SEC Form 40-8F-2 filed by Daxor Corporation

Daxor Corporation (“Applicant”) seeks an order pursuant to Section 8(f) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Act”), declaring that Applicant has ceased to be an investment company under the Act. As of December 31, 2025, Applicant holds no investment securities and is engaged primarily, and holds itself out as a radiopharmaceutical company and medical device manufacturer selling Volumex Test Kits used with our BVA Companion Analyzer.

Applicant is currently an internally-managed, closed-end investment company registered under the Act.  Applicant was originally incorporated in New York State as Iatric Corporation in May 1971 for cryobanking services and discontinued these services through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Scientific Medical Systems in 2017.  In October 1971, the name Iatric Corporation was changed to Idant Corporation.  In May 1973, the name Idant Corporation was changed to Daxor Corporation.  Applicant is a corporation duly qualified and in good standing in the state of New York.

Applicant is a radiopharmaceutical company and medical device manufacturer selling Volumex Test Kits used with our BVA Companion Analyzer. While the company is not engaged in the business of investing, reinvesting, owning, holding or trading in securities, in the past the company was dependent upon earnings from its investment portfolio to fund operations, and was required to register as a closed-end investment company under the Act.  Specifically, on March 30, 2012, the company filed a Form N-8A with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) to register as a closed-end management investment company under the Act.  Applicant’s fiscal/taxable year ends December 31.

Applicant’s common stock has continuously been traded since its initial public offering. Specifically, the company’s common stock is traded on Nasdaq under the symbol DXR. As of May 19, 2025, the company’s authorized securities consisted of 10,000,000 shares of common stock.  Applicant does not have any other securities outstanding.

Applicant is, and will remain, subject to the reporting requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and is currently registered under the Exchange Act. Following deregistration as an investment company under the Act, Applicant will continue to file periodic and current reports with the Commission under the Exchange Act, including reports on Forms 10‑K, 10‑Q and 8‑K, as an operating company.

As the Applicant is no longer dependent upon earnings from its investment portfolio to fund operations, and Applicant is and holds itself out as a radiopharmaceutical company and medical device manufacturer selling Volumex Test Kits used with our BVA Companion Analyzer.  Applicant believes that it no longer qualifies as an “investment company” within the meaning of the Act. In addition, as of December 31, 2025, Applicant holds no investment securities.

Applicant is not currently a party to any litigation or administrative proceeding and has timely complied with its obligations to file annual and other reports with the Commission.

As discussed above, Applicant was originally incorporated in New York State as Iatric Corporation in May 1971 for cryobanking services and discontinued these services through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Scientific Medical Systems in 2017.  In October 1971, the name Iatric Corporation was changed to Idant Corporation.  In May 1973, the name Idant Corporation was changed to Daxor Corporation.

Applicant is a radiopharmaceutical company and medical device manufacturer selling Volumex Test Kits used with our BVA Companion Analyzer.  For the past 21 years, the company’s major focus has been the creation and development of the BVA-100® Blood Volume Analyzer, an instrument that rapidly and accurately measures human blood volume. This instrument is used in conjunction with Volumex®, a single-use radiopharmaceutical diagnostic injection and collection kit. The company also owns the Daxor Oak Ridge Operations facility in Oak Ridge, TN, which manufactures, tests, and develops next-generation models of the BVA-Analyzer . In August 2025 the Food & Drug Administration (“FDA”) cleared the next generation BVA device for commercialization.

While the company is not engaged in the business of investing, reinvesting, owning, holding or trading in securities, in the past the company was dependent upon earnings from its investment portfolio to fund operations, and was required to register as a closed-end investment company under the Act.  Specifically, on March 30, 2012, the company filed a Form N-8A with the Commission to register as a closed-end management investment company under the Act.

Applicant has consistently represented that it is primarily engaged  as a  radiopharmaceutical company and medical device manufacturer selling Volumex Test Kits used with our BVA Companion Analyzer. While Applicant is required under the Act to state in its financial statements that it is a registered investment company, Applicant’s periodic reports to stockholders and press releases have indicated that Applicant is a radiopharmaceutical company and medical device manufacturer selling Volumex Test Kits used with our BVA Companion Analyzer.  Similarly, Applicant’s website, www.daxor.com, represents that Applicant is a medical device manufacturer.  Upon deregistration, Applicant will issue a press release to stockholders indicating that it is an operating company and cease indicating in its financial statements that it is a registered investment company.

The primary activities of Applicant’s directors, officers, and employees, like Applicant’s historical development and public representations, indicate that Applicant is a radiopharmaceutical company and medical device manufacturer selling Volumex Test Kits used with our BVA Companion Analyzer. Applicant’s strategy and operations are managed by Michael Feldschuh, Applicant’s President, with the assistance of Applicant’s other officers and employees, and oversight by Applicant’s Board.

The responsibility of the Board of Directors is to exercise corporate powers and to oversee management of the business of Applicant. The officers of the company are principally responsible for its operations. The company is not engaged in the business of investing, reinvesting, owning, holding or trading in securities. As such, the company has no investment adviser, administrator, affiliated brokerage, transfer agent or dividend reinvestment plan, dividend paying agent, non‑resident managers, or portfolio managers, and does not maintain a separate investment securities portfolio or custody arrangements characteristic of registered investment companies.

As of December 31, 2024 and June 30, 2025, Applicant’s assets consisted primarily of its radiopharmaceutical and medical device manufacturing operations, including its companion BVA Analyzer system and related Volumex® diagnostic products, intellectual property, manufacturing and research and development equipment, the Daxor Oak Ridge Operations facility in Oak Ridge, Tennessee, and cash and cash equivalents. Specifically, as of December 31, 2024 and June 30, 2025, in aggregate, Applicant’s investment securities represented approximately 3.11% and 1.10%, respectively, of Applicant’s total assets measured at fair value on an unconsolidated basis (exclusive of Government securities and cash items).

As of December 31, 2025, Applicant no longer held any investment securities. Applicant’s assets as of that date consisted of its medical device operations and related tangible and intangible assets, together with cash and cash equivalents and Government securities. Accordingly, as of December 31, 2025, zero percent (0%) of Applicant’s total assets (exclusive of Government securities and cash items) on an unconsolidated basis consisted of investment securities.

All of Applicant’s assets have been valued in accordance with Section 2(a)(41) of the Act.  The nature of Applicant’s assets suggests it should no longer be registered as an investment company under the Act.

For the year ended December 31, 2024, Applicant received dividends of $104,115 from its holdings of investment securities.  For the six months ended June 30, 2025, Applicant received dividends of $11,779 from its holdings of investment securities.  Further, for the six months ended June 30, 2025, on a consolidated basis, Applicant derived approximately 87.7% of its gross income from its medical device operations, and approximately 11.8% from realized gains from divestment of its holdings of investment securities, approximately 0.5% from dividends paid by its holdings of investment securities, and less than 1% from its cash items.

Applicant expects to continue to earn a substantial majority of its gross income from its radiopharmaceutical and medical device manufacturing operations. Further, Applicant expects that, having divested its holdings of investment securities by December 31, 2025, its income from investment securities will be de minimis or nonexistent on a going‑forward basis.

Applicant estimates, for fiscal 2025, on a consolidated basis, it derived approximately 89.2% of its gross income from its medical device operations, approximately 10.4% from realized gains from divestment of its holdings of investment securities, approximately 0.2% from dividends paid by its holdings of investment securities, and less than 1% from its cash items.

Applicant currently anticipates that, for fiscal 2026 and future fiscal years, on a consolidated basis, virtually all of its gross income will be derived from its medical device operations and less than 1% from its cash items, with no material income from investment securities.

Applicant presently earns a majority of its gross income from its radiopharmaceutical company and medical device manufacturing operations. Accordingly, the sources of Applicant’s present income suggest that it should no longer be registered as an investment company under the Act.

In light of the foregoing, Applicant’s historical development, public representations of policy, the activities of its directors, officers and employees, the nature of its present assets, and the sources of its present income all demonstrate that Applicant is primarily engaged in an operating business – a radiopharmaceutical company and medical device manufacturer – rather than in investing, reinvesting, owning, holding or trading in securities within the meaning of Section 3(a)(1)(A) of the Act.

Applicant has no present intention to engage primarily, directly or through any subsidiary, in the business of investing, reinvesting, owning, holding or trading in securities, and no present intention to acquire investment securities in amounts that would cause it to become an investment company within the meaning of Section 3 of the Act.

It is anticipated that deregistration will have no unfavorable tax consequences to Applicant or its stockholders.  Applicant has not filed its tax returns on the basis that it qualified to be taxed as a “regulated investment company,” as that term is defined in the applicable provision of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.  Instead, it has been taxed as a regular corporation and will continue to be taxed in the same manner after deregistration.

Applicant is subject to a second level of U.S Federal income tax on a portion of its income as a personal holding company (“PHC”) for U.S Federal income tax purposes. As a PHC in a given year, Applicant is subject to an additional PHC tax, currently 20%, on its undistributed PHC income, which generally includes its taxable income, subject to certain adjustments.  For the year ended December 31, 2024, more than 60% of Applicant’s adjusted gross income came from items defined as PHC income. Applicant incurred no liability for PHC for the year ended December 31, 2024 due to the net operating losses applied to realized gains incurred during the year.

Since Applicant no longer is, proposes, or holds itself out as being engaged primarily in the business of investing, reinvesting or trading in securities within the meaning of Section 3(a)(1)(A) of the Act, and no longer owns or proposes to acquire investment securities having a value exceeding forty percent (40%) of the value of its total assets (exclusive of Government securities and cash items) on an unconsolidated basis as contemplated by Section 3(a) (1)(C) of the Act, Applicant has ceased to be an investment company within the meaning of Section 3 of the Act.  Accordingly, Applicant hereby requests that the Commission issue an order pursuant to Section 8(f) of the Act declaring that Applicant has ceased to be an investment company.

Applicant is not, and has not been, an investment company as defined in Section 3(a)(1)(A) of the Act, which provides that an” ‘investment company’ means any issuer which ... is or holds itself out as being engaged primarily, or proposes to engage primarily, in the business of investing, reinvesting, or trading in securities.” The Commission and courts have generally referred to the following factors in determining whether an issuer is primarily engaged in the business of investing and reinvesting in securities under Section 3(a)(1)(A):  (i) the company’s historical development; (ii) its public representations of policy; (iii) the activity of its directors, officers, and employees; (iv) the nature of its present assets; and (v) the sources of its present income.  While these factors were developed primarily in analyses under Section 3(b)(2) of the Act, they are equally applicable to analyses under Section 3(a)(1)(A).¹

Each of the five factors as they relate to Applicant is discussed above in Section III of this Application.  With respect to factors (i) and (ii), Applicant has clearly and consistently indicated to the public and its stockholders that it is an operating company.  With respect to factor (iii), Mr. Feldschuh and Applicant’s other officers spend substantially all of the time that they devote to Applicant’s business on (a) overseeing and guiding the management of its  radiopharmaceutical and  medical device manufacturing operations and (b) conducting strategic review of Applicant’s radiopharmaceutical and medical device business in order to maximize its growth and operations.  Mr. Feldschuh spends a minimal amount of time evaluating and managing the investment securities held by Applicant.  Applicant’s other officers spend no time engaged in evaluating and managing Applicant’s assets in investment securities.  Applicant’s Board spends a minimal amount of time overseeing Mr. Feldschuh’s work regarding the investment securities.  Stated another way, the Board spends essentially all of its time overseeing the company’s  radiopharmaceutical and medical device business operations.

---

With respect to factors (iv) and (v), less than 40% of the value of Applicant’s total assets (exclusive of Government securities and cash items) on an unconsolidated basis are invested in investment securities and less than 40% of Applicant’s income is derived from investment securities.  As previously noted, Applicant’s income is primarily from its medical device operations. Furthermore, as of December 31, 2025, Applicant held no investment securities, and 0% of the value of Applicant’s total assets (exclusive of Government securities and cash items) consisted of investment securities.

Since Applicant does not hold itself out as being engaged in primarily, nor does it propose in the future to engage primarily, in the business of investing, reinvesting, or trading in securities, Applicant submits that it is not an investment company under Section 3(a)(1)(A) of the Act.

Applicant has no present intention to engage primarily, directly or through any subsidiary, in the business of investing, reinvesting, owning, holding or trading in securities, and no present intention to acquire investment securities in amounts that would cause it to become an investment company within the meaning of Section 3 of the Act.

Applicant no longer is an investment company as defined in Section 3(a)(1)(C) of the Act.  Section 3(a)(1)(C) of the Act defines an investment company as an issuer which “is engaged or proposes to engage in the business of investing, reinvesting, owning, holding, or trading in securities, and owns or proposes to acquire investment securities having a value exceeding 40 per centum of the value of such issuer’s total assets (exclusive of Government securities and cash items) on an unconsolidated basis.” Section 3(a)(2) provides, in pertinent part, that “[a]s used in this section, ‘investment securities’ includes all securities except (A) Government securities, ... and (C) securities issued by majority-owned subsidiaries of the owner which (i) are not investment companies, and (ii) are not relying on the exception from the definition of investment company in paragraph (1) or (7) of subsection (c).”

Section 3(b)(1) of the Act provides that “[n]otwithstanding paragraph (1)(C) of subsection (a), none of the following persons is an investment company within the meaning of this title:  (1) Any issuer primarily engaged, directly or through a wholly owned subsidiary or subsidiaries, in a business or businesses other than that of investing, reinvesting, owning, holding, or trading in securities.” Further, Rule 3a-1 under the Act states that “[n]otwithstanding section 3(a)(1)(C) of the Act, an issuer will be deemed not to be an investment company under the Act; Provided, That:  (a) No more than 45 percent of the value (as defined in section 2(a)(41) of the Act) of such issuer’s total assets (exclusive of Government securities and cash items) consists of, and no more than 45 percent of such issuer’s net income after taxes (for the last four fiscal quarters combined) is derived from, securities other than:  (1) Government securities; (2) Securities issued by employees’ securities companies; (3) Securities issued by majority-owned subsidiaries of the issuer (other than subsidiaries relying on the exclusion from the definition of investment company in section 3(b)(3) or (c)(1) of the Act) which are not investment companies; and (4) Securities issued by companies:  (i) Which are controlled primarily by such issuer; (ii) Through which such issuer engages in a business other than that of investing, reinvesting, owning, holding or trading in securities; and (iii) Which are not investment companies; (b) The issuer is not an investment company as defined in section 3(a)(1)(A) or 3(a)(1)(B) of the Act and is not a special situation investment company; and (c) The percentages described in paragraph (a) of this section are determined on an unconsolidated basis, except that the issuer shall consolidate its financial statements with the financial statements of any wholly-owned subsidiaries.”

Applicant is, and holds itself out as being engaged primarily in the business of medical device manufacturing.  Applicant is not, and is not holding itself out as being engaged primarily, and is not proposing to engage primarily, in the business of investing, reinvesting, owning, holding, or trading in securities.  Further, as of June 30, 2025, no more than 45 percent of the value (as defined in section 2(a)(41) of the Act) of Applicant’s total assets (exclusive of Government securities and cash items) consisted of, and no more than 45 percent of Applicant’s net income after taxes (for the last four fiscal quarters combined) was derived from securities.  Pursuant to Rule 3a-1(c) under the Act, the percentages described above were determined on a consolidated basis, including Applicant’s wholly owned subsidiaries. As of December 31, 2025, Applicant held no investment securities, and accordingly 0% of the value of Applicant’s total assets (exclusive of Government securities and cash items) consisted of investment securities.

On the basis of the foregoing, Applicant meets the conditions of Rule 3a‑1 under the Act. No more than 45 percent of the value of Applicant’s total assets (exclusive of Government securities and cash items) consists of, and no more than 45 percent of Applicant’s net income after taxes (for the last four fiscal quarters combined) is derived from, investment securities, as that term is used in Section 3(a)(2) of the Act and Rule 3a‑1. In addition, Applicant is not an investment company as defined in Section 3(a)(1)(A) or 3(a)(1)(B) of the Act and is not a special situation investment company, and is not engaged, and is not proposing to engage, in the business of issuing face-amount certificates of the installment type, and has not been engaged in such business and does not have any such certificates outstanding.

Accordingly, based on the foregoing authority, we urge the Commission to conclude that Applicant is no longer an investment company under Section 3(a)(1)(C) of the Act.

Continued compliance with the Act would present an undue hardship to Applicant.  By design, the Act is not intended to regulate operating companies and, as such, contains many proscriptions and limitations with respect to activities normally within the scope of an operating company’s business, operations, and financial viability.  Examples include a general prohibition on the granting of warrants, and requirements to obtain stockholder approval prior to issuing securities at less than the net asset value per share.  In addition, the limitations imposed by Section 18 of the Act on Applicant’s capital structure could constrain Applicant’s ability to borrow and otherwise manage its capital structure in ways that the Board believes are prudent and reasonable for an operating company but are prohibited for a registered investment company.  Such restrictions present significant obstacles to capital raising activities in which Applicant would otherwise participate if it were not for its status as a registered investment company.  Further, the prohibitions of Section 17 of the Act on transactions with affiliates, together with Section 23(a) of the Act, also present an obstacle to Applicant by effectively prohibiting many types of incentive-based compensation the Board considers to be reasonable and necessary to attract and retain the best qualified persons to manage Applicant’s business. These burdens are particularly inappropriate for Applicant now that it holds no investment securities and operates exclusively as an operating medical device company.

Applicant has no outstanding senior securities issued under Section 18 of the Act, and any future borrowings or issuances of securities will be undertaken in compliance with requirements applicable to operating companies rather than those applicable to registered investment companies under the Act.

Applicant is no longer an investment company by virtue of the fact that Section 3(a)(1)(A) is not applicable to Applicant. As of December 31, 2025, Applicant held no investment securities, and accordingly 0% of the value of Applicant’s total assets (exclusive of Government securities and cash items) consisted of investment securities. Further, Applicant is primarily engaged as  a radiopharmaceutical company and manufacturing of medical devices. Applicant fully intends to continue to manage its assets and income in a manner that causes Applicant to continue to be excluded from the definition of an investment company under the Act.  Accordingly, for the reasons set forth above, Applicant asserts that it satisfies the standards for an exemptive order under Section 8(f) of the Act.

Applicant is currently registered under the Exchange Act and, subject to the entry of the order requested by this Application, Applicant will file its subsequent reports as an operating company under the Exchange Act, including annual reports on Form 10‑K, quarterly reports on Form 10‑Q, and current reports on Form 8‑K, as applicable.

AUTHORITY TO FILE THIS APPLICATION

Pursuant to Rule 0-2(c) under the Act, Applicant states that the Board, by resolution duly adopted and attached hereto as Exhibit A, has authorized certain officers of Applicant to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and to execute and file with the Commission, this Application.

The verification required by Rule 0-2(d) under the Act is attached hereto as Exhibit B.  All other requirements for the execution and filing of this Application in the name of, and on behalf of, Applicant by the undersigned officer of Applicant have been complied with and such officer is fully authorized to do so.

Pursuant to Rule 0-2(f) under the Act, Applicant states that its address is 109 Meco Lane, Oak Ridge, TN 37830, and Applicant further states that all communications or questions concerning this Application or any amendment thereto should be directed to Robert J. Michel, Chief Financial Officer, Daxor Corporation, 109 Meco Lane, Oak Ridge, TN 37830.

It is desired that the Commission issue an Order pursuant to Rule 0-5 under the Act without a hearing being held.  Applicant has caused this Application to be duly signed on its behalf on the date and year set forth below.

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

Exhibit A

AUTHORIZATION

Secretary’s Certificate of Board of Directors Resolution

I, Robert J. Michel, hereby state that I am the duly elected Secretary of Daxor Corporation (the “Company”), and as said Secretary do hereby certify that the following is a resolution duly adopted by the Board of Directors of the Company and that said resolution has not been amended or modified and is in full force and effect:

Exhibit B

VERIFICATION

The undersigned being duly sworn deposes and says that he has duly executed the attached Application dated February 9, 2026 for and on behalf of Daxor Corporation; that he is the Chief Financial Officer of such company; and that all action by stockholders, directors, and other bodies necessary to authorize deponent to execute and file such instrument has been taken.  Deponent further says that he is familiar with such instrument and the contents thereof, and that the facts therein set forth are true to the best of his knowledge, information and belief.