Institutional Shareholder Services
702 King Farm Boulevard, Suite 400
Rockville, MD 20850
Re: Lazard, Inc. – Inconsistencies in ISS Report on Say-on-Pay Proposal
We write to express our strong concern regarding your research regarding our say-on-pay proposal in your proxy report (“ISS Report”). This letter follows the Company’s letter of April 24, 2025 expressing our initial concerns about your analysis and the subsequent meeting. We will also file this letter with the SEC in order to make it widely available to our shareholders.
We were surprised by your recommendation given the Company’s strong financial performance in 2024 (which was reflected in our TSR of 55%), reasonable compensation levels (CEO awarded compensation was in the 86th percentile, which is less than the peer median in the ISS Report), and acknowledged responsiveness to shareholders’ primary identified concern of repeated use of special Stock Price PRPU awards over multiple years (noting no such intent).
Notably, there are two specific methodological errors that if corrected results in a “low” concern in ISS’s quantitative analysis. Therefore, the current ISS Report merits a revised analysis and recommendation on our say-on-pay proposal for the following reasons:
Summary
ISS research relies on a new and unprecedented peer group. By ISS’s own standards, ISS’s peer group methodology “focuses on identifying companies that are reasonably similar to the subject company in terms of industry profile, size, and market capitalization.” The peer group used in the ISS Report, however, added – without explanation – a company with little to no similarities to Lazard. Freedom Holding is a Kazakhstan-based retail brokerage and investment banking firm listed on an exchange consisting of early-stage issuers with lower market capitalization. Simply omitting Freedom Holding, or using the same peer group used last year or our own peer group from the 2025 Proxy Statement, each results in a “low” concern in ISS’s quantitative analysis.
The same negative impact results from the fact that ISS uses an unconventional approach to valuing equity awards, which more than doubled the value of our CEO’s 2023 equity award. As noted in the ISS Report, the grant date fair market value for our CEO’s 2023 grant of Stock Price PRPUs (as defined in the 2025 Proxy Statement), calculated in accordance with SEC rules and U.S. GAAP and as reported in the relevant proxy statement, was approximately $18.8 million (compared to the $40.5 million value you use in your calculations). Using the Company’s determined value produces a “low” concern under your methodology even when using the ISS peer group that inexplicably contains Freedom Holding.
For these reasons, we request that ISS conduct a thorough review of the ISS Report and revise its say-on-pay proposal recommendation accordingly.
Details
Our Pay and Performance Are Well Aligned When Compared with an Appropriate Peer Group
ISS’s pivotal objection to our say-on-pay proposal is the degree of alignment between our CEO pay and TSR relative to an ISS-derived peer group over the prior three-year period, which produced a “cautionary low” result in the quantitative screen for Relative Degree of Alignment. This result is driven by two factors, without either of which the Company would be a “low” concern under your methodology, and no qualitative review would be appropriate.
ISS significantly changed our peer group in 2024, including the addition of one peer in particular that is objectively wrong
Despite no material changes in our size and business mix, you changed one-third of (six of eighteen) your selected peer group (the “Changed ISS Peer Group”) from 2023 to 2024.
The Changed ISS Peer Group added four companies to the peer group you used last year (the “Original ISS Peer Group”):1 Blue Owl Capital, Inc.; Freedom Holding Corp.; Robinhood Markets, Inc.; and T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. We do not view Blue Owl Capital, Freedom Holding, or Robinhood as peers, and we do not believe any investor does.