for items pre-approved by the Compensation Committee. For 2025, EBITDA excluded stock-based compensation expense, items that are not related to the Company’s ongoing core business operations such as legal fees arising out of the defense of a former Company officer in his civil litigation with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), reorganization costs, and strategic acquisition and integration expenses.
OCF is defined as net cash provided by operating activities calculated in accordance with U.S. GAAP and adjusted for items pre-approved by the Compensation Committee as a percentage of revenue. For 2025, OCF excluded cash impact items that are not related to the Company’s ongoing core business operations such as legal fees arising out of the defense of a former Company officer in his civil litigation with the SEC, as well as acquisition and integration-related expenses.
Safety is one of Granite’s Core Values, and we use safety as a metric in our AIP to align our executive officers with our safety strategy. The Safety performance multiplier includes a severity metric of Days Away, Restricted or Transferred (“DART”) and a frequency metric of OSHA Recordable Incident Rate (“ORIR”). DART and ORIR are weighted 50/50% and applied to the EBITDA and OCF payout results. DART and ORIR are nationally recognized metrics and are used to benchmark safety performance against the construction industry. ORIR tracks all injuries which require OSHA documentation (i.e., those that result in medical treatment, restricted duty or lost time) and represents the number of events per 100 full-time employees. It is calculated by multiplying the number of OSHA recordable injuries (total injuries or lost time injuries) by 200,000 (2,000 hours per employee per year x 100 employees) and dividing by the total number of hours
23
of employee exposure. The DART rate is designed to track OSHA recordable workplace injuries or illnesses that results in time away from work, restricted job roles, or an employee's permanent transfer to a new position. The DART rate is calculated by taking the number of OSHA Recordable injuries and illnesses that resulted in Days Away, Restricted, Transferred x 200,000 (2,000 hours per employee per year x 100 employees) and dividing by the total number of hours of employee exposure. A 50/50 weighting of these two metrics is calculated to determine the performance and payout multiplier.
Individual Performance Modifier. The Annual Incentive Plan includes an individual performance modifier that allows the Compensation Committee to adjust payouts by up to plus or minus 10%, with total awards capped at 200% of target. This modifier applies to all executives, including the CEO, and is designed to recognize individual performance against pre‑established goals that support the Company’s enterprise‑wide financial and strategic objectives, while reinforcing collaboration and alignment across the executive team. Following a qualitative assessment of individual performance for the year, the Compensation Committee did not modify the annual incentive payouts for the executive officers, including the CEO.
The Compensation Committee considered the Company's annual operating plan for the year in setting threshold, target and maximum performance goals for the EBITDA performance metric. When establishing the OCF threshold, target and maximum performance goals the Compensation Committee considered the Company's annual operating plan and historic performance of the Company’s peer group as a benchmark. The payout based on Company financial performance is zero if performance is below threshold for both EBITDA and OCF. Once threshold requirements are met for each metric, Named Executive Officers can earn between 50% and 200% of their annual target opportunity depending on the level of achievement for each metric of the Company financial performance. Linear interpolation applies for performance between threshold/target and target/maximum performance levels. The total bonus calculated for the EBITDA and OCF components is subject to a safety multiplier ranging from 90% to 115% based on safety performance, and the resulting amount may be further adjusted by an individual performance modifier of up to plus or minus 10%. The target and maximum payouts have been set at levels our Compensation Committee believes will provide a meaningful incentive to achieve Company and individual goals and contribute to the Company’s financial performance.
The following were the AIP financial performance measures set for 2025 ($ in millions):
2025 AIP Financial Performance Goals
| Performance Metric | Threshold | Target | Maximum | Actual Performance | Actual Performance as a % of Target | ||||||||||||
| EBITDA | $390.4 | $488.0 | $585.6 | $490.2 | 102% | ||||||||||||
| OCF | 6.3% | 9.0% | 11.7% | 11.0% | 175% | ||||||||||||
The following table outlines the safety performance goals and results. Linear interpolation is used to determine the multiplier when actual performance attained falls between threshold/target and target/maximum performance levels:
2025 AIP Safety Multiplier Goals
| ORIR Performance and Multiplier | DART Performance and Multiplier | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Performance Level | Threshold 90% | Target 110% | Maximum 115% | ORIR Safety Results | Threshold 90% | Target 110% | Maximum 115% | DART Safety Results | Actual Safety Multiplier(1) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Company | 0.92 | 0.70 | 0.49 | 0.42 | 0.47 | 0.35 | 0.25 | 0.14 | 115% | ||||||||||||||||||||
(1) ORIR & DART actual performance weighted 50/50 to determine safety multiplier.
24
Summary of Actual 2025 AIP Total Payouts
Named Executive Officer | AIP Target Opportunity | Actual Payout(1) | Payout as a % of Target | Individual Performance Modifier % | Total AIP Payout | Total Payout as a % of Target | ||||||||||||||
| Kyle T. Larkin | $1,200,000 | $1,612,935 | 134% | - | $1,612,935 | 134% | ||||||||||||||
| Staci M. Woolsey | $350,000 | $470,439 | 134% | - | $470,439 | 134% | ||||||||||||||
| Michael G. Tatusko | $316,368 | $425,234 | 134% | - | $425,234 | 134% | ||||||||||||||
| Brian R. Dowd | $288,246 | $387,435 | 134% | - | $387,435 | 134% | ||||||||||||||
| Bradley J. Williams | $316,368 | $425,234 | 134% | - | $425,234 | 134% | ||||||||||||||
James A. Radich(2) | $436,800 | $327,425 | 75% | - | $327,425 | 75% | ||||||||||||||
(1) Actual payouts include safety multiplier.
(2) Mr. Radich ceased to serve as an executive officer effective July 4, 2025. Pursuant to the terms of his 2025 Annual Incentive Plan award agreement, he received a prorated payout based on actual results through the end of the applicable performance period. See “Separation Agreement with Mr. Radich” for additional information.
Long Term Incentive Compensation
Equity incentive awards are a critical component of the Company’s compensation program and are used to attract and retain talented, highly qualified employees and to reward and incentivize the long-term growth, capital efficiency and success of the Company. Our program includes time-based service awards (25%) and performance-based awards subject to 3-year performance measures, relative TSR (50%) and a capital efficiency metric, RONA (25%).
As presented in detail below, each Named Executive Officer's target long-term incentive opportunity is based on external benchmark data prepared in the last quarter of the prior year for similar positions. The targets are set at the beginning of the performance period by the Compensation Committee after a review of market median long-term incentive target awards of Granite’s peer group and survey data. Outside of its normal course review, the Compensation Committee reviews executive officer compensation in connection with promotions or other significant events. The LTIP target opportunity was conservatively positioned at slightly below the median data in the aggregate for our Named Executive Officers and varied by each Named Executive Officer and their role.
The LTIP incentive target opportunities for the Named Executive Officers under the 2025 - 2027 LTIP are presented below:
| Named Executive Officer | LTIP Incentive Target Opportunity | ||||
| Kyle T. Larkin | $3,600,000 | ||||
| Staci M. Woolsey | $650,000 | ||||
| Michael G. Tatusko | $525,000 | ||||
| Brian R. Dowd | $525,000 | ||||
| Bradley J. Williams | $525,000 | ||||
James A. Radich(1) | $800,000 | ||||
(1) Mr. Radich ceased to serve as an executive officer effective July 4, 2025. Pursuant to the terms of his Long Term Incentive Plan award agreement, he was eligible to receive a prorated payout based on actual results through the end of the applicable performance period. See “Separation Agreement with Mr. Radich” for additional information.
25
Each Named Executive Officer’s target award is divided into two components – Performance Awards and Time-Based Service Awards. The table below reflects the weighting of the LTIP components:
LTIP Components Weighting
| LTIP Component | Weighting | ||||
| 3-Year Relative TSR Performance Award | 50% | ||||
| 3-Year RONA Performance Award | 25% | ||||
| Time-Based Service Award | 25% | ||||
| Total | 100% | ||||
To emphasize and reward sustained long term performance, all Named Executive Officers participated in the 2025 LTIP. The LTIP and related participation agreements provide:
•In the event of a change in control, LTIP awards convert to RSUs, based on target or actual performance through the effective date of the change in control, depending on the timing of the change in control within the performance period, and such RSUs are subject to time-based vesting through the end of the performance period;
•Accelerated vesting (double-trigger) of any converted RSUs upon a change in control and termination of employment without cause or resignation for good reason; and
•Proration of LTIP awards on termination of employment due to death, disability or retirement based on actual performance through the end of the applicable performance period.
Performance Awards
The LTIP is focused on rewarding the creation of long-term value for our shareholders’ benefit and capital efficiency. The performance incentive is based on relative TSR and a capital efficiency metric, RONA, where both are measured over a 3-year performance period, and the incentive payout is earned based on achievement of performance targets, and settled in RSUs at the end of the performance period.
Pursuant to the terms of the LTIP, maximum payouts cannot exceed two times the target performance opportunity. However, the Compensation Committee has the ability to reduce the payout percentage for the performance period in its sole discretion.
Capital Efficiency RONA Performance Metric
The Compensation Committee considered the Company's strategic plan, weighted average cost of capital, and historical performance of the Company’s peer group when setting threshold, target and maximum performance goals for the 2025 RONA performance metric. Goals are established at the beginning of each year during the three year performance period, which are believed by the Committee to be rigorous, yet achievable. Performance will be measured annually over a 3-year period and is defined as adjusted consolidated GAAP net income (which excludes tax effected cost of debt) divided by average adjusted net assets (which excludes land held for future use, deferred income tax and interest bearing debt). RONA performance is calculated annually, and the 3-year average RONA result will be compared to the 3-year average performance goal to determine performance achievement.
Once threshold requirements are met, Named Executive Officers can earn between 50% and 200% of their target opportunity depending on the level of performance achieved. If Company performance is below the performance threshold, there is no payout. Linear interpolation applies for performance between threshold/target and target/maximum performance levels.
The Compensation Committee pre-approves adjustments to GAAP net income and net assets annually including acquisition and integration related expenses, loss on debt extinguishment or financial impacts related to other extraordinary legal costs.
In 2022, adjustments specifically excluded the tax effect of businesses no longer held for sale, legal fees arising out of the SEC investigation, and settlement charges.
For 2023, adjustments specifically excluded legal fees arising out of the defense of a former Company officer in his ongoing civil litigation with the SEC, loss on debt extinguishment, any adjustments attributable to claim recovery related to
26
a certain legacy project and a settlement of a legal matter, and results of acquired businesses (due to the timing of the acquisitions and the absence of full-year results).
For 2024, adjustments specifically excluded legal fees arising out of the defense of a former Company officer in his ongoing civil litigation with the SEC, loss on debt extinguishment, acquisition expenses, and results of an acquired business (due to the timing of the acquisition and the absence of full-year results).
For 2025, adjustments specifically excluded legal fees arising out of the defense of a former Company officer in his civil litigation with the SEC, acquisition expenses, and results of acquired businesses (due to the timing of the acquisitions and the absence of full-year results).
Capital Efficiency RONA Metric Performance Period January 1, 2022– December 31, 2024 Paid in 2025
The following table contains the Capital Efficiency RONA financial performance measure set for 2022-2024:
| 2022 - 2024 Goal | Threshold | Target | Maximum | Actual Performance | ||||||||||
| 3-year Average | 6.1% | 9.1% | 12.1% | 11.0% | ||||||||||
Payout as % of Target(1) | 50.0% | 100.0% | 200.0% | 164.4% | ||||||||||
(1) Linear interpolation applies between performance levels.
Based on actual performance, individual incentives earned by the Named Executive Officers were as follows:
| Named Executive Officer | Target RONA Incentive | Actual RONA Incentive | Restricted Stock Units Awarded(1) | ||||||||
| Kyle T. Larkin | $600,000 | $986,400 | 26,381 | ||||||||
Staci M. Woolsey(2) | $73,150 | $120,259 | 3,216 | ||||||||
| Michael G. Tatusko | $100,000 | $164,400 | 4,396 | ||||||||
| Brian R. Dowd | $93,750 | $154,125 | 4,122 | ||||||||
Bradley J. Williams(3) | $72,000 | $118,368 | 3,165 | ||||||||
James A. Radich(4) | $162,500 | $267,150 | 7,144 | ||||||||
(1) Awards are denominated as a cash value until earned based on performance. The number of RSUs awarded was calculated by dividing the actual long-term incentive value by $37.39, which was the average stock price over the first 30 days of January 2022. The RSU awards fully vested 10 days following the date of grant.
(2) Ms. Woolsey was appointed to Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer effective September 16, 2024 and continued to be eligible to participate based on her role as Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer at the beginning of the 2022-2024 performance period.
(3) Prior to his appointment to executive officer, Mr. Williams was eligible to participate based on his prior role within the company at the beginning of the 2022-2024 performance period.
(4) Mr. Radich ceased to serve as an executive officer effective July 4, 2025.
This 2022 - 2024 RONA performance award is reflected in the 2025 Summary Compensation Table and the 2025 Grants of Plan Based Award Table.
27
Capital Efficiency RONA Metric Performance Period January 1, 2023 – December 31, 2025 Paid in 2026
The following table contains the Capital Efficiency RONA financial performance measure set for 2023 - 2025:
| 2023 - 2025 Goal | Threshold | Target | Maximum | Actual Performance | ||||||||||
| 3-year Average | 8.8% | 11.8% | 14.8% | 12.7% | ||||||||||
Payout as % of Target(1) | 50.0% | 100.0% | 200.0% | 130.7% | ||||||||||
(1) Linear interpolation applies between performance levels.
Based on actual performance, individual incentives earned by the Named Executive Officers were as follows:
| Named Executive Officer | Target RONA Incentive | Actual RONA Incentive | Restricted Stock Units Awarded(1) | ||||||||
| Kyle T. Larkin | $700,000 | $914,900 | 23,893 | ||||||||
Staci M. Woolsey(2) | $77,500 | $101,293 | 2,645 | ||||||||
| Michael G. Tatusko | $112,500 | $147,038 | 3,840 | ||||||||
| Brian R. Dowd | $100,000 | $130,700 | 3,413 | ||||||||
Bradley J. Williams(3) | $93,750 | $122,531 | 3,200 | ||||||||
James A. Radich(4) | $181,250 | $203,992 | n/a | ||||||||
(1) Awards are denominated as a cash value until earned based on performance. The number of RSUs awarded was calculated by dividing the actual long-term incentive value by $38.29, which was the average stock price over the first 30 days of January 2023. The RSU awards fully vested 10 days following the date of grant.
(2) Ms. Woolsey was appointed to Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer effective September 16, 2024 and continued to be eligible to participate based on her role as Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer at the beginning of the 2023-2025 performance period.
(3) Prior to his appointment to executive officer, Mr.Williams was eligible to participate based on his prior role within the company at the beginning of the 2023-2025 performance period.
(4) Mr. Radich ceased to serve as an executive officer effective July 4, 2025. Pursuant to the terms of his Long Term Incentive Plan award agreement, he received a prorated payout based on actual results through the end of the applicable performance period. See “Separation Agreement with Mr. Radich” for additional information.
This 2023-2025 RONA performance award will be reflected in the next year’s 2026 Summary Compensation Table and 2026 Grants of Plan Based Award Table.
Relative TSR Performance Metric
TSR performance is calculated based on Granite’s TSR rank relative to the Russell 3000 companies in the Construction and Engineering or Construction Materials GICS Sub-Industry classification over a 3-year period. The TSR award calculation methodology removes from the measurement group any comparator companies acquired during the performance period. Each 3-year cycle is calculated using a 20-day trading day average for the beginning and ending stock price to avoid potential unintended consequences of spot prices. The higher Granite’s overall performance ranking is, the greater the payout percentage. Please refer to the 2025-2027 TSR Payout Curve below.
28
2025 - 2027 TSR Payout Curve
(Utilizes a Relative TSR Percentile Ranking System to determine payout as a percentage of Target)
| Relative TSR Percentile Rank | Payout (% of Target)(1) | ||||
| 75th Percentile or better | 200% | ||||
| 50th Percentile | 100% | ||||
| 25th Percentile | 35% | ||||
| Below 25th Percentile | 0% | ||||
(1) Linear interpolation applies between performance levels.
The following table contains the performance award and payout timing:
| TSR Performance Period | Award Opportunity | Payout Timing (if award earned based on performance) | ||||||
| January 1, 2022 – December 31, 2024 | 0% – 200% of 2022 Performance Award | Q1 2025 - Completed | ||||||
| January 1, 2023 – December 31, 2025 | 0% – 200% of 2023 Performance Award | Q1 2026 - Completed | ||||||
| January 1, 2024 – December 31, 2026 | 0% – 200% of 2024 Performance Award | Q1 2027 | ||||||
| January 1, 2025 – December 31, 2027 | 0% – 200% of 2025 Performance Award | Q1 2028 | ||||||
Payouts for 2022 - 2024 Total Shareholder Return Awards Paid in 2025
TSR performance was calculated based on Granite’s TSR rank relative to the 31 Russell 3000 companies in the Construction and Engineering or Construction Materials GICS Sub-Industry classification for the three-year performance period beginning January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2024. Granite’s three-year TSR performance as of December 31, 2024 for this performance period was at the 71st percentile, reflecting an earn out of 182% of the target. See “2022-2024 TSR Payout Curve” below. This 2022 - 2024 TSR performance award is reflected in the 2025 Summary Compensation Table and the 2025 Grants of Plan Based Award Table.
2022 - 2024 TSR Payout Curve
(Utilizes a Relative Percentile Ranking System to determine payout as a percentage of Target)
| Relative Percentile Ranking | Payout (% of Target)(1) | ||||
| 75th Percentile or better | 200% | ||||
| 50th Percentile | 100% | ||||
| 25th Percentile | 35% | ||||
| Below 25th Percentile | 0% | ||||
(1) Linear interpolation applies between performance levels.
29
Based on actual performance, individual incentives earned by the Named Executive Officers were as follows:
TSR Performance Period January 1, 2022 - December 31, 2024
| Named Executive Officer | Target TSR Incentive | Actual TSR Incentive | Restricted Stock Units Awarded(1) | ||||||||
| Kyle T. Larkin | $1,200,000 | $2,184,000 | 58,411 | ||||||||
Staci M. Woolsey(2) | $146,300 | $266,266 | 7,121 | ||||||||
| Michael G. Tatusko | $200,000 | $364,000 | 9,735 | ||||||||
| Brian R. Dowd | $187,500 | $341,250 | 9,126 | ||||||||
Bradley J. Williams(3) | n/a | n/a | n/a | ||||||||
James A. Radich(4) | $325,000 | $591,500 | 15,819 | ||||||||
(1)Awards are denominated as a cash value until earned based on performance. The number of RSUs awarded was calculated by dividing the actual long-term incentive value by $37.39, which was the average stock price over the first 30 days of January 2022. The RSU awards fully vested 10 days following the date of grant.
(2) Ms. Woolsey’s performance target was based on her role as Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer when the 3-year performance period began.
(3) Due to the performance period beginning prior to his appointment to executive officer, Mr. Williams was not eligible to participate.
(4) Mr. Radich ceased to serve as an executive officer effective July 4, 2025.
30
Payouts for 2023 - 2025 Total Shareholder Return Awards Paid in 2026
TSR performance was calculated based on Granite’s TSR rank relative to the 28 Russell 3000 companies in the Construction and Engineering or Construction Materials GICS Sub-Industry classification for the three-year performance period beginning January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2025. Granite’s three-year TSR performance as of December 31, 2025 for this performance period was at the 63rd percentile, reflecting an earn out of 150% of the target. See “2023 - 2025 TSR Payout Curve” below. This 2023-2025 TSR performance award will be reflected in the next year’s 2026 Summary Compensation Table and 2026 Grants of Plan Based Award Table.
2023 - 2025 TSR Payout Curve
(Utilizes a Relative Percentile Ranking System to determine payout as a percentage of Target)
| Relative Percentile Ranking | Payout (% of Target)(1) | ||||
| 75th Percentile or better | 200% | ||||
| 50th Percentile | 100% | ||||
| 25th Percentile | 35% | ||||
| Below 25th Percentile | 0% | ||||
(1) Linear interpolation applies between performance levels.
Based on actual performance, individual incentives earned by the Named Executive Officers were as follows:
TSR Performance Period January 1, 2023 – December 31, 2025
| Named Executive Officer | Target TSR Incentive | Actual TSR Incentive | Restricted Stock Units Awarded(1) | ||||||||
| Kyle T. Larkin | $1,400,000 | $2,100,000 | 54,844 | ||||||||
Staci M. Woolsey(2) | $155,000 | $232,500 | 6,072 | ||||||||
| Michael G. Tatusko | $225,000 | $337,500 | 8,814 | ||||||||
| Brian R. Dowd | $200,000 | $300,000 | 7,834 | ||||||||
| Bradley J. Williams | $187,500 | $281,250 | 7,345 | ||||||||
James A. Radich(3) | $362,500 | $468,229 | n/a | ||||||||
(1) Awards are denominated as a cash value until earned based on performance. The number of RSUs awarded was calculated by dividing the actual long-term incentive value by $38.29, which was the average stock price over the first 30 days of January 2023. The RSU awards fully vested 10 days following the date of grant.
(2) Ms. Woolsey’s performance target was based on her role as Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer when the 3-year performance period began.
(3) Mr. Radich ceased to serve as an executive officer effective July 4, 2025. Pursuant to the terms of his Long Term Incentive Plan award agreement, he was eligible to receive a prorated payout based on actual results through the end of the applicable performance period. See “Separation Agreement with Mr. Radich” for additional information.
Time-Based Service Awards
The Compensation Committee believes granting time-based RSUs assists in maintaining competitive levels of compensation, encourages the continued retention of key management and aligns the interest of Named Executive Officers with that of our shareholders. Typically, time-based service awards vest in three equal annual installments beginning on the one-year anniversary of the date of grant, subject to continued service.
31
2025 Time-Based Service Awards
| Named Executive Officer | Time-Based Service Award | Restricted Stock Units Awarded(1) | ||||||
| Kyle T. Larkin | $900,000 | 12,153 | ||||||
| Staci M. Woolsey | $162,500 | 2,194 | ||||||
| Michael G. Tatusko | $131,250 | 1,772 | ||||||
Brian R. Dowd(2) | $131,250 | 1,772 | ||||||
Bradley J. Williams(2) | $131,250 | 1,772 | ||||||
James A. Radich(2)(3) | $200,000 | 2,700 | ||||||
(1) The 2025 time-based service awards were granted on March 14, 2025 based on a closing stock price of $74.05. These RSU awards will vest in three equal annual installments beginning on March 14, 2026.
(2) Pursuant to the Company’s equity incentive plans, Messrs. Williams and Radich qualified as retirement eligible and all of their equity awards vest immediately. Mr. Dowd qualified as retirement eligible effective July 21, 2025 and all of his outstanding equity awards fully vested as of that date.
(3) Mr. Radich ceased to serve as an executive officer effective July 4, 2025.
ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION-RELATED POLICIES AND RETIREMENT BENEFITS
Clawback Policy and Clawbacks
In accordance with SEC and NYSE rules, the Company adopted a clawback policy in October 2023. Under Granite’s clawback policy, the Company will recover reasonably promptly the amount of erroneously awarded incentive-based compensation in the event that Granite is required to prepare an accounting restatement (as such terms are defined in the clawback policy).
Policies and Practices Related to the Grant of Certain Equity Awards Close in Time to the Release of Material Nonpublic Information
We do not grant stock options as part of our equity compensation programs. The Compensation Committee typically grants equity awards in mid-March of each year before the Company’s insider trading window closes. The Compensation Committee does not take material nonpublic information into account when determining the timing and terms of equity awards and has not timed the disclosure of material nonpublic information for the purpose of affecting the value of executive compensation.
Stock Ownership Guidelines
Our Board of Directors adopted Stock Ownership Guidelines to align the interests of Granite's Named Executive Officers with the interests of shareholders and to promote Granite's commitment to sound corporate governance. Named Executive Officers are expected to own and hold a minimum number of shares of Granite common stock based on relevant market standards. Compliance with the guidelines is reviewed by the Compensation Committee on an annual basis. The stock ownership guidelines are as follows:
•CEO: 5x annual base salary
•COO and CFO: 3x annual base salary
•Other Named Executive Officers: 2x annual base salary
Shares that count toward the satisfaction of the guidelines include:
•Shares owned outright by the Named Executive Officer or his or her immediate family members residing in the same household, whether held individually or jointly;
•Any vested, unvested and deferred RSUs;
32
•Shares held for the Named Executive Officer's account in the Granite Construction Incorporated Profit Sharing and 401(k) Plan (“401(k) Plan”); and
•Shares held in trust for the benefit of the Named Executive Officer or his or her family.
Unvested or unexercised stock options and unearned performance-based equity awards do not count towards the guidelines. Until the applicable guideline has been satisfied, the Named Executive Officer is required to retain an amount equal to 50% of net shares received as a result of the vesting of RSUs through Granite's stock incentive plans. Share ownership is measured as of December 31st using the average stock price over the prior year.
As of December 31, 2025, all Named Executive Officers are in compliance with the guideline either by virtue of having attained the required number of shares or complying with the 50% retention requirement.
Anti-Hedging Policy
The Company’s Insider Trading Policy, which applies to employees, officers and directors of the Company and their family members and affiliates, provides that such individuals are prohibited from engaging in hedging transactions involving the Company’s securities. For additional information, see “Information About the Board of Directors and Corporate Governance - Employee, Officer, and Director Hedging.”
Anti-Pledging Policy
In accordance with the Company’s Insider Trading Policy, a transaction in which a holder of a security of the Company uses that security as collateral for a loan or other extension of credit or a pledge is prohibited. This policy applies to employees, officers and directors of the Company and their family members and affiliates.
Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation
Granite offers its Named Executive Officers, Board of Directors, and other key executives, participation in the NQDC, which:
•Allows executive officers to defer up to 50% of their base salary and up to 100% of their incentive compensation (cash and equity);
•Allows non-employee directors to defer receipt of their annual cash retainer and RSU awards;
•Allows participants to choose from a menu of investment options. Granite determines the investment options for the NQDC menu and may add or remove investment options based on a review of the performance of the particular investment;
•Allows distribution options of in-service payments for executives and/or upon retirement or termination for all participants;
•Includes a Rabbi Trust, which provides participants a measure of added security that benefit obligations will be satisfied; and
•Includes an option under which eligible participants can voluntarily direct Granite to purchase life insurance on their behalf and are eligible for a survivor benefit equal to one year's base salary payable in the event of death. The survivor benefit is payable only while the participant is employed with Granite.
33
Flexible Bonus Policy
The Compensation Committee has the authority to award discretionary bonuses to employees of the Company. In 2013, our Compensation Committee determined that it would be beneficial to define and limit its authority to award discretionary bonuses and adopted the Flexible Bonus Policy pursuant to which employees of the Company, including our Named Executive Officers, are eligible to receive a discretionary bonus, which may be based on Company performance, individual performance or such other factors as our Compensation Committee may consider appropriate. In determining Company performance, our Compensation Committee may consider the achievement of corporate financial, strategic and operational objectives including, but not limited to, revenue, income, and committed and awarded projects. In determining individual performance, our Compensation Committee may consider the achievement of personal objectives including, but not limited to, business targets, budgetary targets, succession planning, and safety targets. It is our intention that the discretionary bonuses be fixed and determinable as of year-end; this would require approval prior to year-end. The aggregate amount of any bonus or bonuses payable under the Flexible Bonus Policy to any one participant in any calendar year may not exceed $250,000. Our Compensation Committee believes that the flexible design of this policy is necessary to consider the effects of unanticipated events and circumstances on the Company’s business or on a participant’s performance.
In 2025, no discretionary bonuses were awarded under the Flexible Bonus Policy.
Other Compensation
The Named Executive Officers are eligible to participate in the 401(k) Plan. Granite provides matching contributions up to 6% of an employee’s gross pay at the discretion of the Board of Directors. Ms. Woolsey and Messrs. Larkin, Tatusko, Dowd, and Williams received a $1,000 per month vehicle allowance. Mr. Radich received a $1,000 per month vehicle allowance until his retirement. Although the company allows spousal travel on the Company aircraft, there was no aggregate incremental cost associated with spousal travel in 2025.
Impact of Accounting and Tax Treatments of a Particular Form of Compensation
In connection with its determination of the various elements of compensation for our executive officers, one factor the Compensation Committee considers is the impact of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code (“Section 162(m)”) on the deductibility of compensation for federal income tax purposes. Section 162(m) limits the deductibility of compensation a publicly held company pays to certain covered executive officers to $1 million per executive officer per year.
While the Compensation Committee generally considers this limit when determining compensation, the Compensation Committee has concluded, and reserves the discretion to conclude in the future, that it is appropriate to exceed the limitation on deductibility under Section 162(m) to ensure that executive officers are compensated in a manner that it believes to be consistent with the Company’s best interests and those of its shareholders. Furthermore, interpretations of and changes in the tax laws, and other factors beyond the Compensation Committee’s control, may also affect the deductibility of compensation. The Compensation Committee also considers the accounting treatment of the cash and equity awards that it grants under the cash and equity plans maintained by the Company.
Change-in-Control Arrangements
All of our Named Executive Officers are participants in the Executive Retention and Severance Plan III (“ERSP III”) which provides additional payments and other benefits if the Named Executive Officer is terminated without cause or if the Named Executive Officer terminates employment for “good reason” (as defined further below) following a “change in control” (as defined further below).
The ERSP III provides that if a participant’s employment with Granite is terminated by the Company within two years after a change in control of Granite other than for cause, or if the participant resigns from such employment within two years after a change in control of Granite for good reason, the participant would be entitled to the following benefits:
•A lump sum payment equal to 2 times the participant’s annual base salary rate in effect immediately prior to the participant’s termination;
•A lump sum payment equal to 2 times the average of the aggregate of all annual incentive bonuses earned by the participant for the three fiscal years immediately preceding the fiscal year of the change in control;
34
•A lump sum payment equal to 2 times the average of the aggregate annual employer contribution (the “employer contribution”) made on behalf of the participant for the three fiscal years preceding the fiscal year of the change in control to the 401(k) Plan, and any other retirement plan in effect immediately prior to the change in control;
•A lump sum payment equal to 2 times the average annual premium cost for group health, life, and long-term disability benefits, provided for the three fiscal years preceding the fiscal year of termination;
•Accelerated vesting of equity awards in accordance with the provisions contained in the equity incentive plans (double trigger) (if an equity award is performance-based and a change-in-control occurs in the first year of the performance period, the equity awards will be paid out at target, and if a change-in-control occurs in the second or third year of the performance period, the equity award will be paid out at actual performance through the change-in-control date); and
•Reasonable professional outplacement services for the participant until the earlier of two years following the date of termination or the date on which the participant obtains employment.
Payments made to the terminated participant do not include tax gross-ups and are capped. The amount of the payment will not exceed and will be reduced if required in order not to exceed the “safe harbor” amount allowable under Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code, but only if the reduction would increase the net after-tax amount received by the participant. Under the Company’s ERSP III, each Named Executive Officer is subject to a two-year non-solicitation requirement, and a non-disparagement requirement following termination of employment.
Change in control and good reason have the following meanings under the ERSP III:
•A “change-in-control” is defined as (i) a merger, consolidation or acquisition of Granite where our shareholders do not retain more than 50% of our voting stock or the voting stock in the surviving entity; (ii) the sale or disposition of all or substantially all of our assets to a corporation (other than to one or more subsidiaries of Granite); (iii) the acquisition by affiliated persons of more than 30% of our voting stock; or (iv) a change in the composition of our Board of Directors in any consecutive 12-month period as a result of which fewer than a majority of the directors are “incumbent directors;” and
•“Good reason” means (i) a material diminution in the participant's authority, duties or responsibilities, causing the participant's position to be of materially lesser rank or responsibility within Granite or an equivalent business unit of its parent; (ii) a decrease in the participant's base salary rate (except as part of a broad-based reduction plan applicable to substantially all Company group employees); (iii) a geographical relocation of the participant's principal office location by more than 30 miles (one way); or (iv) any material breach of the ERSP III by Granite with respect to the participant.
35
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT
The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed with management the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” contained in this proxy statement. Based on such review and discussions, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” be included in this proxy statement and incorporated into Granite's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025.
| Members of the Compensation Committee: | |||||||||||
| Louis E. Caldera, Chair | Molly C. Campbell | Celeste B. Mastin | |||||||||
This Report of the Compensation Committee does not constitute soliciting material and shall not be deemed filed or incorporated by reference into any other filing made by us under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that we specifically incorporate this Report of the Compensation Committee by reference therein.
36
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION TABLES
Summary Compensation Table
2025
The following table summarizes, for the fiscal years specified, the compensation for our Named Executive Officers.
| Name | Stock | Non-Equity Incentive Plan | All Other | ||||||||||||||||||||
| and Principal Position | Year | Salary | Bonus | Awards(1) | Compensation(2) | Compensation(3) | Total | ||||||||||||||||
| (a) | (b) | (c) | (d) | (e) | (f) | (g) | (h) | ||||||||||||||||
| Kyle T. Larkin President and Chief Executive Officer | 2025 | $ | 1,000,000 | $ | — | $ | 7,178,777 | $ | 1,612,935 | $ | 69,713 | $ | 9,861,425 | ||||||||||
| 2024 | $ | 975,000 | $ | — | $ | 5,245,403 | $ | 1,431,867 | $ | 74,086 | $ | 7,726,356 | |||||||||||
| 2023 | $ | 925,000 | $ | — | $ | 1,542,925 | $ | 1,680,584 | $ | 75,847 | $ | 4,224,356 | |||||||||||
Staci M. Woolsey(4) Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | 2025 | $ | 500,000 | $ | — | $ | 927,921 | $ | 470,439 | $57,656 | $ | 1,956,015 | |||||||||||
| 2024 | $ | 453,462 | $ | — | $ | 199,889 | $ | 353,947 | $57,413 | $ | 1,064,711 | ||||||||||||
| 2023 | $ | 400,000 | $ | — | $ | 77,495 | $ | 396,403 | $ | 53,300 | $ | 927,198 | |||||||||||
| Michael G. Tatusko Senior Vice President, Construction | 2025 | $ | 486,720 | $ | — | $ | 1,177,617 | $ | 425,234 | $ | 57,141 | $ | 2,146,712 | ||||||||||
| 2024 | $ | 468,000 | $ | — | $ | 870,169 | $ | 372,285 | $ | 57,172 | $ | 1,767,626 | |||||||||||
| 2023 | $ | 450,000 | $ | — | $ | 481,264 | $ | 531,709 | $ | 54,251 | $ | 1,517,224 | |||||||||||
| Brian R. Dowd Senior Vice President, Construction | 2025 | $ | 443,456 | $ | — | $ | 1,112,231 | $ | 387,435 | $60,202 | $ | 2,003,324 | |||||||||||
| 2024 | $ | 426,400 | $ | — | $ | 832,224 | $ | 339,194 | $57,084 | $ | 1,654,902 | ||||||||||||
| 2023 | $ | 410,000 | $ | — | $ | 99,993 | $ | 362,461 | $ | 53,936 | $ | 926,390 | |||||||||||
| Bradley J. Williams Senior Vice President, Construction | 2025 | $ | 486,720 | $ | — | $ | 365,585 | $ | 425,234 | $ | 57,008 | $ | 1,334,547 | ||||||||||
James A. Radich(5) Former Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer | 2025 | $ | 304,500 | $ | — | $ | 1,900,345 | $ | 327,425 | $ | 128,384 | $ | 2,660,655 | ||||||||||
| 2024 | $ | 546,000 | $ | — | $ | 1,412,337 | $ | 534,564 | $ | 51,784 | $ | 2,544,685 | |||||||||||
| 2023 | $ | 525,000 | $ | — | $ | 550,021 | $ | 693,706 | $ | 48,933 | $ | 1,817,660 | |||||||||||
(1) The awards in column (e) reflect the grant date fair value of stock awards granted pursuant to the time-based service award feature of the LTIP and the Performance Award feature of the LTIP. For a detailed explanation, regarding RSUs granted during 2025 to the Named Executive Officers, please refer to the Grants of Plan-Based Awards table. The grant date fair value is determined in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 718, Compensation—Stock Compensation, without regard to potential forfeitures and is determined using the fair value of the Company’s common stock based on the market price at the date of grant. For additional information about the assumptions used in these calculations, see Note 17 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025. For a detailed explanation, please refer to the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Compensation Elements — Long Term Incentive Compensation.”
(2) The amounts in column (f) reflect the cash awards earned for performance under the Company’s annual incentive plan. For a detailed explanation of cash awards earned in 2025 and paid in March 2026, please refer to “Compensation Discussion & Analysis – Compensation Elements – 2025 Annual Incentive Plan.”
(3) Please refer to the "All Other Compensation Table" below for details with respect to all other compensation.
(4) Ms. Woolsey’s 2025 Stock Awards total includes LTIP performance‑based awards, for which the target was established based on her role as Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer at the beginning of the 3-year performance period.
(5) Mr. Radich ceased to serve as an executive officer effective July 4, 2025. Pursuant to the terms of his 2025 Annual Incentive Plan award agreement, he received a prorated payout based on actual results through the end of the applicable performance periods. See “Separation Agreement with Mr. Radich” for additional information.
37
All Other Compensation Table
2025
Named Executive Officer (a) | 401(k) Match(1) (b) | Dividends(2) (c) | Vehicle Allowances(3) (d) | Insurance(4) (e) | Other(5) (f) | Total (g) | ||||||||||||||
| Kyle T. Larkin | $21,000 | $14,510 | $12,000 | $22,203 | — | $69,713 | ||||||||||||||
| Staci M. Woolsey | $21,000 | $2,644 | $12,000 | $22,011 | — | $57,656 | ||||||||||||||
| Michael G. Tatusko | $21,000 | $2,134 | $12,000 | $22,006 | — | $57,141 | ||||||||||||||
| Brian R. Dowd | $21,000 | $1,079 | $12,000 | $26,123 | — | $60,202 | ||||||||||||||
| Bradley J. Williams | $21,000 | — | $12,000 | $24,008 | — | $57,008 | ||||||||||||||
James A. Radich(6) | $21,000 | — | $7,000 | $15,234 | $85,150 | $128,384 | ||||||||||||||
(1) The amounts in column (b) reflect the company matching contribution, not to exceed 6% on compensation deferred into the 401(k) Plan.
(2) The amounts in column (c) reflect RSU dividend equivalent units.
(3) The amounts in column (d) reflect the vehicle allowances provided to the Named Executive Officers.
(4) The amounts in column (e) reflect the company expense for medical, dental, vision, life, short and long-term disability insurance, accidental death & dismemberment insurance, executive liability insurance, and employee assistance program.
(5) The amount in column (f) paid to Mr. Radich pursuant to his separation agreement includes (i) $52,500 for unused accrued vacation, and (ii) $29,650 for a payment equal to eighteen month of COBRA health care coverage, and (iii) a $3,000 gift card treated as taxable income given in recognition of his retirement. Mr. Radich received a pro rata payout under the Company’s Annual Incentive Plan the amount of which is reported under “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” in the Summary Compensation Table above.
(6) Mr. Radich ceased to serve as an executive officer effective July 4, 2025.
38
Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table
2025
The following table provides additional information about plan-based awards granted to our Named Executive Officers during the year ended December 31, 2025.
Estimated Future Payouts under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards(1) | Estimated Future Payouts under Equity Incentive Plan Awards(2) | All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares or Stock Units | Grant Date Fair Value of Stock Awards(3) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Named Executive Officer | Committee Approval Date | Grant Date | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Threshold | Target | Maximum | Threshold | Target | Maximum | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (a) | (b) | (c) | (d) | (e) | (f) | (g) | (h) | (i) | (j) | (k) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Kyle T. Larkin | $600,000 | $1,200,000 | $2,400,000 | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| - | - | - | $1,350,000 | $2,700,000 | $5,400,000 | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2/27/25 | 3/14/25 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 12,153 | (4) | $899,930 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2/27/25 | 3/14/25 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 58,411 | (5) | $4,325,335 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2/27/25 | 3/14/25 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 26,381 | (6) | $1,953,513 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Staci M. Woolsey | $175,000 | $350,000 | $700,000 | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| - | - | - | $243,750 | $487,500 | $975,000 | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2/27/25 | 3/14/25 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 2,194 | (4) | $162,466 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2/27/25 | 3/14/25 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 7,121 | (5) | $527,310 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2/27/25 | 3/14/25 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 3,216 | (6) | $238,145 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Michael G. Tatusko | $158,184 | $316,368 | $632,736 | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| - | - | - | $196,875 | $393,750 | $787,500 | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2/27/25 | 3/14/25 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1,772 | (4) | $131,217 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2/27/25 | 3/14/25 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 9,735 | (5) | $720,877 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2/27/25 | 3/14/25 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 4,396 | (6) | $325,524 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Brian R. Dowd | $144,123 | $288,246 | $576,493 | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| - | - | - | $196,875 | $393,750 | $787,500 | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2/27/25 | 3/14/25 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1,772 | (4) | $131,217 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2/27/25 | 3/14/25 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 9,126 | (5) | $675,780 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2/27/25 | 3/14/25 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 4,122 | (6) | $305,234 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Bradley J. Williams | $158,184 | $316,368 | $632,736 | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| - | - | - | $196,875 | $393,750 | $787,500 | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2/27/25 | 3/14/25 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1,772 | (4) | $131,217 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2/27/25 | 3/14/25 | 3,165 | (6) | $234,368 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
James A. Radich(7) | $218,400 | $436,800 | $873,600 | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| - | - | - | $300,000 | $600,000 | $1,200,000 | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2/27/25 | 3/14/25 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 2,700 | (4) | $199,935 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2/27/25 | 3/14/25 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 15,819 | (5) | $1,171,397 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2/27/25 | 3/14/25 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 7,144 | (6) | $529,013 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
(1) Amounts in columns (d) through (f) reflect threshold, target and maximum incentives, as applicable, under the 2025 AIP. For a detailed discussion of our annual incentive plan and the payout actually received by each Named Executive Officer under the 2025 AIP, please refer to “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Compensation Elements — 2025 Annual Incentive Plan,” “2025 AIP Performance Measures and Results” and the “2025 Summary Compensation Table.”
(2) Amounts in columns (g) through (i) reflect the threshold, target and maximum award amounts applicable to the performance based (TSR and RONA) components of our 2025 LTIP for the performance period January 1, 2025 to December 31, 2027. Each of our Named Executive Officers has the ability to earn from 0% to 200% of the TSR (67% weighting) and RONA (33% weighting) components of the LTIP target opportunity. Any payouts under the LTIP are made in the form of RSUs. Payouts on the TSR and RONA components of the LTIP are made after the end of the performance period. For additional information on LTIP weighting, please refer to the “LTIP Components Weighting.”
(3) Amounts in column (k) reflect RSU awards granted on March 14, 2025. The grant date fair market value was calculated by multiplying the number of RSUs awarded by the closing price of our common stock on the date of the grant, $74.05 for March 14, 2025.
39
(4) The RSUs granted on March 14, 2025 reflect the time-based service awards granted under the 2024 Equity Plan. The number of RSUs granted for the time-based service award was calculated by dividing the time-based service award by the closing price of our common stock of $74.05 on the date of the grant. These RSUs vest in three equal annual installments beginning on March 14, 2026, subject to continued service; unless retirement eligibility per the Company’s equity incentive plan is met, in which case vesting is accelerated. The holders of RSUs are entitled to receive dividend equivalent units in lieu of cash dividends declared by the Board of Directors on the outstanding common stock of the Company.
(5) The RSUs granted on March 14, 2025 reflect the performance awards granted under the 2021 Equity Plan. The number of RSUs granted for the 2022-2024 TSR performance award was calculated by dividing the performance award by the average stock price over the first 30 days of January 2022 of $37.39. The RSUs fully vested 10 days following the date of grant. The holders of RSUs are entitled to receive dividend equivalent units in lieu of cash dividends declared by the Board on the outstanding common stock of the Company.
(6) The RSUs granted on March 14, 2025 reflect the performance awards granted under the 2021 Equity Plan. The number of RSUs granted for the 2022-2024 RONA performance award was calculated by dividing the performance award by the average stock price over the first 30 days of January 2022 of $37.39. The RSUs fully vested 10 days following the date of grant. The holders of RSUs are entitled to receive dividend equivalent units in lieu of cash dividends declared by the Board on the outstanding common stock of the Company.
(7) Mr. Radich ceased to serve as an executive officer effective July 4, 2025.
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End Table
2025
The following table summarizes equity awards made to the Named Executive Officers that were outstanding as of December 31, 2025.
| Stock Awards | ||||||||
Named Executive Officer (a) | Number of Shares or RSUs That Have Not Vested(1)(2) (b) | Market Value of Shares or RSUs That Have Not Vested(3) (c) | ||||||
| Kyle T. Larkin | 27,971 | $3,226,454 | ||||||
| Staci M. Woolsey | 4,823 | $556,333 | ||||||
| Michael G. Tatusko | 4,114 | $474,549 | ||||||
Brian R. Dowd(4) | - | - | ||||||
Bradley J. Williams(4) | - | - | ||||||
James A. Radich(4)(5) | - | - | ||||||
(1) Upon death, disability, or achieving retirement eligibility, all equity awards of a Named Executive Officer vest immediately.
(2) Vesting dates for outstanding RSU awards as of December 31, 2025 for the Named Executive Officers are set forth in the table below.
(3) The amounts shown in column (c) are based on the December 31, 2025 closing price of the Company’s common stock of $115.35.
(4) Pursuant to the Company’s equity incentive plans, Messrs. Dowd, Williams, and Radich qualify as retirement eligible and all of their equity awards vest immediately.
(5) Mr. Radich ceased to serve as an executive officer effective July 4, 2025.
40
Vesting Dates for Outstanding RSU Awards for the Named Executive Officers
| Number of RSUs That Vest on Each Vesting Date | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Named Executive Officer | Award Type | 3/14/2026 | 11/03/2026 | 11/05/2026 | 3/14/2027 | 11/05/2027 | 3/14/2028 | ||||||||||||||||
| Kyle T. Larkin | RSU | 14,878 | - | - | 9,024 | - | 4,069 | ||||||||||||||||
| Staci M. Woolsey | RSU | 2,001 | - | 367 | 1,353 | 367 | 735 | ||||||||||||||||
Michael G. Tatusko(1) | RSU | 2,231 | 1,883 | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||
Brian R. Dowd(2) | RSU | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||
Bradley J. Williams(2) | RSU | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||
James A. Radich(2)(3) | RSU | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||
(1) Pursuant to the terms of the Company’s equity incentive plans, Mr. Tatusko will qualify as retirement eligible effective November 3, 2026 and all of his equity awards will vest as of that date.
(2) Pursuant to the terms of the Company’s equity incentive plans, Messrs. Dowd, Williams, and Radich qualify as retirement eligible and all of their equity awards vest immediately.
(3) Mr. Radich ceased to serve as an executive officer effective July 4, 2025.
Stock Vested Table
2025
The following table summarizes the number of shares our Named Executive Officers acquired upon the vesting of stock awards during 2025 and the value realized before payment of any applicable withholding tax.
| Stock Awards | ||||||||
Named Executive Officer (a) | Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (b) | Value Realized Upon Vesting(1) (c) | ||||||
| Kyle T. Larkin | 102,094 | $7,870,413 | ||||||
| Staci M. Woolsey | 12,763 | $993,430 | ||||||
| Michael G. Tatusko | 16,851 | $1,299,509 | ||||||
| Brian R. Dowd | 20,032 | $1,616,465 | ||||||
| Bradley J. Williams | 4,937 | $383,654 | ||||||
James A. Radich(2) | 25,663 | $1,994,272 | ||||||
(1) The amounts in column (c) are based on the fair market value of our common stock on the applicable vesting date.
(2) Mr. Radich ceased to serve as an executive officer effective July 4, 2025.
41
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table
2025
The following table summarizes our Named Executive Officers' participation in our NQDC plan for the year ended December 31, 2025.
| Named Executive Officer | Executive Contribution in Last Fiscal Year(1)(2) | Registrant Contributions in Last Fiscal Year | Aggregate Earnings in Last Fiscal Year(3) | Aggregate Withdrawals/Distributions | Aggregate Balance at Last Fiscal Year End(4) | ||||||||||||
| (a) | (b) | (c) | (d) | (e) | (f) | ||||||||||||
| Kyle T. Larkin | $14,319 | — | $6,022 | — | $45,266 | ||||||||||||
Staci M. Woolsey(5) | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | ||||||||||||
Michael G. Tatusko(5) | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | ||||||||||||
| Brian R. Dowd | $169,597 | — | $159,197 | — | $1,088,070 | ||||||||||||
Bradley J. Williams(5) | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | ||||||||||||
James A. Radich(6) | $152,250 | — | $45,752 | — | $407,035 | ||||||||||||
(1) The NQDC plan allows Named Executive Officers to defer base salary and incentive compensation, which includes equity and cash awards. Participants are required to make an election each plan year with respect to the amount to be deferred, future distribution date, and form of distribution. Distributions may be in-service distributions while participants are actively employed or a future retirement election. A distribution election is irrevocable on the first day of each plan year. For a detailed explanation of the NQDC, please refer to “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation.”
(2) The amounts in column (b) include: (i) Mr. Larkin’s deferral of 1% or $14,319 of his 2024 AIP award paid in March 2025, (ii) Mr. Dowd’s deferral of 50% or $169,597 of his 2024 AIP award paid in March 2025; and (iii) Mr. Radich’s base salary deferral of $152,250. The base salary deferral reported in column (b) is included in the amount reported as salary for Mr. Radich in the 2025 Summary Compensation Table. The AIP award deferrals reported in column (b) are included in the amounts reported as non-equity incentive plan compensation for Mr. Larkin and Mr. Dowd in the 2025 Summary Compensation Table.
(3) The amounts in column (d) do not include above market or preferential earnings (of which there were none) and, accordingly, such amounts are not reported in the Summary Compensation Table as above market or preferential earnings.
(4) Amounts reported in column (f) for each Named Executive Officer include amounts previously reported in the Summary Compensation Table in previous years when earned if that officer’s compensation was required to be disclosed in a previous year. Amounts previously reported in such years include previously earned, but deferred, salary and incentive compensation.
(5) Ms. Woolsey, Messrs. Tatusko and Williams elected not to participate in the NQDC Plan in 2025.
(6) Mr. Radich ceased to serve as an executive officer effective July 4, 2025.
Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change-in-Control
Except in the case of a change-in-control, Granite is not obligated to pay severance or other enhanced benefits to any of the Named Executive Officers in connection with a termination of their employment. Under the terms of Granite’s equity plans and award agreements, upon death or disability, or becoming retirement eligible, all equity awards of a Named Executive Officer would vest immediately. The amount of equity awards that would vest upon each Named Executive Officer's death, disability, or retirement eligibility (if eligibility was met as of December 31, 2025) is set forth in column (e) below. Under the Company’s ERSP III, each Named Executive Officer is subject to a two-year non-solicitation requirement, and a non-disparagement requirement following termination of employment.
As of December 31, 2025, Mr. Radich was only eligible to receive the benefits set forth in his separation agreement. See “Separation Agreement with Mr. Radich” below for additional information.
The amounts set forth in the following table are an example of the potential payments and benefits to which the Named Executive Officers would be entitled upon a termination of employment without cause or for “good reason” (as defined above under “Change-in-Control Arrangements”) within two years following a change-in-control of Granite. These amounts are based on the assumption that such termination event occurred on the last business day of fiscal year 2025.
42
| Named Executive Officer (a) | Cash Severance Payment (1) (b) | Insurance Benefits (2) (c) | Other Compensation (3) (d) | Accelerated Equity Awards(4) (e) | Total (f) | Section 280G Safe Harbor Provision(5) (g) | Adjusted Total (h) | ||||||||||||||||
| Kyle T. Larkin | $4,438,375 | $42,646 | $39,200 | $24,198,238 | $28,718,459 | — | $28,718,459 | ||||||||||||||||
| Staci M. Woolsey | $1,592,297 | $40,648 | $39,200 | $3,240,412 | $4,912,557 | — | $4,912,557 | ||||||||||||||||
| Michael G. Tatusko | $1,754,382 | $40,352 | $39,200 | $3,623,951 | $5,457,885 | — | $5,457,885 | ||||||||||||||||
| Brian R. Dowd | $1,469,709 | $40,246 | $39,200 | $3,118,603 | $4,667,758 | — | $4,667,758 | ||||||||||||||||
| Bradley J. Williams | $1,430,620 | $36,598 | $39,200 | $3,037,627 | $4,544,045 | — | $4,544,045 | ||||||||||||||||
(1) The amounts in column (b) reflect a lump sum payment equal to (i) two times the annual average of the aggregate annual incentive bonuses earned for the three fiscal years preceding the fiscal year of the change-in-control plus (ii) two times the annual base salary rate in effect immediately prior to the termination. For a detailed explanation, please refer to “Change-in-Control Arrangements.”
(2) The amounts in column (c) reflect a lump sum payment equal to two times the average annual cost to Granite of the Named Executive Officer's group insurance benefits, such as life, health and long-term disability, for the three fiscal years ending before the date of termination. For a detailed explanation, please refer to “Change-in-Control Arrangements.”
(3) The amounts in column (d) reflect a lump sum payment equal to two times the annual average cash equivalent of contributions which were made on behalf of the Named Executive Officer for the three fiscal years ending before the date of termination to the 401(k) Plan and any other retirement plan provided by Granite and in effect as of the date of termination. For a detailed explanation, please refer to “Change-in-Control Arrangements.”
(4) Under the terms of Granite’s equity plans, in the event of a change-in-control, if the acquiring person does not assume or replace outstanding equity awards, all non-exercisable, unvested or unpaid portions of the outstanding equity awards would become immediately exercisable and fully vested. If an equity award is performance-based and a change-in-control occurs in the first year of the performance period, the equity awards will be paid out at target, and if it occurs in the second or third year of the performance period, the equity award will be paid out at actual performance through the change-in-control date. Amounts shown for retirement eligible Named Executive Officers include performance‑based awards, while amounts shown for non‑retirement eligible Named Executive Officers include outstanding time‑based awards and performance‑based awards. The amounts in column (e) reflect the outstanding equity awards valued at the December 31, 2025 closing price of our common stock of $115.35. Pursuant to the terms of Granite’s equity plans, Messrs. Dowd and Williams qualify as retirement eligible and all of their equity awards vest immediately.
(5) Payments under the ERSP III are subject to reduction to the extent necessary not to exceed the “safe harbor” amount under Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code, but only if the reduction would increase the net after-tax amount received by the participant.
43
Separation Agreement with Mr. Radich
As previously disclosed, Mr. Radich retired on July 4, 2025, and he and the Company entered into a Separation Agreement at that time. Pursuant to the Separation Agreement, Mr. Radich:
•Ceased to be an employee of the Company on July 4, 2025 (the “Separation Date”);
•Following the Separation Date, received payment for any accrued but unpaid salary or wages for services rendered through the Separation Date;
•Remained entitled to receive his prorated vested payout in accordance with the Annual Incentive Plan and pre-existing 2025 participation agreement based on actual results;
•Remained entitled to receive his prorated vested payouts pursuant to his pre-existing Long Term Incentive Plan award agreements based on actual results through the end of the applicable performance period, including accrued but unused vacation days, paid in cash;
•Received a cash payment equal to 18 months of COBRA health care coverage for him and his eligible dependents; and,
•In recognition of his retirement, Mr. Radich also received a $3,000 gift card treated as taxable income.
The Separation Agreement also contained customary non-solicit, non-disparagement, cooperation and general release and waiver provisions.
In addition, on July 4, 2025, Mr. Radich and the Company entered into a consulting agreement (the “Consulting Agreement”) which became effective following his retirement. Pursuant to the Consulting Agreement, Mr. Radich agreed to provide consulting services to the Company from the Separation Date through October 31, 2025, as may be requested by the Company, with the ability to extend upon mutual agreement, and assist the Company with, among other things, transition of management following Mr. Radich’s retirement, project and construction management, claim review and other business matters related to the Company. For his services, the Company agreed to pay Mr. Radich an hourly rate of $250.00. The Consulting Agreement also contained customary confidentiality and non-compete provisions. No services were requested or performed pursuant to the Consulting Agreement.
44
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
Stock Ownership
The Board of Directors stock ownership guidelines require all non-employee directors to own and maintain five times their Annual Board of Directors Cash Retainer in Granite common stock after joining the Board of Directors. Until the ownership requirement is reached, directors must hold 75% of the shares they receive from equity grants after paying for taxes. As of December 31, 2025, all non-employee directors are in compliance with the guideline either by virtue of having attained the required number of shares or complying with the retention requirement.
Cash and Equity Compensation Policy
Every other year the compensation consultant conducts a comprehensive review of the Board of Director’s compensation program. The compensation consultant may recommend changes to the cash and equity-based compensation based on benchmarking comparisons or broader market best practices.
Granite's non-employee directors receive annual cash retainers and equity grants as set forth in the table below. Key highlights of the director compensation program are as follows:
•Cash retainers are paid in quarterly installments. No additional fees are paid for attendance at meetings whether in person or telephonically; and
•Directors, other than the Board Chair, receive an annual grant of RSUs valued at $145,000 on the date of grant. The Board Chair receives an annual grant of RSUs valued at $210,000 on the date of grant. All RSUs vest in full annually on May 20. A Director may elect to defer receipt of shares until after the end of his or her service to the Board of Directors.
The following table represents 2025 Cash Retainer and Equity Grants:
| Annual Cash Board Retainers | |||||||||||
| Member | $90,000 | ||||||||||
Board Chair | $175,000 | ||||||||||
| Annual Cash Committee Service Retainers | |||||||||||
Audit/Compliance Committee Member | $10,000 | ||||||||||
Audit/Compliance Committee Chair | $20,000 | ||||||||||
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Member | $7,500 | ||||||||||
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Chair | $15,000 | ||||||||||
Compensation Committee Member | $8,500 | ||||||||||
Compensation Committee Chair | $17,000 | ||||||||||
| Risk Committee Member | $7,500 | ||||||||||
| Risk Committee Chair | $15,000 | ||||||||||
| Annual Equity Grants | |||||||||||
| Member | $145,000 | RSUs | |||||||||
Board Chair | $210,000 | RSUs | |||||||||
45
Director Compensation Table
2025
The following table presents the compensation provided by Granite to our directors for the year ended December 31, 2025.
Director (a) | Fees Earned or Paid in Cash(1) (b) | Stock Award(2) (c) | All Other Compensation(3) (d) | Total (e) | ||||||||||
Louis E. Caldera(4) | $110,375 | $145,000 | $4,333 | $259,708 | ||||||||||
Molly C. Campbell(4) | $113,500 | $145,000 | $2,443 | $260,943 | ||||||||||
David C. Darnell(4) | $56,559 | - | $295 | $56,854 | ||||||||||
Carlos M. Hernandez(4) | $107,500 | $145,000 | $639 | $253,139 | ||||||||||
Alan P. Krusi(4) | $115,000 | $145,000 | $639 | $260,639 | ||||||||||
Celeste B. Mastin(4) | $106,000 | $145,000 | $639 | $251,639 | ||||||||||
Michael F. McNally(4) | $175,000 | $210,000 | $15,552 | $400,552 | ||||||||||
Laura M. Mullen(4) | $117,500 | $145,000 | $5,220 | $267,720 | ||||||||||
J. Timothy Romer(4) | $33,555 | $110,682 | $263 | $144,500 | ||||||||||
(1) The amounts in column (b) reflect the annual cash retainer paid to non-employee directors for the year ended December 31, 2025. In 2025, each non-employee director was paid an annual retainer as a member of the Board of Directors and additional retainers for service as a member of a Board committee. The cash retainer was paid quarterly in equal payments; no meeting fees were paid. The annual cash retainers were prorated to reflect: (i) the retirement of Mr. Darnell from the Board of Directors effective June 5, 2025, and (ii) the appointment of Mr. Romer to the Board of Directors effective September 8, 2025.
(2) The amounts in column (c) reflect the grant date fair value of the 2025 annual equity awards. The grant date fair value is determined in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, Compensation—Stock Compensation, without regard to potential forfeitures and is determined using the fair value of the Company’s common stock based on market price at the date of grant. For additional information about the assumptions used in these calculations, see Note 17 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025. On August 12, 2025, Mses. Campbell, Mastin and Mullen and Messrs. Caldera, Hernandez, and Krusi received an annual equity award of 1,325 RSUs with a grant date fair value of $109.37 per share. As Board Chair, Mr. McNally received an annual equity award of 1,920 RSUs with a grant date fair value of $109.37 per share. In accordance with his appointment to the Board of Directors, Mr. Romer received a prorated annual equity award of 1,012 RSUs on September 15, 2025, with a grant date fair value of $109.37 per share. The RSUs granted to the non-employee directors vest on May 20, 2026. As of December 31, 2025: Mr. Caldera had 7,117 deferred units and 1,326 unvested RSUs; Ms. Campbell had 3,475 deferred units and 1,326 unvested RSUs; Mr. Hernandez, Mr. Krusi, and Ms. Mastin had 1,326 unvested RSUs, respectively; Mr. McNally had 29,004 deferred units and 1,922 unvested RSUs; Ms. Mullen had 9,393 deferred units and 1,326 unvested RSUs; and Mr. Romer had 1,013 unvested RSUs.
(3) The amounts in column (d) include the cash value of dividend equivalents units earned in 2025 from deferred and unvested RSUs.
(4) Ms. Mullen deferred 50% of her annual cash retainer and 100% of her annual RSU award, and Mr. Hernandez deferred 100% of his annual RSU award into the NQDC plan. Mses. Mastin and Campbell and Messrs. Caldera, Darnell, Hernandez, Krusi, and McNally elected not to participate in the deferral of their annual cash retainers or annual equity awards into the NQDC Plan in 2025. Mr. Romer was not eligible to participate in the NQDC for the 2025 Plan year. For a detailed explanation of the NQDC Plan, please refer to “Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation.”
46
PAY RATIO DISCLOSURE
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”) requires we disclose the ratio of our CEO's total annual compensation to the median of the annual total compensation of all our employees and those of our consolidated subsidiaries other than our CEO.
To determine our median employee (excluding the CEO), we made a direct determination from our total employee population. Using a consistently applied compensation measure, which included base pay, overtime, and short-term incentives, we ranked our employees from the highest paid to the lowest paid. We selected a determination date of December 6, 2024. Our employee population of 6,532 U.S. and non-U.S. salary and hourly employees were evaluated as of December 6, 2024 and reflects compensation paid from January 1, 2024 through December 6, 2024. Where allowed under the Dodd-Frank Act, we have annualized compensation through December 6, 2024 for employees hired in 2024 to determine our median employee. Other than the acquisitions described below, which we excluded pursuant to SEC rules, there was not a change in our employee population that we reasonably believed would result in a significant change to the pay ratio and, as a result, we used the same median employee for our pay ratio disclosure.
Based on the above determination, the total annual compensation of our median employee (excluding the CEO) (calculated in accordance with Item 402(c)(2)(x) of Regulation S-K) was $159,401. Our CEO's total annual compensation (calculated in accordance with Item 402(c)(2)(x) of Regulation S-K and as reported in the Summary Compensation Table) was $9,861,425. The resulting ratio was 62:1. This ratio is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K using the data and assumptions summarized above.
On August 5, 2025, we completed the acquisition of Papich Construction, which is a provider of construction services and materials in California’s Central Coast and Central Valley regions. On August 5, 2025, we completed the acquisition of Warren Paving which is a vertically-integrated asphalt contractor and aggregate producer with operations along the Gulf Coast and Mississippi River. On October 3, 2025, we completed the acquisition of Cinderlite which is a construction materials, landscape supply, and transportation company in Carson City, Nevada.
As of December 31, 2025, Papich Construction had 234 employees, Warren Paving had 397 employees and Cinderlite had 47 employees, all of which we did not include in our determination of the median employee as permitted by SEC rules.
The Dodd-Frank Act rules for identifying the median employee and calculating the pay ratio based on that employee’s annual total compensation allow companies to adopt a variety of methodologies, to apply certain exclusions, and to make reasonable estimates and assumptions that reflect their compensation practices. As such, the pay ratio reported by other companies may not be comparable to the pay ratio reported above, as other companies may have different employment and compensation practices and may utilize different methodologies, exclusions, estimates, and assumptions in calculating their own pay ratios.
Our pay ratio is not an element that the Compensation Committee considers in setting the compensation of our CEO, nor is our CEO’s compensation a material element that management considers in making compensation decisions for non-officer employees. However, the compensation of our employees is periodically reviewed to ensure alignment with our compensation philosophy of paying at the market median.
47
PAY VERSUS PERFORMANCE
Introduction
In accordance with the SEC’s disclosure requirements, below is information regarding the “Compensation Actually Paid” (“CAP”) versus our performance (“PVP”). The Compensation Committee does not use CAP as a basis for making compensation decisions, nor does it use net income as required to be shown in the PVP table for incentive plan purposes.
For more information on how the Compensation Committee makes compensation decisions and aligns pay with performance please refer to the "Compensation Discussion and Analysis."
Most Important Metrics Used for Linking CAP and Performance
The list below shows the most important metrics the Compensation Committee used to link pay to performance for 2025.
| Most Important Performance Measures | ||
Adjusted EBITDA was chosen as the company selected performance measure as it is (1) the primary metric in our annual incentive program and (2) influences RONA performance, which is one of the two performance metrics used in our LTIP.
Pay versus Performance Table
Below is the tabular disclosure which shows the total compensation for our Principal Executive Officer (“PEO”) and the average of our non-PEO Named Executive Officers (“NEOs”) (as set forth in the Summary Compensation Table (“SCT”)), the CAP to our PEO and the average for our non-PEO NEOs, our absolute TSR, the TSR of our peer group over the same period, our net income, and our Adjusted EBITDA for fiscal years 2025, 2024, 2023, 2022, and 2021.
Granite 2025 Pay Versus Performance
PEO ( | Non-PEO NEOs(2) | Value of Initial Fixed $100 Investment Based on:(4) | Company Selected Measure ($ mil) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Fiscal Year(1) (a) | SCT Total for PEO (Larkin) (b) | Comp Actually Paid to PEO(3) (Larkin) (c) | Average SCT Total (f) | Average Comp Actually Paid(3) (g) | Granite TSR (h) | Peer Group TSR(5) (i) | GAAP Net Income(6) ($mil) (j) | Adjusted EBITDA(7) ($mil) (k) | ||||||||||||||||||
2025 | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||||||
2024 | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||||||
2023 | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||||||
2022 | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||||||
2021 | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||||||
(1) The Pay Versus Performance Table reflects the required disclosures for fiscal years 2025, 2024, 2023, 2022, and 2021.
(2) Each of the five fiscal years presented include the average SCT totals of the Non-PEO NEOs as applicable in each reporting year. Fiscal year 2025 includes: Ms. Woolsey, Mr. Tatusko, Mr. Dowd, Mr. Williams, and Mr. Radich (former COO). Fiscal year 2024 includes: Ms. Curtis (former CFO), Mr. Radich, Mr. Tatusko, Ms. Woolsey and Mr. Dowd. Fiscal year 2023 includes: Ms. Curtis, Mr. Radich, Mr. Tatusko, and Ms. Woolsey. Fiscal year 2022 includes: Ms. Curtis, Mr. Radich, Mr. Tatusko, Ms. Woolsey and Mr. Richards (former Operating Group SVP). Fiscal year 2021 includes: Ms. Curtis, Mr. Radich, Mr. Tatusko, Mr. Dowd and Ms. Desai (former CFO).
48
(3) SEC rules require certain adjustments be made to the SCT values to determine CAP, as reported in the PVP table above. None of the NEOs participate in any defined benefit plan and as such there is no adjustment included in the table below. The following table details the applicable adjustments that were made to determine CAP.
PEO SCT Total to CAP Reconciliation
Fiscal Year | Deduct SCT Stock & Options Awards | Add Year- End Value of Unvested Equity Granted in Year | Add Change in Value of Unvested Equity Granted in Prior Years | Add Vesting Date Value of Awards Granted During the Year That Vested During the Year | Add Change in Value of Vested Equity Granted in Prior Years | Deduct Fair Value of Equity for Equity Granted that Forfeited/Failed to Meet Vesting Conditions | Total Change in Value of Equity | ||||||||||||||||
PEO (Larkin) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2025 | ($ | $ | $ | $ | ($ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||||
Average Non-PEO NEOs | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2025 | ($ | $ | $ | $ | ($ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||||
(4) The amount represents the value of an initial fixed $100 investment on December 31, 2020, assuming reinvestment of all dividends.
(5) The peer group index is the Dow Jones U.S. Heavy Construction Index.
(6) Represents the GAAP net income attributable to Granite Construction Inc. for each applicable fiscal year end from 2021 to 2025.
(7) Adjusted EBITDA , a non-GAAP measure, is reflective of the Company’s ongoing core business operations. Adjusted EBITDA is earnings before interest, taxes and depreciation and amortization as further adjusted. The Compensation Committee pre-approves further adjustments annually. The following adjustments have been made to exclude the impact of certain charges such as acquisition, divestiture and restructuring expenses, impact of foreign currency, non-cash impairments, non-budgeted gains on sales, newly-adopted accounting standards, COVID-19 expenses, SEC investigation and other extraordinary legal costs, and losses on debt extinguishments.
Consistent with SEC requirements, the tables below demonstrate the relationship between CAP versus performance for the years 2025, 2024, 2023, 2022 and 2021.
CAP VERSUS TSR
49
CAP VERSUS NET INCOME
CAP VERSUS ADJUSTED EBITDA
50
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION
The following table contains information as of December 31, 2025, regarding stock authorized for issuance under the Company’s equity incentive plans and its Employee Stock Purchase Plan:
| Plan Category | Number of Securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights (a)(1) | Weighted average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights (b) | Number of Securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a)) (c)(2) | |||||||||||
Equity Compensation Plans Approved by Shareholders | 1,050,993 | $0.00 | 4,070,693 | |||||||||||
Equity Compensation Plans Not Approved by Shareholders | -- | -- | -- | |||||||||||
Total | 1,050,993 | $0.00 | 4,070,693 | |||||||||||
(1) Reflects (a) 504,487 shares issuable upon vesting and/or settlement of RSUs under our equity incentive plans, of which 211,350 shares are deferred pursuant to our NQDC Plan and (b) 546,506 shares that are issuable if target performance is met pursuant to outstanding LTIP awards under the 2021 Equity Incentive Plan (or 1,093,012 shares if maximum performance is met). The Employee Stock Purchase Plan enables employees to purchase our common stock at a 5% discount on the market value of the last day of the six-month offering period. As such, the number of shares that may be issued during an offering period and the purchase price of such shares cannot be determined in advance.
(2) Includes (a) 2,142,923 shares under the 2024 Equity Incentive Plan and (b) 1,927,770 shares under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan.
51
PROPOSAL 3: RATIFICATION OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Audit/Compliance Committee of the Board of Directors has appointed PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP to serve as Granite's independent registered public accounting firm to perform the audit of our financial statements for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2026. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP and its predecessor, Coopers & Lybrand, have been our auditors since 1982.
A representative of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP will be present at the Annual Meeting. He or she will be given the opportunity to make a statement if he or she desires and will be available to respond to appropriate shareholder questions.
Although ratification is not required by Granite's bylaws or otherwise, the Board is submitting the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP to our shareholders for ratification as a matter of good corporate practice. If shareholders do not ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as Granite's independent registered public accounting firm, the Audit/Compliance Committee will reconsider the appointment. Even if the selection is ratified, the Audit/Compliance Committee, in its discretion, may select a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time during the year if it determines that such a change would be in the best interest of Granite and our shareholders.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS’ RECOMMENDATION
The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote "FOR" the ratification of the appointment by the Audit/Compliance Committee of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as Granite's independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2026.
52
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
Principal Accountant Fees and Services
Aggregate fees for professional services rendered for us by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for the years ended December 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024 were:
2025 | 2024 | ||||||||||
Audit Fees(1) | $ | 4,572,301 | $ | 4,229,391 | |||||||
All Other Fees(2) | 2,132 | 2,132 | |||||||||
| Total | $ | 4,574,433 | $ | 4,231,523 | |||||||
(1) Audit Fees were for professional services rendered for the audits of Granite's consolidated financial statements, including audits of internal control over financial reporting, audits of subsidiary financial statements, quarterly financial reviews, and audit related expenses.
(2) All Other Fees were related to disclosure checklists.
Audit/Compliance Committee Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures
The Audit/Compliance Committee's policy is to pre-approve all audit and permissible non-audit services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm. During 2025, no services were provided to us by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP other than in accordance with the pre-approval policies and procedures.
Based on its review of the non-audit services provided by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, the Audit/Compliance Committee believes that PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP's provision of such non-audit services is compatible with maintaining their independence.
53
REPORT OF THE AUDIT/COMPLIANCE COMMITTEE
The Audit/Compliance Committee is appointed by the Board of Directors and reports to the Board at each meeting. Its purpose is to (a) assist the Board in its oversight of (1) Granite’s accounting and financial reporting policies and procedures, (2) Granite’s system of internal control over financial reporting as required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, (3) the integrity of Granite’s financial statements, (4) the performance of Granite’s internal audit function, (5) the performance, qualifications and independence of Granite’s independent auditor, (6) Granite’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, (7) Granite’s Corporate Compliance Program and Code of Conduct, and (8) the risks from cybersecurity threats; and (b) serve as the Qualified Legal Compliance Committee of the Board of Directors as required. The Audit/Compliance Committee is solely responsible for selecting, evaluating, setting the compensation of, and, where deemed appropriate, replacing the independent registered public accounting firm.
Management is responsible for the preparation, presentation and integrity of Granite’s financial statements. Management is also responsible for maintaining appropriate accounting and financial reporting principles, policies, internal controls and procedures designed to assure compliance with accounting standards and applicable laws and regulations. In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities, the Audit/Compliance Committee reviewed and discussed with management the audited financial statements in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year ended December 31, 2025, including a discussion of the quality, not just the acceptability, of the accounting principles, the reasonableness of significant judgments, and the clarity of disclosures in the financial statements.
The Audit/Compliance Committee also oversees our Ethics and Compliance Program, participates in the annual evaluation of our Corporate Compliance Officer, and the Vice President of Internal Audit, and provides periodic reports to the Board on the progress of the Ethics and Compliance Program and, if warranted, plans for future activities.
The Vice President of Internal Audit reports directly to the Chair of the Audit/Compliance Committee and has direct access and meets regularly with the Audit/Compliance Committee to discuss the results of internal audits and the quality of internal controls. The Corporate Compliance Officer also reports directly to the Audit/Compliance Committee.
The Audit/Compliance Committee discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm the matters required to be discussed by the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and the SEC. In addition, the Audit/Compliance Committee has discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm the auditor's independence from Granite and its management, and received the written disclosures and the letter from the independent registered public accounting firm required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent registered public accounting firm’s communications with the Audit/Compliance Committee concerning independence.
The Audit/Compliance Committee discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm the overall scope and plans for their audit. The Audit/Compliance Committee meets with the independent registered public accounting firm, with and without management present, to discuss the results of their examination, their evaluation of Granite's internal controls, including internal control over financial reporting, and the overall quality of Granite's financial reporting. In addition, the Audit/Compliance Committee reviewed with management and the independent registered public accounting firm drafts of Granite's quarterly and annual financial statements, and press releases prior to the public release of the quarterly earnings. In addition to the quarterly review, the Audit/Compliance Committee met with the CEO and the CFO to discuss the process adopted by management to enable them to sign the certifications that are required to accompany reports filed with the SEC.
Based on the review and discussions referred to above, the Audit/Compliance Committee recommended to Granite's Board of Directors that Granite's audited financial statements be included in Granite's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025.
Members of the Audit/Compliance Committee:
Laura M. Mullen, Chair | Carlos M. Hernandez | Alan P. Krusi | J. Timothy Romer | ||||||||
This Report of the Audit/Compliance Committee does not constitute soliciting material and shall not be deemed filed or incorporated by reference into any other filing made by us under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that we specifically incorporate this Report of the Audit/Compliance Committee by reference therein.
54
Transactions with Related Persons
Granite's legal staff is primarily responsible for the development and implementation of processes and controls to obtain information from the directors and executive officers with respect to related person transactions (transactions involving an executive officer, director, director nominee, or greater than 5% beneficial owner of Granite common stock or an immediate family member of, or anyone (other than a tenant or employee) residing in the home of, an executive officer, director, director nominee, or greater than 5% beneficial owner of Granite common stock). They also determine, based on the facts and circumstances, whether a related person has a direct or indirect interest in the transaction. In addition, the Board of Directors has adopted a written policy and written procedures for review and approval or ratification of related party transactions involving Granite. The policy requires the Audit/Compliance Committee's review and approval or ratification of any related party transaction (as defined in the policy) in which Granite is a participant. This includes, among other things, any related party transaction that would be required to be disclosed under the rules and regulations of the SEC.
Under the policy, the Audit/Compliance Committee reviews the material facts of all related party transactions that require the Audit/Compliance Committee's approval, and either approves or disapproves of the entry into the related party transaction. If advance Audit/Compliance Committee approval of a related party transaction is not feasible, the transaction may only be entered into subject to the Audit/Compliance Committee's later approval. Thereafter, the Audit/Compliance Committee will consider the transaction, and, if the Audit/Compliance Committee determines it to be appropriate, ratify it at the next regularly scheduled meeting of the Audit/Compliance Committee. In determining whether to approve or ratify a related party transaction, the Audit/Compliance Committee takes into account, among other factors it deems appropriate, whether the related party transaction is on terms no less favorable than terms generally available to an unaffiliated third party under the same or similar circumstances, and the extent of the related person's interest in the transaction.
The Audit/Compliance Committee has determined that the following transactions shall be deemed to be pre-approved: (i) employment of an executive officer if (a) the executive officer's compensation is required to be reported in Granite's proxy statement, or (b) the executive officer is not an immediate family member of another executive officer or director of Granite, the executive officer's compensation would be reported in Granite's proxy statement if the executive officer were a “Named Executive Officer”, and the Compensation Committee approved (or recommended that the Board approve) such compensation; (ii) compensation to a director required to be disclosed in Granite's proxy statement; (iii) any transaction with another company at which the related person's only relationship is as an employee (other than an executive officer), director, or beneficial owner of less than 10% of that company's shares, if the aggregate amount involved does not exceed the greater of $1,000,000 or 2% of that company's annual revenues; (iv) any charitable contribution, grant or endowment by Granite to a charitable organization, foundation or university at which a related person's only relationship is as an employee (other than an executive officer) or a director, if the aggregate amount involved does not exceed the lesser of $100,000 or 2% of the charitable organization's total annual receipts; (v) any transaction where the related person's interest arises solely from the ownership of Granite common stock and all holders of Granite common stock receive the same benefit on a pro rata basis; and (vi) any transaction with a related person involving services as a bank depositary of funds, transfer agent, registrar or trustee under a trust indenture or similar services.
In addition, the Board has delegated to the Chair of the Audit/Compliance Committee the authority to pre-approve or ratify (as applicable) any related person transaction in which the aggregate amount involved is expected to be less than $100,000.
No director who has an interest in the transaction under consideration may participate in the approval process. All related party transactions approved by the Audit/Compliance Committee must be disclosed to the full Board of Directors.
55
STOCK OWNERSHIP OF BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND CERTAIN MANAGEMENT
The following table provides information regarding the ownership of our common stock as of February 28, 2026 by each person known to us to beneficially own 5% or more of our common stock, each of our directors and nominees, each of our Named Executive Officers, and all of our current directors and executive officers as a group.
Name | Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership(1) | Percentage (%) of Common Stock Outstanding(2) | ||||||
BlackRock, Inc.(3) 50 Hudson Yards New York, NY 10001 | 6,643,342 | 15.3% | ||||||
The Vanguard Group(4) 100 Vanguard Blvd. Malvern, PA 19355 | 4,933,608 | 11.3% | ||||||
FMR LLC(5) 245 Summer Street Boston, MA 0221 | 4,627,464 | 10.6% | ||||||
State Street Corporation(6) State Street Financial Center 1 Congress Street, Suite 1 Boston, MA 02114 | 2,648,716 | 6.1% | ||||||
Louis E. Caldera | 2,270 | * | ||||||
Molly Campbell | 7,541 | * | ||||||
Carlos M. Hernandez | 2,270 | * | ||||||
Alan P. Krusi | 20,874 | * | ||||||
Celeste B. Mastin | 9,220 | * | ||||||
Michael F. McNally | 3,198 | * | ||||||
Laura M. Mullen | 2,763 | * | ||||||
J. Timothy Romer | - | * | ||||||
Kyle T. Larkin(7) | 174,917 | * | ||||||
Staci M. Woolsey(8) | 17,019 | * | ||||||
Michael G. Tatusko(9) | 45,607 | * | ||||||
Brian R. Dowd(10) | 32,442 | * | ||||||
Bradley J. Williams(11) | 28,220 | * | ||||||
James A. Radich | 33,742 | * | ||||||
All Executive Officers and Directors as a Group (15 Persons)(7-11) | 383,377 | * | ||||||
* Less than 1%
(1) Except as indicated in the footnotes to this table, the persons named in the table have sole voting and dispositive power with respect to all shares of common stock shown as beneficially owned by them, subject to community property laws where applicable. Such shares do not include the individuals’ NQDC shares, if any. Further, except as otherwise provided in the table above, the address of the persons named in the table is: 585 West Beach Street, Watsonville, California 95076.
(2) Calculated on the basis of 43,504,231 shares of common stock issued and outstanding as of February 28, 2026. For all executive officers and directors as a group the percentage is calculated on the basis of the number of shares of common stock issued and outstanding as of February 28, 2026 and includes 146,498 shares of common stock issuable upon the vesting of equity awards within 60 days after February 28, 2026.
(3) Beneficial ownership information is as of March 31, 2025 and based upon a Schedule 13G/A filed by BlackRock, Inc. (“BlackRock”) with the SEC on April 30, 2025. The Schedule 13G/A indicates that BlackRock (i) beneficially owns 6,643,342 shares and (ii) has sole voting power with respect to 6,584,572 shares and sole dispositive power with respect to 6,643,342 shares.
(4) Beneficial ownership information is as of December 29, 2023 and based on a Schedule 13G/A filed by The Vanguard Group (“Vanguard”) with the SEC on February 13, 2024. The Schedule 13G/A indicates that Vanguard (i) beneficially owns 4,933,608 shares and (ii) has shared voting power with respect to 37,207 shares, sole dispositive power with respect to 4,848,342 shares and shared dispositive power with respect to 85,266 shares.
56
(5) Beneficial ownership is as of December 31, 2025 and based on a Schedule 13G/A filed by FMR LLC and Abigail P. Johnson with the SEC on January 8, 2026. The Schedule 13G/A indicates that FMR LLC (i) beneficially owns 4,627,464 shares and (ii) has sole voting with respect to 4,506,730 shares and sole dispositive power with respect to 4,627,464 shares. The Schedule 13G/A also indicates that Abigail P. Johnson (i) beneficially owns 4,627,464 shares and (ii) has sole dispositive power with respect to 4,627,464 shares.
(6) Beneficial ownership information is as of December 31, 2023 and based on a Schedule 13G filed by State Street Corporation (“State Street”) with the SEC on January 24, 2024. The Schedule 13G indicates that State Street (i) beneficially owns 2,648,716 shares and (ii) has shared voting power with respect to 2,504,192 shares and shared dispositive power with respect to 2,648,716 shares.
(7) Includes 93,632 shares of common stock issuable upon vesting of restricted stock units within 60 days after February 28, 2026.
(8) Includes 10,721 shares of common stock issuable upon vesting of restricted stock units within 60 days after February 28, 2026.
(9) Includes 5,586 shares of common stock owned by the Employee Stock Ownership Plan (“ESOP”) but allocated to Mr. Tatusko’s account as of February 28, 2026 and 14,887 shares of common stock issuable upon vesting of restricted stock units within 60 days after February 28, 2026. As a result of having attained age 55 and continuing to be employed by Granite, Mr. Tatusko is currently eligible to make withdrawals of his ESOP shares.
(10) Includes 5,269 shares of common stock owned by the ESOP but allocated to Mr. Dowd’s account as of February 28, 2026 and 12,489 shares of common stock issuable upon vesting of restricted stock units within 60 days after February 28, 2026. As a result of having attained age 55 and continuing to be employed by Granite, Mr. Dowd is currently eligible to make withdrawals of his ESOP shares.
(11) Includes 8,260 shares of common stock owned by the ESOP but allocated to Mr. Williams’ account as of February 28, 2026 and 11,787 shares of common stock issuable upon vesting of restricted stock units within 60 days after February 28, 2026. As a result of having attained age 55 and continuing to be employed by Granite, Mr. Williams is currently eligible to make withdrawals of his ESOP shares.
57
DELINQUENT SECTION 16(a) REPORT
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our executive officers, directors and any persons who beneficially own more than 10% of our common stock to report ownership of, and transactions in, Granite stock with the SEC.
Based solely on our review of these reports and written representations from all of our executive officers and directors that no other reports were required with respect to their beneficial ownership of our common stock during fiscal year 2025, we believe that all reporting requirements applicable to our executive officers, directors and any persons who beneficially own more than 10% of our common stock pursuant to Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act were satisfied, except for one Form 3 and one Form 4 that disclosed one transaction for Mr. Romer that were not reported on a timely basis.
58
VOTING INFORMATION
Who Pays for This Solicitation?
Granite pays for the cost of this proxy solicitation. We will request brokers, trusts, banks and other nominees to solicit their customers who own our stock. We will reimburse their reasonable, out-of-pocket expenses for doing this. Our directors, officers and employees may also solicit proxies by mail, telephone, personal contact, or through online methods without additional compensation.
Who Can Vote?
You will have received notice of the Annual Meeting and can vote if you were a shareholder of record of Granite's common stock as of the close of business on April 10, 2026. You are entitled to one vote for each share of Granite common stock that you own. You may vote all shares owned by you as of the record date, including shares held directly in your name as the shareholder of record and shares held for you as the beneficial owner through a broker, trust, bank or other nominee. As of the close of business on April 10, 2026, there were 43,746,424 shares of common stock issued and outstanding.
How Do I Vote and What Is the Deadline for Voting My Shares?
Shareholders, other than 401(k) Participants, can vote online during the Annual Meeting by following the instructions provided on the meeting website during the Annual Meeting or can vote by proxy in the following three ways:
•By Internet: You can vote by Internet by following the instructions in the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or by visiting https://www.proxyvote.com and following the instructions at that website at any time prior to 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on June 3, 2026;
•By telephone: In the United States and Canada you can vote by telephone by following the instructions in the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or by calling 1.800.690.6903 (toll free) and following the instructions at any time prior to 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on June 3, 2026; or
•By mail: If you have received a paper copy of the proxy card by mail you may submit your proxy by completing, signing and dating your proxy card and mailing it in the accompanying pre-addressed envelope. Instructions are also on the proxy card. Your proxy card must be received prior to 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on June 3, 2026.
Please refer to the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or the information your broker, trust, bank or other nominee provides you for more information on the above options. If you vote your shares over the Internet or by telephone, you should not return a proxy card by mail (unless you are revoking your previous proxy).
401(k) Participants have the option to instruct the trustee of the 401(k) to vote their shares in the following three ways:
•By Internet: You can provide voting directions to the trustee of the 401(k) by Internet by following the instructions on your proxy card or by visiting https://www.proxyvote.com and following the instructions at that website at any time prior to 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on June 1, 2026;
•By telephone: In the United States and Canada you can provide voting directions to the trustee of the 401(k) by telephone by following the instructions on your proxy card or by calling 1.800.690.6903 (toll free) and following the instructions at any time prior to 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on June 1, 2026; or
•By mail: You can provide voting directions to the trustee of the 401(k) by completing, signing and dating your proxy card and mailing it in the accompanying pre-addressed envelope. Instructions are also on the proxy card. Your proxy card must be received prior to 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on June 1, 2026.
If you provide voting directions to the trustee of the 401(k) for your shares over the Internet or telephone, you should not return a proxy card by mail (unless you are revoking your previous voting directions).
What Is the Voting Requirement To Approve the Proposals?
If there is a quorum:
•Nominees for election to the Board in an uncontested election who receive the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast will be elected as members of our Board of Directors for the upcoming three-year term and until his/
59
her successor is elected, or he/she resigns or until his/her death, retirement or removal. This means that the number of votes cast “for” the election of a nominee must exceed the number of votes cast "against" the nominee's election.
•For the advisory vote on execution compensation of the Named Executive Officers, and the ratification of the appointment by the Audit/Compliance Committee of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as Granite’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2026, each will be approved if it receives the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast affirmatively or negatively on such matter.
•Any other matters properly proposed at the meeting will also be determined by a majority of the votes cast affirmatively or negatively, except as otherwise required by law or by Granite's Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, or bylaws.
If you hold shares through a broker, trust, bank or other nominee (i.e., in “street name”), and you do not provide your broker, trust, bank or other nominee with voting instructions, “broker non-votes” may occur. Generally, a broker non-vote occurs when a broker, trust, bank or other nominee who holds shares for a beneficial owner does not vote on a particular matter (i.e., a non-routine matter) because the broker, trust, bank or other nominee does not have discretionary voting power with respect to that matter and has not received instructions on such matter from the beneficial owner. Among our proposals, a broker, trust, bank or other nominee will have discretionary voting power only with respect to the proposal to ratify the appointment by the Audit/Compliance Committee of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as Granite's independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2026.
How Are Votes Counted?
In the election of directors and for all other proposals, you may vote “For,” “Against” or “Abstain” with respect to each of the nominees and proposals.
If you elect to abstain in the election of directors, in the advisory vote on executive compensation of the Named Executive Officers, or in the ratification of the appointment by the Audit/Compliance Committee of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as Granite’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2026, the abstention will not impact the outcome of these matters. In tabulating the voting results for the election of directors and such other matters described in the preceding sentence, only “For” and “Against” votes are counted for purposes of determining whether a majority has been obtained. Abstentions and broker non-votes are not considered to be votes cast affirmatively or negatively and, therefore, will have no effect on the outcome of the vote on any of these matters.
If you vote by telephone, the Internet or by returning your proxy card, your shares will be voted at the Annual Meeting in the manner you indicated. Kyle T. Larkin, Staci M. Woolsey, and M. Craig Hall are officers of the Company and were named by our Board of Directors as proxy holders. They will vote all proxies, or record an abstention, in accordance with the directions on the proxy. If no contrary direction is given, the shares will be voted as recommended by the Board of Directors.
For 401(k) Participants, if you do not provide voting instructions as to one or more of the matters to be voted on or you do not return your proxy card, your shares will be voted in the same proportion as those shares of common stock for which instructions are received from 401(k) Participants.
This proxy statement contains a description of each item that you are to vote on along with our Board's recommendations.
Below is a summary of our Board's recommendations:
•For the election of each of the three director nominees;
•For the approval of the compensation of the Named Executive Officers as disclosed in this proxy statement; and
•For the ratification of the appointment by the Audit/Compliance Committee of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as Granite's independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2026.
As to any other matter that may be properly proposed at the Annual Meeting the shares will be voted in the discretion of the persons named on your proxy card.
After I Vote by Proxy Can I Change or Revoke My Proxy?
You can change your vote or revoke your proxy at any time before the Annual Meeting. Shareholders, other than 401(k) Participants, may change their vote by: (i) voting again by Internet at any time prior to 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on, June
60
3, 2026, if you originally voted by Internet, (ii) voting again by telephone at any time prior to 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on June 3, 2026, if you originally voted by telephone, or (iii) returning a later dated proxy card such that it is received prior to 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on June 3, 2026, if you voted by mail. Shareholders, other than 401(k) Participants, may also revoke their proxy by filing with our Secretary a written revocation that is received by us before the polls close at the Annual Meeting. All 401(k) Participants may change their vote by: (i) providing new voting directions by Internet at any time prior to 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on June 1, 2026, if you provided voting directions by Internet, (ii) providing new voting directions by telephone at any time prior to 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on June 1, 2026, if you provided voting directions by telephone, or (iii) returning a later dated proxy card such that it is received prior to 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on June 1, 2026, if you provided voting directions by mail. Except for 401(k) Participants, shareholders may also change their vote or revoke their proxy by attending the Annual Meeting and voting virtually if they are a shareholder of record.
If you hold your shares through a broker, bank, trust or other nominee, please refer to the information forwarded by your broker, bank, trust or other nominee for procedures on revoking your proxy.
Can I Vote at the Annual Meeting Instead of Voting by Proxy?
You may attend the Annual Meeting and, except for 401(k) Participants, vote virtually instead of voting by proxy. However even if you intend to attend the meeting, we strongly encourage you to vote by Internet, telephone or mail prior to the meeting to ensure that your shares are voted. Although Granite's 401(k) Participants may attend the meeting, they cannot vote virtually at the meeting.
What Constitutes a Quorum?
Granite's bylaws require a quorum to be present in order to transact business at the meeting. A quorum consists of a majority of all of the shares entitled to vote, either in person or represented by proxy. In determining a quorum, we count shares voted for or against, abstentions and broker non-votes as being present.
Who Supervises the Voting at the Meeting?
Granite's bylaws and policies specify that, prior to the Annual Meeting, the Company will appoint an independent Inspector of Elections to supervise the voting at the meeting and count the votes for each proposal following the closing of the polls at the Annual Meeting. The Inspector decides all questions as to the qualification of voters, the validity of proxy cards and the acceptance or rejection of votes. Before assuming his or her duties, the Inspector will take and sign an oath that he or she will faithfully perform his or her duties both impartially and to the best of his or her ability.
How Can I Find Out the Voting Results?
We will announce preliminary voting results at the Annual Meeting, and final results will be published on a Form 8-K to be filed with the SEC within four business days following the Annual Meeting. If the final results are not available at that time, we will provide preliminary results in the Form 8-K, and we will provide the final results in an amendment to the Form 8-K as soon as they become available.
61
PARTICIPATING IN THE 2026 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
This year’s Annual Meeting will be held exclusively in a virtual format through a live audio webcast. You are entitled to participate in the Annual Meeting if you were a shareholder as of the close of business on April 10, 2026, the record date, or hold a valid proxy for the Annual Meeting. To be admitted to the Annual Meeting at http://www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/GVA2026, you must enter the 16-digit control number found next to the label “Control Number” on your Notice of Internet Availability, proxy card, or voting instruction form. If you are a beneficial shareholder, you may contact the bank, broker or other institution where you hold your shares if you have questions about obtaining your control number. Whether or not you participate in the Annual Meeting, it is important that your shares be part of the voting process.
We encourage you to access the Annual Meeting before it begins. Online check-in will start at approximately 10:15 a.m. Pacific Time on June 4, 2026. If you encounter any difficulties accessing the Annual Meeting during the check-in or meeting time, please call the technical support number that will be posted on the Annual Meeting log-in page.
If you have questions you would like to ask at the Annual Meeting, you will have the opportunity to submit questions during the Annual Meeting by logging into the online meeting platform at http://www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/GVA2026, type your question into the “Ask a Question” field, and click “Submit.” Only shareholders with a valid control number will be allowed to ask questions. We will endeavor to answer as many questions submitted by shareholders as time permits. We reserve the right to edit profanity or other inappropriate language and to exclude questions regarding topics that are not pertinent to the proposals under consideration or otherwise don’t comply with our meeting procedures. If we receive substantially similar questions, we may group such questions together and provide a single response to avoid repetition. If there are appropriate questions pertinent to the proposals under consideration that cannot be answered during the Annual Meeting due to time constraints, management will post answers to a representative set of such questions on our website at www.graniteconstruction.com at the "Investors" site. The questions and answers will be available as soon as practicable after the Annual Meeting.
In the event of technical difficulties with the Annual Meeting, we expect that an announcement will be made on http://www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/GVA2026. If necessary, the announcement will provide updated information regarding the date, time, and location of the Annual Meeting. Any updated information regarding the Annual Meeting will also be posted on the investors page of our website at www.graniteconstruction.com.
62
SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS TO BE PRESENTED AT THE 2027 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
Under Granite's bylaws, director nominations and proposals for other business to be presented at the annual shareholder meeting by a shareholder may be made only if that shareholder is entitled to vote at the meeting, timely gave the required notice, and was a shareholder of record at the time when he or she gave the required notice. The required notice must be in writing, must contain the information specified in our bylaws, and must be received at our principal executive offices, addressed to the Corporate Secretary, no less than 120 days prior to the first anniversary of the date the proxy statement for the preceding year's annual meeting of shareholders was released to shareholders. If no meeting was held in the previous year, the date of the annual meeting is changed by more than 30 calendar days from the previous year, or in the event of a special meeting, to be on time, the notice must be delivered by the close of business on the 10th day following the day on which notice of the date of the meeting was mailed or public announcement of the date of the meeting was made.
Separate from the requirements in our bylaws, you may submit proposals on matters appropriate for shareholder action at our annual meeting of shareholders in accordance with Rule 14a-8 promulgated under the Exchange Act (“Rule 14a-8”). Rule 14a-8 entitles a shareholder to require us to include certain shareholder proposals in Granite's proxy materials if the shareholder meets certain eligibility and timing requirements set forth in Rule 14a-8.
Pursuant to Granite's bylaws and Rule 14a-8, to be considered for inclusion in Granite's proxy statement or otherwise presented at our 2027 annual meeting of shareholders, a shareholder nomination or proposal must be received by our Secretary at Granite's principal executive offices on or before Thursday, December 24, 2026.
To comply with the universal proxy rules, shareholders who intend to solicit proxies in support of director nominees other than Granite’s nominees must provide notice that sets forth the information required by Rule 14a-19 under the Exchange Act no later than April 5, 2027.
63
HOUSEHOLDING
As permitted by the Exchange Act, only one copy of the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or proxy materials is being delivered to shareholders residing at the same address, unless any shareholder has notified us of its desire to receive multiple copies of the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or proxy materials, as applicable. This is known as householding. We will promptly deliver, upon oral or written request, a separate copy of the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or the proxy materials, as applicable, to any shareholder residing at a shared address to which only one copy was mailed. Requests for additional copies of the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or proxy materials, or requests to receive multiple or single copies of the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or proxy materials at a shared address in the future, should be directed to: Granite Construction Incorporated, 585 West Beach Street, Watsonville, California 95076, Attention: Investor Relations Department, Telephone: 831.724.1011.
FORM 10-K
Copies of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025 (excluding exhibits) filed with the SEC are available, without charge, upon written request to Granite Construction Incorporated, 585 West Beach Street, Watsonville, California 95076, Attention: Investor Relations Department. Exhibits to the Annual Report on Form 10-K will be furnished upon payment of a fee of $0.25 per page to cover our expenses in furnishing the exhibits.
OTHER MATTERS
As of the date of this proxy statement, the only matters that management intends to present or knows that others will present at the meeting have been included in this proxy statement. If any other matters are properly presented at the meeting, or any adjournment, your shares will be voted in the discretion of the persons named on your proxy card.
Dated: April 23, 2026
M. Craig Hall Executive Vice President, Chief Legal Officer, Corporate Compliance Officer and Secretary | |||||
64
65
66
67
68