Filed by the Registrant ☒ | Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ☐ |
☐ |
Preliminary Proxy Statement
|
☐ |
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
|
☐ |
Definitive Proxy Statement
|
☒ |
Definitive Additional Materials
|
☐ |
Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12
|
☒
|
No fee required.
|
|
☐
|
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
|
|
(1)
|
Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
|
|
(2)
|
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
|
|
(3)
|
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
|
|
(4)
|
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
|
|
(5)
|
Total fee paid:
|
|
☐
|
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
|
|
☐
|
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or
Schedule and the date of its filing.
|
|
(1)
|
Amount Previously Paid:
|
|
(2)
|
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
|
|
(3)
|
Filing Party:
|
|
(4)
|
Date Filed:
|
|
• |
Homer Tovar vs. J. Alexander’s Holdings, Inc., et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-06925, filed on August 17, 2021 in the U.S. District Court for the
Southern District of New York (the “Tovar Complaint”);
|
• |
Clifton McNalley vs. J. Alexander’s Holdings, Inc., et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-06961, filed on August 18, 2021 in the U.S. District Court for
the Southern District of New York (the “McNalley Complaint”);
|
• |
Matthew Hopkins vs. J. Alexander's Holdings, Inc., et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-07063, filed on August 20, 2021 in the U.S. District Court for the
Southern District of New York (the “Hopkins Complaint”); and
|
• |
Todd Augenbaum vs. J. Alexander's Holdings, Inc., et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-04740, filed on August 23, 2021 in the U.S. District Court for the
Eastern District of New York (the “Augenbaum Complaint”).
|
• |
Major vs. J. Alexander's Holdings, Inc., et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-04832, filed on August 26, 2021 in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern
District of New York (the “Major Complaint,” and collectively with the Tovar Complaint, the McNalley Complaint, the Hopkins Complaint and the Augenbaum Complaint, the “Complaints”).
|
$ in millions |
2H 2021
|
2022
|
2023
|
2024
|
2025
|
|||||||||||||||
Public Company EBITDA(1)
|
$ |
12.5
|
$ |
35.3
|
$ |
39.5
|
$ |
45.4
|
$ |
50.3
|
||||||||||
Depreciation and Amortization Expense and Loss on Disposal
|
(6.5
|
)
|
(13.6
|
)
|
(14.6
|
)
|
(15.5
|
)
|
(16.4
|
)
|
||||||||||
Operating Income
|
6.1
|
21.7
|
25.0
|
29.9
|
33.9
|
|||||||||||||||
Income Taxes(2)
|
(0.9
|
)
|
(3.3
|
)
|
(3.7
|
)
|
(4.5
|
)
|
(5.1
|
)
|
||||||||||
After-Tax Operating Income
|
5.1
|
18.4
|
21.2
|
25.4
|
28.8
|
|||||||||||||||
Non-Cash Rent
|
(0.1
|
)
|
0.5
|
0.7
|
0.6
|
0.5
|
||||||||||||||
Depreciation and Amortization Expense and Loss on Disposal
|
6.5
|
13.6
|
14.6
|
15.5
|
16.4
|
|||||||||||||||
Net Capital Expenditures
|
(6.4
|
)
|
(18.8
|
)
|
(19.8
|
)
|
(20.1
|
)
|
(20.4
|
)
|
||||||||||
(Increase)/Decrease in Working Capital
|
2.0
|
0.3
|
1.1
|
1.1
|
1.2
|
|||||||||||||||
Free Cash Flow
|
$ |
7.1
|
$ |
14.1
|
$ |
17.7
|
$ |
22.4
|
$ |
26.6
|
(1) |
Represents EBITDA after pre-opening costs, share-based compensation and public company expenses.
|
(2) |
Assumes a 15.0% effective tax rate.
|