gtn20240323_def14a.htm

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Filed by the Registrant ☒ Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ☐

Check the appropriate box:

☐	Preliminary Proxy Statement

☐	Confidential, For Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

☒	Definitive Proxy Statement

☐	Definitive Additional Materials

☐	Soliciting Material Pursuant to Section 240.14a-12

GRAY TELEVISION, INC.

(Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

N/A
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

☒	No fee required.

☐	Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

☐	Fee computed on table in exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

Meeting to be held on May 8, 2024

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Gray Television, Inc. will be held at 11:30 a.m., Eastern time, on May 8, 2024, at the Company’s corporate headquarters, 4370 Peachtree Road, N.E., Atlanta, Georgia 30319, for the purpose of considering and acting upon:

the election of ten members of Gray Television, Inc.’s Board of Directors;

the ratification of the appointment of RSM US LLP as Gray Television, Inc.’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2024; and

such other business and matters or proposals as may properly come before the meeting.

Only holders of record of Gray Television, Inc. common stock, no par value per share, and Gray Television, Inc. Class A common stock, no par value per share, at the close of business on March 8, 2024 are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the annual meeting. Attendance at the annual meeting is limited to such shareholders and to any invitees of Gray Television, Inc.

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be Held on May 8, 2024.

The Proxy Statement and the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023 are available at www.proxyvote.com.

Your vote is very important. Regardless of whether you plan to attend the annual meeting, we encourage you to vote as soon as possible by one of three convenient methods in order to ensure your shares are represented at the meeting: accessing the internet site listed on the notice of internet availability of proxy materials or proxy card, calling the toll-free number listed on the proxy card, or signing, dating and returning the proxy card in the enclosed postage-paid envelope. Any proxy you give will not be used if you attend the annual meeting and cast your vote in person during the meeting.

By Order of the Board of Directors,

Hilton H. Howell, Jr.
Executive Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Atlanta, Georgia
March 28, 2024

GRAY TELEVISION, INC.
4370 Peachtree Road, N.E.
Atlanta, Georgia 30319

PROXY STATEMENT
For Annual Meeting of Shareholders
to be Held on May 8, 2024

This proxy statement is being furnished by the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Gray Television, Inc., a Georgia corporation (which we refer to as “Gray,” the “Company,” “we,” “us” or “our”), to the holders of shares of each of our common stock, no par value per share (“common stock”), and our Class A common stock, no par value per share (“Class A common stock”), in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the Board for use at our 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the “2024 Annual Meeting”) to be held at the Company’s corporate headquarters, 4370 Peachtree Road, N.E., Atlanta, Georgia 30319, at 11:30 a.m., Eastern time, and at any adjournments or postponements thereof. For directions to the location of the 2024 Annual Meeting, you may contact our corporate offices at (404) 504-9828. Distribution to shareholders of the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”) and this proxy statement and a proxy card is scheduled to begin on or about March 28, 2024.

A proxy delivered pursuant to this solicitation is revocable at the option of the person giving the same at any time before it is exercised. A proxy may be revoked, prior to its exercise, by submitting a later dated vote via the internet or by telephone, by signing and delivering a later dated proxy card, by delivering written notice of the revocation of the proxy to our Corporate Secretary prior to the 2024 Annual Meeting, or by attending and voting at the 2024 Annual Meeting. Attendance at the 2024 Annual Meeting, in and of itself, will not constitute revocation of a proxy. Unless previously revoked, the shares represented by proxy will be voted in accordance with the shareholder’s directions if the proxy is duly submitted prior to the 2024 Annual Meeting.

If you return a signed proxy card that does not indicate your voting preferences, the persons named as proxies on the proxy card will vote your shares FOR the election of each of the director nominees recommended by the Board and FOR the ratification of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, and in accordance with the discretion of the named proxies on any other matters properly brought before the 2024 Annual Meeting.

The expenses associated with this proxy statement and soliciting the proxies sought hereby will be borne by us. In addition to the use of the mail, proxies may be solicited by our officers, directors and employees, who will not receive additional compensation therefor, in person or by telephone or other means of electronic communication. We have retained D.F. King & Co., Inc. to assist with the solicitation of proxies for a fee of $7,000 plus reimbursement of out of pocket expenses. We will also request brokerage firms, banks, nominees, custodians and fiduciaries to forward proxy materials to the beneficial owners of shares of our common stock and our Class A common stock as of the record date for the 2024 Annual Meeting, and will provide reimbursement for the cost of forwarding the proxy materials in accordance with customary practice. Your cooperation in promptly submitting your vote by proxy will help to avoid additional expense.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

VOTING MATTERS	1
PROPOSAL 1 ELECTION OF DIRECTORS	3
PROPOSAL 2 RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF THE COMPANY’S INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR 2024	6
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE	7
STOCK OWNERSHIP	11
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT	41
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION	41
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS	41
DELINQUENT SECTION 16(A) REPORTS	41
AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT	42
OTHER MATTERS	43
SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR INCLUSION IN NEXT YEAR’S PROXY STATEMENT	43
OTHER SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR PRESENTATION AT NEXT YEAR’S ANNUAL MEETING	43
COMPLIANCE WITH UNIVERSAL PROXY RULES FOR DIRECTOR NOMINATIONS	43
AVAILABILITY OF FORM 10-K	43
HOUSEHOLDING	44

GRAY TELEVISION, INC.
4370 PEACHTREE ROAD, N.E.
ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30319

VOTING MATTERS

Record Date and Voting Rights

Our Board has fixed the close of business on March 8, 2024 as the record date (the “Record Date”) for determining holders of our common stock and our Class A common stock entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the 2024 Annual Meeting. Only holders of record of our common stock and/or our Class A common stock at the close of business on that date will be entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the 2024 Annual Meeting. As of the record date, 90,349,144 shares of our common stock and 8,842,764 shares of our Class A common stock were outstanding. Each share of our common stock is entitled to one vote, and each share of our Class A common stock is entitled to ten votes, for each director nominee and each other matter to be acted upon at the 2024 Annual Meeting. Cumulative voting for director nominees is not allowed.

Shareholders of record may vote:

●	by the internet at http://www.proxyvote.com and following the instructions on the Notice or the proxy card;

●	by telephone at 1-800-690-6903 as directed on the proxy card;

●	by completing and mailing the proxy card; or

●	by attending the 2024 Annual Meeting and voting.

Instructions for voting are included on the Notice or the proxy card.

You may revoke your proxy and change your vote by:

●	voting by the internet or telephone on or before 11:59 p.m., Eastern time, on May 7, 2024;

●	signing and properly submitting another proxy with a later date that is received before the polls close at the 2024 Annual Meeting;

●	giving written notice of the revocation of your proxy to the Company’s Corporate Secretary, prior to the 2024 Annual Meeting; or

●	voting in person at the 2024 Annual Meeting.

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the 2024 Annual Meeting

The following information can be found at http://www.proxyvote.com:

●	Notice of Annual Meeting;

●	Proxy Statement;

●	2023 Annual Report on Form 10-K; and

●	Form of Proxy Card.

Quorum

A quorum is necessary to hold a valid 2024 Annual Meeting. A majority of all possible votes, or 89,388,393 votes (including abstentions and broker non-votes (described below)), represented in person or by proxy will constitute a quorum. Votes cast in person or by proxy at the 2024 Annual Meeting will be tabulated by the inspector of elections appointed for the meeting, who also will count such votes to determine whether a quorum is present for the transaction of business.

If a quorum is not present at the scheduled time of the 2024 Annual Meeting, a majority of the shares so represented may adjourn or postpone the 2024 Annual Meeting until a quorum is present. The time and place of the adjourned or postponed 2024 Annual Meeting will be announced at the time the adjournment is taken and, unless such adjournment or postponement is for more than 30 days, no other notice will be given. An adjournment or postponement will have no effect on the business that may be conducted at the 2024 Annual Meeting.

Shares Held by a Bank, Broker or Other Nominee and Broker Non-Votes

If you are the beneficial owner of shares of common stock or Class A common stock held in “street name” by a bank, broker or other nominee, such other party is the record holder of the shares and is required to vote those shares in accordance with your instructions. If you do not give instructions to the record holder, that party will be prohibited from voting your shares on any matter other than with respect to the ratification of the appointment of RSM US LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2024. If you do not provide instructions to the record holder, your shares will be treated as “broker non-votes” with respect to all other proposals voted on at the 2024 Annual Meeting. Additionally, the record holder may elect not to vote your shares with respect to the ratification of our independent registered public accounting firm, in which case your shares would also be treated as “broker non-votes” with respect to that proposal. All “broker non-votes” will be included for purposes of calculating the presence of a quorum, but otherwise will be treated as shares not voted on a proposal.

-1-

Additionally, if you participate in our Capital Accumulation Plan (the “Capital Accumulation Plan”) and have contributions invested in the Company’s common stock or Class A common stock as of the Record Date, your proxy card will also serve as a voting instruction card for the trustee under the Capital Accumulation Plan (the “Capital Accumulation Plan Trustee”). If you do not give instructions to the Capital Accumulation Plan Trustee, the Capital Accumulation Plan Trustee will be prohibited from voting your shares on any matter at the 2024 Annual Meeting and your shares will not be included for purposes of calculating the presence of a quorum.

Required Vote

Director nominees will be elected by a plurality of the votes cast in person or by proxy at the 2024 Annual Meeting, which means that the ten nominees receiving the most votes will be elected. Votes withheld from any nominee will have no effect on the outcome of the election of directors. Abstentions and broker non-votes will not be counted as “votes cast” and, therefore, will have no effect on the outcome of the election of directors.

The ratification of the appointment of RSM US LLP as Gray’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2024 requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast in person or by proxy at the 2024 Annual Meeting. Abstentions and broker non-votes will not be counted as “votes cast” and, therefore, will have no effect on the outcome of this proposal.

With respect to any other matter that may properly come before the 2024 Annual Meeting for shareholder consideration, a matter generally will be approved by the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast in person or by proxy at the 2024 Annual Meeting unless the question is one upon which a different vote is required by express provision of the laws of Georgia, federal law, our Restated Articles of Incorporation (our “Articles”) or our Bylaws (our “Bylaws”), or, to the extent permitted by the laws of Georgia, the Board has expressly provided that some other vote shall be required, in which case such express provisions shall govern.

Board Recommendation

The Board recommends that you vote:

●	“FOR” the election of the ten nominees to the Board to hold office until the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders or until their successors are duly elected and qualified; and

●	“FOR” the ratification of the appointment of RSM US LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2024.

Unexecuted or Unclear Proxies

If you are a record holder and properly execute and return your proxy but do not indicate any voting instructions with respect to one or more matters to be voted upon at the 2024 Annual Meeting, or if your voting instructions are unclear, your shares will be voted in accordance with the recommendation of the Board as to all such matters.

In such event, your shares will be voted FOR the election of all director nominees and FOR the ratification of the appointment of RSM US LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm of the Company for the year ending December 31, 2024, as well as in the discretion of the persons named as proxies on all other matters that may properly come before the 2024 Annual Meeting.

-2-

PROPOSAL 1
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Nominees

The terms of office of all current directors will expire at the 2024 Annual Meeting. Pursuant to our Bylaws and resolutions of the Board, the size of the Board is currently set at ten directors. At the 2024 Annual Meeting, ten directors are to be elected to hold office until our next annual meeting of shareholders and until their successors have been duly elected and qualified. The director nominees are all current directors who have been nominated for election by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.

In case any nominee listed in the table below should be unavailable for any reason, which we have no reason to anticipate, your proxy will be voted for any substitute nominee or nominees who may be selected by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee prior to or at the 2024 Annual Meeting. Alternatively, if no substitute is selected by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee prior to or at the 2024 Annual Meeting, the Board may determine to reduce the membership of the Board to the number of nominees available for election.

Set forth below is information concerning each of the nominees as of March 28, 2024:

Name	Director Since	Age	Position
Hilton H. Howell, Jr.	1993	62	Executive Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Howell W. Newton	1991	77	Lead Independent Director
Richard L. Boger	1991	77	Director
Luis A. Garcia	2016	57	Director
Richard B. Hare	2016	57	Director
Robin R. Howell	2012	59	Director
Donald P. (“Pat”) LaPlatney	2019	64	Director, President and Co-Chief Executive Officer
Lorraine (“Lorri”) McClain	2022	59	Director
Paul H. McTear	2019	75	Director
Sterling A. Spainhour, Jr.	2021	55	Director

Hilton H. Howell, Jr. has served as our Chief Executive Officer since August 2008 and previously served as our President from June 2013 until January 2019. Mr. Howell, who is a member of the Executive Committee of the Board, has been a director since 1993 and served as the Vice Chairman of the Board from 2002 until April 2016 when he was appointed as Chairman and was appointed as Executive Chairman in January 2019. He served as our Executive Vice President from September 2002 to August 2008. He has served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Atlantic American Corporation, an insurance holding company, since 1995, and as Chairman of that company since February 2009. He has been Executive Vice President and General Counsel of Delta Life Insurance Company and Delta Fire & Casualty Insurance Company since 1991. Mr. Howell also serves as a director of Atlantic American Corporation and of each of its subsidiaries, American Southern Insurance Company, American Safety Insurance Company and Bankers Fidelity Life Insurance Company, as well as a director of Delta Life Insurance Company and Delta Fire & Casualty Insurance Company. He is the husband of Robin R. Howell, who is a member of our Board. In addition to the detailed operational knowledge he has gained in his current role as Gray’s Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Howell brings to the Board experience from current and past leadership positions as an executive and his service on numerous boards. Mr. Howell also previously practiced as an attorney in a variety of roles, which experience provides additional perspective to the matters within the purview of the Board.

Howell W. Newton has served as a director since 1991, and as Lead Independent Director since April 2016, and is Chairman of the Audit Committee and a member of each of the Executive Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of our Board. Since December 2015, Mr. Newton has been a Manager of 1899 Management Services, LLC, a real estate and investment company that assumed the assets of Trio Manufacturing Co., a real estate and investment company. Mr. Newton has also served, since October 1996, as Managing General Partner of Willwell LLLP, a family limited liability partnership that owns real estate and financial investments. From 1978 through December 2015, Mr. Newton was President and Treasurer of Trio Manufacturing Co. Mr. Newton’s many years of executive experience with a financial services company provides the Board with considerable financial expertise. His tenure on our Board provides consistent leadership, and his familiarity with Gray’s operations serves as an ongoing resource for issues facing a large, public company.

Richard L. Boger is the Chairman of the Compensation Committee and is also a member of the Executive Committee, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Audit Committee of our Board. Mr. Boger has been President and Chief Executive Officer of Lex-Tek International, Inc., a financial services consulting company, since February 2002. He has also served, between July 2003 and July 2013, as business manager for Owen Holdings, LLLP; since July 2004, as General Partner of Shawnee Meadow Holdings, LLLP; and since March 2006, as business manager for Heathland Holdings, LLLP, each of which is an investment holding company. He has also served, since September 2012, as Trustee for the Boger-Owen Foundation, a 501(c)3 nonprofit under the Internal Revenue Code. He also served from 1993-2022 as a member of the Board of Trustees and Chair of the Audit Committee of CornerCap Group of Funds, a line of mutual funds. In 2021 CornerCap Large/Mid-Cap and CornerCap Balanced Funds converted to Exchange Traded Funds (EFT’s) and on November 18, 2022, the last remaining fund in the series, CornerCap Small Cap Value, was reorganized into the CornerCap Small Cap Value Fund, a series of Managed Portfolio Series by U.S. Bank under its multi-fund Board of Trustees. The CornerCap Group of Funds was dissolved along with the existing Board of Trustees on that date. Mr. Boger brings to the Board extensive managerial and entrepreneurial experience from his position as the Chief Executive Officer of a specialized financial services consulting company, his having founded and sold two commercial insurance services companies, and his service as a partner and business manager in multiple investment companies. His perspective from serving in several industries outside our own, including on the boards of a mutual fund and several nonprofit organizations, provides the Board with an informed resource for a wide range of disciplines and adds a diverse voice to its deliberations.

Luis A. Garcia is a member of the Compensation Committee of the Board. Mr. Garcia has been the President and Lead Strategist of MarketVision, a privately owned, strategic marketing firm focused on understanding diverse audiences, since 2008. Prior thereto, Mr. Garcia served as the managing director of Garcia 360°, an integrated marketing firm which he founded in 1998, until it merged with MarketVision in 2008. The Board believes Mr. Garcia’s entrepreneurial success and considerable strategic marketing experience provide valuable insight and expertise to the Board and allow him to substantively contribute to the vision and growth of the Company.

-3-

Richard B. Hare is the Chairman of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and is also a member of the Audit Committee and the Executive Committee of our Board. Mr. Hare has been the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Haverty Furniture Companies, Inc. (NYSE: HVT), a full service home furnishing retailer, since May 2017. He previously served as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Carmike Cinemas, Inc., one of the largest motion picture exhibitors in the United States, from March 2006 until it was acquired by AMC Entertainment Holdings in December 2016. Prior thereto, Mr. Hare held a number of finance and accounting positions at various entities. Mr. Hare possesses a strong financial management and accounting background, as evidenced by the various senior financial positions held during his career, including his service as an executive vice president and chief financial officer of a public company, which deepen the financial and public company expertise of the Board.

Robin R. Howell is a member of the Executive Committee of our Board. Ms Howell has served as Vice President and a director of both Delta Life Insurance Company and Delta Fire & Casualty Company since 1992. She formerly served as Chairman of the Board of Farmer’s and Merchant’s Bank and as a member of the Board of Directors of Premier Bancshares Inc. She received a BA in Economics from the University of Virginia and a Masters of Business Administration from the University of Texas at Austin, and she has held a number of management and oversight roles in various businesses in which her family has maintained ownership interests since that time. Mrs. Howell is also a member of the board of directors of Atlantic American Corporation. Mrs. Howell is the wife of Mr. Howell. Mrs. Howell is active in the community, serving on the Board of Directors of the High Museum of Art as Chairman and member of the Executive Committee, as a member on the Board of Directors of the Forward Arts Foundation, and as a member of the Junior League of Atlanta. Mrs. Howell’s experience in board matters, and involvement at the executive level in various businesses is invaluable to the Board, and her numerous civic, social and academic associations provide valuable insight to the Company and elevate the Company’s profile in the community.

Donald P. (“Pat”) LaPlatney has served as a director and our President and Co-Chief Executive Officer since January 2019. Immediately prior to the joining the Company, Mr. LaPlatney served between July 2016 and January 2019 as the Chief Executive Officer and President of Raycom Media, Inc. (“Raycom”), a television broadcasting and media company acquired by the Company in January 2019. Mr. LaPlatney also served as a member of the board of directors of Raycom from 2016 until January 2019. Prior to that, he served as Chief Operating Officer of Raycom from April to July 2016, as Senior Vice President from 2012 to April 2016 and as Vice President, Digital Media from August 2007 to 2012. Before joining Raycom in 2007, Mr. LaPlatney held various executive positions at The Tube Media Corp., Westwood One and Raycom Sports. Additionally, Mr. LaPlatney serves as a board member of the National Association of Broadcasters and was previously the Chair of the NBC Affiliate Board. In addition to his operational knowledge in his current role as Gray’s President and Co-Chief Executive Officer, Mr. LaPlatney brings to the Board significant leadership experience in executive roles at Gray and other broadcasting and media organizations, providing valuable insight to the Board and allowing him to contribute to its growth and operations.

Lorraine (“Lorri”) McClain is a member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of our Board. Ms. McClain has served as a director since March 2022. Ms. McClain is currently the President of Reicon Management, Inc., a family investment office. She previously served as the President and Chief Operating Officer of Prestige Communications, Inc., a privately owned cable television operator that served customers in three Mid-Atlantic states, from 1993 to 1999, and as a General Manager of Prestige Cable TV, Inc. from 1992 to 1993. In addition, Ms. McClain is the Chair of the Board of Directors of Anverse Inc., a charitable foundation, a member of the Board of Directors of NSORO, a non-profit organization serving children aging out of foster care, and has long been active in non-profit charitable organizations and philanthropic activities. The Board believes Ms. McClain’s considerable executive and operational experience in the local media industry provides valuable industry-specific insight to the Board allowing her to contribute to its growth and operations, and her numerous philanthropic associations and activities provide valuable insight to the Company and elevate the Company’s profile in the community.

Paul H. McTear is a member of the Compensation Committee of the Board. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. McTear had served as the Chief Executive Officer and President of Raycom from June 2001 until July 2016, and as a member of the board of directors of Raycom from June 2001 until January 2019. He joined Raycom in February 1997 and served as its Chief Financial Officer until he became Chief Executive Officer and President in 2001. Prior to joining Raycom, he served in a variety of executive officer positions at Providence Journal Company, including as Executive Director of Finance of Providence Journal Company’s Broadcasting and Cable Television Division. Mr. McTear was instrumental in the launch of two cable programming networks and has served as a member of the Television Board at the National Association of Broadcasters. The Board believes Mr. McTear’s considerable executive experience in the media and broadcasting space provides essential industry–specific knowledge and expertise to the Board in the regulatory environment in which the Company operates.

Sterling A. Spainhour, Jr. is a member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of our Board. Mr. Spainhour serves as Executive Vice President and Chief Legal Officer of Southern Company (NYSE: SO), one of the nation’s leading energy providers, since April 2023. Prior to that, he served as Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Chief Compliance Officer for Georgia Power, the largest subsidiary of Southern Company, from July 2020 to April 2023. From December 2016 through June 2020 he served as Senior Vice President and General Counsel of Southern Company Services, where he led the legal organization that supports all of Southern Company’s operating subsidiaries. Prior to joining Southern Company, he was a partner at Jones Day, a global law firm, where he practiced law specializing in mergers and acquisitions and corporate governance for over 20 years. The Board believes Mr. Spainhour’s broad experience counseling boards and senior management of publicly traded and private corporations regarding corporate governance, compliance, risk management, and transactional matters enables him to provide the Board an expansive perspective of the legal and business issues pertinent to the growth of the Company.

-4-

Board Composition

Certain highlights of our Board composition following the 2024 Annual Meeting, include the following:

NYSE Independent Nominees		Diversity		Tenure

	Female

		2	0-4 Years	2

	Ethnic Diversity		5-9 Years	4

		2	10+ Years	4

The Board recommends a vote FOR each of the director nominees.

-5-

PROPOSAL 2

RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF THE COMPANY’S
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR 2024

Gray’s independent registered public accounting firm is appointed annually by the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee examines a number of factors when selecting a firm, including the qualifications, staffing considerations, and the independence and quality controls of the firms considered. The Audit Committee has appointed RSM US LLP as Gray’s independent registered public accounting firm to audit our financial statements and our internal control over financial reporting for the year ending December 31, 2024. RSM US LLP has served as Gray’s independent registered public accounting firm since 2006 and is considered by management to be well-qualified.

Shareholder ratification of the selection of RSM US LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm is not required but is being presented to our shareholders as a matter of good corporate practice. Notwithstanding shareholder ratification of the appointment of the independent registered public accounting firm, the Audit Committee, in its discretion, may direct the appointment of a new independent registered public accounting firm if the Audit Committee believes that such a change would be in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders. Should the shareholders not ratify the selection of RSM US LLP as Gray’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2024 under this proposal, it is contemplated that the appointment of RSM US LLP for 2024 will nevertheless be permitted to stand unless the Audit Committee, upon reconsideration, finds other compelling reasons for making a change.

Representatives of RSM US LLP are expected to be present at the 2024 Annual Meeting and, if present, will be given the opportunity to make a statement, if they desire, and to respond to appropriate questions.

Fees

The fees billed by RSM US LLP for 2023 and 2022 were as follows:

	2023 ($)		2022 ($)
Audit fees (1)		1,862,759		1,677,740
Audit-related fees (2)		138,500		105,000
Tax fees		-		-
All other fees (3)		-		26,250
Total		2,001,259		1,808,990

(1)	Audit fees include fees and expenses for the audit of the Company’s financial statements and internal control over financial reporting and fees for quarterly reviews of our reports on Form 10-Q.

(2)	Audit related fees were fees and expenses for audits of our employee benefit plans.

(3)	All other fees were for services provided in connection with various financing activities.

All audit related services, tax services and other non-audit services provided to the Company by RSM US LLP must be, and all such services and the expenses related to such services in 2023 and 2022 were, pre-approved by the Audit Committee, which also concluded that the provision of such services was compatible with the maintenance of RSM US LLP’s independence in the conduct of its auditing functions.

In accordance with its written charter, the Audit Committee reviews and discusses with RSM US LLP, on a periodic basis, any disclosed relationships or services that may impact the objectivity and independence of the independent registered public accounting firm and pre-approves all audit and permitted non-audit services (including the fees and terms thereof) to be performed for us by our independent registered public accounting firm.

The Board recommends a vote FOR the ratification of the appointment of RSM US LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2024.

-6-

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

General

We have adopted a Code of Ethics that applies to all of our directors, executive officers and employees. If any waiver of this Code of Ethics is granted to an executive officer, the waiver will be disclosed in a SEC filing on Form 8-K. Our Code of Ethics and the written charters of our Audit Committee, our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and our Compensation Committee, as well as our Corporate Governance Principles, are available on our website at www.gray.tv in the Investor Relations section under the subheading Governance Documents. All such information is also available in print to any shareholder upon request by telephone at (404) 266-8333.

Determination of Independence

After considering all applicable regulatory requirements and assessing the materiality of each director’s relationship with us, our Board has affirmatively determined that the following current directors are independent in accordance with Sections 303A.02(a) and (b) of the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”) listing standards and the standards set forth in the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the “IRC”) and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”): Messrs. Boger, Garcia, McTear, Hare, Newton and Spainhour and Ms. McClain. In making its independence determinations, the Board considered the following relationships between the Company and its directors, entities associated with directors, or members of their immediate families:

●

Mr. Howell’s status as an executive officer and his family relationships with Mrs. Howell and Mrs. Harriett Robinson, a director emeritus of the Company who is Mr. Howell’s mother-in-law and Mrs. Howell’s mother, and who, together with Mr. and Mrs. Howell, beneficially owns in excess of 46.1% of the outstanding combined voting power of common stock and Class A common stock;

●	Mr. LaPlatney’s status as an executive officer of the Company; and

●	Mrs. Howell’s family relationships with Mr. Howell and Mrs. Robinson.

As a result, our Board has determined that all of the current directors meet the requisite independence standards except: Messrs. Howell and LaPlatney, and Ms. Howell.

Communication with the Board

Gray encourages interested parties to communicate with its Board. Any interested party who wishes to communicate with the Board or with any particular director, including any independent director, may send a letter to our Corporate Secretary, Gray Television, Inc., 4370 Peachtree Road, N.E., Atlanta, Georgia 30319, which communications will be forwarded to the Board by the Company’s Corporate Secretary. Any communication should indicate that you are an interested party and clearly specify that such communication is intended to be made to the entire Board or to one or more particular directors.

Attendance at Annual Meetings

The Board does not have a formal policy with respect to attendance at annual meetings of shareholders, but the Board has historically held a regularly scheduled meeting in connection with each annual meeting of the shareholders, and directors are expected to attend. All director nominees attended the 2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

-7-

Board Leadership Structure

Consistent with our belief that our leadership structure should reflect the best interests of the Company and our shareholders, we have not adopted a written policy with regard to whether or not the positions of Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board should be held by separate individuals. Rather, we believe that the Board should remain free to determine the Company’s oversight and leadership structure from time to time based upon the availability of qualified and competent candidates. Beginning in April 2016, in light of, among other things, the Company’s significant growth and related increase in operational complexity, the desire to ensure effective communication between management and the Board, to provide strong and consistent leadership through a unified voice for the Company, and to help ensure that the Chief Executive Officer understands and can effectively and efficiently oversee the implementation of the recommendations and decisions of the Board, the Board appointed Mr. Howell to the additional role of Chairman of the Board (and then as Executive Chairman in 2019), and appointed Mr. Newton, who is an independent director, to serve in the newly created role of Lead Independent Director of the Board. As Lead Independent Director, Mr. Newton, who also serves on each committee of the Board, among other things:

●	presides over Board meetings in the absence of the Executive Chairman;

●	presides over executive sessions of the independent directors;

●	serves as a liaison between the independent directors and the Executive Chairman and Chief Executive Officer;

●	coordinates with the Executive Chairman and Chief Executive Officer in developing and approving agendas, schedules, and materials for Board meetings; and

●	is available for consultation with significant shareholders.

In accordance with Section 303A.03 of the NYSE listing standards, the independent non-management directors meet in executive sessions without management or non-independent directors present on a periodic basis. This occurred four times during 2023. Mr. Newton, as Lead Independent Director of the Board, presided over these meetings.

Related Party Transactions

With respect to potential transactions with related parties required to be disclosed pursuant to Item 404(a) of Regulation S-K, the Audit Committee charter provides that the Audit Committee must review and approve such transactions in advance after full disclosure of the nature and extent of the related party’s interest in any such transaction. See “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions” for a description of such related party transactions since the beginning of 2023 or that are currently proposed.

Board Committees and Membership

The Board held five meetings during 2023. During 2023, each of the directors attended at least 75% of the meetings of the Board and of all committees of the Board on which such director served.

Our Board has the following committees: the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, and the Executive Committee.

Audit Committee. The purpose of the Audit Committee, which is set forth in its charter, is, among other things, to assist the Board in its oversight of the integrity of the Company’s financial statements; the Company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements; the independent auditor’s qualifications and independence; and the performance of the Company’s internal audit function and independent auditor. The Audit Committee held four meetings during 2023. The current members of the Audit Committee are Messrs. Boger, Hare and Newton (as Chairman). The Board has affirmatively determined that Mr. Hare is an “audit committee financial expert” as that term is defined under applicable SEC rules. The identification of Mr. Hare as an audit committee financial expert does not impose on him any duties, obligations or liabilities that are greater than the duties, obligations and liabilities imposed on the other members of the Audit Committee. The Board has determined that all members of the Audit Committee are independent in accordance with NYSE and SEC rules governing audit committee member independence. The report of the Audit Committee is set forth in this proxy statement under the heading “Report of Audit Committee.”

Compensation Committee. The purpose of the Compensation Committee is to carry out the overall responsibility of the Board relating to executive officer compensation. In carrying out this purpose, the Compensation Committee has the responsibility, as set forth in its charter, to, among other things, establish and review the overall compensation philosophy of the Company; review and approve our goals and objectives relevant to the Chief Executive Officer’s and other executive officers’ compensation; and evaluate the performance of the Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers in light of established goals and objectives and, based on such evaluation, determine and approve compensation of the Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers. The Compensation Committee also administers the Company’s various equity incentive plans. The Compensation Committee held five meetings in 2023. The current members of the Compensation Committee are Messrs. Boger (as Chairman), Garcia, McTear and Newton. The Board has affirmatively determined that all members of the Compensation Committee are independent, in accordance with NYSE, SEC and IRC rules governing independence. The report of the Compensation Committee is set forth in this proxy statement under the heading “Report of Compensation Committee.”

-8-

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The purpose of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, as set forth in its charter, is to, among other things, assist the Board in fulfilling its responsibilities to shareholders by identifying individuals qualified to become directors of the Company, recommending candidates to the Board for all directorships, developing and recommending to the Board an applicable set of corporate governance principles, and overseeing the evaluation of the Board and management. In addition, pursuant to its charter, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is empowered with formal oversight responsibilities of the Company’s commitment to environmental, social and governance (“ESG”) matters. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee held two meetings in 2023. The current members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are Messrs. Boger, Hare (as Chairman), Newton and Spainhour and Ms. McClain. The Board has determined that all members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are independent in accordance with NYSE and SEC rules governing nominating committee independence. In recommending candidates to the Board for nomination as directors, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee strives to identify individuals who bring a unique perspective to Gray’s leadership and contribute to the overall diversity of our Board. Although the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has not adopted a specific written diversity policy for nominations, we believe that a diversity of experience, gender, race, ethnicity and age contributes to effective governance for the benefit of our shareholders. In practice, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers such characteristics together with the other qualities considered necessary by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, such as requisite judgment, skill, integrity and experience. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee does not assign a particular weight to these individual factors. Rather, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee looks for a mix of factors that, when considered along with the experience and credentials of the other candidates and existing directors, will provide shareholders with a diverse and experienced Board. Historically, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has not determined a need to use a recruiting firm to assist with this process.

Executive Committee. The Executive Committee is authorized, subject to any legal or regulatory limits or as specified by the Board, to take such actions between meetings of the Board, as necessary to manage our business affairs, and to facilitate communication and coordination among the senior leadership of our Board. The current members of the Executive Committee are Messrs. Boger, Hare, Howell and Newton and Ms. Howell.

Selection of Director-Nominees

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider recommendations for director nominees submitted by shareholders. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s evaluation of candidates recommended by our shareholders does not differ materially from its evaluation of candidates recommended from other sources. Shareholders wishing to recommend director candidates for consideration by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may do so by writing to our Corporate Secretary, giving the candidate’s name, biographical data, qualifications and all other information that is required to be disclosed under the applicable rules and regulations of the SEC. The foregoing information should be forwarded to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, c/o Corporate Secretary, Gray Television, Inc., 4370 Peachtree Road, N.E., Atlanta, Georgia 30319.

Risk Management

Management of the Company is responsible for the Company’s day-to-day risk management, and the Board serves in an oversight role, including with respect to risk management. The Audit Committee assists the Board in fulfilling this risk management oversight function. The Audit Committee and management of the Company periodically review the Company’s policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management, including major financial risk exposures and the internal controls and procedures in place to manage such risks, as well as the steps that management takes to monitor and control such exposures. In addition, the Audit Committee and the Board consider risk-related matters on an on-going basis in connection with deliberations regarding specific transactions and issues. The Compensation Committee provides oversight of the Company’s risk management processes in the design, implementation and operation of the Company’s incentive compensation policies, practices and plans for executive officers and other employees. The Company believes that the Board’s leadership structure supports the risk oversight function of the Board. Experienced directors chair each of the various committees, there is open communication between management and members of the Board, and the Board is active in fulfilling its oversight role of risk management.

Environmental, Social and Governance

At Gray, the Company operates in alignment with its values to serve its customers, create long-term value for its stockholders, and advance the well-being of its communities. Gray is guided by its principles: commitment to integrity, delivering impact in its research and reporting, and supporting the communities where it lives and works. Today, Gray’s stakeholder-focused strategy is further embedded throughout its business, exhibited by providing opportunities for its people, sustainability in its operations, and responsible business practices.

Both the Board and the executive leadership team at Gray recognize the importance of managing environmental and social risks and opportunities to strengthen long-term financial sustainability. As discussed above, to support these efforts, the Board has empowered the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee with formal oversight responsibilities for ESG matters, pursuant to its charter, including with respect to determining the best oversight structure for the Company and overseeing the Company’s disclosure responsibilities regarding the oversight process and ESG initiatives. The management-level ESG Committee maintains Gray’s ESG strategy and programs and provides regular presentations to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The group consists of executive and senior leaders who oversee Gray’s legal, policy, finance, and risk management functions.

Outlined below are a few highlights of Gray’s approach and performance on its ESG strategy over the past year.

Social Impact

As a local television broadcaster, Gray believes it is both a mission and responsibility to serve its local communities by providing accurate, timely, and unbiased news and information. As the second largest television broadcasting company in the United States, reaching roughly 45 million households, Gray recognizes the responsibility that comes with its impact. The Company does not take lightly its commitment to ensure the accuracy and integrity of its news coverage and programs. As a testament to the quality of its local service, Gray’s television stations comprise the largest portfolio of top-rated local news stations in the country, including 79 number-one ranked television stations (according to Comscore, Inc.). The Company is committed to journalistic integrity, and Gray’s local stations are routinely recognized for their journalistic achievements through local, regional, and national awards. Among the awards, in 2023, Gray television stations received a record 79 regional Edward R. Murrow Awards from the Radio Television Digital News Association—ten stations received the highest honor of overall excellence, five stations were honored for excellence in innovation, four stations were honored for excellence in diversity, equity, and inclusion, and five of the Gray station award recipients went on to take national honors.

-9-

Community Engagement

Gray strives to support and embrace the communities it serves by sponsoring and participating in a wide array of community engagement activities in each of its markets. These include supporting local food banks, education initiatives, and local relief organizations.

In 2023, Gray donated over $322 million in cash contributions, free airtime for public service announcements, and preemption of regularly scheduled programming for matters of greater local importance.

Gray’s People

At Gray, its employees help shape local news and deliver stories that matter. They are the Company’s greatest strength, and Gray seeks to provide an environment that focuses on continual growth, inclusion, and innovation.

Gray’s leadership believes the substantial skills, experience and industry knowledge of its employees and its training programs benefit its operations and performance. There are several ways in which Gray attracts, develops, and retains highly qualified talent, including:

●

Training and investing in Gray’s employees. The growth of Gray’s employees, both professionally and personally, is critical to the Company’s success. Gray offers a variety of training programs, skills development, leadership, and internship opportunities across corporate offices and local stations. In addition, Gray operates a variety of leadership development programs for exceptional employees as well as rising media professionals, students, interns, and fellows. Each year, the Company invests millions of dollars in in-person and virtual training and professional development programs for its employees. Gray’s goal is to continually expand and improve its offerings to meet employees’ needs.

●

Driving a diverse and inclusive culture. To uphold Gray’s commitment to reflect local communities and diverse audiences in its content, the Company strives to ensure that its newsrooms and workplaces embody a diverse and inclusive culture. Gray’s leadership believes inclusion drives innovation and should guide the Company as it builds its teams and business.

For instance, Gray has been working with professional consulting and training teams to support its inclusion efforts since 2019. In 2020, the Company launched a formal inclusion training program specifically targeted for managers. In addition, to expand the reach of our efforts, Gray pivoted to a virtual training series in 2023 conducted by a third-party vendor. To create a cycle of continuous improvement, Gray also created discussion groups of employees with diverse backgrounds and experiences to brainstorm ways the Company can take action for a more inclusive and respectful career experience at Gray.

In February 2022, Gray Media Training Center was established in partnership with WLBT, Gray’s station in Jackson, Mississippi. The Gray Media Training Center teaches students (fellows) best practices in broadcast and digital journalism. By creating these opportunities for students primarily from Historically Black Colleges and Universities in Mississippi, the program helps to improve and expand opportunities. Since the inception of the Gray Media Training Center in the fall of 2022, 45 students have participated in the program, with 13 college graduates accepting jobs at Gray.

Sustainability in Gray’s Operations

In light of the Company’s environmental responsibility, Gray is committed to operating responsibly and efficiently, and to reducing environmental risks, including those related to climate change, associated with its operations. Gray seeks to implement business practices and initiatives that promote sustainability for the good of tomorrow.

The Company continually invests in a number of resource efficiency initiatives and looks for opportunities to make further improvements to its operations. Gray’s ongoing initiatives to reduce energy consumption and related greenhouse gas emissions include:

●	Consolidation of technology core and station operational systems that reduce the electronic footprint needed to operate a television station;

●	Transmitter technology replacements resulting in savings in electricity consumption with newer equipment;

●	Routine replacement of vehicles with more efficient models;

●	Installation of energy-efficient lighting in existing facilities and throughout new builds, especially with regard to studio lighting (reduce and eliminate fluorescent and incandescent lighting); and

●	Installation of new energy-efficient HVAC systems and controls that also eliminate use of previously standard refrigerant elements in order to lessen the impact on ozone layers.

In addition, where possible, Gray seeks to reduce operational waste through reuse, recycling, and other reduction strategies. The Company’s technology and e-waste recycling policies ensure that technical equipment, computers, laptops, monitors, smartphones, tablets, and other aged electronics are responsibly disposed through local partners.

-10-

STOCK OWNERSHIP

The following table sets forth certain information regarding the beneficial ownership of our Class A common stock and our common stock as of March 8, 2024 by (i) any person who is known to us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5.0% of our Class A common stock or our common stock, (ii) our current directors (all of whom are also nominees for director), (iii) each current executive officer named in the Summary Compensation Table below and (iv) all current directors, director nominees, and current executive officers as a group. For purposes of this table, a person is deemed to be a beneficial owner of a security if he or she has or shares the power to vote or to direct the voting of such security, or the power to dispose or to direct the disposition of such security. Accordingly, more than one person may be deemed to be a beneficial owner of the same securities. A person is also deemed to be a beneficial owner of any securities that such person has the right to acquire beneficial ownership of within 60 days. Except as otherwise indicated, the persons named in the table below have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares shown as beneficially owned by them. The information as to beneficial ownership has been furnished by the respective persons listed in the following table. The percentages of each class are based on 90,349,144 shares of common stock and 8,842,764 shares of Class A common stock outstanding as of March 8, 2024. Shares underlying outstanding stock options exercisable within 60 days of such date are deemed to be outstanding for purposes of calculating the percentage owned by such holder.

	Class A Common Stock Beneficially Owned (GTNA)					Common Stock Beneficially Owned (GTN)					Combined Voting Power of Common Stock and Class A Common Stock
Name	Shares		Percent			Shares		Percent			Percent
Richard L. Boger		8,683		*			60,130		*			*
Luis A. Garcia		6,917		*			49,040		*			*
Richard B. Hare		9,607		*			46,788		*			*
Hilton H. Howell, Jr.(1)		4,053,521		45.8	%		1,545,567		1.7	%		23.5	%
Robin R. Howell (2)		4,053,521		45.8	%		1,545,567		1.7	%		23.5	%
Howell W. Newton		22,195		*			84,165		*			*
Donald P. LaPlatney (3)		-		*			999,993		*			*
Lorraine McClain		-		*			29,147		*			*
Paul H. McTear		-		*			89,401		*			*
Harriett J. Robinson (4)		4,958,468		56.1	%		1,635,486		1.8	%		28.7	%
Sterling A. Spainhour, Jr.		-		*			29,294		*			*
Sandra Breland (5)		-		*			352,628		*			*
Kevin P. Latek (6)		53,517		*			686,615		*			*
James C. Ryan (7)		-		*			826,072		*			*
All current directors, director nominees and executive officers as a group (14 persons) (8)		8,113,908		91.8	%		5,601,826		6.2	%		48.5	%
Atlantic American Corporation (9)		880,272		10.0	%		106,000		*			5.0	%
BlackRock, Inc. (10)		-		*			7,324,517		8.1	%		4.1	%
Darsana Capital Partners LP (11)		-		*			5,242,163		5.8	%		2.9	%
Morgan Stanley (12)		-		*			5,149,285		5.7	%		2.9	%
The Vanguard Group (13)		-		*			5,156,292		5.7	%		2.9	%

*	Less than 1%.

(1)

Includes: (a) 81,635 shares of Class A common stock and 81,226 shares of common stock owned by Mr. Howell’s wife directly, as to which shares he disclaims beneficial ownership; (b) 999,000 shares of Class A common stock and 832,500 shares of common stock held in trusts for the benefit of his children, as to which shares he disclaims beneficial ownership; (c) 500 shares of Class A common stock owned by his children as to which shares he disclaims beneficial ownership; and (d) 14,232 shares of common stock held through his 401(k) plan. Also includes 1,652,893 restricted shares of Class A common stock as to which Mr. Howell has voting, but not dispositive, power.

(2)

Includes: (a) an aggregate of 2,972,386 shares of Class A common stock and 631,841 shares of common stock owned directly by Mrs. Howell’s husband or held through his 401(k) plan (including the 1,652,893 restricted shares of Class A common stock included in note (1) above); (b) 500 shares of Class A common stock owned by her children; and (c) 999,000 shares of Class A common stock and 832,500 shares of common stock held in trusts for the benefit of her children. Mrs. Howell disclaims beneficial ownership of all such securities. Also includes 21,642 restricted shares of common stock as to which Mrs. Howell has voting, but not dispositive, power. In addition, this excludes shares beneficially held by Mrs. Robinson as trustee for the benefit of Mrs. Howell, as to which Mrs. Howell has no voting or dispositive power.

-11-

(3)	Includes: (a) 604 shares of common stock held through his 401(k) plan; and (b) 730,367 restricted shares of common stock as to which Mr. LaPlatney has voting, but not dispositive power.

(4)

Includes an aggregate of 2,188,180 shares of Class A common stock and 942,250 shares of the common stock held by various trusts for the benefit of Mrs. Robinson’s daughters or grandchildren, with respect to which Mrs. Robinson serves as trustee. Mrs. Robinson disclaims beneficial ownership of all such securities. Also, this includes an aggregate of 1,728,071 shares of Class A common stock and 216,000 shares of common stock owned by certain entities controlled by Mrs. Robinson, including Atlantic American Corporation. The address for Mrs. Robinson is 4370 Peachtree Road N.E., Atlanta, Georgia 30319.

(5)	Includes: (a) 604 shares of common stock held through her 401(k) plan; and (b) 316,534 restricted shares of common stock as to which Ms. Breland has voting, but not dispositive, power.

(6)	Includes: (a) 2,939 shares of common stock held through his 401(k) plan; and (b) 533,460 restricted shares of common stock as to which Mr. Latek has voting, but not dispositive, power.

(7)	Includes: (a) 15,273 shares of common stock held through his 401(k) plan; and (b) 533,460 restricted shares of common stock as to which Mr. Ryan has voting, but not dispositive, power.

(8)	Includes: (a) 1,652,893 restricted shares of Class A common stock; and (b) 2,286,957 restricted shares of common stock, as to which the directors and executive officers have voting, but not dispositive, power.

(9)

This information is based solely on Gray’s review of a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on December 18, 2019, by Atlantic American Corporation. Bankers Fidelity Life Insurance Company, a wholly owned subsidiary of the company, owns directly 880,272 shares of Class A common stock and 56,000 shares of common stock. American Southern Insurance Co., a wholly owned subsidiary of the company, owns directly 50,000 shares of common stock. The address of Atlantic American Corporation is 4370 Peachtree Road, NE, Atlanta, GA 30319.

(10)	This information is based solely on Gray’s review of a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on January 25, 2024, by BlackRock, Inc. The address of BlackRock, Inc. is 55 East 52nd Street, New York, New York 10055.

(11)

This information is based solely on Gray’s review of a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 14, 2024, by Darsana Capital Partners LP, Darsana Capital Partners GP LLC, Darsana Master Fund LP, Darsana Capital GP LLC and Anand Desai (collectively, “Darsana”). The address of Darsana is 40 West 57th Street, 22nd Floor, New York, New York 10019.

(12)	This information is based solely on Gray’s review of a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 8, 2024, by Morgan Stanley. The address of Morgan Stanley is 1585 Broadway, New York, NY 10036.

(13)	This information is based solely on Gray’s review of a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 13, 2024, by The Vanguard Group. The address of The Vanguard Group is 100 Vanguard Blvd., Malvern, Pennsylvania 19355.

-12-

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Named Executive Officers

The following discussion is focused primarily on the Company’s compensation philosophy, policies and programs as they relate to, and amounts paid or payable to, our executive officers for their services during 2023. Those executive officers consist of the following individuals, who are referred to as our “named executive officers” or the “NEOs”:

Name	Executive Officer Since	Age		Position
Hilton H. Howell, Jr.	2000		62	Executive Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Donald P. (“Pat”) LaPlatney	2019		64	President and Co-Chief Executive Officer
James C. (“Jim”) Ryan	1998		63	Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
Kevin P. Latek	2012		53	Executive Vice President, Chief Legal and Development Officer and Secretary
Sandra (“Sandy”) Breland	2023		61	Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer

Philosophy and Elements of Compensation Program

The goals of our executive compensation program are to attract, retain, motivate and reward our executive officers. We believe that the most appropriate executive compensation program is one that is competitive, yet conservatively designed, and that aligns long-term compensation with the creation of shareholder value and good corporate governance.

We have designed our executive compensation program to reflect the following best practices:

What We Do	What We Don’t Do
● Provide pay opportunities that are appropriate to the size and scale of the Company;	● Pay dividends or dividend equivalents on unearned equity awards;
● Disclose financial performance metrics and goals used in our incentives programs;	● Allow repricing or backdating of stock options without shareholder approval;
● Provide only limited perquisites;	● Provide excise tax gross ups;
● Maintain meaningful executive stock ownership and retention guidelines;	● Allow executive officers to hedge Company stock;
● Annually review the risk profile of compensation programs and maintain risk mitigators;	● Provide special supplemental executive retirement programs; and
● Provide moderate change-in-control protection;	● Provide tax gross-ups on perquisites.
● Require double-trigger change-in-control vesting on long-term equity awards;
● Maintain a NYSE-compliant clawback policy providing for recovery of erroneously awarded cash or equity-based compensation in connection with a financial restatement;
● Retain an independent compensation consultant engaged by, and who reports directly to, the Compensation Committee; and
● Align pay with performance, as a majority of compensation is performance–based.

-13-

The overall compensation program for our executive officers is designed to provide the Compensation Committee with the flexibility to offer a combination of cash (both fixed and incentive-based) and equity-based compensation opportunities in order to retain, motivate and reward our executive officers, as well as to align their interests with those of our shareholders. To accomplish these goals, the Compensation Committee strives to achieve an appropriate level of compensation in order to:

●	motivate our executive officers to deliver superior performance in the short-term by providing competitive base salary increases, and annual incentive opportunities based upon satisfying specific achievements;

●	align the interests of our executive officers with the long-term interests of our shareholders through the grant of equity-based compensation that offers market–competitive, long–term compensation opportunities, with the potential for enhanced compensation in extraordinary circumstances;

●	provide upside and downside risk aligned with other shareholders through meaningful stock ownership by our executive officers;

●	provide an overall compensation package that promotes retention of our executives and is aligned with the defined target market position; and

●	in exceptional circumstances, reward extraordinary performance with special one-time awards.

The primary components of our executive compensation and benefit programs are summarized in the following table:

Program Element		Purpose/Objective
Fixed	Base Salary	● Provide a base level of compensation that is competitive in relation to the responsibilities of each executive’s position in order to attract and retain the talent needed to successfully manage our business and execute our strategies, and reward individual performance
At Risk	Annual Non-Equity Incentive Opportunity Long-Term Equity Incentive Opportunity	● Promote the achievement of the Company’s annual strategic, operational and financial goals ● Align the interests of executives with those of our shareholders ● Motivate and reward executives based upon our success in delivering superior value to our shareholders ● Retain the executive talent necessary to successfully manage our business and execute our strategies
Benefits	Retirement Programs Perquisites	● Reward employees through retirement savings opportunities and provide a competitive level of benefits consistent with market practices ● Provide limited additional benefits consistent with competitive practices ● Increase efficiencies and allow more productive use of NEOs’ time and therefore greater focus on company–related activities
	Post-Termination Compensation and Benefits	● Attract and retain high-quality executives by providing a reasonable level of financial stability in the event of involuntary termination

-14-

Overview of 2023 Performance and Compensation

During 2023, despite the challenging macroeconomic environment, our Company continued to perform well, made significant progress operationally, and continued to return capital to our shareholders through quarterly dividends. We relentlessly pursued and achieved key operational and strategic objectives for the year, including renewing and extending all of our CBS and NBC affiliation agreements, strategically managing our indebtedness, expanding, as well as launching new content initiatives, and driving new core advertising sales initiatives.

The Compensation Committee’s philosophy and decisions during 2023 continued to be driven by the objectives of motivating our executive officers and recognizing them for their unwavering efforts and leadership. The Committee in particular recognized the positive long-term developments that the Company and its executives were able to achieve during the year.

Consistent with the approach in prior years, actual compensation paid in and for 2023 was intended to reward a number of significant achievements, particularly in light of the Company’s overall, and each individual officer’s, performance in successfully executing on our operational and strategic objectives, and positioning the Company for long-term success. The Committee believes the Company’s performance in 2023 resulted from not only the extraordinary strategic leadership of senior management, but also their operational successes, all of which continued to contribute to building long-term value for the Company’s shareholders, including, but not limited, to the following:

●

Achieving core revenue growth that surpassed our peers in each quarter during 2023 due to our strong operations, strategic sales initiatives and training;

●

achieving broadcast cash flow of $912 million for 2023, which was a 12% increase from 2021, the most recent “off-year” of the two year political advertising cycle;

●

continuing to rank first among television broadcast affiliate groups in portfolio quality based upon station rankings in their respective markets;

●

successful renewals of our affiliation agreements with our two largest network partners, CBS and NBC, which together represent roughly two-thirds of our Big Four network channels;

●

continued success in developing and implementing original programming and content as well as new strategic programming initiatives, which included continuing to expand our Local News Live product and our growing Telemundo station group, creating the industry’s first in-house news research and consulting group, and launching the InvestigateTV+ weekday magazine program;

●

executing historic sports initiatives in which we secured long-term broadcast rights to the NBA team in one of our largest markets as well as numerous broadcast rights deals for limited runs of NBA games previously on regional sports networks, recaptured sports broadcasting rights for the Atlantic Coast Conference from Diamond Sports Group, and created statewide sports networks in Georgia and elsewhere;

●

strategically managing our indebtedness, including by securitizing our accounts receivable to maximize repayment opportunities of our outstanding long-term debt and entering into interest rate cap agreements;

●

executing a swap of stations that facilitated our ability to offer statewide sports and other programming in Georgia;

●

further strengthening our operational efficiency and our overall balance sheet through our financial performance and disciplined financial management; and

●

substantially completing construction of the Assembly Atlanta studio facilities, which are now beginning to generate revenue that is expected to provide additional diversification from our broadcasting operations.

As a result of these and other accomplishments by management throughout 2023, the annual non-equity incentive compensation program paid out at 146% of target for each of the NEOs, in recognition of both overall exceptional performance of the Company as well as the individual contributions of each of the executive officers during the year.

-15-

A majority of total compensation (base salary, non-equity incentive compensation paid and long-term equity incentive awards granted) in 2023 is considered “at risk”, meaning that the compensation either is subject to stock price volatility or would only be earned by the Company or the individual meeting annual performance goals. The composition of “at risk” pay in 2023 for the NEOs was as follows:

Compensation Framework: How We Make Decisions

Role of the Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee of the Board maintains responsibility for establishing, reviewing and implementing our overall executive compensation philosophy. The Compensation Committee also administers our executive compensation programs through the development, evaluation and implementation of compensation plans, policies and arrangements for our executive officers; the approval of the compensation of each of our Named Executive Officers; and by administering our equity incentive plans. The Compensation Committee consists of four members of our Board: Messrs. Boger (as Chairman), Garcia, McTear and Newton. The Board has affirmatively determined that all members of the Compensation Committee are independent in accordance with applicable NYSE, SEC and IRC rules governing independence.

Role of the Independent Compensation Consultant

In evaluating, developing and implementing a compensation framework, policies and awards, the Compensation Committee works closely with an independent compensation consultant. The Compensation Committee directly hires, and has sole authority to terminate, the compensation consultant and to determine the terms and conditions of their engagement. The compensation consultant reports directly to the Compensation Committee.

-16-

For 2023, the Compensation Committee again engaged Meridian Compensation Partners, LLC (“Meridian”), a leading compensation consulting firm, as its compensation consultant to advise the Compensation Committee in connection with the development and ongoing implementation of Gray’s compensation philosophy, policies and practices, including through:

●	striving to ensure an appropriate benchmarking of compensation for each executive based on his role, as compared to market data for similar roles within the Company’s peer group, including an annual review, and updates where appropriate to that peer group, described below;

●	establishing goals under the Company’s annual non-equity incentive compensation program based on achievement of defined quantitative financial metrics, as well as qualitative goals and objectives established in the first quarter of the fiscal year;

●	evaluating developments at the Company, in the television broadcast industry and the macro-economy to ensure the Company’s incentive compensation program operates effectively and provides appropriate compensation and retention incentives to the executives; and

●	applying appropriately updated methodologies and market data in making incentive compensation decisions, all as described below.

The Compensation Committee takes steps to monitor and manage the independence of its compensation consultant, and as part of that process annually reviews the role and responsibilities of the compensation consultant and considers the independence factors established by the SEC related to conflicts of interest. As a result of the policies and procedures in place with respect to its compensation consultant, the Compensation Committee believes that Meridian is able to provide candid, direct and objective advice to the Compensation Committee that is not influenced by management. Meridian does not have a relationship with, nor in 2023 did it provide any services to, the Company or the Compensation Committee other than in connection with the engagement as described above. As a result, the Compensation Committee believes that Meridian is fully independent for purposes of serving as the Compensation Committee’s compensation consultant.

Role of Executive Officers

At the request of the Compensation Committee, Mr. Howell, the Company’s Executive Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, often participates in meetings of the Compensation Committee to provide input and answer questions related to management, business objectives and the performance of Gray and its executive officers. Mr. Howell presents individual pay recommendations for each of the NEOs, other than himself, and provides updates to the Committee on individual and Company performance as it relates to incentive plan progress. Neither Mr. Howell nor any other employee of the Company is present when the Compensation Committee meets in executive session to make executive officer compensation decisions.

Mr. Latek and Mr. Ryan may also participate in Compensation Committee meetings at the request of the Committee from time to time to provide input and recommendations for consideration of elements of program design and factors to be considered in establishing incentive compensation objectives.

Consideration of Say-On-Pay Vote and Related Matters

Since the adoption of the Dodd-Frank Act, Gray’s shareholders have been given the right to vote to approve, on an advisory, non-binding basis, the compensation of Gray’s NEOs at specified intervals. At Gray’s 2023 Annual Meeting, the shareholders approved a proposal providing that the shareholders would continue to vote on such compensation every three years. Gray’s shareholders had the opportunity to consider and vote to approve, on a non-binding advisory basis, the compensation of Gray’s NEOs at Gray’s 2023 Annual Meeting and will be provided another opportunity to vote on such compensation at our 2026 Annual Meeting. At Gray’s 2023 Annual Meeting, approximately 85% of the votes cast on our advisory say-on-pay proposal were voted to approve the compensation paid to our NEOs. As a result of the significant level of approval, we continued to apply similar principles to our executive compensation decisions for fiscal year 2023.

Since 2017, the Compensation Committee has engaged Meridian to assist in evaluating our executive compensation program structure and governance processes, and continually reviews the goals, elements and operation of our compensation programs, and takes into account say-on-pay voting results. From time to time, the Compensation Committee also engages in dialogue or obtains other feedback about our compensation programs from key shareholders.

-17-

What We Have Heard		How We Have Responded
Concerns over discretionary bonus payouts despite failure to meet performance thresholds under the program		● Reviewed annual non-equity incentive program design relative to peers to better understand the competitive landscape ● Redesigned annual non-equity incentive program to include qualitative factors in the program in lieu of prior periodic awards outside of the program formula on a discretionary basis ● Added an individual performance multiplier (beginning in 2018) to enable differentiation based on individual contributions
Lack of transparency in proxy disclosure related to annual incentive program performance		● Continually enhance our Compensation Discussion and Analysis disclosure to help readers better understand the compensation program features, rationale for metric selection, impact of prospective changes made and are able to tie overall business strategy to pay results
Lack of performance-vesting criteria on equity grants		● Added performance vesting criteria to the long-term incentive equity award for our CEO in 2018, for our Co-CEO when he joined the Company in 2019, and for the other NEO positions beginning in 2022.
No risk mitigators in place		● Adopted stock ownership guidelines for executive officers (in 2018) and directors (in 2018) to promote stock ownership and ensure alignment with shareholders ● Adopted a clawback policy (in 2018) for bonus or incentive payments in the event that a restatement adversely impacts performance metrics or targets used to determine payouts of incentive awards, in order to mitigate compensation-related risks ● Adopted an additional clawback policy (in 2023) that complies with the NYSE requirements, and provides for recovery of erroneously awarded cash or equity-based compensation in connection with a financial restatement ● Adopted an anti-hedging policy (in 2018) that prohibits directors and executive officers from engaging in derivative or hedging transactions involving the Company’s securities ● Moved from single trigger to double trigger change-in-control vesting restrictions (in 2018) for equity awards to motivate the executives to maximize any transaction value for the longer term
Other governance items of interest		● Implemented a change-in-control severance plan (which excludes excise tax gross-ups) given industry consolidation and a desire to maintain continuity of executive team in the event of such a transaction ● Annually evaluate, and revise when appropriate, compensation benchmarking peer group to include companies that more closely align to the broadcasting industry

These ongoing efforts by the Compensation Committee have resulted in refinements to the compensation programs in an effort to:

●	Increase transparency through enhanced disclosure;

●	Limit discretionary payouts, particularly when performance thresholds are not achieved;

●	Increase individual accountability;

-18-

●	More closely align to market practice, both in quantum and in plan design;

●	Focus on the achievement of specific quantitative and qualitative performance objectives;

●	Mitigate excessive risk taking; and

●	Promote equity ownership.

We value our shareholders’ input, and our goal is to continue to enjoy strong shareholder support for our compensation programs by designing our compensation programs to support our overall compensation philosophy and to align with the creation of shareholder value. The Compensation Committee is committed to continuing to seek investor feedback on executive compensation issues and to design and implement compensation programs that not only serve to attract, incent and retain our key executive officers but also serve the long-term interests of our shareholders.

Determining Competitive Practices

The Compensation Committee, with the assistance of Meridian, has identified, and evaluates the compensation policies and practices of, a peer group for purposes of determining appropriate compensation structure, types and amounts for our executive officers. Specifically, for 2023, the Compensation Committee used the peer group for relevant executive compensation comparisons such as market valuations of similar positions, and benchmarked certain compensation amounts and opportunities for each executive officer to market data for executives performing similar roles at peer group companies.

As part of the Compensation Committee’s periodic review and analysis of the peer group it evaluates, in late 2022 the Compensation Committee, with the assistance of its compensation consultant and executive officers, evaluated the existing peer group and concluded that there had not been any significant changes to the Company, or to the peer group, that would necessitate a change in the peer group for 2023. As a result, the following compensation peer group, which had also been used for 2022, was considered in developing benchmarking data for each of the executive officers for 2023 compensation decisions:

AMC Networks Inc.	Gannett Co., Inc.	Nexstar Media Group, Inc.
Audacy, Inc.	IAC/InterActive Corp	Sinclair Broadcast Group, Inc.
The E.W. Scripps Company	iHeartMedia, Inc.	TEGNA, Inc.
Fox Corporation	The New York Times Company

The Compensation Committee believes that the use of peer group benchmarking for determining executive compensation is appropriate and provides relevant data to help the Compensation Committee execute on its compensation philosophy.

Process for Establishing Executive Officer Total Compensation

Peer group data is one of many inputs used by the Compensation Committee when establishing pay levels for the Company’s NEOs. In establishing NEO compensation levels for 2023, the Compensation Committee, with input from the Company’s Executive Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (with respect to the other executive officers) and its independent compensation consultant, considered and evaluated historical and expected executive performance, peer group compensation metrics, internal pay equity considerations and a competitive market study prepared by the compensation consultant.

Compensation Decisions Made for 2023

Base Salary

The base salary element of our executive compensation program provides each NEO with a fixed amount of annual cash compensation, intended to ensure an appropriate amount of financial certainty. Salaries for the NEOs are generally subject to annual review and adjustment by the Compensation Committee based on the size and complexity of the Company and its operations, the scope of each individual executive’s role, the knowledge and experience of the individual executive, the competitiveness of the executive’s total compensation as compared to the peer group, the performance of the incumbent and other factors.

-19-

Consistent with its practice of making initial compensation decisions for a fiscal year in the first quarter of each year, the Compensation Committee approved base salaries for our NEOs (other than Ms. Breland) for 2023 at meetings held in March and early April 2023. Ms. Breland was promoted to Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer, on May 22, 2023 following the retirement of her predecessor in that position. The Compensation Committee approved her base salary (and other elements of her compensation) at the time of her promotion. At that time, and after consideration of the factors described above, the Compensation Committee approved the following base salary increases for each of the NEOs to more closely align with the competitive market and desired pay positioning, to recognize the growth in the business and to reward individual performance contributions to the Company:

Name	2022 Base Salary ($)		2023 Base Salary ($)		% Increase
Hilton H. Howell, Jr.		1,350,000		1,458,000		8	%
Donald P. LaPlatney		1,150,000		1,242,000		8	%
James C. Ryan		825,000		891,000		8	%
Kevin P. Latek		825,000		891,000		8	%
Sandra Breland (1)		–		775,000		-

(1) Sandra Breland was promoted to Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Offer on May 22, 2023. Her base salary was established, with payment to be prorated accordingly, as of that date.

The Compensation Committee’s practice is to continue to monitor the named executive officers’ base salaries, and make adjustments from time to time as appropriate.

Annual Non-Equity Incentive Compensation Program

The objective of our annual non-equity incentive compensation program is to focus executive officers on attaining specific short-term financial and operational goals that contribute to the long-term success of our business. The annual non-equity incentive compensation program is designed to reward achievement for both Company performance as well as individual performance, when warranted.

In 2023, the overall program design was similar to 2022, with 60% of the target opportunity earned based on performance against select quantitative financial metrics and 40% earned based on performance against qualitative goals that focus on operational and strategic metrics. Goals are typically determined at the Compensation Committee’s regularly scheduled meeting in the first quarter of each year after a review of financial and other performance data from the prior year and certain internally forecasted financial information. The quantitative metrics are designed to provide focus and certainty for management in striving to achieve pre-established financial goals that will lead to overall company success. Qualitative performance metrics will generally be chosen from those the Compensation Committee deems appropriate to motivate the Company’s executive officers towards the achievement of performance-based objectives that are in the Company’s long-term best interests. The program is designed with the ability to modify the payout of the award +/- 25% based upon individual performance, if warranted, but not to exceed the overall maximum payout amount of 200% of target.

Quantitative Performance Metrics (60% weight)

For 2023, the Compensation Committee again selected the following three quantitative metrics against which to measure performance - which are considered by management to be critical factors in driving revenue and profitability for the Company:

Revenue Net of Acquired Stations and Political (weighted 15%)

● Calculated as total revenue net of agency commissions, and excluding revenue from any stations acquired in the current year and political advertising revenue.

Revenue from Acquired Stations and Political (weighted 15%)

● Defined as total revenues (net of agency commissions) from any stations acquired in the current year and political advertising revenue.

Broadcast Cash Flow Net of Completed Transactions and Political Revenue (weighted 30%)

● Defined as net income plus loss on early extinguishment of debt, non-cash corporate and administrative expenses, non-cash stock-based compensation, depreciation and amortization (including amortization of intangible assets and program broadcast rights), any loss on disposal of assets, any miscellaneous expense, interest expense, any income tax expense, non-cash 401(k) expense, less any gain on disposal of assets, any miscellaneous income, any income tax benefits and payments for program broadcast rights.

-20-

For each performance metric, the target performance goal under the Company’s annual non-equity incentive compensation program is aligned with the Company’s internal business plan and annual budget (except that for any acquired stations, 80% of the budgeted revenue for any such acquired stations would be established as the target), all as approved by the Compensation Committee. Threshold goals were established at 80% of the applicable target so that a minimum level of performance was required to be achieved before any incentive payment would be awarded, with a significant reduction to the incentive eligible to be earned if results were below target. Maximum award levels were established at achievement of 110% of target levels, as the Compensation Committee believed this represented an appropriate amount of stretch for the goals.

The Compensation Committee sets the threshold, target and maximum criteria at the start of each fiscal year to ensure that an appropriate degree of difficulty is incorporated into the goals. In addition, and in order to minimize the potential for changes in goals throughout the year, performance for determining award eligibility is evaluated excluding the results of any divested operations.

The following goals were established in early April 2023 for the 2023 year:

Financial Performance Metrics	Threshold ($)		Target ($)		Maximum ($)
	(in thousands)
Revenues (net of acquired stations and political advertising)		2,632,771		3,290,964		3,620,060
Revenues (political advertising and acquired stations)		37,439		46,799		51,479
Broadcast cash flow (net of completed acquisitions and political advertising revenue during the year)		741,609		927,011		1,019,712

Actual performance levels between threshold and target, or between target and maximum, are used to determine actual incentive awards. For purposes of calculating amounts payable under the annual non-equity incentive compensation program, actual Company performance compared to goal performance for each of the metrics was independently determined and calculated.

Qualitative Performance Metrics (40% weight)

As described above, the Compensation Committee believes that in light of, among other things, management’s efforts in developing and executing on operational and strategic objectives, including the successful continued growth of the Company through acquisitions, the increasing scope and complexity of the Company’s operations, and the range of contributions the executive officers make to enhancing the Company’s business operations and long-term value for shareholders, it is appropriate to include certain non-quantitative Company performance metrics (collectively the “qualitative metrics”) for purposes of determining performance under the annual non-equity incentive compensation program. Specifically, the qualitative metrics approved for measurement purposes in 2023, as in 2022, were weighted at 40% of the total award opportunity and were comprised of a mix of absolute and relative factors that the Compensation Committee identified as important measures of success in achieving the Company’s long-term goals.

-21-

The qualitative metrics established for 2023 consisted of the following five absolute measures of the Company’s performance: (1) growth in total revenues (net of agency commissions) of 3% or more; (2) growth in broadcast cash flow; (3) growth in enterprise value (i.e., the sum of the Company’s outstanding debt plus equity value) of 5% or more; (4) effective balance sheet and capital structure management and prudent decision making regarding debt structure and accessing capital markets; and (5) development and implementation of original programming and content and strategic programming initiatives.

In addition, the qualitative metrics included for 2023 consisted of the following relative factors by which the Company’s performance would be measured in comparison to the following television station groups: Sinclair, Nexstar, E. W. Scripps, and TEGNA; and privately-owned Cox Media Group, Graham Media Group and Hearst Corporation:

●

the Company’s ratio of earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) to total revenues (net of agency commissions);

●

the number of individual transactions involving the acquisition of local television stations, in each case including stations ranked first or second in the local market, in new markets and additional television stations in existing markets;

●

the percentage of operating markets with the first and/or second ranked television station;

●

leadership in retransmission rates among peer companies; and

●

strategic and long-term planning.

In considering and evaluating satisfaction of the qualitative factors, the Compensation Committee may also consider various factors that require significant effort of the management team but are not necessarily encompassed in the above list, such as quality of viewing, significant debt refinancing, equity raises, completion and successful integration of large scale acquisitions, stock price performance, short- and/or long-term growth in market capitalization, and other significant activities that position the Company for long-term stability and/or growth.

Annual Award Opportunities

Annual non-equity incentive compensation program payout opportunity levels are established to provide each NEO with a market-competitive incentive opportunity linked to achievement of the pre-determined financial goals, qualitative metrics and individual performance. Consistent with the Company’s overall compensation philosophy, annual non-equity incentive compensation program award opportunity levels (as a percentage of base salary) approved by the Compensation Committee for the NEOs for 2023 were as follows:

	Annual Incentive Opportunity
	Threshold		Target		Maximum
Hilton H. Howell, Jr.		75%		150%		300%
Donald P. LaPlatney		50%		100%		200%
James C. Ryan		50%		100%		200%
Kevin P. Latek		50%		100%		200%
Sandra Breland		45%		90%		180%

At the Compensation Committee’s regularly scheduled meeting in the first quarter of 2024, the achievement of financial goals for 2023 were certified, with resulting payouts approved following the Compensation Committee’s review of the Company’s financial results for the prior fiscal year. The Committee also reviewed certain publicly available information, data available from third parties, and internal proprietary data to assess the Company’s performance with respect to the qualitative metrics. Following careful consideration of all the information, the Committee concluded that on an overall basis the Company surpassed the goals set for the 2023 qualitative metrics by satisfying essentially all of the identified metrics, despite the macroeconomic challenges facing the Company during 2023. In particular, the Company surpassed each of the five absolute metrics, and it generally ranked at the highest levels among industry peers in nearly all of the relative metrics included in the qualitative metrics analysis.

-22-

After assessing each qualitative objective, as well as reviewing additional factors that were deemed appropriate, the Compensation Committee determined that qualitative metric portions of the annual incentive compensation would be scored at 190% of target payout for that component. Total quantitative and qualitative metric amounts for the annual incentive compensation to each NEO were awarded as follows:

Financial Performance Metric	% Weight		Target (in thousands) ($)		Final Results (in thousands) ($)		% Of Target Performance		% of Target Payout
Revenues (Net of Political + Acquired Stations)		15%		3,290,964		3,199,146		97%		93%
Revenues (Political + Acquired Stations)		15%		46,799		78,588		168%		200%
Broadcast Cash Flow		30%		927,011		824,096		89%		72%
Qualitative Metrics		40%	Scored Above Target							190%
Total payout (as % of target)										142%

Based upon the foregoing performance metrics, the annual short-term incentive opportunity award for 2023 would have paid out at 142% of target, but after giving effect to individual performance adjustments provided for under the terms of the awards, based upon consultation with the Chief Executive Officer, the total payout for each of the NEOs was 146% of target.

The Committee did not exercise discretion outside of the terms of the incentive plan to further adjust payouts based on individual performance for 2023. Individual incentive payouts are reported in the Summary Compensation Table found on page 28.

Long-Term Equity Incentive Awards

The decision to grant, and the amounts of, equity-based long-term incentive awards, on an annual basis or otherwise, is generally a discretionary process. In undertaking this decision-making process, the Compensation Committee considers a number of factors, including, but not limited to the following:

●	the amount and value of recent equity-based awards;

●	recent historical Company performance, determined by reference to stock price or other appropriate financial metric;

●	expected short and longer-term Company performance in light of internal budgets or forecasts; and

●	the overall competitiveness of current compensation levels when considered against an appropriate peer group.

In the event equity-based long-term incentive awards are granted, it has been the historical practice that award levels are also established at the Compensation Committee’s discretion, as opposed to being made with a formulaic approach such as is used to provide annual non-equity incentive compensation opportunities.

In order to be able to provide awards intended to further align the interests of our executive officers, and other key employees, with the interests of our shareholders through stock price appreciation, we established, and at our 2022 Annual Meeting the Company’s shareholders approved, the Gray Television, Inc. 2022 Equity and Incentive Compensation Plan (the “2022 EICP”). The 2022 EICP allows for the grant of various types of equity awards, including performance shares, restricted shares and stock options. If stock options are granted, it is our practice to grant options with an exercise price equal to the closing price of the underlying class of our stock on the date of grant.

Since 2018, the structure of the long-term incentive awards granted to our Executive Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and since 2019 to the President and Co-Chief Executive Officer, has been 50% of the equity award in the form of shares of time-based restricted stock that vest in increments over three years, and 50% of the equity award in the form of shares of performance-based restricted stock that vest based on the satisfaction of performance criteria over the three-year period.

-23-

In connection with considering long-term incentive awards that were made in February 2022, the Compensation Committee, in an effort to continue to ensure that the NEOs compensation is well-aligned with the long-term interests of our shareholders and that our long-term incentive structure includes a performance-based component for all of our NEOs, determined to align the structure of the long-term incentive awards for each NEO going forward with the structure currently in place for our Executive Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and for our President and Co-Chief Executive Officer.

2023 Long-Term Incentive Award Opportunities

In accordance with the factors and considerations described above, in 2023, the structure of the long-term incentive awards granted to each of our NEOs were as follows:

●

50% of the equity award was granted in restricted shares of Class A common stock for Mr. Howell, and restricted shares of common stock for each of Messrs. LaPlatney, Ryan and Latek and Ms. Breland, all of which vests in increments based on each officer’s respective continued employment on each of the first, second and third anniversaries of the grant; and

●

50% of the equity award was granted in shares of performance-based restricted shares of Class A common stock for Mr. Howell, and of common stock for each of Messrs. LaPlatney, Ryan and Latek and Ms. Breland, which in each case can be earned in a range of 0% to 200% of the initial shares awarded, at the end of the three year period following the grant date, based upon the average percent of target payout earned based on Company performance under the annual non-equity incentive program in 2022, 2023 and 2024. The earned number of shares initially awarded will vest, and shares earned in excess of the target amount will be paid out, at the end of the three-year period once satisfaction of the performance objective has been certified by the Compensation Committee. In the event that the threshold performance criteria is not satisfied, then the performance-based restricted shares would be forfeited.

After taking into account recent historical Company performance, recent years’ equity incentive awards and the overall value of the NEOs’ respective target compensation levels, in April 2023 the Compensation Committee approved (for all NEOs other than Ms. Breland, whose awards were approved upon her promotion in May 2023) long-term equity incentive (“LTI”) awards with the following values (as a percent of base salary):

Name		LTI % of Base Salary
Hilton H. Howell, Jr.		400%
Donald P. LaPlatney		200%
James C. Ryan		200%
Kevin P. Latek		200%
Sandra Breland		180%

See “Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2023” for additional information, including the amount and grant date fair value of shares awarded.

Payouts of 2021 Long-Term Incentive Grants – CEO and Co-CEO Awards

In February 2024, the Compensation Committee certified that the performance criteria with respect to the performance-based long-term restricted stock awards that had been granted to each of Mr. Howell and Mr. LaPlatney in February 2021 had been achieved, and that they each had earned those shares, all of which vested in accordance with their terms. The number of performance shares actually earned was based on the performance of Gray Television over the three-year performance period ending on December 31, 2023. Consequently, the Compensation Committee approved a total payout to Mr. Howell of 132,006 shares and to Mr. LaPlatney of 66,507 shares, each representing 137% of the target amount of the performance-based stock awards) based on the three-year average target payout achieved (excluding the impact of any individual performance adjustment) under the Annual Non-Equity Incentive Compensation Program. The full amount of the shares received under the 2021 Long-Term Incentive Awards were settled in shares of Class A common stock for Mr. Howell and of Common Stock for Mr. LaPlatney.

-24-

Retirement Plans and Other Benefits

Capital Accumulation Plan

Our NEOs, and all of our other employees, are eligible to participate in the Gray Television, Inc., Capital Accumulation 401(k) Plan (the “Capital Accumulation Plan”). Under the Capital Accumulation Plan employees are eligible to defer a part of their current income under the provisions of Section 401(k) of the IRC. Participants may elect to make pre-tax deferrals from their compensation each year, subject to annual limits on such deferrals imposed by the IRC. We may also, at our discretion, on an annual basis, make a matching contribution with respect to a participant’s elective deferrals and/or may make additional voluntary contributions based on annual Company performance. Discretionary profit sharing contributions, if made, are made to all qualified employees employed on the last day of the plan year, and the amount a qualified employee receives is based on their pay and years of service. In 2023, we intended to make matching contributions sufficient for the Capital Accumulation Plan to meet the safe harbor requirements under Code Section 401(k)(12)(b) and therefore matched employee contributions at a rate of 100% of the first 1% of each employee’s salary deferral, and 50% of the next 5% of each employee’s salary deferral. In addition, in 2023, we approved discretionary profit sharing contributions of approximately $9.9 million in the aggregate. Participants are immediately vested in their voluntary contributions plus any earnings thereon. For 2023, employer contributions (plus earnings thereon) were also immediately vested as required under the safe harbor requirements under Code Section 401(k)(12)(b). The Company’s discretionary profit sharing contributions made for 2023 become 100% vested after a participant completes three years of service. The vested portion of a participant’s accrued benefit is payable in a lump sum upon such employee’s termination of employment, attainment of age 59 1⁄2, retirement, total and permanent disability, or death. Participants may also make in-service withdrawals from the Capital Accumulation Plan and in certain specified instances of hardship.

Pension Plan

Our NEOs are also eligible to participate in the Gray Television, Inc. Retirement Plan (the “Retirement Plan”). This Retirement Plan benefit, however, was frozen effective July 1, 2015, and no further benefits accrue thereunder.

Under this plan, a participating employee who retires on or after attaining age 65 and who has completed five years of service upon retirement may be eligible to receive during his or her lifetime, in the form of monthly payments, an annual pension equal to (i) 22% of the employee’s average earnings for the highest five consecutive years during the employee’s final ten years of employment multiplied by a factor, the numerator of which is the employee’s years of service credited under the plan before 1994 and the denominator of which is the greater of 25 or the years of service credited under the plan, plus (ii) 0.9% of the employee’s monthly average earnings for the highest five consecutive years in the employee’s final ten years of employment added to 0.6% of monthly average earnings in excess of Social Security covered compensation, multiplied by the employee’s years of service credited under the plan after 1993, with a maximum of 25 years minus years of service credited under (i) above. For participants as of December 31, 1993, there is a minimum benefit equal to the projected benefit under (i) at that time. The table in the section entitled Pension Benefits herein lists the years of credited service and the present value of each NEO’s accumulated pension benefit, assuming payment begins at age 65, under the Retirement Plan.

Under the terms of the Retirement Plan, the accrued benefit is subject to the following distribution terms:

●	In the event of death before retirement, 50% of the accrued benefit will become payable to the surviving spouse at the time the deceased participant would have reached age 65;

●	if the deceased participant had completed ten or more years of service, the survivor benefit may commence as early as the time the deceased participant would have reached age 55;

●	if the deceased participant would have been eligible for early retirement at the time of death, the survivor benefit may commence as soon as practicable; and

●	any benefits that commence before the deceased participant would have reached age 65 will be reduced the same as early retirement benefits would have been reduced.

-25-

●	In the event a disability occurs before retirement, the accrued benefit will become payable at age 65; no break in service will occur and benefits will continue to accrue during disability.

●	In the event of voluntary termination, the vested accrued benefit will become payable at age 65;

●	if the participant had completed ten or more years of service, the benefit may commence as early as age 55; and

●	if the participant had completed less than five years of service, the accrued benefit is not vested, and no future benefits would be payable from the Retirement Plan.

Under the terms of the separate pension plan which was merged into the Retirement Plan, as it concerns Mr. Ryan’s accrued benefit, similar spousal distribution protections are in place and will be separately applicable. In addition, because such plan had a lump sum payment option, special rules address how this lump sum option works with the annuity forms of payments also available to participants.

Perquisites

Gray also provides its executive officers with limited perquisites and other benefits, including the right to participate in all employee benefit plans generally available to employees, such as medical, dental, life and disability insurance plans. The Compensation Committee also believes it is appropriate for the Company to pay certain insurance premiums on behalf of our NEOs in order to remain market competitive for executive talent.

Change-in-Control Plan

Gray has adopted a Change in Control Plan under which participants are generally selected by the Compensation Committee and currently include our NEOs, and certain other key employees. Under the Change in Control Plan, a participant who, in connection with a change in control of the Company or within 24 months following a change in control, is involuntarily terminated without cause or voluntarily terminates his or her employment for good reason, would receive certain benefits as outlined below in “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control - Change in Control Plan.”

Other Governance Items

Stock Ownership Guidelines

Based on the view of the Compensation Committee that the ownership of an equity interest in the Company by executives is a component of good corporate governance and aligns executives and shareholder interests, the Compensation Committee adopted stock ownership guidelines that require the NEOs to directly own minimum amounts of the Company’s stock. Shares that count towards the satisfaction of the guidelines are those (i) owned directly by the participant, (ii) held in a brokerage account or 401(k) account, (iii) held in trust or by a wholly-owned family entity and (iv) restricted shares. Stock options, performance shares not yet paid out and any shares held in a margin account or pledged as collateral for a loan, are excluded from the stock ownership guidelines.

The guidelines require the participants to beneficially own a number of shares of Class A and/or common stock that, when multiplied by relevant stock price on the measurement date, produces an amount equal to or greater than the multiple of salaries noted below:

Individual or Group	Multiple of Base Salary
Chief Executive Officer	6X
Other NEOs	3X

Executives have five years to comply with these guidelines, with progress to be reviewed by the Compensation Committee annually. The holdings of each NEO currently satisfy the individual’s stock ownership guidelines, other than Ms. Breland, who has until December 2028 to meet the guidelines.

-26-

Anti-hedging Policy

Gray has adopted a policy that prohibits certain officers and directors of the Company from purchasing any financial instrument that is designed to hedge or offset any decrease in the market share of the Company’s common stock, including prepaid variable forward contracts, equity swaps, collars and exchange funds or any other type of financial transaction. Directors, executive officers and other designated employees are also restricted from engaging in short sales related to the Company’s common stock.

Clawback Policy

In light of new rules promulgated by the NYSE and Securities Exchange Commission, Gray adopted a new compensation recoupment policy in 2023, which policy complies with the required standards (the “NYSE Clawback Policy”). The NYSE Clawback Policy provides for the prompt recovery (or clawback) of certain excess incentive-based compensation received during an applicable three-year recovery period by current or former executive officers in the event Gray is required to prepare an accounting restatement due to material noncompliance with any financial reporting requirement under the securities laws. Excess incentive-based compensation for these purposes generally means the amount of incentive-based compensation received (on or after October 2, 2023) by such executive officer that exceeds the amount of incentive-based compensation that would have been received by such executive officer had it been determined based on the restated amounts, without regard to any taxes paid. Incentive-based compensation potentially subject to recovery under the NYSE Clawback Policy is in general limited to any compensation granted, earned or vested based wholly or in part on the attainment of a financial reporting measure.

In general, Gray may utilize a broad range of recoupment methods under the NYSE Clawback Policy. The NYSE Clawback Policy does not condition clawback on the fault of the executive officer, and clawback thereunder is generally mandatory, except in limited circumstances where the compensation committee has made a determination that recovery would be impracticable and (1) Gray has already attempted to recover such amounts but the direct expenses paid to a third party in an effort to enforce the NYSE Clawback Policy would exceed the amount to be recovered, (2) the recovery of amounts would violate applicable home country law, or (3) the recovery would cause the non-compliance of a tax-qualified retirement plan under the Internal Revenue Code and applicable regulations.

Risk Considerations

The Compensation Committee with the assistance of its independent compensation consultant periodically reviews the Company’s compensation philosophy, policies and practices to ensure that such philosophy, policies and practices are appropriately structured for the Company and its business objectives and discourages executives from taking excessive risk. In developing Gray’s philosophy, and implementing the policies and practices, the Compensation Committee with input from the independent compensation consultant has attempted to mitigate the possibility that excessive short-term risks are being taken at the expense of long-term value. These mitigation strategies include:

●	the annual review and approval of certain financial performance objectives;

●	the use of multiple performance objectives, thus mitigating too heavy a focus on any one in particular;

●	caps on annual incentive plan payouts, limiting the upside potential when maximum performance is achieved; and

●	multi-year vesting of equity-based awards to motivate NEOs to focus on providing consistent results over the longer term.

Starting in 2018, additional risk mitigation policies were added, including the implementation of stock ownership guidelines, an anti-hedging policy and a clawback policy.

Based on its review, and in consultation with and input from the independent compensation consultant, the Compensation Committee has concluded that the compensation policies and programs at Gray do not create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.

Compensation Deduction Limitations

In general, all compensation (other than certain grandfathered compensation) we pay in excess of $1.0 million to anyone who serves as one of our named executive officers is not deductible when calculating our income tax expense. We may from time to time design compensation plans that recognize a full range of performance and other criteria important to our success regardless of the federal tax deductibility of compensation paid under those plans. The Compensation Committee will continue to retain the discretion to pay non-deductible amounts. The Compensation Committee believes that such flexibility best serves the interests of the Company and its shareholders by allowing the Committee to recognize, motivate and retain executive officers as circumstances warrant.

-27-

Summary Compensation Table

The following table sets forth a summary of the compensation of our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and our other executive officers for each of 2023, 2022 and 2021:

Name and Principal Position	Year	Salary(1) ($)		Bonus(2) ($)		Stock Awards(3) ($)		Non-equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)		Change in Pension Value and Non- qualified Deferred Compensation Earnings(4) ($)		All Other Compensation (5) ($)		Total ($)
Hilton H. Howell, Jr.	2023		1,458,000		-		5,832,007		3,184,871		-		155,648		10,630,526
Executive Chairman and	2022		1,350,000		-		4,387,504		2,026,414		-		158,457		7,922,375
Chief Executive Officer	2021		1,227,633		-		8,314,610		1,824,466		-		148,469		11,515,178

Donald P. LaPlatney	2023		1,242,000		-		2,483,997		1,808,692		-		153,128		5,687,817
President and	2022		1,150,000		-		2,299,986		1,564,963		-		141,129		5,156,078
Co-Chief Executive Officer	2021		1,040,000		2,250,000		4,018,002		1,236,490		-		138,309		8,682,801

James C. Ryan	2023		891,000		-		1,782,003		1,297,540		-		73,102		4,043,645
Executive Vice President and	2022		825,000		-		1,649,989		1,122,691		-		76,102		3,673,782
Chief Financial Officer	2021		754,961		2,000,000		3,207,938		841,498		-		76,550		6,880,947

Kevin P. Latek	2023		891,000		-		1,782,003		1,297,540		-		48,655		4,019,198
Executive Vice President, Chief Legal and	2022		825,000		-		1,649,989		1,122,691		-		43,658		3,641,338
Development Officer and Secretary	2021		794,351		2,000,000		3,270,963		885,403		-		45,527		6,996,244

Sandra Breland (6)	2023		683,651		-		966,110		623,365		-		69,912		2,343,037
Executive Vice President, Chief
Operating Officer

(1)	Each of the NEOs contributed a portion of his salary to our Capital Accumulation Plan. The disclosed salary amounts are before the NEOs’ contributions.

(2)	For the year ended December 31, 2021, includes cash portion of the special transaction completion awards, which were granted in December 2021.

(3)

Grant date fair value of awards of restricted shares made in the year indicated, computed in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 718 (Stock Compensation). For the year ended December 31, 2021, includes the grant date fair value of the equity portion of the special transaction completion awards for Messrs. LaPlatney, Ryan and Latek, which were granted in December 2021. See Note 8 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023 for a description of the assumptions made in the valuation of stock awards under FASB ASC Topic 718.

(4)

The Change in Pension Value was calculated as the difference between the Present Value of Accumulated Benefits year at December 31, 2023 and the Present Value of Accumulated Benefits at December 31, 2022, adjusted for benefit payments made during the year. The present value of accumulated benefits at December 31, 2023 was calculated using the assumptions that were used for the December 31, 2023 disclosures, which were the Pri-2012 total mortality table projected using fully generational improvements based on M-2021 and a 4.79% discount rate. SEC rules indicate that if the Change in Pension Value is negative, the result should be displayed as $0 in the Summary Compensation Table. The pension value for each of Howell, Ryan, Latek and Ms. Breland in 2023 increased by $32,285, $55,099, $7,956 and $32,054, respectively. See the table in the section entitled "Pension Benefits" herein for additional information, including the present value assumptions used in this calculation.

(5)	See All Other Compensation table for additional information.

(6)	Ms. Breland was promoted to Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer on May 22, 2023. Her 2023 compensation information includes her pro-rated compensation in her current position as well as her compensation in her prior role with the Company.

-28-

The following table describes each component of the amounts in the All Other Compensation column of the Summary Compensation Table for 2023:

Name	Company Contributions to Defined Contribution Plans ($)		Company Paid Insurance Premiums ($)		Directors’ Fees(1) ($)		Total ($)
Hilton H. Howell, Jr.		26,400		46,747		82,500		155,648
Donald P. LaPlatney		23,100		47,528		82,500		153,128
James C. Ryan		26,400		46,701		-		73,102
Kevin P. Latek		26,400		22,255		-		48,655
Sandra Breland		22,798		47,114		-		69,912

(1)	Represents fees paid for serving as a member of our board of directors. See the section entitled Director Compensation for 2023 for additional information.

Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2023

The table below sets forth information about plan-based awards granted to the named executive officers during 2023 under the Company’s 2022 Equity and Incentive Compensation Plan. Non-equity annual incentive compensation payments were made to our NEOs in 2023 under the Annual Incentive Plan.

		Estimated Future Payouts Under Non- Equity Incentive Plan Awards (1)						Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards						All Other Stock Awards: Numbers of Shares of Stock		All Other Option Awards: Number of Securities		Exercise or Base Price of option		Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards		Share Price on
Name	Grant Date	Threshold ($)		Target($)		Maximum($)		Threshold(#)		Target($)		Maximum($)		or Units (2)(#)		Underlying Options (#)		Awards ($/Sh)		Grant (3)($)		Grant Date
Hilton H. Howell, Jr.	4/10/2023		-		-		-		-		356,916		713,832		356,916		-		-		5,832,007	$	8.17
			1,093,500		2,187,000		4,374,000		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Donald P. LaPlatney	4/10/2023		-		-		-		-		146,635		293,270		146,635		-		-		2,483,997	$	8.47
			621,000		1,242,000		2,484,000		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
James C. Ryan	4/10/2023		-		-		-		-		105,195		210,390		105,195		-		-		1,782,003	$	8.47
			445,500		891,000		1,782,000		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Kevin P. Latek	4/10/2023		-		-		-		-		105,195		210,390		105,195		-		-		1,782,003	$	8.47
			445,500		891,000		1,782,000		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Sandra Breland	3/1/2023		-		-		-		-		-		-		9,565		-		-		109,998	$	11.50
	5/22/2023		-		-		-		-		54,253		108,506		54,253		-		-		856,112	$	7.89
			214,028		428,055		856,110		-		-		-		-		-		-		-

(1)	For information on actual payouts under non-equity incentive plan awards for 2023 performance, see the column titled Non-equity Incentive Plan Compensation in the Summary Compensation Table above.

(2)

In 2023, the stock awards granted to Mr. Howell were in our Class A common stock while the stock awards granted to Mr. LaPlatney, Mr. Ryan, Mr. Latek and Ms. Breland were in our common stock. Of the grants to Mr. Howell, the vesting of 356,916 of the Class A common stock shares are subject to certain performance criteria that may decrease or increase the ultimate amount earned. Of the grants to Mr. LaPlatney (146,635), Ryan (105,195), Latek (105,195) and Ms. Breland (54,253), the vesting of the common stock shares are subject to certain performance criteria that may decrease or increase the ultimate amount earned.

(3)	Grant date fair value of awards computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. See Note 8 to the Company's consolidated financial statements in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023 for more information regarding stock awards under FASB ASC Topic 718.

-29-

Outstanding Equity Awards at December 31, 2023

The following table provides information on the stock options and restricted stock awards held by the NEOs at December 31, 2023. The market value of the stock awards is based on the closing market price per share of our common stock and Class A common stock of $8.96 and $8.57, respectively, as of December 31, 2023.

	Stock Option Awards										Stock Awards
Name	Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Exercisable (#)		Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Unexercisable (#)		Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options (#)		Option Exercise Price ($)		Option Expiration Date		Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($)			Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($)		Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, units of Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#)			Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($)
Hilton H. Howell, Jr		-		-		-		-		-		588,054	(1)		5,039,623		560,179	(2)		4,800,734

SEC Form DEF 14A filed by Gray Television Inc.