UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Filed by the Registrant ☒

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ☐

Check the appropriate box:

☒	Preliminary Proxy Statement
☐	Confidential, For Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)
☐	Definitive Proxy Statement
☐	Definitive Additional Materials
☐	Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12

TruGolf Holdings, Inc.

(Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

☒	No fee required.
☐	Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
☐	Fee computed on table in exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rules 14a6(i)(1) and 0-11

TRUGOLF HOLDINGS, INC.

60 North 1400

West Centerville, Utah 84014

_________, 2026

Dear Fellow Stockholder:

On behalf of the Board of Directors (the “Board”) and management of TruGolf Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”), you are cordially invited to attend the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company to be held online at https://www.cleartrustonline.com/trugolf, on ________, 2026, at 10:00 a.m., Eastern Time (the “Annual Meeting”).

The attached Notice of the Annual Meeting (the “Notice”) and proxy statement (“Proxy Statement”) describe in greater detail all of the formal business that will be transacted at the Annual Meeting. There will not be a physical location for the Annual Meeting. You will be able to attend the Annual Meeting online, vote your shares electronically, and submit your questions during the meeting by visiting https://www.cleartrustonline.com/trugolf. Directors and officers of the Company will be available at the Annual Meeting to respond to any questions that you may have regarding the business to be transacted.

The Company’s Board has determined that each of the proposals that will be presented to the stockholders for their consideration at the Annual Meeting are in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders, and unanimously recommends and urges you to vote “FOR” the proposals set forth in this Proxy Statement. If any other business is properly presented at the Annual Meeting, the proxies will be voted in accordance with the recommendations of the Company’s Board.

Shareholders of record at the close of business on January 20, 2026 are entitled to vote on the matters presented at the Annual Meeting.

We encourage you to attend the Annual Meeting online, but if you are unable to attend, it is important that you vote in advance via the Internet, by telephone, or sign, date and return the enclosed proxy card in the enclosed postage-paid envelope. Your cooperation is appreciated since a majority of the common stock entitled to vote must be represented, either in person or by proxy, to constitute a quorum for the transaction of business at the Annual Meeting.

On behalf of the Board and all of the employees of the Company, we thank you for your continued support.

Sincerely,

/s/ Christopher Jones
Christopher Jones
Chief Executive Officer

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials

for the Annual Stockholder Meeting to be Held on __________, 2026:

Electronic Copies of the Proxy Statement and our 2025 Annual Report on Form 10-K are available at

https:// www.cleartrustonline.com/trugolf

TRUGOLF HOLDINGS, INC.

60 North 1400

West Centerville, Utah 84014

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS TO BE HELD _________, 2026

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) of TruGolf Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) will be held online at https://www.cleartrustonline.com/trugolf, on _______, 2026, at 10:00 a.m., Eastern Time, for the following purposes:

Proposal 1. To elect five Board nominees to the Board of Directors of the Company, each to serve until the 2026 annual meeting of stockholders of the Company or until such person’s successor is qualified and elected (“Proposal 1”).

Proposal 2. To ratify the appointment of Haynie & Company as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2026 (“Proposal 2”).

Proposal 3. To approve the 2026 Equity Incentive Plan (“Proposal 3”).

Proposal 4. To approve the redomestication of the Company’s jurisdiction of incorporation from Delaware to Nevada (the “Redomestication”), including the terms, conditions and effect of such Redomestication (the “Proposal 4”).

Proposal 5. To approve the increase in the Company’s authorized shares of Class A common stock from 650,000,000 shares to ____________ shares in connection with the Redomestication (the “Proposal 5”).

Proposal 6. To approve, for purposes of complying with Nasdaq Listing Rule 5635(d), the issuance of more than 20% of the Company’s issued and outstanding common stock pursuant to the Company’s equity purchase facility agreement dated May 14, 2025 with SZOP Opportunities I LLC (“Proposal 6”).

Proposal 7. To approve an adjournment of the Annual Meeting, if necessary, to solicit additional proxies if there are not sufficient votes in favor of Proposals 2-6 (the “Proposal 7”).

Please refer to the proxy statement for the Annual Meeting (the “Proxy Statement”) for detailed information on the above proposals.

The Board of Directors (the “Board”) is not aware of any other business that will be presented for consideration at the Annual Meeting. If any other matters should be properly presented at the Annual Meeting or any adjournments or postponements of the Annual Meeting for action by stockholders, the persons named in the form of proxy will vote the proxy in accordance with their best judgment on that matter.

Only stockholders of record of the Company at the close of business on January 20, 2026 are entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof. A complete list of these stockholders will be open for the examination of any stockholder of record at the Company’s principal executive offices located at 60 North 1400, West Centerville, Utah 84014 for a period of ten days prior to the Annual Meeting. The list will also be available for the examination of any stockholder of record present at the Annual Meeting. The Annual Meeting may be adjourned or postponed from time to time without notice other than by announcement at the meeting.

By Order of the Board of Directors,

/s/ Christopher Jones
Christopher Jones
Chief Executive Officer
______________, 2026

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials

for the Annual Stockholder Meeting to be Held on __________, 2026:

Electronic Copies of the Proxy Statement and our 2025 Annual Report on Form 10-K are available at

https:// www.cleartrustonline.com/trugolf

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		Page

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING		1
STOCK OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT		6
INFORMATION ABOUT DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS		7
GOVERNANCE OF THE COMPANY		9
COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS		13
RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS		16
PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS		17
PROPOSAL 2: TO RATIFY THE APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM		18
AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT		19
PROPOSAL 3: EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN PROPOSAL		20
PROPOSAL 4: REDOMESTICATION PROPOSAL		25
PROPOSAL 5: THE SHARE INCREASE PROPOSAL		44
PROPOSAL 6: THE NASDAQ PROPOSAL		46
PROPOSAL 7: ADJOURNMENT PROPOSAL		48
AVAILABILITY OF ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K		49
OTHER PROPOSED ACTION		49
HOUSEHOLDING OF PROXY MATERIALS		49
STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS AND SUBMISSIONS		49

TRUGOLF HOLDINGS, INC.

60 North 1400

West Centerville, Utah 84014

PROXY STATEMENT

GENERAL INFORMATION

For the Annual Meeting of Stockholders

To Be Held on ___________, 2026

Our Board of Directors is soliciting proxies to be voted at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) to be held virtually on ______________, 2026, at 10:00 a.m., Eastern Time, for the purposes set forth in the attached Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Notice”) and in this Proxy Statement. This Proxy Statement and the proxies solicited hereby are being first sent or delivered to stockholders of the Company on or about _______________, 2026.

As used in this Proxy Statement, the terms “Company,” “we,” “us,” “our” and “TruGolf” refer to TruGolf Holdings, Inc., and the terms “Board of Directors” and “Board” refers to the Board of Directors of the Company.

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING

What information is contained in this Proxy Statement?

This information relates to the proposals to be voted on at the Annual Meeting, the voting process, and certain other required information.

Can I access the Company’s proxy materials electronically?

Yes. The Proxy Statement and form of Proxy are available at https://www.cleartrustonline.com/trugolf. To view this material, you must have available the control number located on the proxy card or, if shares are held in the name of a broker, bank or other nominee, the voting instruction form.

What does it mean if I receive more than one set of proxy materials?

It means your shares are registered differently or are in more than one account. Please provide voting instructions for each account for which you have received a set of proxy materials.

Who is soliciting my vote pursuant to this Proxy Statement?

Our directors and employees may solicit proxies in person, by telephone, fax, electronic transmission or other means of communication. We will not pay these directors and employees any additional compensation for these services. We will ask banks, brokerage firms, and other institutions, nominees, and fiduciaries to forward these proxy materials to their principal, and to obtain authority to execute proxies, and will reimburse them for their expenses.

Who is entitled to vote?

Only holders of record of our common stock at the close of business on January 20, 2026 (the “Record Date”), are entitled to have their vote counted at the Annual Meeting and any adjournments or postponements thereof.

Stockholder of Record: Shares Registered in Your Name. If on the record date your shares were registered directly in your name with our transfer agent, Equiniti Trust Company, LLC, then you are a stockholder of record. As a stockholder of record, you may vote online at the Annual Meeting or vote by proxy. Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting online, we urge you to submit your proxy vote either online, by telephone, or by filling out and returning the enclosed proxy card to ensure your vote is counted.

Beneficial Owner: Shares Registered in the Name of a Broker or Bank. If on the record date your shares were held, not in your name, but rather in an account at a brokerage firm, bank, dealer, or other similar organization, then you are the beneficial owner of shares held in “street name” and these proxy materials are being forwarded to you by that organization. As a beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your broker or other agent on how to vote the shares in your account. You are also invited to attend the Annual Meeting if your bank or broker provides you with a control number.

How many shares are eligible to be voted?

As of the Record Date, we had __________ shares of common stock outstanding, of which __________ shares are Class A common stock and 199,999 shares are Class B common stock. Each outstanding share of our Class A common stock will entitle its holder to one vote on each of the matters to be voted on at the Annual Meeting, and each outstanding share of our Class B common stock will entitle its holder to 25 votes on each proposal at the Annual Meeting.

What am I voting on?

You are voting on the following matters:

Proposal 2. To ratify the appointment of Haynie & Company as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2026 (“Proposal 2”).

Proposal 3. To approve the 2026 Equity Incentive Plan (“Proposal 3”).

Proposal 5. To approve the increase in the Company’s authorized shares of Class A common stock from 650,000,000 shares to _____________ shares in connection with the Redomestication (referred to as either “Proposal 5” or the “Share Increase Proposal”).

Proposal 7. To approve an adjournment of the Annual Meeting, if necessary, to solicit additional proxies if there are not sufficient votes in favor of Proposals 2-6 (the “Proposal 7”).

How many votes are required to hold the Annual Meeting and what are the voting procedures?

Quorum Requirement: As of the Record Date, __________ shares of the Company’s common stock were issued and outstanding, of which _____________ shares are Class A common stock and 199,999 shares are Class B common stock. The shares of Class B common stock are entitled to 25 votes per share. The holders of a majority of our shares of capital stock issued and outstanding and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting, present or represented by proxy, constitutes a quorum for the purpose of adopting proposals at the Annual Meeting. If you submit a properly executed proxy, then you will be considered part of the quorum. The Annual Meeting will be postponed if a quorum is not present. If a quorum is not present, the Annual Meeting may be adjourned until a quorum is obtained.

Required Votes: Each outstanding share of our Class A common stock is entitled to one vote on each proposal at the Annual Meeting, and each outstanding share of our Class B common stock is entitled to 25 votes on each proposal at the Annual Meeting. If there is a quorum at the Annual Meeting, the matters to be voted upon by the stockholders require the following votes for such matter to be approved:

● Election of Directors: A plurality of the votes cast is required to elect director nominees, and as such, the five nominees who receive the greatest number of “FOR” votes cast by stockholders, entitled to vote at the meeting, will be elected. A nominee who receives a plurality means he or she has received more “FOR” votes than any other nominee for the same director’s seat. Broker non-votes and “WITHHOLD” votes will have no effect on this proposal.

● Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Proposal: The affirmative vote of the holders of at least the majority of the shares of stock present or represented (in person or by proxy) at the Annual Meeting is necessary to approve Proposal 2. Abstentions shall have the effect of a vote “AGAINST” the proposal and broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of this proposal.

● Approval of the Equity Plan Proposal: The affirmative vote of the holders of at least the majority of the shares of stock present or represented (in person or by proxy) at the Annual Meeting is necessary to approve Proposal 3. Abstentions shall have the effect of a vote “AGAINST” the proposal and broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of this proposal.

● Approval of the Redomestication Proposal: The affirmative vote of the holders of at least the majority of our shares of common stock (in person or by proxy) at the Annual Meeting is necessary to approve the Redomestication Proposal. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have the effect of a vote “AGAINST” this proposal.

● Approval of the Share Increase Proposal: The affirmative vote of the holders of at least the majority of our shares of common stock (in person or by proxy) at the Annual Meeting is necessary to approve the Share Increase Proposal. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have the effect of a vote “AGAINST” this proposal.

● Approval of the Nasdaq Proposal: The affirmative vote of the holders of at least the majority of the shares of stock present or represented (in person or by proxy) at the Annual Meeting is necessary to approve the Nasdaq Proposal. Abstentions shall have the effect of a vote “AGAINST” the proposal and broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of this proposal.

● Approval of the Adjournment Proposal: The affirmative vote of the holders of at least the majority of the shares of stock present or represented (in person or by proxy) at the Annual Meeting is necessary to approve the Adjournment Proposal. Abstentions shall have the effect of a vote “AGAINST” the proposal and broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of this proposal.

If a broker indicates on its proxy submitted to the Company that it does not have authority to vote certain shares held in “street name,” the shares not voted are referred to as “broker non-votes.” Broker non-votes occur when brokers do not have discretionary voting authority to vote certain shares held in “street name” on particular proposals under the rules of the New York Stock Exchange, and the “beneficial owner” of those shares has not instructed the broker how to vote on those proposals. If you are a beneficial owner and you do not provide instructions to your broker, bank or other nominee, your broker, bank or other nominee is permitted to vote your shares for or against “routine” matters. Brokers are not permitted to exercise discretionary voting authority to vote your shares for or against “non-routine” matters.

How can I vote my shares in person and participate at the Annual Meeting?

The Annual Meeting will be held entirely online. Stockholders may participate in the Annual Meeting by visiting the following website: https://www.cleartrustonline.com/trugolf. To participate in the Annual Meeting, you will need the control number included on your proxy card or on the instructions that accompanied your proxy materials. Shares held in your name as the stockholder of record may be voted electronically during the Annual Meeting. Shares for which you are the beneficial owner but not the stockholder of record also may be voted electronically during the Annual Meeting in accordance with the instructions from your broker, bank or other nominee. However, even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting online, the Company recommends that you vote your shares in advance, so that your vote will be counted if you later decide not to attend the Annual Meeting.

How can I vote my shares without attending the Annual Meeting?

If you are the stockholder of record, you may vote by one of the following four methods:

	●	Online at the Annual Meeting;
	●	Via the Internet;
	●	By telephone; or
	●	By mail.

If you elect to vote by mail and you requested and received a printed set of proxy materials, you may mark, sign, date and mail the proxy card you received from us in the return envelope. If you did not receive a printed proxy card and wish to vote by mail, you may do so by requesting a paper copy of the proxy materials (as described below), which will include a proxy card.

Whichever method of voting you use, the proxies identified on the proxy card will vote the shares of which you are the stockholder of record in accordance with your instructions. If you submit a proxy card properly voted and returned through available channels without giving specific voting instructions, the proxies will vote the shares as recommended by our Board.

If you own your shares in “street name,” that is, through a brokerage account or in another nominee form, you must provide instructions to the broker or nominee as to how your shares should be voted. Your broker or nominee will usually provide you with the appropriate instruction forms at the time you receive the proxy materials. If you own your shares in this manner, you cannot vote in person at the Annual Meeting unless you receive a proxy to do so from the broker or the nominee.

How may I cast my vote over the Internet or by Telephone?

Voting over the Internet: If you are a stockholder of record, you may use the Internet to transmit your vote up until 11:59 P.M., Eastern Time,__________, 2026 (the day before the Annual Meeting). Visit https://www.cleartrustonline.com/trugolf and have your proxy card in hand when you access the website and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form.

Voting by Telephone: If you are a stockholder of record, you may call 1-813-235-4490, toll-free in the United States, U.S. territories and Canada, and use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your vote up until 11:59 P.M., Eastern Time, ___________, 2026 (the day before the Annual Meeting). Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions.

If you hold your shares in “street name,” that is through a broker, bank or other nominee, that institution will instruct you as to how your shares may be voted by proxy, including whether telephone or Internet voting options are available.

How may a stockholder bring any other business before the Annual Meeting?

The Company’s bylaws (the “Bylaws”) provide that the only matters that may be brought before an Annual Meeting are the matters specified in the notice of meeting, and, as such, stockholders shall not be permitted to propose business at the Annual Meeting.

How may I revoke or change my vote?

If you are the record owner of your shares, and you completed and submitted a proxy card, you may revoke your proxy at any time before it is voted at the Annual Meeting by:

● submitting a new proxy card with a later date;

● delivering written notice to our Corporate Secretary on or before 11:00 a.m. Eastern Time on, __________, 2026 (the Annual Meeting date and time), stating that you are revoking your proxy;

● attending the Annual Meeting and voting your shares online; or

● if you are a record owner of your shares and you submitted your proxy by telephone or via the Internet, you may change your vote or revoke your proxy with a later telephone or Internet proxy, as the case may be.

Please note that attendance at the Annual Meeting will not, in itself, constitute revocation of your proxy.

If you own your shares in “street name,” you may later revoke your voting instructions by informing the bank, broker or other holder of record in accordance with that entity’s procedures.

Who is paying for the costs of this proxy solicitation?

The Company will bear the cost of preparing, printing, and mailing the materials in connection with this solicitation of proxies. In addition to mailing these materials, officers and regular employees of the Company may, without being additionally compensated, solicit proxies personally and by mail, telephone, facsimile or electronic communication.

Are there any rights of appraisal for the holders of our Class A common stock?

The Board of Directors is not proposing any action for which the laws of the State of Delaware, our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation or our Bylaws provide a right of a holder of our Class A common stock to obtain appraisal of or payment for such stockholder’s shares.

Who will count the votes?

The inspector of election appointed for the Annual Meeting will receive and tabulate the ballots and voting instruction forms. The Board has appointed ClearTrust, LLC, or its designee, to serve as the inspector of election.

Where do I find the voting results of the Annual Meeting?

The voting results will be disclosed in a Current Report on Form 8-K that we will file with the SEC within four business days after the Annual Meeting.

How can I obtain the Company’s corporate governance information?

Our corporate governance information is available on our website at www.trugolf.com under “Investor Relations—Corporate Governance.” Our stockholders may also obtain written copies at no cost by writing to us at TruGolf Holdings, Inc., 60 North 1400 West Centerville, Utah 84014, Attention: Corporate Secretary, or by calling (917) 886-9071.

How do I request electronic or printed copies of this and future proxy materials?

You may request and consent to delivery of electronic or printed copies of this and future proxy statements, annual reports and other stockholder communications by visiting www.cleartrustonline.com/trugolf:

When requesting copies of proxy materials and other stockholder communications, you should have available the control number located on the proxy card or, if shares are held in the name of a broker, bank or other nominee, the voting instruction form.

Where are the Company’s principal executive offices?

The principal executive offices of the Company are located at 60 North 1400 West Centerville, Utah 84014, and our telephone number is (917) 886-9071.

How can I obtain additional information about the Company?

We are subject to the informational requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, which requires that we file reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC. The SEC maintains a website that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding companies, including the Company, that file electronically with the SEC. The SEC’s website address is www.sec.gov. In addition, our filings may be inspected and copied at the public reference facilities of the SEC located at 100 F Street, N.E. Washington, DC 20549.

BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP OF COMMON STOCK

The following table sets forth information, as of January 20, 2026, regarding beneficial ownership of our common stock by:

● each of our directors;

● each of our named executive officers;

● all directors and executive officers as a group; and

● each person, or group of affiliated persons, known by us to beneficially own more than five percent of our shares of common stock.

We have determined beneficial ownership in accordance with the rules of the SEC. These rules generally provide that a person is the beneficial owner of securities if such person has or shares the power to vote or direct the voting of securities, or to dispose or direct the disposition of securities, or has the right to acquire such powers within 60 days through (i) the exercise of any option or warrant, (ii) the conversion of a security, (iii) the power to revoke a trust, discretionary account or similar arrangement or (iv) the automatic termination of a trust, discretionary account or similar arrangement.

Except as otherwise indicated, we believe that the beneficial owners of common stock listed below, based on the information each of them has given to us, have sole investment and voting power with respect to their shares, except where community property laws may apply. Except as otherwise noted below, the address for each person or entity listed in the table is c/o TruGolf Holdings, Inc., 60 North 1400 West Centerville, Utah 84014.

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner	Shares of Common Stock		% of Common Stock*			% of Total Voting Power*
Directors and executive officers
Christopher Jones (1)		2,601,088		4.2	%		24.7	%
Brenner Adams (2)		5,236		*			*
Nathan E. Larson (3)		6,536		*			*
Lindsay Jones		-		-			-
B. Shaun Limbers		5,868		*			*
Steven R. Johnson (4)		1,214,825		1.2	%		11.6	%
Humphrey P. Polanen				*			*
Riley Russell		-		-			-
AJ Redmer		-		-			-
All directors and executive officers as a group (9 individuals)		3,834,053		5.8	%		26.9	%
Other 5% beneficial owners
Christopher Jones (1)		2,601,088		4.2	%		24.7	%
David Ashby (5)		1,303,220		2.1	%		12.4	%
Steven R. Johnson (4)		1,214,825		1.2	%		11.6	%

*	Less than 1%.
(1)	Includes 2,522,200 shares underlying 100,888 shares of Class B Common Stock, which are entitled to 25 votes per share and are convertible into shares of Class A Common Stock on a one-for-one basis, and 4,000 shares underlying option awards.
(2)	Includes 2,400 shares underlying option awards.
(3)	Includes 2,400 shares underlying option awards.
(4)	Includes 1,212,825 shares underlying 48,513 shares of Class B Common Stock, which are entitled to 25 votes per share and are convertible into shares of Class A Common Stock on a one-for-one basis, and 2,000 shares underlying option awards.
(5)	Includes 1,264,950 shares underlying 50,598 shares of Class B Common Stock, which are entitled to 25 votes per share and are convertible into shares of Class A Common Stock on a one-for-one basis, and 400 shares underlying option awards.

INFORMATION ABOUT DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

Directors and Executive Officers

The following table sets forth the names and ages of all of our directors and executive officers as of January 20, 2026. Our officers are appointed by, and serve at the pleasure of, the Board of Directors.

Name	Age	Position
Christopher (Chris) Jones	71	Chief Executive Officer, Interim Chief Financial Officer, President and Chairman, Director
Brenner Adams	54	Chief Growth Officer
Nathan E. Larsen	56	Chief Experience Officer
Steven R. Johnson	73	Chief Hardware Officer
*Non-Employee Directors*
Shaun B. Limbers	46	Director
Humphrey P. Polanen ^{(1) (2) (3)}	76	Independent Director
Riley Russell ^{(1) (2) (3)}	54	Independent Director
AJ Redner ^{(1) (2) (3)}	63	Independent Director

⁽¹⁾	Member of the Audit Committee
⁽²⁾	Member of the Compensation Committee
⁽³⁾	Member of the Governance and Nominating Committee

Our Executive Officers

Christopher (Chris) Jones – Chief Executive Officer, Interim Chief Financial Officer, President, Chairman and Director

Mr. Jones is the Chief Executive Officer, Interim Chief Financial Officer, President and Director at TruGolf. He founded Access Software, one of the earliest leaders in gaming and software in 1982. As a founder of Access Software, Mr. Jones helped pioneer 3D simulation. In addition to creating the LINKSTM golf franchise–a highly awarded PC sports title–Access Software gained critical acclaim for the Tex Murphy adventure game series, and its early use of 3D engines and high-quality full motion video. After Access Software was acquired by Microsoft Corp. in 1999, Mr. Jones served as Project Manager for several XBOX titles through July 2004. In 2007, Mr. Jones became Chief Executive Officer of TruGolf and has presided over TruGolf’s growth as a leader in the virtual golf industry ever since. Mr. Jones obtained a Bachelor’s Degree in Marketing and Finance from the University of Utah in Salt Lake City, Utah.

We believe that Mr. Jones is well qualified to serve on the TruGolf Board due to his background in video game development, his numerous years of management experience and the fact that he has been the driving force behind the Company’s operations since the Company’s formation.

Brenner Adams – Chief Growth Officer

Mr. Adams is the Chief Growth Officer at TruGolf. He has served as the Chief Growth Officer of TruGolf since January 2022. Mr. Adams also provides consulting services from time to time through Octant Consulting, of which he is the principal owner. From August 2021 to January 2022, Mr. Adams served as the Chief Information Officer of The Food Truck League. From April 2019 to August 2021, Mr. Adams served as Chief Innovation Officer for Med USA, a medical billing company. From January 2015 to December 2020, Mr. Adams served as an Adjunct Professor at the University of Utah. From February 2012 to April 2019, Mr. Adams served as Chief Executive Officer of The LINK Group, a point-of-sale software company. Mr. Adam’s prior work experience also includes serving as Global Brand Director for Burton Snowboards (2006-2008) and Director of Business Development for Xbox / Take Two (2001 to 2006). Mr. Adams serves on the Board of Directors of a number of private companies. Mr. Adams received a Bachelor of Science degree in Economics and a Master of Business Administration from the University of Utah.

Nathan E. Larsen – Chief Experience Officer

Mr. Larsen is the Chief Experience Officer at TruGolf. He has served as the Chief Experience Officer of TruGolf since October 2021. From January 2019 to October 2021, Mr. Larsen provided freelance brand and marketing consultation services to various companies in the medical, forestry and construction industries. From 2006 to 2019, Mr. Larsen served as President and Chief Operating Officer of Equity Building Solutions Inc., a resident development and construction company. From 2004 to 2006, Mr. Larsen served as Creative Director and Director of Business Development for Take Two Interactive / Indie Built Studio, a software development company which developed games for Xbox and the PlayStation 2. From 1999 to 2004, Mr. Larsen served as Creative Director for Microsoft Corp., in its Xbox Games development division. From 1991 to 1999, Mr. Larsen served as an artist, animator and art director for Access Software. Prior to that, he served as an artist and animator on five PC games published by Sierra On-Line. Mr. Larsen is a member of the Salt Lake Home Builders Association, Utah Valley Home Builders Association and the Park City Area Home Builders Association.

Steven R. Johnson – Chief Hardware Officer

Mr. Johnson is the Chief Hardware Officer of TruGolf. Mr. Johnson has been an employee in a variety of positions with TruGolf since May 1999. He began as a Product Development Manager and became the Executive Vice President in 2007. Prior to joining TruGolf, Mr. Johnson was a Sales Manager of Cassette Productions, LLC, an audio, video and software company. Mr. Johnson attended the University of Utah.

Our Non-Employee Directors

Shaun B. Limbers – Director

Mr. Limbers is a Director at TruGolf. He has served as Clinical Assistant Professor of Entrepreneurship and Director of the Institute for Family Business at Baylor University in Waco, Texas. Since May 2019, Mr. Limbers has served as an Adjunct Faculty Member at Baylor University and Associate Director for Baylor University’s entrepreneurship center. Since March 2010, Mr. Limbers has served as the Chief Executive Officer and founder of McIntyre Investment, LLC (“McIntyre”), an investment banking firm specializing in middle market transactions including primary and secondary investments, merger and acquisition advisory services and real estate. Mr. Limbers is a registered representative with McIntyre’s SEC registered broker-dealer entity, McIntyre Capital Partners, LLC, which is a member of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) and the Securities Investor Protection Corporation (SIPC). He holds a Series 7 license as well as a Series 63 license with FINRA. Prior to forming McIntyre, Mr. Limbers served as Vice President of Christina Development corporation, a real estate investment company, from 2003 to 2010. Mr. Limbers obtained a Bachelor of Science Degree in Business Administration from Pepperdine University and an MBA from the University of Notre Dame.

We believe that Mr. Limbers is well qualified to serve on the TruGolf Board due to his significant experience with private investments, transaction structuring, joint ventures, investment banking and fund raising.

Humphrey P. Polanen – Independent Director

Mr. Polanen serves as an independent director at TruGolf. He is the Chief Executive Officer and managing member of NeoVista Ventures LLC, a healthcare focused holding company. Mr. Polanen was the director of Heritage Commerce Corp (Nasdaq: HTBK), a bank holding company offering a wide array of business and personal banking services, from 1994 to April 2016. Since 1999, Mr. Polanen has been actively involved as an investor and director in various venture capital-backed companies in the technology industry and has served as a director of various private equity funds. He was the Managing Director of Internet Venture Partners BV, an investment firm, from 2000 to 2004. Prior to joining Internet Ventures, he served in various executive positions with Sun Microsystems and Tandem Computers. Mr. Polanen was a director (and former Chairman of the Board) of St. Bernard Software, a publicly traded Internet security company. Mr. Polanen has been a director of TechFlow Inc., an information technology service company, since June 2016. Mr. Polanen practiced corporate law for over ten years at the beginning of his career. He has a Bachelor of Arts degree from Hamilton College and a Juris Doctor degree from Harvard University.

We believe that Mr. Polanen is well qualified to serve on the TruGolf Board due to his experience as an executive, investor, director and business manager with advanced technology companies and private equity firms.

AJ Redmer – Independent Director

Mr. Redmer serves as an independent director at TruGolf. He is the Chief Executive Officer and Managing Director of Redmer Productions LLC. Mr. Redmer founded Redmersoft in 1986 which operated within Lucasfilm Ltd.’s Skywalker Ranch. He helped evolve Redmersoft into Maxis Software Corporation before taking on senior management responsibilities at Lucasfilm Ltd. AJ subsequently went on to senior leadership positions at Spectrum Holobyte, Nintendo and Microsoft where he played a key role in the development of the original Xbox and the Xbox 360. He has also served as the chief executive officer of WeMade Entertainment USA, Inc. He has over 25 years of experience building video game franchises in the entertainment industry. Mr. Redmer has designed and/or overseen the development of some of the most well-known franchises in the gaming industry including: SimCity, Star Wars, Indiana Jones, Tetris, Ridge Racer, Pokémon, Flight Simulator, Age of Empires, Project Gotham Racing and Forza Motorsport.

We believe that Mr. Redmer is well qualified to serve on the TruGolf Board due to his executive experience in the franchising side of the gaming and entertainment industries.

Riley Russell – Independent Director

Mr. Russell serves as an independent director at TruGolf. Mr. Russell has over 30 years’ experience working in the games and interactive entertainment industry. He is currently the Executive Vice President and Studio head at Kojima Productions US. Prior to joining Kojima, Mr. Russell has served as an Executive Vice President with Penumbra, Inc. and as the Chief Legal Officer at Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC until 2021. At Sony, Mr. Russell was responsible for Sony’s interactive division that produces the Sony PlayStation. He has global experience in the video games, entertainment and technology sectors. Mr. Russell is also an active board member of the Video Game Bar Association and the XR Association.

We believe that Mr. Russell is well qualified to serve on the TruGolf Board due to his experience as an executive in the video game and entertainment and technology sector.

GOVERNANCE OF THE COMPANY

Board Constitution

Our Board of Directors currently consists of five members. All directors hold office until the next annual meeting of stockholders or until their successors are duly elected and qualified. At each annual meeting of stockholders, the successors to directors whose terms then expire are elected to serve from the time of election and qualification until the next annual meeting following election or until their successors are duly elected and qualified.

Our Board of Directors oversees the business affairs of the Company and monitors the performance of management. Members of the Board of Directors discussed various business matters informally on numerous occasions throughout the year ended December 31, 2025, and held one formal meeting during 2025. In addition to meetings of the full Board of Directors, our Board has established an Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. We believe that such interaction between fellow Board members and with management provided proper oversight of the Company. Each incumbent director attended more than 75% of the total number of meetings of the Board of Directors and committee meetings of which such director was a member (held during the period for which such director was in office).

Director Independence

The rules of the Nasdaq Stock Market, or the Nasdaq Rules, require a majority of a listed company’s board of directors to be composed of independent directors. In addition, the Nasdaq Rules require that, subject to specified exceptions, each member of a listed company’s audit, compensation and nominating and governance committees be independent. Under the Nasdaq Rules, a director will only qualify as an independent director if, in the opinion of our Board of Directors, that person does not have a relationship that would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director. The Nasdaq Rules also require that audit committee members satisfy independence criteria set forth in Rule 10A-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act. In order to be considered independent for purposes of Rule 10A-3, a member of an audit committee of a listed company may not, other than in his or her capacity as a member of the audit committee, the board of directors, or any other board committee, accept, directly or indirectly, any consulting, advisory, or other compensatory fee from the listed company or any of its subsidiaries or otherwise be an affiliated person of the listed company or any of its subsidiaries. In considering the independence of compensation committee members, the Nasdaq Rules require that our board of directors must consider additional factors relevant to the duties of a compensation committee member, including the source of any compensation we pay to the director and any affiliations with our company.

Our Board of Directors is comprised of a majority of independent directors, as “independence,” is defined by the Nasdaq Rules and by the SEC. Our Board of Directors has concluded that each of Messrs. Polanen, Redmer, and Mr. Russell are “independent”, having concluded that any relationship between such director and our company, in its opinion, does not interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director. Mr. Jones is an employee director.

Board Committees

Our Board of Directors has three standing committees: the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, and the Governance and Nominating Committee.

Audit Committee

The Audit Committee of our Board of Directors was established in accordance with Rule 10A-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act. The current members of our Audit Committee are Messrs. Polanen, Redmer, and Russell with Mr. Polanen serving as the chair. Each member of the Audit Committee meets the independence and other requirements to serve on our Audit Committee under The Nasdaq Stock Market Rules and the rules of the SEC. In addition, our Board of Directors determined that Mr. Polanen is considered an “audit committee financial expert” as defined in the rules of the SEC.

The Audit Committee was formed in 2024. Our Board of Directors has adopted a written charter for the Audit Committee, a copy of which is posted in the Investor Resources and Corporate Governance section of our website at www.ir.trugolf.com/governance-documents. The principal functions of the Audit Committee are to oversee our accounting and financial reporting processes and the audits of our consolidated financial statements; oversee our relationship with our independent auditors, including selecting, evaluating, and setting the compensation of, and approving all audit and non-audit services to be performed by the independent auditors; and facilitate communication among our independent auditors and our financial and senior management. The Audit Committee is also responsible for oversight of cybersecurity risk.

Compensation Committee

We have a standing Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors. The members of our Compensation Committee are Messrs. Polanen, Redmer, and Russell with Mr. Redmer serving as the chair. Each member of the Compensation Committee meets the independence and other requirements to serve on our Compensation Committee under The Nasdaq Stock Market Rules and the rules of the SEC.

The Compensation Committee was formed in 2024. Our Board of Directors has adopted a written charter for the Compensation Committee, a copy of which is posted in the Investor Resources and Corporate Governance section of our website at www.ir.trugolf.com/governance-documents. The Compensation Committee has responsibilities relating to the performance evaluation and the compensation of our Chief Executive Officer; the compensation of our executive officers and directors; and our significant compensation arrangements, plans, policies, and programs, including our stock compensation plans. Certain of our executive officers, our outside counsel, and consultants may occasionally attend the meetings of the Compensation Committee. However, no officer of our company is present during discussions or deliberations regarding that officer’s own compensation.

Governance and Nominating Committee

We have a standing Governance and Nominating Committee of our Board of Directors. The current members of our Governance and Nominating Committee are Messrs. Polanen, Redmer and Russell with Mr. Russell serving as the chair. Each of Messrs. Polanen, Redmer, and Russell meets the independence and other requirements to serve on our Governance and Nominating Committee under The Nasdaq Stock Market Rules and the rules of the SEC.

The Governance and Nominating Committee was formed in 2024. Our Board of Directors has yet to adopt a written charter for the Governance and Nominating Committee. The Governance and Nominating Committee considers the performance of the members of our Board of Directors and nominees for director positions and evaluates and oversees corporate governance and related issues.

The goal of the Governance and Nominating Committee is to ensure that our directors possess a variety of perspectives and skills derived from high-quality business and professional experience. The Governance and Nominating Committee seeks to achieve a balance of knowledge, experience, and capability on our Board of Directors. To this end, the Governance and Nominating Committee seeks nominees with the highest professional and personal ethics and values, an understanding of our business and industry, diversity of business experience and expertise, a high level of education, broad-based business acumen, and the ability to think strategically. Although the Governance and Nominating Committee uses these and other criteria to evaluate potential nominees to our Board of Directors, it has no stated minimum criteria for such nominees. The Governance and Nominating Committee does not use different standards to evaluate nominees depending on whether they are proposed by our directors and management or by our stockholders. To date, we have not paid any third parties to assist us in this process.

Nomination of Director Candidates

We receive suggestions for potential director nominees from many sources, including members of the Board, advisors, and stockholders. Any such nominations, together with appropriate biographical information, should be submitted to the Chairperson of the Governance and Nominating Committee in the manner discussed below. Any candidates submitted by a stockholder or stockholder group are reviewed and considered in the same manner as all other candidates.

Qualifications for consideration as a Board nominee may vary according to the particular areas of expertise being sought as a complement to the existing board composition. However, minimum qualifications include high level leadership experience in business activities, breadth of knowledge about issues affecting the Company, experience on other boards of directors, preferably public company boards, and time available for meetings and consultation on Company matters. Our Governance and Nominating Committee does not have a formal policy with regard to the consideration of diversity in identifying director candidates, but seeks a diverse group of candidates who possess the background, skills and expertise to make a significant contribution to the Board, to the Company and our stockholders. Candidates whose evaluations are favorable are recommended by our Governance and Nominating Committee to the full Board for consideration. The full Board selects and recommends candidates for nomination as directors for stockholders to consider and vote upon at the annual meeting.

A stockholder wishing to nominate a candidate for election to our Board of Directors at any annual meeting at which the Board of Directors has determined that one or more directors will be elected must submit a written notice of his or her nomination of a candidate to the Chairperson of the Governance and Nominating Committee (c/o the Corporate Secretary), providing the candidates name, biographical data and other relevant information together with a consent from the nominee. Pursuant to our Bylaws, the submission must be received at our principal executive offices no earlier than 120 days prior to the anniversary date of the mailing date of our previous year’s proxy statement and no later than 90 days prior to the anniversary date of the mailing date of our previous year’s proxy statement so as to permit the Board of Directors time to evaluate the qualifications of the nominee.

In addition to satisfying the foregoing requirements under our Bylaws, stockholders who intend to solicit proxies in support of director nominees other than our nominees must comply with the additional requirements of Rule 14a-19(b) under the Exchange Act to comply with the universal proxy rules. The requirements under the universal proxy rules are in addition to the applicable procedural requirements under our Bylaws described above.

Code of Ethics

We have adopted a Code of Ethics and Business Conduct (“Code of Ethics”) that sets forth various policies and procedures to promote ethical behavior and that applies to all our directors, officers and employees. The Code of Ethics is publicly available on our website at www.ir.trugolf.com/governance-documents. Amendments to the Code of Ethics and any grant of a waiver from a provision of the Code of Ethics requiring disclosure under applicable SEC rules will be disclosed on our website.

Board Member Attendance at Annual Meetings

We do not have a formal policy regarding Board attendance at our annual meetings, however, all of our directors are invited to the Annual Meeting. This will be our first Annual Meeting since our business combination.

Board Leadership Structure and Role in Risk Oversight

Christopher Jones serves as our Chairman of the Board and as our Chief Executive Officer. Our Board of Directors has no policy with regard to the separation of the offices of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, and believes, given the size of our company, it is appropriate for Mr. Jones to serve in both roles.

Our management is responsible for managing risks in our business, including developing processes to manage and monitor risks. The Board views its role as one of oversight. The Board focuses on understanding management’s risk management systems, the effectiveness of those systems, and the way in which management proactively manages risks. In addition, the Board utilizes the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, the Audit Committee and the Compensation Committee to manage risks that arise under each committee’s area of focus.

The Audit Committee is responsible for oversight of cybersecurity risk. Our Chief Executive Officer is the member of management responsible for managing and assessing our cybersecurity practices.

Stockholder Communications with Directors

Persons wishing to write to our Board of Directors, or to a specified director or committee of the Board, should send correspondence to the Corporate Secretary at 60 North 1400, West Centerville, Utah 84014. Electronic submissions of stockholder correspondence will not be accepted.

The Corporate Secretary will forward to the directors all communications that, in his or her judgment, are appropriate for consideration by the directors. Examples of communications that would not be appropriate for consideration by the directors include commercial solicitations and matters not relevant to the stockholders, to the functioning of the Board or to the affairs of the Company. Any correspondence received that is addressed generically to the Board of Directors will be forwarded to the Chairman of the Board.

Anti-Hedging Policy

Our policies prohibit directors, officers and other employees from purchasing financial instruments (including prepaid variable forward contracts, equity swaps, collars, and exchange funds), or otherwise engaging in transactions, that hedge or offset, or are designed to hedge or offset, any decrease in the market value of our equity securities without our prior approval.

Insider Trading Policy

Our Board has adopted an Insider Trading Policy that applies to all of our directors, executive officers, and employees. This policy also is affirmed by our domestic third party vendors, and our international vendors either affirm this policy or a similar, local, more applicable policy, regulation, or law. The policy attempts to establish standards that will avoid even the appearance of improper conduct on the part of insiders by requiring, among other things, that insiders maintain the confidentiality of information about the Company and to not engage in transactions in the Company’s securities while aware of material nonpublic information.

Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act, requires officers and directors of our company and persons who beneficially own more than 10% of a registered class of our company’s equity securities to file initial statements of beneficial ownership of common stock (Form 3) and statements of changes in beneficial ownership of common stock (Forms 4 or 5) with the SEC. Officers, directors, and greater than 10% stockholders are required by SEC regulations to furnish us with copies of all such forms they file. Except as set forth below, we believe that all directors, executive officers and holders of more than 10% of the common stock complied in a timely manner with the filing requirements applicable to them with respect to transactions during the year ended December 31, 2025: Christopher Jones and Steven R. Johnson had one late Form 4 filing on April 25, 2025 reporting one transaction that occurred on April 21, 2025.

COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The following table shows the total compensation paid or accrued during the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 to our named executive officers who were serving as executive officers in all capacities (our “named executive officers”).

Summary Compensation Table

Name and Principal Position	Year	Salary ($)		Bonus ($)		Stock Awards ($)⁽¹⁾		Option Awards ($) ⁽¹⁾		Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)		Non-qualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($)		All Other Compensation ($)⁽²⁾		Total ($)
Christopher Jones	2024		72,000						95,091		-		-		-		167,091
Chief Executive Officer	2023		150,000		-		-		-		-		-		-		150,000
Brenner Adams	2024		84,000		-		-		57,055		-		-	$	79,000		220,055
Chief Growth Officer	2023		168,000		-		690,000		-		-		-		-		858,000
Nathan Larsen	2024		163,000		-		-		57,055		-		-		-		220,055
Chief Experience Officer	2023		163,000		-		690,000		-		-		-		-		853,000
Lindsay Jones	2024		82,000		10,000		119,959		-		-		-		-		211,959
Former Chief Financial Officer	2023		24,892		-		-		-		-		-		-		24,892

(1)	Represents the full grant date fair value of the option grant or stock award calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. These amounts do not necessarily correspond to the actual value that may be realized by the named executive officer. For a summary of the assumptions made in the valuation of the awards, please see Note 19 to our financial statements as of and for the period ended December 31, 2024 included in the 2024 Annual Report.

(2)	Represents payments made by us for consulting services while the officer was not a salaried employee.

Outstanding Equity Awards as of December 31, 2024

As of December 31, 2024, the named executive officers collectively hold 8,800 outstanding option awards granted by the Company, with individual holdings as detailed in the table below.

Employment Agreements with our Named Executive Officers

Christopher Jones

On January 1, 2023, we entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Jones to serve as our Chief Executive Officer (the “Jones Employment Agreement”). The Jones Employment Agreement has an initial term of five years ending on January 1, 2028, and can be terminated by either party. Pursuant to the Jones Employment Agreement, Mr. Jones is eligible to receive an annual base salary of $160,000 and performance-based annual bonuses along with equity incentive plans. Mr. Jones is also eligible for certain compensation based on future changes of control (50% or greater) as well as compensation based upon termination of his employment or resignation. In addition, Mr. Jones received 4,000 options to purchase the Company’s Class A common stock in accordance with the Company’s 2024 Stock Incentive Plan.

Brenner Adams

On January 18, 2024, effective January 25, 2024, we entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Adams to serve as our Chief Growth Officer (the “Adams Employment Agreement”). The Adams Employment Agreement is evergreen and can be terminated by either party. Pursuant to the Adams Employment Agreement, Mr. Adams is eligible to receive an annual base salary of $120,000 and a quarterly bonus. In addition, Mr. Adams received 2,400 options to purchase the Company’s Class A common stock in accordance with the Company’s 2024 Stock Incentive Plan. Mr. Adams serves on a part-time basis.

Nathan Larsen

On January 18, 2024, effective January 25, 2024, we entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Larsen to serve as our Chief Experience Officer (the “Larsen Employment Agreement”). The Larsen Employment Agreement is evergreen and can be terminated by either party. Pursuant to the Larsen Employment Agreement, Mr. Larsen is eligible to receive an annual base salary of $144,000 and a quarterly bonus. In addition, Mr. Larsen received 2,400 options to purchase the Company’s Class A common stock in accordance with the Company’s 2024 Stock Incentive Plan.

Outstanding Equity Awards

The following table sets forth certain information concerning our outstanding options for our named executive officers as of December 31, 2024:

Name	Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable		Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable		Option Exercise Price ($)		Option Expiration Date
Christopher Jones		4,000		-	$	46.50		10/11/2034
Brenner Adams		2,400		-	$	46.50		10/11/2034
Nathan Larsen		2,400		-	$	46.50		10/11/2034

Recoupment Policy

We adopted the TruGolf Holdings, Inc. Dodd-Frank Restatement Recoupment Policy effective as of October 2, 2023. In the event that we are required to prepare a financial restatement, the Committee will seek to recoup, to the extent required by applicable law and the policy, all erroneously awarded incentive-based compensation calculated on a pre-tax basis received after October 2, 2023, by a person (i) after beginning service as an executive officer, (ii) who served as an executive officer at any time during the performance period for that incentive-based compensation, and (iii) during the three completed fiscal years immediately preceding the date that the Company is required to prepare a restatement, and any transition period (that results from a change in the Company’s fiscal year) of less than nine months within or immediately following those three completed fiscal years. “Clawback” or recoupment policy in our executive compensation program contributes to creating and maintaining a culture that emphasizes integrity and accountability and reinforces the performance-based principles underlying our executive compensation program.

Granting of Certain Equity Awards Close in Time to the Release of Material Nonpublic Information

We do not grant equity awards in anticipation of the release of material nonpublic information that is likely to result in changes to the price of our common stock, and do not time the public release of such information based on award grant dates. During the last completed fiscal year, we have not made awards to any named executive officer or director during the period beginning four business days before and ending one business day after the filing of a period report on Form 10-Q or Form 10-K or the filing or furnishing of a current report on Form 8-K, and we have not timed the disclosure of material nonpublic information for the purpose of affecting the value of executive compensation.

Risks from Compensation Policies and Practices

Our Compensation Committee reviews our compensation policies and practices to determine areas of potential risks and the actions we have taken, or should take, to mitigate any such identified risks. Based on the Compensation Committee’s review of our compensation policies and practices, we do not believe that any risks relating to our compensation policies and practices for our employees are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on our business.

Director Compensation

Other than the named executive officers that received compensation for services rendered in all capacities for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, no other directors on the TruGolf Board received any compensation for the year ended December 31, 2024.

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Existing Equity Compensation Plan

The following table summarizes certain information regarding our equity compensation plan as of December 31, 2024:

Plan Category	Number of Securities to be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options		Weighted-Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options		Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans (Excluding Securities Reflected in Column (a))
	(a)		(b)		(c)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders		22,620	$	46.50		7,944
Total		22,620	$	46.50		7,944

⁽¹⁾	Consists of the 2024 Equity Incentive Plan. For a description of this plan, see Note 19 to our 2024 Consolidated Financial Statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024.

RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Except as set out below, during the year ended December 31, 2024, there were no transactions, or currently proposed transactions, in which we were or are to be a participant and the amount involved exceeds the lesser of $120,000 or one percent of the average of our total assets at year-end for the last two completed fiscal years, and in which any of the following persons had or will have a direct or indirect material interest:

	●	any director or executive officer of our company;
	●	any person who beneficially owns, directly or indirectly, shares carrying more than 5% of the voting rights attached to our outstanding shares of common stock;
	●	any promoters and control persons; and
	●	any member of the immediate family (including spouse, parents, children, siblings and in laws) of any of the foregoing persons.

Note Payable with ARJ Trust

In December 2008, we entered into a $500,000, 8.50% annual interest rate note payable with a trust (“ARJ Trust”) indirectly controlled by our chief executive officer. We make monthly interest-only payments of $3,451. The outstanding principal balance of this note was $500,000 as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively.

In June 2010, we entered into a second $150,000, 8.50% annual interest rate note with ARJ Trust. We make monthly interest-only payments of $1,063. The outstanding principal balance of this note was $150,000 as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively.

Note Payable with McKettrick

In May 2019, we entered into a $1,750,000, zero interest rate note payable with a former shareholder to repurchase all of their shares in the Company. The note is payable in annual installments of $250,000 due on December 21 of each year. The note matures on December 1, 2027. There is a late fee of 5%, if not paid within 10 days of the due date. During the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 the Company made cash payments of $500,000 and $300,000 ($250,000 for the installment fee and $50,000 for a negotiated extension fee). The outstanding principal balance of this note was $800,000 and $1,300,000 as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively.

Note Payable with Carver

In January 2021, we entered into a $220,000, zero interest rate note payable with a former shareholder to repurchase all of their shares in the Company. The note is payable in semi-annual installments of $18,500 due on March 31 and September 30 each year and matures on October 1, 2027. During the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, the Company made cash payments of $37,000 and $37,000, respectively. The outstanding principal balance of this note was $111,000 and $148,000 as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively.

Note Payable with Chris Jones

During the year ended December 31, 2024, the Company chief executive officer loaned the Company an aggregate of $2 million for operating expenses. The loaned amount has a zero interest rate and no stated maturity date. The Company made $350,000 in payments towards the loan during the nine months ended September 30, 2025, however, the Company expects to pay back the loan in full. The principal balance of the loan payable was $1,650,000 and $2,000,000 at September 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024, respectively.

Policies and Procedures for Related Party Transactions

Our audit committee charter provides that our audit committee is responsible for reviewing and approving in advance any related party transaction. This will cover, with certain exceptions set forth in Item 404 of Regulation S-K under the Securities Act, any transaction, arrangement or relationship, or any series of similar transactions, arrangements or relationships in which we were or will be a participant to, where the amount involved exceeds the lesser of $120,000 or one percent of the average of our total assets at year-end for the last two completed fiscal years, and a related person had or will have a direct or indirect material interest, including, without limitation, purchases of goods or services by or from the related person or entities in which the related person has a material interest, indebtedness, guarantees of indebtedness and employment by us of a related person. In determining whether to approve a proposed transaction, our audit committee will consider all relevant facts and circumstances including: (i) the materiality and character of the related party’s direct or indirect interest; (ii) the commercial reasonableness of the terms; (iii) the benefit or perceived benefit, or lack thereof, to us; (iv) the opportunity cost of alternate transactions; and (v) the actual or apparent conflict of interest of the related party.

PROPOSAL 1:

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Our Board of Directors currently consists of five members: Christopher Jones, B. Shaun Limbers, Humphrey P. Polanen, Riley Russell, and AJ Redmer. The Nominating and Governance Committee nominated, and the Board approved and recommended, all of the current members of our Board for re-election. All nominees have consented to being named herein and have indicated their intention to serve as our directors, if elected. The Board has no reason to believe that any nominee would be unable or unwilling to serve if elected. Unless authority to do so is withheld, the persons named as proxies will vote the shares represented by such proxies for the election of the named director nominees. In case any of the nominees becomes unavailable for election to the Board the persons named as proxies will have full discretion and authority to vote or refrain from voting for any other nominees in accordance with their judgment. The Board nominees, if elected, will serve until the next annual meeting of shareholders or until each successor is duly elected and qualified.

Biographical information for our directors is provided above in the section entitled “Information About Directors and Executive Officers.”

Vote Required and Recommendation of the Board of Directors

A plurality of the votes cast is required to elect director nominees, and as such, the five nominees who receive the greatest number of FOR votes cast by stockholders, entitled to vote at the meeting, will be elected. A nominee who receives a plurality means he or she has received more FOR votes than any other nominee for the same director’s seat. Broker non-votes and WITHHOLD votes will have no effect on this proposal.

The Board recommends that stockholders vote FOR each of the five nominees for election to our Board of Directors.

PROPOSAL 2:

TO RATIFY THE APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Our Audit Committee has selected Haynie & Company (“Haynie”) as our independent registered public accounting firm to audit our financial statements for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2025. Our stockholders are being asked to ratify this appointment. In the event that ratification of this selection of auditors is not approved by the stockholders, we will reassess our selection of auditors. Representatives of Haynie are expected to be present at the Annual Meeting, will be available to respond to appropriate questions and will have the opportunity to make a statement at the Annual Meeting.

The following table sets forth the fees billed to our company for professional services rendered by Haynie for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023:

Services	2024		2023
Audit fees ⁽¹⁾	$	188,000	$	140,000
Audit-related fees ⁽²⁾		-		-
Tax fees ⁽³⁾		13,000		-
All other fees⁽⁴⁾		3,500		-
Total fees	$	204,500	$	140,000

⁽¹⁾

Audit fees consisted of billing for professional services normally provided in connection with statutory and regulatory filings, including (i) fees associated with the audits of our financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 and, (ii) fees associated with quarterly reviews for the quarters ended March 31, 2024 and 2023, June 30, 2024 and 2023, and September 30, 2024 and 2023.

⁽²⁾	Audit related fees consisted of billings for professional services for reviews of our periodic filings under form 10-K and 10-Q and acquisition audits for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023.

⁽³⁾	Tax fees consisted primarily of tax related advisory and preparation services.

⁽⁴⁾	All Other Fees consist of fees billed for products and services provided by our independent registered public accountants, other than those disclosed above.

Audit Fees

Audit fees represent the aggregate fees billed for professional services rendered by our independent accounting firm for the audit of our annual financial statements, review of financial statements included in our quarterly reports, comfort and consent procedures for registration statements or services that are normally provided in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements for those fiscal years.

Audit-Related Fees

Audit-related fees represent the aggregate fees billed for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements and are not reported under Audit Fees.

Tax Fees

Tax fees represent the aggregate fees billed for professional services rendered by our principal accountants for permissible tax compliance services.

All Other Fees

All other fees represent the aggregate fees billed for products and services other than the services reported in the other categories.

Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

The Audit Committee on an annual basis reviews audit and non-audit services performed by the independent auditors. All audit and non-audit services are pre-approved by the Audit Committee, which considers, among other things, the possible effect of the performance of such services on the auditors’ independence.

Vote Required and Recommendation of the Board of Directors

The affirmative vote of the holders of at least the majority of the shares of stock present or represented (in person or by proxy) at the Annual Meeting is necessary to approve Proposal 2. Abstentions shall have the effect of a vote “AGAINST” the proposal and broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of this proposal.

The Board recommends that stockholders vote FOR the ratification of the appointment of Haynie as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2025.

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

The Audit Committee assists the Board of Directors with its oversight responsibilities regarding the Company’s financial reporting process. The Company’s management is responsible for the preparation, presentation and integrity of the Company’s financial statements and the reporting process, including the Company’s accounting policies, internal control over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures. Haynie & Company, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, is responsible for performing an audit of the Company’s financial statements.

We have reviewed and discussed with management and Haynie & Company the Company’s audited financial statements. We discussed with Haynie & Company the overall scope and plans of their audit. We met with Haynie & Company, with and without management present, to discuss the results of its examinations, its evaluation of the Company’s internal controls, and the overall quality of the Company’s financial reporting.

With regard to the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, the Audit Committee (i) reviewed and discussed with management the Company’s audited financial statements as of December 31, 2024, and for the year then ended; (ii) discussed with Haynie & Company the matters required by Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) and the Securities and Exchange Commission; (iii) received the written disclosures and the letter from Haynie & Company required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB Haynie & Company’s communications with the Audit Committee regarding independence; and (iv) discussed with Haynie & Company their independence.

Based on the review and discussions described above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Company’s Board of Directors that the Company’s audited financial statements be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Humphrey P. Polanen (Chairperson)

Riley Russell

AJ Redner

PROPOSAL 3:

TO APPROVE THE 2026 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN

In January 2026, the Compensation Committee of the Board approved the TruGolf Holdings, Inc. 2026 Stock Plan (the “2026 Plan”), subject to the receipt of stockholder approval, which the Company is seeking at this stockholders’ meeting. The 2026 Plan authorizes the issuance of up to [___] shares of common stock.

Overview

Equity awards have been historically and, we believe, will continue to be, an integral component of our overall compensation program for our employees, directors and consultants. We previously utilized our 2024 Stock Incentive Plan (“2024 Plan”) for awards. As of the Record Date, our 2024 Plan has 7,944 shares available for issuance. Upon approval of the 2026 Plan, no further awards will be granted under the 2024 Plan, and any shares remaining available under the 2024 Plan will be cancelled and will not carry over to the 2026 Plan. Approval of the 2026 Plan will allow us to continue to grant equity awards at levels we determine to be appropriate in order to attract new employees and directors, retain our existing employees and directors and to provide incentives for such persons to exert maximum efforts for our success. The 2026 Plan will allow us to continue to utilize a broad array of equity incentives with flexibility in designing equity incentives, including stock option grants, stock appreciation rights, stock awards, and stock unit awards.

We believe it is critical for our long-term success that the interests of our employees and directors are tied to our success as “owners” of our business. The equity incentive programs we have in place are intended to build stockholder value by attracting and retaining talented employees and directors. We believe we must continue to offer competitive equity compensation packages in order to retain and motivate the talent necessary for our continued growth and success. We carefully monitor the equity compensation and equity holdings of our employees, directors and consultants as well as the type of equity awards we grant to ensure these awards continue to provide incentives for the recipients to work towards our success. To date, stock options and restricted stock units have been the sole component of our equity program. The potential value of stock options is realized only if our share price increases, and so stock options provide a strong incentive for individuals to work to build stockholder value.

We have and we expect to continue to experience some growth in personnel as we progress our business. Additionally, we aim to conserve cash and use equity as a significant part of our employee compensation. If our stockholders do not approve the 2026 Plan we believe that we will be unable to successfully use equity as part of our compensation program, as most of our competitors in the industry do, putting us at a significant disadvantage. Additionally, we would then have to utilize more cash to compensate our employees. Therefore, we believe that approval of this request is in the best interest of our stockholders and our company.

Key Features Designed to Protect Stockholders’ Interests

The design of the 2026 Plan reflects our commitment to corporate governance and the desire to preserve stockholder value as demonstrated by the following features of the plan:

Independent administrator. The compensation committee of the board of directors, which is comprised solely of non-employee directors, will administer the 2026 Plan.

Repricing prohibited. Stockholder approval is required for any repricing of any stock options or stock appreciation rights.

Limitations on Dividend Payments on Awards. Dividends and dividend equivalents on all stock units and stock awards are paid only to the extent the awards vest, and no dividends or dividend equivalents are ever paid on stock options or stock appreciation rights.

No discount awards; maximum term specified. Stock options and stock appreciation rights must have an exercise price or base price no less than the fair market value on the date the award is granted and a term no longer than ten years’ duration.

Award design flexibility. Different kinds of awards may be granted under the 2026 Plan, giving us the flexibility to design our equity incentives to compliment the other elements of compensation and to support the attainment of our strategic goals.

Share counting. The number of shares available for grant under the 2026 Plan is reduced by the gross number of shares subject to awards, and shares withheld for taxes in connection with awards or tendered in payment of an option’s exercise price cannot be used for future grants. Shares subject to awards that expire, are forfeited, or are settled in cash will become available again for future grants under the 2026 Plan.

Non-employee director limits. The 2026 Plan contains a limit on the compensation that may be paid to any non-employee member of our Board in any calendar year.

No tax gross-ups. The 2026 Plan does not provide for tax gross-ups.

Fixed term. The 2026 Plan has a fixed term of ten years from its initial effective date, which would be the date of the Annual Meeting if this Proposal 3 is approved.

Description of the 2026 Plan

The 2026 Plan is a stock-based compensation plan that provides for discretionary grants of stock options, stock awards, stock unit awards and stock appreciation rights to key employees, non-employee directors and consultants. The material features of the 2026 Plan are outlined below. The following description of the 2026 Plan is a summary only and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the complete text of the 2026 Plan. Stockholders are urged to read the actual text of the 2026 Plan in its entirety, which is appended to this Proxy Statement as Appendix A.

Administration. The 2026 Plan is administered by our compensation committee of the board of directors (we refer to the body administering the 2026 Plan as the “Committee”). The Committee, which is comprised of directors who satisfy the non-employee director definition under Rule 16b-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, has full authority to select the individuals who will receive awards under the 2026 Plan, determine the form and amount of each of the awards to be granted and establish the terms and conditions of awards.

Limit on Non-Employee Director Compensation. Under the 2026 Plan, the following limits apply to non-employee directors. The aggregate value of all compensation granted or paid, as applicable, to any individual for service as a non-employee director with respect to any calendar year, including awards granted under the 2026 Plan and cash fees paid to such non-employee director, will not exceed $500,000 in total value. For purposes of these limitations, the value of awards is calculated based on the grant date fair value of such awards for financial reporting purposes.

Number of Shares of Common Stock. [_____] shares will be available for issuance under the 2026 Plan. Shares issuable under the 2026 Plan may be authorized but unissued shares or treasury shares. The number of shares of common stock available for issuance under the 2026 Plan will automatically increase on January 1st of each calendar year, beginning on January 1, 2027 and ending on (and including) January 1, 2036 (each, an “Evergreen Date”) in an amount equal to 5% of the total number of shares of common stock outstanding on the December 31st immediately preceding the applicable Evergreen Date (the “Evergreen Increase”). Notwithstanding the foregoing, our board of directors may act prior to the Evergreen Date of a given year to provide that there will be no Evergreen Increase for such year, or that the Evergreen Increase for such year will be a lesser number of shares of common stock than would otherwise occur pursuant to the preceding sentence. If there is a lapse, forfeiture, expiration, termination or cancellation of any award made under the 2026 Plan for any reason, the shares subject to the award will again be available for issuance. Any shares subject to an award that are delivered to us by a participant, or withheld by us on behalf of a participant, as payment for an award or payment of withholding taxes due in connection with an award will not again be available for issuance, and all such shares will count toward the number of shares issued under the 2026 Plan. The number of shares of common stock issuable under the 2026 Plan is subject to adjustment, in the event of any reorganization, recapitalization, stock split, stock distribution, merger, consolidation, split-up, spin-off, combination, subdivision, consolidation or exchange of shares, any change in the capital structure of the company or any similar corporate transaction. In each case, the Committee has the discretion to make adjustments it deems necessary to preserve the intended benefits under the 2026 Plan. No award granted under the 2026 Plan may be transferred, except by will, the laws of descent and distribution.

Eligibility. All employees designated as key employees for purposes of the 2026 Plan, all non-employee directors and consultants are eligible to receive awards under the 2026 Plan. As of the Record Date, [__] employees and all [__] non-employee directors were eligible to participate in the 2026 Plan.

Awards to Participants. The 2026 Plan provides for discretionary awards of stock options, stock awards, stock unit awards and stock appreciation rights to participants. Each award made under the 2026 Plan will be evidenced by a written award agreement specifying the terms and conditions of the award as determined by the Committee in its sole discretion, consistent with the terms of the 2026 Plan.

Stock Options. The Committee has the discretion to grant non-qualified stock options or incentive stock options to participants and to set the terms and conditions applicable to the options, including the type of option, the number of shares subject to the option and the vesting schedule; provided that the exercise price of each stock option will be not less than the closing price of the common stock on the date on which the option is granted (“fair market value”), each option will expire not more than ten years from the date of grant (or such shorter period as may be specified in the award agreement) and no dividend equivalents may be paid with respect to stock options.

In addition, an incentive stock option granted to a key employee is subject to the following rules: (i) the aggregate fair market value (determined at the time the option is granted) of the shares of common stock with respect to which incentive stock options are exercisable for the first time by a key employee during any calendar year (under all incentive stock option plans of the company and its subsidiaries) cannot exceed $100,000, and if this limitation is exceeded, that portion of the incentive stock option that does not exceed the applicable dollar limit will be an incentive stock option and the remainder will be a non-qualified stock option; (ii) if an incentive stock option is granted to a key employee who owns stock possessing more than 10% of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock of the company, the exercise price of the incentive stock option will be 110% of the closing price of the common stock on the date of grant and the incentive stock option will expire no later than five years from the date of grant; and (iii) no incentive stock option can be granted after ten years from the initial effective date of the 2026 Plan.

Stock Appreciation Rights. The Committee has the discretion to grant stock appreciation rights to participants. The Committee determines the exercise price for a stock appreciation right, which cannot be less than 100% of the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant. Upon the exercise of a stock appreciation right, we will pay the participant in common stock or in cash, at our discretion, an amount equal to the product of (1) the excess of the per share fair market value of our common stock on the date of exercise over the exercise price, multiplied by (2) the number of shares of common stock with respect to which the stock appreciation right is exercised. The Committee has the discretion to set the terms and conditions applicable to the award, including the number of shares subject to the stock appreciation right and the vesting schedule, provided that each stock appreciation right will expire not more than ten years from the date of grant and no dividends or dividend equivalents shall be paid with respect to any stock appreciation right prior to the exercise of the stock appreciation right.

Stock Awards. The Committee has the discretion to grant stock awards to participants. Stock awards will consist of shares of common stock granted without any consideration from the participant or shares sold to the participant for appropriate consideration as determined by the Committee. The number of shares awarded to each participant, and the restrictions, terms and conditions of the award, will be at the discretion of the Committee. Subject to the restrictions, a participant will be a shareholder with respect to the shares awarded to him or her and will have the rights of a shareholder with respect to the shares, including the right to vote the shares and receive dividends on the shares; provided that dividends otherwise payable on any stock award subject to restrictions will be held by us and will be paid to the holder of the stock award only to the extent the restrictions on such stock award lapse.

Stock Units. The Committee has the discretion to grant stock unit awards to participants. Each stock unit entitles the participant to receive, on a specified date or event set forth in the award agreement, one share of common stock or cash equal to the fair market value of one share on such date or event, as provided in the award agreement. The number of stock units awarded to each participant, and the terms and conditions of the award, will be at the discretion of the Committee. Unless otherwise specified in the award agreement, a participant will not be a shareholder with respect to the stock units awarded to him prior to the date they are settled in shares of common stock. The award agreement may provide that until the restrictions on the stock units lapse, the participant will be paid an amount equal to the dividends that would have been paid had the stock units been actual shares; provided that such dividend equivalents will be held by us and paid only to the extent the restrictions lapse.

Award Limits. The 2026 Plan contains a limit on the number of shares of common stock as to which any one recipient may receive stock options or stock appreciation rights in any calendar year to $1.0 million in total value (calculating the value of any such awards based on the grant date fair value of such awards for financial reporting purposes). In addition, the 2026 Plan contains a limit on the number of shares of common stock that may be used for stock awards and/or stock unit awards to any one recipient in any calendar year to $1.0 million in total value (calculating the value of any such awards based on the grant date fair value of such awards for financial reporting purposes). Each of the above limits is calculated separately and the issuance of stock options or stock appreciation rights will not limit the stock awards and/or stock unit awards that may also be issued to the same person. We believe this modification will prevent the volatility of our stock price from effecting our ability to plan future awards.

Payment for Stock Options and Withholding Taxes. The Committee may make one or more of the following methods available for payment of any award, including the exercise price of a stock option, and for payment of the tax obligation associated with an award: (i) cash; (ii) cash received from a broker-dealer to whom the holder has submitted an exercise notice together with irrevocable instructions to deliver promptly to us the amount of sales proceeds from the sale of the shares subject to the award to pay the exercise price or withholding tax; (iii) by directing us to withhold shares of common stock otherwise issuable in connection with the award having a fair market value equal to the amount required to be withheld; and (iv) by delivery of previously acquired shares of common stock that are acceptable to the Committee and that have an aggregate fair market value on the date of exercise equal to the exercise price or withholding tax, or certification of ownership by attestation of such previously acquired shares.

Provisions Relating to a “Change in Control” of the Company. Notwithstanding any other provision of the 2026 Plan or any award agreement, in the event of a “Change in Control” of the company, the Committee has the discretion to provide that all outstanding awards will become fully exercisable, all restrictions applicable to all awards will terminate or lapse, and performance goals applicable to any stock awards will be deemed satisfied at the target level. In addition, upon such Change in Control, the Committee has sole discretion to provide for the purchase of any outstanding stock option for cash equal to the difference between the exercise price and the then fair market value of the common stock subject to the option had the option been currently exercisable, make such adjustment to any award then outstanding as the Committee deems appropriate to reflect such Change in Control and cause any such award then outstanding to be assumed by the acquiring or surviving corporation after such Change in Control.

Amendment of Award Agreements; Amendment and Termination of the 2026 Plan; Term of the 2026 Plan. The Committee may amend any award agreement at any time, provided that no amendment may adversely affect the right of any participant under any agreement in any material way without the written consent of the participant, unless such amendment is required by applicable law, regulation or stock exchange rule.

The Board may terminate, suspend or amend the 2026 Plan, in whole or in part, from time to time, without the approval of the stockholders, unless such approval is required by applicable law, regulation or stock exchange rule, and provided that no amendment may adversely affect the right of any participant under any outstanding award in any material way without the written consent of the participant, unless such amendment is required by applicable law, regulation or rule of any stock exchange on which the shares are listed.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, neither the 2026 Plan nor any outstanding award agreement can be amended in a way that results in the repricing of a stock option. Repricing is broadly defined to include reducing the exercise price of a stock option or stock appreciation right or cancelling a stock option or stock appreciation right in exchange for cash, other stock options or stock appreciation rights with a lower exercise price or other stock awards. (This prohibition on repricing without stockholder approval does not apply in case of an equitable adjustment to the awards to reflect changes in the capital structure of the company or similar events.)

No awards may be granted under the 2026 Plan on or after the tenth anniversary of the initial effective date of the 2026 Plan, which would be the date of the Annual Meeting if this Proposal 3 is approved.

U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences

The information set forth below is a summary only and does not purport to be complete. The information is based upon current U.S. federal income tax rules and therefore is subject to change when those rules change. Because the tax consequences to any recipient of an award may depend on his or her particular situation, each recipient should consult the recipient’s tax adviser regarding the federal, state, local, and other tax consequences of the grant or exercise of an award or the disposition of shares acquired as a result of an award. The 2026 Plan will not be qualified under the provisions of section 401(a) of the Code and will not be subject to any of the provisions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended.

Non-Qualified Stock Options. A participant will not recognize any income at the time of grant. On the date the participant exercises the non-qualified stock option, the participant will recognize ordinary income in an amount equal to the excess of the fair market value of the shares on the date of exercise over the exercise price. The participant will be responsible for remitting to us the withholding tax obligation that arises at the time the option is exercised. We generally will receive a tax deduction for the same amount of ordinary income recognized by the participant. When the participant sells these shares, any gain or loss recognized by the participant is treated as either short-term or long-term capital gain or loss depending on whether the participant has held the shares more than one year.

Incentive Stock Options. A participant will not recognize any income at the time of grant. If the participant is issued shares pursuant to the exercise of an incentive stock option, and if the participant does not make a disqualifying disposition of the shares within one year after the date of exercise or within two years after the date of grant, the participant will not recognize any income, for federal income tax purposes, at the time of the exercise. When the participant sells the shares issued pursuant to the incentive stock option, the participant will be taxed, for federal income tax purposes, as a long-term capital gain on any amount recognized by the participant in excess of the exercise price, and any loss sustained by the participant will be a long-term capital loss. No deduction will be allowed to us for federal income tax purposes. If, however, the participant sells the shares before the expiration of the holding periods, the participant will recognize ordinary income on the difference between the exercise price and the fair market value at exercise, and we generally will receive a tax deduction in the same amount. Upon exercise of an incentive stock option, the excess of the fair market value over the exercise price is an item of tax preference to the participant for purposes of determining the alternative minimum tax.

In order to qualify as an incentive stock option, the option must be exercised within three months after the participant’s termination of employment for any reason other than death or disability and within one year after termination of the participant’s employment due to disability. If the option is not exercised within this time period, it will be treated as a non-qualified stock option and taxed accordingly.

Stock Awards/Stock Units. If a participant receives a stock award, the participant will recognize ordinary income upon becoming entitled to transfer the shares at the end of the restriction period without forfeiture. A participant generally will recognize ordinary income when he receives cash or shares pursuant to the settlement of stock units, provided that if the shares are subject to any further restrictions on transfer, the participant will recognize ordinary income upon becoming entitled to transfer the shares at the end of the restriction period without forfeiture. The amount of income the participant recognizes will be equal to the fair market value of the shares on such date, or the amount of cash received less the amount paid by the participant for the shares. This amount will also be the participant’s tax basis for the shares. The participant will be responsible for remitting to us the withholding tax obligation that arises at the time the ordinary income is recognized. In addition, the holding period begins on the day the restrictions lapse, or the date the shares are received if not subject to any restrictions, for purposes of determining whether the participant has long-term or short-term capital gain or loss on a subsequent sale of the shares. We generally will be entitled to a deduction with respect to the ordinary income recognized by the participant.

If a participant who receives a stock award subject to restrictions makes an election under Section 83(b) of the Code within 30 days after the date of the grant, the participant will have ordinary income equal to the fair market value on the date of grant, less the amount paid by the participant for the shares, and the participant will recognize no additional income until the participant subsequently sells the shares. The participant will be responsible for remitting to us the withholding tax obligation that arises at the time the ordinary income is recognized. When the participant sells the shares, the tax basis will be equal to the fair market value on the date of grant and the holding period for capital gains purposes begins on the date of the grant. If the participant forfeits the shares subject to the Section 83(b) election, the participant will not be entitled to any deduction, refund, or loss for tax purposes (other than a capital loss with respect to the amount previously paid by the participant), and we will have to include the amount that was previously deducted from our gross income in the taxable year of the forfeiture.

Stock Appreciation Rights. A participant will not recognize any income at the time of the grant of a stock appreciation right. Upon exercise of the stock appreciation right, the participant will recognize ordinary income equal to the amount received upon exercise. The participant will be responsible for remitting to us the withholding tax obligation that arises at the time the ordinary income is recognized. We generally will be entitled to a deduction with respect to the ordinary income recognized by the participant.

Awards Granted Under the 2026 Plan

No awards have been granted under the 2026 Plan.

Vote Required and Recommendation of the Board of Directors

The affirmative vote of the holders of at least the majority of the shares of stock present or represented (in person or by proxy) at the Annual Meeting is necessary to approve Proposal 3. Abstentions shall have the effect of a vote “AGAINST” the proposal and broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of this proposal.

The Board recommends that stockholders vote FOR the approval of the 2026 Plan.

PROPOSAL 4:

THE REDOMESTICATION PROPOSAL

Introduction

Our Board has approved a proposal to redomesticate the Company from a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Delaware to a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Nevada (the “Redomestication”). The Board recommends that stockholders approve the Redomestication and adopt the plan of conversion by which the Redomestication will be effectuated (the “Plan of Conversion”), which is included as Appendix B to this proxy statement and described in more detail below. Upon the completion of the Redomestication, the Company will become a Nevada corporation and will operate its business under its name “TruGolf Holdings, Inc.”

The Redomestication is expected to reduce the Company’s overall tax burden given the franchise taxes imposed on Delaware corporations. The Board also believes that the Redomestication in Nevada will give the Company a greater measure of flexibility and simplicity in corporate governance than is currently available under Delaware law and will provide for greater protection for our directors and officers from unmeritorious lawsuits. The Redomestication will not result in any change in the Company’s business, operations, management, assets, liabilities or net worth.

Accordingly, the Board believes that it is in the Company’s and stockholders’ best interests that the Company’s state of incorporation be changed from Delaware to Nevada.

Reasons for the Redomestication

The Board believes that there are several reasons the Redomestication is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders. In particular, the Board believes that the Redomestication will allow the Company to take advantage of certain provisions of the corporate and tax laws of Nevada.

The Redomestication will eliminate the Company’s obligation to pay the annual Delaware franchise tax, which we expect will result in substantial savings to us over the long term. For example, based on our current capital structure and assets, the Company’s Delaware franchise taxes are expected to be approximately $[____] per year if it remained a Delaware company. If the Company redomesticates in Nevada, its annual state-level fees are expected to include an annual business license fee of $500 and a fee of $150 for filing the Company’s annual list of directors and officers. In addition, in connection with the redomestication, the Company will be required to pay a one-time filing fee to file its articles of incorporation in Nevada, which is based on the number of authorized shares and their par value and is currently expected to be approximately $150.

In addition, the Redomestication will provide potentially greater protection from unmeritorious litigation for directors and officers of the Company. Delaware law permits a corporation to adopt provisions limiting or eliminating the liability of a director or an officer to a company and its stockholders for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty, provided that the liability does not arise from certain proscribed conduct, including breach of the duty of loyalty, acts or omissions not in good faith or which involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law. In contrast, Nevada law permits a broader exclusion of individual liability of both officers and directors to a company and its stockholders, providing for an exclusion of any damages as a result of any act or failure to act in his or her capacity as a director or officer unless the presumption that the director or officer acted in good faith, on an informed basis and with a view to the interests of the company, has been rebutted, and it is proven that the director’s or officer’s act or failure to act constituted a breach of his or her fiduciary duties as a director or officer, and such breach involved intentional misconduct, fraud or a knowing violation of law. As a result, under Nevada law, directors and officers generally will not be personally liable to the Company or its stockholders for monetary damages arising from alleged breaches of fiduciary duty unless it is proven that such individual engaged in intentional misconduct, fraud or a knowing violation of law.

There is currently no known pending claim or litigation against any of our directors or officers for breach of fiduciary duty related to their service as directors or officers of the Company. Nevertheless, the directors and officers of the Company have an interest in the Redomestication to the extent that they will be entitled to such limitation of liability in the future. The Board was aware of these interests and considered them, among other matters, in reaching its decision to approve the Redomestication and to recommend that stockholders vote in favor of this proposal.

Furthermore, by reducing the risk of lawsuits being filed against the Company’s directors and officers, the Redomestication may help us attract and retain qualified management. As previously discussed and for the reasons described below, we believe that, in general, Nevada law provides greater protection to our directors, officers and the Company than Delaware law. The increasing frequency of claims and litigation directed towards directors and officers has greatly expanded the risks facing directors and officers of public companies in exercising their duties. The amount of time and money required to respond to these claims and to defend these types of litigation matters can be substantial. Delaware law provides that every person becoming a director or officer of a Delaware corporation consents to the personal jurisdiction of the Delaware courts in connection with any action concerning the corporation. Accordingly, both directors and officers can be personally sued in Delaware, even though the director or officer has no other contacts with the state. Similarly, Nevada law provides that every person who accepts election or appointment, including reelection or reappointment, as a director or officer of a Nevada corporation consents to the personal jurisdiction of the Nevada courts in connection with all civil actions or proceedings brought in Nevada by, on behalf of or against the entity in which the director or officer is a necessary or proper party, or in any action or proceeding against the director or officer for a violation of a duty in such capacity, whether or not the person continues to serve as a director or officer at the time the action or proceeding is commenced. Though Delaware corporate law has recently been amended to, among other things, increase protections for officers of a corporation, we believe Nevada is more advantageous than Delaware because Nevada has pursued a statute-focused approach that does not depend upon judicial interpretation, supplementation and revision, and is intended to be stable, predictable and more efficient, whereas much of Delaware corporate law still consists of judicial decisions that migrate and develop over time.

The Redomestication is also expected to provide corporate flexibility in connection with certain corporate transactions. However, the Redomestication is not being effected to prevent a change in control, nor is it in response to any present attempt known to our Board to acquire control of the Company or obtain representation on the Board. Nevertheless, certain effects of the proposed Redomestication may be considered to have anti-takeover implications by virtue of being subject to Nevada law.

Principal Terms of the Redomestication

The Redomestication would be effected through a conversion pursuant to Section 266 of the Delaware General Corporation Law (“DGCL”) as set forth in the Plan of Conversion. The Plan of Conversion provides that the Company will convert from a Delaware corporation into a Nevada corporation pursuant to Section 266 of the DGCL and Sections 92A.195 and 92A.205 of the Nevada Revised Statutes (the “NRS”).

The Plan of Conversion provides that upon the Redomestication each outstanding share of Class A common stock and each share of Class B common stock of the Delaware Corporation will be automatically converted into one outstanding share of Class A common stock or Class B common stock, respectively, of the Nevada Corporation. Similarly, each outstanding share of the Series A Preferred Stock of the Delaware Corporation will be automatically converted into one outstanding share of Series A Preferred Stock of the Nevada Corporation.

At the Effective Time (as defined below) of the Redomestication, the Class A common stock will continue to be traded on The Nasdaq Capital Market under the existing trading symbol, “TRUG”. There is not expected to be any interruption in the trading of the Class A common stock as a result of the Redomestication.

The Board currently intends that the Redomestication will occur as soon as practicable following the Annual Meeting. If the Redomestication is approved by stockholders, it is anticipated that the Redomestication will become effective at the date and time (the “Effective Time”) specified in each of (i) the Articles of Conversion to be executed and filed with the office of the Nevada Secretary of State in accordance with NRS 92A.205 and (ii) the Certificate of Conversion to be executed and filed with the Office of the Secretary of State of Delaware in accordance with Section 266 of the DGCL. However, the Redomestication may be delayed by the Board or the Plan of Conversion may be terminated and abandoned by action of the Board at any time prior to the Effective Time of the Redomestication, whether before or after the approval by the Company’s stockholders, if the Board determines for any reason that the consummation of the Redomestication should be delayed or would be inadvisable or not in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders, as the case may be.

Effects of the Redomestication

Following the Redomestication, the Company will be governed by the NRS instead of the DGCL, and the Company will be governed by the form of Nevada Articles of Incorporation (the “Nevada Charter”) and the form of Nevada Bylaws (the “Nevada Bylaws”), included as Appendix C and Appendix D, respectively, to this proxy statement. The Company’s current Charter, as amended (collectively, the “Delaware Charter”), and its current Bylaws (the “Delaware Bylaws”) will no longer be applicable following completion of the Redomestication.

Following completion of the Redomestication, the Company will continue to exist in the form of a Nevada corporation. By virtue of the Redomestication, all of the rights, privileges, and powers of the Delaware corporation, and all property, real, personal, and mixed, and all debts due to the Delaware corporation, as well as all other things and causes of action belonging to the Delaware corporation, will remain vested in the Nevada corporation and will be the property of the Nevada corporation. In addition, all debts, liabilities, and duties of the Delaware corporation will remain attached to the Nevada corporation and may be enforced against the Nevada corporation.

There will be no change in our business, properties, assets, obligations, or management as a result of the Redomestication. Our directors and officers immediately prior to the Redomestication will serve as our directors and officers following the completion of the Redomestication. We will continue to maintain our headquarters in Centerville, Utah.

Effect of Vote for the Redomestication

A vote in favor of this Redomestication Proposal is a vote to approve the Plan of Conversion and therefore the Redomestication. A vote in favor of the Redomestication Proposal is also effectively a vote in favor of the Nevada Charter and the Nevada Bylaws.

If the Redomestication Proposal fails to obtain the requisite vote for approval, the Redomestication will not be consummated and the Company will continue to be incorporated in Delaware and be subject to the Delaware Charter, Delaware Bylaws and the DGCL.

No Securities Act Consequences

The Company will continue to be a publicly held company following completion of the Redomestication, and its Class A common stock will continue to be listed on The Nasdaq Capital Market under the corporate name, “TruGolf Holdings, Inc.” and its existing trading symbol “TRUG”. The Company will continue to file required periodic reports and other documents with the SEC. There is not expected to be any interruption in the trading of the Class A common stock as a result of the Redomestication. We and our stockholders will be in the same respective positions under the federal securities laws after the Redomestication as we and our stockholders were prior to the Redomestication.

Key Differences Between Delaware Charter and Bylaws and Nevada Charter and Bylaws

Following completion of the Redomestication, the Company will be governed by the NRS instead of the DGCL as well as the Nevada Charter and Nevada Bylaws, forms of which are included as Appendix C and Appendix D, respectively, to this proxy statement. Our current Delaware Charter and Delaware Bylaws will no longer be applicable following completion of the Redomestication.

Comparison of Stockholder Rights Under Delaware and Nevada Law

The rights of our stockholders are currently governed by the DGCL, the Delaware Charter and the Delaware Bylaws. Following completion of the Redomestication, the rights of our stockholders will be governed by the NRS, the Nevada Charter and the Nevada Bylaws.

The statutory corporate laws of Nevada, as governed by the NRS, are similar in many respects to those of Delaware, as governed by the DGCL. However, there are certain differences that may affect your rights as a stockholder, as well as the corporate governance of the Company. The following are brief summaries of material differences between the current rights of stockholders of the Company and the rights of stockholders of the Company following completion of the Redomestication. The following discussion does not provide a complete description of the differences that may affect you. This summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to the NRS and DGCL as well as the Delaware Charter and Delaware Bylaws and the Nevada Charter and Nevada Bylaws.

Increasing or Decreasing Authorized Capital Stock. The NRS allows the board of directors of a corporation, unless restricted by the articles of incorporation, to increase or decrease the number of authorized shares in a class or series of the corporation’s shares and correspondingly effect a forward or reverse split of any class or series of the corporation’s shares (and change the par value thereof) without a vote of the stockholders, so long as the action taken does not adversely change or alter any right or preference of the stockholders and does not include any provision or provisions pursuant to which only money will be paid or scrip issued to stockholders who hold 10% or more of the outstanding shares of the affected class and series. Delaware law has no similar provision.

If the Share Increase Proposal is approved, the Nevada Charter will reflect the increase in the number of authorized shares of Class A common stock and the corresponding increase in authorized capital stock. The Nevada Charter will thus authorize the following: _________________ shares Class A common stock, 10,000,000 shares of Class B common stock, and 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock. If the Share Increase Proposal is not approved, the Nevada Charter will be filed with the current authorized number of shares.

Cumulative Voting. Cumulative voting for directors entitles each stockholder to cast a number of votes that is equal to the number of voting shares held by such stockholder multiplied by the number of directors to be elected and to cast all such votes for one nominee or distribute such votes among up to as many candidates as there are positions to be filled. Cumulative voting may enable a minority stockholder or group of stockholders to elect at least one representative to the board of directors where such stockholders would not be able to elect any directors without cumulative voting.

Although the DGCL does not generally grant stockholders cumulative voting rights, a Delaware corporation may provide in its certificate of incorporation for cumulative voting in the election of directors. The NRS also permits any Nevada corporation to provide in its articles of incorporation the right to cumulative voting in the election of directors as long as certain procedures are followed.

Neither the Delaware Charter nor the Nevada Charter provides for cumulative voting in the election of directors.

Vacancies. Under both the DGCL and the NRS, subject to the certificate or articles of incorporation and bylaws, vacancies on the board of directors, including those resulting from any increase in the authorized number of directors, may be filled by the affirmative vote of a majority of the remaining directors then in office, even if less than a quorum. Any director so appointed will hold office for the remainder of the term of the director no longer on the board.

Removal of Directors. Under the DGCL, the holders of a majority of shares of each class entitled to vote at an election of directors may vote to remove any director or the entire board without cause unless (i) the board is a classified board, in which case directors may be removed only for cause, or (ii) the corporation has cumulative voting, in which case, if less than the entire board is to be removed, no director may be removed without cause if the votes cast against his or her removal would be sufficient to elect him or her. The NRS requires the vote of the holders of at least two-thirds of the shares or class or series of shares of the issued and outstanding stock entitled to vote at an election of directors in order to remove a director or all of the directors. The articles of incorporation may provide for a voting threshold higher than two-thirds, but not lower. Furthermore, the NRS does not make a distinction between removals for cause and removals without cause.

The Delaware Charter requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the outstanding shares of the stock of the Company entitled to elect directors and effect their removal, but only for cause. On the other hand, the Nevada Charter requires the affirmative vote of two-thirds of the outstanding shares of the stock of the Company entitled to elect directors and effect their removal, with or without cause. Under NRS § 78.335, directors can be removed with or without cause, unless the articles of incorporation or bylaws specifically require removal only for cause. The Nevada Charter provides that directors can be removed with or without cause.

Fiduciary Duties and Business Judgment. Nevada, like most jurisdictions, requires that directors and officers of Nevada corporations exercise their powers in good faith and with a view to the interests of the corporation, but, unlike some other jurisdictions, fiduciary duties of directors and officers are codified in the NRS. As a matter of law, directors and officers are presumed to act in good faith, on an informed basis and with a view to the interests of the corporation in making business decisions. In performing such duties, directors and officers may exercise their business judgment through reliance on information, opinions, reports, financial statements and other financial data prepared or presented by corporate directors, officers or employees who are reasonably believed to be reliable and competent. Reliance may also be extended to legal counsel, public accountants, advisors, bankers or other persons reasonably believed to be competent, and to the work of a committee (on which the particular director or officer does not serve) if the committee was established and empowered by the corporation’s board of directors, and if the committee’s work was within its designated authority and was about matters on which the committee was reasonably believed to merit confidence. However, directors and officers may not rely on such information, opinions, reports, books of account or similar statements if they have knowledge concerning the matter in question that would make such reliance unwarranted.

Under Delaware law, members of the board of directors or any committee designated by the board of directors are similarly entitled to rely in good faith upon the records of the corporation and upon such information, opinions, reports and statements presented to the corporation by corporate officers, employees, committees of the board of directors or other persons as to matters such member reasonably believes are within such other person’s professional or expert competence, provided that such other person has been selected with reasonable care by or on behalf of the corporation. Such appropriate reliance on records and other information protects directors from liability related to decisions made based on such records and other information. Both Delaware and Nevada law extend the statutory protection for reliance on such persons to corporate officers.

Flexibility for Decisions, Including Takeovers. Nevada provides directors with more discretion than Delaware in making corporate decisions, including decisions made in takeover situations. Under Nevada law, director and officer actions taken in response to a change or potential change in control are granted the benefits of the business judgment rule. However, in the case of an action to resist a change or potential change in control that impedes the rights of stockholders to vote for or remove directors, directors will only be given the benefit of the presumption of the business judgment rule if the directors have reasonable grounds to believe a threat to corporate policy and effectiveness exists and the action taken that impedes the exercise of the stockholders’ rights is reasonable in relation to such threat.

In exercising their powers, including in response to a change or potential change of control, directors and officers of Nevada corporations may consider all relevant facts, circumstances, contingencies or constituencies, which may include, without limitation, the effect of the decision on several corporate constituencies in addition to the stockholders, including the corporation’s employees, suppliers, creditors and customers, the economy of the state and nation, the interests of the community and society in general, and the long-term as well as short-term interests of the corporation and its stockholders, including the possibility that these interests may be best served by the continued independence of the corporation. To underscore the discretion of directors and officers of Nevada corporations, the NRS specifically states that such directors and officers are not required to consider the effect of a proposed corporate action upon any constituent as a dominant factor. Further, a director may resist a change or potential change in control of the corporation if the board of directors determines that the change or potential change of control is opposed to or not in the best interest of the corporation upon consideration of any relevant facts, circumstances, contingencies or constituencies, including that there are reasonable grounds to believe that, within a reasonable time, the corporation or any successor would be or become insolvent or subjected to bankruptcy proceedings.

The DGCL does not provide a similar list of statutory factors that corporate directors and officers may consider in making decisions. In a number of cases and in certain situations, Delaware law has been interpreted to provide that fiduciary duties require directors to accept an offer from the highest bidder regardless of the effect of such sale on the corporate constituencies other than the stockholders. Thus, the flexibility granted to directors of Nevada corporations when making business decisions, including in the context of a hostile takeover, are greater than those granted to directors of Delaware corporations.

Limitation on Personal Liability of Directors and Officers. The NRS and the DGCL each, by way of statutory provisions or permitted provisions in corporate charter documents, eliminate or limit the personal liability of directors and officers to the corporation or their stockholders for monetary damages for breach of a director’s fiduciary duty, subject to the differences discussed below.

The DGCL precludes liability limitation for acts or omissions not in good faith or involving intentional misconduct and for paying dividends or repurchasing stock out of other than lawfully available funds. Under the NRS, in order for a director or officer to be individually liable to the corporation or its stockholders or creditors for damages as a result of any act or failure to act, the presumption of the business judgment rule must be rebutted and it must be proven that the director’s or officer’s act or failure to act constituted a breach of his or her fiduciary duties as a director or officer and that the breach of those duties involved intentional misconduct, fraud or a knowing violation of law. Unlike the DGCL, however, the limitation on director and officer liability under the NRS does not distinguish the duty of loyalty or transactions from which a director derives an improper personal benefit, but does, pursuant to NRS 78.300, impose limited personal liability on directors for distributions made in violation of NRS 78.288. Further, the NRS permits a corporation to renounce in its articles of incorporation any interest or expectancy to participate in specific or specified classes or categories of business opportunities. Both the DGCL and the NRS permit limitation of liability which applies to both directors and officers, though the NRS expressly also applies this limitation to liabilities owed to creditors of the corporation. Furthermore, under the NRS, it is not necessary to adopt provisions in the articles of incorporation limiting personal liability of directors or officers as this limitation is provided by statute. Under Delaware law, the exculpation of officers is authorized only in connection with direct claims brought by stockholders, including class actions; however, the DGCL does not eliminate monetary liability of officers for breach of fiduciary duty arising out of claims brought by the corporation itself or for derivative claims brought by stockholders in the name of the corporation.

Both the Delaware Charter and the Nevada Charter provide a limitation to personal liability of a director or officer to the fullest extent permitted by Delaware and Nevada law, respectively.

Indemnification. The NRS and the DGCL each permit corporations to indemnify directors, officers, employees and agents in similar circumstances, subject to the differences discussed below.

In suits that are not brought by or in the right of the corporation, both jurisdictions permit a corporation to indemnify current and former directors, officers, employees and agents for attorneys’ fees and other expenses, judgments and amounts paid in settlement that the person actually and reasonably incurred in connection with the action, suit or proceeding. The person seeking indemnity may recover as long as he or she acted in good faith and believed his or her actions were either in the best interests of or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation. Under the NRS, the person seeking indemnity may also be indemnified if he or she is not liable for breach of his or her fiduciary duties. Similarly, with respect to a criminal proceeding, the person seeking indemnification must not have had any reasonable cause to believe his or her conduct was unlawful.

In derivative suits, a corporation in either jurisdiction may indemnify its directors, officers, employees or agents for expenses that the person actually and reasonably incurred. A corporation may not indemnify a person if the person was adjudged to be liable to the corporation unless a court otherwise orders. No corporation may indemnify a party unless it decides that indemnification is proper. Under the DGCL, the corporation through its stockholders, directors or independent legal counsel will determine whether the conduct of the person seeking indemnity conformed with the statutory provisions governing indemnity. Under the NRS, the corporation through its stockholders, directors or independent counsel must determine that the indemnification is proper.

The NRS and the DGCL also each permit corporations to pay the expenses of officers and directors incurred in defending a civil or criminal action, suit or proceeding in advance of the final disposition of the action, suit or proceeding, upon receipt of an undertaking by or on behalf of the director or officer to repay the amount if it is ultimately determined that the director or officer is not entitled to be indemnified by the corporation.

Under the NRS, the indemnification pursuant to the statutory mechanisms available under the NRS, as described above, does not exclude any other rights to which a person seeking indemnification or advancement of expenses may be entitled under the articles of incorporation or any bylaw, agreement, vote of stockholders or disinterested directors or otherwise, but unless ordered by a court, indemnification may not be made to or on behalf of any director or officer finally adjudged by a court of competent jurisdiction, after exhaustion of any appeals taken therefrom, to be liable for intentional misconduct, fraud or a knowing violation of law, and such misconduct, fraud or violation was material to the cause of action.

Both the Delaware Bylaws and the Nevada Bylaws include substantially similar provisions providing for indemnification, including advancement of expenses, consistent with the laws of the respective states. In addition, both the Delaware Charter and Nevada Charter provides for indemnification and advancement of expenses to the fullest extent permitted by law.

Director Compensation. The DGCL does not have a specific statute on the fairness of director compensation. In contrast, the NRS provides that, unless otherwise provided in the articles of incorporation or bylaws, the board of directors, without regard to personal interest, may establish the compensation of directors for services in any capacity. If the board of directors so establishes the compensation of directors, such compensation is presumed to be fair to the corporation unless proven unfair by a preponderance of the evidence.

Action by Written Consent of Directors. Both the DGCL and NRS provide that, unless the articles or certificate of incorporation or the bylaws provide otherwise, any action required or permitted to be taken at a meeting of the directors or a committee thereof may be taken without a meeting if all members of the board or committee, as the case may be, consent to the action in writing. Neither the Delaware Charter or Delaware Bylaws nor the Nevada Charter or Nevada Bylaws limit Board action by written consent.

Actions by Written Consent of Stockholders. Both the DGCL and NRS provide that, unless the articles or certificate of incorporation provides otherwise, any action required or permitted to be taken at a meeting of the stockholders may be taken without a meeting if the holders of outstanding stock having at least the minimum number of votes that would be necessary to authorize or take the action at a meeting of stockholders consent to the action in writing. In addition, the DGCL requires the corporation to give prompt notice of the taking of corporate action without a meeting by less than unanimous written consent to those stockholders who did not consent in writing. There is no equivalent requirement under the NRS. Except with respect to changes to the preferred stock, neither the Delaware Charter nor the Nevada Charter allow stockholder action by written consent.

Dividends and Distributions. Delaware law is more restrictive than Nevada law with respect to dividend payments. Unless further restricted in the certificate of incorporation, the DGCL permits a corporation to declare and pay dividends out of either (i) surplus, or (ii) if no surplus exists, out of net profits for the fiscal year in which the dividend is declared and/or the preceding fiscal year (provided that the amount of capital of the corporation is not less than the aggregate amount of the capital represented by the issued and outstanding stock of all classes having a preference upon the distribution of assets). The DGCL defines surplus as the excess, at any time, of the net assets of a corporation over its stated capital. In addition, the DGCL provides that a corporation may redeem or repurchase its shares only when the capital of the corporation is not impaired and only if such redemption or repurchase would not cause any impairment of the capital of the corporation.

The NRS provides that no distribution (including dividends on, or redemption or purchases of, shares of capital stock or distributions of indebtedness) may be made if, after giving effect to such distribution, (i) the corporation would not be able to pay its debts as they become due in the usual course of business, or, (ii) except as otherwise specifically permitted by the articles of incorporation, the corporation’s total assets would be less than the sum of its total liabilities plus the amount that would be needed at the time of a dissolution to satisfy the preferential rights of preferred stockholders. Directors may consider financial statements prepared on the basis of accounting practices that are reasonable in the circumstances, a fair valuation, including but not limited to unrealized appreciation and depreciation, and any other method that is reasonable in the circumstances.

Restrictions on Business Combinations. Both Delaware and Nevada law provide certain protections to stockholders in connection with certain business combinations. These protections can be found in NRS 78.411 to 78.444, inclusive, and Section 203 of the DGCL. Under Section 203 of the DGCL, certain “business combinations” with “interested stockholders” of the Company are subject to a three-year moratorium unless specified conditions are met. For purposes of Section 203, the term “business combination” is defined broadly to include (i) mergers with or caused by the interested stockholder; (ii) sales or other dispositions to the interested stockholder (except proportionately with the corporation’s other stockholders) of assets of the corporation or a subsidiary equal to 10% or more of the aggregate market value of either the corporation’s consolidated assets or its outstanding stock; (iii) the issuance or transfer by the corporation or a subsidiary of stock of the corporation or such subsidiary to the interested stockholder (except for transfers in a conversion or exchange or a pro rata distribution or certain other transactions, none of which increase the interested stockholder’s proportionate ownership of any class or series of the corporation’s or such subsidiary’s stock); or (iv) receipt by the interested stockholder (except proportionately as a stockholder), directly or indirectly, of any loans, advances, guarantees, pledges or other financial benefits provided by or through the corporation or a subsidiary.

The three-year moratorium imposed on business combinations by Section 203 of the DGCL does not apply if: (i) prior to the time on which such stockholder becomes an interested stockholder the board of directors approves either the business combination or the transaction which resulted in the person becoming an interested stockholder; (ii) the interested stockholder owns 85% of the corporation’s voting stock upon consummation of the transaction that made him, her or it an interested stockholder (excluding from the 85% calculation shares owned by directors who are also officers of the target corporation and shares held by employee stock plans that do not permit employees to decide confidentially whether to accept a tender or exchange offer); or (iii) at or after the time on which such stockholder becomes an interested stockholder, the board approves the business combination and it is also approved at a stockholder meeting by at least two-thirds (66-2/3%) of the outstanding voting stock not owned by the interested stockholder.

In contrast, the NRS imposes a maximum moratorium of two years versus Delaware’s three-year moratorium on business combinations. However, NRS 78.411 to 78.444, inclusive, regulate combinations more stringently. First, an interested stockholder is defined as a beneficial owner of 10% or more of the voting power. Second, the two-year moratorium can be lifted only by advance approval of the combination or the transaction by which such person first becomes an interested stockholder by a corporation’s board of directors or unless the combination is approved by the board and 60% of the corporation’s voting power not beneficially owned by the interested stockholder, its affiliates and associates, as opposed to Delaware’s provision that allows interested stockholder combinations with stockholder approval at the time of such combination. Finally, after the two-year period, a combination remains prohibited unless (i) it is approved by the board of directors, the disinterested stockholders or a majority of the outstanding voting power not beneficially owned by the interested stockholder and its affiliates and associates or (ii) the interested stockholders satisfy certain fair value requirements. But note that these statutes do not apply to any combination of a corporation and an interested stockholder after the expiration of four years after the person first became an interested stockholder. The combinations statutes in Nevada apply only to Nevada corporations with 200 or more stockholders of record. As of the record date, the Company has fewer than 200 stockholders of record.

Companies are entitled to opt out of the business combination provisions of the DGCL and NRS. The Company is subject to the business combination provisions of Section 203 of the DGCL and plans to be subject to the business combination provisions of NRS 78.411 to 78.444, inclusive, under the Nevada Charter.

Acquisition of Controlling Interests. In addition to certain restrictions on business combinations with interested stockholders, Nevada law also protects the corporation and its stockholders from persons acquiring a “controlling interest” in a corporation. The provisions can be found in NRS 78.378 to 78.3793, inclusive. Delaware law does not have similar provisions. Pursuant to NRS 78.379, any person who acquires a controlling interest in a corporation may not exercise voting rights on any control shares unless such voting rights are conferred by a majority vote of the disinterested stockholders of the issuing corporation at a special meeting of such stockholders held upon the request and at the expense of the acquiring person. NRS 78.3785 provides that a “controlling interest” means the ownership of outstanding voting shares of an issuing corporation sufficient to enable the acquiring person, individually or in association with others, directly or indirectly, to exercise (i) one fifth or more but less than one third, (ii) one third or more but less than a majority or (iii) a majority or more of the voting power of the issuing corporation in the election of directors, and once an acquirer crosses one of these thresholds, shares which it acquired in the transaction taking it over the threshold and within the 90 days immediately preceding the date when the acquiring person acquired or offered to acquire a controlling interest become “control shares” to which the voting restrictions described above apply. In the event that the control shares are accorded full voting rights and the acquiring person acquires control shares with a majority or more of all the voting power, any stockholder, other than the acquiring person, who does not vote in favor of authorizing voting rights for the control shares is entitled to demand payment for the fair value of such person’s shares, and the corporation must comply with the demand.

NRS 78.378(1) provides that the control share statutes of the NRS do not apply to any acquisition of a controlling interest in an issuing corporation if the articles of incorporation or bylaws of the corporation in effect on the 10th day following the acquisition of a controlling interest by the acquiring person provide that the provisions of those sections do not apply to the corporation or to an acquisition of a controlling interest specifically by types of existing or future stockholders, whether or not identified. In addition, NRS 78.3788 provides that the controlling interest statutes apply as of a particular date only to a corporation that has 200 or more stockholders of record, at least 100 of whom have addresses in Nevada appearing on the corporation’s stock ledger at all times during the 90 days immediately preceding that date, and which does business directly or indirectly in Nevada. NRS 78.378(2) provides that the corporation may impose stricter requirements if it so desires. Corporations are entitled to opt out of the above controlling interest provisions of the NRS.

Stockholder Vote for Mergers and Other Corporate Reorganizations. Under the DGCL, unless the certificate of incorporation specifies a higher percentage, the stockholders of a corporation that is being acquired in a merger or selling substantially all of its assets must authorize such merger or sale of assets by vote of an absolute majority of outstanding shares entitled to vote. The corporation’s board of directors must also approve such transaction. Similarly, under the NRS, a merger or sale of all assets requires authorization by stockholders of the corporation being acquired or selling its assets by at least a majority of the voting power of the outstanding shares entitled to vote, as well as approval of such corporation’s board of directors. Although a substantial body of case law has been developed in Delaware as to what constitutes the “sale of substantially all of the assets” of a corporation, it is difficult to determine the point at which a sale of virtually all, but less than all, of a corporation’s assets would be considered a “sale of all of the assets” of the corporation for purposes of Nevada law. It is possible that many sales of less than all of the assets of a corporation requiring stockholder authorization under Delaware law would not require stockholder authorization under Nevada law.

The DGCL and NRS have substantially similar provisions with respect to approval by stockholders of a surviving corporation in a merger. The DGCL does not require a stockholder vote of a constituent corporation in a merger (unless the corporation provides otherwise in its certificate of incorporation) if (i) the plan of merger does not amend the existing certificate of incorporation, (ii) each share of stock of such constituent corporation outstanding immediately before the effective date of the merger is an identical outstanding share after the effective date of merger and (iii) either no shares of the common stock of the surviving corporation and no shares, securities or obligations convertible into such stock are to be issued or delivered under the plan of merger, or the authorized unissued shares or treasury shares of the common stock of the surviving corporation to be issued or delivered under the plan of merger plus those initially issuable upon conversion of any other shares, securities or obligations to be issued or delivered under such plan do not exceed 20% of the shares of common stock of such constituent corporation outstanding immediately prior to the effective date of the merger. The NRS does not require a stockholder vote of the surviving corporation in a merger under substantially similar circumstances. The Delaware Charter does not require a higher percentage to vote to approve certain corporate transactions. The Nevada Charter also does not specify a higher percentage.

Appraisal or Dissenter’s Rights. In both jurisdictions, dissenting stockholders of a corporation engaged in certain major corporate transactions are entitled to appraisal rights. Appraisal or dissenter’s rights permit a stockholder to receive cash generally equal to the fair value of the stockholder’s shares (as determined by agreement of the parties or by a court) in lieu of the consideration such stockholder would otherwise receive in any such transaction.

Under Section 262 of the DGCL, appraisal rights are generally available for the shares of any class or series of stock of a Delaware corporation in a merger, consolidation or conversion, provided that no appraisal rights are available with respect to shares of any class or series of stock if, at the record date for the meeting held to approve such transaction, such shares of stock, or depositary receipts in respect thereof, are either (i) listed on a national securities exchange or (ii) held of record by more than 2,000 holders, unless the stockholders receive in exchange for their shares anything other than shares of stock of the surviving or resulting corporation (or depositary receipts in respect thereof), or of any other corporation that is listed on a national securities exchange or held by more than 2,000 holders of record, cash in lieu of fractional shares or fractional depositary receipts described above or any combination of the foregoing.

In addition, Section 262 of the DGCL allows beneficial owners of shares to file a petition for appraisal without the need to name a nominee holding such shares on behalf of such owner as a nominal plaintiff and makes it easier than under Nevada law to withdraw from the appraisal process and accept the terms offered in the merger, consolidation or conversion. Under the DGCL, no appraisal rights are available to stockholders of the surviving or resulting corporation if the merger did not require their approval. The Delaware Charter and Delaware Bylaws do not provide for appraisal rights in addition to those provided by the DGCL.

Under the NRS, a stockholder is entitled to dissent from, and obtain payment for, the fair value of the stockholder’s shares in the event of (i) certain acquisitions of a controlling interest in the corporation, (ii) consummation of a plan of merger, if approval by the stockholders is required for the merger, regardless of whether the stockholder is entitled to vote on the merger or if the domestic corporation is a subsidiary and is merged with its parent, or if the domestic corporation is a constituent entity in a merger pursuant to NRS 92A.133, (iii) consummation of a plan of conversion to which the corporation is a party, (iv) consummation of a plan of exchange in which the corporation is a party, (v) any corporate action taken pursuant to a vote of the stockholders, if the articles of incorporation, bylaws or a resolution of the board of directors provides that voting or nonvoting stockholders are entitled to dissent and obtain payment for their shares, or (vi) any corporate action to which the stockholder would be obligated, as a result of the corporate action, to accept money or scrip rather than receive a fraction of a share in exchange for the cancellation of all the stockholder’s outstanding shares, except where the stockholder would not be entitled to receive such payment pursuant to NRS 78.205, 78.2055 or 78.207.

Holders of covered securities (generally those that are listed on a national securities exchange), any shares traded in an organized market and held by at least 2,000 stockholders of record with a market value of at least $20,000,000, and any shares issued by an open end management investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 and which may be redeemed at the option of the holder at net asset value are generally not entitled to dissenter’s rights. However, this exception is not available if (i) the articles of incorporation of the corporation issuing the shares provide that such exception is not available, (ii) the resolution of the board of directors approving the plan of merger, conversion or exchange expressly provides otherwise or (iii) the holders of the class or series of stock are required by the terms of the corporate action to accept for the shares anything except cash, shares of stock or other securities as described in NRS 92A.390(3) or any combination thereof. The NRS prohibits a dissenting stockholder from voting his or her shares or receiving certain dividends or distributions after his or her dissent. The Nevada Charter and Nevada Bylaws do not provide for dissenter’s rights in addition to those provided by the NRS. The mechanics and timing procedures vary somewhat between Delaware and Nevada, but both require technical compliance with specific notice and payment protocols.

Special Meetings of the Stockholders. The DGCL permits special meetings of stockholders to be called by the board of directors or by any other person authorized in the certificate of incorporation or bylaws to call a special stockholder meeting. In contrast, the NRS permits special meetings of stockholders to be called by the entire board of directors, any two directors or the President, unless the articles of incorporation or bylaws provide otherwise. Under the Delaware Charter and Delaware Bylaws, a special meeting of stockholders may be called by resolution of the board of directors, the Chief Executive Officer, the President, or the Chairman of the Board. The Nevada Bylaws contain identical provisions.

Special Meetings Pursuant to Petition of Stockholders. The DGCL provides that a director or a stockholder of a corporation may apply to the Court of Chancery of Delaware if the corporation fails to hold an annual meeting for the election of directors or there is no written consent to elect directors in lieu of an annual meeting for a period of 30 days after the date designated for the special meeting or, if there is no date designated, within 13 months after the last annual meeting.

Under the NRS, stockholders having not less than 15% of the voting interest may petition the district court to order a meeting for the election of directors if a corporation fails to call a meeting for that purpose within 18 months after the last meeting at which directors were elected.

Adjournment of Stockholder Special Meetings. Under the DGCL, if a meeting of stockholders is adjourned due to lack of a quorum and the adjournment is for more than 30 days, or if after the adjournment a new record date is fixed for the adjourned meeting, notice of the adjourned meeting must be given to each stockholder of record entitled to vote at the meeting. At the adjourned meeting the corporation may transact any business that might have been transacted at the original meeting.

In contrast, under the NRS, a corporation is not required to give any notice of an adjourned meeting or of the business to be transacted at an adjourned meeting, other than by announcement at the meeting at which the adjournment is taken, unless the board of directors of the corporation fixes a new record date for the adjourned meeting or the meeting date is adjourned to a date more than 60 days later than the date set for the original meeting, in which case a new record date must be fixed and notice given.

Duration of Proxies. Under the DGCL, a proxy executed by a stockholder may not be voted after a period of three years from its date, unless the proxy provides for a longer period. The Delaware Bylaws provide that a proxy is valid for three years, unless the proxy provides for a longer period. Under the NRS, a proxy is effective only for a period of six months, unless it is coupled with an interest or unless otherwise provided in the proxy, which duration may not exceed seven years. The NRS also provides for irrevocable proxies, without limitation on duration, in limited circumstances. The proxy provisions in the Nevada Bylaws are consistent with the NRS.

Quorum and Voting. The DGCL provides that the certificate of incorporation and bylaws may establish quorum and voting requirements, but in no event shall quorum consist of less than one-third of the shares entitled to vote. If the certificate of incorporation and bylaws are silent as to specific quorum and voting requirements: (a) a majority of the shares entitled to vote shall constitute a quorum at a meeting of stockholders; (b) in all matters other than the election of directors, the affirmative vote of the majority of shares present at the meeting and entitled to vote on the subject matter shall be the act of the stockholders; (c) directors shall be elected by a plurality of the votes of the shares present at the meeting and entitled to vote on the election of directors; and (d) where a separate vote by a class or series is required, a majority of the outstanding shares of such class or series shall constitute a quorum entitled to take action with respect to that vote on that matter and, in all matters other than the election of directors, the affirmative vote of the majority of shares of such class or series present at the meeting shall be the act of such class or series or classes or series. A bylaw amendment adopted by stockholders which specifies the votes that shall be necessary for the election of directors shall not be further amended or repealed by the board. The Delaware Bylaws provide that the holders of a majority of the Company’s shares of capital stock issued and outstanding and entitled to vote, shall constitute a quorum at all meetings of the stockholders for the transaction of business, except as otherwise provided by statute or by the Certificate of Incorporation.

The NRS provides that, unless the articles of incorporation or bylaws provide otherwise, a majority of the voting power of the corporation, present in person or by proxy at a meeting of stockholders (regardless of whether the proxy has authority to vote on any matter), constitutes a quorum for the transaction of business. Under the NRS, unless the articles of incorporation or bylaws provide for different proportions, action by the stockholders on a matter other than the election of directors is approved if the number of votes cast in favor of the action exceeds the number of votes cast in opposition to the action. Unless provided otherwise in the corporation’s articles of incorporation or bylaws, directors are elected at the annual meeting of stockholders by plurality vote. The Nevada Bylaws provide that the holders of one-third of the Company’s stock issued, outstanding and entitled to vote, present in person or represented by proxy, shall constitute a quorum at all meetings of the stockholders for the transaction of business, except as otherwise provided by law, the Nevada Charter or the Nevada Bylaws. Consistent with the NRS, the Nevada Bylaws also provide that, except as otherwise provided by law, in the Nevada Charter or the Nevada Bylaws, that action by the stockholders on a matter other than the election of directors is approved if the number of votes cast in favor of the action exceeds the number of votes cast in opposition to the action.

Stockholder Inspection Rights. The DGCL grants any stockholder or beneficial owner of shares the right, upon written demand under oath stating the proper purpose thereof, either in person or by attorney or other agent, to inspect and make copies and extracts from a corporation’s stock ledger, list of stockholders and its other books and records for any proper purpose. A proper purpose is one reasonably related to such person’s interest as a stockholder.

Inspection rights under Nevada law are more limited. The NRS grants any person who has been a stockholder of record of a corporation for at least six months immediately preceding the demand, or any person holding, or thereunto authorized in writing by the holders of, at least 5% of all of its outstanding shares, upon at least five days’ written demand the right to inspect in person or by agent or attorney, during usual business hours (i) the articles of incorporation and all amendments thereto, (ii) the bylaws and all amendments thereto and (iii) a stock ledger or a duplicate stock ledger, revised annually, containing the names, alphabetically arranged, of all persons who are stockholders of the corporation, showing their places of residence, if known, and the number of shares held by them respectively. A Nevada corporation may require a stockholder to furnish the corporation with an affidavit that such inspection is for a proper purpose related to his or her interest as a stockholder of the corporation.

In addition, the NRS grants certain stockholders the right to inspect the books of account and records of a corporation for any proper purpose. The right to inspect the books of account and all financial records of a corporation, to make copies of records and to conduct an audit of such records is granted only to a stockholder who owns at least 15% of the issued and outstanding shares of a Nevada corporation, or who has been authorized in writing by the holders of at least 15% of such shares. However, these requirements do not apply to any corporation that furnishes to its stockholders a detailed annual financial statement or any corporation that has filed during the preceding 12 months all reports required to be filed pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act.

Business Opportunities. Under Delaware law, the corporate opportunity doctrine holds that a corporate officer or director may not generally and unilaterally take a business opportunity for his or her own if: (i) the corporation is financially able to exploit the opportunity; (ii) the opportunity is within the corporation’s line of business; (iii) the corporation has an interest or expectancy in the opportunity; and (iv) by taking the opportunity for his or her own, the corporate fiduciary will thereby be placed in a position inimical to his duties to the corporation. The DGCL permits a Delaware corporation to renounce, in its certificate of incorporation or by action of the board of directors, any interest or expectancy of the corporation in, or being offered an opportunity to participate in, specified business opportunities or specified classes or categories of business opportunities that are presented to the corporation or one or more of its officers, directors or stockholders.

Similar to the DGCL, the NRS permits a Nevada corporation to renounce, in its articles of incorporation or by action of the board of directors, any interest or expectancy to participate in specified business opportunities or specified classes or categories of business opportunities that are presented to the corporation or one or more of its officers, directors or stockholders. Neither the Company’s Delaware Charter, nor the Company’s Nevada Charter contain such provisions.

Potential Risks and Disadvantages of the Redomestication

Because

SEC Form PRE 14A filed by TruGolf Holdings Inc.