UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM N-CSR
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED MANAGEMENT
INVESTMENT COMPANIES
Investment Company Act file number 811-06416
DTF Tax-Free Income 2028 Term Fund Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)
10 South Wacker Drive, 19th Floor
Chicago, Illinois 60606
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
| Kathryn Santoro, Esq. DTF Tax-Free Income 2028 Term Fund Inc. One Financial Plaza Hartford, CT 06103-2608 |
Adam D. Kanter, Esq. Mayer Brown LLP 1999 K Street, NW Washington, DC 20006-1101 |
(Name and address of agent for service)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: 866-668-8552
Date of fiscal year end: October 31
Date of reporting period: October 31, 2025
Item 1. Reports to Stockholders.
(a) The Report to Shareholders is attached herewith.
LETTER TO SHAREHOLDERS
| Total Return1 For the period indicated through October 31, 2025 | |||
| |
One Year |
Five Years
(annualized) |
Ten Years
(annualized) |
| DTF Tax-Free Income 2028 Term Fund Inc. |
|
|
|
| Market Value2
|
5.4% |
-0.8% |
1.2% |
| Net Asset Value3
|
2.8% |
-2.0% |
0.8% |
| Bloomberg Municipal Bond 1 Year
Index4 |
3.2% |
1.7% |
1.5% |
| Bloomberg Municipal Bond 5 Year
Index5 |
4.5% |
1.1% |
1.9% |
| Bloomberg U.S. Municipal
Index6 |
4.2% |
1.2% |
2.4% |
| |
|
| 1 |
Past performance is not indicative of future results. Current performance may be lower or higher than performance in historical
periods. |
| 2 |
Total return on market value assumes a purchase of common stock at the opening market price on the first business day and a
sale at the closing market price on the last business day of each
period shown in the table and assumes reinvestment of dividends at the actual reinvestment prices obtained under the terms of the Fund’s dividend reinvestment plan. Total return on market value
does not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder may pay on
fund distributions or the sale of fund shares. In addition, when buying or selling stock, you would ordinarily pay brokerage expenses. Because brokerage expenses and taxes are not
reflected in the above calculations, your total return net of
brokerage and tax expense would be lower than the total returns on
market value shown in the table. Source: Administrator of
the Fund. |
| 3 |
Total return on NAV uses the same methodology as is described in note 2, but with use of NAV for beginning, ending and
reinvestment values. Because the Fund’s expenses (ratios
detailed on page 17 of this report) reduce the Fund’s NAV, they are already reflected in the Fund’s total return on NAV shown in the table. NAV represents the underlying value of the Fund’s net
assets, but the market price per share may be higher or lower than the NAV.
Source: Administrator of the Fund. |
| 4 |
The Bloomberg Municipal Bond 1 Year Index is the 1 year component of the Bloomberg U.S. Municipal Index. It is designed
to measure the one-to-two-year area of the tax-exempt bond market. The
index is calculated on a total return basis with dividends
reinvested. The index is unmanaged, its returns do not reflect any
fees, expenses, or sales charges, and it is not available for direct investment. Source: Bloomberg. |
| 5 |
The Bloomberg Municipal Bond 5 Year Index is the 5 Year component of the Bloomberg U.S. Municipal Index. It is designed
to measure the four-to-six-year area of the tax-exempt bond market.
The index is calculated on a total return basis with dividends reinvested. The index is unmanaged, its returns do not reflect any fees, expenses, or sales charges, and it is not available for direct
investment. Source: Bloomberg. |
| 6 |
The Bloomberg U.S. Municipal Index is a market capitalization-weighted index that is designed to measure the long-term
tax-exempt bond market. The index is calculated on a total return
basis with dividends reinvested. The index is unmanaged, its
returns do not reflect any fees, expenses, or sales charges, and it is not
available for direct investment. Source: Bloomberg. |
| Cents Per Share |
Record Date |
Payable Date |
Cents Per Share |
Record Date |
Payable Date |
| 3.25 |
October 15 |
October 31 |
3.25 |
January 15 |
January 29 |
| 3.25 |
November 17 |
November 28 |
3.25 |
February 17 |
February 26 |
| 3.25 |
December 15 |
December 31 |
3.25 |
March 16 |
March 30 |
Vice President and Chief Investment OfficerPresident and Chief Executive Officer
| Par Value |
Description |
Value |
| Municipal Bonds—94.4% | ||
| |
◼
Alabama—1.0% | |
| 750 |
Auburn University, Series B 5.000%, 6/1/33 |
$870
|
| |
◼
Alaska—0.9% | |
| 750 |
Borough of North Slope, General Obligation 5.000%, 6/30/27 |
778 |
| |
◼
Arizona—1.2% | |
| 1,000 |
Maricopa County Industrial Development Authority, Banner Health Revenue, 4.000%, 1/1/34 |
1,008 |
| |
◼
Arkansas—1.1% | |
| 410 |
Beaver Water District of Benton & Washington Counties, 5.000%, 4/15/27 |
423 |
| 505 |
City of Bentonville Sales & Use Tax Revenue, 5.000%, 11/1/26 |
516 |
| |
|
939 |
| |
◼
California—2.9% | |
| 330 |
California State Health Facilities Financing Authority, Providence St. Joseph Health Revenue, Series A 4.000%, 10/1/36 |
331 |
| 1,000 |
Inglewood Unified School District, General Obligation, Series B 5.000%, 8/1/28 |
1,061 |
| 1,000 |
State of California, General Obligation 5.000%, 8/1/28 |
1,068 |
| |
|
2,460 |
| |
◼
Colorado—7.5% | |
| 1,000 |
Boulder Larimer & Weld Counties St. Vrain Valley School District RE1J, General Obligation, Series 1J (ST AID WITHHLDG) 5.000%, 12/15/34 |
1,183 |
| Par Value |
Description |
Value |
| 1,000 |
City & County of Denver, Airport System Revenue, Series D (AMT) 5.500%, 11/15/30 |
$1,122
|
| 1,795 |
Public Authority For Colorado Energy, Natural Gas Purchase Revenue 6.250%, 11/15/28 |
1,865 |
| 1,000 |
Regional Transportation District, COP 5.000%, 6/1/26 |
1,013 |
| 1,200 |
Regional Transportation District, Sales Tax Revenue, Series A 5.000%, 1/15/28 |
1,241 |
| |
|
6,424 |
| |
◼
Connecticut—5.4% | |
| 390 |
Connecticut Housing Finance Authority, Housing Mortgage Finance Program Revenue, Series D-2 (AMT) 3.000%, 5/15/33 |
371 |
| 1,415 |
Connecticut State Health & Educational Facilities Authority, Yale University Revenue, Series C-1 5.000%, 7/1/40 (Mandatory put
2/01/28)(1) |
1,487 |
| 500 |
State of Connecticut, General Obligation, Series A 5.000%, 1/15/26 |
502 |
| 1,085 |
State of Connecticut, General Obligation, Series D 5.000%, 9/15/31 |
1,227 |
| 935 |
State of Connecticut, General Obligation, Series E 5.000%, 9/15/35 |
986 |
| |
|
4,573 |
| |
◼
Florida—8.4% | |
| 2,000 |
Alachua County Housing Finance Authority, Harbor Cove Apartments Revenue 3.300%, 12/1/29 (Mandatory put
6/01/27)(1) |
2,005 |
| 1,255 |
City of Gainesville Utilities System Revenue, Series A 5.000%, 10/1/32 |
1,308 |
| Par Value |
Description |
Value |
| 2,035 |
County of Seminole, Sales Tax Revenue, Series B (NATL Insured) 5.250%, 10/1/31 |
$2,245
|
| 500 |
Marion County School Board COP, (AG Insured) 5.000%, 6/1/27 |
517 |
| 1,080 |
Miami Beach Health Facilities Authority, Mt. Sinai Medical Center, 5.000%, 11/15/39 |
1,081 |
| |
|
7,156 |
| |
◼
Georgia—5.2% | |
| 1,260 |
Carroll City-County Hospital Authority, Tanner Medical Center Project Revenue (CNTY GTD Insured) 5.000%, 7/1/33 |
1,456 |
| 1,000 |
Jackson County School District, General Obligation (ST AID WITHHLDG) 5.000%, 3/1/28 |
1,057 |
| 1,000 |
Paulding County School District, General Obligation (ST AID WITHHLDG) 5.000%, 2/1/28 |
1,053 |
| 500 |
State of Georgia, General Obligation, Series A-2 5.000%, 2/1/28 |
516 |
| 300 |
Upper Oconee Basin Water Authority, 5.000%, 7/1/29 |
326 |
| |
|
4,408 |
| |
◼
Hawaii—1.3% | |
| 1,000 |
County of Maui, General Obligation 5.000%, 9/1/28 |
1,066 |
| |
◼
Illinois—5.6% | |
| 500 |
City of Chicago, Multi-Family Housing Revenue, Paul G. Stewart Phases 1 & 2, Series F (AMT, GNMA FHA Insured) 4.900%, 3/20/44 |
500 |
| Par Value |
Description |
Value |
| 250 |
City of Chicago, Water Revenue, Second Lien 5.000%, 11/1/30 |
$255
|
| 665 |
City of Chicago, Water Revenue, Second Lien (AG Insured)
5.250%, 11/1/32 |
692 |
| 1,000 |
State of Illinois, General Obligation 5.000%, 2/1/27 |
1,025 |
| 2,020 |
State of Illinois, General Obligation 5.500%, 1/1/29 |
2,179 |
| 160 |
State of Illinois, General Obligation, Series D 5.000%, 11/1/26 |
163 |
| |
|
4,814 |
| |
◼
Kentucky—3.3% | |
| 530 |
Kenton County Airport Board, 5.000%, 1/1/27 |
532 |
| 1,265 |
Kentucky State Property & Building Commission, Series B (ST APPROP) 5.000%, 11/1/26 |
1,292 |
| 1,000 |
Rural Water Financing Agency, Public Projects Construction Revenue, Series A 3.700%, 5/1/27 |
990 |
| |
|
2,814 |
| |
◼
Louisiana—2.6% | |
| 2,000 |
State of Louisiana, General Obligation, Series C 5.000%, 12/1/29 |
2,193 |
| |
◼
Maine—0.9% | |
| 725 |
Maine Health & Higher Educational Facilities Authority, Series A (ST INTERCEPT ST RES FD GTY) 5.000%, 7/1/33 |
726 |
| |
◼
Massachusetts—0.3% | |
| 250 |
Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority, Sales Tax Revenue, Series A 5.000%, 7/1/27 |
260 |
| Par Value |
Description |
Value |
| |
◼
Michigan—1.9% | |
| 1,055 |
Great Lakes Water Authority Water Supply System Revenue, Senior Lien, Series C 5.000%, 7/1/28 |
$1,070
|
| 540 |
Michigan State Building Authority, Facilities Program Lease Revenue, Series I 4.000%, 10/15/36 |
544 |
| |
|
1,614 |
| |
◼
Minnesota—2.5% | |
| 200 |
Minnesota Housing Finance Agency, Series E (GNMA/FNMA/FHLMC Insured) 2.700%, 7/1/44 |
155 |
| 2,000 |
Minnesota Rural Water Finance Authority, Inc., 3.300%, 8/1/26 |
2,001 |
| |
|
2,156 |
| |
◼
Nebraska—2.3% | |
| 1,925 |
City of Omaha, General Obligation 5.250%, 4/1/27 |
1,995 |
| |
◼
New Jersey—6.3% | |
| 2,500 |
New Jersey Transportation Trust Fund Authority, Series A 5.000%, 6/15/33 |
2,876 |
| 1,000 |
New Jersey Turnpike Authority, Series B 5.000%, 1/1/28 |
1,050 |
| 1,115 |
State of, New Jersey, General Obligation, Sales Tax Revenue 5.000%, 6/1/26 |
1,129 |
| 295 |
State of, New Jersey, General Obligation, Sales Tax Revenue 4.000%, 6/1/31 |
316 |
| |
|
5,371 |
| Par Value |
Description |
Value |
| |
◼
New York—4.1% | |
| 500 |
New York City Transitional Finance Authority, Future Tax Secured Subordinate Revenue, Series A-1 5.000%, 11/1/27 |
$523
|
| 1,500 |
New York City Transitional Finance Authority, Future Tax Secured Subordinate Revenue, Series G-1 5.000%, 5/1/40 |
1,654 |
| 750 |
New York State Dormitory Authority, Income Tax Revenue, Series A 5.000%, 3/15/28 |
792 |
| 500 |
New York State Dormitory Authority, Series A (AG ST AID WITHHLDG Insured) 5.000%, 10/1/26 |
511 |
| |
|
3,480 |
| |
◼
North Carolina—1.8% | |
| 870 |
North Carolina Housing Finance Agency 2.850%, 7/1/27 |
866 |
| 625 |
Raleigh Durham Airport Authority, Series A 5.000%, 5/1/26 |
626 |
| |
|
1,492 |
| |
◼
Oklahoma—3.8% | |
| 2,000 |
Oklahoma Capitol Improvement Authority, Series A 5.000%, 7/1/26 |
2,030 |
| 1,200 |
Oklahoma Water Resources Board, Clean Water Program Revenue 5.000%, 4/1/26 |
1,211 |
| |
|
3,241 |
| |
◼
Oregon—1.2% | |
| 1,000 |
Oregon State Lottery, Series A 5.000%, 4/1/28 |
1,058 |
| Par Value |
Description |
Value |
| |
◼
Pennsylvania—2.1% | |
| 1,000 |
City of Philadelphia, General Obligation, Series C 5.000%, 8/1/28 |
$1,061
|
| 315 |
City of Pittsburgh, General Obligation 5.000%, 9/1/26 |
321 |
| 375 |
County of York, General Obligation 5.000%, 6/1/31 |
423 |
| |
|
1,805 |
| |
◼
Rhode Island—2.5% | |
| 400 |
Providence Public Building Authority, Capital Improvement Program Revenue, Series A (AG Insured) 5.000%, 9/15/28 |
423 |
| 1,500 |
Rhode Island Commerce Corp., Department of Transportation, Series A 5.000%, 5/15/32 |
1,702 |
| |
|
2,125 |
| |
◼
South Carolina—0.4% | |
| 350 |
South Carolina Public Service Authority, Series A 5.000%, 12/1/28 |
374 |
| |
◼
Tennessee—3.6% | |
| 1,000 |
County of Shelby, General Obligation, Series A 5.000%, 4/1/27 |
1,033 |
| 1,000 |
Memphis-Shelby County Airport Authority, Series D 5.000%, 7/1/26 |
1,014 |
| 1,000 |
Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson County Electric Revenue, Series B 5.000%, 5/15/28 |
1,060 |
| |
|
3,107 |
| Par Value |
Description |
Value |
| |
◼
Texas—11.6% | |
| 350 |
Arlington Higher Education Finance Corp., Trinity Basin Preparatory Revenue (PSF-GTD Insured) 5.000%, 8/15/26 |
$356
|
| 1,000 |
Central Texas Turnpike System, Second Tier, Series C 5.000%, 8/15/31 |
1,119 |
| 735 |
City of New Braunfels Utility System Revenue, 5.000%, 7/1/28 |
775 |
| 340 |
Fort Bend County Public Facility Corp., 5.000%, 3/1/26 |
342 |
| 1,250 |
Grand Parkway Transportation Corp., Subordinate Tier Toll Revenue 5.000%, 10/1/52 (Mandatory put
4/01/28)(1) |
1,300 |
| 1,350 |
Klein Independent School District, General Obligation, Series A 5.000%, 8/1/28 |
1,432 |
| 1,505 |
North Texas Tollway Authority, Special Project System Revenue, Convertible Capital Appreciation Bonds, Series C, 7.000%, 9/1/43 (Pre-Refunded 9/1/31 @
100)(2) |
1,816 |
| 1,000 |
State of Texas, General Obligation 5.000%, 10/1/27 |
1,045 |
| 1,500 |
State of Texas, General Obligation 5.000%, 10/1/30 |
1,670 |
| |
|
9,855 |
| |
◼
Washington—2.4% | |
| 750 |
City of Seattle WA Municipal Light & Power Revenue 5.000%, 2/1/28 |
790 |
| 1,260 |
Port of Seattle, Intermediate Lien, Series C (AMT) 5.000%, 5/1/32 |
1,291 |
| |
|
2,081 |
| Par Value |
Description |
Value |
| |
◼
Wisconsin—0.3% | |
| 250 |
Public Finance Authority, Waste Management, Inc. Project Revenue (AMT) 2.875%, 5/1/27 |
$246
|
| Total Municipal Bonds (Cost $80,044) |
80,489 | |
| Total Long-Term Investments—94.4% (Cost $80,044) |
80,489 | |
| Short-Term Investment—1.2% | ||
| Municipal Bond—1.2% | ||
| |
◼
New Jersey—1.2% | |
| 1,000 |
Monmouth County Improvement Authority Governmental Pooled Loan Project Revenue (CNTY GTD Insured) 4.000%, 3/13/26 |
1,004 |
| Total Short-Term Investment (Cost $1,004) |
1,004 | |
| TOTAL INVESTMENTS—95.6% (Cost $81,048) |
81,493 | |
| |
Other assets less liabilities—4.4% |
3,791 |
| NET ASSETS—100.0% |
$85,284 | |
| |
|
| AG |
Insured by Assured Guaranty Inc. |
| AMT |
Alternative Minimum Tax |
| CNTY GTD |
County Guarantee Program |
| COP |
Certificate of Participation |
| FHA |
Federal Housing Authority |
| FHLMC |
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (“Freddie Mac”) |
| FNMA |
Federal National Mortgage Association (“Fannie Mae”) |
| GNMA |
Government National Mortgage Association (“Ginnie Mae”) |
| NATL |
National Public Finance Guarantee Corp. |
| PSF-GTD |
Permanent School Fund Guarantee Program |
| ST AID WITHHLDG |
State Aid Withholding |
| ST APPROP |
State Appropriation |
| ST INTERCEPT |
State Intercept |
| ST RES FD GTY |
State Resource Fund Guaranty |
| (1) |
Variable or step coupon security; interest rate shown reflects the rate in effect at October
31, 2025. For securities based on a published reference rate and spread, the
reference rate and spread are indicated in the description above. Certain
variable rate securities are not based on a published reference rate and spread but are determined by the issuer or agent and are based on current market conditions. These securities do not
indicate a reference rate and spread in their description above. |
| (2) |
Prerefunded and refunded issues are secured by escrowed cash, U.S. government
obligations, or other securities. |
| |
Level 2 |
| Municipal Bonds |
$81,493 |
| Total investments |
$81,493 |
| Summary of Ratings as a Percentage of Long-Term Investments (Unaudited) | |
| Rating * |
% |
| AAA |
8.6 |
| AA |
57.9 |
| A |
29.2 |
| BBB |
1.9 |
| BB |
0.0 |
| B |
0.0 |
| NR |
2.3 |
| |
100.0 |
| * |
Individual ratings are grouped based on the lower rating of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC (“S&P”) or Moody’s
Investors Service, Inc. (“Moody’s”) and are expressed using the
S&P ratings scale. If a particular security is rated by either
S&P or Moody’s, but not both, then the single rating is used. If a particular
security is not rated by either S&P or Moody’s, then a rating
from Fitch Ratings, Inc. is used, if available. The Fund does not evaluate these ratings but simply assigns them to the appropriate credit quality category as determined by the ratings agencies, as applicable. Securities that have not been
rated by S&P, Moody’s or Fitch totaled 2.3% of the portfolio at the end of the
reporting period. |
| Portfolio Composition as a Percentage of Long-Term Investments (Unaudited) | |
| |
% |
| General Obligation |
35.5 |
| Utilities |
11.4 |
| Leasing |
11.1 |
| Special Tax |
11.1 |
| Transportation |
7.9 |
| Housing |
4.8 |
| Industrial Revenue & Pollution Control |
4.1 |
| Airport |
4.0 |
| Education |
4.0 |
| Healthcare |
3.9 |
| Pre-Refunded |
2.2 |
| |
100.0 |
| Assets: |
|
| Investments at value (cost $81,048) |
$81,493
|
| Cash |
4,632 |
| Receivables: |
|
| Interest |
1,143 |
| Prepaid expenses |
3 |
| Total assets |
87,271 |
| Liabilities: |
|
| Payables: |
|
| Investment securities purchased |
1,825 |
| Dividend distributions on common stock |
5 |
| Investment advisory fees (Note 3) |
36 |
| Administrative fees (Note 3) |
7 |
| Accrued expenses |
114 |
| Total liabilities |
1,987 |
| Net Assets |
$85,284 |
| CAPITAL: |
|
| Common stock ($0.01 par value; 599,996,750 shares authorized and 7,029,567 shares issued and
outstanding) |
$70 |
| Additional paid-in capital |
94,003 |
| Total distributable earnings (accumulated losses) |
(8,789) |
| Net Assets |
$85,284 |
| |
|
| NET ASSET VALUE |
$12.13 |
| INVESTMENT INCOME: |
|
| Interest |
$2,759
|
| EXPENSES: |
|
| Investment advisory fees (Note
3) |
426 |
| Administrative fees (Note 3)
|
96 |
| Professional fees |
170 |
| Transfer agent fees |
79 |
| Reports to shareholders |
59 |
| Custodian fees |
27 |
| Accounting agent fees |
17 |
| Directors’ fees (Note 3) |
12 |
| Other expenses |
32 |
| Total expenses |
918 |
| Net investment income (loss) |
1,841 |
| REALIZED AND UNREALIZED GAIN (LOSS): |
|
| Net realized gain (loss) on investments |
(172) |
| Net change in unrealized appreciation / depreciation on investments |
672 |
| Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) |
500 |
| NET INCREASE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM OPERATIONS |
$2,341 |
| |
For the year ended
October 31, 2025 |
For the year ended
October 31, 2024 |
| OPERATIONS: |
|
|
| Net investment income (loss) |
$1,841
|
$2,116
|
| Net realized gain (loss) |
(172) |
(523) |
| Net change in unrealized appreciation / depreciation |
672 |
2,638 |
| Net increase (decrease) in net assets applicable to common stock resulting from operations |
2,341 |
4,231 |
| DISTRIBUTIONS TO STOCKHOLDERS: |
|
|
| Net investment income |
(1,841) |
(2,116) |
| Return of capital |
(901) |
(626) |
| Decrease in net assets from distributions to stockholders |
(2,742) |
(2,742) |
| Total increase (decrease) in net assets |
(401) |
1,489 |
| NET ASSETS: |
|
|
| Beginning of year |
85,685 |
84,196 |
| End of year |
$85,284 |
$85,685 |
| |
For the year ended October 31, | ||||
| |
2025 |
2024 |
2023 |
2022 |
2021 |
| PER SHARE DATA: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Net asset value, beginning of period |
$12.19 |
$11.98 |
$11.93 |
$15.72 |
$15.79 |
| Net investment income (loss) |
0.26 |
0.30 |
0.22 |
0.33 |
0.43 |
| Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) |
0.07 |
0.30 |
0.22 |
(3.57) |
(0.01) |
| Net increase (decrease) from investment operations applicable to common stock |
0.33 |
0.60 |
0.44 |
(3.24) |
0.42 |
| Distributions on common stock: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Net investment income |
(0.26) |
(0.30) |
(0.30) |
(0.39) |
(0.49) |
| Net realized gain |
— |
— |
— |
(0.16) |
—(1) |
| Return of capital |
(0.13) |
(0.09) |
(0.09) |
— |
— |
| Total distributions |
(0.39) |
(0.39) |
(0.39) |
(0.55) |
(0.49) |
| Net asset value, end of period |
$12.13 |
$12.19 |
$11.98 |
$11.93 |
$15.72 |
| Market value, end of period |
$11.39 |
$11.19 |
$10.51 |
$10.79 |
$14.26 |
| RATIOS TO AVERAGE NET ASSETS APPLICABLE TO COMMON STOCK: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Operating expenses |
1.08% |
0.97% |
2.72% |
3.13% |
2.37% |
| Operating expenses, without leverage |
1.08% |
0.97% |
1.18% |
1.32% |
1.46% |
| Net investment income |
2.16% |
2.46% |
1.79% |
2.39% |
2.57% |
| SUPPLEMENTAL DATA: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Total return on market
value(2) |
5.35% |
10.30% |
0.91% |
(21.04)% |
3.62% |
| Total return on net asset
value(2) |
2.76% |
5.03% |
3.62% |
(21.10)% |
2.54% |
| Portfolio turnover rate |
38% |
59% |
27% |
7% |
10% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| Net assets applicable to common stock, end of period (000’s omitted) |
$85,284
|
$85,685
|
$84,196
|
$83,859 |
$110,483
|
| Preferred stock outstanding, end of period (000’s omitted)(3) |
$— |
$— |
$— |
$65,000 |
$65,000 |
| Asset coverage on preferred stock(4) |
$— |
$— |
$— |
$229,013
|
$269,973
|
| Asset coverage ratio on preferred
stock(5) |
—% |
—% |
—% |
229% |
270% |
| |
|
| (1) |
Amount per share is less than $0.01. |
| (2) |
Total return on market value assumes a purchase of common stock at the opening market price on the first business day and a sale at the closing market price on the
last business day of each period shown in the table and assumes
reinvestment of dividends at the actual reinvestment prices obtained under the terms of the Fund’s dividend reinvestment plan. Total return on market value does not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder may pay on fund distributions or the sale of fund
shares. In addition, when buying or selling stock, you would ordinarily
pay brokerage expenses. Because brokerage expenses and taxes are not reflected in the above calculations, your total return net of brokerage and tax expense would be lower than the total return on market value shown in the table. Total return on net asset
value uses the same methodology, but with use of net asset value for beginning,
ending and reinvestment values. |
| (3) |
During the year ended October 31, 2023, the Fund voluntarily redeemed all 650 of its Series 2050 Remarketable Variable Rate MuniFund Term Preferred Shares at
100% of its liquidation preference plus accrued dividends. |
| (4) |
Represents value of net assets applicable to common stock plus preferred stock outstanding at period end divided by the preferred stock outstanding at period end,
calculated per $100 liquidation preference per share of preferred
stock. |
| (5) |
Represents value of net assets applicable to common stock plus preferred stock outstanding at
period end divided by the preferred stock outstanding at period end. |
| Federal Tax Cost |
Unrealized Appreciation |
Unrealized (Depreciation) |
Net Unrealized Appreciation
(Depreciation) |
| $81,048 |
$837
|
$(392
) |
$445
|
| Short-Term |
Long-Term |
| $250
|
$8,984
|
| |
Year Ended |
Year Ended |
| |
2025 |
2024 |
| Distributions paid from: |
|
|
| Tax-exempt income |
$1,841
|
$2,116
|
| Return of capital |
901 |
626 |
| Total |
$2,742 |
$2,742 |
| Capital loss carryforwards |
$(9,234
) |
| Net unrealized appreciation |
445 |
| |
$(8,789 ) |
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
December 12, 2025
TAX INFORMATION (Unaudited)
| |
Exempt-interest dividends (%) |
| |
100.00% |
INFORMATION ABOUT PROXY VOTING BY THE FUND (Unaudited)
INFORMATION ABOUT THE FUND’S PORTFOLIO HOLDINGS (Unaudited)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (Unaudited)
INVESTMENT OBJECTIVES, PRINCIPAL STRATEGIES AND PRINCIPAL RISKS (Unaudited)
INFORMATION ABOUT DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS OF THE FUND (Unaudited)
Directors of the Fund (Unaudited)
| Name and Age |
Postion(s) Held with
Fund |
Term of Office and Length of Time Served |
Pricipal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years |
Number of Portfolios in Fund
Complex Overseen by
Director |
Other Directorships Held by the Director |
| Independent Directors |
|
|
|
|
|
| Donald C. Burke
Age: 65 |
Director |
Term expires 2027; Director since 2014 |
Private investor since 2009; President and Chief Executive Officer, Blackrock U.S. Funds 2007–2009; Managing Director, Blackrock, Inc. 2006-2009; Managing Director, Merrill Lynch Investment Managers 1990-2006 |
97 |
Director, Avista Corp.
(energy company);
Director, Duff &
Phelps Utility and
Corporate Bond Trust Inc. (“DUC”) 2014-2021; Trustee, Goldman Sachs Fund Complex 2010-2014; Director, BlackRock Luxembourg and Cayman Funds 2006-2010 |
| Name and Age |
Postion(s) Held with
Fund |
Term of Office and Length of
Time Served |
Pricipal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years |
Number of Portfolios in
Fund Complex
Overseen by Director |
Other Directorships
Held by the Director |
| Mareilé B Cusack
Age: 67 |
Director |
Term expires 2026; Director since 2023 |
General Counsel, Ariel Investments, LLC (registered investment adviser) 2008-2023 (Chief Privacy Officer 2019-2023, Senior Vice President 2012-2023, Anti-Money Laundering Officer 2010-2023 and Vice President 2007-2012); Vice President, Ariel Investment Trust (mutual fund complex) 2008-2023 (Anti-Money Laundering Officer 2010-2023, Secretary 2014-2023 and Assistant Secretary 2008-2014); Vice President, General Counsel, Secretary and Anti-Money Laundering Officer, Ariel Distributors, LLC (registered broker-dealer) 2008-2023; Vice President and General Counsel, Ariel Alternatives, LLC (registered investment adviser), Project Black Management Co. (relying adviser) and Ariel GP Holdco, management member to Project Black, LP (private fund) 2021-2023; Vice President and Associate General Counsel, Chicago Stock Exchange March-October 2007 (Chief Enforcement Counsel 2004-2007); Chief Legal Officer, Illinois Gaming Board 1995-2001; Branch Chief, Branch of Interpretations and Small Offering Issuers, Chicago Regional Office, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission 1991-1995 (Staff Attorney, Enforcement Division 1988-1991) |
3 |
|
| Name and Age |
Postion(s) Held with
Fund |
Term of Office and Length of
Time Served |
Pricipal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years |
Number of Portfolios in
Fund Complex
Overseen by Director |
Other Directorships
Held by the Director |
| Mark G. Kahrer
Age: 63 |
Director |
Term expires 2028; Director since March 2025 |
Senior Vice President-Regulatory Affairs, Marketing and Energy Efficiency, New Jersey Natural Gas (subsidiary of New Jersey Resources) 2020-Present (Vice President of Regulatory Affairs, 2017-2019); Public Service Enterprise Group, 1983-2017 (positions held include Vice President Finance & Development, PSEG Power; Vice President - Finance, PSE&G; Assistant Treasurer; Director, Financial Risk Management; Director - Corporate Accounting) |
3 |
|
| Eileen A. Moran
Age: 71 |
Director and Chair of the Board |
Term expires 2027; Director since 2008 |
Private investor since 2011; President and Chief Executive Officer, PSEG Resources L.L.C. (investment company) 1990-2011 |
3 |
Director, DUC 1996-2021 |
| Interested Directors |
|
|
|
|
|
| George R. Aylward
Age: 61 |
Director |
Term expires 2025; Director since 2024 |
Director, President and Chief Executive Officer (since 2008) Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. and/or certain of its subsidiaries; and various senior officer positions with Virtus affiliates since 2005 |
108 |
Director, Stone Harbor
Investment Funds plc
(9 sub-funds), Stone
Harbor Global Funds
plc (2 sub-funds) and
Virtus Global Funds
ICAV (9 sub-funds)
since 2023; Member,
Board of Governors of
the Investment Company Institute since 2021; and Director, Virtus Global Funds, plc (5 sub-funds) since 2013 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Officers of the Fund (Unaudited)
| Name, Address
and Age |
Position(s) Held with Fund and Length of Time Served |
Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years |
| David D. Grumhaus, Jr.
Age: 59 |
President and Chief Executive Officer since 2021 |
President and Chief Investment Officer of the
Investment Adviser since 2021 (Co-Chief
Investment Officer 2020; Senior Portfolio
Manager 2014-2020) |
| W.
Patrick Bradley, CPA Virtus Investment Partners, Inc.
One Financial Plaza
Hartford, CT 06103
Age: 53 |
Vice President since 2024, Treasurer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer since July 2025 (Assistant Treasurer 2024-July 2025) |
Executive Vice President, Fund Services since
2016 (Senior Vice President, Fund Services
2010-2016) and various officer positions since
2004, Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. and/or
certain of its subsidiaries; Director since 2023,
Stone Harbor Investment Funds plc and Stone
Harbor Global Funds plc; Director since 2019,
Virtus Global Funds ICAV; Director since 2013,
Virtus Global Funds, plc; various officer
positions since 2006 of various registered funds
advised by subsidiaries of Virtus Investment
Partners, Inc.; Member, BNY Mellon Asset
Servicing Client Advisory Board 2022-2025 |
| Jennifer S. Fromm
Virtus Investment Partners, Inc.
One Financial Plaza
Hartford, CT 06103
Age: 52 |
Vice President and Assistant Secretary of since March 2025 (Vice President and Secretary, 2020 to 2024) |
Vice President since 2016 and Senior Counsel,
Legal since 2007 and various officer positions
since 2008, Virtus Investment Partners, Inc.
and/or certain of its subsidiaries; various officer
positions since 2008 of various registered funds
advised by subsidiaries of Virtus Investment
Partners, Inc. |
| Kathleen L. Hegyi
Age: 58 |
Chief Compliance Officer since 2022 |
Managing Director and Chief Compliance
Officer of the Investment Adviser since 2022;
Senior Compliance Officer, William Blair &
Company, L.L.C. 2010-2022 |
| Daniel J. Petrisko, CFA
Age: 65 |
Executive Vice President since 2021 and Assistant Secretary since 2015 (Senior Vice President 2017 – 2021; Vice President 2015-2016) |
Executive Managing Director of the Investment
Adviser since 2017 (Senior Managing Director
2014-2017; Senior Vice President 1997 – 2014;
Vice President 1995 – 1997); Chief Investment
Officer, DUC 2004-2021, Senior Vice President
2017-2021 and Assistant Secretary 2015-2021
(Vice President 2000-2016; Portfolio Manager
2002-2004) |
| Name, Address and
Age |
Position(s) Held with Fund and Length of
Time Served |
Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years |
| Timothy P. Riordan
Virtus Investment Partners, Inc.
One Financial Plaza, Hartford, CT 06103
Age: 61 |
Vice President since 2023 |
Assistant Vice President, Fund Administration,
Virtus Fund Services, LLC since March 2025;
Senior Vice President, Fund Administration,
Robert W. Baird & Co Incorporated since 2019;
Senior Vice President, J.J.B. Hilliard, W.L.
Lyons LLC 2018-2019 (Vice President
1998-2018) |
| Kathryn L. Santoro
Virtus Investment Partners, Inc.
One Financial Plaza, Hartford, CT 06103
Age: 51 |
Vice President since March 2025 and Secretary since 2024 |
Vice President and Senior Attorney, Virtus
Investment Partners, Inc. since 2024; various
officer positions of registered funds advised by
subsidiaries of Virtus Investment Partners, Inc.
since 2024; Vice President, General Counsel, and
Secretary, Anuvu Corp. 2021 – 2023; Managing
Counsel, Janus Henderson Investors and various
officer positions of registered funds advised by
Janus Henderson Investors 2016 – 2020 |
| Dusty L. Self
Virtus Investment Partners, Inc.
1290 Palmetto Avenue
Winter Park, FL 32789
Age: 58 |
Chief Investment Officer since 2024 and Vice President since 2022 (Portfolio Manager 2022-2024) |
Senior Portfolio Manager of the Investment
Adviser since 2022; Managing Director and
Senior Portfolio Manager of Seix Investment
Advisors, a division of Virtus Fixed Income
Advisers, LLC (and predecessor firms) since
2011; Portfolio Manager, Virtus Seix Short Term
Municipal Bond Fund since 2011, Virtus Seix
Investment Grade Tax Exempt Bond Fund since
2018 and Virtus Seix High Grade Municipal
Bond Fund since 2018; managed municipal bond
investments since 1992 |
| Nikita K. Thaker, CPA
Virtus Investment Partners, Inc.
One Financial Plaza, Hartford, CT 06103
Age: 47 |
Vice President and Assistant Treasurer since 2024 |
Vice President and Closed-End Fund Controller,
Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. since 2021
(Assistant Vice President—Mutual Fund
Accounting & Reporting, 2015 to 2021; Director
2011-2015); various officer positions, Virtus
Investment Partners, Inc. and/or certain of its
subsidiaries since 2015; Vice President,
Controller and Assistant Treasurer, Virtus
Closed-End Funds and Virtus Closed-End Funds
II since 2021 (Assistant Treasurer 2017-2021) |
DIVIDEND REINVESTMENT AND CASH PURCHASE PLAN (Unaudited)
Chair
President and Chief Executive Officer
Executive Vice President and Assistant Secretary
Vice President and Chief Investment Officer
Vice President, Treasurer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer
Chief Compliance Officer
Vice President and Secretary
Vice President and Assistant Secretary
Vice President and Assistant Treasurer
Vice President
Stock Exchange under the symbol DTF
Duff & Phelps Investment Management Co.
10 South Wacker Drive, 19th Floor
Chicago, IL 60606
(312) 368-5510
Virtus Fund Services, LLC
One Financial Plaza
Hartford, CT 06103
Computershare
P.O. Box 43078
Providence, RI 02940-3078
The Bank of New York Mellon
Mayer Brown LLP
Ernst & Young LLP
(b) Not applicable.
Item 2. Code of Ethics.
As of the end of the period covered by this report, the registrant has adopted a code of ethics that applies to the registrant’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer (the “Code of Ethics”). The registrant’s principal financial officer also performs the functions of principal accounting officer.
The text of the registrant’s Code of Ethics is posted on the registrant’s web site at www.dpimc.com/dpg. In the event that the registrant makes any amendment to or grants any waiver from the provisions of the Code of Ethics, the registrant intends to disclose such amendment or waiver on its web site within five business days.
Item 3. Audit Committee Financial Expert.
The registrant’s board of directors has determined that two members of its audit committee: Donald C. Burke and Mark G. Kahrer, are audit committee financial experts and that each of them is “independent” for purposes of this Item.
Item 4. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.
The following table sets forth the aggregate audit and non-audit fees billed to the registrant for each of the last two fiscal years for professional services rendered by the registrant’s principal accountant, Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm (the “Independent Auditor”).
| Fiscal year ended |
Fiscal year ended | |||
| (a) Audit Fees (1) |
$58,900 | $57,780 | ||
| (b) Audit-Related Fees (2)(6) |
$0 | $0 | ||
| (c) Tax Fees (3)(6) |
$9,220 | $8,935 |
| (d) All Other Fees (4)(6) |
$0 | $0 | ||
| Aggregate Non-Audit Fees (5)(6) |
$9,220 | $8,935 |
| (1) | Audit Fees are fees billed for professional services rendered by the Independent Auditor for the audit of the registrant’s annual financial statements and for services that are normally provided by the Independent Auditor in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements. |
| (2) | Audit-Related Fees are fees billed for assurance and related services by the Independent Auditor that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit of the registrant’s financial statements and are not reported under the caption “Audit Fees.” |
| (3) | Tax Fees are fees billed for professional services rendered by the Independent Auditor for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning. In both periods shown in the table, such services consisted of review of the registrant’s annual federal and excise tax returns and preparation and analysis of state income tax returns. |
| (4) | All Other Fees are fees billed for products and services provided by the Independent Auditor, other than the services reported under the captions “Audit Fees,” “Audit-Related Fees” and “Tax Fees.” |
| (5) | Aggregate Non-Audit Fees are non-audit fees billed by the Independent Auditor for services rendered to the registrant, the registrant’s investment adviser (the “Adviser”) and any entity controlling, controlled by or under common control with the Adviser that provides ongoing services to the registrant (collectively, the “Covered Entities”). During both periods shown in the table, no portion of such fees related to services rendered by the Independent Auditor to the Adviser or any other Covered Entity. |
| (6) | No portion of these fees was approved by the Audit Committee after the beginning of the engagement pursuant to the waiver of the pre-approval requirement for certain de minimis non-audit services described in Section 10A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and applicable regulations. |
(e)(1) Disclose the audit committee’s pre-approval policies and procedures described in paragraph (c)(7) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X.
The registrant’s audit committee of its board of directors (the “Audit Committee”) has adopted policies and procedures for the pre-approval of services provided by Ernst & Young LLP (the “Policy”).
Under the Policy, the Audit Committee identifies certain audit, audit-related, and tax services, which the Audit Committee may pre-approve on a general basis (i.e., without case-by-case consideration) (“general pre-approval”). Additionally, the Audit Committee may grant general
pre-approval to certain non-audit services identified in the Policy provided to the registrant or its affiliates that relate directly to the operations and financial reporting of the registrant, so long as the Audit Committee believes such services are (a) consistent with the SEC’s auditor independence rules, and (b) routine and recurring services that will not impair the independence of the independent auditors. In addition to the foregoing, the Audit Committee must pre-approve, on a case-by-case basis (“specific pre-approval”) (1) annual audit services engagement terms and fees, (2) any audit-related services not subject to general pre-approval in the Policy, (3) tax services related to large and complex transactions, and (4) any other non-audit services not subject to general pre-approval in the Policy.
The Audit Committee has determined that the chair of the Audit Committee may provide specific pre-approval for such services that meet the above requirements but are not included in the general pre-approval (“specific pre-approval”) in the event such approval is sought between regularly scheduled meetings. Services provided pursuant to the general pre-approval and the specific pre-approval are reported to the audit committee at its next regularly scheduled meeting, and the audit committee is asked to ratify services provided pursuant to the specific pre-approval.
Pre-approval fee levels or budgeted amounts for all services to be provided by the independent auditor will be established annually by the Audit Committee. Any proposed services exceeding these levels or amounts will require specific pre-approval by the Audit Committee.
| (f) | The percentage of hours expended on the principal accountant’s engagement to audit the registrant’s financial statements for the most recent fiscal year that were attributed to work performed by persons other than the principal accountant’s full-time, permanent employees was less than fifty percent. |
| (g) | Aggregate non-audit fees are shown in the table above. |
| (h) | The registrant’s audit committee of the board of directors has considered whether the provision of non-audit services that were rendered to the registrant’s investment adviser (not including any sub-adviser whose role is primarily portfolio management and is subcontracted with or overseen by another investment adviser), and any entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the investment adviser that provides ongoing services to the registrant that were not pre-approved pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(ii) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X is compatible with maintaining the principal accountant’s independence. |
| (i) | Not applicable. |
| (j) | Not applicable. |
Item 5. Audit Committee of Listed Registrants.
The registrant has a separately-designated standing Audit Committee established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). The
members of the audit committee include all the independent members of the registrant’s board of directors, which are Donald C. Burke, Mareilé B. Cusack, Mark G. Kahrer and Eileen A. Moran.
Item 6. Investments.
| (a) | Schedule of Investments in securities of unaffiliated issuers as of the close of the reporting period is included as part of the report to shareholders filed under Item 1(a) of this form. |
| (b) | Not applicable. |
Item 7. Financial Statements and Financial Highlights for Open-End Management Investment Companies.
| (a) | Not applicable for Closed-End Management Investment Companies. |
| (b) | Not applicable for Closed-End Management Investment Companies. |
Item 8. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants for Open-End Management Investment Companies.
Not applicable for Closed-End Management Investment Companies.
Item 9. Proxy Disclosures for Open-End Management Investment Companies.
Not applicable for Closed-End Management Investment Companies.
Item 10. Remuneration Paid to Directors, Officers, and Others of Open-End Management Investment Companies.
Not applicable for Closed-End Management Investment Companies.
Item 11. Statement Regarding Basis for Approval of Investment Advisory Contract.
Not applicable.
Item 12. Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for Closed-End Management Investment Companies.
The registrant’s board of directors has adopted the following proxy voting policies and procedures.
DNP SELECT INCOME FUND INC.
DUFF & PHELPS UTILITY AND INFRASTRUCTURE FUND INC.
DTF TAX-FREE INCOME 2028 TERM FUND INC.
PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
As Amended June 8, 2022
| I. | Definitions. As used in these Policies and Procedures, the following terms shall have the meanings ascribed below: |
| A. | “Adviser” refers to Duff & Phelps Investment Management Co. |
| B. | “corporate governance matters” refers to changes involving the corporate ownership or structure of an issuer whose voting securities are within a portfolio holding, including changes in the state of incorporation, changes in capital structure, including increases and decreases of capital and preferred stock issuance, mergers and other corporate restructurings, and anti-takeover provisions such as staggered boards, poison pills, and supermajority voting provisions. |
| C. | “Delegate” refers to the Adviser, any proxy committee to which the Adviser delegates its responsibilities hereunder and any qualified, independent organization engaged by the Adviser to vote proxies on behalf of the Fund. |
| D. | “executive compensation matters” refers to stock option plans and other executive compensation issues, including votes on “say on pay” and “golden parachutes.” |
| E. | “Fund” refers to DNP Select Income Fund Inc., Duff & Phelps Utility and Infrastructure Fund Inc. or DTF Tax-Free Income 2028 Term Fund Inc., as the case may be. |
| F. | “Investment Company Act” refers to the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended. |
| G. | “portfolio holding” refers to any company or entity whose voting securities are held within the investment portfolio of the Fund as of the date a proxy is solicited. |
| H. | “Principal Underwriter” refers to Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, solely with respect to DNP Select Income Fund Inc. |
| I. | “proxy contests” refer to any meeting of shareholders of an issuer for which there are at least two sets of proxy cards, one solicited by management and the others by a dissident or group of dissidents. |
| J. | “social issues” refers to social, political and environmental issues. |
| K. | “takeover” refers to “hostile” or “friendly” efforts to effect radical change in the voting control of the board of directors of a company. |
| II. | Responsibilities of Delegates. |
| A. | In the absence of a specific direction to the contrary from the Board of Directors of the Fund, the Adviser will be responsible for voting proxies for all portfolio holdings in accordance with these Policies and Procedures, or for delegating such responsibility as described below. |
| B. | The Adviser has a Proxy Committee (“Proxy Committee”) that is responsible for establishing policies and procedures designed to enable the Adviser to ethically and effectively discharge its fiduciary obligation to vote all applicable proxies on behalf of all clients. The Adviser also utilizes Institutional Shareholder Services (“ISS”), a qualified, non-affiliated independent third party, to serve as the Adviser’s proxy voting agent in the provision of certain administrative, clerical, functional recordkeeping and support services related to the Adviser’s proxy voting processes and procedures. |
| C. | In voting proxies on behalf of the Fund, each Delegate shall have a duty of care to safeguard the best interests of the Fund and its shareholders and to act in accordance with these Policies and Procedures. |
| D. | No Delegate shall accept direction or inappropriate influence from any other client or third party, or from any director, officer or employee of any affiliated company, and shall not cast any vote inconsistent with these Policies and Procedures without obtaining the prior approval of the Board of Directors of the Fund or its duly authorized representative. |
| III. | General policy. |
| A. | It is the intention of the Fund to exercise voting stock ownership rights in portfolio holdings in a manner that is reasonably anticipated to further the best economic interests of shareholders of the Fund. Accordingly, the Fund or its Delegate(s) shall endeavor to analyze and vote all proxies that are considered likely to have |
| financial implications, and, where appropriate, to participate in corporate governance, shareholder proposals, management communications and legal proceedings. The Fund and its Delegate(s) must also identify potential or actual conflicts of interests in voting proxies and address any such conflict of interest in accordance with these Policies and Procedures. |
| B. | Absent special factors, the policy of the Adviser is to exercise its proxy voting discretion in accordance with ISS guidelines. However, all proposals are individually evaluated by the Proxy Committee, which may determine to vote contrary to an ISS recommendation when it believes that doing so is in the best interest of the Fund. |
| IV. | Special factors to be considered when voting. |
| A. | The Delegate may abstain from voting when it concludes that the effect on shareholders’ economic interests or the value of the portfolio holding is indeterminable or insignificant. |
| B. | In analyzing anti-takeover measures, the Delegate shall vote on a case-by-case basis taking into consideration such factors as overall long-term financial performance of the target company relative to its industry competition. Key measures which shall be considered include, without limitation, five-year annual compound growth rates for sales, operating income, net income, and total shareholder returns (share price appreciation plus dividends). Other financial indicators that will be considered include margin analysis, cash flow, and debt levels. |
| C. | In analyzing proxy contests for control, the Delegate shall vote on a case-by-case basis taking into consideration such factors as long-term financial performance of the target company relative to its industry; management’s track record; background of the proxy contest; the strategic plan of the dissident slate and |
| the quality of its critique against management; qualifications of director nominees and any compensatory arrangements (both slates); evaluation of which nominee(s) would be most likely to pursue policies that will have the highest likelihood to maximize the economic interests of shareholders of the Fund; the likelihood that the proposed objectives and goals can be achieved (both slates); and stock ownership positions. |
| D. | In analyzing contested elections for director, the Delegate shall vote on a case- by-case basis taking into consideration such factors as long-term financial performance of the company relative to its industry; management’s track record; background of the contested election; the strategic plan of the dissident slate and the quality of its critique against management; qualifications of director nominees and any compensatory arrangements (both slates); whether the board has a sufficient number of independent directors; evaluation of which nominee(s) would be most likely to pursue policies that will have the highest likelihood to maximize the economic interests of shareholders of the Fund; the likelihood that the proposed objectives can be achieved (both slates); and stock ownership positions. |
| E. | In analyzing corporate governance matters, the Delegate shall vote on a case-by- case basis taking into consideration such factors as: tax and economic benefits associated with amending an issuer’s state of incorporation; dilution or improved accountability associated with changes in capital structure; management proposals to require a supermajority shareholder vote to amend charters and bylaws and bundled or “conditioned” proxy proposals; long-term financial performance of the company relative to its industry; and management’s track record. |
| F. | In analyzing executive compensation matters, the Delegate shall vote on a case- by-case basis, taking into consideration a company’s overall pay program and demonstrated pay-for-performance philosophy, and generally disfavoring such problematic pay practices as (i) repricing or replacing of underwater stock options, (ii) excessive perquisites or tax gross-ups and (iii) change-in-control payments that are excessive or are payable based on a “single trigger” (i.e., without involuntary job loss or substantial diminution of duties). With respect to the advisory vote on the frequency of “say on pay” votes, the Delegate shall vote in favor of an annual frequency for such votes. |
| G. | In analyzing shareholder proposals involving social issues, the Delegate shall vote on a case-by-case basis. The Proxy Committee shall incorporate environmental, social and governance (“ESG”) issues into its evaluation of ISS recommendations and the Delegate’s voting of proxies generally, consistent with the Adviser’s fiduciary duties and the economic interests of the Fund and its shareholders. |
| H. | In analyzing shareholder proposals calling for a report on political contributions, the Delegate shall vote on a case-by-case basis, evaluating the quality and sufficiency of the current level of reporting and other disclosures provided by the company. |
| I. | In analyzing shareholder proposals calling for a report on lobbying activities, the Delegate shall vote on a case-by-case basis, evaluating the quality and sufficiency of the current level of reporting and other disclosures provided by the company. |
| V. | Conflicts of interest |
| A. | The Fund and its Delegate(s) seek to avoid actual or perceived conflicts of interest in the voting of proxies for portfolio holdings between the interests of Fund shareholders, on the one hand, and those of the Adviser, the Principal Underwriter (if applicable) or any affiliated person of the Fund, the Adviser or the Principal Underwriter (if applicable), on the other hand. The Board of Directors may take into account a wide array of factors in determining whether such a conflict exists, whether such conflict is material in nature, and how to properly address or resolve the same. |
| B. | While each conflict situation varies based on the particular facts presented and the requirements of governing law, the Board of Directors or its duly authorized representative may take the following actions, among others, or otherwise give weight to the following factors, in addressing material conflicts of interest in voting (or directing Delegates to vote) proxies pertaining to portfolio holdings: (i) vote pursuant to the recommendation of the proposing Delegate; (ii) abstain from voting; or (iii) rely on the recommendations of an established, independent third party with qualifications to vote proxies, such as Institutional Shareholder Services. |
| C. | The Adviser shall notify the Board of Directors of the Fund promptly after becoming aware that any actual or potential conflict of interest exists and shall seek the Board of Directors’ recommendations for protecting the best interests of Fund’s shareholders. The Adviser shall not waive any conflict of interest or vote any conflicted proxies without the prior written approval of the Board of Directors or its duly authorized representative. |
| VI. | Miscellaneous. |
| A. | The following documents shall be kept in an easily accessible place for the period of time required to comply with applicable laws and regulations and shall be available for inspection either physically or through electronic means: (i) a copy of these Policies and Procedures; (ii) the proxy voting records of the Fund, including the items of information required to be set forth in SEC Form N-PX and a description of the basis for each proxy vote in accordance with these Policies and Procedures; (iii) a copy of any document created by the Delegate that was material to deciding how to vote or that memorialized the basis for that decision. |
| B. | In the event that a determination, authorization or waiver under these Policies and Procedures is requested at a time other than a regularly scheduled meeting of the Board of Directors, the Chairman of the Audit Committee shall be |
| the duly authorized representative of the Board of Directors with the authority and responsibility to interpret and apply these Policies and Procedures and shall provide a report of his or her determinations at the next following meeting of the Board of Directors. |
| C. | The Adviser shall present a report of any material deviations from these Policies and Procedures at every regularly scheduled meeting of the Board of Directors and shall provide such other reports as the Board of Directors may request from time to time. The Adviser shall provide to the Fund or any shareholder a record of its effectuation of proxy voting pursuant to these Policies and Procedures at such times and in such format or medium as the Fund shall reasonably request. The Adviser shall be solely responsible for complying with its disclosure and reporting requirements under applicable laws and regulations, including, without limitation, Rule 206(4)-6 under the Advisers Act. The Adviser shall gather, collate and present information relating to its proxy voting activities and those of each Delegate in such format and medium as the Fund shall determine from time to time in order for the Fund to discharge its disclosure and reporting obligations pursuant to Rule 30b1-4 under the Investment Company Act. |
| D. | The Adviser shall pay all costs associated with proxy voting for portfolio holdings pursuant to these Policies and Procedures and assisting the Fund in providing public notice of the manner in which such proxies were voted, except that the Fund shall pay the costs associated with any filings required under the Investment Company Act. |
| E. | In performing its duties hereunder, any Delegate may engage the services of a research and/or voting adviser, the cost of which shall be borne by such Delegate. |
| F. | These Policies and Procedures shall be presented to the Board of Directors annually for its amendment and/or approval. |
Item 13. Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Management Investment Companies.
In this Item, the term “Fund” refers to the registrant, DTF Tax-Free Income 2028 Term Fund Inc.
The Fund’s Portfolio Manager
The portfolio manager employed by Seix Investment Advisors LLC, a division of Virtus Fixed Income Advisers, LLC (“Seix”), an affiliate of Duff & Phelps Investment Management Co., the Fund’s investment adviser (the “Adviser”), is responsible for the day-to-day management of the
Fund’s portfolio. The portfolio manager is a dual hatted employee of the Adviser and Seix, each of which is a subsidiary and affiliated manager of Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. (“Virtus”).
Dusty L. Self has been Vice President of the Fund since 2022. She is Managing Director and Senior Portfolio Manager – Tax-Exempt Assets for Seix. Before attaining her current position as Portfolio Manager with Seix. Ms. Self worked as a portfolio specialist and then as a performance analyst. Prior to beginning her career in investment management with Seix’s predecessor firm, she worked for Barnett Bank in the Commercial Loans division. Ms. Self joined Seix upon integration in 2014, having joined a predecessor firm in 1992. Ms. Self has over 30 years of experience focused on investment grade fixed income strategies.
Other Accounts Managed by the Fund’s Portfolio Manager
The following table provides information as of October 31, 2025 regarding the other accounts besides the Fund that are managed by the portfolio manager of the Fund. As noted in the table, portfolio manager of the Fund may also manage or be members of management teams for other mutual funds within the same fund complex or other similar accounts. For purposes of this disclosure, the term “fund complex” includes the Fund and all other investment companies advised by affiliates of Virtus, the Adviser’s ultimate parent company. As of October 31, 2025, the Fund’s portfolio managers did not manage any accounts with respect to which the advisory fee is based on the performance of the account, nor do they manage any hedge funds.
| Registered Investment Companies (1) |
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles (2) |
Other Accounts (3) | ||||||||||
| Name of Portfolio Manager |
Number of Accounts |
Total Assets (in millions) |
Number of Accounts |
Total Assets (in millions) |
Number of Accounts |
Total Assets (in millions) | ||||||
| Dusty L. Self |
4 | $523.4 | — | — | 13 | $530.0 | ||||||
| (1) | Registered Investment Companies include all open and closed-end mutual funds. For Registered Investment Companies, assets represent net assets of all open-end investment companies and gross assets of all closed-end investment companies. |
| (2) | Other Pooled Investment Vehicles include, but are not limited to, securities of issuers exempt from registration under Section 3(c) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, such as private placements and hedge funds. |
| (3) | Other Accounts include, but are not limited to, individual managed accounts, separate accounts, institutional accounts, pension funds and collateralized bond obligations. |
Compensation of the Fund’s Portfolio Manager
The following is a description of the compensation structure of the Fund’s portfolio manager. The Adviser is committed to attracting and retaining the highest caliber employees and investment talent. The Adviser’s compensation and benefits program is comprehensive and designed to reward performance and commitment to shareholders. Portfolio managers receive a competitive base salary, an incentive bonus opportunity, and a benefits package.
Following is a more detailed description of the Adviser’s compensation structure:
| • | Base Salary: Each portfolio manager is paid a fixed based salary, which is designed to be competitive in light of the individual’s experience and responsibilities. The Adviser uses independent, third-party compensation surveys of the investment industry to evaluate competitive market compensation for its employees. |
| • | Incentive Bonus: Annual incentive payments for portfolio managers are based on targeted compensation levels, adjusted for profitability and investment performance factors, and a subjective assessment of contribution to the team effort. Individual payments are assessed using comparisons of actual investment performance with specific peer group or index measures. For compensation purposes, a fund’s performance is generally measured over one-, three-, and five-year periods and the portfolio manager’s participation is based on the performance of each fund/account managed. The short-term incentive payment is generally paid in cash, but a portion may be payable in Virtus restricted stock units or as deferred cash that appreciates or depreciates in value based on the rate of return of one or more mutual funds managed or advised by the portfolio manager. |
| • | Other Benefits: Portfolio managers are also eligible to participate in broad-based plans offered by Virtus, including 401(k), health, and other employee benefit plans. |
While portfolio manager compensation contains a performance component, this component is adjusted to reward investment personnel for managing within the stated framework and for not taking unnecessary risk. This approach helps ensure that investment management personnel remain focused on managing and acquiring securities that correspond to a fund’s mandate and risk profile and are discouraged from taking on more risk and unnecessary exposure to chase performance for personal gain. The Adviser believes it has appropriate controls in place to handle any potential conflicts that may result from a substantial portion of portfolio manager compensation being tied to performance.
Equity Ownership of Portfolio Manager
The following table sets forth the dollar range of equity securities in the Fund beneficially owned, as of October 31, 2025, by the portfolio manager identified above.
|
Name of Portfolio Manager |
Dollar Range of Equity Securities in the Fund | |
|
Dusty L. Self |
None |
Item 14. Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Company and Affiliated Purchasers.
(a) Not applicable.
Item 15. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
There have been no material changes to the procedures by which the shareholders may recommend nominees to the registrant’s board of directors, where those changes were implemented after the registrant last provided disclosure in response to the requirements of Item 407(c)(2)(iv) of Regulation S-K (17 CFR 229.407) (as required by Item 22(b)(15) of Schedule 14A (17 CFR 240.14a-101)), or this Item.
Item 16. Controls and Procedures.
| (a) | The registrant’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer or persons performing similar functions, have concluded that the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “1940 Act”) (17 CFR 270.30a-3(c))) are effective, as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of this report that includes the disclosure required by this paragraph, based on an evaluation of those controls and procedures made as required by Rule 30a-3(b) under the 1940 Act and Rule 13a-15(b) under the Exchange Act. |
| (b) | There has been no change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the 1940 Act (17 CFR 270.30a-3(d))) that occurred during the most recent fiscal period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. |
Item 17. Disclosure of Securities Lending Activities for Closed-End Management Investment Companies.
| (a) | Not applicable. |
(b) Not applicable.
Item 18. Recovery of Erroneously Awarded Compensation.
Not Applicable.
Item 19. Exhibits.
| (a)(1) | ||||
| (a)(2) | Not applicable. | |||
| (a)(3) | ||||
| (a)(4) | There were no written solicitations to purchase securities under Rule 23c-1 under the Act sent or given during the period covered by the report by or on behalf of the Registrant to 10 or more persons. | |||
| (a)(5) | ||||
| On December 10, 2025, the audit committee of the registrant’s Board of Directors approved the engagement of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) as independent public accounting firm for the registrant for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2026, thereby replacing EY effective upon the completion of their October 31, 2025 audit and issuance of their report thereon. Through December 12, 2025 (opinion date of the October 31, 2025 financial statements) and during the registrant’s fiscal year ended October 31, 2025, neither the registrant nor anyone on its behalf consulted with PwC on items which: (i) concerned the application of accounting principles to a specified transaction, either completed or proposed, or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on the registrant’s financial statements; or (ii) concerned the subject of a disagreement (as defined in paragraph (a)(1)(iv) of Item 304 of | ||||
| Regulation S-K) or reportable events (as described in paragraph (a)(1)(v) of said Item 304). | ||||
| The registrant has requested that EY furnish it with a letter addressed to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission stating whether or not it agrees with the above statements. A copy of such letter is filed as an Exhibit to this Form N-CSR. | ||||
| (b) | ||||
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
| (Registrant) | DTF Tax-Free Income 2028 Term Fund Inc. |
| By (Signature and Title) | /s/ David D. Grumhaus, Jr. | |||
| David D. Grumhaus, Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer | ||||
| (Principal Executive Officer) | ||||
| Date | December 23, 2025 |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
| By (Signature and Title) | /s/ David D. Grumhaus, Jr. | |||
| David D. Grumhaus, Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer | ||||
| (Principal Executive Officer) | ||||
| Date | December 23, 2025 | |||
| By (Signature and Title) | /s/ W. Patrick Bradley | |||
| W. Patrick Bradley, | ||||
| Vice President, Treasurer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer | ||||
| (Principal Financial Officer) |
| Date | December 23, 2025 | |||