SEC Form PRE 14A filed by Primis Financial Corp.

​

​

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of

the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.    )

Filed by the Registrant  [X]

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant  [ ]

Check the appropriate box:

​

Primis Financial Corp.

(Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

​

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

​

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

​

​

​

​

​

​

THE HOLDING COMPANY FOR

​

1676 International Drive, Suite 900

McLean, Virginia 22102

NOTICE OF 2025 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

TO BE HELD ON THURSDAY, JUNE 26, 2025

Stockholders of Primis Financial Corp.:

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the 2025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) of Primis Financial Corp. (the “Company”) will be held at The Commonwealth Club, 401 W. Franklin Street, Richmond, VA 23220, on Thursday, June 26, 2025, beginning at 1:00 p.m. (Eastern Time).

The Annual Meeting will be held for the following purposes:

The foregoing items of business are more fully described in the proxy statement, which is attached hereto and made a part thereof.

The close of business on April 28, 2025, has been fixed as the record date for the determination of stockholders entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting or at any adjournments thereof. A list of stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting will be available for inspection by any stockholder at the Company’s office at 10900 Nuckols Road, Suite 325, Glen Allen, Virginia 23060 during usual business hours for a period of at least ten days prior to the Annual Meeting.

Your Vote is Important.

You are cordially invited and urged to attend the Annual Meeting. Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, you are urged to submit your proxy as soon as possible so that your shares can be voted at the meeting in accordance with your instructions. You may vote by signing, dating and mailing the proxy card. The proxy is revocable in the manner described in the Proxy Statement at any time before it is voted at the Annual Meeting. If you attend the Annual Meeting, you may vote, during the meeting if you wish, even if you have previously returned your proxy card.

If you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, please note that we may ask to see valid picture identification, such as a driver’s license, to identify you as a stockholder. Stockholders holding stock in brokerage accounts (“street name” holders) will need to bring a copy of a brokerage statement reflecting stock ownership as of the record date.

Cameras (including cellular phones with photographic capabilities), recording devices and other similar electronic devices will not be permitted at the meeting. Please silence your cell phones during the Annual Meeting as a courtesy to others.

​

​

May 16, 2025
McLean, Virginia

​

​

​

PROXY STATEMENT

FOR

2025 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

TO BE HELD ON THURSDAY, JUNE 26, 2025

​

General Information

This Proxy Statement is being furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the Board of Directors of Primis Financial Corp. (the “Company”) for use at the 2025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company to be held at The Commonwealth Club, 401 W. Franklin Street, Richmond, VA 23220, on Thursday, June 26, 2025, beginning at 1:00 p.m. (Eastern time), and any adjournments or postponements thereof (the “Annual Meeting”) for the purposes set forth in this Proxy Statement and the accompanying Notice of 2025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

This Proxy Statement, the Notice of Meeting and the enclosed proxy card is first being sent to stockholders on or about May 16, 2025. For information on how to vote your shares, see the instructions included on the enclosed proxy card and under “Information About Voting” below.

Important Notice regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting to be Held on Thursday, June 26, 2025.

The Proxy Statement and the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 are available at www.envisionreports.com/FRST.

We have mailed to certain stockholders a notice of internet availability of proxy materials on or about May 16, 2025. This notice contains instructions on how to access and review the Company’s Proxy Statement and Annual Report on Form 10-K on the internet. The notice also contains information on how to submit your proxy on the internet or by phone or, if you prefer, to obtain a paper or email copy of the materials.

​

​

Information About Voting

You are entitled to vote at the meeting if you were a holder of record of the Company’s common stock, $0.01 par value per share (“Common Stock”), at the close of business on April 28, 2025.

Stockholders can vote in person at the Annual Meeting or by proxy. You can vote by proxy by signing, dating and mailing the enclosed proxy card or you may vote online at www.envisionreports.com/FRST or by phone at 1-800-652-VOTE (8683).

If your shares are held in the name of a bank, broker or other holder of record, you will receive instructions from the holder of record, which you should follow in order to vote your shares. If your shares are not registered in your own name and you plan to vote your shares in person at the Annual Meeting, you should contact your broker or agent to obtain a legal proxy.

If you vote by proxy, the individuals named on the proxy card (your “proxies”) will vote your shares in the manner you indicate. You may specify whether your shares should be voted for or against each of the proposals. If you sign and return the card without indicating your instructions, your shares will be voted as follows:

You may revoke or change your proxy at any time before it is exercised by (1) delivering to us a signed proxy card with a date later than your previously delivered proxy, (2) voting in person at the Annual Meeting, or (3) sending a written revocation to the Company’s Secretary, Cheryl Wood, prior to the Annual Meeting. Your most current proxy card will be the one that is counted. All written notices of revocation and other communications with respect to revocation or proxies should be sent to: Primis Financial Corp., 10900 Nuckols Road, Suite 325, Glen Allen, Virginia 23060, (804) 528-4754, Attention: Corporate Secretary. Any stockholder who holds shares in street name with a bank or broker must contact that bank or broker if he or she wishes to revoke his or her proxy.

The Board of Directors knows of no other matters to be presented at the Annual Meeting. If any other matter should be presented at the Annual Meeting upon which a vote may be properly taken, shares represented by an executed and unrevoked proxy will be voted with respect thereto in accordance with the judgment of the persons designated in the proxy. The proxy also confers on the proxies the discretionary authority to vote with respect to any matter presented at the Annual Meeting for which advance notice was not timely received by the Company in accordance with the Company’s Amended and Restated Bylaws.

Solicitation of Proxies

This proxy solicitation is made by the Board of Directors of the Company and the cost of this solicitation is being borne by the Company. Proxies will be solicited through the mail and, if deemed advisable, directors, officers and regular employees of the Company may solicit proxies personally or by telephone or other means of communication, without being paid additional compensation for such services. The Company will reimburse banks, brokerage houses and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries for their reasonable expenses in forwarding the proxy materials to beneficial owners of the Company’s Common Stock.

Annual Report

The Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, including consolidated financial statements and related notes, for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), accompanies but does not constitute part of this Proxy Statement.

​

VOTING SHARES AND VOTING RIGHTS

Only holders of record of Common Stock at the close of business on April 28, 2025 (the “Record Date”), are entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting and any adjournments or postponements thereof. On that date there were 24,722,734 shares of Common Stock outstanding, which is the only outstanding class of voting securities of the Company. The holders of at least a majority of the outstanding shares of Common Stock must be represented at the Annual Meeting, in person or by proxy, in order to constitute a quorum for the transaction of business. Abstentions and shares held of record by a broker or nominee that are voted on any matter will be included in determining whether a quorum exists. Each holder of Common Stock shall have one vote for each share of Common Stock registered in such holder’s name on the books of the Company on the Record Date.

A broker non-vote occurs when a broker does not have discretionary authority to vote the shares and has not received voting instructions from the beneficial owner of the shares. Brokers, as holders of record, are permitted to vote on certain routine matters, but not on non-routine matters. The ratification of the appointment of the independent registered public accounting firm is the only matter to be presented at the Annual Meeting that is considered routine under applicable rules. The election of the directors, the amendment to the Company’s articles of incorporation to declassify the Board, the approval of the Primis Financial Corp. Omnibus Incentive Plan, and the advisory (non-binding) vote to approve the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers are not deemed to be routine matters, so a broker is not permitted to vote on these matters without instructions from the beneficial owner of the shares. If a stockholder holds shares in street name and does not provide voting instructions to its broker, those shares will be counted as broker non-votes in the election of the directors, the amendment to the Company’s articles of incorporation to declassify the Board, the approval of the Primis Financial Corp. Omnibus Incentive Plan, and the advisory (non-binding) vote to approve the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers.

Director nominees are elected by a plurality of the votes of the shares of Common Stock present in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote on the election of directors. This means that the director nominee with the most votes for a particular board seat is elected for that seat regardless of whether or not such nominee receives a majority of the votes cast. There will be no cumulative voting in the election of the directors. A broker non-vote or a withholding of authority to vote with respect to the director nominees will not have the effect of a vote against such nominee because it is not a vote cast in favor of or against the proposal.

The affirmative vote of the majority of the shares of Common Stock present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote is required to approve the amendment to the Company’s articles of incorporation to declassify the Board, to approve the Primis Financial Corp. Omnibus Incentive Plan, and to ratify the appointment of the independent registered public accounting firm. Since the ratification of the appointment of the independent registered public accounting firm is considered a routine matter under applicable rules and a broker or other nominee may generally vote on routine matters, no broker non-votes are expected to exist in connection with this proposal. Abstentions will have the effect of a vote against the ratification of the appointment of the independent registered public accounting firm.

​

​

​

Proposal 1.

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Election Procedures; Term of Office; Director Retirements

Members of the Company’s and the Bank’s Board of Directors are expected to have the appropriate skills and characteristics necessary to function in the Company and Bank’s current operating environment and contribute to its future direction and strategies. These include legal, financial, management and other relevant skills. In addition, the Company looks to achieve a diversified Board, including members with varying experience, age, perspective, residence, background, race, gender, and other demographic characteristics. All of our directors are nominated on the basis of merit.

The Board of Directors currently consists of ten directors. Following the date of the Annual Meeting, the Board of Directors will consist of ten directors in the event that each of the nominees is elected. In accordance with the Company’s Amended and Restated Bylaws, members of the Board of Directors are divided into three classes, Class I, Class II and Class III. The members of each class are elected for a term of office to expire at the third succeeding annual meeting of stockholders following their election.

The Board of Directors has approved the nomination of John F. Biagas, John M. Eggemeyer, F.L. Garrett, III and Dr. Allen R. Jones Jr. to serve as Class I directors. The terms of the Class I directors expire at the annual meeting of stockholders in 2028 and until his or her successor is duly elected and qualified or until his earlier resignation or removal. The nominees receiving a plurality of the votes of the shares of Common Stock present in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote on the election of directors will be elected. Unless the authority to vote for the election of directors is withheld, all shares of Common Stock represented by proxy will be voted FOR the election of the nominees.

If the nominees become unavailable to serve as a director for any reason before the election, the shares represented by proxy will be voted for such other person, if any, as may be designated by the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors has no reason to believe that the nominees will be unavailable to serve as a director. John F. Biagas, John M. Eggemeyer, F.L. Garrett, III and Dr. Allen R. Jones Jr. have consented to being named herein and to serve if elected.

Any director vacancy occurring after the election may be filled only by a majority vote of the remaining directors, even if there is less than a quorum of the Board of Directors.

The biographies of the nominees and continuing directors below contains information regarding the person’s service as a director, business experience, director positions held currently or at any time during the last five years, information regarding involvement in certain legal or administrative proceedings, if applicable, and the experiences, qualifications, attributes or skills that caused the Corporate Governance Committee and the Board of Directors to determine that the person should serve as a director.

Nominees for Election

The following table sets forth the name, age and position with the Company and Primis Bank (the “Bank”) for the nominees for election as directors of the Company:

​

John F. Biagas has been a director of the Company and the Bank since the closing of the Company’s merger with Eastern Virginia Bankshares, Inc. (“EVBS”) in June 2017, and on March 20, 2025, the Board of Directors named Mr. Biagas Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company and the Bank.  Mr. Biagas served as a director of EVBS and Eastern Virginia Bank (“EVB”) from 2014 until 2017, and has been the owner, President and CEO of Bay Electric Co., Inc., an electrical and general contractor located in Newport News, Virginia since 1997. Mr. Biagas is a Master Electrician licensed in four states and the District of Columbia. Bay Electric serves a very diverse client base and specializes in general contracting as well as in design/build general and electrical construction, security/technology solutions and services, and solar photovoltaic. Under Mr. Biagas’ direction, Bay Electric has become one of the fastest growing minority-owned electrical and general construction contractors in the Mid-Atlantic region with annual revenues in excess of $70 million. Mr. Biagas is also the Vice Rector for the Old Dominion University Board of Visitors and serves as vice chair of the Student Advancement Committee and as a member of the Administration and Finance Committee. Mr. Biagas provides the Board of Directors essential guidance related to his business development expertise and general business experience through owning and operating a fast-paced contracting company and working on multi-million dollar projects. Mr. Biagas brings to the Board of Directors extensive experience in identifying potential risks and rewards in real estate development and construction. Mr. Biagas also brings to the Board of Directors leadership skills and oversight experience through his service on numerous local, statewide and national boards, including the U.S. Chamber of Commerce Board of Directors, a founding and current member of the Virginia Chapter of the Young Presidents Organization and as a founding member and director of Virginia Company Bank from its inception in 2005 until its acquisition by EVBS in 2014.

John M. Eggemeyer has been a director of the Company and the Bank since June 15, 2021. Mr. Eggemeyer is a Founder and Managing Principal of Castle Creek Capital LLC which has been an investor in the banking industry since 1990. Mr. Eggemeyer has over 40 years of experience in the banking industry and has been involved in more than 75 bank acquisitions. In 2006, the American Banker honored Mr. Eggemeyer as “Community Banker of the Year” for his success as a builder of community banking companies. Prior to founding Castle Creek, Mr. Eggemeyer spent nearly 20 years as a senior executive with some of the largest banking organizations in the U.S. with responsibilities across a broad spectrum of banking activities. Mr. Eggemeyer has served as the Chairman of PacWest Bancorp since its formation in 2000, is a Board member of The Bancorp, Northpointe Bancshares, Inc. and was a founder and Director of Guaranty Bancorp. Previously, he was Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of White River Capital and a Board member of TCF Financial Corporation, Western Bancorp and American Financial Realty. Mr. Eggemeyer’s civic and philanthropic efforts have been focused in the areas of improving the quality of instruction in education and expanding educational opportunities for lower income students. He was a founder and past President of the Rancho Santa Fe Community School Endowment and was a member of the Rancho Santa Fe School Site Selection Committee. He also helped establish the Minnesota Charter of A Better Chance, a national organization committed to creating improved educational opportunities for minority high school students. Mr. Eggemeyer is a Life Trustee of Northwestern University where he serves on the Finance and Investment Committees and is a past Trustee of the Bishop’s School of La Jolla, California and the Parent Advisory Board at Stanford University. Mr. Eggemeyer holds a Bachelor of Science degree from Northwestern University and an M.B.A. from the

University of Chicago. Mr. Eggemeyer brings to the Board of Directors extensive experience in identifying potential risks and rewards in the banking industry. The Company benefits from his experience and counsel as a member of our board.

F.L. Garrett, III has served as a director of the Company and the Bank since the closing of the Company’s merger with EVBS in June 2017. Mr. Garrett served as Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors of EVBS and previously served as Chairman of the Board of Directors of a predecessor of EVB. Mr. Garrett served as a director of the Bank and a predecessor of the Bank from 1982 until June 2017. Mr. Garrett has owned Harborside Storage since 1994, a boat storage company and has been an active realtor with Long & Foster Real Estate in Essex County, Virginia and neighboring areas since 1989. As a local business owner and a successful realtor, Mr. Garrett contributes to the Board of Directors a strong sense of changing economic and market conditions in the Company’s market areas. Mr. Garrett has also developed extensive knowledge of our business during his extended service to the Company, the Bank and one of the Bank’s predecessors.

Dr. Allen R. Jones Jr. has been a director of the Company and the Bank since June 15, 2021. Dr. Jones is a licensed physical therapist in the Commonwealth of Virginia. Dr. Jones is the owner and CEO of Dominion Physical Therapy, a practice he founded in 1990 and has since expanded to six locations in the Hampton Roads region. Virginia has been Dr. Jones’ home since 1987, the year he completed his degree in physical therapy from the University of Connecticut. Dedicated to continuing education, he earned a Doctor of Physical Therapy degree from Rocky Mountain University School of Health Professions in Provo, Utah, in 2014 and also holds a postgraduate certification in Clinical Management of Head, Facial and Neck Pain and TMJ Disorders. He has been a member of the American Physical Therapy Association since 1988. Dr. Jones’ passion for high-quality care has led to numerous awards for his practice, as well as statewide leadership positions. In 2014, Gov. Terry McAuliffe appointed him to the Virginia State Board of Physical Therapy. Dr. Jones was reelected as Chairman of the Board of Physical Therapy for the state of Virginia on August 11, 2020, where he previously served as Chairman in 2017 and 2018. Dr. Jones served as Chairman for two consecutive years (2019-2021) for the Board of Health Professions. For three decades, Dr. Jones has worked hard to foster a spirit of community involvement and service through his practice. In 2014, Dr. Jones provided financial and staffing support for a collaborative trip with Old Dominion specialists to the Dominican Republic to educate clinical staff there on the treatment of autism spectrum disorder. Dr. Jones serves as a board member of Norfolk State University Foundation and Old Dominion University School of Physical Therapy & Athletic Training. Dr. Allen contributes to the Board of Directors with strong ties to its surrounding communities in the Company’s market areas. Dr. Allen has also developed extensive knowledge of our business as he served as our Hampton Advisory Board Chairman since 2018.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE ELECTION OF THE NOMINEES LISTED ABOVE FOR ELECTION TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS.

​

​

CONTINUING DIRECTORS

The following table sets forth certain information with respect to the Company’s Class II and Class III directors whose terms of office do not expire at the Annual Meeting:

​

Robert Y. Clagett has served as a director of the Company and the Bank since August 2014. Mr. Clagett has practiced law in the State of Maryland since 1967, with a primary focus in real estate law. He previously served as a director of Prince George’s Federal Savings Bank commencing in 1967 and was elected President and Chief Executive Officer in 1968. Mr. Clagett served as President of Prince George’s Federal Savings Bank from 1968 to 2005 and served as Chief Executive Officer from 1968 to 2014. The Company believes Mr. Clagett’s qualifications to sit on the Board of Directors include his extensive banking experience and legal expertise.

Deborah B. Diaz has served as a director of the Company and the Bank since October 2020. Ms. Diaz is CEO of Catalyst ADV, a technology and strategic growth advisory firm, and venture capital advisor developing new business markets and industry partnership opportunities since 2016. Catalyst ADV currently provides advisory services to high tech, transportation and aerospace clients such as Google, Boeing, Dell Technologies, Leidos, Equinix, PTC and many other notable public companies. Previously, Ms. Diaz served as Chief Technology Officer and Deputy Chief Information Officer at the National Aeronautics and Space Administration responsible for global system infrastructure, investment oversight, risk management, data management, innovation and technology infusion from 2009 to 2016. As Chief Information Officer for Science and Technology of the Department of Homeland Security, she was responsible for all global defense and research system infrastructure and manufacturer delivery to support a $1 billion portfolio from 2002 to 2007. She has also served as a senior government executive and international consultant in the areas of intellectual property, patents, digital transformation, data forensics, and foreign joint ventures. Ms. Diaz serves on the advisory boards of Dell Technologies; Intel Corporation; Equinix, Inc.; Raytheon Forcepoint and on the National Association of Corporate Directors (“NACD”) Capital Area Chapter Board. Ms. Diaz has also previously served on multiple private company and non-profit boards. Ms. Diaz was NACD Directorship Certified in 2019. The Company believes Ms. Diaz qualifications to sit on the Board of Directors include her extensive operational experience as a technology executive and strategic cybersecurity expert focused on digital transformation and risk management.

Charles A. Kabbash has served as a director of the Company and the Bank since April 2005. Mr. Kabbash is the owner of 414 Associates, a real estate investment and holding company, operating primarily in the Charlottesville, Virginia area since 1984. Mr. Kabbash has also served a partner in Kabbash, Fox & Gentry Commercial Real Estate since 2009 and is the owner of Kabbash Business Brokerage, which negotiates the purchase or sale of businesses. Both of these firms also operate primarily in the Charlottesville area. In addition, Mr. Kabbash is the co-owner, along with his wife, Rebecca Gentry, of CandR LLC, a company investing in emerging businesses. Mr. Kabbash was a realtor at Summit Realty from 2002 to 2009. Mr. Kabbash is heavily involved in the business, political and civic community in Charlottesville, Virginia.

The Company believes Mr. Kabbash’s qualifications to sit on the Board of Directors include his management and operational expertise from years spent as a professional realtor, investor and consultant.

W. Rand Cook has been served as Chairman of the Board of each the Company and the Bank since 2020, and on March 20, 2025, began serving as Vice-Chairman of the Company of the Bank. Mr. Cook has also served as a director of the Company and the Bank since the closing of the Company’s merger with EVBS in June 2017. Mr. Cook served as Chairman of the Board of Directors of EVBS and served as a director of EVB and a predecessor of EVB from 2000 until June 2017. Mr. Cook is a Partner in the law firm of McCaul, Martin, Evans and Cook, P.C., where he has been practicing law since 1985, and is the Commissioner of Accounts for Hanover County Circuit Court. Mr. Cook holds both MBA and JD degrees, and maintains an active law practice that focuses on corporate law and debtor and creditor rights. Mr. Cook brings experience in corporate governance, strategic planning and financial planning to the Board of Directors, and his legal background gives Mr. Cook valuable insight into various legal risks that the Company may encounter. Previously, Mr. Cook worked with the Virginia General Assembly, which provides Mr. Cook with a unique perspective on state legislative and regulatory environments.

Eric A. Johnson has served as a director of the Company and the Bank since the closing of the Company’s merger with EVBS in June 2017. For over 45 years, Mr. Johnson has been in the real estate business. Mr. Johnson has served as a real estate broker with Mason Realty in Middlesex, Virginia since 1976 and served as a director of EVB and a predecessor of EVB from 1988 until June 2017. In addition, Mr. Johnson previously owned Urbanna Market and Urbanna Builders Supply, both of which generated multi-million dollar annual sales. Mr. Johnson brings experience in local real estate markets to the Board of Directors, as well as entrepreneurial spirit, business judgment and knowledge of local business markets that he has developed through his business ventures.

Dennis J. Zember, Jr. has served as a director of the Company and the Bank since February 2020. Mr. Zember was appointed President and Chief Executive Officer of both the Company and the Bank on February 19, 2020. Mr. Zember was previously Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Ameris Bancorp from June 2016 through June 2018 and Chief Financial Officer of Ameris Bancorp from February 2005 through December 2017. The Company believes Mr. Zember’s qualifications to sit on the Board of Directors include his extensive banking experience from years spent as an executive in the industry.

​

​

​

​

​

Proposal 2.

APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT TO THE COMPANY’S ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION TO DECLASSIFY THE COMPANY’S BOARD OF DIRECTORS

​

Background

​

Article 8.A. of the Company’s articles of incorporation, as amended, currently divides the Board of Directors into three classes. Each class is elected for a three-year term, with the terms staggered so that approximately one-third of directors, plus any newly appointed directors, stands for election each year. There are currently four Class I directors, whose term expires at the Annual Meeting; three Class II directors, whose term expires at the 2026 annual meeting of stockholders; and three Class III directors, whose term expires at the 2027 annual meeting of stockholders.

​

In the past, the Company’s various Boards of Directors have believed that a classified board structure served the best interests of the Company and its stockholders. Among other considerations, classified boards generally can provide for company and board continuity and stability, promote director independence that is less subject to management or outside influence, and inhibit coercive takeover tactics and special interest groups focused on short-term gain from taking rapid control of a company without giving its board the opportunity to negotiate the payment of an appropriate premium.

​

While the Board continues to believe these are important considerations, the Board also understands that the corporate governance best practices in recent years have moved away from classified boards in favor of electing all directors annually. As part of its ongoing responsibilities to monitor current developments in corporate governance and review and recommend changes to the Company’s governing documents, the Corporate Governance Committee evaluated the classified board structure during early 2025 and considered, among other things, that an annual election of all directors would provide stockholders with greater opportunity to register their views at each annual meeting on the performance of the entire Board over the prior year. Director elections are the primary means for stockholders to express their views on the performance of individual directors, and a classified board structure affords stockholders this opportunity only once every three years for each director.

​

After carefully weighing these considerations, the Board concluded that the annual election of all directors will both enhance our corporate governance practices and be an effective way to maintain and enhance the accountability of the Board. Accordingly, the Board, upon the recommendation of the Corporate Governance Committee, unanimously determined that it is in the best interests of the Company to eliminate the classified board structure.

​

The Proposal

​

On April 24, 2025, upon recommendation of the Corporate Governance Committee, the Board unanimously approved and adopted, subject to stockholder approval, a proposed amendment to Article 8.A. of the Company’s articles of incorporation to eliminate the Board’s classified structure (the “Declassification Amendment”). The text of the revised Article 8.A., is attached to this Proxy Statement as Appendix A. If approved by stockholders, this Declassification Amendment would become effective upon the filing of articles of amendment with the State Corporation Commission of the Commonwealth of Virginia. Further, if this Declassification Amendment is approved by stockholders, conforming amendments will be made to the Company’s bylaws to reflect the elimination of the Company’s classified Board structure.

​

In order to facilitate the transition from staggered three-year terms to non-staggered one-year terms and to implement the annual election of all directors effective at the 2026 annual meeting, each director whose term extends beyond the 2026 annual meeting (including all director nominees nominated for election at the Annual Meeting) on April 24, 2025 tendered his or her irrevocable resignation effective immediately prior to election of directors at the 2026 annual meeting, conditioned upon the Company’s stockholders approving the Declassification Amendment and the Company receiving a Certificate of Amendment from the State Corporation Commission of the Commonwealth of Virginia

​

If this proposal does not receive the required number of votes in favor, neither Article 8.A. of the Company’s articles of incorporation nor the Company’s Bylaws will be amended, and the board will remain classified with all directors continuing to serve three-year terms.

​

​

Stockholder Vote Required

​

Approval of the amendment to the Company’s articles of incorporation to declassify the Board of Directors requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes entitled to be cast on the matter. Failures to vote, abstentions, and broker non-votes will not count as votes cast on the proposal, and, accordingly, will have the same effect as votes against the Declassification Amendment.

​

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR APPROVAL OF THIS PROPOSAL TO AMEND THE COMPANY’S ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION TO DECLASSIFY THE COMPANY’S BOARD OF DIRECTORS.

​

​

​

​

Proposal 3.

APPROVAL OF THE PRIMIS FINANCIAL CORP. OMNIBUS INCENTIVE PLAN

​

​

We are asking our stockholders to approve the Primis Financial Corp. Omnibus Incentive Plan (referred to as the “Plan”). Upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, our board adopted the Plan on April 24, 2025, subject to approval by our stockholders.

​

The Plan is intended to serve as the successor to the Primis Financial Corp. 2017 Equity Compensation Plan (the "Prior Plan"). If our stockholders approve the Plan, all future equity awards will be made from the Plan, and we will not grant any additional awards under the Prior Plan.

​

If the Plan is not approved by our stockholders, the Compensation Committee will not be able to grant awards under the Prior Plan because, as of May 31, 2025, there will be no further shares available for issuance under the Prior Plan. We would accordingly be at a disadvantage against our competitors for recruiting, retaining and motivating individuals critical to our success and could be forced to increase cash compensation.

​

Proposed Share Reserve

​

The aggregate number of shares of common stock that may be issued under all equity awards granted pursuant to the Plan, subject to adjustments described below, will be equal to 600,000 shares. From and after the effective date of the Plan, no further awards shall be granted under the Prior Plan, and the Prior Plan will remain in effect only so long as awards granted thereunder remain outstanding.

Key Data Relating to Outstanding Equity Awards and Shares Available

​

The following table includes information regarding outstanding equity awards and shares available for future awards under the Prior Plan as of December 31, 2024 (and without giving effect to approval of the Plan under this proposal):

​

​

Burn Rate, Dilution and Overhang

​

A common measure of a stock plan’s cost is the “burn rate,” which refers to how fast a company uses the supply of shares authorized for issuance under its stock plan. Our burn rate for the last three years is set forth below, and our average burn rate over such three-year period was 0.5% of shares of our common stock outstanding per year.

​

​

Sound Governance Provisions Included in the Plan

The Plan incorporates numerous governance best practices, including:

​

​

Summary of Material Terms of the Plan

​

The principal features of the Plan are summarized below. However, this summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the Plan, as attached to this proxy statement as Appendix B.  Because this is a summary, it may not contain all the information that you may consider to be important. Therefore, we recommend that you read Appendix B carefully before you decide how to vote on this proposal.

​

Purpose. The purpose of the Plan is to promote the success and enhance the value of the Company by linking the personal interests of employees, officers, directors and consultants of the Company or its affiliates with its stockholders, as well as by providing such persons with an incentive for outstanding performance. Also, the Plan provides flexibility for the Company to attract, motivate, and retain these individuals upon whose judgment, interest, and efforts the successful conduct of which the Company’s business is largely dependent.

​

Administration. Generally, the Plan will be administered by the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee will have the authority to (i) designate participants; (ii) determine the types of awards to be granted to each participant and the number, terms and conditions thereof; establish, adopt or revise any rules and regulations as it may deem advisable to administer the Plan; (iii) interpret the terms and intent of the Plan and any award certificate; and (iv) make all other decisions and determinations that may be required under the Plan. Unless and until changed by our board, the Compensation Committee is designated to administer the Plan.

​

Eligibility. The Plan permits the grant of awards to employees, officers, directors, and consultants of the Company and its affiliates as selected by the Compensation Committee. As of March 31, 2025, approximately 602 employees and officers and 9 non-employee director nominees would be eligible to participate in the Plan.

​

Permissible Awards. The Plan authorizes the granting of awards in any of the following forms:

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

Share Reserve. The aggregate number of shares of common stock that may be issued under all equity awards granted pursuant to the Plan, subject to adjustments described below, will be equal to 600,000, less one share for every one share subject to an award granted under the 2017 Plan after December 31, 2024 and prior to the Effective Date. After December 31, 2024, any shares subject to an award under the Prior Plan that are terminated or expire unexercised, are settled for cash, or are canceled, forfeited or lapse for any reason, then in each such case, the shares subject to the awards under the Prior Plan will, to the extent of such termination, expiration, cash settlement, cancellation, forfeiture or lapse, be added to the shares available for grant under the Plan on a one-for-one basis.

​

Share Counting. Shares of common stock reserved and available for issuance pursuant to awards granted under the Plan shall be counted against the Plan reserve as follows:

​

​

​

​

Adjustments. In the event of a transaction between the Company and its stockholders that causes the per-share value of the Company’s common stock to change (including, without limitation, any stock dividend, stock split, spin-off, rights offering, or large nonrecurring cash dividend), the share authorization limits under the Plan will be adjusted proportionately, and the Compensation Committee must make such adjustments to the Plan and awards as it deems necessary, in its sole discretion, to prevent dilution or enlargement of rights immediately resulting from such transaction. In the event of any corporate event or transaction involving the Company, such as a merger, consolidation, reorganization, recapitalization, stock split, a stock dividend, spin-off, or a combination or exchange of shares, dividend in kind or other like change in capital structure, the Compensation Committee may, in its sole discretion, make such other appropriate adjustments to the terms of any outstanding awards to reflect such changes or distributions and to modify any other terms of outstanding awards.

​

Limitations on Non-Employee Director Awards. The aggregate compensation that may be granted or awarded during a single fiscal year to any non-employee director in respect of his or her services as a non-employee director, including all fees, cash retainers and equity awards, shall not exceed $250,000, or $400,000 in the case of a non-employee director who serves as Chair of our Board or Lead Director. For purposes of such limit, the value of awards will be determined based on the aggregate grant date fair value of all awards issued to the director in such year (computed in accordance with applicable financial accounting rules).

​

Treatment of Awards upon Death or Disability. Unless otherwise provided in an award agreement or any special plan document or agreement governing an award, in the event of a participant’s death, his or her options and SARs will become fully exercisable, and all time-based vesting restrictions on that participant’s outstanding awards will lapse. Any outstanding performance-based awards will be deemed to have been earned as of the date of termination based upon an assumed achievement of all relevant performance goals at the target level and will be paid on a pro rata basis.

​

Treatment of Awards upon a Change in Control. Unless otherwise provided in an award agreement or any special plan document or agreement governing an award:

​

Discretionary Acceleration. The Compensation Committee may in its sole discretion at any time determine that all or a portion of a participant’s awards will become fully-vested and, if applicable, exercisable.

​

Limitations on Transfer; Beneficiaries. A participant may not assign or transfer an award other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution; provided, however, that the Compensation Committee may permit other transfers (other than transfers for value). A participant may, in the manner determined by the Compensation Committee, designate a beneficiary to exercise the rights of the participant and to receive any distribution with respect to any award upon the participant’s death.

​

Termination and Amendment of the Plan. our board or the Compensation Committee may terminate or amend the Plan, but if an amendment would constitute a material amendment requiring shareholder approval under applicable listing requirements, laws, policies or regulations, then such amendment will be subject to shareholder approval. No termination or amendment of the Plan may, without the written consent of the participant, reduce or diminish the value of an outstanding award. In addition, except for any mandatory adjustments to the Plan and outstanding awards, without the prior approval of our stockholders, the Plan may not be amended to permit: (i) the exercise price or base price of an option or SAR to be reduced, directly or indirectly, (ii) an option or SAR to be cancelled in exchange for cash, other awards, or options or SARs with an exercise or base price that is less than the exercise price or base price of the original option or SAR, or otherwise, or (iii) the Company to repurchase an option or SAR for value (in cash or otherwise) from a participant if the current fair market value of the shares underlying the option or SAR is lower than the exercise price or base price per share of the option or SAR. Unless sooner terminated, the Plan will terminate on June 26, 2035.

​

The Compensation Committee may amend or terminate outstanding awards. However, such amendments may require the consent of the participant and, unless approved by the stockholders, the exercise price of an outstanding option may not be reduced, directly or indirectly, and the original term of an option may not be extended.

​

Prohibition on Repricing. Outstanding stock options and SARs cannot be repriced, directly or indirectly, without shareholder approval. The exchange of an “underwater” stock option or SAR (i.e., an award having an exercise price in excess of the current market value of the underlying stock) for another award or for a cash payment would be considered an indirect repricing and would, therefore, require shareholder approval.

​

Clawback Policy. Awards under the Plan will be subject to the Company’s clawback or similar policy, as amended from time to time.

​

​

Federal Income Tax Consequences

​

The U.S. federal income tax discussion set forth below is intended to provide general information only and does not purport to be a complete analysis of all of the potential tax effects of the Plan. It is based upon laws, regulations, rulings and decisions now in effect, all of which are subject to change. State and local income tax consequences are not discussed, and may vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction.

​

Nonstatutory Stock Options. There will be no federal income tax consequences to the optionee or to the Company upon the grant of a nonstatutory stock option under the Plan. When the optionee exercises a nonstatutory stock option; however, he or she will recognize ordinary income in an amount equal to the excess of the fair market value of the stock received upon exercise of the option at the time of exercise over the exercise price, and the Company will be allowed a corresponding federal income tax deduction. Any gain that the optionee realizes when he or she later sells or disposes of the shares will be short-term or long-term capital gain, depending on how long the shares were held.

​

Incentive Stock Options. There will be no federal income tax consequences to the optionee or to the Company upon the grant or exercise of an incentive stock option. If the optionee holds the shares for the required holding period of at least two years after the date the option was granted and one year after exercise, the difference between the exercise price and the amount realized upon sale or disposition of the shares will be long-term capital gain or loss, and the Company will not be entitled to a federal income tax deduction. If the optionee disposes of the shares in a sale, exchange, or other disqualifying disposition before the required holding period ends, he or she will recognize taxable ordinary income in an amount equal to the excess of the fair market value of the shares at the time of exercise over the exercise price, and the Company will be allowed a federal income tax deduction equal to such amount. While the exercise of an incentive stock option does not result in current taxable income, the excess of the fair market value of the shares at the time of exercise over the exercise price will be an item of adjustment for purposes of determining the optionee’s alternative minimum taxable income.

​

SARs. A participant receiving a SAR under the Plan will not recognize income, and the Company will not be allowed a federal income tax deduction, at the time the SAR award is granted. When the participant exercises the SAR, the amount of cash and the fair market value of any shares of stock received will be treated as ordinary income to the participant and the Company will be allowed a corresponding federal income tax deduction at that time.

​

Restricted Stock. Unless a participant makes an election to accelerate recognition of the income to the date of grant as described below, the participant will not recognize income, and the Company will not be allowed a federal income tax deduction, at the time a restricted stock award is granted, provided that the award is nontransferable and is subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture. When the restrictions lapse, the participant will recognize ordinary income equal to the fair market value of the stock as of that date (less any amount he or she paid for the stock), and the Company will be allowed a corresponding federal income tax deduction at that time, subject to any applicable limitations under Code Section 162(m). If the participant files an election under Code Section 83(b) within 30 days after the date of grant of the restricted stock, he or she will recognize ordinary income as of the date of grant equal to the fair market value of the stock as of that date (less any amount paid for the stock), and the Company will be allowed a corresponding federal income tax deduction at that time, subject to any applicable limitations under Code Section 162(m). Any future appreciation in the stock will be taxable to the participant at capital gains rates. However, if the stock is later forfeited, the participant will not be able to recover the tax previously paid pursuant to the Code Section 83(b) election.

​

Stock Units. A participant will not recognize income, and the Company will not be allowed a tax deduction, at the time a stock unit award is granted. Upon receipt of shares of stock (or the equivalent value in cash) in settlement of a stock unit award, a participant will recognize ordinary income equal to the fair market value of the stock or other property as of that

date (less any amount he or she paid for the stock), and the Company will be allowed a corresponding federal income tax deduction at that time, subject to any applicable limitations under Code Section 162(m).

​

Cash-Based Awards. A participant will not recognize income, and the Company will not be allowed a tax deduction, at the time a cash-based award is granted (for example, when the performance goals are established). Upon receipt of cash in settlement of the award, a participant will recognize ordinary income equal to the cash received, and the Company will be allowed a corresponding federal income tax deduction at that time, subject to any applicable limitations under Code Section 162(m).

​

Tax Withholding. The Company has the right to deduct or withhold, or require a participant to remit to the Company, an amount sufficient to satisfy federal, state, and local taxes (including employment taxes) required by law to be withheld with respect to any exercise, lapse of restriction or other taxable event arising as a result of the Plan.

​

Benefits to Named Executive Officers and Others

​

As of April 29, 2025, no awards had been granted under the Plan. All awards under the Plan will be made at the discretion of the Compensation Committee. Therefore, it is not presently possible to determine the benefits or amounts that will be received by any individuals or groups pursuant to the Plan in the future.

​

Stockholder Vote Required

​

Approval of the Plan requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes entitled to be cast on the matter. Failures to vote, abstentions, and broker non-votes will not count as votes cast on the proposal, and, accordingly, will have the same effect as votes against the Plan.

​

​

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR APPROVAL OF THE PRIMIS FINANCIAL CORP. OMNIBUS INCENTIVE PLAN.

.

​

Proposal 4.

PROPOSAL TO RATIFY APPOINTMENT OF

INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Based on the Audit Committee’s approval and recommendation, the Board of Directors has selected Crowe LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2025 and has further directed that management submit the selection of the independent registered public accounting firm for ratification by the stockholders at the Annual Meeting.

At the Annual Meeting, the stockholders will be asked to consider and act upon a proposal to ratify the appointment of Crowe LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2025. The ratification of such appointment will require the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of the Company’s Common Stock entitled to vote and present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting. Representatives of Crowe LLP will be present at the Annual Meeting, will be given an opportunity to make a statement (if they desire to do so) and will be available to respond to appropriate questions from stockholders.

Stockholder ratification of the selection of Crowe LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the 2025 fiscal year is not required by the Company’s Amended and Restated Bylaws, state law or otherwise. However, the Board of Directors is submitting the selection of Crowe LLP to the Company’s stockholders for ratification as a matter of good corporate practice. If the stockholders fail to ratify the selection, the Audit Committee will reconsider whether or not to retain Crowe LLP. Even if the selection of Crowe LLP is ratified, the Audit Committee may, in their discretion, direct the appointment of a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time during the 2025 fiscal year if they determine that such a change would be in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE PROPOSAL TO RATIFY THE APPOINTMENT OF CROWE LLP AS THE COMPANY’S INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR THE 2025 FISCAL YEAR.

​

​

Proposal 5.

ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

In accordance with the requirements of Section 14A of the Exchange Act (which was added by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act) and the related rules of the SEC, the Company is providing stockholders the opportunity to vote on a non-binding, advisory resolution to approve the compensation of its named executive officers.

The Company urges stockholders to read the section entitled “COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS”, which describes in more detail how its executive compensation policies and procedures operate and are designed to achieve its compensation objectives, as well as the Summary Compensation Table and other related compensation tables and narrative, which provide detailed information on the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers. The Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors believe that the policies and procedures articulated in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis are effective in advancing both the short- and long-term interests of stockholders while also ensuring that the Company and the Bank are able to attract, retain and motivate executive management talent, and that the compensation of its named executive officers reported in this Proxy Statement has contributed to the Company’s recent and long-term success.

The Company is asking for stockholder approval of the compensation of its named executive officers as disclosed in this Proxy Statement in accordance with the SEC rules, which disclosures include the information contained in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables and the narrative discussion following the compensation tables. This vote is not intended to address any specific item of compensation, but rather the overall compensation of the Company’s named executive officers and the policies and practices described in this Proxy Statement.

Accordingly, the Company is asking its stockholders to vote on the following resolution at the Annual Meeting:

“RESOLVED, that the Company’s stockholders approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the named executive officers, as disclosed in the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 2025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the 2024 Summary Compensation Table and the other related tables and disclosure.”

This advisory vote, commonly referred to as a “say-on-pay” vote, is non-binding on the Board. Although non-binding, the Board and the Compensation Committee will review and consider the voting results when making future decisions regarding its executive compensation program.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE NON-BINDING PROPOSAL TO APPROVE THE COMPENSATION OF THE COMPANY’S NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

​

​

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Meetings of the Board of Directors

The Board of Directors held eleven (11) meetings during 2024. There was no director who attended less than 75% of the aggregate of the (1) total number of meetings of the Board and (2) total number of meetings held by Board committees on which he or she served. Each director is expected to dedicate sufficient time, energy and attention to company matters to ensure the diligent performance of his or her duties, including by attending annual and special meetings of the stockholders of the Company, the Board and committees of which he or she is a member.

Board Leadership Structure

The Company believes refreshing Board leadership roles on a regular basis enhances the effectiveness of the Board and its oversight of management.  On March 20, 2025, the Board of Directors named John F. Biagas Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company and the Bank and named W. Rand Cook Vice-Chairman of the Company of the Bank.  Both Mr. Biagas and Mr. Cook will also serve as ex-oficio members of all Board committees.  Additional changes to committee leadership and assignments are more fully described below.

Currently the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman positions are separated, with Mr. Zember currently serving as the President and Chief Executive Officer of both the Company and the Bank. The role of the Chief Executive Officer is to set the strategic direction for the Company and manage its performance, while the Chairman of the Board is tasked with setting the agenda for Board meetings and presiding over meetings of the Board. The Board of Directors believes bifurcating the roles of Chief Executive Officer and Chairman is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders, as doing so best positions the Company to carry out its strategic plan for core growth and enhanced performance; provides for greater accountability and transparency; enhances oversight of operations; and provides for greater Board involvement.

Oversight of Risk Management

The Board, as a whole and also at the committee level, plays an active role in overseeing management of the Company’s risks. The Board regularly reviews information regarding the Company’s asset quality, securities portfolio, capital, liquidity, cybersecurity and operations, as well as the risks associated with each. The Company’s Compensation Committee is responsible for overseeing the management of risks relating to the Company’s executive compensation plans and arrangements as well as overseeing succession planning. The Audit Committee oversees management of financial and regulatory risks. The Corporate Governance Committee manages environmental, social, and governance risks including risks associated with members of the Board of Directors, independence, and competence. The Asset-Liability Management Committee of the Bank’s Board of Directors is responsible for overseeing the management of risks regarding the Bank’s policies and procedures related to investments in securities, liquidity and interest sensitivity. The Enterprise Risk Committee has oversight of the enterprise-wide risk management framework and includes the strategies, policies, procedures, assessments and systems established and maintained by management to identify, assess, measure and manage the Company's material risks. While each committee is responsible for evaluating certain risks and overseeing the management of such risks, the entire Board of Directors is regularly informed through committee reports about such risks.

Oversight of Cybersecurity Risk

Information security is a significant operational risk for financial institutions, and includes the risk of losses resulting from cyber-attacks. The Board recognizes the importance of maintaining the trust and confidence of our customers, clients, and employees, and devotes significant time and attention to oversight of cybersecurity and information security risk as a result. In light of these risks, the Board devotes attention to oversight of cybersecurity and assesses the risks and changes in the cyber environment through presentations and reports provided to our Board on a quarterly basis. The Board has primary responsibility for this oversight. In this capacity, the Board oversees the Company’s processes for identifying, assessing, monitoring and managing cybersecurity risk.

Committees of the Board of Directors of the Company

The Board of Directors of the Company has four committees, the Audit Committee, the Corporate Governance Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Enterprise Risk Committee, each of which is described below.

Audit Committee. The members of the Audit Committee until November 21, 2024 were Robert Y. Clagett (Chairman), John F. Biagas, W. Rand Cook (ex-officio), Deborah B. Diaz, and Eric A. Johnson. On November 21, 2024, John M. Eggemeyer was added to the Audit Committee. As of March 20, 2025, the members of the Audit Committee are Eric A. Johnson (Chairman) John F. Biagas (ex-officio), W. Rand Cook (ex-officio), Deborah B. Diaz, Robert Y. Clagett and John Eggemeyer, all of whom the Board has determined to be “independent directors” as defined under the NASDAQ Stock Market listing standards and in Section 10A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). The Board has determined that all of the Audit Committee members have the financial knowledge, business experience and independent judgment necessary for service on the Audit Committee. The Board has further determined that John Eggemeyer has the requisite attributes of an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by the rules and regulations of the SEC, and has the financial literacy and accounting or financial qualifications and experience to provide effective financial expertise to the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee operates pursuant to a written charter, which is available electronically in the corporate governance section of the Investor Relations page of the Company’s website at www.primisbank.com.

As set forth in the Audit Committee’s charter, the functions of the Audit Committee are to assist the Board in its oversight of:

In carrying out these responsibilities, the Audit Committee, among other things:

The Audit Committee’s meetings include, whenever appropriate, executive sessions with the Company’s independent registered public accountants and with the Bank’s internal auditors, in each case without the presence of the Company’s or the Bank’s management. The Audit Committee met nine (9) times during 2024.

As part of its oversight of the Company’s financial statements, the Audit Committee reviews and discusses with both management and the independent registered public accountants all annual and quarterly financial statements prior to their

issuance. During 2024, management of the Company advised the Audit Committee that each set of financial statements reviewed had been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and reviewed significant accounting and disclosure issues with the Audit Committee.

Corporate Governance Committee. The Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for making recommendations to the Board regarding the membership of the Board, including:

The Corporate Governance Committee operates pursuant to a written charter, a copy of which is available electronically in the corporate governance section of the Investor Relations page of the Company’s website at www.primisbank.com.

The members of the Corporate Governance Committee until March 20, 2025 were Charles A. Kabbash (Chairman), W. Rand Cook, Deborah B. Diaz, F. L. Garrett, III, and Eric A. Johnson. As of March 20, 2025, the members of the Corporate Governance Committee are W. Rand Cook (Chairman), John F. Biagas (ex-officio), Deborah B. Diaz, Eric A. Johnson, Charles A. Kabbash and F.L. Garrett. The Corporate Governance Committee met two (2) times in 2024.

Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee is responsible for overseeing the development and implementation of the Company’s compensation programs, including:

The Compensation Committee operates pursuant to a written charter, a copy of which is available electronically in the corporate governance section of the Investor Relations page of the Company’s website at www.primisbank.com.

The members of the Compensation Committee until March 20, 2025 were John F. Biagas (Chairman), Robert Y. Clagett, W. Rand Cook (ex-officio), and F.L. Garrett, III. As of March 20, 2025, the members of the Compensation Committee are John M. Eggemeyer (Chairman), John F. Biagas (ex-officio), W. Rand Cook (ex-officio), Robert Y. Clagett and F.L. Garrett, III. The Compensation Committee may, in its discretion, delegate all or a portion of its duties and responsibilities to a subcommittee of the committee. In 2024, the Compensation Committee met seven (7) times.

In 2024, the Compensation Committee engaged Pearl Meyer (the “Consultant”) to provide advice with respect to executive officer and director compensation for 2024. The Consultant periodically attended the Compensation Committee’s meetings, including executive sessions, and provided information and advice independent of management

and, at the direction of the Compensation Committee Chairman, assisted management with various activities that support the Company’s executive compensation program. The Compensation Committee considered the independence of the Consultant in light of the SEC rules and NASDAQ listing standards and concluded that the work of the Consultant did not raise any conflicts of interest. The Consultant did not provide any services to the Company other than executive compensation-related services. Additional information regarding the Compensation Committee’s processes and procedures for consideration of executive compensation is provided in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section below.

Enterprise Risk Committee. The Enterprise Risk Committee has been established to approve and periodically review the Company's risk management policies and to oversee the implementation of the Company's enterprise-wide risk management framework. The enterprise-wide risk management framework includes the strategies, policies, procedures, assessments and systems established and maintained by management to identify, assess, measure and manage the Company's material risks. In addition, the Enterprise Risk Committee coordinates with the Audit Committee of the Board in reviewing the Company's financial and operational risks, corporate-wide compliance and other areas of Audit Committee responsibility or with the Compensation, Nominating and Governance Committees of the Board for review of compensation-related risks.

​

The members of the Enterprise Risk Committee until March 20, 2025 were John M. Eggemeyer (Chairman), Deborah B. Diaz, Dr. Allen R. Jones, Jr., and W. Rand Cook (ex-officio). As of March 20, 2025, the members of the Enterprise Risk Committee are Deborah B. Diaz (Chairman), John F. Biagas (ex-officio), W. Rand Cook (ex-officio) and Dr. Allen R. Jones, Jr. The Enterprise Risk Committee met four (4) times in 2024.

​

Committees of the Board of Directors of the Bank

The Board of Directors of the Bank (the “Bank Board”) has one committee, the Asset-Liability Management Committee, which is described below.

Asset-Liability Management Committee. The Asset-Liability Management Committee ensures that the Bank’s investment policies and procedures are adequate and that the Bank’s investments in securities are consistent with the guidelines established in the Bank’s policies and comply with applicable laws and regulations. The committee evaluates the performance of the securities portfolio to ensure that the Bank’s objectives with respect to diversification, liquidity, and quality are met. While management is responsible for purchase decisions with respect to investment securities, the Asset-Liability Management Committee is responsible for reviewing and ratifying management’s investment transactions. The Asset-Liability Management Committee is also responsible for reviewing the entire balance sheet to ensure that products and funding sources adhere to the Board’s policies relating to asset-liability and interest rate risk management.

The members of the Asset-Liability Management Committee are currently W. Rand Cook, F.L. Garrett, III, Charles A. Kabbash and Dennis J. Zember, Jr. with the addition of John F. Biagas (ex-oficio) effective March 20, 2025. Five non-director executive officers also serve as members of the Asset-Liability Management Committee: the Bank’s Chief Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer, Chief Credit Officer, Chief Risk Officer, and Treasurer. The Asset-Liability Management Committee met four (4) times in 2024.

Board and Director Evaluations

The Board of Directors as a whole, and directors as individuals, have been subject to evaluation for effectiveness from time to time. In 2024, the Board adopted the following framework to ensure regular review:

​

​

​

The Board has not established term limits or a mandatory age of retirement but anticipates the preceding framework will result in regular Board refreshment over time. Through the work of the Corporate Governance Committee, Board refreshment will utilize the nomination process outlined while pursuing the diversity goals highlighted below.

Director Nominations Process

The Corporate Governance Committee considers nominees to serve as directors of the Company and recommends such persons to the Board of Directors. The Corporate Governance Committee also considers director candidates recommended by stockholders if such candidates appear to be qualified to serve on the Board of Directors and meet the criteria for nominees considered by the Corporate Governance Committee. The Corporate Governance Committee may choose not to consider an unsolicited recommendation if no vacancy exists on the Board of Directors and the Corporate Governance Committee does not perceive a need to increase the size of the Board. In order to avoid the unnecessary use of the Corporate Governance Committee’s resources, the Corporate Governance Committee will consider only those director candidates recommended in accordance with the procedures set forth below in the section entitled “Procedures to be Followed by Stockholders.”

Criteria for Director Nominees.

The Corporate Governance Committee has adopted a set of criteria that it considers when it selects individuals to be nominated for election to the Board of Directors. The Corporate Governance Committee considers the following criteria in selecting nominees: financial expertise and business experience; familiarity with and participation in the local community and the nominee’s ability to refer business to the Company; integrity, honesty and reputation; dedication to the Company and its stockholders, including the nominee’s ownership of the Company’s Common Stock; independence; and any other factors the Corporate Governance Committee deems relevant, including age, size of the Board of Directors and regulatory disclosure obligations.

The Corporate Governance Committee does not have a formal policy with respect to diversity; however, the Board and the Corporate Governance Committee believe that it is essential that the Board as a whole should have diversity of thought and experience, which may, at any one or more times, include differences with respect to personal, educational or professional experience, gender, ethnicity, national origin, geographic representation, skill set, community involvement and age. The Company believes that the backgrounds and qualifications of the directors, considered as a group, should provide a significant composite mix of experience, knowledge, and abilities that will allow the Board to fulfill its responsibilities, that are appropriate to achieve the Company’s strategic vision and business objectives, and that best serve the Company’s and stockholders’ long-term interests. The diversity of the Board is evaluated on a continuing basis by assessing whether varying viewpoints are routinely presented, evaluating the individual performance and contributions of each Director, and ensuring that varying perspectives are presented on key issues.

The Corporate Governance Committee may weigh the foregoing criteria differently in different situations, depending on the composition of the Board at the time. The Audit Committee maintains at least one director who meets the definition of “audit committee financial expert” under the regulations of the SEC.

In addition, prior to nominating an existing director for re-election to the Board of Directors, the Corporate Governance Committee considers and reviews an existing director’s Board and committee attendance and performance; length of Board service; experience, skills and contributions that the existing director brings to the Board; and independence.

Process for Identifying and Evaluating Director Nominees.

Pursuant to the Corporate Governance Committee Charter, as approved by the Board of Directors, the Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for the process relating to director nominations, including identifying, interviewing and selecting individuals who may be nominated for election to the Board of Directors. The process that the Corporate Governance Committee follows when it identifies and evaluates individuals to be nominated for election to the Board of Directors is set forth below.

Identification. For purposes of identifying nominees for the Board of Directors, the Corporate Governance Committee will rely on personal contacts of the members of the Board of Directors as well as their knowledge of members of the Bank’s local communities. The Corporate Governance Committee will also consider director candidates recommended by stockholders in accordance with the policy and procedures set forth below in the paragraph entitled “Procedures to be Followed by Stockholders.” The Corporate Governance Committee has not historically used an independent search firm in identifying nominees, although it may utilize such search firms in the future.

Evaluation. In evaluating potential nominees, the Corporate Governance Committee determines whether the candidate is eligible and qualified for service on the Board of Directors by evaluating the candidate under the selection criteria set forth above. In addition, for any new director nominee, the Corporate Governance Committee will conduct a background check of the individual and interview the candidate. After evaluating the candidate(s), the Corporate Governance Committee makes a recommendation to the full Board. The full Board interviews the final candidate(s) before making a decision. A director and officer questionnaire is completed by the candidate(s) after their selection.

Procedures to be Followed by Stockholders

Any stockholder of the Company may nominate one or more persons for election as a director of the Company at an annual meeting of stockholders if the stockholder complies with the prior notice and information provisions contained in the Company’s Amended and Restated Bylaws. In order for a director nomination to be timely, a stockholder’s notice to the Company must be received at the Company’s offices not later than the 90^th day prior to the anniversary date of the immediately preceding year’s annual meeting. To submit a nomination of a director candidate, a stockholder must submit the following information in writing, addressed to the Chairman of the Corporate Governance Committee, care of the Corporate Secretary, at 10900 Nuckols Road, Suite 325, Glen Allen, Virginia 23060:

A nomination of any person not made in compliance with the foregoing procedures may not be eligible to be voted upon by the stockholders at the meeting.

If the Corporate Governance Committee receives a director nomination from a stockholder or group of stockholders who (individually or in the aggregate) beneficially own more than 5% of the Company’s outstanding common stock for at least one year as of the date of such recommendation, the Company, as required by applicable securities law, will identify the candidate and stockholder or group of stockholders recommending the candidate and will disclose in its proxy statement whether the Corporate Governance Committee chose to nominate the candidate, as well as certain other information.

Stockholder Communications with Directors; Director Attendance at Annual Meeting

The Board of Directors will give appropriate attention to written communications received from stockholders, and will respond if and as appropriate. Stockholders or other interested parties can contact any director or committee of the Board of Directors by writing to them in care of Cheryl Wood, Corporate Secretary, 10900 Nuckols Road, Suite 325, Glen Allen, Virginia 23060. Comments or complaints relating to the Company’s accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters will be referred to members of the Audit Committee. Other concerns will also generally be referred to the Audit Committee.

In addition, the Board of Directors encourages directors to attend the annual meeting of stockholders. All ten Company directors attended the Company’s 2024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on December 19, 2024.

​

Policy On Insider Trading

Prohibitions on Hedging

The Company prohibits all directors, officers and employees from engaging in speculative trading and hedging shares of Company securities. This includes prohibitions against short-selling Company securities and transactions in any derivative of Company securities, including buying and writing options. Directors, officers and employees are restricted from buying Company securities on margin or using Company securities as collateral for a loan. Additionally, the Company’s Insider Trading Policy prohibits trading for directors, officers and certain employees during designated blackout periods and requires approval by the Company’s Compliance Officer prior to any trade.

Code of Ethics

The Company’s Board of Directors has adopted a Code of Ethics that applies to all directors, officers and employees, including the Company’s Chairman of the Board, the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer and senior financial officers. The Board designed the Code of Ethics in an effort to deter wrongdoing and to promote honest and ethical conduct, including the ethical handling of conflicts of interest, full, fair and accurate disclosure in filings and other public communications made by the Company, compliance with applicable laws, prompt internal reporting of violations

of the Code of Ethics, and accountability for adherence to the Code. The Code of Ethics is available electronically in the corporate governance section of the Investor Relations page of the Company’s website at www.primisbank.com.

Director Independence

During the review by the Company’s Board of Directors of director independence, the Board considered transactions and relationships between each director or any member of his or her immediate family and the Company and its subsidiaries and affiliates, including those reported under “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions” below. The Board also considered whether there were any transactions or relationships between directors or any member of their immediate family (or any entity of which a director or an immediate family member is an executive officer, general partner or significant equity holder) and members of the Company’s senior management or their affiliates. The purpose of this review was to determine whether any such relationships or transactions existed that were inconsistent with a determination that the director is independent.

As a result of this review, the Board affirmatively determined that all of the Company’s current directors, with the exception of Dennis J. Zember, Jr., are independent directors as defined by the listing standards of the NASDAQ Stock Market. Mr. Zember is considered to be an “inside” director because of his employment as a senior executive of the Company. The independent directors of the Company hold regularly scheduled executive sessions from time to time without the Chief Executive Officer or any other member of management present in accordance with NASDAQ listing requirements.

Environmental, Social and Governance (“ESG”)

The Company understands the importance of conducting our business in a manner that aims to be sustainable, while trying to promote positive social impacts and transparent governance practices. It is important to us to build formal ESG programs for the Company and to demonstrate how Primis’ culture helps shape our service to all of our stakeholders. We recognize the magnitude of ESG in today’s marketplace and want to aim to do our part. In 2024, we continued to build sustainability infrastructure and practices in support of positive societal impacts, ESG factors, and transparency.

We believe that our Board of Directors play an important oversight role in assessing our ESG practices at Primis and understanding the various risks and potential impact of ESG issues on our businesses. ESG practices at Primis are monitored by our Board of Directors and through committees at the executive leadership level. While our Corporate Governance Committee reviews many of the issues within the scope of ESG matters, other Board Committees receive regular updates with respect to matters more directly related to the scope of the work of those particular committees. For instance, our Enterprise Risk Committee reviews cybersecurity risks, environmental risks to our businesses—including the potential risks associated with climate change—and oversees ESG risk management initiatives and activities.

In recent years, we enhanced our commitment to ESG progress by filling two important positions: a Director of Corporate Social Responsibility and a Director of CRA (“Community Reinvestment Act”) Compliance. Our Director of Corporate Social Responsibility has overall responsibility for guiding the Bank’s community engagement as well as oversight of Primis Works, the single-mother internship program started in 2021. Our Director of CRA Compliance further focuses on our products, services and engagement with low to moderate income areas where we bank. Through their efforts, and the efforts of the Board, management and the broader Primis community, 2024 saw the following accomplishments:

Volunteerism, Sponsorship and Donation

As a Company, we provide financial resources to various community groups in order to magnify their abilities to support our communities. Through Primis’ Community Champion program, we also provide our team members up to eight hours of paid time to volunteer at their discretion.  In addition to paid volunteer hours, Primis employees are encouraged to participate on civic boards to lend expertise to their communities.  Examples of this community support include:

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

Primis Works

​

In addition to the activities described above, Primis is particularly proud of its flagship program, Primis Works, which empowers single mothers by providing a life-changing opportunity to establish and grow meaningful careers. Designed as a financial services internship, this four-month experience goes beyond being just a job and offers full benefits, paid childcare, and combines classroom education, mentorship, personal and professional development, and extensive job training in a variety of departments at Primis.  The goal of the program is not only to give graduates a rewarding business experience, but also to enhance overall life skills setting graduates on the road to long-term professional success.  Now in its fourth year, Primis has multiple successful employees that are graduates of Primis Works.  Primis Works graduated 6 associates in 2024.

​

​

Sheflett Memorial STEM Challenge

​

Named to honor the life and legacy of former Primis chief information officer George “Cody” Sheflett Jr., the STEM Challenge partners predominantly minority female students at regional universities and high schools into teams led by Primis volunteer coaches and challenges them to work together to solve complex problems and present their research to a panel of judges. The problems given to the teams are often business issues within the financial services industry with a desired technology solution. In addition to learning about financial services and technology, the students refine soft skills such as teamwork and public speaking, augment career awareness and develop real world problem solving skills. Scholarships are awarded to all of the participants with additional awards to winning team members and associated schools.

​

Recent community partnerships include Norfolk State University, Virginia State University, Rappahannock Community College, Chesapeake Bay Governor’s School, Appomattox Regional Governor’s School, Hampton YMCA and Dr. Henry A. Wise, Jr. High School.

​

​

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

Appropriate compensation is critical to attracting, retaining and motivating directors who have the qualities necessary to serve the Corporation as a director and who meet the guidelines set forth by our Governance Committee.  The following discusses the Company’s approach to director compensation.

Stock Ownership Policy

In December of 2022, the Board adopted stock ownership guidelines for directors of the Company to further align the Board’s long-term interests with those of the Company’s stockholders.  Before their third anniversary as a board member, directors must own unencumbered shares with a minimum value equal to 100% of the average annual board compensation.

To encourage further stock ownership by its directors, the Bank maintains a stock matching program pursuant to which it funds the purchase of additional shares of Company common stock on behalf of a director in an amount equal to 125% of the shares of Company common stock otherwise purchased by the director, up to an annual value of $25,000 per director.

2024 Director Fees

In 2024, each non-employee member of the Board of Directors received an annual retainer of $30,000 and the chairman of each board committee received an additional annual retainer of $2,500, in each case payable quarterly. During 2024, all board meetings of the Company and the Bank were joint meetings, with the Chairman of the Board receiving $2,000 per meeting attended and each non-employee director receiving $1,000 per meeting attended. For special meetings of the Company and the Bank, all non-employee directors received $1,000 per meeting attended. For all committee meetings, the non-employee directors received $700 per meeting attended. Each non-employee director of the Bank and the Company also receives reimbursement for any travel, food and lodging expenses. Directors who are also employees of the Company or the Bank received no additional compensation for their service as a director.

2024 Director Compensation⁽¹⁾

The following table contains information concerning the compensation of the directors of the Company and the Bank for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024. The named executive officers who also serve (or served) as directors did not receive any compensation for their service as directors for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024.

​

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

The executive officers of the Company are:

​

Biographical information for our executive officers who are not directors follows. Biographical information for Mr. Zember is included in “Continuing Directors” above.

Matthew A. Switzer has served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company and the Bank since January 2021. Mr. Switzer served as Managing Director at Stephens, Inc. from June 2015 to January 2021. Prior to that, Mr. Switzer served at Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, a Stifel Company, from July 2005 to May 2015, most recently as Managing Director.

Rickey A. Fulk has served as Executive Vice President of the Company and President of the Bank since October 2023. Mr. Fulk has worked for Primis Bank (or its predecessors) since 1998 in various commercial capacities, most recently as the regional executive for the Richmond and Hampton Roads areas. Mr. Fulk is an active leader in the community with a passion for supporting animal rescue and the local humane society.

Marie T. Leibson has served as Executive Vice President and Chief Credit Officer of the Company and the Bank since 2021. Ms. Leibson served as Executive Vice President and Chief SBA Lending Officer of the Company and the Bank from 2018 until 2020. Ms. Leibson served as Senior Vice President and Senior Lending Officer of the Bank from 2005 until 2018. Ms. Leibson previously served as Vice President of Commercial and SBA Lending at Southern Financial Bank from 1995 until 2004.

Ann-Stanton C. Gore has served as Executive Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer of the Company and the Bank since September 2021. Prior to that, Ms. Gore served as Senior Vice President and Director of Corporate Communications of Ameris Bank from 2019 to 2021. Ms. Gore served as Senior Vice President and Director of Corporate Marketing of Ameris Bank from 2018 to 2019. Ms. Gore previously served as Vice President and Corporate Marketing Manager of Ameris Bank from 2014 to 2018.

​

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

This section discusses the Company’s compensation program, including how it relates to the executive officers named in the compensation tables that follow (who we sometimes refer to below and elsewhere in this Proxy Statement as the “named executive officers”). The executive officers of the Company currently hold equivalent executive officer positions with the Bank and all executive compensation is paid by the Bank for services performed by executives of the Bank. Accordingly, the following discussion of executive compensation relates to the compensation by the Bank to executives of the Bank. Our named executive officers (the “NEOs”) are:

The primary objective of our executive compensation program is to attract, retain and motivate key employees and enable those persons to participate in the long-term success of the Company while also advancing the interests of our stockholders. As such, the compensation program is designed to provide levels of compensation which are reflective of both the individual’s and the organization’s performance in achieving certain goals and objectives and in helping to build value for our stockholders. Set forth below is an analysis of our compensation program, the material compensation policy decisions we have made under this program and the material factors that we considered in making those decisions.

​

​

Overview of Compensation Program

The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors is responsible for developing and making recommendations to the Board with respect to the Company’s executive compensation policies. The Compensation Committee, along with the Board, has reviewed the compensation policies and practices for all employees and concluded that any risks arising from such policies and practices are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.

Compensation Philosophy and Objectives

The fundamental objectives of the Bank’s executive compensation policies are to ensure that Bank executives are provided incentives and compensated in a way that advances both the short- and long-term interests of stockholders while also ensuring that the Company and the Bank are able to attract, retain and motivate executive management talent. Accordingly, compensation is based on: (1) the employee’s individual performance and his or her ability to lead the Company and the Bank to achieve their respective financial goals, (2) the Company’s consolidated financial performance and (3) compensation compared to peer institutions’ executive compensation. In making decisions with respect to any element of an executive officer’s compensation, the Compensation Committee considers the total compensation that may be awarded to the executive officer, including salary, annual bonus, long-term equity incentive compensation, accumulated realized and unrealized stock option gains, and the dollar value to the executive and cost to the Company of all perquisites and other personal benefits. The Compensation Committee’s goal is to award compensation that is reasonable when all elements of potential compensation are considered.

The Compensation Committee believes tying compensation to Company performance is critical for ensuring management alignment with stockholders, particularly for CEO compensation. As discussed further below, executive compensation in 2024 was heavily influenced by the Company’s earnings performance for the year.    

Setting Executive Compensation

In reviewing the 2024 compensation of each of our executive officers, the Compensation Committee reviewed all components of his or her respective compensation, including base salary, annual bonus, long-term equity incentive compensation, accumulated realized and unrealized stock option gains, and the dollar value to the executive and cost to the Company of all perquisites and other personal benefits. In addition, the Compensation Committee reviewed each executive officer’s compensation history and performance information and the market data discussed below.

Role of Compensation Consultant and Market Data

As discussed earlier in this Proxy Statement, in 2024, the Compensation Committee engaged the Consultant to provide advice with respect to executive officer and director compensation for 2024.

The Consultant reviewed a peer group comprised of 22 mid-Atlantic U.S. banks ranging in assets from $2.1 billion to $6.3 billion, with median assets of $3.6 billion. The peer group, consisted of the following banks: ACNB Corporation, Bankwell Financial Group, Inc., BCB Bancorp, Inc., C&F Financial Corporation, Capital City Bank Group, Carter Bankshares, City Holding, CNB Financial, Colony Bankcorp, First Bank, First Community Bancshares, HomeTrust Bancshares, John Marshall Bancorp, MainStreet Bancshares, Inc., MetroCity Bankshares, Mid Penn Bancorp, MVB Financial, Orrstown Financial Services, Peoples Financial Services, Shore Bancshares, Inc., SmartFinancial Inc. and Southern First Bancshares, Inc.  The Consultant also reviewed recent trends in the public markets related to compensation practices and certain notable developments with regulations and court cases that the committee should be aware of.

The Company evaluated publicly available compensation data for the peer group but did not benchmark the compensation of its named executive officers to a certain percentage or range of compensation within the market data collected. Instead, the Compensation Committee used this information as a point of reference for measurement, but not as the determinative factor in setting the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers. The Compensation Committee did not use the compensation data to “target” a specific compensation level for any given executive. Rather,

the Compensation Committee used its understanding of peer group compensation as a starting point for its decision making.

Because the comparative compensation information is just one of the analytical tools that are used in setting named executive officer compensation, the Compensation Committee has discretion in determining the nature and extent of its use. Further, given the limitations associated with comparative pay information for setting individual executive compensation, including the difficulty of assessing and comparing wealth accumulation through equity gains and post-employment amounts, the Compensation Committee may elect not to use the comparative compensation information at all in the course of making compensation decisions.

Role of Executives in Establishing Compensation

The Compensation Committee meets with the CEO early in the year to evaluate Company performance and determine incentive compensation related to the recently completed fiscal year and salary adjustments for the upcoming year. For 2024, the Compensation Committee made all decisions with respect to the compensation of Mr. Zember, subject to review and approval by the full Board of Directors. Mr. Zember reviewed the performance of the Company’s executive officers (other than himself) and, based on that review, recommended to the Compensation Committee amounts payable to such other executive officers, including the other named executive officers. Mr. Zember was not involved with any aspect of determining his own pay.

Consideration of Last Year’s Advisory Stockholder Vote on Executive Compensation

At the 2024 annual meeting of stockholders (the “2024 Annual Meeting”), approximately 94% of the shares represented and entitled to vote at the annual meeting were voted to approve the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers, as discussed and disclosed in the proxy statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting. The Compensation Committee concluded that the results of the advisory say-on-pay vote reflected stockholder support of our compensation program. In light of this support, the Compensation Committee did not make material changes to our executive compensation program.

Components of Executive Compensation

The principal components of the executive compensation program of the Company (through the Bank) are:

Base Salary

Salaries provide executive officers with a base level of monthly income and help achieve the objectives outlined above by attracting and retaining strong talent. Generally, base salaries are not based on specific measures of corporate performance, but are determined by tenure of service, scope of the position, including current job responsibilities, relative salaries of the Company’s peers and the officer’s individual performance and contribution to the Company. The Company’s base salaries are adjusted based on factors such as individual experience, individual performance, individual potential, cost of living considerations and specific issues particular to the Company as well as the Compensation Committee’s subjective judgment. The Compensation Committee monitors the base salary levels and the various

incentives of the named executive officers of the Company to ensure that overall compensation is consistent with the Company’s objectives and remains competitive within the area of the Company’s operations.

Effective March 1, 2024, the Compensation Committee approved an increase to the base salary of the following executive officers: Mr. Zember, 7.0% to $722,113; Mr. Switzer, 9.1% to $360,030; Mr. Fulk, 8.3% to $324,900; Ms. Leibson, 5.5% to $314,911; and Ms. Gore, 5.8% to $275,080.

Non-Equity Incentive Compensation

The Compensation Committee spent considerable time in 2024, in coordination with the full Board of Directors and the CEO, aligning targets for incentive pay with the Company’s short-term goals. In 2024, the Compensation Committee established the following goals with high and low ranges of achievement around the target and with each goal weighted equally:

​

​

Targets incentive percentages of base salary were determined for executive management. These targets combined with the weighted payout as described above would determine short-term incentives. The following table shows the target incentive payout levels for each named executive officer assuming 100% performance on the established goals:

​

As noted above, actual results relative to 2024 goals implied a payout of 70% of targeted incentive amounts for the year driven by deposit growth and expense control. However, the Compensation Committee noted that, while progress had been made on numerous strategic initiatives and on improving core profitability, the Company ultimately reported a net loss for the year largely attributable to the performance of a third-party originated consumer loan portfolio.  As a result, the Compensation Committee used its discretion to substantially reduce short-term incentive payments for executive management for 2024. In addition, the Compensation Committee noted financial reports were not filed timely in 2024 due to accounting issues with the loan portfolio highlighted above. As a result, the Compensation Committee further reduced short-term incentive compensation for the CFO and eliminated short-term incentive compensation for the CEO for 2024.

Long-Term Equity Incentive Awards

The Company maintains an equity compensation program for its named executive officers and other key employees, in order to attract, retain and motivate key employees and enable those persons to participate in the long-term success of the Company. In 2021, the Compensation Committee began including performance-based grants in management’s long-term equity incentive awards to increase the alignment of management incentives with long-term goals versus time-based grants alone. Beginning in 2022, the Compensation Committee chose to make all awards performance-based. The performance-based restricted stock units are convertible, on a one-for-one basis, into shares of stock based on the level of achievement of the Company’s adjusted earnings per share compound annual growth over the 5-year performance period commencing the year of the grant. The following table details the performance targets and payout levels for the 2022 and 2023 performance unit grants, which performance periods conclude March 15, 2027 and 2028, respectively. The Compensation Committee did not approve any performance-based restricted stock units in 2024.

​

Amendment to Mr. Zember’s Performance Units. During 2023, the Compensation Committee amended Mr. Zember’s 2021 and 2022 performance units (collectively, the “Zember Performance Unit Amendment”) to provide that (i) with respect to the 2021 performance units, to the extent that the Company meets the performance targets that would entitle Mr. Zember to earn more than 50,000 shares upon settlement of the award in 2026 (or, in certain limited circumstances, an earlier date as provided in the award agreement), Mr. Zember’s award will be limited at 50,000 shares of stock and he will be entitled to the cash value of any shares earned in excess of 50,000 (with the value of any cash awards received by Mr. Zember in 2026 limited to $500,000); and (ii) with respect to the 2022 performance units, to the extent that the Company meets the performance targets that would entitle Mr. Zember to earn more than 50,000 shares upon settlement of the award in 2027 (or, in certain limited circumstances, an earlier date as provided in the award agreement), Mr. Zember’s award will be limited at 25,233 shares of stock, and he will be entitled to the cash value of any shares earned in excess of 25,233 (with the value of any cash awards received by Mr. Zember in 2027 limited to $500,000). The terms of Mr. Zember’s 2023 performance units are consistent with those provided in the Zember Performance Unit Amendment.

​

Perquisites and Employee Benefit Plans

Perquisites represent a small part of the Company’s executive compensation program. The Compensation Committee reviews annually the perquisites provided to the named executive officers, and offers such benefits after consideration of the business need. The named executive officers are eligible to participate in the same employee benefits plans that are generally available to all Company employees.

Employment Agreements

During 2024, the Company and the Bank were party to employment agreements with our named executive officers. The Compensation Committee and the Bank believe that the employment and change-in-control agreements are a critical tool in retaining our executive team. These agreements also include certain protections for the Company and the Bank in the form of post-employment restrictive covenants.

Employment Agreement with Mr. Zember. Effective December 20, 2022, the Company entered into an amended and restated employment agreement with Mr. Zember, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and the Bank. The amended and restated agreement amends and restates in its entirety the original employment agreement with Mr. Zember, dated February 19, 2020 (the “Original Employment Agreement”). The amended and restated employment agreement is substantially the same as the Original Employment Agreement, except as described herein. Pursuant to the amended and restated agreement, Mr. Zember’s base salary was set at $642,735 to align with his 2022 base salary, with eligibility for annual increases at the Compensation Committee’s discretion, and the Company committed to providing Mr. Zember life insurance in the amount of $5,000,000, with fifty percent (50%) of the proceeds directed to the Company and fifty percent (50%) of the proceeds directed to Mr. Zember’s designated beneficiary. The amended and restated agreement also provides that if Mr. Zember’s employment is terminated without cause or he resigns for good reason following a change in control, then his performance-based equity awards will be deemed to have been earned as of his termination date based upon the actual level of achievement of all relevant performance goals measured as of the date of such termination.

Employment Agreement with Mr. Switzer. Effective January 10, 2021, the Company was party to an employment agreement with Mr. Switzer, pursuant to which Mr. Switzer serves as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company and the Bank. The employment agreement has an initial two-year term that would expire on January 10, 2023, subject to automatic two-year renewals unless either party provided written notice of non-renewal no later than sixty days before any renewal date. Mr. Switzer’s employment agreement provides for an annual base salary and eligibility for equity awards and annual bonuses and certain other benefits, and payment of private club dues. Mr. Switzer’s employment agreement also provided that any incentive compensation paid to Mr. Switzer, including both equity and cash incentive compensation, is subject to repayment or clawback as further described in the agreement.

​

Employment Agreement with Mr. Fulk. Effective October 25, 2023, the Company entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Fulk, pursuant to which Mr. Fulk serves as Executive Vice President of the Company and the Bank. The employment agreement has an initial two-year term that would expire on September 13, 2023, subject to automatic two-year renewals unless either party provided written notice of non-renewal no later than sixty days before any renewal date. Mr. Fulk’s employment agreement provides for an annual base salary and eligibility for equity awards and annual bonuses and certain other benefits, and payment of private club dues. Mr. Fulk’s employment agreement also provided that any incentive compensation paid to Mr. Fulk, including both equity and cash incentive compensation, is subject to repayment or clawback as further described in the agreement.

Employment Agreement with Ms. Gore. Effective September 13, 2021, the Company entered into an employment agreement with Ms. Gore, pursuant to which Ms. Gore serves as Executive Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer of the Company and the Bank. The employment agreement has an initial two-year term that would expire on September 13, 2023, subject to automatic two-year renewals unless either party provided written notice of non-renewal no later than sixty days before any renewal date. Ms. Gore’s employment agreement provides for an annual base salary and eligibility for equity awards and annual bonuses and certain other benefits, and payment of private club dues. Ms. Gore’s employment agreement also provided that any incentive compensation paid to Ms. Gore, including both equity and cash incentive compensation, is subject to repayment or clawback as further described in the agreement.

Clawback Policy

We maintain a clawback policy (the “Clawback Policy”) that complies with the applicable NASDAQ listing standards and Rule 10D-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. In the event of a restatement of the reported financial results of the Company due to material non-compliance with financial reporting requirements, the Compensation Committee will recover reasonably promptly the amount of all erroneously awarded compensation received by a current or former executive officer during the covered period (within the meaning of such terms as provided in the NASDAQ listing standards).

Equity Grant Practices

The Compensation Committee does not take material nonpublic information into account when determining the timing and terms of equity awards. The Company has not timed the disclosure of material nonpublic information for the purpose of affecting the value of executive compensation for NEO grants in fiscal year 2024.

​

​

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in any of the Company’s previous or future filings under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 that might incorporate this Proxy Statement or future filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, in whole or in part, the following report of the Compensation Committee shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any such filing.

The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis with management and, based on such review, has recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement.

​

​

​

Summary Compensation Table

The following table provides information regarding the compensation paid or accrued by the Company to or on behalf of the Company’s named executive officers for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2024, 2023, and 2022.

​

​

As described in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2022, the financial statements included in Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data were restated as of and for the year ended December 31, 2022, to correct the accounting for an agreement with a third-party that originates and services a consumer loan portfolio for the Company (the “Consumer Program”). The error corrections required a recovery analysis under the Clawback Policy, which was effective from and after October 2, 2023, in accordance with Section 5608 of the Nasdaq Listing Rules. The Clawback Policy was filed with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023, as Exhibit 97. In accordance with the Nasdaq Listing Rules, the Clawback Policy only applies to incentive compensation received on or after October 2, 2023. Accordingly, any incentive compensation received prior to that date is not subject to recovery under the Clawback Policy. 

The Compensation Committee concluded that recovery of compensation was not required pursuant to the Clawback Policy because none of the “incentive compensation” covered by the Clawback Policy that otherwise may have been impacted by the restatement has been paid or otherwise settled to the executive officers. The Compensation Committee eliminated short-term incentive payments for executive management for 2023. No amounts have been settled or otherwise paid with respect to the 2021 Performance Units, 2022 Performance Units and 2023 Performance Units because their respective performance periods have not yet concluded.

2024 Grants of Plan-Based Awards

The following table contains information about the named executive officers’ grants plan-based awards during 2024. No equity awards were granted during 2024.