SEC Form 10-Q filed by ACELYRIN INC.

5/14/25 4:03:15 PM ET

$SLRN

Biotechnology: Pharmaceutical Preparations

Health Care

Get the next $SLRN alert in real time by email

slrn-20250331

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)


x			QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2025


o			TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _____ to_____.

Commission File Number: 001-41696

ACELYRIN, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Delaware			85-2406735
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)			(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

4149 Liberty Canyon Road

Agoura Hills, California 91301

(Address of principal executive offices)

(805) 456-4393

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:


Title of each class	Trading Symbol(s)	Name of each exchange on which registered
		The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC
Common Stock ($0.00001 par value)	SLRN	(Nasdaq Global Select Market)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:

Large accelerated filer

Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer

Smaller reporting company

Emerging growth company

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.): Yes o No x

The number of shares of Registrant’s common stock issued and outstanding as of May 9, 2025, was 100,953,651.

Table of Contents

ACELYRIN, INC.

FORM 10-Q

TABLE OF CONTENTS


		Page
PART I	FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1	Financial Statements (unaudited)	5
	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets	5
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss	6
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock and Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)	7
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	8
	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	9
Item 2	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	27
Item 3	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	38
Item 4	Controls and Procedures	38

PART II	OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1	Legal Proceedings	40
Item 1A	Risk Factors	41
Item 2	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	97
Item 3	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	97
Item 4	Mine Safety Disclosures	97
Item 5	Other Information	97
Item 6	Exhibits	98
	Signature	99

Table of Contents

SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2025 ("Quarterly Report") contains forward-looking statements that involve substantial risks and uncertainties. The forward-looking statements are contained principally in the sections titled “Risk Factors,” “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” “Business” and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report. All statements other than statements of historical facts contained in this Quarterly Report, including statements regarding our future results of operations and financial position, business strategy, product candidates, planned preclinical and clinical trials, results of preclinical and clinical trials, research and development costs, regulatory approvals, timing and likelihood of success, as well as plans and objectives of management for future operations, are forward-looking statements. These statements speak only as of the date of this Quarterly Report and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other important factors that are in some cases beyond our control and may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements.

In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terms such as “anticipate,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “would,” “expect,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “could,” “intend,” “target,” “project,” “believe,” “estimate,” “predict,” “potential,” or “continue” or the negative of these terms or other similar expressions. Forward-looking statements contained in this Quarterly Report include, but are not limited to, statements about:

•the occurrence of any event, change or other circumstance that could give rise to the termination of the Merger Agreement (as defined below) and any inability to complete the Merger (as defined below);

•our plans relating to the development of our product candidates, including our decision to delay certain development activities until the closing of the Merger;

•the occurrence of any event that causes the Rights (as defined below) under our Rights Plan (as defined below) to become exercisable;

•the characteristics, safety, tolerability and efficacy of our product candidates, including the potential of our product candidates to demonstrate differentiation from other approved therapies or therapies in development;

•the timing, progress and results of our preclinical studies and clinical trials, including statements regarding the timing of initiation and completion of studies or trials and related preparatory work, the period during which the results of the trials will become available and our development plans;

•the timing and costs involved in obtaining and maintaining regulatory approval of our product candidates, and the timing or likelihood of regulatory filings and approvals, including our expectation to seek special designations for certain of our product candidates for various diseases;

•our plans relating to commercializing our product candidates, if approved, including the geographic areas of focus and our ability to grow a salesforce;

•our estimates of the number of patients who suffer from the diseases we target, and the corresponding size of the market opportunities for our product candidates in each of the diseases we target;

•our ability to successfully procure the manufacture and supply of our product candidates for clinical trials and for commercial use, if approved;

•the rate and degree of market acceptance of our product candidates, as well as the pricing and reimbursement of our product candidates, if approved;

•our continued reliance on third parties to conduct clinical trials of our product candidates, and for the manufacture and supply of our product candidates;

•the scope of protection we are able to establish and maintain for intellectual property rights related to our product candidates;

Table of Contents

•the success of competing therapies that are, or may become, available and other developments relating to our competitors and our industry;

•existing regulations and regulatory developments in the United States and other jurisdictions;

•the implementation of our business model and strategic plans for our business and operations;

•our ability to retain the continued service of our key professionals and to identify, hire, and retain additional qualified professionals;

•our ability to acquire additional product candidates and advance them into clinical development;

•our expectations regarding our financial performance, expenses, revenue opportunities, capital requirements and needs for additional financing;

•our expectations regarding the impact of geopolitical conflicts and economic uncertainty, including fluctuating interest rates and inflation and potential tariffs on our business and operations, including clinical trials, contract manufacturing organizations (“CMOs”), collaborators, contract research organizations (“CROs”) and employees;

•our expectations related to the costs, timing and the estimated financial impact of the Restructuring Plan (as defined below) we implemented in 2024; and

•our expectations regarding the period during which we will qualify as an emerging growth company under the JOBS Act.

We have based these forward-looking statements on our current expectations and projections about our business, the industry in which we operate and trends that we believe may affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects and these forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance or development. These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this Quarterly Report and are subject to a number of risks, uncertainties and assumptions described in the section titled “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report.

Because forward-looking statements are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties, many of which are out of our control and cannot be predicted or quantified, you should not rely on these forward-looking statements as predictions of future events. The events and circumstances reflected in our forward-looking statements may not be achieved or occur and actual results could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements. Except as required by applicable law, we do not plan to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements contained herein after we distribute this Quarterly Report, whether as a result of any new information, future events or otherwise.

In addition, “we believe” and similar statements reflect our beliefs and opinions on the relevant subject. These statements are based upon information available to us as of the date of this Quarterly Report and while we believe such information forms a reasonable basis for such statements, such information may be limited or incomplete, and our statements should not be read to indicate that we have conducted an exhaustive inquiry into, or review of, all potentially available relevant information. These statements are inherently uncertain, and you are cautioned not to unduly rely upon them.

Table of Contents

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

ACELYRIN, INC.

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

(in thousands, except share and per share data)

(unaudited)


	March 31, 2025		December 31, 2024
Assets
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	58,271	$	73,890
Short-term marketable securities	352,321		373,990
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	18,900		33,107
Total current assets	429,492		480,987
Prepaid expenses and other assets, non-current	1,352		1,223
Operating lease right-of-use asset	4,664		6,752
Property, plant and equipment, net	452		1,635
Restricted cash	544		544
Total assets	$	436,504	$	491,141

Liabilities, redeemable convertible preferred stock and stockholders’ equity (deficit)
Current liabilities
Accounts payable	$	9,932	$	4,888
Accrued research and development expenses	4,726		11,042
Accrued compensation and other current liabilities	8,299		9,297
Severance liability	346		1,351
Total current liabilities	23,303		26,578
Operating lease liability, non-current	5,970		6,270
Total liabilities	29,273		32,848

Stockholders’ equity (deficit)
Common stock, par value of $0.00001 per share; 790,000,000 shares authorized as of March 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024; 100,907,206 and 100,452,061 shares issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024, respectively	1		1
Additional paid-in capital	1,199,420		1,195,243
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) income	19		(6)
Accumulated deficit	(792,209)		(736,945)
Total stockholders' equity (deficit)	407,231		458,293
Total liabilities, redeemable convertible preferred stock and stockholders’ equity (deficit)	$	436,504	$	491,141

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

ACELYRIN, INC.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss

(in thousands, except share and per share data)

(unaudited)


	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2025		2024
Operating expenses:
Research and development	$	42,138	$	58,032
General and administrative	17,717		24,742
Total operating expenses	59,855		82,774
Loss from operations	(59,855)		(82,774)
Interest income	4,658		9,150
Other income (expense), net	(67)		38,651
Net loss	$	(55,264)	$	(34,973)
Other comprehensive loss
Unrealized (loss) gain on short-term marketable securities, net	25		(267)
Total other comprehensive (loss) gain	$	25	$	(267)
Net loss and other comprehensive loss	$	(55,239)	$	(35,240)
Net loss per share attributable to common stockholders, basic and diluted	$	(0.55)	$	(0.36)
Weighted-average common shares outstanding, basic and diluted	100,680,308		97,913,660

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

ACELYRIN, INC.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock and Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)

(in thousands, except share data)


	Common Stock			Additional Paid-in Capital		Accumulated Deficit		Accumulated Other Comprehensive Gain (Loss)		Total Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)
	Shares	Amount
Balance at December 31, 2024	100,452,061	$	1	$	1,195,243	$	(736,945)	$	(6)	$	458,293
Issuance of common stock upon settlement of restricted stock units, net of shares withheld for taxes	447,541	—		—		—		—		—
Stock-based compensation expense	—	—		4,172		—		—		4,172
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of options	7,604	—		5		—		—		5
Net loss	—	—		—		(55,264)		—		(55,264)
Unrealized loss on short-term marketable securities, net	—	—		—		—		25		25
Balance at March 31, 2025	100,907,206	$	1	$	1,199,420	$	(792,209)	$	19	$	407,231

Balance at December 31, 2023	97,865,890	$	1	$	1,144,893	$	(488,719)	$	162	656,337
Issuance of common stock upon settlement of restricted stock units	47,639	—		—		—		—		—
Stock-based compensation expense	—	—		20,163		—		—		20,163
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of options	945,471			2,807		—		—		2,807
Net loss	—	—		—		(34,973)		—		(34,973)
Unrealized gain on short-term marketable securities, net	—	—		—		—		(267)		(267)
Balance at March 31, 2024	98,859,000	$	1	$	1,167,863	$	(523,692)	$	(105)	$	644,067

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

ACELYRIN, INC.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(in thousands)

(unaudited)


	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2025		2024
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss	$	(55,264)	$	(34,973)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operations:
Stock-based compensation expense	4,172		20,163
Income from sale of asset	—		(7,000)
Net amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts on marketable securities	(1,638)		(5,362)
Depreciation and amortization expense	113		55
Impairment of long-lived assets	2,916		—
Non-cash lease expense	322		46
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Prepaid expense and other current assets	14,207		205
Prepaid expenses and other assets, non-current	(129)		2,503
Accounts payable	5,044		(31,926)
Accrued research and development expenses	(6,316)		2,093
Accrued compensation and other current liabilities	(998)		(2,651)
Operating lease liability	(379)		(60)
Severance liability	(1,005)		(392)
Net cash used in operating activities	(38,955)		(57,299)
Cash flows from investing activities
Proceeds from sale of asset	—		7,000
Purchase of marketable securities	(139,158)		(198,007)
Proceeds from maturities of short-term marketable securities	162,490		289,567
Sales of marketable securities	—		2,391
Purchase of property, plant and equipment	(1)		(55)
Net cash provided by investing activities	23,331		100,896
Cash flows from financing activities
Proceeds from exercise of common stock options	5		2,807
Net cash provided by financing activities	5		2,807
Net (decrease) increase in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash	(15,619)		46,404
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of period	74,434		218,097
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of period	$	58,815	$	264,501

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

ACELYRIN, INC.

Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

1. Description of Business, Organization and Liquidity

Organization and Business

ACELYRIN, INC. (the “Company”) is a late-stage biopharma company focused on identifying, acquiring, and accelerating the development and commercialization of transformative medicines. The Company was incorporated in the State of Delaware on July 27, 2020. Since its inception, the Company has devoted substantially all of its resources to organizing the Company, hiring personnel, business planning, acquiring and developing its product candidates, performing research and development, enabling manufacturing activities in support of its product development efforts, establishing and protecting its intellectual property portfolio, raising capital, and providing general and administrative support for these activities.

The Company did not have any significant operations from the inception date until August 2021. On August 9, 2021, the Company entered into the License and Collaboration Agreement with Affibody AB, a Swedish company, and licensed worldwide development, manufacturing and commercialization rights to a therapeutic candidate, izokibep, for use in the treatment of inflammatory and autoimmune disorders, excluding rights in certain Asian and Nordic countries. See Note 6 for further detail.

Open Market Sales Agreement

On November 13, 2024, the Company filed a shelf registration statement on Form S-3 (the “Form S-3”), which was declared effective by the SEC on November 22, 2024. This shelf registration statement covered the offering, issuance, and sale by the Company of up to an aggregate of $400.0 million of its common stock, preferred stock, debt securities and warrants.

On November 13, 2024, the Company entered into a sales agreement with a sales agent to provide for the offering, issuance and sale by the Company of up to $150.0 million of its common stock from time to time in “at-the-market” offerings under the Form S-3 (the "ATM Sales Agreement"). During the year ended December 31, 2024, the Company issued 0 shares of common stock under the ATM Sales Agreement. The Form S-3 will expire in November 2027.

Liquidity

The Company has incurred significant losses and negative cash flows from operations since its inception. During the three months ended March 31, 2025 and 2024, the Company incurred net losses of $55.3 million and $35.0 million, respectively. The net loss of $55.3 million in the three months ended March 31, 2025 included $4.2 million in stock-based compensation expense and $2.9 million for the impairment of long lived assets. The net loss of $35.0 million in the three months ended March 31, 2024 includes $37.0 million of other income related to arrangements with vendors and an asset sale. As of March 31, 2025, the Company had an accumulated deficit of $792.2 million. Cash used in operating activities was $39.0 million and $57.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively.

The Company has historically financed its operations primarily through the sale of shares of its redeemable convertible preferred stock in private placements and the sale of shares of its common stock in its IPO. As of March 31, 2025, the Company had cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and short-term marketable securities of $411.1 million. The Company does not have any products approved for sale and has not generated any revenue from product sales to date. The Company expects to continue to incur significant and increasing expenses and substantial losses for the foreseeable future as it continues its development of and seeks regulatory approvals for its product candidates and commercializes any approved products, seeks to expand its product pipeline and invests in its organization. The Company’s ability to achieve and sustain profitability will depend on its ability to successfully develop, obtain regulatory approval for and commercialize its product candidates. There can be no assurance that the Company will ever earn revenue or achieve profitability, or if achieved, that the revenue or profitability will be sustained on a continuing basis. Unless and until it does generate revenue, the Company will need to continue to raise additional capital. Management expects that its cash and cash equivalents and short-term marketable securities will be sufficient to fund its current operating plan and capital expenditure requirements for at least the next 12 months from the date of issuance of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

The accounting policies used by the Company in its presentation of interim financial results are consistent with those presented in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on March 18, 2025, (the “Annual Report on Form 10-K”) except for the updates to the following:

Basis of Presentation

The condensed consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes are unaudited and have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) and applicable rules and regulations of the SEC regarding interim financial reporting. The accompanying financial statements are consolidated and include the accounts of ACELRYIN, INC. and its wholly owned subsidiary, WH2, LLC. The subsidiary has not had any operations or any balances from its inception.

Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in the financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. Accordingly, these condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and the related notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2024 included in the Company’s Annual Report. The information as of December 31, 2024 included in the condensed consolidated balance sheets was derived from the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements. These unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the same basis as the Company’s annual consolidated financial statements and, in the opinion of management, reflect all adjustments, which include only normal recurring adjustments necessary for a fair statement of the Company’s consolidated financial statements. The results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2025 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2025 or for any other interim period or for any other future year.

Interim Financial Statements

The accompanying unaudited interim financial statements have been prepared from the books and records of the Company in accordance with GAAP for interim financial information and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X promulgated by the SEC, which permits reduced disclosures for interim periods. All adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of the accompanying balance sheets, statements of operations and comprehensive loss, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows have been made. Although these interim financial statements do not include all of the information and footnotes required for complete annual financial statements, management believes the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. Unaudited interim results of operations and cash flows are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full year. Unaudited interim financial statements and footnotes should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and footnotes included in the Company’s 2024 Annual Report filed on Form 10-K.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of expenses during the reporting period. On an ongoing basis, the Company evaluates its estimates and judgments, including but not limited to those related to accrued research and development costs, the fair value of common stock and stock-based compensation expense, the fair value of derivative tranche liability, the valuation of deferred tax assets and uncertain income tax positions, restructuring costs and long-lived asset impairment costs. Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ materially from those estimates.

Segment Information

The Company has one reportable and one operating segment: clinical biopharma. The clinical biopharma segment researches and develops treatments of diseases with pathology related to excess activation of the immune system. The

Table of Contents

clinical biopharma segment does not have any products approved for sale and has not generated any revenue from product sales. The Company manages business activities on a consolidated basis.

The accounting policies of the clinical biopharma segment are the same as those described in this summary of significant accounting policies. The chief operating decision maker assesses performance for the clinical biopharma segment and decides how to allocate resources based on the Company’s net loss that also is reported on its consolidated statement of comprehensive loss. The measure of segment assets is reported on the balance sheet as total consolidated assets. The Company does not have intra-entity sales or transfers.

The Company’s chief operating decision maker is the chief executive officer. The chief operating decision maker uses net loss in deciding whether to invest the Company’s resources into the clinical biopharma segment or otherwise, such as for external acquisitions. Net loss is used to monitor budgeted versus actual results. The chief operating decision maker reviews significant expenses within the clinical biopharma segment for R&D and G&A external costs including licenses, CRO, CMC, transition services, and professional consulting services, and internal costs including personnel and facilities and overhead.


	Three months ended
	March 31, 2025		March 31, 2024
R&D:
Internal	$	10,960	$	13,277
Clinical	13,525		12,841
CMC	14,909		28,507
Other*	2,744		3,077
Total segment R&D	42,138		57,702
Segment G&A:
Internal	4,098		20,080
External	13,619		4,992
Total segment G&A	17,717		25,072
Interest and other income	4,591		47,801
Segment net loss	$	55,264	$	34,973

*Other R&D costs include materials and supplies, biometrics, program management, quality, regulatory, safety, clinical development medical affairs and translational science expense.

Concentration of Credit Risk

Cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and short-term marketable securities are financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk. As of March 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024, cash consists of cash deposited with one financial institution, and account balances exceed federally insured limits. Management believes that the Company is not exposed to significant credit risk due to the financial strength of this institution.

The Company also has investments in money market funds, U.S. Treasury obligations, corporate debt obligations, and federal agency obligations, which can be subject to certain credit risks. The Company mitigates the risks by investing in high-grade instruments, limiting its exposure to any one issuer and monitoring the ongoing creditworthiness of the financial institutions and issuers. The Company has not experienced any losses on its financial instruments.

Leases

The Company adopted Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842)” accounting standard as of January 1, 2022. The contractual arrangements that meet the definition of a lease are classified as operating or finance leases and are recorded on the balance sheets as both a right-of-use asset (“ROU asset”) and lease liability, calculated by discounting fixed lease payments over the lease term at the rate implicit in the lease or the Company’s incremental borrowing rate (“IBR”). Lease ROU assets and lease obligations are recognized based on the present value of the future

Table of Contents

minimum lease payments over the lease term at the lease commencement date. The Company currently does not have any finance leases.

Operating lease ROU assets are adjusted for (i) payments made at or before the commencement date, (ii) initial direct costs incurred, and (iii) tenant incentives under the lease. As the implicit rate for the operating leases are not determinable, the Company determines its IBR based on the information available at the applicable lease commencement date. The IBR is determined by using the rate of interest that the Company would pay to borrow on a collateralized basis an amount equal to the lease payments for a similar term and in a similar economic environment where the asset is located. The Company considers a lease term to be the noncancelable period that it has the right to use the underlying asset, including any periods where it is reasonably certain the Company will exercise any option to extend the contract.

Lease costs for minimum lease payments for operating leases are recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Lease liabilities are increased by interest and reduced by payments each period, and the ROU asset is amortized over the lease term. Variable lease costs are recorded when incurred. In measuring the ROU assets and lease liabilities, the Company has elected to combine lease and non-lease components. The Company excludes short-term leases, if any, having initial terms of 12 months or less at lease commencement as an accounting policy election, and recognizes rent expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term for these types of leases.

The Company determines the classification of subleases at the inception of the sublease, as well as whether the Company has been relieved of its primary obligation under the original lease. The Company's sublease is classified as an operating lease. The Company has not been relieved of its primary obligation under the original lease and continues to account for the original lease as it did prior to the commencement of the sublease. The Company recognizes sublease income from fixed leased payments on a straight-line basis over the term of the sublease as a reduction of the fixed lease expense under the original lease. The Company recognizes income from variable sublease payments that do not depend on a rate or index as a reduction of the variable lease expense under the original lease in the period in which the changes in facts and circumstances on which the variable sublease payments are based occur.

3. Fair Value Measurements

The authoritative guidance on fair value measurements establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy for disclosure of fair value measurements as follows:

Level 1 — Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2 — Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.

Level 3 — Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

The Company’s financial instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis consist of Level 1, Level 2, and Level 3 financial instruments. Usually, short term marketable securities are considered Level 2 when their fair values are determined using inputs that are observable in the market or can be derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data such as pricing for similar securities, recently executed transactions, cash flow models with yield curves, and benchmark securities. In addition, Level 2 financial instruments are valued using comparisons to like-kind financial instruments and models that use readily observable market data as their basis. Corporate debt obligations, commercial paper, government agency obligations and asset-backed securities are valued primarily using market prices of comparable securities, bid/ask quotes, interest rate yields and prepayment spreads and are included in Level 2.

Financial assets and liabilities are considered Level 3 when their fair values are determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar techniques, and at least one significant model assumption or input is unobservable.

Table of Contents

The following table sets forth the Company’s financial instruments that were measured at fair value on a recurring basis by level within the fair value hierarchy (in thousands):


	Fair Value Measurements as of March 31, 2025
As of March 31, 2025:	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3

Assets:
Money market funds (included in cash and cash equivalents)	$	46,714	$	46,714	$	-	$	-
U.S. Treasury obligations ($3,992 included in cash and cash equivalents)	253,613		-		253,613		-
Corporate debt obligations ($0 included in cash and cash equivalents)	88,234		-		88,234		-
Federal agency obligations ($0 included in cash and cash equivalents)	14,466		-		14,466		-
Total fair value of assets	$	403,027	$	46,714	$	356,313	$	-


	Fair Value Measurements as of December 31, 2024
As of December 31, 2024:	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3

Assets:
Money market funds (included in cash and cash equivalents)	$	49,171	$	49,171	$	-	$	-
U.S. Treasury obligations ($794 included in cash and cash equivalents)	218,637		-		218,637		-
Corporate debt obligations ($— included in cash and cash equivalents)	133,005		-		133,005		-
Federal agency obligations ($— included in cash and cash equivalents)	23,142		-		23,142		-
Total fair value of assets	$	423,955	$	49,171	$	374,784	$	-


Classified as:	March 31, 2025		December 31, 2024
Cash and cash equivalents	$	50,706	$	49,965
Short-term marketable securities	$	352,321	$	373,990
Total cash equivalents and marketable securities	$	403,027	$	423,955

Table of Contents

4. Cash, Cash Equivalents, Restricted Cash and Available-For-Sale Marketable Securities

Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash


Classified as:	March 31, 2025		December 31, 2024
Cash and cash equivalents	$	58,271	$	73,890
Restricted cash	544		544
Total cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash	$	58,815	$	74,434

Restricted cash represents cash held at a financial institution that is pledged as collateral for a stand-by letter of credit for $0.2 million for lease commitments and $0.3 million for the Company’s corporate credit card program. The cash will be restricted until the termination or modification of the lease agreement and corporate credit card program, respectively. Restricted cash is included in non-current assets.

Available-for-sale securities marketable securities

The following tables summarize the estimated fair value of the Company’s available-for-sale marketable securities as of March 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024 (in thousands):


As of March 31, 2025:	Total Amortized Cost		Total Unrealized Gain		Total Unrealized Loss		Total Estimated Fair Value

Money market funds (included in cash and cash equivalents)	$	46,714	$	—	$	-	$	46,714
U.S. Treasury obligations ($3,992 included in cash and cash equivalents)	253,558		88		(33)		253,613
Corporate debt obligations ($— included in cash and cash equivalents)	88,283		6		(55)		88,234
Federal agency obligations ($— included in cash and cash equivalents)	14,453		13		-		14,466
Total available for sale marketable securities	$	403,008	$	107	$	(88)	$	403,027


As of December 31, 2024:	Total Amortized Cost		Total Unrealized Gain		Total Unrealized Loss		Total Estimated Fair Value

Money market funds (included in cash and cash equivalents)	$	49,171	$	—	$	-	$	49,171
U.S. Treasury obligations ($794 included in cash and cash equivalents)	218,581		100		(44)		218,637
Corporate debt obligations ($0 included in cash and cash equivalents)	133,108		27		(130)		133,005
Federal agency obligations ($0 included in cash and cash equivalents)	23,101		41		—		23,142
Total available for sale marketable securities	$	423,961	$	168	$	(174)	$	423,955

As of March 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024, no significant facts or circumstances were present to indicate a deterioration in the creditworthiness of the issuers of the marketable securities, and the Company has no requirement or intention to sell these securities before maturity or recovery of their amortized cost basis. The Company considered the current and expected future economic and market conditions and determined that its investments were not significantly impacted. For all securities with a fair value less than its amortized cost basis, the Company determined the decline in fair value below amortized cost basis to be immaterial and non-credit related, and therefore no allowance for losses has been

Table of Contents

recorded. During the three months ended March 31, 2025 and for the year ended December 31, 2024, the Company did not recognize any impairment losses on its investments.

The Company presents accrued interest and dividends receivable related to the available-for-sale marketable securities in prepaid expenses and other current assets, separate from short-term investments in the condensed consolidated balance sheet. As of March 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024, accrued interest receivable was $2.4 million and $2.1 million, respectively. The Company’s accounting policy is to not measure an allowance for credit losses for accrued interest receivables and to write-off any uncollectible accrued interest receivable as a reversal of interest income in a timely manner, which it considers to be in the period in which the Company determines the accrued interest will not be collected. The Company has not written off any accrued interest receivables for the three months ended March 31, 2025.

As of March 31, 2025, all available for sale marketable securities mature within one year.

5. Consolidated Balance Sheet Components

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

Prepaid expenses and other current assets consisted of the following (in thousands):


	March 31, 2025		December 31, 2024
Credit voucher	$	12,160	$	24,265
Interest receivable	2,421		2,096
Value-Added Tax (VAT) receivable	2,026		3,869
Prepaid other services	1,311		1,113
Prepaid research and development expenses	656		881
Prepaid insurance and other current assets	326		883
Total	$	18,900	$	33,107

Prepaid expenses and other assets, non-current

Other non-current assets consisted of the following (in thousands):


	March 31, 2025		December 31, 2024
Prepaid research and development expenses, non-current	$	739	$	610
Deferred financing costs	579		579
Security deposits	34		34
Total	$	1,352	$	1,223

Property, plant and equipment, net

Property, plant and equipment consisted of the following (in thousands):


	March 31, 2025		December 31, 2024
Furniture and fixtures	$	385	$	658
Computer and other equipment	265		1,121
Leasehold improvements	144		334
Total property, plant and equipment, gross	794		2,113
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization	(342)		(478)
Property, plant and equipment, net	$	452	$	1,635

Table of Contents

The Company recognized $1.1 million in property, plant and equipment non-cash impairment expense in the three months ended March 31, 2025 in connection with its sublease of its South San Francisco office. See Note 7 for further detail.

Accrued research and development expenses

Accrued research and development expenses consisted of the following (in thousands):


	March 31, 2025		December 31, 2024
Accrued clinical expenses	$	3,586	$	9,471
Accrued clinical manufacturing expenses	1,140		1,571
Total	$	4,726	$	11,042

Accrued compensation and other current liabilities

Accrued compensation and other current liabilities consisted of the following (in thousands):


	March 31, 2025		December 31, 2024
Accrued professional services fees	$	3,831	$	721
Accrued compensation	2,725		7,308
Other accrued expenses and current liabilities	1,743		1,268
Total	$	8,299	$	9,297

6. Significant Agreements

License and Commercialization Agreement with Pierre Fabre

Upon the closing of the ValenzaBio Acquisition, the Company became the successor to ValenzaBio’s rights under the March 25, 2021 license and commercialization agreement between ValenzaBio and Pierre Fabre, as amended (the “Pierre Fabre Agreement”). The Company received certain exclusive worldwide licenses with the right to sublicense certain patents, know-how and other intellectual property to develop, manufacture, use and commercialize lonigutamab for non-oncology therapeutic indications. The license from Pierre Fabre extends to any product containing lonigutamab (excluding any fragments or derivatives) as its sole active ingredient (each, a “PF Licensed Product”). The Pierre Fabre Agreement prohibits the Company from using the licensed intellectual property in any antibody drug conjugate, multi-specific antibodies or any other derivatives of lonigutamab.

In the event that the Company decides to sublicense the rights to develop or commercialize a PF Licensed Product in any territory outside of the United States and Canada, Pierre Fabre retains the right of first negotiation to acquire such development and commercialization rights in one or more countries in such territory. Subject to the validation of certain clinical trial criteria by a joint steering committee, Pierre Fabre has the option to reclaim all exclusive rights to develop, commercialize and exploit the PF Licensed Product in such territories and to obtain an exclusive sublicensable license in such territories for any improvements and trademarks to such PF Licensed Product, and to exploit such PF Licensed Product for non-oncology therapeutic indications, subject to certain payment obligations. The option period commenced in October 2024.

In October 2024, Pierre Fabre exercised its option under the Pierre Fabre Agreement, requiring the Company to buy out its right to the option for a one-time payment of $31.0 million. The Company recognized the option exercise expense in the consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive loss in the period ended December 31, 2024.

As consideration for the amendment to the Pierre Fabre Agreement, which became effective upon the closing of the ValenzaBio Acquisition (See Note 12 for further detail.), the Company paid Pierre Fabre an aggregate license payment of $10.0 million. The Company is also obligated to (i) make payments of up to $100.5 million upon the achievement of various development and regulatory milestones, (ii) make milestone payments of up to $390.0 million upon the

Table of Contents

achievement of certain commercial milestones, and (iii) pay tiered royalties in the high single-digit to low-teen percentages to Pierre Fabre on worldwide net sales in a given calendar year. Royalties will be payable for each PF Licensed Product in a given country during a period commencing upon the first commercial sale of such PF Licensed Product in such country and continuing until the latest of (a) 10 years after such first commercial sale, (b) expiration of last-to-expire valid claim in a licensed patent in such country and (c) expiration of regulatory exclusivity for such PF Licensed Product in such country. In the event the Company enters into a sublicense with a third party, the Company must also share with Pierre Fabre a percentage of any revenues from option fees, upfront payments, license maintenance fees, milestone payments or the like generated from the sublicense. Such percentage may be between the high single-digits to the low thirties based on which stage of development of a PF Licensed Product the sublicense relates to.

Unless earlier terminated, the Pierre Fabre Agreement will continue on a PF Licensed Product-by-PF Licensed Product and country-by-country basis until there are no more royalty payments owed to Pierre Fabre on any PF Licensed Product thereunder. Either party may terminate the Pierre Fabre Agreement upon an uncured material breach, or upon the bankruptcy or insolvency of the other party. Pierre Fabre may also terminate the agreement if the Company or any of its affiliates institutes a patent challenge against the licensed patents from Pierre Fabre. The Company may also terminate the Pierre Fabre Agreement with or without cause upon nine months’ prior written notice, so long as there is no ongoing clinical trial for any PF Licensed Product.

As of March 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024, no milestones were probable and accrued in the condensed consolidated balance sheet.

License and Collaboration Agreement with Affibody

On August 9, 2021, the Company entered into a license agreement with Affibody AB (“Affibody”) (the “Affibody Agreement”) under which Affibody granted the Company exclusive, sublicensable licenses to develop, commercialize and manufacture products containing izokibep for all human therapeutic uses on a worldwide basis, subject to a pre-existing agreement with Inmagene Biopharmaceuticals (“Inmagene”) with respect to certain Asian and Nordic countries.

The Company chairs a global joint steering committee composed of designees from Affibody, Inmagene and the Company and retains final decision-making authority for izokibep global development. In doing so, the Company is obligated to use commercially reasonable efforts (i) to develop products containing izokibep worldwide, excluding certain defined territories, (ii) for the conduct and finalization of certain ongoing clinical trials, and (iii) to commercialize products containing izokibep for all human therapeutic uses worldwide, excluding certain defined territories, after obtaining the applicable marketing authorization. The Company is responsible for manufacturing both the clinical and commercial supply of licensed product globally.

In connection with the Affibody Agreement, the Company paid a non-refundable upfront license fee in the aggregate amount of $3.0 million in August 2021 and September 2021, and $22.0 million in October 2021. The Company is also obligated to pay Affibody (i) an aggregate of up to $280.0 million, $30.0 million of which would be due prior to the first approval in the United States, upon the achievement of various development, regulatory and commercialization milestones and (ii) high single-digit to low-teens royalties on net sales of licensed products in the territory where the Company has commercialization rights, subject to certain reductions. Royalties will be due on a licensed product-by-licensed product and country-by-country basis beginning after the first commercial sale of the licensed product, except in Mainland China, Hong Kong, Macau, Taiwan and South Korea, and lasting until the later of (a) the expiration of all valid patent claims or regulatory exclusivity covering the licensed product in that country and (b) ten years after such first commercial sale.

In the event the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) grants the Company (or its affiliates or sublicensees) a priority review voucher for a licensed product, the Company will pay Affibody either: (a) if the Company sells or transfer such priority review voucher to a third-party, approximately one third of the proceeds received from the sale, net of taxes, or (b) if the Company uses the priority review voucher for an indication or product outside the scope of the Affibody Agreement, approximately one third of the fair market value of the priority review voucher as determined in accordance with the Affibody Agreement.

The acquisition of the exclusive license was accounted for as an in-process research and development asset acquisition and as the acquired technology did not have an alternative use, the total consideration of $25.0 million was recorded as research and development expense in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss for the year ended December 31, 2021. Milestone payments are contingent consideration and are accrued when contingent events occur and achievement of milestones is probable. In November 2023, the Company paid a total amount of $15.0 million in

Table of Contents

relation with attaining one of the development milestones described above and recorded the payment within research and development expenses in the consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive loss for the year ended December 31, 2023. Royalties will be recognized as cost of sales when products are sold and royalties are payable.]

On January 31, 2025, the Company delivered a Notice of Termination to Affibody terminating the Affibody Agreement, which became effective 90 days following delivery of the Notice in accordance with the terms of the Affibody Agreement. Following termination of the Affibody Agreement, the Company will no longer have any material financial or other obligations under the Affibody Agreement.

As of March 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024, no royalties or additional milestones were probable and accrued in the condensed consolidated balance sheet.

7. Commitments and Contingent Liabilities

License Agreements

The Company is required to pay certain milestones upon the achievement of specific development and regulatory events, upon products commercialization and products’ royalties under its license agreements, including its agreements with Affibody, Pierre Fabre, Novelty Nobility and other non-exclusive license agreements. None of the milestones, other than the $15.0 million Affibody milestone in November 2023 (See Note 6 for further detail.) were achieved or probable, all products were in development, as such, no milestones or royalties were accrued in the condensed consolidated balance sheets as of March 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024.

Research and Development Agreements

The Company enters into various agreements in the ordinary course of business, such as those with suppliers, contract research organizations, contract manufacturing organizations, and clinical trial sites. These contracts generally provide for termination on notice or may have a potential termination fee if a purchase order is canceled within a specified time. The total value of non-cancellable obligations under contracts was $9.4 million and $21.5 million as of March 31, 2025, and December 31, 2024, respectively. This presentation of non-cancellable purchase obligations does not include any estimates of potential reduction of such liabilities related to mitigation obligations of the counter-parties in the event of cancellation under the terms of our engagements. The credit voucher may be used to settle invoices for services and raw materials for up to $8.6 million committed as part of the non-cancelable purchase obligations. See Note 12 for further detail.

During the three months ended March 31, 2025, and year ended December 31, 2024, there were no amounts accrued related to termination and cancellation charges in the consolidated balance sheets, as the Company has not determined cancellation to be probable.

Lease

In January 2023, the Company entered into a lease agreement to rent approximately 10,012 square feet of office space in Southern California. The term of the lease is 65 months with an option to extend it for an additional three years. Monthly rent payments are approximately $30,500, subject to an annual 3.0% increase and six months rental abatement during the first year. In addition to the base rent, the Company is obligated to pay variable costs related to its share of operating expenses and taxes. In connection with the lease agreement, the Company made a security deposit of $34,000, that is included in prepaid expenses and other assets, non-current in the condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2024. As of the lease commencement date the Company recorded $1.3 million as right-of-use (“ROU”) asset and operating lease liability, non-current, in the condensed consolidated balance sheet.

In July 2023, the Company entered into a lease agreement to rent approximately 22,365 square feet of office space in South San Francisco. The term of the lease is 60 months with an option to extend it for an additional five years. Monthly base rent payments are approximately $150,000, subject to an annual 3.5% increase and a share of building operating expenses. In addition to the base rent, the Company is obligated to pay variable costs related to its share of operating expenses and taxes. In connection with the lease agreement, the Company made a security deposit in the form of a letter of credit of $0.2 million that is classified as non-current in the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2024. As of the lease commencement date, the Company recorded $6.1 million as the ROU asset, $0.2 million as the operating lease liability, current, and $5.7 million as the operating lease liability, non-current, in the consolidated balance sheet.

Table of Contents

Fixed operating lease costs were $0.5 million and less than $0.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. Variable operating lease costs were $0.2 million and $— million for the three months ended March 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. Lease costs were recorded in general and administrative expenses and research and development expenses in the condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss.

The following table summarizes a maturity analysis of the Company’s operating lease liabilities showing the aggregate lease payments as of March 31, 2025 (in thousands):


2025 (remainder of the year)	$	1,656
2026	2,275
2027	2,352
2028	2,291
2029	1,548
Total future lease payments	10,122
Less imputed interest	(3,054)
Total operating lease liability balance	7,068
Less current portion of lease liability	(1,098)
Operating lease liability, non-current	$	5,970

The weighted-average remaining lease term was 52 months and the weighted-average discount rate was 17.6%.

Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities was less than $0.5 million.

In February 2025, the Company entered into an agreement to sublease the entirety of its leased space in South San Francisco through October 2029, the remainder of the lease term. The sublease included the ROU asset and certain property, plant and equipment (collectively, "Sublease Asset Group"). The sublease commenced in the first quarter of 2025. Sublease income during the period ended March 31, 2025 was less than $0.1 million.

The Company tests long-lived assets for recoverability whenever events or changes in circumstances suggest that the carrying value of an asset or group of assets may not be recoverable. As a result of the sublease, the Company reviewed the Sublease Asset Group for impairment. As part of the impairment evaluation, the Company compared the undiscounted sublease income to the net book value of the Sublease Asset Group and determined that it had a net carrying value that exceeded its undiscounted future cash flows. Accordingly, the Company estimated the fair value of the Sublease Asset Group based on its discounted cash flows using an estimated borrowing rate of 11.8%. The carrying value of the Sublease Asset Group exceeded its estimated fair value and, as a result, the Company recorded a non-cash Sublease Asset Group impairment expense of $2.9 million for the period ended March 31, 2025. The impairment expense is recorded within general and administrative and research and development expenses in the statements of operations and comprehensive loss.

Legal Contingencies

It is possible that additional suits will be filed, or allegations made by stockholders, with respect to these same or other matters and also naming the Company and/or its officers and directors as defendants. This lawsuit and any other potential lawsuits are subject to inherent uncertainties, and the actual defense and disposition costs will depend upon many unknown factors. The outcome of this lawsuit is necessarily uncertain. The Company could be forced to expend significant resources in the defense against this and any other related lawsuits and the Company may not prevail. The Company currently is not able to estimate the possible loss to the Company from this lawsuit, as this lawsuit is currently at an early

Table of Contents

stage, and such amounts could be material to the Company’s financial statements even if the Company prevails in the defense against this lawsuit. The Company cannot be certain how long it may take to resolve this lawsuit or the possible amount of any damages that the Company may be required to pay. The Company does not consider any payment to be probable or reasonably estimable and has not accrued for any potential liability relating to this lawsuit.

From time to time, the Company may become involved in additional legal proceedings or be subject to claims arising in the ordinary course of business. The Company records a liability for such matters when it is probable that future losses will be incurred and that such losses can be reasonably estimated. Significant judgment is required to determine both probability and the estimated amount.

Guarantees and Indemnifications

In the normal course of business, the Company enters into agreements that contain a variety of representations and provide for general indemnification. Its exposure under these agreements is unknown because it involves claims that may be made against the Company in the future. To the extent permitted under Delaware law, the Company has agreed to indemnify its directors and officers for certain events or occurrences while the director or officer is, or was serving, at a request in such capacity. To date, the Company has not paid any claims or been required to defend any action related to its indemnification obligations. As of March 31, 2025, the Company did not have any material indemnification claims that were probable or reasonably possible and consequently has not recorded related liabilities.

8. Common Stock

On May 9, 2023, immediately prior to the IPO closing, each share of the Company’s Class A Common Stock then issued and outstanding was reclassified and became one share of the Company’s common stock. As of December 31, 2024, there were no shares of Class B Common Stock outstanding.

As of March 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024, the Company’s Common Stock reserved for future issuance was as follows:


	March 31,	December 31,
	2025	2024
Shares available for future grants under Equity Incentive Plan	11,636,801	6,368,075
Outstanding stock options	11,261,681	13,620,039
Performance based restricted stock units1	474,154	641,856
Outstanding restricted stock units	2,851,217	1,026,425
Options assumed upon ValenzaBio acquisition	55,311	55,311
ESPP Shares available for future grants	2,679,974	1,675,454
Total shares reserved for future issuance	28,959,138	23,387,160

1.The performance based restricted stock units balance is based on the target number of shares

Founders’ Common Stock

On the IPO closing date, each share of the founders’ Class A common stock issued and outstanding was reclassified and became one share of the Company’s common stock; no vesting or other terms were modified.

In July 2020, the Company issued 2,839,749 shares of its common stock to founders at a price of $0.00002 per share. The issuance price was the estimated fair value of the shares as the shares were issued at inception and no intellectual property was contributed by the founders. The founders had voting rights and rights to receive dividends regardless of the vesting of the shares. Issued shares vested monthly over 48 months, as founders continued providing services to the Company. The Company had the right to repurchase unvested shares at the price paid by the founders if services were terminated. Stock-based compensation expense was minimal for these shares. In December 2022, the Company repurchased 591,613 restricted common shares at the original purchase price that were unvested as of the date of repurchase in connection with one founder’s resignation. As of March 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024, 0 shares were unvested. During the three months ended March 31, 2025 and the year ended December 31, 2024, 0 and 207,060 founders’ shares vested.

Table of Contents

9. Equity Incentive Plan

In April 2023, the Company’s board of directors adopted, and stockholders approved, the 2023 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2023 Plan”) that became effective on May 4, 2023. The Company reserved 12,000,000 new shares of common stock for issuance under the 2023 Plan. In addition, 6,920,846 shares issued and outstanding under the Company’s 2020 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended (the “2020 Plan”), have been added to the 2023 Plan as such shares become available from time to time if awards terminate, expire, or lapse for any reason without the delivery of shares, or are reacquired or withheld (or not issued) to satisfy a tax withholding obligation or the purchase or exercise price. The 2023 Plan also provides that the number of shares initially reserved and available for issuance will automatically increase each January 1, beginning on January 1, 2024 and ending on January 1, 2033, by an amount equal to the lesser of (i) 5% of the shares of common stock outstanding on the last day of the immediately preceding fiscal year, and (ii) such smaller number of shares of stock as determined by the Company’s board of directors. On March 19, 2025, 5,297,102 additional shares of common stock became available for issuance under the 2023 Plan pursuant to the provision. No more than 56,762,538 shares of stock may be issued upon the exercise of incentive stock options under the 2023 Plan. The Company may grant incentive stock options, nonstatutory stock options (“NSOs”), restricted stock units (“RSUs”), restricted stock awards (“RSAs”), stock appreciation rights (“SARs”), performance awards and other awards to the Company’s officers, employees, directors and consultants. Options under the 2023 Plan may be granted for periods of up to 10 years at exercise prices no less than the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant and usually vest over four years. The exercise price of an option granted to a 10% stockholder may not be less than 110% of the fair market value of the shares on the date of grant and such option may not be exercisable after the expiration of five years from the date of grant. The grant date fair market value of all awards made under our 2023 Plan and all cash compensation paid by us to any non-employee director for services as a director in any fiscal year may not exceed $750,000, increased to $1,000,000 in the fiscal year of their initial service as a non-employee director. The 2023 Plan is the successor to and continuation of the 2020 Plan and no additional awards may be granted under the 2020 Plan. All outstanding awards granted under the 2020 Plan will remain subject to the terms of the 2020 Plan. The 2020 Plan provided for the grant of incentive stock options, nonstatutory stock options, RSUs and RSAs to the Company’s officers, employees, directors and consultants. As of March 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024, 11,636,801 and 6,368,075 shares of the Company’s common stock remained available for issuance under the 2023 Plan.

In April 2023, the Company’s board of directors and stockholders adopted the 2023 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “ESPP”), which became effective on May 4, 2023. The ESPP authorized issuance of up to 900,000 shares of common stock. The ESPP permits participants to purchase common stock through payroll deductions of up to 15% of their eligible compensation. Employees purchase shares of common stock at a price per share equal to 85% of the lower of the fair market value at the start or end of six-month purchase and offering consecutive periods. The aggregate number of shares reserved for sale under the 2023 ESPP will increase automatically on January 1 for a period of up to 10 calendar years, commencing on January 1, 2024, by the number of shares equal to the lesser of 1% of the Company's total outstanding shares of common stock on the immediately preceding December 31st, and 2,700,000 shares or a lesser number of shares as may be determined by the board of directors. On March 19, 2025, the Company registered 1,004,520 additional shares of its Common Stock under the ESPP pursuant to the provision. There were 2,679,974 and 1,675,454 ESPP shares available for future grants as of March 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024, respectively.

Stock Options

Stock options issued under the 2020 and 2023 Plan generally vest over a four-year period and expire ten years from the date of grant. Certain options provide for accelerated vesting if there is a change in control, as defined in the individual award agreements.

Table of Contents

A summary of option activity under the 2020 and 2023 Plans is as follows:


	Number of Options	Weighted- Average Exercise Price Per Share		Weighted- Average Remaining Contractual Term (in years)	Aggregate Intrinsic Value (in thousands)
Outstanding at December 31, 2024	13,620,039	$	7.8329	7.8	$	118
Options granted	70,500	2.4094
Options exercised	(7,604)	0.7683
Options expired	(1,019,039)	12.6575
Options forfeited	(1,402,215)	9.0133
Outstanding at March 31, 2025	11,261,681	$	7.2202	7.7	$	81
Exercisable at March 31, 2025	3,806,996	$	8.8216	5.2	$	68
Vested and expected to vest at March 31, 2025	11,261,681	$	7.2202	7.7	$	81

The aggregate intrinsic value is calculated as the difference between the exercise price of the underlying stock options and the estimated fair value of the Company’s common stock for those stock options that had exercise prices lower than the estimated fair value of the Company’s common stock at March 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024. The fair value of shares vested during the three months ended March 31, 2025 was $5.5 million. The weighted-average grant date fair value of options granted in three months ended March 31, 2025 was $1.7844.

ValenzaBio 2020 Stock Option Plan

On January 4, 2023, in connection with the ValenaBio Acquisition, the Company assumed the ValenzaBio 2020 Stock Option Plan and options to issue 1,249,811 shares of the Company’s Class A Common Stock to ValenzaBio option holders, who entered into consulting agreements with the Company. The weighted-average exercise price of assumed options was $3.6736 per share.

Under the terms of the ValenzaBio Merger Agreement, the assumed options vested in full on March 31, 2023. A total of zero options assumed under the ValenzaBio 2020 Stock Option Plan were exercised for the three months ended March 31, 2025.

Restricted Stock Units

A summary of unvested RSU activity is presented in the following table:


	Number of RSUs	Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value
Unvested at December 31, 2024	1,026,425	$	11.90
Granted	2,488,750	1.99
Vested	(447,541)	5.17
Forfeited	(216,417)	5.88
Unvested at March 31, 2025	2,851,217	$	4.77

Performance-Based Restricted Stock Units

In August 2023, the Company granted PSUs to certain employees and officers of the Company. The PSUs may vest over several years subject to the achievement of (i) certain clinical development milestones over a performance period from the grant date to May 2027 (the “Performance Period”) or (ii) market conditions (i.e., stock price hurdle) based on pre-specified volume-weighted average stock price measurements as of each vesting performance measurement date, and continued employment with the Company through the applicable vesting date(s). The target number of shares under the PSUs at the grant date was 3,135,104. The ultimate number of PSU shares that may vest, in the aggregate over the Performance Period, could in certain cases be up to 150% of the target number of shares upon the achievement of certain market or performance conditions.

Table of Contents

A summary of PSU activity based on the target number of shares is presented in the following table:


	Number of PSUs	Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value*
Outstanding at December 31, 2024	641,856	$	27.43
Granted	—	—
Vested	—	—
Forfeited	(167,702)	27.43
Outstanding at March 31, 2025	474,154	$	27.43

*The grant date fair value is based only on the PSUs with market conditions and does not factor in any performance conditions.

As the PSUs granted in 2023 are subject to a market condition, the grant date fair value for such PSUs was based on a Monte Carlo simulation model. The Company estimated the fair value of PSUs based on the grant date price of its common stock of $26.97 and the following assumptions: expected volatility of 87.71%, risk-free-rate of 4.47%, and zero expected dividend yield. In 2023, the Company granted PSUs to employees with a weighted-average grant date fair value of $27.43. The unvested awards will expire if it is determined that the vesting conditions have not been met during the applicable three-year performance period.

2023 Employee Stock Purchase Plan

The most recent purchase period commenced on December 15, 2024 and will end on June 14, 2025. The Company recorded $0.2 million in accrued liabilities as of March 31, 2025.

Stock-Based Compensation Expense

The Company used Black-Scholes option pricing model to estimate fair value of each option at the grant date based on the following assumptions for the three months ended March 31, 2025 and 2024:


	Three Months Ended March 31,		Three Months Ended March 31,
	2025		2024

Expected volatility	85.06% - 85.55%		87.37% - 87.37%
Expected dividend yield	0	%	0	%
Expected term (in years)	5.98 - 6.04		6.08 – 6.08
Risk-free interest rate	4.40% - 4.42%		3.95% - 3.95%

The following table presents the classification of stock-based compensation expense related to awards granted to employees (in thousands):


	Three Months ended March 31,
	2025		2024
Research and development expenses	$	1,758	$	4,591
General and administrative expenses	2,414		15,572
Total stock-based compensation expense	$	4,172	$	20,163

Table of Contents

The stock-based compensation expense relates to the following equity-based awards:


	Three Months ended March 31,
	2025		2024
Restricted stock units	$	1,245	$	4,415
Performance-based restricted stock units	(1,451)		9,900
Stock options	4,316		5,751
ESPP	62		97
Total stock-based compensation expense	$	4,172	$	20,163

As of March 31, 2025 there was $31.7 million of unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to granted stock options, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.5 years. As of March 31, 2025, there was $11.5 million of unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to RSUs which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.3 years. The Company reversed $1.5 million in net compensation expense during the three months ended March 31, 2025 related to PSUs. This expense is related to both the market and performance conditions associated with the PSUs. As of March 31, 2025, the Company evaluated the clinical development milestone performance conditions and determined certain conditions to be probable of achievement. As of March 31, 2025, total compensation cost not yet recognized related to unvested PSUs was $4.3 million, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.3 years. Total compensation cost not recognized related to unvested PSUs can increase up to $5.5 million depending on the future achievement of PSUs performance conditions.

10. Net Loss Per Share Attributable to Common Stockholders

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net loss per share attributable to common stockholders (in thousands, except share and per share data):


	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2025		2024
Numerator:
Net loss	$	(55,264)	$	(34,973)
Denominator:
Weighted average common shares outstanding	100,680,308		98,090,167
Less: Weighted-average common shares subject to repurchase	—		(176,507)
Weighted-average common shares outstanding, basic and diluted	100,680,308		97,913,660
Net loss per share attributable to common stockholders, basic and diluted	$	(0.55)	$	(0.36)

The following outstanding shares of potentially dilutive securities were excluded from the computation of diluted net loss per share attributable to common stockholders for the periods presented because including them would have been antidilutive:


	As of March 31,
	2025	2024
Outstanding options to purchase common stock	11,261,681	12,915,515
Unvested RSUs outstanding	2,851,217	3,369,141
Unvested PSUs expected to vest	106,685	653,929
Outstanding options to purchase common stock assumed upon the ValenzaBio acquisition	55,311	146,885
Common stock subject to repurchase	—	118,320
ESPP	218,866	96,544
Total	14,493,760	17,300,334

Table of Contents

The PSUs included above represent the expected payout at the reporting date under the current performance vesting conditions assessment see Note 9 for further detail.

11. Other Income

Arrangements with Vendors

In March 2024, the Company entered into arrangements with certain vendors where the Company received a payment of $30.0 million and a $5.0 million service credit.

The $30.0 million payment received from these arrangements was recorded as a gain in other income (expense), net in the condensed consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive loss for the three months ended March 31, 2024 and included in the cash flows from operating activities in the condensed consolidated statement of cash flows for the same period. The $5.0 million service credit was recorded as a credit within research and development expenses.

Asset Sale

In January 2024, the Company entered into an asset purchase agreement (“Purchase Agreement”) with Tenet Medicines, Inc. (“Tenet”). The Company recorded $7.0 million cash received as other income, net in the condensed consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive loss for the three months ended March 31, 2024.

In consideration for the licenses and other rights Tenet received under the Purchase Agreement, the Company is entitled to receive development, regulatory and commercial milestone payments of up to $157.5 million, royalty on worldwide net sales and payments on sublicense income.

12. Restructuring

On August 10, 2024, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a plan to suspend new internal investment in the development of izokibep in hidradenitis suppurativa (“HS”), psoriatic arthritis (“PsA”) and axial spondyloarthritis (“AxSpA”), pursuant to which the Company is focusing its efforts primarily on its lonigutamab clinical program in thyroid eye disease (“TED”) and implemented an associated workforce reduction (the “Restructuring Plan”). As part of the Restructuring Plan, the Company’s workforce was reduced by 40 people, or approximately 1/3 of the Company’s then-existing headcount.

In connection with the workforce reduction, the Company incurred restructuring charges totaling $4.2 million in cash-based expenses related to one-time employee severance payments and benefits, which it recognized for the year ended December 31, 2024. Remaining employee severance payments and benefits of less than $0.1 million and $0.8 million were included in restructuring liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet for the period ended March 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024, respectively. The remaining severance benefits will be paid in the second quarter of 2025.

In the third quarter of 2024, the Company entered into an agreement to cancel certain services with a vendor under a manufacturing agreement related to the suspension of new internal development of izokibep in HS, PsA and AxSpA. All post-cancellation obligations were settled in the fourth quarter of 2024. The Company incurred net restructuring charges of $7.2 million consisting of $42.9 million of expense in connection with such cancellation of services netted against a $35.7 million credit voucher received as part of the agreement to cancel services upon payment of the amounts due to the manufacturer, and recognized those costs in the year ended December 31, 2024. The balance of the credit voucher was $12.2 million as of March 31, 2025 and $24.3 million as of December 31, 2024.

The following table summarizes the change in the Company’s restructuring liabilities for the period ended March 31, 2025 (in thousands):

Table of Contents


	Severance and other employee-related benefits	Service cancellation costs	Total
Balance at December 31, 2024	829	—	829
Restructuring charges	—	—	—
Cash payments	(757)	—	(757)
Revaluation	—	—	—
Balance at March 31, 2025	72	—	72

13. Subsequent Events

On February 6, 2025, the Company, Alumis Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Alumis”), and Arrow Merger Sub, Inc., a Delaware corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of Alumis (“Merger Sub”), entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger, subsequently amended on April 20, 2025, (the “Merger Agreement”), pursuant to which, among other matters, and subject to the satisfaction or waiver of the conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement, Merger Sub will merge with and into the Company, with the Company continuing as a wholly owned subsidiary of Alumis and the surviving corporation of the merger (the “Merger”).

On May 13, 2025, the Company held a virtual Special Meeting of its stockholders to, among other matters, vote on the proposal to adopt the Merger Agreement. Following a vote by the holders of a majority of the shares of common stock issued and outstanding as of the close of business on April 1, 2025, the record date for the Special Meeting, the proposal to adopt the Merger Agreement was approved. The Company currently expects to close the Merger in the second quarter of 2025.

Table of Contents

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations and the unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with our audited financial statements and related notes thereto as of and for the year ended December 31, 2024 and the related Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, both of which are contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on March 19, 2025. This discussion and analysis and other parts of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contain forward-looking statements based upon current beliefs, plans and expectations related to future events and our future financial performance that involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions, such as statements regarding our intentions, plans, objectives and expectations for our business. Our actual results and the timing of selected events could differ materially from those described in or implied by these forward-looking statements as a result of several factors, including those set forth under “Risk Factors” in Part II, Item 1A of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. See also the section titled “Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.”

Overview

ACELYRIN is a late-stage clinical biopharma company focused on identifying, acquiring, and accelerating the development and commercialization of transformative medicines.

On February 6, 2025, we, Alumis Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Alumis”), and Arrow Merger Sub, Inc., a Delaware corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of Alumis (“Merger Sub”), entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger, subsequently amended on April 20, 2025, (the “Merger Agreement”), pursuant to which, among other matters, and subject to the satisfaction or waiver of the conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement, Merger Sub will merge with and into us, with us continuing as a wholly owned subsidiary of Alumis and the surviving corporation of the merger (the “Merger”).

On May 13, 2025, we held a virtual Special Meeting of our stockholders to, among other matters, vote on the proposal to adopt the Merger Agreement. Following a vote by the holders of a majority of the shares of common stock issued and outstanding as of the close of business on April 1, 2025, the record date for the Special Meeting, the proposal to adopt the Merger Agreement was approved. We currently expect to close the Merger in the second quarter of 2025.

Our lead product candidate is lonigutamab, a subcutaneously delivered, monoclonal antibody targeting IGF-1R for the treatment of Thyroid Eye Disease (“TED”). TED is a potentially vision-threatening progressive autoimmune ocular disease in which the eye muscles, eyelids, tear glands and fatty tissues behind the eye become inflamed. Recurrent inflammation, scarring and fibrosis lead to pathological changes in the tissues surrounding the eyeball. Initial TED symptoms include redness, irritation, and discomfort of the eyes and eyelids, pain and headaches. As the fat and muscle tissues surrounding the eye continue to swell, disabling symptoms include double vision and corneal erosions due to eye bulging and the subsequent inability to close the eyelids. Elevated ocular pressure can occur with compression of the retinal nerve, leading to blindness, or optic neuropathy. The most obvious feature of TED is the protrusion of the eye outward from the eye socket, or proptosis.

Lonigutamab binds to a distinct epitope as compared to current standard of care, which results in internalization of the IGF-1 receptor within minutes. We believe the characteristics of lonigutamab that enable subcutaneous delivery also enable the potential for longer-term, convenient dosing, which can potentially improve depth and durability of clinical response.

On March 20, 2024, we announced interim data from our Phase 1/2 dose ranging trial of lonigutamab in TED. In the first dosing cohort at week 0 and 3, six patients received a 40mg dose of lonigutamab and two patients received placebo. The efficacy results observed at week 6 for this first cohort were as follows: for proptosis response (≥ 2 millimeter reduction in proptosis from baseline), 50% for lonigutamab and 0% for placebo; for clinical activity response (“CAS”) (≥ 2 point reduction in CAS), 100% for lonigutamab and 0% for placebo; and for diplopia response, (> 1 Bahn-Gorman improvement), 25% for lonigutamab and 0% for placebo. In the second dosing cohort, six patients received a 50mg loading dose of lonigutamab at week 0 and a 25mg dose of lonigutamab weekly thereafter. The efficacy results observed at week 6 for this second cohort were as follows: proptosis response (≥ 2 millimeter reduction in proptosis from baseline) was 67%, CAS response (≥ 2 point reduction in CAS) was 83%, and diplopia response (> 1 Bahn-Gorman improvement) was 40%. With regard to safety, there were no changes observed in audiology, no hyperglycemia events, and no serious adverse events in either cohort. In the first dosing cohort (40mg of lonigutamab administered at week 0 and 3), there were 3

Table of Contents

patients who reported mild tinnitus with no associated changes in audiograms and one patient that received placebo discontinued due to dysthyroid optic neuropathy. On August 13, 2024, we provided an update on the lonigutamab development program indicating that we had completed the Phase 1 proof-of-concept portion of the lonigutamab trial and the dose-ranging Phase 2 portion of the program in TED patients continued.

On January 6, 2025, we announced additional interim data from our Phase 1/2 dose ranging trial of lonigutamab in TED. In these data, lonigutamab demonstrated (i) clinically meaningful and competitive improvements across all manifestations of TED, including proptosis, CAS and diplopia, as well as the Graves Ophthalmology-Quality of Life (“Go-QoL”) tool, (ii) significant proptosis response with a 50mg loading and 25mg weekly subcutaneous dose of lonigutamab and (iii) efficacy with lower levels of exposure than seen with intravenously-administered anti-IGF-1R agents. In addition, no cases of hearing impairment as measured by audiogram, hyperglycemia or menstrual disorders in TED patients had been reported to date at any dose level. Pharmacokinetic data also showed that a 100mg loading dose achieved target therapeutic concentration within days.

On January 6, 2025, we announced our intention to initiate our Phase 3 LONGITUDE program in the first quarter of 2025. On February 6, 2025, we announced that we had entered into the Merger Agreement and that, in connection therewith, we would delay initiation of the Phase 3 LONGITUDE program until the closing of the Merger and that we planned to re-evaluate the development program for lonigutamab to enable potential confirmation of its differentiation in a capital efficient manner.

In August 2024, we committed to implementing a restructuring plan (the “Restructuring Plan”) to suspend new internal investment in the development of izokibep in hidradenitis suppurativa (“HS”), psoriatic arthritis (“PsA”) and axial spondyloarthritis (“AxSpA”) and to focus our efforts primarily on our lonigutamab clinical program in TED. Although the clinical trial results from our Phase 3 clinical trial of izokibep in HS reported on August 13, 2024 were positive, we made a strategic, capital-allocation decision at that time to prioritize the development of lonigutamab. We committed to completing the then-ongoing Phase 3 clinical trial of izokibep in HS through week 32 and the Phase 2b/3 trial in PsA through its respective long-term follow up period, but we otherwise suspended further internal development of izokibep in HS, PsA and AxSpA. We continued our Phase 2b/3 clinical trial of izokibep in uveitis through its week 24 primary endpoint data readout, and on December 10, 2024 we announced that the Phase 2b/3 trial of izokibep in non-infectious, non-anterior uveitis did not meet the primary endpoint of a statistically significant improvement in time to treatment failure versus placebo as measured by treatment failure rates at 24 weeks, and further did not meet any secondary endpoints. Based on these data, and the guidance regarding other indications previously announced on August 13, 2024, we have stopped all development of izokibep and provided notice of termination to Affibody AB (“Affibody”) of our license agreement with Affibody for izokibep, as discussed further below. We expect to substantially complete the wind-down of activities related to the izokibep program by the end of the second quarter of 2025. Our SLRN-517 program was suspended on August 10, 2024 and we subsequently terminated our license agreement with Novelty Nobility effective January 16, 2025. For more information on the Restructuring Plan, see Note 12 for further detail.

Since our inception in July 2020, we have devoted substantially all of our resources to organizing our company, hiring personnel, business planning, acquiring and developing our product candidates, performing research and development, conducting clinical trials, enabling manufacturing activities in support of our product development efforts, establishing and protecting our intellectual property portfolio, raising capital, and providing general and administrative support for these activities. We do not have any products approved for sale and have not generated any revenue from product sales. We expect to continue to incur significant and increasing expenses and increasing substantial losses for the foreseeable future as we continue our development of and seek regulatory approvals for our product candidates and commercialize any approved products, seek to expand our product pipeline and invest in our organization. Our ability to achieve and sustain profitability will depend on our ability to successfully develop, obtain regulatory approval for and commercialize our product candidates. There can be no assurance that we will ever earn revenues or achieve profitability, or if achieved, that the revenues or profitability will be sustained on a continuing basis.

We have incurred significant losses and negative cash flows from operations since our inception. Our net loss for the three months ended March 31, 2025 and 2024 was $55.3 million and $35.0 million, respectively. The net loss of $55.3 million in the three months ended March 31, 2025 included $4.2 million in stock-based compensation expense and $2.9 million for the impairment of long lived assets. The net loss of $35.0 million in the three months ended March 31, 2024 included $37.0 million of other income. As of March 31, 2025, we had an accumulated deficit of $792.2 million. Substantially all of our net losses have resulted from costs incurred in connection with our research and development programs and, to a lesser extent, from general and administrative costs associated with our operations. Our net losses and operating losses may fluctuate from quarter to quarter and year to year depending primarily on the timing of acquisition or

Table of Contents

in-licensing of any new product candidates, the timing of our preclinical studies and clinical trials, our other research and development expenses, and the timing and amount of any milestone or royalty payments due under our existing or future license agreements.

Because of the numerous risks and uncertainties associated with therapeutic product development, we may never achieve or sustain profitability and, unless and until we are able to develop and commercialize our product candidates, we will need to continue to raise additional capital. Until such time as we can generate significant revenue from product sales, if ever, we expect to finance our operations through public or private equity or debt financings, or potentially other capital sources, such as collaboration or licensing arrangements with third parties or other strategic transactions. There are no assurances that we will be successful in obtaining an adequate level of financing to support our business plans when needed on acceptable terms, or at all. In addition, we may seek additional capital due to market conditions or strategic considerations even if we believe we have sufficient funds for our current or future operating plans. To the extent that we raise additional capital through the sale of equity or convertible debt securities, the ownership interest of our stockholders will be or could be diluted, and the terms of these securities may include liquidation or other preferences that adversely affect the rights of our common stockholders. Debt financing and equity financing, if available, may involve agreements that include covenants limiting or restricting our ability to take specific actions, such as incurring additional debt, making capital expenditures or declaring dividends. If we raise additional funds through collaboration or licensing arrangements with third parties or other strategic transactions, we may have to relinquish rights to our intellectual property, future revenue streams, research programs, or product candidates or grant licenses on terms that may not be favorable to us. Our ability to raise additional funds and the terms upon which we are able to raise such funds may be adversely impacted by the Restructuring Plan, the pendency of the Merger and/or by future clinical trial outcomes and general economic and market conditions. As a result of these and other factors, we cannot be certain that additional funding will be available on acceptable terms, or at all. If we are unable to raise capital as and when needed, or on attractive terms, we may have to significantly delay, reduce, or discontinue the development and commercialization of our product candidates or scale back or terminate our pursuit of new in-licenses and acquisitions.

We currently have limited sales, marketing and commercialization capabilities.

As of March 31, 2025, we had $411.1 million in cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and short-term marketable securities. On May 9, 2023, we closed our initial public offering (“IPO”) in which we sold an aggregate of 34,500,000 shares of common stock at a price to the public of $18.00 per share, which included 4,500,000 shares issued upon the full exercise by the underwriters of their option to purchase additional shares of common stock. We received aggregate net proceeds from the IPO of approximately $573.6 million, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and other offering costs. Based on our current operating plan, we estimate that our existing cash and cash equivalents and short-term marketable securities will be sufficient to fund our operating plan and capital expenditure requirements for at least the next 12 months from the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. We have based this estimate on our current assumptions, which may prove to be wrong, and we may exhaust our available capital resources sooner than we expect.

Macroeconomic Trends

We continue to actively monitor the impact of various macroeconomic and geopolitical trends, such as fluctuating interest rates, inflation, potential tariffs, supply chain disruptions, geopolitical instability, changes in regulations, including government fiscal policies, fluctuating monetary exchange rates, geopolitical instability and related sanctions, and volatility in the U.S. and global financial markets, on our business. To date, we have not experienced a material financial statement impact or any significant business disruptions, including with our vendors or third parties, as a result of these negative macroeconomic and geopolitical trends. However, our business has been, and may continue to be, impacted by the negative macroeconomic and geopolitical trends wherever we have clinical trial sites, CMO facilities or other business operations. Further, negative macroeconomic and geopolitical trends conditions could adversely impact our ability to obtain financing in the future on terms acceptable to us, or at all.

Restructuring Plan

On August 10, 2024, our Board of Directors suspended new internal investment in the development of izokibep in HS, PsA and AxSpA, and focused our efforts primarily on our lonigutamab clinical program in TED and implemented an associated workforce reduction (the “Restructuring Plan”). As part of the Restructuring Plan, our workforce was reduced by 40 people, or approximately 1/3 of our then-existing headcount.

Table of Contents

In connection with the workforce reduction, we incurred restructuring charges totaling $4.2 million in cash-based expenses related to one-time employee severance payments and benefits, which we recognized for the year ended December 31, 2024. Remaining employee severance payments and benefits of less than $0.1 million and $0.8 million were included in restructuring liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet for the period ended March 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024, respectively. The remaining severance benefits will be paid in the second quarter of 2025.

In the third quarter of 2024, we entered into an agreement to cancel certain services with a vendor under a manufacturing agreement related to the suspension of new internal development of izokibep in HS, PsA and AxSpA. All post-cancellation obligations were settled in the fourth quarter of 2024. We incurred net restructuring charges of $7.2 million consisting of $42.9 million of expense in connection with such cancellation of services netted against a $35.7 million credit voucher received as part of the agreement to cancel services upon payment of the amounts due to the manufacturer, and recognized those costs in the year ended December 31, 2024. The balance of the credit voucher was $12.2 million as of March 31, 2025 and $24.3 million as of December 31, 2024.

License and Collaboration Agreements

License and Commercialization with Pierre Fabre

Upon the closing of the ValenzaBio Acquisition, we became the successor to ValenzaBio’s rights under the March 25, 2021 license and commercialization agreement between ValenzaBio and Pierre Fabre, as amended (the "Pierre Fabre Agreement"). We received certain exclusive worldwide licenses with the right to sublicense to certain patents, know-how and other intellectual property to develop, manufacture, use and commercialize lonigutamab for non-oncology therapeutic indications. The license from Pierre Fabre extends to any product containing lonigutamab (excluding any fragments or derivatives) as its sole active ingredient (each, a "PF Licensed Product"). The Pierre Fabre Agreement prohibits us from using the licensed intellectual property in any antibody drug conjugate, multi-specific antibodies or any other derivatives of lonigutamab.

In the event we that decide to sublicense the rights to develop or commercialize a PF Licensed Product in any territory outside of the United States and Canada, Pierre Fabre retains the right of first negotiation to acquire such development and commercialization rights in one or more countries in such territory. Subject to the validation of certain clinical trial criteria by a joint steering committee, Pierre Fabre has the option to reclaim all exclusive rights to develop, commercialize and exploit the PF Licensed Product in such territories and to obtain an exclusive sublicensable license in such territories for any improvements and trademarks to such PF Licensed Product, and to exploit such PF Licensed Product for non-oncology therapeutic indications, subject to certain payment obligations. The option period commenced in October 2024. If Pierre Fabre exercises such option, Pierre Fabre has the right to require us to buy out its right to the option for a one-time payment of $31.0 million or we have the right to choose to buy out Pierre Fabre’s option by making the one-time payment of $31.0 million, in each case within 30 days from Pierre Fabre’s notice of exercise of such option. In October 2024, Pierre Fabre exercised its option under the Pierre Agreement, requiring us to buy out its right to the option for a one-time payment of $31.0 million which we paid in the fourth quarter of 2024. We are solely responsible for the development, regulatory approvals and commercialization of each PF Licensed Product.

License and Collaboration Agreement with Affibody

On August 9, 2021, we entered into a license and collaboration agreement with Affibody AB ("Affibody") (the "Affibody Agreement") under which Affibody granted us exclusive, sublicensable licenses to develop, commercialize and manufacture products containing izokibep for all human therapeutic uses on a worldwide basis, subject to a pre-existing agreement with Inmagene Biopharmaceuticals ("Inmagene") with respect to certain Asian and Nordic countries.

On January 31, 2025, we delivered a Notice of Termination (the “Notice”) to Affibody terminating the Affibody Agreement, which became effective 90 days following delivery of the Notice in accordance with the terms of the Affibody Agreement. Following termination of the Affibody Agreement, we will no longer have any material financial or other obligations under the Affibody Agreement.

Components of Results of Operations

Operating Expenses

Our operating expenses consist of (i) research and development expenses and (ii) general and administrative expenses.

Table of Contents

Research and Development

Research and development expenses consist of external and internal costs primarily related to acquiring our product candidate pipeline and technologies, and clinical development of our product candidates.

External costs include:

•costs associated with acquiring technology and intellectual property licenses that have no alternative future uses and costs incurred under in-license or assignment agreements, including milestone payments;

•costs incurred in connection with the clinical development of our product candidates, including under agreements with CROs, CMOs and other third parties that conduct clinical trials and manufacture clinical supplies, product candidates, and components on our behalf; and

•costs for third-party professional research and development consulting services.

Internal costs include:

•research and development personnel-related costs, including salaries, benefits, travel and meals expenses and stock-based compensation expense; and

•allocated facilities and other overhead costs, including software, computer supplies and accessories and other miscellaneous expenses.

We expense research and development costs as incurred. Costs of certain activities are recognized based on an evaluation of the progress to completion of specific tasks. However, payments made prior to the receipt of goods or services that will be used or rendered for future research and development activities are deferred and capitalized as prepaid expenses and other current assets on our balance sheets. The capitalized amounts are recognized as expense as the goods are delivered or as related services are performed. We do not allocate employee costs, laboratory supplies and facilities, including other internal costs, to specific product candidates because these costs are associated with multiple programs and, as such, are not separately classified. We use internal resources primarily for managing our process development, manufacturing, and clinical development activities. We deploy our personnel across all of our research and development activities and, as our employees work across multiple programs, we do not currently track our costs by product candidate.

We have delayed the initiation of our Phase 3 LONGITUDE program until the closing of the Merger. However, we still expect to incur substantial research and development expenses over the longer-term as we advance our product candidates into and through clinical trials, pursue regulatory approval of our product candidates, build our operational and commercial capabilities for supplying and marketing our products, if approved, and potentially expand our pipeline of product candidates. The process of conducting the necessary clinical research to obtain regulatory approval is costly and time-consuming. The probability of success for our product candidates may be affected by a variety of factors, including the safety and efficacy of our product candidates, clinical data, investment in our clinical programs, competition, manufacturing capability and commercial viability. We may never succeed in achieving regulatory approval for any of our product candidates. As a result of the uncertainties discussed above, we are unable to determine the duration and completion of costs of our research and development projects or if, when and to what extent we will generate revenue from

Table of Contents

the commercialization and sale of our product candidates, if approved by the FDA and other applicable regulatory authorities.

Our future research and development costs may vary significantly based on factors such as:

•the timing and progress of our preclinical and clinical development activities;

•the number and scope of preclinical and clinical programs we decide to pursue;

•the amount and timing of any milestone payment due under an existing, or any future, license and/or collaboration agreement;

•the number of patients that participate in our clinical trials, and per participant clinical trial costs;

•the number and duration of clinical trials required for approval of our product candidates;

•the number of sites included in our clinical trials, and the locations of those sites;

•delays or difficulties in adding trial sites and enrolling participants in our clinical trials;

•patient drop-out or discontinuation rates;

•potential additional safety monitoring requested by regulatory authorities;

•the phase of development of our product candidates;

•the efficacy and safety profile of our product candidates, including the ability to demonstrate differentiation from other approved therapies or therapies in development;

•milestone payments that may become payable under our licensing agreements due to clinical and regulatory outcomes;

•the timing, receipt, and terms of any approvals from applicable regulatory authorities including the FDA and non-U.S. regulators;

•maintaining a continued acceptable safety profile of our product candidates following approval, if any, of our product candidates;

•changes in the competitive outlook;

•the extent to which we establish additional strategic collaborations or other arrangements; and

•the impact of any business interruptions to our operations or to those of the third parties with whom we work.

A change in the outcome of any of these variables with respect to the development of any of our product candidates could significantly change the costs and timing associated with the development of that product candidate. For example, in February 2025 we announced that we were delaying the initiation of our Phase 3 LONGITUDE program until the closing of the Merger to re-evaluate the development program for lonigutamab in a capital efficient manner. Additionally, despite the positive results in our Phase 3 clinical trial of izokibep in HS announced in August 2024, at that time we made a strategic, capital allocation decision to prioritize the development of lonigutamab in TED and we implemented the Restructuring Plan. We also incurred net restructuring charges of $7.2 million consisting of $42.9 million of expense related to the cancellation contract manufacturing services netted against a $35.7 million credit voucher received as part of

Table of Contents

this cancellation agreement upon payment of the amounts due to the manufacturer, and recognized those costs in the year ended December 31, 2024.

General and Administrative

Our general and administrative expenses consist primarily of personnel-related costs, legal and external consulting services, including those relating to intellectual property and corporate matters, and allocated overhead, including software, computer supplies and accessories, insurance and other miscellaneous expenses. Personnel-related costs include salaries, annual bonuses, benefits, recruiting fees, travel and meal expenses and stock-based compensation for our general and administrative personnel.

We expect to continue to incur expenses associated with being a public company, including costs related to accounting, audit, legal, regulatory, and tax-related services associated with maintaining compliance with applicable Nasdaq and SEC requirements; costs related to the filed purported securities class action lawsuit against us; additional director and officer insurance costs; and investor and public relations costs. We expect to scale our general and administrative expenses commensurate with the scope and stage of our clinical development pipeline. In addition, during the pendency of the Merger, we will continue to incur costs, fees, expenses and charges related to the Merger.

Other Income (Expense), Net

Other income (expense), net consists primarily of interest income and amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts on short-term marketable securities and net foreign currency transaction loss.

Results of Operations

Comparison of the Three Months Ended March 31, 2025 and 2024

The following table summarizes our results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2025 and 2024 (dollars in thousands):


	Three Months Ended March 31,				Change
	2025		2024		$		%
Operating expenses:
Research and development	$	42,138	$	58,032	$	(15,894)	(27)	%
General and administrative	17,717		24,742		(7,025)		(28	%)
Total operating expenses	59,855		82,774		(22,919)		(28)	%
Loss from operations	(59,855)		(82,774)		22,919		(28)	%
Interest income	4,658		9,150		(4,492)		(49	%)
Other income (expense) net	(67)		38,651		(38,718)		*
Total other income	4,591		47,801		(43,210)		(90)	%
Net loss	$	(55,264)	$	(34,973)	$	(20,291)	58	%

*not meaningful

Table of Contents

Research and Development Expenses

The following table summarizes our research and development expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2025 and 2024 (dollars in thousands):


	Three Months Ended March 31,				Change
	2025		2024		$		%
External costs:
CRO, CMO and Affibody transition services	$	28,324	$	41,384	$	(13,060)	(32	%)
Professional consulting services	2,418		2,732		(314)		(11)	%
Other research and development costs, including laboratory materials and supplies	45		105		(60)		(57)	%
Internal costs:
Personnel-related costs	8,217		13,277		(5,060)		(38	%)
Facilities and overhead costs	3,134		534		2,600		487	%
Total research and development expense	$	42,138	$	58,032	$	(15,894)	(27)	%

Research and development expenses decreased by $15.9 million, from $58.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2024 to $42.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025. The decrease was primarily due to a decrease in costs for CMO and CRO expenses and personnel-related costs.

External CRO, CMO and Affibody transition services expenses decreased by $13.1 million, from $41.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2024 to $28.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025 as result of reduced research and development activity under the Restructuring Plan.

Our CRO and CMO expenses by program for the three months ended March 31, 2025 and 2024 were as follows (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2025		2024
Izokibep	$	8,124	$	39,229
Lonigutamab (XLRN-421)	20,229		2,052
SLRN-517	(4)		35
Other	(25)		68
Total CRO, CMC, transition services	$	28,324	$	41,384

Expenses related to professional consulting services decreased by $0.3 million, from $2.7 million to $2.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025 compared to March 31, 2024, as we reduced our research and development activities.

Personnel-related costs decreased by $5.1 million from $13.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2024 to $8.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025. Employees’ salaries and benefits decreased by $2.6 million to $6.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025 from $8.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2024 due to a decrease in headcount from 43 at March 31, 2024 to 28 at March 31, 2025 as a result of the Restructuring. Stock-based compensation expense decreased by $2.8 million, from $4.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2024 to $1.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025, also as result of a decrease in headcount and a decrease in our common stock fair value.

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses decreased by $7.0 million from $24.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2024 to $17.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025.

Table of Contents

Expenses related to professional consulting services increased by $4.9 million, from $3.6 million to $8.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025 compared to March 31, 2024. The increase was driven by legal, banker, consulting and other professional fees related to the Merger.

Employees’ salaries and benefits decreased by $13.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025 compared to March 31, 2024. The decrease was mainly driven by a decrease in stock-based compensation expense of $13.2 million from $15.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2024 to $2.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025, due to higher forfeitures upon the departure of senior employees, a smaller executive leadership team and a decrease in our common stock fair value.

Total Other Income

Total other income decreased by $43.2 million, from $47.8 million in net income for the three months ended March 31, 2024 to $4.6 million in net income for the three months ended March 31, 2025. The decrease was primarily related to non-recurring other income (expense), net and interest income earned on our available-for-sale marketable securities.

We recognized $38.7 million of other income (expense), net related to non-recurring income from arrangements with vendors of $30.0 million, a sale of an asset of $7.0 million and transactions in foreign currencies for the three months ended March 31, 2024, with no similar transactions in the three months ended March 31, 2025.

We recognized $4.7 million and $9.2 million interest income earned on our available-for-sale marketable securities for the three months ended March 31, 2025 and March 31, 2024, respectively.

Liquidity, Capital Resources and Capital Requirements

Sources of Liquidity

Since our inception, we have not generated any revenue from product sales and have incurred significant operating losses and negative cash flows from our operations. From inception, we have primarily funded our operations from sales of shares of our redeemable convertible preferred stock in private placements and issuance of our common stock in our IPO in May 2023.

As of March 31, 2025, we had $411.1 million in cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and short-term marketable securities. Based on our current operating plan, we estimate that our existing cash and cash equivalents and short-term marketable securities will be sufficient to fund our current operating plan and capital expenditure requirements for at least the next 12 months from the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. We have based this estimate on our current assumptions, which may prove to be wrong, and we may exhaust our available capital resources sooner than we expect. Because of the numerous risks and uncertainties associated with therapeutic product development, we may never achieve or maintain profitability and, unless and until we are able to commercialize our product candidates, if ever, we will continue to be dependent upon equity financing, debt financing, and other forms of capital raises. If we are unable to raise capital as and when needed or on attractive terms, we may have to significantly delay, reduce, or discontinue the development and commercialization of our product candidates or scale back or terminate our pursuit of new in-licenses and acquisitions.

Future Funding Requirements

Our primary uses of cash are to fund our operations, which consist primarily of research and development expenditures related to our programs and, to a lesser extent, general and administrative expenditures. We are subject to all of the risks typically related to the development of new drug candidates, and we may encounter unforeseen expenses, difficulties, complications, delays and other unknown factors that may adversely affect our business. For example, although we committed to implementing the Restructuring Plan, we may not achieve the expected cost preservation benefits of the Restructuring Plan on the expected timeline, or at all, and we could otherwise consume capital more rapidly than we currently anticipate.

Cash used to fund operating expenses is impacted by the timing of when we pay these expenses, as reflected in the change in our outstanding accounts payable, accrued expenses, and prepaid expenses.

Table of Contents

Our future funding requirements will depend on many factors, including the following:

•the timing, scope, progress and results of our preclinical studies and clinical trials for our current and future product candidates;

•the number, scope and duration of clinical trials required for regulatory approval of our current and future product candidates;

•the outcome, timing and cost of seeking and obtaining regulatory approvals from the FDA and comparable foreign regulatory authorities for our product candidates, including any requirement to (and/or as a result of negative or inconclusive clinical trial results for any of our product candidates) conduct more studies or generate additional data beyond that which we currently expect would be required to support a Biologic License Application (“BLA”);

•the costs associated with the Restructuring Plan and associated workforce reduction;

•the cost of manufacturing clinical and commercial supplies as well as scale up of our current and future product candidates;

•the increase in the number of our employees and expansion of our physical facilities to support growth initiatives;

•our ability to maintain existing, and establish new, strategic collaborations, licensing or other arrangements, including our license and collaboration agreements with Affibody and Pierre Fabre, and the financial terms of any such agreements, including the timing and amount of any future milestone, royalty or other payments due under any such agreement;

•the cost of filing and prosecuting our patent applications, and maintaining and enforcing our patents and other intellectual property rights;

•the extent to which we acquire or in-license other product candidates and technologies;

•the cost of defending intellectual property disputes, including patent infringement actions brought by third parties against our product candidates;

•the effect of competing technological and market developments;

•the costs and timing of future commercialization activities, including product manufacturing, marketing, sales and distribution, for any of our product candidates for which we receive marketing approval;

•the amount of revenue, if any, received from commercial sales of our product candidates, should any of our product candidates receive marketing approval;

•our implementation of various computerized informational systems and efforts to enhance operational systems;

•expenses and potential liabilities associated with the pending purported class action securities lawsuit;

•the costs associated with being a public company;

•the impacts of negative macroeconomic trends, such as high rates of inflation, global supply chain disruptions and geopolitical instability, which may exacerbate the magnitude of the factors discussed above; and

•the consummation of the Merger.

Furthermore, our operating plans may change, and we may need additional funds to meet operational needs and capital requirements for clinical trials and other research and development expenditures.

Table of Contents

If we fail to close the Merger, then until such time as we can generate significant revenue from product sales, if ever, we expect to finance our operations through public or private equity or debt financings, or potentially other capital sources, such as collaboration or licensing arrangements with third parties or other strategic transactions. There are no assurances that we will be successful in obtaining an adequate level of financing to support our business plans when needed on acceptable terms, or at all. In addition, we may seek additional capital due to market conditions or strategic considerations even if we believe we have sufficient funds for our current or future operating plans. To the extent that we raise additional capital through the sale of equity or convertible debt securities, the ownership interest of our stockholders will be or could be diluted, and the terms of these securities may include liquidation or other preferences that adversely affect the rights of our common stockholders. Debt financing and equity financing, if available, may involve agreements that include covenants limiting or restricting our ability to take specific actions, such as incurring additional debt, making capital expenditures or declaring dividends. If we raise additional funds through collaboration or licensing arrangements with third parties or other strategic transactions, we may have to relinquish rights to our intellectual property, future revenue streams, research programs, or product candidates or grant licenses on terms that may not be favorable to us. Our ability to raise additional funds and the terms upon which we are able to raise such funds may be adversely impacted by the Restructuring Plan and our decision to focus our resources primarily on lonigutamab in TED, by the pendency of the Merger and/or by future clinical trial outcomes and general economic and market conditions. As a result of these and other factors, we cannot be certain that additional funding will be available on acceptable terms, or at all. If we are unable to raise capital as and when needed or on attractive terms, we may have to significantly delay, reduce, or discontinue the development and commercialization of our product candidates or scale back or terminate our pursuit of new in-licenses and acquisitions.

Cash Flows

The following summarizes our cash flows for the periods indicated (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2025		2024
Net cash used in operating activities	$	(38,955)	$	(57,299)
Net cash provided by investing activities	23,331		100,896
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities	5		2,807
Net increase in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash	$	(15,619)	$	46,404

Operating Activities

Net cash used in operating activities was $39.0 million and $57.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025 and March 31, 2024, respectively.

Cash used in operating activities in the three months ended March 31, 2025 was primarily due to our net loss for the period of $55.3 million. Adjustments to net loss for non-cash items include $4.2 million related to stock-based compensation expense, $2.9 million for the impairment of long lived assets, $0.3 million in non-cash lease expense and $0.1 million in depreciation and amortization expense, partially offset by $1.6 million related to an amortization of premiums and discounts on short-term marketable securities. The changes in operating assets and liabilities of $10.4 million include a decrease of $14.2 million in prepaid expenses and other assets, current and an increase of $5.0 million in accounts payable, partially offset by a decrease of $6.3 million in accrued research and development expenses, a decrease of $1.0 million in accrued compensation and other current liabilities, a decrease of $1.0 million in severance liability and a decrease of $0.4 million in lease liability. Cash used in operating activities in the three months ended March 31, 2025 includes payments of $2.2 million for Merger related legal, banker, consulting and other professional fees.

Cash used in operating activities in the three months ended March 31, 2024 was primarily due to our net loss for the period of $35.0 million, of which $7.0 million is presented as cash used in investing activities as it related to a payment received for a sale of an asset. Adjustments to net loss for non-cash items included $20.2 million related to stock-based compensation expense and $5.4 million gain related to an amortization of premiums and discounts on short-term marketable securities. The changes in operating assets and liabilities of $30.2 million include a decrease of $31.9 million in accounts payable and a $2.7 million decrease in accrued compensation and other current liabilities, partially offset by an increase of $2.1 million in accrued research and development expenses and an increase of $2.5 million in prepaid expenses and other assets, non-current. The increase in accrued research and development expenses and accounts payable were primarily due to costs associated with the development of izokibep and lonigutamab.

Table of Contents

Investing Activities

Cash provided by investing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2025 of $23.3 million related to $162.5 million of maturities and sales of short-term marketable securities partially offset by purchases of $139.2 million of short-term marketable securities.

Financing Activities

Cash provided by financing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2025 was less than $0.1 million, from the proceeds from the exercise of common stock options.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

See Note 2 to our condensed consolidated financial statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for more information regarding recently issued accounting pronouncements.

Critical Accounting Policies and Significant Judgments and Estimates

A summary of critical accounting policies, significant judgments and estimates are disclosed in Note 2 of the notes to the audited consolidated financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024.

Emerging Growth Company Status

We are an emerging growth company, as defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012 (the “JOBS Act”). Under the JOBS Act, emerging growth companies can delay adopting new or revised accounting standards issued subsequent to the enactment of the JOBS Act until such time as those standards apply to private companies. We have elected to use this extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards that have different effective dates for public and private companies until the earlier of the date that we (a) are no longer an emerging growth company or (b) affirmatively and irrevocably opt out of the extended transition period provided in the JOBS Act. As a result, our condensed consolidated financial statements may not be comparable to those of companies that comply with the new or revised accounting pronouncements as of public company effective dates. We may choose to early adopt any new or revised accounting standards whenever such early adoption is permitted for private companies.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act and are not required to provide the information required under this item.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our management, with the participation and supervision of our Chief Executive Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of March 31, 2025, the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to a company’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Based on her evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer has concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level as of March 31, 2025.

Table of Contents

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation required by Rule 13a-15(d) and 15d-15(d) of the Exchange Act that occurred during the most recent fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2025 that materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Limitations on the Effectiveness of Controls

In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable not absolute, assurance of achieving the desired control objectives. In addition, the design of disclosure controls and procedures must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints and the benefits of controls and procedures must be considered relative to their costs.

Table of Contents

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

On November 15, 2023, a purported federal securities class action lawsuit was commenced in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. On February 15, 2024, the Court appointed joint lead plaintiffs and lead counsel. An amended complaint was filed on March 26, 2024 (Boukadoum v. Acelyrin, Inc. et al., No. 2:23-cv-09672-FMO-MAA), naming us and current and former executive officers and directors as defendants. The complaint alleges that the defendants violated the Exchange Act and Securities Act by misleading investors about the Phase 2b trial of izokibep in HS. The original complaint was filed following our announcement of the week 16 results from the Part B portion of such Phase 2b trial. The amended complaint seeks damages and an award of reasonable costs and expenses, including attorneys' fees, expert fees and other costs, as well as such other and further relief as the court may deem just and proper. On May 3, 2024, defendants filed their motion to dismiss the amended complaint, which remains pending. It is possible that additional suits will be filed, or allegations made by stockholders, with respect to these same or other matters and also naming us and/or our officers and directors as defendants. This lawsuit and any other potential lawsuits are subject to inherent uncertainties, and the actual defense and disposition costs will depend upon many unknown factors. We could be forced to expend significant resources in the defense against this and any other related lawsuits and we may not prevail.

On April 22, 2025, Richard Lawrence, a purported stockholder of the Company, filed a complaint in the Supreme Court of the State of New York against us and the individual members of the Board, captioned Lawrence v. Acelyrin, Inc., et al. (the “Lawrence Complaint”). The Lawrence Complaint alleges, among other things, claims of negligent misrepresentation and concealment and negligence against us and the members of the Board under New York common law in connection with alleged failures to disclose certain supposedly material information regarding the Merger in the Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed by us on April 4, 2025 in connection with the Merger (the “Proxy Statement”). The Lawrence Complaint seeks, among other things, an order enjoining the defendants from consummating the Merger; revisions to the Proxy Statement; rescission of the Merger if it has already been consummated or actual and punitive damages; and an award of plaintiff’s costs, including reasonable allowance for attorneys’ and experts’ fees and expenses.

On April 23, 2025, Michael Kent, a purported stockholder of the Company, filed a complaint in the Supreme Court of the State of New York against us and the individual members of the Board, captioned Kent v. Acelyrin, Inc., et al. (the “Kent Complaint”). The Kent Complaint alleges, among other things, claims of negligent misrepresentation and concealment and negligence against us and the members of the Board under New York common law in connection with alleged failures to disclose certain supposedly material information regarding the Merger in the Proxy Statement. The Kent Complaint seeks, among other things, an order enjoining the defendants from consummating the Merger; revisions to the Proxy Statement; rescission of the Merger if it has already been consummated or actual and punitive damages; and an award of plaintiff’s costs, including reasonable allowance for attorneys’ and experts’ fees and expenses.

We have also received certain demand letters from purported stockholders of the Company making similar assertions as the foregoing complaints (the “Letters”). Additional lawsuits may be filed against us, the Board, and Alumis in connection with the Merger Agreement and the Proxy Statement.

From time to time, we may become involved in additional legal proceedings or be subject to claims arising in the ordinary course of our business. Regardless of outcome, such additional proceedings or claims could have an adverse impact on us because of defense and settlement costs, diversion of resources, and other factors, and there can be no assurances that favorable outcomes will be obtained.

Table of Contents

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. Before deciding to invest in shares of our common stock, you should carefully consider the risks described below, together with the other information contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, including in the section titled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and in our audited financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. We cannot assure you that any of the events discussed below will not occur. These events could adversely impact our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects. If that were to happen, the trading price of our common stock could decline, and you could lose all or part of your investment.

SUMMARY RISK FACTORS

Below is a summary of material factors that make an investment in our securities speculative or risky. Importantly, this summary does not address all of the risks that we face. Additional discussion of the risks and uncertainties summarized in this risk factor summary, as well as other risks that we face, follows this summary. This summary is qualified in its entirety by that more complete discussion of such risks and uncertainties.

•The Merger is subject to various closing conditions, including governmental approvals, and other uncertainties and there can be no assurances as to whether or when it may be completed.

•If the Merger Agreement is terminated, we may, under certain circumstances, be obligated to pay a termination fee to Alumis and these costs could require us to use available cash that would have otherwise been available for general corporate purposes.

•While the Merger is pending, we are subject to business uncertainties and contractual restrictions that could materially and adversely affect our operations, the development of our product candidates and the future of our business or result in a loss of employees.

•We are a clinical stage biopharma company with a limited operating history, no products approved for commercial sale, have incurred substantial losses since our inception and anticipate incurring substantial and increasing losses for the foreseeable future.

•Preclinical and clinical development involves a lengthy and expensive process, with an uncertain outcome, and results of earlier studies and trials may not be predictive of future trial results. We may incur additional costs or experience delays in completing, or ultimately be unable to complete, the development and commercialization of our current product candidates or any future product candidates.

•We will require substantial additional financing to achieve our goals and failure to obtain additional capital when needed, or on acceptable terms to us, could cause us to delay, limit, reduce, or terminate our product development or future commercialization efforts.

•Our clinical trials may reveal significant adverse events not seen in our preclinical studies or prior clinical trials and may result in a safety or tolerability profile that could delay or prevent regulatory approval or market acceptance of our product candidates.

•We face competition from entities that have made substantial investments into the rapid development of novel treatments for immunological indications, including large and specialty pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, many of which already have approved therapies and/or product candidates under development, in our current indications.

•Our business depends entirely on the success of our product candidates and we cannot guarantee that any or all of our product candidates will successfully complete development, receive regulatory approval, or be successfully commercialized. If we are unable to develop, receive regulatory approval for, and ultimately successfully commercialize our product candidates, or experience significant delays in doing so, our business will be materially harmed.

•We plan to focus our resources primarily on the development of lonigutamab for the treatment of TED and accordingly, our future success, including our ability to finance our business, may be substantially dependent on our ability to successfully develop and commercialize lonigutamab in such indication. Our decision to focus

Table of Contents

our resources and existing capital on lonigutamab for the treatment of TED may be unsuccessful and may never lead to the development of a viable commercial product.

•Our ongoing and planned clinical trials, even if successfully completed, may not be sufficient for approval of our product candidate for the applicable indication.

•If the Merger is not completed, we may engage in strategic transactions in the future, which could impact our liquidity, increase our expenses and present significant distractions to our management.

•We previously identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting. If we identify additional material weaknesses in the future or otherwise fail to maintain effective internal control over financial reporting in the future, we may not be able to accurately or timely report our financial condition or results of operations, which may adversely affect investor confidence in us and, as a result, the value of our common stock.

•If we are unable to obtain and maintain sufficient intellectual property protection for our product candidates and any future product candidates we may develop, or if the scope of the intellectual property protection obtained is not sufficiently broad, our competitors or other third parties could develop and commercialize products similar or identical to ours, and our ability to successfully develop and commercialize our product candidates may be adversely affected.

•Even if we receive regulatory approval for any of our product candidates, we will be subject to ongoing regulatory obligations and continued regulatory review, which may result in significant additional expense. Additionally, our product candidates, if approved, could be subject to labeling and other restrictions and market withdrawal. We may also be subject to penalties if we fail to comply with regulatory requirements or experience unanticipated problems with our product candidates.

•We may have conflicts with our current or future licensors or collaborators that could delay or prevent the development or commercialization of our product candidates.

•We have been named a defendant in a purported securities class action lawsuit. This could result in substantial damages or other expenses, and could divert management’s time and attention from our business.

Risks Related to the Merger

The Merger is subject to various closing conditions, including governmental approvals, and other uncertainties and there can be no assurances as to whether or when it may be completed.

On February 6, 2025, we entered into the Merger Agreement with Alumis and Merger Sub, subsequently amended on April 20, 2025. The consummation of the Merger is subject to customary closing conditions and a number of the conditions are not within our control, and may prevent, delay or otherwise materially adversely affect the completion of the transaction. These conditions include, among other things, (i) authorization for listing on The Nasdaq Stock Market of the shares of voting common stock of Alumis, par value $0.0001 per share, to be issued to our stockholders pursuant to the Merger Agreement, and (ii) the absence of any law, judgment, order, injunction, ruling, writ award or decree by any governmental entity of competent jurisdiction restraining, enjoining or otherwise prohibiting the consummation of the Merger. It is also possible that a change, event, fact, effect or circumstance could occur that could lead to a material adverse effect to us, which may give Alumis the ability to not complete the Merger. We cannot predict with certainty whether and when the required closing conditions that have not yet been satisfied will be satisfied or if another uncertainty may arise.

If an event occurs delaying or preventing the Merger, such delay or failure to complete the Merger may cause uncertainty or other negative consequences that may materially and adversely affect our financial performance and operating results, and the price per share for our common stock and perceived acquisition value.

Further, we and our directors and Alumis and its directors could become subject to lawsuits that may be filed relating to the Merger. Two putative shareholder lawsuits have been filed by our shareholders challenging the disclosures made in connection with the Merger. The lawsuits seek to enjoin the Merger, to recover damages if the Merger is consummated, attorneys’ fees, and other relief. Additional lawsuits arising out of the Merger may be filed in the future.

Table of Contents

While we intend to defend against any such actions vigorously, the costs of the defense of such lawsuits and other effects of such litigation could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results.

If the Merger Agreement is terminated, we may, under certain circumstances, be obligated to pay a termination fee to Alumis and these costs could require us to use available cash that would have otherwise been available for general corporate purposes.

If the Merger Agreement is terminated, in certain circumstances, including in the event of a termination by us in order to accept a Company Superior Proposal, as defined in the Merger Agreement, we would be required to pay Alumis a termination fee of $10,000,000. If the Merger Agreement is terminated, the termination fee we may be required to pay, if any, under the Merger Agreement may require us to use available cash that would have otherwise been available for general corporate purposes. Further, if the Merger Agreement is terminated, we may be subject to various legal proceedings, whether brought by Alumis or other parties alleging a breach by us of the Merger Agreement or for other reasons, which could result in unanticipated rulings or our entry into settlements. In addition, the failure to complete the Merger may negatively impact our ability to raise additional funds on acceptable terms, or at all. For these and other reasons, a failed Merger could materially and adversely affect our business, operating results or financial condition, which in turn would materially and adversely affect our business or financial condition, the price per share of our common stock or our perceived acquisition value.

While the Merger is pending, we are subject to business uncertainties and contractual restrictions that could materially adversely affect our operations, the development of our product candidates and the future of our business or result in a loss of employees.

The Merger Agreement includes restrictions on the conduct of our business prior to the completion of the Merger, generally requiring us to conduct our business in the ordinary course, consistent with past practice, and subjecting us to a variety of specified limitations absent Alumis’ prior written consent. In particular, we have agreed to delay initiation of our Phase 3 LONGITUDE program for lonigutamab until the closing of the Merger. We may find that these and other contractual arrangements in the Merger Agreement may delay or prevent us from or limit our ability to respond effectively to competitive pressures, industry developments and future business opportunities that may arise during such period, even if our management and board of directors think they may be advisable. A delayed initiation of our Phase 3 LONGITUDE trial for lonigutamab may cause further delays if the new trial timing requires further negotiation or revising of agreements with our expected CROs, clinical trial sites and other third parties necessary to conduct such trials. Any delay in trial initiation would also be expected to result in delays to clinical data read-outs and potential commercialization of lonigutamab. The pendency of the Merger may also divert management’s attention and our resources from ongoing business and operations. Our employees and partners may have uncertainties about the effects of the Merger. Similarly, current and prospective employees may experience uncertainty about their future roles with us following completion of the Merger, which may materially adversely affect our ability to attract and retain key employees. If any of these effects were to occur, it could materially and adversely impact our revenues, earnings and cash flows and other business results and financial condition, as well as the market price of our common stock and our perceived acquisition value, regardless of whether the Merger is completed. In addition, whether or not the Merger is completed, while it is pending we will continue to incur costs, fees, expenses and charges related to the proposed Merger, which may materially and adversely affect our business results and financial condition.

Risks Related to Our Financial Position and Need for Capital

We are a clinical stage biopharma company with a limited operating history, no products approved for commercial sale, have incurred substantial losses since our inception and anticipate incurring substantial and increasing losses for the foreseeable future.

We are a clinical stage biopharma company with a limited operating history. We have no product candidates approved for commercial sale and have not generated any revenue. Biopharmaceutical product development is a highly speculative undertaking. It entails substantial upfront capital expenditures and significant risk that any product candidate will fail to demonstrate adequate efficacy or an acceptable safety profile, gain regulatory approval or become commercially viable.

We have and will continue to incur significant development and other expenses related to our clinical development and ongoing operations. Our net loss for the three months ended March 31, 2025, and 2024 was $55.3 million and $35.0 million, respectively. As of March 31, 2025, we had an accumulated deficit of $792.2 million. Substantially all of our

Table of Contents

losses have resulted from expenses incurred in connection with the acquisition and development of our pipeline and from general and administrative costs associated with our operations. We expect to incur significant losses for the foreseeable future, and we expect these losses to increase as we continue our development of our product candidates.

We anticipate that our expenses will increase substantially if, and as, we:

•conduct further preclinical or clinical trials for our product candidates;

•identify additional product candidates and acquire rights from third parties to those product candidates through licenses or other acquisitions, and conduct development activities, including preclinical studies and clinical trials;

•procure the manufacturing of preclinical, clinical and commercial supply of our current or any future product candidates;

•seek regulatory approvals for our current or any future product candidates;

•commercialize our current or any future product candidates, if approved;

•take steps toward our goal of being an integrated biopharma company capable of supporting commercial activities, including establishing sales, marketing and distribution infrastructure;

•attract, hire and retain qualified clinical, scientific, operations and management personnel;

•add and maintain operational, financial and information management systems;

•protect, maintain, enforce and defend our rights in our intellectual property portfolio;

•defend against third-party interference, infringement and other intellectual property claims, if any;

•address any competing therapies and market developments;

•experience any delays in our preclinical studies or clinical trials and regulatory approval for our product candidates due to the impacts of negative macroeconomic trends, such as high rates of inflation, geopolitical instability and war; and

•incur costs associated with operating as a public company.

Even if we succeed in commercializing one or more product candidates, we expect to incur substantial development costs and other expenditures to develop and market additional product candidates. We may also encounter unforeseen expenses, difficulties, complications, delays and other unknown factors that may adversely affect our business. The size of our future net losses will depend, in part, on the rate of future growth of our expenses and our ability to generate revenue or raise additional capital. Our prior losses and expected future losses have had and will continue to have an adverse effect on our stockholders’ equity and our working capital.

Preclinical and clinical development involves a lengthy and expensive process, with an uncertain outcome, and results of earlier studies and trials may not be predictive of future trial results. We may incur additional costs or experience delays in completing, or ultimately be unable to complete, the development and commercialization of our current product candidates or any future product candidates.

Investment in drug development is a highly speculative undertaking and the risk of our product candidates’ failure to continue in development, and ultimately be commercialized, is high. In 2024, we stopped further development of izokibep in HS, PsA, AxSpA and uveitis and SLRN-517 in chronic urticaria. It is impossible to predict when or if any of our product candidates will receive regulatory approval. To obtain the requisite regulatory approvals to commercialize any product candidates, we must demonstrate through preclinical studies and lengthy, complex and expensive clinical trials that our product candidates are safe and effective in humans. Clinical testing can take many years to complete, and its outcome is inherently uncertain. The results of preclinical studies and early clinical trials of our product candidates may not be predictive of the results of later-stage clinical trials. For example, despite encouraging results from the open-label Part A of our Phase 2b trial of izokibep in HS, the primary endpoint of HiSCR75 at week 16 did not meet statistical significance in

Table of Contents

the Part B portion of such trial. This result significantly harmed our stock price and investor perceptions of the prospects for izokibep in HS. Similarly, our Phase 2b/3 trial of izokibep in uveitis failed to meet the primary endpoint or any secondary endpoint. Moreover, although the results from our Phase 3 clinical trial of izokibep in HS we announced in August 2024 were positive, we made a strategic capital allocation decision, implemented the Restructuring Plan and suspended new internal investment in the development of izokibep in HS, PsA and AxSpA. Our clinical trials are subject to significant risk factors that can have a material and negative impact on outcomes, many of which are beyond our control. Such factors include unexpectedly high placebo rates and patient responder discontinuations unrelated to adverse events, both of which we observed in our Phase 2b trial of izokibep in HS, safety limitations and/or tolerability concerns. Other factors that can impact our clinical trial results include, without limitation, patient baseline demographics, clinical protocol adherence, physician and patient scored outcome measures, among others. Any such negative impacts could materially and adversely affect our business, development, regulatory approval and commercialization prospects of our product candidates. In addition, differences in trial design make it difficult to extrapolate the results of earlier clinical trials to later clinical trials. A number of companies in the biopharmaceutical industry, including us, have suffered significant setbacks in advanced clinical trials due to lack of efficacy or unfavorable safety profiles, notwithstanding promising results in earlier trials such as the promising results from the open-label Part A of our Phase 2b trial of izokibep in HS. In addition, results in one indication may not be predictive of results for the same product candidate in another indication. Moreover, clinical data are often susceptible to varying interpretations and analyses, and many companies that have believed their product candidates performed satisfactorily in clinical trials have nonetheless failed to obtain marketing approval of such product candidates. We may be unable to establish clinical endpoints that applicable regulatory authorities would consider clinically meaningful. Commencing any future clinical trials is subject to finalizing the trial design and submitting an application to the FDA or a similar foreign regulatory authority. Even after we make our submission, the FDA or other regulatory authorities could disagree that we have satisfied their requirements or disagree with our study design, which may require us to complete additional trials, amend our protocols or impose stricter conditions on the commencement of clinical trials. There is typically a high rate of failure of product candidates proceeding through clinical trials, and failure can occur at any time. Most product candidates that commence clinical trials are never approved as products and there can be no assurance that any of our current or future clinical trials will ultimately be successful or support the approval of our current or any future product candidates.

We expect to continue to rely in part on our collaborators, CROs and clinical trial sites to ensure the proper and timely conduct of our clinical trials, including the participant enrollment process, and we have limited influence over their performance. We or our collaborators may experience delays in initiating or completing clinical trials due to unforeseen events or otherwise, that could delay or prevent our ability to receive marketing approval or commercialize our current and any future product candidates, including:

•regulators, such as the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory agencies, Institutional Review Boards (“IRBs”), or ethics committees may impose additional requirements before permitting us to initiate a clinical trial, may not authorize us or our investigators to commence or conduct a clinical trial at a prospective trial site, may not allow us to amend trial protocols, or may require that we modify or amend our clinical trial protocols;

•we may experience delays in reaching, or fail to reach, agreement on acceptable terms with trial sites and CROs, the terms of which can be subject to extensive negotiation and may vary significantly;

•clinical trial sites deviating from trial protocol or dropping out of a trial;

•the number of participants required for clinical trials may be larger, enrollment in clinical trials may be slower or participants may drop out or fail to return for post-treatment follow-up, in each case at a higher rate than we anticipate (as we experienced with respect to participant discontinuations in each of our Phase 2b trial and our Phase 3 trial of izokibep in HS);

•the cost of clinical trials may be greater than we anticipate, or we may have insufficient funds for a clinical trial or to pay the substantial user fees required by the FDA upon the submission of a BLA;

•the quality or quantity of data relating to our product candidates or other materials necessary to conduct our clinical trials may be inadequate to initiate or complete a given clinical trial or support marketing approval;

•reports from clinical testing of other therapies may raise safety, tolerability or efficacy concerns about our product candidates; and

Table of Contents

•clinical trials of our product candidates may fail to show appropriate safety, tolerability or efficacy, may produce negative or inconclusive results, or may otherwise fail to improve on the existing standard of care, and we may decide, or regulators may require us, to conduct additional clinical trials or abandon product development programs.

Participant enrollment, a significant factor in the timing of clinical trials, is affected by many conditions including the size and nature of the patient population, the number and location of clinical sites we enroll, the proximity of participants to clinical sites, the eligibility and exclusion criteria and overall design of the clinical trial, the inability to obtain and maintain participant consents, the ongoing risk that enrolled participants will drop out before completion, competing clinical trials and clinicians’ and patients’ perceptions as to the potential advantages of the product candidate being studied in relation to other available therapies. Risks related to patient enrollment are heightened in longer clinical trials. In addition, our clinical trials will compete with other clinical trials for product candidates that are in the same areas as our product candidates, and this competition may reduce the number and types of participants available to us. Indication sizes and related disease prevalence may also factor into enrollment. We may experience slower enrollment than anticipated in our trials, which could impact our development timelines, our costs, or other factors. For example, we announced top-line results in our Phase 2b/3 trial in uveitis in December 2024 versus mid-2024 as initially anticipated due to slower enrollment.

Participants, including in any control groups, may withdraw from the clinical trial if they are not experiencing improvement in their underlying disease or condition or if they experience other difficulties or issues. Participants may also withdraw from the clinical trial if they experience improvement in their underlying manifestations of disease, and determine that further treatment is not necessary or unduly burdensome relative to their experienced improvement. Additionally, we could encounter delays if treating clinicians encounter unresolved ethical issues associated with enrolling participants in clinical trials of our product candidates in lieu of prescribing existing treatments that have established safety and efficacy profiles. Even if we are able to enroll a sufficient number of participants in our clinical trials, delays in enrollment or small population size may result in increased costs or may affect the timing or outcome of our clinical trials. We have experienced and expect to continue to experience participant withdrawals or discontinuations from our trials. Such withdrawals may compromise the quality of our data or contribute to negative or inconclusive results from trials, as we experienced in the week 16 Part B results of our Phase 2b trial of izokibep in HS. Any of these conditions may negatively impact our ability to successfully complete such trials and/or include results from such trials in regulatory submissions, which could adversely affect our ability to advance the development of our product candidates in a timely and cost-efficient manner, or at all.

We could also encounter delays if a clinical trial is suspended, put on clinical hold or terminated by us, IRBs, or regulatory authorities, or if a clinical trial is recommended for suspension or termination by its applicable Data Safety Monitoring Board (“DSMB”). A suspension or termination may be imposed due to a number of factors, including failure to conduct the clinical trial in accordance with applicable regulatory requirements, guidelines or clinical protocols; failure by CROs to perform in accordance with Good Clinical Practice (“GCP”) requirements; inspection of the clinical trial operations or trial site by the FDA, EMA or other regulatory authorities resulting in the imposition of a clinical hold, unforeseen safety issues or adverse side effects; failure to establish or achieve clinically meaningful trial endpoints; changes in governmental regulations or administrative actions; or lack of adequate funding to continue the clinical trial. Clinical trials may also be delayed or terminated as a result of inconclusive or negative interim results. Many of the factors that cause, or lead to, a delay in the commencement or completion of clinical trials may also ultimately lead to the denial of regulatory approval of our product candidates. Further, the FDA, EMA or other regulatory authorities may disagree with our clinical trial design and our interpretation of data from clinical trials, or may change the requirements for approval even after they have reviewed and commented on the design for our clinical trials.

We may also conduct preclinical and clinical research in collaboration with other academic, pharmaceutical and biotechnology entities. Such collaborations may be subject to additional delays because of the management of the trials, contract negotiations, the need to obtain agreement from multiple parties and may increase our costs and expenses.

Our development costs will increase if we experience delays or other modifications in clinical testing including, but not limited to, required or desired trial population sizes and/or the number of clinical studies required to be conducted to obtain relevant health authority approvals. We do not know whether any of our clinical trials will begin as planned, will need to be restructured or will be completed on schedule, or at all. Significant clinical trial delays also could impact our ability to seek regulatory approval, and/or shorten any periods during which we may have the exclusive right to commercialize our product candidates and may allow our competitors to bring products to market before we do, potentially

Table of Contents

impairing our ability to successfully commercialize our product candidates. Any delays in, halts to, or increase in costs in, our clinical development programs may harm our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

We will require substantial additional financing to achieve our goals and failure to obtain additional capital when needed, or on acceptable terms to us, could cause us to delay, limit, reduce, or terminate our product development or commercialization efforts.

Until such time, if ever, as we can generate substantial product revenue, we expect to finance our cash needs through equity offerings, debt financings, or other capital sources, including potential collaborations, licenses and other similar arrangements. To the extent that we raise additional capital through the sale of equity or convertible debt securities, ownership interests will be diluted, and the terms of these securities may include liquidation or other preferences that adversely affect the rights of our common stockholders. Any future debt financing and preferred equity financing, if available, may involve agreements that include covenants limiting or restricting our ability to take specific actions, such as incurring additional debt, selling or licensing our assets, making capital expenditures, declaring dividends or encumbering our assets to secure future indebtedness. Such restrictions could adversely impact our ability to conduct our operations and execute our business plan.

If we raise additional funds through future collaborations, licenses and other similar arrangements, we may have to relinquish valuable rights to our future revenue streams or product candidates, or grant licenses on terms that may not be favorable to us and/or that may reduce the value of our common stock. Our ability to raise additional funds and the terms upon which we are able to raise such funds may be adversely impacted by the pendency of the Merger, and/or by future clinical trial outcomes and general economic and market conditions. As a result of these and other factors, we cannot be certain that additional funding will be available on acceptable terms, or at all. In addition, delays in financings or limited access to capital may impact the scope, timing and ability to conduct all planned clinical development activities, which could materially and adversely affect our business, operations and financial condition. In any event, if we are unable to raise additional funds through equity or debt financings or other arrangements when needed or on terms acceptable to us, we would be required to delay, limit, reduce, or terminate our product development or commercialization efforts or grant rights to develop and market product candidates that we would otherwise prefer to develop and market ourselves.

Risks Related to Product Candidate Development and Commercialization

Our clinical trials may reveal significant adverse events not seen in our preclinical studies or prior clinical trials and may result in a safety or tolerability profile that could delay or prevent regulatory approval or market acceptance of our product candidates.

Undesirable or clinically unmanageable side effects observed in our clinical trials for our product candidates could occur and cause us or regulatory authorities to interrupt, delay or halt our clinical trials and could result in a more restrictive label or the delay or denial of marketing approval by the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities. We believe there is an unmet patient need to improve on the safety and side-effect profile of the sole currently approved therapy in the United States for the treatment of TED. If our product candidate lonigutamab is shown to have similar adverse events or side effects as the existing therapy, or other safety or tolerability concerns, such as hearing impairment, then our opportunity to disrupt the current standard of care will be limited. We observed certain adverse events in our ongoing Phase 2 clinical trial of lonigutamab including, without limitation, headache, tinnitus and injection site reactions. We also observed certain adverse events and serious adverse events (“SAEs”) in our clinical trials of izokibep, some of which were determined to be drug-related by the principal investigator, and/or led to trial discontinuation including, without limitation, injection site reactions, infections such as nasopharyngitis, and inflammatory bowel disease. Additional adverse events and SAEs may continue to emerge in our ongoing and future clinical trials.

If additional adverse events, SAEs or other side effects are observed in any of our clinical trials that are atypical of, or more severe than, the known side effects of the respective class of agents that each of our product candidates are a part of, we may have difficulty recruiting participants to our clinical trials, participants may drop out of our trials, or we may be required to abandon those trials or our development efforts of one or more product candidates altogether. For example, certain participants withdrew from our trials of izokibep in PsA and HS due to SAEs, including without limitation adverse events such as injection site reactions and erythema. While we believe that certain side effects could be reversible with sufficient recovery periods, we will need to monitor the severity and duration of side effects in our clinical trials. If such effects are more severe, less reversible than we expect or not reversible at all, we may decide or be required to perform additional studies or to halt or delay further clinical development of any of our product candidates which could result in the delay or denial of regulatory approval by the FDA or other regulatory authorities.

Table of Contents

We believe that one of the benefits of lonigutamab is its potential to improve on the safety and side-effect profile of the sole currently approved therapy in the United States for the treatment of TED. If lonigutamab is shown to have similar adverse events, side effects, or other safety or tolerability concerns, such as hearing impairment, then our opportunity to disrupt the current standard of care will be limited. Adverse events and SAEs that emerge during clinical investigation of or treatment with our product candidates or any future product candidates may be deemed to be related to our product candidates. This may require longer and more extensive clinical development, or regulatory authorities may increase the amount of data and information required to approve, market, or maintain any product candidate and could result in warnings and precautions in our product labeling or a restrictive risk evaluation and mitigation strategy (“REMS”). This may also result in an inability to obtain approval of any product candidate. We, the FDA, EMA or other applicable regulatory authorities, or an IRB, may suspend clinical trials of a product candidate at any time for various reasons, including a belief that participants in such trials are being exposed to unacceptable health risks or adverse side effects. Some potential product candidates developed in the biotechnology industry that initially showed promise in early-stage trials have later been found to cause side effects that prevented their further development. Even if the side effects do not preclude the product candidate from obtaining or maintaining marketing approval, undesirable side effects, like those mentioned above, may inhibit market acceptance of the approved product due to its tolerability versus other therapies. Any of these developments could materially harm our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Interim, initial, “top-line” and preliminary data from our clinical trials that we announce or publish from time to time may change as more patient data become available and are subject to audit and verification procedures that could result in material changes in the final data.

From time to time, we publicly disclose preliminary or top-line data from our preclinical studies and clinical trials, which are based on preliminary analyses of then-available data, and the results and related findings and conclusions are subject to change following a more comprehensive review of the data related to the particular preclinical study or clinical trial. We also make assumptions, estimations, calculations and conclusions as part of our analyses of data, and we may not have received or had the opportunity to fully and carefully evaluate all data. As a result, the top-line or preliminary results that we report may differ from future results of the same studies or trials, or different conclusions or considerations may qualify such results, once additional data have been received and fully evaluated. Top-line data also remain subject to audit and verification procedures that may result in the final data being materially different from the preliminary data we previously published. As a result, top-line data should be viewed with caution until the final data are available.

From time to time, we may also disclose interim data from our preclinical studies and clinical trials. Interim data from clinical trials that we may complete are subject to the risk that one or more of the clinical outcomes may materially change as participants’ enrollment continues and more participants’ data become available or as participants from our clinical trials continue other treatments for their disease. Adverse differences between interim data and final data could significantly harm our business prospects.

Further, others, including regulatory agencies, may not accept or agree with our assumptions, estimates, calculations, conclusions or analyses or may interpret or weigh the importance of data differently, which could impact the value of the particular program, the approvability or commercialization of the particular product candidate and could adversely affect the success of our business. In addition, the information we choose to publicly disclose regarding a particular study or clinical trial is based on what is typically extensive information, and you or others may not agree with what we determine is material or otherwise appropriate information to include in our disclosure.

If the interim, top-line or preliminary data that we report differ from actual results, or if others, including regulatory authorities, disagree with the conclusions reached, our ability to obtain approval for, and commercialize, our product candidates may be harmed, which could harm our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects. Further, disclosure of interim, top-line or preliminary data by us or by our competitors could result in volatility in the price of our common stock.

Furthermore, if we fail to replicate the positive results from our preclinical studies or clinical trials in our future clinical trials, we may be unable to successfully develop, obtain regulatory approval for and commercialize our current or future product candidates.

We may expend our limited resources to pursue a particular product candidate in specific indications and fail to capitalize on product candidates or indications that may be more profitable or for which there is a greater likelihood of success.

Table of Contents

Because we have limited financial and managerial resources, we focus our development efforts on certain selected product candidates in certain selected indications, and our development priorities may change over time. For example, we initially focused substantially all of our efforts on izokibep for the treatment of HS, PsA, AxSpA and uveitis, and to a lesser extent, our earlier-stage programs. However, as part of the Restructuring Plan, we suspended new internal investment to develop izokibep for the treatment of HS, PsA and AxSpA and focused our resources primarily on the development of lonigutamab for the treatment of TED. We subsequently terminated our license agreement with Affibody relating to izokibep. As a result, we have expended significant resources developing izokibep, for which we will not receive any return on our investment. Likewise, we terminated our license agreement with Novelty Nobility relating to SLRN-517 and, as a result, we will not receive a return on our investment in that product candidate. On February 6, 2025, we announced that, in connection with our entry into the Merger Agreement, we would delay initiation of the Phase 3 LONGITUDE program for lonigutamab until the closing of the Merger and that we planned to re-evaluate the development program for lonigutamab to enable potential confirmation of its differentiation in a capital efficient manner. As a result of our decisions to pursue certain product candidates and indications, we may forgo or delay pursuit of opportunities with other product candidates, or other indications for our existing product candidates that later prove to have greater commercial potential. Our resource allocation decisions may cause us to fail to capitalize on viable commercial products or profitable market opportunities. Our spending on current and future development programs and product candidates for specific indications, such as our spending on lonigutamab for the treatment of TED, may not yield any commercially viable product candidates. In this regard, our decision to focus our resources primarily on lonigutamab for the treatment of TED may be unsuccessful and may never lead to the development of a viable commercial product. If we do not accurately evaluate the commercial potential or target market for a particular product candidate, we may relinquish valuable rights to that product candidate through collaboration, licensing or other royalty arrangements in cases in which it would have been more advantageous for us to retain sole development and commercialization rights.

We face competition from entities that have made substantial investments into the rapid development of novel treatments for immunological indications, including large and specialty pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, many of which already have approved therapies in our current indications.

The development and commercialization of therapies is highly competitive. Our product candidates, if approved, will face significant competition, including from well-established, currently marketed therapies and our failure to demonstrate a meaningful improvement to the existing standard of care may prevent us from achieving significant market penetration. Many of our competitors have significantly greater resources and experience than we do and we may not be able to successfully compete. We face substantial competition from multiple sources, including large and specialty pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, academic research institutions and governmental agencies and public and private research institutions. Our competitors compete with us on the level of the technologies employed, or on the level of development of their products as compared to our product candidates. In addition, many small biotechnology companies have formed collaborations with large, established companies to (i) obtain support for their research, development and commercialization of products or (ii) combine several treatment approaches to develop longer lasting or more efficacious treatments that may potentially directly compete with our current or any future product candidates. We anticipate that we will continue to face increasing competition as new therapies and combinations thereof, and related data emerge.

Our current product candidate lonigutamab, under development for the treatment of TED, if approved, would face competition from an existing approved treatment, which has achieved commercial success, as well as potential competition from product candidates in clinical development by third parties. Currently, the sole-approved product for the treatment of TED is Tepezza, an intravenously delivered IGF-1R inhibitor, which has achieved wide-spread use in the treatment of TED. In addition, other therapies, such as corticosteroids, have been used on an off-label basis to alleviate some of the symptoms of TED. There are also multiple companies developing product candidates for TED including argenx SE, Lassen Therapeutics, Roche, Roivant, Sling Therapeutics, Inc., and Viridian Therapeutics, Inc., some of which are late-stage and may receive approvals in the near term. On February 6, 2025, we announced that, in connection with our entry into the Merger Agreement, we would delay initiation of the Phase 3 LONGITUDE program until the closing of the Merger and that we planned to re-evaluate the development program for lonigutamab to enable potential confirmation of its differentiation in a capital efficient manner. Our decision to delay initiation of the Phase 3 LONGITUDE trial for lonigutamab increases the risk that one or more of the foregoing product candidates may receive approval before we are able to obtain approval for lonigutamab, if ever. This competition could have a material adverse impact on our business if our anticipated market share, pricing, government and private payer access, or a combination thereof, are lower than expected due to competition from branded and generic alternative therapies.

To compete successfully, we need to disrupt any marketed drugs, meaning that we will have to demonstrate that the relative cost, method of administration, safety, tolerability and efficacy of our product candidates provides a better

Table of Contents

alternative to existing and new therapies. Our commercial opportunity and likelihood of success will be reduced or eliminated if our product candidates are not ultimately demonstrated to be safer, more effective, more conveniently administered, or less expensive than the current standard of care. Furthermore, even if our product candidates are able to achieve these attributes, and are approved, acceptance of our products may be inhibited by the reluctance of physicians to switch from existing therapies to our products, or if physicians choose to reserve our products for use in limited circumstances.

Many of our competitors have significantly greater financial, technical, manufacturing, marketing, sales and supply resources or experience than we have. In addition, many of these competitors have significantly greater experience than we have in conducting human clinical trials and obtaining regulatory approvals. Competitors could succeed in obtaining FDA or other regulatory approvals more rapidly than we potentially could, or obtain approvals for superior products. Competitors may also obtain patent protection or other intellectual property rights that limit our ability to develop or commercialize our product candidates or any future product candidates. Many of our competitors have also established distribution channels, sales and marketing and other capabilities for the commercialization of their products, where we do not have any yet established. In addition, may competitors have greater name recognition and more extensive collaborative relationships. If we obtain regulatory approval for any product candidate, we will face competition based on many different factors, including the safety and effectiveness of our current or any future product candidates, the ease with which our current or any future product candidates can be administered and the extent to which participants accept relatively new routes of administration, the timing and scope of regulatory approvals for these product candidates, the availability and cost of manufacturing, marketing and sales capabilities, price, reimbursement coverage and patent position. Competing products could present superior treatment alternatives, including by being more effective, safer, less expensive or marketed and sold more effectively than any products we may develop. Competitive products may make any products we develop obsolete or noncompetitive before we recover the expense of developing and commercializing our current or any future product candidates. Such competitors could also recruit our employees, which could negatively impact our level of expertise and our ability to execute our business plan.

Mergers and acquisitions in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries may result in even more resources being concentrated among a smaller number of our competitors. Early-stage companies may also prove to be significant competitors, particularly through collaborative arrangements with large and established companies. These third parties compete with us in recruiting and retaining qualified management and other personnel and establishing clinical trial sites and participants’ registration for clinical trials, as well as in acquiring technologies complementary to, or necessary for, our programs.

We conduct, and may in the future conduct, clinical trials for product candidates outside the United States, and the FDA and comparable foreign regulatory authorities may not accept data from such trials.

We conduct clinical trials outside the United States, including (without limitation) in Europe and Australia, and we expect to continue to conduct trials internationally in the future. The acceptance of data from clinical trials conducted outside the U.S. or another jurisdiction by the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authority may be subject to certain conditions or may not be accepted at all. In cases where data from foreign clinical trials are intended to serve as the basis for marketing approval in the U.S., the FDA will generally not approve the application on the basis of foreign data alone unless (i) the data are applicable to the U.S. population and U.S. medical practice and (ii) the trials were performed by clinical investigators of recognized competence and pursuant to GCP regulations. Additionally, the FDA’s clinical trial requirements, including sufficient size of patient populations and statistical powering, must be met. Many foreign regulatory authorities have similar approval requirements. In addition, such foreign trials are subject to the applicable local laws of the foreign jurisdictions where the trials are conducted. There can be no assurance that the FDA or any comparable foreign regulatory authority will accept data from trials conducted outside of the U.S. or the applicable jurisdiction. If the FDA or any comparable foreign regulatory authority does not accept such data, it would result in the need for additional trials, which could be costly and time-consuming, and which may result in current or future product candidates that we may develop being delayed or not receiving approval for commercialization in the applicable jurisdiction.

Even if we receive marketing approval for our current or future product candidates in the U.S., we may never receive regulatory approval to market outside of the U.S.

We plan to seek regulatory approval of our current or future product candidates outside of the U.S. In order to market any product outside of the U.S., however, we must establish and comply with the numerous and varying safety, efficacy and other regulatory requirements of other applicable countries. Approval procedures vary among countries and can involve additional product candidate testing and additional administrative review periods. The time required to obtain

Table of Contents

approvals in other countries might differ substantially from that required to obtain FDA approval. The marketing approval processes in other countries generally implicate all of the risks detailed above regarding FDA approval in the U.S. as well as other risks. In particular, in many countries outside of the U.S., products must receive pricing and reimbursement approval before the product can be commercialized. Obtaining this approval can result in substantial delays in bringing products to market in such countries. Marketing approval in one country does not ensure marketing approval in another, but a failure or delay in obtaining marketing approval in one country may have a negative effect on the regulatory process in others and would impair our ability to market our current or future product candidates in such foreign markets. Any such impairment would reduce the size of our potential market, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

The successful commercialization of our product candidates, if approved, will depend in part on the extent to which governmental authorities and health insurers establish coverage, adequate reimbursement levels and favorable pricing policies. Failure to obtain or maintain coverage and adequate reimbursement for our product candidates could limit our ability to market those products and decrease our ability to generate revenue.

The availability of coverage and the adequacy of reimbursement by governmental healthcare programs such as Medicare and Medicaid, private health insurers and other third-party payors are essential for most patients to be able to afford prescription medications such as our product candidates, if approved. Our ability to achieve coverage and acceptable levels of reimbursement for our products by third-party payors will have an effect on our ability to successfully commercialize those products. Even if we obtain coverage for a given product by a third-party payor, the resulting reimbursement payment rates may not be adequate or may require co-payments that patients find unacceptably high. We cannot be sure that coverage and reimbursement in the United States, the European Union, Japan or elsewhere will be available for any product that we may develop, and any reimbursement that may become available may be decreased or eliminated in the future.

Third-party payors increasingly are challenging prices charged for biopharmaceutical products and services, and many third-party payors may refuse to provide coverage and reimbursement for particular drugs when equivalent generic drugs, biosimilars or less expensive therapies are available. It is possible that a third-party payor may consider our product candidates, if approved, as substitutable and only be willing to cover the cost of the alternative product. Even if we show improved efficacy, safety or improved convenience of administration with our product candidates, if approved, pricing of competitive products may limit the amount we will be able to charge for any of our product candidates, if approved. Third-party payors may deny or revoke the reimbursement status of a given product or establish prices for new or existing marketed products at levels that are too low to enable us to realize an appropriate return on our investment in our product candidates. In some cases, when new competitor generic and biosimilar products enter the market, there are mandatory price reductions for the innovator compound. In other cases, payors employ “therapeutic category” price referencing and seek to lower the reimbursement levels for all treatments in the respective therapeutic category. Additionally, new competitor brand drugs can trigger therapeutic category reviews in the interest of modifying coverage and/or reimbursement levels. The potential of third-party payors to introduce more challenging price negotiation methodologies could have a negative impact on our ability to successfully commercialize any of our product candidates, if approved.

There is significant uncertainty related to third-party payor coverage and reimbursement of newly approved products. In the United States, third-party payors, including private and governmental payors, such as the Medicare and Medicaid programs, play an important role in determining the extent to which new drugs will be covered. Some third-party payors may require pre-approval of coverage for new or innovative devices or therapies before they will reimburse healthcare providers who use such therapies. It is difficult to predict at this time what third-party payors will decide with respect to the coverage and reimbursement for our products, if approved.

Obtaining and maintaining reimbursement status is time consuming, costly and uncertain. The Medicare and Medicaid programs increasingly are used as models for how private payors and other governmental payors develop their coverage and reimbursement policies for drugs. However, no uniform policy for coverage and reimbursement for products exists among third-party payors in the United States. Therefore, coverage and reimbursement for products can differ significantly from payor to payor. As a result, coverage determination is often a time consuming and costly process that will require us to provide scientific and clinical support for the use of our products to each payor separately, with no assurance that coverage and adequate reimbursement will be applied consistently or obtained in the first instance. Furthermore, rules and regulations regarding reimbursement change frequently, in some cases at short notice, and we believe that changes in these rules and regulations are likely.

Table of Contents

Outside the United States, international operations are generally subject to extensive governmental price controls and other market regulations, and we believe the increasing emphasis on cost-containment initiatives in Europe and other countries has and will continue to put pressure on the pricing and usage of our products. In many countries, the prices of medical products are subject to varying price control mechanisms as part of national health systems. Other countries allow companies to fix their own prices for medical products but monitor and control company profits. Additional foreign price controls or other changes in pricing regulation could restrict the amount that we are able to charge for our product candidates, if approved. Accordingly, in markets outside the United States, the reimbursement for our product candidates may be reduced compared with the United States and may be insufficient to generate commercially reasonable revenue and profits.

Moreover, increasing efforts by governmental and third-party payors in the United States and abroad to cap or reduce healthcare costs may cause such organizations to limit both coverage and the level of reimbursement for newly approved products and, as a result, they may not cover or provide adequate payment for our products. We expect to experience pricing pressures in connection with the sale of any of our product candidates due to the trend toward managed healthcare, the increasing influence of health maintenance organizations and additional legislative changes. The downward pressure on healthcare costs in general, particularly prescription drugs and surgical procedures and other treatments, has become very intense. As a result, increasingly high barriers are being erected to the entry of new products.

Risks Related to Our Business and Operations

Our business depends entirely on the success of our product candidates and we cannot guarantee that any or all of our product candidates will successfully complete development, receive regulatory approval, or be successfully commercialized. If we are unable to develop, receive regulatory approval for, and ultimately successfully commercialize our product candidates, or experience significant delays in doing so, our business will be materially harmed.

We currently have no products approved for commercial sale or for which regulatory approval to market has been sought. We have invested a significant portion of our efforts and financial resources in the development of our product candidates, which are still in clinical development, and expect that we will continue to invest heavily in our current and potential future product candidates. Our business and our ability to generate revenue, which we do not expect will occur for many years, if ever, are substantially dependent on our ability to develop, obtain regulatory approval for, and then successfully commercialize our product candidates, which may never occur.

We currently generate no revenue and we may never be able to develop or commercialize any products. We cannot assure you that we will meet our timelines for our current or future clinical trials, which may be delayed or not completed for a number of reasons, including the negative impacts of geopolitical instability, public health crises, labor shortages, inflation or other macroeconomic factors impacting our third-party CROs, CMOs, clinical trial sites, investigators or us. Our product candidates are susceptible to the risks of failure inherent at any stage of product development, including the appearance of unexpected adverse events, the failure to achieve primary endpoints with statistical significance in clinical trials, the failure to demonstrate sufficient differentiation from other approved therapies or therapies in development or high cost of development.

Even if our product candidates are successful in clinical trials, we are not permitted to market or promote any of our product candidates before we receive regulatory approval from the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities, and we may never receive sufficient regulatory approval that will allow us to successfully commercialize any product candidates. If we do not receive FDA or comparable foreign regulatory approval with the necessary conditions to allow commercialization, we will not be able to generate revenue from those product candidates in the United States or elsewhere in the foreseeable future, or at all. Any significant delays in obtaining approval for and commercializing our product candidates could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

We have not previously submitted a BLA for our product candidates or similar marketing application to the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities, for any product candidate, and we cannot be certain that our current or any future product candidates will be successful in clinical trials or receive regulatory approval. The FDA may also consider its approvals of competing products, which may alter the treatment landscape concurrently with their review of our BLA submissions and lead to changes in the FDA’s review requirements that have been previously communicated to us and our interpretation thereof. Those could include changes to requirements for clinical data or clinical trial design, and such changes could delay approval or necessitate withdrawal of our BLA submissions.

Table of Contents

If approved for marketing by applicable regulatory authorities, our ability to generate revenue from our product candidates will depend on our ability to:

•price our products competitively such that third-party and government reimbursement permits broad product adoption;

•demonstrate the superiority of our products compared to the standard of care, as well as other therapies in development;

•create market demand for our product candidates;

•effectively commercialize any of our products that receive regulatory approval;

•manufacture product in sufficient quantities, and at acceptable quality, timing and cost, to meet commercial demand at launch and thereafter;

•establish and maintain agreements with wholesalers, distributors, pharmacies, and group purchasing organizations on commercially reasonable terms;

•obtain, maintain, protect and enforce patent and other intellectual property rights and regulatory exclusivity for our products;

•maintain compliance with applicable laws, regulations, and guidance specific to commercialization, including interactions with health care professionals, patient advocacy groups, and communication of health care economic information to payors and formularies;

•achieve market acceptance of our products by patients, the medical community, and third-party payors;

•maintain a distribution and logistics network capable of product storage within our specifications and regulatory guidelines, and further capable of timely product delivery to commercial clinical sites; and

•assure that our product will be used as directed and that additional unexpected safety risks will not arise.

Our ongoing and planned clinical trials, even if successfully completed, may not be sufficient for approval of our product candidate for the applicable indication.

FDA approval of a new biologic or drug generally requires dispositive data from two well-controlled, Phase 3 clinical trials of the relevant biologic or drug in the relevant patient population. In addition, the standard of care may change with the approval of new products in the same indications that we are studying. This may result in the FDA or other regulatory agencies requesting additional trials to show that our product candidate is superior to the new products, such as an additional comparative trial against an approved therapy, which would significantly delay our development timelines and require substantially more resources. In addition, the FDA may only allow us to evaluate a subset of participants that have failed or who are ineligible for approved therapies, which are extremely difficult participants to treat and participants with advanced and aggressive disease, and our product candidates may fail to improve outcomes for such participants. Generally speaking, Phase 3 clinical trials typically involve hundreds of patients, have significant costs and take years to complete. If we are in the future required to conduct additional Phase 3 clinical trials for TED, then our development timeline will be significantly extended, and the related expenses will be significantly increased. Additionally, even if such trials are completed, they may not ultimately be sufficient to achieve health authority approval in one or more indications.

In addition, if the FDA grants approval for our product candidates then, as a condition for approval, the FDA may require us to perform post-marketing studies to verify and describe the predicted effect on irreversible morbidity or mortality or other clinical endpoint, and our product candidates may, even if approved, be subject to withdrawal procedures by the FDA.

Our clinical trial results may also not support approval. In addition, our product candidates could fail to receive regulatory approval for many reasons, including the following:

Table of Contents

•the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities may disagree with the design or implementation of our clinical trials;

•we may be unable to demonstrate to the satisfaction of the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities that our product candidates are safe and effective for any of their proposed indications;

•the results of clinical trials may not meet the level of statistical significance required by the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities for approval, including due to the heterogeneity of patient populations, participant discontinuation rates, or apparent improvement in trial participants receiving placebo;

•we may be unable to demonstrate that our product candidates’ clinical and other benefits outweigh their safety risks;

•the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities may disagree with our interpretation of data from preclinical studies or clinical trials;

•the data collected from clinical trials of our product candidates may not be sufficient to the satisfaction of the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities to support the submission of a BLA or other comparable submission in foreign jurisdictions or to obtain regulatory approval in the U.S. or elsewhere;

•the FDA, EMA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities will evaluate any combination product designs, review CMOs’ manufacturing process and inspect our CMOs’ commercial manufacturing facilities and may not approve of such; and

•the approval policies or regulations of the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities may significantly change in a manner rendering our clinical data insufficient for approval.

The implementation of our Restructuring Plan may not be successful.

In August 2024, we implemented a Restructuring Plan which included the suspension of internal development of izokibep in HS, PsA and AxSpA and in connection therewith, implemented a workforce reduction affecting approximately 1/3 of our then-existing headcount. The objective of the Restructuring Plan was to focus our efforts primarily on the development of lonigutamab as a potential treatment for TED and to realign our workforce to meet our needs in light of our plan to wind-down internal development of izokibep in those indications. However, our decision to focus our efforts primarily on lonigutamab for the treatment of TED may be unsuccessful and may never lead to the development of a viable commercial product. Moreover, on February 6, 2025, we announced that, in connection with our entry into the Merger Agreement, we would delay initiation of the Phase 3 LONGITUDE program for lonigutamab until the closing of the Merger and that we planned to re-evaluate the development program for lonigutamab to enable potential confirmation of its differentiation in a capital efficient manner. The Restructuring Plan may yield unintended consequences and costs, such as attrition beyond our intended workforce reduction, a reduction in morale among our remaining employees, and the risk we may not achieve the anticipated cost preservation or other benefits of the Restructuring Plan, all of which could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects. In addition, while positions have been eliminated, certain functions necessary to our continued operations remain, and we may be unsuccessful in distributing the duties and obligations of departed employees among our remaining employees. We may also discover that the Restructuring Plan will make it difficult for us to resume development activities we have suspended or to pursue new initiatives, requiring us to hire qualified replacement personnel, which may require us to incur additional and unanticipated costs and expenses. Any of these unintended consequences could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

If our product candidates, if approved, do not achieve broad market acceptance, the revenue that we generate from their sales will be limited.

We have never commercialized a product candidate for any indication. Even if our product candidates are approved by the appropriate regulatory authorities for marketing and sale, they may not gain acceptance among physicians, patients, third-party payors and others in the medical community. If any product candidate for which we obtain regulatory approval does not gain an adequate level of market acceptance, we may not generate sufficient product revenue or become profitable.

Table of Contents

The degree of market acceptance of any of our product candidates will depend on a number of factors, some of which are beyond our control, including:

•the safety, efficacy, tolerability and relative ease of administration of our product candidates, including the potential prevalence and severity of side effects and adverse events, and how such profile compares to those of existing therapies, or those under development;

•the indications for which the products are approved and the approved claims that we may make for the products;

•limitations or warnings contained in the products’ FDA-approved labeling, including ones that may be more restrictive than other competitive products;

•distribution and use restrictions imposed by the FDA with respect to such products or to which we agree as part of a mandatory REMS or voluntary risk management plan;

•changes in the standard of care for the targeted indications for such product candidates;

•cost of treatment as compared to the clinical benefit in relation to alternative treatments or therapies;

•the availability of adequate coverage and reimbursement by third parties, such as insurance companies and other healthcare payors, and by government healthcare programs, including Medicare and Medicaid;

•the extent and strength of our marketing and distribution of such product candidates;

•other potential advantages of, and availability of, alternative treatments already used or that may later be approved for any of our intended indications;

•the timing of market introduction of such product candidates, as well as competitive products;

•the reluctance of physicians to switch their patients’ current standard of care;

•our ability to offer such product candidates for sale at competitive prices;

•the ability to manage our third-party supply and manufacturing operations effectively and in a cost-effective manner, while increasing production capabilities for our current product candidates to commercial levels;

•the quality and timely supply of our raw material and components from our third -party manufacturers' suppliers;

•adverse publicity about our product or favorable publicity about competitive products; and

•potential product liability claims.

Our efforts to educate the medical community and third-party payors as to the benefits of our product candidates may require significant resources and may never be successful. Even if the medical community accepts that our product candidates are safe and effective for their approved indications, physicians and patients may not immediately be receptive and may be slow to adopt them as an accepted treatment of the approved indications. If our current or future product candidates are approved, but do not achieve an adequate level of acceptance among physicians, patients, and third-party payors, we may not generate meaningful revenue from our product candidates and may never become profitable.

We will need to grow our organization, and we may experience difficulties in managing our growth and expanding our operations, which could adversely affect our business.

As our development and commercialization plans and strategies develop, and as we operate as a public company, we expect to expand our employee base for managerial, operational, financial and other resources. In addition, we have limited experience in manufacturing and commercialization. As our product candidates enter and advance through preclinical studies and clinical trials, we expect to continue to need to expand our development and regulatory capabilities and contract with other organizations to provide manufacturing and other capabilities for us. In the future, we expect to have to manage additional relationships with collaborators or partners, suppliers and other organizations. Our ability to manage our

Table of Contents

operations and future growth will require us to continue to improve our operational, financial and management controls, reporting systems and procedures. We may not be able to implement improvements to our management information and control systems in an efficient or timely manner and may discover additional deficiencies in our existing systems and controls. Our inability to successfully manage our growth and expand our operations could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

We are dependent on the services of our management and other clinical and scientific personnel, and if we are not able to retain these individuals or recruit additional management or clinical and scientific personnel, our business will suffer.

Our success depends in part on our continued ability to attract, retain and motivate highly qualified management, clinical and scientific personnel. We are highly dependent on the efforts and abilities of the principal members of our senior management and other key personnel. The loss of services of any of these individuals could delay or prevent the successful development of our product candidates and prevent us from achieving our business objectives. Although we have executed employment agreements or offer letters with each member of our senior management team, these agreements are terminable at will with or without notice and, therefore, we may not be able to retain their services as expected. For example, in May 2024, Shao-Lee Lin resigned as our Chief Executive Officer, and Mina Kim, our then Chief Legal and Administrative Officer, was appointed as our Chief Executive Officer. In January 2025, Gil M. Labrucherie resigned as our Chief Financial Officer and Chief Business Officer. Executive management transition, particularly at the principal executive officer level, inherently causes some loss of institutional knowledge, which could negatively impact strategy, execution, and our ability to compete. In addition, changes to company strategy, which may occur with the appointment of new executive leadership, can create uncertainty. Transition periods are often difficult and may have a disruptive impact on our ability to retain and recruit talent, execute on our business plans, and could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and growth prospects. In this regard, the implementation of our Restructuring Plan and associated workforce reduction may yield unintended consequences and costs, such as difficulty retaining and motivating remaining employees, increased difficulty in our day-to-day operations and loss of institutional knowledge and expertise, and difficulty in attracting and hiring qualified employees in the future.

We will need to expand and effectively manage our managerial, operational, financial and other resources in order to successfully pursue our clinical development and commercialization efforts. We may not be successful in continuing to attract or retain qualified management and scientific and clinical personnel in the future due to the intense competition for qualified personnel among biopharmaceutical, biotechnology and other businesses, particularly in the Los Angeles area and the greater San Francisco Bay Area. If we are not able to attract, integrate, retain and motivate necessary personnel to accomplish our business objectives, we may experience constraints that will significantly impede the achievement of our development objectives, our ability to raise additional capital and our ability to implement our business strategy. We do not currently maintain “key person” life insurance on the lives of our executives or any of our employees. This lack of insurance means that we may not have adequate compensation for the loss of the services of these individuals.

Our employees, independent contractors, consultants, commercial partners and vendors may engage in misconduct or other improper activities, including noncompliance with regulatory standards and requirements.

We are exposed to the risk of fraud or other illegal activity by our employees, independent contractors, consultants, commercial partners, CROs, CMOs and other parties. Misconduct by these parties could include intentional, reckless and/or negligent conduct that fails to comply with FDA or other regulations, provide true, complete and accurate information to the FDA, EMA and other similar foreign regulatory bodies, comply with manufacturing standards we may establish, comply with healthcare fraud and abuse laws and regulations, report financial information or data accurately or disclose unauthorized activities to us. If we obtain FDA approval of any of our product candidates and begin commercializing those products in the United States, our potential exposure under these laws will increase significantly, and our costs associated with compliance with these laws are likely to increase. In particular, sales, marketing and business arrangements in the healthcare industry are subject to extensive laws and regulations intended to prevent fraud, kickbacks, self-dealing and other abusive practices. These laws and regulations may restrict or prohibit a wide range of pricing, discounting, marketing and promotion, sales commission, customer incentive programs and other business arrangements. Employee misconduct could also involve the improper use of information obtained in the course of clinical trials, which could result in regulatory sanctions and serious harm to our reputation. Additionally, we are subject to the risk that a person could allege such fraud or other misconduct, even if none occurred. It is not always possible to identify and deter employee misconduct, and the precautions we take to detect and prevent this activity may not be effective in controlling unknown or unmanaged risks or losses or in protecting us from governmental investigations or other actions or lawsuits stemming from a failure to comply with such laws or regulations. If any such actions are instituted against us, and we are not successful in defending ourselves

Table of Contents

or asserting our rights, those actions could have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects, including the imposition of significant civil, criminal and administrative penalties, damages, fines, disgorgement, imprisonment, the curtailment or restructuring of our operations, loss of eligibility to obtain approvals from the FDA, exclusion from participation in government contracting, healthcare reimbursement or other government programs, including Medicare and Medicaid, integrity oversight and reporting obligations, or reputational harm.

Our future growth may depend, in part, on our ability to operate in foreign markets, where we would be subject to additional regulatory burdens and other risks and uncertainties.

Our future growth may depend, in part, on our ability to develop and commercialize our product candidates in foreign markets, including in the European Union (“EU”), United Kingdom (“UK”) and Japan, for which we may rely on collaboration with third parties. We are not permitted to market or promote any of our product candidates before we receive regulatory approval from the applicable regulatory authority in that foreign market and may never receive such regulatory approval for any of our product candidates. To obtain separate regulatory approval in many other countries, we must comply with numerous and varying regulatory requirements of such countries regarding safety and efficacy and governing, among other things, clinical trials and commercial sales, pricing and distribution of our product candidates, and we cannot predict success in these jurisdictions. If we fail to comply with the regulatory requirements in international markets and receive applicable marketing approvals, our target market will be reduced and our ability to realize the full market potential of our product candidates will be harmed and our business will be adversely affected. We may not obtain foreign regulatory approvals on a timely basis, if at all. Our failure to obtain approval of any of our product candidates by regulatory authorities in another country may significantly diminish the commercial prospects of that product candidate and our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects could be adversely affected. Moreover, even if we obtain approval of our product candidates and ultimately commercialize our product candidates in foreign markets, we would be subject to the risks and uncertainties, including the burden of complying with complex and changing foreign regulatory, tax, accounting and legal requirements and reduced protection of intellectual property rights in some foreign countries.

Our business entails a significant risk of product liability and our ability to obtain sufficient insurance coverage could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

As we conduct clinical trials of our current or future product candidates, we are exposed to significant product liability risks inherent in the development, testing, manufacturing and marketing of new treatments. Product liability claims could delay or prevent completion of our development programs. If we succeed in marketing products, such claims could result in FDA, EMA or other investigation of the safety and effectiveness of our future product candidates, our manufacturing processes and facilities or our marketing programs and potentially a recall of our products or more serious enforcement action, limitations on the approved indications for which they may be used or suspension or withdrawal of approvals. Regardless of the merits or eventual outcome, liability claims may also result in decreased demand for our product candidates, termination of clinical trial sites or entire trial programs, withdrawal of clinical trial participants, injury to our reputation and significant negative media attention, significant costs to defend the related litigation, a diversion of management’s time and our resources from our business operations, substantial monetary awards to trial participants or patients, loss of revenue, the inability to commercialize any products that we may develop, and a decline in our stock price. We may need to obtain higher levels of product liability insurance for later stages of clinical development or marketing any of our product candidates. Any insurance we may obtain may not provide sufficient coverage against potential liabilities. Furthermore, clinical trial and product liability insurance is becoming increasingly expensive. As a result, we may be unable to obtain sufficient insurance at a reasonable cost to protect us against losses caused by product liability claims that could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Our insurance policies are expensive and only protect us from some business risks, which will leave us exposed to significant uninsured liabilities.

We do not carry insurance for all categories of risk that our business may encounter. Some of the policies we currently maintain include workers’ compensation, cybersecurity, clinical trials, and directors’ and officers’ liability insurance. We do not know, however, if we will be able to maintain insurance with adequate levels of coverage. Any significant uninsured liability may require us to pay substantial amounts, which would adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

If the Merger is not completed, we may engage in strategic transactions in the future, which could impact our liquidity, increase our expenses and present significant distractions to our management.

Table of Contents

As a core part of our strategy, if the Merger is not completed, we may enter into strategic transactions, including acquisitions of companies, asset purchases and in-licensing of intellectual property with the potential to acquire and advance new assets or product candidates where we believe we are well qualified to optimize the development of promising therapies. Our ability to realize the anticipated benefits of an acquisition will depend, to a large extent, on our ability to continue the development of assets, technologies and programs we acquire. The expected synergies in development programs, pipelines and other areas of focus may not be realized on a timely basis or at all, and there may be risks associated with the acquisition that we did not previously anticipate. For example, we may learn of unanticipated liabilities that we have assumed in any acquisition.

Additional potential transactions that we may consider in the future include a variety of business arrangements, including strategic partnerships, in-licensing of product candidates, strategic collaborations, joint ventures, restructurings, divestitures, business combinations and investments. Any future transactions could increase our near and long-term expenditures, result in potentially dilutive issuances of our equity securities, including our common stock, or the incurrence of debt, contingent liabilities, amortization expenses or acquired in-process research and development expenses, any of which could affect our financial condition, liquidity and results of operations.

Future acquisitions may also require us to obtain additional financing, which may not be available on favorable terms or at all. These transactions may never be successful and may require significant time and attention of our management. In addition, the integration of any business that we may acquire in the future may disrupt our existing business and may be a complex, risky and costly endeavor for which we may never realize the full benefits of the acquisition. Accordingly, although there can be no assurance that we will undertake or successfully complete any additional transactions of the nature described above, any additional transactions that we do complete could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Our ability to use our net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforwards and certain other tax attributes to offset taxable income or taxes may be limited.

We have incurred substantial losses during our history and do not expect to become profitable in the near future, and we may never achieve profitability. As of December 31, 2024, we had federal NOL carryforwards of $159.7 million and state NOL carryforwards of $5.8 million. Under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code), our U.S. federal net operating losses will not expire and may be carried forward indefinitely but the deductibility of federal net operating losses is limited to no more than 80% of current year taxable income (with certain adjustments). In addition, under Sections 382 and 383 of the Code, if a corporation undergoes an “ownership change,” generally defined as a greater than 50 percentage point change (by value) in its equity ownership by certain stockholders over a three-year period, the corporation’s ability to use its pre-change NOL carryforwards and other pre-change tax attributes to offset its post-change income or taxes may be limited. We have experienced ownership changes in the past. We completed a Section 382 analysis through December 31, 2023, the most recent year we experienced an ownership change. Our net operating losses and credits were substantially free of limitations as of December 31, 2023. Similar provisions of state tax law may also apply to limit our use of accumulated NOLs and other state tax attributes. In addition, at the state level, there may be periods during which the use of net operating losses is suspended or otherwise limited, which could accelerate or permanently increase state taxes owed. As a result, we may be unable to use all or a material portion of our net operating losses and other tax attributes, which could adversely affect our future cash flows.

Recent and future changes to tax laws could materially adversely affect our company.

The tax regimes we are subject to or operate under, including with respect to income and non-income taxes, are unsettled and may be subject to significant change. Changes in tax laws, regulations, or rulings, or changes in interpretations of existing laws and regulations, could materially adversely affect our company. For example, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act, and the Inflation Reduction Act (the “IRA”) enacted many significant changes to the U.S. tax laws. Future guidance from the Internal Revenue Service and other tax authorities with respect to such legislation may affect us, and certain aspects thereof could be repealed or modified in future legislation. For example, the IRA includes provisions that will impact the U.S. federal income taxation of certain corporations, including imposing a 15% minimum tax on the book income of certain large corporations and a 1% excise tax on certain corporate stock repurchases that would be imposed on the corporation repurchasing such stock. In addition, many countries in Europe, as well as a number of other countries and organizations (including the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development and the European Commission), have proposed, recommended, or (in the case of countries) enacted or otherwise become subject to changes to existing tax laws or new tax laws that could significantly

Table of Contents

increase our tax obligations in the countries where we do business or require us to change the manner in which we operate our business.

If our internal information technology systems, or those used by our CROs, CMOs, clinical sites or other contractors, consultants and service providers upon which we rely, or our data are or were compromised, become unavailable or suffer security breaches, loss or leakage of data or other disruptions, we could suffer material adverse consequences resulting from such compromise, including but not limited to, operational or service interruption, harm to our reputation, litigation, fines, penalties and liability, compromise of sensitive information related our business, and other adverse consequences.

In the ordinary course of our business, we, and the third parties upon which we rely, process confidential and sensitive data and as a result, we and the third parties upon which we rely face a variety of evolving threats which could cause security incidents.

Our internal information technology systems and those of our CROs, CMOs, clinical sites and other contractors, consultants and service providers upon which we rely are vulnerable to cyberattacks, computer viruses, bugs, worms, or other malicious codes, malware (including as a result of advanced persistent threat intrusions), and other attacks by computer hackers, cracking, application security attacks, social engineering, supply chain attacks and vulnerabilities through our third-party service providers, distributed denial-of-service attacks, credential stuffing, credential harvesting, personnel misconduct or error, supply-chain attacks, software bugs, server malfunctions, software or hardware failures, loss of data or other information technology assets, adware, attacks enhanced or facilitated by AI, telecommunications failures, earthquakes, fires, floods, and other similar threats.

Such threats are prevalent and continue to rise, are increasingly difficult to detect, and come from a variety of sources, including traditional computer “hackers,” threat actors, “hacktivists,” organized criminal threat actors, personnel (such as through theft or misuse), sophisticated nation states, and nation-state-supported actors. In particular, ransomware attacks, including those from organized criminal threat actors, nation-states and nation-state supported actors, are becoming increasingly prevalent and severe and can lead to significant interruptions, delays, or outages in our operations, loss of data (including sensitive customer information), loss of income, significant extra expenses to restore data or systems, reputational loss and the diversion of funds. To alleviate the negative impact of a ransomware attack, it may be preferable to make extortion payments, but we may be unwilling or unable to do so (including, for example, if applicable laws or regulations prohibit such payments).

Some threat actors also now engage and are expected to continue to engage in cyber-attacks, including without limitation nation-state actors, for geopolitical reasons and in conjunction with military conflicts and defense activities. During times of war and other major conflicts, we, the third parties upon which we rely, and our customers may be vulnerable to a heightened risk of these attacks, including retaliatory cyber-attacks, that could materially disrupt our systems and operations, supply chain, and ability to produce, sell and distribute our goods and services. In addition to experiencing a security incident, third parties may gather, collect, or infer sensitive information about us from public sources, data brokers, or other means that reveals competitively sensitive details about our organization and could be used to undermine our competitive advantage or market position.

Additionally, remote work has become more common and has increased risks to our information technology systems and data, as more of our employees utilize network connections, computers and devices outside our premises or network, including working at home, while in transit and in public locations.

Furthermore, future or past business transactions (such as acquisitions or integrations) could expose us to additional cybersecurity risks and vulnerabilities, as our systems could be negatively affected by vulnerabilities present in acquired or integrated entities’ systems and technologies. Additionally, we may discover security issues that were not found during due diligence of such acquired or integrated entities, and it may be difficult to integrate companies into our information technology environment and security program.

While we have implemented security measures to protect against security incidents, there can be no assurance that these measures will be effective. We take steps designed to detect, mitigate and remediate vulnerabilities in our information systems (such as our hardware and/or software, including that of third parties upon which we rely). We may not, however, be able to detect, mitigate and remediate all such vulnerabilities, including in a timely manner. Vulnerabilities could be exploited but may not be detected until after a security incident has occurred. Further, we may experience delays in developing and deploying remedial measures and patches designed to address any such identified vulnerabilities.

Table of Contents

We rely on third-party service providers and technologies to operate critical business systems to process sensitive information in a variety of contexts, including, without limitation, cloud-based infrastructure, encryption and authentication technology, employee email, and other functions. We also rely on third-party service providers such as CROs, CMOs, clinical sites and other contractors and consultants to assist with our clinical trials, provide other products or services, or otherwise to operate our business. Our ability to monitor these third parties’ information security practices is limited, and these third parties may not have adequate information security measures in place. If our third-party service providers experience a security incident or other interruption, we could experience adverse consequences. We cannot assure you that our contractual measures and our own privacy and security-related safeguards will protect us from the risks associated with the third-party processing of such information. While we may be entitled to damages if our third-party service providers fail to satisfy their privacy or security-related obligations to us, any award may be insufficient to cover our damages, or we may be unable to recover such award. In addition, supply-chain attacks have increased in frequency and severity, and we cannot guarantee that third parties and infrastructure in our supply chain or our third-party partners’ supply chains have not been compromised or that they do not contain exploitable defects or bugs that could result in a breach of or disruption to our information technology systems (including our services) or the third-party information technology systems that support us and our services.

Any of the previously identified or similar threats could cause a security incident or other interruption that could result in unauthorized, unlawful, or accidental acquisition, modification, destruction, loss, alteration, encryption, disclosure of, or access to our sensitive data or our information technology systems, or those of the third parties upon whom we rely. A security incident or other interruption could disrupt our ability (and that of third parties upon whom we rely) to provide our services including clinical trials.

The costs related to significant security breaches or disruptions could be material and cause us to incur significant expenses. If the information technology systems of our CROs, CMOs, clinical sites and other contractors, consultants and service providers become subject to disruptions or security incidents, we may have insufficient recourse against such third parties and we may have to expend significant resources to mitigate the impact of such an event, and to develop and implement protections to prevent future events of this nature from occurring.

If any such incidents were to occur and cause interruptions in our operations, it could result in a disruption of our business and development programs. For example, the loss of clinical trial data from completed or ongoing clinical trials for a product candidate could result in delays in our regulatory approval efforts and significantly increase our costs to recover or reproduce the data, or may limit our ability to effectively execute a product recall, if required in the future. To the extent that any disruption or security incident were to result in the loss of or damage to our data or applications, or inappropriate disclosure of personal, confidential or proprietary information, we could incur liability and the further development of any product candidates could be delayed. Applicable data privacy and security obligations may require us to notify relevant stakeholders of security incidents, including individuals, customers, regulators and investors, or to implement other requirements, such as providing credit monitoring. Such disclosures and compliance with such requirements can be costly, and the disclosure or the failure to comply with such requirements could lead to adverse consequences. Any such event could also result in legal claims or proceedings, liability under laws that protect the privacy of personal information and significant regulatory penalties, and damage to our reputation and a loss of confidence in us and our ability to conduct clinical trials, which could delay the clinical development of our product candidates.

Our contracts may not contain limitations of liability, and even where they do, there can be no assurance that limitations of liability in our contracts are sufficient to protect us from liabilities, damages, or claims related to our data privacy and security obligations. While we maintain cybersecurity insurance coverage, we cannot be sure that our insurance coverage will be adequate or sufficient to protect us from or to mitigate liabilities arising out of our privacy and security practices, that such coverage will continue to be available on commercially reasonable terms or at all, or that such coverage will pay future claims.

Our operations are concentrated in one location, and we or the third parties upon whom we depend may be adversely affected by a wildfire and earthquake or other natural disasters and our business continuity and disaster recovery plans may not adequately protect us from a serious disaster.

Our current operations are predominantly located in California. Any unplanned event, such as flood, wildfire, explosion, earthquake, extreme weather condition, medical epidemic, power shortage, telecommunication failure or other natural or manmade accidents or incidents that result in us being unable to fully utilize our facilities may have a material and adverse effect on our ability to operate our business, particularly on a daily basis, and have significant negative consequences on our financial and operating conditions. Any similar impacts of natural or manmade disasters on our third-

Table of Contents

party CMOs, CROs or other vendors located globally, could cause delays in our clinical trials and may have a material and adverse effect on our ability to operate our business and have significant negative consequences on our financial and operating conditions. If a natural disaster, power outage or other event occurred that prevented us from using our clinical sites, impacted clinical supply or the conduct of our clinical trials, that damaged critical infrastructure, such as the manufacturing facilities of our third-party CMOs, or that otherwise disrupted operations, it may be difficult or, in certain cases, impossible, for us to continue our business for a substantial period of time. The disaster recovery and business continuity plans we and our CMOs and CROs or other vendors have in place may prove inadequate in the event of a serious disaster or similar event. As part of our risk management policy, we maintain insurance coverage at levels that we believe are appropriate for our business. However, in the event of an accident or incident at these facilities, we cannot assure you that the amounts of insurance will be sufficient to satisfy any damages and losses. If our facilities, or the manufacturing facilities of our CMOs, are unable to operate because of an accident or incident or for any other reason, even for a short period of time, any or all of our development programs may be harmed. Any business interruption could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Our projections regarding the market opportunities for our product candidates may not be accurate, and the actual market for our products may be smaller than we estimate.

The precise incidence and prevalence for all the conditions we aim to address with our product candidates are unknown. Our projections of both the number of people who have these diseases, as well as the subset of people with these diseases who have the potential to benefit from treatment with our product candidates, are based on our beliefs and estimates. These estimates have been derived from a variety of sources, including sales of our competitors, scientific literature, surveys of clinics, patient foundations or market research, and may prove to be incorrect in general, or as to their applicability to our company. Further, new trials may change the estimated incidence or prevalence of these diseases. The total addressable market across our product candidates will ultimately depend upon, among other things, the diagnosis criteria included in the final label for each of our product candidates approved for sale for these indications, the ability of our product candidates to improve on the safety, convenience, cost and efficacy of competing therapies or therapies in development, acceptance by the medical community and patients, drug pricing and reimbursement. The number of patients in the United States and other major markets and elsewhere may turn out to be lower than expected, patients may not be otherwise amenable to treatment with our product candidates or new patients may become increasingly difficult to identify or gain access to, all of which would adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects. Further, even if we obtain significant market share for our product candidates, because some of our potential target populations are very small, we may never achieve profitability despite obtaining such significant market share.

Our business could be adversely affected by the effects of health pandemics or other health crises, which could cause significant disruptions in our operations and those of our CMOs, CROs and other third parties upon whom we rely.

Health pandemics or other health crises, such as COVID-19, have in the past and could again in the future result in a disruption of our businesses, delay our research and development programs and timelines, negatively impact productivity and increase risks associated with cybersecurity. More specifically, these types of events may negatively impact personnel at third-party manufacturing facilities or the availability or cost of materials, which could disrupt our supply chain. Moreover, our trials may be negatively affected. Clinical site initiation and patient enrollment may be delayed due to prioritization of hospital resources. Some patients may not be able or willing to comply with trial protocols if wide spread health crisis impede patient movement or interrupt healthcare services. Our ability to recruit and retain patients, principal investigators and site staff (who as healthcare providers may have heightened exposure) may be hindered, which would adversely affect our trial operations. In addition, we rely on independent clinical investigators, CROs and other third-party service providers to assist us in managing, monitoring and otherwise carrying out our preclinical studies and clinical trials, including the collection of data from our trials, and the effects of health pandemics or other health crises may affect their ability to devote sufficient time and resources to our programs. As a result, the expected timeline for data readouts, including incompleteness in data collection and analysis and other related activities, and certain regulatory filings may be negatively impacted, which would adversely affect our ability to obtain regulatory approval for and to commercialize our product candidates, increase our operating expenses and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects. In addition, impact on the operations of the FDA or other regulatory authorities could negatively affect our planned trials and approval processes. Finally, economic conditions and business activity may be negatively impacted and may not recover as quickly as anticipated.

Our cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash may be exposed to failure of our banking institutions.

Table of Contents

We seek to minimize our exposure to third-party losses of our cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash we hold our balances in multiple financial institutions. Notwithstanding, those institutions are subject to risk of failure. If failures in financial institutions occur where we hold deposits in the future, such events could have a material impact on our cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash balances, expected results of operations or financial performance, and any such loss or limitation on our cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash would adversely affect our business.

Public opinion and scrutiny of immunology treatments may impact public perception of our company and product candidates, or may adversely affect our ability to conduct our business and our business plans.

Public perception may be influenced by claims, such as claims that our product candidates are unsafe, unethical or immoral and, consequently, our approach may not gain the acceptance of the public or the medical community. Negative public reaction to immunology treatments in general could result in greater government regulation and stricter labeling requirements of products to treat immunological diseases, including any of our product candidates, if approved, and could cause a decrease in the demand for any product candidates we may develop. For example, certain participants in Phase 2 and Phase 3 trials for the sole currently-approved therapy in TED reported developing hearing impairment symptoms. If the public or medical professionals associate these side effects with all IGF-1R therapies, market acceptance of our product candidate lonigutamab, if approved, may be negatively impacted. Adverse public attitudes may also adversely impact our ability to enroll clinical trials. Moreover, our success will depend upon physicians specializing in the treatment of those diseases that our product candidates target prescribing, and their patients being willing to receive, treatments that involve the use of our product candidates in lieu of, or in addition to, existing treatments they are already familiar with and for which greater clinical data may be available. Adverse events in our clinical trials, even if not ultimately attributable to our product candidates, and the resulting publicity could result in withdrawal of clinical trial participants, increased governmental regulation, unfavorable public perception, potential regulatory delays in the testing or approval of our product candidates, stricter labeling requirements for those product candidates that are approved and a decrease in demand for any such product candidates. More restrictive government regulations or negative public opinion could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects, and may delay or impair the development and, if approved, commercialization of our product candidates or demand for any products we may develop.

Risks Related to Intellectual Property

If we are unable to obtain and maintain sufficient intellectual property protection for our product candidates and any future product candidates we may develop, or if the scope of the intellectual property protection obtained is not sufficiently broad, our competitors or other third parties could develop and commercialize products similar or identical to ours, and our ability to successfully develop and commercialize our product candidates may be adversely affected.

We rely upon a combination of patents, know-how and confidentiality agreements to protect the intellectual property related to our product candidates and technologies and to prevent third parties from copying and surpassing our achievements, thus eroding our competitive position in our market.

Our success depends in large part on our ability to obtain and maintain patent protection in the United States and other countries for our product candidates and their uses, as well as our ability to operate without infringing, misappropriating or otherwise violating the proprietary rights of others. We seek to protect our proprietary position by filing patent applications in the United States and abroad related to our novel discoveries and technologies that are important to our business. Although we in-license issued patents, we do not own any issued patents and our pending and future patent applications may not result in patents being issued. We cannot assure you that issued patents will afford sufficient protection of our product candidates or their intended uses against competitors, nor can there be any assurance that the patents issued will not be infringed, designed around, invalidated by third parties, or effectively prevent others from commercializing competitive technologies, products or product candidates.

Obtaining and enforcing patents is expensive and time-consuming, and we may not be able to file, prosecute, maintain, enforce or license all necessary or desirable patent applications or maintain and/or enforce patents that may issue based on our patent applications, at a reasonable cost or in a timely manner. We may not be able to obtain or maintain patent applications and patents due to the subject matter claimed in such patent applications and patents being in disclosures in the public domain. It is also possible that we will fail to identify patentable aspects of our research and development results before it is too late to obtain patent protection. Although we enter into non-disclosure and confidentiality agreements with parties who have access to confidential or patentable aspects of our research and development output, such as our employees, corporate collaborators, outside scientific collaborators, CROs, CMOs, consultants, advisors and other third parties, any of these parties may breach these agreements and disclose such results

Table of Contents

before a patent application is filed, thereby jeopardizing our ability to seek patent protection. Consequently, we may not be able to prevent any third parties from using any of our technology that is in the public domain to compete with our technologies or product candidates.

Composition of matter patents for biological and pharmaceutical product candidates often provide a strong form of intellectual property protection for those types of products, as such patents provide protection without regard to any method of use. However, we cannot be certain that the claims in our or our collaborators’ or licensors’ pending patent applications directed to composition of matter of our product candidates will be considered patentable by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) or by patent offices in foreign countries, or that the claims in any of our or our licensors’ issued patents will be considered valid and enforceable by courts in the United States or foreign countries. Method of use patents protect the use of a product for the specified method. This type of patent does not prevent a competitor from making and marketing a product that is identical to our product candidates for an indication that is outside the scope of the patented method. Moreover, even if competitors do not actively promote their product for our targeted indications, clinicians may prescribe these products “off-label.” Although off-label prescriptions may infringe or contribute to the infringement of method of use patents, the practice is common and such infringement is difficult to prevent or prosecute.

The patent position of biopharmaceutical companies generally is highly uncertain, involves complex legal and factual questions and has in recent years been the subject of much litigation, resulting in court decisions, including Supreme Court decisions, which have increased uncertainties as to the ability to enforce patent rights in the future. As a result, the issuance, scope, validity, enforceability and commercial value of any patent rights are highly uncertain. Our pending and future owned and in-licensed patent applications may not result in patents being issued which protect our technologies or product candidates, effectively prevent others from commercializing our technologies or product candidates or otherwise provide any competitive advantage. In fact, patent applications may not issue as patents at all. The coverage claimed in a patent application can also be significantly reduced before the patent is issued, and its scope can be reinterpreted after issuance. In addition, the laws of foreign countries may not protect our rights to the same extent as the laws of the United States, or vice versa.

The patent application process is subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, and there can be no assurance that we will be successful in protecting our product candidates by obtaining and defending patents. For example, we may not be aware of all third-party intellectual property rights potentially relating to our product candidates or their intended uses, and as a result the impact of such third-party intellectual property rights upon the patentability of our own or our licensors’ patents and patent applications, as well as the impact of such third-party intellectual property upon our freedom to operate, is highly uncertain. Publications of discoveries in the scientific literature often lag behind the actual discoveries, and patent applications in the United States and other jurisdictions are typically not published until 18 months after filing or, in some cases, not at all. Therefore, we cannot know with certainty whether we were the first to make the inventions claimed in our patents or pending patent applications, or that we were the first to file for patent protection of such inventions. If a third party can establish that we or our licensors were not the first to make or the first to file for patent protection of such inventions, our owned or licensed patent applications may not issue as patents and even if issued, may be challenged and invalidated or rendered unenforceable. As a result, the issuance, inventorship, scope, validity, enforceability and commercial value of our or our licensors’ patent rights are highly uncertain.

The issuance of a patent is not conclusive as to its inventorship, scope, validity or enforceability and our or our licensors’ pending patent applications may be challenged in patent offices in the United States and abroad. Even issued patents may later be found invalid or unenforceable or may be modified or revoked in proceedings instituted by third parties before various patent offices or in courts. For example, our or our licensors’ pending patent applications may be subject to third-party pre-issuance submissions of prior art to the USPTO or our issued patents may be subject to post-grant review (“PGR”) proceedings, oppositions, derivations, reexaminations, interferences, inter partes review (“IPR”) proceedings or other similar proceedings, in the United States or elsewhere, challenging our or our licensors’ patent rights or the patent rights of others. Such submissions may also be made prior to a patent’s issuance, precluding the granting of a patent based on one or more of our owned or licensed pending patent applications. An adverse determination in any such challenges may result in loss of exclusivity or in patent claims being narrowed, invalidated, or held unenforceable, in whole or in part, which could limit our ability to stop others from using or commercializing similar or identical technology and product candidates, or limit the duration of the patent protection of our technology and product candidates. Such challenges also may result in substantial cost and require significant time from our scientists and management, even if the eventual outcome is favorable to us. Any of the foregoing could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Table of Contents

A third party may also claim that our owned or licensed patent rights are invalid or unenforceable in a litigation. The outcome following legal assertions of invalidity and unenforceability is unpredictable. An adverse result in any legal proceeding could put one or more of our owned or in-licensed patents at risk of being invalidated or interpreted narrowly and could allow third parties to commercialize our products and compete directly with us, without payment to us, or result in our inability to manufacture or commercialize our technology, products or product candidates without infringing third-party patent rights.

In addition, given the amount of time required for the development, testing and regulatory review of new product candidates, patents protecting such candidates might expire before or shortly after such candidates are commercialized. The degree of future protection for our proprietary rights is uncertain. Only limited protection may be available and may not adequately protect our rights or permit us to gain or keep any competitive advantage. Any failure to obtain or maintain patent protection with respect to our product candidates or their uses could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

We have in-licensed issued patents, but we do not currently own any issued patents relating to our technology, products and product candidates.

Although we exclusively in-license issued patents from licensor and collaborators related to lonigutamab, we do not own any issued patents. We cannot be certain that the claims in our U.S. pending patent applications, corresponding international patent applications and patent applications in certain foreign jurisdictions, or those of our licensors, will be considered patentable by the USPTO, courts in the United States or by the patent offices and courts in foreign countries, nor can we be certain that any issued claims will not be found invalid or unenforceable if challenged. Additionally, our provisional applications may never result in issued patents. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that we or our licensors will obtain any additional issued patents or that any issued patents we or our licensors obtain will provide us with any competitive advantage. Any failure to obtain adequate patent protection for our product candidates and technology could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Our rights to develop and commercialize our product candidates are subject, in large part, to the terms and conditions of licenses granted to us by others, such as Pierre Fabre. If we fail to comply with our obligations in the agreements under which we in-license or acquire development or commercialization rights to product candidates, or data from third parties, we could lose such rights that are important to our business.

We are heavily reliant upon licenses to certain patent rights and other intellectual property that are important or necessary to the development of lonigutamab. For example, we depend on licenses from Pierre Fabre for certain intellectual property relating to the development and commercialization of lonigutamab, respectively, in specific territories.

Pierre Fabre may have relied upon, and any future licensors may rely upon, third-party companies, consultants or collaborators, or on funds from third parties such that our licensors are not the sole and exclusive owners of the patents we in-licensed. If our licensors, including Pierre Fabre, fail to prosecute, maintain, enforce, and defend such patents, or lose rights to those patents, the rights we have licensed may be reduced or eliminated, and our right to develop and commercialize lonigutamab could be adversely affected. Further development and commercialization of lonigutamab and development of any other future product candidates may require us to enter into additional license or collaboration agreements. For example, our licensors or other third parties may develop intellectual property covering lonigutamab which we have not licensed. Our future licenses may not provide us with exclusive rights to use the licensed patent rights and other intellectual property licensed thereunder, or may not provide us with exclusive rights to use such patent rights and intellectual property in all relevant fields of use and in all territories in which we wish to develop or commercialize lonigutamab or our other product candidates in the future.

In spite of our efforts, licensors such as Pierre Fabre might conclude that we are in material breach of obligations under our license agreements and may therefore have the right to terminate the license agreements, thereby removing our ability to develop and commercialize product candidates and technology covered by such license agreements. If such in-licenses are terminated, or if the underlying patents fail to provide the intended exclusivity, our competitors would have the freedom to seek regulatory approval of, and to market, products identical to our product candidates and the licensors to such in-licenses could prevent us from developing or commercializing product candidates that rely upon the patents or other intellectual property rights which were the subject matter of such terminated agreements. In addition, we may seek to obtain additional licenses from our licensors and, in connection with obtaining such licenses, we may agree to amend our existing licenses in a manner that may be more favorable to the licensors, including by agreeing to terms that could enable third parties (potentially including our competitors) to receive licenses to a portion of the intellectual property that is

Table of Contents

subject to our existing licenses and compete with our existing product candidates. Any of these events could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects.

Disputes may arise regarding intellectual property subject to a licensing agreement, including:

•the scope of rights granted under the license agreement and other interpretation-related issues;

•our financial or other obligations under the license agreement;

•the extent to which our processes infringe on intellectual property of the licensor that is not subject to the licensing agreement;

•the sublicensing of patent and other rights under our collaborative development relationships;

•our diligence obligations under the license agreement and what activities satisfy those obligations;

•the inventorship or ownership of inventions and know-how resulting from the joint creation or use of intellectual property by our licensors and us and our partners; and

•the priority of invention of patented technology.

In addition, our license agreements are, and future license agreements are likely to be, complex, and certain provisions in such agreements may be susceptible to multiple interpretations. The resolution of any contract interpretation disagreement that may arise could narrow what we believe to be the scope of our rights to the relevant intellectual property or increase what we believe to be our financial or other obligations under the relevant agreement, either of which could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects. Moreover, if disputes over intellectual property that we have licensed prevent or impair our ability to maintain our current licensing arrangements on commercially acceptable terms, we may be unable to successfully develop and commercialize the affected product candidates, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects.

We may not be successful in obtaining or maintaining necessary rights to our product candidates through acquisitions and in-licenses.

Because our development programs may in the future require the use of proprietary rights held by third parties, the growth of our business may depend in part on our ability to acquire, in-license, or use these third-party proprietary rights. We may be unable to acquire or in-license any compositions, methods of use, processes or other third-party intellectual property rights from third parties that we identify as necessary for our product candidates on commercially reasonable terms or at all. Even if we are able to in-license any such necessary intellectual property, it could be on nonexclusive terms, thereby giving our competitors and other third parties access to the same intellectual property licensed to us, and it could require us to make substantial licensing and royalty payments. The licensing and acquisition of third-party intellectual property rights is a competitive area, and a number of more established companies may pursue strategies to license or acquire third-party intellectual property rights that we may consider attractive or necessary. These established companies may have a competitive advantage over us due to their size, capital resources and greater clinical development and commercialization capabilities. In addition, companies that perceive us to be a competitor may be unwilling to assign or license rights to us. We also may be unable to license or acquire third-party intellectual property rights on terms that would allow us to make an appropriate return on our investment or at all. If we are unable to successfully obtain rights to required third-party intellectual property rights or maintain the existing intellectual property rights we have obtained, we may have to abandon development of the relevant program or product candidate, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects.

While we normally seek to obtain the right to control prosecution, maintenance and enforcement of the patents relating to our product candidates, there may be times when the filing and prosecution activities for patents and patent applications relating to our product candidates are controlled by our future licensors or collaboration partners. If any of our future licensors or collaboration partners fail to prosecute, maintain and enforce such patents and patent applications in a manner consistent with the best interests of our business, including by payment of all applicable fees for patents covering our product candidates, we could lose our rights to the intellectual property or our exclusivity with respect to those rights, our ability to develop and commercialize those product candidates may be adversely affected and we may not be able to prevent competitors from making, using and selling competing products. In addition, even where we have the right to

Table of Contents

control patent prosecution of patents and patent applications we have licensed to and from third parties, we may still be adversely affected or prejudiced by actions or inactions of our licensees, our future licensors and their counsel that took place prior to the date upon which we assumed control over patent prosecution.

We may enter into license agreements in the future with others to advance our existing or future research or allow commercialization of our existing or future product candidates. These licenses may not provide exclusive rights to use such intellectual property and technology in all relevant fields of use and in all territories in which we may wish to develop or commercialize our technology and product candidates in the future. In that event, we may be required to expend significant time and resources to redesign our product candidates, or the methods for manufacturing them, all of which may not be feasible on a technical or commercial basis. If we are unable to do so, we may be unable to develop or commercialize the affected product candidates, which could harm our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects significantly. We cannot provide any assurances that third-party patents do not exist which might be enforced against our current manufacturing methods, product candidates, or future methods or product candidates resulting in either an injunction prohibiting our manufacture or future sales, or, with respect to our future sales, an obligation on our part to pay royalties and/or other forms of compensation to third parties, which could be significant.

We may form or seek collaborations or strategic alliances or enter into additional licensing arrangements in the future, and we may not realize the benefits of such alliances or licensing arrangements.

Any future collaborations that we enter into may not be successful. The success of our collaboration arrangements will depend heavily on the efforts and activities of our collaborators. Collaborations are subject to numerous risks, which may include that:

•collaborators have significant discretion in determining the efforts and resources that they will apply to collaborations;

•collaborators may not pursue development and commercialization of our product candidates or may elect not to continue or renew development or commercialization programs based on trial or test results, changes in their strategic focus due to the acquisition of competitive products, availability of funding or other external factors, such as a business combination that diverts resources or creates competing priorities;

•collaborators could independently develop, or develop with third parties, products that compete directly or indirectly with our product candidates;

•a collaborator with marketing, manufacturing and distribution rights to one or more products may not commit sufficient resources to or otherwise not perform satisfactorily in carrying out these activities;

•we could grant exclusive rights to our collaborators that would prevent us from collaborating with others;

•collaborators may not properly maintain or defend our intellectual property rights or may use our intellectual property or proprietary information in a way that gives rise to actual or threatened litigation that could jeopardize or invalidate our intellectual property or proprietary information or expose us to potential liability;

•disputes may arise between us and a collaborator that causes the delay or termination of the research, development or commercialization of our future product candidates or that results in costly litigation or arbitration that diverts management attention and resources;

•collaborations may be terminated, and, if terminated, may result in a need for additional capital to pursue further development or commercialization of the applicable future product candidates;

•collaborators may own or co-own intellectual property covering our product candidates that results from our collaborating with them, and in such cases, we would not have the exclusive right to develop or commercialize such intellectual property; and

•a collaborator’s sales and marketing activities or other operations may not be in compliance with applicable laws resulting in civil or criminal proceedings.

Table of Contents

We cannot ensure that patent rights relating to inventions described and claimed in our or our licensors’ pending patent applications will issue or that patents based on our or our licensors’ patent applications will not be challenged and rendered invalid and/or unenforceable.

The patent application process is subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, and there can be no assurance that we, our licensors, or any of our potential future collaborators will be successful in protecting our product candidates by obtaining and defending patents. We have several pending U.S. and foreign patent applications in our portfolio. We cannot predict:

•if and when patents may issue based on our patent applications;

•the scope of protection of any patent issuing based on our patent applications;

•whether the claims of any patent issuing based on our patent applications will provide protection against competitors;

•whether or not third parties will find ways to invalidate or circumvent our patent rights;

•whether or not others will obtain patents claiming aspects similar to those covered by our patents and patent applications;

•whether we will need to initiate litigation or administrative proceedings to enforce and/or defend our patent rights which will be costly whether we win or lose;

•whether the patent applications that we own will result in issued patents with claims that cover our product candidates or uses thereof in the United States or in other foreign countries; and

•whether, if pandemics or health crises arise, we may experience patent office interruption or delays to our ability to timely secure patent coverage to our product candidates.

We cannot be certain that the claims in our or our licensors’ pending patent applications directed to our product candidates and/or technologies will be considered patentable by the USPTO or by patent offices in foreign countries. There can be no assurance that any such patent applications will issue as granted patents. One aspect of the determination of patentability of our and our licensors’ inventions depends on the scope and content of the “prior art,” information that was or is deemed available to a person of skill in the relevant art prior to the priority date of the claimed invention. There may be prior art of which we are not aware that may affect the patentability of our or our licensors’ patent claims or, if issued, affect the validity or enforceability of a patent claim. Even if the patents do issue based on our or our licensors’ patent applications, third parties may challenge the validity, enforceability or scope thereof, which may result in such patents being narrowed, invalidated or held unenforceable. Furthermore, even if they are unchallenged, patents in our and our licensors’ portfolio may not adequately exclude third parties from practicing relevant technology or prevent others from designing around our claims. If the breadth or strength of our intellectual property position with respect to our product candidates is threatened, it could dissuade companies from collaborating with us to develop and threaten our ability to commercialize our product candidates. In the event of litigation or administrative proceedings, we cannot be certain that the claims in any of our issued patents will be considered valid by courts in the United States or foreign countries.

We may not be able to protect our intellectual property rights throughout the world.

Patents are of national or regional effect. Filing, prosecuting and defending patents on all of our research programs and product candidates in all countries throughout the world would be prohibitively expensive, and our and our licensors’ intellectual property rights in some countries outside the United States can be less extensive than those in the United States. In addition, the laws of some foreign countries do not protect intellectual property rights to the same extent as federal and state laws in the United States, even in jurisdictions where we do pursue patent protection. Consequently, we may not be able to prevent third parties from practicing our or our licensors’ inventions in all countries outside the United States, even in jurisdictions where we or our licensors do pursue patent protection, or from selling or importing products made using our or our licensors’ inventions in and into the United States or other jurisdictions. Competitors may use our or our licensors’ technologies in jurisdictions where we have not obtained patent protection to develop their own products and, further, may export otherwise infringing products to territories where we and our licensors have patent protection, but enforcement is not as strong as that in the United States. These competitor products may compete with our product

Table of Contents

candidates, and our and our licensors’ patents or other intellectual property rights may not be effective or sufficient to prevent them from competing.

Various companies have encountered significant problems in protecting and defending intellectual property rights in foreign jurisdictions. The legal systems of many countries do not favor the enforcement of patents and other intellectual property protection, particularly those relating to pharmaceuticals, which could make it difficult for us to stop the infringement of our and our licensors’ patents or marketing of competing products in violation of our proprietary rights.

Various countries outside the United States have compulsory licensing laws under which a patent owner may be compelled to grant licenses to third parties. In addition, many countries limit the enforceability of patents against government agencies or government contractors. As a result, a patent owner may have limited remedies in certain circumstances, which could materially diminish the value of such patent. If we or our licensors are forced to grant a license to third parties with respect to any patents relevant to our business, our competitive position may be impaired, and our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects may be adversely affected. Accordingly, our efforts to enforce our intellectual property rights around the world may be inadequate to obtain a significant commercial advantage from the intellectual property that we develop or license.

Further, the standards applied by the USPTO and foreign patent offices in granting patents are not always applied uniformly or predictably. As such, we do not know the degree of future protection that we will have on our technologies and product candidates. While we will endeavor to try to protect our technologies and product candidates with intellectual property rights such as patents, as appropriate, the process of obtaining patents is time consuming, expensive and unpredictable.

Intellectual property rights do not necessarily address all potential threats to our competitive advantage.

The degree of future protection afforded by our intellectual property rights is uncertain because intellectual property rights have limitations and may not adequately protect our business or permit us to maintain our competitive advantage. For example:

•others may be able to make product candidates that are similar to ours but that are not covered by the pending patent applications that we own or the patents or patent applications that we license;

•we or our licensors or future collaborators might not have been the first to make the inventions covered by the pending patent application that we own or have exclusively licensed;

•we or our licensors or future collaborators might not have been the first to file patent applications covering certain of our or their inventions;

•others may independently develop similar or alternative technologies or duplicate any of our technologies without infringing or otherwise violating our owned or licensed intellectual property rights;

•it is possible that noncompliance with the USPTO and foreign governmental patent agencies requirement for a number of procedural, documentary, fee payment and other provisions during the patent process can result in abandonment or lapse of a patent or patent application, and partial or complete loss of patent rights in the relevant jurisdiction;

•it is possible that our pending owned or licensed patent applications or those that we may own or license in the future will not lead to issued patents;

•issued patents may be revoked, modified, or held invalid or unenforceable, as a result of legal challenges by our competitors;

•others may have access to the same intellectual property rights licensed to us in the future on a non-exclusive basis;

•our competitors might conduct research and development activities in countries where we do not have patent rights and then use the information learned from such activities to develop competitive products for sale in our major commercial markets;

Table of Contents

•we may not develop additional proprietary technologies that are patentable;

•we cannot predict the scope of protection of any patent issuing based on our and our licensors’ patent applications, including whether the patent applications that we own, presently in-license, or, in the future, in-license will result in issued patents with claims that directed to our product candidates or uses thereof in the United States or in other foreign countries;

•there may be significant pressure on the U.S. government and international governmental bodies to limit the scope of patent protection both inside and outside the United States for disease treatments that prove successful, as a matter of public policy regarding worldwide health concerns;

•countries other than the United States may have patent laws less favorable to patentees than those upheld by U.S. courts, allowing foreign competitors a better opportunity to create, develop and market competing product candidates;

•the claims of any patent issuing based on our patent applications may not provide protection against competitors or any competitive advantages, or may be challenged by third parties;

•if enforced, a court may not hold that our patents, if they issue in the future, are valid, enforceable and infringed;

•we may need to initiate litigation or administrative proceedings to enforce and/or defend our patent rights which will be costly whether we win or lose;

•we may choose not to file a patent application in order to maintain certain trade secrets or know-how, and a third party may subsequently file a patent application covering such intellectual property;

•we may fail to adequately protect and police our trademarks and trade secrets; and

•the patents of others may have an adverse effect on our business, including if others obtain patents claiming subject matter similar to or improving that covered by our patent applications.

Should any of these or similar events occur, they could significantly harm our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

We may not identify relevant third-party patents or may incorrectly interpret the relevance, scope or expiration of a third-party patent, which might adversely affect our ability to develop and market our product candidates.

As the biopharmaceutical industry expands and more patents are issued, the risk increases that our product candidates may be subject to claims of infringement of the patent rights of third parties. There can be no assurance that our operations do not, or will not in the future, infringe, misappropriate or otherwise violate existing or future third-party patents or other intellectual property rights. Identification of third-party patent rights that may be relevant to our operations is difficult because patent searching is imperfect due to differences in terminology among patents, incomplete databases and the difficulty in assessing the meaning of patent claims. We cannot guarantee that any of our patent searches or analyses, including the identification of relevant patents, the scope of patent claims or the expiration of relevant patents, are complete or thorough, nor can we be certain that we have identified each and every third-party patent and pending application in the United States and abroad that is relevant to or necessary for the commercialization of our product candidates in any jurisdiction.

Numerous U.S. and foreign patents and pending patent applications exist in our market that are owned by third parties. Our competitors in both the United States and abroad, many of which have substantially greater resources and have made substantial investments in patent portfolios and competing technologies, may have applied for or obtained or may in the future apply for and obtain, patents that will prevent, limit or otherwise interfere with our ability to make, use and sell our product candidates. We do not always conduct independent reviews of pending patent applications of and patents issued to third parties. Patent applications in the United States and elsewhere are typically published approximately 18 months after the earliest filing for which priority is claimed, with such earliest filing date being commonly referred to as the priority date. Certain U.S. applications that will not be filed outside the U.S. can remain confidential until patents issue. In addition, patent applications in the United States and elsewhere can be pending for many years before issuance, or unintentionally abandoned patents or applications can be revived. Furthermore, pending patent applications that have been

Table of Contents

published can, subject to certain limitations, be later amended in a manner that could cover our technologies, product candidates or the use of our product candidates. As such, there may be applications of others now pending or recently revived patents of which we are unaware. These patent applications may later result in issued patents, or the revival of previously abandoned patents, that may be infringed by the manufacture, use or sale of our technologies or product candidates or will prevent, limit or otherwise interfere with our ability to make, use or sell our technologies and product candidates.

The scope of a patent claim is determined by an interpretation of the law, the written disclosure in a patent and the patent’s prosecution history. Our interpretation of the relevance or the scope of a patent or a pending application may be incorrect. For example, we may incorrectly determine that our product candidates are not covered by a third-party patent or may incorrectly predict whether a third-party’s pending application will issue with claims of relevant scope. Our determination of the expiration date of any patent in the United States or abroad that we consider relevant may be incorrect. Our failure to identify and correctly interpret relevant patents may negatively impact our ability to develop and market our product candidates.

We cannot provide any assurances that third-party patents and other intellectual property rights do not exist which might be enforced against our current technology, including our research programs, product candidates, their respective methods of use, manufacture and formulations thereof, and could result in either an injunction prohibiting our manufacture or future sales, or, with respect to our future sales, an obligation on our part to pay royalties and/or other forms of compensation to third parties, which could be significant.

We may be involved in lawsuits to protect or enforce our patents or other intellectual property, which could be expensive, time-consuming and unsuccessful.

Competitors or other third parties may infringe our patents, trademarks or other intellectual property. To counter infringement or unauthorized use, we or one of our licensing partners may be required to file infringement claims, which can be expensive and time consuming and divert the time and attention of our management and scientific personnel. Our or our licensors’ pending patent applications cannot be enforced against third parties practicing the technology claimed in such applications unless and until a patent issues from such applications. Any claims we assert against perceived infringers could provoke these parties to assert counterclaims against us alleging that we infringe their patents, in addition to counterclaims asserting that our patents or our licensors’ patents are invalid or unenforceable, or both. In patent litigation in the United States, defendant counterclaims alleging invalidity and/or unenforceability are commonplace. Grounds for a validity challenge could be an alleged failure to meet any of several statutory requirements, including lack of novelty, obviousness, non-enablement, insufficient written description or failure to claim patent-eligible subject matter. Grounds for an unenforceability assertion could be an allegation that someone connected with prosecution of the patent withheld relevant information from the USPTO or made a misleading statement during prosecution. The outcome following legal assertions of invalidity and unenforceability is unpredictable. In any patent infringement proceeding, there is a risk that a court will decide that a patent of ours or our licensors is invalid or unenforceable, in whole or in part, and that we do not have the right to stop the other party from using the invention at issue. There is also a risk that, even if the validity of such patents is upheld, the court will construe the patent’s claims narrowly or decide that we do not have the right to stop the other party from using the invention at issue on the grounds that our or our licensors’ patent claims do not cover the invention, or decide that the other party’s use of our or our licensors’ patented technology falls under the safe harbor to patent infringement under 35 U.S.C. §271(e)(1). An adverse outcome in a litigation or proceeding involving our or our licensors’ patents could limit our ability to assert our or our licensors’ patents against those parties or other competitors and may curtail or preclude our ability to exclude third parties from making and selling similar or competitive products. Any of these occurrences could adversely affect our competitive position, and our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects. Similarly, if we assert trademark infringement claims, a court may determine that the marks we have asserted are invalid or unenforceable, or that the party against whom we have asserted trademark infringement has superior rights to the marks in question. In this case, we could ultimately be forced to cease use of such trademarks.

Even if we establish infringement, the court may decide not to grant an injunction against further infringing activity and instead award only monetary damages, which may or may not be an adequate remedy. Furthermore, because of the substantial amount of discovery required in connection with intellectual property litigation, there is a risk that some of our confidential information could be compromised by disclosure during litigation. There could also be public announcements of the results of hearings, motions or other interim proceedings or developments. If securities analysts or investors perceive these results to be negative, it could adversely affect the price of shares of our common stock. Moreover, we cannot assure you that we will have sufficient financial or other resources to file and pursue such infringement claims, which typically last for years before they are concluded. Even if we ultimately prevail in such claims, the monetary cost of such litigation

Table of Contents

and the diversion of the attention of our management and scientific personnel could outweigh any benefit we receive as a result of the proceedings.

Intellectual property rights of third parties could adversely affect our ability to commercialize lonigutamab or any future product candidates, and we, our licensors or collaborators, or any future strategic partners may become subject to third party claims or litigation alleging infringement of patents or other proprietary rights or seeking to invalidate patents or other proprietary rights. We might be required to litigate or obtain licenses from third parties in order to develop or market lonigutamab or any future product candidates. Such litigation or licenses could be costly or not available on commercially reasonable terms.

Our commercial success depends, in part, on our ability to develop, manufacture, market and sell our product candidates and use our proprietary technologies without infringing, misappropriating or otherwise violating the intellectual property and other proprietary rights of third parties. Third parties may allege that we have infringed, misappropriated or otherwise violated their intellectual property. Litigation or other legal proceedings relating to intellectual property claims, with or without merit, is unpredictable and generally expensive and time consuming and, even if resolved in our favor, is likely to divert significant resources from our core business, including distracting our technical and management personnel from their normal responsibilities. In addition, there could be public announcements of the results of hearings, motions or other interim proceedings or developments and if securities analysts or investors perceive these results to be negative, it could have a substantial adverse effect on the market price of our common stock. Such litigation or proceedings could substantially increase our operating losses and reduce the resources available for development activities or any future sales, marketing or distribution activities. We may not have sufficient financial or other resources to adequately conduct such litigation or proceedings. Some of our competitors may be able to sustain the costs of such litigation or proceedings more effectively than we can because of their greater financial resources and more mature and developed intellectual property portfolios. Uncertainties resulting from the initiation and continuation of patent litigation or other proceedings could adversely affect our ability to compete in the marketplace.

There is a substantial amount of intellectual property litigation in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries, and we may become party to, or threatened with, litigation or other adversarial proceedings regarding intellectual property rights with respect to our product candidates. We cannot be certain that our product candidates will not infringe existing or future patents owned by third parties. Third parties may assert infringement claims against us based on existing or future intellectual property rights, regardless of their merit. We may decide in the future to seek a license to such third-party patents or other intellectual property rights, but we might not be able to do so on reasonable terms. Proving patent invalidity may be difficult. For example, in the United States, proving invalidity in court requires a showing of clear and convincing evidence to overcome the presumption of validity enjoyed by issued patents. As this burden is a high one, there is no assurance that a court of competent jurisdiction would invalidate the claims of any such United States patent or find that our technologies or product candidates do not infringe any such claims. If we are found to infringe, misappropriate or otherwise violate a third party’s intellectual property rights, we could be forced, including by court order, to cease developing, manufacturing or commercializing the infringing technology or product candidate. Further, we may be required to redesign the technology or product candidate in a non-infringing manner, which may not be commercially feasible. Alternatively, we may be required to obtain a license from such third party in order to use the infringing technology and continue developing, manufacturing or marketing the infringing product candidate. However, we may not be able to obtain any required license on commercially reasonable terms or at all. Even if we were able to obtain a license, it could be non-exclusive, thereby giving our competitors access to the same technologies licensed to us, and it could require us to make substantial licensing and royalty payments. In addition, we could be found liable for monetary damages, including treble damages and attorneys’ fees if we are found to have willfully infringed a patent. A finding of infringement could prevent us from commercializing our technologies or product candidates or force us to cease some of our business operations, which could materially harm our business. Claims that we have misappropriated the confidential information or trade secrets of third parties could have a similar negative impact on our business.

We may not be aware of patents that have already been issued and that a third party, for example, a competitor in the fields in which we are developing our product candidates, might assert are infringed by our current or future product candidates, including claims to compositions, formulations, methods of manufacture or methods of use or treatment that cover our product candidates. It is also possible that patents owned by third parties of which we are aware, but which we do not believe are relevant to our product candidates, could be found to be infringed by our product candidates. In addition, because patent applications can take many years to issue, there may be currently pending patent applications that may later result in issued patents that our product candidates may infringe. Our competitors in both the United States and abroad, many of which have substantially greater resources and have made substantial investments in patent portfolios and competing technologies, may have applied for or obtained or may in the future apply for and obtain, patents that will

Table of Contents

prevent, limit or otherwise interfere with our ability to make, use and sell our product candidates. The pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries have produced a considerable number of patents, and it may not always be clear to industry participants, including us, which patents cover various types of products or methods of use. The coverage of patents is subject to interpretation by the courts, and the interpretation is not always uniform. If we were sued for patent infringement, we would need to demonstrate that our product candidates or methods of use either do not infringe the patent claims of the relevant patent or that the patent claims are invalid or unenforceable, and we may not be able to do this. Proving invalidity may be difficult. For example, in the United States, proving invalidity in court requires a showing of clear and convincing evidence to overcome the presumption of validity enjoyed by issued patents, and there is no assurance that a court of competent jurisdiction would invalidate the claims of any such U.S. patent. Even if we are successful in these proceedings, we may incur substantial costs and the time and attention of our management and scientific personnel could be diverted in pursuing these proceedings, which could adversely affect our business and operations. Furthermore, because of the substantial amount of discovery required in connection with intellectual property litigation, there is a risk that some of our confidential information could be compromised by disclosure during litigation. In addition, we may not have sufficient resources to bring these actions to a successful conclusion.

We may choose to challenge the enforceability or validity of claims in a third party’s U.S. patent by requesting that the USPTO review the patent claims in an ex-parte re-exam, inter partes review or post-grant review proceedings. These proceedings are expensive and may consume our time or other resources. We may choose to challenge a third party’s patent in patent opposition proceedings in the European Patent Office (“EPO”), or other foreign patent office. The costs of these opposition proceedings could be substantial and may consume our time or other resources. If we fail to obtain a favorable result at the USPTO, EPO or other patent office then we may be exposed to litigation by a third party alleging that the patent may be infringed by our product candidates.

Our product candidates licensed from various third parties may be subject to retained rights.

Our licensors may retain certain rights under the relevant agreements with us, including the right to use the underlying product candidates for academic and research use, to publish general scientific findings from research related to the product candidates, to make customary scientific and scholarly disclosures of information relating to the product candidates, or to develop or commercialize the licensed product candidates in certain regions. For example, we depend on our license and collaboration agreement with Pierre Fabre for the development of lonigutamab, which grants us certain exclusive licenses to certain patents, know-how and other intellectual property to develop, manufacture, use and commercialize lonigutamab for non-oncology therapeutic indications. The license includes certain retained rights by Pierre Fabre, for example rights in oncology therapeutic indications, as well as their rights in the option territory described elsewhere under Note 6 to our consolidated financial statements entitled “Significant Agreements” in this Form 10-Q.

In addition, the United States federal government retains certain rights in inventions produced with its financial assistance under the Patent and Trademark Law Amendments Act (“Bayh-Dole Act”). The federal government retains a “nonexclusive, nontransferable, irrevocable, paid-up license” for its own benefit. The Bayh-Dole Act also provides federal agencies with “march-in rights.” March-in rights allow the government, in specified circumstances, to require the contractor or successors in title to the patent to grant a “nonexclusive, partially exclusive, or exclusive license” to a “responsible applicant or applicants.” If the patent owner refuses to do so, the government may grant the license itself. We may at times choose to collaborate with academic institutions to accelerate our preclinical research or development. While we do not currently engage, and it is our policy to avoid engaging, university partners in projects in which there is a risk that federal funds may be commingled, we cannot be sure that any co-developed intellectual property will be free from government rights pursuant to the Bayh-Dole Act. Although none of our licenses to date are subject to march-in rights, if, in the future, we co-own or license in technology which is critical to our business that is developed in whole or in part with federal funds subject to the Bayh-Dole Act, our ability to enforce or otherwise exploit patents covering such technology may be adversely affected.

Changes in patent law in the United States and other jurisdictions could diminish the value of patents in general, thereby impairing our ability to protect our product candidates.

As is the case with other biopharmaceutical companies, our success is heavily dependent on intellectual property, particularly patents. Obtaining, defending, maintaining and enforcing patents in the biopharmaceutical industry involves both technological and legal complexity and is therefore costly, time consuming and inherently uncertain. Changes in either the patent laws or interpretation of the patent laws in the United States could increase the uncertainties and costs surrounding the prosecution of patent applications and the enforcement or defense of issued patents, and may diminish our ability to protect our inventions, obtain, maintain, enforce and protect our intellectual property rights and, more generally,

Table of Contents

could affect the value of our intellectual property or narrow the scope of our future owned and licensed patents. Patent reform legislation in the United States and other countries, including the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (“Leahy-Smith Act”), signed into law on September 16, 2011, could increase those uncertainties and costs surrounding the prosecution of our patent applications and the enforcement or defense of our future issued patents. The Leahy-Smith Act includes a number of significant changes to U.S. patent law. These include provisions that affect the way patent applications are prosecuted, redefine prior art and provide more efficient and cost-effective avenues for competitors to challenge the validity of patents. These include allowing third-party submission of prior art to the USPTO during patent prosecution and additional procedures to attack the validity of a patent by USPTO administered post-grant proceedings, including post-grant review, inter partes review, and derivation proceedings.

Further, because of a lower evidentiary standard in these USPTO post-grant proceedings compared to the evidentiary standard in United States federal courts necessary to invalidate a patent claim, a third party could potentially provide evidence in a USPTO proceeding sufficient for the USPTO to hold a claim invalid even though the same evidence would be insufficient to invalidate the claim if first presented in a district court action. Accordingly, a third party may attempt to use the USPTO procedures to invalidate our or our licensors’ patent claims that would not have been invalidated if first challenged by the third party as a defendant in a district court action. Thus, the Leahy-Smith Act and its implementation could increase the uncertainties and costs surrounding the prosecution of our or our licensors’ patent applications and the enforcement or defense of our or our licensors’ future issued patents, all of which could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

After March 2013, under the Leahy-Smith Act, the United States transitioned to a first inventor to file system in which, assuming that the other statutory requirements are met, the first inventor to file a patent application will be entitled to the patent on an invention regardless of whether a third-party was the first to invent the claimed invention. A third party that files a patent application in the USPTO after March 2013, but before we file an application covering the same invention, could therefore be awarded a patent covering an invention of ours or our licensors even if we had made the invention before it was made by such third party. This will require us to be cognizant going forward of the time from invention to filing of a patent application. Since patent applications in the United States and most other countries are confidential for a period of time after filing or until issuance, we cannot be certain that we or our licensors were the first to either (i) file any patent application related to our product candidates and other proprietary technologies we may develop or (ii) invent any of the inventions claimed in our or our licensors’ patents or patent applications. Even where we have a valid and enforceable patent, we may not be able to exclude others from practicing the claimed invention where the other party can show that they used the invention in commerce before our filing date or the other party benefits from a compulsory license. However, the Leahy-Smith Act and its implementation could increase the uncertainties and costs surrounding the prosecution of our patent applications and the enforcement or defense of our future issued patents, all of which could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

In addition, the patent positions of companies in the development and commercialization of pharmaceuticals are particularly uncertain. The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled on several patent cases in recent years, either narrowing the scope of patent protection available in certain circumstances or weakening the rights of patent owners in certain situations. Depending on future actions by the U.S. Congress, the U.S. courts, the USPTO and the relevant law-making bodies in other countries, the laws and regulations governing patents could change in unpredictable ways that would weaken our or our licensors’ ability to obtain new patents and patents that we or our licensors might obtain in the future. We cannot predict how future decisions by the courts, the U.S. Congress or the USPTO may impact the value of our patents. Any similar adverse change in the patent laws of other jurisdictions could also adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

We may become subject to claims challenging the inventorship or ownership of our or our licensors’ patents and other intellectual property.

We may be subject to claims that former employees, collaborators or other third parties have an interest in our or our licensors’ patents or other intellectual property as an inventor or co-inventor. The failure to name the proper inventors on a patent application can result in the patents issuing thereon being unenforceable. Inventorship disputes may arise from conflicting views regarding the contributions of different individuals named as inventors, the effects of foreign laws where foreign nationals are involved in the development of the subject matter of the patent, conflicting obligations of third parties involved in developing our product candidates or as a result of questions regarding co-ownership of potential joint inventions. Litigation may be necessary to resolve these and other claims challenging inventorship or ownership. Alternatively, or additionally, we may enter into agreements to clarify the scope of our rights in such intellectual property. If we fail in defending any such claims, in addition to paying monetary damages, we may lose valuable intellectual

Table of Contents

property rights, such as exclusive ownership of, or right to use, valuable intellectual property. Such an outcome could adversely affect our business. Even if we are successful in defending against such claims, litigation could result in substantial costs and be a distraction to management and other employees.

Our current or future licensors may have relied on third-party consultants or collaborators or on funds from third parties, such as the U.S. government, such that our licensors are not the sole and exclusive owners of the patents we in-licensed. If other third parties have ownership rights or other rights to our in-licensed patents, they may be able to license such patents to our competitors, and our competitors could market competing products and technology. This could adversely affect our competitive position, business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects.

In addition, while it is our policy to require our employees and contractors who may be involved in the conception or development of intellectual property to execute agreements assigning such intellectual property to us, we may be unsuccessful in executing such an agreement with each party who, in fact, conceives or develops intellectual property that we regard as our own. The assignment of intellectual property rights may not be self-executing, or the assignment agreements may be breached, and we may be forced to bring claims against third parties, or defend claims that they may bring against us, to determine the ownership of what we regard as our intellectual property. Such claims could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects.

Patent terms may be inadequate to protect our competitive position on products or product candidates for an adequate amount of time.

Patents have a limited lifespan. In the United States, if all maintenance fees are timely paid, the natural expiration of a patent is generally 20 years from its earliest U.S. non-provisional or international patent application filing date. Various extensions may be available, but the life of a patent, and the protection it affords, is limited. Even if patents covering our products or product candidates are obtained, once the patent life has expired, we may be open to competition from competitive products, including generics or biosimilars. Given the amount of time required for the development, testing and regulatory review of products or new product candidates, patents protecting such products or candidates might expire before or shortly after such products or candidates are commercialized. As a result, our owned and licensed patent portfolio may not provide us with sufficient and continuing rights to exclude others from commercializing products similar or identical to ours.

Obtaining and maintaining patent protection depends on compliance with various procedural, document submission, fee payment and other requirements imposed by government patent agencies, and our patent protection could be reduced or eliminated as a result of noncompliance with these requirements.

Periodic maintenance fees, renewal fees, annuity fees and various other government fees on patents and/or applications will be due to be paid to the USPTO and various government patent agencies outside of the United States over the lifetime of our owned or licensed patents and patent applications. We rely on our outside counsel or our licensing partners to pay these fees due to U.S. and non-U.S. patent agencies. The USPTO and various non-U.S. government patent agencies require compliance with several procedural, documentary, fee payment and other similar provisions during the patent application process. We are also dependent on our licensors to take the necessary action to comply with these requirements with respect to our licensed intellectual property. In many cases, an inadvertent lapse can be cured by payment of a late fee or by other means in accordance with the applicable rules. There are situations, however, in which noncompliance can result in abandonment or lapse of the patent or patent application, resulting in partial or complete loss of patent rights in the relevant jurisdiction. In such an event, potential competitors might be able to enter the market and this circumstance could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

If we do not obtain patent term extension for our product candidate, our business may be materially harmed.

Depending upon the timing, duration and specifics of any FDA marketing approval of any of our product candidates, one or more of our or our licensors’ issued U.S. patents or issued U.S. patents that we may own in the future may be eligible for limited patent term extension under the Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Action of 1984 (“Hatch-Waxman Amendments”). The Hatch-Waxman Amendments permit a patent extension term (“PTE”) of up to five years as compensation for patent term lost during the FDA regulatory review process. A patent term extension cannot extend the remaining term of a patent beyond a total of 14 years from the date of product approval, only one patent may be extended and only those claims covering the approved drug, a method for using it or a method for manufacturing it may be extended. Similar patent term restoration provisions to compensate for commercialization delay caused by regulatory review are also available in certain foreign jurisdictions, such as in Europe under Supplemental Protection Certificate

Table of Contents

(“SPC”). However, we may not be granted any extensions for which we apply because of, for example, failing to exercise due diligence during the testing phase or regulatory review process, failing to apply within applicable deadlines, failing to apply prior to expiration of relevant patents, or otherwise failing to satisfy applicable requirements. In addition, to the extent we wish to pursue patent term extension based on a patent that we in-license from a third party, we would need the cooperation of that third party. Moreover, the applicable time period or the scope of patent protection afforded could be less than we request. If we are unable to obtain patent term extension, or the term of any such extension is less than we request, our competitors may obtain approval of competing products following our patent expiration, and our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects could be materially harmed.

If we are unable to protect the confidentiality of our trade secrets, our business and competitive position would be harmed.

In addition to the protection afforded by patents, we rely on trade secret protection and confidentiality agreements to protect proprietary know-how that is not patentable or that we elect not to patent, processes for which patents are difficult to enforce and any other elements of our discovery and development processes that involve proprietary know-how, information or technology that is not covered by patents. We may also rely on trade secret protection as temporary protection for concepts that may be included in a future patent filing. However, trade secret protection will not protect us from innovations that a competitor develops independently of our proprietary know how. If a competitor independently develops a technology that we protect as a trade secret and files a patent application on that technology, then we may not be able to patent that technology in the future, may require a license from the competitor to use our own know-how, and if the license is not available on commercially-viable terms, then we may not be able to launch our product candidate. Additionally, trade secrets can be difficult to protect and some courts inside and outside the United States are less willing or unwilling to protect trade secrets. Although we require all of our employees to assign their inventions to us, and require all of our employees, consultants, advisors and any third parties who have access to our proprietary know-how, information or technology to enter into confidentiality agreements, we cannot be certain that our trade secrets and other confidential proprietary information will not be disclosed or that competitors will not otherwise gain access to our trade secrets. If our trade secrets are not adequately protected, our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects could be adversely affected.

If our trademarks and trade names are not adequately protected, then we may not be able to build name recognition in our markets of interest and our business may be adversely affected.

Our registered or unregistered trademarks or trade names may be challenged, infringed, circumvented or declared generic or determined to be infringing on other marks. During trademark registration proceedings, we may receive rejections of our applications by the USPTO or in other foreign jurisdictions. Although we are given an opportunity to respond to such rejections, we may be unable to overcome them. In addition, in the USPTO and in comparable agencies in many foreign jurisdictions, third parties are given an opportunity to oppose pending trademark applications and to seek to cancel registered trademarks. Opposition or cancellation proceedings may be filed against our trademarks, which may not survive such proceedings. Moreover, any name we have proposed to use with our product candidate in the United States must be approved by the FDA, regardless of whether we have registered it, or applied to register it, as a trademark. Similar requirements exist in Europe. The FDA typically conducts a review of proposed product names, including an evaluation of potential for confusion with other product names. If the FDA or an equivalent administrative body in a foreign jurisdiction objects to any of our proposed proprietary product names, we may be required to expend significant additional resources in an effort to identify a suitable substitute name that would qualify under applicable trademark laws, not infringe the existing rights of third parties and be acceptable to the FDA. Furthermore, in many countries, owning and maintaining a trademark registration may not provide an adequate defense against a subsequent infringement claim asserted by the owner of a senior trademark.

We may not be able to protect our rights to these trademarks and trade names, which we need to build name recognition among potential partners or customers in our markets of interest. At times, competitors or other third parties may adopt trade names or trademarks similar to ours, thereby impeding our ability to build brand identity and possibly leading to market confusion. In addition, there could be potential trade name or trademark infringement claims brought by owners of other registered trademarks or trademarks that incorporate variations of our registered or unregistered trademarks or trade names. Over the long term, if we are unable to establish name recognition based on our trademarks and trade names, then we may not be able to compete effectively and our business may be adversely affected. Our efforts to enforce or protect our proprietary rights related to trademarks, trade names, domain name or other intellectual property may be ineffective and could result in substantial costs and diversion of resources and could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Table of Contents

We may be subject to claims asserting that our employees, consultants or advisors have wrongfully used or disclosed alleged trade secrets of their current or former employers or claims asserting ownership of what we regard as our own intellectual property.

Certain of our employees, consultants or advisors have in the past and may in the future be employed at universities or other biotechnology or pharmaceutical companies, including our competitors or potential competitors. Although we try to ensure that our employees, consultants and advisors do not use the proprietary information or know-how of others in their work for us, we may be subject to claims that these individuals or we have used or disclosed intellectual property, including trade secrets or other proprietary information, of any such individual’s current or former employer. Litigation may be necessary to defend against these claims. If we fail in defending any such claims, in addition to paying monetary damages, we may lose valuable intellectual property rights. An inability to incorporate such technologies or features would harm our business and may prevent us from successfully commercializing our technologies or product candidates. In addition, we may lose personnel as a result of such claims and any such litigation or the threat thereof may adversely affect our ability to hire employees or contract with independent contractors. A loss of key personnel or their work product could hamper or prevent our ability to commercialize our technologies, or product candidates, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects. Even if we are successful in defending against such claims, litigation could result in substantial costs and be a distraction to management.

In addition, we or our licensors may in the future be subject to claims by former employees, consultants or other third parties asserting an ownership right in our owned or licensed patents or patent applications. An adverse determination in any such submission or proceeding may result in loss of exclusivity or freedom to operate or in patent claims being narrowed, invalidated or held unenforceable, in whole or in part, which could limit our ability to stop others from using or commercializing similar technology and therapeutics, without payment to us, or could limit the duration of the patent protection covering our technologies and product candidates. Such challenges may also result in our inability to develop, manufacture or commercialize our technologies and product candidates without infringing third-party patent rights. In addition, if the breadth or strength of protection provided by our owned or licensed patents and patent applications is threatened, it could dissuade companies from collaborating with us to license, develop or commercialize current or future technologies and product candidates. Any of the foregoing could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Risks Related to Government Regulation

The regulatory approval process is highly uncertain, and we may be unable to obtain, or may be delayed in obtaining, U.S. or foreign regulatory approval and, as a result, unable to commercialize lonigutamab and any future product candidates. Even if we believe our current, or planned clinical trials are successful, regulatory authorities may not agree that they provide adequate data on safety or efficacy.

Lonigutamab and any future product candidates are subject to extensive governmental regulations relating to, among other things, research, testing, development, manufacturing, approval, recordkeeping, reporting, labeling, storage, packaging, advertising and promotion, pricing, post-approval monitoring, marketing and distribution of products. Rigorous preclinical studies and clinical trials and an extensive regulatory approval process are required to be completed successfully in the United States and in many foreign jurisdictions before a new product can be marketed. Satisfaction of these and other regulatory requirements is costly, time consuming, uncertain and subject to unanticipated delays. It is possible that none of our product candidates will obtain the regulatory approvals necessary for us to begin selling them.

Our company has no prior experience in conducting and managing the clinical trials necessary to obtain regulatory approvals, including approval by the FDA. The time required to obtain FDA and other approvals is unpredictable but typically takes many years following the commencement of clinical trials, depending upon the type, complexity and novelty of the product candidate. The standards that the FDA and its foreign counterparts use when regulating us require judgment and can change, which makes it difficult to predict with certainty their application. Any analysis we perform of data from preclinical studies and clinical trials is subject to confirmation and interpretation by regulatory authorities, which could delay, limit or prevent regulatory approval. We may also encounter unexpected delays or increased costs due to new government regulations, for example, from future legislation or administrative action, or from changes in FDA policy during the period of product development, clinical trials and FDA regulatory review. It is impossible to predict whether additional legislative changes will be enacted, or whether FDA or foreign regulations, guidance or interpretations will be changed, or the impact of such changes, if any. Any elongation or de-prioritization of preclinical studies or clinical trials or delay in regulatory review resulting from such disruptions could materially affect the development and study of lonigutamab and any future product candidates.

Table of Contents

Further, the FDA and its foreign counterparts may respond to any BLA that we may submit by defining requirements that we do not anticipate.

Such responses could delay clinical development of lonigutamab and any future product candidates.

Any delay or failure in obtaining required approvals could adversely affect our ability to generate revenue from the particular product candidate for which we are seeking approval. Furthermore, any regulatory approval to market a product may be subject to limitations on the approved uses for which we may market the product or on the labeling or other restrictions.

We are also subject to or may in the future become subject to numerous foreign regulatory requirements governing, among other things, the conduct of clinical trials, manufacturing and marketing authorization, pricing and third-party reimbursement. The foreign regulatory approval process varies among countries and may include all of the risks associated with the FDA approval process described above, as well as risks attributable to the satisfaction of local regulations in foreign jurisdictions. Moreover, the time required to obtain approval may differ from that required to obtain FDA approval. FDA approval does not ensure approval by regulatory authorities outside the United States and vice versa. Any delay or failure to obtain U.S. or foreign regulatory approval for a product candidate could have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Even if we receive regulatory approval for any of our product candidates, we will be subject to ongoing regulatory obligations and continued regulatory review, which may result in significant additional expense. Additionally, our product candidates, if approved, could be subject to labeling and other restrictions and market withdrawal. We may also be subject to penalties if we fail to comply with regulatory requirements or experience unanticipated problems with our product candidates.

Any regulatory approvals that we or our existing or future collaborators obtain for our product candidates may also be subject to limitations on the approved indicated uses for which a product may be marketed or to the conditions of approval, or contain requirements for potentially costly post-marketing testing and surveillance to monitor the safety and efficacy of the product candidate.

In addition, if the FDA, EMA or a comparable foreign regulatory authority approves any of our product candidates, the manufacturing processes, labeling, packaging, distribution, post-approval monitoring and adverse event reporting, storage, import, export, advertising, promotion and recordkeeping for the product will be subject to extensive and ongoing regulatory requirements. The FDA has significant post-market authority, including the authority to require labeling changes based on new safety information and to require post-market studies or clinical trials to evaluate safety risks related to the use of a product or to require withdrawal of the product from the market. The FDA also has the authority to require a REMS plan after approval, which may impose further requirements or restrictions on the distribution or use of an approved drug. The manufacturing facilities we use to make a future product, if any, will also be subject to periodic review and inspection by the FDA and other regulatory agencies, including for continued compliance with current Good Manufacturing Practices (“cGMPs”) requirements. The discovery of any new or previously unknown problems with our third-party manufacturers, manufacturing processes or facilities may result in restrictions on the product, manufacturer or facility, including withdrawal of the product from the market. As we expect to rely on third-party manufacturers, we will not have control over compliance with applicable rules and regulations by such manufacturers. Any product promotion and advertising will also be subject to regulatory requirements and continuing regulatory review. The FDA imposes stringent restrictions on manufacturers’ communications regarding use of their products. Although clinicians may prescribe products for off-label uses as the FDA and other regulatory agencies do not regulate a physician’s choice of drug treatment made in the physician’s independent medical judgment, they do restrict promotional communications from companies or their sales force with respect to off-label uses of products. In addition, as we do not intend to conduct head-to-head comparative clinical trials for our product candidates, we will be unable to make comparative claims regarding any other products in the promotional materials for our product candidates. If we promote our products, if approved, in a manner inconsistent with FDA-approved labeling or otherwise not in compliance with FDA regulations, we may be subject to enforcement action. If we or our existing or future collaborators, manufacturers or service providers fail to comply with applicable continuing regulatory requirements in the United States or foreign jurisdictions in which we seek to market our product candidates, we or they may be subject to, among other things, fines, warning or untitled letters, holds on clinical trials, delay of approval or refusal by the FDA or similar foreign regulatory bodies to approve pending applications or supplements to approved applications, suspension or withdrawal of regulatory approval, product recalls and seizures, administrative detention of products, refusal to permit the import or export of products, operating restrictions, injunction, civil penalties and criminal prosecution.

Table of Contents

Subsequent discovery of previously unknown problems with a product, including adverse events of unanticipated severity or frequency, or with our third-party manufacturers or manufacturing processes, or failure to comply with regulatory requirements, may result in, among other things:

•restrictions on the marketing or manufacturing of the product, withdrawal of the product from the market or voluntary or mandatory product recalls;

•fines, warning or untitled letters or holds on clinical trials;

•refusal by the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency or the FDA to approve pending applications or supplements to approved applications filed by us or our strategic partners;

•suspension or revocation of product license approvals;

•product seizure or detention or refusal to permit the import or export of products; and

•injunctions or the imposition of civil or criminal penalties.

We also cannot predict the likelihood, nature or extent of government regulation that may arise from future legislation or administrative or executive action, either in the United States or abroad. Changes in FDA staffing could result in delays in the FDA’s responsiveness or in its ability to review submissions or applications, issue regulations or guidance, or implement or enforce regulatory requirements in a timely fashion or at all.

Recently enacted legislation, future legislation and other healthcare reform measures may increase the difficulty and cost for us to obtain marketing approval for and commercialize our product candidates and may affect the prices we may set.

In the United States and some foreign jurisdictions, there have been, and we expect there will continue to be, a number of legislative and regulatory changes to the healthcare system, including cost-containment measures that may reduce or limit coverage and reimbursement for newly approved drugs and affect our ability to profitably sell any product candidates for which we obtain marketing approval. In particular, there have been and continue to be a number of initiatives at the U.S. federal and state levels that seek to reduce healthcare costs and improve the quality of healthcare.

Several healthcare reform initiatives culminated in the enactment of the Inflation Reduction Act in August 2022, which allows, among other things, the Department of Health and Human Services, or HHS, to negotiate the selling price of a statutorily specified number of drugs and biologics each year that the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, or CMS, reimburses under Medicare Part B and Part D. The negotiated price may not exceed a statutory ceiling price. Only high expenditure single-source drugs that have been approved for at least 7 years (11 years for single-source biologics) can qualify for negotiation, with the negotiated price taking effect two years after the selection year. For 2026, the first year in which negotiated prices become effective, CMS selected 10 high-cost Medicare Part D drugs in 2023, negotiations began in 2024, and the negotiated maximum fair price for each drug has been announced. CMS has selected 15 additional Medicare Part D drugs for negotiated maximum fair pricing in 2027. For 2028, up to an additional 15 drugs, which may be covered under either Medicare Part B or Part D, may be selected, and for 2029 and subsequent years, up to 20 additional Part B or Part D drugs may be selected. A drug or biological product that has an orphan drug designation for only one rare disease or condition will be excluded from the Inflation Reduction Act’s price negotiation requirements, but loses that exclusion if it has designations for more than one rare disease or condition, or if is approved for an indication that is not within that single designated rare disease or condition, unless such additional designation or such disqualifying approvals are withdrawn by the time CMS evaluates the drug for selection for negotiation. The Inflation Reduction Act also imposes rebates on Medicare Part B and Part D drugs whose prices have increased at a rate greater than the rate of inflation. In addition, the law eliminates the “donut hole” under Medicare Part D beginning in 2025 by significantly lowering the beneficiary maximum out-of-pocket cost and establishing a new manufacturer discount program, which requires manufacturers, in order for their drugs to be covered by Medicare Part D, to provide statutorily defined discounts on their brand (NDA) drugs dispensed to Part D enrollees. The Inflation Reduction Act also extends enhanced subsidies for individuals purchasing health insurance coverage in ACA marketplaces through plan year 2025. The Inflation Reduction Act permits the Secretary of HHS to implement many of these provisions through guidance, as opposed to regulation, for the initial years. Manufacturers that fail to comply with the Inflation Reduction Act may be subject to various penalties, some significant, including civil monetary penalties. These provisions are taking effect progressively starting in 2023, although they may be subject to legal challenges. For example, the provisions related to the negotiation of selling prices of

Table of Contents

high-expenditure single-source drugs and biologics have been challenged in multiple lawsuits. Thus, it is unclear how the Inflation Reduction Act will be implemented but it will likely have a significant impact on the pharmaceutical industry and the pricing of our products and therapeutic candidates. The adoption of restrictive price controls in new jurisdictions, more restrictive controls in existing jurisdictions or the failure to obtain or maintain timely or adequate pricing could also adversely impact revenue. We expect pricing pressures will continue globally.

At the state level, legislatures have increasingly passed legislation and implemented regulations designed to control pharmaceutical and biological product pricing, including price or patient reimbursement constraints, discounts, restrictions on certain product access and marketing cost disclosure and transparency measures, and, in some cases, designed to encourage importation from other countries and bulk purchasing. Legally mandated price controls on payment amounts by third-party payors or other restrictions could harm our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects. In addition, regional healthcare authorities and individual hospitals are increasingly using bidding procedures to determine what pharmaceutical products and which suppliers will be included in their prescription drug and other healthcare programs. This could reduce the ultimate demand for our product candidates, if approved, or put pressure on our product pricing, which could negatively affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

We expect that additional state and federal healthcare reform measures may be adopted in the future. Such reform measures may result in more rigorous coverage criteria and in additional downward pressure on the price that we receive for any approved product. The implementation of cost containment measures or other healthcare reforms may prevent us from being able to generate revenue, attain profitability, or commercialize our product.

Legislative and regulatory proposals have been made to expand post-approval requirements and restrict sales and promotional activities for pharmaceutical products. We cannot be sure whether additional legislative changes will be enacted, or whether the FDA regulations, guidance or interpretations will be changed, or what the impact of such changes on the marketing approvals of our therapeutic candidates, if any, may be. In addition, increased scrutiny by the U.S. Congress of the FDA’s approval process may significantly delay or prevent marketing approval, as well as subject us to more stringent product labeling and post-marketing testing and other requirements.

Disruptions at the FDA may slow the time necessary for new products to be reviewed and/or approved, which would adversely affect our business. In addition, there is substantial uncertainty regarding new initiatives under the new Administration and how these might impact the FDA, its implementation of laws, regulations, policies and guidance and its personnel. Similar initiatives may also be directed toward other government agencies. These initiatives could prevent, limit or delay development and regulatory approval of our product candidates, which would adversely affect our business.

Disruptions at the FDA may slow the time necessary for new products to be reviewed and/or approved, which would adversely affect our business. Changes in FDA staffing could result in delays in the FDA’s responsiveness or in its ability to review submissions or applications, issue regulations or guidance, or implement or enforce regulatory requirements in a timely fashion or at all. If any legislation, executive orders, or lapses in agency funding impose constraints on the FDA’s ability to engage in oversight and implementation activities in the normal course, our business may be negatively impacted.

Similar consequences would also result in the event of another significant shutdown of the federal government. For example, in 2024, the U.S. government was on the verge of a shutdown and has previously shut down several times, and certain regulatory agencies, such as the FDA, had to furlough critical employees and stop critical activities. If a prolonged government shutdown occurs, or if geopolitical or global health concerns prevent the FDA from conducting their regular inspections, reviews, or other regulatory activities, it could significantly impact the ability of the FDA to timely review and process our regulatory submissions, which could have a material adverse effect on our business. Further, future government shutdowns or delays could impact our ability to access the public markets and obtain necessary capital in order to properly capitalize and continue our operations.

FDA-regulated industries, such as ours, face uncertainty with regard to the regulatory environment we will face under the new Administration as we proceed with research and development and potential future commercialization. Some of these efforts have manifested to date as efforts to reduce the size of the federal government, including large-scale reductions in force at FDA. The loss of key personnel at the FDA, including those in leadership positions, is likely to impact operations at the FDA, which could result in, among other things, delays or limitations on our ability to obtain guidance from the FDA on our product candidates in development, longer review times, and delays in obtaining regulatory approvals for our product candidates. Moreover, the new Administration has recently proposed action to freeze or reduce the budget of the National Institutes of Health as related to its funding for medical research, which could decrease the ability of facilities that rely on NIH funding to enroll and conduct clinical trials or increase the costs to us of conducting

Table of Contents

clinical trials. There remains general uncertainty regarding future activities. New executive orders, regulations, policies or guidance could be issued or promulgated that adversely affects us or creates a more challenging or costly environment to pursue the development of new therapeutic products. Alternatively, state governments may attempt to address or react to changes at the federal level with changes to their own regulatory frameworks in a manner that is adverse to our operations. If we become negatively impacted by future governmental orders, regulations, policies or guidance, there could be a material adverse effect on us and our business.

Our current product candidates and any of our future product candidates regulated as biologics in the United States may face competition sooner than anticipated from biosimilars approved through an abbreviated regulatory pathway.

The enactment of the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act of 2009 (“BPCIA”) as part of the Patient ACA created an abbreviated pathway for the approval of biosimilar and interchangeable biological products. The abbreviated regulatory pathway establishes legal authority for the FDA to review and approve biosimilar biological products, including the possible designation of a biosimilar as “interchangeable” based on its similarity to an existing brand product. Under the BPCIA, an application for a biosimilar product cannot be approved by the FDA until 12 years after the original branded product was approved under a BLA. Certain changes, however, and supplements to an approved BLA, and subsequent applications filed by the same sponsor, manufacturer, licensor, predecessor in interest, or other related entity do not qualify for the 12-year exclusivity period.

Lonigutamab is a biological product candidate. We anticipate being awarded market exclusivity for each of our biological product candidate that is subject to its own BLA for 12 years in the United States. However, the term of the patents that cover such product candidate may not extend beyond the applicable market exclusivity awarded by a particular country. For example, in the United States, if all of the patents that cover our particular biological product expire before the 12-year market exclusivity expires, a third party could submit a marketing application for a biosimilar product four years after approval of our biological product, the FDA could immediately review the application and approve the biosimilar product for marketing 12 years after approval of our biological product, and the biosimilar sponsor could then immediately begin marketing. Alternatively, a third party could submit a full BLA for a similar or identical product any time after approval of our biological product, and the FDA could immediately review and approve the similar or identical product for marketing and the third party could begin marketing the similar or identical product upon expiry of all of the patents that cover our particular biological product.

There is also a risk that this exclusivity could be changed in the future. For example, this exclusivity could be shortened due to congressional action or through other actions, including future proposed budgets, international trade agreements and other arrangements or proposals. Additionally, there is a risk that the FDA will not consider our product candidates to be reference products for competing products, potentially creating the opportunity for biosimilar competition sooner than anticipated. The extent to which a biosimilar, once approved, will be substituted for any one of our reference products in a way that is similar to traditional generic substitution for non-biological products is not yet clear, and will depend on a number of marketplace and regulatory factors that are still developing. It is also possible that payors will give reimbursement preference to biosimilars over reference biological products, even absent a determination of interchangeability.

Laws and regulations outside the United States differ, including the length and extent of patent and exclusivity protection and pathways for competition to enter the market. For example, in the EU exclusivity is generally 10 years and can be extended to 11 years under certain circumstances. Other countries may have significantly shorter or longer periods of exclusivity. In addition, other countries may have different standards in determining similarity to a reference product. Any market entry of competing products to our product candidates in these other regions could adversely affect our business in those regions.

To the extent that we do not receive any anticipated periods of regulatory exclusivity for our product candidates it could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Our operations and relationships with healthcare providers, healthcare organizations, customers and third-party payors will be subject to applicable anti-bribery, anti-kickback, fraud and abuse, transparency and other healthcare and privacy laws and regulations, which could expose us to, among other things, enforcement actions, criminal sanctions, civil penalties, contractual damages, reputational harm, administrative burdens and diminished profits and future earnings.

Our future arrangements with healthcare providers, healthcare organizations, third-party payors and customers will expose us to broadly applicable anti-bribery, fraud and abuse and other healthcare laws and regulations that may constrain

Table of Contents

the business or financial arrangements and relationships through which we research, market, sell and distribute our products, if approved. In addition, we may be subject to data privacy and security regulation by the U.S. federal government and the states and the foreign governments in the jurisdictions in which we conduct our business. Restrictions under applicable federal and state anti-bribery and healthcare laws and regulations, include the following:

•the federal Anti-Kickback Statute, which prohibits, among other things, individuals and entities from knowingly and willfully soliciting, offering, receiving or providing remuneration, directly or indirectly, in cash or in kind, to induce or reward, or in return for, either the referral of an individual for, or the purchase, order or recommendation of, any good or service, for which payment may be made, in whole or in part, under a federal and state healthcare program such as Medicare and Medicaid. A person or entity does not need to have actual knowledge of the statute or specific intent to violate it in order to have committed a violation;

•the federal criminal and civil false claims laws, including the federal False Claims Act, which can be enforced through civil whistleblower or qui tam actions against individuals or entities, and the Federal Civil Monetary Penalties Laws, which prohibit, among other things, knowingly presenting, or causing to be presented, to the federal government, claims for payment that are false or fraudulent, knowingly making, using or causing to be made or used, a false record or statement material to a false or fraudulent claim, or from knowingly making a false statement to avoid, decrease or conceal an obligation to pay money to the federal government. In addition, certain marketing practices, including off-label promotion, may also violate false claims laws. Moreover, the government may assert that a claim including items and services resulting from a violation of the federal Anti-Kickback Statute constitutes a false or fraudulent claim for purposes of the federal False Claims Act;

•the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (“HIPAA”), which imposes criminal and civil liability, prohibits, among other things, knowingly and willfully executing, or attempting to execute a scheme to defraud any healthcare benefit program, or knowingly and willfully falsifying, concealing or covering up a material fact or making any materially false statement in connection with the delivery of or payment for healthcare benefits, items or services; similar to the federal Anti- Kickback Statute, a person or entity does not need to have actual knowledge of the statute or specific intent to violate it in order to have committed a violation;

•HIPAA, as amended by the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act of 2009 (“HITECH”) and their respective implementing regulations, which impose obligations on certain healthcare providers, health plans, and healthcare clearinghouses, known as covered entities, as well as their business associates that perform certain services involving the storage, use or disclosure of individually identifiable health information for or on behalf of a covered entity and their covered subcontractors, including mandatory contractual terms, with respect to safeguarding the privacy, security, and transmission of individually identifiable health information, and require notification to affected individuals and regulatory authorities of certain breaches of security of individually identifiable health information;

•the federal legislation commonly referred to as the Physician Payments Sunshine Act, enacted as part of the ACA, and its implementing regulations, which requires certain manufacturers of covered drugs, devices, biologics and medical supplies that are reimbursable under Medicare, Medicaid, or the Children’s Health Insurance Program, with certain exceptions, to report annually to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (“CMS”) information on certain payments and other transfers of value to clinicians (defined to include doctors, dentists, optometrists, podiatrists and chiropractors), teaching hospitals, and certain other health care providers (such as physician assistants and nurse practitioners), as well as ownership and investment interests held by the clinicians described above and their immediate family members;

•state privacy laws and regulations that impose restrictive requirements regulating the use and disclosure of personal information, including health information;

•foreign privacy, data protection, and data security laws and regulations, such as the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (“EU GDPR”), which imposes comprehensive obligations on covered businesses to, among other things, make contractual privacy, data protection and data security commitments, cooperate with European data protection authorities, implement security measures, give data breach notifications, and keep records of personal information processing activities;

•the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977, as amended, which prohibits, among other things, U.S. companies and their employees and agents from authorizing, promising, offering, or providing, directly or indirectly, corrupt

Table of Contents

or improper payments or anything else of value to foreign government officials, employees of public international organizations and foreign government owned or affiliated entities, candidates for foreign political office, and foreign political parties or officials thereof;

•analogous state and foreign laws and regulations, such as state anti-kickback and false claims laws, that may apply to sales or marketing arrangements and claims involving healthcare items or services reimbursed by non-governmental third-party payors, including private insurers; and

•certain state laws that require pharmaceutical companies to comply with the pharmaceutical industry’s voluntary compliance guidelines and the relevant compliance guidance promulgated by the federal government in addition to requiring drug manufacturers to report information related to payments to clinicians and other healthcare providers or marketing expenditures and drug pricing information, and state and local laws that require the registration of pharmaceutical sales representatives.

If we or our current or future collaborators, manufacturers or service providers fail to comply with applicable federal, state or foreign laws or regulations, we could be subject to enforcement actions, which could affect our ability to develop, market and sell our product candidates successfully and could harm our reputation and lead to reduced acceptance of our products, if approved by the market.

Efforts to ensure that our current and future business arrangements with third parties comply with applicable healthcare laws and regulations could involve substantial costs. It is possible that governmental authorities will conclude that our business practices do not comply with current or future statutes, regulations, agency guidance or case law involving applicable fraud and abuse or other healthcare laws and regulations. If our operations are found to be in violation of any such requirements, we may be subject to significant penalties, including civil, criminal and administrative penalties, damages, fines, disgorgement, imprisonment, the curtailment or restructuring of our operations, loss of eligibility to obtain approvals from the FDA, exclusion from participation in government contracting, healthcare reimbursement or other government programs, including Medicare and Medicaid, integrity oversight and reporting obligations, or reputational harm, any of which could adversely affect our financial results. These risks cannot be entirely eliminated. Any action against us for an alleged or suspected violation could cause us to incur significant legal expenses and could divert our management’s attention from the operation of our business, even if our defense is successful. In addition, achieving and sustaining compliance with applicable laws and regulations may be costly to us in terms of money, time and resources.

Governments outside the United States tend to impose strict price controls, which may adversely affect our revenue, if any.

In some countries, particularly in the European Union, the pricing of prescription pharmaceuticals is subject to governmental control. In these countries, pricing negotiations with governmental authorities can take considerable time after the receipt of marketing approval for a drug. To obtain coverage and reimbursement or pricing approval in some countries, we may be required to conduct a clinical trial that compares the cost-effectiveness of our product candidate to other available therapies. In addition, many countries outside the U.S. have limited government support programs that provide for reimbursement of drugs such as our product candidates, with an emphasis on private payors for access to commercial products. If reimbursement of our products, if approved is unavailable or limited in scope or amount, or if pricing is set at unsatisfactory levels, our business could be materially harmed.

We are subject to stringent and evolving U.S. and foreign laws, regulations and rules, contractual obligations, industry standards, policies, and other obligations related to data privacy and security. Our actual or perceived failure to comply with such obligations could lead to regulatory investigations or actions; litigation (including class claims); fines and penalties; disruptions of our business operations; reputational harm; loss of revenue or profits; loss of customers or sales; and other adverse business consequences.

In the ordinary course of business, we and our third-party service providers collect, receive, store, process, generate, use, transfer, disclose, make accessible, protect, secure, dispose of, transmit, and share (collectively, process or processing) personal data and other sensitive information, including proprietary and confidential business data, trade secrets, employee data, intellectual property, data about trial participants in connection with clinical trials, and other sensitive third-party data (collectively, sensitive data). Our and our third-party service providers data processing activities may subject us to numerous data privacy and security laws and regulations, guidance, industry standards, external and internal privacy and security policies, contractual requirements, and other obligations.

Table of Contents

Various legislative and regulatory bodies, or self-regulatory organizations, may enact new or expand or otherwise revise existing laws, rules or regulations, or guidance regarding data privacy and security. In the United States, federal, state, and local governments have enacted numerous data privacy and security laws, including data breach notification laws, personal data privacy laws, consumer protection laws (e.g., Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act), and other similar laws (e.g., wiretapping laws). In the past few years, over a third of U.S. states have enacted comprehensive privacy laws that impose certain obligations on covered businesses, including providing specific disclosures in privacy notices and affording residents with certain rights concerning their personal data. As applicable, such rights may include the right to access, correct, or delete certain personal data, and to opt-out of certain data processing activities, such as targeted advertising, profiling, and automated decision-making. The exercise of these rights may impact our business and ability to provide our products and services. Certain states also impose stricter requirements for processing certain personal data, including sensitive information, such as conducting data privacy impact assessments. These state laws allow for statutory fines for noncompliance. For example, the California Consumer Privacy Act, as amended (“CCPA”) applies to personal data of consumers, business representatives, and employees, and among other things requires covered businesses to provide specific disclosures in privacy notices and honor requests of California residents to exercise certain privacy rights, including the right to opt out of certain disclosures of their information. The CCPA provides for civil penalties of up to $7,500 per violation as well as a private right of action with statutory damages for certain data breaches, thereby potentially increasing risks associated with a data breach. Although the CCPA and other comprehensive state privacy laws include limited exceptions, including for certain information collected as part of clinical trials, these developments may impact our processing of personal data and increases the compliance costs and legal risk for us and the third parties upon whom we rely. Similar laws have been enacted and are being considered in several other states, as well as at the federal and local levels and we expect more states to pass similar laws in the future. In addition to government activity, privacy advocacy groups and technology and other industries are considering various new, additional or different self-regulatory standards that may place additional burdens on us.

There are also various laws and regulations in other jurisdictions outside the United States relating to data privacy and security, with which we may need to comply. For example, the EU GDPR and the United Kingdom’s equivalent (“UK GDPR”), collectively, GDPR, impose strict requirements for processing personal data. We also have clinical trial activities in Asia, and may be subject to data privacy regimes in the region, such as Japan’s Act on the Protection of Personal Information. Notably, the GDPR imposes large penalties for noncompliance, including the potential for fines of up to €20 million under the EU GDPR / £17.5 million under the UK GDPR, or 4% of the annual global revenue of the noncompliant entity, whichever is greater. The GDPR also provides for private litigation related to processing of personal data brought by classes of data subjects or consumer protection organizations authorized at law to represent their interests. Additionally, EU member states may introduce further conditions, including limitations, and make their own laws and regulations further limiting the processing of special categories of personal data, including personal data related to health, biometric data used for unique identification purposes and genetic information, which could limit our ability to collect, use and share EU data, and could cause our compliance costs to increase, ultimately adversely affecting our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

In addition, we may be unable to transfer personal data from Europe and other jurisdictions to the United States or other countries due to data localization requirements or limitations on cross-border data flows. Europe and other jurisdictions have enacted laws requiring data to be localized or limiting the transfer of personal data to other countries. In particular, the European Economic Area (“EEA”) and the UK have placed limitations and strict compliance requirements on the transfer of personal data to the United States and other countries whose privacy laws it believes are inadequate.

Other jurisdictions may adopt similarly stringent interpretations of their data localization and cross-border data transfer laws. Although there are currently various mechanisms that may be used to transfer personal data from the EEA and UK to the United States in compliance with law, these mechanisms are subject to legal challenges, and there is no assurance that we can satisfy or rely on these measures to lawfully transfer personal data to the United States.

In addition to data privacy and security laws, we are also bound by other obligations related to data privacy and security, and our efforts to comply with such obligations may not be successful.

Each of these laws, rules, regulations and contractual obligations relating to data privacy and security, and any other such changes thereto or new laws, rules, regulations or contractual obligations could impose significant limitations, require changes to our business, or restrict our collection, use, storage or processing of personal data, which may increase our compliance expenses and make our business more costly or less efficient to conduct. In addition, any such changes could compromise our ability to develop an adequate marketing strategy and pursue our growth strategy effectively or even prevent us from providing certain products in jurisdictions in which we currently operate and in which we may operate in

Table of Contents

the future or incur potential liability in an effort to comply with such legislation, which, in turn, could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects. Complying with these numerous, complex and often changing regulations is expensive and difficult, and failure to comply with any data privacy or security laws, whether by us, one of our CROs, CMOs or another third party service provider, could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects, including but not limited to: investigation costs; material fines and penalties; compensatory, special, punitive and statutory damages; litigation; consent orders regarding our privacy and security practices; requirements that we provide notices, credit monitoring services and/or credit restoration services or other relevant services to impacted individuals; adverse actions against our licenses to do business; reputational damage; and injunctive relief. New regulation or legislative actions regarding data privacy and security (together with applicable industry standards) may increase our costs of doing business. In this regard, we expect that there will continue to be new proposed laws, regulations and industry standards relating to privacy and data protection in the United States, the EEA and other jurisdictions, and we cannot determine the impact such future laws, regulations and standards may have on our business.

Any actual or perceived failure by us or our CROs, CMOs or third-party service providers to comply with any federal, state or foreign laws, rules, regulations, industry self-regulatory principles, industry standards or codes of conduct, regulatory guidance, orders to which we may be subject or other legal obligations relating to privacy, data protection, data security or consumer protection could adversely affect our reputation, brand and business and result in adverse consequences including but not limited to: government enforcement actions (e.g., investigations, fines, penalties, audits, inspections, and similar); litigation (including class-action claims) and mass arbitration demands; additional reporting requirements and/or oversight; bans on processing personal data; orders to destroy or not use personal data; and imprisonment of company officials. In particular, plaintiffs have become increasingly more active in bringing privacy-related claims against companies, including class claims and mass arbitration demands. Some of these claims allow for the recovery of statutory damages on a per violation basis, and, if viable, carry the potential for monumental statutory damages, depending on the volume of data and the number of violations. Any of these events could adversely affect our reputation, business, or financial condition, including but not limited to: loss of customers; interruptions or stoppages in our business operations (including clinical trials); inability to process personal data or to operate in certain jurisdictions; limited ability to develop or commercialize our products; expenditure of time and resources to defend any claim or inquiry; adverse publicity; or substantial changes to our business model or operations.

We also publicly post policies concerning our collection, use, disclosure and other processing of the personal data provided to us by our website visitors and certain other parties. Although we endeavor to comply with our public statements and documentation, we may at times fail to do so or be perceived to have failed to do so. Our publication of our policies and other statements we publish that provide promises and assurances about privacy and security can subject us to potential state and federal action if they are found to be deceptive, unfair or misrepresentative of our actual practices. Any actual or perceived failure by us to comply with federal, state or foreign laws, rules or regulations, industry standards, contractual or other legal obligations, or any actual, perceived or suspected cybersecurity incident, whether or not resulting in unauthorized access to, or acquisition, release or transfer of personal data or other data, may result in enforcement actions and prosecutions, private litigation, significant fines, penalties and censure, claims for damages by customers and other affected individuals, regulatory inquiries and investigations or adverse publicity and could cause individuals and entities to lose trust in us, any of which could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Risks Related to Our Reliance on Third Parties

We may have conflicts with our current or future licensors or collaborators that could delay or prevent the development or commercialization of our product candidates.

We are currently party to license and collaboration agreements with Pierre Fabre and we expect to enter into similar strategic transactions in the future. We have terminated our license agreement with Novelty Nobility and also given notice of termination of our license and collaboration agreement with Affibody. We may have conflicts with our current or future collaborators, such as conflicts concerning the interpretation of preclinical or clinical data, the achievement of milestones, the interpretation of contractual obligations, payments for services, development obligations or the ownership of intellectual property developed during our collaboration. If any conflicts arise with any of our collaborators, such collaborator may act in a manner that is adverse to our best interests. Any such disagreement could result in one or more of the following, each of which could delay or prevent the development or commercialization of our product candidates, and in turn prevent us from generating revenue: disputes regarding milestone payments or royalties; uncertainty regarding ownership of intellectual property rights arising from our collaborative activities, which could prevent us from entering into

Table of Contents

additional collaborations; unwillingness by the collaborator to cooperate in the development or manufacture of a product candidate, including providing us with data or materials; unwillingness on the part of a collaborator to keep us informed regarding the progress of its development and commercialization activities or to permit public disclosure of the results of those activities; initiating of litigation or alternative dispute resolution options by either party to resolve the dispute; or attempts by either party to terminate the agreement.

We have relied and expect to continue to rely on third parties to conduct our preclinical studies and clinical trials. If those third parties do not perform as contractually required, fail to satisfy legal or regulatory requirements, miss expected deadlines or terminate the relationship, our development programs could be delayed, more costly or unsuccessful, and we may never be able to seek or obtain regulatory approval for or commercialize our product candidates.

We rely and intend to rely in the future on third-party clinical investigators, CROs, clinical data management organizations to conduct, supervise and monitor preclinical studies and clinical trials of our current or future product candidates. Because we currently rely and intend to continue to rely on these third parties, we will have less control over the timing, quality and other aspects of preclinical studies and clinical trials than we would have had we conducted them independently. These parties are not, and will not be, our employees and we will have limited control over the amount of time and resources that they dedicate to our programs. Additionally, such parties may have contractual relationships with other entities, some of which may be our competitors, which may draw time and resources from our programs.

We have no experience as a company in filing and supporting the applications necessary to gain marketing approvals. Securing marketing approval requires the submission of extensive preclinical and clinical data and supporting information to regulatory authorities for each indication to establish the product candidate’s safety or efficacy for that indication. Securing marketing approval also requires the submission of information about the product manufacturing process to, and inspection of manufacturing facilities and clinical trial sites by, applicable regulatory authorities.

Large-scale clinical trials require significant financial and management resources, and reliance on third-party clinical investigators, CROs, partners or consultants. Relying on third-party clinical investigators or CROs may force us to encounter delays and challenges that are outside of our control. For example, in November 2023 we reported a third party programming error impacted dose sequencing in our Phase 2b/3 trial of izokibep in PsA. In addition, we may not be able to demonstrate sufficient comparability between products manufactured at different facilities to allow for inclusion of the clinical results from participants treated with products from these different facilities, in our product registrations. Further, our third party clinical manufacturers may not be able to manufacture our product candidates or otherwise fulfill their obligations to us because of interruptions to their business, including the loss of their key staff or interruptions to their raw material supply.

Our reliance on these third parties for development activities will reduce our control over these activities. Nevertheless, we are responsible for ensuring that each of our clinical trials is conducted in accordance with the applicable trial protocol and legal, regulatory and scientific standards, and our reliance on the CROs, clinical trial sites, and other third parties does not relieve us of these responsibilities. For example, we will remain responsible for ensuring that each of our preclinical studies are conducted in accordance with good laboratory practices (GLPs) and clinical trials are conducted in accordance with GCPs. Moreover, the FDA and comparable foreign regulatory authorities require us to comply with GCP for conducting, recording and reporting the results of clinical trials to assure that data and reported results are credible and accurate and that the rights, integrity and confidentiality of trial participants are protected. Regulatory authorities enforce these requirements through periodic inspections (including pre-approval inspections once a BLA is submitted to the FDA) of trial sponsors, clinical investigators, trial sites and certain third parties including CROs. If we, our CROs, clinical trial sites, or other third parties fail to comply with applicable GCP or other regulatory requirements, we or they may be subject to enforcement or other legal actions, the clinical data generated in our clinical trials may be deemed unreliable and the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities may require us to perform additional clinical trials. We cannot assure you that upon inspection by a given regulatory authority, such regulatory authority will determine that any of our clinical trials comply with GCP regulations. Moreover, our business may be significantly impacted if our CROs, clinical investigators or other third parties violate federal or state healthcare fraud and abuse or false claims laws and regulations or healthcare privacy and security laws.

In the event we need to repeat, extend, delay or terminate our clinical trials because these third parties do not successfully carry out their contractual duties, meet expected deadlines or conduct our clinical trials in accordance with regulatory requirements or our stated protocols, our clinical trials may need to be repeated, extended, delayed or terminated and we may not be able to obtain, or may be delayed in obtaining, marketing approvals for our product candidates, and we

Table of Contents

will not be able to, or may be delayed in our efforts to, successfully commercialize our product candidates or we or they may be subject to regulatory enforcement actions. As a result, our results of operations and the commercial prospects for our product candidates would be harmed, our costs could increase and our ability to generate revenue could be delayed. For example, we experienced a third party programming error impacting dose sequencing in the Phase 2b/3 trial in PsA. To the extent we are unable to successfully identify and manage the performance of third-party service providers in the future, our business may be materially and adversely affected.

Terminating existing agreements with these third parties to align with our changed strategies or reprioritization of product candidates could also result in expensive termination fees or expenses in negotiating. For example, prioritizing lonigutamab as our lead product candidate in August 2024 and suspending further development of izokibep required making amendments to our agreement with our third-party manufacturer, which resulted in additional expense to and termination fees of approximately $7.2 million in the year ended December 31, 2024.

If any of our relationships with these third parties terminate, we may not be able to enter into alternative arrangements or do so on commercially reasonable terms. Switching or adding additional contractors involves additional cost and time and requires management time and focus. In addition, there is a natural transition period when a new third party commences work. As a result, delays could occur, which could compromise our ability to meet our desired development timelines. In addition, if an agreement with any of our collaborators terminates, our access to technology and intellectual property licensed to us by that collaborator may be restricted or terminate entirely, which may delay our continued development of our product candidates utilizing the collaborator’s technology or intellectual property or require us to stop development of those product candidates completely.

In addition, principal investigators for our clinical trials may serve as scientific advisors or consultants to us from time to time and receive compensation in connection with such services. Under certain circumstances, we may be required to report some of these relationships to the FDA. The FDA may conclude that a financial relationship between us and/or a principal investigator has created a conflict of interest or otherwise affected interpretation of the study. The FDA may therefore question the integrity of the data generated at the applicable clinical trial site and the utility of the clinical trial itself may be jeopardized. This could result in a delay in approval, or rejection, of our marketing applications by the FDA and may ultimately lead to the denial of regulatory approval of one or more of our product candidates.

We rely on third-party manufacturers and suppliers to supply our product candidates. The loss of our third-party manufacturers or suppliers, or their failure to comply with applicable regulatory requirements or to supply sufficient quantities at acceptable quality levels or prices, within acceptable timeframes, or at all, would materially and adversely affect our business.

We do not own or operate facilities for drug manufacturing, storage, distribution or quality testing. We currently rely, and expect to continue to rely, on third-party contract developers and manufacturers to manufacture bulk drug substances, drug products, raw materials, samples, device components, and other materials for our product candidates. Reliance on third-party manufacturers may expose us to different risks than if we were to manufacture product candidates ourselves. There can be no assurance that our preclinical, clinical and commercial product supplies will not be limited, interrupted, terminated or will be of satisfactory quality or be available at acceptable prices. In addition, any replacement of our manufacturer could require significant effort and time because there may be a limited number of qualified replacements.

Furthermore, there are a limited number of suppliers for device components, raw materials, and packaging we use in our product candidates, which exposes us to the risk of disruption in the supply of the materials necessary to manufacture our product candidates for our preclinical studies and clinical trials, and if approved, ultimately for commercial sale.

The manufacturing process for our product candidates is subject to the FDA, EMA and foreign regulatory authority review. We, and our suppliers and manufacturers, some of which are currently our sole source of supply, must meet applicable manufacturing requirements and undergo rigorous facility and process validation tests required by regulatory authorities in order to comply with regulatory standards, such as cGMPs. Securing marketing approval also requires the submission of information about the product manufacturing process to, and inspection of manufacturing facilities by, the FDA, EMA and foreign regulatory authorities. If our CMOs cannot successfully manufacture material that conforms to our specifications and the strict regulatory requirements of the FDA, EMA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities, we may not be able to rely on their facilities for the manufacture of elements of our product candidates. Moreover, we do not conduct the manufacturing process ourselves and are dependent on our CMOs for manufacturing in compliance with current regulatory requirements. In the event that any of our manufacturers fails to comply with such requirements or to

Table of Contents

perform its obligations in relation to quality, timing or otherwise, or if our projected manufacturing capacity or supply of materials becomes limited, interrupted, or more costly than anticipated, we may be forced to enter into an agreement with another third party, which we may not be able to do timely or on reasonable terms, if at all. In some cases, the technical skills or technology required to manufacture our product candidates may be unique or proprietary to the original manufacturer and we may have difficulty transferring such to another third party.

These factors would increase our reliance on such manufacturer or require us to obtain a license from such manufacturer in order to enable us, or to have another third party, manufacture our product candidates. If we are required to change manufacturers for any reason, we will be required to verify that the new manufacturer maintains facilities and procedures that comply with applicable quality standards and regulations and guidelines; and we may be required to repeat some of the development program. The delays and costs associated with the verification of a new manufacturer could negatively affect our ability to develop product candidates in a timely manner or within budget.

We expect to continue to rely on third-party manufacturers if we receive regulatory approval for any product candidate. To the extent that we have existing, or enter into future, manufacturing arrangements with third parties, we will depend on these third parties to perform their obligations in a timely manner consistent with contractual and regulatory requirements, including those related to quality control and assurance. Any manufacturing facilities used to produce our product candidates will be subject to periodic review and inspection by the FDA and foreign regulatory authorities, including for continued compliance with cGMP requirements, quality control, quality assurance and corresponding maintenance of records and documents. If we are unable to obtain or maintain third-party manufacturing for product candidates, or to do so on commercially reasonable terms, we may not be able to develop and commercialize our product candidates successfully. Our or a third party’s failure to execute on our manufacturing requirements, comply with cGMPs or maintain a compliance status acceptable to the FDA, EMA or foreign regulatory authorities could adversely affect our business in a number of ways, including:

•an inability to initiate or continue preclinical studies or clinical trials of product candidates;

•delay in submitting regulatory applications, or receiving regulatory approvals, for product candidates;

•loss of the cooperation of existing or future collaborators;

•requirements to cease distribution or to recall batches of our product candidates; and

•in the event of approval to market and commercialize a product candidate, an inability to meet commercial demands for our products.

Additionally, our CMOs may experience difficulties due to resource constraints or as a result of labor disputes or unstable political environments. If our CMOs were to encounter any of these difficulties, our ability to provide our product candidates to participants in preclinical and clinical trials, or to provide product for treatment of participants once approved, would be jeopardized.

In January 2024, there was congressional activity, including the introduction of the BIOSECURE Act (H.R. 7085) in the House of Representatives and a substantially similar Senate bill (S. 3558). If these bills become law, or similar laws are passed, they would have the potential to severely restrict the ability of U.S. biopharmaceutical companies like us to purchase products or services from, or otherwise collaborate with, certain Chinese biotechnology companies “of concern” without losing the ability to contract with, or otherwise receive funding from, the U.S. government. It is possible some of our contractual counterparties could be impacted by such legislation, which could increase the cost or reduce the supply of material available to us, delay the procurement or supply of such material, delay or impact clinical trials, and could adversely affect our financial condition and business prospects.

We depend on sole source and limited source suppliers for certain drug substances, drug products, raw materials, samples, components, and other materials used in our product candidates. If we are unable to source these supplies on a timely basis, or establish longer-term contracts with our CMOs, we will not be able to complete our clinical trials on time and the development of our product candidates may be delayed.

We depend on sole source and limited source suppliers for certain drug substances, drug products, raw materials, samples, components, and other materials used in our product candidates. We do not currently have long-term supply contracts with all of our CMOs and they are not obligated to supply drug products to us for any period, in any specified

Table of Contents

quantity or at any certain price beyond the delivery contemplated by the relevant purchase orders. As a result, our suppliers could stop selling to us at commercially reasonable prices, or at all. While we have entered into long-term master supply agreements with certain of our CMOs, in the future as we advance our clinical trials or commercialization plans, we may not be successful in negotiating additional long-term supply agreements on favorable terms or at all. If we do enter into such long-term master supply agreements, or enter into such agreements on less favorable terms than we currently have with certain of our CMOs, we could be subject to binding long-term purchase obligations that may be harmful to our business, including in the event that we do not conduct our trials on planned timelines or utilize the drug products that we are required to purchase. For example, in July 2024, we and one of our CMOs entered into an agreement to terminate a supply agreement in connection with which we incurred contract termination costs of $14.3 million. In any event, any change in our relationships with our CMOs or changes to contractual terms of our agreements with them could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Furthermore, any of the sole source and limited source suppliers upon whom we rely could stop producing our supplies, cease operations or be acquired by, or enter into exclusive arrangements with, our competitors. Additionally, our manufacturing process for lonigutamab requires special equipment, and identifying additional suppliers able to fabricate such equipment at their facility at acceptable costs may be difficult. Establishing additional or replacement suppliers for these supplies, and obtaining regulatory clearance or approvals that may result from adding or replacing suppliers, could take a substantial amount of time, result in increased costs and impair our ability to produce our products, which would adversely impact our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects. Any such interruption or delay may force us to seek similar supplies from alternative sources, which may not be available at reasonable prices, or at all. Any interruption in the supply of sole source or limited source components for our product candidates would adversely affect our ability to meet scheduled timelines and budget for the development and commercialization of our product candidates, could result in higher expenses and would harm our business. For example, we were notified in 2024 that manufacturing facilities where our CMO manufactures lonigutamab drug substance will be closing. Accordingly, we have transferred lonigutamab drug substance manufacturing to the CMO’s alternative manufacturing plant, which requires process changes, comparability studies, and regulatory filings to compliantly support clinical trials. Such tech transfer activities involve rigorous planning and execution with associated technical resources. We cannot assure you that we will not experience any disruptions in our lonigutamab drug substance supply, or not experience any adverse impact to the regulatory process or timelines for lonigutamab, as a result of the transfer. In this regard, although we have not experienced any significant disruption as a result of our reliance on limited or sole source suppliers to date, we have a limited operating history and cannot assure you that we will not experience disruptions in our supply chain in the future as a result of such reliance or otherwise.

The operations of our suppliers, most of which are located outside of the United States, are subject to additional risks that are beyond our control and that could harm our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Currently, most of our suppliers are located outside of the United States. As a result of our global suppliers, we are subject to risks associated with doing business abroad, including:

•political unrest, terrorism, labor disputes, and economic instability resulting in the disruption of trade from foreign countries in which our products are manufactured;

•the imposition of new laws and regulations, including those relating to labor conditions, quality, and safety standards, imports, duties, taxes, and other charges on imports, as well as trade restrictions and restrictions on currency exchange or the transfer of funds, particularly new or increased tariffs imposed on imports from countries where our suppliers operate;

•greater challenges and increased costs with enforcing and periodically auditing or reviewing our suppliers’ and manufacturers’ compliance with cGMPs or status acceptable to the FDA, EMA or foreign regulatory authorities;

•reduced protection for intellectual property rights, including trademark protection, in some countries, particularly China;

•disruptions in operations due to global, regional, or local public health crises or other emergencies or natural disasters, including, for example, potential disruptions due to pandemics or health crises;

•disruptions or delays in shipments; and

Table of Contents

•changes in local economic conditions in countries where our manufacturers or suppliers are located.

These and other factors beyond our control could interrupt our suppliers’ production, influence the ability of our suppliers to export our clinical supplies cost-effectively or at all, and inhibit our suppliers’ ability to procure certain materials, any of which could harm our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

The manufacturing of our product candidates is complex, and our third-party manufacturers may encounter difficulties in production. If our third-party manufacturers encounter such difficulties, our ability to provide supply of our product candidates for clinical trials, our ability to obtain marketing approval, or provide supply of our products for participants, if approved, could be delayed or halted.

Our product candidates are biopharmaceuticals and the process of manufacturing biopharmaceuticals is complex, time-consuming, highly regulated and subject to multiple risks. Our CMOs must comply with legal requirements, cGMPs and guidelines for the manufacturing of biopharmaceuticals used in clinical trials and, if approved, marketed products. Our CMOs may have limited experience in the manufacturing of cGMP batches of our products.

Manufacturing biopharmaceuticals is highly susceptible to drug product loss due to contamination, equipment failure, improper installation or operation of equipment, vendor or operator error, inconsistency in yields, variability in product characteristics and difficulties in scaling the production process. If any such drug product loss occurs, the impact to our business could be compounded by the long lead times needed to procure additional drug product due to plant capacity limitations, or other restrictions, at our CMOs. Even minor deviations from normal manufacturing processes could result in reduced production yields, product defects and other supply disruptions. If microbial, viral or other contaminations are discovered at our third-party manufacturers’ facilities, such facilities may need to be closed for an extended period of time to investigate and remedy the contamination, which could delay clinical trials and adversely affect our business. Moreover, if the FDA, EMA or any other regulatory authority determines that our third-party manufacturers’ facilities are not in compliance with applicable laws and regulations, including those governing cGMPs, they may deny BLA establishment licensure until the deficiencies are corrected or we replace the manufacturer in our BLA with a manufacturer that is able to ensure safety, purity and potency of the product being manufactured.

In addition, there are risks associated with large scale manufacturing for clinical trials or commercial scale including, among others, cost overruns, potential problems with process scale-up, process reproducibility, stability issues, compliance with cGMPs, lot consistency and timely availability of raw materials. Even if we obtain regulatory approval for any of our product candidates, there is no assurance that manufacturers will be able to manufacture the approved product to specifications acceptable to the FDA, EMA or other regulatory authorities, to produce it in sufficient quantities to meet the requirements for the potential launch of the product or to meet potential future demand. If our manufacturers are unable to produce sufficient quantities for clinical trials or for commercialization, commercialization efforts would be impaired, which would have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Scaling up a biopharmaceutical manufacturing process is a difficult and uncertain task. If our third-party manufacturers are unable, or decide not, to adequately validate or scale-up the manufacturing process at our current manufacturers’ facilities, we will need to transfer to another manufacturer and complete the manufacturing validation process, which can be lengthy. If we are able to adequately scale-up the manufacturing process and produce qualification lots for our product candidates with CMOs, we will in most cases still need to negotiate with such CMOs an agreement for commercial supply and it is not certain we will be able to come to agreement on terms acceptable to us.

We cannot assure you that any stability or other issues relating to the manufacture and testing of any of our current or future product candidates or products will not occur in the future. If our third-party manufacturers were to encounter any of these difficulties, our ability to provide any product candidates to participants in clinical trials and products to participants, once approved, would be jeopardized. Any delay or interruption in clinical trial supplies could delay the completion of planned clinical trials, increase the costs associated with maintaining clinical trial programs and, depending upon the period of delay, require us to commence new clinical trials at additional expense or terminate clinical trials completely. Any adverse developments affecting clinical or commercial manufacturing of our product candidates or products may result in shipment delays, inventory shortages, lot failures, product withdrawals or recalls, or other interruptions in the supply of our product candidates or products. We may also have to take inventory write-offs and incur other charges and expenses for product candidates or products that fail to meet specifications, undertake costly remediation efforts or seek more costly manufacturing alternatives. Accordingly, failures or difficulties faced at any level of our supply chain could adversely affect our business and delay or impede the development and commercialization of any of our

Table of Contents

product candidates or products, if approved, and could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

As part of our process development efforts, we also may make changes to the manufacturing processes at various points during development, for various reasons, such as controlling costs, achieving scale, decreasing processing time, increasing manufacturing success rate or other reasons. Such changes carry the risk that they will not achieve their intended objectives, and any of these changes could cause our current or future product candidates to perform differently and affect the results of our future clinical trials. In some circumstances, changes in the manufacturing process may require us to perform ex vivo comparability studies and to collect additional data from participants prior to undertaking more advanced clinical trials. For instance, changes in our process during the course of clinical development may require us to show the comparability of the product used in earlier clinical phases or at earlier portions of a trial to the product used in later clinical phases or later portions of the trial.

Risks Related to Ownership of Our Common Stock

Our quarterly and annual operating results may fluctuate significantly or may fall below the expectations of investors or securities analysts or any guidance we may publicly provide, each of which may cause our stock price to fluctuate or decline.

We expect our operating results to be subject to quarterly and annual fluctuations which may, in turn, cause the price of our common stock to fluctuate substantially. Our net loss and other operating results will be affected by numerous factors, including:

•variations in the level of expense related to the ongoing development of lonigutamab or future development programs;

•results and timing of ongoing and future preclinical studies and clinical trials, or the addition or termination thereof;

•the timing of payments we may make or receive under existing license and collaboration arrangements or the termination or modification thereof;

•our execution of any strategic transactions, including acquisitions, collaborations, licenses or similar arrangements, and the timing and amount of payments we may make or receive in connection with such transactions;

•any intellectual property infringement lawsuit or opposition, interference or cancellation proceeding in which we may become involved;

•recruitment and departures of key personnel;

•if any of our product candidates receives regulatory approval, the terms of such approval and market acceptance and demand for such products;

•regulatory developments affecting our product candidates or those of our competitors;

•fluctuations in stock-based compensation expense;

•the continuing impact of negative macroeconomic trends, such as fluctuating interest rates, inflation, potential tariffs, supply chain disruptions and geopolitical instability on our business and operations;

•our ability to achieve the expected cost benefits of the Restructuring Plan on the expected timeline, or at all;

•changes in general market and economic conditions;

•news regarding the Merger Agreement; and

Table of Contents

•fluctuations in the stock price of Alumis as a result of any of the above or similar developments, which may impact the price of our common stock through the implied valuation in the Merger Agreement;

If our quarterly or annual operating results fall below the expectations of investors or securities analysts or any forecasts or guidance we may provide to the market, the price of our common stock could decline substantially. Such a stock price decline could occur even when we have met any previously publicly stated guidance we may provide. We believe that quarterly or annual comparisons of our financial results are not necessarily meaningful and should not be relied upon as an indication of our future performance.

Our stock price is likely to continue to be volatile, which could result in substantial losses for investors.

The market price of our common stock is likely to continue to be volatile and could fluctuate widely in response to many factors, including but not limited to:

• the pendency of the Merger and any developments related thereto;

•volatility and instability in the financial and capital markets;

• announcements relating to our product candidates, including matters relating to clinical trials, such as trial design or trial results, by us or our collaborators;

• announcements by competitors that impact our competitive outlook;

• negative developments with respect to our product candidates, or similar products or product candidates with which we compete;

• developments with respect to patents or intellectual property rights;

• announcements of technological innovations, new product candidates, new products or new contracts by us or our competitors;

• announcements relating to strategic transactions, including acquisitions, collaborations, licenses or similar arrangements;

• actual or anticipated variations in our operating results due to the level of development expenses and other factors;

• changes in financial estimates by equities research analysts and whether our earnings (or losses) meet or exceed such estimates;

• announcement or expectation of financing efforts and receipt, or lack of receipt, of funding in support of conducting our business;

• sales of our common stock by us, our insiders, or other stockholders, or issuances by us of shares of our common stock in connection with strategic transactions, financings or otherwise;

• conditions and trends in the pharmaceutical, biotechnology and other industries;

• regulatory developments within, and outside of, the United States, including changes in the structure of health care payment systems;

• litigation or arbitration, including the pending purported securities class action lawsuit against us;

• public health crises, natural disasters, major catastrophic events, general economic, political and market conditions and other factors; and

• the occurrence of any of the risks described in this section titled “Risk Factors”.

Table of Contents

In recent years, the stock market in general, and the market for pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies in particular, has experienced significant price and volume fluctuations that have often been unrelated or disproportionate to changes in the operating performance of the companies whose stock is experiencing those price and volume fluctuations. Broad market and industry factors may seriously affect the market price of our common stock, regardless of our actual operating performance.

We are an “emerging growth company” and we cannot be certain if the reduced reporting requirements applicable to emerging growth companies will make our common stock less attractive to investors.

We are an “emerging growth company” as defined in the JOBS Act. For as long as we continue to be an emerging growth company, we may take advantage of exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not emerging growth companies, including (i) not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2022 (the "Sarbanes-Oxley Act"), (ii) reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports and proxy statements and (iii) exemptions from the requirements of holding nonbinding advisory stockholder votes on executive compensation and stockholder approval of any golden parachute payments not approved previously.

We could be an emerging growth company for up to five years following the completion of our May 2023 initial public offering, although circumstances could cause us to lose that status earlier, including if we are deemed to be a “large accelerated filer,” which occurs when the market value of our shares that is held by non-affiliates equals or exceeds $700.0 million as of the prior June 30, or if we have total annual gross revenue of $1.24 billion or more during any fiscal year before that time, in which cases we would no longer be an emerging growth company as of the December 31 of such year, or if we issue more than $1.0 billion in non-convertible debt during any three-year period before that time, in which case we would no longer be an emerging growth company immediately.

Under the JOBS Act, emerging growth companies can also delay adopting new or revised accounting standards until such time as those standards apply to private companies. We have elected to take advantage of the benefits of this extended transition period. Our financial statements may therefore not be comparable to those of companies that comply with such new or revised accounting standards. Until the date that we are no longer an “emerging growth company” or affirmatively and irrevocably opt out of the exemption provided by Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the Securities Act, upon issuance of a new or revised accounting standard that applies to our financial statements and that has a different effective date for public and private companies, we will disclose the date on which adoption is required for non-emerging growth companies and the date on which we will adopt the recently issued accounting standard.

Anti-takeover provisions in our charter documents and under Delaware law could prevent or delay an acquisition of us that may be beneficial to our stockholders, and may prevent attempts by our stockholders to replace or remove our current management.

Our restated certificate of incorporation and our restated bylaws contain provisions that could delay or prevent a change in control of our company. These provisions could also make it difficult for stockholders to elect directors who are not nominated by current members of our board of directors or take other corporate actions, including effecting changes in our management. These provisions:

• establish a classified board of directors so that not all members of our board are elected at one time;

• permit only the board of directors to establish the number of directors and fill vacancies on the board;

• provide that directors may only be removed “for cause” and only with the approval of two-thirds of our stockholders;

• require super-majority voting to amend some provisions in our restated certificate of incorporation and restated bylaws;

• authorize the issuance of “blank check” preferred stock that our board could use to implement a stockholder rights plan;

• eliminate the ability of our stockholders to call special meetings of stockholders;

Table of Contents

• prohibit stockholder action by written consent, which requires all stockholder actions to be taken at a meeting of our stockholders;

• prohibit cumulative voting; and

• establish advance notice requirements for nominations for election to our board or for proposing matters that can be acted upon by stockholders at annual stockholder meetings.

In addition, Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law (DGCL) may discourage, delay or prevent a change in control of our company. Section 203 imposes certain restrictions on mergers, business combinations and other transactions between us and holders of 15% or more of our common stock.

Actions of activist stockholders could be disruptive to the Merger and our operations, and divert the attention of management.

Stockholders have in the past and may, from time to time, submit hostile offers, engage in proxy solicitations or advance stockholder proposals, or otherwise attempt to effect changes and assert influence on our board of directors and management. For example, Tang Capital Management, LLC, through its affiliate, Concentra Biosciences, LLC, sent an unsolicited indication of interest to our board of directors in February 2025 offering to acquire all of our outstanding shares for $3.00 per share in cash plus a contingent value right that represented the right to receive 80% of the net proceeds from any out-license or disposition of our development programs or intellectual property (the “Concentra Indication of Interest”). Following a fulsome review, our board of directors determined that the Concentra Indication of Interest is not reasonably expected to result in a superior proposal to the Merger.

Activist investors may attempt to effect changes in our strategic direction and how we are governed, or to acquire control over us. While we welcome the opinions of all our stockholders, activist campaigns that contest or conflict with our strategic direction could have an adverse effect on us. Actions by activist stockholders may disrupt our ability to complete the Merger, manage our operations, be costly and time-consuming, and divert the attention of our board of directors and management. In addition, perceived uncertainties as to our future direction may make it more difficult to attract and retain qualified personnel and business partners. These types of actions could cause significant fluctuations in our stock price based on temporary or speculative market perceptions or other factors that do not necessarily reflect the underlying fundamentals and prospects of our business.

We have implemented a Rights Plan that could discourage a takeover or other transaction that stockholders may consider favorable.

On March 13, 2025, our board of directors approved the adoption of a limited-duration stockholder rights plan (the “Rights Plan”) pursuant to a Rights Agreement with Computershare Trust Company, N.A., as rights agent (the “Rights Agreement”). Pursuant to the Rights Plan, we will issue one right (a “Right”) for each issued and outstanding share of our common stock as of the close of business on March 24, 2025. The rights will become exercisable only if a person or a group of affiliated or associated persons has become an “Acquiring Person,” which is defined in the Rights Agreement as a person or group of affiliated or associated persons who, at any time after March 13, 2025, acquires or obtains the right to acquire beneficial ownership of 10% or more of our outstanding common stock (20% in the case of a person who reports their beneficial ownership on Schedule 13G) (the “Triggering Percentage”). The Rights Plan will expire on March 12, 2026 unless earlier redeemed by us. The overall effect of the Rights Plan and the issuance of the Rights may be to discourage any person, entity or group from gaining a control or control-like position in our company or engaging in other tactics, potentially disadvantaging the interests of our stockholders, without negotiating with the Board and without paying an appropriate control premium to all stockholders. The Rights Plan has similar provisions to those of other plans adopted by publicly-held companies in comparable circumstances. It is intended to protect stockholders’ interests, including by providing our board of directors sufficient time to make informed judgments and take actions that are in the best interests of all of our company’s stockholders and other stakeholders. Nevertheless, the Rights Plan and Rights may be considered to have certain anti-takeover effects, including potentially discouraging a third party from attempting to obtain a substantial position in our common stock or seeking to obtain control of our company and discouraging a takeover attempt that stockholders may consider favorable or that could result in a premium over the market price of our common stock.

The exclusive forum provisions in our organizational documents may limit a stockholder’s ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum that it finds favorable for disputes with us or any of our directors, officers, or employees, or the underwriters of any offering giving rise to such claim, which may discourage lawsuits with respect to such claims.

Table of Contents

Our restated certificate of incorporation, to the fullest extent permitted by law, provides that the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware is the exclusive forum for: any derivative action or proceeding brought on our behalf; any action asserting a breach of fiduciary duty; any action asserting a claim against us arising pursuant to the DGCL, our restated certificate of incorporation, or our restated bylaws; or any action asserting a claim that is governed by the internal affairs doctrine. This exclusive forum provision does not apply to suits brought to enforce a duty or liability created by the Exchange Act.

This choice of forum provision may limit a stockholder’s ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum that it finds favorable for disputes with us or any of our directors, officers, or other employees, or the underwriters of any offering giving rise to such claims, which may discourage lawsuits with respect to such claims. Alternatively, if a court were to find the choice of forum provisions contained in our restated certificate of incorporation to be inapplicable or unenforceable in an action, we may incur additional costs associated with resolving such action in other jurisdictions, which could harm our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Section 22 of the Securities Act creates concurrent jurisdiction for federal and state courts over all claims brought to enforce any duty or liability created by the Securities Act or the rules and regulations thereunder. Our restated bylaws provide that the federal district courts of the United States of America will, to the fullest extent permitted by law, be the exclusive forum for resolving any complaint asserting a cause of action arising under the Securities Act, or the Federal Forum Provision, including for all causes of action asserted against any defendant named in such complaint. For the avoidance of doubt, this provision is intended to benefit and may be enforced by us, our officers and directors, the underwriters to any public offering giving rise to such complaint, and any other professional entity whose profession gives authority to a statement made by that person or entity and who has prepared or certified any part of the documents underlying the offering. Our decision to adopt a Federal Forum Provision followed a decision by the Supreme Court of the State of Delaware holding that such provisions are facially valid under Delaware law. While federal or other state courts may not follow the holding of the Delaware Supreme Court or may determine that the Federal Forum Provision should be enforced in a particular case, application of the Federal Forum Provision means that suits brought by our stockholders to enforce any duty or liability created by the Securities Act must be brought in federal court and cannot be brought in state court, and our stockholders cannot waive compliance with the federal securities laws and the rules and regulations thereunder. Section 27 of the Exchange Act creates exclusive federal jurisdiction over all claims brought to enforce any duty or liability created by the Exchange Act or the rules and regulations thereunder. In addition, neither the exclusive forum provision nor the Federal Forum Provision applies to suits brought to enforce any duty or liability created by the Exchange Act. Accordingly, actions by our stockholders to enforce any duty or liability created by the Exchange Act or the rules and regulations thereunder must be brought in federal court, and our stockholders cannot waive compliance with the federal securities laws and the rules and regulations thereunder.

Any person or entity purchasing or otherwise acquiring or holding any interest in any of our securities shall be deemed to have notice of and consented to our exclusive forum provisions in our restated bylaws, including the Federal Forum Provision. These provisions may limit a stockholders’ ability, and/or may result in increased costs for a stockholder, to bring such a claim in a judicial forum of their choosing for disputes with us or our directors, officers, other employees or agents. That may discourage lawsuits against us and our directors, officers, other employees or agents.

Our board of directors are authorized to issue and designate shares of our preferred stock without stockholder approval.

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation authorizes our board of directors, without the approval of our stockholders, to issue shares of preferred stock, subject to limitations prescribed therein or by applicable law, rules and regulations; to establish the number of shares to be included in each such series of preferred stock; and to fix the designation, powers, preferences and rights of each such series and the qualifications, limitations or restrictions thereof. The powers, preferences and rights of these additional series of convertible preferred stock may be senior to or on parity with our common stock, which may reduce our common stock’s value.

Because we do not anticipate paying any dividends on our capital stock in the foreseeable future, capital appreciation, if any, will be our stockholders’ sole source of gain.

We have never declared nor paid dividends on our capital stock. We currently intend to retain all of our future earnings, if any, to finance the growth and development, operation and expansion of our business and we do not anticipate declaring or paying any dividends in the foreseeable future. As a result, capital appreciation of our common stock, which may never occur, will be our stockholders’ sole source of gain on investment for the foreseeable future.

Table of Contents

General Risk Factors

Unstable economic and market conditions may have serious adverse consequences on our business, financial condition and stock price.

Global economic and business activities continue to face widespread uncertainties, and global credit and financial markets have experienced extreme volatility and disruptions in the past several years, including severely diminished liquidity and credit availability, rising inflation and monetary supply shifts, fluctuating interest rates, potential tariffs, labor shortages, declines in consumer confidence, declines in economic growth, increases in unemployment rates, recession risks, and uncertainty about economic and geopolitical stability (for example, related to the ongoing military and other conflicts between Russia and Ukraine or in the Middle East). The extent of the impact of these conditions on our operational and financial performance, including our ability to execute our business strategies and initiatives in the expected timeframe, as well as that of third parties upon whom we rely, will depend on future developments which are uncertain and cannot be predicted. There can be no assurance that further deterioration in economic or market conditions will not occur, or how long these challenges will persist. If the current equity and credit markets further deteriorate, or do not improve, it may make any necessary debt or equity financing more difficult, more costly, and more dilutive. Furthermore, our stock price may decline due in part to the volatility of the stock market and the general economic downturn.

If securities or industry analysts do not publish research or reports about our business, or if they publish inaccurate or unfavorable research about our business, our stock price and trading volume could decline.

The trading market for our common stock is influenced in part by the research and reports that industry or securities analysts publish about us or our business. We do not have any control over the industry or securities analysts, or the content and opinions included in their reports and may never obtain research coverage by securities and industry analysts. If analysts cease coverage of us, we could lose visibility in the financial markets, and the trading price for our common stock could be impacted negatively. If any of the analysts who cover us publish inaccurate or unfavorable research or opinions regarding us, our business model, our intellectual property or our stock performance, or if our preclinical studies and clinical trials and operating results fail to meet the expectations of analysts, our stock price would likely decline.

We incur increased costs as a result of operating as a public company, and our management is required to devote substantial time to new compliance initiatives and corporate governance practices.

As a public company we incur significant legal, accounting and other expenses that we did not incur as a private company. The Securities Act, the Exchange Act, Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, the listing requirements of the Nasdaq Global Select Market and other applicable securities rules and regulations impose various requirements on public companies, including establishment and maintenance of effective disclosure and financial controls and corporate governance practices. Our management and other personnel will continue to need to devote a substantial amount of time to these compliance initiatives. Moreover, we expect these rules and regulations to substantially increase our legal and financial compliance costs over those incurred as a private company and to make some activities more time consuming and costly, particularly after we are no longer an emerging growth company. We cannot predict or estimate the amount or timing of additional costs we may incur to respond to these requirements, and these increased costs may require us to reduce costs in other areas of our business. The impact of these requirements could also make it more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified persons to serve on our board of directors, our board committees or as executive officers.

Failure to maintain effective internal control over financial reporting could adversely affect our business and if investors lose confidence in the accuracy and completeness of our financial reports, the market price of our common stock could be negatively affected.

We are required to comply with the SEC’s rules implementing Sections 302 and 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, which require our management certify financial and other information in our quarterly and annual reports and provide an annual management report on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. As an emerging growth company, our independent registered public accounting firm will not be required to formally attest to the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting until the later of the year following our first annual report required to be filed with the SEC or the date we are no longer an emerging growth company. At such time, our independent registered public accounting firm would need to issue a report that is adverse in the event that there are material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting.

Table of Contents

To comply with the requirements of being a public company, we have undertaken various actions, and will need to take additional actions, such as implementing controls and procedures and hiring additional accounting or internal audit staff or consultants. Testing and maintaining internal controls over financial reporting can divert our management’s attention from other matters that are important to the operation of our business. For example, in connection with the preparation of our financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2022, material weaknesses were identified in the design and operating effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. Additionally, as of December 31, 2023, material weaknesses existed in the design and operating effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. While we have remediated these material weaknesses as of December 31, 2024, we cannot assure you that there will not be material weaknesses or significant deficiencies in our internal control over financial reporting in the future. If we identify material weaknesses that we are not able to timely remediate, investors may lose confidence in the accuracy and completeness of our financial reports. As a result, the market price of our common stock could be negatively affected and we could become subject to investigations by the stock exchange on which our securities are listed, the SEC or other regulatory authorities, which could require additional financial and management resources. In addition, if we fail to remediate any material weaknesses, our financial statements could be inaccurate, and we could face restricted access to capital markets.

Our disclosure controls and procedures may not be effective and may not prevent or detect all errors or acts of fraud.

We are subject to the periodic reporting requirements of the Exchange Act. We designed our disclosure controls and procedures to provide reasonable assurance that information we must disclose in reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, and recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC. Our disclosure controls and procedures may not be effective. Any disclosure controls and procedures, no matter how well-conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met because of the inherent limitations in all control systems. In the future we might identify additional material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting that also impact the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures.

In any event, these inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. For example, our directors or executive officers could inadvertently fail to disclose a new relationship or arrangement causing us to fail to make any related party transaction disclosures. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people or by an unauthorized override of the controls. Accordingly, because of the inherent limitations in our control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected. In addition, we do not have a formal risk management program for identifying and addressing risks to our business in other areas.

We have been named a defendant in a purported securities class action lawsuit. This could result in substantial damages or other expenses, and could divert management’s time and attention from our business.

The market price of our common stock is likely to continue to be volatile. In the past, companies that have experienced volatility in the market price of their stock have been subject to securities class action litigation. In addition, litigation, including securities class action litigation, has often followed the announcement of adverse clinical or regulatory events such as negative or inconclusive clinical trial results, announcements of significant business transactions, such as the sale or purchase of a company, or announcement of any other strategic transaction. Any of these events may also result in investigations by the SEC or other regulatory authorities. In this regard, on November 15, 2023, a purported federal securities class action lawsuit was commenced in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. On February 15, 2024, the Court appointed joint lead plaintiffs and lead counsel. An amended complaint was filed on March 26, 2024, naming us and current and former officers and directors as defendants. The complaint alleges that the defendants violated the Exchange Act and Securities Act in its disclosures regarding the primary endpoint of HiSCR75 at week 16 not meeting statistical significance in our Phase 2b trial of izokibep in HS. The amended complaint seeks damages and an award of reasonable costs and expenses, as well as such other and further relief as the court may deem just and proper. On May 3, 2024, defendants filed their motion to dismiss the amended complaint, which remains pending. This lawsuit is subject to inherent uncertainties, including its outcome. We could be subject to additional litigation in the future. We could be forced to expend significant resources and incur substantial legal fees and costs in the defense of this suit, and we may not prevail. We have not established any reserve for any potential liability relating to this lawsuit. It is possible that we could, in the future, incur judgments or enter into settlements of claims for monetary damages. A decision adverse to our interests could result in the payment of substantial damages, or possibly fines, and could have a material adverse effect on our cash flow, results of operations and financial position.

Table of Contents

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

None

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

Not applicable.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

On March 11, 2025, Shephard Mpofu, M.D., MRCP, FRCP, the Company’s Chief Medical Officer, terminated a prearranged trading plan he had previously adopted with respect to the sale of up to 245,687 shares of common stock owned by Dr. Mpofu (the “Mpofu Plan”). The Mpofu Plan was adopted on November 25, 2024 and, prior to its termination by Dr. Mpofu, was to expire by its terms on December 31, 2025, or earlier, upon the completion of all transactions subject to the trading arrangements specified in the Mpofu Plan or the occurrence of certain events set forth therein. As of the date of termination of the Mpofu Plan, Dr. Mpofu had not sold any shares of common stock under its terms. The Mpofu Plan was entered into during an open trading window in accordance with the Company’s Insider Trading Policy and was intended to satisfy the affirmative defense of Rule 10b5-1(c) under the Exchange Act.

On May 8, 2025, the Company’s board of directors agreed, contingent upon the closing of the Merger, to modify the terms of the Company’s existing Severance Plan (the “Current Severance Plan”) which provides for specified severance benefits to eligible employees of the Company, including its named executive officers, upon certain types of qualifying termination events, to enhance certain severance amounts and extend the post-termination exercise period of certain Company options to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock (“Options”).

Under the amended and restated Severance Plan (the “Amended Severance Plan”), upon the closing of the Merger, in the event of a Covered Employee’s Involuntary Termination (as such terms are defined in the Amended Severance Plan) that occurs following the consummation of the Merger but on or before the first anniversary of the Closing, but after giving effect to the equity vesting benefits set forth in Section 4.1.3 of the Amended Severance Plan, each of such Covered Employee’s then outstanding vested Options shall be amended to provide that the vested portion of such Covered Employee’s Options shall remain exercisable until the earlier of (i) the designated Extension Date, as determined in the Amended Plan and as applicable to such Covered Employee, or (ii) the expiration of the Options’ term, subject to earlier termination pursuant to Section 3(c) of the 2020 Plan.

The preceding summary of the terms of the Amended Severance Plan is qualified in its entirety by reference to, and should be read in conjunction with, the complete copy of the Amended Severance Plan, which will be filed in the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2025.

Table of Contents

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

Incorporated by Reference

Exhibit

No.

Description

Form

File No.

Exhibit

Filing Date

2.1

Agreement and Plan of Merger, by and among the Registrant, Alumis Inc. and Arrow Merger Sub, Inc. dated as of February 6, 2025.

8-K

001-41696

2.1

February 6, 2025

2.2

Amendment to the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of April 20, 2025

8-K

001-41696

3.1

April 21, 2025

3.1

Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company.

8-K

001-41696

3.1

May 9, 2023

3.2

Certificate of Designations of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock of ACLEYRIN, INC.

8-K

001-41696

3.2

March 13, 2025

3.3

Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company.

8-K

001-41696

3.3

May 9, 2023

31.1*

Certification of Principal Executive , Financial and Accounting Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1*+

Certification of Principal Executive , Financial and Accounting Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

101.ins*

Instance Document

101.sch*

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

101.cal*

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

101.def*

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

101.lab*

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document

101.pre*

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

104*

Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101)

* Filed herewith.

+ Furnished herewith and not deemed to be “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

Table of Contents

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


	ACELYRIN, INC.

Dated: May 14, 2025	By:	/s/ Mina Kim
	Name:	Mina Kim
	Title:	Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

Get the next $SLRN alert in real time by email

Date	Price Target	Rating	Analyst
8/14/2024	$18.00 → $6.00	Buy → Neutral	H.C. Wainwright
7/8/2024	$13.00	Equal Weight → Overweight	Wells Fargo
12/13/2023	$11.00	Equal Weight	Wells Fargo
12/8/2023	$8.00	Neutral	Citigroup
9/13/2023	$19.00	Overweight → Equal-Weight	Morgan Stanley
9/5/2023	$44.00	Buy	H.C. Wainwright
5/30/2023		Overweight	Morgan Stanley
5/30/2023	$31.00	Buy	Jefferies

SEC Form 10-Q filed by ACELYRIN INC.

Chat with this insight

Recent Analyst Ratings for
$SLRN

$SLRN
Press Releases

Fastest customizable press release news feed in the world

Alumis Stockholders Approve Merger with ACELYRIN

ACELYRIN Stockholders Approve Merger with Alumis to Create Clinical Biopharma Company Dedicated to Innovating, Developing and Commercializing Transformative Therapies for Immune-mediated Diseases

Leading Independent Proxy Advisory Firm ISS Recommends ACELYRIN Stockholders Vote "FOR" the Proposed Transaction with Alumis

$SLRN
Analyst Ratings

Analyst ratings in real time. Analyst ratings have a very high impact on the underlying stock. See them live in this feed.

ACELYRIN downgraded by H.C. Wainwright with a new price target

ACELYRIN upgraded by Wells Fargo with a new price target

Wells Fargo initiated coverage on ACELYRIN with a new price target

$SLRN
SEC Filings