SEC Form PX14A6G filed by Domino's Pizza Inc

$DPZ
Food Distributors
Consumer Discretionary
Get the next $DPZ alert in real time by email
PX14A6G 1 y314251px14a6g.htm

 

United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, DC 20549

 

 

Notice of Exempt Solicitation

 

 

1.Name of Registrant:

DOMINO’S PIZZA

 

2.Name of persons relying on exemption:

THE ACCOUNTABILITY BOARD, INC.

 

3.Addresses of persons relying on exemption:

401 Edgewater Pl #600, Wakefield, MA 01880

 

4.Written materials:

The attached written materials are submitted pursuant to a voluntary application of Rule 14a-6(g)(1) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Submission is not required of this filer under the terms of the Rule but is made in the interest of public disclosure and consideration of these important issues.

 

  
 

 

 

March 14, 2025

 

Dear fellow Domino’s shareholders,

 

Proposal Six in Domino’s proxy statement is our advisory proposal to give shareholders with an aggregate of at least 15% of outstanding common stock the right to call special meetings. The Board has put forth a competing (binding) proposal, Proposal Five, seeking a Charter amendment to provide this right at a 25% threshold. The Board now asks shareholders to vote AGAINST our proposal (which requires only a simple majority of votes cast to pass) and FOR theirs (which requires a 75% supermajority of all outstanding shares to pass).

 

First, Domino’s Board claims our proposed 15% threshold would be costly and disruptive—but this argument lacks merit.

 

Indeed, the right to call a meeting does not mean frequent or unnecessary meetings. Special meetings are rare, precisely because shareholders must still coordinate and justify their necessity. They are called only in extraordinary circumstances when waiting for an annual meeting is impractical.

 

Further, 15% is a well-established standard. As our proposal notes, ISS, Glass Lewis, and major institutional investors—including BlackRock and Vanguard—recognize 15% as an appropriate threshold. And many companies, including those in the S&P 500, have adopted this standard, acknowledging its balance between shareholder rights and protection against abuse.

 

In fact, Domino’s own leaders recognize this, having supported lower thresholds elsewhere.

 

For instance, with Domino’s own Executive Chair (David Brandon) as a Board member, in 2023, DTE Energy put forth its own proposal to lower its special meeting threshold from 25% to 15%.

 

In its proposal, DTE’s Board made many of the points Domino’s now makes against our proposal regarding too small a threshold being problematic. But unlike Domino’s, DTE’s Board (again, including Mr. Brandon) concluded: “We believe that our proposed 15% ownership threshold appropriately balances [the] concerns with the need for shareholders to have a mechanism by which to discuss extraordinary events in a timely manner. The Board also believes that adoption of the proposed 15% ownership threshold is appropriate because the company is committed to high standards of corporate governance.”

 

Moreover, although Domino’s opposition statement touts its governance practices, its governance profile is actually quite concerning.

 

For instance, it has a plurality voting standard for uncontested director elections, doesn’t give shareholders the right to act by written consent, has a non-independent Board Chair, and has certain ultra-high 75% supermajority voting requirements.

 

Speaking of Domino’s supermajority voting requirements, they are highly relevant to evaluating Proposals Five and Six.

 

  
 

 

Although the proxy statement includes a Board proposal to eliminate supermajority requirements, the 75% requirement for Charter amendments is still currently in place and serves as the standard for which any Charter amendment proposed on the 2025 proxy statement must be approved.

 

Thus, because the Board’s special meetings proposal is for such an amendment, it requires 75% of outstanding shares to pass. By contrast, because our special meetings proposal is not a direct charter amendment, it needs only a simple majority of votes cast to pass. (And if the elimination of supermajority voting is approved at this year’s meeting, any later action taken to implement the proposal would not be subject to such restrictively high standards.)

 

Imagine that, per the Board’s recommendation, our proposal fails. Though imagine, also, that it receives high support—say in the 49% range. Now imagine that theirs receives a high vote too, but one that falls just short of the required supermajority of all outstanding shares—say, 74%. In that case, most shareholders would’ve clearly requested the right to call special meetings, but neither proposal would’ve technically passed and we could be left with none.

 

In fact, the 49% and 74% scenario is not just a hypothetical one.

 

In 2021, a Bloomin’ Brands shareholder passed a proposal to eliminate supermajority requirements (which, like Domino’s, were set at an ultra-high 75%). So, in 2022, Bloomin’s Board put forth a binding amendment to eliminate supermajority voting—just as Domino’s Board has done this year. Simultaneously, Bloomin’ also faced a shareholder proposal asking it to adopt a special meeting right in 2022—just as Domino’s is now facing this year.

 

So, with the company’s 75% supermajority provision still in place, Bloomin’s Board opposed that proposal and put forth its own competing proposal to adopt a special meeting right at a 25% threshold—just as Domino’s Board has done this year. It’s the exact same scenario. In fact, even the proposal numbers (Five and Six) are the same.

 

The Bloomin’ shareholder proposal on special meetings won 49.5% of votes needed to pass—just half-a-percent short. Meanwhile, the Board’s competing proposal won 74% of the votes needed to pass—just one percent short.

 

So, if you want the right to call special meetings and plan to support the Board’s proposal, please also support ours. Consider it an insurance policy. Because if the Board’s proposal fails to achieve the ultra-high 75% supermajority it needs to pass and ours also doesn’t pass, shareholders could be left with no special meeting right at all.

 

While Boards can voluntarily act in response to a high shareholder vote (as Bloomin’s ultimately did in 2023, albeit at a higher threshold than many shareholders voted for), the greater concern is that if neither proposal passes—even if just by a narrow margin—the Board may simply do nothing. In fact, that’s what Domino’s Board has done before. In 2015, a shareholder proposal seeking proxy access fell just short of 50% of the votes required to pass, yet the Board failed to adopt the request. It wasn’t until almost a decade later, in 2023, that Domino’s shareholders finally gained proxy access.

 

In short, voting for our proposal, which requires substantially fewer votes to pass than the Board’s, provides the greatest chance that a critical tool for shareholder rights and Board accountability will be established.

 

Finally, we note that for all the Board’s discussion about its attention to governance matters, its response to our Proposal seems to be taken almost verbatim from Bloomin’s response to the similar 2022 proposal it faced.

 

  
 

 

Not only is the scenario precisely the same (again, down to the proposal numbers) but much of the language in Domino’s opposition statement is essentially a verbatim reproduction of the one Bloomin’ used in 2022. For example, consider the opening to each company’s opposition statement:

 

The opening to Bloomin’s

2022 opposition statement

The opening to Domino’s

2025 Opposition Statement

 

The Board has carefully considered this stockholder proposal and believes that it is not in the best interests of our stockholders for the reasons outlined below.

 

The Board…has carefully considered this shareholder proposal and believes that it is not in the best interests of our shareholders for the reasons outlined below.

 

Accordingly, the Board unanimously recommends that stockholders vote AGAINST this Proposal No. 6 and instead approve the Company’s special meeting right proposal outlined in Proposal No. 5.

 

Accordingly, the Board…unanimously recommends that stockholders vote AGAINST this Proposal Six and instead approve the Company’s special meeting right proposal outlined in Proposal Five…

 

Our Company’s Special Meeting Right Proposal is More Consistent with Market Practice

 

Our Company’s Special Meeting Right Proposal is More Consistent with Current Market Practice

 

We are recommending that our stockholders approve the amendments to the Charter described in Proposal No. 5, which would enable stockholders who hold, in the aggregate, at least 25% of our outstanding common stock to request a special meeting of stockholders.

 

We are recommending that our shareholders approve the amendments...described in Proposal Five, which would enable shareholders who hold, in the aggregate, at least 25% of our outstanding common stock to request a special meeting of shareholders.

 

In contrast, the stockholder proposal described in this Proposal No. 6 asks the Board to take steps to allow stockholders who hold, in the aggregate, at least 10% of our common stock to call special meetings.

 

In contrast, the shareholder proposal described in this Proposal Six asks the Board of Directors to take steps to allow shareholders who hold, in the aggregate, at least 15% of our common stock to call special meetings.

 

A 25% ownership threshold is more consistent with market practice.

 

A 25% ownership threshold is more consistent with current market practice…

 

According to data from Deal Point Data, a corporate governance database, approximately 50.4% of the companies included in the S&P 500 that afford stockholders the right to request a special meeting have set the ownership threshold for the exercise of such a right at 25% or greater, while only 24% have adopted a 10% ownership threshold.

 

According to data from Deal Point Data, a corporate governance database, the most common ownership threshold among the companies included in the S&P 500 that afford shareholders the right to request a special meeting is 25% with approximately 47% of the S&P 500 companies that afford shareholders the right to request a special meeting having set the ownership threshold for the exercise of such a right at 25% or greater, while only 16.7% have adopted a 15% ownership threshold.

 

Our Company’s Special Meeting Right Proposal More Appropriately Balances Stockholder Rights with the Protection of the Long-Term Interests of the Company and our Stockholders

 

Our Company’s Special Meeting Right Proposal More Appropriately Balances Shareholder Rights with the Protection of the Long-Term Interests of the Company and our Shareholders

 

In addition to not aligning with market practice, the Board believes that the stockholder proposal does not strike the appropriate balance between enhancing stockholder rights and protecting the long-term interests of the Company and our stockholders.

 

The Board of Directors believes that the shareholder proposal does not strike the appropriate balance between enhancing shareholder rights and protecting the long-term interests of the Company and our shareholders.

 

  
 

 

In fact, not only is Domino’s opposition statement concerningly similar to Bloomin’s, but so is the Board’s competing proposal. For example, let’s examine the openings of those proposals too:

 

From the opening to Bloomin’s

2022 Board proposal

From the opening to Domino’s

2025 Board proposal

 

Our stockholders do not presently have the right to request that the Company call a special meeting of stockholders, and, as part of the Board’s and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s ongoing review of the Company’s corporate governance standards, the Board and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considered whether it was appropriate and timely to provide stockholders with the right to request a special meeting of stockholders.

 

Our shareholders do not presently have the right to request that the Company call a special meeting of shareholders. As part of the Board’s and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s ongoing review of the Company’s corporate governance standards, the Board and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee have continued to consider whether it was appropriate and timely to provide shareholders with the right to request a special meeting of shareholders.

 

 

To be clear, we recognize that companies may take similar positions on certain governance matters. But we believe that when it comes to something as important as the protection of its shareholders, more is expected from our company than canned responses from competitors’ playbooks.

 

In conclusion, please vote “FOR” Proposal Six.

 

Domino’s lack of special meeting right is just one major governance deficiency within a long list of others. While the Board now proposes a 25% threshold, this is an insufficient concession that does not provide meaningful shareholder access, as demonstrated by the comments of other companies where Domino’s own current directors serve. A 15% threshold is reasonable and widely supported. Rather than adopt it, the Board seems to copy extensively from the playbook of another company to oppose it—despite the fact (or perhaps precisely because of it) that ours only requires a simple majority to pass while theirs requires a supermajority. We ask that you reject the Board’s entreaties and vote FOR our proposal to ensure that shareholders have a real voice when it matters most.

 

Thank you for your attention and consideration. We’re not asking for and can’t accept your proxy. Please vote “FOR” Proposal Six. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Get the next $DPZ alert in real time by email

Chat with this insight

Save time and jump to the most important pieces.

Recent Analyst Ratings for
$DPZ

DatePrice TargetRatingAnalyst
2/25/2025Buy → Hold
Argus
11/8/2024$419.00 → $559.00Hold → Buy
Loop Capital
9/6/2024$510.00 → $490.00Outperform
Oppenheimer
7/8/2024$530.00 → $580.00Neutral → Outperform
Robert W. Baird
6/13/2024$612.00Buy
Goldman
2/27/2024$530.00Hold → Buy
Argus
2/27/2024$420.00 → $430.00Overweight → Neutral
JP Morgan
1/16/2024$467.00Hold → Buy
Gordon Haskett
More analyst ratings

$DPZ
Press Releases

Fastest customizable press release news feed in the world

See more
  • Domino's® Announces Executive Promotions

    ANN ARBOR, Mich., March 10, 2025  /PRNewswire/ -- Domino's Pizza Inc. (NASDAQ:DPZ), the largest pizza company in the world, is pleased to announce the promotion of three company executives into new roles. Joseph Jordan is being elevated to the position of chief operating officer and president – Domino's U.S., Weiking Ng is being promoted to executive vice president – International, and Ryan Mulally is being promoted to executive vice president – general counsel and corporate secretary. All three executives will report to Russell Weiner, Domino's chief executive officer. "Joe,

    $DPZ
    Food Distributors
    Consumer Discretionary
  • Stuffed to Perfection: Domino's® Finally Launches Parmesan Stuffed Crust!

    Buttery-flavored dough is packed with 100% melty mozzarella and sprinkled with Parmesan Domino's is giving away $250,000 worth of free Parmesan Stuffed Crust Pizza to anyone who has ordered stuffed crust from competitors in the past ANN ARBOR, Mich., March 3, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- Make way. There's a new crust in town. Domino's Pizza Inc. (NASDAQ:DPZ) is introducing Parmesan Stuffed Crust – a delicious, cheesy crust that gives customers what they crave – and it's now available in stores across the U.S. We're excited to announce that our first-ever stuffed crust is finally here

    $DPZ
    Food Distributors
    Consumer Discretionary
  • Domino's Pizza® Announces Fourth Quarter and Fiscal 2024 Financial Results

    Global retail sales growth (excluding foreign currency impact) of 4.4% for the fourth quarter; 5.9% growth for fiscal 2024 U.S. same store sales growth of 0.4% for the fourth quarter; 3.2% growth for fiscal 2024 International same store sales growth (excluding foreign currency impact) of 2.7% for the fourth quarter; 1.6% growth for fiscal 2024 Global net store growth of 364 for the fourth quarter; 775 for fiscal 2024 Income from operations increased 6.4% for the fourth quarter; 7.3% for fiscal 2024 (excluding the $0.2 million and $5.8 million negative impacts of foreign currency exchange rates on international franchise royalty revenues, income from operations increased 6.5% and 8.0% for the

    $DPZ
    Food Distributors
    Consumer Discretionary

$DPZ
Analyst Ratings

Analyst ratings in real time. Analyst ratings have a very high impact on the underlying stock. See them live in this feed.

See more

$DPZ
Insider Trading

Insider transactions reveal critical sentiment about the company from key stakeholders. See them live in this feed.

See more

$DPZ
SEC Filings

See more

$DPZ
Leadership Updates

Live Leadership Updates

See more
  • Domino's® Appoints Kate Trumbull as Executive Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer

    ANN ARBOR, Mich., Oct. 17, 2024 /PRNewswire/ -- Domino's Pizza Inc. (NYSE:DPZ), the largest pizza company in the world, today announced the promotion of Kate Trumbull to Executive Vice President, Chief Marketing Officer, effective Nov. 1, 2024. In her new role, Trumbull will oversee global marketing and continue to report to Joe Jordan, President, U.S. and Global Services. Additionally, Risa O'Hara and the international marketing team will report to Trumbull as part of this expanded global marketing organization. Trumbull joined Domino's in 2011 from Procter & Gamble, where sh

    $DPZ
    Food Distributors
    Consumer Discretionary
  • Domino's® Names Maureen Pittenger as Executive Vice President - Chief Human Resources Officer

    ANN ARBOR, Mich., June 24, 2024 /PRNewswire/ -- Domino's Pizza Inc. (NYSE:DPZ), the largest pizza company in the world, is pleased to announce the appointment of Maureen Pittenger as executive vice president – chief human resources officer, effective July 8, 2024. Pittenger will report to Domino's CEO Russell Weiner. In her new role, Pittenger will lead all aspects of Domino's human resources strategies and functions. "We are excited to have Maureen join Domino's as she brings a proven track record of building high-performing teams," said Weiner. "At Domino's, our people are o

    $DPZ
    Food Distributors
    Consumer Discretionary
  • Joe & the Juice Appoints Industry Leader Jeffrey Lawrence to Board of Directors

    Joe & the Juice ("the Company"), an urban juice bar and coffee concept selling freshly prepared juices, shakes, sandwiches, and coffee using natural and organic ingredients, today announced that Jeffrey Lawrence, a seasoned foodservice, consumer retail, franchising, and technology industry executive, has joined the Company's Board of Directors. Mr. Lawrence's appointment will support Joe & the Juice as it further accelerates its growth and expansion in international markets. Mr. Lawrence brings more than 25 years of leadership experience in building and franchising digitally enabled foodservice and consumer brands. He previously served in global senior leadership roles at Domino's Pizza (

    $DPZ
    $FIGS
    $SHAK
    $XPOF
    Food Distributors
    Consumer Discretionary
    Apparel
    Restaurants

$DPZ
Financials

Live finance-specific insights

See more
  • Domino's Pizza® Announces Fourth Quarter and Fiscal 2024 Financial Results

    Global retail sales growth (excluding foreign currency impact) of 4.4% for the fourth quarter; 5.9% growth for fiscal 2024 U.S. same store sales growth of 0.4% for the fourth quarter; 3.2% growth for fiscal 2024 International same store sales growth (excluding foreign currency impact) of 2.7% for the fourth quarter; 1.6% growth for fiscal 2024 Global net store growth of 364 for the fourth quarter; 775 for fiscal 2024 Income from operations increased 6.4% for the fourth quarter; 7.3% for fiscal 2024 (excluding the $0.2 million and $5.8 million negative impacts of foreign currency exchange rates on international franchise royalty revenues, income from operations increased 6.5% and 8.0% for the

    $DPZ
    Food Distributors
    Consumer Discretionary
  • Domino's Pizza® to Transfer Stock Exchange Listing to Nasdaq

    ANN ARBOR, Mich., Dec. 12, 2024 /PRNewswire/ -- Domino's Pizza, Inc. (NYSE:DPZ), the largest pizza company in the world, today announced that it will voluntarily transfer its stock exchange listing to the Nasdaq Global Select Market from the New York Stock Exchange, effective December 31, 2024, after market close. Domino's common stock is expected to begin trading as a Nasdaq-listed security on January 2, 2025. The Company will retain its current ticker symbol "DPZ." About Domino's Pizza® Founded in 1960, Domino's Pizza is the largest pizza company in the world, with a signifi

    $DPZ
    Food Distributors
    Consumer Discretionary
  • Domino's Pizza® Announces Third Quarter 2024 Financial Results

    Global retail sales growth (excluding foreign currency impact) of 5.1% U.S. same store sales growth of 3.0%  International same store sales growth (excluding foreign currency impact) of 0.8% Global net store growth of 72 Income from operations increased 5.0%; excluding the $1.4 million negative impact of foreign currency exchange rates on international franchise royalty revenues, income from operations increased 5.7% ANN ARBOR, Mich., Oct. 10, 2024 /PRNewswire/ -- Domino's Pizza, Inc. (NYSE: DPZ), the largest pizza company in the world, announced results for the third quarter of 2024.

    $DPZ
    Food Distributors
    Consumer Discretionary

$DPZ
Large Ownership Changes

This live feed shows all institutional transactions in real time.

See more