SEC Form DEF 14A filed by IAC Inc.

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549​

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.   )

Filed by the Registrant   ☒

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant   ☐

Check the appropriate box:

☐

Preliminary Proxy Statement

​

☐

Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

​

☒

Definitive Proxy Statement

​

☐

Definitive Additional Materials

​

☐

Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12

​

(Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

☒

No fee required.

​

☐

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

​

☐

Fee computed on table in exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rules 14a6(i)(1) and 0-11.

​

 

May 6, 2025

Dear Stockholder:

You are invited to attend the Annual Meeting of stockholders of IAC Inc., which will be held on June 18, 2025, at 9:30 a.m., Eastern Time. This year’s Annual Meeting will be a virtual meeting, conducted solely online. Stockholders will be able to attend the Annual Meeting by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/IAC2025. We believe hosting a virtual meeting will allow for greater stockholder attendance at the Annual Meeting by enabling stockholders who might not otherwise be able to travel to a physical meeting to attend online and participate from any location around the world.

At the Annual Meeting, stockholders will be asked to: (i) elect twelve directors, (ii) approve a non-binding advisory vote on 2024 executive compensation and (iii) ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as IAC’s independent registered public accounting firm for the 2025 fiscal year. IAC’s board of directors believes that the proposals being submitted for stockholder approval are in the best interests of IAC and its stockholders and recommends a vote consistent with the Board’s recommendation for each proposal.

It is important that your shares be represented and voted at the Annual Meeting regardless of the size of your holdings. Whether or not you plan to participate in the Annual Meeting, please take the time to vote online, by telephone or, if you received a printed proxy card, by returning a marked, signed and dated proxy card. If you participate in the Annual Meeting, you may also vote your shares online at that time if you wish, even if you have previously submitted your vote.

Sincerely,

Barry Diller

Chairman and Senior Executive

 

May 6, 2025

The Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on:

June 18, 2025,
at 9:30 a.m., Eastern Time

This year’s Annual Meeting will be a virtual meeting, conducted solely online. Stockholders will be able to attend the Annual Meeting by visiting: www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/​IAC2025.

IAC’s board of directors has set April 30, 2025 as the record date for the Annual Meeting. This means that holders of record of IAC common stock and Class B common stock at the close of business on that date are entitled to receive notice of the Annual Meeting and vote their shares at the Annual Meeting and any related adjournments or postponements.

Your Vote is Important

Only stockholders and persons holding proxies from stockholders may participate in the Annual Meeting. To participate in the Annual Meeting online at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/IAC2025, you will need the details included (and to follow the instructions set forth) on your Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, your proxy card or the instructions that accompanied your proxy materials.

By order of the Board,

Kendall Handler

Executive Vice President,
Chief Legal Officer and Secretary

Q:

Why did I receive a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials?

​

A:

In accordance with rules adopted by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), we have elected to deliver this proxy statement and our 2024 Annual Report on Form 10-K (the “Annual Report”) to the majority of our stockholders online in lieu of mailing printed copies of these materials to each of our stockholders (the “Notice Process”). If you received a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”) by mail, you will not receive printed copies of our proxy materials unless you request them. Instead, the Notice provides instructions on how to access this proxy statement and our Annual Report online, as well as how to obtain printed copies of these materials by mail. We believe that the Notice Process allows us to provide our stockholders with the information they need in a more timely manner than if we had elected to mail printed materials, while reducing the environmental impact of  (and lowering the costs associated with) the printing and distribution of our proxy materials.

​

The Notice, and for stockholders who previously elected to receive printed copies of our proxy materials, this proxy statement and our Annual Report, are being mailed on or about May 6, 2025 to stockholders of record at the close of business on April 30, 2025, and this proxy statement and our Annual Report will be available at www.proxyvote.com beginning on May 6, 2025. If you received a Notice by mail but would rather receive printed copies of our proxy materials, please follow the instructions included in the Notice. You will not receive a Notice if you have previously elected to receive printed copies of our proxy materials.

Q:

Can I vote my shares by filling out and returning the Notice?

​

A:

No. However, the Notice provides instructions on how to vote your shares: (i) before the date of the Annual Meeting by way of completing and submitting your proxy online, by phone or by requesting and returning a written proxy card by mail or (ii) by voting at the Annual Meeting online at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/IAC2025.

​

Q:

How do I participate in the Annual Meeting?

​

A:

You may attend the annual meeting as a guest or as a stockholder. To vote or ask questions at the Annual Meeting online at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/IAC2025, you will need the details included (and to follow the instructions set forth) in your Notice, your proxy card or the instructions that accompanied your proxy materials.

​

Q:

Who is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting?

​

A:

Holders of IAC common stock and Class B common stock at the close of business on April 30, 2025, the record date for the Annual Meeting established by the Board, are entitled to receive notice of the Annual Meeting and to vote their shares at the Annual Meeting and any related adjournments or postponements.

​

At the close of business on April 30, 2025, there were 73,914,474 shares of IAC common stock and 5,789,499 shares of Class B common stock outstanding. Holders of IAC common stock are entitled to one vote per share and holders of Class B common stock are entitled to ten votes per share.

Q:

What is the difference between a stockholder of record and a stockholder who holds IAC shares in street name?

​

A:

If your IAC shares are registered in your name, you are a stockholder of record. If your IAC shares are held in the name of your broker, bank or other holder of record, your shares are held in street name.

​

You may examine a list of stockholders of record at the close of business on April 30, 2025 for any purpose germane to the Annual Meeting during normal business hours during the 10-day period preceding the date of the meeting at IAC’s corporate headquarters, located at 555 West 18th Street, New York, New York 10011, as well as during the Annual Meeting online at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/IAC2025.

 1

 

Q:

What shares are included on the enclosed proxy card?

​

A:

If you are a stockholder of record only, you will receive one proxy card from Broadridge for all IAC shares that you hold. If you hold IAC shares in street name through one or more banks, brokers and/or other holders of record, you will receive proxy materials, together with voting instructions and information regarding the consolidation of your votes, from the third party or parties through which your IAC shares are held. If you are a stockholder of record and hold additional IAC shares in street name, you will receive proxy materials from Broadridge and the third party or parties through which your IAC shares are held.

​

Q:

What are the quorum requirements for the Annual Meeting?

​

A:

The presence at the Annual Meeting (in person or by proxy) of holders having a majority of the total votes entitled to be cast by holders of IAC common stock and Class B common stock at the Annual Meeting constitutes a quorum.

​

Stockholders who participate in the Annual Meeting online at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/IAC2025 will be deemed to be in person attendees for purposes of determining whether a quorum has been met. When holders of IAC common stock vote as a separate class, the presence at the Annual Meeting of holders of a majority of the total votes entitled to be cast by holders of IAC common stock is required for a quorum to be met. Shares of IAC common stock and Class B common stock represented by proxy will be treated as present at the Annual Meeting for purposes of determining whether there is a quorum, without regard to whether the proxy is marked as casting a vote or abstaining. In the absence of a quorum, the chairperson of the Annual Meeting or holders of a majority of the voting power of the shares of IAC common stock and Class B common stock represented at the Annual Meeting will have the power to adjourn the Annual Meeting until a quorum is present.

Q:

What matters will IAC stockholders vote on at the Annual Meeting?

​

A:

IAC stockholders will vote on the following proposals:

​

•

Proposal 1 — to elect twelve members of IAC’s board of directors (the “Board”), each to hold office until the next succeeding annual meeting of stockholders or until such director’s successor shall have been duly elected and qualified (or, if earlier, such director’s removal or resignation from the Board);

​

•

Proposal 2 — to approve a non-binding advisory vote on 2024 executive compensation (the “Advisory Say on Pay Proposal”);

​

•

Proposal 3 — to ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as IAC’s independent registered public accounting firm for the 2025 fiscal year; and

​

•

to transact such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting and any related adjournments or postponements.

​

Q:

What are my voting choices when voting for director nominees and what votes are required to elect director nominees to the Board?

​

A:

You may vote in favor of all director nominees, withhold votes as to all director nominees or vote in favor of and withhold votes as to specific director nominees.

​

The election of each of Chelsea Clinton, Barry Diller, Michael D. Eisner, Bonnie S. Hammer, Victor A. Kaufman, Bryan Lourd, David Rosenblatt, Maria Seferian and Alexander von Furstenberg as directors requires the affirmative vote of a plurality of the total number of votes cast by the holders of shares of IAC common stock and Class B common stock voting together as a single class (hereinafter collectively referred to as “IAC capital stock”), with each share of IAC common stock and Class B common stock representing the right to one and ten vote(s), respectively.

The election of each of Tor R. Braham, Alan G. Spoon and Richard F. Zannino as directors requires the affirmative vote of a plurality of the total number of votes cast by the holders of shares of IAC common stock, voting as a separate class.

The Board recommends a vote FOR the election of each of the director nominees.

Q:

What are my voting choices when voting on the Advisory Say on Pay Proposal and what votes are required to approve such proposal?

​

A:

You may vote in favor of the Advisory Say on Pay Proposal, vote against such proposal or abstain from voting on such proposal.

​

The approval of the Advisory Say on Pay Proposal requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the voting power of the shares of IAC capital stock present at the Annual Meeting in person or represented by proxy and

 2

 

entitled to vote on the matter, voting together as a single class. As an advisory vote, the Advisory Say on Pay Proposal is not binding upon IAC or the Board.

The Board recommends a vote FOR the Advisory Say on Pay Proposal.

Q:

What are my voting choices when voting on the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as IAC’s independent registered public accounting firm for the 2025 fiscal year and what votes are required to ratify such appointment?

​

A:

You may vote in favor of the ratification, vote against the ratification or abstain from voting on the ratification.

​

The ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as IAC’s independent registered public accounting firm for the 2025 fiscal year requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the voting power of shares of IAC capital stock present at the Annual Meeting in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on the matter, voting together as a single class.

The Board recommends a vote FOR the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as IAC’s independent registered public accounting firm for the 2025 fiscal year.

Q:

Could other matters be decided at the Annual Meeting?

​

A:

As of the date of this proxy statement, IAC did not know of any matters to be raised at the Annual Meeting, other than those referred to in this proxy statement.

​

If any other matters are properly presented at the Annual Meeting for consideration, the three IAC officers who have been designated as proxies for the Annual Meeting (Christopher Halpin, Kendall Handler and Kyra Ayo Caros) will have the discretion to vote on any such matters for stockholders who have submitted their proxy.

Q:

What do I need to do now to vote at the Annual Meeting?

​

A:

The Board is soliciting proxies for use at the Annual Meeting. Stockholders may submit proxies to instruct the designated proxies to vote their shares before the date of the Annual Meeting in any of three ways:

​

•

Submitting a proxy online: Submit your proxy online at www.proxyvote.com. Online proxy voting is available 24 hours a day and will close at 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on June 17, 2025;

​

•

Submitting a proxy by telephone: Submit your proxy by telephone (1.800.690.6903). Telephone proxy voting is available 24 hours a day and will close at 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on June 17, 2025; or

​

•

Submitting a proxy by mail: If you choose to submit your proxy by mail, simply mark, date and sign your proxy, and return it in the postage-paid envelope provided or to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, New York 11717.

​

You may also participate in the Annual Meeting online at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/IAC2025 and vote your shares online at that time, even if you have previously submitted your vote. To do so, you will need the details included (and to follow the instructions set forth) in your Notice, your proxy card or the instructions that accompanied your proxy materials.

For IAC shares held in street name, holders may submit a proxy online or by telephone before the date of the Annual Meeting if their broker, bank and/or other holder of record makes these methods available. If you submit a proxy online or by telephone, DO NOT request and return a printed proxy card. If you hold your shares through a broker, bank and/or other holder of record, follow the voting instructions you receive from your broker, bank and/or other holder of record.

Q:

If I hold my IAC shares in street name, will my broker, bank or other holder of record vote these shares for me?

​

A:

If your IAC shares are held in street name, you must provide your broker, bank and/or other holder of record with instructions in order to vote such shares. If you do not provide voting instructions, whether such shares can be voted by your broker, bank and/or other holder of record depends on the type of item being considered for a vote.

​

Non-Discretionary Items. The election of directors and the approval of the Advisory Say on Pay Proposal are non-discretionary items and may NOT be voted on by your broker, bank and/or other holder of record absent specific voting instructions from you. If your bank, broker or other holder of record does not receive specific voting instructions from you, a broker non-vote will occur in the case of your IAC shares for these proposals.

 3

 

Discretionary Items. The ratification of Ernst & Young LLP as IAC’s independent registered public accounting firm for the 2025 fiscal year is a discretionary item. Generally, brokers, banks and other holders of record that do not receive voting instructions from you may vote on this proposal in their discretion.

Q:

What effect do abstentions and broker non-votes have on quorum requirements and the voting results for each proposal to be voted on at the Annual Meeting?

​

A:

Abstentions and shares represented by broker non-votes are counted as present for purposes of determining a quorum. Abstentions are treated as shares present and entitled to vote and, as a result, have the same effect as a vote against any proposal for which the voting standard is based on the number of shares present and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting (the Advisory Say on Pay Proposal and the Auditor Ratification Proposal) and have no impact on the vote on any proposal for which the vote standard is based on the actual number of votes cast at the meeting (the election of directors). Shares represented by broker non-votes are not treated as shares entitled to vote and, as a result, have no effect on the outcome of any of the proposals to be voted on by stockholders at the Annual Meeting.

​

Q:

Can I change my vote or revoke my proxy?

​

A:

Yes. If you are a stockholder of record, you may change your vote or revoke your proxy at any time before the polls close at the Annual Meeting by:

​

•

submitting a later-dated proxy relating to the same IAC shares online at www.proxyvote.com, by telephone or by mail before the date of the Annual Meeting;

​

•

delivering a written notice, bearing a date later than your proxy, stating that you revoke the proxy; or

​

•

participating in the Annual Meeting and voting online at that time at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/​IAC2025 (although virtual attendance at the Annual Meeting will not, by itself, change your vote or revoke a proxy).

​

To change your vote or revoke your proxy before the date of the Annual Meeting, follow the instructions provided on your Notice, proxy card or proxy materials to do so online or by telephone, or send a written notice or a new proxy card to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, New York 11717.

If you hold your IAC shares through a broker, bank and/or other holder of record, follow the instructions that you received from your broker, bank and/or other holder of record if you wish to change your vote or revoke your proxy before the Annual Meeting.

Q:

What if I do not specify a choice for a matter when returning a proxy?

​

A:

If you do not give specific instructions, proxies that are signed and returned will be voted FOR the election of all director nominees, the Advisory Say on Pay Proposal and the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as IAC’s independent registered public accounting firm for the 2025 fiscal year.

​

Q:

How are proxies solicited and who bears the related costs?

​

A:

IAC bears all expenses incurred in connection with the solicitation of proxies. In addition to solicitations by mail, directors, officers and employees of IAC may solicit proxies from stockholders by various means, including by telephone, e-mail, letter or in person.

​

Following the initial mailing of the Notice and proxy materials, IAC will request brokers, banks and other holders of record to forward copies of these materials to persons for whom they hold IAC shares and to request authority for the exercise of proxies. In such cases, IAC, upon request from such holders, will reimburse them for their reasonable expenses.

Q:

What should I do if I have questions about the Annual Meeting?

​

A:

If you have any questions about the Annual Meeting, the various proposals to be voted on at the Annual Meeting and/or how to participate in the Annual Meeting online at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/IAC2025 and vote at that time or would like copies of our proxy materials, please contact IAC Investor Relations at 1.212.314.7400 or [email protected].

​

 4

Proposal and Required Vote

At the upcoming Annual Meeting, a board of twelve directors will be elected, each to hold office until the next succeeding annual meeting of stockholders or until such director’s successor shall have been duly elected and qualified (or, if earlier, such director’s removal or resignation from the Board). Information concerning director nominees, eleven of whom are incumbent directors and one of whom is a new director nominee, is set forth below. All director nominees have been recommended for re-election or initial election, as applicable, by the Nominating Committee. Although IAC management does not anticipate that any of the persons named below will be unable or unwilling to stand for re-election or initial election, as applicable, in the event of such an occurrence, proxies may be voted for a substitute designated by the Board.

The election of each of Chelsea Clinton, Barry Diller, Michael D. Eisner, Bonnie S. Hammer, Victor A. Kaufman, Bryan Lourd, David Rosenblatt, Maria Seferian and Alexander von Furstenberg as directors requires the affirmative vote of a plurality of the total number of votes cast by the holders of shares of IAC capital stock, voting together as a single class.

The Board has designated Tor R. Braham, Alan G. Spoon and Richard F. Zannino as nominees for those positions on the Board to be elected by the holders of IAC common stock voting as a separate class. The election of each of them as directors requires the affirmative vote of a plurality of the total number of votes cast by the holders of shares of IAC common stock, voting as a separate class.

 5

 

Information Concerning Director Nominees

Background information about each director nominee is set forth below, including information regarding the specific experiences, characteristics, attributes and skills considered in connection with the nomination of each director nominee, all of which the Nominating Committee and the Board believe provide IAC with the perspective and judgment needed to guide, monitor and execute its strategies. References to service at IAC prior to June 2020 refer to IAC’s predecessor entity or entities (as applicable).

 6

 

 7

 

 8

 

 9

 

 10

 

 11

 

 12

 

 13

 

 14

 

 15

Leadership Structure

IAC’s business and affairs are overseen by its Board, which currently has eleven members. There are two members of management on the Board and, of the nine remaining current directors, eight are independent.

The Board has standing Audit, Compensation and Human Capital and Nominating Committees, each comprised solely of independent directors, as well as an Executive Committee. For more information regarding director independence and committees of the Board, see the discussion under Director Independence and Board of Directors and Board Committees below. All directors play an active role in Board matters, are encouraged to communicate among themselves and directly with IAC’s Chairman and Senior Executive and have full access to IAC management at all times.

Independent directors meet in scheduled executive sessions without IAC management present at least twice a year and may schedule additional meetings as they deem appropriate. The Board does not have a lead independent director or any other formally appointed leader for these sessions. The independent membership of the Audit, Compensation and Human Capital and Nominating (following the Annual Meeting, the Nominating and Corporate Governance) Committees ensures that directors with no ties to IAC management are charged with oversight for all of the financial reporting and executive compensation-related decisions made by IAC management, as well as for the recommendation of candidates for Board membership. At each regularly scheduled board meeting, the Chair of each of these committees (as applicable) provides the full Board with an update of all significant matters discussed, reviewed, considered and/or approved by the relevant committee since the last regularly scheduled board meeting.

Mr. Diller currently serves as both Chairman and Senior Executive of IAC and has held both positions (for IAC and its predecessor entity) since December 2010. Following Mr. Levin’s transition from his role as the Chief Executive Officer of IAC (“IAC CEO”) on March 31, 2025 (see Compensation Discussion and Analysis-CEO Transition), as of the date of this proxy statement, there is no IAC CEO and IAC does not currently intend to appoint a new IAC CEO. As of the date of this proxy statement, Christopher Halpin, Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer, and Kendall Handler, Executive Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Secretary, report directly to Mr. Diller. The Board believes that direct leadership from Mr. Diller, leveraging his extensive industry experience and proven ability to navigate complex environments, is in the best interests of IAC and its shareholders at this time. Therefore, Mr. Diller will continue to provide strategic oversight and vision, working closely with Mr. Halpin and Ms. Handler to drive IAC’s continued growth, as they contemporaneously maintain their focus on the day-to-day management of IAC’s operations.

 16

 

Risk Oversight

IAC management is responsible for assessing and managing IAC’s exposure to various risks on a day-to-day basis, which responsibilities include the creation of appropriate risk management programs and policies. IAC management has developed and implemented guidelines and policies to identify, assess and manage significant risks facing IAC. Such guidelines and policies include (among others) an assessment across all of IAC’s businesses, in connection with which management at each IAC business assesses, on an ongoing basis, strategic, financial, operational, information security and regulatory risks, together with related mitigation plans.

The results of these assessments are then consolidated and reviewed by an Executive Risk Committee, which consists of members of IAC senior management. As part of its review, the Executive Risk Committee will prioritize risks and discuss mitigation plans. Following such review, these risk assessments are discussed at least semi-annually with the Audit Committee and at least annually with the Board.

In developing this framework, IAC management recognizes that leadership and success are impossible without taking risks; however, also recognizes that the imprudent acceptance of risks or the failure to appropriately identify and mitigate risks could adversely impact IAC stockholder value. The Board is responsible for overseeing IAC management in the execution of its responsibilities and for assessing IAC’s overall approach to risk management. The Board exercises these responsibilities periodically as part of its meetings and through discussions with IAC management, as well as through the Audit Committee (which examines various components of financial and cybersecurity risks, among other risks) and the Compensation and Human Capital Committee (which examines compensation-related and workplace conduct risks, among other risks) as part of their responsibilities.

Information security and cybersecurity are key risks to IAC and its various business, and are therefore key focuses of our risk management efforts. We assess, identify and manage cybersecurity risks as part of a comprehensive information security program that is intended to align with standard industry frameworks, such as International Organization for Standardization (IOS) 27000 and the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Cyber Security Framework. The Board is responsible for overseeing IAC management’s execution of its information security and cybersecurity responsibilities, including its approach to information security and cybersecurity risk management. The Board executes this oversight in coordination with the Audit Committee, which pursuant to its charter, assists the Board with risk assessment and risk management policies as they relate to information security and cybersecurity risk exposure (among other risks), as well as part of its regularly scheduled meetings and through discussions with IAC management on an as needed basis.

Certain compensation-related matters are also key components of risk management at IAC, with IAC periodically conducting risk assessments of its compensation policies and practices, including those related to its executive compensation programs. The goal of these assessments is to determine whether the general structure of IAC’s compensation policies and programs and the administration of these programs pose any material risks to IAC. Any material findings as a result of these assessments are discussed with the Compensation and Human Capital Committee and (as appropriate) the Board. Based upon these assessments, IAC believes that its compensation policies and programs do not encourage excessive or unnecessary risk-taking and are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on IAC.

In addition, an overall review of risks is inherent in the consideration by the Board of IAC’s long-term strategies and in the transactions and other matters presented to the Board, including significant capital expenditures, acquisitions and divestitures and financial matters. The role of the Board in risk oversight of IAC is consistent with IAC’s leadership structure, with IAC’s Chairman and Senior Executive and other members of IAC senior management having responsibility for assessing and managing IAC’s risk exposure, and the Board and its committees providing oversight in connection with these efforts.

Clawback Policy

In 2023, IAC adopted a compensation clawback policy in accordance with the adoption of the final rules implementing the incentive-based compensation recovery provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act Wall Street Reform and the Consumer Protection Act by the SEC. This policy provides for the mandatory recovery of erroneously awarded “incentive-based compensation” from current and former IAC “executive officers” ​(as such terms are defined in the final rules) in the event of certain accounting restatements specified in the final rules. The recovery of such compensation applies regardless of whether a given executive officer engaged in misconduct or otherwise caused or contributed to the relevant accounting restatement.

Our compensation clawback policy has been filed as Exhibit 97.1 to the Annual Report.

 17

 

Stock Ownership Policy

IAC has a stock ownership policy that covers members of the Board and executive officers. The policy provides for a minimum IAC ownership target that each non-employee director, as well as IAC’s Chairman and Senior Executive and its other executive officers, is expected to accumulate and hold. Under the policy, all non-employee directors are expected to hold the lesser of a number of shares of IAC common stock with a value of at least five times their annual cash retainer (rounded down to the nearest 100 shares) and 12,400 shares of IAC common stock. For ownership target levels applicable to IAC’s Chairman and Senior Executive and its other executive officers, see Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Stock Ownership Policy.

Securities Trading Policy

The Board has adopted a securities trading policy (the “Securities Trading Policy”) governing the purchase, sale and/or other transfer of  (and certain other transactions involving) IAC securities by: (i) IAC directors, officers and employees (and certain persons and entities affiliated with such persons) and (ii) any other persons (such as contractors or consultants) who have access to material non-public information concerning IAC and its businesses from time to time (such individuals, collectively, “Covered Persons”). IAC believes that such policy is reasonably designed to promote compliance with insider trading laws, rules and regulations and the listing standards of The Nasdaq Stock Market, LLC (“Nasdaq”).

The Securities Trading Policy also expressly prohibits all Covered Persons from engaging in: (i) transactions in publicly traded options, warrants, puts and calls or similar instruments relating to securities of IAC, (ii) short sales of securities of IAC and/or (iii) hedging transactions (or any other transaction that hedges or offsets, or is designed to hedge or offset) any decrease in the market value of securities of IAC (“Hedging and Monetization Transactions”). This prohibition extends to any and all forms of Hedging and Monetization transactions, such as zero-cost collars and forward sale contracts (among others).

In addition, the Securities Trading Policy provides that Covered Persons may not enter into any transaction(s) that involve the pledging of IAC securities, including by purchasing securities of IAC on margin or holding securities of IAC in an account utilizing margins (“Pledges”).

Our Securities Trading Policy has been filed as Exhibit 10.19 to the Annual Report.

Hedging and Pledging Policies and Practices

As noted above, the Securities Trading Policy provides that Covered Persons may not engage in Hedging and Monetization Transactions and Pledges.

Director Independence

Under the Marketplace Rules of Nasdaq (the “Marketplace Rules”), the Board has a responsibility to make an affirmative determination that those members of the Board who serve as independent directors do not have any relationships that would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director. In connection with the independence determinations described below, the Board reviewed information regarding transactions, relationships and arrangements relevant to independence, including those required by the Marketplace Rules. Such information is obtained from director responses to questionnaires circulated by IAC management, as well as from IAC records and publicly available information. Following these determinations, IAC management monitors those transactions, relationships and arrangements that were relevant to such determinations, as well as periodically solicits updated information potentially relevant to independence from internal personnel and directors, to determine whether there have been any developments that could potentially have an adverse impact on prior independence determinations.

In connection with such review, the Board determined that each of Messrs. Eisner, Lourd, Rosenblatt, Spoon and Zannino and Mses. Clinton, Hammer and Seferian satisfied the director independence requirements set forth in the Marketplace Rules. In connection with his nomination, the Board also determined that Mr. Braham satisfied the director independence requirements. Additionally, the Board determined that the members of the Audit and Compensation and Human Capital Committees satisfied separate independence requirements under standards imposed by applicable SEC rules and the Marketplace Rules for audit committee and compensation committee members.

Of the remaining incumbent directors, Messrs. Diller and Kaufman are executive officers of IAC and Mr. von Furstenberg is Mr. Diller’s stepson. Given these relationships, none of these directors is independent.

Director Nominations

In connection with the current slate of director nominees, the Nominating Committee identified, reviewed and evaluated individuals potentially qualified to become members of the Board and recommended potential candidates to the

 18

 

Board. While there are no specific requirements for eligibility to serve as a director of IAC, in evaluating candidates, the Nominating Committee considered (regardless of how the candidate was identified or recommended) whether the professional and personal ethics and values of the candidate are consistent with those of IAC, whether the candidate’s experience and expertise would be beneficial to the Board, whether the candidate is willing and able to devote the necessary time and energy to the work of the Board and whether the candidate is prepared and qualified to represent the best interests of IAC’s stockholders. While the Board does not have a formal diversity policy, the Nominating Committee also considered the overall diversity of the experiences, characteristics, attributes, skills and backgrounds of candidates relative to those of other members of the Board and those represented by the Board as a whole to ensure that the Board has the right mix of skills, expertise and background. Of IAC’s 11 current directors, three identify as female, five as male and three directors have chosen not to disclose their gender identity.

The Board does not have a formal policy regarding the consideration of director nominees recommended by stockholders; however, the Board will evaluate and consider any director nominees in accordance with IAC’s bylaws. Stockholders who wish to make a recommendation for a director nominee should send the recommendation to IAC Inc., 555 West 18th Street, New York, New York 10011, Attention: Corporate Secretary. The envelope must contain a clear notation that the enclosed letter is a “Director Nominee Recommendation.” The letter must identify the author as an IAC stockholder, provide a brief summary of the candidate’s qualifications and history, together with an indication that the recommended individual would be willing to serve (if elected), and must be accompanied by evidence of the sender’s IAC stock ownership. Any director recommendations will be reviewed by IAC’s Corporate Secretary and the Chairman and Senior Executive, and if deemed appropriate, forwarded to the Nominating Committee for further review. If the Nominating Committee believes that the candidate fits the profile of a director described above, the recommendation will be shared with the Board.

Communications with the Board

Stockholders who wish to communicate with the Board or a particular director may send any such communication to IAC Inc., 555 West 18th Street, New York, New York 10011, Attention: Corporate Secretary. The mailing envelope must contain a clear notation indicating that the enclosed letter is a “Stockholder — Board Communication” or “Stockholder — Director Communication.” All such letters must identify the author as an IAC stockholder, provide evidence of the sender’s IAC stock ownership and clearly state whether the intended recipients are all members of the Board or a particular director or directors. IAC’s Corporate Secretary will then review such correspondence and forward it to the Board, or to the specified director(s), if appropriate.

The Board and Board Committees

The Board

During 2024, the Board met four (4) times and took action by written consent once. All then-incumbent directors attended at least 75% of the meetings of the Board and the Board committees on which they served during 2024. Directors are not required to attend annual meetings of IAC stockholders. Two members of the Board attended IAC’s 2024 annual meeting of stockholders.

The Board currently has four standing committees: the Audit Committee, the Compensation and Human Capital Committee, the Nominating Committee (which following the Annual Meeting will be renamed the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee) and the Executive Committee.

Board Committees

The following table sets forth the members of each committee of the Board, the number of meetings held by each such committee during 2024 and the number of times that each such committee took action by written consent during 2024. Each committee member identified below served in the capacity or capacities (as applicable) set forth in the following table for all of 2024.

 19

 

​

(1)

Independent director.

​

(2)

Former Chief Executive Officer and director.

​

Audit Committee

The Audit Committee of the Board functions pursuant to a written charter adopted by the Board, the most recent version of which was filed as Appendix A to the proxy statement filed in connection with our 2023 annual meeting of stockholders (the “2023 Proxy Statement”). The Audit Committee is appointed by the Board to assist the Board with a variety of matters described in the charter, which include monitoring: (i) the integrity of IAC’s financial statements, (ii) the effectiveness of IAC’s internal control over financial reporting, (iii) the qualifications and independence of IAC’s independent registered public accounting firm, (iv) the performance of IAC’s internal audit function and independent registered public accounting firm, (v) IAC’s risk assessment and risk management policies as they relate to financial, information security and cybersecurity and other risk exposures, and (vi) the compliance by IAC with legal and regulatory requirements. In fulfilling its purpose, the Audit Committee maintains free and open communication among its members, IAC’s independent registered public accounting firm, IAC’s internal audit function and IAC management. The Audit Committee may form and delegate authority to subcommittees and may delegate authority to one or more of its members. The formal report of the Audit Committee is set forth under the caption Audit Committee Matters — Audit Committee Report.

The Board has previously concluded that Mr. Spoon is an “audit committee financial expert,” as such term is defined in applicable SEC rules and the Marketplace Rules and has satisfied the independence requirements set forth therein.

Compensation and Human Capital Committee

The Compensation and Human Capital Committee of the Board functions pursuant to a written charter adopted by the Board, the most recent version of which was filed as Appendix B to the 2023 Proxy Statement. The Compensation and Human Capital Committee is appointed by the Board to assist the Board with all matters relating to the compensation of IAC’s executive officers, as well as with those relating to human capital and workplace conduct. Consistent with its responsibility for these matters, the Compensation and Human Capital Committee has overall responsibility for approving and evaluating all compensation plans, policies and programs of IAC as they relate to IAC’s executive officers, as well as works with IAC management to assess risks relating to compensation, human capital and workplace conduct. The Compensation and Human Capital Committee may form and delegate authority to subcommittees and may delegate authority to one or more of its members. The Compensation and Human Capital Committee may also delegate to one or more IAC executive officers the authority to make grants of equity-based compensation to eligible individuals (other than directors and executive officers) to the extent allowed under Delaware law. For additional information on IAC’s processes and procedures for the consideration and determination of executive compensation and the related roles of the Compensation and Human Resources Committee, IAC management and consultants, see the discussion under

 20

 

Compensation Discussion and Analysis. The formal report of the Compensation and Human Capital Committee is set forth under the caption Compensation and Human Capital Committee Report.

Nominating Committee

The Nominating Committee of the Board functions pursuant to a written charter adopted by the Board, the most recent version of which was filed as Appendix C to the 2023 Proxy Statement (the “Nominating Committee Charter”). The Nominating Committee is appointed by the Board to assist the Board with all matters relating to: (i) the identification, review and evaluation of individuals qualified to become members of the Board, (ii) the recommendation of director nominees for the next annual meeting of stockholders (and nominees to fill vacancies on the Board as necessary) and (iii) the making of recommendations with respect to the compensation and benefits of non-employee directors. If elected at the Annual Meeting, Mr. Braham will join the Nominating Committee. Effective upon the Annual Meeting, the Nominating Committee will be renamed the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, and all references to the Nominating Committee in the Nominating Committee Charter shall be deemed to refer to the committee as renamed.

Executive Committee

The Executive Committee of the Board has all the power and authority of the Board, except those powers specifically reserved to the Board by Delaware law or IAC’s organizational documents.

 21

As required pursuant to Section 14 of the Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), IAC is seeking an advisory vote from its stockholders to approve the compensation of IAC’s named executives for 2024. This proposal is not intended to address any specific item of compensation, but rather IAC’s overall compensation program and policies relating to its named executives.

As described in detail in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, IAC’s executive officer compensation program is designed to provide the level of compensation necessary to attract, retain, motivate and reward talented and experienced executives and to motivate them to achieve short-term and long-term goals, thereby enhancing stockholder value and creating a successful company.

IAC believes that its executive officer compensation program, with its balance of short-term and long-term incentives, rewards sustained performance that is aligned with the long-term interests of IAC stockholders. Accordingly, IAC believes that the compensation paid to its named executives in 2024 was fair and appropriate and is asking IAC stockholders to vote FOR the adoption of the following resolution:

“RESOLVED, that IAC’s stockholders approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of IAC’s named executives for 2024, as disclosed in this proxy statement, pursuant to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s compensation disclosure rules, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the Executive Compensation tables and the related narrative discussion.”

The approval, on an advisory basis, of the Advisory Say on Pay Proposal requires the affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the aggregate voting power of the shares of IAC capital stock present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on the matter, voting together as a single class. The vote is advisory in nature and therefore not binding on IAC or the Board. However, the Board and the Compensation and Human Capital Committee value the opinions of all of IAC’s stockholders and will consider the outcome of this vote when making future compensation decisions for its named executives.

 22

Subject to stockholder ratification, the Audit Committee of the Board has appointed Ernst & Young LLP as IAC’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2025.

The Audit Committee annually evaluates the performance of Ernst & Young LLP and determines whether to continue to retain such firm or consider the retention of another firm. In appointing Ernst & Young LLP as IAC’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2025, the Audit Committee considered:(i) the firm’s performance as IAC’s independent registered public accounting firm, (ii) the fact that the firm has audited the financial statements of IAC (and its predecessor entities) since 1996, (iii) the firm’s independence with respect to the services to be performed for IAC and (iv) the firm’s strong and considerable qualifications and general reputation for adherence to professional auditing standards.

A representative of Ernst & Young LLP is expected to attend the Annual Meeting and will be given an opportunity to make a statement if such representative chooses to do so and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.

Ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as IAC’s independent registered public accounting firm requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the voting power of the shares of IAC capital stock present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on the matter, voting together as a single class.

 23

Audit Committee Report

The Audit Committee functions pursuant to a written charter adopted by the Board, the most recent version of which was filed as Appendix A to the proxy statement filed in connection with our 2023 annual meeting of stockholders. The Audit Committee charter governs the operations of the Audit Committee and sets forth its responsibilities, which include providing assistance to the Board with the monitoring of: (i) the integrity of IAC’s financial statements, (ii) the effectiveness of IAC’s internal control over financial reporting, (iii) the qualifications and independence of IAC’s independent registered public accounting firm, (iv) the performance of IAC’s internal audit function and independent registered public accounting firm, IAC’s risk assessment and risk management policies as they relate to financial and other risk exposures and (vi) the compliance by IAC with legal and regulatory requirements. It is not the duty of the Audit Committee to plan or conduct audits or to determine that IAC’s financial statements and disclosures are complete, accurate and have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and applicable rules and regulations. Management is responsible for IAC’s financial reporting process, including systems of internal control over financial reporting. The independent registered public accountants are responsible for performing an independent audit of IAC’s consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of IAC’s internal control over financial reporting in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (the “PCAOB”) and to issue a report thereon. The Audit Committee’s responsibility is to engage the independent auditor and otherwise to monitor and oversee these processes.

In fulfilling its responsibilities, the Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the audited consolidated financial statements of IAC included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024 with IAC’s management and Ernst & Young LLP, IAC’s independent registered public accounting firm (“Ernst & Young”), as well as related reports regarding such financial statements and internal control over financial reporting with Ernst & Young.

The Audit Committee has discussed with Ernst & Young the matters required to be discussed by the applicable requirements of the PCAOB and the SEC. In addition, the Audit Committee has received the written disclosures and the letter from Ernst & Young required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding Ernst & Young’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence and has discussed with Ernst & Young its independence from IAC and its management.

In reliance on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board that the audited consolidated financial statements for IAC be included in IAC’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024, as amended by Amendment No. 1.

Members of the Audit Committee

Alan G. Spoon (Chair)
Bryan Lourd
Richard Zannino

 24

 

Fees Paid to IAC’s Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The following table sets forth fees for all professional services provided by Ernst & Young LLP to IAC for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023:

​

(1)

Audit Fees in 2024 include fees associated: (i) with the annual audit of financial statements and internal control over financial reporting and the review of periodic reports, (ii) for accounting consultations, including those related to certain internal audit and equity award matters, (iii) for services provided in connection with preparation for the Angi Spin-Off and (iv) for statutory audits (audits required by local law performed for an IAC business in a jurisdiction abroad).

​

Audit Fees in 2023 include fees associated: (i) with the annual audit of financial statements and internal control over financial reporting and the review of periodic reports, (ii) for accounting consultations and (iii) for statutory audits (audits required by local law performed for an IAC business in a jurisdiction abroad).

Excludes 2024 and 2023 Audit Fees in the total aggregate amount of  $3,001,933 and $2,625,553, respectively, incurred and paid directly by Angi.

(2)

Audit-Related Fees in 2024 and 2023 include fees associated with: (i) the annual audit of stand-alone financial statements for DDM, which DDM is required to deliver to its lenders, (ii) employee benefit plan audits for IAC and DDM, (iii) post-report review procedures performed in connection with the issuance of consents for SEC filings by a wholly-owned subsidiary of IAC and (iv) an aviation fuel audit for DDM.

​

(3)

Tax fees in 2024 and 2023 primarily include fees paid for international tax compliance services.

​

Audit and Non-Audit Services Pre-Approval Policy

The Audit Committee has a policy governing the pre-approval of all audit and permitted non-audit services performed by IAC’s independent registered public accounting firm to ensure that the provision of these services does not impair such firm’s independence from IAC and its management. Unless a type of service to be provided by IAC’s independent registered public accounting firm has received general pre-approval, it requires specific pre-approval by the Audit Committee. Any proposed services in excess of pre-approved cost levels also require specific pre-approval by the Audit Committee. In all pre-approval instances, the Audit Committee considers whether such services are consistent with applicable rules regarding auditor independence.

All tax services require specific pre-approval by the Audit Committee. In addition, the Audit Committee has designated specific services that have the pre-approval of the Audit Committee (each of which is subject to pre-approved cost levels) and has classified these pre-approved services into one of three categories: Audit, Audit-Related and All Other (excluding Tax). The term of any pre-approval is twelve (12) months from the date of the pre-approval, unless the Audit Committee specifically provides for a different period. The Audit Committee reviews the list of pre-approved services from time to time and will revise it as and if appropriate. Pre-approved fee levels for all services to be provided by IAC’s independent registered public accounting firm are established periodically from time to time by the Audit Committee.

Pursuant to the pre-approval policy, the Audit Committee may delegate its authority to grant pre-approvals to one or more of its members and has currently delegated this authority to its Chair. The decisions of the Chair (or any other member(s) to whom such authority may be delegated) to grant pre-approvals are presented to the full Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting. The Audit Committee may not delegate its responsibilities to pre-approve services to IAC management.

 25

 

Information Concerning IAC Executive Officers Who Are Not Directors

Background information about IAC’s current executive officers and its former Chief Executive Officer, none of which are director nominees, is set forth below. For background information about IAC’s Chairman and Senior Executive, Barry Diller, and Vice Chairman, Victor A. Kaufman, see Information Concerning Director Nominees beginning on page 6.

 26

 

 27

Philosophy and Objectives

Overview

The executive officers whose compensation is discussed in this compensation discussion and analysis (the “CD&A”), and to whom IAC refers to as its named executive officers in this CD&A (the “NEOs”), are:

•

Barry Diller, Chairman and Senior Executive;

​

•

Joseph Levin, former Chief Executive Officer (until March 31, 2025);

​

•

Christopher Halpin, Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer;

​

•

Kendall Handler, Executive Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Secretary; and

​

•

Victor Kaufman, Vice Chairman.

​

IAC’s executive compensation program is designed to increase long-term stockholder value by attracting, retaining, motivating and rewarding leaders with the competence, character, experience and ambition necessary to enable IAC to meet its growth objectives.

Although IAC is a publicly traded company, it attempts to foster an entrepreneurial culture, and attract and retain senior executives with entrepreneurial backgrounds, attitudes and aspirations. Accordingly, when attempting to recruit and retain executive officers, as well as other executives who may become executive officers at a later time, IAC competes not only with other public companies, but also with earlier stage companies, companies funded by private equity and venture capital and other professional firms. IAC structures its executive compensation program so that it can compete in this varied marketplace for talent, with an emphasis on variable, contingent compensation and long-term equity ownership.

While IAC considers competitive market data in establishing broad compensation policies and practices and annually assesses the compensation associated with particular executive positions, it does not definitively rely on competitive market data or other benchmarking information in establishing executive compensation levels or structures. IAC makes decisions based on a host of factors particular to a given executive officer’s situation, including its firsthand experience with competition for recruiting executives and its understanding of the current environment, and believes that over-reliance on survey data (or a benchmarking approach) is too rigid for the dynamic and fast changing marketplace for talent in which IAC competes.

Similarly, IAC believes that arithmetic approaches to measuring and rewarding short-term performance often fail to adequately consider the multiple factors that contribute to success at a given individual executive and business level. In any given fiscal year, IAC may have multiple objectives, and these objectives (and their relative importance) often change as competitive and strategic landscapes shift and as IAC’s portfolio of businesses evolves. Accordingly, IAC has historically avoided the use of strict formulas in its annual bonus program, believing that they often over-compensate or under-compensate a given performance level. IAC instead relies primarily on an approach that, while based on clear objectives, is not formulaic and allows for the exercise of discretion by the Compensation and Human Capital Committee of the Board (for purposes of this CD&A, the “Committee”), based on its review of a range of Company factors and, to a lesser extent, each executive’s individual performance and other considerations, in setting final bonus amounts.

In addition, IAC is of the view that long-term incentive compensation in the form of equity awards aligns the interests of its executives with those of its stockholders. To further this important goal, equity awards play a prominent role in IAC’s overall executive compensation program. IAC has changed the form of its equity awards periodically over the years. For example, in 2019, IAC shifted from stock options to full value restricted stock unit (“RSU”) awards in an effort to reduce the dilutive impact of equity awards granted to its executive officers and strengthen the durability of retention, while still aligning the interests of its executives with those of its stockholders. Then, in 2020, IAC granted five (5) year cliff-vesting RSU awards (and, in the case of Mr. Levin only, a long-term, cliff-vesting performance-based restricted stock award (the

 28

 

“Restricted Stock Award”), which was cancelled and forfeited in connection with the CEO Transition (defined and described below)). In 2023, IAC moved to annual RSU awards generally vesting in equal installments over a four (4) year period and, in 2025, to reduce the number of shares issued to management, the Committee approved annual RSU awards generally vesting in equal installments over a three (3) year period. However, vesting schedules for the RSU awards granted in each of 2023, 2024 and 2025 vary by individual executive based on the vesting schedules of their outstanding awards as of the relevant grant dates. If previously granted cliff-vesting RSUs remained outstanding, in most cases, new RSU awards were backloaded to avoid incremental vestings in the year of the cliff vesting. IAC will continue to evaluate the appropriate form of equity-based incentive awards as market conditions evolve.

CEO Transition

On January 13, 2025, IAC announced that Mr. Levin would cease to serve as IAC’s Chief Executive Officer and as a member of the Board, effective as of the completion of the spin-off of Angi (the “Angi Spin-Off”). In connection with this announcement, IAC and Mr. Levin entered into an employment transition agreement, dated January 13, 2025 (the “ETA”). Pursuant to the ETA, Mr. Levin transitioned out of his role as Chief Executive Officer of IAC and resigned as a member of the Board immediately following the completion of the Angi Spin-Off on March 31, 2025 (the “CEO Transition”).

Pursuant to the ETA: (i) each of the employment agreement, by and between IAC and Mr. Levin, dated November 5, 2020 (the “CEO Employment Agreement”), the Amended and Restated Restricted Stock Agreement, by and between IAC and Mr. Levin, dated June 7, 2021 (the “RSA”), and the Voting Agreement, by and among Mr. Diller and the trustees of certain trusts, on the one hand, and Mr. Levin, on the other hand, dated November 5, 2020 (the “Voting Agreement”), were terminated, and (ii) the Restricted Stock Award granted to Mr. Levin was forfeited and cancelled in its entirety; provided, however, that the customary restrictive covenants contained in the CEO Employment Agreement (confidentiality, non-compete, non-solicit and those relating to proprietary rights and the related assignment of such rights) will remain in effect in accordance with the terms thereof.

Mr. Levin continued to serve as Chief Executive Officer and as a member of the Board through March 31, 2025 (the “CEO Transition Period”). During the CEO Transition Period, the Company paid Mr. Levin his then current annual base salary ($1,000,000) and provided him with his then current employee benefits. Following the CEO Transition Period, pursuant to the ETA, Mr. Levin agreed to provide consulting services to IAC for a period of six (6) years following March 31, 2025 (the “Consulting Services”). In consideration for the Consulting Services to be provided by Mr. Levin, the Company agreed to pay Mr. Levin an annual fee in the amount of  $3,000,000 per year, with $1,000,000 of such annual fee payable in equal monthly installments, and the remaining $2,000,000 of such annual fee payable on the first business day following each of March 31, 2026, 2027, 2028, 2029, 2030 and 2031. If IAC terminates the Consulting Services other than for Cause (as defined in the ETA), if Mr. Levin terminates the Consulting Services due to a Company payment default or in the event of Mr. Levin’s death or disability during the six (6) year Consulting Services period, IAC will pay all unpaid consulting fees for the balance of such period in one lump sum installment. IAC’s payment obligations related to the Consulting Services will immediately cease if IAC terminates the Consulting Services for Cause.

Annual Advisory Vote on NEO Compensation

 29

 

Compensation Decisions — Roles and Responsibilities

The Committee has primary responsibility for establishing the compensation of our executive officers. All compensation decisions referred to throughout this CD&A have been made by the Committee at meetings, based (in part) on recommendations from Messrs. Diller and, prior to the CEO Transition, Mr. Levin, as well as on such additional information deemed pertinent by the Committee in its discretion (as described below). The Committee currently consists of Messrs. Rosenblatt (Chair) and Zannino.

Our executive officers participate in structuring IAC-wide compensation programs and establishing appropriate annual cash bonus and equity pools. In early 2025, Mr. Diller met with the Committee and discussed his views regarding corporate and individual executive officer performance for 2024 for Messrs. Levin, Halpin and Kaufman and Ms. Handler, and his recommendations for annual bonuses for these executive officers. Mr. Diller also separately discussed his views regarding his own performance with the Committee. Following these discussions, the Committee met in an executive session to review and discuss these recommendations. After consideration of these recommendations, the Committee ultimately determined annual cash bonuses and RSU awards in respect of performance for the 2024 fiscal year for each executive officer and determined to increase Mr. Halpin’s base salary to $750,000 given his increased duties and responsibilities following the CEO Transition. In establishing a given executive officer’s compensation package, each individual component was evaluated independently and in relation to the package as a whole. Prior earning histories and outstanding long-term compensation arrangements were also reviewed and considered. However, the Committee does not believe in any formulaic relationship or targeted allocation between these elements. Instead, each individual executive officer’s situation was evaluated on a case-by-case basis (and is each year), considering a variety of relevant factors at the time.

The Committee periodically solicits advice from consulting firms and engages legal counsel (as appropriate). The Committee also receives, on at least an annual basis, a live presentation by an independent compensation consultant (see below) about recent developments and best practices concerning executive compensation, which took place in early 2024 and 2025. IAC may also periodically solicit survey or peer compensation data from various consulting firms and review this information with the Committee.

In addition, when structuring and determining compensation packages for Messrs. Diller and Kaufman, the Committee utilizes an independent compensation consultant, Compensia, Inc. (“Compensia”), chosen after considering such factors that the Committee reasonably determined to be appropriate and as may be required by 5605(d)(3) of the Marketplace Rules. From time to time, the Committee will direct Compensia to furnish any reports and/or peer studies as may be required by the Committee and continues to work with Compensia when structuring executive compensation.

The Committee initially retained Compensia in late 2021. As part of the annual review process for 2024 compensation, IAC asked Compensia to conduct a competitive market assessment of the Company’s executive compensation program. Compensia compiled data from proxy statements filed by (and other publicly available information regarding) peer companies and industry specific compensation survey data regarding compensation for executive officer positions (where available) to assist the Committee in its general understanding of current compensation practices.

Based on the consideration of the various independence factors specified in applicable SEC rules and the Marketplace Rules, and a review of these factors for 2024 and through early 2025, the Committee determined that its relationship with Compensia, and the work of Compensia on behalf of the Committee, does not raise any conflict of interest. The Committee will review the independence of Compensia (or such other compensation consultant as the Committee may retain from time to time) annually.

Compensation Elements

Compensation packages for our executive officers primarily consist of base salary, annual cash bonuses, equity awards and, in certain instances, perquisites and other benefits.

Base Salary

Base salary represents the fixed portion of an executive officer’s compensation and is intended to provide compensation for expected day-to-day performance. IAC typically negotiates a new executive officer’s starting salary upon arrival, based on factors such as prior compensation levels for the particular position within IAC, IAC’s New York City location, salary levels of other executive officers within IAC and salary levels available to the individual in alternative opportunities. Base

 30

 

salaries are reviewed periodically and may be increased based on a number of factors, including the assumption of additional responsibilities and other factors that demonstrate an executive officer’s increased value to IAC and review of competitive market data.

Annual Cash Bonuses

General

IAC’s bonus program is designed to reward performance on an annual basis and annual cash bonuses are discretionary. Annual cash bonuses for IAC’s executive officers tend to be highly variable from year-to-year depending on IAC’s performance and, in certain circumstances, individual executive officer performance. Because of the variable nature of the annual cash bonus program, and because in any given year, annual cash bonuses can make up the significant majority of an executive officer’s total cash compensation, IAC believes its executive officer annual cash bonus program provides a strong incentive for its executive officers to achieve annual corporate, strategic and individual performance objectives. Annual cash bonuses for IAC executive officers in respect of performance for the 2024 fiscal year were determined and paid in February 2025.

In making its determinations regarding individual annual cash bonus amounts, the Committee considers a variety of factors, such as growth in profitability and/or achievement of strategic objectives by IAC and, to a lesser extent, an individual executive officer’s performance and contribution to IAC. The Committee does not quantify the weight given to any specific factor or otherwise follow a formulaic calculation. Rather, the Committee engages in an overall assessment of appropriate annual cash bonus levels based on an evaluation of all of the criteria it determines to be relevant.

2024 Cash Bonuses

In determining cash bonus amounts for IAC executive officers in respect of performance for the 2024 fiscal year, the Committee considered a variety of factors specific to IAC’s overall performance, including the following:

While the factors noted above were the primary factors considered in determining annual cash bonus amounts, the Committee also considered each executive officer’s role and responsibilities, the relative contributions made by each executive officer during the year, the relative size of annual cash bonuses paid to other executive officers, the recommendations of the Chairman and Senior Executive (other than for his own annual cash bonus) and market data. In addition, the Committee considered achievements in 2024 as compared to achievements and annual cash bonus levels in prior years.

*

Adjusted EBITDA is a supplemental measure to U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). For a definition and description of Adjusted EBITDA, as well as a full reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to operating income (loss) (the most directly comparable financial measure per GAAP), see the disclosure set forth under the captions Item 7 — Management’s Discussion and Analysis — Principles of Financial Reporting” on pages 66-67 and Note 9 — Segment Information to IAC’s consolidated financial statements on pages 131-132, in each case, of the Annual Report.

​

 31

 

With respect to Mr. Diller’s annual cash bonus in respect of performance for the 2024 fiscal year, the Committee considered his continuing strategic oversight of IAC’s businesses and involvement with MGM, the Company’s profitability on a consolidated basis for 2024 and his prior compensation history, as well as reviewed a market assessment of compensation for Chair roles conducted by Compensia. With respect to Mr. Levin’s annual cash bonus in respect of performance for the 2024 fiscal year, the Committee considered his contributions during the year, notwithstanding the CEO Transition.

With respect to annual cash bonuses in the case of our other NEOs in respect of performance for the 2024 fiscal year, the Committee considered the following in the case of: (i) Mr. Halpin, his continuing role as both Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as well as his role in managing the Company’s balance sheet and capital position, his contributions to strategic, cost management and other operational initiatives and his operational responsibilities as Chief Operating Officer, (ii) Ms. Handler, her overall leadership, as well as her ongoing oversight of IAC’s legal, human resources, regulatory and compliance activities and contributions to strategic and operational initiatives, and (iii) Mr. Kaufman, his participation in strategic oversight of the Company.

Long-Term Incentives

Overview

Due to IAC’s entrepreneurial philosophy, we believe that providing a meaningful equity stake in our business is essential to create compensation opportunities that can compete, on a risk-adjusted basis, with the wide range of entrepreneurial employment alternatives in the competitive market. In addition, IAC believes that ownership shapes behavior, and that by providing compensation in the form of equity awards, it aligns executive officer incentives with stockholder interests in a manner that drives superior performance over time.

In determining the size of equity awards for an executive officer for any given period, the Committee reviews and evaluates on an individual-by-individual basis the amount of outstanding unvested and/or unexercised equity awards, as well as previously earned or exercised equity awards. In setting award levels, the predominant factors considered by the Committee are providing the executive officer with effective retention incentives, appropriate reward for past performance and incentives for strong future performance and competitive conditions. The annual corporate performance factors relevant to setting annual cash bonus amounts are also considered, although equity awards tend to be more forward-looking, and are a longer-term retention and reward instrument relative to annual cash bonuses.

IAC’s practice has been to schedule Committee meetings at which equity awards are to be granted well in advance of (and without regard to) the timing of the release of earnings or other material information.

2024 Equity Awards

In late 2023 and early 2024, the Committee reviewed outstanding equity awards held by our executive officers (other than Mr. Levin) and other employees. At such time, for NEOs, these awards consisted of RSU awards for Messrs. Diller, Halpin and Kaufman and Ms. Handler scheduled to cliff vest in each of 2025, 2027, 2025 and 2025, respectively. Although these prior RSU awards granted in 2020 (and in the case of Mr. Halpin only, 2022) were generally intended to be multi-year awards, in early 2023 and 2024, the Committee gradually shifted to a more systematic annual grant program in light of then current market conditions and retention profiles. As a result, in February 2024, the Committee granted RSUs to:

•

Mr. Halpin with a grant date value of  $3.5 million, vesting 50% on each of the second and fourth anniversaries of the grant date, respectively, subject to continued service through the applicable vesting dates; and

​

•

Ms. Handler with a grant date value of  $2.5 million, vesting 33% on each of the second, third and fourth anniversaries of the grant date, respectively, subject to continued service through the applicable vesting dates.

​

In determining the RSU awards for 2024, the Committee noted current market conditions and retention profiles. For Mr. Halpin, the Committee considered overall annual compensation for his role and the vesting schedules of his outstanding RSU awards, which resulted in the majority of his equity compensation vesting in 2027. For Ms. Handler, the Committee noted overall annual compensation for her role, as well as the vesting schedules of her outstanding RSU awards.

No other executive officer received an equity award in 2024. For Messrs. Diller, Levin and Kaufman, this was due to their then current equity positions.

2025 Equity Awards

In late 2024 and early 2025, the Committee reviewed outstanding equity awards held by our executive officers and other employees, including the awards previously granted to Mr. Halpin and Ms. Handler.

 32

 

Considering these previous grants and current market and retention trends, the Committee granted RSUs in February 2025 to:

No other executive officer received an equity award in 2025. For Mr. Diller, this was due to his current equity award holdings and, for Mr. Levin, due to the CEO Transition.

Stock Ownership Policy

To further align the interests of IAC’s executive officers with those of its stockholders, the Committee has a formal stock ownership policy (the “Stock Ownership Policy”) for IAC’s executive officers (the “Designated Executives”) in place. The Stock Ownership Policy provides for a minimum stockholding target that each Designated Executive is expected to accumulate and hold (the “Stock Targets”). Under the Stock Ownership Policy, the Stock Targets are:

The Stock Targets are established on the date an executive officer is first appointed as a Designated Executive and annually thereafter on June 30th (a “Measurement Date”), based on the average closing price of IAC common stock for

 33

 

the 30 consecutive trading days immediately prior to the applicable Measurement Date. Designated Executives will have five years from the later of the effective date of the Stock Ownership Policy (April 2022) and the date of hire or appointment into an eligible position to achieve the Stock Targets for their respective levels.

Under the Stock Ownership Policy, shares of IAC common stock owned outright or in a trust or other arrangement under the Designated Executive’s direction (such as shares owned by immediate family members, so long as the Designated Executive does not disclaim beneficial ownership for SEC reporting purposes) count toward compliance with the Stock Target requirements, but unexercised stock options and unvested RSU and restricted stock awards do not count toward compliance with the Stock Target requirements.

The Stock Ownership Policy also includes stock retention provisions. If a Designated Executive has not met his or her Stock Target requirements on the most recent Measurement Date, he or she must retain 25% of the net shares acquired upon the exercise of any stock options or vesting of RSU or restricted stock awards until a subsequent Measurement Date on which the applicable Stock Target requirements are met (the “Holdback”). The Committee has discretion to increase the Holdback percentage if a given Designated Executive’s progress toward his or her Stock Target requirements is not satisfactory. Based on the most recent Measurement Date (June 30, 2024), the following Stock Target requirements are in effect for IAC’s NEOs:

​

(1)

From and after her appointment as an executive officer in December 2021, Ms. Handler has retained all of the net shares acquired upon the vesting of her RSU awards. And while she did not meet her Stock Target as of the most recent Measurement Date (June 30, 2024), based on her holdings of IAC common stock as of February 2025 and assuming her compliance with the Stock Ownership Policy through the next Measurement Date on June 30, 2025, she is expected to meet her Stock Target on such date.

​

For information regarding shares of IAC common stock held by each NEO, see Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management.

Change of Control

IAC equity awards granted to executive officers generally include a so-called “double-trigger” change of control provision, which provides for the acceleration of the vesting of outstanding equity awards in connection with a change of control of IAC only when an award holder suffers an involuntary termination of employment during the two (2)year period following such change of control. The Committee believes that providing for the acceleration of the vesting of equity awards after an involuntary termination of employment in this case will assist in the retention of IAC’s executive officers through a change of control transaction. Prior to the cancellation and forfeiture of the Restricted Stock Award in January 2025 in connection with the CEO Transition, the terms of such award provided for full vesting upon the consummation of a change of control of IAC. The Board and the Committee believed that this treatment was appropriate given the long-term nature of the arrangement and the Voting Agreement, which was an essential element of the arrangement for Mr. Levin. The Voting Agreement was terminated in January 2025 in connection with the CEO Transition.

For purposes of this discussion and the discussion below under the Severance caption, we use the term “involuntary termination” to mean both a termination of an executive officer’s employment by IAC without “cause” and a resignation by an executive officer for “good reason” or similar construct.

Severance

IAC generally provides its executive officers with some amount of salary continuation and the acceleration of the vesting of certain equity awards in the event of an involuntary termination of employment. IAC believes that by providing this benefit, it increases the retentive effect of its equity program, which IAC believes is its most important retention incentive.

IAC generally does not provide for the acceleration of the vesting of equity awards in the event an executive officer voluntarily resigns from IAC.

Other Compensation

General

IAC provides Mr. Diller (and prior to the CEO Transition, provided Mr. Levin) with various non-cash benefits as part of their overall compensation packages. Under certain limited circumstances, other executive officers have also received

 34

 

non-cash benefits. The value of these benefits is calculated under appropriate rules and is considered as a component of compensation when establishing overall compensation levels. The value of all non-cash benefits is reported under the All Other Compensation column in the Summary Compensation Table pursuant to applicable SEC rules. IAC’s executive officers do not participate in any deferred compensation or retirement programs other than IAC’s 401(k) plan. IAC does not generally provide tax gross-ups for its executive officers. Other than those described specifically below, IAC’s executive officers do not partake in any benefit programs, or receive any significant perquisites, distinct from other IAC employees.

Mr. Diller

Pursuant to IAC policy, Mr. Diller is required to travel, both for business and personal purposes, on corporate aircraft. In addition to serving general security interests, this means of travel permits him to travel non-stop and without delay, to remain in contact with IAC while he is traveling, to change his plans quickly in the event IAC business requires and to conduct confidential IAC business while flying, be it telephonically, by e-mail or in person. These interests are similarly furthered on both business and personal flights, as Mr. Diller typically provides his services to IAC while traveling in either case. Nonetheless, the incremental cost to IAC of his travel for personal purposes is reflected as compensation to Mr. Diller from IAC and is considered in establishing his overall compensation package. IAC provides certain IT equipment and services for use by certain individuals who work for Mr. Diller personally. These uses are valued by IAC at their incremental cost to IAC.

Mr. Levin

Prior to the CEO Transition, pursuant to IAC policy, Mr. Levin was encouraged to travel, both for business and personal purposes, on corporate aircraft for the same reasons as set forth above for Mr. Diller. The incremental cost to IAC of his travel for personal purposes is reflected as compensation to Mr. Levin from IAC and was considered in establishing his overall compensation package.

Tax Deductibility

Compensation in excess of  $1 million paid to IAC’s current NEOs will not be deductible by reason of Section 162(m) of the Code unless it qualifies for limited transition relief applicable to certain arrangements in place as of November 2, 2017 (“Grandfathered Arrangements”). The Committee reserves the right to modify Grandfathered Arrangements in a manner that results in the loss of a compensation deduction if it determines that such modifications are consistent with IAC’s best interests.

In addition, the Committee believes that, in establishing the cash and equity incentive compensation plans and arrangements for IAC’s executive officers, the potential deductibility of the compensation payable under those plans and arrangements is just one relevant factor to consider. For that reason, the Committee may deem it appropriate to provide one or more of IAC’s executive officers with the opportunity to earn incentive compensation, whether through cash incentive awards tied to its financial performance or equity incentive awards tied to a given executive officer’s continued service, which may be in excess of the amount deductible by reason of Section 162(m) of the Code. The Committee believes it is important to maintain cash and equity incentive compensation at the requisite level to attract and retain the individuals essential to IAC’s financial success, even if all or part of that compensation may not be deductible by reason of the Section 162(m) limitation.

Other Guidelines and Procedures Affecting Executive Compensation

 35

 

Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation

IAC follows Financial Accounting Standard Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718 (“ASC 718”) for its stock-based compensation awards. ASC 718 requires companies to measure the compensation expense for all share-based payment awards made to employees and directors based on the grant date “fair value” of these awards. This calculation is performed for accounting purposes and reported in the compensation tables below, even though IAC’s executive officers may never realize any value from their awards. ASC Topic 718 also requires companies to recognize the compensation cost of their stock- based awards in their income statements over the period that an employee is required to render service in exchange for the award.

 36

The Compensation and Human Capital Committee has reviewed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and discussed it with IAC management. In reliance on its review and the discussions referred to above, the Compensation and Human Capital Committee has recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in IAC’s 2024 Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended by Amendment No. 1 and this proxy statement.

Members of the Compensation and Human Capital Committee

David Rosenblatt (Chair)
Richard F. Zannino

 37

In 2024, the membership of IAC’s Compensation and Human Capital Committee consisted of Messrs. Rosenblatt (Chair) and Zannino. None of these individuals have ever been an officer or employee of IAC at any time during their respective service on the committee.

 38

Overview

The Executive Compensation section of this proxy statement sets forth certain information regarding total compensation earned by our NEOs for the years set forth below, as well as IAC equity awards granted to them in 2024 (as and if applicable), equity awards held by them on December 31, 2024 and the dollar value realized by them upon the exercise and/or vesting of equity awards (as applicable) during 2024.

Summary Compensation Table

​

(1)

The amounts in the table above for 2024 under the column header Stock Awards reflects the grant date fair value of IAC RSUs calculated by multiplying the closing price of IAC common stock on the grant date by the number of IAC RSUs awarded. For further details regarding these awards, see footnote 1 to the table set forth under Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2024 and footnote 2 to the table set forth under Outstanding Equity Awards at 2024 Fiscal Year-End.

​

(2)

Additional information regarding all other compensation amounts for each NEO in 2024 is as follows:

​

​

(a)

Pursuant to IAC’s Airplane Travel Policy, Mr. Diller is required to travel by IAC aircraft (either IAC-owned or aircraft in which IAC has purchased a fractional interest) for both business and personal purposes and, prior to the CEO Transition, Mr. Levin

​

 39

 

was encouraged to use IAC aircraft (either IAC-owned or aircraft in which IAC has purchased a fractional interest) for business and personal purposes when doing so would serve the interests of IAC. See the discussion regarding airplane travel under the Other Compensation section of the Compensation Discussion and Analysis. Amounts in the table above for Messrs. Diller and Levin reflect the incremental cost to IAC for personal use of IAC aircraft. We calculate the incremental cost to IAC for personal use based on the average variable operating costs to IAC. In the case of IAC-owned aircraft, variable operating costs include fuel, certain maintenance costs, navigation fees, on-board catering, landing fees, crew travel expenses and other miscellaneous variable costs. The total annual variable costs are divided by the annual number of miles the IAC-owned aircraft flew to derive an average variable cost per mile. This average variable cost per mile is then multiplied by the miles flown for personal use.

Incremental costs do not include fixed costs that do not change based on usage, such as pilot salaries, the purchase costs of IAC-owned aircraft, insurance, scheduled maintenance and non-trip related hangar expenses. In the case of aircraft in which IAC has purchased a fractional interest, variable costs are calculated by multiplying the hours flown for personal use by the hourly flight and fuel charges, plus airport arrival and/or departure fees (if applicable), and do not include monthly management fees for such aircraft. In the event a NEO has family members or other guests accompany him or her on a business or personal trip, such travel (while it does not result in any incremental cost to IAC) results in the imputation of taxable income to the relevant NEO, the amount of which is calculated in accordance with applicable Internal Revenue Service rules.

(b)

In the case of Mr. Diller, represents the total amount of other benefits provided to Mr. Diller, none of which individually exceeded 10% of the total value of all perquisites and personal benefits and which reflect an allocation (based on the number of personal computers and communication devices supported by IAC) of costs relating to the use by such individuals of IAC’s information technology technical support and certain communications equipment.

​

(3)

Mr. Levin served as Chief Executive Officer of IAC from June 24, 2015 to March 31, 2025. In addition, Mr. Levin served as Chief Executive Officer of Angi from October 10, 2022 to April 4, 2024. For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, $130,833 of Mr. Levin’s 2024 salary, $478,750 of his bonus in respect of performance for the 2024 fiscal year and $5,000 of his 401(k) matching amounts, in each case, reflected in the table above, was allocated to Angi. See Note 16-Related Party Transactions to IAC’s consolidated financial statements on page 154 of the Annual Report. In connection with the CEO Transition, Mr. Levin was appointed Executive Chairman of Angi as of April 1, 2025. See the disclosure under the captions Compensation Discussion and Analysis-CEO Transition and Certain Relationships and Related Person Transactions-Relationships Involving Significant Stockholders, Executive Officers and Directors-Relationships Involving Mr. Levin.

​

 40

 

Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2024

The table below provides information regarding all IAC equity awards granted to our NEOs in 2024. The number of IAC RSUs granted do not reflect adjustments made to such awards in connection with the Angi Spin-Off.

​

(1)

Reflects the grant date fair value of IAC RSU awards granted to Mr. Halpin and Ms. Handler in February 2024, calculated by multiplying the closing price of IAC common stock on the grant date by the number of IAC RSUs awarded.

​

(2)

Represents IAC RSUs that vest in two equal installments on the second and fourth anniversaries of the grant date, subject to continued service through the applicable vesting dates, and with partial vesting upon certain terminations of employment.

​

(3)

Represents IAC RSUs that vest in three equal installments on the second, third and fourth anniversaries of the grant date, subject to continued service through the applicable vesting dates, and with partial vesting upon certain terminations of employment.

​

 41

 

Outstanding Equity Awards at 2024 Fiscal Year-End

​

(1)

The number of IAC stock options, RSUs and shares of restricted stock and exercise prices in this table do not reflect adjustments made to such awards (as applicable) in connection with the Angi Spin-Off.

​

(2)

In connection with the spin-off of Vimeo in 2021 (the “Vimeo Spin-Off”), each IAC stock option outstanding (all of which were vested) at the time of the Vimeo Spin-Off was split into an IAC stock option and a Vimeo stock option. In addition, in connection with the separation of the businesses within IAC’s former Match Group financial reporting segment from IAC in 2020 (the “Match Separation”), each IAC stock option outstanding (all of which were vested) at the time of the Match Separation was split into an IAC stock option and a Match Group stock option. These IAC, Vimeo and Match Group stock options otherwise have the same terms and conditions (including exercise periods) as the corresponding vested IAC stock options outstanding immediately prior to the relevant transaction.

​

For all IAC NEOs, any value realized upon the exercise of Vimeo and/or Match Group stock options is treated for tax purposes as compensation payable to them in their respective current or former (as applicable) capacities as executive officers of IAC. Accordingly, information regarding Vimeo and Match Group stock options held by IAC NEOs as of December 31, 2024 appears below and information regarding exercises of Vimeo stock options and Match Group stock options by any NEO in any fiscal year (as applicable) will be disclosed under the caption Option Exercises and Stock Vested for the relevant year.

 42

 

​

(3)

In the case of Mr. Diller, represents IAC RSUs that cliff vest on November 5, 2025, subject to continued service through the vesting date, and with partial vesting upon certain terminations of employment.

​

In the case of Mr. Levin, represents the Restricted Stock Award that was scheduled to generally cliff vest on the tenth anniversary of the grant date (November 5, 2020), based on the satisfaction of certain IAC stock price targets and Mr. Levin’s continued employment through the vesting date, and with partial vesting upon certain terminations of employment. In connection with the CEO Transition, the Restricted Stock Award was cancelled and forfeited in January 2025 in connection with the entry by IAC and Mr. Levin into the ETA. See Note 10-Stock Based Compensation to IAC’s consolidated financial statements on pages 133-134 of the Annual Report and the disclosure under the captions Compensation Disclosure and Analysis-CEO Transition and Certain Relationships and Related Person Transactions-Relationships Involving Significant Stockholders, Executive Officers and Directors-Relationships Involving Mr. Levin.

As of December 31, 2024 and the date of this proxy statement, Mr. Levin holds 3,247,000 shares of Vimeo restricted stock, which he received pursuant to the terms of the Restricted Stock Award in connection with the Vimeo Spin-Off. The vesting of these shares of Vimeo restricted stock is subject to Mr. Levin’s continued service at Vimeo (as of the date of this proxy statement, he serves as a special advisor to Vimeo), among other conditions.

In the case of Mr. Halpin, represents: (i) 174,906 IAC RSUs that vest in one lump sum installment on January 26, 2027, (ii) 37,658 IAC RSUs that vested/vest 37.5% on the first and second anniversaries of the grant date, respectively, and 12.5% on the third and fourth anniversaries of the grant date (February 8, 2023), respectively, and (iii) 67,088 IAC RSUs that vest in two equal installments on the second and fourth anniversaries of the grant date (February 6, 2024), in all cases, subject to continued service through the applicable vesting dates, and with partial vesting upon certain terminations of employment.

In the case of Ms. Handler, represents: (i) 27,752 IAC RSUs that cliff vested on February 15, 2025, (ii) 60,151 IAC RSUs that cliff vest on November 30, 2025, (iii) 35,304 IAC RSUs that vested/vest 25%, 50% and 25% on the first, third and fourth anniversaries of the grant date (February 8, 2023), and (iv) 47,920 IAC RSUs that vest in three equal installments on the second, third and fourth anniversaries of the grant date (February 6, 2024), in all cases, subject to continued service through the applicable vesting dates, and with partial vesting upon certain terminations of employment.

In the case of Mr. Kaufman, represents IAC RSUs that cliff vested on February 15, 2025.

For a discussion of the treatment of the IAC RSU and restricted stock awards described above in connection with certain terminations of employment, see Estimated Potential Payments Upon Termination of Change in Control.

(4)

Reflects the maximum number of shares of restricted IAC common stock held by Mr. Levin as of December 31, 2024. This award was forfeited and cancelled in connection with the CEO Transition.

​

 43

 

2024 Option Exercises and Stock Vested

Information regarding the number of shares acquired by IAC NEOs upon the exercise of IAC and Vimeo stock options and the vesting of IAC RSUs in 2024 and the related value realized (if any), excluding the effect of applicable taxes, is set forth in the table below. None of our NEOs exercised any Match Group stock options in 2024. Applicable stock prices are the actual historical stock prices as of the date(s) of exercise and/or vesting and, accordingly, do not reflect adjustments made to such prices to reflect the Angi Spin-Off.

​

(1)

In addition to the exercise of IAC stock options described in the table above, Mr. Levin exercised Vimeo stock options in 2024 (the “Vimeo Option Exercise”).

​

In connection with the Vimeo Option Exercise, he realized value in the amount of  $1,021,636, which is equal to the difference between the exercise price of such stock options and the closing price of Vimeo common stock at the time of exercise, multiplied by the number of stock options exercised.

(2)

Represents the dollar value realized by Mr. Halpin and Ms. Handler upon the vesting of IAC RSUs, which is equal to the closing price of IAC common stock on the vesting date, multiplied by the number of IAC RSUs that vested.

​

 44

 

Estimated Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

Overview

Certain IAC employment agreements, equity award agreements and/or omnibus stock and annual incentive plans entitle IAC NEOs to continued base salary payments, the acceleration of the vesting of IAC equity awards and/or extended post-termination exercise periods for stock options upon certain terminations of employment (including certain terminations during specified periods following a change in control of IAC). In addition, pursuant to the terms of Mr. Levin’s Restricted Stock Award prior to the CEO Transition, he was entitled to the acceleration of the vesting of 100% of such award upon a change in control of IAC.

Amounts and Benefits Payable Upon a Qualifying Termination

Certain amounts that would have become payable to IAC NEOs upon the events described above (as and if applicable), assuming that the relevant event occurred on December 31, 2024, are described and quantified in the table below. These amounts, which exclude the effect of any applicable taxes, are based on the applicable base salary, the number of unvested IAC RSUs and/or shares of IAC restricted stock outstanding on December 31, 2024 and the closing price of IAC common stock on December 31, 2024 ($43.14, the actual stock price as of such date, which does not reflect adjustments made to such stock price in connection with the Angi Spin-Off).

•

Mr. Diller. With the exception of the agreement related to Mr. Diller’s RSU award granted in November 2020 (the “2020 Award Agreement”), no payments or other benefits would have been made or provided to Mr. Diller pursuant to any agreement between him and IAC upon a termination without cause or a resignation for good reason (a “Qualifying Termination”) or due to death or disability on December 31, 2024. Upon a Qualifying Termination, pursuant to the terms of the 2020 Award Agreement, Mr. Diller would have been entitled to the vesting of eighty percent (80%) of such award as of December 31, 2024.

​

•

Mr. Levin. Upon a Qualifying Termination on December 31, 2024, pursuant to the terms of his employment agreement then in effect, Mr. Levin would have been entitled to:

​

•

receive base salary through the date that is twelve (12) months from the date of such Qualifying Termination (the “Severance Period”), subject to the execution and non-revocation of a release and compliance with customary post-termination covenants, and subject to offset for any amounts earned from other employment during the Severance Period; and

​

•

continue to have the ability to exercise his vested IAC, Vimeo and Match Group stock options through June 30, 2026.

​

In addition, pursuant to the terms of the Restricted Stock Award, upon a Qualifying Termination on December 31, 2024, Mr. Levin would have been entitled to the vesting of 50% of such award.

For Mr. Levin, “good reason” meant: (i) a material reduction in his title, responsibilities, duties or authority from time to time; for the avoidance of doubt, it shall be a material adverse change in his title, responsibilities, duties or authority if: (A) a material acquisition or disposition of any assets or business, (B) the entry into a material new line of business or (C) the spin-off or split-off or similar separation of a material business of IAC is approved by the Board over his written objection (which must be provided by him reasonably in advance of the approval of the Board, so long as he has reasonable notice of its consideration), (ii) any material reduction in his base salary, (iii) the relocation of his principal place of employment outside of New York, New York, (iv) the failure of IAC to nominate him to stand for re-election to the Board or his removal from the Board (other than by reason of death, disability, cause or a voluntary resignation), (v) the requirement that he report to anyone other than IAC’s Chairman and Senior Executive (or, if Mr. Diller ceases to serve as IAC’s Chairman and Senior Executive, to the Board), (vi) an individual other than Mr. Diller, Mr. Levin or another member of the Board who has served for at least three years at the time of his or her appointment is elected to serve as Chairman of the Board, (vii) any other action or inaction that constitutes a material breach by IAC of his employment agreement and (viii) a successor to all or substantially all of the business and/or assets of IAC does not assume expressly and agree to perform his employment agreement.

Upon a termination of Mr. Levin’s employment due to his death on December 31, 2024, pursuant to the terms of his employment agreement then in effect: (i) his estate would have been entitled to continue to have the ability to exercise his vested IAC, Vimeo and Match Group stock options through June 30, 2026, and (ii) a portion of his Restricted Stock Award would have vested, based on IAC stock price performance through the date of his death (taking into account the shortened IAC stock price performance period), subject to pro-ration, based on the portion of the ten (10) year term that would have elapsed through such date. Upon a termination of

 45

 

Mr. Levin’s employment due to disability on December 31, 2024, he would have been entitled to receive the benefits described in (ii) immediately above pursuant to the terms of the Restricted Stock Award.

In connection with the CEO Transition and pursuant to the ETA, the Restricted Stock Award was forfeited and cancelled in January 2025. See Note 10-Stock Based Compensation to IAC’s consolidated financial statements on pages 133-134 of the Annual Report and the disclosure under the captions Compensation Discussion and Analysis-CEO Transition and Certain Relationships and Related Person Transactions-Relationships Involving Significant Stockholders, Executive Officers and Directors-Relationships Involving Mr. Levin.

•

Mr. Halpin. Upon a Qualifying Termination on December 31, 2024, pursuant to the terms of his employment agreement, Mr. Halpin would have been entitled to:

​

•

receive base salary for the Severance Period, subject to the execution and non-revocation of a release and compliance with customary post- termination covenants, and subject to offset for any amounts earned from other employment during the Severance Period; and

​

•

the partial vesting of outstanding and unvested IAC equity awards (including any cliff vesting awards, which shall be subject to pro-ration as though such awards had an annual vesting schedule) in amounts equal to the number that would have otherwise vested during the Severance Period.

​

For Mr. Halpin, “good reason” means: (i) the material diminution in his base salary, (ii) a material adverse change in reporting structure, such that he is no longer reporting to IAC’s Chief Executive Officer (or if IAC does not have a Chief Executive Officer, to its Chairman and Senior Executive), (iii) a material adverse change in his title, duties or level of responsibilities (excluding for this purpose any such change that is an isolated and inadvertent action not taken in bad faith, but including any circumstance under which IAC is no longer publicly traded and is controlled by another company) and (iv) a material relocation of his principal place of employment outside of the New York City metropolitan area, in each case, without his written consent or that is not cured promptly after notice. No payments or other benefits would have been made or provided to Mr. Halpin pursuant to any agreement between him and IAC upon a termination of his employment due to death or disability.

•

Ms. Handler. Upon a Qualifying Termination on December 31, 2024, pursuant to the terms of her employment agreement, Ms. Handler would have been entitled to:

​

•

receive base salary for the Severance Period, subject to the execution and non-revocation of a release and compliance with customary post-termination covenants, and subject to offset for any amounts earned from other employment during the Severance Period;

​

•

the partial vesting of outstanding and unvested IAC equity awards (including any cliff vesting awards, which shall be subject to pro- ration as though such awards had an annual vesting schedule) in amounts equal to the number that would have otherwise vested during the Severance Period; and

​

•

continue to have the ability to exercise her vested IAC and Vimeo stock options through June 30, 2026.

​

For Ms. Handler, “good reason” means: (i) a material adverse change in her title, duties or level of responsibilities (excluding for this purpose any such change that is an isolated and inadvertent action not taken in bad faith, but including any circumstance under which IAC is no longer publicly traded and is controlled by another company), (ii) a material reduction in her base salary, (iii) a material relocation of her principal place of employment outside of the New York City metropolitan area and (iv) a material adverse change in reporting structure such that she is no longer reporting to IAC’s Chief Executive Officer (or if IAC does not have a Chief Executive Officer, to its Chairman and Senior Executive), in each case, without her written consent or that is not cured promptly after notice.

•

Mr. Kaufman. Upon a Qualifying Termination on December 31, 2024, pursuant to the terms of his employment agreement, Mr. Kaufman would have been entitled to the partial vesting of outstanding and unvested IAC equity awards (including any cliff vesting awards, which shall be subject to pro-ration as though such awards had an annual vesting schedule) in amounts equal to the number that would have otherwise vested during the Severance Period.

​

For Mr. Kaufman, “good reason” means a material breach of his employment agreement by the Company that is not cured promptly after notice.

Award Vesting

In addition to the payments and benefits described above, pursuant to the terms of their respective IAC RSU awards granted in 2020 (Ms. Handler and Mr. Kaufman) and 2022 (Mr. Halpin): (i) Ms. Handler and Mr. Kaufman would have been entitled to the vesting of eighty percent (80%) of their awards and (ii)Mr. Halpin would have been entitled to the vesting of forty percent (40%) of his award, in each case, as of December 31, 2024. No payments or other benefits would have been

 46

 

made or provided to Messrs. Diller, Halpin and Kaufman nor Ms. Handler pursuant to any agreement between these NEOs and IAC upon a termination of their respective employment due to death or disability.

Amounts and Benefits Payable Upon a Change in Control

Apart from Mr. Levin, no payments would have been made to any of our NEOs pursuant to any agreement between any of them and IAC upon a change in control of IAC on December 31, 2024.

In the case of Mr. Levin, pursuant to the terms of the Restricted Stock Award, 100% of his award would have vested upon a change in control of IAC as of December 31, 2024. The terms of the Restricted Stock Award provided that “change in control” had the meaning set forth in IAC’s 2018 Stock and Annual Incentive Plan; provided, however, that the occurrence of the following would have also constituted a “change in control” for purposes of the award: (i) the acquisition by any individual entity or group other than Barry Diller of any of his affiliates (the “Permitted Holders”) of beneficial ownership of equity securities of IAC representing both: (A) more than 35% of the voting power of the then outstanding equity securities of IAC entitled to vote generally in the election of directors (“Outstanding Company Voting Securities”) and (B) more than the aggregate voting power of the then Outstanding Company Voting Securities represented by the equity securities held by the Permitted Holders.

Upon a Qualifying Termination on December 31, 2024 that occurred during the two (2) year period following a change in control of IAC (as defined in the applicable omnibus stock and annual incentive plan(s) and related award agreements), the vesting of all then outstanding and unvested IAC RSUs held by each NEO would have been accelerated.

In addition, under the Equity and Bonus Compensation Agreement, dated August 24, 1995, between IAC and Mr. Diller, IAC agreed that to the extent any payment or distribution by IAC to or for the benefit of Mr. Diller (whether under the terms of the related agreement or otherwise) would be subject to the excise tax imposed by §4999 of the Code, or any interest or penalties are incurred by Mr. Diller with respect to such excise tax, then Mr. Diller would be entitled to a gross-up payment covering the excise taxes and related interest and penalties. Given the payments Mr. Diller would have received upon an assumed change in control of IAC on December 31, 2024, IAC does not believe that any excise tax would be imposed or that any gross-up would be required.

​

(1)

Represents the closing price of IAC common stock ($43.14) on December 31, 2024, multiplied by: (i) in the case of Messrs. Diller, Halpin and Kaufman and Ms. Handler, the number of IAC RSUs, and (ii) in the case of Mr. Levin, the number of shares of restricted IAC common stock, in each case, that would have vested upon the occurrence of the relevant event specified above. The stock price as of December 31, 2024 is the actual historical stock price as of such date and, accordingly, does not reflect adjustments made to such stock price in connection with the Angi Spin-Off.

​

(2)

In the event of Mr. Levin’s death or disability on December 31, 2024, pursuant to the terms of the Restricted Stock Award, shares of IAC common stock would have vested in a number to be determined by reference to the related award agreement.

​

(3)

Reflects the maximum number of shares of IAC common stock that would have vested as of December 31, 2024 pursuant to the terms of the Restricted Stock Award.

​

 47

 48